Liverpool City Council

Business Paper

 

 

 

 

Council Agenda

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ordinary Council Meeting

25 June 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Francis Greenway Centre

170 George Street

Liverpool


Description: LCC_bw_logo 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


You are hereby notified that an Ordinary Council Meeting of Liverpool City Council will be held at the Francis Greenway Centre, 170 George Street, Liverpool on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 commencing at 6.00pm. Doors to the Francis Greenway Centre will open at 5.45pm.

 

Liverpool City Council Meetings are taped for the purposes of minute taking and record keeping.  If you have any enquiries please contact Council and Executive Services on 9821 9237.

 

 

 

Rob Noble

ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

 


 

 

 


Order of Business

 

                                                                                                              PAGE     TAB

Opening

Prayer

Apologies 

Condolences

Confirmation of Minutes

Ordinary Council Meeting held on 28 May 2014 and the Extraordinary Council Meeting held on 27 May 2014.......................................................................................................................................... 5

Declarations of Interest

Public Forum

Mayoral Report

NIL

Notices of Motion Of Rescission

NIL

Notices of Motion

NOM 01          Outstanding Legal, social and other Liabilities................................................ 76......... 1

NOM 02          Community Engagement................................................................................ 78......... 2

NOM 03          CCTV.............................................................................................................. 80......... 3

NOM 04          Recording of Minutes of Council Meetings.................................................... 82......... 4

NOM 05          Election of Councillor as an Executive Member on NSW Branch of the Australian Local Government Women’s Association (ALGWA)............................................... 84......... 5

Motions of Urgency

NIL

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

IHAP 01          Torrens title subdivision creating two allotments at 165 Fifth Avenue, Austral 86         6

IHAP 02          Alterations and additions and two lot Torrens title subdivision at 5 Durack Place, Casula                                                                                                                          91......... 7

IHAP 03          Construction of a nine storey residential flat building containing thirty-six residential units with basement car parking and ancillary site works....................................... 98......... 8

IHAP 04          Subdivision of two existing lots into 13 Torrens Title lots; road construction and tree removal at Lot 423 and Lot 41 San Cristobal Drive, Green Valley.............. 104......... 9

Chief Executive Officer Report

CEO 01          Supporting our Locals................................................................................... 111....... 10

CEO 02          Staff Matter................................................................................................... 114....... 11

Executive Director Report

ED 01             Local Government NSW Annual Conference.............................................. 116....... 12

ED 02             Councillor Access to Information and Interaction with Staff Policy............. 123....... 13

ED 03             Annual Reporting of Contracts for Senior Staff........................................... 134....... 14

ED 04             Endorsement of the 2013-17 Delivery Program and 2014-15 Operational Plan..... 137 15

Business Excellence Report

GMBE 01       Statutory Investment Report May 2014....................................................... 155....... 16

City Presentation Report

GMCP 01       ST2248 - Supply and Delivery of Trees and Shrubs.................................... 167....... 17

GMCP 02       ST2328 - Supply and Delivery of Two (2) Wood Chippers.......................... 169....... 18

Community and Culture  Report

GMCC 01       Local Government Arts and Culture Awards................................................ 171....... 19

GMCC 02       Request for Rental Waiver - Disability South West Limited (Noah's Ark Toy Library) 174                                                                                                                         20

Economy and Engagement Report

GMEE 01       Donations, Grants and Sponsorship............................................................. 177....... 21

GMEE 02       Liverpool Youth Council Committee Community Member Nomination 2014-2016 192 22

Governance Report

GMGO 01      Enterprise Risk Management Draft Policy and Strategy............................. 194....... 23

GMGO 02      Compulsory Acquisition of a part of Lot 10 DP 881265, Mill Park, Casula by the Rail Corporation of New South Wales................................................................. 201....... 24

GMGO 03      Review of the Code of Meeting Practice..................................................... 206....... 25

GMGO 04      Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy............................................................ 208....... 26

Infrastructure and Environment Report

GMIE 01         Tender ST2329 – Liverpool LGA Traffic and Transport Study.................... 240....... 27

GMIE 02         Council’s Multi-Storey Parking Stations....................................................... 243....... 28

GMIE 03         Tender PQ2347 - Air Conditioning Upgrade at Hilda Davis Community Centre..... 252 29

GMIE 04         Tender WT2348 - Construction of Amalfi Park Detention Basin, Graham Avenue, Lurnea                                                                                                                        254....... 30

Planning and Growth Report

GMPG 01       LLEP Draft Amendment No. 50 - Proposed Rezoning of 900 Cowpasture Road, Cecil Hills. Sydney Water Site. ............................................................................. 256....... 31

GMPG 02       Draft Amendment to Part 5 Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Development in Rural and Environmental Zones).................................................................. 266....... 32

GMPG 03       Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No.42) and Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Amendment No.12) - Restricted Premises 275     33

GMPG 04       Public Exhibition Outcomes - Liverpool Development Control Plan Draft Amendment 13                                                                                                                        305....... 34

GMPG 05       Approval for Works-In-Kind Tender for DA-647/2012/A, DA-290/2013/A and DA-378/2013....................................................................................................... 317....... 35

GMPG 06       Black Muscat Park - Noise and Unapproved Use....................................... 323....... 36

GMPG 07       Changes to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Charter and Procedure 335                                                                                                                         37

Committee Reports

CTTE 01         Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee
Meeting held on 8 May 2014 ....................................................................... 351....... 38

CTTE 02         Minutes of Liverpool Youth Council meeting held on 6 May 2014............... 358....... 39

CTTE 03         Local Traffic Committee Minutes of Meeting Held on 14 May 2014........... 362....... 40

CTTE 04         Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee 8 May 2014........................... 368....... 41

CTTE 05         Environment Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of 12 May 2014......... 373....... 42

CTTE 06         Minutes of Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 4 June 2014...... 400....... 43

CTTE 07         Key Site Master Planning Steering Committee Minutes - 3 June 2014....... 407....... 44

CTTE 08         Minutes of the Warwick Farm Racing Precinct Steering Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014..................................................................................................... 409....... 45

CTTE 09         Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee........................................... 414....... 46

CTTE 10         Street Naming Committee minutes from 3 June 2014................................ 418....... 47

CTTE 11         Liverpool Sports Committee Minutes of Meeting 27 March 2014................ 423....... 48

CTTE 12         Minutes of Economic Development Committee meeting held 4 June 2014 432....... 49

CTTE 13         Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 4 June 2014... 440....... 50

Correspondence Reports

CORR 01       Incoming and Outgoing Correspondence Report......................................... 446....... 51

Questions with Notice

QWN 01         Question with Notice - Clr Stanley................................................................ 448....... 52

QWN 02         Question with Notice - Clr Harle................................................................... 450....... 53

QWN 03         Question with Notice - Clr Stanley................................................................ 453....... 54  

Questions Taken on Notice

Presentations by Councillors

Close

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

MINUTES OF THE Ordinary Meeting

HELD ON 28 May 2014

 

 

PRESENT:

Mayor Ned Mannoun

Councillor Balloot

Councillor Hadchiti

Councillor Hadid

Councillor Harle

Councillor Karnib

Councillor Mamone

Councillor Shelton

Councillor Stanley

Councillor Waller

Mr Rob Noble, Acting Chief Executive Officer

Ms Julie Hately, Executive Director

Ms Toni Averay, Acting Executive Director

Mr Mathew Walker, Group Manager Business Excellence

Ms Kiersten Fishburn, Group Manager Community and Culture

Mr Gino Belsito, Group Manager City Presentation

Ms Nadia Napoletano, Group Manager Governance

Mr Michael Cullen, Group Manager Economy and Engagement

Mr Raj Autar, Group Manager Infrastructure and Environment

Ms Carole Todd, Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

The meeting commenced at 6.00PM

 

 

OPENING                              6.00PM

PRAYER                               The prayer of the Council will be read by Pastor Steve Riethmuller from Cartwright Gospel Chapel.

APOLOGIES                         Clr Ristevski

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti                   Seconded: Clr Karnib

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

CONDOLENCES                Nil

Confirmation of Minutes

 

That the minutes of the Ordinary Meeting held on 30 April 2014 and the Extraordinary Meeting held on 7 May 2014 be confirmed as a true record of that meeting.

Motion:                                  Moved:Clr Hadid                            Seconded: Clr Mamone

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Declarations of Interest

Clr Waller declared a non pecuniary, less than significant interest in the following Item:

          Item GMEE 03:   Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

Reason: She is a member of the Meals on Wheels Board which is a not for profit non-government organisation. She did not participate in the submission to council.

Clr Waller will not leave the Chambers for the duration of this Item.

 

Clr Hadchiti declared a non pecuniary, less than significant interest in the following Item:

Item GMPG 03: DA-834/2008 – S96 Modification at 65-69 Castlereagh Street Liverpool

Reason: Clr Hadchiti has used the aservices of the applicant (Ron Dunkley and Associates) in the past with full commercial rates paid, and he also has a personal relationship with the Prestia family who are owners of the property.

Clr Hadchiti will leave the Chambers for the duration of this Item.

Public Forum

(Presentation – Items not on agenda)             

1.      Mr John Lupton addressed Council on the following matter:

Share Care Organisation

 

(Representation – Items on agenda)

1.         Mr Patrick McKone (Chairperson of the Midnight Basketball Liverpool Committee) addressed Council on the following Item:

 

Item – GMEE 01 Midnight Basketball Program.

 

 

During this presentation to Council, Mr McKone and three participants of the basketball program presented a basketball and framed basketball shirt to Council in appreciation of support given to the program.

 

2.         Mr Brad McAndrew (on behalf of Hydrox Nominees Pty Ltd) addressed Council on the following Item:

 

Item – GMPG 05 – Voluntary Planning Agreement Between Liverpool City Council and Hydrox Nominees Pty Ltd.

 


 

Mayoral Minute

SUBJECT: Serbian Flood Fund Raising Appeal

 

The recent severe floods in Serbia have been devastating with their effect. States of  emergency have been declared in parts of Serbia after the heaviest rain and worst floods since records began 120 years ago.

 

Overflowing rivers have burst into towns and villages, cutting off whole communities, while  landslides have buried houses. At least 40 people have died in the after flooding caused by unprecedented torrential rain, with thousands more displaced. There are also concerns over the possibility of disease being spread by thousands of carcasses of dead animals which are starting to rot in rising temperatures.

The Serbian community of Liverpool is seeking support to help cater for humanitarian needs of the severely affected population, including the provision of safe drinking water. This Sunday 1 June, The Serbian Community is holding a Serbian Flood Fund Raising Appeal at the Serbian Cultural Club at Middleton Grange. I propose that Council demonstrate compassion, solidarity and support with our Serbian community by supporting the fundraising appeal.  

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun

 

That Council:

 

1.    On behalf of the citizens of Liverpool expresses sympathy and solidarity with our Serbian community at this time of natural disaster in Serbia.

 

2.    Donates $5,000 to the Serbian Flood Fundraising Appeal and authorises the Mayor or his representative to formally present the donation at the fundraising function on Sunday 1 June 2014. Such funds to be sourced from the Councillor Reserve.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


Notices of Motion

ITEM NO:      NOM 01

FILE NO:        110061.2014

SUBJECT:     Establishing an additional Sister City

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

 That Council:

 

1.       Investigate the possibility of establishing a Sister City relationship with Hangzhou China.

 

2.       Endorse Clr Balloot’s self-funded attendance at the APEC SMETC to promote Liverpool in that forum.

 

3.       Provide marketing merchandise to hand out at the conference.

 

4.       Considers reimbursement of:

a.   freight charges for the promotional materials from Australia and back if required,

b.   internal flights between Jiangxi to Beijing and Beijing to Hangzhou,

c.   accommodation between those cities.

 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved:  Clr Balloot                       Seconded:Clr Karnib

 

That Council:

 

1.    Receive a report on the current nature and status of sister city relationships with Liverpool.

 

2.    Investigate the possibility of establishing a Sister City relationship with Hangzhou, China or another city in China.

 

3.    Endorse Councillor Balloot’s self-funded attendance at the APEC SMET to promote Liverpool in that forum.

 

4.    Provide marketing merchandise about Liverpool for distribution at the conference.

 

5.    Reimburse Councillor Balloot reasonable expenses for the freight costs for the Liverpool marketing merchandise.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

Amendment                          Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That Council:

 

1.    Investigate the possibility of establishing a Sister City relationship with a City in China.

 

2.    Report to Council by the September Council meeting on the financial impacts of such a relationship.

 

3.    Provide a report by the September Council meeting on all current and previous Sister City relationships.

On being put to the meeting the Amendment (from Clrs Stanley and Shelton) was declared LOST.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion (from Clrs Balloot and Karnib) was then voted on and was declared CARRIED.

 

Division called:

 

Vote for:

                             Mayor Mannoun

                             Clr Balloot

                             Clr Hadchiti

                             Clr Hadid

                             Clr Karnib

                             Clr Mamone

 

Vote against:

                             Clr Harle

                             Clr Shelton

                             Clr Stanley

                             Clr Waller

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM NO:      NOM 02

FILE NO:        111429.2014

SUBJECT:     Changes to Racial Discrimination Act (18C)

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Understands the fundamental importance of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 to our community.

 

2.   Recognises that section 18C provides protection to individuals from offensive behaviour because of race, colour, national or ethnic origin.

 

3.   Writes to all local members of State and Federal Parliament detailing the Council's motion and seeking their support when they are considering changes to the Racial Discrimination Act.

 

4.    Writes to the Federal Attorney General requesting he withdraw the Draft Exposure Amendment to the Racial Discrimination Act and detailing the motion passed by Council.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

ITEM NO:      NOM 03

FILE NO:        111453.2014

SUBJECT:     Fire Safety Certifications / Inspections

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council pursuant to s.10A(2)(g) of the Local Government Act, 1993 moves into closed session to consider the notice of motion forwarded in the confidential papers.  

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton                       Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That this matter be dealt with at the end of this meeting in Closed Session pursuant to s.10A(2)(g) of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

ITEM NO:      IHAP 01

FILE NO:        092665.2014

SUBJECT:     DA 1112/2013 - Alterations and fitout of Shop 7 at 42-48 Epsom Road, Chipping Norton

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.         Approves Development Application No. DA-1112/2013, subject to the recommended conditions attached to the Council officer’s IHAP Report and as modified by IHAP as follows:

 

            Prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate

2A.           Prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, the existing rubbish bins              are to be fitted with a lid that is permanently attached or similar.

 

          Use of the site

25A.         The outdoor dining tables approved for the exterior of the restaurant must               be located adjacent to the bollards and awning supports, leaving a clear              passage against the shopfront.

 

2.         Notify in writing, the persons who made a submission with regard to the proposed development.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Clr Mamone

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ITEM NO:      IHAP 02

FILE NO:        093382.2014

SUBJECT:     DA 712/2013 - Demolition and construction of a residential flat building of 58 residential units at 36-40 Speed St, Liverpool

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approves Development Application No. DA-712/2013, subject to the recommended conditions contained within attachment 4 (under separate cover).

 

2.   Notifies the persons who made a submission with regard to the proposed development, in writing, of Council’s decision.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved:  Clr Hadid                          Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ITEM NO:      IHAP 03

FILE NO:        095895.2014

SUBJECT:     DA-977/2013 Expansion of restaurant and outdoor dining at Shop 13, 172 Green Valley Way, Green Valley

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approves Development Application No. DA-977/2013 to formalise the expansion of the existing approved restaurant operating from Shop 13, into the adjoining premises; minor shopfront alterations; and provision of an outdoor dining area on Council owned footpath, to be operated in conjunction with the existing restaurant, subject to the amended conditions of consent as contained within attachment 3.

 

2.   Notifies the persons who made a submission with regard to the proposed development, in writing, of Council’s decision.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadid                           Seconded: Clr Mamone

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Chief Executive Officer Report

ITEM NO:      CEO 01

FILE NO:        100300.2014

SUBJECT:     Key Site Master Planning Committee Charter

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the report.

 

2.       Adopts the draft charter attached to this report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadid                           Seconded: Clr Mamone

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ITEM NO:      CEO 02

FILE NO:        109234.2014

SUBJECT:     March 2014 Performance Report

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the March 2014 Performance Report which outlines the progress of all principal activities contained in the Delivery Program 2013-17 from January to March 2014.

 

2.      Allows the Acting Chief Executive Officer to make a presentation on progress made in the January to March 2013 period with a copy of the presentation forming part of the minutes of the meeting.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Waller                          Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That Council:

 

1.    Receives and notes the March 2014 Performance Report which outlines the progress of all principal activities contained in the Delivery Program 2013-17 from January to March 2014.

 

2.    The presentation on progress made in the January to March 2014 period to form part of the minutes of the meeting.

 

3.    The presentation to be provided to Councillors in hard copy.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Note, The presentation referred to in points 2 and 3 of the resolution can be found on pages 14 To 22.


    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

 

    


Executive Director Report

ITEM NO:      ED 01

FILE NO:        101224.2014

SUBJECT:     Establishment of Liverpool Airport Coordination Group and Liverpool Airport Taskforce

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Establish the Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce to be chaired by the Mayor with membership as detailed in this report.

 

2.   Appoint three Councillors as Taskforce members.

 

3.   Endorse the creation of the Airport Coordination Working Group as detailed in this report.

 

4.   Amalgamate the Economic Development and Tourism and Events Committees and schedule Taskforce Committee meetings on the same day.

 

5.   Endorse the recruitment of a Project Officer to support the Taskforce as funded in the 2014/15 budget.

 

6.   Adopt the draft Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce Charter as attached to this report.

 

7.   Note the information contained in this report regarding the Taskforce role and priorities.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti                      Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That Council:

 

1.    Establish the Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce to be chaired by the Mayor with membership as detailed in this report.

 

2.    Appoint the Mayor and Councillors Hadchiti, Mamone and Waller (and Clr Karnib as an alternate) as Taskforce members and update the Badgerys Creek Taskforce Draft Charter.

 

3.    Endorse the creation of the Airport Coordination Working Group as detailed in this report.

 

4.    Amalgamate the Economic Development and Tourism and Events Committees and schedule Taskforce Committee meetings on the same day.

 

5.    Endorse the recruitment of a Project Officer to support the Taskforce as funded in the 2014/15 budget.

 

6.    Adopt the draft Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce Charter as attached to this report subject to the following change of the last sentence of Clause 12, so that the last sentence in clause 12 to now read:

 

       “Taskforce meetings can only be held if five (5) ordinary days notice has been       given to all members and Councillors.”

 

7.    Note the information contained in this report regarding the Taskforce role and priorities.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 Business Excellence Report

ITEM NO:      GMBE 01

FILE NO:        078406.2014

SUBJECT:     March 2014 Budget Review

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the report.

 

2.       Votes the identified budget variations in accordance with this report.

 

3.       Consider and approve following recommended initiatives to commit the surplus funds:

 

·    Transfer $125k to the Plant Reserve

·    Allocate $250k to engage a Fire Inspection Consultant

·    Transfer $166k to the Council Reserve

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun               Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That Council:

 

1.    Receives and notes the report.

 

2.    Votes the identified budget variations in accordance with this report.

 

3.    Consider and approve following recommended initiatives to commit the surplus funds:

 

·         Transfer $125k to the Plant Reserve

·         Transfer $250k to engage a Fire Inspection Consultant

·         Allocate $100k to CPAC

·         Transfer $66k to the Council Reserve

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM NO:      GMBE 02

FILE NO:        098159.2014

SUBJECT:     2008/2009 Refinancing Existing Loan

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council note the refinancing requirement for this loan and authorise the Acting Chief Executive Officer to accept the best quote offered and execute the loan agreement.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ITEM NO:      GMBE 03

FILE NO:        098246.2014

SUBJECT:     Statutory Investment Report April 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes this report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton                       Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Community and Culture  Report

ITEM NO:      GMCC 01

FILE NO:        080228.2014

SUBJECT:     Expression of Interest EOI2333 Management of Leisure Centre - Carnes Hill

 

RECOMMENDATION

That Council:

1.       Accept the Expression of Interest received and place on a shortlist of applicants.

2.       Revisit the provision of a shortlist of applicants when the building is completed to reflect potential future market interest.

3.       Makes public its decision regarding tender EOI 2333 Management of Leisure Centre – Carnes Hill.

4.       Notes that the Executive Director will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft Minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority.

5.       Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That this matter be dealt with at the end of this meeting in Closed Session pursuant to s.10A(2)(g) of the Local Government Act 1993

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

ITEM NO:      GMCC 02

FILE NO:        098067.2014

SUBJECT:     Liverpool City Council Sporting Grants Program 2013/2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Adopts the recommendations for Sporting Grants, as determined by the Liverpool  Sports Committee grants assessment panel:

Sporting Organisation

Amount

Chipping Norton Baseball Club

$2,929.00

Australian Barefoot Water Ski Club

$317.00

Bringelly Netball Club

$5,000.00

South West Tigers Junior AFL Club

$1,414.00

Moorebank Sports Netball Club

$3,618.00

Moorebank Liverpool District Hockey Club

$1,290.00

Prestons Robins Little Athletics

$2,500.00

Southern Districts Soccer Football Association

$5,000.00

Southern Districts Softball Association

$2,932.00

Total

$25,000.00

 

2.   Due to the absence of applications in the “disability” category, allocate the grant funding which is specifically for people with a disability, to applicants who were identified as next eligible for funding:

Sporting Organisation

Amount

Liverpool PSSA

$5,000.00

Total

$5,000.00

 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM NO:      GMCC 03

FILE NO:        101555.2014

SUBJECT:     Adoption of the Customer Service and Communication Policy

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Adopts the revised Customer Service and Communication Policy.

 

2.   Continues to carry out customer service training for all staff incorporating the Customer Service and Communication Policy.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadid                           Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Economy and Engagement Report

ITEM NO:      GMEE 01

FILE NO:        095785.2014

SUBJECT:     Midnight Basketball Program

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes this report.

 

2.       Notes that an additional $19,597.56 from salary savings over 2014-15 and 2015-16 financial years will be allocated to cover the staff time associated with the delivery of the Liverpool Midnight Basketball Program.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadid                           Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ITEM NO:      GMEE 02

FILE NO:        097693.2014

SUBJECT:     Donations Policy

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council adopts The Donations and Community Grants Policy.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Waller                Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

Council adopts the Donations and Community Grants policy that was put to Council in February 2014.

 

Foreshadowed Motion:       Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Mayor Mannoun

 

That this item be deferred and review the funding available to the Community Grants program and the Youth Council.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion (from Clrs Waller and Stanley) was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM NO:      GMEE 03

FILE NO:        099457.2014

SUBJECT:     Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Endorses the Financial Contribution Panel's recommendations for the provision of $3,800 under the Sporting Donations Program as summarised in the table below:

Applicant Name

Amount

Jasmine Pritchard

$200

Cameron Parsons

$200

Keifer Dotti

$500

Jacob Dowson

$200

Jonas Dowson

$200

Maddison Blackman

$100

Gaurav Sami

$100

Shaneel Sami

$100

Ian Thomas McFarlane

$500

Elyse Nicole Ryan

$500

Hayley Rotondo

$100

Shannon Brown

$100

Jayden Lach

$500

Jake Holmes

$100

Kaushal Kumar

$100

Jessica Cutner

$300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.       Endorses the Financial Contribution Panel's recommendations for the provision of $22,140.35 under the Community Grants Program as summarised in the table below:

 

Applicant Name

Project Name

Amount

Karitane

Harmony At Home

$2,500

Karitane

Engaging Vulnerable Families

$4,723

The Probus Club of Liverpool City Inc.

Liverpool City Probus

$4,127.85

City of Liverpool Meals on Wheels

Christmas Hamper Project for Meals on Wheels clients

$3,500

Liverpool U3A – School for Seniors Inc.

Purchase of new lounges

$1,252

Liverpool Neighbourhood Connections

Pre-Loved Clothing Store

$935

Miller Art & Fact Inc

2168 Youth Music Project: Developing Local Talent

$4,825.50

Treehouse Theatre Inc.

The Tree of Life Project

$5,000

 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Governance Report

ITEM NO:      GMGO 01

FILE NO:        062389.2014

SUBJECT:     Draft Conservation Management Plan for the Soldiers' Memorial School of Arts building, 306 Macquarie Street, Liverpool

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council adopts the Conservation Management Plan for the Soldiers’ Memorial School of Arts building.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun               Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ITEM NO:      GMGO 02

FILE NO:        102706.2014

SUBJECT:     Budget Request for Consultancy Services re Fire Certification Work

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Adopts the recommendations as detailed in the confidential report.

 

2.      Keeps confidential the report pursuant to the provisions of S10(A)(2)(c) of the Local Government Act because it contains information that would, if disclosed confer a confidential advantage on a person with whom Council is conducting (or proposed to conduct) business.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That this matter be dealt with at the end of this meeting in Closed Session pursuant to s.10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Infrastructure and Environment Report

ITEM NO:      GMIE 01

FILE NO:        088506.2014

SUBJECT:     Warren Serviceway Car Park Fees and Charges

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Amends the fees and charges for the Warren Serviceway, Bathurst Street and Northumberland Street Car parks to include a corporate rate for companies operating in the Liverpool City Centre. The corporate rate will be determined through negotiation with these companies for permanent parking.

 

2.   Delegates the Group Manager Infrastructure and Environment to negotiate and set the parking fees and charges in consultation with the Group Manager Governance and subject to approval of Chief Executive Officer.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 


 

ITEM NO:      GMIE 02

FILE NO:        100461.2014

SUBJECT:     WT2332 - Landscaping on Bernera Road, Prestons between Camden Valley Way and Kurrajong Road

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Adopts the recommendation put forward in the confidential report provided under separate cover.

 

2.       Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Waller                          Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That Council:

 

1.    Accepts the Tender from Marsupial Landscape Management Pty Ltd for Tender WT2332 – Landscaping on Bernera Road, Prestons between Camden Valley Way and Kurrajong Road for the price of $622,263 plus GST.

 

2.    Makes public its decision regarding tender WT2332 - Landscaping on Bernera Road, Prestons between Camden Valley Way and Kurrajong Road.

 

3.    Notes that the Executive Director will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft Minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority.

 

4.    Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Planning and Growth Report

ITEM NO:      GMPG 01

FILE NO:        070580.2014

SUBJECT:     Post Exhibition Report of draft Amendment No 43 to LLEP 2008- Clause 4.2B

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council resolves to adopt Amendment No 43 as amended and refer to NSW Planning & Environment for the plan to be gazette (notified).

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Clr Hadchiti left the Chambers at 7.01pm.

 

Clr Mamone left the Chambers at 7.03pm.

ITEM NO:      GMPG 02

FILE NO:        077268.2014

SUBJECT:     DA-834/2008 - S96 Modification at 65-69 Castlereagh Street, Liverpool

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves modification to Development Consent DA-834/2008 and amends the development consent in the following way:

 

Condition No. 1 is amended to read as follows:

 

1.       Development must be carried out in accordance with Development Application received on 13 February 2008 and as modified in application DA-834/2008/A, DA-834/2008/B and DA-834/2008/C as follows:

 

(a)   Architectural plans prepared by Ron C Dunkley Architects and Associates, and Simon Chan + Associates Pty Limited as follows:

 

·   Basement 2 Plan Drawing No. A1, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/A made on 28 March 2013

·   Basement 1 Plan Drawing No. A2, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/A made on 28 March 2013

·   Roof Plan Drawing No. A12, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/A made on 28 March 2013

·   East Elevation Drawing No. GA14, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/C made on 11 November 2013

·   West Elevation Drawing No. GA15, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/C made on 11 November 2013

·   North Elevation Drawing No. A15, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/C made on 11 November 2013

·   Northern Elevation at Northern Boundary Drawing No. GA18, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/C made on 11 November 2013

·   Southern Elevation Drawing No. GA16, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/A made on 28 March 2013

·   Section A-A Drawing No. A17, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/A made on 28 March 2013

 

·   Ground Floor Plan Drawing No. GA4, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/C made on 11 November 2013

·   Level 1 Floor Plan Drawing No. A4, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/A made on 28 March 2013

·   Level 2 Floor Plan Drawing No. A5, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/A made on 28 March 2013

·   Level 3 Floor Plan Drawing No. A6, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/A made on 28 March 2013

·   Level 4 Floor Plan Drawing No. A7, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/A made on 28 March 2013

·   Level 5 Floor Plan Drawing No. A8, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/A made on 28 March 2013

·   Level 6 Floor Plan Drawing No. A9, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/A made on 28 March 2013

·   Level 7 Floor Plan Drawing No. A10, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/A made on 28 March 2013

·   Level 8 Floor Plan Drawing No. A11, Project No 1120 as amended in modification application DA-834/2008/A made on 28 March 2013

(b)   Concept Stormwater Management layout and Sediment and Erosion Control Layout as amended, prepared by AWL design, Drawing No. SW8007-S1 Issue B and dated 28 March 2008

 

(c)   Landscape Plan prepared by Precinct Landscapes Drawing No. 1512A-3 and dated 25 June 2008

 

(d)   Acoustic Assessment prepared by Wilkinson Murray Pty Limited, Report No. 08050 Version A and dated February 2008

 

(e)   Schedule of External Finishes and Colours

 

(f)   BASIX Certificate Number 178352M and dated 25 January 2008

 

(g)   Waste Management Plan prepared by Ron C Dunkley and Associates P/L and dated 6 February 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

Councillors Hadchiti and Mamone were absent from the chambers when this motion was voted on.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ITEM NO:      GMPG 03

FILE NO:        080448.2014

SUBJECT:     Post Exhibition LLEP Amendment No. 36 - Cemeteries & Crematoria and draft DCP controls.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Adopts LLEP 2008 Amendment No. 36 and refer it to NSW Planning & Environment for the plan to be gazetted on the NSW Government legislation website.

 

2.       Adopts the draft DCP 2008 amendments to come into effect upon publication of a notice in the local paper. 

 

3.       Resolves to write to the Cemetery Reform Group outlining issues and concerns surrounding cemeteries and crematoria land use permissibility in rural areas within the Liverpool LGA.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Waller                          Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

Clr Mamone was absent from the Chambers when this motion was voted on.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Deputy Mayor Hadid left the Chambers at 7.08pm.

 

Clr Mamone returned to the Chambers at 7.09pm.

ITEM NO:      GMPG 04

FILE NO:        097018.2014

SUBJECT:     DA-903/2012 - S96 Modification to residential flat building. Lot 102 - DP 1102856, 3 George Street, Warwick Farm

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Modification Application DA-903/2012/A involving minor internal layout amendments and amends Condition No.1 of Development Consent DA-903/2012, as outlined within attachment 1.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

Deputy Mayor Hadid was absent from the Chambers when this motion was voted on.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ITEM NO:      GMPG 05

FILE NO:        097995.2014

SUBJECT:     Voluntary Planning Agreement between Liverpool City Council and Hydrox Nominees Pty Ltd

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Publicly exhibit the Planning Agreement between Liverpool City Council and Hydrox Nominees Pty Limited for a minimum of 28 days.

 

2.       Delegates to the Chief Executive Officer (or Acting), subject to considerations of any changes following public exhibition, to enter into and execute the Planning Agreement in the form that is publicly exhibited or with minor alterations.

 

3.       Notes that if changes (other than typographical or grammatical corrections) arise from the public exhibition process that these will be reported back to Council.

 

4.       Notes that this delegation is within the powers that can be dedicated under Section 377 of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

5.       Create a Financial Reserve called the Georges River Flood Mitigation Reserve to hold funds collected from Hydrox Nominees Pty Ltd toward the future use for Flood Mitigation works within the Georges River catchment. 

 

6.       Receive a future report noting the aims and possible benefits of the Georges River Flood Study to be prepared by Council’s Group Manager Infrastructure and Environment. 

 

7.       If executed, place the $550,000 provided through this Planning Agreement in the Georges River Flood Mitigation Reserve. 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Waller                          Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

Deputy Mayor Hadid was absent from the Chambers when this motion was voted on.

 

 

 

 

 


Committee Reports

ITEM NO:      CTTE 01

FILE NO:        047872.2014

SUBJECT:     Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 3 April 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 3 April 2014.

 

2.   Supports funding of up to $3,000 being provided by Council for the attendance by two committee members at the Local Government Aboriginal Network conference in Narranderra on 10-12 September 2014

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ITEM NO:      CTTE 02

FILE NO:        085405.2014

SUBJECT:     Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee 10 April 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 10 April 2014.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ITEM NO:      CTTE 03

FILE NO:        093449.2014

SUBJECT:     Minutes of Liverpool Youth Council meeting held on 1 April 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 1 April 2014.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Deputy Mayor Hadid returned to the Chambers at 7.12pm.

 

Clr Mamone retired from the Chambers at 7.14pm.

 

ITEM NO:      CTTE 04

FILE NO:        098555.2014

SUBJECT:     No Intermodal Committee Meeting Minutes of 6 May 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 6 May 2014.

 

2.   Allocates $25,000 from the Intermodal Fighting Fund to undertake the post card campaign.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti                      Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That Council:

 

1.    Receives and notes the Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 6 May 2014.

 

2.    Allocates $25,000 from the Intermodal Fighting Fund to further undertake an awareness campaign.

 

3.    Officers to report back to Council on approaching the Intermodal company for compensation for potential problems the Intermodal may cause for the community.

 

Foreshadowed Motion:       Moved: Clr Waller                          Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That Council:

 

1.    Receives and notes the Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 6 May 2014.

 

2.    Officers to report back to Council on approaching the Intermodal company for compensation for potential problems the Intermodal may cause for the community.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion (from Clrs Hadchiti and Hadid) was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

Division called:

 

Vote for:

                             Mayor Mannoun

                             Clr Balloot

                             Clr Hadchiti

                             Clr Hadid

                             Clr Harle

                             Clr Stanley

 

Vote against:

                             Clr Karnib

                             Clr Shelton

                             Clr Waller

 


 

ITEM NO:      CTTE 05

FILE NO:        099783.2014

SUBJECT:     Minutes of Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 7 May 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the Tourism and Events Committee Meeting held on 7 May 2014.

 

2.    Notes the New Year’s Eve costings to extend the event to midnight and the report on the New Year’s Eve event.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ITEM NO:      CTTE 06

FILE NO:        099824.2014

SUBJECT:     Minutes of Economic Development Committee meeting held 7 May 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Economic Development Committee Meeting held on 7 May 2014.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ITEM NO:      CTTE 07

FILE NO:        099827.2014

SUBJECT:     Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 7 May 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Building our New City Committee Meeting held on 7 May 2014.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ITEM NO:      CTTE 08

FILE NO:        108991.2014

SUBJECT:     Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee Meeting held on 7 May 2014.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Correspondence Reports

ITEM NO:      CORR 01

FILE NO:        076528.2014

SUBJECT:     Incoming and Outgoing Correspondence Report

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Balloot                        Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Questions with Notice

ITEM NO:      QWN 01

FILE NO:        105358.2014

SUBJECT:     Question with Notice - Clr Shelton

 

Please address the following:

 

During the ordinary council meeting of 26 June 2013 a resolution to the following

effect was passed.

 

That Council:

 

1.    Adopts the Growing Liverpool 2023 Community Strategic Plan, Delivery Program 2013-2017 Operational Plan 2013-2014 with the changes outlined in this report.

 

2.    ...

 

3.    Places on public exhibition for 28 days the fees and charges for community and recreational facilities

 

a)    ...

 

b)    Amended fees and charges as presented. Notifies affected food premises in writing in the Mayor's name of the newreduced fees and charges.

 

Please advise the revenue that has to date been lost to Council if it were assumed

these particular fees and charges had remained unaltered and not 'reduced' and

notified 'in writing in the Mayor's name'.

 

Reduction of the primary inspection fee for food business who employee 0 to 5 employees:

·         Original adopted fee for the 2012/2013 fees & charges = $138.18 (GST exclusive)

·         Reduced adopted fee 2013/14 = $130.91 (GST exclusive)

·         Reduction of income to date $6,862.52

 

Reduction of the Re- inspection fee for food business who employ 0 to 5 employees:

·         Original adopted fee for the 2012/2013 fees & charges = $138.18 (GST exclusive)

·         Reduced adopted fee = $90 (GST exclusive)

·         Reduction of income to date $4,191.66

 


ITEM NO:      QWN 02

FILE NO:        105256.2014

SUBJECT:     Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

 

 

Please address the following:

 

1. How many bus shelters have been constructed in the 2013-2014 year?

 

2. What are their locations?

 

3. Is there any back log from previous years?

 

4. How many will be constructed in 2014-2015 financial year?

 

5. Where are new bus shelters to be located?

 

6. Please indicate whether these are in new or established suburbs.

 

7. What is the approximate cost of a bus shelter?

 

 

A response to these questions will be included in the June business paper.

 


Mayor Mannoun left the Chambers at 7.28pm.

 

Deputy Mayor Hadid took the chair.

 

Mayor Mannoun returned to the Chambers at 7.30pm.

ITEM NO:      QWN 03

FILE NO:        111418.2014

SUBJECT:     Question with Notice - Clr Harle

 

Please address the following:

 

1.    Can Council provide the status of steps implemented to prevent Public Address Systems being used in the Chipping Norton Recreational Area since the matter was previously debated in Council?

 

2.    Have prominent signs indicating that “PA system are not allowed in the park” been installed as was promised when the matter was raised previously?

 

3.    Is Council aware that Black Muscat Park is again regularly used by large groups that produce extremely loud music, particularly “Middle Eastern Music” which continues to be a major problem despite Councils’ preventative efforts?

 

4.    The matter was again reported on the 18th of May. Previously Rangers were to attend the Park area early on Saturday and Sunday mornings to prevent groups setting up PA systems, has this practice been discontinued?

 

5.    Have Rangers asked Police for assistance when complaints have been received from nearby residents and if so, what was the response?

 

6.    Several incident have been reported to me of noise affected residents being harassed and intimidated by large groups of 1000 or more Black Muscat Park users. Those incidents occurred when residents opposite the park asked operators to reduce the sound level or questioned if they had permission from Liverpool Council to use the area. Has Council issued permits over the last six months allowing any groups to use the park area, including permission to operate PA systems?

 

7.    Is Council aware that members of these groups use wood gathered from bush areas within the park to fuel open fires and barbeques rather than use those supplied by Council?

 

8.    Is Council aware that those open fires often result in covering large areas of the park with dense smoke that detrimentally affects all park users as well as residents in the adjoining areas? Often to the extent that residents are forced to close all windows and doors to avoid the smoke that lingers for several hours after park users have left the area.

 

9.    In relation to toilet amenities for the Chipping Norton Recreational areas; does the system cope when groups of several thousand visitors use these facilities and what is Councils liability if problems occur?

 

 

10.  Can I be provided with the approximate costs associated for two Rangers to patrol the area on Saturdays, Sundays and public Holidays from 10:00 am to 3:00pm?

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Harle

 

1.    That the responses to the questions in Item QWN 03 be brought back to Council in a Council report.

 

2.    That the report to include the cost of having two Rangers on that site on weekends and public holidays.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Motion                                    Moved: Mayor Mannoun

 

That Council move into Closed Session:

 

1.    To consider confidential reports and information tabled at the meeting.

 

2.    Pursuant to Section 10A(1)-(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public be excluded from the meeting on the basis that the business to be considered is classified confidential under the provisions of:

 

2.1.  s10(A)(2)(g) of the Local Government Act because it contains advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.

 

2.2.  s10(A)(2)(di) of the Local Government Act because it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

2.3.  s10(A)(2)(c) of the Local Government Act because it contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

 

3.    That the correspondence and reports relevant to the subject business be withheld from access to the media and public as required by Section 11(2) of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Council moved into Closed Session at 7.34pm. The public and the media left the Chambers.

 

 


 

Mayor Mannoun left the Chambers at 7.56pm.

 

Deputy Mayor hadid took the Chair.

 

Clr Hadchiti left the Chambers at 7.56pm.

 

Clr Hadchiti returned to the Chambers at 7.57pm

 

Mayor Mannoun returned to the Chambers at 8.00pm.

 

Clr Balloot left the Chambers at 8.13pm.

 

Clr Balloot returned to the Chambers at 8.15pm.

 

ITEM NO:

NOM 03

FILE NO:

111453.2014

SUBJECT:

Fire Safety Certifications / Inspections

NOTICE OF MOTION

That Council forthwith notifies in writing all building owners and occupiers affected by the issue by Council and its agents of potentially inaccurate fire safety certifications (and like instruments).

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton                       Seconded: Clr Waller

 

1.    That Council forthwith notifies in writing all building owners and occupiers affected by the issue by Council and its agents of potentially inaccurate fire safety certifications (and like instruments).

 

2.    A report be brought back to the next Council meeting if possible, prepared by an independent auditor, addressing the approach that had been taken since becoming aware of the issue, and the approach to now be taken to address the process and actions required. This is be reported back to Council directly as a matter of priority.

 

3.    That Council waives the requirement to tender for services due to the “extenuating circumstances” of the matter in accordance with s55(3)K of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

4.    That the following comments made at this meeting from Councillors Stanley and Waller be noted in the minutes:

 

When Councillors Stanley and Waller had been informed of the issue in 2010, they were assured that the issue had been addressed and would be addressed. They expressed their dissatisfaction that this was not correct and requested that their comments be noted in the Minutes.

 

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

Clr Mamone had retired from the meeting when this motion was voted on.

 


 

ITEM NO:

GMCC 01

FILE NO:

080228.2014

SUBJECT:

Expression of Interest EOI2333 management of Leisure Centre - Carnes Hill

RECOMMENDATION

That Council:

 

1.    Accept the Expression of Interest received and place on a shortlist of applicants.

 

2.    Revisit the provision of a shortlist of applicants when the building is completed to reflect potential future market interest.

 

3.    Makes public its decision regarding tender EOI 2333 Management of Leisure Centre – Carnes Hill.

 

4.    Notes that the Executive Director will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft Minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority.

 

5.    Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Waller

 

1.    Rejects the Expression of Interest 2333.

 

2.    Calls for tenders for the management of the Leisure Centre at Carnes Hill at such time as the facility is constructed and closer to the opening.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

Clr Mamone had retired from the meeting when this motion was voted on.

 


 

 

ITEM NO:

GMGO 02

FILE NO:

102706.2014

SUBJECT:

Budget Request for Consultancy Services re Fire Certification Work

RECOMMENDATION

That Council:

 

1.    Adopts the recommendations as detailed in the confidential report.

 

2.    Keeps confidential the report pursuant to the provisions of S10(A)(2)(c) of the Local Government Act because it contains information that would, if disclosed confer a confidential advantage on a person with whom Council is conducting (or proposed to conduct) business.

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


 

Motion                              Moved: Mayor Mannoun

 

That Council move out of Closed Session and into Open Council.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

Open Council resumed at 8.23pm.

 

The resolutions relating to the follwing Items while the meeting was closed to the public was read to the meeting by the Mayor:

 

ITEM NO:           NOM 03

SUBJECT:                   Fire Safety Certifications / Inspections

 

ITEM NO:           GMCC 01

SUBJECT:                    Expression of Interest EOI2333 management of Leisure Centre – Carnes                          Hill

 

ITEM NO:           GMGO 02

SUBJECT:                   Budget Request for Consultancy Services re Fire Certification Work.

 

 

 

THE MEETING CLOSED AT 8.26PM.

 

 

<Signature>

Name: Ned Mannoun

Title:     Mayor

Date:     25 June 2014

I have authorised a stamp bearing my signature to be affixed to the pages of the Minutes of the Council Meeting held on  28 May 2014. I confirm that Council has adopted these Minutes as a true and accurate record of the meeting.

   


76

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Notices of Motion

 

NOM 01

Outstanding Legal, social and other Liabilities

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Lead partnerships and collaboration with community, business and governments

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

128956.2014

Author

Anne Stanley - Councillor

 

 

Background

 

It has been some time since a report has been presented to Council regarding its exposure to liabilities and issues that may cause concerns for Council and its residents.

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Provides a report to the July 2014 (under confidential cover as necessary) a report that details all known areas of concern for current and projected exposure to legal, financial and social liabilities.

 

2.   The report should advise level of projected exposure, Council's current position and what steps are being taken to address these situations.

 

ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT

 

Council is currently undertaking an enterprise wide risk management review and will have a finalised risk register inclusive of corporate and operational  risks by mid to end  July 2014.  Risks management and reviews are ongoing and profiles will be amended as required and reported to Council.   Additionally, Internal Audit is preparing their annual audit plan that will consider those risk profiles as input for the development of annual audit plan accordingly.  The Audit findings are reported to the Executive and the Ethics & Audit  Committee, and copies of those minutes will be reported to Council. 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.

Civic Leadership and Governance

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


78

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Notices of Motion

 

NOM 02

Community Engagement

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

134503.2014

Author

Anne Stanley - Councillor

 

 

Background

 

In response to questioning from Liverpool residents I request the following report  be provided to Council at its next meeting.

 

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives a report at its July 2014 meeting regarding the effectiveness of the subscription to the “Bang the Table” marketing campaign.

 

2.   Total costs of the initiative; broken up into individual campaigns.

 

3.   Are Council Officers able to ascertain the effectiveness of the use of this type of marketing to improve Council’s communication with its residents? What has that been?

 

4.   Effective immediately provides all Councillors with a copy of the campaigns and the questions to be asked before the phone calls take place. (To allow Councillors to deal with feedback by residents effectively).

 

5.   Approval for all questions by consultation with the Mayor and CEO. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT

 

Liverpool Listens has been live since May 2014 and evaluation is scheduled in a further 9 months at which time a report will be provided.

 

Reachtel has been used to trial key events including New Years Eve and the first Night Markets, whilst impact is still being ascertained anecdotal evidence shows a raised awareness.  

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Civic Leadership and Governance

Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Deliver services that are customer focused.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


80

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Notices of Motion

 

NOM 03

CCTV

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Improve the community’s sense of safety in Liverpool

Key Policy

Community Safety and Crime Prevention Strategy

File Ref

134517.2014

Author

Anne Stanley - Councillor

 

 

Background

 

Significant Council resources have been set aside for the operation of CCTV and Wi-Fi in the Liverpool CBD. It is timely that a progress report be provided to ratepayers regarding the project.

 

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Provides a report to the July 2014 Council meeting detailing the current operation of CCTV and Wi-Fi in the CBD.

 

2.   The report should discuss (but not limited to):

 

a)   Total spending to date

b)   Funding sources and how money has been allocated

c)   Details of any grant applications (whether successful or not) that may have been made to assist Council to set up and run CCTV

d)   Estimates of yearly maintenance and other costs that affect Council Budget.

e)   effectiveness of the initiative.

 

 

 

ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT

 

An evaluation of the effectiveness of the CCTV cameras network  forms an essential part of the management of the asset. While installation is complete the network has not as yet been formally activated. Once the  CCTV system is activated, at minimum, an annual evaluation process will be put in place and a report prepared to provide feedback to Council. An evaluation report  is likely to be prepared 12 months from activation so a report would be expected to be finalised around June/July 2015 .

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

Support policies and plans that prevent crime.

Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


82

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Notices of Motion

 

NOM 04

Recording of Minutes of Council Meetings

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Information Technology Strategy

File Ref

134688.2014

Author

Anne Stanley - Councillor

 

Background

 

Currently the recordings of Council meetings are only kept until the Minutes of Council are confirmed effectively one month or less. Due to a delay in a request this has meant the minutes were destroyed before a confirmation of an answer to a question was available. I suggest to ensure this does not happen again the recordings of Council Meetings are not destroyed for at least 6 months.

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Saves the recordings of Council meetings for 6 months after the confirmations of the Minutes of that meeting.

 

2.   Updates the Code of Meetings Practice page 15 at 21.7 to read:

 

21.7. For the purposes of compiling the minutes of meetings, each meeting shall be recorded, with the recordings kept, other than by resolution of Council, for six months after the minutes of that meeting are confirmed by Council and the recordings must be disposed of in accordance with the General Records Disposal Schedule for Local Government.

 

3.   Updates any other relevant Council Policy documents to reflect these changes.

 

ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT

 

Council meetings are recorded for the purposes of compiling the minutes of meetings. Therefore, once the minutes are confirmed by Council, recordings can be disposed of.

 

To assist with the responding to any requests relating to the Council meeting, the Notice of Motion is supported.

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.

Civic Leadership and Governance

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


84

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Notices of Motion

 

NOM 05

Election of Councillor as an Executive Member on NSW Branch of the Australian Local Government Women’s Association (ALGWA)

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Workforce Management Plan

File Ref

134728.2014

Author

Anne Stanley - Councillor

 

 

Background

 

I refer to the Mayoral Minute of 26th June 2013 and am pleased to advise Council of the re-election of Councillor Wendy Waller as an Executive Member of the NSW Branch of the Australian Local Government Women's Association at its recent AGM and conference held in Broken hill at the end of March 2014.

 

This is Councillor Waller's second term and she was endorsed by ALGWA members at the meeting, a proud achievement for her and her skills and experience in Local Government.

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Congratulates Councillor Waller on her service to the Australian Local Government Women’s Association and appointment to the NSW Executive.

 

2.   Extends the Councillor expenses policy to cover the reasonable costs of travel and accommodation to attend Australian Local Government Women’s Association meetings for the one year term.

 

ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT

 

Clr Waller is commended on her re-election as an Executive Member of the NSW Branch of the Australian Local Government Women’s Association (ALGWA).

 

The ALGWA is included in the list of conferences to which the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Mayor and Councillors applies and as such costs of travel and accommodation will be met by Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

Promote community harmony and address discrimination.

Civic Leadership and Governance

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil   


86

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 01

Torrens title subdivision creating two allotments at 165 Fifth Avenue, Austral

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

119807.2014

Report By

Phillip Johnston - Senior Development Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

Property

165 Fifth Avenue, Austral (Lot 1113 DP 2475)

Owner

Frances, Frank, Grace & John TETTE

Applicant

Frances Tette

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council has received and considered Development Application DA-908/2013 which seeks consent for a facilitating Torrens title subdivision creating two allotments of Lot 1113 DP 2475, known as 165 Fifth Avenue, Austral.

 

The Development Application was not required to be notified or exhibited to surrounding properties in accordance with the Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (LDCP 2008).

 

The Development Application was referred to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) for consideration on 26 May 2014, in accordance with the Council endorsed IHAP Charter and Procedure. The Panel concurred with the planning officer’s recommendation to approve the development application, subject to conditions of consent.

 

The development accords with Council’s strategic vision to facilitate diverse and more affordable housing options.

 

Council officers agree with the IHAP recommendation and it is therefore considered that Development Application DA-908/2013 should be approved.

 

 

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Development Application DA-908/2013 for a facilitating Torrens title subdivision creating two allotments, subject to the recommended conditions attached to the Council officer’s IHAP report.

 

REPORT

 

The Site

The subject site is identified as Lot 1113 in DP 2475 and is known as 165 Fifth Avenue, Austral. The site is rectangular in shape, the street frontage and rear boundary measures 80.47 metres with side boundaries measuring 150.88 metres. The site has a total area of 1.214 hectares.

 

The subject site currently contains two dwellings (to be situated on separate allotments as a result the proposed subdivision), which are situated to the west (proposed Lot 1) and east (proposed Lot 2) of each other. The western dwelling is situated approximately 23 metres from the street frontage, while the eastern dwelling is setback approximately 44 metres.

 

The locality is characterised as rural residential, with a rectangular lot layout as shown in Figure 1.

 

Description: http://adm-m-gis1/output/Buffer_ims_adm-m-gis1728810080362062.jpg

Figure 1: 2013 Aerial photograph of the subject site

 

 

The Proposal

Details of the proposed development are as follows:

 

·  Torrens title subdivision creating two allotments, each having areas measuring 6071m2

 

·  Proposed Lots 1 and 2 each provide a 40.235 metre frontage and side boundaries measuring 150.88 metres.

 

·  No construction works are proposed.

 

·  The application is accompanied by a written request to vary a development standard pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Regional Growth Centres) 2006. The variation seeks to vary Clause 4.1B Residential Density of SEPP (SRGC) 2006, which prescribes a minimum density requirement of 15 dwellings per hectare. The proposal maintains the existing two dwellings and no additional dwellings are proposed.

 

·  The proposed lot layout is shown within Figure 2.

 

Figure 2. Plan of proposed subdivision

 

Zoning

The subject site is zoned R2 Low Density Residential pursuant to the SEPP (SRGC) 2006. Clause 2.6 of the SEPP (Appendix 8) provides that subdivision is permissible within the R2 Low Density Residential zone applying to the land, subject to Council consent. An extract of the zoning map is provided in Figure 3.

 

Description: http://adm-m-gis1/output/Buffer_ims_adm-m-gis185246624232461.jpg

Figure 3. Zoning map extract of SEPP (SRGC) 2006

 

Section 79C: Relevant matters for consideration

An assessment of the application against the relevant matters for consideration prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 has been undertaken and detailed in the Council officer’s planning report. The assessment has concluded that the proposal is acceptable and is unlikely to result in any adverse impacts. The assessment report considered by the IHAP panel is attached to this report under separate cover (see Attachment 1).

 

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel

Pursuant to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, the proposal was referred to IHAP for consideration as the proposal includes a request to vary a development standard in excess of ten per cent, pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the SEPP (SRGC) 2006.

 

The Panel concurred with the planning officer’s recommendation to approve the application, subject to conditions of consent.

 

Conditions

A copy of the draft conditions of consent are attached to this report under separate cover (see Attachment 1).

 

Conclusion

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The application is considered to be worthy of support and is recommended for approval subject to conditions.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

IHAP report (Under separate cover)

2.View

IHAP recommendation (Under separate cover)

  


91

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 02

Alterations and additions and two lot Torrens title subdivision at 5 Durack Place, Casula

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

120346.2014

Report By

Barry Curran - Development Assessment Planner – Statutory Planning

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

Property

5 Durack Place, Casula (LOT 3087 DP 813122)

Owner

MR S EBADEH-AHVAZI

Applicant

DONYA CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council has received and considered a development application DA-1281/2013, proposing alterations and additions to the existing single storey dwelling, demolition of ancillary structures and Torrens title subdivision into a two lot battle-axe arrangement, at 5 Durack Place, Casula.

 

The application was referred to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) who recommended that the application be approved, subject to landscape conditions relating to the future driveway arrangement.

 

The application has been considered in the context of the applicable planning instruments and merit, and it is considered that the application should be approved, subject to additional amendments as recommended by the IHAP, which are discussed in detail in this report.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Development Application DA-1281/2013, subject to the recommended  conditions attached to the Council officers IHAP Report and as modified by IHAP and the Council officer as follows:

 

 

 

 

B.     PRIOR TO ISSUE OF A CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE

 

2a.     The proposed concrete driveway shall be located adjacent to the proposed boundary      with proposed Lot 2 and a 600mm wide landscape strip be created between the      proposed driveway and the boundary to the property to the north-west.

 

2b.     A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the PCA, prior to issue of any construction certificate.

 

2c.     The proposed allotment boundary of the battle-axe    handle where it traverses the          shared driveway, should be maintained at 3 metres wide     with a right of carriageway in           favour of proposed lot 2 where it overlaps the driveway of        the existing dwelling.

 

E.      PRIOR TO ISSUE OF A SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE

 

38a. The proposed driveway and landscaping should be constructed and installed prior to release of a subdivision certificate to ensure early establishment of landscaping.

 

42a. The following restriction as to user must be placed over proposed Lot 1 to benefit Lot 2. 

        Details shall be submitted with the application for a Subdivision Certificate.

 

(a)     A right of carriageway in favour of Lot 2 must be provided where it overlaps the

         driveway of the existing dwelling on Lot 1.

 

REPORT

 

Background

Council has received and considered a development application proposing alterations and additions to the existing single storey dwelling, demolition of ancillary structures and two lot Torrens title subdivision into a two lot battle-axe arrangement at 5 Durack Place, Casula.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the endorsed Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, the proposal is referred to the IHAP for consideration, and is now referred to Council for consideration and determination, as the proposed development includes a request to vary a development standard in excess of 10%, pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008.

 

At their meeting on 26 May 2014, the IHAP made the following recommendation:

 

The panel agrees with the recommendation contained within the assessment report subject to the inclusion of additional conditions of consent to address the following points:

 

“1.     The proposed concrete driveway shall be located adjacent to the proposed boundary      with proposed Lot 2 and a 600mm wide landscape strip be created between the         proposed driveway and the boundary to the property to the north-west.

 

2.       A detailed landscape plan should be submitted prior to issue of construction certificate. The proposed driveway and landscaping should be constructed and         installed prior to release of subdivision certificate to ensure early establishment of         landscaping.

 

3.       The proposed allotment boundary of the battle-axe    handle where it traverses the          shared driveway, should be maintained at 3 metres wide     with a right of carriageway in           favour of proposed lot 2 where it overlaps the driveway of        the existing dwelling.”

 

With respect to point 1 above, it is noted that the adjoining property to the north-west is identified as Lot 4003 within DP 817846.

 

The proposal

The application seeks consent for alterations and additions to the existing dwelling and two lot Torrens title subdivision as shown in Figure 1. The proposal also seeks a variation of 28% to the minimum lot width requirement of 5 metres (to the proposed access handle), as specified in Clause 7.13 Minimum lot width in Zones R1, R2, R3 and R4 of the LLEP 2008.

 

    Figure 1: Submitted Subdivision Plan

Note: proposed Lot 1 is adjacent to Durack Place and proposed Lot 2 is the battle-axe allotment, as per the subdivision plan shown in figure 1.

 

Accordingly, the application is accompanied by written requests, pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the LLEP 2008, to vary:

 

·    Clause 7.13 of the LLEP 2008, which prescribes the minimum subdivision lot width requirement.

The applicant has provided an indicative floor plan and building footprint for proposed lot 1 to enable consideration of the proposal with respect to Councils relevant development controls and standards.

 

 

 

The site

The subject site is identified as Lot 3087 DP 813122, 5 Durack Place, Casula. The site is zoned R2 – Low Density Residential, with a total site area of 920m2, and currently accommodates a single storey detached brick veneer dwelling.

 

SUBJECT SITE

 

 

Figure 2: Aerial Photograph of the subject site

 

IHAP Recommendation

The IHAP recommendation seeks to minimise the potential impacts of the future development through the imposition of adequate landscaping. In terms of amenity for proposed Lot 2, the shared driveway is recommended to be maintained at 3 metres, which will address the overlap of driveway of the existing lot.

 

The recommendations of the Panel are summarised and discussed below:

 

1. Location of driveway adjacent to the proposed boundary with Lot 2.

 

Given the orientation of the site, the location of the driveway to a position adjacent to the proposed Lot 2 provides a greater area to facilitate additional landscaping along the north-west boundary adjacent to the property located to the north-west of the subject site, (Lot 4003 within DP 817846). This will allow a further area of permeable space on the site, as well as softening a hard boundary edge.

 

 

 

 

 

2. Shared driveway

 

In terms of amenity for proposed Lot 2, the driveway where it traverses the shared area with Lot 1 in its proposed form, illustrates a curved edge which has the effect of decreasing the driveway width at a critical point. In recommending the continued driveway width being maintained at 3 metres, this would allow improved maneuverability and access across the shared driveway in the event of two potential vehicles using the driveway simultaneously.

 

It is evident that the IHAP recommendations would improve the design outcome of proposed Lots 1 and 2, particularly in terms of the additional landscaping recommended to adjoin the lot on the north-west boundary, and with regard to access and maneuverability.

 

On this basis, in accordance with the IHAP recommendations and the assessment conducted above, it is recommended that the following conditions be included in the consent as follows:

 

B.     PRIOR TO ISSUE OF A CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE

 

“2a.   The proposed concrete driveway shall be located adjacent to the proposed boundary      with proposed Lot 2 and a 600mm wide landscape strip be created between the         proposed driveway and the boundary to the property to the north-west.

 

2b.     A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the PCA, prior to issue of any construction certificate.

 

2c.     The proposed allotment boundary of the battle-axe    handle where it traverses the          shared driveway, should be maintained at 3 metres wide     with a right of carriageway in           favour of proposed lot 2 where it overlaps the driveway of        the existing dwelling.

 

E.      PRIOR TO ISSUE OF A SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE

 

38a. The proposed driveway and landscaping should be constructed and installed prior to release of a subdivision certificate to ensure early establishment of landscaping.

 

42a. The following restriction as to user must be placed over proposed Lot 1 to benefit Lot 2. 

        Details shall be submitted with the application for a Subdivision Certificate.

 

(a)     A right of carriageway in favour of Lot 2 must be provided where it overlaps the 

         driveway of the existing dwelling on Lot 1.”

 

Conclusion

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and is worthy of support. On this basis, the application is recommended for approval, subject to the draft conditions contained within the council officers IHAP report, and the additional conditions contained herein.

 

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Environmental and Sustainability

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.


Social and Cultural

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Applicant Details

2.View

IHAP Report (Under separate cover)

3.View

IHAP Recommendation (Under separate cover)

  


97

IHAP 02

Alterations and additions and two lot Torrens title subdivision at 5 Durack Place, Casula

Attachment 1

Applicant Details

 


98

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 03

Construction of a nine storey residential flat building containing thirty-six residential units with basement car parking and ancillary site works

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

121338.2014

Report By

Rodger Roppolo - Development Assessment Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

Property

Lot 34 and Lot 35, DP 35236

4-6 Browne Parade, Warwick Farm

Owner

Otis Developments Pty Ltd

Applicant

Otis Developments Pty Ltd

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The development application DA-1413/2013 seeks consent for the construction of a residential flat building comprising a total of 36 residential units at 4-6 Browne Parade, Warwick Farm.

 

The development application was exhibited in accordance with Liverpool Development Control Plan (LDCP) 2008 and one submission was received objecting to the proposal. The concerns raised in the submissions do warrant refusal of the application.

 

The application was referred to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) who recommended that the application be deferred subject to additional information being submitted and considered in respect to design guidelines. The applicant has since provided additional information addressing the concerns raised by the IHAP.

 

Based on an assessment of the application in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment (EP&A) Act 1979, it is considered that the proposed development is acceptable. Accordingly, the application is recommended for approval.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Approves Development Application No. DA-1413/2013, subject to the recommended conditions attached to the Council officer’s IHAP Report

 

2.       Notify in writing, the persons who made a submission with regard to the proposed development.

 

REPORT

 

The Site

The subject site is identified as Lot 34 and Lot 35 in DP 35236, 4-6 Browne Parade, Warwick Farm.

 

The Proposal

The development application seeks consent for the construction of a residential flat building comprising a total of 36 residential units. The key components of the proposed development are as follows:

 

·    Construction of a nine-storey residential flat building containing 36 residential units comprising of:

1 bedroom units x 4

2 bedroom units x 28

3 bedroom units x 4

·    Car parking for a total of 43 spaces is provided in Basement Levels 1 and 2.

·    Deep soil landscaping is provided along site boundaries which will accommodate medium to larger trees. 

 

Perspective drawings of the proposed development are provided below:

 

 

Exhibition of Proposal

The development application was publically exhibited for a period of 14 days between 23 January 2014 – 7 February 2014 in accordance with Liverpool Development Control Plan (LDCP) 2008. One submission was received objecting to the proposal.

 

The Issues

The development is generally compliant with applicable planning provisions, with the exception of minor variations to the side and rear setback controls contained within the LDCP 2008, and daylight access and building separation guidelines of the Residential Flat Design Code (RFDC). Other key issues pertain to concerns raised as part of the community consultation process undertaken, where a submission was received objecting to the development.

 

The above issues have been addressed in detail within the Council Officer’s IHAP Report (See Attachment 2, under separate cover) and do no warrant refusal of the Development Application.

 

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel

On Monday 26 May 2014, the application was referred to the IHAP in accordance with the Council endorsed IHAP Charter and Procedure. The IHAP recommended deferral of the determination of the application pending receipt of additional plans and specifications to address the following concerns:

 

1.   The panel raised concerns relating to the shadow impact of the adjoining buildings to the north (currently under construction and approved to a maximum height of 16 storeys) on the proposed development. On this basis, a further assessment was requested to determine that the development complies with the requirements for solar access contained within SEPP 65 and the RFDC guidelines; and

2.   The panel raised concerns relating to the limited amenity of the proposed common open space area due to its location on the southern side of the adjoining building. Specific concern was raised that the common open space area would not comply with the objectives for common open space in SEPP 65.

Submission of Additional Information

Following the IHAP meeting, additional information was submitted by the applicant addressing the concerns raised by the IHAP as outlined above.

 

Shadow analysis diagrams (See Attachment 4, under separate cover) were submitted by the applicant which takes into account the overshadowing impacts generated from the adjoining 16 storey residential flat building (currently under construction) on the proposed development. The shadow diagrams illustrate that 70% of the proposed units will receive solar access for a minimum period of two hours, which demonstrates compliance with the requirements of solar access in SEPP 65.

 

In regards to the concerns raised by the panel in relation to the location of the common open space area, it is acknowledged that the common open space is located to the north eastern corner of the site, which is the best orientation for open space in respect to amenity and natural sunlight. The shadow diagrams illustrate that the common open space will receive a minimum of two hours of solar access between the hours of 10:30am to 12:30pm on the winter solstice. Overall, the common open space complies with the objectives of open space in SEPP 65.

 

Conclusion

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations contained within Section 79C of the EP&A Act 1979. The application is considered to have merit and is unlikely to result in an adverse impact on the amenity of adjoining properties.

 

Accordingly, the application is recommended for approval subject to the recommended conditions of consent.

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Environmental and Sustainability

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Applicant Details

2.View

IHAP Report (Under separate cover)

3.View

IHAP Recommendation (Under separate cover)

4.View

Shadow Analysis Diagrams (Under separate cover)

  


103

IHAP 03

Construction of a nine storey residential flat building containing thirty-six residential units with basement car parking and ancillary site works

Attachment 1

Applicant Details

 


104

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 04

Subdivision of two existing lots into 13 Torrens Title lots; road construction and tree removal at Lot 423 and Lot 41 San Cristobal Drive, Green Valley

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

122664.2014

Report By

Brendon Clendenning - Senior Development Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

Property

Lot 423 of DP: 866612 &  Lot 164 of DP 1157952

Owner

Frank Morizzi

Applicant

Roy Morizzi

 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council has received and considered a development application DA-1291/2013, proposing the subdivision of two existing lots into thirteen Torrens title lots; road construction and tree removal at Lot 423 San Cristobal Drive, Green Valley.

 

This application was referred to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) who recommended that the determination of the application be approved subject to review and further consideration of draft Condition 19, which requires the creation of a drainage easement, and subject to the inclusion of additional conditions to reduce the hardstand area in the proposed cul-de-sac.

 

The IHAP recommendation has been considered in the context of applicable planning instruments and Development Control Plans and it is concluded that Condition 19 may be deleted subject to the imposition of an alternative condition, and that there is no scope to reduce the amount of hardstand area within the cul-de-sac. These matters are discussed in further detail later in this report.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approves Development  Application DA-1291/2013, subject to the recommended conditions attached to the Council officer’s IHAP Report and as modified by the following additional changes:

 

a.   Delete Condition 19 as contained within the IHAP report.

b.   Insert the following new condition to be satisfied prior to the issue of a Subdivision Certificate:

“Lot 12 and Lot 13 shall each be burdened by a restriction on the use of land which states that the burdened lots have no building entitlement. The 88B Instrument shall state that each restriction on the use of land shall not be extinguished or altered without the written consent of Liverpool City Council”.

 

 

REPORT

 

Background

Council has received and considered a development application proposing the subdivision of two existing lots into thirteen Torrens title lots; road construction and tree removal at Lot 423 San Cristobal Drive, Green Valley.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the endorsed Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, the proposal was referred to the IHAP for consideration, and is now referred to Council for consideration and determination, as the proposed development includes a request to vary a development standard in excess of 10%; pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (LLEP 2008).

 

At their meeting on 26 May 2014, IHAP made the following recommendations:

 

“The Panel recommends that Council approves DA-1291/2013 for proposed 13 lot Torrens title subdivision, road construction and tree removal at Lot 423 DP 866612 and Lot 164 DP 1157952, San Cristobal Drive, Green Valley subject to conditions as recommended by Council officers and conditions recommended in the Panel’s minutes…”

 

The additional conditions recommended by the panel, were discussed in further detail within the recommendation, as follows:

 

“To mitigate the extensive hard stand area in the cul-de-sac, the Panel recommends that Council require the cul-de-sac to be constructed of permeable paving and, if appropriate, include centrally located landscaping (including a tree).

 

The applicant questioned the meaning of proposed condition 19, noting that the extension of San Cristobal Drive will allow for stormwater to be collected within the new road. Condition 19 appears to require creation of an easement over proposed Lot 13 to drain San Cristobal Drive. The applicant indicated that the owner had allowed Council to temporarily drain stormwater across the development site from San Cristobal Drive however there is no agreement to a continuation of this arrangement once the site is developed. The Panel considers that creation of a permanent drainage easement in this location appears to be onerous and unnecessary. The Panel recommends that Council officers review the relevance of Condition 19”.

 

The Proposal

§     The development application proposes the following:

·    Removal of 45 trees.

·    Subdivision of the existing two lots into thirteen Torrens title lots.

·    Construction and continuation of Bernier Crescent to adjoining sites along the eastern and western boundaries.

 

Figure 1: Plan of proposed subdivision

 

DP 1157952 indicates that there is a drainage easement burdening the land. The proposal seeks to continue the drainage easement along the southern boundary of proposed Lot 13 and the western boundary of Proposed Lot 12, as indicated in the above subdivision plan.

 

Figure 2: Extract of DP 1157952

 

The proposal includes three lots with a minimum lot width under 10 metres, with each of these representing a numerical non-compliance with the requirements of the LLEP 2008 for minimum lot width.

 

The application is accompanied by a written request, pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the LLEP 2008, to vary Clause 7.13 which prescribes the minimum lot width subdivision requirements.

 

The Site

The subject site is known as Lot 423 DP 866612 and Lot 164 DP 1157952, San Cristobal Drive, Green Valley, and has a total site area of 4,982m2. The site is accessible from the western end of San Cristobal Drive and Bernier Way. The site is currently sparsely occupied by trees, and contains no buildings.

Subject Site

 

Figure 3: Aerial image of the subject site

 

Assessment of Additional Information requested by IHAP

 

Reduction in Hardstand Area

To mitigate the extensive hard stand area within the cul-de-sac, the IHAP recommended that Council require the cul-de-sac to be constructed of permeable paving and, if appropriate, include centrally located landscaping (including a tree).

 

Upon review of this matter, it was considered that as the road had been provided in accordance with the DCP layout, and in accordance with Council specifications, there was limited scope to require the provision of permeable paving. Further, it was determined that the provision of centrally located landscaping was not practical as the cul-de-sac would not be able to accommodate a 11m rigid vehicle, which is required for the management of waste services.

 

Stormwater Drainage

An overland flow path is currently provided on the western end of the subject site, via a depression through proposed Lot 12 and proposed Lot 13. The overland flow path enables storm water to pass from San Cristobal Avenue to the north of the subject land, through to the drainage reserve to the south of the subject site.

 

The applicant has indicated that this depression was deliberately provided in order to enable overland flow to accommodate the subdivision developments adjoining the subject land to the north and east, being works approved as part of DA-733/2007 and DA-853/2009.

 

To the west of the subject land, a staged subdivision was approved within DA-426/2002. The third and final stage of the subdivision was approved within DA-924/2005. An Engineering Construction Certificate was issued by a Private Certifier in relation to DA-924/2005, despite the subsurface drainage of San Cristobal Avenue being provided some distance from the subject site. As a consequence, the applicant is unable to connect the subsurface drainage of the portion of San Cristobal Avenue within the site, which adjoins to the site immediately to the west. This effectively prevents the drainage of San Cristobal Avenue, as San Cristobal Avenue falls from east to west.

 

As a consequence, the western end of the portion of San Cristobal Avenue that is contained within the subject land would be prone to localised flooding. To address this matter, the following condition was recommended in the report presented to IHAP:

 

“19.      An easement to drain water of suitable width must be provided through proposed Lot 12 and 13 to benefit the Council. The pipe within the easement must be connected to the existing pit within San Cristobal Drive and convey stormwater to the channel. Details of this easement must be included with any application for a Subdivision Certificate”.

 

During the IHAP meeting, the applicant requested that this condition be deleted, as the applicant was of the opinion that this condition unfairly impacted upon the development potential of the site, and benefited the owner of the site to the west, as that site would not necessarily need to drain San Cristobal Avenue if Condition 19 was imposed. On this basis, the IHAP has recommended that Council review this condition.

 

Following the IHAP meeting, Council indicated to the applicant that the drainage of San Cristobal Avenue to the west is being pursued further with the owner of the site adjoining to the west. However, in the event that this matter is not resolved, or the development is not finalised in a timely manner, it is within Council’s duty of care to require an alternative arrangement to prevent localised flooding to the subject site. However, given the impact of the condition on the development potential of the subject site, it is agreed that the condition could be amended.

 

The applicant suggested that Lot 12 and Lot 13 be approved only as residue lots, with a restriction benefiting Council to be placed on the 88B Instrument, which indicates that a building may not be erected on Lot 12 or Lot 13; and if the drainage issue is resolved in the future, the applicant may then seek to have that restriction extinguished by Council. In the event that the drainage to San Cristobal Avenue is not provided by the property owner of the adjoining property to the west, the applicant may then seek a Section 96 application to provide a permanent and alternative drainage easement.

 

As a consequence, it is recommended that draft Condition 19 be deleted, and the following condition of consent be imposed, to be satisfied prior to the issue of a Subdivision Certificate:

 

            “Lot 12 and Lot 13 shall each be burdened by a restriction on the use of land which states that the lot has no building entitlement. The 88B Instrument shall state that each restriction on the use of land shall not be extinguished or altered without the written consent of Council”.

 

Conclusion

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and is worthy of support. On this basis, the application is recommended for approval, subject to the draft conditions presented to IHAP, including the deletion of Draft Condition 19, and the inclusion of the additional condition described herein.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

 


Social and Cultural

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

IHAP report for DA-1291/2013 (Under separate cover)

2.View

IHAP recommendation for DA-1291/2013 (Under separate cover)

   


111

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Chief Executive Officer Report

 

CEO 01

Supporting our Locals

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Lead partnerships and collaboration with community, business and governments

Key Policy

Property Strategy

File Ref

117136.2014

Report By

Matthew Walker - Group Manager Business Excellence

Approved By

Rob Noble - Acting Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This is report is prepared in response to the Notice of Motion tabled at the Council meeting of 26 March 2014 regarding Supporting Our Locals.

 

Liverpool City Council aims to establish and maintain an environment for long term sustainable local economy and presently undertakes a number of strategies to support local existing businesses. Further information is available within the below Report.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receive and note this report.

 

REPORT

 

Liverpool City Council is committed to supporting existing local businesses and creating an environment for a long term sustainable local economy. With Council expenditure of approximately $90 million on goods and services every year, it is evident that there is an opportunity for Council to support local business through its procurement practices.

 

A recent trend across local councils is to introduce a preferencing policy, this is a policy document purports that to give local suppliers an advantage against non-local suppliers when evaluating offers received. Whilst this practice has its merits, the practical application to a tender process is a complex task  that opens the procurement process to public scrutiny  with risk of  the transparency of the process  being called into question. Additionally, applying such a policy to a tender evaluation process can often mean Council does not necessarily achieve the best value for money outcome.

 

Section 1.6 of the Tendering Guidelines for NSW states in relation to local supply:

"The implementation of local preference policies is not necessarily inconsistent
with the principles of National Competition Policy. However, the use of local
preference in the evaluation of tenders and awarding of contracts possesses
inherent risks in terms of anti-competitiveness and the maintenance of
defensibility, accountability and probity
."

 

Some of the issues and considerations when applying a local preference policy include:

 

-     What constitutes “local”. Depending on the commodity being purchased often determines where it can be sourced from. For example, trades persons can be commonly sought in the Liverpool LGA but engineers are more widespread.

A further consideration on what constitutes “local” is how the locality of the company is assessed and verified. Often businesses have a business or head office address in one geographic location but employ local employees and subcontractors. This information is difficult to obtain and verify.

 

-     How to fairly apply a local preference in evaluating quotes. Consideration would need to be given on how to practically apply a preference. Some options include evaluating local supplier’s offers at a discounted price or applying a percentage weighting to the evaluation criteria. This can often mean the best value for money offer is overlooked or other value added benefits are not fairly considered.

For the reasons noted above a local preferencing policy hasn’t been applied at Liverpool City Council.  Council can provide support and preference to local suppliers  by providing them with the tools, information and opportunities they need to develop and grow within the local economic environment.  By implementing other innovative initiatives that can withstand public scrutiny.

 

Procurement has given some consideration to preferencing local suppliers and has since implemented the following initiatives:

 

-     Local Supplier Register – In May 2014 a local supplier register has been made available on Council’s website. This is a register where local businesses can provide their company details and the information is stored in a spreadsheet. Currently at LCC, quotes under $150,000 are managed in house and the requesting officer chooses three companies they would like to quote. Now procurement can issue the supplier interest register to all council employees and direct requesting officers to choose local companies who have registered their interest to work with Council.

 

-     Supplier Forum – Council publically invited local businesses to attend a supplier forum held on 20 May 2014. This forum aims to provide local suppliers with information and resources around procurement processes at Liverpool Council and included information on where to find tenders and some tips on submitting an offer. The forum included guest speakers from WSROC, Local Government Procurement and Industry Capability Network who provided the attendees with more useful information on their respective areas. Council intends to frequently run supplier forums to continue to expand suppliers knowledge base.

 

-     Tenders valued at greater than $150,000 will continue to be publically advertised on e-tendering portal Tenderlink, in the two local Liverpool papers and on the Liverpool City Council website.

 

Internal training to Council employees on Procurement practices can focus and encourage officers to “choose local” where the option exists..

 

The above initiatives will not only provide local suppliers with more business opportunities, they will also increase suppliers knowledge and understanding of the operations of Liverpool Council, procurement within the local public sector, and will provide suppliers with additional resources that they can access to obtain further business opportunities. 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Deliver services that are customer focused.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


114

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Chief Executive Officer Report

 

CEO 02

Staff Matter

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Workforce Management Plan

File Ref

135355.2014

Report By

Rob Noble - Acting Chief Executive Officer

Approved By

Rob Noble - Acting Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The report proposes to deal with a clause of a staff member’s contract.

 

The report recommends that the arrangement suggested in the confidential report be adopted.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the arrangement suggested in the confidential report be adopted by Council and it remain confidential pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(a) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains personnel matters concerning particular individuals (other than Councillors).

 

REPORT

 

The report proposes to deal with a clause of a staff member’s contract.

 

The report recommends that the arrangement suggested in the confidential report be adopted.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil  


116

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Executive Director Report

 

ED 01

Local Government NSW Annual Conference

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

127270.2014

Report By

George Georgakis - Service Manager Council and Executive Services

Approved By

Julie Hately - Executive Director

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2014 is being held in Coffs Harbour from Sunday 19 October to Tuesday 21 October 2014.

 

The Local Government NSW Association entitles Liverpool City Council to 11 voting delegates and this report recommends that Council seeks nominations for voting delegates to enable planning for accommodation and travel arrangements. 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That:

 

1.   Council nominates up to 11 delegates to attend the 2014 Local Government New South Wales Annual Conference to vote on motions.

 

2.    Council staff prepare a report to the July Council meeting to consider proposed motions to be submitted to the Conference. 

 

REPORT

 

The 2014 Local Government NSW Annual Conference is being held in Coffs Harbour from

Sunday 19 October to Tuesday 21 October 2014. The Conference is the annual policy making event for councils who are members of Local Government NSW. Councils work together through Local Government NSW to promote local government and advocate on behalf of their communities for local democracy, informed decision making and good governance.

 

 

Following feedback from delegates in 2013 in Sydney, where some delegates requested the discussion of specific motions and others requested the discussion of consolidated overarching issues, the Board has decided to try to balance both. The Board has set the first day of business as the primary time to discuss all issues and motions, and a session time will be put aside to ask how Councils wish to deal with motions and issues into the future.

 

This report recommends that Council seeks nominations for voting delegates to enable planning for accommodation and travel arrangements. A separate report will be submitted to the July 2014 Council meeting to consider proposed motions to be submitted to the Conference.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Costs will be approximately $2,500 per delegate for registration, travel, accommodation and meals.

Environmental and Sustainability

Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Act as an environmental leader in the community.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Local Government NSW Draft Program and Conference Information 2014

  


121

ED 01

Local Government NSW Annual Conference

Attachment 1

Local Government NSW Draft Program and Conference Information 2014

 


 


 


 


 


123

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Executive Director Report

 

ED 02

Councillor Access to Information and Interaction with Staff Policy

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Information Technology Strategy

File Ref

128877.2014

Report By

George Georgakis - Service Manager Council and Executive Services

Approved By

Julie Hately - Executive Director

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report proposes changes to the Councillor Access to Information and Interaction with Staff Policy to provide Councillors with access to additional Council officers and to make amendments to the timeframe for Mayoral, Deputy Mayor and Councillor enquiries to be responded to.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council adopts the revised Councillor Access to Information and Interaction with Staff Policy.

 

 

REPORT

 

Council has in place a variety of policies that provide guidance and clarification on a number of matters. These policies contribute to good public decision making and increase Council’s transparency and accountability to the community.

 

The Councillor Access to Information and Interaction with Staff Policy was last updated in June 2013. Policies are periodically reviewed to ensure they reflect current practices and legislative requirements.

 

The primary purpose of the policy is to provide a process for the Mayor and Councillors to access Council staff, records, information and buildings. This assists Councillors to exercise their statutory role as a member of the governing body and to undertake their civic duty in an orderly and regulated manner.

 

This report presents an updated Councillor Access to Information and Interaction with Staff Policy by proposing changes to provide Councillors with greater access to other Council officers and to also make amendments to the timeframe for Mayoral, Deputy Mayor and Councillor enquiries to be responded to.

 

It is recommended that all Service Managers, the Mayor’s Senior Policy Advisor and the Chief Executive Officer’s Personal Assistant be added to the list of officers who can interact with Councillors for “Councillor support and requests” and Service Managers be added the list of officers who can interact with Councillors for “Operational advice” as outlined in Attachment A (Interaction between Councillors and Council staff) of the Policy.

 

It is also recommended that Clause 4.7 be amended so that the timeframe for responses to Mayoral and Deputy Mayor requests be altered to 5 ordinary days and the timeframe for responses to Councillors requests be altered to 7 ordinary days. This change is recommended to provide adequate time for staff to undertake necessary investigations and provide complete and all-inclusive responses. The definition of “ordinary days” has also been included in the Policy.

 

The proposed changes are shown in the attached document with track changes.

 

It is recommended that Council adopts the revised Councillor Access to Information and Interaction with Staff Policy as attached to this report.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Councillor Access to Information and Interaction with Staff Policy

  


125

ED 02

Councillor Access to Information and Interaction with Staff Policy

Attachment 1

Councillor Access to Information and Interaction with Staff Policy

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


134

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Executive Director Report

 

ED 03

Annual Reporting of Contracts for Senior Staff

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Workforce Management Plan

File Ref

128889.2014

Report By

Matthew Walker - Group Manager Business Excellence

Approved By

Julie Hately - Executive Director

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Section 339 of the Local Government Act 1993 states that the General Manager must, at least once annually, report to Council on the contractual conditions of designated senior staff positions.

 

This report outlines the number of designated senior staff positions currently in Council's organisational structure for the previous 12 months and the contractual conditions of each senior staff position, as required by Section 338 of the Local Government Act 1993. It is recommended that Council receives and notes the report.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the report.

 

 

 

REPORT

 

Pursuant to Section 339 of the Local Government Act 1993 (herein referred to as the Act), the general manager must, at least once annually, report to Council on the contractual conditions of designated senior staff position.

 

Section 338 of the Act states:

 

1.   The General Manager and other senior staff of a council are to be employed under contracts that are performance-based.

 

2.   The term of a contract must not be less than 12 months or more than five years (including any option for renewal). A term that is less than 12 months is taken to be for 12 months and a term for more than five years is taken to be limited to five years.

As per the Act, all of Council’s designated senior staff are employed under a contract of employment that has a performance based component.

 

All senior positions are based on a standard contract that is issued by the Office of Local Government. The contractual arrangements for the designated senior staff appointed in those positions within the last 12 months are outlined below.

 

Position

Incumbent

Contract Term

Expiry Date

Chief Executive Officer

Farooq Portelli

Contract End 1 July 2014 as per council resolution 30 April 2014

NA

Carl Wulff

4 Years

23 June 2018

Executive Director

Julie Hately

3 years

27 March 2016

Executive Director

Vacant

NA

NA

Group Manager Strategy & Executive

Biljana Sankovic

Contract End 1 July 2014 as per council resolution 28 May 2014

NA

Group Manager

Community & Culture

Kiersten Fishburn

3 years

28 April 2016

Group Manager Economy & Engagement

Michael Cullen

3 years

28 April 2016

Group Manager

Infrastructure & Environment

Rajen Autar

3 years

28 April 2016

Group Manager Business Excellence

Matthew Walker

3 years

28 April 2016

Group Manager

City Presentation

Gino Belsito

3 years

28 April 2016

Group Manager

Governance

Nadia Napoletano

3 years

16 June 2016

Group Manager

Planning & Growth

Toni Averay

3 Years

14 July 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Council at its meeting on 28 May 2014 amended the organisational structure to include the following senior staff positions effective from 2 July 2014:

 

Chief Executive Officer

Executive Director x 2 positions

Group Manager, Community and Culture

Group Manager, Economy and Engagement

Group Manager, Infrastructure and Environment

Group Manager, Business Excellence

Group Manager, City Presentation

Group Manager, Governance

Group Manager, Planning and Growth

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


137

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Executive Director Report

 

ED 04

Endorsement of the 2013-17 Delivery Program and 2014-15 Operational Plan

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

128850.2014

Report By

Hiba Soueid - Service Manager Corporate Strategy and Performance

Approved By

Julie Hately - Executive Director

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report proposes to adopt Council’s 2013-2017 Delivery Program and 2014-2015

Operational Plan in accordance with Section 404 and 405 of the Local Government Act 1993  which requires Council to review its Delivery Program and adopt its annual Operational Plan by 30 June each year.

 

At its meeting on 7 May 2014, Council resolved to place the draft Delivery Program and Operational Plan and Budget on public exhibition to allow for public comments and submissions and to receive a further report after a review of public submissions.

 

This report outlines submissions received during the exhibition period and outlines any changes which have been made to the document as a result of submissions received.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Adopts the 2013-17 Delivery Program and 2014-15 Operational Plan with the changes outlined in this report.

 

2.       Makes the rates and charges for the financial year commencing 1 July 2014 as outlined in the Statement of Revenue Policy and exhibited in the draft Delivery Program and Operational Plan.

 

3.       Approves the fees and charges outlined below to be placed on public exhibition for 28 days and that a further report to Council be provided with any submissions made:

 

3.1     Attached changes to the fee structure for onsite sewerage fees.

 

3.2     New fee structure to apply to construction certificates for Class 2-9 Commercial / Industrial, Class 10A Outbuildings over $5,000 Residential and Class 2-9 and 10A Commercial over $5,000 if the application is lodged as a combined Development Application and Construction Certificate including registration.

3.3     Change in cost of after-hours venue hire for the Michael Wenden Aquatic Leisure Centre from not applicable in 2013-14 to subject to negotiation in 2014-15.

 

4.   Writes to the individuals and groups who provided a submission, thanking them for their submission and provides a response to their feedback and, or comments.

 

 

 

REPORT

 

2013-17 Delivery Program and 2014-15 Operational Plan and Budget

 

The Delivery Program documents all of the principal activities which Council will be delivering during its term of office. It is Council’s commitment to the community and outlines how it will contribute to achieving the strategies listed in the Community Strategic Plan. The Delivery Program addresses all of Council’s operations and allocates high level responsibilities for each activity.

 

The Operational Plan outlines the specific actions which Council will deliver as well as the budget for the 2014-15 financial year and Statement of Revenue Policy (Fees and Charges).

 

For improved integration and functionality, the Delivery Program and Operational Plan have been included in the same document. It includes the following:

 

·    Council's principal activities over four years:

·    Performance measures to determine effectiveness;

·    2014-15 actions;

·    2014-15 draft budget;

·    2014-15 proposed capital works program; and

·    2014-15 draft revenue pricing policy (proposed rates, fees and charges).

 

The Local Government Act 1993 requires Council to undertake a detailed review of its Community Strategic Plan and Delivery Program by 30 June in the year following an election. The Operational Plan and annual budget are required to be adopted by 30 June of each year.

 

2014-15 Budget

 

At its February meeting, Council resolved to apply to the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) for continuation of the previously approved nine per cent special rate variation (SRV) which expires on 30 June 2014 and an estimated notional rate increase of thee percent. As the result of the application was not known at the time of preparing the draft budget, two budget options were placed on public exhibition. Option 1 included the nine per cent SRV and Option 2 which showed a reduction in Council’s rate revenue and expenditure.

 

On Tuesday 3 June 2014, Council received noticed that its application to IPART was successful and that it would receive a permanent increase of 12 per cent to the rates base. Subsequently, budget option 1 has been proposed as the budget model for next year.

 

Capital Works

 

Council has committed $86.9m to capital works in the 2014-15 budget, details of works to be undertaken are available in the full document provided under separate cover.

 

Proposed major works include:

 

·    Detailed designs and commencing construction of Carnes Hill Recreation and Community Centre.

·    Extension of Kurrajong Road – Kookaburra to Sarah Holland Drive.

·    Investigation and design of and land acquisitions for a Warwick Farm bypass road.

·    Construction of CBD Trunk Drainage – Elizabeth Street and George to College Streets.

·    Construction of Amalfi Park Detention Basin.

·    Playground Replacement.

·    Road Works

Devonshire Road, Rossmore

Maxwells Avenue, Sadleir

Wilson Road, Hinchinbrook.

 

Proposed Changes

 

During the exhibition period, staff recommended several changes to the Statement of Revenue Policy (fees and charges). These have been included as attachments to the report (Attachments 1 to 3). It is proposed that these fees and charges be placed on public exhibition for 28 days to allow for public comments and submissions. The proposed changes are as follows:

 

Item

Changes

Onsite Sewerage Fees

Various changes to the fee structure for onsite sewerage fees

Statutory Planning

A new fee structure to apply to construction certificates for Class 2-9 Commercial / Industrial, Class 10A Outbuildings over $5,000 Residential and Class 2-9 + 10A Commercial over $5,000 if the application is lodged as a combined Development Application and Construction Certificate including registration

Michael Wenden Aquatic Leisure Centre

Change in cost of after-hours venue hire, from not applicable in 2013-14 to subject to negotiation in 2014-15

 

In addition, several editorial and incidental changes have also been made to the draft documents as a result of internal staff feedback. These changes are minor in nature with their purpose being to improve readability and clarity of the documents.

 

 

 

 

Public Exhibition

 

The documents were placed on Public Exhibition between Friday 9 May and Tuesday 10 May. The following methods were undertaken in order to solicit public feedback and input:

 

·    Hard copies were placed at various locations including Council’s Customer Service Centre and all libraries;

·    Presentations were made at the Rural Community Forum on Tuesday 13 May and Urban Community Forum on Tuesday 20 May;

·    The document was placed on Council’s homepage and the Liverpool Listens page;

·    Public notices were placed in local papers;

·    Updates were made on Council’s Facebook and Twitter account directing people to the plans.

As a result of the exhibition period, six submissions were received. Comments made during the submission process include requests for more information around certain areas in the budget, suggestions regarding capital improvement projects which should be undertaken, support for the allocation of funds towards the Warwick Farm bypass road and the waiving of several fees. A summary of the items raised during the public exhibition period and officer responses to these submissions have been attached for your information (Attachment 4). 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

This report recommends adoption of Council’s Delivery Program and Operational Plan which encompass all economic and financial, environmental and sustainability, social and cultural and civic leadership and governance considerations of Council.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Proposed statutory planning fees to be placed on public exhibition

2.View

Proposed on-site sewerage fees for public exhibition

3.View

Proposed fee to after hours hire of Michael Wenden Acquatic Leisure Centre

4.View

Summary of submissions received and officer comments

5.View

2013-17 Delivery Program and 2014-15 Operational Plan and Budget (Including Statement of Revenue Policy - Fees and Charges) (Under Separate Cover)

  


141

ED 04

Endorsement of the 2013-17 Delivery Program and 2014-15 Operational Plan

Attachment 1

Proposed statutory planning fees to be placed on public exhibition

 


 


143

ED 04

Endorsement of the 2013-17 Delivery Program and 2014-15 Operational Plan

Attachment 2

Proposed on-site sewerage fees for public exhibition

 


2

ED 04

Endorsement of the 2013-17 Delivery Program and 2014-15 Operational Plan

Attachment 3

Proposed fee to after hours hire of Michael Wenden Acquatic Leisure Centre

 


145

ED 04

Endorsement of the 2013-17 Delivery Program and 2014-15 Operational Plan

Attachment 4

Summary of submissions received and officer comments

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


155

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Business Excellence Report

 

GMBE 01

Statutory Investment Report May 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

127402.2014

Report By

Christian  Hope - Senior Financial Accountant

Approved By

Matthew Walker - Group Manager Business Excellence

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report details the balance of investments held at 31 May 2014 in a form compliant with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council's Investment Policy at the time of entering into each transaction.

 

Council held investments with a market value of $152 million as at 31 May 2014. The portfolio yielded a return of 4.07 per cent being 137 basis points above the benchmark of 2.7 per cent for the month of May 2014.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes this report.

 

REPORT

Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 requires that the Responsible Accounting Officer must provide Council with a written report setting out details of all money that Council has invested under section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993.

Council's portfolio of $152 million consisted of $15.1 million invested in various debt securities (bonds) with maturity dates ranging from one year to thirteen and a half years; $124.5 million in short to medium term deposits; and $12.4 million in Cash at Call bank accounts. Council yielded a return of 4.07 per cent being 137 basis points above the benchmark of 2.7 per cent for the month of May.


As at the end of May 2014 the ratio of market value compared to face value of various debt securities is shown in the table below.

 

Asset Class

May-14

Jun-13

Senior Debts (FRN's)

101.59%

 101.79%

Senior Bonds (NCD & Corporate Bonds)

104.19%

 106.3%

MBS (Reverse Mortgage Backed Securities)

  59.93%

  57.07%

Total

  93.89%

  90.89%

 

Council is fully compliant with the requirements of the Ministerial Investment Order including the grand fathering provision in regards to its investment portfolio holdings. The grand fathering provision states that Council may continue to hold to maturity, redeem or sell investments that comply with previous Ministerial Investment Orders. Any new investments must comply with the most recent Order.

 

At its June 2014 meeting, the Board of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 2.5 per cent. A statement released on 3 June 2014 by Glenn Stevens, Governor of the RBA commenting on the RBA decision is attached to this report.

 

The return on term deposits over medium term (2 to 3 years to maturity) is currently at 4.1 per cent to 4.35 per cent per annum. Short term deposits rate (less than one year to maturity) is hovering from 3.3 per cent for 30 days to 3.8 per cent for one year.

 

Council continues to closely monitor the investments in its portfolio to ensure continued compliance and minimal exposure to risk.

 

Portfolios break down (at "Market Value")

 

The chart below shows the proportion of Council's investment portfolio by category of investment type at market value.

 

 

 

 

Movement in Investment Holding

 

Council held investments with a market value of $152 million as at 31 May 2014 compared to $144.4 million as at 30 April 2014.  A summary of major types of receipts and payments for the period is attached to this report.

 

Portfolio Maturity Profile

 

The chart below shows the market value of funds invested at different durations to maturity.

 

 

 

Investment Portfolio at a Glance

 

Portfolio Performance vs. 90 day annualised Bank Bill Index for the month

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

The portfolio yield for May is above the annualised benchmark for the month (4.07% against 2.7%).

Portfolio Performance vs. 90 day Bank Bill index over the 12 month period.

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

The portfolio yield for the past 12 month period is above the benchmark for the same period (4.28% against 2.68%).

Annual Income vs. Budget

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

Council’s investment income on

General Fund was $10k above the year to date revised budget.

 

 

 

 

 

Investment Policy Compliance

 

Legislative Requirements

 

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

Fully Compliant.

Portfolio Credit Rating Limit

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

Fully Compliant.

Institutional Exposure Limits

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

Fully Compliant.

Term to Maturity Limits

       X

Exceeded term to maturity limit on

existing Mortgage Back Securities

purchased in 2006 and in 2007

The maturity dates have been

extended by the issuer of the

securities to reflect the revised

actuarial expected weighted average life (WAL) of when they are most likely to be fully paid.

 

Certificate of Responsible Accounting Officer

 

The Group Manager Business Excellence, as Responsible Accounting Officer certifies that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Councils Investment Policies at the time of their placement. The previous investments are covered by the “grandfather” clauses of the current investment guidelines issued by the Minister for Local Government.

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

For the month of May 2014, Council investment income on General Fund was above year to date revised budget by $10k.Council's portfolio and returns will be closely monitored for the last month of the financial year.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Statement by Glen Stevens Governor RBA June 2014

2.View

Movement in Investment Holding May 2014

3.View

Portfolio Investment Details

4.View

Performance Graphs Actual to Budget May 2014

  


159

GMBE 01

Statutory Investment Report May 2014

Attachment 1

Statement by Glen Stevens Governor RBA June 2014

 


 


161

GMBE 01

Statutory Investment Report May 2014

Attachment 2

Movement in Investment Holding May 2014

 


 


163

GMBE 01

Statutory Investment Report May 2014

Attachment 3

Portfolio Investment Details

 


 


 


167

GMBE 01

Statutory Investment Report May 2014

Attachment 4

Performance Graphs Actual to Budget May 2014

 

 


167

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

City Presentation Report

 

GMCP 01

ST2248 - Supply and Delivery of Trees and Shrubs

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Create clean and attractive public places for people to engage and connect

Key Policy

Strategic Maintenance Plan

File Ref

102252.2014

Endorsed By

Nick Bolton - Parks Coordinator

Approved By

Gino Belsito - Group Manager  City Presentation

 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

It is Council’s intention to enter into a panel contract with suitably experienced and competent companies for the provision of tree and shrubs for a period of 2 years with the possibility of extension 3 times for 12 months each.

 

A panel supply contract was in place for these services and expired June 2013. A review of the performance of the panel supply contract for these services was carried out and found that the supply list needed to be extended to cover a greater range of plant species to fulfill Council’s needs.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That Council:

1.       Adopts the recommendation put forward in the confidential report provided under separate cover.

2.       Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Report

 

Tenders were invited publicly via the Sydney Morning Herald on 21st January 2014 the Liverpool Leader and South West Advertiser on 29th January 2014 and was made available on the Council eTendering portal https://www.tenderlink.com/liverpoolcity from 20th February 2014 with the following submissions received (in alphabetical order):-

 

Tenderer

Alpine Nurseries Pty Ltd

Green Leisure Group

Greenhaven Garden Centre

Greening Australia NSW

Muru Mittigar Pty Ltd

Toolijooa Pty Ltd

 

Preliminary assessment of the submissions was carried out to check for general compliance with the requirements of the selection criteria and the tender document. It was found that all tenders were conforming and were considered for further assessment.

 

Full details of the tenders and the evaluation are provided in a confidential report under separate cover.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

Protect, enhance and maintain areas of endangered ecological communities and high quality bushland as part of an attractive mix of land uses.

Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues.

Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.

Civic Leadership and Governance

Act as an environmental leader in the community.

Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility.

Deliver services that are customer focused.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


169

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

City Presentation Report

 

GMCP 02

ST2328 - Supply and Delivery of Two (2) Wood Chippers

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Create clean and attractive public places for people to engage and connect

Key Policy

Strategic Maintenance Plan

File Ref

102330.2014

Endorsed By

Garry Hanlon - Parks Coordinator

Approved By

Gino Belsito - Group Manager  City Presentation

 

 

Executive Summary

 

It is Council’s intention to enter into a contract with a suitably experienced and competent contractor for the provision of Supply and Delivery of Two (2) Wood Chippers for a lump sum price.

 

RECOMMENDATION

That Council:

1.       Adopts the recommendation put forward in the confidential report provided under separate cover.

2.       Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

Report

 

Council provides tree maintenance services to residents and rate payers. In order to provide this service Council staff require a wood chipper.

 

Council’s current wood chippers have reached their useful life expectancy and are due to be replaced under the Plant and Fleet replacement program.

 

Tenders were invited publicly via the Sydney Morning Herald on Tuesday 18 March 2014, the Liverpool Leader and South West Advertiser on Wednesday 19 March 2014 and was made available on the Council eTendering portal https://www.tenderlink.com/liverpoolcity from Monday 10 March 2014.

 

Tenders closed at 3:00 pm on 10 April 2014 with the following submissions received (in alphabetical order):-

 

Tenderer

Marriott Tree Equipment Pty Ltd T/A Bandit Tree Equipment

Vermeer Australia Pty Ltd (two submissions received)

 

Preliminary assessment of the submissions was carried out to check for general compliance with the requirements of the selection criteria and the tender document. It was found that 2 out of 3 tenders were conforming and were considered for further assessment.

 

Full details of the tenders and the evaluation are provided in a confidential report under separate cover.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The recommendation has been provided for within the 2013/14 budget.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability implications

Social and Cultural

There are no social or cultural implications

Civic Leadership and Governance

The recommendation provides opportunity to advocate for the local community. 

The recommendation is required in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil  


171

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Community and Culture  Report

 

GMCC 01

Local Government Arts and Culture Awards

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Deliver a range of stimulating and vibrant cultural events, programs and festivals

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

127996.2014

Report By

Kiersten Fishburn - Group Manager Community & Culture

Approved By

Kiersten Fishburn - Group Manager Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Liverpool City Council recently won two awards in the Local Government Arts and Culture Awards, which were announced at Parliament House on 27 May 2014.

 

The Awards were for projects delivered by Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre (CPAC). ‘A Streetcar Named Desire’, won the Developing Arts and Culture: Performing Arts award while ‘Wild Stories’ was awarded the Interdisciplinary Arts and Culture: Environmental Arts category.

 

These Awards confirm the quality of the program being delivered at CPAC and demonstrate the growing and vibrant arts community in South-West Sydney.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.         Acknowledges the win of two 2014 Local Government Arts and Culture Awards.

 

2.         Thank staff at Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre for their work.

 

 

REPORT

 

The Local Government Arts and Culture Awards recognise innovation and quality in arts and cultural programming. At the 2014 Awards, announced at Parliament House on 27 May 2014, Liverpool City Council received two awards for programs delivered by Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre. ‘A Streetcar Named Desire’, won the Developing Arts and Culture: Performing Arts award while ‘Wild Stories’ was awarded the Interdisciplinary Arts and Culture: Environmental Arts category.

The Auslan Interpreted production of ‘A Streetcar Named Desire’ was delivered in collaboration with Liverpool Performing Arts Ensemble, Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre and Auslan Stage Left (Auslan Interpreters specialising in performing arts).

 

The idea behind this particular production was to create a performance that was considerate of the needs of those in the Auslan arts community. This was done by carefully considering the placement of interpreters, the placement of the Auslan audience, lighting requirements and the visual elements of the actors involved in the production.  It was also about developing partnerships with local community to help realise the engagement process.

 

Wild Stories, held December 2012 to January 2013, was the result of an 18-month artist-in-residence program at Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre with artist, naturalist and forager, Diego Bonetto.

 

The exhibition and public program was focused on community and cultural connections with the Australian environment built on Bonetto’s longstanding commitment towards challenging and undermining our preconceived understanding of rightfully belonging species. Wild Stories aimed to provide an entry point into environmental belonging and cultural identity. As exotic as weeds may seem, Bonetto successfully harvests the knowledge, experience and traditions that people of South West Sydney inherently possess or underuse, often embedded in the traditional practices of pickled foods, medicinal herb remedies, crafts, wine, folklore and mythology.

 

 

 

 

The receipt of these Awards is testimony to the quality of programming delivered at Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre and demonstrates the creative innovation and engagement with the arts and culture occurring in South-West Sydney.

 


 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Facilitate the development of new tourism based on local attractions, culture and creative industries.

Environmental and Sustainability

Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues.


Social and Cultural

Provide cultural centres and activities for the enjoyment of the arts.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Deliver services that are customer focused.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


174

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Community and Culture  Report

 

GMCC 02

Request for Rental Waiver - Disability South West Limited (Noah's Ark Toy Library)

 

Strategic Direction

Healthy Inclusive  City

Plan, support and deliver high quality and accessible services, program and facilities

Key Policy

Library Services Strategy

File Ref

128095.2014

Report By

Kiersten Fishburn - Group Manager Community & Culture

Approved By

Kiersten Fishburn - Group Manager Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Disability South West Limited (Noah’s Ark Toy Library) has been based in the Orange Room at the City Library since the library first opened. There has never been a formal agreement in place for this arrangement, nor has there been any agreement over fees and charges.

 

Having the toy library collocated within the City Library provides an extremely complementary service that increases options for families using our service. It also means that Council does not have to provide a toy borrowing service as other libraries do.

 

This report recommends that Disability South West Limited (Noah’s Ark Toy Library) are put on a three-year license for use of the Orange Room to continue their valued service delivery. It also recommends that the normal fees for this room hire are waived to allow the organisation to continue to provide access to toys and in recognition of the complementary service they deliver.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Approve a three-year license from 1 July 2014 for Disability South West Limited (Noah’s Ark Toy Library) to use the City Library Orange Room for service delivery.

 

2.       Approve the waiver of normal rental fees for the period of this license.

 

 

 


 

REPORT

 

Disability South West Limited (Noah’s Ark Toy Library) have been located in the Orange Room of the City Library since the library was opened. They have been a major part of both the library community and the broader Liverpool community providing opportunity for families to borrow toys. This is an invaluable service that allows children to access toys for recreation and education at a very minimal annual fee for families. It plays a strong role in reducing inequality and also provides a social outlet for families who meet when they visit the library.

 

This arrangement complements the service that Council’s library delivers and also means that our library does not have to provide toys for borrowing (as other libraries do). As tenants in the building, the experience has been a very positive one with benefits for all parties.

 

However, there has never been a formal agreement in place for this arrangement, nor any discussion of room rental fee. To ensure transparency and probity, it is recommended that Disability South West Limited (Noah’s Ark Toy Library) be placed on a three-year license agreement for the use of the Orange Room in City Library. This would allow them to continue their service delivery with the surety of Council support. Based on current fees and charges at a Category C Community Rate, the three-year rental fee would be $9,792. It is recommended that this fee is waived to allow the organisation to continue to provide access to toys and in recognition of the complementary service they deliver to the library.

 

Disability South West Limited (Noah’s Ark Toy Library) meet the criteria of being:

 

·    incorporated or auspiced, non-profit community service organisations or groups providing programs or services to the residents of Liverpool.

 

·    Having Public Liability Insurance of up to $20 million.

 

They also align clearly with the objectives in Council’s Social Justice Policy around access and equity. 

 

As no fees have ever been charged before for the room use, this will not impact on projected income for the library.

 


 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Revenue forgone of $9,792.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.

Deliver high quality services for children and their families.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil  


177

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Economy and Engagement Report

 

GMEE 01

Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

 

Strategic Direction

Healthy Inclusive  City

Foster social inclusion, strengthen the local community and increase opportunities for people who may experience barriers

Key Policy

Multicultural Action Plan

File Ref

133467.2014

Report By

Mark Egan - Coordinator Community  Planning

Approved By

Michael Cullen - Group Manager, Economy and Engagement

 

Executive Summary

 

Council provides financial assistance to the community under three categories; Community Donations (including Community Grants, Small Grants, Men’s Shed One-off Grants, School and Youth Donations), Sporting Donations and Corporate Sponsorship.

 

The Financial Contributions Panel (FCP) met recently to consider applications from local residents for the Sporting Donations Program, local young people for the Youth Donations Program and local community organisations for the Community Grants and Corporate Sponsorship.

 

This report presents the funding recommendations made by the FCP for Council's consideration.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Endorses the Financial Contributions Panel's recommendations for the provision of $1,900 under the Sporting Donations Program as summarised in the table below

 

Applicant Name

Amount

Georgia Heath

$200

Maddison Heath

$200

Chantelle Mills

$200

Amber Williams

$500

Shannon Fitzgerald

$200

Cayla Fitzgerald

$200

Daniel J Lambert

$200

Tiana Stojkovic

$200

 

2.   Endorses the Financial Contributions Panel's recommendations for the provision of $17,370 under the Community Donations Program (including four Community Grants applications and one Youth Donation applications) as summarised in the table below

 

Applicant Name

Project Name

Amount

Liverpool Neighbourhood Connections

Keep ‘em Safe

$5,000

Liverpool Neighbourhood Connections

Cooking for Living

$1,875

Sloosh Kidscare Inc.

The Early Buzz Program

$4,995

La’u Samoa Council

Samoan Independence Day

$5,000

Shayla Gibbs

National representation at World Hip Hop Dance Championship in USA

$500

 

 

3.   Endorses the Financial Contributions Panel's recommendations for the provision of $15,000 from the 2014/15 Corporate Sponsorship Program, subject to Council’s adoption of its  2014/15 budget, as summarised in the table below:

 

Applicant name

Amount

NSW Business Chamber

$5,000 ex GST

 The Eid Festival In The Park

$3,000 ex GST

Share Care Incorporated

$5,000 ex GST

Tank U Pty Ltd T/A  Australian Fighters and Martial Arts Exhibition

$1,000 ex GST

Hoxton Park Public School P & C

$1,000 ex GST

 

 

 

REPORT

 

The Donations program has three categories:

 

·    Community Donations (including Community Grants, Small Grants, Men’s Shed One-off Grants School and Youth Donations);

 

·    Sporting Donations; and

 

·    Corporate Sponsorship.

 

Applications for Sporting Donations, Community Grants and Corporate Sponsorship are accepted on an ongoing basis. Applications are then reviewed by the Financial Contributions Panel (FCP) comprising of the Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Chief Executive Officer and delegated staff.

 

This report contains the most recent recommendations by the FCP for Sporting Donations, Community Donations and Corporate Sponsorship.

 

Sporting Donations

 

Council's Sporting Donations Program is available to individuals and sporting teams who live in Liverpool City. Nine (9) applications for sporting donations were received by Council. Eight (8) applications met the program criteria and were recommended for funding by the Liverpool Sports Committee. The program criteria can be found as an attachment to this report for the reference of Councillors. A summary of the request received and the FCP recommendations are shown in the table below.

 

Applicant Details

Eligibility

Representation

FCP Recommendation

Georgia Heath

Representing Baseball NSW at the National U15 Women Championships in Wollongong 18 to 26 April 2014.

National

$200

Maddison Heath

Representing Baseball NSW at the National U15 Women Championships in Wollongong 18 to 26 April 2014.

National

$200

Chantelle Mills

Representing Baseball NSW at the National U15 Women Championships in Wollongong 18 to 26 April 2014.

National

$200

Amber Williams

Representing Australian National Hip Hop Dance Team at 2014 World Hip Hop Dance Championships in Las Vegas 5 to 10 August 2014.

International

$500

Shannon Fitzgerald

Representing NSW Country Women Baseball Team at the 2014 Women’s National Championship in Wollongong April 2014.

National

$200

Cayla Fitzgerald

Representing NSW Country Under15’s Baseball Team at the 2014 Women’s National Championship in Wollongong April 2014.

National

$200

Daniel J Lambert

Representing NSW Tertiary Students Rugby League Team at the National in Coffs Harbour 10 to 13 July 2014.

National

$200

Tiana Stojkovic

Representing NSW PSSA Tennis Team at the Interstate Championship in Darwin 16 to 24 August 2014.

National

$200

Mounties U14 Soccer Team

Ineligible as this is not a representative team but a local team entering a tournament.  The Sports committee noted that funding this would set a precedent for all self-nominated teams to be eligible for funding - Local resident

Local

Not recommended for funding

 

Community Grants

Council's Community Grants Program is available to community groups who provide programs or services to the residents of Liverpool. Four (4) applications for community grants and two (2) applications for Youth Donations were received by Council. Of these applications, five (5) applications met the program criteria and are recommended for funding. The program criteria can be found as an attachment to this report for the reference of Councillors. A summary of the requests are outlined in the table below.

 

Applicant Details

Event Name and Description

Amount Requested

FCP Recommendation

Liverpool Neighbourhood Connections

Keep ‘em Safe

To erect a perimeter fence around the car park of Frank Oliveri Hall to ensure a safe, clean and attractive environment for staff and participants at Henckenberg Connections. This will also allow for landscaping to be completed in the area.  

 

Community Benefits:

·    Achieving a clean, safe and attractive environment.

·    Allows and staff and participants to achieve a sense of safety and well-being.

·    Centre targets around 300 per week.

$5,000

$5,000

Liverpool Neighbourhood Connections

Cooking for Living

Purchase cooking equipment to provide cooking classes for members of the community.

 

Community Benefits:

·    Encourage people to cook for themselves and adopt a healthy way of eating.

·    The classes will be free.

$1,875

$1,875

Sloosh Kidscare Inc.

The Early Buzz Program

The Early Buzz Program will offer a range of diverse sport, cultural, healthy eating, and healthy lifestyle and leisure activities for the children within the existing before school care program at no extra cost to the families.

 

Community Benefits:

·    Miller is the most disadvantaged area in NSW and this project aims to give children the skills to grow up healthy and active adults at no extra cost.

$4,995

$4,995

La’u Samoa Council

Samoan Independence Day

A cultural fete to celebrate the 52nd Anniversary of the Independence of Samoa.

 

Community Benefits:

·    This program is based on the cultural, social and religious developments of young Samoan people.

·    The project will seek to provide assistance across young people who are at risk of leaving school to develop an understanding of their culture.

$5,000

$5,000

Tiana Stojkovic

Youth Donation application: Applicant wants to travel to Darwin to represent NSW in the School Sport Australia Championships- Tennis

.

$200

$0 (ineligible through Youth Donations Program, but has been approved through Sports Donation Program for the same amount)

 

Shayla Gibbs

Youth Donation application: Applicant wants to represent Australia in the World Hip Hop Dance Championship in the USA.

 

$500

$500

 

Corporate Sponsorship

Council delivers a Corporate Sponsorship Program for local organisations seeking financial support to deliver events that benefit Liverpool. Six (6) applications for corporate sponsorship were received by Council. Five (5) applications met the program criteria and are recommended for funding. The program criteria can be found as an attachment to this report for the reference of Councillors. A summary of the request received and the FCP recommendation are shown in the table below.

 

Applicant Details

Project Name and Description

Amount Requested

FCP

Recommend-ation

NSW Business Chamber

 

 

 

 

NSW Business Chamber 2014 Business Awards for Sydney South West region - 5 September – Casula Powerhouse

 

A state-wide awards program celebrated across each region in NSW.  It is proposed to hold the Sydney South West awards ceremony in Liverpool at CPAC. 

Benefits include: Option one – Primary Regional Sponsorship – Regional sponsor for specific nominated region, 2 x complimentary tickets to State Awards gala dinner.  Representative invited to judge suitable award category at Regional level.  Recognised as primary sponsor in President and M.C. welcome address, speaking opportunity, 6 x complementary places, opportunity to purchase additional tickets at discounted rates.  Sponsor link on awards home page and mention in EDMs.  Signage opportunities at the venue.

Strong Alignment with economic development aims for the region and showcasing one of the region’s and Council’s key facilities to a business audience.

$5,000 ex GST

$5,000 ex GST

 The Eid Festival In The Park

Liverpool Eid Festival – 8,9,10 August – Bulldogs Land

 

The Eid Festival will include stalls, entertainment, amusements, and petting zoo.  Free Entry.  Expected audience is 5,000-8,000 people.

 

Benefits include signage opportunities in the lead up and at the event, logo inclusion and opportunity for a stall on the day and an opportunity for the Mayor to speak at the event.

 

Aligns with program objectives and is bringing a new free activity to Liverpool, but is not activating the city centre

$10,000 ex GST

$3,000 ex GST

Share Care Incorporated

Share Care Inaugural Charity Ball– West Leagues Club Campbelltown– 7 November 2014

Not for profit organisation running fundraising event to improve services provided to disabled children and young adults from their Heckenberg head office.  It is a ticketed event.    Anticipated attendances at approx. 350 people.

 

Benefits: Range of benefits varies depending upon the package selected.  Gold provides premium signage at the event, 10 x tickets, CEO acknowledgement on the night, opportunity to present and draw raffle, opportunity for short address, distribution of collateral at event. 

 

Moderate alignment with program objectives. The event will not be held in Liverpool, will not attract large numbers of people and is a paid event.  However the proceeds will go towards supporting a locally based not for profit organisation who provides important services to the local community.  The organisers have indicated that they may run the event in future years in Liverpool.

$5,000 ex GST

$5,000 ex GST

Tank U Pty Ltd T/A  Australian Fighters and Martial Arts Exhibition

Australian Fighters and martial Arts Exhibition – 2-3 August – Whitlam Centre

 

An exhibition of various martial arts styles and instructors form across Sydney and NSW.  They will promote an anti-bullying initiative called Bully Stop.  It is a ticketed event - $80 Family, $22 Adult, Child $14 and under 12s are free.  Tank U Pty Ltd is a for-profit organisation.  However, some profits will be donated to a non-profit organisation called Angels goal Inc. who provide education support to victims of abuse and bullying.  Organiser is aiming for attendance numbers of 12,000 across the weekend however the event has not been run before.  A smaller event in Penrith attracted 200 people. The aim is to run the event in Liverpool annually.  Requesting that Council cover the cost of the venue and facilities hire.

 

Benefits include: Logo inclusion on promotional flyers, posters, website etc. Sponsor recognition in media releases. Opportunity for signage and to distribute publications at the event.

 

Moderate Alignment.  Whilst the event is new to Liverpool it is not in the CBD.    It is also a for-profit organisation that is charging a significant amount for tickets and is asking Council to cover the costs of the venue and facilities hire.  The organisers have indicated that some profits will be provided to a not-for-profit organisation that provides support to victims of bullying. A smaller style event in Penrith, run over one day attracted 200 people.

$18,500 ex GST

$1,000 ex GST

Hoxton Park Public School P & C

Hoxton Park Public School Spring Fair – August 30 – Hoxton Park Public School

School’s annual spring fair.  Free event.  Previously has drawn over 800 participants and over 40 exhibitors from business, government and food producers.

 

Benefits include: Gold Sponsorship $1000 and above.  Speaking and presentation opportunity on the day.  Large advert in the Fair Program. Logo and signage at the event.  Logo and recognition on all materials in the lead up to the event. 

 

Moderate alignment with program criteria.  Activity is not in the city centre and does not align with economic development objectives.  Moderate alignment with community and social  benefit. 

 

$1,000 ex GST

$1,000 ex GST

Future Achievement Australia Foundation

Max Potential program 2014

22 week community program that matches young adults with community leaders to coach in personal leadership and the delivery of a community service project.  The program matches 20 young adults with 20 coaches.   Aim is to build resilience and coaching skills whilst allowing young adults to positively engage.

 

Benefits include:  Acknowledgement and signage recognition.  Coaching and mentoring skills for those who agree to mentor young adults.

 

Not recommended for funding through Corporate Sponsorship program.  This activity is better placed being supported via Council’s learning and development program so that Council staff can act as mentors to these young adults.  This will result in stronger benefits for Council through skills development of staff, whilst also supporting a worthwhile project.  Council’s learning and development staff are investigating providing coaches at a cost of $2,000 per coach with Max Potential.

$4,000 ex GST

Not recommended for funding at this stage

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

A budget allocation of $15,000 for the Sporting Donations Program was adopted by Council in its 2013/2014 Operational Plan. If the recommended amount of $1,900 is endorsed the remaining balance will be $10,800. The recommendations within this report for sporting donations will be funded from the Sporting Donations Program.

 

A budget allocation of $100,000 for the Community Grants Program was adopted by Council in its 2013/2014 Operational Plan as part of the Community Donations Program. If the recommended amount of

$17,370 is endorsed the remaining balance will be $408.60. The recommendations within this report for Community Grants will be funded from the Community Donations Program.

 

A budgetary allocation of $51,500 for the Corporate Sponsorship

Program was adopted by Council in its 2013/2014 Operational Plan. The budget is fully committed. Given that each of these events occur in 2014/15 recommended projects (totaling $15,000) can be funded from the 2014/15 Corporate Sponsorship Program subject to Council adoption of the 2014/15 budget.

 

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Criteria for Community Donations

2.View

Criteria for Youth Donations

3.View

Criteria for Sporting Donations

4.View

Criteria for Corporate Sponsorship

  


187

GMEE 01

Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

Attachment 1

Criteria for Community Donations

 

Criteria for Community Grants Program

 

Program eligibility and exclusions:

To be eligible for funding through the Community Grants Program, applicants must:

·     Be incorporated or auspiced, non-profit community service organisations or groups providing programs or services to the residents of Liverpool.

·     Have Public Liability Insurance of up to $20 million.

·     Supply a copy of their most recent annual report and/or financial statements.

·     Have acquitted previous Liverpool City Council donations and grants and have no outstanding debts to Liverpool City Council

 

Applications will not be accepted from the following organisations or for the purposes outlined below:

·     Government departments

·     Commercial or profit making enterprises

·     Political parties

·     Individuals unless auspiced by an incorporated organisation

·     General fundraising activities

·     General shortfalls in funding by government departments

·     Completed projects

·     Retrospective projects

·     Profit making projects

·     Duplication of existing services

 

Assessment Criteria

To be considered for a grant, applicants should clearly describe the proposed project and how it will meet the following criteria:

 

Criteria

Weighting

Evidence that the organisation has capacity to deliver the project.

15%

Evidence provided to support the need for the project, including the degree to which the project addresses at least one of the strategic directions in Growing Liverpool 2023, Community Strategic Plan

20%

The anticipated number of individuals that will participate in and benefit from the proposed project.

15%

Timeframe and budget are realistic and align with project objectives.

20%

Evidence of collaboration and partnership to maximise the use of existing community resources and to avoid duplication.

20%

Evidence project strategies are innovative or practical to meeting the project need.

10%

 


189

GMEE 01

Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

Attachment 2

Criteria for Youth Donations

 


189

GMEE 01

Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

Attachment 3

Criteria for Sporting Donations

 


191

GMEE 01

Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

Attachment 4

Criteria for Corporate Sponsorship

 


 


192

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Economy and Engagement Report

 

GMEE 02

Liverpool Youth Council Committee Community Member Nomination 2014-2016

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

134150.2014

Report By

Derek Tweed - Community Development Worker (Youth)

Approved By

Michael Cullen - Group Manager, Economy and Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report seeks the endorsement of the newly recruited Liverpool Youth Council members for the 2014-2016 term.

 

The Liverpool Youth Council Committee Charter requires 12 community representatives to be elected to the Liverpool Youth Council Committee for each two year period. The positions have been advertised for the 2014-2016 term and Council received 35 applications. A review of the applications was undertaken as well as interviewing eligible candidates against the identified selection criteria. This report presents the candidates recommended for endorsement by Council.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves and endorses the nominations of the selection panel for the new Liverpool Youth Council for the 2014-2016 term (confidential report attached with the applicants’ details).

 

REPORT

 

In July 2012 Council endorsed the Youth Strategy 2012-2017. The associated Action Plan was endorsed in November 2013. This Action Plan includes encouraging young people to provide advice and input into Council programs, policies and projects through the Liverpool Youth Council. In addition to this, the Action Plan makes reference to providing leadership and development opportunities for young people through the Liverpool Youth Council.

 

Since its establishment in 1999, the Liverpool Youth Council has been operating as a dynamic forum that reflects the needs of young people and the commitment of Council to young people. The main purposes of the Liverpool Youth Council are to provide a link between young people and to act as a consultative mechanism. It provides an opportunity for young people to have their say and to develop skills in leadership throughout the process.

         

The current Liverpool Youth Council 2012-2014 term will officially end on 30 June 2014. The current Youth Council members have achieved a range of individual accomplishments as well as making an impact on larger community issues. This will be presented to Council in the Youth Council’s final Annual Report 2013-2014 in the latter part of 2014.

 

In line with the Youth Council Charter, a new Youth Council is recruited each two year period. A new team of 12 young people have been recruited to participate in the next Youth Council.

 

Community Development staff are planning to work with the new recruits through the induction and training phase which takes place during the first six months of the new Youth Council term (July to December 2014).

 

At the completion of the induction and training process, the first ordinary meeting of the Liverpool Youth Council will be held on 7 October 2014. Following this meeting the minutes will be reported to Council.

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Funding for the Liverpool Youth Council is allocated within the Economy and Engagement Group budget.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil  


194

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Governance Report

 

GMGO 01

Enterprise Risk Management Draft Policy and Strategy

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Enterprise Risk Management Strategy

File Ref

116046.2014

Report By

Mark Brookfield - Risk Coordinator

Approved By

Nadia Napoletano - Group Manager Governance

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Risk Management within Council is currently undertaken by individual Units in isolation addressing delivery of their specific programs. The Enterprise Risk Management Strategy & Policy provides an organisation wide approach with a centralised Risk Register.  Identifying particular events or circumstances relevant to the organisation's objectives both (risks and opportunities), assessing them in terms of likelihood and magnitude of impact, determining a response strategy, and monitoring progress. Strategic and Emerging Risks will also be assessed. Risk registers will be reviewed quarterly in line with financial and other key performance indicators, to ensure Council meets Department of Local Government guidelines.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council adopt the Draft Risk Management Policy and Risk Management Framework.

 

REPORT

 

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Policy

 

An ERM Policy provides the basis for Council’s risk management approach and establishes the risk management responsibilities of the Council, Council’s Ethics and Audit Committee, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Council’s Risk Management Committee, Executive Directors, Group Managers, Service Managers and other members of Council staff.

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Strategy

The ERM Strategy supports the ERM Policy by further defining the systems and processes necessary to maintain an effective and efficient risk management framework.

 

The ERM Strategy specifies the approach, the management components and resources to be applied to the management of risk. It details the procedures, practices, assignment of responsibilities, sequence and timing of activities to help all people within the organisation manage risk.

 

The risk management process can be applied to a particular activity, service, process and project, and to part or whole of the organisation.

 

The ERM Strategy also aims to ensure a consistent, proactive and holistic approach that encourages a “whole of business” or “enterprise-wide” view of risk rather than managing risk in “silos”.

Benefits of Managing Risk

 

The benefits of a risk aware culture, regular risk management thinking and managing organisation-wide risks will include:

 

a)      Increased likelihood of achieving objectives;

b)      Better decision-making and planning;

c)      Better identification of opportunities and threats;

d)      Proactive rather than reactive management;

e)      More effective allocation and use of resources (human, financial, intellectual);

f)       Improved stakeholder confidence and trust;

g)      Improved compliance with key regulatory requirements;

h)      Improved internal control environment;

i)        Better corporate governance; and

j)        Enhanced communication and reporting of risk.

 

A presentation was provided at the Councillor information session on 14 May 2014.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Under separate cover)

2.View

Draft Risk Management Policy

  


199

GMGO 01

Enterprise Risk Management Draft Policy and Strategy

Attachment 2

Draft Risk Management Policy

 


 


 


 


 


201

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Governance Report

 

GMGO 02

Compulsory Acquisition of a part of Lot 10 DP 881265, Mill Park, Casula by the Rail Corporation of New South Wales

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Property Strategy

File Ref

122997.2014

Report By

Andy Kabok - Senior Property Officer

Approved By

Nadia Napoletano - Group Manager Governance

 

 

Executive Summary

 

A Proposed Acquisition Notice (PAN) has been received from the Rail Corporation of New South Wales (Railcorp) advising that the Minister for Transport and Executive Council has approved the compulsory acquisition of a part of Lot 10 DP 881265, Mill Park, Casula.

 

A part of Lot 10 DP 881265 is required by Railcorp for the purposes of enclosing a critical piece of railway infrastructure associated with the recently constructed Southern Sydney Freight Line.

 

The compulsory acquisition of a part of Lot 10 DP 881265 will be undertaken in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 with the Valuer General determining the amount of compensation applicable.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Notes that the Rail Corporation of New South Wales are compulsory acquiring a part of Lot 10 DP 881265, Mill Park, comprising an area of approximately 21.3 square metres for the purposes of enclosing a critical piece of railway infrastructure;

 

2.       Notes that in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991, the compensation amount payable to Council will be determined by the Valuer General;

 

3.       Authorises its delegated officer to execute any document, under Power of Attorney necessary to give effect to this decision;

 

4.       Transfers the compensation amount into the Property Development Reserve;

 

5.       Notes that a follow up report will be submitted to Council advising of the compensation amount determined by the Valuer General.

 

 

REPORT

 

A Proposed Acquisition Notice (PAN) has been received from the Rail Corporation of New South Wales (Railcorp) advising that the Minister for Transport and Executive Council has approved the compulsory acquisition of a part of Lot 10 DP 881265, Mill Park, Casula and has approved a reduced PAN period of 7 days.

 

A part of Lot 10 DP 881265 is required by Railcorp for the purposes of enclosing a critical piece of railway infrastructure associated with the recently constructed Southern Sydney Freight Line.

 

The portion of Lot 10 DP 881265 being compulsory acquired comprises of an area of approximately 21.3 square metres and directly adjoins the railway lines.

 

In accordance with Section 13 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991:

 

“A proposed acquisition notice must be given at least 90 days before the land is compulsory acquired. A shorter period of notice may be given if:

 

The Minister responsible for that authority approves of the shorter period, but only if that Minister is satisfied that the urgency of the matter or other circumstances of the case make it impracticable to give any longer period of notice”.

 

Railcorp has advised that the land will be acquired by publishing an Acquisition Notice in the Government Gazette on or after 6 June 2014.

 

This report recommends that Council notes that the Rail Corporation of New South Wales is compulsory acquiring a part of Lot 10 DP 881265, Mill Park, comprising an area of approximately 21.3 square metres for the purposes of enclosing a critical piece of railway infrastructure and that the compensation amount payable to Council will be determined by the Valuer General.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Rail Corporation of New South Wales will meet all costs associated with the compulsory acquisition. The compensation amount will be determined by the Valuer General and has not been budgeted for. It is recommended that the compensation amount be transferred into the Property Development Reserve.

Environmental and Sustainability

Support the delivery of a range of transport options.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Location Map

2.View

Plan of Acquisition

  


205

GMGO 02

Compulsory Acquisition of a part of Lot 10 DP 881265, Mill Park, Casula by the Rail Corporation of New South Wales

Attachment 1

Location Map

 


205

GMGO 02

Compulsory Acquisition of a part of Lot 10 DP 881265, Mill Park, Casula by the Rail Corporation of New South Wales

Attachment 2

Plan of Acquisition

 


206

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Governance Report

 

GMGO 03

Review of the Code of Meeting Practice

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Workforce Management Plan

File Ref

123274.2014

Report By

David Maguire - Governance Officer

Approved By

Nadia Napoletano - Group Manager Governance

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council resolved at its meeting on 26 March 2014 to place the Code of Meeting Practice (the Code), containing proposed amendments to clauses 5 and 20 of the Code, on public exhibition, as required under sections 363 and 363 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act).

 

No submissions were received.

 

It is recommended that Council receives and notes this report and proceeds with the proposed amendments as advertised.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes this report.

 

2.       Proceeds with the proposed amendments as advertised.

 

 

REPORT

 

At its meeting on 26 March 2014, Council resolved to place on public exhibition amendments to the Code. The amendments involved:

 

a)   Inserting the following words at the end of clause 5(2): “without the possibility of further extension beyond 10.00 pm”.

 

b)   By amending the order of business in clause 20 to allow for IHAP and DA matters requiring determination by Council to be considered consecutively.

 

The Code was exhibited for 28 days, with 42 days allowed for the receipt of submissions under sections 361 and 363 of the Act. No submissions were received.

 

It is noted that, on 28th November 2012, Council resolved to make a number of amendments to the Code, including changing the time of the Council meeting and setting a specific time by which the meeting should close. It appears that the amendments made to the Code at that time did not fully capture intention of that resolution. The proposed amendment to clause 5(2) would assist with the efficient running of Council meetings, promote effective decision making and ensure compliance by Council with work health and safety requirements relating to hours of work for members of Council staff.

 

The proposed amendment to clause 20 would allow Council to consider IHAP matters and DA matters together, instead of separately, in its order of business. There is some benefit to Council in considering all planning matters on its agenda at the same time during Council meetings.

 

If Council adopts the proposed amendment to clause 20, it may be prudent for Council to review, within the next 12 months, the effect of the proposed amendment in terms of Council having appropriate time to deal with the other matters on its business papers.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Code of Meeting Practice (Under separate cover)

  


208

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Governance Report

 

GMGO 04

Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Workforce Management Plan

File Ref

123580.2014

Report By

David Maguire - Governance Officer

Approved By

Nadia Napoletano - Group Manager Governance

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Section 252 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act) requires that Council adopt or amend a policy annually for the payment of expenses and provision of facilities to the Mayor and Councillors. The Mayor and Councillors can only receive reimbursement for expenses and be provided with facilities in accordance with this policy.

 

The Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy attached to this report (previously known as the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Mayor and Councillors Policy) was previously adopted by Council on 30 October 2013.

 

Apart from renaming the policy and minor amendments reflecting legislative and formatting changes (highlighted in red type), the only other change to the policy is the statement of remuneration of the Mayor and Councillors set out in the table to clause 4.1.2.

 

In accordance with section 253(3) of the Act, the amendments set out in the attached policy are not substantial and do not require to be advertised.

 

It is recommended that Council notes this report, notes the changes to the remuneration of the Mayor and Councillors as per the recent determination of the Local Government Remuneration Tribunal (LGRT) and adopts the policy attached to this report.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Notes this report.

 

2.   Resolves to fix the fees payable to the Mayor and Councillors for the period 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2015 in accordance with the maximum for a Metropolitan Centre as determined by the Local Government Remuneration Tribunal on 24 April 2014.

 

3.   Adopts the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy attached to this report.

 

REPORT

 

Section 252 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act) requires that Council adopt or amend a policy annually for the payment of expenses and provision of facilities to the Mayor and Councillors. The Mayor and Councillors are only entitled to receive reimbursement for expenses and to be provided with facilities in accordance with this policy.

 

The LGRT, an independent tribunal, makes an annual determination of fees paid to mayors and councillors throughout NSW, based on the size of particular councils. That determination was handed down on 24 April 2014 and recommends an increase of 2.5% for the 2014/15 financial year.

 

The fee range determined for the category in which Liverpool is placed (Metropolitan Centre), has the following minimum and maximum range as determined by the Tribunal on 24 April 2014:

 

Councillor

Mayor

Minimum

Maximum

Minimum

Maximum

$12,210

$22,800

$25,950

$60,580

 

 

The above range is payable for the 2014-2015 financial year.

 

Council’s Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Mayor and Councillors Policy states:

 

As a policy objective, the annual fee paid for Councillors and the Mayor will be equivalent to the maximum fee as recommended by the Tribunal. This objective recognises that Liverpool is a rapidly growing Council, requiring enormous effort in managing this growth while simultaneously ensuring that the existing population is supported and well served.

 

In accordance with the aforementioned policy objective it will be recommended that the fees payable to the Mayor and Councillors be consistent with the maximum for the Metropolitan Centre category as determined by the Tribunal on 24 April 2014. The fees for the Mayor and Councillors of our Council are set out in clause 4.1.2 of the attached policy and are in accordance with the recent determination made by the LGRT.

 

Apart from the changes to the fees payable to the Mayor and Councillors, the other amendments to the previous policy approved by Council on 30 October 2013 include a change in the title (adopting plain English drafting principles) and changes in formatting and legislative requirements (for example, references to the current Code of Conduct). In accordance with section 253(3) of the Act, the amendments set out in the attached policy are not substantial and do not require to be advertised. Therefore, the attached policy can be adopted by Council without exhibition.

 

In accordance with section 253(4) of the Act, a copy of the policy must be forwarded to the Chief Executive Officer of the Office of Local Government within 28 days of its adoption.

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy

2.View

Copy of the Local Government Tribunal Report and Determination

  


211

GMGO 04

Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy

Attachment 1

Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


229

GMGO 04

Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy

Attachment 2

Copy of the Local Government Tribunal Report and Determination

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

 


240

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Infrastructure and Environment Report

 

GMIE 01

Tender ST2329 – Liverpool LGA Traffic and Transport Study

 

Strategic Direction

Accessible Connected City

Provide safe and easy travel with a high quality road and traffic management network

Key Policy

Traffic and Transport Plan

File Ref

121127.2014

Report By

Charles Wiafe - Service Manager Traffic and Transport

Approved By

Raj Autar - Group Manager Infrastructure and Environment

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council’s Delivery Plan identifies the development of a Traffic and Transport Management Plan for the Liverpool Local Government Area (LGA). The plan will identify key drivers for traffic and transport demand within the LGA and will recommend improvement strategies to manage and enhance the transport network in response to the identified demands.

 

A detailed LGA-wide traffic and transport study is essential to inform the development of the Traffic and Transport Management Plan. The study will aim to assess the cumulative traffic and transport impacts of future land use changes and other additional economic developments in and around the Liverpool LGA.

 

Council invited tenders for the traffic study in March 2014 and following receipt of tenders, the Federal Government announced Badgerys Creek as the site for the second Sydney Airport. Badgerys Creek Airport will have a significant impact on traffic conditions within the western parts of Liverpool as well as the LGA generally, however, the traffic impacts of the Airport are currently not included in the scope of Council’s proposed traffic study.

 

A range of technical studies are expected to be undertaken to assess the environmental impacts of the Airport and traffic is expected to be one of the key areas that will be the subject of detailed studies. In view of the traffic studies and corresponding management plans that will be developed for the Airport, this report recommends that the development of a Traffic and Transport Management Plan for the Liverpool LGA be deferred until more details are known about the traffic impacts of the Airport. The need and scope of any further traffic study can be determined once Airport related traffic impacts have been identified.

 

Accordingly, it is recommended that in accordance with Section 178 of the Local Government Act (General) Regulation 2005, Council decline to accept any of the tenders received for the traffic study and defer the proposal for the contract to take into consideration the traffic impacts of Badgerys Creek Airport and associated transport infrastructure upgrades.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Declines to accept any of the tenders for Tender ST2329 - Liverpool LGA Traffic and Transport Study.

 

2.   In accordance with Section 178, Clause 3(a) of the Local Government Act (General) Regulation 2005, postpones the proposal for the contract.

 

REPORT

The Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 forecasts significant land use changes, population growth and economic development in the Liverpool LGA over the coming decades. A significant proportion of land use changes is planned to occur in the South West Growth Centre, as these areas are rezoned to facilitate urban development on formerly rural land. 

Separate land use/transport impact assessments have been undertaken as part of the rezoning process for each of the release areas within the South West Growth Centre.  However, such impact assessments have tended to concentrate on the impacts on the road network and transport systems in close proximity to the release areas, rather than assessing the cumulative traffic and transport impacts on the existing and planned transport system (including the already congested network close to the Liverpool City Centre and other parts of the LGA).

 

In view of the significant urban development planned in and around the Liverpool LGA, particularly in the South West Growth Centre, Council’s Delivery Plan identifies the development of a Traffic and Transport Management Plan for the Liverpool Local Government Area (LGA). The plan will identify key drivers for traffic and transport demand within the LGA and will recommend improvement strategies to manage and enhance the transport network in response to the identified demands.

 

A detailed LGA-wide traffic and transport study is essential to inform the development of the Traffic and Transport Management Plan. The study will aim to assess the cumulative traffic and transport impacts of future land use changes and other additional economic developments in and around the Liverpool LGA. In this regard, Council has secured part funding from the Department of Planning and Environment for the traffic study.

 

Tenders for the study were invited between 19 March 2014 and 8 April 2014 and at the close of the tender period, three conforming tenders were received from the following companies:

 

§ Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd

§ Sinclair Knight Merz (Jacobs SKM)

§ Traffic Design Group Limited

 

On 15 April 2014, the Federal Government announced Badgerys Creek as the site for the second Sydney Airport. Badgerys Creek Airport will have a significant impact on traffic conditions within the western parts of Liverpool as well as the LGA generally, however, the traffic impacts of the Airport are currently not included in the scope of Council’s proposed traffic study.

 

A range of technical studies are expected to be undertaken to assess the environmental impacts of the Airport and traffic is expected to be one of the key areas that will be the subject of detailed studies. In view of the future traffic studies and corresponding management plans that will be developed for the Airport, this report recommends that the development of a Traffic and Transport Management Plan for the Liverpool LGA be deferred until more details are known about the traffic impacts of the Airport. The need and scope of any further traffic study can be determined once Airport related traffic impacts have been identified.

 

Accordingly, it is recommended that in accordance with Section 178 of the Local Government Act (General) Regulation 2005, Council decline to accept any of the tenders received for the traffic study and defer the proposal for the contract to take into consideration the traffic impacts of Badgerys Creek Airport and associated transport infrastructure upgrades.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The deferral will enable Council to revise the scope of the traffic study to ensure it is targeted and relevant in view of the major developments planned for the LGA.

Environmental and Sustainability

The deferral will enable Council to be better informed about the full impacts of the Airport proposal prior to retendering the traffic study.


Social and Cultural

There are no social or cultural implications at this stage.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The recommendation provides opportunity to advocate for the local community. 

The recommendation is required in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


243

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Infrastructure and Environment Report

 

GMIE 02

Council’s Multi-Storey Parking Stations

 

Strategic Direction

Accessible Connected City

Provide safe and easy travel with a high quality road and traffic management network

Key Policy

Traffic and Transport Plan

File Ref

100255.2014

Report By

Albert Galletta - Service Manager Special Projects

Approved By

Raj Autar - Group Manager Infrastructure and Environment

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report presents the outcomes of a range of investigations that have been undertaken to review the ongoing serviceability of Council’s multi-storey parking stations comprising Northumberland Street and Warren Serviceway Car Parks.

 

While these parking stations were built to standards applicable at the time, the standards governing the management of these types of structures have changed over time and the   review aimed to establish any major gaps in the capacity of the parking stations to continue to perform this important traffic management function.

 

The required investigations have now been completed and the findings have enabled the development of a rolling priority program of renewal and upgrade works for the two multi-storey car parks. The program will assist the formulation of Council’s annual capital works budget each year and will enable more effective project forward planning, investigations and design ahead of implementation.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the contents of this report.

 

REPORT

 

1.   Background

Council owns and operates the following two multi-storey parking stations as part of a range of facilities for the effective management of traffic and parking within the Liverpool City Centre.

 

 

 

Parking Station

Capacity

(spaces)

Built

(year)

Age

(years)

Northumberland Street Car Park

414

1960

54

Warren Serviceway Car Park

704

1987

27

TOTAL

1118

 

 

 

2.   Need and scope of review

The two parking stations were built at different times to meet parking demand over the years and while built to standards that were applicable at the time, community expectations and therefore standards governing the management of these facilities have changed.

 

The investigations that were undertaken during 2013 and early 2014 covered the following areas:

 

·    Structural assessment - detailed structural investigations of the parking stations to establish underlying causes of some of the visible distresses e.g. concrete cracking and spalling;

·    BCA & Standard Compliance - comprehensive inspection and audit to assess the level of compliance of the structures with the Building Code of Australia (BCA) and other relevant standards and guidelines; and

·    Building Services assessment - assessment of compliance of installed services with relevant design and installation standards with respect to mechanical ventilation, general lighting, emergency lighting and fire detection and protection services.

 

3.   Summary of Findings

The following section details the outcome of the investigations undertaken. While the investigations have been undertaken against current standards and guidelines, a detailed risk assessment process has been adopted to better guide Council in determining the actual extent of any upgrade works that may need to be carried out and to ensure that upgrading to current standards do not create significant construction issues without any corresponding increase in health, safety and amenity benefits.

 

4.   Northumberland Street Car Park

The following table summarises the outcomes of the various assessments that have been undertaken for Northumberland Street Car Park (NSCP).

 

Assessment category

Results                                                                                        and recommendations - NSCP

Estimated cost

1. Structural Assessment

1.1.  The main structural framework comprising beams and columns have been found to be in a satisfactory condition and are expected to continue performing satisfactorily for the foreseeable future with regular maintenance.

 

1.2.  However, due to age and usage, parts of the structure comprising mostly the slabs and ramps have deteriorated beyond normal maintenance repairs and major strengthening would be required to restore serviceability.

1.3.  A range of repair and renewal methodologies have been developed and the required works have been programmed to be undertaken during the 2014-15 program year.

1.4.  Investigations have concluded that following completion of the identified renewal works, NSCP can be expected to remain serviceable for another fifteen years, subject to ongoing routine inspections and timely maintenance.

$375,000

2. BCA Compliance Check

Inspections have found that the parking station generally complies with the applicable provisions of the regulations in force at the time of construction.

However, several elements of the building have been found to be non-compliant when compared with current standards. Council therefore undertook a risk based approach to assess the need for any upgrade works to ensure balance between upgrade costs and the resulting health, safety and amenity benefits.

2.1.  Fire safety - the building currently does not have fire hydrants and fire hoses for fire fighting. In this regard, fire extinguishers are proposed to be provided throughout the building to assist fire fighting.

2.2.  Emergency egress - it was found that exit signage currently provided is inadequate and the building is not provided with fire-isolated stairs. While emergency lighting and exit signage will be upgraded, due to the age of the building, it is considered uneconomical to provide fire-isolated stairs.

2.3.  Emergency egress - the audit also found that the distance between exits exceed the maximum allowable travel distance in cases of emergencies. Extended travel distance of 65m in lieu of 40m exists in the car park. To fully comply with this requirement, a new set of stairs will need to be provided to reduce this distance. However, in view of the substantial costs associated with this work, provision of new stairs is not recommended at this stage. Council will instead improve exist signage and associated delineation and guidance signage to facilitate quick access to the two stairs at either end of the building.

2.4.  Access and parking - the audit also found a range of minor non-compliances with current standards, however, these are minor and are unlikely to affect the performance of the car park. Where possible appropriate actions will be taken to address these non-compliances.

$10,000

 

3. Review against other standards - vehicular safety barriers

3.1.  Vehicle safety barriers - earlier investigations had found that the vehicle safety barriers at NSCP did not have adequate strength to restrain out-of-control vehicles as required by current standards.

3.2.  Subsequent investigations and risk assessments found that the presence of raised kerbs along the perimeter of the upper floors would considerably reduce the likelihood of such an event, except in certain areas where no such kerbs exist.  

3.3.  The Department of Planning Circular in this regards recognised that it may not be reasonable or practicable for all existing car parks to achieve standards required by the current Australian Standard as some existing structures may not be able to be upgraded to current standards – “Some situations will require a flexible approach in which existing structural capacity, economic and social impact factors are considered in a balanced manner to achieve the required outcome of providing for the safety of car park users”.

3.4.  Following a detailed risk assessment, Council has identified a range of improvement works including wheel stops, safety barriers and screening to prevent falls.

$240,000

(over two years)

4. Building Services Assessment

4.1.  Electrical Services - while general lighting has been found to be reasonable and close to code requirements, emergency and exit lighting will require substantial upgrade and this has been included in the planned program of works for the car park.

4.2.  Mechanical Services - the car park is naturally ventilated and there are no mechanical ventilation services.

4.3.  Fire Protection Services - there are no fire fighting services and portable fire extinguishers are proposed to be installed. Risk analysis found that it would be unlikely that there would be large numbers of motorists at any floor at a given time and hence it would not be economical to install fire hydrants and hoses, which are estimated to cost over $200,000.

$130,000

(over two years)

5. New parking management system

5.1.  Council, at its meeting of 29 May 2013 resolved to investigate the feasibility of introducing a boom gate based parking management system to replace the existing pay-and-display parking meters at NSCP.

5.2.  At its meeting of 30 October 2013, Council considered the scope and indicative cost of a boom gate system, however, accepted officer recommendation to defer and re-evaluate the matter following completion of the various structural and BCA investigations.

5.3.  A detailed analysis of the costs and benefits of boom gate systems found that a nested boom gate system would be the most suitable car park management system for NSCP. This is estimated to cost approximately $390,000.

$390,000

 

The following table provides a proposed program of works for NSCP, which identifies an expenditure of close to $1.9 million over the next five years.

 

Required renewal and upgrade - NSCP

2014-15

2015-16

2016-19

1. Structural improvements

 

 

 

§ Slab strengthening

$280,000

 

 

§ Rectify cracks and other identified defects

$95,000

 

 

2. BCA Compliance

 

 

 

§ Access and mobility improvements

$10,000

 

 

3. Safety barrier

 

 

 

§ Install wheel stops

$30,000

 

 

§ Install screen to prevent falls

 

$90,000

 

§ Vehicle safety barrier - high priority

 

$120,000

 

§ Vehicle safety barrier - low priority

 

 

$550,000

4. Building services

 

 

 

§ Electrical services - emergency lighting and exit signage

$30,000

$35,000

$25,000

§ Fire extinguishers

 

$40,000

 

5. Integrated Parking Management System

 

 

 

§ Boom gate parking control with automatic payment

 

 

$390,000

6. Operations and maintenance

 

 

 

§ Ongoing operational and maintenance activities

$50,000

$50,000

$150,000

TOTAL

$495,000

$335,000

$1,115,000

 

5.   Warren Serviceway Car Park

A similar investigation was carried out for the Warren Serviceway Car Park (WSCP) and the following table summarises the outcomes of the various assessments that have been undertaken.

 

Assessment category

Results                                                                                        and recommendations - WSCP

Estimated cost

1.   Structural Assessment

1.1.  A range of minor defects have been identified and the structure has been found to be in a sound condition overall. Appropriate repair and renewal methodologies have been developed and due to the minor nature of these works and in view of other priorities, the required works have been programmed to be undertaken during the 2015-16 program year.

 

1.2.  Investigations have concluded that WSCP will continue to perform satisfactorily into the foreseeable future, subject to ongoing routine inspections and timely maintenance.

$120,000

2. BCA Compliance Check

Inspections have found that the parking station generally complies with the applicable provisions of the regulations in force at the time of construction.

However, due to age and usage, several elements of the building have been found to have deteriorated and would require renewal and upgrades over the short to medium term. These include:

2.1.  Fire safety - maintenance, testing and replacement of elements of the existing fire fighting systems. Most of the identified works are already underway;

2.2.  Emergency egress - improvements to emergency lighting and exit signage including better guidance for persons with disabilities through use of tactile ground surface indicators; and

2.3.  Access and mobility - the audit also found a range of minor non-compliances with current standards, however, these are minor and are unlikely to affect the performance of the car park. Where possible appropriate actions will be taken to address these non-compliances.

$200,000

(over five years)

3. Other standards review - safety barriers

3.1.  Vehicle safety barrier - earlier investigations had found that the vehicle safety barriers at WSCP did not have adequate strength to restrain out-of-control vehicles as required by current standards.

3.2.  Subsequent investigations and risk assessments found that complete absence of any wheel stops has resulted in regular vehicular impact to the existing parapet walls, which also acts as the barrier.

3.3.  As a first priority, Council has already commenced installing wheel stops to prevent vehicular impact.

3.4.  The Department of Planning Circular in this regards recognised that it may not be reasonable or practicable for all existing car parks to achieve standards required by the current Australian Standard as some existing structures may not be able to be upgraded to current standards. Some situations will require a flexible approach in which existing structural capacity, economic and social impact factors are considered in a balanced manner to achieve the required outcome of providing for the safety of car park users.

3.5.  Following a detailed risk assessment, Council has identified areas of the car parks that require some form of safety barriers now with a program to progressively provide safety barriers within other parts of the car park at a later stage.

$410,000

(over five years)

4. Building Services Assessment

4.1.  Electrical Services - while general lighting has been found to be reasonable and close to code requirements, emergency and exit lighting will require upgrade and this has been included in the planned program of works for the car park.

4.2.  Mechanical Services - parts of the car park is naturally ventilated while lower level have mechanical ventilation services. The exhaust fans of the mechanical system appear to have reached the end of its serviceable life and will require replacement in the short term.

4.3.  Fire Protection Services - as in 2.1 above.

Included in 2 (above)

5. New parking management system

5.1.  Council, at its meeting of 29 May 2013 resolved to introduce discounted parking fee at WSCP to improve utilisation of Levels 4, 5 and 6 of the car park. It was identified that a nested parking area will need to be created within these levels using additional boom gates and an amount of $90,000 was allocated for these works.

5.2.  Subsequent investigations found that due to the age of the existing parking management system (now obsolete), it was not economically viable to add new boom gates to the existing system.

5.3.  At its meeting of 2 December 2013, Council allocated an additional $390,000 for the full replacement of the parking management system.

5.4.  Following a review of available options, a public tender process for the supply and installation of a parking management system has been concluded and results will be reported to the July meeting of Council.

$480.000

(available budget)

 

The following table provides a proposed program of works for WSCP, which identifies an expenditure of close to $2.8 million over the next five years.

 

Required renewal and upgrade - WSCP

2014-15

2015-16

2016-19

1.   Structural improvements

 

 

 

§ Rectify identified concrete defects

 

$120,000

 

2. BCA Compliance

 

 

 

§ Access and mobility improvements

$32,000

 

 

3. Safety barrier

 

 

 

§ Install wheel stops (underway)

$40,000

 

 

§ Install screen to prevent falls

 

$120,000

 

§ Vehicle safety barrier - high priority

 

$250,000

 

§ Vehicle safety barrier - low priority

 

 

$1,200,000

4. Building services

 

 

 

§ Electrical - emergency lighting and exit signage

 

$80,000

 

§ Fire fighting equipment (underway)

$90,000

 

 

§ Mechanical services - exhaust fan improvements

 

 

$125,000

5. Integrated Parking Management System

 

 

 

§ Replace existing parking management system

$480,000

 

 

6. Operations and maintenance

 

 

 

§ Ongoing operational and maintenance activities

$50,000

$50,000

$150,000

TOTAL

$692,000

$620,000

$1,475,000

 

6.   Discussion and Conclusions

The investigations undertaken have given Council a sound basis to objectively plan the long term maintenance and renewal requirements for the two multi-storey parking stations so that these facilities continue to provide the important parking function over the long-term and in a cost effective manner. The following annual expenditures have been identified for the two car parks over the short to medium term with a total forecast expenditure of $4.7 million over this period.

Car park

Expenditure

2014-15

2015-16

2016-19

TOTAL

Northumberland Street Car Park

$495,000

$335,000

$1,115,000

$1.9M

Warren Serviceway Car Park

$692,000

$620,000

$1,475,000

$2.8M

TOTAL

$1,187,000

$955,000

$2,590,000

$4.7M

 

 

The above priority program will assist the formulation of Council’s annual capital works budget each year and will enable more effective project forward planning, investigations and design ahead of implementation.

 

Northumberland Street Car Park

 

With regards to Northumberland Street Car Park, the structural repairs identified as well as the other associated repairs will significantly improve the serviceability of the facility. These works have been provided for in the 2014-2015 program year and work has commenced to develop appropriate specifications to enable tenders to be called later in the year.

 

Further, while a boom gate based parking management system will improve performance of the car park, it is considered that the need for this improvement be reviewed in the context of the future of this car park in view of its age, plans for a major off-street car park at the southern end of the city centre and the major strategic review of possible development options for the southern end.

 

Warren Serviceway Car Park

 

The Warren Serviceway Car Park is in a satisfactory condition and a lot of the improvements identified are already being progressed. Due to inherent design, the program of works identifies the need to progressively provide vehicular safety barriers along the perimeter of the upper floors.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Ensuring that key assets continue to provide acceptable levels of service over time and in a cost effective manner.

Environmental and Sustainability

Provide efficient parking for the city centre.


Social and Cultural

Well maintained and modern parking facilities encourage utilisation as well as safety perception of the building.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Deliver services that are customer focused.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


252

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Infrastructure and Environment Report

 

GMIE 03

Tender PQ2347 - Air Conditioning Upgrade at Hilda Davis Community Centre

 

Strategic Direction

Natural Sustainable City

Reduce adverse environment impacts for present and future generations

Key Policy

Integrated Environmental Sustainability Action Plan

File Ref

121108.2014

Report By

Kevin Smith - Service Manager Infrastructure Delivery

Approved By

Raj Autar - Group Manager Infrastructure and Environment

 

 

Executive Summary

 

It is Council’s intention to enter into a contract with a suitably experienced and competent contractor for the upgrade of the air conditioning at the Hilda Davis Community Centre in Liverpool.

 

There has been no contract in place previously for this service. Council has invited quotes and the report recommends that the contract be awarded to the preferred company as outlined in the confidential report.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Accepts the recommendation put forward in the confidential report provided under separate cover.

 

3.         Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of ta confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

REPORT

 

The Hilda Davis Community Centre is a Council community centre and provides a wide range of activities for the community to enjoy. The existing air conditioning system, installed in the 1990’s, comprises heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems to maintain environmental comfort, health and amenity of the occupants.

 

As part of the Waste and Sustainability Improvement Payment (WASIP) program, Council found that due to usage and age, the existing air conditioning system at Hilda Davis Community Centre had deteriorated beyond normal repairs and needed complete replacement.

 

On 12 February 2014, Council sought quotes from reputable and appropriately qualified and experienced Contractors.

 

The following companies submitted a quote through Council’s e-tendering portal on 10 April 2014.

Company

 Noppen Air Pty Ltd

 ABT Construction and Fitout

 James and Scott Air t/a Innovative Air Solution

 Integral Electrical Engineering Company Pty Ltd

 

A preliminary assessment of all submissions was carried out to check for general compliance with the requirements of the selection criteria and the quotation document. It was found that all four companies were conforming and were considered for further assessment.

 

Full details of the quotations and the evaluation are provided in a confidential report under separate cover.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Deliver and maintain a range of infrastructure such as community centres.

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings.

Deliver high quality buildings to enhance local community interaction.

Environmental and Sustainability

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings.


Social and Cultural

Provide community centres and activities for the enjoyment of the residents.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Act as an environmental leader in the community.

Deliver services that are public focused.

Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


254

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Infrastructure and Environment Report

 

GMIE 04

Tender WT2348 - Construction of Amalfi Park Detention Basin, Graham Avenue, Lurnea

 

Strategic Direction

Natural Sustainable City

Reduce adverse environment impacts for present and future generations

Key Policy

Floodplain Risk Management Plans

File Ref

122430.2014

Report By

Kevin Smith - Service Manager Infrastructure Delivery

Approved By

Raj Autar - Group Manager Infrastructure and Environment

 

 

Executive Summary

 

It is Council’s intention to enter into a contract with a suitably experienced contractor for the construction of a flood detention basin at Amalfi Park in Lurnea.

There has been no contract in place previously for these works. Public tenders were invited for the construction of Amalfi Park Detention Basin and the report recommends that the contract be awarded to the preferred tenderer as outlined in the confidential report.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Adopts the recommendation put forward in the confidential report provided under separate cover.

2.    Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A (2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

REPORT

 

Brickmakers Creek is a tributary of Cabramatta Creek, which flows through the suburbs of Casula, Lurnea and Liverpool to meet Cabramatta Creek in Warwick Farm. Brickmakers Creek is the primary cause of flooding of major parts of the northern Liverpool City Centre.  The flooding extends to Elizabeth Drive, Hume Highway and Cumberland Highway and adjoining residential areas, causing significant adverse impacts on traffic and potentially causes risks to life and properties.

 

In order to mitigate the adverse impacts of flooding, the Cabramatta Creek Floodplain Management Plan has recommended a series of flood mitigation works including the construction of a detention basin at Amalfi Park in Lurnea. Implementation of the project will improve public safety and protect properties and infrastructure within the suburbs of Casula, Lurnea and Liverpool.

 

The tender process was carried out in accordance with Council’s Procurement Policy and Procedures.

Tenders were invited publicly via The Sydney Morning Herald on 15 April 2014, the Liverpool Leader and South West Advertiser on 16 April 2014 and were made available on the Council eTendering portal https://www.tenderlink.com/liverpoolcity from 9 April 2014.

 

Tenders closed at 3:00pm on 16 May 2014 and the following submissions were received (in alphabetical order):

 

Company

Citywide Civil Engineering (NSW) Pty Ltd

Civil Constructions Pty Ltd

Cleary Bros (Bombo) Pty Ltd

M & M Prpic Pty Ltd

 

Preliminary assessment of the submissions was carried out to check for general compliance with the requirements of the selection criteria and the tender document. It was found that three out of four tenders were conforming and were considered for further assessment.

 

Full details of the tenders and the evaluation are provided in a confidential report under separate cover.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Reduction in flood damage as over 60 properties and northern CBD area will be flood free.

Environmental and Sustainability

Manage the environmental health of waterways.

Enhance the environmental appearance by landscape development.

Minimise risk of flooding.


Social and Cultural

Improve public safety


Civic Leadership and Governance

Project jointly funded by Council, Roads and Maritime Services and Office of Environment and Heritage. Council was successful in securing grants worth over $2.8 million.

 

ATTACHMENTS

Nil  


256

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Planning and Growth Report

 

GMPG 01

LLEP Draft Amendment No. 50 - Proposed Rezoning of 900 Cowpasture Road, Cecil Hills. Sydney Water Site.

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

090632.2014

Report By

Katie Miles - Strategic Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council has received a planning proposal to rezone approximately 300,000sqm of land from SP2 Infrastructure and approximately 800sqm of RE1 Public Recreation land to R2 Low Density Residential at 900 Cowpasture Road, Cecil Hills (Part lot 5 DP 1044168 and lot 2 DP 1134646), known as the Sydney Water Site.

 

The applicant has identified that the subject site is surplus to Sydney Water’s operational requirements. As such, the current SP2 Infrastructure and RE1 Public Recreation zonings are impeding the site’s redevelopment for non-water supply needs.

 

The proposal is consistent with the State’s draft Metropolitan Strategy, the draft South West Sub-regional Plan, and local strategic policies. This report recommends the Council endorse the rezoning application and submit the planning proposal to the NSW Planning & Environment.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Endorses the Sydney Water Site Planning Proposal (Amendment No. 50) to be forwarded to NSW Planning and Environment seeking Gateway determination.

 

2.       Subject to Gateway approval, proceeds with public authority consultation and public exhibition in accordance with the determination.

 

3.       Notes that the outcomes of public authority consultation and public exhibition will be reported to council in future.

 

REPORT

 

In March 2014, Council received a rezoning application seeking to rezone part of Lot 5 DP 1044168 from SP2 Infrastructure (Water Supply System) as well as part of Lot 2 DP 1134646 RE1 Public Recreation, to R2 Low Density Residential, located at 900 Cowpasture Road, Cecil Hills.

 

Figure 1: Subject Site’s Current Zoning under the LLEP (SP2 & RE1)

 

Figure 2: Proposed Rezoning of Subject Site

The site is located along Cowpasture Road, approximately 800m from the Cecil Hills Shopping Centre. The subject site hosts a redundant depot, which comprises demountable buildings and associated structures, which is within the north-west corner of the landholding. The depot buildings will be removed, while a large water reservoir located within the southeast corner (to the south of the proposed rezoning) will remain operational. There is also scattered vegetation mostly concentrated around the site boundaries but some of which contains a threatened ecological community of Cumberland Plain Woodland.

 

Figure 3: Aerial Photography of Subject Site

           

The Site

The site comprises the following lots:

         

          - Part of 900 Cowpasture Road, Cecil Hills – Lot 5 DP 10441698

          - 904 Cowpasture Road, Cecil Hills – Lot 2 DP 1134646

 

The subject site is an irregular shaped lot of approximately 27,800sqm which has a 140m eastern frontage to Cowpasture Road, with vehicular access provided via a sealed access to the south west. Security fencing has been located along all boundaries. The lots are owned by the applicant, Sydney Water Corporation, who seeks to rezone the subject site R2 Low Density Residential which mirrors the planning provisions of the residential community immediately to the north and south of the site.

 

The majority of the subject site is zoned SP2 Infrastructure for the purposes of the Sydney Water Corporation to operate their water supply system. Sydney Water have identified within their proposal that this land is surplus to their operational requirements and are recommending that the rezoning proceed to allow for additional residential space within the area. Council supports Sydney Water’s recommendation for rezoning as it achieves the housing objectives of State and local policies.

 

Proposed Amendment to Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008

The proposed seeks to rezone SP2 Infrastructure and RE1 Public Recreation to R2 Low Density Residential for the subdivision of approximately 30 lots- which will be lodged as a separate development application in the future. The internal departments of Council (Traffic and Transport, Sustainable Environment, and Flood Engineering) have reviewed the planning proposal and support the rezoning subject to specific conditions to be addressed within the subdivision application.

 

As a result of this proposed rezoning to Residential a number of ancillary mapping planning amendments are required, these are reflective of the planning provisions applying to the surrounding residential areas;

 

Table 1 – Maps to be Amended

Map Reference

Proposed Change

Land Zoning

4900_COM_LZN_007_020_20100224

R2 Residential

Lot Size

4900_COM_LZN_007_020_20100224

Category D- 300sqm

Floor Space Ratio

4900_COM_LZN_007_020_20100224

Category F- 0.6:1

Height of Building

4900_COM_LZN_007_020_20100224

Category I- 8.5m

 

Consistency with Legislation, State and Local Policies

Metropolitan and Sub-Regional Strategies

The Metropolitan Strategy for Sydney 2036 and the Draft South West Sub-regional Strategy identify Liverpool as a regional city that will provide approximately 23,000 new dwellings over the next 25 years. The planning proposal achieves new dwelling targets within close proximity of the Cecil Hills local centre with public transport nodes available.

 

The planning proposal achieves the objectives of the following sub-regional housing directions and is supported by Strategic Planning;

 

SW C1.3.1 – South West Councils to plan for sufficient zoned land to accommodate their local government area housing target in their Principal LEPs.

 

SW C2.1.2 – Councils to provide in their LEPs zoned capacity for a significant majority of new dwellings to the located in strategic and local centres, as defined in this strategy.

 

Growing Liverpool 2023

This document identifies social and community priorities for Liverpool and proposes strategies that work towards and sustain a positive level of wellbeing within the community. The planning proposal is considered to be consistent with the Liverpool Community Strategy. In particular, the following actions of the Strategy are relevant;

 

 

2d – facilitate diverse and more affordable housing options;

4e – protect and preserve Liverpool’s heritage including its rural landscape and cultural heritage;

5b – Enhance and protect natural corridors, waterways and bushland;

5c- Reduce adverse environmental impacts for present and future generations; 

6a- Provide safe and easy travel with a high quality road and traffic management network;

6b- Encourage sustainable and alternative transport options such as walking, cycling and integrated public transport.

 

Conclusion

The planning proposal to rezone the subject site to R2 Low Density Residential zone provides a logical rezoning of a now surplus Government site in a manner that would be consistent with existing surrounding zoning and development. The planning proposal is consistent with relevant guidelines, State legislation, Ministerial directions and local policies. It is therefore recommended that Council resolve to forward this planning proposal to the NSW Planning & Infrastructure for progression through the Gateway Process.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Deliver and maintain a range of transport related infrastructure such as footpaths, bus shelters and bikeways.

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues.

Facilitate economic development.

Environmental and Sustainability

Protect, enhance and maintain areas of endangered ecological communities and high quality bushland as part of an attractive mix of land uses.

Support the delivery of a range of transport options.


Social and Cultural

Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place.

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Sydney Water Planning Proposal (Amendment No. 50) (Under separate cover)

2.View

Proposed R2 Residential Rezoning Map to LLEP 2008

3.View

Floor Space Ratio Amendment 50

4.View

Height of Building Amendment 50

5.View

Lot Size Amendment 50

  


263

GMPG 01

LLEP Draft Amendment No. 50 - Proposed Rezoning of 900 Cowpasture Road, Cecil Hills. Sydney Water Site.

Attachment 2

Proposed R2 Residential Rezoning Map to LLEP 2008

 


263

GMPG 01

LLEP Draft Amendment No. 50 - Proposed Rezoning of 900 Cowpasture Road, Cecil Hills. Sydney Water Site.

Attachment 3

Floor Space Ratio Amendment 50

 


265

GMPG 01

LLEP Draft Amendment No. 50 - Proposed Rezoning of 900 Cowpasture Road, Cecil Hills. Sydney Water Site.

Attachment 4

Height of Building Amendment 50

 


265

GMPG 01

LLEP Draft Amendment No. 50 - Proposed Rezoning of 900 Cowpasture Road, Cecil Hills. Sydney Water Site.

Attachment 5

Lot Size Amendment 50

 


273

GMPG 02

Draft Amendment to Part 5 Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Development in Rural and Environmental Zones)

Attachment 1

Amendments to Part 5 LDCP 2008 - Track Changes

 

 

 


GMPG 02

Draft Amendment to Part 5 Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Development in Rural and Environmental Zones)

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

101014.2014

Report By

Graham Matthews - Strategic Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

At its ordinary meeting of 30 April 2014 Council received a report entitled “Residential densities in rural and R5 zones – rationale” and resolved in part to:

 

Prepare and submit to the NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure a planning proposal to apply to all land zoned RU2 – Rural Landscape which makes permissible with consent, development for the purpose of a dual occupancy with a maximum gross floor area of 200sqm. The planning proposal is to make clear that this provision is to make permissible with consent attached dual occupancy.

 

The planning proposal was sent to the Department of Planning and Environment on 6 May 2014. This report proposes amendments to Part 5 of the Liverpool Development Control Plan (LDCP) 2008 (Development in Rural and Environmental Zones) that will help facilitate the proposed amendment to Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Resolves to prepare and publicly exhibit an amendment to Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 in accordance with Section 74C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

2.       Receives a future report considering the comments received during public exhibition.

 

 

 

 

REPORT

 

Background

At its ordinary meeting of 30 April 2014 Council received a report entitled “Residential densities in rural and R5 zones – rationale” and resolved, That Council:

 


1. Notes that planning in rural zones should primarily aim to:

 

·    Protect the agricultural pursuits on good quality, large-lot land,

·    Protect the rural/vegetated visual character of prominent land,

·    Protect steeply sloping land from runoff created by impervious areas,

·    Maintain large lot sizes in areas where there are large tracts of remnant bushland and environmentally sensitive land,

·    Ensure the provision of access of residents to utility services and facilities, and

·    Protect land likely to undergo future development.

2. Notes that residential densities and scale should be appropriately controlled in rural

areas in accordance with state controls, such as Ministerial Direction 1.5 rural Lands,

State Environmental Planning Policy (Rural Lands) 2008, and State Environmental

Planning Policy Sydney Region Growth Centres 2006.

 

3. Prepare and submit to the NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure a

planning proposal to apply to all land zoned RU2 Rural Landscape which makes

permissible with consent, development for the purpose of a dual occupancy with a

maximum gross floor area of 200sqm. The planning proposal is to make clear that

this provision is to make permissible with consent attached dual occupancy.

 

4. Notes that Amendment 28 which is currently with Planning and Infrastructure will

amend the LEP to deliver greater flexibility in accordance with these principles and

policies.

 

A planning proposal requesting a Gateway determination for an amendment to Clause 7.24 – Dual Occupancies in Zones RU1, RU2 and RU4, to permit attached dual occupancies of up to 200sqm on land zoned RU2 – Rural Landscape was sent to the Department of Planning and Environment on 6 May 2014. The purpose of this report is to make such changes to Part 5 of LDCP 2008 as are necessary to facilitate Council’s resolution and the proposed amendment to Clause 7.24 of LLEP 2008.

 

Proposed Amendments to LDCP 2008

 

Section 9.1 Dwelling Houses and Dual Occupancies

To partner with the above LEP amendment it is proposed to amend the DCP to provide guidelines for the development of attached dual occupancies on land zoned RU2 – Rural Landscape up to a maximum gross floor area of 200sqm.

 

The proposed additions to the controls of Section 9.1 also ensure that, while subdivision of an attached dual occupancy along the line of the party wall is permissible, that neither of the resultant semi-detached dwellings may the subject of a further application for an additional dual occupancy development on the land. Consistent with Council’s resolution reproduced above, proposed amendments also seek to ensure that any proposed secondary dwelling should be visually unobtrusive, so as to protect the rural landscape values and amenity of the RU2 – Rural Landscape zone.

 

Further additions to Section 9.1 of Part 5 of LDCP 2008 seek to ensure that the natural environment in rural and environmental zones be protected from excessive runoff, by controlling the siting of secondary dwellings on sloping land; that remnant Cumberland Plains Woodland and other environmentally sensitive land be protected in the siting of secondary dwellings and that secondary dwellings be located to avoid bushfire hazard, consistent with Ministerial Direction 4.4 (Planning for Bushfire Protection).

 

Proposed amendments to Section 9.1 of Part 5 of LDCP 2008 will also ensure that applicants provide evidence of adequate provision of urban services and facilities to the satisfaction of NSW instrumentalities and Council, with care to be taken with the on-site disposal of effluent, particularly on sloping sites subject to flooding and smaller sites.

 


Section 9.14 Secondary Dwellings (Granny Flats)

Amendments to Section 9.14 of Part 5 of LDCP 2008 ensure that any proposed secondary dwelling to be developed on land zoned RU2 – Rural Landscape is attached to the principal dwelling.

 

Please see Attachment 1 to view the proposed DCP amendments (shown in tracked changes).

 

Conclusion

The proposed amendments to Part 5 of LDCP 2008 (Development in Rural and Environmental Zones) will act to facilitate Council’s resolution at its ordinary meeting of 30 April 2014 regarding dual occupancies on rural zoned land and support Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 48) which seeks to permit attached dual occupancy on land zoned RU2 – Rural Landscape to a maximum gross floor area of 200sqm.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

Retain viable opportunities for local food production while managing land use to meet urban growth.

Protect, enhance and maintain areas of endangered ecological communities and high quality bushland as part of an attractive mix of land uses.

 


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Amendments to Part 5 LDCP 2008 - Track Changes

  


 


 


 


 


 


275

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Planning and Growth Report

 

GMPG 03

Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No.42) and Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Amendment No.12) - Restricted Premises

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney

Key Policy

City Centre Strategy

File Ref

101724.2014

Report By

Taylar Vernon - Strategic Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council has prepared and exhibited draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008 (Amendment No 42) and draft Liverpool Development Control Plan (LDCP) 2008 (Amendment No 12). The draft documents establish greater control on the location, design and signage of restricted premises in Liverpool.

 

Public exhibition and public authority consultation of the draft planning controls was undertaken concurrently from 2 April 2014 to 5 May 2014, with no external comments being received. The following public authorities were consulted;

 

·    NSW Police Force

·    Adjoining Local Government Areas

Internal feedback received during the exhibition period highlighted the need for minor changes to draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment No 12). The changes which have been made following public exhibition (see Attachment 2) provide consistency between Council’s planning documents.

 

It is recommended that the amendments to the LLEP 2008 and LDCP 2008 are adopted.

 

Council is authorised to exercise delegation in making the attached draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No 42).

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Adopt Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No 42) and forward the plan to NSW Planning and Environment requesting notification (gazettal) of the amendment.

 

2.       Adopt Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Amendment No 12), to come into effect as at its notification in the local paper.

 

 

REPORT

 

Background

 

The Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008 defines restricted premises as “premises that, due to their nature, restrict patrons or customers over 18 years of age, and includes sex shops and similar premises, but does not include a pub, hotel, or motel accommodation, home occupation (sex services) or sex services premises.”

 

The Hill PDA Floorspace Survey December 2011 identified five (5) businesses fitting the above definition operating in the southern part of the Liverpool City Centre in late 2011. The five businesses had a combined retail floorspace of 317sqm.

 

At its meeting dated 28 August 2013, Council resolved (inter alia) to "review the controls for restricted premises to further discourage this business activity from operating in the B3 Commercial [Core] zone and Liverpool CBD." In accordance with this resolution, Council officers initially proposed to prohibit restricted premises in the B2 Local Centre, B3 Commercial Core and B4 Mixed Use zones as part of draft Amendment No 32 to the LLEP 2008. The changes to permissibility which were proposed at that time were not supported in the Gateway determination due to inconsistency with the requirements of the Standard Instrument LEP.

 

Council officers subsequently prepared a Planning Proposal (Attachment 1) which outlined proposed locational controls to prohibit restricted premises on land opposite or adjacent to various land uses including community facilities, recreation facilities, sex service premises and existing restricted premises. Further, restricted premises will be prohibited from locating on land opposite or adjacent to land upon which development consent has been granted for any of these uses.

 

Council also prepared a draft amendment to the Liverpool Development Control Plan (DCP) 2008 (Attachment 2). The draft amendment adds controls on the design, location and signage of restricted premises under Part 4 – Development in Liverpool City Centre and Part 6 – Development in Business Zones (Except Liverpool City Centre. The draft amendment also removes controls related to sex service premises in the Liverpool City Centre, as these will no longer be permitted in the B3 Commercial Core zone once draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment No 27) is finalised. This is anticipated to occur in the near future.

 

At its meeting dated 5 February 2014, Council considered the draft Planning Proposal and draft DCP amendments and made the following resolutions;

 

1.   Endorses the attached draft Planning Proposal and authorises Council officers to forward a copy to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure seeking a Gateway determination.

2.   Agrees that subject to Gateway approval, public authority consultation and public exhibition proceed in accordance with the determination.

3.   Authorises public exhibition of the attached draft amendment to the Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008.

4.   Notes that the outcomes of public authority consultation and public exhibition will be reported to a future meeting of Council.

The Gateway determination, dated 3 March 2014, stated that the proposed amendment to the LLEP 2008 should proceed, subject to conditions requiring the Planning Proposal to be publically exhibited and relevant public authorities be consulted.

 

Public Exhibition and Public Authority Consultation

 

The Gateway determination stipulated that community consultation was required under sections 56(2)(c) and 57 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 for a period of 28 days. Consultation with the following public authorities was also required, in accordance with section 56(2)(d);

 

·    NSW Police Force

·    Adjoining Local Government Areas

The draft Planning Proposal and draft DCP amendments were publically exhibited for a period of 28 days (excluding public holidays), between 2 April and 5 May 2014. Relevant public authorities were also consulted during this time. Although no comments were received, some minor changes have been made to the draft DCP amendment as a result of internal consultation.

 

Amendments to Draft DCP Controls

 

Attachment 2 illustrates the changes which have been made to the proposed DCP controls following public exhibition. A description of these changes is provided below;

 

Remove controls for ‘Sex Service Premises’ from Clause 7.2 (Part 4)

 

Amendment 27 to the LLEP 2008 introduces changes  which will prohibit ‘Sex Service Premises’ in the Liverpool City Centre. That amendment is well progressed and likely to be gazetted prior to these draft DCP controls being adopted by Council. It is therefore proposed to remove controls relating to Sex Service Premises from Part 4 – Development in the Liverpool City Centre.

 

Proposed changes to Clause 12.2 (Part 7)

 

It was previously proposed, as part of this amendment, to permit ‘restricted premises’ in industrial zones. These proposed changes have since been removed from the planning proposal. Given that Council is no longer seeking to amend the permissibility of ‘restricted premises’ in industrial zones, no amendment to Part 7 – Development in Industrial Zones of the LDCP 2008 is required.

 

Additional controls for ‘Restricted Premises’ to be included in Part 6

 

The exhibited DCP amendment included additional controls addressing the design and siting of, and the signage for ‘Restricted Premises’ in the Liverpool City Centre. Given that these developments are permitted in business zones elsewhere in the Liverpool Local Government Area, it is proposed to also include the proposed controls in Part 6 - Development in Business Areas. These controls will then apply to all ‘restricted premises’ throughout Liverpool.

 

Conclusions

 

The attached Planning Proposal and draft DCP amendment has been prepared and exhibited in accordance with the resolution of Council at its meeting dated 5 February 2014. The intent of these changes is to ensure that restricted premises are not visually prominent from public places or in locations which are regularly frequented by children.

 

The draft Planning Proposal and draft DCP amendment were exhibited for a period of 28 days from 2 April 2014 to 5 May 2014. Relevant public authorities were consulted concurrently. Council received no external feedback on the proposed changes, there were, however, some minor inconsistencies between the proposed DCP amendments and the LLEP 2008 which were highlighted during internal consultation.

 

It is recommended that the proposed amendments to the LLEP 2008 and LDCP 2008 be adopted. It is noted that Council has been granted delegation with regard to making this amendment. As such, if endorsed by Council, the required documentation can be submitted to NSW Planning and Environment for notification (gazettal). With regard to the LDCP 2008 amendment, it is recommended that, if endorsed, a notice be placed in the local paper notifying of the adoption of the DCP amendment.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no financial implications for Council resulting from this report.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations


Social and Cultural

There are benefits to social and cultural cohesion


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Draft Planning Proposal Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendmnet No 42)

2.View

Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan (Amendment No 12) - Restricted Premises

3.View

Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No 42)

  


289

GMPG 03

Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No.42) and Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Amendment No.12) - Restricted Premises

Attachment 1

Draft Planning Proposal Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendmnet No 42)

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


291

GMPG 03

Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No.42) and Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Amendment No.12) - Restricted Premises

Attachment 2

Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan (Amendment No 12) - Restricted Premises

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


303

GMPG 03

Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No.42) and Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Amendment No.12) - Restricted Premises

Attachment 3

Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No 42)

 


 


 


305

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Planning and Growth Report

 

GMPG 04

Public Exhibition Outcomes - Liverpool Development Control Plan Draft Amendment 13

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

111545.2014

Report By

Patrick Waite - Trainee Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council officers have identified a number of necessary minor amendments to the Liverpool Development Control Plan (DCP) 2008. Amendments are in primarily minor amendments relating to Section 18 Notification of Application of Part 1 the Liverpool DCP. These proposed amendments are deemed necessary for orderly and efficient use of the DCP.

 

Draft Amendment 13 was publicly exhibited from 16 April 2014 to 19 May 2014 during which no submissions were received.

 

This report recommends the progressing with the amendment to the Liverpool DCP 2008.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council adopts Amendment 13 to the Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 in accordance with the section 21 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 to come into effect upon the publication of a public notice in the local paper.

 

 

REPORT

 

Background

A reform program is currently being progressed within the Planning and Growth Group to improve application turnaround times, increase transparency, promote greater efficiency, and to ensure the best use of available resources.

 

At its meeting on the meeting on 5 February 2014, Council resolved to adopt a number of amendments that reduced notification requirements for low impact development. This draft amendment proposes a number of house-keeping amendments that similarly seek to clarify the notification and advertising provisions.

Proposed amendments

The proposed amendments include minor reformatting of the written instrument, and additions to three clauses Land Table 10 that improve clarity and improve efficient use of the Liverpool DCP.

 

1.    Insert into Section 18.3, clause 1

 

Following the dot points in Clause 1, add the word “or”.

 

2.   Insert into Section 18.3, add clause 10 to read

 

“Where the impact of the development is being reduced or if the modifications are internal, no re-notification is required”.

 

3.   Insert into Section 18.4, add clause 5 to read

 

“Where the impact of the development is being reduced or if the modifications are internal, no re-notification is required”.

 

4.   Insert into Clause 18.5

 

“Section 96(1)(A) – No notification if the impact of the development is being reduced or if the modifications are internal, otherwise Notify or Advertise as per the original application.

 

Section 96(AA) – No notification if the impact of the development is being reduced or if the modifications are internal, otherwise Notify or Advertise as per the original application”.

 

5.   In Table 10

 

Delete the line item “Food and Drink Premises” as this is a group term.

Clarify the wording of the Dwelling House variation to read “Where Variation is greater than 10%”:

 

These amendments are shown in Attachment 1 – tracked changes.

Community Consultation

Council publicly exhibited draft amendment 13 of the DCP 2008 for 30 days (excluding public holidays) from the 16 April 2014 to 19 May 2014 within the following local newspaper publications:

-     16 April 2014

-     23 April 2014

-     30 April 2014

-     7 May 2014

-     14 May 2014

The public exhibition material was made available for viewing at Council’s Administration Building. Additionally, the exhibition documents were available for download from Council’s website during the duration of the public exhibition period. Council staff was also available to answer customer enquiries over the phone and in person.

 

No submissions were received during the public exhibition period.

Conclusion

The DCP is seen as a working document where regular reviews and amendments are required to keep the document up to date and concise. Draft Amendment No. 13 seeks to promote the orderly and efficient use the DCP in respect to notification of applications.

 

Therefore, it is recommended that Draft Amendment 13 as submitted to council on 26 March 2014 be adopted to be effective from publication of a notice in the local newspaper.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities.

Deliver and maintain a range of transport related infrastructure such as footpaths, bus shelters and bikeways.

Encourage and promote businesses to develop in the hospital, health and medical precinct (of the City Centre).

Provide efficient parking for the City Centre.

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues.

Facilitate economic development.

Facilitate the development of new tourism based on local attractions, culture and creative industries.

Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities (in the City Centre).

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are positive environmental and sustainability considerations, with the reduction use in paper and printing material.


Social and Cultural

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Tracked changes - DCP Amendmenrt 13

  


315

GMPG 04

Public Exhibition Outcomes - Liverpool Development Control Plan Draft Amendment 13

Attachment 1

Tracked changes - DCP Amendmenrt 13

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


317

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Planning and Growth Report

 

GMPG 05

Approval for Works-In-Kind Tender for DA-647/2012/A, DA-290/2013/A and DA-378/2013

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

111831.2014

Endorsed By

Charlie Caraballo - Coordinator Land Development

Approved By

Toni Averay - Acting Executive Director

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council has received a works-in-kind (WIK) application from the developers of Lot 102 DP1184347 Diamond Hill Circuit Edmondson Park (DA-290/2013/A), lot 99 DP 1168485 No. 1170 Camden Valley Way Edmondson Park (DA-647/2012/A) and Lot 1418 DP854378 Government Road Hinchinbrook (DA-378/2013) seeking approval for carrying out WIK listed in Liverpool Contributions Plan 2009. In order to carry out the subdivision works the developers of DA-290/2013/A, DA-647/2012/A and DA-378/2013 is required construct road, creek embellishment and channel works in partnership with the Council.

 

In accordance with Council's Works-In-Kind policy 2012, the developer has carried out a competitive tender process and has nominated a preferred contractor with the lowest tender received. Council officers have reviewed the tender documentation and are satisfied with the proposed delivery arrangement. The tender price for the WIK is much higher than the value of works indicated on Liverpool Contributions Plan 2009. It is considered that proposal would deliver value for money to the Council and at the same time allow the development to proceed.

 

This report recommends that the Council approvesa the lowest tender with the provison that the WIK credit be capped at the amounts indicated in Liverpool Council Contributions Plan 2009.

 

RECOMMENDATION

That Council:

1.       Accept the Tender WIK proposal by the developer subject to capping the WIK credit to the amounts indicated on the Liverpool Contributions Plan 2009.

2.       Notes that the Executive Director will finalise and sign a WIK agreement in accordance with the delegated authority.

3.       Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

DETAILED REPORT

 

Development approval for DA-290/2013/A, DA-647/2012/A and DA-378/2013 was granted by Council. In carrying out the development works, a number of work items will require a WIK arrangement. These WIK items are listed in the Liverpool Contributions Plan 2009.

 

Below is a list of works items Council is prepared to offset and credit the developers.

 

DA-290/2013/A

 

1.       Works Component for items no. RLR30 and RLR31  (road works)                 $29,002.76

2.       Land Component for items no. RLR30 and RLR31    (road works)               $143,471.10

3.       Embellishment works at Cabramatta Creek West Arm item no. 1                            $65,222.50

Total                                                                                                                           $237,696.36

 

DA-647/2012/A

 

1.       Works Component for items no. RLR30 and RLR31  (road works)                 $22,903.10

2.       Land Component for items no. RLR30 and RLR31    (road works)               $113,297.25

3.       Embellishment works at Cabramatta Creek West Arm item no. 1                            $49,755.89

Total                                                                                                                           $185,956.24

 

DA-378/2013

 

1.       Works Component for item no. TN 7.17 north side of channel work                  $9052.00

2.       Works Component for item no. TN 7.19 adjacent to Park                                $34,456.00

3.       Land Component for item no. TN 7.17 north side of channel work                  $31,713.00

4.       Land Component for item no. TN 7.19 adjacent to Park                                $120,714.00

Total                                                                                                                           $195,935.00

 

Following an initial consultation process, the developer submitted an application for carrying out WIK. The developer was advised to employ a competitive tender process in accordance with Council's WIK policy.

 

Six tenders were received from the following service providers for DA-290/2013/A and DA-647/2012/A.

(Note: The list of service providers has not been disclosed for privacy reasons)

 

After a tender evaluation process by the developer, O’Neill Civil Pty Ltd has been considered for Civil Works and Greater West Landscapes Pty Ltd for Cabramatta Creek embellishment. These two companies emerged as the lowest tenderer and the preferred tenderer for DA-290/2013/A and DA-647/2012/A.

 

Four tenders were received from the following service providers for DA-378/2013.

(Note: The list of service providers has not been disclosed for privacy reasons)

 

After a tender evaluation process TRN Group emerged as the lowest tenderer and the preferred tenderer for DA-378/2013.

 

Council officers have reviewed the tender documentation and are satisfied with the proposed WIK delivery arrangements.

 

Noting that the lowest tender, with adjustments for qualified items, potential variations and provisional sums, could be much higher than the value of works provided in the contributions plan, it is recommended that the WIK proposal by the developer be accepted subject to capping of WIK credit to  amounts provided in the Liverpool Contributions Plan 2009.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The current value of s94 contributions for the development relating to DA-290/2013/A is $504,639 and DA-647/2012/A is $408,603. The value of WIK, after adjustments for the CPI and the Land Value Index (LVI) at the time of settlement would be off-set against the CPI and the land value index adjusted contributions due. DA-378/2013 s94 contributions have been paid in full and the WIK value shall be credited to the developer.

 

The proposal will have no financial implications to the Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Deliver and maintain a range of transport related infrastructure such as footpaths, bus shelters and bikeways.

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues.

Environmental and Sustainability

Manage the environmental health of waterways.

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Social and Cultural

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.

Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

LOCALITY SKETCH: DA-378/2013

2.View

LOCALITY SKETCH :DA-647/2012/A

3.View

LOCALITY SKETCH: DA-290/2013/A

  


321

GMPG 05

Approval for Works-In-Kind Tender for DA-647/2012/A, DA-290/2013/A and DA-378/2013

Attachment 1

LOCALITY SKETCH: DA-378/2013

 


321

GMPG 05

Approval for Works-In-Kind Tender for DA-647/2012/A, DA-290/2013/A and DA-378/2013

Attachment 2

LOCALITY SKETCH :DA-647/2012/A

 


323

GMPG 05

Approval for Works-In-Kind Tender for DA-647/2012/A, DA-290/2013/A and DA-378/2013

Attachment 3

LOCALITY SKETCH: DA-290/2013/A

 


323

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Planning and Growth Report

 

GMPG 06

Black Muscat Park - Noise and Unapproved Use

 

Strategic Direction

Healthy Inclusive  City

Improve health and wellbeing and encourage a happy, active community

Key Policy

Recreation Strategy

File Ref

122707.2014

Report By

Heather Warton – Manager Community Standards

Approved By

Toni Averay - Acting Executive Director

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Responses have been provided separately in this agenda to Questions with Notice by Councillor Harle about noise complaints and large gatherings in Black Muscat Park.  This report provides background information and proposes options for further action to address these issues.

 

Since 2011, numerous complaints have been made to Council’s after-hours service about large groups playing amplified music in Black Muscat Park on weekends.  For most of this period, Council’s rangers have attended the site as part of random patrols across the LGA and in response to after-hours complaints. 

 

During the period September 2013 to March 2014, an increased presence was provided in response to further complaints.  Scheduled patrols were undertaken three times daily every Saturday and Sunday. However, during this time only four substantiated noise complaints were identified, and these were resolved on the spot.  Accordingly, the regular patrols were discontinued.  Councillors were advised of this decision in a Memo from the then CEO dated 10 February 2014.

 

This report considers the various issues relating to recreational use of Black Muscat Park and proposes possible options to address these issues.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Notes the background information in this report and the options discussed.

 

2.   Endorses Option 1 for a trial period of 3 months commencing on Saturday 5 July at an estimated cost of $8000.

 

3.   Directs that the trial be funded from operational budget savings to be allocated at the first quarterly review.

 

REPORT

 

Location

Black Muscat Park is located in the Chipping Norton Lakes area, see Figures 1 and 2.

 

Figure 1: Location of  Black Muscat Park in Liverpool LGA

 

Figure 2: Black Muscat Park

 

Background

 

Since March 2011, a total of 20 complaints have been made regarding large groups and music in Black Muscat Park. 17 of these complaints have been made by one complainant.

 

Black Muscat Park is an attractive area for large families and other groups as it is a large open space well-serviced with facilities such as parking, playground equipment and shelters.

 

Figure 3 View of the Park and facilities

 

 

Council’s policies on use of parks

 

Park Bookings

 

Council has a policy on the use of parks by individuals and groups.  The policy Recreation and Open Space Booking Terms and Conditions for Casual Hire of Passive Recreation Parks (see Attachment 1) states that Council permission is required for social or public gatherings of more than 50 people. Hirers are subject to compliance with the following terms and conditions:

 

·    No interference is to be caused to community members accessing the park, or neighbouring residents.

·    Noise is to be controlled by the Hirer and is not to create a nuisance to other park users or neighbouring residents.  Therefore the use of public address systems, large sound systems and activities that generate excessive noise cannot be used without the written permission of council.

 

Given the conflicts with adjoining residents, current practice is to direct large groups to other locations, more remote from residential areas.  However, often large groups gather in Black Muscat without contacting Council first or seeking Council’s permission.

 

Park regulations

 

Councils may control activities in parks via signage.  Section 632 of the Local Government Act 1993 states that it is an offence for a person to fail to comply with signage in a public place. The penalty is $110 for an on-the spot fine or ten penalty units ($1,100) for Court action. 

 

Signs are located in several prominent locations in Black Muscat Park - see photographs in Figures 5 and 6. The signs specifically do not allow:

 

·    Amplified music, except with approval; and

·    Open fires except in fireplaces provided by Council or portable barbecues 450 mm above ground level.

 

Figure 5: Park s632 sign

 


 

Figure 6 Park signage re amplified music

 

 

Enforcement action to date

 

As noted above, since September 2011, Council’s rangers and compliance officers have responded to various complaints about groups playing music in the park.  During the period September 2013 to March 2014, officers patrolled the park three times a day on weekends; at about 10am, 1pm and 3pm.  Over the 41 days that the park was visited, issues were recorded on only four occasions:

 

·    Saturday 2 November

·    Sunday 15 December

·    Saturday 1 January 2014; and

·    Sunday 2 February 2014 a cultural group of about 100 people

The scheduled patrols were discontinued in March 2014 and Councillors were informed of this decision by the former CEO in a memo dated 10 February 2014 (see Attachment 2).  The memo advised that the following approach would be implemented:

 

1.   Only random patrols of Chipping Norton Lakes will be conducted as part of the broader compliance program covering the whole city.

 

2.   After hours call service will be advised to refer complaints regarding excessive noise to the on-call compliance officer for investigation as appropriate.  Matters involving public disorder should be referred immediately to the police.

 

3.   The police will be consulted regarding these directions.

 

In response to complaints received via the after-hours service, officers attended the park most recently on Sunday 13 April, Sunday 27 April and Sunday 18 May 2014.

 

On some occasions, including on 13 April, the group complied with officer requests to turn the music down.  On other occasions, the groups have not complied. 

 

Limitations of enforcement action

Council’s powers to address noise issues are very limited.  Council officers attending the park in response to complaints cannot force organisers to provide their names and addresses.  Compliance officers are trained to deal with conflict situations; however, they can feel intimidated by large groups if organisers are uncooperative.  Where organisers have not applied for a park booking and names are not provided to attending Council officers, Council has no means by which to follow up complaint matters. On-the-spot fines are not effective deterrents, particularly when groups do not provide names and addresses.

Council officers have contacted Liverpool police on a number of occasions for assistance with noise complaints in the park, but the police were unable to attend given other priorities at the time.

Council officers have consulted with Liverpool Local Area Command regarding Black Muscat Park noise and nuisance complaints.  It was agreed that Council officers will continue to respond to complaints and seek the cooperation of individuals or groups to stop noise nuisance or public disorder.  In circumstances where cooperation is not achieved, or where Council officers feel intimidated, officers will return to Liverpool to seek assistance from Liverpool police.  Police assistance will be subject to available resources and other priorities that may exist at the time, but it was noted that noise complaints will not be prioritised by the police over more serious crime or traffic incidents.

Council officers have also sought the assistance of the local Crime Prevention Officer to try to track down the organisers of large groups to discuss alternative locations away from residential areas that might be better suited to their needs.  To date these efforts have been unsuccessful but are continuing. Council’s Community Development officers will also be asked to assist if contact is made.

Summary and Options

In summary, Black Muscat is attractive to families and groups alike because it is a large open recreational area, and it has good facilities including parking, playground equipment and shelters.  There is no mechanism to mandate that groups advise Council of their proposed usage, and there are few means for Council officers to prevent park users from playing music. 

It is noted that there are only a limited number of complainants, and that one complainant has made 17 complaints.  However, it is acknowledged that the entire Chipping Norton Lakes area is an extremely popular recreational area and that inevitably there will be conflicts between park users and local residents given the increasing numbers of visitors.


 

Options

 

There are a number of options which might assist Council to better manage recreational use in Chipping Norton Lakes on weekends, and Black Muscat Park in particular.  These options are detailed below:

 

Option 1 – Security guards trial

 

·    Engage two security guards to patrol Chipping Norton Lakes parks on Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays from 9am to 2pm for a trial period of 3 months, commencing on Saturday 5 July 2014.  The security personnel would be in place at the park to check whether there is a park booking; and to advise users bringing in generators and amplifiers that these are not permitted before the organisers have a chance to set up. 

·    Significant noise issues and matters of public disorder would still be referred to Liverpool police for assistance where the security personnel were unable to achieve cooperation.

·    The estimated cost of two security personnel for five hours on Saturdays and Sundays is $660 per weekend.  This is based on an hourly rate of $33 per hour (including GST) under a current contract Council has with a security firm.

·    The security guards would be required to maintain a log of all incidents and actions for review at the completion of the trial period in order for Council to make a decision about whether to continue the arrangement, or implement other solutions.

 

Comment

This option has the benefit of providing an immediate solution without impacting on Council’s limited compliance resources, which are required to manage issues across the whole LGA.  The trial would provide data for Council’s review, and would also serve to educate regular park users about appropriate use of the park.

 

While the cost of the trial has not been included in the 14/15 budget, given it is a relatively small cost, it is expected that these funds could be found through savings at the first quarterly review.

 

This option is considered the most suitable and is recommended for Council adoption.

 

Option 2 – Alternative area for large groups

 

·    Develop an alternative open space area elsewhere in the Chipping Norton Lakes parks more remote from residential areas to incorporate parking, playground equipment, toilets, shelters with seating, barbecues, and possibly 3 phase power for music amplification.  There is a suitable area available that is currently under-utilised as it lacks facilities.

·    The open space area in Black Muscat Park closest to residents would need to be re-landscaped to make it less attractive to large groups by dividing it into smaller areas by way of mounds and plantings.  Large groups would be directed to the other area specifically designed for this purpose.

·    A more rigorous park booking system should be implemented once the alternative area has been developed.


 

Comment

This option has not yet been formally costed but it is estimated it would cost in the vicinity of $800,000 for park embellishments alone, with additional costs to be calculated for the sewer connection, access road and car park.  The landscaping works in Black Muscat Park would cost in the vicinity of $10,000.

 

The main disadvantage of this option is that it involves removing a large open space area that is popular with many groups, most of whom don’t create noise nuisance for neighbouring residents.  Additionally, funds would need to be identified for the required works and the works program adjusted accordingly.

 

This option has the advantage of delivering a valuable community and Council asset in a large open space designed for large groups and away from residents.  This could be used for future Council events too.

 

Option 3 – Additional Council compliance officers

 

·    Provide dedicated Council compliance officers to patrol Chipping Norton Lakes every weekend from 9am to 2pm, or as per the previous arrangements of three scheduled patrols each day on weekends and public holidays.

·    Additional resources would be required as existing resources are inadequate to provide this level of dedicated support as well as coverage across the whole LGA.

·    Police assistance would still need to be sought for significant noise issues and matters of public disorder when officers are unable to achieve the cooperation of users.

 

Comment

This option would ensure a consistent approach as Council officers would be involved and they would be reporting incidents and actions in accordance with the previous arrangements.  Additionally, Council officers are easily identifiable in their Council uniforms, and their regular presence would confirm Council’s commitment to managing the parks for the use and enjoyment of all users while still respecting the rights and needs of adjoining residents.

 

However, this option would require the engagement of two additional officers.  This would represent a higher cost than the security guards option.  On a part-time basis, the cost of two additional officers would be in the range of $1100 per week depending on qualifications and experience, or $4400 per month.  Full time officers would cost in the vicinity o $70,000 per year each. Additionally, it would be necessary to undertake a recruitment process which would involve further cost and time delay, and there is no guarantee that suitable candidates could be recruited quickly. 

 

Option 4 – Continue as per current arrangements

 

·    Council could decide to continue with the current arrangements whereby Council officers respond to complaints, noting the recent discussions with Liverpool police and the agreement to seek police assistance where cooperation of users has not been achieved.

·    This option would need to be supported by an enhanced education campaign to remind park users of their obligations and the park rules.


 

Comments

The number of complaints over the last three years is relatively small considering the number of park users and the popularity of the Chipping Norton Lakes parks in general.  It is also noted that most of the complaints have been made by one resident.  Enhanced education could help to remind park users of the need to respect local residents and other users. 

 

However, given the increasing popularity of these parks, it is expected that complaints will continue, and some Council investment to ensure park use does not detrimentally impact on residential amenity is considered appropriate.

 

CONCLUSION

 

It is considered that Option 1, the security guards trial, is the best option.  This option provides an immediate solution without impacting on Council’s limited compliance resources, and will provide data to help inform Council’s further decisions.  The cost of the trial can be funded through savings at the first quarterly review in the coming financial year.  Council has a current contract arrangement with a security firm.

 

This option is considered the most suitable and it is recommended that Council endorse this approach.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Facilitate the development of new tourism based on local attractions, culture and creative industries.

Environmental and Sustainability

Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support policies and plans that prevent crime.

Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place.

Promote community harmony and address discrimination.

Support access and services for people with a disability.

Deliver high quality services for children and their families.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media.

Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Deliver services that are customer focused.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Council policy: Recreation and Open space Booking Terms and Conditions for Casual Hire of Passive Recreational Parks

2.View

Previous Memo from the then CEO dated 10 Febraury 2014 Complaints relating to noise and activities at Black Muscat Park.

  


333

GMPG 06

Black Muscat Park - Noise and Unapproved Use

Attachment 1

Council policy: Recreation and Open space Booking Terms and Conditions for Casual Hire of Passive Recreational Parks

 


335

GMPG 06

Black Muscat Park - Noise and Unapproved Use

Attachment 2

Previous Memo from the then CEO dated 10 Febraury 2014 Complaints relating to noise and activities at Black Muscat Park.

 


335

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Planning and Growth Report

 

GMPG 07

Changes to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Charter and Procedure

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

129662.2014

Report By

Lina Kakish - Acting Manager Statutory Planning

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report outlines the changes to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure to accommodate the improvements to IHAP processes endorsed by Council at the meeting of 30 October 2013.

 

Liverpool Council was one of the first councils in New South Wales to establish an IHAP as a way of improving transparency, accountability and public scrutiny of Council’s development assessment decision making process. This has now been acknowledged as industry best practice.

 

The changes discussed within this report propose amendments to the IHAP charter to reflect the Council resolution of 30 October 2013.  Minor additional changes are also proposed to further improve the IHAP process by streamlining IHAP triggers and administrative procedures.

 

Additionally, a change to the IHAP delegation is proposed to reflect the requirement for all development applications proposing a variation to a development standard of 10% or greater, to be decided by Council. 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Adopts the revised Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Charter and Procedure as attached to this report.

 

2.       Amends the IHAP delegation of 30 October 2013 by including a new Clause (c) as follows to reflect the requirement for all development applications proposing a variation to a development standard of 10% or greater to be decided by Council:

 

 

(c)    That all development applications where there has been a variation to a          development standard of 10% or greater, be determined by the elected Council         in accordance with Clause 4.6 of Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008.

 

3.       Delegates authority to the CEO to approve and amend the IHAP procedure from time to time, in consultation with the members of the IHAP and the community.

 

4.       Notes that a further report will be provided to Council at a future meeting on assessment panel options as part of a broader review of development assessment delegations.

 

 

 

REPORT

 

Background

 

The role of the IHAP in the NSW Planning System

In NSW, a Council may elect to implement an IHAP for the purpose of the assessment of any aspect of a development application or any planning matter. The provision of an IHAP is not a mandatory requirement for any Council within NSW; however if established, the IHAP is required to be developed in accordance with Clause 23I Independent Hearing and Assessment Panels of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (EP&AA) 1979.

 

Liverpool Council has an established IHAP that has been developed and implemented in accordance with the requirements of the EP&AA 1979, to provide increased transparency, confidence in, and scrutiny of planning decisions.

 

Establishment of IHAP at Liverpool City Council

On 10 March 1997, Council resolved that an IHAP be established to provide an independent hearing forum for objectors and applicants, and to independently make recommendations to Council on development applications. Each IHAP consists of five members representing the areas of:

 

·    Planning Law

·    Environment

·    Urban Design

·    Community

·    Traffic.

 

Changes to the IHAP Charter

On 30 October 2013, Council resolved to endorse the proposed changes to the IHAP charter as follows:

 

1.   Delegates authority to the CEO to determine all applications regarding developments in the CBD referred to IHAP, subject to the following conditions;

 

a)   That all Councillors be notified in writing of the determinations of the IHAP meeting within 24 hours of the meeting.

b)   That Councillors have 72 hours from the time of the IHAP meeting to request that the matter be resolved by Council if three or more Councillors notify the CEO in writing if they deem it to be in the community interest to do so.

 

2.   Amends the IHAP charter to reflect the above delegated authority.

 

3.   For the purposes of this motion, the CBD shall be defined by and generally bound by the train line to the east, Hume Highway/Copeland Street to the north and west and Atkinson Street to the South.

 

Discussion

 

The draft revised IHAP Charter (Attachment 1) responds to the Council resolution and proposes minor amendments to IHAP triggers to further streamline development assessment processes.

 

Following are the proposed revised referral triggers:

 

1.   Any building over three storeys in the Liverpool CBD area and those Class  2  to  9  Buildings  under  the  Building  Code  of Australia (BCA) where there are five or more unresolved objections;

 

2.   Any matter that involves a variation to the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 of 10% or greater.

 

3.   Any development application lodged on behalf of Council or by Council, where it has a pecuniary interest in the development.

 

The development applications referred to above will only be considered by the IHAP and Council in circumstances where the Joint Regional Planning Panel is not the determining authority.

 

Key Changes

 

In summary, the draft revised Charter incorporates the following key changes:

 

(a)  Provides for development applications within the Liverpool CBD to be determined by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) using Delegated Authority in accordance with   Council’s resolution of 30 October 2013, except for applications involving a proposed variation to a development standard of 10% or greater; and

 

(b)  Amending the submission trigger for referral to IHAP from three submissions to five unresolved objections, and requiring that submissions received and representations made during the public hearing raise issues relevant to the development application.

 

Each of these key changes is discussed separately below.

 

Delegation to the CEO

The Charter has been amended to give effect to Council’s resolution of 30 October 2013 providing the CEO with authority to determine CBD applications referred to IHAP, unless three or more Councillors advise that they wish the applications to be decided by Council.

 

Notwithstanding this delegation, the Charter notes that the CEO cannot determine any development application if the application seeks a variation of 10% or greater of a development standard in the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 or relevant State Policy.  In such cases, the application must be reported to the full Council for decision in accordance with the direction provided by NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure, pursuant to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

In response to the findings of the Independent Commission Against Corruption investigation into corruption allegations affecting Wollongong City Council, all development applications with SEPP 1 or clause 4.6 applications with variations of 10% or greater must be reported to Council for determination.  Councils are also required to report these variations to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure every quarter.

 

For the period 1/7/2012 to 30/6/2013, Liverpool Council’s reports to the Department identified a total 17 applications with variations of 10% or greater, while for the period 1/7/2013 to 31/3/2014, 13 applications have been identified.

 

Council’s legal officers have confirmed that notwithstanding Council’s adoption of the clause 4.6 provision within the Liverpool LEP 2008, these requirements remain in force in accordance with the NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure’s Planning Circular PS 11-018, and supporting Guide to Varying Development Standards.

 

Accordingly, an amendment to the delegation of 30 October 2013 is proposed to reflect this requirement.  The proposed amendment would involve the inclusion of a new clause (c) noting that any development application involving a variation of 10% or greater would be decided by Council.

 

The proposed amended delegation is as follows:

 

That Council:

 

1.   Delegates authority to the CEO to determine all applications regarding developments in the CBD referred to IHAP, subject to the following conditions:

 

a)   That all Councillors be notified in writing of the determinations of the IHAP meeting within 24 hours of the meeting.

 

b)   That Councillors have 72 hours from the time of the IHAP meeting to request that the matter be resolved by Council if three or more Councillors notify the CEO in writing if they deem it to be in the community interest to do so.

 

c)   That all development applications where there has been a variation to a development standard of 10% or greater, be determined by the elected Council in accordance with Clause 4.6 of Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008.

 

2.   Amends the IHAP charter to reflect the above delegated authority.

 

3.   Delegate to the CEO to determine applications in the CBD that are not referred to IHAP where no objections have been received and design excellence has been achieved as per the IHAP charter subject to the following conditions:

 

a)   That all Councillors be notified in writing of the CEO’s intention to determine the application with 48 hours notice.

 

b)   Councillors can within that period request that the matter be resolved by Council if three or more Councillors notify the CEO in writing if they deem it to be in the community interest to do so.

 

c)   That all development applications, where there has been a variation greater than 10% in development standards be determined by the elected Council in accordance with Clause 4.6 of Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008.

 

4.   For the purposes of this motion, the CBD shall be defined by and generally bound by the train line to the east, Hume Highway/Copeland Street to the north and west and Atkinson Street to the South.

 

In summary then, any development application incorporating development proposals with variations greater than 10%, should be determined by full Council and not by the CEO or his delegate.

 

Submissions

It is proposed to increase the submission trigger for referral to IHAP from three submissions to five.  Accordingly, applications will only be reported to IHAP for consideration if there are five or more valid and unresolved objections received in response to the notification/public exhibition of a development application. 

 

All submissions are considered during the assessment process by Council’s planning and other relevant technical officers.  Referral to IHAP can add two months delay to the decision making timeframe for the determination of a development application.  This represents additional cost and uncertainty for applicants. Where there are fewer than five submissions, matters raised in submissions will still be addressed by Council officers as part of the assessment process. Given this is a very small number of submissions, this should not delay the assessment process where applications are largely consistent with LEP controls and have not triggered the 10% variation referral requirement.

 

A review of IHAP referrals was conducted for the period May 2013 to May 2014.  During this period, 39 development applications were referred to IHAP.  Following is a breakdown of the referral triggers:

 

·    Three or four submissions  – 5*  (*3 of which also had an additional trigger)

·    Five submissions or greater - 9

·    Variation to a development standard of greater than 10% - 17

·    Development greater than three storeys in the city centre – 4

·    Combination of the above – 4

 

Accordingly, it is considered that increasing the submission trigger threshold to 5 submissions will have minimal impact on community consultation but will assist in improving efficiencies and streamlining development assessment processes.

 

It is also proposed to further define the submission referral trigger to include the requirement for such submissions to be ‘unresolved’.  Often submissions deal with matters which are not relevant planning considerations, such as property valuations.  On other occasions, submissions raise issues which are dealt with through relevant conditions of consent, or through changes to the development proposal during the assessment process. A benchmarking review has been conducted of other Sydney based Councils with independent assessment panels.  This review confirmed that the majority of Councils include the term ‘unresolved’ in the submission trigger (Waverley, Wollongong, Mosman, Manly and Sutherland.)  Warringah specifies that the submissions be ‘relevant’.

 

Additionally, Council’s implementation of ePlanning in January 2014 means that all applications and associated documentation are now published on line for 24/7 access by submitters, applicants and other interested parties.  Given this increased transparency and improved access to information, and noting the amendments to notification procedures approved by Council in the recent Amendment 10 to the Liverpool Development Control Plan, it is considered timely to make this minor change to the IHAP submission referral trigger.

 

It is also noted that a large percentage of the variation triggers related to Clause 7.13 of the Liverpool LEP – Minimum lot width in Zones R1, R2, R3 and R4.  A change to this clause is currently in progress as part of Draft Amendment 32 to the LLEP.  This amendment among other things will allow two adjacent allotments to share a single access handle with a minimum width of 5m, which will allow greater flexibility in the design of subdivision patterns and resultant lot shapes.

 

Draft Amendment 32 has received Gateway determination, has been considered by State agencies and has been publicly exhibited.  The outcomes of the public exhibition will be reported to Council in the coming months.  The Gateway stipulates that the amendment is to be finalised by 30 September 2014.

 

The proposed changes outlined above will enable development applications to be determined more efficiently while still maintaining transparent, robust decision making processes in compliance with legislative requirements.

 

Development assessment panels

The benchmarking review noted above also identified that many Councils have delegated authority to determine development applications to their independent assessment panels, where applications are not determined by officers under delegated authority or by the JRPP.  For example, the following Councils have Development Assessment Panels which determine development applications on behalf of the Council:

 

·    North Sydney

·    Lane Cove

·    Waverley

·    Campbelltown

·    Manly; and

·    Wollongong.


 

The functions of most of the assessment panels are very similar to those of the Mosman Development Assessment Panel which are to:

 

(a)  determine development applications and S82A reviews that are within the delegations of those functions to the MDAP from the Council and/or the General Manager;

(b)  provide an independent and open forum for interested persons and the community to make submissions relevant to the applications before MDAP;

(c)  provide increased transparency for the determination of referred development applications made to the Council; and

(d)  achieve good urban design and development outcomes consistent with the relevant legislation and planning controls.

 

It is proposed to undertake further research and benchmarking on assessment panel options as part of a broader review of development assessment delegations.  A report will be provided to Council at a future Council meeting for consideration.

 

Changes to the IHAP Administrative Procedures

IHAP administrative procedures have also been revised to give effect to the Council resolution of 30 October 2013 and to improve IHAP processes and efficiency.

 

The new IHAP administrative procedure (Attachment 2) outlines the changes to the administrative processes supporting IHAP meetings, including the day and duration of meetings, meeting structure and format, the process for finalisation of IHAP recommendations and the content of IHAP minutes.

 

Conclusion

This report presents the revised IHAP Charter and administrative procedure for Council approval.  These changes aim to simplify IHAP processes to further improve development assessment decision making and to give effect to the Council resolution of 30 October 2013. 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities.

Facilitate economic development.

Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities (in the City Centre).

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

The IHAP processes support community engagement and input into development assessment decision making.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Revised draft IHAP Charter

2.View

IHAP Procedure April 2014

  


343

GMPG 07

Changes to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Charter and Procedure

Attachment 1

Revised draft IHAP Charter

 


 


 


 


347

GMPG 07

Changes to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Charter and Procedure

Attachment 2

IHAP Procedure April 2014

 


 


 


 

 


351

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 01

Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee
Meeting held on 8 May 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

047873.2014

Report By

Norma Burrows - Community Development Worker (ATSI)

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Group Manager Economy & Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 8 May 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

 

1.       The Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 8 May 2014        are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none     of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place.

Promote community harmony and address discrimination.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultattive Committee Meeting held on 8 May 2014 

  


353

CTTE 01

Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee

Meeting held on 8 May 2014

Attachment 1

Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultattive Committee Meeting held on 8 May 2014

 


 


 


 


 


358

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 02

Minutes of Liverpool Youth Council meeting held on 6 May 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

117579.2014

Report By

Derek Tweed - Community Development Worker (Youth)

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Group Manager Economy & Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 6 May 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council held on Tuesday 6 May 2014.

 

2.       Notes that the Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake. Furthermore notes that funding for the Liverpool Youth Council is allocated within the budget of the Community Development Unit.

 

 

 

REPORT

 

The Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 6 May 2014 are attached for the information of Council. The Minutes identify a number of actions for Council Staff and Youth Councillors to undertake, none of which have financial or policy implications for Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Funding for the Liverpool Youth Council is allocated within the budget of the Community Development Unit.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Minutes of Liverpool Youth Council meeting held on 6 May 2014

  


361

CTTE 02

Minutes of Liverpool Youth Council meeting held on 6 May 2014

Attachment 1

Minutes of Liverpool Youth Council meeting held on 6 May 2014

 


 


362

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 03

Local Traffic Committee Minutes of Meeting Held on 14 May 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Accessible Connected City

Provide safe and easy travel with a high quality road and traffic management network

Key Policy

Traffic and Transport Plan

File Ref

120044.2014

Report By

Charles Wiafe - Service Manager Traffic and Transport

Approved By

Raj Autar – Group Manager Infrastructure & Environment

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Liverpool Local Traffic Committee (LTC) Meeting held on 14 May 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 14 May 2014.

 

2.       Adopts the following recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting:

 

          Item 1    Pine Road, Casula - Proposed road closure of the section close to the Hume Highway

 

i.   Approves the proposed full road closure of the section of Pine Road, between the BP Service Station driveway off Pine Road and the Hume Highway, Casula and associated road works i.e. extension of Ingham Drive to the Hume Highway and realignment of Pine Road, to connect to the proposed Ingham Drive extension. 

ii.  Advises all stakeholders of the outcome.

          Item 2    Macquarie Street, Liverpool – Review of on-street parking after hours 

 

i.   Approves amendment of the existing No Stopping zone from full time No Stopping to No Stopping 5:00am-7:00pm between 333 to 345 Macquarie Street (for a distance of approximately 42m) for a trial period of six months.  The outcome of the trial period to be reported to the LTC.

ii.  Advises all stakeholders of the outcome.

 

          Item 3      Quadrat Lane, Sadleir – Request for Children’s Crossing outside Sadleir Public School

 

i.   Approves the installation of Children’s Crossing on Quadrat Lane, Sadleir outside Sadleir Public School.

ii.  Sadleir Public School be notified and be requested to sign the Children’s Crossing Flags Agreement.

          Item 4    George Street, Liverpool – Proposed Special Event (Starry Sari Night)

 

i.   Approves the proposed road event (for 2014 and 2015) as Class 2 Special Events with the following requirements:

·      Submission of a Special Events Traffic Management Plan with associated traffic control plan to RMS for endorsement.

·      Advertising of the event and the proposed temporary road closures of the events at least 28 days prior to the event.

·      Certificate of currency, with RMS and the Police indemnified.

·      Consultation with the Police. 

·      Appropriate consultation with local bus operators and emergency access.

 

          Item 5    Nuwarra Road and Marshall Avenue Intersection, Moorebank – Review of Intersection Control

 

i.   Approves the installation of an advisory sign “Do Not Queue Across Intersection” (G9–237) on Nuwarra Road at its intersection with Marshall Avenue for westbound motorists as per RMS guidelines.

ii.  Advises all stakeholders of the outcome.

 

REPORT

 

At its meeting held on 14 May 2014, the LTC considered the following five agenda items.  The minutes of the meeting are attached for Council’s consideration and adoption.

 

Item 1    Pine Road, Casula - Proposed road closure of the section close to the Hume Highway

 

Council’s Development Control Plan (DCP) for Casula includes a proposal to close the section of Pine Road, between the BP Service Station driveway off Pine Road and the Hume Highway, Casula and divert traffic onto an extension of Ingham Drive to the Hume Highway.

 

Council is now proposing to implement full road closure of the affected section of Pine Road and carry out the associated road works.  The Committee was requested to support the proposed full road closure and the associated road works. 

 

As part of the proposed full road closure, Ingham Drive will be extended to Hume Highway and Pine Road will be realigned to include an east-west section to connect the proposed Ingham Drive extension, to accommodate all traffic that is currently using the section of Pine Road to be closed.

 

The realigned Pine Road and Ingham Drive extensions are proposed to minimise delays to all turning movements at the realigned Pine Road and Ingham Drive. In addition, to permit safe turning movements at the Hume Highway, the new intersection located at Ingham Drive to the Highway will be a signalised intersection. 

 

Funding arrangements for the Pine Road closure will be addressed as part of the development application for the proposed Woolworths shopping centre development along Ingham Drive, just west of the Hume Highway, should the application be approved.

 

The land acquisition required for the road closure and associated Ministerial approvals have all been obtained.

 

The Committee discussed and supported the proposed Pine Road closure and associated road works.

 

Item 2    Macquarie Street, Liverpool – Review of on-street parking after hours  

 

Council has received representations from restaurant proprietors whose businesses are located along the southern section of Macquarie Street between Memorial Avenue and Terminus Street, Liverpool, to permit on-street parking outside the evening peak hours. 

 

Approximately eighteen months ago, Council received similar representations for on-street parking to be permitted.  However, it was not supported because of possible impacts on traffic flow.  As part of the further assessment of this request, traffic counts were carried out for seven days between 12 and 18 April 2014.

 

The results indicated that there is a considerable reduction in traffic volume along this section of Macquarie Street between 5:00pm to 7:00pm. 

 

The Committee discussed and agreed that the proposed on-street parking can be permitted on a six month trial period with the outcome of the trial to be reported to the RMS and Police.

 

Item 3    Quadrat Lane, Sadleir – Request for Children’s Crossing outside Sadleir Public School

 

The Principal of Sadleir Public School has requested that a Children’s Crossing be installed in Quadrat Lane, at the rear of the school to allow children to cross the road safely. Quadrat Lane provides direct pedestrian access to the Primary School and is one of the only locations where an appropriate crossing facility has not been provided. 

 

Quadrat Lane has a carriageway width of 4.5m along its entire length and is being used as a one way thoroughfare in a westerly direction.

 

To improve driver behaviour and enhance pedestrian safety, it is recommended that signage be installed to promote the one way vehicular movement in a westerly direction. There is only one business that may be affected with this arrangement.  However, it faces Celebration Road and would not be affected by a permanent one way direction.

 

The RMS representative indicated that for the proposed one way movement to be installed, a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) is to be submitted to the RMS for consideration.  The Green Valley Police representative recommended that No Stopping signs should be installed on both sides of the lane to permit appropriate traffic movements.

 

The RMS representative advised that following the RMS approval of the required TMP, if required, the one way movement can be considered by the LTC members at a Special Electronic Meeting. 

 

The Committee discussed and supported the proposed installation of a Children’s Crossing on the section of Quadrat Lane at the back of the Sadleir Public School, subject to the School Principal signing the Children’s Crossing Flag Agreement.

 

Item 4    George Street, Liverpool – Proposed Special Event (Starry Sari Night)

 

Last year, Council organised a Starry Sari Night event in George Street, Liverpool as the beginning of an annual event for the next three years (2013 to 2015).

 

The 2014 Starry Sari Night event is scheduled for Saturday, 20 September 2014 in George and Scott Streets, Liverpool.  For the 2013 event, the section of George Street between Moore Street and Scott Street was closed.  For this year’s event, sections of George Street and Scott Street will be closed.  The event will commence at 3:00pm and conclude by 10:00pm.  The Committee was requested to classify the event and recommend relevant conditions.

 

The Committee discussed and classified the event as a Class 2 Special Event subject to the conditions listed in the recommendation. 

 

Item 5    Nuwarra Road and Marshall Avenue Intersection, Moorebank – Review of Intersection Control

 

Council has received numerous representations from local residents and the State Member for Menai regarding traffic delays associated with turning movements out of Marshall Avenue into Nuwarra Road in Moorebank.  The Committee was requested to support the installation of a ‘KEEP CLEAR’ marking at the intersection.

 

Nuwarra Road is a two-lane two-way regional road providing a key sub-arterial link between two major State Roads comprising Heathcote and Newbridge Roads. It carries significant traffic volume with a high proportion of heavy vehicles and is also a gazetted B-double route.

 

The Nuwarra Road/Marshall Avenue intersection provides access to a number of residential properties along Clyde Avenue and Vasta Avenue. The intersection has a seagull island control which permits right turn movements in and out of Marshall Avenue. Due to increased traffic along Nuwarra Road, local residents from the Marshall Avenue precinct are experiencing delays in the morning and the afternoon peak periods.  

 

The RMS representative outlined that it is illegal for motorists to queue across intersections and that the RMS’ Supplement to Traffic Management Guidelines indicate that KEEP CLEAR pavement markings can be considered if a location is near traffic signals and is affecting traffic flow and road safety.

 

However, to highlight the NSW Road Rules requirements and improve traffic flow from Marshall Avenue, the Committee discussed and supported installation of advisory signs “DO NOT QUEUE ACROSS INTERSECTION” (G9– 237).

 

 

 

 

Technical Discussion and General Business Items

 

In addition to the Agenda items the Committee also discussed the following two Technical Discussion and ten General Business items:

 

TD1   Liverpool City Centre Traffic Study

TD2   Manning Street, Warwick Farm – Horse Crossing Warning Options

 

G1     Sadleir Avenue, Sadleir – Traffic survey results

G2     Green Valley Road, Green Valley – Request for No Stopping

G3     Miller T-Way Car Park off Banks Road – Request for No Stopping

G4     Hinchinbrook Drive, Hinchinbrook – Line marking

G5     Newbridge Road/Speed Street intersection, Liverpool – Removal of existing pedestrian bridge and provision of signalised crossing on the western side of the intersection

G6     Casula Mall Shopping Centre Car Park – Road safety audit to be conducted by Casula Mall

G7     Cartwright Avenue, Miller – Request for Bus Zone to be reinstated

G8     Moore Street, Liverpool – Request for the Bus Zone to be extended and trolley bay moved

G9     Lyn Parade and Hoxton Park Road intersection, Prestons – Illegal right turns from kerb lane from Lyn Parade into Hoxton Park Road

G10   Malinya Crescent and Nuwarra Road, Moorebank – Request for KEEP CLEAR marking

Details of the discussions and the Committee’s comments are provided in the minutes.

 

Budget Impact

 

All the supported traffic facilities with the exception of Item 1 i.e. Pine Road Closure will be funded under the RMS Grant for the installation of new traffic facilities.  The traffic facilities under Item 1 will be funded by Council and the developer of the proposed Woolworths Shopping Centre development should the application be approved.  Details of the funding arrangement will be provided as part of the development assessment of the proposed development.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues.

Environmental and Sustainability

Promote an integrated and user friendly public transport service.

Support the delivery of a range of transport options.


Social and Cultural

Improved traffic and pedestrian safety.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The recommendation provides opportunity to advocate for the local community.

The recommendation is required in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Minutes - LTC Meeting - 14 May 2014 (Under separate cover)

  


367

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 04

Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee 8 May 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

121304.2014

Report By

Kathryn Sloan - Community Development Worker (Aged and Disability)

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Group Manager Economy and Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 8 May 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 8 May 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee held on 8 May 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support access and services for people with a disability.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Liverpool Access Committee Minutes - 8 May 2014

  


369

CTTE 04

Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee 8 May 2014

Attachment 1

Liverpool Access Committee Minutes - 8 May 2014

 


 


 


372

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 05

Environment Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of 12 May 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Natural Sustainable City

Lead the community to develop and implement environmentally sustainable practices

Key Policy

Environment Restoration Plan

File Ref

125166.2014

Report By

Kevin Smith - Service Manager Infrastructure Delivery

Approved By

Raj Autar – Group Manager Infrastructure & Environment

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Environment Advisory Committee (EAC) Meeting held on 12 May 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Environment Advisory Committee Meeting held on 12 May 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

The Environment Advisory Committee (EAC) is a Committee of Council constituted under Section 355 of the Local Government Act 1993. The purpose of the EAC is to:

 

·    Consider key environmental issues facing Liverpool and make recommendations to Council.

·    Provide input to Council with respect to the development of environmental programs for Liverpool.

·    Work in partnership with Council in terms of various environmental initiatives.

·    Provide input to the implementation of Council's Environment Restoration Plan (ERP).

·    Provide input to the development of future programs as part of the ongoing implementation of the ERP.

 

On 12 May 2014, the EAC considered the following two reports:

 

1.    Report No. 03/14 (See ‘Attachment 2’) – Environment Volunteer Program (EVP) Update, July – December 2013

The purpose of this report was to provide the EAC with an update on the delivery of the EVP and future activities to be completed under the program. The report provided an update on the program from 1 July 2013 to 31 December 2013 including the key activities completed in relation to delivery of the Environment Volunteer Program.

 

2.    Report No. 04/14 (See ‘Attachment 3’) – Environment Restoration Plan (ERP) Bush Regeneration Contracts for 2013/2014

Since the commencement of the Environment Restoration Plan in 2007, a Site Selection process has been undertaken annually to inform sites chosen for Bush Regeneration projects.  At the EAC meeting held on 10 February 2014, it was discussed that the Site Selection Process would be reviewed to determine if a program of works could be developed which would provide sites for bush regeneration works across multiple years.

 

Results of the last Round of Site Selections were reviewed to find sufficient projects to inform works for the Environment Restoration plan up to 2017.  This report provided a list of bush regeneration works to be completed from 2014 to June 2017 using site selection results from Round 7 of the Site Selection Process.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

Manage the environmental health of waterways.

Protect, enhance and maintain areas of endangered ecological communities and high quality bushland as part of an attractive mix of land uses.

Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues.


Social and Cultural

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.

Deliver high quality services for children and their families.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Act as an environmental leader in the community.

Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

EAC Meeting Minutes of 12 May 2014

2.View

EAC Report No. 03/14

3.View

EAC Report No. 04/14

  


375

CTTE 05

Environment Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of 12 May 2014

Attachment 1

EAC Meeting Minutes of 12 May 2014

 


 


 


 


379

CTTE 05

Environment Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of 12 May 2014

Attachment 2

EAC Report No. 03/14

 


 


 


 


383

CTTE 05

Environment Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of 12 May 2014

Attachment 3

EAC Report No. 04/14

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


399

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 06

Minutes of Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 4 June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Deliver a range of stimulating and vibrant cultural events, programs and festivals

Key Policy

Events Strategy

File Ref

126730.2014

Report By

Julie Scott - Manager Economic Development

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Group Manager Economy and Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Tourism and Events Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Tourism and Events Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Tourism and Events Committee held on 4 June 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions for Council staff to undertake, none of which have financial implications for Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The activities of the Committee support Council’s efforts to facilitate the development of new tourism based on local attractions, culture and creative industries as well as economic development.

Environmental and Sustainability

Environmental and sustainability considerations are factored into the planning approval process for relevant events.


Social and Cultural

The work of the Committee supports events and activities which promote Council’s diversity.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The Committee provides guidance for Council’s tourism and events efforts.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Minutes Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 4 June 2014

  


401

CTTE 06

Minutes of Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 4 June 2014

Attachment 1

Minutes Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 4 June 2014

 


 


 


 


 


406

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 07

Key Site Master Planning Steering Committee Minutes - 3 June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Activate the city centre and develop vibrant places that attract people to Liverpool

Key Policy

City Centre Strategy

File Ref

127236.2014

Report By

Tersia Wilson - Business Support Officer

Approved By

Nadia Napoletano – Group Manager Governance

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Key Site Master Planning Steering Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the Minutes of the Key Site Master Planning Steering Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014;

 

2.       Adopts the recommendation put forward in the confidential report provided under separate cover; and

 

3.       Keeps confidential the minutes supplied under separate cover containing information pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains information that would if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Key Site Master Planning Steering Committee held on 3 June 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that are required to be undertaken by Council staff.

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities.

Provide efficient parking for the City Centre.

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues.

Facilitate economic development.

Facilitate the development of new tourism based on local attractions, culture and creative industries.

Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities (in the City Centre).

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


408

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 08

Minutes of the Warwick Farm Racing Precinct Steering Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

129023.2014

Report By

Megan Munari - Senior Strategic Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd – Group Manager Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Warwick Farm Racing Precinct Steering Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Warwick Farm Racing Precinct Steering Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

The Minutes of the Warwick Farm Racing Precinct Steering Committee held on 3 June 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Draft minutes from Warwick Farm Racing Precinct Steering Committee 3 June 2014

  


413

CTTE 08

Minutes of the Warwick Farm Racing Precinct Steering Committee Meeting held on 29 April 2014

Attachment 1

Draft minutes from Warwick Farm Racing Precinct Steering Committee 3 June 2014

 


 


 


413

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 09

Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

130862.2014

Report By

Grace Farrugia - Business Support Officer

Approved By

Matthew Walker – Group Manager Business Exellence

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee held on 4 June 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee 4 June 2014

  


415

CTTE 09

Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee

Attachment 1

Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee 4 June 2014

 


 


417

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 10

Street Naming Committee minutes from 3 June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

131332.2014

Report By

Katie Miles - Strategic Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd – Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Street Naming Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the Minutes of the Street Naming Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014.

 

2.       Allocates $2,650 to be funded from the General Fund for a commemorative naming plaque for Bob Evans Park in Moorebank.

 

 

REPORT

 

The Minutes of the Street Name Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, other than the request for a $2,650 plaque allocation fund for Bob Evans Park, no other actions will have any financial impact on Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Street Naming Committee Meeting Minutes 3 June 2014

  


419

CTTE 10

Street Naming Committee minutes from 3 June 2014

Attachment 1

Street Naming Committee Meeting Minutes 3 June 2014

 


 


 


422

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 11

Liverpool Sports Committee Minutes of Meeting 27 March 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Healthy Inclusive  City

Plan, support and deliver high quality and accessible services, program and facilities

Key Policy

Recreation Strategy

File Ref

127974.2014

Report By

Mark Westley - Sports Development Officer

Approved By

Kiersten Fishburn – Group Manager Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

On Thursday 27 March 2014, the scheduled meeting of the Liverpool City Sports Committee was held.

 

This report seeks Council to receive and note the minutes of this meeting.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the minutes of the Liverpool City Sports Committee meeting held on 27 March 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

The Liverpool City Sports Committee is a committee of Council which was established in August 2006. This committee is made up of association endorsed sporting representatives from sports that are conducted within the Liverpool Local Government Area and representatives from the NSW Police and the Department of Education.

 

A copy of the minutes from the meeting held on Thursday 27 March 2014, are attached for Council to receive and note.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Liverpool Sports Committee Minutes 27 March 2014

  


431

CTTE 11

Liverpool Sports Committee Minutes of Meeting 27 March 2014

Attachment 1

Liverpool Sports Committee Minutes 27 March 2014

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


431

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 12

Minutes of Economic Development Committee meeting held 4 June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney

Key Policy

Economic Development Strategy

File Ref

133853.2014

Report By

Julie Scott - Manager Economic Development

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Group Manager Economy and Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Economic Development Committee meeting held on 4 June 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Economic Development Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014.

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Economic Development Committee meeting held on 4 June 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have financial implications for Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The activities of the Committee support Council’s efforts to facilitate economic development.

Environmental and Sustainability

Environmental and sustainability considerations will be factored into economic development activities.


Social and Cultural

Economic development will boost demand for cultural and arts activities.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The Committee provides guidance for Council’s economic development projects and initiatives.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Minutes Economic Development Committee meeting held 4 June 2014

  


433

CTTE 12

Minutes of Economic Development Committee meeting held 4 June 2014

Attachment 1

Minutes Economic Development Committee meeting held 4 June 2014

 


 


 


 


 


 


439

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 13

Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 4 June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney

Key Policy

Economic Development Strategy

File Ref

133858.2014

Report By

Julie Scott - Manager Economic Development

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Group Manager Economy and Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Building Our New City Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the Building our New City Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014.

 

2.   Approves the raising of a $10.7m loan to be serviced from the Town Improvement Fund levy with or without a NSW Government Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme subsidy to fund a range of Building Our New City projects prioritised through the process facilitated by the NSW Government Architect’s Office.

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Building Our New City Committee meeting held on 4 June 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions for Council staff, some of which have financial implications for Council.

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

                                                     

Economic and Financial

The activities of the Committee support Council’s efforts to further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities.

Costs will be incurred by Council in servicing a $10.7m loan. If Council is successful in its application for a subsidy from the Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme these costs will be lower.

Environmental and Sustainability

Environmental and sustainability considerations will be factored into urban design for key City Centre precincts.


Social and Cultural

Revitalisation of the City Centre will embrace a range of arts and space activation opportunities.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The Committee provides guidance for Council’s Building Our New City Projects.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Minutes Building Our New City Committee meeting held 4 June 2014

  


441

CTTE 13

Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 4 June 2014

Attachment 1

Minutes Building Our New City Committee meeting held 4 June 2014

 


 


 


 

 


445

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Correspondence Reports

 

CORR 01

Incoming and Outgoing Correspondence Report

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

NA

File Ref

076531.2014

Report By

George Georgakis - Service Manager Council and Executive Services

Approved By

George Georgakis - Service Manager Council and Executive Services

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The purpose of this report is to table all incoming and outgoing correspondence generated as a result of a council resolution, and petitions received by Council.

 

At the Extraordinary meeting of Council on 28 April, 2010 Council resolved to:

 

Establish a new standing agenda item in all council meeting agendas called “Correspondence”. All incoming and outgoing correspondence, in whatever form, including emails, fax messages, letters, submission, resulting from a council resolution must be tabled in chambers and be put on the agenda at the next scheduled Council meeting.

 

At the Extraordinary meeting of 25 February, 2014 Council resolved that:

 

“Petitions received by Council be attached to the Correspondence item on the Council Business Papers and provided under separate cover.”

 

Accordingly correspondence and the list of petitions received between 15 May 2014 and 12 June 2014 are included in this report.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the report.

 

 

 

 

 

 

REPORT

 

incoming correspondence

No

Date

From

To

Details

Nil

 

 


OUtgoing correspondence

No

Date

From

To

Details

Nil

 

 


Petitions

No

Issue

Number of Signatories

1

Opposition to the Federal Government’s compulsory acquisition of land parcels on the Georges River corridor for the Moorebank Terminal. Seeking a fair go for South West Sydney.

46

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social or cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Provides information to Councillors to assist in decision making processes.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil  


447

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Questions with Notice

 

QWN 01

Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

 

Strategic Direction

Accessible Connected City

Provide safe and easy travel with a high quality road and traffic management network

Key Policy

Asset Management Plan

File Ref

106084.2014

 

 

QUESTION WITH NOTICE

 

Please address the following:

 

1.   How many bus shelters have been constructed in the 2013-2014 year?

 

Five bus shelters are scheduled to be installed in the 2013-14 program year. A contract is being awarded for the fabrication and installation of the bus shelters and at this stage, the shelters are expected to be installed by August 2014.

 

 

2.   What are their locations?

 

·    Cowpasture Road, Hinchinbrook - on the eastern side approximately 50m south of Collarenebri Rd;

 

·    Mannow Avenue, West Hoxton - on the southern side approximately 50m west of Tunnack Close;

 

·    Greenway Drive, West Hoxton - on the northern side approximately 70m west of Carmichael Drive;

 

·    Joshua Moore Drive, Horningsea Park - on the northern side approximately 45m east of Cowpasture Rd; and 

 

·    Hoxton Park Road, Hoxton Park - on the northern side approximately 50m east of Glen Innes Rd.

 

 

3.   Is there any back log from previous years?

 

In response to a significant demand for bus shelters, Council has developed a city wide priority program for the progressive installation of bus shelters, which aims to provide over 40 shelters in the short to medium term. However, due to competing priorities and constrained budgets, only limited funding is able to be directed towards bus shelters, which has created a backlog of the above 40 shelters.

 

The need for bus shelters is identified in consultation with the community and bus operators. The ranking of priority for the provision of bus shelters is generally based on the following factors:

 

·    proposed location of shelter - bus stops adjoining high pedestrian and patron generating facilities will be ranked higher .e.g. schools, shopping centres, aged care facilities and community facilities; and

 

 

4.   How many will be constructed in the 2014-2015 financial year?

 

Three bus shelters are planned to be installed in the 2014-2015 program year.

 

 

5.   Where are new bus shelters to be located?

 

·    Heckenberg Rd, Sadleir - on the southern side at 87 Heckenberg Rd;

 

·    Leacocks Lane, Casula - on the western side approximately 45m west of Roberts Rd; and

 

·    Middleton Grange - location to be confirmed following further investigation.

 

 

6.   Please indicate whether these are in new or established suburbs.

 

Shelters will be provided in both new release and established areas of Liverpool.

 

 

7.   What is the approximate cost of a bus shelter?

 

The estimated cost to supply and install new bus shelters ranges between $20,000 and $25,000 depending on extent of site works required to provide fully accessible bus stops. Shelters cost approximately $18,000.

 

 


449

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Questions with Notice

 

QWN 02

Question with Notice - Clr Harle

 

Strategic Direction

Healthy Inclusive  City

Improve health and wellbeing and encourage a happy, active community

Key Policy

Recreation Strategy

File Ref

117517.2014

 

 

QUESTION WITH NOTICE

 

Please address the following:

 

1.   Can Council provide the status of steps implemented to prevent Public Address Systems being used in the Chipping Norton Recreational Area since the matter was previously debated in Council?

 

Signage has been erected that indicates that amplified music is not permitted without approval from Council, and Counci’s Compliance Officers attend the site in response to complaints.   Council officers have also had discussions with NSW Police, Liverpool Local Area Command (LAC).

 

2.   Have prominent signs indicating that “PA system are not allowed in the park” been installed as was promised when the matter was raised previously?

 

As noted in response to Question 1 above, there are signs in the park advising that amplified music is not permitted except with Council approval. 

 

3.   Is Council aware that Black Muscat Park is again regularly used by large groups that produce extremely loud music, particularly “Middle Eastern Music” which continues to be a major problem despite Councils’ preventative efforts?

 

A number of complaints have been made this year regarding large groups playing music in the park.  Council officers have responded as noted above. It is noted that the complaints have been made by one resident. 

 

4.   The matter was again reported on the 18th of May. Previously Rangers were to attend the Park area early on Saturday and Sunday mornings to prevent groups setting up PA systems, has this practice been discontinued?

 

Council’s Compliance Officers currently attend the site in response to calls to the after-hours pager, as resources allow. During the period October 2013 to March 2014, rangers were rostered to attend the site three times on Saturdays and Sundays.  As noted in the memo to Councillors in Attachment B, the regular patrols ceased in March 2014. 

 

5.   Have Rangers asked Police for assistance when complaints have been received from nearby residents and if so, what was the response?

 

Liverpool police have been contacted on several occasions to assist officers attending the site.  The police have advised they cannot prioritise noise complaints over more serious crime matters.  However, in recent discussions, Liverpool LAC has advised that if Council officers are unable to resolve a situation in the park, they should return to seek police assistance in person.  Subject to available resources, police will accompany Council officers to assist if the circumstances warrant it.

 

6.   Several incident have been reported to me of noise affected residents being harassed and intimidated by large groups of 1000 or more Black Muscat Park users. Those incidents occurred when residents opposite the park asked operators to reduce the sound level or questioned if they had permission from Liverpool Council to use the area. Has Council issued permits over the last six months allowing any groups to use the park area, including permission to operate PA systems?

 

Council’s Recreation section advises that the booking arrangements do not involve the issue of a formal permits.  The users are not given exclusive use of an area of any park.  No approvals have been issued for use of this part of Black Muscat Park and no approvals have been issued to allow for the use of amplified music or PA systems.

 

7.   Is Council aware that members of these groups use wood gathered from bush areas within the park to fuel open fires and barbeques rather than use those supplied by Council?

 

Council’s Recreation section is unaware of such practices.

 

8.   Is Council aware that those open fires often result in covering large areas of the park with dense smoke that detrimentally affects all park users as well as residents in the adjoining areas? Often to the extent that residents are forced to close all windows and doors to avoid the smoke that lingers for several hours after park users have left the area.

 

Council’s Recreation section is unaware of such practices.

 

9.   In relation to toilet amenities for the Chipping Norton Recreational areas; does the system cope when groups of several thousand visitors use these facilities and what is Councils liability if problems occur?

 

Council’s Coordinator Facility Maintenance Programs advises that unless affected by vandalism or improper use, the toilets in the Chipping Norton Recreation area are adequate for the numbers that use the facilities. 

 

 

 

 

Two years ago Council was fixing problems with the toilets at Black Muscat and Homestead Parks every week.  Works have been carried out since then to reduce the impact of improper use of the toilets on their function.  For example the tank at Black Muscat was failing continually because people were putting items like nappies down the toilet.  A secondary tank has now been installed so these bulky items stay in the first tank and pump out occurs from the second tank.

Homestead Park toilets have now been improved so it pumps directly to sewer.  The only major incident in the past few years occurred recently when the pump failed due to an electrical fault and toilets had to be closed until the new pump was available.

 

 

10. Can I be provided with the approximate costs associated for two Rangers to patrol the area on Saturdays, Sundays and public Holidays from 10:00 am to 3:00pm?

 

Two Compliance Officers allocated to the park for five hours on a Saturday and Sunday would cost in the range of $925 to $1,110 (depending on the hourly rate of the officer).  However, these officers would need to be in addition to normal rostering requirements on weekends for compliance and enforcement activities across the LGA.  Additional resources would be needed.  The cost of two security guards for five hours each day for Saturday and Sunday would be $660 total.

 



 

 

 


452

Ordinary Meeting 25 June 2014

Questions with Notice

 

QWN 03

Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

134461.2014

 

 

QUESTION WITH NOTICE

 

Please address the following:

 

1. Have staff had an opportunity to look at the ramifications of changes and funding cuts in the Federal Budget

 

2. Can I be advised what the budget will mean for:

 

a)   The Pensioner rate subsidies?

 

b)   Road upgrades and works for the next budget.

 

c)   Any other known changes that may affect ratepayers or Liverpool plans or projects

 

 

A response to these questions will be included in the July business paper.