Liverpool City Council

Business Paper

 

 

 

 

Council Agenda

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ordinary Council Meeting

30 July 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Francis Greenway Centre

170 George Street

Liverpool


Description: LCC_bw_logo 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


You are hereby notified that an Ordinary Council Meeting of Liverpool City Council will be held at the Francis Greenway Centre, 170 George Street, Liverpool on Wednesday, 30 July 2014 commencing at 6.00pm. Doors to the Francis Greenway Centre will open at 5.45pm.

 

Liverpool City Council Meetings are taped for the purposes of minute taking and record keeping.  If you have any enquiries please contact Council and Executive Services on 9821 9237.

 

Text Box:
 

 

 


Carl Wulff

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

 


 

 

 


Order of Business

 

                                                                                                              PAGE     TAB

Opening

Prayer

Apologies 

Condolences

Confirmation of Minutes

Extraordinary Council Meeting held on 20 June 2014............................................................. 5

Declarations of Interest

Public Forum

Mayoral Report

NIL

Notices of Motion Of Rescission

NIL

Notices of Motion

NOM 01          Bus Shelter in Liverpool LGA.......................................................................... 78......... 1

NOM 02          Youth Homeless Services in Liverpool........................................................... 80......... 2

NOM 03          Liquor Related Development Applications...................................................... 89......... 3

NOM 04          Council Committees....................................................................................... 95......... 4

NOM 05          Quota 50th Birthday July 2014 Presentation by Councillors.......................... 97......... 5

Motions of Urgency

NIL

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

IHAP 01          DA-790/2013 - Stage 2 development of a court approved masterplan in DA-394/2011 for a non-denominational cemetrary at 41 Greendale Road, Bringelly (Lot 5 DP 252040) 99                                                                                                                           6

IHAP 02          DA-105/2014 - Torrens title subdivision creating five lots at 54 Nineteenth Avenue, Hoxton Park.................................................................................................. 105......... 7

IHAP 03          DA-1198/2013 - Partial demolition and alterations and additions to the existing dwelling; use of the dwelling as a child care centre; and installation of signage at 4 Bungarra Crescent, Chipping Norton........................................................................... 110......... 8

Development Application Determination Report

DAD 01           Modification to Development Consent No.693/2009 at 320-400 Badgerys Creek Road, Badgerys Creek (Lot 1 DP 1188956)........................................................... 117......... 9

DAD 02           Modification to Development Consent No. DA-611/2009 at  No.1 Mill Road Liverpool (Lot 1 100 DP1180561)........................................................................................ 144....... 10

DAD 03           Modification to DA-492/2008 - Education Establishment at 83-87 Gurner Avenue, Austral.                                                                                                                        159....... 11

DAD 04           Modification to DA-1552/2006 - Road Bridge at Newbridge Road, Moorebank (Lot 6 & 7 DP 1065574 & Pt Lot 105 DP 1070029)....................................................... 168....... 12

Chief Executive Officer Report

CEO 01          Local Government NSW Annual Conference.............................................. 193....... 13

CEO 02          Proposed Organisational Structure............................................................... 203....... 14

CEO 03          Adoption of the exhibited amendments to the Revenue Policy (Fees and Charges) 2014-15.................................................................................................................. 209....... 15

Executive Director Report

ED 01             Hoarding Fees............................................................................................... 216....... 16

ED 02             IHAP Members............................................................................................. 222....... 17

Business Excellence Report

GMBE 01       Affixation of the Common Seal of Council................................................... 224....... 18

GMBE 02       Statutory Investment Report June 2014....................................................... 226....... 19

City Presentation Report

NIL

Community and Culture  Report

GMCC 01       Quarterly Report on Compliments and Complaints..................................... 237....... 20

Economy and Engagement Report

GMEE 01       Donations, Grants and Sponsorship............................................................. 239....... 21

GMEE 02       Community and Business Representation - Liverpool Council's Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce...................................................................................................... 246....... 22

Governance Report

GMGO 01      Proposed Deed of Agreement to facilitate the acquisition of a part of Lot 1 DP 1175057, Progress Circuit, Prestons and the construction of the Lyn Parade, Prestons extension                                                                                                                       248....... 23

GMGO 02      Acquisition of Lot 358 DP 1184144, 80 Inverell Avenue, Hinchinbrook for drainage purposes........................................................................................................ 253....... 24

GMGO 03      Acquisition of Lot 200 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill for the purposes of extending Kurrajong Road............................................................................ 256....... 25

GMGO 04      Authorisation of Remediation Works, Lot 2 DP 719245, 33 Moore Street, Liverpool 261                                                                                                                         26

Infrastructure and Environment Report

GMIE 01         Tender WT2324 - Replacement of Car Park Equipment, Management System and Maintenance at the Warren Serviceway Car Park...................................... 263....... 27

GMIE 02         Liverpool City Centre Traffic Study - Findings and next steps..................... 269....... 28

Planning and Growth Report

GMPG 01       LLEP Draft Amendment No 49 - Removal of Flood Prone Area Mapping from LLEP 281                                                                                                                         29

GMPG 02       Draft Liverpool LEP 2008 Amendment 35 Post Exhibition Report.............. 307....... 30

GMPG 03       Draft LLEP 2008 Amendment No 32 (Anomalies) Post Exhibition Report . 314....... 31

GMPG 04       Public Exhibition Outcomes - Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Amendment 15) .......................................................................................... 320....... 32

Committee Reports

CTTE 01         Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee
Meeting held on 4 June 2014 ....................................................................... 328....... 33

CTTE 02         Liverpool Youth Council Meeting Notes June 2014..................................... 333....... 34

CTTE 03         Heritage Advisory Committee Minutes 3 June 2014.................................... 338....... 35

CTTE 04         Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee 12 June 2014......................... 345....... 36

CTTE 05         No Intermodal Committee Meeting Minutes of 1 July 2014......................... 350....... 37

CTTE 06         Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee........................................... 375....... 38

CTTE 07         Key Sites Master Planning Steering Committee Minutes from meeting held 1 July 2014                                                                                                                       379....... 39

CTTE 08         Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 2 July 2014.... 385....... 40

CTTE 09         Minutes of Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 2 July 2014....... 410....... 41

CTTE 10         Minutes of Economic Development Committee meeting held 2 July 2014. 436....... 42

Correspondence Reports

CORR 01       Incoming and Outgoing Correspondence Report......................................... 461....... 43

Questions with Notice

QWN 01         Question with Notice - Clr Stanley................................................................ 463....... 44

QWN 02         Question with Notice - Clr Harle................................................................... 465....... 45

QWN 03         Question with Notice - Clr Shelton................................................................ 466....... 46  

Questions Taken on Notice

Presentations by Councillors

Close

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

MINUTES OF THE EXTRAOrdinary Meeting

HELD ON 20 June 2014

(INCLUDING ITEMS LISTED FOR THE ORDINARY MEETING 25 June 2014)

 

PRESENT:

Mayor Ned Mannoun

Councillor Hadchiti

Councillor Hadid

Councillor Harle

Councillor Karnib

Councillor Mamone

Councillor Ristevski

Councillor Shelton

Councillor Stanley

Mr Rob Noble, Acting Chief Executive Officer

Ms Julie Hately, Executive Director

Ms Toni Averay, Acting Executive Director

Mr Mathew Walker, Group Manager Business Excellence

Ms Kiersten Fishburn, Group Manager Community and Culture

Mr Gino Belsito, Group Manager City Presentation

Ms Nadia Napoletano, Group Manager Governance

Mr Michael Cullen, Group Manager Economy and Engagement

Mr Raj Autar, Group Manager Infrastructure and Environment

.

The meeting commenced at 6.01pm

 

 

OPENING                              6.01pm

 

PRAYER                               The prayer of the Council was read by Pastor Paul Mosiejczuk

                                                from Liverpool Baptist Church.

 

APOLOGIES                          Councillors Balloot and Waller

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti          Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


 

 

Declarations of Interest

Clr Hadchiti declared a non pecuniary, less than significant interest in the following Item:

Item GMEE 01:     Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

Reason:                Clr Hadchiti was invited and attended La’u Samoa Council’s 52nd Anniversary of the Independence of Samoa event at Macquarie Function Centre. 

Clr Hadchiti will not leave the Chambers for the duration of this Item.


 

ITEM NO:

NOM 01

FILE NO:

135348.2014

SUBJECT:

Council agenda items for 25 June 2014 meeting

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council transact the following Council business at this meeting:

 

·    Council agenda items for 25 June 2014 meeting.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Clrs Stanley and Shelton asked to be recorded as voting against the motion.

 

NOTICES OF MOTION

 


 

ITEM NO:

CEO 01

FILE NO:

135519.2014

SUBJECT:

Cancel the Ordinary Council meeting scheduled for 25 June 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council cancel the Ordinary Council meeting scheduled for 25 June 2014.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                         Moved: Mayor Mannoun               Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Clrs Stanley and Shelton asked to be recorded as voting against the motion.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REPORT

Public Forum

 

(Presentation – Items not on agenda)                   

1.         Ms Debra Atkins addressed Council on sponsorship for Stage Struck Dancing Studio Tour.

 

2.         Mr Eric Corso addressed Council on public recreational areas and the town centre of Middleton Grange.

 

3.      Mr John Anderson addressed Council on the Proposed Intermodal.

 

Motion:                         Moved: Clr Ristevski                     Seconded: Mayor Mannoun

That a two minute extension of time be given to Mr John Anderson.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

(Representation – Items on agenda)

 

1.       Ms Sharon Hughes addressed Council on the following Item:

 

Item CTTE 03 – Local Traffic Committee Minutes of Meeting Held on 14 May 2014 (Pine Road, Casula – Proposed road closure of the section close to Hume Highway.)


 

 

Mayoral Minute

SUBJECT: Sponsorship request to support local children dance at Disneyland

 

Council has been approached by the Australian Dance and Drama Company seeking sponsorship for 23 Liverpool children to dance at Disneyland in the USA.  The children will also participate in workshops held by Disney Choreographers and the Edge Performing Arts while in the USA.

 

While fundraising for the tour has been in place over the last 12 months a shortfall in funding still exists.

 

The Australia Dance and Drama Company has sought help from Council to assist these children for the 5 July – 13 July, 2014 tour to the USA.

 

Children from this group have performed free of charge at Council’s Australia Day 2014 celebration and at the 2013 Spring Garden Festival at Bigge Park.  The Dance and Drama Company have indicated that the children would be happy to perform at future Liverpool Council sponsored events.

 

Many of the children touring have conditions ranging from mild cerebral palsy to scoliosis and diabetes.  Dancing assists these children to participate in a normal active lifestyle.

 

As the children will be touring in early July, I have brought forward this request for sponsorship as an urgent item for consideration by Council.

 

I propose that sponsorship of $200 per dancer be provided by Council, representing $4,600 in total. 

 

The Sponsorship is consistent with Council’s Corporate Sponsorship guidelines through its community and social development and cultural development objectives.  While funding can be provided to a for-profit or not-for-profit organisation, I propose that in this case funds be directed to the participating children as below:

 

Name

Suburb

Age

Erin McClatchey

Until recently Miller

17 years

Rachael Dimond

Moorebank

13 years

Emily Gonano

Moorebank

 6 years

Bethany Gonano

Moorebank

 8 years

Chloe Gonano

Moorebank

10 years

·          Emma Shaliapin

Mount Pritchard

10 years

·          Jake Katavich

Until recently Moorebank

10 years

·          Taylor Katavich

Until recently Moorebank

13 years

Sandra Yazbeck

Chipping Norton

 9 years

Della Reinke

Chipping Norton

10 years

Holly Reinke

Chipping Norton

11 years

Jasmin Stroud

Until recently Moorebank

16 years

·          Kara Buttigieg

Holsworthy

16 years

Madison Palmer

Wattle Grove

11 years

·          Hayley Billingsley

Moorebank

14 years

·          Taryn Pritchard

Hammondville

11 years

Emma Frisina

Casula

20 years

Lara Turk

Chipping Norton

10 years

·          Jessica Jelavic

Prestons

12 years

Brittney Phillips

Lurnea

 9 years

·          Rylee McCartney

Hammondville

12 years

Kirby McCartney

Hammondville

10 years

Lily Wise

Hammondville

 7 years

 

·         Denotes life challenge

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun              

That Council

  1. Provides sponsorship of $200 to each child participating in the dancing tour arranged by Australian Dance and Drama Company to the USA from 5 July – 13 July, 2014 funded from the Councillor Reserve.

 

  1. Takes up the opportunity for the children from the Australian Dance and Drama Company to perform at upcoming Council events, including the Night Markets.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


Notices of Motion

ITEM NO:       NOM 01

FILE NO:        128956.2014

SUBJECT:     Outstanding Legal, Social and Other Liabilities

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Provides a report to the July 2014 (under confidential cover as necessary) a report that details all known areas of concern for current and projected exposure to legal, financial and social liabilities.

 

2.   The report should advise level of projected exposure, Council's current position and what steps are being taken to address these situations.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That Council:

 

  1. That Council receives a risk report based on the new Enterprise Risk Management Policy and Strategy, every six months commencing July 2014.

 

  1. The report should advise level of projected exposure, Council's current position and what steps are being taken to address these situations.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 


ITEM NO:       NOM 02

FILE NO:        134503.2014

SUBJECT:     Community Engagement

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives a report at its July 2014 meeting regarding the effectiveness of the subscription to the “Bang the Table” marketing campaign.

 

2.   Total costs of the initiative; broken up into individual campaigns.

 

3.   Are Council Officers able to ascertain the effectiveness of the use of this type of marketing to improve Council’s communication with its residents? What has that been?

 

4.   Effective immediately provides all Councillors with a copy of the campaigns and the questions to be asked before the phone calls take place. (To allow Councillors to deal with feedback by residents effectively).

 

5.   Approval for all questions by consultation with the Mayor and CEO. 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

 Foreshadowed Motion       Moved: Clr Ristevski           Seconded: Clr Mamone

 

That Council notes the comments of the Acting Chief Executive Officer (as shown below) and receives and notes the motion only:

 

Liverpool Listens has been live since May 2014 and evaluation is scheduled in a further 9 months at which time a report will be provided.

 

Reachtel has been used to trial key events including New Years Eve and the first Night Markets, whilst impact is still being ascertained anecdotal evidence shows a raised awareness.  

 

On being put to the meeting the motion moved by Clr Stanley was declared LOST.

 

The foreshadowed motion moved by Clr Ristevski then became the motion and on being put to the meeting was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       NOM 03

FILE NO:        134517.2014

SUBJECT:     CCTV

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Provides a report to the July 2014 Council meeting detailing the current operation of CCTV and Wi-Fi in the CBD.

 

2.   The report should discuss (but not limited to):

 

a)   Total spending to date

b)   Funding sources and how money has been allocated

c)   Details of any grant applications (whether successful or not) that may have been made to assist Council to set up and run CCTV

d)   Estimates of yearly maintenance and other costs that affect Council Budget.

e)   effectiveness of the initiative.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

Foreshadowed Motion        Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Clr Ristevski

 

That Council notes the comments of the Acting Chief Executive Officer (as shown in the Council Agenda) and receives and notes the motion with an evaluation report to be prepared within 3 to 6 months.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion moved by Clr Stanley was declared LOST.

 

The foreshadowed motion moved by Clr Hadid then became the motion and on being put to the meeting was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       NOM 04

FILE NO:        134688.2014

SUBJECT:     Recording of Minutes of Council Meetings

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Saves the recordings of Council meetings for 6 months after the confirmations of the Minutes of that meeting.

 

2.   Updates the Code of Meetings Practice page 15 at 21.7 to read:

 

21.7. For the purposes of compiling the minutes of meetings, each meeting shall be recorded, with the recordings kept, other than by resolution of Council, for six months after the minutes of that meeting are confirmed by Council and the recordings must be disposed of in accordance with the General Records Disposal Schedule for Local Government.

 

3.   Updates any other relevant Council Policy documents to reflect these changes.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That Council:

 

1.   Saves the recordings of Council meetings for a four year rolling period.

 

2.   Updates the Code of Meetings Practice page 15 at 21.7 to read:

 

21.7. For the purposes of compiling the minutes of meetings, each meeting shall be recorded, with the recordings kept, other than by resolution of Council, for a four year rolling period after the minutes of that meeting are confirmed by Council and the recordings must be disposed of in accordance with the General Records Disposal Schedule for Local Government.

 

3.  Updates any other relevant Council Policy documents to reflect these changes.

 

4. Staff prepare a report to Council on the feasibility of introducing full web broadcasting of Council meetings and their availability as a podcast as practiced by a number of NSW Councils.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       NOM 05

FILE NO:        134728.2014

SUBJECT:     Election of Councillor as an Executive Member on NSW Branch of the Australian Local Government Women’s Association (ALGWA)

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Congratulates Councillor Waller on her service to the Australian Local Government Women’s Association and appointment to the NSW Executive.

 

2.   Extends the Councillor expenses policy to cover the reasonable costs of travel and accommodation to attend Australian Local Government Women’s Association meetings for the one year term.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That Council:

 

1.   Congratulates Councillor Waller on her service to the Australian Local Government Women’s Association and appointment to the NSW Executive.

 

  1. Extends the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy to cover the reasonable costs of travel and accommodation to attend Australian Local Government Women’s Association meetings for the one year term.

 

3.   Extends the Civic Expenses and Facilities Expenses Policy point 4.10.1 to read: “Any interstate travel to be approved by the Chief Executive Officer.”

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

ITEM NO:       IHAP 01

FILE NO:        119807.2014

SUBJECT:     Torrens title subdivision creating two allotments at 165 Fifth Avenue, Austral

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Development Application DA-908/2013 for a facilitating Torrens title subdivision creating two allotments, subject to the recommended conditions attached to the Council officer’s IHAP report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 


ITEM NO:       IHAP 02

FILE NO:        120346.2014

SUBJECT:     Alterations and additions and two lot Torrens title subdivision at 5 Durack Place, Casula

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Development Application DA-1281/2013, subject to the recommended  conditions attached to the Council officers IHAP Report and as modified by IHAP and the Council officer as follows:

 

B.     PRIOR TO ISSUE OF A CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE

 

2a.     The proposed concrete driveway shall be located adjacent to the proposed boundary      with proposed Lot 2 and a 600mm wide landscape strip be created between the      proposed driveway and the boundary to the property to the north-west.

 

2b.     A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the PCA, prior to issue of any construction certificate.

 

2c.     The proposed allotment boundary of the battle-axe    handle where it traverses the          shared driveway, should be maintained at 3 metres wide     with a right of carriageway in           favour of proposed lot 2 where it overlaps the driveway of        the existing dwelling.

 

E.      PRIOR TO ISSUE OF A SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE

 

38a. The proposed driveway and landscaping should be constructed and installed prior to release of a subdivision certificate to ensure early establishment of landscaping.

 

42a. The following restriction as to user must be placed over proposed Lot 1 to benefit Lot 2. 

        Details shall be submitted with the application for a Subdivision Certificate.

 

(a)     A right of carriageway in favour of Lot 2 must be provided where it overlaps the

         driveway of the existing dwelling on Lot 1.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Clr Harle

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.


ITEM NO:       IHAP 03

FILE NO:        121338.2014

SUBJECT:     Construction of a nine storey residential flat building containing thirty-six residential units with basement car parking and ancillary site works

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Approves Development Application No. DA-1413/2013, subject to the recommended conditions attached to the Council officer’s IHAP Report

 

2.       Notify in writing, the persons who made a submission with regard to the proposed development.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Clr Harle

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.


ITEM NO:       IHAP 04

FILE NO:        122664.2014

SUBJECT:     Subdivision of two existing lots into 13 Torrens Title lots; road construction and tree removal at Lot 423 and Lot 41 San Cristobal Drive, Green Valley

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approves Development  Application DA-1291/2013, subject to the recommended conditions attached to the Council officer’s IHAP Report and as modified by the following additional changes:

 

a.   Delete Condition 19 as contained within the IHAP report.

 

b.   Insert the following new condition to be satisfied prior to the issue of a Subdivision Certificate:

 

“Lot 12 and Lot 13 shall each be burdened by a restriction on the use of land which states that the burdened lots have no building entitlement. The 88B Instrument shall state that each restriction on the use of land shall not be extinguished or altered without the written consent of Liverpool City Council”.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Clr Harle

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 
Chief Executive Officer Report

ITEM NO:       CEO 01

FILE NO:        117136.2014

SUBJECT:     Supporting our Locals

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receive and note this report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Ristevski

 

  1. That Council receive and note this report.

 

  1. That Councillors receive an update at a Councillor Briefing Session on what other Councils are doing to preference their local businesses.

 

  1. That Council designate an appropriate officer for contact and advice to local businesses interested in providing goods and services to Council and establishes an annual workshop on how to do business with Council with particular advice on applying for Council tenders

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Mayor Mannoun left the Chambers at 6.57pm.

 

Deputy Mayor Hadid took the Chair.

 

Mayor Mannoun returned to the Chambers at 7.00pm.

 

 


ITEM NO:       CEO 02

FILE NO:        135355.2014

SUBJECT:     Staff Matter

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the arrangement suggested in the confidential report be adopted by Council and it remain confidential pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(a) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains personnel matters concerning particular individuals (other than Councillors).

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

Foreshadowed Motion:        Moved: Clr Hadchiti                     Seconded: Clr Ristevski

 

That Council receive and note the report.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion from Clr Hadid was declared CARRIED and the foreshadowed motion from Clr Hadchiti lapsed.

 

 
Executive Director Report

ITEM NO:       ED 01

FILE NO:        127270.2014

SUBJECT:     Local Government NSW Annual Conference

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That:

1.   Council nominates up to 11 delegates to attend the 2014 Local Government New South Wales Annual Conference to vote on motions.

 

2.    Council staff prepare a report to the July Council meeting to consider proposed motions to be submitted to the Conference. 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That:

 

1.   Council nominates up to 11 delegates to attend the 2014 Local Government New South Wales Annual Conference to vote on motions.

 

2.   Council staff prepare a report to the July Council meeting to consider proposed motions to be submitted to the Conference with the issue of trailer parking on residential streets to be one of the motions to be prepared.

 

3.   Interested Councillors wishing to attend the Conference to contact the Chief Executive Officer’s Office by Friday, 27 June 2014.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 


ITEM NO:       ED 02

FILE NO:        128877.2014

SUBJECT:     Councillor Access to Information and Interaction with Staff Policy

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council adopts the revised Councillor Access to Information and Interaction with Staff Policy.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti                      Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That Council adopts the revised Councillor Access to Information and Interaction with Staff Policy subject to the following changes:

 

  1. The response times referred to in the Policy for Mayoral, Deputy Mayor and  Councillor requests be changed to two ordinary days.

 

  1. A definition of the word “response” be included in the Policy.

 

  1. The Chief Executive Officer to review the current system and report back to Council.

 

  1. Point 4.8.3 of the Policy which deals with inappropriate interactions and currently reads:

 

                   “The following interactions are inappropriate:

 

4.8.3. The Mayor or Councillors approaching staff outside the Council building or outside hours of work to discuss Council business.”

 

To be deleted from the policy.

 

Foreshadowed Motion        Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion from Clr Hadchiti was declared CARRIED and the foreshadowed motion from Clr Shelton lapsed.

 

Clrs Shelton and Stanley asked to be recorded as voting against the motion.

 

 


ITEM NO:       ED 03

FILE NO:        128889.2014

SUBJECT:     Annual Reporting of Contracts for Senior Staff

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       ED 04

FILE NO:        128850.2014

SUBJECT:     Endorsement of the 2013-17 Delivery Program and 2014-15 Operational Plan

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Adopts the 2013-17 Delivery Program and 2014-15 Operational Plan with the changes outlined in this report.

 

2.       Makes the rates and charges for the financial year commencing 1 July 2014 as outlined in the Statement of Revenue Policy and exhibited in the draft Delivery Program and Operational Plan.

 

3.       Approves the fees and charges outlined below to be placed on public exhibition for 28 days and that a further report to Council be provided with any submissions made:

 

3.1     Attached changes to the fee structure for onsite sewerage fees.

 

3.2     New fee structure to apply to construction certificates for Class 2-9 Commercial / Industrial, Class 10A Outbuildings over $5,000 Residential and Class 2-9 and 10A Commercial over $5,000 if the application is lodged as a combined Development Application and Construction Certificate including registration.

 

3.3     Change in cost of after-hours venue hire for the Michael Wenden Aquatic Leisure Centre from not applicable in 2013-14 to subject to negotiation in 2014-15.

 

4.   Writes to the individuals and groups who provided a submission, thanking them for their submission and provides a response to their feedback and, or comments.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That Council:

 

1.       Adopts the 2013-17 Delivery Program and 2014-15 Operational Plan with the changes outlined in this report.

 

2.       Makes the rates and charges for the financial year commencing 1 July 2014 as outlined in the Statement of Revenue Policy and exhibited in the draft Delivery Program and Operational Plan.

 

3.       Approves the fees and charges outlined below to be placed on public exhibition for 28 days and that a further report to Council be provided with any submissions made:

 

3.1     Attached changes to the fee structure for onsite sewerage fees.

 

 

 

3.2     New fee structure to apply to construction certificates for Class 2-9 Commercial / Industrial, Class 10A Outbuildings over $5,000 Residential and Class 2-9 and 10A Commercial over $5,000 if the application is lodged as a combined Development Application and Construction Certificate including registration.

 

3.3     Change in cost of after-hours venue hire for the Michael Wenden Aquatic Leisure Centre from not applicable in 2013-14 to subject to negotiation in 2014-15.

 

3.4    Delete the Busking Permit Fee.

 

4.    Writes to the individuals and groups who provided a submission, thanking them for their submission and provides a response to their feedback and, or comments.

 

5.   That Council review its hoarding fees and any methodology used to come up with that figure and compare them with other Councils hoarding fees and provide a report back to Council.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Division Called:

 

Vote for:             Mayor Mannoun

Clr Hadchiti

Clr Hadid

Clr Mamone

Clr Ristevski

 

Vote Against:     Clr Harle

Clr Karnib

Clr Shelton

                             Clr Stanley

 
Business Excellence Report

ITEM NO:       GMBE 01

FILE NO:        127402.2014

SUBJECT:     Statutory Investment Report May 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes this report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 
City Presentation Report

ITEM NO:       GMCP 01

FILE NO:        102252.2014

SUBJECT:     ST2248 - Supply and Delivery of Trees and Shrubs

 

RECOMMENDATION

That Council:

1.       Adopts the recommendation put forward in the confidential report provided under separate cover.

2.       Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That Council:

1.       Accept the Tender from Alpine Nurseries Pty Ltd, Green Leisure Group, Greenhaven Garden Centre, Greening Australia NSW, Muru Mittigar Pty Ltd, Toolijooa Pty Ltd for Tender ST2248 Tree and Shrub Supply and Delivery for an initial 2 year contract term with the option of extending 3 times for 12 months each.

2.       Makes public its decision regarding tender ST2248 - Tree and Shrub Supply and Delivery.

3.     Notes that the Executive Director will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft Minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

 


ITEM NO:       GMCP 02

FILE NO:        102330.2014

SUBJECT:     ST2328 - Supply and Delivery of Two (2) Wood Chippers

 

RECOMMENDATION

That Council:

1.       Adopts the recommendation put forward in the confidential report provided under separate cover.

2.       Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Harle

 

That Council deal with this matter at the end of the meeting in Closed Session.

            

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 
Community and Culture  Report

ITEM NO:       GMCC 01

FILE NO:        127996.2014

SUBJECT:     Local Government Arts and Culture Awards

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Acknowledges the win of two 2014 Local Government Arts and Culture Awards.

 

2.       Thank staff at Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre for their work.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 


ITEM NO:       GMCC 02

FILE NO:        128095.2014

SUBJECT:     Request for Rental Waiver - Disability South West Limited (Noah's Ark Toy Library)

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Approve a three-year license from 1 July 2014 for Disability South West Limited (Noah’s Ark Toy Library) to use the City Library Orange Room for service delivery.

 

2.       Approve the waiver of normal rental fees for the period of this license.

 

COUNCIL DECISION


Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That Council:

 

  1. Approve a three-year license from 1 July 2014 for Disability South West Limited (Noah’s Ark Toy Library) to use the City Library Orange Room for service delivery.

 

  1. Approve the waiver of normal rental fees for the period of this license.

 

  1. Note the savings it’s experiencing by not having to provide a toy borrowing service as this I being provided by Noah’s Ark Toy Library.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 
Economy and Engagement Report

ITEM NO:       GMEE 01

FILE NO:        133467.2014

SUBJECT:     Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Endorses the Financial Contributions Panel's recommendations for the provision of $1,900 under the Sporting Donations Program as summarised in the table below

 

Applicant Name

Amount

Georgia Heath

$200

Maddison Heath

$200

Chantelle Mills

$200

Amber Williams

$500

Shannon Fitzgerald

$200

Cayla Fitzgerald

$200

Daniel J Lambert

$200

Tiana Stojkovic

$200

 

 

2.   Endorses the Financial Contributions Panel's recommendations for the provision of $17,370 under the Community Donations Program (including four Community Grants applications and one Youth Donation applications) as summarised in the table below

 

Applicant Name

Project Name

Amount

Liverpool Neighbourhood Connections

Keep ‘em Safe

$5,000

Liverpool Neighbourhood Connections

Cooking for Living

$1,875

Sloosh Kidscare Inc.

The Early Buzz Program

$4,995

La’u Samoa Council

Samoan Independence Day

$5,000

Shayla Gibbs

National representation at World Hip Hop Dance Championship in USA

$500

 

 

3.   Endorses the Financial Contributions Panel's recommendations for the provision of $15,000 from the 2014/15 Corporate Sponsorship Program, subject to Council’s adoption of its  2014/15 budget, as summarised in the table below:

 

 

 

Applicant name

Amount

NSW Business Chamber

$5,000 ex GST

 The Eid Festival In The Park

$3,000 ex GST

Share Care Incorporated

$5,000 ex GST

Tank U Pty Ltd T/A  Australian Fighters and Martial Arts Exhibition

$1,000 ex GST

Hoxton Park Public School P & C

$1,000 ex GST

 

 

 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Mayor Mannoun

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       GMEE 02

FILE NO:        134150.2014

SUBJECT:     Liverpool Youth Council Committee Community Member Nomination 2014-2016

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves and endorses the nominations of the selection panel for the new Liverpool Youth Council for the 2014-2016 term (confidential report attached with the applicants’ details).

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Mamone            Seconded: Clr Harle

 

That Council endorses the following young people as members of the Liverpool Youth Council for the 2014-2016 term.

         

Alicia Camilleri

Marcelo Locardi-Rauth

Andy Oraha

Michael Tanazefti

Audrey Figues

Michael Tien

Christina Pisani

Nikhil Goyal

Lilly Lyons

Sarah Yahya

Luke Hey

Tanika Sibal

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 
Governance Report

ITEM NO:       GMGO 01

FILE NO:        116046.2014

SUBJECT:     Enterprise Risk Management Draft Policy and Strategy

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council adopt the Draft Risk Management Policy and Risk Management Framework.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun               Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

1.    That Council adopt the Draft Risk Management Policy and Risk Management Framework.

 

2.    That the Risk Management Committee referred to in the Policy be a Committee of Council and a Charter be brought back to Council for adoption.

 

Foreshadowed Motion:       Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That Council defer adoption of the Risk Management Policy until further information is brought back to Council in July 2014 in relation to the Risk Management Committee, which shall consist of a majority of professional staff members of Council together with Councillor members.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion from Mayor Mannoun was declared LOST.

 

The foreshadowed motion from Clr Stanley became the motion and on being put to the meeting was declared CARRIED.

 

Mayor Mannoun called for recess of Council at 8.02pm.

 

Mayor Mannoun resumed the meeting at 8.15pm.

 

 


ITEM NO:       GMGO 02

FILE NO:        122997.2014

SUBJECT:     Compulsory Acquisition of a part of Lot 10 DP 881265, Mill Park, Casula by the Rail Corporation of New South Wales

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Notes that the Rail Corporation of New South Wales are compulsory acquiring a part of Lot 10 DP 881265, Mill Park, comprising an area of approximately 21.3 square metres for the purposes of enclosing a critical piece of railway infrastructure;

 

2.       Notes that in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991, the compensation amount payable to Council will be determined by the Valuer General;

 

3.       Authorises its delegated officer to execute any document, under Power of Attorney necessary to give effect to this decision;

 

4.       Transfers the compensation amount into the Property Development Reserve;

 

5.       Notes that a follow up report will be submitted to Council advising of the compensation amount determined by the Valuer General.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That the recommendation be adopted.


On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       GMGO 03

FILE NO:        123274.2014

SUBJECT:     Review of the Code of Meeting Practice

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes this report.

 

2.       Proceeds with the proposed amendments as advertised.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       GMGO 04

FILE NO:        123580.2014

SUBJECT:     Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Notes this report.

 

2.   Resolves to fix the fees payable to the Mayor and Councillors for the period 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2015 in accordance with the maximum for a Metropolitan Centre as determined by the Local Government Remuneration Tribunal on 24 April 2014.

 

3.   Adopts the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy attached to this report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That Council:

 

  1. Notes this report.

 

  1. Resolves to fix the fees payable to the Mayor and Councillors for the period 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2015 in accordance with the maximum for a Metropolitan Centre as determined by the Local Government Remuneration Tribunal on 24 April 2014.

 

  1. Adopts the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy attached to this report subject to the following change:

 

Remove “Senior Advisor” from Point 4.4.2(d) of the Policy.

 

Foreshadowed Motion:     Moved: Mayor Mannoun   Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That the recommendation be adopted with the addition to Clause 4.10.1 as referred to below:

 

Note: During Item NOM 05 of this meeting (on page 12 of these minutes), Council adopted a further change to the Policy as outlined below:

 

          “Council extends the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy point 4.10.1 to read:

 

          Any interstate travel to be approved by the Chief Executive Officer.”

 

On being put to the meeting the motion moved by Clr Harle was declared LOST.

 

Clrs Shelton and Stanley asked that they be recorded as voting for the motion.

 

The foreshadowed motion from Mayor Mannoun then became the motion and on being put to the meeting was declared CARRIED.

 

Clrs Shelton and Stanley asked that they be recorded as voting against the motion.

 


Infrastructure and Environment Report

ITEM NO:       GMIE 01

FILE NO:        121127.2014

SUBJECT:     Tender ST2329 – Liverpool LGA Traffic and Transport Study

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Declines to accept any of the tenders for Tender ST2329 - Liverpool LGA Traffic and Transport Study.

 

2.   In accordance with Section 178, Clause 3(a) of the Local Government Act (General) Regulation 2005, postpones the proposal for the contract.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 


ITEM NO:       GMIE 02

FILE NO:        100255.2014

SUBJECT:     Council’s Multi-Storey Parking Stations

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the contents of this report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       GMIE 03

FILE NO:        121108.2014

SUBJECT:     Tender PQ2347 - Air Conditioning Upgrade at Hilda Davis Community Centre

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

  1. Accepts the recommendation put forward in the confidential report provided under separate cover.

 

  1. Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of ta confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That Council:

 

1.   Accepts the quote from Integral Electrical Engineering Co. Pty Ltd for Quote PQ2347 Replacement of Air Conditioning System at Hilda Davis Community Centre for the lump sum price of $178,228 plus GST.

 

2.   Makes public its decision regarding quote PQ2347 - Replacement of Air Conditioning System at Hilda Davis Community Centre.

 

3.   Notes that the Executive Director will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft minutes on Council website for the quote, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority.

 

4.   Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 


ITEM NO:       GMIE 04

FILE NO:        122430.2014

SUBJECT:     Tender WT2348 - Construction of Amalfi Park Detention Basin, Graham Avenue, Lurnea

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Adopts the recommendation put forward in the confidential report provided under separate cover.

 

2.    Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A (2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Clr Harle

 

That Council:

 

  1. Accepts the Tender submission from Civil Constructions Pty Ltd for WT2348 -Construction of Amalfi Park Detention Basin, Graham Avenue, Lurnea for the price of $3,512,345.45 plus GST.

 

  1. Makes public its decision regarding WT2348 – Construction of Amalfi Park Detention Basin, Graham Avenue, Lurnea

 

  1. Notes that the Executive Director will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority.

 

  1. Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A (2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

 
Mayor Mannoun left the Chambers at 8.24pm.

 

Deputy Mayor Hadid took the Chair.

 

Mayor Mannoun returned to the Chambers at 8.27pm.

 

Mayor Mannoun left the Chambers at 8.28pm.

 

Deputy Mayor Hadid took the Chair.

 

Mayor Mannoun returned to the Chambers at 8.29pm. 

 

Planning and Growth Report

 

ITEM NO:       GMPG 01

FILE NO:        090632.2014

SUBJECT:     LLEP Draft Amendment No. 50 - Proposed Rezoning of 900 Cowpasture Road, Cecil Hills. Sydney Water Site

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Endorses the Sydney Water Site Planning Proposal (Amendment No. 50) to be forwarded to NSW Planning and Environment seeking Gateway determination.

 

2.       Subject to Gateway approval, proceeds with public authority consultation and public exhibition in accordance with the determination.

 

3.       Notes that the outcomes of public authority consultation and public exhibition will be reported to council in future.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

Council defer the matter for further information and a report back to Council.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Vote for:              Mayor Mannoun

                             Clr Hadchiti

                             Clr Hadid

                             Clr Harle

                             Clr Karnib

                             Clr Mamone

                             Clr Ristevski

                             Clr Shelton

 

Vote against: Clr Stanley


ITEM NO:       GMPG 02

FILE NO:        101014.2014

SUBJECT:     Draft Amendment to Part 5 Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Development in Rural and Environmental Zones)

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Resolves to prepare and publicly exhibit an amendment to Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 in accordance with Section 74C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

2.       Receives a future report considering the comments received during public exhibition.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley                        Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 


ITEM NO:       GMPG 03

FILE NO:        101724.2014

SUBJECT:     Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No.42) and Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Amendment No.12) - Restricted Premises

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Adopt Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No 42) and forward the plan to NSW Planning and Environment requesting notification (gazettal) of the amendment.

 

2.       Adopt Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Amendment No 12), to come into effect as at its notification in the local paper.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Vote for:             Mayor Mannoun

                             Clr Hadchiti

                             Clr Hadid

                             Clr Harle

                             Clr Karnib

                             Clr Mamone

                             Clr Ristevski

                             Clr Shelton

 

Vote against:      Clr Stanley

 

 

 


ITEM NO:       GMPG 04

FILE NO:        111545.2014

SUBJECT:     Public Exhibition Outcomes - Liverpool Development Control Plan Draft Amendment 13

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council adopts Amendment 13 to the Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 in accordance with the section 21 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 to come into effect upon the publication of a public notice in the local paper.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Clr Ristevski

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

 


ITEM NO:       GMPG 05

FILE NO:        111831.2014

SUBJECT:     Approval for Works-In-Kind Tender for DA-647/2012/A, DA-290/2013/A and DA-378/2013

 

RECOMMENDATION

That Council:

1.       Accept the Tender WIK proposal by the developer subject to capping the WIK credit to the amounts indicated on the Liverpool Contributions Plan 2009.

2.       Notes that the Executive Director will finalise and sign a WIK agreement in accordance with the delegated authority.

3.       Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

 


ITEM NO:       GMPG 06

FILE NO:        122707.2014

SUBJECT:     Black Muscat Park - Noise and Unapproved Use

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Notes the background information in this report and the options discussed.

 

2.   Endorses Option 1 for a trial period of 3 months commencing on Saturday 5 July at an estimated cost of $8000.

 

3.   Directs that the trial be funded from operational budget savings to be allocated at the first quarterly review.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Ristevski

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       GMPG 07

FILE NO:        129662.2014

SUBJECT:     Changes to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Charter and Procedure

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Adopts the revised Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Charter and Procedure as attached to this report.

 

2.       Amends the IHAP delegation of 30 October 2013 by including a new Clause (c) as follows to reflect the requirement for all development applications proposing a variation to a development standard of 10% or greater to be decided by Council:

 

(c)    That all development applications where there has been a variation to a          development standard of 10% or greater, be determined by the elected Council         in accordance with Clause 4.6 of Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008.

 

3.       Delegates authority to the CEO to approve and amend the IHAP procedure from time to time, in consultation with the members of the IHAP and the community.

 

4.       Notes that a further report will be provided to Council at a future meeting on assessment panel options as part of a broader review of development assessment delegations.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

1.       Adopts the revised Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Charter and Procedure as attached to this report.

 

2.       Amends the IHAP delegation of 30 October 2013 by including a new Clause (c) as follows to reflect the requirement for all development applications proposing a variation to a development standard of 10% or greater to be decided by Council:

 

(c)    That all development applications where there has been a variation to a          development standard of 10% or greater, be determined by the elected Council         in accordance with Clause 4.6 of Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008.

 

3.       Notes that a further report will be provided to Council at a future meeting on assessment panel options as part of a broader review of development assessment delegations.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion

 Committee Reports

ITEM NO:       CTTE 01

FILE NO:        047873.2014

SUBJECT:     Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 8 May 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

  1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 8 May 2014.

 

  1. Note that the Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That Council:

 

  1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 8 May 2014.

 

  1. Note that the Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

  1. That the committee be invited to provide to Council a schedule of recurring annual events and anticipated costs.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       CTTE 02

FILE NO:        117579.2014

SUBJECT:     Minutes of Liverpool Youth Council meeting held on 6 May 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council held on Tuesday 6 May 2014.

 

2.       Notes that the Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake. Furthermore notes that funding for the Liverpool Youth Council is allocated within the budget of the Community Development Unit.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun               Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


ITEM NO:       CTTE 03

FILE NO:        120044.2014

SUBJECT:     Local Traffic Committee Minutes of Meeting Held on 14 May 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 14 May 2014.

 

2.       Adopts the following recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting:

 

          Item 1    Pine Road, Casula - Proposed road closure of the section close to the Hume Highway

 

i.   Approves the proposed full road closure of the section of Pine Road, between the BP Service Station driveway off Pine Road and the Hume Highway, Casula and associated road works i.e. extension of Ingham Drive to the Hume Highway and realignment of Pine Road, to connect to the proposed Ingham Drive extension. 

ii.  Advises all stakeholders of the outcome.

 

          Item 2    Macquarie Street, Liverpool – Review of on-street parking after hours 

 

i.   Approves amendment of the existing No Stopping zone from full time No Stopping to No Stopping 5:00am-7:00pm between 333 to 345 Macquarie Street (for a distance of approximately 42m) for a trial period of six months.  The outcome of the trial period to be reported to the LTC.

ii.  Advises all stakeholders of the outcome.

 

          Item 3      Quadrat Lane, Sadleir – Request for Children’s Crossing outside Sadleir Public School

 

i.   Approves the installation of Children’s Crossing on Quadrat Lane, Sadleir outside Sadleir Public School.

ii.  Sadleir Public School be notified and be requested to sign the Children’s Crossing Flags Agreement.

 

          Item 4    George Street, Liverpool – Proposed Special Event (Starry Sari Night)

 

i.   Approves the proposed road event (for 2014 and 2015) as Class 2 Special Events with the following requirements:

·      Submission of a Special Events Traffic Management Plan with associated traffic control plan to RMS for endorsement.

·      Advertising of the event and the proposed temporary road closures of the events at least 28 days prior to the event.

·      Certificate of currency, with RMS and the Police indemnified.

·      Consultation with the Police. 

·      Appropriate consultation with local bus operators and emergency access.

 

          Item 5    Nuwarra Road and Marshall Avenue Intersection, Moorebank – Review of Intersection Control

 

i.   Approves the installation of an advisory sign “Do Not Queue Across Intersection” (G9–237) on Nuwarra Road at its intersection with Marshall Avenue for westbound motorists as per RMS guidelines.

ii.  Advises all stakeholders of the outcome.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 14 May 2014.

 

2.       Adopts the following recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting:

 

          Item 1    Pine Road, Casula - Proposed road closure of the section close to the Hume Highway

 

i.   Approves the proposed full road closure of the section of Pine Road, between the BP Service Station driveway off Pine Road and the Hume Highway, Casula and associated road works i.e. extension of Ingham Drive to the Hume Highway and realignment of Pine Road, to connect to the proposed Ingham Drive extension. 

ii.  Advises all stakeholders of the outcome.

 

          Item 2    Macquarie Street, Liverpool – Review of on-street parking after hours 

 

Note: Council at its meeting on 20 June 2014 did not approve the Traffic Committee’s

          recommendation in relation to this Item and instead resolved:

 

i.   Approves amendment of the existing No Stopping zone from full time No Stopping to No Stopping 5:00am-8:00pm between 333 to 345 Macquarie Street (for a distance of approximately 42m) for a trial period of six months.  The outcome of the trial period to be reported to the LTC.

ii.  Advises all stakeholders of the outcome.

 

          Item 3      Quadrat Lane, Sadleir – Request for Children’s Crossing outside Sadleir Public School

 

i.                      Approves the installation of Children’s Crossing on Quadrat Lane,

Sadleir outside Sadleir Public School.

ii.  Sadleir Public School be notified and be requested to sign the Children’s Crossing Flags Agreement.

 

          Item 4    George Street, Liverpool – Proposed Special Event (Starry Sari Night)

 

i.   Approves the proposed road event (for 2014 and 2015) as Class 2 Special Events with the following requirements:

·      Submission of a Special Events Traffic Management Plan with associated traffic control plan to RMS for endorsement.

·      Advertising of the event and the proposed temporary road closures of the events at least 28 days prior to the event.

·      Certificate of currency, with RMS and the Police indemnified.

·      Consultation with the Police. 

·      Appropriate consultation with local bus operators and emergency access.

 

          Item 5    Nuwarra Road and Marshall Avenue Intersection, Moorebank – Review of Intersection Control

 

i.   Approves the installation of an advisory sign “Do Not Queue Across Intersection” (G9–237) on Nuwarra Road at its intersection with Marshall Avenue for westbound motorists as per RMS guidelines.

ii.  Advises all stakeholders of the outcome.

 

Foreshadowed motion:       Moved: Mayor Mannoun               Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That the recommendation be adopted subject to Item 1 relating to Pine Road Casula being deferred.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion from Clr Stanley was declared CARRIED.

 

The foreshadowed motion from Mayor Mannoun therefore lapsed and was not voted on.

 

 


ITEM NO:       CTTE 04

FILE NO:        121304.2014

SUBJECT:     Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee 8 May 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 8 May 2014.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       CTTE 05

FILE NO:        125166.2014

SUBJECT:     Environment Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of 12 May 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Environment Advisory Committee Meeting held on 12 May 2014.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       CTTE 06

FILE NO:        126730.2014

SUBJECT:     Minutes of Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 4 June 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Tourism and Events Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun               Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


ITEM NO:       CTTE 07

FILE NO:        127236.2014

SUBJECT:     Key Site Master Planning Steering Committee Minutes - 3 June 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the Minutes of the Key Site Master Planning Steering Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014;

 

2.       Adopts the recommendation put forward in the confidential report provided under separate cover; and

 

3.       Keeps confidential the minutes supplied under separate cover containing information pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains information that would if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That Council:

 

  1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Key Site Master Planning Steering Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014;

 

  1. Adopts the recommendation put forward in the confidential report provided under separate cover; and

 

  1. Keeps confidential the minutes supplied under separate cover containing information pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains information that would if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

 

  1. That the minutes in future are provided to Council so that ratepayers are aware of what is discussed at this Committee. Only Items that satisfy Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 are to be reported separately. 

 

  1. Notice of meetings of this Committee be given to all Councillors with a minimum of 3 days notice.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 


ITEM NO:       CTTE 08

FILE NO:        129023.2014

SUBJECT:     Minutes of the Warwick Farm Racing Precinct Steering Committee Meeting held on 29 April 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Warwick Farm Racing Precinct Steering Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun               Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       CTTE 09

FILE NO:        130862.2014

SUBJECT:     Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun               Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       CTTE 10

FILE NO:        131332.2014

SUBJECT:     Street Naming Committee minutes from 3 June 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the Minutes of the Street Naming Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014.

 

2.       Allocates $2,650 to be funded from the General Fund for a commemorative naming plaque for Bob Evans Park in Moorebank.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun               Seconded: Clr Mamone

 

That Council:

 

  1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Street Naming Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014.

 

  1. Allocates $2,650 to be funded from the General Fund for a commemorative naming plaque for Bob Evans Park in Moorebank.

 

  1. Approve the name Gran Sasso Avenue for the street in Edmonson Park referred to in Item 3 of the Minutes.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       CTTE 11

FILE NO:        127974.2014

SUBJECT:     Liverpool Sports Committee Minutes of Meeting 27 March 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the minutes of the Liverpool City Sports Committee meeting held on 27 March 2014.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:       CTTE 12

FILE NO:        133853.2014

SUBJECT:     Minutes of Economic Development Committee meeting held 4 June 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Economic Development Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


9.30pm Extension of time to continue meeting

 

Motion:                         Moved: Mayor Mannoun               Secconded: Clr Hadid

 

That an extension of time of 30 minutes be granted to continue the meeting.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

ITEM NO:       CTTE 13

FILE NO:        133858.2014

SUBJECT:     Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 4 June 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the Building our New City Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014.

 

2.   Approves the raising of a $10.7m loan to be serviced from the Town Improvement Fund levy with or without a NSW Government Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme subsidy to fund a range of Building Our New City projects prioritised through the process facilitated by the NSW Government Architect’s Office.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded:          Clr Shelton

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the Building our New City Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014.

 

2.   Defers the raising of a $10.7m loan to be serviced from the Town Improvement Fund levy until such time as costings and plans for the revitalisation project are in place.

 

Foreshadowed motion:       Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion moved by Clr Stanley was declared LOST.

 

Division Called:

 

Vote for:             Clr Harle

                             Clr Karnib

                             Clr Shelton

                             Clr Stanley

 

 

Vote against:      Mayor Mannoun

                              Clr Hadchiti

                              Clr Hadid

                              Clr Mamone

                              Clr Ristevski

 

The foreshadowed motion then became the motion and on being put to the meeting was declared CARRIED.

 

Clrs Shelton and Stanley asked to be recorded as voting against the motion (moved by Mayor Mannoun).

 

 

 

 
Correspondence Reports

ITEM NO:       CORR 01

FILE NO:        076531.2014

SUBJECT:     Incoming and Outgoing Correspondence Report

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 
Questions with Notice

ITEM NO:       QWN 01

FILE NO:        106084.2014

SUBJECT:     Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

 

QUESTIONS WITH NOTICE

Please address the following:

 

  1. How many bus shelters have been constructed in the 2013-2014 year?

 

Five bus shelters are scheduled to be installed in the 2013-14 program year. A contract is being awarded for the fabrication and installation of the bus shelters and at this stage, the shelters are expected to be installed by August 2014.

 

  1. What are their locations?

 

·         Cowpasture Road, Hinchinbrook - on the eastern side approximately 50m south of Collarenebri Rd;

 

·         Mannow Avenue, West Hoxton - on the southern side approximately 50m west of Tunnack Close;

 

·         Greenway Drive, West Hoxton - on the northern side approximately 70m west of Carmichael Drive;

 

·         Joshua Moore Drive, Horningsea Park - on the northern side approximately 45m east of Cowpasture Rd; and

 

·         Hoxton Park Road, Hoxton Park - on the northern side approximately 50m east of Glen Innes Rd.

 

  1. Is there any back log from previous years?

 

In response to a significant demand for bus shelters, Council has developed a city wide priority program for the progressive installation of bus shelters, which aims to provide over 40 shelters in the short to medium term. However, due to competing priorities and constrained budgets, only limited funding is able to be directed towards bus shelters, which has created a backlog of the above 40 shelters.

 

The need for bus shelters is identified in consultation with the community and bus operators. The ranking of priority for the provision of bus shelters is generally based on the following factors:

 

proposed location of shelter - bus stops adjoining high pedestrian and patron generating facilities will be ranked higher .e.g. schools, shopping centres, aged care facilities and community facilities; and

 

 

 

 

  1. How many will be constructed in the 2014-2015 financial year?

 

Three bus shelters are planned to be installed in the 2014-2015 program year.

 

  1. Where are new bus shelters to be located?

 

·         Heckenberg Rd, Sadleir - on the southern side at 87 Heckenberg Rd;

 

·         Leacocks Lane, Casula - on the western side approximately 45m west of Roberts Rd; and

 

·         Middleton Grange - location to be confirmed following further investigation.

 

  1. Please indicate whether these are in new or established suburbs.

 

Shelters will be provided in both new release and established areas of Liverpool.

 

  1. What is the approximate cost of a bus shelter?

 

The estimated cost to supply and install new bus shelters ranges between $20,000 and $25,000 depending on extent of site works required to provide fully accessible bus stops. Shelters cost approximately $18,000.

 

 


ITEM NO:       QWN 02

FILE NO:        117517.2014

SUBJECT:     Question with Notice - Clr Harle

 

QUESTIONS WITH NOTICE

 

Please address the following:

 

  1. Can Council provide the status of steps implemented to prevent Public Address Systems being used in the Chipping Norton Recreational Area since the matter was previously debated in Council?

 

Signage has been erected that indicates that amplified music is not permitted without approval from Council, and Counci’s Compliance Officers attend the site in response to complaints. Council officers have also had discussions with NSW Police, Liverpool Local Area Command (LAC).

 

  1. Have prominent signs indicating that “PA system are not allowed in the park” been installed as was promised when the matter was raised previously?

 

As noted in response to Question 1 above, there are signs in the park advising that amplified music is not permitted except with Council approval.

 

  1. Is Council aware that Black Muscat Park is again regularly used by large groups that produce extremely loud music, particularly “Middle Eastern Music” which continues to be a major problem despite Councils’ preventative efforts?

 

A number of complaints have been made this year regarding large groups playing music in the park. Council officers have responded as noted above. It is noted that the complaints have been made by one resident.

 

  1. The matter was again reported on the 18th of May. Previously Rangers were to attend the Park area early on Saturday and Sunday mornings to prevent groups setting up PA systems, has this practice been discontinued?

 

Council’s Compliance Officers currently attend the site in response to calls to the after-hours pager, as resources allow. During the period October 2013 to March 2014, rangers were rostered to attend the site three times on Saturdays and Sundays. As noted in the memo to Councillors in Attachment B, the regular patrols ceased in March 2014.

 

  1. Have Rangers asked Police for assistance when complaints have been received from nearby residents and if so, what was the response?

 

Liverpool police have been contacted on several occasions to assist officers attending the site. The police have advised they cannot prioritise noise complaints over more serious crime matters. However, in recent discussions, Liverpool LAC has advised that if Council officers are unable to resolve a situation in the park, they should return to seek police assistance in person. Subject to available resources, police will accompany Council officers to assist if the circumstances warrant it.

 

  1. Several incident have been reported to me of noise affected residents being harassed and intimidated by large groups of 1000 or more Black Muscat Park users. Those incidents occurred when residents opposite the park asked operators to reduce the sound level or questioned if they had permission from Liverpool Council to use the area. Has Council issued permits over the last six months allowing any groups to use the park area, including permission to operate PA systems?

 

Council’s Recreation section advises that the booking arrangements do not involve the issue of a formal permits. The users are not given exclusive use of an area of any park. No approvals have been issued for use of this part of Black Muscat Park and no approvals have been issued to allow for the use of amplified music or PA systems.

 

  1. Is Council aware that members of these groups use wood gathered from bush areas within the park to fuel open fires and barbeques rather than use those supplied by Council?

 

Council’s Recreation section is unaware of such practices.

 

  1. Is Council aware that those open fires often result in covering large areas of the park with dense smoke that detrimentally affects all park users as well as residents in the adjoining areas? Often to the extent that residents are forced to close all windows and doors to avoid the smoke that lingers for several hours after park users have left the area.

 

Council’s Recreation section is unaware of such practices.

 

  1. In relation to toilet amenities for the Chipping Norton Recreational areas; does the system cope when groups of several thousand visitors use these facilities and what is Councils liability if problems occur?

 

Council’s Coordinator Facility Maintenance Programs advises that unless affected by vandalism or improper use, the toilets in the Chipping Norton Recreation area are adequate for the numbers that use the facilities.

 

Two years ago Council was fixing problems with the toilets at Black Muscat and Homestead Parks every week. Works have been carried out since then to reduce the impact of improper use of the toilets on their function. For example the tank at Black Muscat was failing continually because people were putting items like nappies down the toilet. A secondary tank has now been installed so these bulky items stay in the first tank and pump out occurs from the second tank. Homestead Park toilets have now been improved so it pumps directly to  sewer. The only major incident in the past few years occurred recently when the pump failed due to an electrical fault and toilets had to be closed until the new pump was available.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. Can I be provided with the approximate costs associated for two Rangers to patrol the area on Saturdays, Sundays and public Holidays from 10:00 am to 3:00pm?

 

Two Compliance Officers allocated to the park for five hours on a Saturday and Sunday would cost in the range of $925 to $1,110 (depending on the hourly rate of the officer). However, these officers would need to be in addition to normal rostering requirements on weekends for compliance and enforcement activities across the LGA. Additional resources would be needed. The cost of two security guards for five hours each day for Saturday and Sunday would be $660 total.

 

 


ITEM NO:       QWN 03

FILE NO:        134461.2014

SUBJECT:     Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

 

QUESTIONS WITH NOTICE

 

Please address the following:

 

  1. Have staff had an opportunity to look at the ramifications of changes and funding cuts in the Federal Budget

 

  1. Can I be advised what the budget will mean for:

 

a)    The Pensioner rate subsidies?

 

b)    Road upgrades and works for the next budget.

 

c)    Any other known changes that may affect ratepayers or Liverpool plans or projects.

 

A response to these questions will be included in the July business paper.

Clr Stanley requested a response to be provided to Councillors before the next Council meeting.

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

 

Motion                                   Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Harle

 

That the minutes of the Extraordinary Meeting held on 27 May 2014 and the Ordinary Meeting held on 28 May 2014 be confirmed as a true record of those meetings.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 


 

Motion                              Moved: Mayor Mannoun

That Council:

 

1.    Move into Closed Session to consider the Item GMCP 02.

 

2.    Pursuant to Section 10A(1)-(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public be excluded from the meeting on the basis that the business to be considered is classified confidential under the provisions of:

 

s10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act because it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Council moved into Closed Session at 9.36pm. The public and the media left the Chambers.

 

Motion                              Moved: Mayor Mannoun

 

That Council move out of Closed Session and into Open Council.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

Open Council resumed at 9.38pm.

 

 


 

ITEM NO:

GMCP 02

FILE NO:

102330.2014

SUBJECT:

ST2328 - Supply and Delivery of Two (2) Wood Chippers

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

  1. Adopts the recommendation put forward in the confidential report provided under separate cover.

 

  1. Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That Council:

  1. Accept the Tender from Mariott Tree Equipment Pty Ltd T/A Bandit Tree Equipment for the Supply and Delivery of Two (2) Wood Chippers for the lump sum price of $177,600 inclusive of GST.

 

  1. Makes public its decision regarding tender ST2328 -. Supply and Delivery of Two (2) Wood Chippers

 

  1. Notes that the Executive Director will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft Minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority.

 

  1. Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 


 

THE MEETING CLOSED AT 9.40pm.

 

 

<Signature>

Name: Ned Mannoun

Title:     Mayor

Date:    30 July 2014

I have authorised a stamp bearing my signature to be affixed to the pages of the Minutes of the Extraordinary Council Meeting held on Friday, 20 June 2014. I confirm that Council has adopted these Minutes as a true and accurate record of the meeting.

   


78

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Notices of Motion

 

NOM 01

Bus Shelter in Liverpool LGA

 

Strategic Direction

Accessible Connected City

Encourage sustainable and alternative transport options such as walking, cycling and integrated public transport

Key Policy

Traffic and Transport Plan

File Ref

164272.2014

Author

Anne Stanley - Councillor

 

 

Background

 

I refer to the answer provided to the Questions on Notice 01 (File No 106084.2014) from Council's Extraordinary Meeting of 20th June 2014.

 

Since 2008 the number of Bus Shelters provided by this Council per year has steadily decreased to the budgeted Bus Shelters of three for the 2014-15 financial year. This will leave a back log of at least 40 Bus Shelters.

 

The provision of Bus Shelters supports the public transport strategy and provides shelter for residents against the elements especially appreciated by mobility impaired, those with young children or the elderly. For some of these groups public transport is their only option and should be encouraged and supported.

 

It is recognised that the provision of a bus shelter is of significant expense to Council's budget so exploring other cost effective ways to provide such a community resource is requested.

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Investigates options to provide more Bus Shelters in Liverpool to reduce current back log by:

 

a)   increasing the number of sponsored or advertising shelters

b)   more cost effective design solutions

c)   exploring grant sources 

d)   commit budget to reduce the back log of bus shelters by no less than 10 each year over the next 5 years commencing with the 2015-16 budget year

 

e)   increase the number of bus shelters provided 2014-15 if changes to design can reduce the cost of shelters

 

2.    Provide a report to Council for its September 2014 meeting discussing the findings of this motion.

 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT

 

Council plans to install five bus shelters by August 2014, with a further three to be installed by October 2014 as part of the normal program of works for the 2014 and 2015 program years.

 

Further, Council will shortly be commencing a tender process for the long-term supply of bus shelters to Liverpool. As part of this process, Council will be exploring cost effective options for the supply, installation and ongoing maintenance of the bus shelters. One of the options may involve granting limited and controlled advertising rights to bus shelter suppliers as a way to offset the cost of supply, installation and maintenance of these structures. This method of procurement will also enable Council to finance the provision of bus shelters in low traffic streets not normally viable for advertising.

 

However, at this stage, the tender process is anticipated to be completed by late this year with a report to Council anticipated at either the December 2014 or February 2015 Council meeting. This report will also include a comprehensive discussion of the matters raised in this notice of motion.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Deliver and maintain a range of transport related infrastructure such as footpaths, bus shelters and bikeways.

Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues.

Environmental and Sustainability

Promote an integrated and user friendly public transport service.

Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.

Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


80

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Notices of Motion

 

NOM 02

Youth Homeless Services in Liverpool

 

Strategic Direction

Healthy Inclusive  City

Foster social inclusion, strengthen the local community and increase opportunities for people who may experience barriers

Key Policy

Youth Strategy

File Ref

164377.2014

Author

Anne Stanley - Councillor

 

 

Background

 

On any given night 1 in 200 Australians are homeless and of that 27% are under the age of 18 years.

 

 Due to funding changes by the current state government under the banner of Going Home Staying Home programme the Liverpool Youth Refuge which has been operating for 27 years has been defunded and will cease operation from the end of October this year. This will reduce to 3 (from 8) the number of youth refuges available from Fairfield to Bowral. The accommodation will change from specific single sex refuges with 24 hour care to larger dual sex refuges which may not be appropriate for all young people and their complex needs causing them further hardship.

 

Liverpool Youth Refuge currently provides crisis accommodation, support, early intervention and a young parents project to at risk and homeless young people. The crisis refuge and Young Parents Project provides intensive individualised case management, living skills, and social skills, recreational and educational programs such as a young parents group. It provides wrap around supports and hence young people are linked in with appropriate agencies to best meet their needs such as headspace for counselling. The service has consistently met targets over its operation and provides a service which unfortunately is sorely needed in our community.  The crisis refuge is staffed 24 hours, seven days a week and accommodates 8 homeless young people 12-17 years of age including 2 crisis overnight beds. On average Liverpool Youth Refuge accommodates approximately 70-75 young people in the refuge and 12 families in their Young Parents Project per year. The aim of the refuge is to transition young people back home to their family if this is an appropriate option. If it is not an appropriate option staff work with the young person to secure more stable long term supported accommodation.. Liverpool Youth Refuge is one of only 2 Specialist Homeless Services (SHS) in the Sydney Metropolitan area that provides accommodation for young people from 12 years of age.

 

 

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Views with serious concern the decision by the NSW government to defund the Liverpool Youth Refuge.

 

2.   Views with concern the defunding of other specialist homeless services through both Liverpool and New South Wales and issues and hardship that will cause.

 

3.   Writes to other services in Liverpool to ascertain how they have been effected by the changes in the funding model by the State Government and advocates similarly for all services.

 

4.   Provides a report to the next Council meeting detailing other effected services.

 

5.   Resolves to write to the Minister for Family and Community Services and the Premier of NSW expressing Council's strong opposition to the defunding of this service and calling on the government to reconsider its decision to defund the Liverpool Youth Refugee and all other effected services in Liverpool LGA; noting this motion.

 

6.   To show Council's commitment to this service provide a one off grant of $50, 000 from the Councillor reserve to assist the Liverpool Youth Refuge provide services for the youth of Liverpool if the NSW Government reconsiders its decision and decides to fund the service.

 

7.    Write to all local members of Parliament in the Liverpool area seeking their support to lobby Minister and Premier to reconsider this decision.

 

 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT

 

The Mayor and Group Manager, Economy and Engagement met with representatives of the Liverpool Youth Refuge on July 11, 2014. The Refuge representatives expressed their disappointment about the pending closure of the service as a result of the consortium covering the operations of the Mount Pritchard facility not winning a tender under the NSW Government's Going Home Staying Home reform initiative. However, I am advised that the representatives of the Refuge indicated that the facility would be closing and that only a recurrent funding solution from the NSW Government would allow them to continue to operate. The Refuge operators believed this to be extremely unlikely.

 

A letter to the Minister for Family and Community Services has been sent by the Mayor expressing concern about the loss of the service. A letter to the Refuge thanking them for their 27 years of service to the Liverpool area has also been sent.

 

The results of the tendering process for the Going Home Staying Home reform are known. A fact sheet from the NSW Government on successful services to South West Sydney and the rationale for reforming specialist homelessness services is attached as information. There are organisations servicing Liverpool who have gained funding and others that have been unsuccessful. The fact sheet cites a 2% increase in funding for homelessness services in South West Sydney.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.

 

Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

South Western Sydney SHS Tender Outcome factsheet

  


83

NOM 02

Youth Homeless Services in Liverpool

Attachment 1

South Western Sydney SHS Tender Outcome factsheet

 


 


 


 


 


 


89

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Notices of Motion

 

NOM 03

Liquor Related Development Applications

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

164468.2014

Author

Peter Harle  - Councillor

 

 

Background

 

Council is once again confronted with a controversial liquor related DA (1454/2013) for a large late trading pub with possibly 30 poker machines in the relatively quiet and peaceful Casula community. It has already attracted an unprecedented level of media attention and objections in part as a result of its proximity to a large primary school, other vulnerable communities and the known harms and risks associated with providing alcohol as late as 3.00 am.

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-18/casula-residents-fight-plan-for-late-night-pub/5460774

 

The Macarthur Tavern which is understood to be also owned by the proponent (De Angelis hotel group) was recently listed by the NSW government as the equal most violent licensed premise in NSW.

 

In considering all DAs, especially such controversial DAs as the one immediately above, it is essential that all Councillors have before them both the full broad range of evidence and material relating to the likely social impact of the proposed development, and, the correct legal advice on the scope of their consideration of all relevant aspects impacting upon their determination.

 

Being in possession of all such supporting material from both the proponent and the objectors in conjunction with ensuring the Councillors are fully aware of all the (legal) parameters they have in determining applications, will reduce the grounds of appeal of any consequential DA determination and potential costs to Liverpool ratepayers.

 

Notwithstanding Council’s Dan Murphy’s Moorebank 2013 decision, on 15 May 2014, Council advised the Alcohol Community Action Project (ACAP) that the consideration of the impact of alcohol in a DA was a matter for “OLGR” (Office of Liquor, Gaming and Racing) i.e. the NSW government. In fact, the Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority (ILGA), not OLGR, determine liquor licenses in NSW.

 

ILGA has made a number of references to the important role of NSW Local Government in preventing alcohol related harms through proper planning and approval processes. See for example pp 6, 7 and 11 of their submission to the review of the NSW Liquor Act http://www.olgr.nsw.gov.au/pdfs/submissions/liquor/104.pdf .

 

This Council advice to ACAP and the possible significant alcohol and gambling risks of the Hotel DA were subject to unprecedented attention by both Houses of NSW Parliament in late June 2014 (Dr Andrew McDonald 17/6 – Dr John Kaye 18/6 – see attached).

 

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/south-west/upper-house-slams-planned-hotel-in-casula-as-greens-fight-to-stop-pokies-near-school/story-fngr8hxh-1226974990225

 

The following proposed NOMs are intended to ensure that all Councillors (and their constituents) retain the essential confidence that they can determine all liquor related DAs on behalf of local communities, to the full legal extent provided them and that they have all the relevant information before them in determining the specific Casula Hotel DA.

 

Obtaining the following requested advice will also assist Councillors discharge their due diligence obligations.

 

financial implications

 

The request to the CEO of ILGA for advice should be of no cost to the Council.

 

Enhancing Council’s due diligence with respect to the correct consideration of liquor related DAs and similar matters with the full range of evidence and information may reduce the risk of costly court appeals.

 

The cost to Councils and local communities of alcohol and gambling harms is immense in NSW with the NSW Auditor General in 2013 estimating the total (including social) costs of the oversupply and misuse of alcohol in NSW was near $4B pa with only a small proportion of these costs being recovered from the liquor industry.

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

1.   In order for Councillors to meet their due diligence and statutory obligations, Council and IHAP suspend consideration of DA (1454/2013) – Hume Hwy Hotel Casula until it obtains and provides Councillors with:

 

a)   Independent advice from the CEO of ILGA as to the capacity/obligations Councils have to consider the social impacts of liquor related developments. Is the consideration of the general social impact of liquor related DAs and s96 amendments the sole prerogative of OLGR or ILGA?

 

b)   Information from Police on the legal compliance record for all De Angelis group hotels, the number of alcohol reported incidents within each hotel and the number and type of alcohol related incidents that are linked to the hotels’ patrons after they leave those licensed premises (contained in COPS linking data).

 

c)   Advice from FACS as to their intentions for the ongoing provision of emergency/crisis public accommodation provided on site at the Fontainebleau Motel (or elsewhere) – location of the proposed Hume Hwy hotel.

 

d)   Advice from the owner and Council of the intended use of the heritage important Commercial Hotel – Liverpool if their liquor and poker machine licensees were to be removed to the proposed Hume Hwy hotel.

 

2.   Council notes that the substantial disproportionate negative social impact the introduction and operation of poker and other gambling machines can have on especially socially disadvantaged communities including migrants and person with English as a Second Language (ESL). In particular, that Liverpool LGA pub poker machines have the highest rate of return (losses to community) before tax in NSW (OLGR) and neighbouring Fairfield LGA has the worst rate of gambling losses in NSW.

 

To address this problem Council:

 

a)   Requests the NSW Premier to repeal s209 of the NSW Gaming Machines Act 2001 that precludes Councils from considering the social impact of poker machines imposed upon local communities when determining DA’s and related matters

 

b)   Requests the NSW Premier to provide local government (that is closest to local communities) the planning powers to consider and determine all aspects of the provision of poker machines and other gambling devices in their LGAs, and notes that this request is consistent with Goal “32” of the NSW State Plan 2021 “Increase the opportunity for people to participate in the way government makes decisions….. devolve decision making as close to the people and places affected by decisions”…

 

c)   Requests Local Government NSW (formerly the Local Government and Shires Associations of NSW (LGSA) to circulate this motion with a supportive discussion paper to all other Councils to gauge their level of support and response.

 

 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT

 

Due to the complex nature of this NOM, a full response cannot be provided in time to meet the printing deadline for business papers. A full response will be compiled and circulated at the Council meeting. 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

Support policies and plans that prevent crime.

Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place.

Civic Leadership and Governance

Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Speech by Dr Andrew McDonald Hansard 17 June 2014

  


93

NOM 03

Liquor Related Development Applications

Attachment 1

Speech by Dr Andrew McDonald Hansard 17 June 2014

 


 


95

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Notices of Motion

 

NOM 04

Council Committees

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

164537.2014

Author

Geoff Shelton - Councillor

 

 

Background

 

Given:

 

1.   In 2013 the charters of a number of Council's committees were amended to reduce the number of councillors required to attend in order quorums might be more readily achieved,

 

2.   Attendance by councillors in committees in any event has been historically low over a long period of time (for example the No intermodal Committee has on several occasions since its inception failed to achieve a quorum, and it has been almost a year since the Ethics and Audit Committee has met),

 

3.   The 'Master Plan Steering Committee' purported to meet on 4 November 2013 after approximately one hour's notice had been given to councillors, in admitted breach of Reg 262 of the Local Government (General) Regulation, 2005 (refer QWN in the November 2013 meeting agenda),

 

4.   In its meeting of 3 June 2014 the Master Plan Steering Committee purported to amend its charter to remove the word 'Councillors' and replace it with 'Members'  again with the effect of inhibiting the dissemination of information to councillors,

 

5.   The precedent of committees purporting to meet and transact business without an adopted charter has blithely been set, and

 

6.   The important role of committees as an expression of the democratic values of Council,

 

7.   The following motion is proposed.                   

 

 

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That the charters of all committees of Council be amended such that all Councillors are members of each committee.

 

 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT

 

Clause 260 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 deals with Council Committees and states:   

 

1.   A council may, by resolution, establish such committees as it considers necessary.

 

2.   A committee is to consist of the mayor and such other councillors as are elected by the councillors or appointed by the council.

 

3.   The quorum for a meeting of a committee is to be:

 

a)   Such number of members as the council decides, or

b)   If the council has not decided a number-a majority of the members of the committee.

 

Traditionally, a report is submitted to Council each September to nominate its representatives on its Committees.

 

Councillors are at liberty to amend the Charters of Committees to reflect quorum requirements.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

.

There are no social and cultural considerations.

Civic Leadership and Governance

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


97

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Notices of Motion

 

NOM 05

Quota 50th Birthday July 2014 Presentation by Councillors

 

Strategic Direction

Healthy Inclusive  City

Improve health and wellbeing and encourage a happy, active community

Key Policy

NA

File Ref

164592.2014

Author

Anne Stanley - Councillor

 

 

Background

 

Presentation by Councillors

 

I attended with my colleagues Mayor Mannoun, and Councillors Harle and Waller, the 50th Birthday Celebration of the Quota Club of Liverpool and the installation of the new Board for 2014/15. Liverpool is fortunate to have several different service clubs such as Quota assisting with our community.

 

Quota Club of Liverpool was formed on 18th July 1964 by business women within our community. To celebrate 50 years of service to Liverpool there was a pictorial presentations and a brief history of the Club provided to the attendees highlighting the many achievements of the club over that time. There is not enough room to list in this report the many and varied accomplishments of the Quota over the last 50 years or even in the last 12 months, but they are varied and many. They are tireless workers for their community.

 

What was evident from the history is just how much difference the club has made over its fifty years. In fact I realised that personally my family had benefitted from the selfless service by the club. I know how much the ladies made a difference to my Mum with their nursing home visits. In the last year they have made monetary donations to 18 different causes, as well as volunteering to provide breakfast for school children who would otherwise start their school day without breakfast and organising fundraising barbeques and much more. Each year they sponsor a public speaking competition where the winners then go on to represent their district at the NSW finals. The winner for 2014 was Glynn Megarrity of All Saints College and he will be representing Liverpool District in August in Batemans Bay.

 

The Club was honoured with an order of Liverpool Award in 2012 which was so very well deserved. I congratulate and thank Quota for their service to Liverpool and its residents for the last 50 years and look forward to their continued support in the future.

 

 

The new Board that was installed at the Dinner is:

 

President                       Kerrie Oxlade

Vice Presidents             Heather Cox and Jeanette Jackson

Fundraising                   Elizabeth Habib

Secretary                      Lorraine Perry

Treasurer                      Donna Currant

 

 

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Notes the 50th Anniversary of the Quota Club of Liverpool on 18th July 2014.

 

2.   Acknowledges the club and its members over the last 50 years for their support of the people of Liverpool.

 

3.    Writes to the President to acknowledge this milestone, providing a copy of this report and motion.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.

Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil   


99

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 01

DA-790/2013 - Stage 2 development of a court approved masterplan in DA-394/2011 for a non-denominational cemetrary at 41 Greendale Road, Bringelly (Lot 5 DP 252040)

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

124503.2014

Report By

Shannon Rickersey - Senior Development Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

Property

Lot 5 in DP 252040, 41 Greendale Road Bringelly

Owner

Mr A Sadik

Applicant

Modernity Pty Ltd

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council has received and considered Development Application DA-790/2013, which seeks consent for Stage 2 development of court approved master plan in DA-394/2011 for a non-denominational cemetery.

 

The Development Application was publicly exhibited from 14 August 2013 to 13 September 2013.  A total of eleven submissions were received in relation to this application of which ten raised concerns with the proposal.

 

The Development Application was referred to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) for consideration on 7 April 2014 in accordance with the IHAP Charter and Procedure. The Panel deferred the matter at the meeting and requested copies of court approved plans be provided to enable a complete and proper assessment of the application to be undertaken in respect to the proposed development. It is noted that the Land and Environment Court (LEC) judgement which granted consent to the Masterplan development requires Stage 2 to be developed in accordance with the Masterplan approval. On this basis, while the Panel were initially presented with the LEC Court Judgement and a number of court approved plans which were available to Council at the time; the Panel recommended that a full set of the court approved plans be obtained before a final recommendation is made to the proposal.

 

Following the receipt of the full architectural plans forming part of the Court approval, the Development Application was again considered at IHAP on 26 May 2014. The Panel requested that the applicant provide additional details to Council in regards to landscaping, floor levels, fencing and rain water tanks; prior to the application being referred to Council for determination.

 

Council officers have reviewed the additional information and are satisfied that all outstanding matters have been adequately assessed. It is therefore recommended that Development Application DA-790/2013 should be approved subject to conditions of consent.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approves Development Application DA-790/2013 at 41 Greendale Road, Bringelly (Lot 5 DP 252040) for the Stage 2 development of the court approved master plan in DA-394/2011 for a non-denominational cemetery, subject to the recommended conditions of consent.

 

2.   Notifies in writing, the persons who made a submission with regard to the proposed development.

 

 

REPORT

 

The Site

The subject site is identified as Lot 5 DP 252040 being 41 Greendale Road, Bringelly. The site is currently occupied by a two storey brick residential dwelling, disused concrete pool, a number of sheds and dams.  The site is sporadically vegetated and a riparian corridor traverses the south western corner of the site with two smaller gully corridors intersecting the eastern boundary. The endemic vegetation that covers the site is identified as Cumberland Plain Woodland with the densest areas of vegetation located within the south western portion of the site around the riparian corridor, which contains an ephemeral stream.  There are three dams on site, two smaller dams in the south adjoining Greendale Road and a third larger dam at the rear in the north western corner of the property.  The site is identified as being bushfire prone land.  The site is identified in Figure 1.

 

Subject Site

 

Figure 1: Aerial view of site.

 

Background

Approval for the non-denominational cemetery was granted with conditions, following a hearing at the NSW Land and Environment Court on 9 January 2013. This approval granted consent to the concept proposal relating to the overall development and Stage 1 of the development only. The court approval contains a condition of consent stating that Stage 2 of the development cannot be carried out without further development approval.

 

The Proposal

The proposal seeks consent for Stage 2 of an approved master plan in DA-394/2011 for a non-denominational cemetery comprising of:

 

·    Burial plots comprising 6,474 double depth burial plots (12,948 internments), 1,542 low impact burial plots in tree protection zones, 4,722 urn burials under trees, 20,000 ash internments within columbarium poles and 5,100 ash internments under roses within a walled garden (total 44,312 internments);

·    Erection and operation of administrative facilities comprising funeral director's office, visitors centre, all-weather covered ceremonial space and chapel, cafe and toilets;

·    Erection and occupation of a caretaker's lodge including garage and maintenance shed;

·    Erection of columbarium poles with enclosed garden;

·    Erection of elevated and at grade nature walks / access paths;

·    Provision of car parking for 161 cars comprising 137 permanent hard surface spaces (inclusive of 4 disabled parking spaces) and 24 landscaped overflow spaces;

·    Erection of entry gates;

·    Widening of Greendale Road;

·    Ancillary drainage, landscaping and earthworks to facilitate water management; and

·    Signage adjacent to entry driveway.

 

The main issue for consideration with the current application is consistency with the Stage 1 court approval.

 

Zoning

The subject site is zoned RU1 Primary Production Zone under the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (LLEP 2008).  An extract of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 is provided in Figure 2.

 

Subject Site

 

Figure 2: Extract of LLEP Zoning map

 

Cemeteries are permissible with consent in the RU1 Zone and the use for the land as a cemetery was approved with the Stage 1 application. 

 

Section 79C: Relevant matters for consideration

An assessment of the application against the relevant matters for consideration prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (EP&AA) 1979 has been undertaken and detailed in the Council officer’s planning report. The assessment has concluded that the proposal is consistent with the Stage 1 court approved master plan for the site.  The assessment report considered by the IHAP panel is attached to this report under separate cover (see Attachment 2).

 

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel

The Development Application was considered at IHAP on 26 May 2014 having being previously deferred at the 7 April meeting where the Panel requested a complete set of the Court approved of the Stage 1 and master plan development.

 

The Panel on this occasion recommended that upon submission of information that addresses additional matters raised in the assessment, the application be referred to Council for determination.  The matters recommended to be addressed included:

 

 

1.   Relationship between existing ground and finished ground levels.

2.   Set out relative to boundaries.

3.   Detailed information on perimeter wall/gates and fences.

4.   Final location and size of underground water storage tank to be designed by an appropriately qualified person and details provided.

5.   Final location and size of waste water treatment facilities.

6.   An amended detailed landscape plan including species, numbers, sizes, location, specification, and outline of maintenance to ensure the successful implementation.

 

The applicant has provided a response to these items as follows:

 

1.   The relationship between the existing ground and finished ground levels is shown on the grading cut and fill plan (plan 11 of Stage 1 court approved plans).

2.   A Wall Set Out Plan has been submitted showing the location of structures relative to the boundaries.

3.   The applicant has provided additional fencing details on a revised Stage 1 plan (plan 8).  The fencing is to be constructed of a 1 metre high rural style fence with rabbit proof wiring.  Front gates are also to be of a rural style. 

4.   The location and size of water storage tanks were specified in the Stormwater Drainage Plan prepared by Martens that formed part of the Stage 1 court approved documents.

5.   The location and size of waste water treatment facilities were specified in the Groundwater Geotech, Wastewater and Salinity Assessment prepared by Martens that formed part of the Stage 1 court approved documents.  The final design for the system would be required prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate for this application.

6.   Amended landscaping plans and implementation and maintenance details have been provided.  An implementation watering period of 12 months is proposed.

 

The additional information provided by the applicant is attached to this report under separate cover (see Attachment 4).

 

This information has been reviewed as follows:

 

1.   The finished ground levels are shown on the Grading Cut and Fill Plan part of Stage 1 approval which is consistent with the finished floor levels on the plans submitted as part of Stage 2 of the development.

2.   The Wall Set Out Plan shows setbacks to boundaries consistent with the Stage 1 court approved plans.

3.   Fencing details along the perimeter and front gates are satisfactory. The Stage 1 court approved documentation noted that the columbarium walls in the garden area were to be at a height of 2 metres.  Condition 15 (b) of the court approved consent required that the maximum height of the columbarium walls is not to exceed RL 121.6.  Details of the external wall around the garden area on the Wall Set Out Plan show a height of between 3.6 metres to 7.1 metres without noting the RL height.  The landscaping plans show the amended gabion walls to height of RL 121.6 thus complying with this condition.  A draft condition requiring amended Wall Set Out Plans to be submitted to clarify the RL height of the external wall height on these plans to a height of RL 121.6, to comply with the court approved conditions, is included in the draft conditions of consent.

4.   Noted and correct.

5.   Noted and correct.

6.   The amended landscaping plan and implementation details have been reviewed by Council staff and a member of the Panel who’s expertise relates to landscape architecture.  The implementation period of 12 months is deemed to be inadequate and a new updated draft condition of consent requiring amended implementation details including a watering period of 3 years is included in the draft conditions of consent.

 

Conditions

A copy of the updated draft conditions of consent are attached to this report under separate cover (see Attachment 5).

 

Conclusion

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.  The application is considered to be worthy of support and is recommended for approval subject to conditions.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Facilitate economic development.

Environmental and Sustainability

Manage the environmental health of waterways.

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Protect, enhance and maintain areas of endangered ecological communities and high quality bushland as part of an attractive mix of land uses.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Applicant details (Under separate cover)

2.View

IHAP report (Under separate cover)

3.View

IHAP recommendation  (Under separate cover)

4.View

Additional information (Under separate cover)

5.View

Revised conditions of consent (Under separate cover)

  


105

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 02

DA-105/2014 - Torrens title subdivision creating five lots at 54 Nineteenth Avenue, Hoxton Park

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

151287.2014

Report By

Ruth Bennett - Development Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

Property

54 Nineteenth Avenue, Hoxton Park, Lot 536 DP 865435

Owner

LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL

Applicant

PROUST & GARDNER

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council has received and considered Development Application DA-105/2014, which seeks consent for a Torrens title subdivision creating five lots at 54 Nineteenth Avenue, Hoxton Park.

 

The Development Application was referred to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) for consideration on 30 June 2014, in accordance with the Council endorsed IHAP Charter and Procedure.  The Panel concurred with the planning officer’s recommendation to approve the development application, subject to conditions.

 

The development accords with Council’s strategic vision for the Hoxton Park area to provide for the creation of lots that are available for future low density residential development.

 

Council officers agree with the IHAP recommendation and it is therefore considered that Development Application DA-105/2014 be approved. 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Development Application DA-105/2014 at 54 Nineteenth Avenue, Hoxton Park (Lot 536 in DP 865435), subject to the recommended conditions contained within Attachment 2 (under separate cover).

 

REPORT

 

The Site

The subject site is identified as Lot 536 in DP 865435, 54 Nineteenth Avenue, Hoxton Park.  It is located on the corner of Nineteenth Avenue and Wollomombi Way, Hoxton Park.  It is currently used as a community park.  The site has a site area of 1815m2, and is relatively flat in topography with an RL measuring 35.78 in the north-west of the lot to 34.25 in the south-east of the lot.

 

SUBJECT SITE

 

Figure 1: Aerial photograph of Site

 

The Locality

The site is located within the Hoxton Park area.  The area is characterised by low and medium density residential development to the north, west and south of the site.  To the east lies a public reserve and drainage reserve.

 

The Proposal

The development application seeks consent for the subdivision of Lot 536 DP 865435 to create five (5) residential lots.

 

Specific components of the proposal are outlined in detail below:

 

·    Torrens title subdivision to create five residential lots.

 

The residential lots range in area between 334sqm to 396sqm.  Details of the lot numbers, size and width are provided below.

 

PROPOSED LOT NO.

Area (sqm)

Width (m)

1

334

12.0

2

354

12.0

3

374

10.03

4

396

11.43 and splay 6.4

5

356

15.96

 

An extract of the proposed plan of subdivision is provided in Figure 5 below.

 

Figure 2: Extract of proposed subdivision plan

 

Zoning

The subject site is zoned R2 Low Density under the provisions of Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (LLEP 2008).

 

SUBJECT SITE

 

Figure 3: Extract from LLEP 2008 Zoning Map

 

Section 79C Relevant matters for consideration

An assessment of the application against the relevant matters for consideration prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 has been undertaken.  The assessment has concluded that the proposed development is acceptable and is unlikely to result in any adverse impacts.  The assessment report considered by the IHAP is attached to this report under separate cover (see Attachment 2).

 

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel

Pursuant to Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, the proposal was referred to IHAP for consideration, as the application is made on behalf of Council and Council has a pecuniary interest in the development.

 

The panel has concurred with the recommendations made in the Officer’s report.

 

Conditions

A copy of the draft conditions of consent and recommendations made by IHAP are attached to this report under separate cover (see Attachments 2 and 3).

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Facilitate economic development.

 

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Applicant details (Under separate cover)

2.View

IHAP report (Under separate cover)

3.View

IHAP recommendation (Under separate cover)

  


110

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 03

DA-1198/2013 - Partial demolition and alterations and additions to the existing dwelling; use of the dwelling as a child care centre; and installation of signage at 4 Bungarra Crescent, Chipping Norton

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

151949.2014

Report By

Brendon Clendenning - Senior Development Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

Property

Lot 52 DP 566849 - 4 Bungarra Crescent Chipping Norton

Owner

Mr Ozden Mustafa

Applicant

Mr Ozden Mustafa

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council is in receipt of a Development Application proposing partial demolition of existing dwelling; alterations and additions to the existing dwelling; use of the dwelling as a child care centre; and installation of business identification signage at 4 Bungarra Crescent, Chipping Norton.

 

This application was referred to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) who recommended that the application be approved as per the Officer recommendation, subject to the imposition of additional conditions of consent relating to design, traffic management and landscaping.

 

The recommended conditions are considered to be appropriate and it therefore considered that the conditions be incorporated into the recommended conditions of consent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Approve the application DA-1198/2013, subject to the recommended conditions attached to the IHAP Report and the following amendments to the Draft Determination Notice considered by IHAP:

 

Amend Draft Condition 1 to read as follows:

 

1.      Development the subject of this determination notice must be carried out strictly in accordance with Development Application No. DA-1198/2013 lodged on 24 October 2013 and accompanying plans and reports listed below and stamped DA-1198/2013, except where modified by the undermentioned conditions and amendments contained within this condition:

 

Description

Issue

Job No

Sheet

Date

Prepared By

DA01 - Cover Page, Site Analysis & Site/Roof Plan

B

13011

1 of 5

28 March 2014

De Angelis Taylor + Associates

DA02 - Ground Floor Plan & Sections

B

13011

2 of 5

28 March 2014

De Angelis Taylor + Associates

DA03 -Elevations & Street Elevation

B

13011

3 of 5

28 March 2014

De Angelis Taylor + Associates

DA04 - Demolition Plan & Earthworks Plan

B

13011

4 of 5

28 March 2014

De Angelis Taylor + Associates

L-01 - Landscape Plan

B

3442b

 

24 March 2014

Ray Fuggle Associates

Exterior Finishes Schedule

C

13011

-

n.d.

De Angelis Taylor + Associates

Childcare Centre Noise Assessment

-

20130747.1

-

26 August 2013

Acoustic Logic

 

          The following design amendments are required:

·    A minimum of 50% of the rear yard marked on the approved landscape plan as “turf, artificial turf or wetpour rubber”, is to be comprised of permeable landscaping. This shall be situated in such a manner as to ensure the viability of the trees to be retained.

·    The two Pyrus Calleryana provided within the front setback shall be planted with a pot size of 200L.

 

 

 

 

·    Horizontal sunhoods shall be located above the front windows to the rooms marked as Foyer, Admin and Staff Room. There are to be two continuous sunhoods: one over the windows between the Foyer and the Admin room, and one over all three windows to the Staff Room. The sunhoods are to project one metre from the front wall.

·    The proposed front wall sign shall be located below the first sunhood described above.

 

Amend Draft Condition 129 to read as follows:

 

129.    The applicant is to prepare and implement an Operational Traffic Management Plan (OTMP). The OTMP shall incorporate the following:

 

·    Strategies for information advising parents and care givers of preferred route to the child care centre and the time for pick-up and drop-off, having regard to the Assessment of Traffic and Parking Implications prepared by Traffic Impact Services Pty Ltd and dated October 2013, and having regard for the peak periods of vehicle movement for nearby schools.

·    Strategies for minimising potential queuing when parents drop off and pick up children.

 

The OTMP shall be implemented on an ongoing basis.

 

 

REPORT

 

Background

 

Council has received and considered a development application proposing partial demolition of the existing dwelling; alterations and additions to the existing dwelling; use of the dwelling as a child care centre; and installation of business identification signage at 4 Bungarra Crescent, Chipping Norton.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the endorsed Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, the proposal was referred to the IHAP for consideration, and is now referred to Council for consideration and determination, as the proposal has received 12 objections.

 

At their meeting on 30 June 2014, IHAP made the following recommendations:

 

“The Panel recommends additional conditions relating to the front façade of the proposed building and to landscaping.

 

The drawings submitted should be amended to reflect the following conditions:

 

 

 

 

Design changes

Horizontal sunhoods should be located above the front windows to the entry of the office, admin and staff room. These are to be continuous sunhoods linking the windows between the entry and the admin and a second sun hood linking the three windows to the staff room. They are to project approximately one metre. The proposed sign should be located below the sunhood and between the windows to the entry and the office.

 

Traffic Management

Operational traffic management plan shall be inserted in section F of conditions relating to use, such that interaction with the long day care childcare use and the adjacent schools should be minimised. The plan should minimise potential queuing when parents drop off and pick up children.

 

Landscaping

The proposed trees to the front boundary are to be a minimum (pot size) of 200 litre with a clear stem of two metres so as to ensure clear site lines and provide an appropriate amenity. The soft fall or artificial turf proposed should be a permeable surface to ensure the retention of the existing trees”.

 

The Proposal

 

The Development Application proposes the following:

 

·    Demolition of the majority of the existing dwelling, include the outbuilding located on the east of the site.

·    Construction of a single storey child care centre to cater for 28 children and three staff, with hours from 7:00am-6:00pm, Monday to Friday.

·    Provision of a total of six parking spaces including:

4 at the east of the site, including a stacked parking space

2 at the front of the site including an accessible parking space.

·    Construction of a second vehicular crossing to enable vehicles to enter and exit in a forward direction.

·    Provision of a Perspex return over the rear fence to address acoustic impacts of the proposal.

 

The Site

 

The subject site is known as Lot 52 DP 566849, Chipping Norton and has an area of 815.5m2.The site is accessible from Bungarra Crescent and currently contains a detached single storey dweling.

 

Subject Site

 

Figure 1 Aerial image of the subject site

 

Consideration of IHAP Recommendation

 

An assessment of each of the matters raised in the IHAP recommendation has been undertaken, and is provided below.

 

Design changes

 

Section 2.7 of Part 3.8 of the Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (LDCP 2008), Non-residential Development in Residential Zones, requires new child care centres to enhance the character of the neighbourhood, and to add visual interest to the street.

 

Similarly, State Environmental Planning Policy 64 - Advertising and Signage requires signage to be consistent with the character of the area, the streetscape, and the building to which it relates.

 

The recommended additional condition will improve the capacity of the proposal to meet the objectives described above, with little impact on the functionality of the proposed development. Therefore, the additional condition is considered warranted.

 

Note:   The plans indicate that the ‘entry’ is an outdoor landing providing adjacent to the area marked as ‘foyer’. The area marked as ‘entry’ does not contain any windows. Similarly, there is no area marked on the plans as an ‘office’. To avoid confusion, it is recommended that the description of the window locations, be modified to reflect the room names shown on the plans.

 

Traffic Management

 

The recommended condition is similar to Draft Condition 129 recommended by Council Officers, which is reproduced below:

 

“The applicant is to prepare and implement operational traffic management strategies in advising parents and care givers of preferred route to the child care centre and the time for pick-up and drop-off, having regard to the Assessment of Traffic and Parking Implications prepared by Traffic Impact Services Pty Ltd and dated October 2013”.

 

This condition may be amended to incorporate the IHAP recommendation such that the condition reads as follows:

 

“The applicant is to prepare and implement an Operational Traffic Management Plan (OTMP). The OTMP shall incorporate the following:

 

·     Strategies for information advising parents and care givers of preferred route to the child care centre and the time for pick-up and drop-off, having regard to the Assessment of Traffic and Parking Implications prepared by Traffic Impact Services Pty Ltd and dated October 2013, and having regard for the peak periods of vehicle movement for nearby schools.

·     Strategies for minimising potential queuing when parents drop off and pick up children.

 

The OTMP shall be implemented on an ongoing basis”.

 

The original draft condition was imposed in order to minimise traffic and parking impacts in the locality. The amended condition requires the applicant to consider additional matters within an OTMP, which would further assist in minimising traffic and parking impacts in the locality. In this regard, the amended condition is considered to be appropriate.

 

Landscaping

 

Section 2.7 of Part 3.8 of the LDCP 2008, Non-residential Development in Residential Zones, requires consideration to be given to landscaping provided at childcare centres within residential areas. The LDCP 2008 requires the setback areas to be utilised for canopy tree planting and for all development to include canopy trees that will achieve a minimum 8m height at maturity.

 

The landscape plan indicates that the two Pyrus Calleryana are to be provided at the front of the property, with a minimum pot size of 35L and a mature height of 10m. However, a 35L tree will be relatively small when initially planted. The provision of a 200L pot size tree will ensure that the tree is of a substantial size from the commencement of the use of the childcare centre.

 

The proposal does not comply with the LDCP requirement for 50% of the front setback to be landscaped, and provides for approximately 24% of the landscaped area at the front of the site. The applicant has demonstrated that compliance with this requirement would be unable to be achieved without a reduction in the provision of parking. The provision of mature trees from the commencement of the operation of the use would improve the landscape outcome for the site, and for this reason, this increase in the size of the trees is appropriate and may be incorporated into the recommended conditions of consent contained within the IHAP report.

 

Conclusion

 

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and is worthy of support. On this basis, the application is recommended for approval, subject to the additional conditions described herein.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Social and Cultural

There are no civic social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

IHAP Report for DA-1198/2013  (Under separate cover)

2.View

IHAP Recommendation for DA-1198/2013  (Under separate cover)

   


117

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Development Application Determination Report

 

DAD 01

Modification to Development Consent No.693/2009 at 320-400 Badgerys Creek Road, Badgerys Creek (Lot 1 DP 1188956)

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

140655.2014

Report By

Brendon Clendenning - Senior Development Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

Property

320-400 Badgerys Creek Road, Badgerys Creek - Lot 1 DP 1188956

Owner

MISS M A ELFORD

MR A ABDUL-RAHMAN

Applicant

Elford Group Pty Ltd

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council is in receipt of a modification application which has been made pursuant to Section 96(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, which seeks to modify Development Consent DA-693/2009.

 

Development Consent was granted by Council on 2 September 2009, for operation of an extractive industry (shale quarry) and materials resource recovery facility to run concurrently at Lot 1 DP 1188956, 320-400 Badgerys Creek Road, Badgerys Creek. A subsequent Section 96(2) modification was approved under delegated authority on 16 February 2011 to rectify minor errors in Conditions 10 and 133 and to delete Conditions 121 and 193.

 

The Section 96(2) modification seeks to enable the stockpiling of screened soil at the site and to use the material in the construction of bunds, acoustic barriers and for other land profiling purposes, which would then be used as landfill in the resource recovery facility. The modification also seeks to modify Condition 9 such that an Environmental Protection License is required prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate rather than prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

The approved development is classified as Designated Development pursuant to Clause 19 and Clause 32 of Part 1 of Schedule 3 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act Regulation 2000, and as Integrated Development, which requires approval from the NSW Environment Protection Authority pursuant to the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, the Department of Trade and Investment (Resources and Energy) pursuant to the Mining Act 1992 , and the NSW Office of Water pursuant to the Water Management Act 2000.

 

The application has been considered pursuant to Section 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and it has been determined that the modification will result in substantially the same development as that to which consent was originally granted. Assessment of the application has been undertaken which has concluded that these amendments are satisfactory and will not result in any adverse impacts upon the locality. Accordingly, it is recommended that the consent be modified as detailed within this report.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approve the application to modify DA-693/2009 at 320-400 Badgerys Creek Road, Badgerys Creek (Lot 1 DP 1188956), pursuant to Section 96(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the following way:

 

A.        New Condition 1A is added to Development Consent No. DA-693/2009 to read as follows:

 

1A.      Consent is granted for the receipt and stockpiling of screened soil to be used in accordance with the requirements of the Sydney Trains Screened Soil Exemption dated February 2014, or a more recent version, as updated by the EPA. The use of the material is subject to the following:

 

i.      Screened soil must only be used to construct acoustic berms, in accordance with Condition 124 and Condition 125, and to construct visual berms adjacent to the eastern boundary of the site.

ii.     Notwithstanding (i) berms must be finished as indicated within the approved documentation outlined within Condition 1, including the Landscape Plan.

iii.    Measures for controlling the growth of noxious weeds must be implemented in the stockpile locations.

iv.   The quantity of screened soil accepted on site must not exceed 85,000 tonnes.

v.    The material must be stockpiled within the location of proposed Pit 5, and at no time shall exceed 10m in height, or 85m in length.

vi.   The screened soil must be stored in separate stockpiles of a maximum height of 3 meters.

vii.  The storage of screened soil must be carried out in a manner which minimises or prevents the emission of dust from the premises.

viii. The construction of acoustic and visual berms must be carried out in a manner which minimises or prevents the emission of dust from the premises.

 

 

ix.   Any unused material must be either transported off site to an industrial site authorised to receive the waste as per the resource recovery exemption, or subsequently applied to land as waste, with any required appropriate levy paid.

 

B.        Condition 9 is deleted from Development Consent No. DA-693/2009.

 

C.        Condition 119 is added to Development Consent No. DA-693/2009.

 

119A.   Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, an Environmental Protection License must be obtained from the NSW Environmental Protection Authority. A copy of the Environmental Protection License must be provided to Council.

 

119A.   Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, an Environmental Protection License must be obtained from the NSW Environmental Protection Authority. A copy of the Environmental Protection License must be provided to Council.

 

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Site

 

(i)         The subject land was identified as Lot 1 DP 576709, Lot 2 DP 576709, Lot 3 DP 576709 at the time of approval. These lots have since been consolidated and the subject site is now identified as Lot 1 DP 1188956. The address of the property is 320-400 Badgerys Creek Road, Badgerys Creek. The site is irregular in shape with a frontage of approximately 689m to Badgery’s Creek Road. The site has an area of 39.91 hectares.

 

An aerial photograph of the site is illustrated in Figure 1. 

 

Subject Land

 

 
 

Figure 1 Aerial Photograph of the subject site

 

 

 

The southern boundary of the site is approximately 766m in length, whilst a creek line defines the northern boundary of the site. The site slopes west to east at a moderate grade. The area generally adjacent to the creek is densely vegetated comprised primarily of Cumberland Plain Woodland.

 

2.       Background

 

(ii)        A development application (DA2000/2003) was lodged on 10 April 2003 for an extractive industry (clay and shale) and the operation of a waste management facility which would accept both inert materials and general solid waste.

(iii)      

(iv)       The development application was ultimately refused due to insufficient information and documentation being submitted to address the concerns raised by numerous authorities who consequently were not able to issue General Terms of Approval.

 

In this regard, and given concurrence was not provided, DA2000/2003 was refused.

 

2.1       Approved Application

 

DA-693/2009 was approved for the operation of a shale quarry and demolition materials recovery facility at the site. The proposed development consists of three stages:

 

·    STAGE 1 - Site establishment and construction: 3 -6 months

·    STAGE 2 – Resources extraction and material sorting operations: 23-26 years

·    STAGE 3 – Rehabilitation following excavation of the final pit: 2-3 years.

 

The stages are summarised below:

 

2.1.1      Stage 1 - Site establishment and construction

 

Stage 1 involves the construction of required infrastructure and establishing the site for the proposed activities. Activities undertaken at this stage include:

 

·    Construction of a new entrance, internal road system, installation of a weighbridge;

·    Construction of hard stand areas and storage bays;

·    Erection of site buildings including demountable office and amenities block as well as the construction of a machinery shed;

·    Construction of earthern mounds to a height of 5 metres which will be located on the boundary between site activities and adjacent properties;

·    Construction of a sedimentation dam; and

·    Vegetation within the areas to be extracted would be cleared prior to the excavation of each quarry pit, concurrent with mound construction.

 

Figure 2 Primary Development Activities (extracted from Environmental Impact Statement prepared by Benbow Environmental)

 

2.1.2      Stage 2 - Resources extraction and material sorting operations

 

Primary development activities for the development are resource extraction and demolition materials recovery which will be carried out concurrently on the site, as follows:

 

Resource extraction

 

The extraction of shale and sandstone is carried out through a series of open cut pits. Shale will be excavated progressively from north to the south, from Pit 1 to Pit 6 (as illustrated in the proposed site layout plan). The total volume of resources to be extracted is estimated at 2 million cubic metres. A maximum 150,000 tonnes will be extracted each year. Estimated resource volumes, quantities and extraction time are outlined in Table 1 below:

 

EXTRACTION PIT

RESOURCE VOLUME (m³)

RESOURCE QUANTITY (t)

ESTIMATED EXTRACTION TIME (years)

1

298,215

596,000

4

2

374,250

742,500

5

3

389,610

779,220

5

4

178,740

357,480

2.5

5

208,305

416,610

3

6

256,500

513,000

3.5

Table 1: Estimated resource volumes, quantities and extraction time (extract from Environmental Impact Statement prepared by Benbow Environmental)

 

Several types of machinery will be required to excavate geological resources. An indication of machinery used is presented in Table 2 below:

 

Rock Mass Classification

Minimum Machinery Required

Residual Soil

Hydraulic excavator, bulldozer blade and bucket

Class V Shale

Hydraulic excavator

Class IV Shale

Hydraulic excavator

Class III Shale

Excavator with rock breaker

Class II Shale/Class III Sandstone

Caterpillar, D8 Dozer or equivalent with ripping tyne

Table 2: Excavation methods and typical machinery required (extract from Environmental Impact Statement prepared by Benbow Environmental)

 

The excavator will load extracted material directly into bogies trucks and dog trailers for delivery to market facilities off site. If deemed necessary, rocks, specifically sandstone, may require crushing on site. Under these circumstances, resource material would be transported to the stock pile area located in the south eastern corner of the site for processing. 

 

Demolition Materials Recovery

 

Inert demolition material will be brought onto the site once operations commence. Inert demolition materials include; concrete, bricks, steel, glass and Virgin Excavated Natural Material (VENM). No organic material, hazardous or putrescibles waste will be accepted on site.

 

Acceptable wastes associated with demolition include:

 

·    Glass, plastic, rubber, plasterboard, ceramics, bricks, concrete or metal;

·    Paper or cardboard;

·    Wood waste;

·    Building cavity dust waste from residential premises or educational or childcare centre institutions;

·    Synthetic fibre waste;

·    VENM;

·    Asphalt waste from road construction;

 

Wastes which will not be accepted on site for rehabilitation include:

 

·    Green waste (garden wastes)

·    Special waste such as asbestos and waste tyres

·    Liquid waste

·    Hazardous waste

·    General putrescibles solid waste i.e. household and general waste, food wastes etc

 

A maximum of 168,000 tonnes per year of inert waste brought from demolition sites will be sorted into recyclable and non-recyclable material. Demolition material which can be recovered will be sold to the construction industry. It is anticipated that this would comprise approximately 12,000 tonnes per year of timber/wood products. Non-recyclable material would be crushed and utilised to fill and rehabilitate exhausted quarries.

 

Throughout the development, excavation and material sorting operations will take place simultaneously, noting that Pit 1 will not be filled within inert material until it has been wholly excavated. During the first 4 years of development as the first pit is quarried, waste will be accepted on site but quantities will be limited.

 

2.1.3      Stage 3 - Rehabilitation

 

Rehabilitation will be undertaken in two phases. The first phase involves filling excavated quarries with inert material. After extraction has been completed from each pit, the pits are to be lined with a clay liner at the base of the pit and potentially the pit walls. The upper 5 metres of each pit will then be compacted to 98% to enable final reuse of the site in the future. Earthen mounds will be removed and utilised for top soil for the site.

 

The site is to be finally rehabilitated to its original topography and revegetated with native grasses for soil stability. Details of site rehabilitation will be provided in a Rehabilitation Plan to ensure the site is suitable for future use.

 

2.2       Previous Section 96 Application

 

On 16 February 2011 Council approved an application for changes to various conditions. The application enabled the following changes:

·    Contribution to be paid during the operations, rather than prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate

·    Removal of requirement for road construction.

·    Removal of requirement of lot consolidation, were consolidated at the time.

·    Removal of depth restriction on excavator and front end loader.

 

3.       The Proposal

 

An application has been made pursuant to Section 96(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 which seeks to modify Development Consent DA-693/2009. The proposed modification is summarised within Figure 3

 

Figure 3 Excerpt from Statement of Environmental Effects describing proposed modification

 

4.       Legislative Framework:

 

4.1       Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000

 

4.1.1    Designated Development

 

The proposed development is identified as Designated Development pursuant to Clause 77A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Schedule 3 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

Clause 19 of Schedule 3 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 prescribes:

 

Clause 19 Extractive industries

 

 (1)       Extractive industries (being industries that obtain extractive materials by methods including excavating, dredging, tunnelling or quarrying or that store, stockpile or process extractive materials by methods including washing, crushing, sawing or separating):

(a)        that obtain or process for sale, or reuse, more than 30,000 cubic metres of extractive material per year, or

(b)        that disturb or will disturb a total surface area of more than 2 hectares of land by:

(i)           clearing or excavating, or

(ii)          constructing dams, ponds, drains, roads or conveyors, or

(iii)         storing or depositing overburden, extractive material or tailings, or

(c)  that are located:

(i)           in or within 40 metres of a natural waterbody, wetland or a environmentally sensitive area, or

(ii)          within 200 metres of a coastline, or

(iii)         in an area of contaminated soil or acid sulphate soil, or

(iv)         on land that slopes at more than 18 degrees to the horizontal, or

(v)          if involving blasting, within 1,000 metres of a residential zone or within 500 metres of a dwelling not associated with the development, or

(vi)          within 500 metres of the site of another extractive industry that has      operated during the last 5 years.

 

The extractive industry component of the development application is classified as Designated Development in that:

 

·    Approximately 150,000 tonnes will be extracted each year which is in excess of the minimum 30,000 cubic metres;

·    More then 2 hectares of the site will be disturbed during the development. The 6 extractive pits proposed total approximately 19 hectares;

·    The site is within 40 metres of a waterbody (i.e. Badgery’s Creek); and

·    The subject site is identified to contain Environmentally Significant Land.

 

Clause 32 of Schedule 3 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 prescribes:

 

Clause 32 Waste management facilities or works

 

(1)        Waste management facilities or works that store, treat, purify or dispose of waste or sort, process, recycle, recover, use or reuse material from waste and:

(a)        that dispose (by landfilling, incinerating, storing, placing or other means) of solid or liquid waste:

(i)         that includes any substance classified in the Australian Dangerous Goods Code or medical, cytotoxic or quarantine waste, or

(ii)         that comprises more than 100,000 tonnes of “clean fill” (such as soil, sand, gravel, bricks or other excavated or hard material) in a manner that, in the opinion of the consent authority, is likely to cause significant impacts on drainage or flooding, or

(iii)        that comprises more than 1,000 tonnes per year of sludge or effluent, or

(iv)       that comprises more than 200 tonnes per year of other waste material, or

 

(b)           that sort, consolidate or temporarily store waste at transfer stations or materials recycling facilities for transfer to another site for final disposal, permanent storage, reprocessing, recycling, use or reuse and:

(i)         that handle substances classified in the Australian Dangerous Goods Code or medical, cytotoxic or quarantine waste, or

(ii)        that have an intended handling capacity of more than 10,000 tonnes per year of waste containing food or livestock, agricultural or food processing industries waste or similar substances, or

(iii)       that have an intended handling capacity of more than 30,000 tonnes per year of waste such as glass, plastic, paper, wood, metal, rubber or building demolition material, or

(c)           that purify, recover, reprocess or process more than 5,000 tonnes per year of solid or liquid organic materials, or

(d)           that are located:

(i)         in or within 100 metres of a natural waterbody, wetland, coastal dune field or environmentally sensitive area, or

(ii)        in an area of high watertable, highly permeable soils, acid sulphate, sodic or saline soils, or

(iii)       within a drinking water catchment, or

(iv)        within a catchment of an estuary where the entrance to the sea is intermittently open, or

(v)        on a floodplain, or

(vi)        within 500 metres of a residential zone or 250 metres of a dwelling not associated with the development and, in the opinion of the consent authority, having regard to topography and local meteorological conditions, are likely to significantly affect the amenity of the neighbourhood by reason of noise, visual impacts, air pollution (including odour, smoke, fumes or dust), vermin or traffic.

 

The material resource recovery component of the development is considered Designated Development due to the following:

 

·    The facility would have a handling capacity that is concurrent with the rate of extraction – 168,000 tonnes per annum (i.e. in excess of 30,000 tonnes per annum);

·    The facility would process more than 5,000 tonnes per year of solid materials;

·    The subject site is within 100m of a natural waterbody (i.e. Badgery’s Creek);

·    The development is in an area of high water table; and

·    The development is within 250m of a dwelling not associated with the development.

 

Given the approved development is Designated Development, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was submitted in conjunction with the approved development application, in accordance with Clause 112 of the Act and Clause 230 of the Regulations. The original assessment report considered the following specific environmental impacts with respect to the construction and operation of the quarry and materials resource recovery facility. These specific identified environmental impacts were:

 

1.         Acoustic amenity;

2.         Air quality;

3.         Visual amenity;

4.         Water quality;

5.         Traffic generation;

6.         Waste generation and management;

7.         Cultural heritage; and

8.         Flora and fauna.

 

The purpose of the EIS accompanying the development application was to identify and quantify these impacts and to assess their significance. There is no requirement to submit an EIS with a Section 96 application. However, with regard to the Statement of Environmental Effects (SEE) submitted with this application, and the nature of the proposed modifications, the following matters require consideration:

 

4.1.1.1   Acoustic Amenity

 

The EIS was accompanied by an acoustic assessment which examined the existing acoustic environment and the potential for noise on the nearest residential receivers. The approval of this application required consideration of this report, and additional conditions were imposed to ensure the proposal is satisfactory following the commencement of works. Provided these conditions are retained, the proposal is acceptable with respect to acoustic amenity, irrespective of the change of material.

 

4.1.1.2   Visual Amenity

 

The existing visual amenity of the site is one that is typical of a rural landscape. The site is dominated by grasses with several vegetation stands across the site. Native vegetation occurs along the creek line. The site is gently undulating with slopes towards the west, north and north east.

 

The approved development creates potential visual amenity impacts, including those resulting from excavation operations, materials stockpiling, hardstand features, site buildings and vehicle use.

 

The modification as proposed would enable screened soil obtained from Sydney Trains to be stockpiled on the site and used in the construction of barriers serving a visual amenity purpose. Each of these matters are discussed in the following.

 

Stockpiling

Noting that no site plan was approved with the original application, the stormwater plan is relied on to indicate the approved location of the general stockpile area, as indicated in the excerpt shown in Figure 4.

 

Pit 5

 

 

Approved stockpile area

 

 

Figure 4 Excerpt of approved stormwater plan with existing stockpile area and Pit 5 shown indicated.

 

No stormwater plan was submitted with the Section 96 application; however, the SEE indicates that the proposed location of the stockpile area for the screened soil, is in the area that will later become Pit 5, as depicted in Figure 5

 

 

Figure 5 Excerpt from Statement of Environmental Effects showing location of proposed stockpile area

 

The SEE also indicates that the proposed dimensions of the stockpile, as indicated in Figure 6.

Figure 6 Excerpt from Statement of Environmental Effects showing dimensions of proposed stockpile area

 

 

The SEE describes the stockpile as designed to hold almost 50,000 tonnes of engineering fill on site, with a height of 10m, a length of 85m, a width of 40m at the bottom and 30m at the top and a gradient of 1, or 45 degrees.

 

This stockpile area is located in excess of 50m from the nearest boundary, and behind visual bunds. As such, and having consideration to its height, the stockpiles are unlikely to create adverse visual impacts on the locality. As no formal plans of the stockpiling area have been submitted as part of this modification, it is recommended that new conditions limit the size and location of the stockpiling area in accordance with the dimensions shown in Figure 6.

 

Visual Barriers

 

The EIS outlines that the development will minimise visual impacts through the establishment of earth mounds (bunding). The earth mounds will consist of indigenous trees, shrubs and ground covers combined with stabilising grasses. The earth mounds will be located around most of the site as well as around each pit while they are being excavated.

 

The proposed modification would enable the use of screened soil obtained from Sydney Trains in the construction of these barriers. This would be acceptable provided that the bunding is finished as per the approved landscaped plan and associated documentation contained within Condition 1 of DA-693/2009.

 

4.1.1.3   Water Quality

 

Department of Primary Industries indicated to Council that drainage associated with the stockpile materials has the potential to impact upon water quality for downstream agricultural users. However, the EIS indicated methods by which water will be discharged from the site, and the conditions of consent require water to managed in accordance with the EIS. Subsequently, it is not considered that additional conditions are required due to the stockpiling.

 


 

4.1.1.4   Traffic Generation

 

The SEE indicates the following:

 

"The material will be transported in truck and dog trailer vehicles (or similar), with an approximate individual payload capacity of 25 tonnes. A maximum of 100,000 tonnes of material would result in approximately 4000 loads being brought to site (8000 truck movements into and out of the site). This material will be brought on site during the planning and construction phase, which are likely to span March to October (8 months or 175 weekdays). Assuming that all deliveries are completed two months prior to the operation phase (approximately November), this results in 131 weekdays where delivery is likely to be taken. Assuming uniformity in delivery quantity throughout this period, the proposed modification will result in an additional 22 vehicles (45 truck movements, into and out of the site) each weekday. These deliveries of material will cease during the operational phase of the project, so this modification does not affect the operational traffic volume and noise calculations submitted in the EIS”.

 

It is evident that this calculation would in fact result in 61.5 truck movements per day, and that the movements are understated. However, there are currently no conditions of consent, or no recommendations within the approved Traffic Report that restrict the quantity of vehicular movements, either on a daily basis, or at different times of the year. Thus, this calculation may not necessarily reflect the way that the deliveries are undertaken.

 

Notwithstanding, the delivery of the materials will occur prior to the use of the site as an extractive industry or as a resource recovery facility, during which vehicle movements (including those not related to the subject development) are predicted within the approved Traffic Report to increase. The Traffic Report submitted with the Development Application indicated that during the operational phase, the projected total average two-way truck movements per day would be 84 with 67 to/from the north and 17 to/from the south.

 

It is considered that the road network has capacity for additional daily traffic generation of as indicated by the proposal, and that the proposal is acceptable with respect to traffic generation.

 

4.1.1.5   Waste Generation and Management

 

The SEE indicates that any material that remains following construction works will either be transported off site to an industrial site authorised to receive the waste as per the RRE or subsequently applied to land as waste, with the EPA levy paid. It is recommended that this requirement be incorporated into the new conditions.

 

4.1.1.6.  Flora and Fauna

 

A Flora and Fauna Survey, Vegetation Assessment and Threatened Species Impact Assessment were undertaken and accompanies the development application. To ensure that impact on vegetation and flora and fauna is minimised, a number of recommendations were provided. The proposed modifications are not expected to alter previously considered ecological and riparian matters

 

The Department of Primary Industries indicated to the stockpiling of material will require weed management. This can be incorporated into the conditions of consent.

 

4.2     Water Management Act 2000

 

The approved development required a Controlled Activity Approval under the Water Management Act 2000. As such, the application is defined as Integrated Development in accordance with Section 91 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, and concurrence is therefore required from the Department of Water and Energy.

 

Consultation with the Department of Water and Energy will be canvassed in more detail later in this report.

 

4.3     Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997

 

The approved development requires an Environmental Protection Licence as it is a scheduled activity pursuant to the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997.  As such, the application is defined as Integrated Development in accordance with Section 91 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, and concurrence is required from the Department of Environment and Climate Change.

 

Consultation with the Department of Environment and Climate Change will be canvassed in more detail later in this report.

 

5.       Environmental Planning Instruments

 

The application has been assessed against the relevant Environmental Planning Instruments listed below:

·      Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008

·      State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007

·      State Environmental Planning Policy (Mining, Petroleum and Extractive Industries) 2007

·      State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Regional Growth Centres) 2006

·      State Environmental Planning Policy No. 44 – Koala Habitat Protection

·      State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land

·      Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 9—Extractive Industry

·      Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 – Hawkesbury Nepean River

 

The relevant matters requiring further discussion are detailed below:

 

5.1     Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008

 

5.1.1    Permissibility

 

The subject site is zoned RU1 – Primary Production, pursuant to Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (LLEP 2008).

 

The proposed development is defined as an “extractive industry” and a “waste or resource management facility”. An extractive industry is permissible pursuant to Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008, the waste or resource management facility is permissible pursuant to State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007, which is discussed elsewhere.

 

The resource extraction component of the development application can be defined as an “extractive industry” pursuant to LLEP 2008.

 

An “extractive industry” means ‘the winning or removal of extractive materials (other than from a mine) by methods such as excavating, dredging, tunnelling or quarrying, including the storage, stockpiling or processing of extractive materials by methods such as recycling, washing, crushing, sawing or separating, but does not include turf farming’.

 

An “extractive industry” is a permissible land use with Council consent in the RU1 – Primary Production zone pursuant to LLEP 2008. 

 

5.1.2    Zone Objectives

 

The objectives of the RU1 – Primary Production zone are as follows:

 

(a)  To encourage sustainable primary industry production by maintaining and enhancing the natural resource base.

(b)  To encourage diversity in primary production enterprises and systems appropriate for the area.

(c)  To minimise the fragmentation and alienation of resource lands.

(d)  To minimise conflict between land uses within the zone and land uses within adjoining zones.

(e)  To ensure development does not unreasonable increase the demand for public services or public facilities.

(f)  To ensure that the development does not hinder the development or operation of an airport on Commonwealth land in Badgery’s Creek.

(g)  To preserve bushland, wildlife corridors and natural habitat.

 

It is considered that the proposed modification satisfies the objectives of the RU1 – Primary Production zone.

 

Minimisation of land use conflict

 

In relation to objective (d), it is considered that conflict between land users within proximity to the development is minimised by maintaining existing amenity levels.  Compatibility (and impact on amenity) with land users immediately adjoining the site and in the immediate locality have been assessed earlier in the report.

 

It is considered that the proposed safeguards and mitigation measures implemented will minimise actual impacts from the development. Details of mitigation measures are addressed in more detail later in this report.

 

In regards to objectives (e) and (g), it is considered that the proposed development is unlikely to generate a demand for public infrastructure, it is unlikely to hinder any future development at the proposed site for Badgerys Creek Airport.

 

In regards to objective (f) the proposal will retain all vegetation identified as environmentally significant land and it is the intention of the application to prepare and implement an Vegetation Management Plan. Issues relating to flora and fauna and vegetation will be canvassed in more detail later in this report.

 

5.1.3    Miscellaneous Provisions

 

Clause 7.6 Environmentally significant land

 

Clause 7.6(2) prescribes:

 

Before determining an application to carry out development on environmentally significant land, the consent authority must consider such of the following as relevant:

 

(a)     the condition and significance of the vegetation on the land and whether it should be substantially retained in that location,

(b)     the importance of the vegetation in that particular location to native fauna,

(c)     the sensitivity of the land the effect of clearing vegetation,

(d)     the relative stability of the bed and banks of any water body that mat be affected by the development, whether on the site, upstream or down stream,

(e)     the effect of the development on water quality, stream flow and the functions of aquatic ecosystems (such as habitat and connectivity),

(f)      the effect of the development on public access to and use of any waterbody and its foreshores.

 

The proposed modifications are not expected to alter previously considered ecological and riparian matters

 

5.2     State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007

 

5.2.1    Permissibility

 

As outlined previously, the proposed development incorporates two (2) components being resources extraction, and material sorting operations.

 

The extraction component of the proposal is separately defined and permitted pursuant to Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008.

 

A premises which sorts materials is defined as a ‘waste disposal facility’, which means ‘a facility for the disposal of waste by landfill, incineration or other means, including associated works or activities such as recycling, resource recovery and other resource management activities, energy generation from waste gases, leachate management, odour control and the winning of extractive material to generate a void for disposal of waste or to cover waste after its disposal’, pursuant to State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007. 

 

A ’waste disposal facility’ is further classified under the grouping of “waste or resource management facility” pursuant to State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007.  Specifically, a “waste or resource management facility” means ‘a waste or resource transfer station, a resource recovery facility or a waste disposal facility’.

 

The site is zoned RU1 – Primary Production under LLEP 2008, and a “waste or resource management facility” is a permissible land use in the RU1 – Primary Production zone under the provisions of SEPP (Infrastructure) 2007. 

 

5.2.2    Traffic Generating Development to be referred to the RTA

 

The development is identified as Traffic Generating Development, and, as such, the application was referred to the Sydney Regional Development Advisory Committee (RTA) pursuant to Schedule 3 of the SEPP (Infrastructure) 2007, for comment and assessment.

 

RMS raises no objection to the proposed modification as it wiil not have any significant impact on the classified road network.

 

5.3     State Environmental Planning Policy (Mining, Petroleum and Extractive Industries) 2007

 

The subject SEPP recognises the importance of extractive industries to NSW and the need to establish appropriate planning controls to encourage sustainable development through the environmental assessment and sustainable management of the extractive industry.

 

In this regard, the SEPP prescribe matters for consideration in the assessment of development applications for extractive industries. The proposed modification is consistent with the objectives of State Environmental Planning Policy (Mining, Petroleum and Extractive Industries) 2007 and is satisfactory with respective to the objectives of the zone.

 

5.4     State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Regional Growth Centres) 2006

 

The subject site is located within the South West Growth Centres. In this regard, State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Regional Growth Centres) 2006 (the SEPP) applies to the proposal. The SEPP seeks to establish a framework and process in which to guide the development of land located within the Growth Centres.

 

The proposal was referred to the

 

5.4.5    Whether the proposed development will detrimentally affect the existing drainage patters and soil stability in the locality

 

It is considered that the proposed development will not affect drainage patterns. Finalisation of the pit rehabilitation stage involves compacting for 5m to 98% compaction, to ensure satisfactory soil stability for future building foundations.

 

5.7     State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land (SEPP 55) defines contaminated land as being ‘land in, on or under which any substance is present at a concentration or above the concentration at which the substance is normally present in, on or under land in the same locality, being a presence that presents a risk of harm to human health or any other aspect of the environment’.

 

There is no evidence to suggest that such contamination exists in respect of the quarry site and no reason to suspect that the land may be contaminated, being used for grazing purposes in the past. A review by Council’s Environmental Health officers, concurred with the findings contained within the EIS in that there is evidence to suggest that the site has been contaminated and that site has been used for grazing purposes. Consequently it is considered SEPP 55 does not require any further consideration.          

 

5.8     Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 9—Extractive Industry

 

This application was referred to the Department of Mineral Resources (now the NSW Department of Resources and Energy: Trade & Investment Division) in accordance with Section 8 of the Plan. No objections were raised to the proposed modifications, and the proposed modifications are consistent with the objectives of the Plan.

 

5.9     Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 – Hawkesbury Nepean River

           

The subject site is located within the Hawkesbury-Nepean catchment.  As such, Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 – Hawkesbury Nepean River (SREP 20) applies to the proposed development. The SREP requires the consent authority to consider whether the proposal would have a detrimental impact on the catchment.

 

Council is satisfied that the proposal as modified can be both constructed and operated to ensure all water quality issues are contained within the subject site, and that the proposed water quality management and mitigation measures would ensure that water discharged from the site does not affect down stream water quality within the catchment.

 

6.       Development Control Plans

 

6.1     Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008

 

The following parts of Liverpool Development Control Plan (DCP) 2008 are applicable to the proposed development:

 

·    Part 1.1 – General Controls for all Development;

·    Part 1.2 – Additional General Controls for Development; and

·    Part 5 – Development on Rural and Environmental Protection Zones. 

 

            The proposal modification does not require consideration of any additional matters prescribed within LDCP 2008, other than those discussed in this report, in relation to separate legislation or planning instruments.

 

7.       Referrals

 

7.1     External Referrals

 


EXTERNAL REFERRALS:

Roads and Maritime Services

No objection subject to conditions of consent.

Rural Fire Services

No response received to date.

Office of Water

Proposal not on waterfront land; no objections to the proposed modification.

Department of Environment and Heritage

No response received to date.

Department of Trade and Investment (Resources and Energy)

No objections to the proposed modification.

Department of Primary Industries (Agricultural Land Use Planning)

Application supported, however the modification for stockpiling of material requires weed management according to any local or regional weed management plans, and for the drainage from the stockpile to address water quality for downstream agricultural water users.

Department of Planning (formerly Growth Centres Commission)

No objection subject to conditions of consent.

Environmental Protection Authority (EPA)

The response from the EPA indicating the following concerns:

 

·    Concerns regarding the amount of soil to be brought onto the Premises.

·    Soil must meet the chemical criteria and be used for complying activities.

·    The modification does not adequately demonstrate how the proposed “acoustic bunds” will address potential noise issues generated from the proposed landfilling activities.

·    The amount of soil may also pose dust issues.

·    Soil brought onto the Premises must be used in accordance with the requirements of the Sydney Trains Screened Soil Exemption February 2014.

·    This soil must only be used to build acoustic bunds in accordance with DA Condition 124 and 125.

·    Only the amount of soil required to build the acoustic bunds should be brought onto the site.

·    Soil must be stored in separate stockpiles of a maximum height of 3 meters.

·    The storage of soil and construction of acoustic bunds but be carried out in a manner which minimises or prevents the emission of dust from the premises.

 

The applicant responded to these concerns which were then forwarded to the EPA.

 

The applicants response included recommended conditions to be incorporated into the modified consent. These conditions are considered appropriate.

 

No response was received from the EPA, and it is assumed there are no further objections.

 

 

                                                           

Aboriginal Land Councils

The development application was referred to the Gandangara and Tharawal Local Aboriginal Land Council for comment. No response to date has been received.

 

Transport for NSW

The application was referred to Transport for NSW given its proximity to the South West Rail Link. Transport for NSW reviewed the application and considered that the proposed modification will not affect the South Wes West Rail Link (SWRL) extension project, and that there were no objections to the proposed modification.

 

7.2     Internal Referrals

 


INTERNAL REFERRALS:

Aboriginal Consultative Committee

No objection, subject to conditions relating to preservation of aboriginal artefacts of archaeological or heritage significance. Existing conditions considered to be adequate.

Engineer

No objections.

Traffic

No objection, subject to conditions relating to truck movements and street lighting. Existing conditions considered to be adequate.

Environmental Health

No objections.

Natural Resources Planner

No objections.

 

8.       Public Participation

 

8.1     Advertising

 

The development was advertised for a period of 14 days from 16 April 2014 and 5 May 2014) in accordance During the advertising period a total of four written submissions were received, all objecting to the proposal.

 

8.2     Nature of Submissions

 

ISSUE: Miscalculation within Statement of Environmental Effects (SEE) with respect to Traffic generation

 

Comment: The SEE indicates the following:

 

 

 

 

(v)        As indicated elsewhere the SEE provides a miscalculation. However, there are currently no conditions of consent, or no recommendations within the approved Traffic Report that restrict the quantity of vehicular movements, either on a daily basis, or at different times of the year (however conditions 145 and 146 restrict truck movements and deliveries to certain times during the week). Thus, this calculation may not necessarily reflect the way that the deliveries are undertaken.

(vi)      

(vii)      Notwithstanding, the delivery of the materials will occur prior to the use of the site as an extractive industry or as a resource recovery facility, during which vehicle movements (including those not related to the subject development) are predicted within the approved Traffic Report to increase. The Traffic Report submitted with the Development Application indicated that during the operational phase, the projected total average two-way truck movements per day would be 84 with 67 to/from the north and 17 to/from the south.

(viii)    

(ix)       Council considers that the road network has capacity for additional daily traffic generation of approx. as indicated by the proposal, and that the proposal is acceptable with respect to traffic generation.

 

ISSUE: The original traffic study was apparently conducted in 2008 and 6 years later may be outdated particularly given that motorists are using Badgerys Creek Road as a short cut to avoid tolls on the M7 in order to access new housing at Oran Park, Harrington Park and many parts of Camden and Campbelltown

 

Comment: Given the information discussed above, a revised study was not considered necessary.

 

ISSUE: Current operations alleged to be falling outside of the approval and associated conditions of consent, with specific reference to the following:

·    Currently operating without an Occupation Certificate or an Environmental Protection Licence with gravel already being refined on site.

·    No signage provided in accordance with Conditions 153 and 161, which is required to indicate the phone number to which complaints may be directed.

·    No preparation of a bush regeneration plan as required by Condition 39.

 

Comment: No evidence is currently available to indicate that this is the case. It is recommended that these matters be investigated by Council’s Enforcement Officers. Notwithstanding, this would not prevent Council from approving the subject modification.

 

ISSUE: “Huge amounts of dust will be generated from the day-to-day stockpiling of the 100,000 tonnes of engineering fill, affecting the air we breathe, and polluting the pastures in Badgerys Creek and Bringelly, and the watercourse of Badgerys Creek which borders this site. Winds may carry this dust for kilometres”.

 

Comment: Various conditions are attached to the RRE, in order to ensure that the use of the material has minimal environmental impact. Subject to compliance with the requirements of the RRE, use of the material will be in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Protection Authority.

 

ISSUE: “No analysis of the exact nature/composition of “Sydney Trains screened soil” or “engineering fill” from Sydney Trains Ballast Recycling Centre at Chullora is included in the SEFF. Appendices listed at the end of the SEFF were not attached to the document, but it seems by accessing one document via the EPA website that some harmful compounds may be in this “fill”. The SEFF does not address this issue, but claims that, environmentally, there is a benefit in reusing this material at the Badgerys Creek site instead of disposal. In effect, the engineering fill is proposed to be disposed of at this site rather than other sites, so the only “advantage” is to free up other sites from receiving this fill.

 

Comment: As indicated, various conditions are attached to the RRE, in order to ensure that the use of the material has minimal environmental impact. Subject to compliance with the requirements of the RRE, use of the material will be in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Protection Authority.

 

ISSUE: Property is zoned for rural purposes, and the SEE indicates that the approval of the extractive industry and landfilling operations qualifies the site as industrial.

 

Comment: The SEE indicates that there are six conditions placed on the consumer benefitting from the resource recovery exemption, with one of these conditions reading as follows:

 

“The material may only be applied to land for the purpose of earthworks during construction activities on land zoned for industrial uses, or for building or maintaining railway infrastructure”.

 

The approved operations are permissible on the subject site as outlined elsewhere in this report. However, the permissibility of the development should not be construed to indicate that the zoning of the site is effectively changed. The zoning of the site remains as RU1 - Primary Production.

 

However, the resource recovery exemption (RRE) shown on the EPA website accessed on 8 July 2014 indicates that there are only two conditions imposed on the consumer, and that the above condition does not apply (note that the copy of the RRE provided with the application also excludes the above condition and contains only three conditions in total).

 

 

ISSUE: The proposed development is inconsistent with the relevant planning matters for consideration stated in Clause 16(1) (a), (b), (e) and (f) of the State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006. We are concerned the proposed development will cause adverse visual impacts and preclude the orderly and coordinated provision of aviation, rail and road infrastructure planned to support Sydney's Second Airport, the Broader Western Sydney Employment Area and the South West Growth Centre.

 

Comment: Consideration of State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006 formed part of the assessment of the original application. The approved development was considered to compatible with future industrial/employment land uses, as it involves both rehabilitation of the extractive pits and the entire site so that it is capable of accommodating future development as identified within the adopted Structure Plan. In this regard, it is considered that the proposed development would not alienate the site from future land uses.

 

Condition 1 of the existing consent requires the extractive operations and materials resource recovery operations to be limited to a 25 year period from the date of issue of the Occupation Certificate.

 

The proposed modifications would not influence the previous consideration of the State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006.

 

ISSUE: Impact on wildlife, particularly, wedged tail eagles, population that that within the subject site property and surrounding developments. Concerns raised in relation to other wildlife including wallabies, echidnas, blue tongue lizards, long neck turtles, wombats, and koalas.

 

Comment: Consideration of State Environmental Planning Policy No. 44 – Koala Habitat Protection of the approved application whereby it was concluded that the study area is not identified as a core koala habitat, and that no further consideration of SEPP 44 was required.

 

The flora and fauna report submitted with the original application indicated that the habitats likely to be present on the site and affected by the proposal are not considered significant to the threatened species identified and no further actions for habitat protection was considered necessary.  It is noted however, that a wildlife corridor exists outside the proposed excavation area and the development would not present any barriers to restrict movement patterns along this corridor and that the development footprint was determined on the basis of minimising impacts on the site’s vegetation and providing adequate buffer and separation distances between extractive pits and environmentally significant land.

 

The proposed modifications would not change the location of barriers, etc and the stockpiling will be in an area which is already approved as an extraction pit.

 

9.       Section 79C Relevant Matters for Consideration

 

The following summarises the assessment of the proposal in terms of the heads of consideration in Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979:

 

(a)     The provisions of:

 

(i)      Any Environmental Planning Instrument

 

          The subject site is zoned RU1 – Primary Production. The proposed development including the operation of an extractive industry and materials resource recovery facility are permissible land uses within the RU1 zone pursuant the provisions of SEPP (Infrastructure) 2007 and LLEP 2008.

 

          The development as modified would be consistent with the objectives of the RU1 zone,

 

          In addition to the above, assessment of the proposed modification concludes that the proposal is consistent with the standards and relevant matters for consideration prescribed by the numerous planning instruments that are applicable to the proposed development.

      

(ii)     Any Draft Environmental Planning Instrument

 

There is no draft environmental planning instrument that relates to the site.

 

(iii)    Any Development Control Plan

 

Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 applies to the proposed development. The proposed development has demonstrated general compliance with the requirements contained within Parts 1, and 5 of the LDCP 2008.

 

(iv)    Any Planning Agreement

 

          Not applicable.

 

(v)     The Regulations

 

Procedures relating to designated development applications have been adequately addressed throughout this report, and complied with during assessment and consideration of the modification.

 

(b)     The likely impacts of the development, including environmental impacts on both the natural and built environments, and social and economic impacts in the locality

 

Assessment of the proposal and the information received from the relevant authorities has concluded that subject to the imposition of conditions as recommended, the proposed modification will not generate undue adverse impacts on the locality.

 

(c)     The suitability of the site for the development

 

Consideration has been given to the impacts of the proposal on surrounding residences and existing land users in the vicinity of the site, and assessment of the application has concluded that the site is suitable for the proposed development as modified.

 

(d)     Any submissions made

 

Detailed previously within report.

 

(e)     The public interest

 

The public interest is taken to include the provision of a facility for future and existing residents of the Liverpool local government area.

 

The issues raised in the objections made to this proposal have been adequately addressed throughout this report.  It is considered that the proposed development is worthy of support. 

 

10.     Section 96(2) Modification

 

The application has been assessed in accordance with the relevant matters for consideration prescribed by Section 79C and 96(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

(2) Modifications involving minimal environmental impact

 

A consent authority may, on application being made by the applicant or any other person entitled to act on a consent granted by the consent authority and subject to and in accordance with the regulations, modify the consent if:

 

(a)       it is satisfied that the development to which the consent as modified relates is substantially the same development as the development for which the consent was originally granted and before that consent as originally granted was modified (if at all), and

 

Consent was originally granted for an extractive industry and resource recovery facility. The proposed modifications will enable the use of certain materials on the site to facilitate this development, and will result in substantially the same development for which consent was originally granted.

 

(b)       it has consulted with the relevant Minister, public authority or approval body (within the meaning of Division 5) in respect of a condition imposed as a requirement of a concurrence to the consent or in accordance with the general terms of an approval proposed to be granted by the approval body and that Minister, authority or body has not, within 21 days after being consulted, objected to the modification of that consent, and

 

(c)       it has notified the application in accordance with:

 

(x)   the regulations, if the regulations so require, or

(xi)  a development control plan, if the consent authority is a council that has made a development control plan that requires the notification or advertising of applications for modification of a development consent, and

 

The application was advertised in accordance with LDCP 2008 as indicated elsewhere within this report.

 

(d)       it has considered any submissions made concerning the proposed modification within any period prescribed by the regulations or provided by the development control plan, as the case may be.

 

Submissions have been considered as indicated elsewhere within this report.

 

 

11      Changes to conditions

 

The proposed new conditions are generally supported, however the wording and location within the Determination Notice, are different to that proposed by the applicant, for reasons outlined within this report.

 

12.     Conclusion

 

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Sections 79C and 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as canvassed in detail in the above report.

 

Following this assessment of the proposal, it is considered that the proposed modifications are minor and will not result in any adverse environmental impacts. On this basis, it is recommended that consent be granted to modification to DA-693/2009/B, as indicated within the recommendation.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

 

Environmental and Sustainability

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

 


Social and Cultural

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.

 


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Applicant Details (Under separate cover)

2.View

Decision Notice - DA-693/2009 (Under separate cover)

3.View

Stormwater Plan - DA-693/2009 (Under separate cover)

4.View

Landscape Plan - DA-693/2009 (Under separate cover)

5.View

Determination Notice DA-693/2009/A (Under separate cover)

6.View

Statement of Environmental Effects - DA-693/2009/B (Under separate cover)

7.View

Screened Soil Exemption - EPA - DA-693/2009/B (Under separate cover)

8.View

Applicants response to submissions - DA-693/2009/B (Under separate cover)

9.View

Environmentatl Impact Statement ( 937 page document - available on request - Trim ref: 159227.2014) (Under separate cover)

  


144

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Development Application Determination Report

 

DAD 02

Modification to Development Consent No. DA-611/2009 at  No.1 Mill Road Liverpool (Lot 1 100 DP1180561)

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

151941.2014

Report By

Brendon Clendenning - Senior Development Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

Property

1 Mill Road, Liverpool

Owner

Liverpool Business Estate Pty Ltd

Applicant

Merhis Contracting Pty Ltd

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council is in receipt of a modification application made pursuant to Section 96(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act), which seeks to modify Development Consent DA-611/2009.

 

Development Consent was granted by Council on 1 September 2009, for erection of an eight storey residential flat building comprising of 1 x studio apartment, 1 x 1 bedroom apartment, 30 x 2 bedroom apartments, 16 x 3 bedroom apartments, two levels of basement car parking and associated landscaping at 1 Mill Road, Liverpool.

 

This modification, DA-611/2009/A, seeks to incorporate a steel frame structural system, resulting in increased floor-to-floor heights, as well as seeking a range of other modifications to the approved development.

 

The application has been considered pursuant to Section 96 of the EP&A Act and it has been determined that the modification will result in substantially the same development as that to which consent was originally granted. Assessment of the application has been undertaken which has concluded that the proposed modifications are satisfactory and will not result in any adverse impacts upon the residential amenity of the locality. Accordingly, it is recommended that the consent be modified as detailed within this report.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Approve the application to modify DA-611/2009, Pursuant to Section 96(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the following way:

 

A.      Condition 1 of Development Consent No. DA-611/2009 is modified to read as follows:

 

1.       Development must be carried out generally in accordance with Development Application received 4 July 2008 and the following plans and documentation:

 

(a)     Architectural plans prepared by Tony Owen Prtnrs as follows:

 

·        Site Plan / Site Analysis Plan – Drawing No. A 001 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Basement 2 Plan – Drawing No. A 101 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Basement 1 Plan – Drawing No. A 102 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Ground Floor Plan – Drawing No. A 103 Revision B and dated 6 May 2014;

·        Level 1-3 Floor Plan – Drawing No. A 104 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Level 4 Floor Plan – Drawing No. A 105 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Level 5-6 Floor Plan – Drawing No. A 106 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Level 7 Floor Plan – Drawing No. A 107 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014

·        Roof Plan – Drawing No. A 108 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        East Elevation – Drawing No. A 200 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        North Elevation – Drawing No. A 201 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        West Elevation – Drawing No. A 202 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        South Elevation – Drawing No. A 203 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Section A-A – Drawing No. A 300 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Section B – Drawing No. A 301 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Adaptable Unit – Drawing No. A 110 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Carpark Ramp Section – Drawing No. A 410 Revision A and dated 6 May 2014;

 

(b)     Engineering and Hydraulic Plans prepared by Australian Consulting Engineers as follows:

 

·   Upper Basement Drainage Plan and Details, Drawing No.D02 Revision D, Job No.08AH225 and dated 18 June 2006;

·   Ground/Site Stormwater Drainage Plan and Details, Drawing No. D03 Revision E and dated 18 June 2006;

·   Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Drainage Plan and Details, Drawing No.D04 Revision A and dated 31 October 2008; and

·   Proposed Easement and existing layout, Drawing No.D05 Revision C, Job No.08AH225 and dated 19 June 2006.

 

(c)     Landscape Works Site Plan prepared by Formed Gardens, Job No. FG 13 235 Drawing No. L_001, Issue D, and dated 6 May 2014;

 

(d)     Soil Salinity Study prepared by Environmental Solutions and dated 24 November 2008;

 

(e)     Access Report prepared by Accessibility Solutions Pty Ltd and dated 19 June 2009;

 

(f)      Assessment of Traffic and Parking Implications prepared by Traffic Impact Services Pty Ltd and dated November 2008;

 

(g)     Safety Management Plan prepared by Tony Owen NDM;

 

(h)     Waste Management Plan dated 5 December 2008;

 

(i)      Schedule of Finishes approved in accordance with Part 1 and generally in accordance with materials schedule board submitted by CMT Architects and dated 19 December 2008, except as updated by plan titled Material Finishes, Drawing No. A 408, Revision A, prepared by Tony Owen Ptnrs, and dated 12 February 2014;

 

(j)      BASIX Certificate 527234M and dated 17 February 2014;

 

except where modified by the following conditions.

 

B.      Condition 23 of Development Consent No. DA-611/2009 is modified to read as follows:

 

2.       As a consequence of this development, Council has identified an increased demand for public amenities and public services.  The following payment represents 2% of the cost of the development and is imposed in accordance with Liverpool Contributions Plan 2007 Liverpool City Centre. 

 

The total contribution is $205,485.

 

 

A breakdown of the contributions payable is provided in the attached payment form.

 

Contributions will be adjusted at the time of payment in line with the Consumer Price Index (all groups index number for Sydney) using the following formula:

 

Contribution at the time of payment = C x CPI2

                                                           CP11           

Where:      

C =    Original contributions as shown on the consent

CPI2 =        Latest "Consumer Price Index: All Groups Index Number" for Sydney available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics at the time that the contribution is to be paid

         CPI2 =         Latest "Consumer Price Index: All Groups Index Number" for Sydney available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics as at the time of granting the development consent

 

Payments made prior to the settlement of this amount shall be deducted from the remaining balance, and shall be adjusted to the Consumer Price Index as required.

 

The Contributions Plan may be inspected at Council’s Administration Centre, 1 Hoxton Park Road, Liverpool or at www.liverpool.nsw.gov.au.

 

Please note.  Payment must be accompanied by the attached form.    

 

C.      Condition 30 shall be deleted.

 

D.      Condition 31 shall be deleted.

 

E.      Attachment 2: Section 94A Payment Form is attached to the Development Consent to read as follows:

         

ATTACHMENT 2. SECTION 94A PAYMENT FORM

 

CONTRIBUTIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 94A OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL

PLANNING & ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

 

Liverpool Contribution Plan 2007

 

Note to the applicant:           When remitting payment as specified in the Conditions of Consent to the approval, this Form must be submitted with your payment.

                                    These figures have been calculated to the CPI September 2013 Quarter and will be adjusted at the time of payment in accordance with the conditions of consent.

 

APPLICATION NO.:             DA-611/2009

 

PROPERTY:                         1 Mill Road, Liverpool

 

PROPOSAL:                          Erection of an eight storey residential flat building comprising of 1 x studio apartment, 30 x 2 bedroom apartments, 16 x 3 bedroom apartments, two levels of basement car parking and associated landscaping

 

Facilities

Amount ($)

Job No.

Liverpool Contributions Plan 2007

Central Library Extensions

$3,948

GL.10000001870.10112

Whitlam Centre Extensions

$2,916

GL.10000001869.10110

District Community Facility upgrade (Central area)

$3,764

GL.10000001870.10099

Woodward and Collimore Parks

$17,714

GL.10000001869.10093

Georges River Foreshore

$124,001

GL.10000001869.10105

Bigge Park

$26,572

GL.10000001869.10105

Pioneer Park

$26,572

GL.10000001869.10105

Access – car parks, bridge link, bus priority

$0

GL.10000001868.10108

Central Library Extensions

$3,948

GL.10000001870.10112

Whitlam Centre Extensions

$2,916

GL.10000001869.10110

District Community Facility upgrade (Central area)

$3,764

GL.10000001870.10099

Woodward and Collimore Parks

$17,714

GL.10000001869.10093

Total

$205,487

 

 

---------------------------------------------- OFFICE USE ONLY -------------------------------------------

 

RECORD OF PAYMENT

 

Total Amount paid: ______________________________

 

Date:________________________

 

Receipt No.:_____________________________Cashier:_____________________

 

2.       Write to the applicant to advise of the remaining balance of the Section 94A Contributions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REPORT

 

 

1.       The Site

 

The subject site is legally described as Lot 1 100 DP1180561 and is known as No.1 Mill Road, Liverpool. The site is situated on the corner of Mill Road and Speed Street. The site is irregular in shape with an area of approximately 1820m², and frontages of approximately 32.6 metres to Mill Road and 38.9 metres to Speed Street.

 

An aerial photograph of the site is illustrated in Figure 1.

 

Subject Site

 

Figure 1 Aerial Photograph of the subject site

 

The site has a southern orientation to Mill Road and an eastern orientation to Speed Street. The site is currently vacant and there are no significant trees located on the property. The immediate locality is surrounded by established flat buildings ranging between two and four storeys in height that were likely to have been constructed during the 1960’s and 1970’s.

 

2.       Background

 

The development application was approved by Council for the erection of an eight storey residential flat building with a total of 48 residential units comprising the following:

 

·      One x 1 studio apartment;

·      One x 1 bedroom apartment;

·      30 x 2 bedroom apartments;

·      16 x 3 bedroom apartments;

·      Two levels of basement car parking providing a total of 63 car parking spaces, six of which are identified for visitor car parking and one that is designated as a loading bay;

·      Waste compartment rooms provided within the basement;

·      Landscape works.

 

Council originally granted development consent to DA-611/2009 subject to a condition that the consent is not to operate until the applicant satisfies the specific requirements of that condition, pursuant to the provision section 80(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (“deferred commencement” consent). The condition required the applicant to submit amended plans that confirmed compliance with the solar access provisions contained within the Residential Flat Design Code.

 

The amended plans were submitted to Council in accordance with the requirements of the condition, and the consent became operational on 1 October 2009, with a lapse date of 1 October 2014. The amended plans form the current approved design.

 

3.       Current status of the Development

 

A Construction Certificate was issued by a Private Certifier on 4 November 2013. Preliminary physical works have been commenced at the site.

 

4.       The Proposal

 

An application has been made pursuant to Section 96(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) which seeks to modify Development Consent DA-693/2009 in the following way:

 

·    Adoption of a steel frame structural system.

·    Increase to the overall height floor-to-floor heights of each habitable floor, as a consequence of adopting the steel frame system. This would increase the height of the roof of the building by approximately 2.25m.

·    Reduction in the level of the basement levels, requiring additional excavation.

·    Reduction in the maximum height of the development, due to a reduction in the height of the stair overrun, which was approved as the highest element of the building.

·    Increase in size of basement to provide storage, as required by condition 30.

·    Changes to floor layout as indicated on plans.

·    Adjustment to balcony layouts and building entries.

·    Revised paint colours.

·    Changes to parking layout.

·    Removal of one lift

 

5.       Environmental Planning Instruments

 

The application has been assessed against the relevant Environmental Planning Instruments listed below:

·    Greater Metropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No. 2 – Georges River Catchment (deemed SEPP);

·    Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008

·    State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land

·    State Environmental Planning Policy No. No 65—Design Quality of Residential Flat Development

·    State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004

 

The development application has been assessed against all relevant matters of consideration as required by Section 79C and Section 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The key issues identified as part of the assessment process are addressed below.

 

5.1     Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008

 

5.1.1    Permissibility

 

The subject site is zoned R4 High Density Residential pursuant to LLEP 2008. The approved development that is defined as a residential flat building, which is permissible in the R4 zone.

 

Subject Site

 

Figure 2 Extract of LLEP 2008 Zoning Map.

 

 

5.1.2    Principal Development Standards

 

The LLEP 2008 contains a number of principal development standards which are relevant to the proposal. Assessment of the application against the relative standards is provided below. The proposal has been assessed against these standards and this assessment is summarised below.

 

LLEP DEVELOPMENT PROVISION

REQUIRED

PROPOSED

 

COMPLIANCE  (and percentage of any variation)

Clause 4.3 Height of Buildings

 

Maximum height of 35 metres is permitted.

 

The original application was a maximum height of approximately 31m in height. However deletion of the lift overrun will reduce the maximum height of the proposal to be approximately 100mm, resulting in a maximum building height commensurate with the approved development.

Yes

Clause 4.4 Floor Space Ratio

 

Pursuant to the FSR map and Clause 4.4(2B), the maximum FSR for the site is 2.545:1

The original IHAP report states that the approved development provided sought provided a floor space ratio of 2.54:1, which complies with the requirement. However, the floor space ratio of the proposal provided with the operational plans has been calculated to be approximately 2.72:1, and the floor space ratio as the proposed modification has been calculated to be 2.68:1.

No

Clause 7.14 Minimum Building Street Frontage

Minimum building street frontage of 24m

The site has frontages of approximately 32.6 metres to Mill Road and 38.9 metres to Speed Street.

 

Yes

 

Based on the above, it is considered that the proposal is generally consistent with the principle development standards contained with the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008, with the exception of floor space ratio.

 

Floor Space Ratio

The proposal seeks an increase in floor space ratio, which appears to be largely a consequence of the repositioning and resizing of the approved balconies. The proposal would increase the floor space ratio from 2.54:1 to approximately 2.68:1, representing a non-compliance of approximately 5.34%.

 

It has been established in the Land in Environment Court that Section 96 may be used to approve an application to modify a development application, irrespective of any breach of development standards, or request to vary those development standards. Consideration has been given to the non-compliance in the absence of any formal request to vary the development standard, and it is considered that the non-compliance is acceptable for the following reasons.

 

·    The new works will not present overbearing impacts or be detrimental to the amenity of the adjoining properties;

·    The increase in floor space ratio appears to be largely derived from changes to the balcony layouts and will improve the habitant’s residential accommodation and amenity through practical use of space, while created insignificant changes to the overall floor plate at each floor level;

·    The proposal will maintain development consistency with the desired future character of the locality.

·    The proposal as modified will comply with the objectives of the LLEP 2008

·    The proposed modification does not detrimentally impact upon the landscape to which it is immediately related.

 

5.1.3 Miscellaneous Provisions

 

Acid Sulfate Soils

The subject site is shown on the Acid Sulfate Soils Map as being Class 5 land, which requires the submission of an Acid Sulfate Soils Management Plan for works within 500 metres of adjacent Class 1, 2, 3 or 4 land that is below 5 metres Australian Height Datum by which the water table is likely to be lowered below 1 metre Australian Height Datum on adjacent Class 1, 2, 3 or 4 land.

 

The proposal seeks additional excavation, resulting from a proposed lower basement, and a proposed increase in the size of the basement to accommodate the storage areas. The proposal is within Class 5 land; however is approximately one kilometre from the nearest Class 1,2,3 or 4 land. Therefore, no further information is required with respect to acid sulfate soils.

 

5.2 State Environmental Planning Policy No. No 65—Design Quality of Residential Flat Development (SEPP 65)

 

The application seeks to address conditions of consent, which were imposed to satisfy the requirements of the Residential Flat Design Code referred to within SEPP 65. These matters are discussed below:

 

Storage

 

The following condition of consent was imposed to improve the provision of storage areas in the development:

 

30.       Amended architectural plans are to be amended which is to clearly depict changes to the nominated storage areas contained within the basement levels for each associated unit. The storage areas which are to be reconfigured include:

 

(i)   Storage rooms which are located to the east and south of car parking spaces numbered 10-18 for basement level 1; and

 

(ii)  Storage rooms which are located to the east and south of car parking spaces numbered 10-19 for basement level 2.          

           

            The configuration of the storage rooms are to address the principles of safer by design and are to ensure a long obstructed path for access to the storage rooms is avoided.

 

            Architectural plans are to clearly depict that the changes result in compliance with the storage requirements as prescribed by Residential Flat Design Code.

 

The amended proposal has provided storage areas that are accessible via resident and visitor parking spaces. The Residential Flat Design Code stipulates that storage areas may be provided in basement car parks, provided they do not compromise natural ventilation or create potential conflicts with fire regulations (i.e. this would include interference with egress paths, or use of materials that would cause the spread of fire). The location of the storage areas is considered satisfactory and is in accordance with the Residential Flat Design Code and the principles of safer by design.

 

It is recommended that condition 30 be deleted.

 

Privacy

 

The following condition of consent was imposed to improve the privacy to adjoining properties:

 

31.       Amended architectural plans showing the location of fixed and moveable louvers to the north and west elevations are to be submitted to and approved by Council.

 

The modified plans provide louvres to each balcony on the north and west elevations, and this condition may be deleted.

 

6. Draft Environmental Planning Instruments

 

The proposal is not affected by any Draft Environmental Planning Instruments.

 

7. Planning Agreements

 

The proposal is not affected by any Planning Agreements.

 

8. Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000

 

The Development Application has been assessed against the relevant clauses of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000. The Development Application fully complies with the relevant provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

9. Development Control Plans

 

9.1     Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008

 

            The following parts of Liverpool Development Control Plan  2008 (LDCP 2008) are applicable to the proposed development:

 

·    Part 1 – General Controls for all Development;

·    Part 4 – Development in Liverpool City Centre.

 

            Aside from the matters raised elsewhere within this report, the  matters are raised by the proposed modifications that are pertinent to LDCP 2008.

 

Parking

 

The proposal seeks the deletion of one parking space in Basement Level 2 in order to accommodate additional storage areas.

 

 

10      Referrals

 

10.1   Internal Referrals

 

INTERNAL REFERRALS

Building

No objection; no additional conditions of consent.

 

Engineer

No objection; no additional conditions of consent.

 

Landscape

No objection; no additional conditions of consent.

 

Traffic

Concerns in relation to storage areas allowing for the undetected storage of flammable and dangerous materials. However, as outlined elsewhere, The Residential Flat Design Code stipulates that storage areas may be provided in basement car parks, provided they do not compromise natural ventilation or create potential conflicts with fire regulations (i.e. this would include interference with egress paths, or use of materials that would cause the spread of fire). The proposal is satisfactory in this regard.

 

 

11 Section 96(2) Modifications Generally

A consent authority may, on application being made by the applicant or any other person entitled to act on a consent granted by the consent authority and subject to and in accordance with the regulations, modify the consent if:

 

(a)       it is satisfied that the development to which the consent as modified relates is substantially the same development as the development for which consent was originally granted and before that consent as originally granted was modified (if at all), and

 

Consent was originally granted for an eight storey residential flat building containing 48 units, and two basement levels. As a consequence of the modifications, the development would maintain the approved floor layouts and general design of the building and will constitute substantially the same development for which consent was originally granted.

 

(b)       it has consulted with the relevant Minister, public authority or approval body (within the meaning of Division 5) in respect of a condition imposed as a requirement of a concurrence to the consent or in accordance with the general terms of an approval proposed to be granted by the approval body and that Minister, authority or body has not, within 21 days after being consulted, objected to the modification of that consent, and

 

No such consultation was required.

 

(c)       it is satisfied that the development to which the consent as modified relates is substantially the same development as the development for which the consent was originally granted and before that consent as originally granted was modified (if at all), and

 

Consent was originally granted for a ten storey residential flat building containing 44 units, and three basement levels. The proposed modifications will not modify the development in a significant way, and will result in substantially the same development for which consent was originally granted.

 

(d)       it has notified the application in accordance with:

 

(i)    the regulations, if the regulations so require, or

 

(ii)   a development control plan, if the consent authority is a council that has made a development control plan that requires the notification or advertising of applications for modification of a development consent, and

 

The application was notified for a period of 17 days from 15 April 2014 to 2 May 2014. The notification was made to nearby property owners, as well as objectors to the previous application. Public consultation for Section 96(2) applications are required where there is an increase in the impact of the development. Given, the increase in height, this is considered to be the case.

 

During the notification period no written submissions were received.

 

(e)       it has considered any submissions made concerning the proposed modification within any period prescribed by the regulations or provided by the development control plan, as the case may be.

 

There were no submissions received.

 

12.     Changes to conditions

 

There following comments are provided in relation to the required changes to the conditions of consent.

 

 

 

Revised Plans

Condition 1 shall be modified to reflect the amended architectural plans, landscape plans, BASIX Certificate, and schedule of external colours and finishes.

 

Stormwater

The stormwater plans included in Condition 1 are required to be updated to reflect the proposed modified building form. However, Conditions 44-46 are currently imposed, which requires the submission of an amended stormwater plan prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate. As a result, the existing conditions may remain, and no changes to Condition1 are required.

 

Developer Contributions

 

Condition 23 requires the payment of Section 94A Developer Contributions totaling $150,831. As the application was determined on 24 August 2009, the contributions figure was accurate for the quarter of September 2009.

 

The Section 94A fees are based on the cost of the development and the cost of development is increased as a consequence of the proposed modification from $8,502,467 as disclosed with the lodgment of the original application to $9,340,309, as indicated within the submitted Quantity Surveyors report submitted with the application and dated July 2013. The contributions shall include GST, which would increase the figure to $10,274,340.

 

A Section 94A Payment Form was not included as an attachment with the Determination Notice. It is recommended that the Determination Notice be modified to include a Section 94A Payment Form with the consent, which indicates that the contributions figure was accurate at the time the Quantity Surveyors report was prepared.

 

It is noted that a payment of $170,049 was made on 1 November 2013. This was valid for the quarter of December 2013. Should this modification be approved, it is recommended that the applicant be advised under separate cover, of the remaining balance of the required contributions, to bring the total to $205,487 as at the September 2013 quarter.

 

12.     Conclusion

 

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Sections 79C and 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as canvassed in detail in the above report.  The site remains suitable for the proposed development as modified, and the proposed development as modified is not contrary to the public interest.

 

Following this assessment of the proposal, it is considered that the proposed modifications are satisfactory and will not result in any adverse impacts. On this basis, it is recommended that consent be granted to modification to DA-611/2009/A.

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Applicant Details (Under separate cover)

2.View

Decision Notice - 1 Mill Road Liverpool - DA-611/2009 (Under separate cover)

3.View

Operational Plans - 1 Mill Road Liverpool - DA-611/2009 (Under separate cover)

4.View

Full set of proposed modified plans for July 2014 Council meeting - 1 Mill Road Liverpool - DA-611/2009/A (Under separate cover)

5.View

BASIX Certificate - 1 Mill Road Liverpool - DA-611/2009/A (Under separate cover)

  


158

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Development Application Determination Report

 

DAD 03

Modification to DA-492/2008 - Education Establishment at 83-87 Gurner Avenue, Austral.

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

143905.2014

Report By

Surb Bhatti - Development Assessment Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

Property

83-87 Gurner Avenue, Austral

Owner

AUSTRALIAN ISLAMIC CULTURAL

CENTRE INCORPORATED

Applicant

AL-FAISAL COLLEGE LIMITED

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council is in receipt of an application to modify DA-492/2008 pursuant to Section 96AA of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.   DA-492/2008 was granted consent by the Land and Environment Court for the erection of a school over eight stages at 83-87 Gurner Avenue, Austral.  

 

The application to modify DA-492/2008 was received by Council on 29 November 2013 and seeks to amend Condition No.1 and No.157 of the Court ordered consent relating to the requirement for acoustic attenuation measures. In particular, changes are proposed to the siting, height and construction type of the approved acoustic fencing along the north, eastern and western side boundaries.

 

Pursuant to Section 96AA of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, it has been determined that the modification will result in substantially the same development as originally approved.

 

The application was notified for a 14 day period from 8 January 2014 to 23 January 2014. No submissions were received. Following the receipt of amended plans, the application was again placed on public exhibition between 2 April 2014 and 17 April 2014. No submissions were received.

 

Assessment of the application has been undertaken and has concluded that the proposed amendments are satisfactory and will not result in any adverse impacts upon the residential amenity of the locality. Accordingly, it is recommended that the consent be modified as detailed in this report.   

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Approves modification application DA-492/2008/A which seeks to modify DA-492/2008 at 83-87 Gurner Avenue, Austral subject to amendments to Conditions No. 1 and No. 157 of the development consent and additional conditions of consent, as follows:

 

·    Condition No.1 of DA-492/2008 is amended to read as follows:

 

Development must be carried out generally in accordance with Development Application received 30 November 2007 and Modification Application DA-492/2008/B received on 24 December 2014, except where amended by DA-492/2008/A as follows:

 

Architectural Drawings

 

Drawing

No.

lssue

Title

Author

Date

2836-A01

 

5

Site plan and

construction

stages

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

 

16 October 2009

2836-A02

4

Ground Floor Plan

1of 2

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

8 October 2009

2836-A03

4

Ground Floor Plan

2of 2

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

8 October 2009

2836-A04

4

First Floor Plan 1 of 2

 

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

8 October 2009

2836-A05

4

First Floor Plan 2 of 2

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

8 October 2009

2836-A06

2

Sections and Elevations 1

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

14 September 2008

2836-A07

2

Sections and Elevations 2

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

14 September 2008

2836-A08

4

Sections and Elevations 3

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

8 October 2009

LC01/1-

R13802

 

-

Concept Landscape Plan

 

Michael Siu

Landscape

Architects

5 November 2008

2

CC

Admin Building Ground & First Floor

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

11 September 2013

S96-02

-

Detail Plan

Millennium Design Consultants Pty Ltd

April 2013

 

Note: Drawing No. 2, issue CC, prepared by Acrom Holdings Pty Ltd, supersedes Drawings 2836-A02, 2836-A03, 2836-04 and 2836-05 as it relates to the floors of the Administration Building. 

 

          Documents

 

Title

Author

Date

Traffic and Car Parking

Assessment Report

Reference No.07197

Transport and Traffic

Associates

 

September 2007

Supplementary Report

Transport and Traffic

Associates

11 June 2008

Noise Acoustic Assessment

Reference No.

R020708nk1589.wpd

Koikas Acoustics Pty Ltd

 

4 July 2008

Bush Fire Hazard Assessment

Report

Building Code and

Bushfire Hazard

Solutions

September 2008

Wastewater Management

Report

Report No. 16908-8

Enviro Tech

Environmental and

Engineering

Consultants

29 October 2008

Contamination Assessment

Phase 1 and 2

Report No.11908-4

Enviro Tech

Environmental and

Engineering

Consultants

4 August 2008

Salinity Report

Report No.REP-16408-4

Enviro Tech

Environmental and

Engineering

Consultants

14 September 2008

Concept Management Plan for

the Educational Establishment

 

 

Document entitled "To demolish

all existing buildings on site and

construct a school (Qaadiri

College), catering for 1000

students with ancillary facilities

and a child care centre catering

for 29 children"

D-Plan Urban

Planning Consultants

Pty Ltd

March 2008

Acoustic assessment report

SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd (reference No: 610.13781 S96 L01 20140304)

5 March 2014

                                              

·   
Condition No. 157 is amended to read as follows:

 

          Acoustic

 

          157.   An acoustic fence is to be constructed along the entire western side boundary       and part of the eastern side boundary of the site, as indicated on the approved plans. A qualified acoustic consultant is to certify that the       acoustic fence has been        constructed in      accordance with the     approved acoustic           assessment reports.     Note: the acoustic fencing is permitted to be constructed on (meaning a zero setback      from the property boundary) the eastern and western boundary.

 

·    The following conditions of consent are inserted into DA-492/2008:

 

          Prior to the release of a Construction Certificate

 

         Amended Fencing Detail Plan

 

1A. Elevation plans detailing the construction type, materials and colours of the       proposed fencing along the entire northern, eastern and western boundary of the subject site, are required to be submitted and approved by Council prior to the release of any Construction Certificate. The plans shall be accompanied by a statement prepared by a qualified and practicing acoustic person, detailing that the fencing will be consistent with the approved noise acoustic assessment and acoustic assessment report listed within Condition No. 1 of this development consent.

 

               Recommendations of Acoustic Report

 

          71A.The recommendations provided in the approved acoustic assessment report prepared by SLR           Consulting Australia Pty Ltd (reference No: 610.13781 S96 L01   20140304), dated 5       March 2014 shall be      implemented and incorporated into the design and     construction         of the development and shall be shown on   plans accompanying the CC application. 

 

        During Construction Works

 

Pollution Control

 

          98A.Building operations such as brick cutting, mixing mortar and the washing of tools,    paint brushes, form-work, concrete trucks and the like shall not be performed on the   public footway or any other locations which may lead to the discharge of materials into       Council’s stormwater drainage system.

 

 

E. Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate

 

         Recommendations of Acoustic Report

 

107A.A Compliance Certificate or other documentation deemed suitable to the PCA is     to be submitted to the PCA, detailing compliance with the following:

 

          (a)     The recommendations contained within the acoustic assessment report by SLR              Consulting Australia Pty Ltd (reference No: 610.13781 S96 L01 20140304),           dated 5 March 2014

          Use of the site

 

238A.   Any public address system or sound amplifying equipment shall be installed so

                as to   not emit an offensive noise as defined by the Protection of the      

                Environment Act 1997.

 

238B. Noise associated with the use of the premises including but not limited to children     playing, alarm systems and the bell shall not give rise to offensive noise as is                 defined within the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997.

 

REPORT

The site

The subject land is known as No’s 83 and 85-87 Gurner Avenue, Austral and is legally identified as Lots 90 and 91 in DP 1050385. The site is situated on the northern side of Gurner Avenue with a north/south orientation. An aerial photograph of the site is illustrated in Figure 1.

 

Figure 1 Aerial Photograph of the subject site

Background

The Court approved school makes provision for a maximum of 600 students when fully developed. 360 students will be accommodated in the primary school and 240 students will be accommodated in the high school. An administration building, sports hall and library are to be constructed to support the school development. The construction works will be implemented in eight stages as follows:

 

·        Stage One - Demountable buildings (Administration, classrooms and toilet);

·        Stage Two - West wing of the primary school together with the canteen and administration;

·        Stage Three - North wing of the primary school;

·        Stage Four - West wing of the high school block;

·        Stage Five - East wing of the high school block;

·        Stage Six - North wing of the high school block;

·        Stage Seven - Library block; and

·        Stage Eight - The multi-purpose hall.

 

Council has received two applications made pursuant to Section 96AA of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 seeking to modify the court ordered consent. Modification application DA-492/2008/A being the subject application, was received on 29 November 2013; and modification application DA-492/2008/B was received on 24 December 2013. DA-492/2008/B sought a number of internal amendments to the layout and internal configuration of the approved administration building; and was granted consent by Council at the meeting of 5 February 2014.

Current Status of the Development 

Physical works associated with the approved development have commenced on the site and include internal roads, car parking, lighting, primary school, administration building, canteen and stormwater infrastructure for internal roads.

The Proposal

The modification application seeks to amend Condition No.1 and No.157 of DA-492/2008 to enable the following modifications to be made to the approved development:

 

·    Extent of fence

Fencing along the eastern boundary between the subject development site and the adjoining land zoned as RE1 Public Recreation will be 1.8m high pailing type fencing above a treated pine retaining wall graduated to a height of 0.7 metres; which reflects the gentle decline of the ground level toward the north of the site (see Figure 2).

 

·    Fencing setback

The approved development requires the acoustic fencing to be setback 3m from the eastern boundary for the entire elevation and 3m from the western boundary for a length of 150m from the street. The modification seeks to amend the setback of the fencing to enable the construction of the acoustic fencing to be built on the property boundary along all relevant elevations (being the eastern and western setback).

 

The applicant has also submitted an updated acoustical assessment by SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd, for the proposed changes. This report reviewed the acoustical implications of the Koikas Acoustics Pty Ltd acoustic report dated 2008, which was part of the Court approved development application, and the addendum report dated 2013 which accompanied the modification application when initially submitted. The SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd acoustic assessment report was referred to Councils Environmental Health Section and is supported subject to conditions of consent. 

 

Zoning Permissibility

 

The subject site is zoned R2 Low Density Residential under State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006. Educational establishments, including a school, are a permissible form of development in the R2 Low Density Residential Zone. An extract of the current zoning map is provided in Figure 2.

 

Internal Referrals

 

Environmental Health

Council’s Environmental Health Section supports the recommendation within the acoustic report by SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd, subject to conditions of consent. SLR has advised that the NSW Industrial Noise Policy is not the appropriate noise criteria to be used for assessing noise related impacts from schools (educational establishments). The work undertaken by SLR includes a review of the Land and Environment Court cases relating to similar incidences of noise issues resulting from the operation of a school. It has been revealed that the Land and Environment Court does not consider noise associated with students engaged in outdoor play and sporting activities to be “offensive” in nature as is defined under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act.. These issues have been reviewed and supported by Council’s Environmental Health Section.

 

 

Subject Site

 

Figure 2: Extract of LLEP 2008 zoning map

 

 

 

Relevant Matters for Consideration

 

The application has been assessed in accordance with the relevant matters for consideration prescribed by Section 79C and 96AA(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

A summary of the assessment of the application completed under the relevant matters for consideration is provided below:

 

Section 96AA: Modification by consent authorities of consents granted by the Court

 

The application to modify the consent was made under Section 96AA(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

·    Assessment of the application has concluded that the proposal represents "substantially the same" development for the following reasons:

·    The external appearance of the development and its relationship to adjoining development is unaltered;         and

·    The modification will not impose any additional amenity impacts on adjoining properties in terms of views, privacy, visual bulk, overshadowing, odour, noise, traffic or stormwater runoff.

On the basis of the above, the proposed modification will result “substantially the same development" as that to which consent was originally granted and therefore complying with Section 96AA(1)(a).

 

Notification

 

The application was notified for a period of 14 days from 8 January 2014 to 23 January 2014 and the subsequent revisions were also notified for a period of 14 days from 2 April 2014 to 17 April 2014. During these notification periods, no submissions were received.

 

Section 79C: Relevant matters for consideration

 

An assessment of the application against the relevant matters for consideration prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979   has been undertaken. This assessment has concluded that the proposed modification is acceptable and is unlikely to result in any adverse impacts. The modifications sought under this application do not involve any changes to the relevant development standards and controls of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan and Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008.

 

Conclusion

 

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Sections 79C and 96AA(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as canvassed above.  The site continues to be suitable for the proposed development The development as modified remains within the public interest. On this basis, it is recommended that the proposal be approved.

 

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Deliver high quality services for children and their families.

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Applicant details (Under separate cover)

2.View

Court Approval - DA-492/2008 (Under separate cover)

3.View

Section 96AA Notice of Determination - DA-492/2008/B (Under separate cover)

4.View

Architectural Plan - DA-492/2008/A (Under separate cover)

  


Text Box: 168
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 


DAD 04

Modification to DA-1552/2006 - Road Bridge at Newbridge Road, Moorebank (Lot 6 & 7 DP 1065574 & Pt Lot 105 DP 1070029)

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

161067.2014

Report By

David Smith - Senior Development Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

Property

Lot 6 and 7 DP 1065574 and Part Lot 105 DP 1070029 Newbridge Road Moorebank

Owner

Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd

Tanlane Pty Ltd

Applicant

Resource Applications Pty Ltd

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council is in receipt of a modification application (DA-1552/2006/B) which has been made pursuant to Section 96(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, seeking to modify Development Consent DA-1552/2006.

 

Development Consent was granted by Council on 24 April 2007, for the construction of a road bridge at Lot 6 and 7 DP 1065574 and Part Lot 105 DP 1070029 Newbridge Road Moorebank, to enable flood free vehicular access to land at Moorebank East.

 

The modification to DA-1552/2006 seeks to amend the design of the approved road bridge to maintain consistency with both the NSW Court of Appeal and the Land and Environment Court Orders which granted consent to a concept ramp design for the bridge.

 

Council is also in receipt of a development application (DA-61/2014) for the use of the road bridge. This application involves no physical construction works and seeks consent to utilise the bridge for vehicles and pedestrians/cyclists.

 

The modification application is being referred to full elected Council for consideration and determination as the original development application DA-1552/2006 was determined by the Council.

 

Text Box: 169
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 


The application has been considered pursuant to Section 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and it has been determined that the modification will result in substantially the same development as that to which consent was originally granted. Assessment of the application has been undertaken which has concluded that these amendments are satisfactory and will not result in any adverse impacts upon the locality. Accordingly, it is recommended that the consent be modified as detailed within this report.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approves the application to modify DA-1552/2006 at Lots 6 & 7 DP 1065574 & Pt Lot 105 DP 1070029 pursuant to Section 96(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the following way:

 

A.        Condition 1 is amended to read as follows:

 

Development must be carried out strictly in accordance with DA-1552/2006 and accompanying plans, except where modified by the undermentioned conditions.

 

Modification application DA-1552/2006/B and plans:

 

Worley Parsons

 

101015-00561-CI-FIG 3, Worley Parsons, Issue B, dated 21.08.13

 

Cardno

 

SK1001, Cardno, Revision L, dated 15.08.13

SK1003, Cardno, Revision E, dated 01.08.13

SK1004(E) – Cross Sections

SK2001, Cardno, Revision D, dated 15.08.13

SK2003, Cardno, Revision D, dated 05.08.13

SK2004 (C) – Cross Sections Layout

 

Report “Assessment of the Impact of the Proposed Bridge on Flooding in the Vicinity of the Georges Cove Marina, Moorebank. Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Ref: NA49913037:BCP/bcp dated 23 May 2014, except where modified by the undermentioned conditions.

 

B.        Condition 14 is amended to read as follows:

 

The bridge is to be designed and constructed such that it is able to comply with the Orders of the NSW Court of Appeal (Tanlane’s easement over Moorebank Recyclers land) and the Orders of the NSW Land and Environment Court (Moorebank recyclers Pty Ltd easement over Council Land).

 

 

 

Text Box: 170
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 


C.      New Condition 17A is added to Development Consent DA-1552/2006  to read as     follows:

 

17A      There shall be no net loss of floodplain storage volume below the 1% Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) flood. The compensatory flood storage volume shall be no less than 4,780cum. The flood compensatory storage shall be provided as shown in Drawing No DA-001, Job No. 0914, Issue C by Micheal Fountain Architects Pty Ltd (Amendment June 2014).

 

D.        New Condition 31A is added to Development Consent DA-1552/2006  to read as follows:

 

31A      Prior to the issue of the construction certificate, the plans identified in Condition 1 are to be amended to exclude the central bridge pier and to ensure the minimum bridge clear span is 32m.

 

E.        New Condition 34A is added to Development Consent DA-1552/2006  to read as follows:

 

34A      The approved intersection treatment of Brickmakers Drive and the bridge with the associated road link is to be constructed to Councils satisfaction prior to opening the bridge to traffic. 

 

F.         New Condition 34B is added to Development Consent DA-1552/2006  to read as follows:

 

34B      The developer is required to provide detailed analysis (Sidra Modelling) and design of the required urban channelised interim intersection treatment off Brickmakers Drive. 

 

G.        Condition 39 is amended to read as follows:

 

39        The height clearance of the bridge is affected with the flood level and the use of the underpass. Appropriate information about the flood levels should be used along with the future use of the underpass to determine the height clearance. This assessment should be carried out and included in the design to the satisfaction of Council, prior to construction certificate.  

 

H.        Condition 45 is amended to read as follows:

 

45.       The bridge design shall be undertaken in accordance with Bridge Design Code AS5100. The design shall include impact of blockage and loading from debris.

  

I.          New Condition 45A is added to Development Consent DA-1552/2006 to read as follows:

 

45A.     Timber formworks shall not constitute a structural component of the bridge. To facilitate inspection and maintenance, all formworks shall be removed from the built structure prior to handover to Council

171

                                                                       Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Development Application Determination Report

 

 

 

REPORT

 

1.   The site

 

The subject site is described as Lot 6 and 7 DP 1065574 and Pt. Lot 105 DP 1070029 located at Newbridge Road, Moorebank.

 

Figure 1: Aerial Photograph

 

2.   Background

 

The original development application to construct the bridge was determined by Council on 24 April 2007. This consent was subsequently amended pursuant to s96(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act on 25 May 2007 (DA-1225/2006/A).

 

This application seeks to modify the original plans, particularly the bridge and ramp to ensure consistency with Court orders.

 

There are other interrelated applications for this locality including:

 

·    DA-846/2012 – proposed marina on Lot 7 DP 1065574 (Tanlane Industries P/L). This application will be considered by the Joint Regional Planning Panel (JRPP) for determination;

 

·    Part 3A Major Projects Application for a materials recycling facility on Lot 6 DP 1065574. This application is awaiting determination by NSW Planning and Environment.

 

§ Easements for access as ordered by the NSW Land and Environment Court over:

 

-     Lot 309 and Part Lots 310 DP 1118048 owned by Liverpool City Council;

-     Lot 6 DP 1065574 owned by Moorebank Recyclers P/L;

-     Lot 7 DP 1065574 owned by Tanlane Industries P/L.

172

                                                                       Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Development Application Determination Report

 

 
 

 


3.   The Issues

 

The key issues relating to the proposed modification application (DA-1552/2006/B) relate to whether additional impacts created as a result of the proposed modified bridge design are significant in terms of environmental impacts and flooding.

4.   Exhibition of the proposal

 

In accordance with the Liverpool Development Control Plan, the modification application DA-1552/2006/B was advertised from 31 March 2014 until 30 April 2014 with seventeen (17) submissions received in response. 

 

5.   Conclusion

 

Modification application DA-1552/2006/B was assessed having regards to Section 96(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act including Section 79C considerations.

 

SITE DESCRIPTION AND LOCALITY

 

6.   The Site

 

The subject site comprises several properties, which are situated on the eastern side of residential land known as Georges Fair and Brickmakers Drive, Moorebank as described below and as shown as Figure 1:

 

Legal description

Owner

Comments

Lot 309

DP1118048

Liverpool City Council

Vegetated land and unused. Previous approval for construction of road bridge DA-1552/2006. The land is subject to access easements created by way of Orders from Land and Environment Court case NSWLEC/2013/93.

 

 

Lot 310

DP1118048

 

Liverpool City Council

Vegetated land known as Wurrungwuri Reserve. The land is subject to access easements created by way of Orders from Land and Environment Court case NSWLEC/2013/93.

 

 

Lot 6

DP1065574

Moorebank Recyclers P/L

Former landfill, vacant and unused. Provided with a dirt track about 10m wide running north south connecting to Newbridge Road to the north. A drainage channel adjacent to and immediately east of the panhandle. The land is subject to access easements created by way of Orders from Land and Environment Court case NSWLEC/2013/93.

Text Box: 173
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 

 

 

Lot 7

DP1065574

Tanlane P/L

Subject site is used as a material recycling facility. The land is subject to access easements created by way of Orders from Land and Environment Court case NSWLEC/2013/93.

 

 

 

Lot 7

DP 1065574

(Tanlane)

 

Pt. Lot 310

DP 1118048

(Liverpool Council)

 

Pt. Lot 310

DP 1118048

(Liverpool Council)

 

Bridge Location

Lot 309

DP 1118048

(Liverpool Council)

 

Lot 6

DP 1065574

(Moorebank Recyclers)

 

Brickmakers Drive

 
Description: http://adm-m-gis1/output/Buffer_ims_adm-m-gis185246624168853.jpg

 

Figure 2: Locality plan.

 

The locality is characterised by residential development to the west of the subject site, and a materials recycling facility to the east. Vegetated land is situated to the north and south of the site.

 

 

 

 

Text Box: 174
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 


7.   The Proposal

 

Modification application DA-1552/2006/B seeks approval to modify the wording of Condition No. 14 of DA-1552/2006, which currently reads as follows: 

 

      14.        “The bridge is to be designed and constructed such that it is able to accommodate  the access ramps (Concrete Recyclers Access Option A) as designed in concept by Patterson Britton and Partners Pty Ltd”.

 

Condition 14 is proposed to be read as follows:

 

14.       “The bridge is to be designed and constructed such that it is able to comply with the orders of the NSW Court of Appeal (Tanlane’s easement over Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd land) and the orders of the Land and Environment Court (Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd easement over Councils land).

 

Consequential changes are also required to Condition 1 regarding the approved plans, as well as other minor modifications to existing conditions, and additional conditions resulting from the changed bridge and ramp plans.

8.   Statutory Considerations

 

The subject site is zoned:

 

·    RE2 – Private Recreation

·    E2 – Environmental Conservation

·    R3 – Medium Density Residential

·    SP2 – (Drainage)

 

The development is a permissible form of development with Consent.

 

In addition to the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008, the following planning instruments and controls are relevant to the development: 

 

·    Greater Metropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No.2 – Georges River Catchment

·    Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (LDCP 2008)

·    State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007

·    State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land

·    State Environmental Planning Policy No. 19 – Bushland in Urban Areas

 

9.   Planning Assessment

 

DA-1552/2006/B has been assessed in accordance with Section 96(1A) and Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. 

The modifications to DA-1552/2006 have been assessed as substantially the same development as that approved previously. The reasons for this are:

 

 

Text Box: 175
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 

 


·    The proposed development, as modified, will result in a minor alteration to the development which was originally granted consent.

·    The proposed development as modified, will not result in a separate and distinct use.

·    The key physical substance of the structure to be constructed and maintained remains substantially the same.

 

The only additional impacts of the modified development relate to the minor environmental impacts resulting from a small amount of additional vegetation clearing within and adjoining the road corridor. It is considered that there is only a minor impact on the E2 Environmental Conservation lands. This is considered further in the assessment of environmental impacts detailed below.

 

Section 79C(1)(a)(1) – Any Environmental Planning Instrument

 

a)   Greater Metropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No. 2 – Georges River Catchment (now deemed SEPP).

 

The subject land is located within the Georges River Catchment and as such The Greater Metropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No. 2 applies.

 

The Greater Metropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No. 2 – Georges River Catchment generally aims to maintain and improve the water quality and river flows of the Georges River and its tributaries.

 

The proposed development will not significantly compromise the aims and objectives of The Greater Metropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No. 2 – Georges River Catchment. To mitigate construction works, conditions of consent are imposed within the approval.

 

Clause 8 General

Principles

Comment

(a) the aims, objectives and planning principles of this plan,

The proposed development seeks to maintain and improve the water quality of the Georges River.

(b) the likely effect of the proposed plan, development or activity on adjacent or downstream local government areas,

 

 

The proposal provides soil and erosion control measures, embellishment of river foreshore land and drainage facilities to assist in managing the site. It is considered that the proposed development will not compromise the environmental quality of the site.

(c) the cumulative impact of the proposed development or activity on the Georges River or its tributaries,

The bridge development does not create any significant cumulative impacts on the Georges River system. Relevant conditions are imposed within the consent to mitigate environmental impacts which would address acid sulfate soils, contamination, vegetation, aquatic impact, erosion and sediment control.

Text Box: 176
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 

 

 

(d) any relevant plans of management including any River and Water Management Plans approved by the Minister for Environment and the Minister for Land and Water Conservation and best practice guidelines approved by the Department of Urban Affairs and Planning

 

Biodiversity of the Georges River Catchment

Minimal impacts are created by extending the approved bridge embankment within the established road bridge corridor (Lot 309) established by the LEC. The development does not significantly comprise the biodiversity of the Georges River Catchment. The proposed boulder retaining wall, drainage channel and open span under the bridge facilitates a fauna corridor between the north and south (Part Lot 310 within the Wurrungwuri Reserve).  No immediate impacts are created to habitat areas along the banks of Georges River.

Georges River Catchment Built Environment and Foreshore

Access Study

In a specific local context, it is noted that the bridge access from Brickmakers Drive was identified as a suitable location providing flood free access to potential future development sites within the Moorebank East Precinct.

Georges River Catchment: Better Practice Guidelines for Foreshore Works

The proposed development would be consistent with the principles set out in these guidelines.

(e) the Georges River Catchment Regional Planning Strategy

The proposal does not compromise the initiatives of the Georges River Catchment Regional Planning Strategy.

(f) all relevant State Government policies, manuals and guidelines of which the council, consent authority, public authority or person has notice,

The proposed development has been considered in terms of the relevant documents. Conditions are imposed within the consent mitigating potential concerns.

(g) whether there are any feasible alternatives to the development or other proposal concerned.

The subject site was considered by the LEC and has been established as the appropriate location for an access corridor containing a bridge. The locality has been rezoned to accommodate a road access to facilitate future developments within the Moorebank East Precinct.

Clause 9 Specific

Principles

Comment

(1) Acid sulfate soils

The land is within Class 4 Acid Sulfate Soils as identified on LLEP 2008 Acid Sulfate Soil mapping. Conditions are imposed within the consent to mitigate impacts of any acid sulfate soils.

(2) Bank disturbance

The bridge embankment works are not situated along Georges River. No disturbance of the bank or foreshore along the Georges River and its tributaries is proposed. Minor works are created at the intersection of Brickmakers Drive.

 

 

 

Text Box: 177
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 

 

 

 


(3) Flooding

The site is situated within flood prone land. Conditions are imposed within the consent for the bridge to withstand immersion during any flooding events. The top deck is designed to be above the 1% AEP.

 

(4) Industrial discharges

Not applicable

(5) Land degradation

Conditions are imposed within the consent to mitigate erosion and sediment control.

(6) On-site sewage management

Not applicable

(7) River-related uses

Road connection to future redevelopment of land within the Moorebank East Precinct and in particular a proposed marina adjacent to Georges River.

(8) Sewer overflows

Not applicable

(9) Urban/stormwater

runoff

Minimal discharge is created as stormwater runoff. Runoff is directed to drainage network system. Conditions are imposed within the consent to mitigate stormwater runoff.

(10) Urban

development areas

No direct flows are discharged to Georges River. Conditions are imposed within the consent to mitigate impacts to the river.

(11) Vegetated buffer

areas

The bridge is not adjacent to the banks of Georges River. The existing vegetation within the channel and bridge locality is suitably vegetated. 

(12) Water quality and

river flows

The bridge location is not within the banks of Georges River water course (refer to Figure 1 above). An assessment has been made which confirms that the proposed development would have an unlikely impact on water quality and river flows.

(13) Wetlands

The subject site does not contain wetlands.

 

Clause 11 Planning Control Table

 

16 Public Utility undertaking

 

Public utility undertakings (in this instance ‘road’) are permissible subject to approval. A 2007 approval has been issued for an open spanned road bridge, which spans some vegetated land, an access way, and drainage channel. At ground level the open span measures approximately 72 metres, and allows for the passing of fauna and flood waters. The current proposal seeks to provide a narrower span – approximately 32 metres. This represents approximately one-third of the bridges length. The planning controls that are to be used are those set out with Liverpool LEP 2008 or deemed environmental planning instrument – in this instance, the deemed SEPP - Greater Metropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No 2—Georges River Catchment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Text Box: 178
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 


b)   State Environmental Planning Policy No.19 – Bushland in Urban Areas

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 19 – Bushland in Urban Areas (SEPP 19) applies to the proposal. The general aims of the policy are to protect and preserve bushland within the urban areas and maintain its value to the community as part of the natural heritage and its aesthetic value and recreational, educational and scientific resource.

 

The SEPP No.19 includes the following relevant definition:

 

“bushland means land on which there is vegetation which is either a remainder of the natural vegetation of the land or, if altered, is still representative of the structure and floristics of the natural vegetation.”

 

To the north and south, the bridge site (Lot 309) adjoins land zoned E2 Environmental Conservation under LLEP 2008. Accordingly, Council is required to undertake a merit assessment of the proposed development against Clause 9 Land adjoining land zoned or reserved for public open space. Following is a table summarising the matters for consideration in determining development application and compliance:

 

9 Land adjoining land zoned or reserved

for public open space

Comment

(1)        This clause applies to land which adjoins bushland zoned or reserved for public open space purposes.

The site adjoins and contains E2 Environmental Conservation land.

(2) Where a public authority:

(a) proposes to carry out development on land to which this clause applies, or

(b) proposes to grant approval or development consent in relation to development on land to which this clause applies, the public authority shall not carry out that development or grant the approval or development consent unless it has taken into account:

The application involves granting of

development consent on land to which this

clause applies, where the following comments are made:

(c) the need to retain any bushland on the land,

The LEC has approved an access easement for the purpose of facilitating a road bridge. Minimal impacts are created to Wurrungwuri Reserve, which adjoins the north and south bridge elevations.  The immediate location has been described as containing weeds and provides minimal flora and fauna habitat as outlined with the ecology report for the proposed access arrangements for the potential access ramps for the proposed MKR at Lot 6 DP 1065574.

 

 

Text Box: 179
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 

 

(d) the effect of the proposed development on bushland zoned or reserved for public open space purposes and, in particular, on th erosion of soils, the siltation of streams and waterways and the spread of weeds and exotic plants within the bushland, and

Conditions of consent have been imposed to mitigate erosion, sedimentation and water quality

 

(e) any other matters which, in the opinion of the approving or consent authority, are relevant to the protection and preservation of bushland zoned or reserved for public open space purposes.

 

The VMP is considered to be sufficient in

preserving and embellishing bushland areas with the intent to enhance these areas for public benefit.

 

The provisions of SEPP 19 are considered to have been satisfactorily addressed.

 

c)   State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land (SEPP 55)

 

The objectives of SEPP 55 are:

 

§ To provide for a state wide planning approach to the remediation of contaminated land.

§ To promote the remediation of contaminated land for the purposes of reducing the risk of harm to human health or any other aspect of the environment.

 

Pursuant to the above SEPP, Council must consider:

 

§ whether the land is contaminated.

§ if the land is contaminated, whether it is satisfied that the land is suitable, after remediation) for the proposed use.

 

DA-1552/2006 contains conditions concerning remediation of land. Site contamination matters are not proposed to be modified by this application.

 

d)   State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007

 

Schedule 3 of the SEPP identifies traffic generating development that requires referral to the RMS for comment. The RMS has been consulted and has expressed a view that traffic signals at the intersection of the bridge and Brickmakers Drive is not supported until such time as traffic volumes warrant this. This has been included in the traffic assessment below.

 

DA-1552/2006/B relate only to the bridge design. Actual traffic impacts have been assessed in DA-846/2012 (Marina development) and the Part 3A application for the Materials Recycling Centre. 

 

 

 

Text Box: 180
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 


e)   Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008

 

(i)         Permissibility

 

The proposed bridge works are situated within the Private Recreation RE2 zone, Environmental Conservation E2 zone, Medium Density R3 zone and SP2 Drainage zone.

 

Under the provisions of LLEP 2008, the proposed development is defined as road.

 

road means a public road or a private road within the meaning of the Roads Act 1993, and includes a classified road”.

 

The land use of ‘roads’ is permissible subject to consent.

 

Extent of bridge works

 
Description: http://adm-m-gis1/output/Buffer_ims_adm-m-gis185246624310968.jpg

Figure 3 - Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008

 

(ii)        Zone objectives

 

The objectives of the zones are as follows:

 

“Zone R3 Residential

 

·    To provide for the housing needs of the community within a medium density residential environment.

·    To provide a variety of housing types within a medium density residential environment.

·   

Text Box: 181
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 


·         To enable other land uses that provides facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.

·    To provide for a concentration of housing with access to services and facilities.

·    To provide for a suitable visual transition between high density residential areas and lower density areas.

·    To ensure that a high level of residential amenity is achieved and maintained.

 

Zone SP2 Drainage

 

·    To provide for infrastructure and related uses.

·    To prevent development that is not compatible with or that may detract from the provision of infrastructure.

·    To reserve land for the provision of infrastructure.

 

 

 

 

Zone E2 Environmental Conservation

 

·    To protect, manage and restore areas of high ecological, scientific, cultural or aesthetic values.

·    To prevent development that could destroy, damage or otherwise have an adverse effect on those values.

·    To enable the recreational enjoyment, cultural interpretation or scientific study of the natural environment.

 

With respect to the objectives of the zones, the following relevant comments are offered:

 

·    The construction of the bridge will facilitate pedestrian and vehicular access from Brickmakers Drive to the adjoining land zoned for residential, commercial and recreational purposes.

·    The proposal is considered a significant project for Liverpool in that flood free access is provided, and provides for the further economic use of land given the capacity of the adjoining land to be developed relevant to their zone.

·    The bridge works have been designed so as to minimise flora and fauna impacts.

 

(iii)       Principal Development Standards

 

No principle development standards contained within the LEP apply to this application.

 

(iv)       Miscellaneous provisions

 

DA-1552/2006/B seeks to modify condition 14 of the original approval and consequential amendments to the approved plans. There will be minor tree removals required resulting from the amended ramp design. The applications have been

Text Box: 182
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 


referred to Council’s natural environment department who have recommended the applications be approved subject to conditions.  

 

Clause 7.8 of the LLEP concerns flood planning. The application has been referred to Council’s flood engineering department as the proposal is located within a flood area. With appropriate conditions of consent, the engineering department supports the application. Therefore, it is considered that the objectives of Clause 7.8 are met.

 

Section 79C(1)(a)(ii) - Any Draft Environmental Planning Instrument

 

There are no relevant draft policies applicable to the proposed subdivision.

 

Section 79C(1)(a)(iii) - Provisions of any Development Control Plan

 

Moorebank Structure Plan.

 

Moorebank East, which includes Moorebank Recyclers Lot 6 and Tanlane’s Lot 7 DP 1065574, has been envisioned to provide future residential and commercial development. The area will be an accessible place with a clearly identifiable hierarchy of streets. There is to be a network of footpaths and cycleways that will help connect the precinct to the immediate surrounding areas, namely Georges Fair situated to the left of Brickmakers Drive. A road link from Brickmakers Drive, utilising Lot 309, will connect to Davy Robinson Drive.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Text Box: 183
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 


Figure 4 - Road hierarchy within Moorebank Structure Plan

 

The proposed modifications are consistent with the Moorebank Structure Plan.

 

Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008

 

The following parts of DCP 2008 are applicable to the proposed development:

 

·    Part 1 – General Controls for all Development;

·    Part 2.10 – Moorebank East (Benedict Sands)

 

CONTROLS

COMMENT

COMPLIES

PART 1 – GENERAL CONTROLS FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT

1.       Tree Preservation

Refer to Clause 5.9 of LLEP 2008.

Yes

2.         Landscaping

After construction, the affected area will be suitably re-vegetated.

Yes

Text Box: 184
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 

 

3.         Bushland and Fauna Habitat Preservation

Refer to Clause 5.9 of LLEP 2008.

Yes

4.         Bush Fire Risk

The subject site is within a bush fire area. Conditions are imposed within the consent to withstand radiant heat loads.

Yes

5.         Water Cycle Management

Conditions are imposed within the consent.

Yes

6.         Development near creeks and rivers

The proposed bridge is situated 320 metres to the west of Georges River.

Yes

7.         Erosion and Sediment Control

Conditions are imposed within the consent to mitigate erosion.

Yes

8.         Flooding Risk

The subject site is within the Georges River flood plain. The proposal provides flood free access for future development within Moorebank East.

Yes

9.         Contamination Land Risk

Conditions are imposed within the consent seeking compliance with the requirements of the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997, SEPP 55 and NSW EPA guidelines.

Yes

10.       Salinity

Conditions are imposed within the consent to mitigate salinity.

Yes

11.       Acid Sulfate Soils Risk

Refer to Clause 7.7 of LLEP 2008.

Yes

12.       Weeds

The removal of weeds will be carried out as part of the construction works for the road bridge.

Yes

13.       Demolition of existing development

The proposed development does not propose demolition of the site.

Yes

14.       On-site sewage disposal

The proposal does not propose any facilities.

N/A

15.       Aboriginal Archaeological Sites

The subject site is not identified as containing Aboriginal archaeological sites

Yes

16.       Heritage and Archaeological sites

The subject site has not been identified as containing heritage and archaeological sites

Yes

17.       Notifications of Applications

The proposal was placed on public exhibition and advertised to adjoining owners.

 

Yes

Text Box: 185
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 

 

2.  Car Parking

The proposal does not generate the need for car parking.

N/A

4 & 5.  Water and Energy Conservation

The proposal does not generate the need for water and energy conservation. Some surface water drainage will flow into the drainage channel situated under the bridge.

Yes

6.        Land fill

Earth landfill is proposed to be contained within the approved works area. 

Yes

7.        Waste Management

Conditions are imposed within the consent to mitigate construction waste materials.

Yes

8.        Outdoor Advertising

No advertising structures are proposed.

N/A

PART 2.10 – DEVELOPMENT IN MOOREBANK EAST

2.1       Street network

Information has been submitted which demonstrates that vehicular access to and from Brickmakers Drive and land within Moorebank East can be made.

Yes

2.2      Pedestrian and Cyclist amenity

A pedestrian/cycle way is provided along the north side of the bridge.

Yes

2.4      Open space

The proposal does not generate the need for or impact upon open space.

Yes

2.5      Views and View   sharing

The proposal does not comprise any views.

Yes

2.6       Foreshore access

The proposal does not require foreshore access.

Yes

2.7       Drainage

Some surface water drainage will flow into the drainage channel situated under the bridge.

Yes

 

 

 

Section 79C(1)(a)(iiia) – Voluntary Planning Agreements

 

None.

 

Section 79C(1)(a)(iv) – The Regulations

 

No additional items for consideration.

 

Section 79C(1)(b) – The Likely Impacts of the Development

Text Box: 186
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 


(a)        Natural and Built Environment

 

In relation to the modification application DA-1552/2006/B, the natural and built environment will not be significantly impacted as a consequence of the proposed modification. The impacts of this modification are limited to flooding and impacts on the environment.

 

The application was referred to internal Council departments for comments. This included specialist assessments on flooding impacts, traffic impacts and impacts on the natural environment.

 

These assessments are summarised below:

 

Flooding Impacts

 

The application was referred to Council’s flood engineering department for comments relating to impacts of the proposal on flooding. The pertinent points raised by the flooding engineers are included below.

 

The proposed development site is located on the Georges River floodplain. The development site is affected by flooding under the 1% Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) event.

 

In the original proposal (DA1552/2006) the bridge was approved with a span of 72m. The Section 96 modification proposal involves extension of the bridge abutment involving filling of the floodplain and substantial reduction of the bridge span. The proposed modification will reduce the waterway width and potentially impact on flood levels.  Therefore, the applicant was requested to undertake a review of the flood impact assessment considering proposed modifications and submit a revised flood impact assessment report to demonstrate that the proposed modified bridge will not have any adverse flooding impact in the area. The applicant has undertaken a review of flood impact assessment including hydraulic modelling incorporating revised bridge configuration and submitted a report.  The study was undertaken by Cardno Pty Ltd dated 23 May 2014.

 

The Cardno letter report titled “Assessment of the Impact of the Proposed Bridge on Flooding in the Vicinity of the Georges Cove Marina, Moorebank” (Ref: NA49913037:BCP/bcp, dated: 23 May 2014) presents the results of the hydraulic modelling and assessment of flooding impacts. The flood modelling report has indicated that the bridge configuration has been modified to minimise flooding impact.  The bridge has been modified from a two span bridge to a single 32m span bridge.   The flood impact assessment indicates that despite the modifications that have been made to the bridge, flood levels have increased.  However, considering the minor nature of the impact contained within the reserve as demonstrated by the flood assessment report, the proposed bridge proposal in its modified form is acceptable to Council. The applicant is required to submit amended drawings of the modified bridge.

 

 

Text Box: 187
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 


Construction of the bridge will result in loss of flood storage volume of 4,780m3 and hence compensatory flood storage shall be provided for this amount. The applicant has proposed to provide compensatory storage by lowering a section of the car parking area within the Georges Cove Marina and has submitted amended plans as shown in Drawing No. DA-001, Job No. 0914, Issue C by Micheal Fountain Architects Pty Ltd (Amendment June 2014).

 

Considering the minimal impact on flood levels and compensatory flood storage being provided the proposed Section 96 modification proposal is supported. In order to mitigate adverse impact of flooding, conditions of consent shall apply for the proposed development.

 

An assessment of likely flood impacts of the modified road bridge has been undertaken, and the modified proposal is supported subject to conditions.

 

Traffic Impacts

 

The application was referred to Council’s traffic and transport department for comments relating to traffic impacts.

 

The critical traffic issues have been assessed by Council’s traffic and transport engineers and are as follows:

 

·    The bridge is to accommodate two way traffic movements and appropriate pedestrian/bicycle facilities.

·    The bridge shall be able to accommodate a combined bicycle/pedestrian path in accordance with the RMS Design Guides.

·    Accompanied by a detailed street lighting plan. 

·    Provision of a temporary turning head or equivalent at the intersection of the road bridge with the Benedict site, however, not required on connection of the road bridge with a future road on the Benedict site.

·    Concept plans including dimensions of the road bridge and its proposed full connection with Brickmakers Drive.

 

Traffic Generation and Impact In the short term, the proposed bridge will be carrying traffic to the proposed Marina (if approved). This traffic impact has been assessed under DA-846/2012.

 

The SEE has outlined that the use of the Road Bridge has very limited impacts which are limited to the issues of traffic utilising the road bridge and the associated impacts of the noise relating to this traffic use.

Traffic impacts for the Marina as well as all the likely future traffic generating developments have been assessed at the request of the JRPP by Colston Budd Hunt and Kafes who reported the following:

An unsignalised intersection of Brickmakers Drive with the road bridge would operate with average delays of less than 20 seconds per vehicle during morning, afternoon and evening peak periods. This represents LOS B, a satisfactory level of service…….Therefore; an unsignalised t-intersection of Brickmakers Drive with the road bridge will cater for the traffic from the proposed marina development.

Text Box: 188
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 


In respect of other future developments the report notes that To cater for future traffic flows from other development in Moorebank East, as noted in the joint experts report of 27 May 2013 in proceedings no. 30141 of 2013, an alternative control, such as traffic signals, would be required at the intersection.

 

The above statements are acceptable on traffic grounds. However, a layout of the signalised intersection treatment has not been provided.

 

Further assessment on the required interim intersection treatment is provided under Access and Car Parking Design below.

 

Car parking assessment The proposed bridge will not generate car parking demand. Car parking assessment is therefore not required.

 

Access and car parking design

 

Vehicular access of the proposed bridge to the existing local road network is via Brickmakers Drive. The required intersection treatment off Brickmakers Drive has been discussed by the applicant under DA-846/2012 and DA-1552/2006.  The discussion under DA-846/2012 has outlined that whilst future traffic volumes may meet the RMS warrant for traffic signals, an interim treatment with an urban channelised intersection would be the appropriate treatment.

 

A Section 138 of the Roads Act approval is required for the connection to Brickmakers Drive.   

 

It is recommended that the proposed bridge and associated road link should include an interim treatment with an urban channelised intersection treatment. Detailed analysis (Sidra Modelling) and design are to be submitted to Council prior to the issue of C.C.

 

At the eastern end of the access road from the bridge, an appropriate road link or turning facilities should be provided (to Councils satisfaction).

 

An assessment of likely traffic impacts of the modified road bridge has been undertaken, and the modified proposal is supported subject to conditions.

 

Environmental Impacts

 

The application was referred to Council’s Natural Environment department for comments relating to environmental impacts.

 

The comments received from natural environment department are summarised below:

 

It is considered that the ‘Expert Opinion – Ecology’ of Dr Steven Ward (dated 26 April 2013) encompasses the issues that were not considered sufficiently addressed by the previously reviewed Ecological Assessment Of Amended Part 3a Application For Access For The Moorebank Recyclying (sic) Facility (Cumberland Ecology 5/08/2013).  Whilst the expert opinion report is not specific to the current access design, it adequately addresses pertinent

Text Box: 189
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 


matters which were not sufficiently considered by the other documentation reviewed to date, such as indirect impacts and habitat fragmentation.  It is expected that the discussion provided for these matters would also be applicable to the current proposal.  Therefore, it is considered that the ecological assessment submitted for the part 3A assessment, when supplemented with Dr Ward’s expert opinion report and Experts’ Joint Report – Ecology Issues (21 May 2013), adequately addresses ecological matter associated with the proposal.

 

(b)       Social Impacts and Economic Impacts

 

In respect of social and economic impacts it is noted that:

 

§ The proposed development will give effect to the road network set out in the DCP to allow the redevelopment of the Moorebank east precinct.

 

§ The proposed development will facilitate the reconnection of the community with the river foreshore precinct in concert with Liverpool Council’s broader strategic planning policies. In particular the development will service the George’s Fair development which comprises some 960 dwellings on lands directly adjoining the development.

 

Section 79C(1)(c) – The Suitability of the Site for the Development

 

The site is flood liable; however, is situated between 300 metres and 376 metres from the western edge of Georges River. On 27 April 2007, DA-1552/2006 was approved for the construction of a road bridge, which provides a future road link between Brickmakers Drive from the west to future growth areas within Moorebank East.

 

Flooding

 

The subject site is located on the Georges River flood plain; however, the bridge is designed to provide a 1% AEP flood access with connection with Brickmakers Drive. Council’s engineering department supports the proposal subject to conditions.

 

Traffic

 

The Council has assessed the likely traffic impacts from the modifications to the bridge, and support the proposal subject to conditions. The proposal has been referred to RMS for their comments, which have been included in the assessment produced above.

Vegetation

 

The Section 96(1A) Modification Application follows on from the LEC Orders, in that the proposed bridge works are to be contained within the established easement.

 

The bridge provides earth embankment works extending beyond the original approval (DA-1552/2006). Due to the proposed works, some clearing of vegetation is required. Council’s Natural Environment department have reviewed the application and support the proposal, subject to conditions. 

 

190

                                                                       Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Development Application Determination Report

 

 
 

 


Section 79C(1)(d) – Any submissions made in relation to the Development


The modification application DA-1552/2006/B was advertised in accordance with the Liverpool Development Control Plan from 31 March 2014 until 30 April 2014 with seventeen (17) public submissions being received 

 

Many of the submissions lodged were pro-forma submissions. The main issues raised in those submissions are summarised below:

 

§ Support the marina development.

§ The proposed changes to the ramps will be unsafe and unsuitable for traffic and pedestrians.

§ Dust and noise impacts from trucks using the bridge.

§ Oppose the materials recycling facility.

 

The Section 96(1A) Application proposes modifications to the approved bridge (under DA-1552/2006); however, as discussed earlier, the applicant has also included the proposed access ramps as put forward by Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd for the MRF currently under assessment by NSW Planning and Environment. 

 

Whilst acknowledging the benefits of the bridge itself, the submissions object to the separate proposed access ramps and the MRF. It is important to note that the marina proposal (and the MRF proposal respectively) are currently being considered by the JRPP and NSW Planning and Environment and any impacts including traffic will be considered during the assessment.

 

A submission was received from Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd.

 

The main issues raised in the Moorebank Recyclers submission are summarised below:

 

1.   The applicant proposes to dedicate the road bridge to the Council as a public road pursuant to the Voluntary Planning Agreement. As the road bridge traverses part of Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd’s land, Moorebank Pty Ltd will not consent to the dedication of this land.

 

2.   DA seeking consent for the use of the road bridge should not be considered and determined until the application for the marina development is determined.

 

3.   The information supplied by the application, particularly in relation to traffic and acoustic impacts is inadequate.

 

4.   An assessment of the likely traffic impacts on the area, particularly the intersection of the modified road bridge with Brickmakers Drive needs to be considered.

 

An assessment of the issues raised in the submission from Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd  is outlined below:

 

 

Text Box: 191
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 


1.   An amendment to the VPA is pending which will exclude the small part of land owned by Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd from the requirement to be dedicated.

 

2.   It is not considered appropriate to delay the determination of the use of the bridge application while other applications including the marina development and the materials recycling facility are being considered. The application has been referred to internal Council departments who support the proposal subject to conditions. There has been a long history of legal action involving the parties to ensure access can be obtained from Brickmakers Drive to the east Moorebank area. It is also noted that the bridge itself has been approved under DA-1552/2006.

 

3.   A joint planning report has been prepared addressing the modification application and the use of the bridge application.

 

4.   Council considers it has sufficient information available to determine application DA-1552/2006/B.

 

5.   The application was referred to Councils traffic and transport department and the Roads and Maritime Service (RMS) has also provided comments. Traffic engineers consider the proposal can be supported with appropriate conditions.    

 

Independent Hearings and Assessment Panel

In accordance with the Liverpool City Council IHAP Charter, the s96(1A) application would normally be referred to IHAP for consideration as more than five submissions were received following public exhibition. However, the issues raised in those submissions concern traffic impacts from the proposed marina and the proposed materials recycling facility which are separate development applications currently being assessed. The traffic impacts of these developments will be considered during the determination of those applications.

 

As a result, it is considered that the submissions received on these applications are not unresolved objections and the proposed application can therefore be determined by Council and not referred to the IHAP. 

 

Internal Referrals

The following comments have been received from Council’s Internal Departments

 

DEPARTMENT

COMMENTS

Engineering

Approval subject to conditions.

Strategic Planning

Approval subject to conditions.

Flooding

Approval subject to conditions

Traffic

Approval subject to conditions

Natural Resources

Approval subject to conditions

 

External Referrals

As the original bridge application was referred to the NSW Office of Water, the modification application was also referred. A response was received from NSW Office of Water on 9/7/14, and advised that the modification application was not a controlled activity as defined by the WM Act and there was no objection raised.

 

 

Text Box: 192
 	ORDINARY MEETING 30 JULY 2014
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DETERMINATION REPORT

 

 


The modification application DA-1552/2006/B was referred to Roads and Maritime Services. RMS provided comments concerning the signalisation of the intersection with Brickmakers Drive not occurring until such time as the signals are warranted.

 

Section 79C(1)(e) – The Public Interest

 

The proposal provides flood free access and will provide a ‘public good’ in the future. The proposal does not compromise the future development of the locality; therefore, it is considered that the proposal is not contrary to the public interest.

 

10. Conclusion

 

Modification application DA1552/2006/B has been assessed having regard to the provisions of Section 96(1A), (3) and (4) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

The proposed modifications to DA1552/2006, namely modifying Condition 14 is considered to have merit and is consistent with the planning objectives and controls that are relevant to the site and this type of development. On this basis, it is recommended that the modification Application be approved subject to conditions.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues.

Facilitate economic development.

Facilitate the development of new tourism based on local attractions, culture and creative industries.

Environmental and Sustainability

Manage the environmental health of waterways.

Protect, enhance and maintain areas of endangered ecological communities and high quality bushland as part of an attractive mix of land uses.

Support the delivery of a range of transport options.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Determination Notice - DA-1552/2006 and DA-1552/2006/A (Under separate cover)

2.View

Approved Plans DA-1552/2006 (Under separate cover)

3.View

Architectural Plans - DA-1552/2006/B (Under separate cover)

   


192

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Chief Executive Officer Report

 

CEO 01

Local Government NSW Annual Conference

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

155618.2014

Report By

George Georgakis - Service Manager Council and Executive Services

Approved By

Carl Wulff - Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2014 is being held in Coffs Harbour from Sunday 19 October to Tuesday 21 October 2014.

 

The Local Government NSW Association Conference entitles Liverpool City Council to 11 voting delegates and this report is prepared for Council to consider proposed motions to be submitted to the Conference.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council endorse the key issues to be submitted for consideration at the Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2014.

 

REPORT

 

Council considered a report relating to the Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2014 at the June 2014 Council meeting and resolved:

 

1.   Council nominate up to 11 delegates to attend the 2014 Local Government New South Wales Annual Conference to vote on motions.

 

2.   Council staff prepare a report to the July Council meeting to consider proposed motions to be submitted to the Conference with the issue of trailer parking on residential streets to be one of the motions to be prepared.

 

3.   Interested Councillors wishing to attend the Conference to contact the Chief Executive Officer’s Office by Friday 27 June 2014.

 

All Councillors except Councillor Shelton will be attending the Conference.

 

In accordance with point 2 of the June 2014 Council resolution, this report addresses the proposed motions to be submitted to the Conference.

 

Following feedback from delegates in 2013 in Sydney, where some delegates requested the discussion of specific motions and others requested the discussion of consolidated overarching issues, the Board has decided to try to balance both. The Board has set the first day of business as the primary time to discuss all issues and motions, and a session time will be put aside to ask how Councils wish to deal with motions and issues into the future.

 

Local Government NSW has requested that Councils identify the most important issues which are causing concern to the Council and local community and suggest an appropriate solution.

 

Councils are asked to identify issues or motions relating to the following overall categories:

 

1. Industrial relations and employment

2. Economic

3. Environmental

4. Governance/Civic leadership

5. Social Policy

The Association will review all responses received and then identify the top issues as identified overall by member Councils. These issues will then be out to the Conference for debate and deliberation as part of the business sessions. Issues identified by Councils which fall outside of the issues will be considered by the Board prior to the Conference and Council will be informed by the President of the outcome of these deliberations.

 

It is recommended that Council submit the following issues to be considered for inclusion in the Conference business paper:

 

 

1.   Title

Advertising Trailers

 

Details of Issue

Currently if an advertising trailer as a registered vehicle parks on the side of the road, it is legally allowed to stay in that position, and Council has little ability to move it on. The advertising may not be appropriate, there is no conformity in size or message and in many cases it is inappropriate and an eyesore along the main roads of the Local Government area. This may also be a distraction for drivers and therefore pose further risk for safety.

 

Motion or Proposed Solution

That the State Government implements laws to allow Councils to regulate and/or prohibit advertising trailers in their local government areas. Any new law should allow Council to limit the size, type and where trailers may locate, and allow a fee to be charged for any applications made for this to happen.

                    

 

 

 

 

2.   Title

Abandoned Vehicles

 

Details of Issue

The legislation relevant to  abandoned vehicles is the Impounding Act 1993 and Road Rules 2008.  The Road Rules are administered by the RTA.

 

If a vehicle is parked legally kerbside, in the correct direction of travel and not contrary to any control signage, then this satisfies the requirements of the Roads Act  and no offence is committed. To declare a vehicle as ‘abandoned’ Council must form the view that the owner is not known and the owner is not living nearby.

 

Council must establish the ownership of a vehicle prior to commencement of any proposed impounding action. This satisfies the provisions of the Impounding Act 1993.

 

Council makes enquiries of the NSW Police Force and also performs a Roads and Maritime Service (RMS) Drives check to identify the owner.  If ownership has been established and a claim established over any such vehicle, then the vehicle cannot be considered to be abandoned.

 

In many instances where ownership has been established, the vehicle in question is usually parked outside of its owners premises thus no action to remove the vehicle may be undertaken. Where there is some distance from where the owner of a vehicle resides, Council writes to the owner of the vehicle advising that Council has had the vehicle reported to them as abandoned and that it needs to be to removed within a prescribed period of time. Compliance is generally achieved by this means.

 

In instances where a vehicle has been completely destroyed, usually burnt out, NSW Police will conduct enquiries/investigation and at the expiration of enquiries/investigation will notify Council of the outcome.

 

If the vehicle has been identified as stolen Council will not proceed with any impounding action as the vehicle will be considered to be a crime scene.  Further compounding this issue is consideration of other interested parties who may have a claim over ownership, such as Insurance Companies and Financial Institutions.

 

Where legitimate impounding of a vehicle has occurred, the vehicle will be held for a period of 31 days, giving sufficient time for an owner to make claim of ownership. If no owner is established then Council is authorised to dispose of the vehicle (through its impounding agent).

 

Registration status has no bearing on authority for Council to commence any form of action against an owner of a vehicle. Police have certain powers conferred upon them to take action against any driver of an unregistered or un-roadworthy motor vehicle. RMS also possess powers regarding driving of un-roadworthy motor vehicles.

 

             Motion or Proposed Solution 

   That the Road Rules 2008 and any other related relevant legislation be amended to  

   make it an offence to stand an unregistered motor vehicle on a road.

 

3.   Title

Support for Liverpool as a regional centre

 

Details of Issue

Liverpool has a current population of about 185,000 people and it is projected the population will grow to about 325,000 by 2036. Population growth requires the delivery of appropriate and extensive infrastructure for the new communities and maintenance of existing infrastructure.

 

Motion or Proposed Solution

That the Association calls on the federal government to work in partnership with local and regional growth Councils and provide additional resources to support the delivery of critical employment, infrastructure and services that meet the demands of a growing population.

  

 

4.   Title

Public Library Funding Campaign

 

Details of Issue

The NSW public library funding situation is an historic issue that has been ignored by successive NSW governments. The funding level has now reached a crisis point. The key issues are:

 

-      NSW receives the lowest per capita funding for public libraries from the State Government of all states in Australia;

 

-      State Government expenditure on public libraries has decreased as a proportion of total public library expenditure from 23% in 1980 to 7% in 2013;

 

-      NSW Local Government Councils are currently paying 93% of the costs to operate public libraries in NSW (which are governed by state legislation).

 

Motion or Proposed Solution

1.   That the Association make representation to the state government in relation to the need for additional funding for the provision of public library services.

 

2.   That the Association call upon the government to implement the Reforming Public Library Funding submission of the Library Council or NSW in 2012 for the reform of the funding system for NSW public libraries.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Costs will be approximately $2,500 per delegate for registration, travel, accommodation and meals.

Environmental and Sustainability

Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Act as an environmental leader in the community.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Local Government NSW Draft Program and Conference Information 2014

  


197

CEO 01

Local Government NSW Annual Conference

Attachment 1

Local Government NSW Draft Program and Conference Information 2014

 


 


 


 


 


202

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Chief Executive Officer Report

 

CEO 02

Proposed Organisational Structure

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Workforce Management Plan

File Ref

164528.2014

Report By

Deborah Cuthbertson - Executive Assistant to the CEO

Approved By

Carl Wulff - Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report seeks Council’s endorsement of an amendment to the executive component of the organisational structure adopted by Council at its Ordinary Meeting of 6 February 2013. The proposed amendments are designed to enable Council to optimise the present opportunities presented in the growth that is happening in Liverpool and South West Sydney.

 

The proposed amended structure entails the deletion of the two positions of Executive Directors along with a combination of the Group Manager Governance  and Group Manager Business Excellence into a single Group Manager position to be known as the Chief Financial Officer.  It further proposes the establishment of a new Group Manager’s position completely focussed on the property portfolio of Council both for the regulatory function and to maximise the opportunities around commercial holdings that Council currently has.  The final proposed adjustment to the Executive Structure is the introduction of a Business Improvement Manager’s position reporting directly to the Chief Executive Officer. 

 

The proposed amended structure is not an organisational restructure, simply a minor amendment to the Executive Structure of the organisation to better place Council to take advantage of the opportunities presenting themselves over the next number of years in Liverpool and South West Sydney.

 

It is recommended that Council endorse the proposed amendment to the Executive Structure as outlined in this report.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Adopts the organisation structure as provided in Attachment 1 of this report in accordance with Section 333 of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

2.   Notes the effective date for implementation of the revised executive structure for senior staff positions as 1 August 2014.

 

3.   Determines the positions of Directors ‘Senior Staff’ positions subject to performance based contracts in accordance with Section 332 of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

4.   Notes the draft Executive Structure as provided in Attachment 1.

 

5.   Notes the termination of the senior staff positions of Executive Directors and 2 Group Managers.


 

6.   Notes that the proposed structure will finance the new positions of Property and Business Improvement.

 

REPORT

The number of groups and grouping structure is based on the priorities identified for delivery and on the expertise required to deliver on the strategic direction of Council.  The eight groups, led by a Group Manager to be called Directors are outlined below.

 

It is also proposed to reallocate the functional areas of Community Engagement and Development from Economy and Engagement to Community and Culture.  This would consolidate some of the key functions of community development into a single portfolio.

 

A further reallocation of Accessible Transport from Infrastructure and Environment to Planning and Growth is proposed.  This will allow a broader strategic focus to be developed for the future growth of the city.

 

Group

Description

Strategic priorities for delivery

City             Presentation

A cleaner and well-presented city and public spaces, including maintenance of Liverpool’s city centre, parks and  open spaces, roads, buildings, drains and streets

·    clean city

·    maintained city

·    accessible open space

Community and Culture

Quality and efficient  services to the community, including customer services, cultural centres, libraries, children’s services, and community and recreation facilities

·    informed city

·    quality services and activities

·    efficient service delivery

·    customer service

 

Economy and Engagement

Building Liverpool’s economy, engaging and communicating with the broad community, including community capacity building, events and fostering civic pride

·    economic growth

·    community events

·    community engagement and development

Executive and Strategy

Supporting the Mayor, Councillors and senior executive team including driving Council’s whole of organisation strategy, policy and continuous improvement efforts

·    leadership support

·    corporate strategy

·    continuous improvement

Infrastructure and Environment

Planning and delivering new infrastructure in the built environment, including transport related infrastructure and services, while balancing and protecting the  natural environment

·    infrastructure delivery

·    accessible transport

·    environmental protection and sustainability

Planning and Growth

Leading, planning and managing development in Liverpool, including significant areas of residential, commercial and industrial growth across the local government area

·    sustainable urban growth

·    efficient development processes

·    city centre development

CFO

Business sustainability, including financial, workforce and information technology corporate systems, ethical governance, information management and statutory compliance functions including risk

·    financial and business sustainability

·    employer of choice

·    state of the art technology

·    ethical governance

·    statutory compliance

·    risk and information management

Property & Commercial Development

Development and management of Council’s property portfolio

·    Commercial property management

·    Leases

·    Licences

·    Acquisitions of property

·    Disposal of property

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Proposed Executive Structure - 21 July 2014

2.View

Current Structure - 21 July 2014

  


205

CEO 02

Proposed Organisational Structure

Attachment 1

Proposed Executive Structure - 21 July 2014

 


209

CEO 02

Proposed Organisational Structure

Attachment 2

Current Structure - 21 July 2014

 


207

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Chief Executive Officer Report

 

CEO 03

Adoption of the exhibited amendments to the Revenue Policy (Fees and Charges) 2014-15

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

162656.2014

Report By

Miles Carter - Project Officer - Strategy and Performance

Approved By

Hiba Soueid - Service Manager Corporate Strategy and Performance

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The purpose of this report is to advise Council of the outcome of public exhibition of the proposed amendments to the Statement of Revenue Policy 2014-15 (Fees and Charges).

 

The public exhibition period closes on 24 July 2014. At the time of publishing this report, Council did not receive any submissions on the proposed amendments to the policy. Should submissions be received prior to the closing date, an update will be provided at the council meeting for Council's consideration.

 

This report recommends that Council considers any submissions received and adopts the amendments to the Statement of Revenue Policy 2014-15 as exhibited and attached to this report.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:


Considers any submissions received and adopts the following amendments to the Statement of Revenue Policy (Fees and Charges) 2014-2015:

 

1.   Changes to the fee structure for onsite sewerage fees.

2.   New fee structure for construction certificates for Class 2-9 Commercial / Industrial, Class 10A Outbuildings over $5,000 Residential and Class 2-9 and 10A Commercial over $5,000 if the application is lodged as a combined Development Application and Construction Certificate including registration.

3.   Change in cost of after-hours venue hire for the Michael Wenden Aquatic Leisure Centre from not applicable in 2013-14 to subject to negotiation in 2014-15.

 

REPORT

 

The Statement of Revenue Policy  (Fees and Charges), which is part of the 4-year Delivery Program and 2014-15 Operational Plan was adopted by Council at its meeting on 20 June 2014.

 

At the same meeting, Council resolved to place the following amendments to the fees and charges on public exhibition:

 

1.    Changes to the fee structure for onsite sewerage fees.

2.    New fee structure for construction certificates for Class 2-9 Commercial / Industrial, Class 10A Outbuildings over $5,000 Residential and Class 2-9 and 10A Commercial over $5,000 if the application is lodged as a combined Development Application and Construction Certificate including registration.

3.    Change in cost of after-hours venue hire for the Michael Wenden Aquatic Leisure Centre from not applicable in 2013-14 to subject to negotiation in 2014-15.

 

The proposed changes were placed on public exhibition from 25 June to 24 July 2014. Information was placed on Council’s website under the Public Exhibition section and notices seeking submissions were included in the Liverpool City Council News section of the Liverpool Leader and South West Advertiser newspapers, issues 9 and 16 July 2014.

 

At the time of publishing this report, Council did not receive any submissions on the proposed amendments. Should submissions be received prior to the closing date, an update will be provided at the council meeting for Council's consideration.

 

This report recommends that Council considers any submissions received and adopts the amendments to the Statement of Revenue Policy 2014-2015 as exhibited and attached to this report.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The financial implications for each of the fees and charges have been outlined in the attached documents.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Ensure Fees and Charges are equitable.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Amendments to the Revenue Policy (Fees and Charges) 2014-15

  


215

CEO 03

Adoption of the exhibited amendments to the Revenue Policy (Fees and Charges) 2014-15

Attachment 1

Amendments to the Revenue Policy (Fees and Charges) 2014-15

 


 


 


 

 


214

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Executive Director Report

 

ED 01

Hoarding Fees

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

156374.2014

Report By

Toni Averay - Acting Executive Director

Approved By

Toni Averay - Acting Executive Director

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council adopted the 2013-17 Delivery Program and 2014-15 Operational Plan at its extraordinary meeting on 20 June 2014. 

 

Council also resolved as follows: 

 

5.       That Council review its hoarding fees and any methodology used to come up with that figure and compare them with other Councils’ hoarding fees and provide a report back to Council.

 

This report provides Council with the required information regarding hoarding fees.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Notes the information contained in this report.

 

2.   Endorses the following proposed new hoarding fees:

       A class – Application fee of $250 and $25 per metre

       B class – Application fee of $500 and $50 per metre.

 

3.   Directs the Group Manager Planning and Growth to progress an amendment to the adopted 2014/15 Revenue Policy (Fees and Charges) incorporating the revised hoarding fees, including public exhibition.

 

 

 

 

 

REPORT

 

During the Council meeting of 20 June 2014, Council’s current hoarding fees were discussed and it was noted that the fees are higher than those of a number of other western Sydney Councils.   Advice was also requested regarding advertising signage on hoardings and on Council property in general. 

 

Methodology and benchmarking

 

Hoarding fees are levied as part of Council’s regulatory function under the Roads Act 1993.

 

A consent for a hoarding is required under s138(1(a) of the Act.  The consent is granted under section 139(1) of the Roads Act.

 

Section 138(1)(a) states that:

 

138   Works and structures

1)   A person must not:

a)   erect a structure or carry out a work in, on or over a public road, or

b)   dig up or disturb the surface of a public road, or

c)   remove or interfere with a structure, work or tree on a public road, or

d)   pump water into a public road from any land adjoining the road, or

e)   connect a road (whether public or private) to a classified road, otherwise than with the consent of the appropriate roads authority

Powers to charge fees

 

There are no fees prescribed in the Roads Act Regulation 2008.  Council’s powers to charge a fee comes from sections 608(1) and 608(2) of the Local Government Act 1993. 

 

This allows Council to charge a fee in connection with the exercise of Council’s regulatory function as follows:

 

608   Council fees for services

 

1)   A council may charge and recover an approved fee for any service it provides, other than a service provided, or proposed to be provided, on an annual basis for which it is authorised or required to make an annual charge under section 496 or 501.

 

2)   The services for which an approved fee may be charged include the following services provided under this Act or any other Act or the regulations by the council:

·    supplying a service, product or commodity

·    giving information

·    providing a service in connection with the exercise of the council’s regulatory functions—including receiving an application for approval, granting an approval, making an inspection and issuing a certificate

·    allowing admission to any building or enclosure.

 

It is understood Council’s current hoarding fees were developed after benchmarking against Canterbury and Sydney City Councils.  However, it is apparent from broader benchmarking as shown in the following table that there is a significant range of different charges across Councils in western Sydney.  It is noted that Liverpool, Canterbury and Parramatta charge the highest fees.

 

 

A Class Hoarding

B Class Hoarding

Example*

B Class 20 metre hoarding for 12 months

Council

Application fee

Fee

Application

Fee

Fee

Liverpool City

$275

$50 per metre per month

$540

$120 per metre per month

$29,340

 

Bankstown City

$134

$35 per metre per month

$273

$38 per metre per month

$9147

Canterbury City

$275

$50 per month/lineal metre

$540

$120/month

Lineal metre

$29,340

Fairfield City

N/A

$128 per frontage per week

N/A

$292 per frontage per week

$15,184

Parramatta City

(City centre)

$267.18

$526.32 per lineal m metre pa (pro rata)

$534.37

$726.83  per lineal metre pa (pro rata)

(no site shed)

$15,071

 

$1385.81 per lineal metre per annum

(with site shed)

$28,251

Campbelltown

N/A

$8.00 per month, per metre of frontage

N/A

$25.00 per month, per metre of frontage

$6,000

Penrith

$205.00

$21.00 per m2 for 4 weeks per week, thereafter $20 per m2 per week

$205.00

$15.00 per lineal metre per week

$505.00

Auburn

$200.00 plus $3,500 refundable bond

For 2 weeks minimum - $7.25 per metre per week.

For 1 month or longer - $28.00 per metre per month

$200.00 plus $3,500 refundable bond

For 2 weeks minimum - $8.25 per metre per week.

For 1 month or longer - $31.00 per metre per month

$7,640 plus refundable bond of $3,500

Camden

$125.00

$16.71m2 per

month, with minimum

fee of $769.37

$125.00

$16.71m2 per

month, with minimum

fee of $769.37

$4,135.40

Sydney

$303.00 plus bond $583.00 per m2 of paving

$7.02-11.72 per lineal metre per week

$303.00 plus bond of $1,167.00 per lineal metre of paving

$9.47-32.53 per lineal metre per week

$9,394.20 to $31,531.80 plus bond

 

Approvals 2013/14

 

A review of Council’s records has identified that three hoardings applications were lodged in 2013/14, with a total of $75,430 in fees being charged.

 

Advertising signage

 

Separate advice has been provided to Council regarding advertising on Council properties.

 

A standard condition is included in Council’s hoarding approvals stating that no advertising material of any kind is allowed except for a sign 1800mm x 1200mm stating the builder’s name.  There is also a requirement to include a ‘Bill Poster will be prosecuted sign’ on the front of the hoarding.  The builder is responsible for ensuring it remains free of posters and advertising for the duration of the approval.

 

Section 139(3) of the Roads Act 1993 provides the ability to condition that no signs be placed on the hoarding as follows:

 

139   Nature of consent

1.   A consent under this Division:

a)   may be granted on the roads authority’s initiative or on the application of any person, and

b)   may be granted generally or for a particular case, and

c)   may relate to a specific structure, work or tree or to structures, works or trees of a specified class, and

(c1) in relation to integrated development within the meaning of section 91 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, is subject to Division 5 of Part 4 of that Act, and

d) may be granted on such conditions as the appropriate roads authority thinks fit.

2.   In particular, a consent under this Division with respect to the construction of a utility service in, on or over a public road may require the service to be located:

a)   in such position as may be indicated in that regard in a plan of subdivision or other plan registered in the office of the Registrar-General with respect to the road, or

b)   in such other position as the roads authority may direct.

3.   In particular, a consent under this Division with respect to the erection of a structure may be granted subject to a condition that permits or prohibits the use of the structure for a specified purpose or purposes.

 

Proposed amendment to current Hoarding Fees

 

It is difficult to accurately estimate the cost to Council of enforcement and compliance responsibilities associated with the management of hoardings to ensure public safety.  However, given the range of different fees charged by Councils for hoardings, and noting the discussion about hoarding fees at the last Council meeting, Council may wish to consider reducing the current hoarding fees in order to support business investment in the CBD.  It would be recommended that the application fees remain at levels similar to current levels as these reflect the workload involved for Council officers.

 

Accordingly, the following suggested new hoarding fee structure could be considered by Council:

 

A class – Application fee of $250 and $25 per metre per month.

 

B class – Application fee of $500 and $50 per metre per month.*

 

*If adopted, the charge for a B Class 20m hoarding for 12 months would be $12,500.

 

Process for Amendments to Fees and Charges

 

Should Council determine to amend the current hoarding fees, in accordance with s610F of the NSW Local Government Act 1993 public notice must be given for at least 28 days. Following is an extract of the relevant section of the Act.

 

610F Public notice of fees

1)   A council must not determine the amount of a fee until it has given public notice of the fee in accordance with this section and has considered any submissions duly made to it during the period of public notice.

2)   Public notice of the amount of a proposed fee must be given (in accordance with section 405) in the draft operational plan for the year in which the fee is to be made.

3)   However, if, after the date on which the operational plan commences:

a)   a new service is provided, or the nature or extent of an existing service is changed, or

b)   the regulations in accordance with which the fee is determined are amended, the council must give public notice (in accordance with section 705) for at least 28 days of the fee proposed for the new or changed service or the fee determined in accordance with the amended regulations.

4)   This section does not apply to a fee determined by a council for an application made in a filming proposal, if that fee is consistent with a scale or structure of fees set out in an applicable filming protocol.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Deliver and maintain a range of transport related infrastructure such as footpaths, bus shelters and bikeways.

Facilitate economic development.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


220

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Executive Director Report

 

ED 02

IHAP Members

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

156893.2014

Report By

Toni Averay - Acting Executive Director

Approved By

Toni Averay - Acting Executive Director

 

 

Executive Summary

 

At the meeting of 20 June 2014, Council resolved to adopt changes to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure.  It was also noted that a further report will be provided at a future Council meeting on assessment panel options as part of a broader review of development assessment delegations.

 

Council approved the appointment of the current IHAP members at the meeting of 21 March 2011 for the period 2011-2014.  Accordingly, the current appointments need to be formally extended or a new expression of interest process conducted.  It is proposed that the appointment of the current IHAP members be extended for a period of 12 months to enable the review to be undertaken.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approves the extension of the current IHAP appointments for a period of 12 months.

 

2.   Authorises the Chief Executive Officer to finalise all appointment details and letters of acceptance for panel members.

 

 

REPORT

 

Council resolved to establish an IHAP on 10 March 1997 to provide an independent hearing forum for objectors and applicants, and to independently make recommendations to Council on development applications. 

 

The appointment of the current IHAP members was approved by Council on 21 March 2011 for a period of three years.  This appointment period has now expired and accordingly, the current appointments need to be formally extended, or a new expression of interest process should be conducted.  Given that a review of independent assessment  options is to be conducted, it is appropriate that the current appointments be extended for a period of 12 months until the review has been finalised.

 

There are currently 10 active IHAP members representing the following areas:

·  Planning Law

·  Environment

·  Urban design/architecture

·  Traffic, and

·  Community

It is considered that the current membership provides a sound platform for independent input into development assessment decisions.  The proposed extensions will enable current IHAP processes to be maintained while the review is undertaken.

.

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

IHAP costs are included in the current budget.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

The IHAP process facilitates community input into the development assessment process. The current IHAP membership includes community members and IHAP meetings are open to the public.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil   


222

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Business Excellence Report

 

GMBE 01

Affixation of the Common Seal of Council

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

147029.2014

Report By

Vishwa Nadan - Service Manager Financial Management

Approved By

Matthew Walker - Group Manager Business Excellence

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The Council at its meeting on 28 May 2014 resolved to refinance a $4.78m loan and authorised the Acting Chief Executive Officer to execute the loan agreement with the financial institution offering most favourable terms.

 

The National Australia Bank (NAB) (which was the preferred financier) required the Common Seal of Council to be affixed to the loan agreement.  The use of Council’s Seal is regulated by the Local Government Act and requires an express resolution of the Council.

 

The loan, subject to refinancing, expired on 30 June 2014 and in the absence of such a resolution, the NAB agreed to execute the loan with an undertaking that the Council will affix the Common Seal post the Council Meeting scheduled to be held on 30 July 2014.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council authorises the Common Seal of Council to be affixed to the loan refinancing agreement with National Australia Bank for $4.78m which was drawn on 30 June 2014.

 

REPORT

 

On June 2009, the Council borrowed $6.5m to fund its capital works program. Due to the uncertainty in the financial market, banks in Australia at that time were not willing to lend for longer than five years. The Council took a five year renewable reset margin loan (margin of 2.2% over 90 day BBSY) with repayments based on a tenor of 15 years. The $4.78m balance of this loan was due for refinancing on 30 June 2014.

 

The Council at its meeting on 28 May 2014 resolved to refinance the $4.78m loan and authorised the Acting Chief Executive Officer to execute the loan agreement with the financial institution offering most favourable terms.

 

Based on quotations and assessment of the current market, the offer from the NAB for a 10-year fixed term loan at 4.94% interest was accepted.

 

To execute the loan agreement, NAB requires the Common Seal of the Council to be affixed to the loan agreement.  The use of Council’s Seal is regulated by the Local Government Act and requires an express resolution of the Council. In the absence of such a resolution, the NAB agreed to execute the loan with an undertaking that the Council will affix the Common Seal post the Council Meeting scheduled to be held on 30 July 2014.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


224

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Business Excellence Report

 

GMBE 02

Statutory Investment Report June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

149826.2014

Report By

Christian  Hope - Senior Financial Accountant

Approved By

Matthew Walker - Group Manager Business Excellence

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report details the balance of investments held at 30 June 2014 in a form compliant with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council's Investment Policy at the time of entering into each transaction.

 

Council held investments with a market value of $150.6 million as at 30 June 2014. The portfolio yielded a return of 4.08 per cent being 143 basis points above the benchmark of 2.65per cent for the month of June 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes this report.

 

REPORT

 

Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 requires that the Responsible Accounting Officer must provide Council with a written report setting out details of all money that Council has invested under section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993.

Council's portfolio of $150.6 million consisted of $15.2 million invested in various debt securities (bonds) with maturity dates ranging from one year to thirteen and a half years; $122.5 million in short to medium term deposits; and $ 12.9 million in Cash at Call bank accounts. Council yielded a return of 4.08 per cent being 143 basis points above the benchmark of 2.65 per cent for the month of June.


As at the end of June 2014 the ratio of market value compared to face value of various debt securities is shown in the table below.

 

Asset Class

Jun-14

Jun-13

Senior Debts (FRN's)

101.48%

 101.79%

Senior Bonds (NCD & Corporate Bonds)

104.56%

 106.3%

MBS (Reverse Mortgage Backed Securities)

  60.14%

  57.07%

Total

  94.05%

  90.89%

 

Council is fully compliant with the requirements of the Ministerial Investment Order including the grand fathering provision in regards to its investment portfolio holdings. The grand fathering provision states that Council continue to hold to maturity, redeem or sell investments that comply with previous Ministerial Investment Orders. Any new investments must comply with the most recent Order.

 

At its June 2014 meeting, the Board of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 2.5 per cent. A statement released on 1 July 2014 by Glenn Stevens, Governor of the RBA commenting on the RBA decision is attached to this report.

 

The return on term deposits over medium term (2 to 3 years to maturity) is currently at 3.9 per cent to 4.1 per cent per annum. Short term deposits rate (less than one year to maturity) is ranging from 3.3 per cent for 30 days to 3.7 per cent for one year.

 

Council has appointed a new investment advisor - CPG Research and Advisory Pty Ltd. CPG was considered the preferred firm to provide investment advice, portfolio review and investment policy review to Council given its reputation and long association servicing local government. CPG Research will start to provide advisory services from 1 July 2014. Council continues to closely monitor the investments in its portfolio to ensure continued compliance and minimal exposure to risk.

 

Portfolios break down (at "Market Value")

 

The chart below shows the proportion of Council's investment portfolio by category of investment type at market value.

 

 

Movement in Investment Holding

 

Council held investments with a market value of $150.6 million as at 30 June 2014 compared to $152 million as at 31 May 2014.  A summary of major types of receipts and payments for the period is attached to this report.

 

Portfolio Maturity Profile

 

The chart below shows the market value of funds invested at different durations to maturity.

 

 

 

Investment Portfolio at a Glance

 

Portfolio Performance vs. 90 day annualised Bank Bill Index for the month

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

The portfolio yield for June is above the annualised benchmark for the month (4.08% against 2.65%).

Portfolio Performance vs. 90 day Bank Bill index over the 12 month period.

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

The portfolio yield for the past 12 month period is above the benchmark for the same period (4.24% against 2.66%).

Annual Income vs. Budget

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

Council’s investment income on

General Fund was $45k above the year to date revised budget.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment Policy Compliance

 

Legislative Requirements

 

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

Fully Compliant.

Portfolio Credit Rating Limit

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

Fully Compliant.

Institutional Exposure Limits

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

Fully Compliant.

Term to Maturity Limits

       X

Exceeded term to maturity limit on

existing Mortgage Back Securities

purchased in 2006 and in 2007

The maturity dates have been

extended by the issuer of the

securities to reflect the revised

actuarial expected weighted average life (WAL) of when they are most likely to be fully paid.

 

Certificate of Responsible Accounting Officer

 

The Group Manager Business Excellence, as Responsible Accounting Officer certifies that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Councils Investment Policies at the time of their placement. The previous investments are covered by the “grandfather” clauses of the current investment guidelines issued by the Minister for Local Government.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

For the month of June 2014, Council investment income on General Fund was above year to date revised budget by $45k.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Statement by Glen Stevens Governor RBA July 2014

2.View

Movement in Investment Holding - June 2014

3.View

Portfolio Investment Details

4.View

Performance Graphs Actual to Budget June 2014

  


231

GMBE 02

Statutory Investment Report June 2014

Attachment 1

Statement by Glen Stevens Governor RBA July 2014

 


229

GMBE 02

Statutory Investment Report June 2014

Attachment 2

Movement in Investment Holding - June 2014

 


 


231

GMBE 02

Statutory Investment Report June 2014

Attachment 3

Portfolio Investment Details

 


 


 


237

GMBE 02

Statutory Investment Report June 2014

Attachment 4

Performance Graphs Actual to Budget June 2014

 

 


235

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Community and Culture  Report

 

GMCC 01

Quarterly Report on Compliments and Complaints

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Customer Service Policy

File Ref

130642.2014

Report By

Kiersten Fishburn - Group Manager Community & Culture

Approved By

Kiersten Fishburn - Group Manager Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council adopted the Customer Feedback Policy on 24 April 2013.  At that time Council resolved to adopt the Policy and for the Manager Customer Service to monitor feedback and to provide a summary report to the Council every three months as part of Council's quarterly performance review and to the Chief Executive Officer every month.  The report sets out the number of complaints and compliments received from members of the community with regard to Council services.

 

This report details the formal feedback received for the quarter April - June 2014 noting that Council received formal feedback from 30 members of the community. 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes this report.

 

 

REPORT

 

Council adopted the Customer Feedback Policy on 24 April 2013.   At that time Council resolved to adopt the Policy and for the Manager Customer Service to monitor feedback and to provide a summary report to the Council every three months as part of Council's quarterly performance review and to the Chief Executive Officer every month.  The report sets out the number of complaints and compliments received from members of the community with regard to Council services.

 

The following table details the formal complaints and compliments that were received for the quarter of April - June 2014.

 

 

 

 

Compliments

Complaints

Strategy & Executive

 

1

City Presentation

2

 

Community & Culture

5

4

Governance

1

 

Business Excellence

 

 

Planning & Growth

10

1

Economy & Engagement

6

 

Infrastructure & Environment

 

 

Total

24

6

 

These figures do not reflect customer requests received by Council that form part of general council operations, for example reporting a pot hole. Complaints recorded are those where service was not adequately delivered.

 

The compliments recorded here reflect those that have been formally received (via letter or email) and do not reflect informal thanks such as a verbal recognition that our staff receive for the quality of their work and the services delivered.

 

As per the Council resolution, these have also been reported to the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive monthly as part of the broader report on customer service trends and statistics. 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Deliver services that are customer focused.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil  


237

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Economy and Engagement Report

 

GMEE 01

Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

 

Strategic Direction

Healthy Inclusive  City

Foster social inclusion, strengthen the local community and increase opportunities for people who may experience barriers

Key Policy

Multicultural Action Plan

File Ref

155177.2014

Report By

Mark Egan - Coordinator Community  Planning

Approved By

Michael Cullen - Group Manager, Economy and Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council provides financial assistance to the community under three categories; Community Donations (including Community Grants, Small Grants, Men’s Shed One-off Grants, School and Youth Donations), Sporting Donations and Corporate Sponsorship.

 

The Financial Contributions Panel (FCP) recently considered a number of applications for Corporate Sponsorship.

 

This report presents the funding recommendations made by the FCP for Council's consideration.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Endorses the Financial Contributions Panel's recommendations for the provision of $10,000 from the 2014/15 Corporate Sponsorship Program as summarised in the table below:

 

Applicant name

Amount

Igbo Community Australia

$5,000 + GST

Future Achievement Australia Foundation

$4,000 + GST

Thomas Hassall Anglican College Parents and Friends Association

$1,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

REPORT

 

The Donations program has three categories:

 

·    Community Donations (including Community Grants, Small Grants, Men’s Shed One-off Grants School and Youth Donations);

 

·    Sporting Donations; and

 

·    Corporate Sponsorship.

Applications for Sporting Donations, Community Grants and Corporate Sponsorship are accepted on an ongoing basis. Applications are then reviewed by the Financial Contributions Panel (FCP) comprising of the Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Chief Executive Officer and delegated staff.

 

This report contains the most recent recommendations by the FCP.

 

Corporate Sponsorship

Council delivers a Corporate Sponsorship Program for local organisations seeking financial support to deliver events that benefit Liverpool. Three (3) applications for corporate sponsorship were received by Council. All three (3) applications met the program criteria and are recommended for funding. The program criteria can be found as an attachment to this report for the reference of Councillors. A summary of the request received and the FCP recommendation are shown in the table below.

 

APPLICANT

PROJECT NAME & DESCRIPTION

AMOUNT REQUESTED

AMOUNT RECOMMENDED

Igbo Community Australia

 

African Cultural Night - 16 August - Liverpool Catholic Club.

A key cultural event on the African community calendar with dinner and entertainment.  This is one of only two significant events targeting the African community in Sydney.  As a result it attracts attendees from a number of locations across Sydney as well as high profile dignitaries including Federal and State Ministers and respected artists and NGO leaders.  It is a ticketed event with tickets costing $42 which includes dinner, entertainment and free babysitting for the evening.  Igbo Community Australia is a Not for profit organisation and any profits made from the evening are channeled back into community activities.   Anticipated attendance – 650 people. 

 

Benefits include: Logo inclusion on event signage, opportunity to display council signage at the event and on screen, logo inclusion on advertising, sponsor recognition with media releases, opportunity to distribute promotional material at the event, speaking opportunity on the night.  Four free tickets on the night.

 

The event does align with program criteria.  However as it is a ticketed event the benefits to the broader community are more limited than if it were an outdoor free event.  Recommended for funding.

$5,000 + GST

$5,000 + GST

Future Achievement Australia Foundation

Max Potential program 2014

22 week community program that matches young adults with community leaders to coach in personal leadership and the delivery of a community service project.  The program matches 20 young adults with 20 coaches.   Aim is to build resilience and coaching skills whilst allowing young adults to positively engage.  Request is for funds to assist with the marketing of the program.

 

Benefits include:  Acknowledgement and signage recognition.  Coaching and mentoring skills for those who agree to mentor young adults.

 

Recommended for funding.  Whilst the 2015 program is likely to be supported through Council’s learning and development program, funds have been sought to actively market and promote the 2014 program. The initiative aligns with Council’s corporate sponsorship program as it directly supports young adults in the Liverpool community who are looking for employment through skills development and mentoring activities.

$4,000 + GST

$4,000 + GST

Thomas Hassall Anglican College Parents and Friends Association

 

Thomas Hassall Anglican College South West Festival – 16 August – Middleton Grange

Annual event for the school consisting of food and market stalls, games, rides and displays including a motor show.  Council has previously sponsored this event and run an information and recycling demonstration at the event.  Funding options range from bronze at $750, silver $1,000, gold $2,500 and platinum (major) $5,000.

 

Bronze benefits include: Stall space, acknowledgement in newsletter and on college website for 1 month, certificate of appreciation.

 

Silver benefits include: Stall space, acknowledgement in newsletter and on college website for 2 months, certificate of appreciation,

 

Gold benefits include: Stall space, acknowledgement in newsletter and on college website for 2 months, certificate of appreciation, and announcement over PA system at event.

 

Platinum benefits include: Stall space, acknowledgement in newsletter and on college website for 4months, certificate of appreciation, announcement over PA system at event, logos featured in advertising material, engraved sponsorship trophy.

 

Council revised its corporate sponsorship policy objectives last year, after this event was supported by the program.  Whilst the activity aligns with some of Council’s corporate sponsorship objectives it does not activate the CBD and does not provide strong economic benefits to Liverpool.  Council in its last funding round provided funding to Hoxton Park Public School for an annual event of a similar nature to a level of $1,000l.  Recommended for funding at the Silver Level of $1,000 in line with funds provided to other schools in the region for similar activities.

 

$5,000

$1,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

A budgetary allocation of $80,000 for the Corporate Sponsorship

Program was adopted by Council in its 2014/15 Operational Plan. If the recommended amount of $10,000 is endorsed the remaining balance will be $43,500. The recommendations within this report for Corporate Sponsorship will be funded from the Corporate Sponsorship Program.

 

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about available services and facilities.

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Council’s sponsorship of these events helps raise awareness of programs and services run by these organisations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Criteria for Corporate Sponsorship

  


245

GMEE 01

Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

Attachment 1

Criteria for Corporate Sponsorship

 


 


244

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Economy and Engagement Report

 

GMEE 02

Community and Business Representation - Liverpool Council's Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney

Key Policy

Economic Development Strategy

File Ref

155980.2014

Report By

Michael Cullen - Group Manager, Economy and Engagement

Approved By

Toni Averay - Acting Executive Director

 

 

Executive Summary

 

At its meeting of 28 May 2014, Council approved the establishment of a Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce chaired by the Mayor.  The approved membership of the Committee comprised:

 

·    The Mayor

·    Three other Councillors elected by the Council

·    The Chief Executive Officer (or delegate)

·    A representative from the NSW Business Chamber

·    A representative from the Liverpool business community, and

·    A representative from the local community

 

Expressions of Interest were sought for the designated local business and community representative positions.  Ten Expressions of Interest were received in total and were of a high calibre.

 

Recommendations to Council to fill the two positions available on the Taskforce are attached for Council’s consideration in a confidential report.

 

Candidates were considered against the following criteria:

 

1.   A demonstrated and current work, business or residential connection to the Liverpool local government area

2.   A passion to help Liverpool attain its potential as the regional city for South West Sydney

3.   Knowledge of, and interest in, positive outcomes for Badgerys Creek and the wider Liverpool local government area

4.   An ability to attend regular monthly meetings of the Committee for a term of two years

5.   A demonstrated track record of success in business, industry or commercial development (business representatives) and/or

6.   Access to community networks and a demonstrated ability to represent broad community interests (community representatives)

 

The candidates recommended to Council for consideration will be able to provide access to a broad range of networks beyond their own individual business or community interests.  Factors such as the ability for the member to represent the multicultural qualities of Liverpool and the opportunities that arise from the Airport from this diversity was also a consideration in assessing community interests.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council appoints the two representatives recommended in the confidential report to positions on the Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce.

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The activities of the Taskforce will support Council’s efforts to advocate to the Commonwealth and NSW Governments for the necessary infrastructure and planning investments to support the Airport and its ability to generate new economic development opportunities for the Liverpool local government area

Environmental and Sustainability

Environmental and sustainability factors will be important aspects that need to be considered in development of the Airport at Badgerys Creek.


Social and Cultural

The availability of supporting social and cultural facilities will be important considerations in development of the Airport site at Badgerys Creek.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The Taskforce will assist Council in its advocacy efforts to influence the Commonwealth and NSW Governments decision concerning development of the Airport and its connecting infrastructure.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil  


246

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Governance Report

 

GMGO 01

Proposed Deed of Agreement to facilitate the acquisition of a part of Lot 1 DP 1175057, Progress Circuit, Prestons and the construction of the Lyn Parade, Prestons extension

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Property Strategy

File Ref

134681.2014

Report By

Andy Kabok - Senior Property Officer

Approved By

Nadia Napoletano - Group Manager Governance

 

 

Executive Summary

 

A development application (DA-720/1998) for the subdivision of four lots to create 47 industrial lots, one lot as a Public Reserve (Part Lot 1 DP 1175057) and associated public roads (Lyn Parade extension) was approved on 2 October 1998. Discussions with the landowner as to the acquisition of a part of Lot 1 DP 1175057, Progress Circuit, Prestons (drainage land) for drainage purposes and the construction of the Lyn Parade extension commenced in the early 2000’s and have been ongoing.

 

An agreement has now been reached, subject to Council approval, for Council to enter into a Deed of Agreement with the landowner to facilitate the acquisition of a part of Lot 1 DP 1175057 (drainage land) for drainage purposes and to agree to the terms, timing and payments relating to the construction of the Lyn Parade extension at Prestons.

 

This report recommends that Council proceed with the acquisition of a part of Lot 1 DP 1175057 Progress Circuit, Prestons (drainage land) and enters into a Deed of Agreement detailing the terms, timing and payments relating to the construction of the Lyn Parade extension as outlined in the confidential attachment in accordance with Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Agrees to enter into a Deed of Agreement with the landowner on terms outlined in the confidential attachment including:

 

1.1  Approve the acquisition of a part of Lot 1 DP 1175057, Progress Circuit,        Prestons, containing an area of approximately 13,684 square metres for         drainage purposes (drainage land);

 

1.2 Upon acquisition of the drainage land, classifies a part of Lot 1 DP 1175057, Progress Circuit, Prestons as ‘Community’ land;

 

1.3 Approve the acquisition of a two metre wide middle strip of land within the  proposed Lyn Parade road extension,  comprising an area of approximately 616 square metres (road extension portion);

 

1.4 Dedicates the road extension when completed as a public road in accordance with the Roads Act 1993;

 

1.5 Reimburse the landowner the cost of construction of the two metre wide middle strip of road extension as outlined point 1.3;

 

2.   Notes the linear and/or square metre areas stated are approximate and subject to final survey. Council approves acquisition and construction costs on a dollar per square/linear metre basis as outlined in the confidential attachment; 

 

3.   Keeps confidential the attachment supplied under separate cover containing the purchase price and details of the deed of agreement pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and

 

4.   Authorises its delegated officer to execute any documents, under Power of Attorney necessary to give effect to this decision.

 

 

REPORT

 

A development application (DA-720/1998) for the subdivision of four lots to create 47 industrial lots, one lot as a Public Reserve (Part Lot 1 DP 1175057) and associated public roads (Lyn Parade extension) was approved on 2 October 1998.

 

Discussions with the land owner as to the acquisition of a part of Lot 1 DP 1175057, Progress Circuit, Prestons (drainage land) for drainage purposes and the construction of the Lyn Parade extension commenced in the early 2000’s and have been ongoing.

 

A part of Lot 1 DP 1175057, Progress Circuit, Prestons, has been identified and zoned for drainage purposes with an area of approximately 13,684 square metres to be acquired (drainage land).

 

Council appointed a valuer to prepare a valuation of a part of Lot 1 DP 1175057 (drainage land) in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991. Negotiations with the landowner have now been completed and a purchase price has been agreed, subject to Council approval. Details of the valuation and negotiations are considered to be confidential for commercial reasons and are contained in the confidential attachment.

 

An agreement has also been reached, subject to Council approval, for Council to enter into a Deed of Agreement with the landowner to facilitate the construction of the Lyn Parade extension.

 

In accordance with the Liverpool Contribution Plan 2009 Council is required to acquire a two metre wide middle strip of land within the designated roadway and to reimburse the landowner for the cost of construction of this portion of the road pavement (road extension portion).

 

Details of the agreed terms and timing of construction of the Lyn Parade extension are considered to be confidential for commercial reasons and are contained in the confidential attachment.

 

Lyn Parade extension will provide a link between the Prestons Industrial area and Camden Valley Way and will assist in alleviating traffic problems along Hoxton Park Road and divert industrial traffic away from the surrounding residential areas at Prestons and Lurnea.

 

On completion of the Lyn Parade extension, Council will commence the closure of the temporary road between Enterprise Circuit and Wonga Road. It is considered that the closure of this temporary road would considerably reduce industrial traffic along Wonga Road, Lurnea

   

This report recommends that Council proceeds with the acquisition of a part of Lot 1 DP 1175057 Progress Circuit, Prestons (drainage land) and enters into a Deed of Agreement detailing the terms, timing and Council payments relating to the construction of the Lyn Parade extension.

 

Council notes the fact that the linear and/or square metre areas provided are approximate and estimated acquisition and construction costs have been calculated on a square metre and lineal metre basis. This figure may marginally change subject to the final survey and any additional area will be acquired based on the agreed rates per square/linear metre contained in the confidential attachment.

 

It should be noted that upon completion of the Lyn Parade extension, the road is to be dedicated as road in accordance with the Roads Act 1993. Upon acquisition, a part of Lot 1 DP 1175057, Progress Circuit, Prestons is to be classified as ‘Community’ land.

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Funding for the acquisition is provided for in Council’s Section 94 Contribution Plan and will be allocated in the September 2014 budget review.

Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Location Map

  


253

GMGO 01

Proposed Deed of Agreement to facilitate the acquisition of a part of Lot 1 DP 1175057, Progress Circuit, Prestons and the construction of the Lyn Parade, Prestons extension

Attachment 1

Location Map

 


251

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Governance Report

 

GMGO 02

Acquisition of Lot 358 DP 1184144, 80 Inverell Avenue, Hinchinbrook for drainage purposes

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Property Strategy

File Ref

148552.2014

Report By

Andy Kabok - Senior Property Officer

Approved By

Nadia Napoletano - Group Manager Governance

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 identifies lands to be acquired by Council for various types of infrastructure or open space. Council is required to acquire Lot 358 DP 1184144, 80 Inverell Avenue, Hinchinbrook, for drainage purposes. Lot 358 DP 1184144 is zoned 'SP2 Infrastructure (Drainage)' and forms part of the drainage system in this area.

 

Agreement has been reached, in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 with the owners, for Council to acquire Lot 358 DP 1184144, 80 Inverell Avenue, Hinchinbrook, subject to Council approval. Details of the acquisition price are considered confidential and are supplied to Council under separate cover, in accordance with Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

This report recommends that Council proceeds with the acquisition of Lot 358 DP 1184144, 80 Inverell Avenue, Hinchinbrook, on the terms outlined in the confidential attachment. 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approves the acquisition of Lot 358 DP 1184144, 80 Inverell Avenue, Hinchinbrook, containing an area of 5,077 square metres for the price and terms outlined in the confidential attachment;

 

2.   Upon settlement of the acquisition, classifies Lot 358 DP 1184144, 80 Inverell Avenue, Hinchinbrook as 'Community' land;

 

 

 

 

3.   Keeps confidential the attachment supplied under separate cover containing the acquisition price pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and

 

4.   Authorises its delegated officer to execute any document, under Power of Attorney necessary to give effect to this decision.

 

REPORT

 

As part of the development in Hinchinbrook, various areas and parcels of land have been identified for acquisition for drainage purposes. The Liverpool Contribution Plan provides the mechanism to collect the funding to enable the acquisition of this land.

 

Lot 358 DP 1184144, 80 Inverell Avenue, Hinchinbrook, has been identified and zoned for drainage purposes with an area of 5,077 square metres to be acquired.

 

Council appointed a valuer to determine the value of Lot 358 DP 1184144 in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991. Negotiations with the owner have now been completed and a purchase price has been agreed to subject to Council approval. Details of the valuation and negotiations are considered to be confidential for commercial reasons and are contained in the confidential attachment in accordance with Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

This report recommends that Council proceeds with the acquisition of Lot 358 DP 1184144, 80 Inverell Avenue, Hinchinbrook, in accordance with the terms outlined in the confidential attachment.

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Funding for the acquisition is provided for in Council's Section 94 Contribution Plan and is included in this year's budget.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Location Map

  


253

GMGO 02

Acquisition of Lot 358 DP 1184144, 80 Inverell Avenue, Hinchinbrook for drainage purposes

Attachment 1

Location Map

 


254

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Governance Report

 

GMGO 03

Acquisition of Lot 200 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill for the purposes of extending Kurrajong Road

 

Strategic Direction

Accessible Connected City

Provide safe and easy travel with a high quality road and traffic management network

Key Policy

Road Safety Plan

File Ref

151176.2014

Report By

Andy Kabok - Senior Property Officer

Approved By

Nadia Napoletano - Group Manager Governance

 

 

Executive Summary

 

On 26 March 2012 Council resolved to “acquire part of Lot 3126 in Deposited Plan 1160426, 3126 Pioneer Drive, Carnes Hill”, now known as Lot 200 DP 1194243 for the purposes of extending Kurrajong Road.

 

The agreed acquisition amount as outlined in the confidential attachment was based on an approximate area to be acquired of 12,779 square metres. Following completion of the final road design, the area of Lot 200 DP 1194243, required to be acquired has increased to 14,530 square metres.

 

This report recommends that Council proceeds with the acquisition of Lot 200 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill and agrees to the increased purchase price as outlined in the confidential attachment in accordance with Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Agrees to the acquisition of Lot 200 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill for the increased purchase price outlined in the confidential attachment;

 

2.       Keeps confidential the report supplied under separate cover containing the acquisition price pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and

 

 

3.    Authorises its delegated officer to execute any document, under Power of Attorney necessary to give effect of this decision.

 

REPORT

 

Kurrajong Road functions as a major sub-arterial road and provides primary access to major commercial, industrial and residential areas and distribution centres within Prestons. In order to support current and future residential and industrial release areas, Council has planned to extend Kurrajong Road between Kookaburra Road, Prestons and Sarah Hollands Drive, Carnes Hill.

 

The proposed extension of Kurrajong Road necessitated the need to acquire various parcels of land, one being a part of Lot 3126 DP 1160426, Pioneer Drive, Carnes Hill, now known as Lot 200 DP 1194243.

 

A report was prepared to the 26 March 2012 Council meeting recommending that Council approves the acquisition of a part of Lot 3126 DP 1160426, now known as Lot 200 DP 1194243.

 

Council resolved to “acquire part of Lot 3126 in Deposited Plan 1160426, Lot 3126 Pioneer Drive, Carnes Hill for the price and terms outlined in the confidential attachment”.

 

The agreed acquisition amount was based on an approximate area to be acquired of 12,779 square metres. At the time this agreement was made, the land to be acquired for the purposes of extending Kurrajong Road was at the initial road design stage. The plan of subdivision creating Lot 200 was registered on 14 May 2014 and the area to be acquired has increased to 14,530 square metres. This is an increase of 1,751 square metres from the approximate area of 12,779 square metres stated in the 26 March 2012 Council report.

 

Agreement with the landowners has been reached to adopt the rate per square metre that was used to calculate the original purchase price, agreed to by Council on 26 March 2012 and to apply this rate to the additional area that is to be acquired, subject to Council approval. Details of the increased acquisition price are considered to be confidential for commercial reasons and are supplied to Council under separate cover.

 

This report recommends that Council proceeds with the acquisition of Lot 200 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill and agrees to the increased purchase price as outlined in the confidential attachment in accordance with Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Funding for the acquisition is provided for in Council’s Section 94 Contribution Plan and is included in this years’ budget.

Environmental and Sustainability

Promote an integrated and user friendly public transport service.

Support the delivery of a range of transport options.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Location Map

2.View

Council Resolution 26 March 2014

  


257

GMGO 03

Acquisition of Lot 200 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill for the purposes of extending Kurrajong Road

Attachment 1

Location Map

 


261

GMGO 03

Acquisition of Lot 200 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill for the purposes of extending Kurrajong Road

Attachment 2

Council Resolution 26 March 2014

 


259

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Governance Report

 

GMGO 04

Authorisation of Remediation Works, Lot 2 DP 719245, 33 Moore Street, Liverpool

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Property Strategy

File Ref

157890.2014

Report By

Michal Szczepanski - Property Officer - Building Management

Approved By

Nadia Napoletano - Group Manager Governance

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council’s Administration Building at 33 Moore Street, Liverpool, known as Lot 2 DP 719245, requires upgrade and replacement of relevant plant and equipment  (remediation works) to ensure continued serviceability.

 

These remediation works would have been identified and captured within the accommodation plan proposal that was deferred at the March 2014 Council meeting.   Notwithstanding the deferral of that plan some works are required to take place to ensure the continued optimization of the building. 

 

Engineers are considering various relevant remediation works that need to be undertaken and this report seeks Council’s concurrence to authorise the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to proceed with any necessary remediation works that may be identified. Some of these works include replacing cooling tower supports.  Scope and costs of works undertaken can be reported to council in due course.

 

In order to undertake any remediation works identified necessary this report seeks that Council delegate to the CEO authority to utilise funds from the Administration Building Reserve to fund those works. 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Delegate to the CEO authority to utilise funds from the Administration Building Reserve to remediation works;

 

2.   Authorises the Chief Executive Officer or his delegate to enter into contracts for remediation works within Lot 2 DP 719245, 33 Moore Street, Liverpool;

 

3.   Notes that in the event that funds are allocated for remediation works a report outlining the works undertaken and costs of works will be submitted to the next available Council meeting.

 

REPORT

 

Council purchased Lot 2 DP 719245, 33 Moore Street, Liverpool, on 25 May 2011. At the time of purchase, a due diligence report was prepared which outlined the condition of plant and equipment located within the building.

 

The report stated that most of the key plant and equipment servicing Council’s Administration Building at 33 Moore Street, Liverpool would need replacement within the next 5 years and  money was allocated to the Administration Building reserve in anticipation of those future works.

 

The report also stated that works would be required to upgrade, retrofit or replace plant and equipment in due course. Council has proactively managed the day to day operation, repairs and maintenance of the plant and equipment however time has come to undertake more substantial works.

 

To ensure that building services can be restored in a timely manner to ensure a safe working environment of the occupants of the building, the Council delegates to the CEO the authority to utilize funds from the Administration Building Reserve to undertake any works required.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Funding for remediation works has not been budgeted for and will be requested in the respective quarterly reviews if required. All funds would be sourced from the Administration Building Reserve.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Deliver services that are customer focused.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil  


261

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Infrastructure and Environment Report

 

GMIE 01

Tender WT2324 - Replacement of Car Park Equipment, Management System and Maintenance at the Warren Serviceway Car Park

 

Strategic Direction

Accessible Connected City

Provide safe and easy travel with a high quality road and traffic management network

Key Policy

Traffic and Transport Plan

File Ref

108749.2014

Endorsed By

Charles Wiafe - Service Manager Traffic and Transport

Approved By

Raj Autar - Group Manager Infrastructure and Environment

 

 

Executive Summary

 

It is Council’s intention to enter into a contract with a suitably experienced and competent contractor to replace the existing car parking management and payment system at the Warren Serviceway Car Park in Liverpool.

 

The existing system needs to be replaced to enable implementation of an efficient payment system including the provision of nested areas to effectively manage the multiple fee structure that has been introduced to improve utilisation of the car park.

 

Council has invited tenders for this work and this report recommends that the contract be awarded to the preferred tenderer as outlined in the confidential report.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

 That Council:

 

1.   Adopts the recommendation outlined in the confidential report provided under separate cover.

2.   Keeps confidential the details supplied under separate cover containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

 

 

 

 

Report

 

Warren Serviceway Car Park comprises a total of 698 car parking spaces including 650 spaces for paid parking over seven floors.  The car park currently has a parking management and communication system that was installed over twenty years ago.

 

The management system is obsolete and does not comply with Europay, MasterCard and Visa (EMV) standards, a global standard for inter-operation of credit cards and automated teller machines (ATMs) and for authenticating credit and debit card transactions.

Further, Council, at its meeting held on 29 May 2013 resolved to introduce discounted parking fees on levels 4, 5 and 6 of the Warren Serviceway Car Park to boost utilisation and allocated $90,000 for its implementation. To provide this discounted parking efficiently, separate zones (nested areas) need to be created by the installation of additional boom gates.

 

However, due to the age of the existing parking management equipment, extensive investigations found that it is not economically viable to add new boom gates to the existing system. Consequently, Council, at its meeting held on 27 November 2013 resolved to allocate a further $390,000 to replace the existing obsolete parking management system. 

 

Council's investigations have found that:

·    Due to the age of the existing equipment, the existing pay stations are not EMV compliant. (EMV stands for Europay, MasterCard and Visa, a global standard for chip cards for authenticating credit and debit card transactions). EMV chip card transactions improve security against fraud compared to magnetic strip card transactions.

·    All card readers in Council's car parks should have been EMV compliant by 1 April 2014 to reduce the risk of credit card fraud. However, in this regard, Council and the Commonwealth Bank have agreed to a Compliance Action Plan, which outlines a program to replace the obsolete equipment and achieve compliance. 

·    lt is not economically viable to upgrade the existing equipment to achieve the required EMV compliance, which means that simply adding a new boom gate to the existing system is no longer an option.

·    While Council has explored the option of upgrading the pay stations only to meet EMV compliance, the age of other elements of the parking management system would mean that Council would incur substantial ongoing maintenance costs without any corresponding benefit of a proper parking management system.

·    The only option available to Council is to replace the existing parking management system with a current modern equivalent.

 

The replacement will:

·        Provide exit gates and pay stations that are EMV compliant with  enabled PayPass and EFTPOS functionality; and

·        Permit users to purchase and top up pass cards online. 

 

Overtime, the new equipment will enable Council to manage the car park remotely.

 

Tenders were invited for a lump sum contract for the supply, installation and commissioning of a parking management system, including:

 

·    Replacement of all entry and exit boom gates;

·    Compliant pay stations;

·    PayPass at exit gates;

·    Nested area for levels 4 to 6  for discount parking;

·    Nested areas for reserved parking;

·    Intercom system for 24/7 customer service (Call Centre);

·    CCTV system on all levels of the car park;

·    Reactive and preventative maintenance; and

·    LED occupancy signage at entrances informing motorists of available parking spaces.

 

 

REVIEW OF VEHICLE CIRCULATION WITHIN THE CAR PARK

 

As part of replacement of the existing car parking management and payment system, Council engaged an independent Car Parking Consultant to review the following aspects of the car park and provide advice on the appropriate locations for the installation of the required additional boom gates within the car park:

 

·    Vehicle circulation within the car park; 

·    Increased use of the existing driveway off George Street for entry and exit;

·    Provision of a third exit lane to Warren Serviceway to improve exit movements from the car park;

·    Options for increasing reserved car parking spaces;

·    Provision of disabled access from the car park;

·    Provision of nested areas on levels 4, 5 and 6;

·    Appropriate locations for installation of CCTV; and

·    Appropriate locations for car parking occupancy display and general signage.

 

The investigations have identified the following:

 

1.   Vehicle circulation within the car park

The car park is designed with an express exit ramping system that reduces traffic movement out of the car park. The existing vehicle circulation provides an efficient circulation.  Altering vehicle circulation within the car park, such as reversing the entry and exit lanes, would require motorists to travel the length of each level in order to exit the car park.  This will not improve traffic movement or the delays at the car park exits.

 

 

 

2.   Increased use of the entry/exit on George Street

The car park has an existing entry and exit driveway to a reserve area on the ground level.   An option of increasing exit movements to George Street has identified that as part of the car park extensions carried out some time ago, three supporting columns were installed in a previous driveway from George Street to the main car park.  This has reduced the driveway width (from George Street) to a single traffic lane.  Provision of a dual lane would require relocation of the support (load bearing) columns, which would be costly.

 

The investigation has recommended an extension of Dewsbury Lane into George Street to reduce the current traffic delays during the afternoon peak period.  Such an extension could also accommodate some traffic from the basement car park at 33 Moore Street.

 

The design for such an extension can be completed by December 2014 and the required works can be included in the 2015/16 works program.

 

3.   Provision of a third exit lane from the car park to Warren Serviceway

 

Currently there are two exit lanes from the car park to Warren Serviceway, one via the car park office lane and the other via a prepaid express lane.  As part of the existing payment system, motorists exiting the car have two options:

·    Pay for parking using the car park pay station and exit via either two lanes;  or

 

·    Pay for parking using the car park office lane.

 

With this arrangement, it is not uncommon for motorists who do not pay for parking using the pay station, to attempt to exit via the lane that will only accept pre-paid parking tickets.  During peak times this arrangement results in motorists blocking the exit lane.  To address this issue, the exit lanes will be widened to provide an additional lane for pre-paid ticket holders.

4.   Options for increasing reserved car parking spaces

The investigation has identified that the current provision for the reserved car parking spaces can be increased by 20 spaces on the ground level to meet demand.  However, these spaces would need to be marked individually and patrolled by Council from time to time.  The reserved spaces will be increased as part of the installation of the new car park management system.

5.   Provision of disabled access from the car park

The investigation has identified that a cost effective disabled access option cannot be provided from the ground level to Warren Serviceway, Dewsbury Serviceway or George Street.  To improve disabled access from the Car park, the investigation has recommended that the existing disabled spaces within the car park, be relocated to level 1 which would allow mobility impaired visitors to take to the lift to the George Street and access other local streets.

In addition, Council will consider disabled access improvements by way of a clearly delineated internal pathway and access ramp onto Dewsbury Serviceway with a pedestrian crossing facility to link to the footpath along Dewsbury Serviceway and Bigge Street. 

Improved footpaths along Warren Serviceway, Dewsbury Serviceway will also be considered as part of possible future works to extend Dewsbury Serviceway to George Street.

 

6.   Provision of nested areas on levels 4, 5 and 6

The investigation has identified appropriate locations at the entry and exit to level 4, where additional boom gates can be installed to provide the required nested areas on levels 4, 5 and 6 for weekly and monthly discounted car parking.

Two additional boom gates will be installed as part of the installation of the new car park management system. This will result in the loss of six parking spaces.

7.   Appropriate locations for installation of CCTV

The investigation has identified appropriate locations where 22 new CCTV cameras can be installed to improve passive surveillance and security in the car park.  These cameras will be installed as part of the installation of the new car park management system.

The new cameras and recording system will be compatible the system currently in operation in the City Centre.

8.   Appropriate locations for car parking occupancy display and general signage

The investigation has recommended that LED car parking occupancy display and general signage be installed at the external walls fronting George Street and the corner of the Dewsbury Serviceway and Warren Serviceway.  These signs will be installed as part of the new car park management system.

The investigation did not consider a car park space availability and guidance system.  Due to the current utilisation, such a system is not required at this stage. Should utilisation increase significantly, consideration can be given to such a system.  

To improve way finding to the car park, additional directional signage, including the use of LED’s will be considered and reported to Council in early 2015.

 

TENDER PROCESS FOR A NEW PARKING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

 

A tender process was carried out in accordance with Council’s Procurement Policy and Procedures.

 

Lump sum tenders were invited publicly through the Sydney Morning Herald on 25 February 2014, the Liverpool Leader and South West Advertiser on 26 February 2014 and Council’s eTendering portal on 19 February 2014.

 

Tenders closed at 3:00pm on 31 March 2014, with the following submissions received (in alphabetical order):

 

Company

CDS Worldwide Pty. Ltd

DESIGNA SABAR Pty Ltd

FAAC Australia Pty Ltd t/as Datapark

RTS Constructions Aust t/as Automated Parking Systems

TMA Tech Pty Limited

Wilson Parking Australia Pty Ltd

 

Preliminary assessment of the submissions was carried out to check for general compliance with requirements of the selection criteria and tender document.  The assessment has identified that five tenders were conforming and were considered for further assessment.

 

Full details of tenders and the evaluation are provided in a confidential report under separate cover.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Improved car park management system.

 

The recommendation has been provided for within the 2013/2014 budget.


Social and Cultural

The new parking system will provide improved customer safety through a modern CCTV system and the Call Centre service will provide 24/7 customer assistance and service.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The recommendation provides opportunity to advocate for the local community.

 

The recommendation is required in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


267

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Infrastructure and Environment Report

 

GMIE 02

Liverpool City Centre Traffic Study - Findings and next steps

 

Strategic Direction

Accessible Connected City

Provide safe and easy travel with a high quality road and traffic management network

Key Policy

Traffic and Transport Plan

File Ref

151206.2014

Report By

Charles Wiafe - Service Manager Traffic and Transport

Approved By

Raj Autar - Group Manager Infrastructure and Environment

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council, at its meeting held on 28 August 2013, resolved to undertake a traffic study within the Liverpool City Centre to develop improvement strategies to address deficiencies in the existing traffic system, as well as accommodate projected traffic arising from future developments in and around the City Centre.

 

Council subsequently engaged Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd to undertake the required traffic study. Following a period of traffic surveys, extensive modelling and analysis, the study is now completed and a copy of the draft Traffic Study Report is attached.

 

The Study has found that a range of traffic related improvements would be required to accommodate the current and future traffic demand and to provide a road network system that efficiently moves traffic in and around the City Centre.

 

This report provides a summary of the study findings and a broad action plan for the implementation of the study recommendations.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.         Notes the study findings and recommendations contained in the attached report;

 

2.         Undertakes detailed consultation with the Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) and Transport for NSW to secure their support for implementation of the study recommendations; 

 

3.       Makes representation to the Minister for Roads and Ports to seek State Government funding to enable the provision of a grade-separated intersection at Hume Highway and Hoxton Park Road intersection;

4.       Undertakes community consultation on the study findings and recommendations; and

 

5.       Be presented with a further report on an implementation plan following the initial consultation with the community and RMS.

 

REPORT

 

Council, at its meeting held on 28 August 2013, resolved to undertake a traffic study within the Liverpool City Centre to develop improvement strategies to address deficiencies in the existing traffic system as well as accommodate projected traffic arising from future developments in and around the City Centre.

 

Significant delays are being experienced at a number of key intersections providing access to the City Centre including intersections at Hume Highway/Hoxton Park Road/Macquarie Street and Hume Highway/Elizabeth Drive. In addition, key intersections and road links within the City Centre have been experiencing significant delays. 

 

Further, additional traffic from future developments projected within the City Centre will exacerbate the existing congestion and delays being experienced at the key intersections and road links within the City Centre.

 

To better define the nature of the traffic related problems being experienced and to inform the development of a suitable and longer term traffic management strategy for the Liverpool City Centre, Council commissioned a comprehensive traffic study of the City Centre. The traffic study aimed to:

 

§ Identify deficiencies in the existing traffic and transport system;

 

§ Assess the traffic impacts of future land use changes and projected developments (including additional car parks) within and around the City Centre; and

 

§ Develop suitable strategies to address the existing deficiencies as well as accommodate projected land use changes and future developments within the City Centre.

 

1.   TRAFFIC STUDY AREA

 

The subject area for this traffic study comprises the parts of the City Centre bound by the Southern Railway Line to the east, Hume Highway to the north and west and Mill Road to the south.   A map showing the study area and the key roads is shown in Figure 1.

 

2.   EXISTING ROAD NETWORK IN THE STUDY AREA

 

The existing road network in and around the City Centre comprises several classified state roads and an internal Ring Road System with connecting local streets as shown in Figure 1.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1

 

 

The key roads in the City Centre are as follows:

 

a)   Classified state roads

 

§ Hume Highway along the northern and western boundaries of the City Centre is a six lane arterial road and forms part of the main north-south arterial roads within the local region.

 

§ Hoxton Park Road is a four lane arterial road providing one of the two main east-west links into the City Centre.  It is one of main east-west arterial roads within the local region.

 

§ Elizabeth Drive is a six lane east-west arterial road west of Hume Highway, which then continues as a local street east of Hume Highway, providing a key link to major destinations including Westfield and the Hospital at the northern end of the City Centre; and

 

§ Newbridge Road /Terminus Street / Macquarie Street link comprises four lanes, which provides the main east-west link from Hume Highway towards the east along the southern end of the City Centre.

 

b)   The City Centre Ring Road network

 

The City Centre Ring Road network was developed over many years as part of a desired strategy to protect the viability of the City Centre and to cater for its expansion and growth. The ring road comprises Bathurst Street, Campbell Street, Bigge Street and a dog-leg section of Pirie and Macquarie Streets.

 

§ Bathurst Street is a north-south distributor road through the western part of the City Centre.  It operates as a two-lane two-way road with on street parking lanes on both sides of the street.  It provides an important link between Macquarie Street and Westfield Shopping Centre.

 

§ Bigge Street is a north-south distributor road through the eastern part of the City Centre.   It operates as a two-lane two-way road with on street parking lanes on both sides of the street. It provides an important link between Hume Highway and Newbridge Road and attracts significant through traffic (bypassing the City Centre).

 

§ Campbell Street is the northern link along the ring road. It predominantly provides access to Hume Highway, Westfield Shopping Centre and the Medical Precinct east of George Street.

 

§ Bigge Street/Pirie Street/Macquarie Street/Bathurst Street link forms the southern section of the ring road network.  It operates as a two-lane two-way road with a dog leg movement from Pirie Street to Bathurst Street.

 

c)   Key elements of the internal local street network

 

§ George and Northumberland Streets are one-way streets and they operate with two lanes with on street parking on both sides of the streets.

 

§ Moore Street is an important four lane east-west local road, which forms part of the Liverpool to Parramatta Transitway and is an important bus route through the City Centre.

 

§ Memorial Road is an east-west local road providing a secondary access to/from Hume Highway in the southern part of the City Centre.

 

3.   STUDY APPROACH

The study was carried out in the following three stages.

 

a)   Stage 1 - Review of existing land use, traffic studies and traffic counts  

A comprehensive traffic survey was carried out in November/December 2013.  In February 2014, the RMS provided traffic signal operational counts from the existing traffic signals in the City Centre providing input into the development of a traffic model for the study area.

 

In addition, Council provided information regarding existing and future land-use changes in the City Centre area. This information has been reviewed and the associated traffic impacts taken into consideration in the development of the traffic model (for the study).

 

b)  Stage 2 - Development of a traffic model and intersection performance analysis

This involved the development of a base traffic model using traffic survey data to replicate existing (2013) morning and afternoon traffic conditions.

 

This was followed by intersection performance analysis of critical intersections to assess the level of traffic delays and congestion at these intersections.

 

c)   Stage 3 - Future year modelling and option testing

The base model was modified to take into consideration traffic expected to be generated by future additional developments by 2026 within and outside the City Centre.  The future development includes a proposed car park in the southern part of City Centre and road network changes by 2026.

 

The 2026 model was then used to:

 

§ Identify transport infrastructure upgrades including testing of improvement options to address or minimise existing traffic congestion and accommodate traffic impacts of additional developments within the City Centre; and

 

§ Develop traffic management improvements and implications, along with recommended timing for implementation.

 

4.   EXISTING TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CITY CENTRE

 

According to a 2011 State Government’s Bureau of Transport Statistics (BTS) Journey to Work information, car use and public transport use accounts for approximately 72% and 11% respectively during morning peak trips in the City Centre.

 

The travel modes indicate that like other parts of Western Sydney, there is a high dependence on the use of cars for the journey to work. Any improvements options will need to include major improvements to the existing road network.

 

This Traffic Study has assessed existing traffic conditions within the City Centre and has identified improvement options to minimise current and forecasted delays and congested road sections.

 

a)   Existing Traffic Volumes

 

Traffic volumes along four critical road sections close to and within the City Centre (in both directions) in the morning and afternoon peak periods are shown in the table below.

 

Location

Approximate Traffic Volume

Hume Highway, south of Hoxton Park Road

5,100 veh/hr

Hume Highway, south of Orange Grove Road

4,900 veh/hr

Bigge Street

1,500 veh/hr

Bathurst Street

1,200 veh/hr

 

Analysis has found that the high traffic volumes and closely spaced intersecting roads along the section of the Hume Highway close to the City Centre are the primary cause of traffic congestions and delays. 

 

The study has identified that 54% of traffic from the six arterial roads around the City Centre during the morning peak period enters the City Centre and the remaining 46% bypasses the City Centre. The distribution of traffic along Hume Highway during the morning peak is shown in the table below.

 

Location

Traffic to the City Centre

Bypass City Centre to the North or South

To other roads

Hume Highway - at Hoxton Park Road northbound

47%

41%

12%

Hume Highway - south of Orange Grove Road

54%

28%

18%

 

5.   RESULTS OF TRAFFIC MODELLING

 

The traffic modelling and intersection performance analysis has confirmed that significant traffic delays in the morning and afternoon peak periods results in long traffic queues along sections of the following roads and associated intersections:

 

Road Sections

§ Hume Highway between Elizabeth Drive and Hoxton Park Road;

§ Bigge Street, between Elizabeth Drive and Railway Street; and

§ Terminus Street/Macquarie Street between Hume Highway and Bathurst Street.

 

Intersections

§ Hume Highway/Hoxton Park Road;

§ Hume Highway/Memorial Avenue;

§ Hume Highway/Moore Street;

§ Hume Highway/Elizabeth Drive;

§ Hume Highway/Campbell Street;

§ Newbridge Road/Terminus Street/Speed Street;

§ Terminus Street/Macquarie Street;

§ Bigge Street/Railway Street;

§ Bigge Street/Moore Street;

§ Bigge Street/Elizabeth Street;

§ Bathurst Street/Memorial Avenue;

§ Bathurst Street/Elizabeth Street; and

§ Bathurst Street/Campbell Street.

 

These congested road sections and intersections during the morning and afternoon peak periods are shown in Figures 2 and 3.

 

 

 

FIGURE 2 (AM)                                                      FIGURE 3 (PM)

 

       

 

The long delays are caused by:

§ Current capacity constraints at Hume Highway/Hoxton Park Road/Macquarie Street intersection;

§ Substantial through traffic volume at Hume Highway/Hoxton Park Road and through Bigge Street/Speed Street/Newbridge Road link;

§ Current restrictions to right-turn movements from Macquarie Street to Hume Highway, which is resulting in through traffic and congestion at the Hume Highway at its intersection with Moore Street and Memorial Avenue;

§ Capacity constraints along sections of Bigge and Bathurst Streets;

§ Capacity constraints at the Terminus Street/Macquarie Street intersection; and

§ Inefficiencies and poor performance of the southern link of the City Centre ring road.

 

6.   FORECAST TRAFFIC CONDITIONS

 

The following additional developments are projected within the City Centre, which will significantly influence traffic generation and flow patterns over the medium to long term (2026).

§ An additional 1,280 dwellings;

§ Additional 18,350 m2 GFA for commercial/retail area; and

§ Approximately 800 car parking spaces in the southern part of the City Centre.

 

 

The forecasted additional development is expected to generate between 1800 and 2000 veh/hr during the morning and afternoon peak periods.  This volume is equivalent to the road capacity of a two-lane two-way road.  To accommodate this additional traffic, significant improvements would be required at the existing congested road sections and intersections.

 

7.   CITY CENTRE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES - IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

 

The study has identified and considered a number of improvements and tested six key improvements to reduce delays at the congested road sections and intersections, as well as to accommodate projected additional developments and these are summarised in the table below.

 

A

Grade separation at the Hoxton Park Road and Hume Highway intersection - this is similar to a previous consideration by the RMS to improve traffic flow at the intersection.

B

Bathurst Street extension to provide a direct link to Terminus Street - this will remove the existing dog-leg section of the Ring Road thereby making the southern ring road more legible and efficient.

C

Introduce two-way traffic arrangements in George and Northumberland Streets.  In this option, consideration could be given to traffic changes at both ends of Dewsbury Serviceway between George Street and Bigge Street. 

D

Provision of a new traffic signal at Pirie Street / Speed Street / Bigge Street intersection. This is to improve pedestrian safety in response to current unacceptable crash history at the intersection.

E

Further review of removal of left-turn ban at the intersection of George and Scott Streets - currently being used as a bus lane.

F

Introduce traffic through the Macquarie Mall between Elizabeth Street and Moore Street. This is not a recommendation at this stage as discussed below.

 

8.   TRAFFIC IMPACTS OF THE SIX TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

 

a)   Grade separation at the Hoxton Park Road and Hume Highway intersection

The RMS assesses the performance of intersections using Level of Service ratings (LoS). A LoS of “A” indicates efficient traffic flow with delays while a LoS of “F” indicates long and unacceptable delays.

The study found that the performance of the above intersection will improve significantly from a current LoS of F to LoS B. The modelling has predicted significant improvements to queue lengths at this location as shown in the before and after modelling results below.

 

 

 

 

 

  

The proposed treatment provides an opportunity for the reinstatement of westbound right turning movements from Macquarie Street to Hume Highway.  This will reduce right turn movement from Memorial Avenue to Hume Highway and consequently LoS will improve from E to C and D to C at the Memorial Avenue/Bathurst Street intersection.

 

b)   Bathurst Street extension to link Terminus Street

The study has identified that major network deficiency exists at the southern end of the City Centre with implications for motorists travelling east-west and north-south through the southern fringes.  The traffic modelling indicates that extending Bathurst Street to Terminus Street and closing Pirie Street between Terminus Street and Macquarie Street would significantly improve traffic movements through the southern fringes.

The extension will improve current congestion and LoS in Macquarie Street. The following figure indicates the predicted queue length for the existing and with proposed Bathurst Street extension.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                 

 

c)   Two-way traffic arrangements in George and Northumberland Streets

In this option, consideration could also be given to traffic changes at both ends of Dewsbury Serviceway between George Street and Bigge Street.

During peak hours, traffic congestion is observed along Bathurst Street and Bigge Street, particularly at the Bathurst Street/Memorial Avenue, Bathurst Street/Elizabeth Street and Bigge Street/Moore Streets intersections.  Traffic congestion in these streets could be reduced by diverting part traffic through adjoining streets which requires restoring two-way movement through George and Northumberland Streets.

The traffic analysis shows substantial improvement to the Commercial Core Precinct should two way conversions in George and Northumberland Streets proceed.

 

d)   New traffic signals at Pirie/Speed/Bigge Street intersection

Currently, the intersection at Speed Street/Bigge Street and Pirie Street is priority controlled. A new traffic signal is proposed to reduce traffic conflicts along Speed Street and Pirie Street and to provide a signalised pedestrian crossing to improve road/pedestrian safety. This project could be implemented as a standalone project.

 

e)   Review of eastbound traffic via George and Scott Streets

The removal of the existing left-turn ban at the intersection of George and Scott Street would affect the existing bus routes and the operation of two traffic signals at George Street/Scott Street and Newbridge Road/Terminus Street/Speed Street intersections.

The modelling indicates that permitting the eastbound left turn movements at the George Street/Scott Street and Newbridge Road/Speed Street intersections could be managed.  However, the associated traffic impacts along the affected section of George Street, Scott Street and Newbridge Road needs to be discussed in detail with the RMS.

Further, the implications of this on the effectiveness and operation of the southern link of the Ring Road needs to be further investigated.

 

f)    Introduce traffic through Macquarie Mall

 

A new access road through Macquarie Mall will divert traffic from alternative parallel routes comprising the adjoining George and Northumberland Streets and will require a significant geometric modification of the existing Macquarie Street/Moore Street and Macquarie Street Mall/Elizabeth Street signalised intersections.

The traffic modelling indicates that a new traffic link would not be expected to attract significant traffic volume. Introducing northbound right turn movements from Moore Street to Macquarie Mall will increase delays at the Macquarie Mall/Moore Street intersection, which may introduce delays for bus movements along Moore Street.  This requires detailed consultation with the RMS and Transport for NSW.

g)   Other improvements

In addition to the above improvements, the study has also identified the need for a range of intersection improvements along the section of Hume Highway between Hoxton Park Road and Bigge Street.

It is considered that the recommended grade separation of the Hume Highway/Hoxton Park Road intersection would provide the opportunity for RMS to consider and modify traffic signal phasings at the intersections along the above section of Hume Highway to optimise performance and improve turning movements out of the City Centre.

The RMS is aware of the delays along this section of the Hume Highway and has advised that the Hume Highway/Bigge Street intersection will be upgraded with left-turn lanes in and out of Bigge Street.

9.   NEXT STEPS AND INDICATIVE TIMING

 

Detailed consultation is now required with the RMS to further develop the identified solutions. The table below shows the required actions with indicative timings to progress the study findings into deliverable actions for implementation.

 

Action

Indicative Timing

1.

Undertake detailed consultation with the RMS and Transport for NSW.

August - October 2014

2.

Undertake Stakeholder consultation.

October  - November 2014

3.

Make representation to the State Government for detailed planning and funding for the construction of the grade separation at Hume Highway and Hoxton Park Road intersection.

October  - December  2014

4.

Undertake preliminary design of short term options and budgeting.

February 2015 - June 2015

5.

Submit a report to Council on a staged implementation plan of adopted projects.

Early 2015

 

The RMS is responsible for design and construction of the recommended grade separation at the Hume Highway/Hoxton Park Road/Terminus Street intersection.  For all other options, Council is required to liaise with the RMS for approval of any new changes to existing traffic signal designs, while Council will be undertaking all construction activities.

 

10.   BUDGET IMPACT

Detailed budget impact of the study findings and recommendations has not been compiled.  The recommended grade separation at the Hume Highway/Hoxton Park Road/Terminus Street intersection is under the responsibility of the RMS and would require funding and implementation by the State Government.

 

The other recommended upgrades are under Council’s responsibility.  Designs with cost estimates and recommended staging of Council‘s adopted projects will be outlined in a further report to Council following RMS review and approval, as well as stakeholder consultation.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Provide efficient parking for the City Centre.

Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues.

Facilitate economic development.

Environmental and Sustainability

Promote an integrated and user friendly public transport service.

Support the delivery of a range of transport options.


Social and Cultural

Improved traffic and pedestrian safety.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Deliver services that are customer focused.

Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Draft - Liverpool City Centre Traffic Study (Under separate cover)

   


279

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Planning and Growth Report

 

GMPG 01

LLEP Draft Amendment No 49 - Removal of Flood Prone Area Mapping from LLEP

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

089159.2014

Report By

Katie Miles - Strategic Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The Liverpool Local Government Area (LGA) is traversed by a large number of rivers and creeks making flood management a key area of responsibility for Liverpool Council. Large areas of the LGA are subject to flooding from both overland flows and mainstream flooding. Further, with larger urban release areas, landform in the LGA is continually changing to convert flood prone areas to viable developable land through landfilling activities.

 

However, updating of records to reflect flood free nature of the new properties created can take up to 12 months. Whilst Council’s Flood Maps can be updated quickly to reflect on the ground changes, the Flood Prone Land Maps in the LEP must go through the 9-12 month LEP amendment process. This results in inconsistencies in the identification of flood prone land and affects development assessment, 149 Certificate information, and insurance premiums, as well as creating angst and uncertainty for land owners and developers.

 

Council’s Planning and Engineering staff have therefore undertaken a joint review to improve the internal processes in the way flood data is updated and communicated to the community. The review of current flood planning controls has been undertaken considering relevant policies, regional strategies, and best practice guidelines, in particular investigating the best mechanism to map or identify flood liable land.

 

A planning proposal has been prepared which proposes to remove the Flood Prone Land Maps from Liverpool LEP 2008 and amend clause 7.8 Flood Planning to rely on Council’s Flood Maps rather than maps contained in the LEP. This is in line with the approach taken by many other metropolitan Councils, particularly those experiencing significant growth and change which would result in flood mapping information having to be regularly updated.

 

This proposed amendment would allow Council’s flood planning data to be more quickly updated in response to flood mitigation works, ensuring that 149 Certificates are up to date and that there are no out dated restrictions on land which would affect new development.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Forwards a planning proposal to NSW Planning and Environment seeking a Gateway Determination to amend Clause 7.8 and remove the LEP Flood Prone Land Area Mapping.

 

2.       Proceeds with public authority consultation and public exhibition in accordance with the determination, subject to Gateway approval.

 

3.       Notes that the outcomes of public authority consultation and public exhibition will be reported to Council in the future.

 

4.       Proceeds with the minor amendment to the DCP which will identify flooding risk provisions applying to land at or below the flood planning area (as opposed to being identified as per the Flood Prone Land Maps within the LLEP 2008). 

 

REPORT

 

Land that is affected by the flood planning area is identified via two mechanisms being:

 

1.    Council’s Flood Plain Risk Management Studies:

 

·    Anzac Creek Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    South Creek Floodplain;

·    Cabramatta Creek Flood Plain Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    Georges River Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    Austral Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    Upper Nepean River Flood Management Study and Plan.  

 

2.   The Flood Prone Land Area Maps of the Liverpool LEP 2008.

 

If land is identified by either of these mechanisms as flood liable than any development proposal must comply with the relevant Flood Planning provisions within both the LLEP & LDCP 2008. Inconsistencies occur as Council’s Flood Studies are able to be amended when cut and fill works are carried out and approved by Council’s Infrastructure and Environment Department, in affect they are able to be updated straight away after works have been completed, however, the LLEP Maps must undergo the amendment process to be updated. This can take up to 12+ months to complete and during this time properties which are no longer flood affected are still subject to flood planning provisions, and the relevant 149 Certificate will still denote the property as flood affected which has impacts on insurance premiums and land values. 

 

 

These local flood policies are updated frequently within Liverpool’s high-growth areas and new urban release areas which comprise much of the LGA. As development alters the land topography, associated with infrastructure and engineering works, Council’s technical support team update Liverpool’s flood mapping database and management policies to reflect these changes. However, in turn the Flood Mapping within the LLEP is unable to be quickly amended and misrepresents the flood planning areas. This is undesirable for land owners, developers, prospective buyers, Liverpool City Council and NSW Planning & Environment.

 

If the Flood Prone Land Area Maps remain within the Liverpool LEP 2008 council will need to progress ongoing planning proposals requesting flood area adjustments into the future. Property owners who have had the flood threat removed will experience significant delays until these proposals are gazetted on the LEP flood map. Their respective 149 planning certificate will continue to state the property is flood affected until gazettal. This means flood related development control and planning provisions are imposed on sites where the flood risk has been removed.

 

This review considers the mechanism of identifying flood prone land within the LLEP mapping is a doubled-up mechanism of flooding provisions which are out-of-date and problematic for all stakeholders and Council.

 

Council’s flood engineers recommend that “the Flood Prone Land Area maps be excluded from the Liverpool LEP 2008, and that flood affectation is mapped through a flood prone land area map”. It is noted that this impacts on land assessment on flood prone land. The attached planning proposal seeks the removal of these maps from the LLEP and amendment of Clause 7.8 Flood Planning to NSW Planning & Environment’s model clause for flood planning. 

 

The proposed removal of the Flood Prone Land Area Maps from the LLEP 2008 is the only way to prevent the incorrect statements of flood risk on 149 planning certificates and will thus avoid future conflicts between land owners, developers, Council and insurance companies that are being currently experienced. The proposed removal of LEP flood mapping would mean that 149(2)&(5) planning certificate flood information will be based on Council’s flood mapping system and not out-dated LLEP flood prone mapping.

 

The exclusion of flood mapping from the LLEP 2008 will reduce red tape in development assessment and ensure appropriate planning occurs in flood prone areas. The planning proposal will aid meeting housing targets of the draft South West Subregional Strategy, encourage the uptake of new subdivision/release areas, as well as reducing the costs and concerns of land owners in regards to flood insurance premiums.

 

Liverpool will experience extensive population growth over the next 20 years with many residents settling in to new suburbs in a city built on the flood plains of the Georges and Nepean river systems. Effective planning policy must be continually under evaluation in high growth localities. Suburbs which are expected to undergo high rates of development, or have experienced continual development over the last decade, are evolving. Thus there is an impetus placed on monitoring the synergetic relationship between an evolving precinct and its planning provisions. This is especially apparent in regards to prevention planning for natural disasters, such as bushfires and flooding.

 

 

 

The bushfire prone land maps are not issued under the LEP Standard Instrument as the consent authority is the NSW Rural Fire Service, but these maps trigger equivalent planning provisions and development controls on affected properties as would an LEP Map relating to building heights, floor space ratios or environmentally sensitive areas for example.

 

As the bushfire prone land maps exist outside of the LEP it is a relevant example of how the Flood Mapping of the Flood Risk Management Policies would operate effectively if removed from the LLEP and too, how natural hazard prevention planning needs to be adaptable to specific circumstances.

 

The Planning Proposal

 

This planning proposal seeks to:

 

1.   Remove the Flood Prone Land Area Maps (FLD001-FLD015) from the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008; and

 

2.   To amend Clause 7.8 of the written instrument to the NSW Planning & Environment’s Flood Planning model clause, as identified below:

7.8 Flood Planning

 

(1) The objectives of this clause are as follows:

          a) to minimise the flood risk to life and property associated with the use of     land,

          b) to allow development on land that is compatible with the land’s flood having        taking into account projected changes as a result of climate change,

          c) to avoid significant adverse impacts on flood behaviour and the environment.

 

(2) This clause applies to land at or below the flood planning area. 

 

(3) Development consent must not be granted to development on land to which this clause applies unless the consent authority is satisfied that the development:

 

          a) is compatible with the flood hazard of the land; and

          b) will not significantly adversely affect flood behaviour resulting in detrimental        increases in the potential flood affectation of other development or properties,       and

          c) incorporates appropriate measures to manage risk to life from flood, and

          d) will not significantly adversely affect the environment or cause avoidable   erosion, siltation, destruction of riparian vegetation or a reduction in the stability      of river banks or watercourses, and

          e) is not likely to result in unsustainable social and economic costs to the      community           as a consequence of flooding.

 

(4) A word or expression used in this clause has the same meaning as it has in the NSW Government’s Floodplain Development Manual published in 2005, unless it is otherwise defined in this clause.

 

(5) In this clause, flood planning area means the level of a 1:100 ARI (average recurrent interval) flood event plus 0.5 metre freeboard.

 

 

 

The amendment of Clause 7.8 is necessary so to refer to the flood planning area of Council’s flood policies, and to remove the overly verbose nature of the existing clause.   This current clause was the model clause recommended by the NSW Government in 2006, however, the model clause has now been updated. This amendment seeks to utilize the updated model clause.

 

The NSW Government’s Standard Technical Requirements for LEP Maps (Version 2.0) does not define flood mapping as mandatory for inclusion within the new LEPs. Flood mapping is a locally specific map which illustrates unique local conditions or affectations. Many local government authorities have opted not to incorporate a flooding map into their LEPs as Figure 1 below identify which outer Sydney Councils have incorporated flood mapping into their LEPs like Liverpool, and which Councils have not. As can be seen most growth Councils have opted to not include flood mapping into their LEPs.

Figure 1: A depiction of Councils which have/have not included flood mapping in their LEPs.

 

Liverpool’s Flood Management Policies

 

The Liverpool area is located on a number of floodplains, which means that significant portions of land are subject to flooding. As flooding can cause significant damage Council has adopted a number of Flooding Risk Management Plans which include:

 

·    Anzac Creek Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    South Creek Floodplain;

·    Cabramatta Creek Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    Georges River Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    Austral Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    Upper Nepean River Flood Management Study and Plan.

 

As development occurs in these areas which alter flood affectation of plans need to be updated. Council’s Infrastructure and Environment Department update the relevant flood maps, thus any proposed development on flood affected land then triggers compliance with the LLEP Clause 7.8 and LDCP flooding development controls, irrespective of the LLEP Flood Mapping. This ensures that all DAs for development on flood prone land will continue to be assessed appropriately.

 

The implementation of the attached planning proposal will provide important community benefits including ensuring individual land owners are not subject to unnecessary flood insurance premiums, it will provide security to developers that flood engineering and mitigation works will be reflected in development assessment, it will provide Council with an accurate real-time flood assessment areas, it will remove confusion between the LLEP 2008 flood maps versus the real-time flood mapping available on Council’s in-house systems as well as within the flood plan and risk management studies on Councils website.

 

It is important to note that only parts of the current LLEP flood prone mapping which are inaccurate area in locations where substantial development occurs, however the majority of Liverpool’s floodplain mapping is correct. As a result of the development ground topography is altered primarily by raising land levels above the 100 year flood planning level, thus flood mapping is altered to remove the flood affectation from completed development sites. There are no changes to the flood planning level nor are there any changes to any adopted flood policies.

 

The Draft DCP Amendment

 

Part 1 of the Liverpool DCP describes general controls relating to all development within the Liverpool and within this document is Section 9 Flooding Risk. The denotation of this Section of when it applies currently states:

 

          Applies to:

                   This section applies to land identified as Flood Prone Land within the Liverpool                 LEP 2008.

 

With the proposed removal of these maps from the LEP, the wording of this clause will need to be amended. It is recommended that the following is incorporated:

 

          Applies to:

                   This section applies to land identified as at or below the flood planning area.

 

Conclusion

 

Due to the lengthy legislative process to facilitate LEP amendments, the LLEP 2008 flood prone land maps are unable to keep up to date with amendments to the flood plain particularly in Council’s rapidly developing release areas. An analysis of flood planning options has been undertaken including research into the new model clause and comparisons to similar growth area council’s which recommends that flood prone land mapping not be included in the LLEP, but are managed as a standalone set of maps which are referenced through the LEP Clause 7.8.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The proposal to amend the LEP to make this change will provide advantages to the community, developers and to Council and NSW Planning and Environment through providing clearer information through flood prone land maps, consistent information in Section 149 certificates and through eradicating the need to prepare ongoing amendments to the LEP to address flood prone land. The suggested approach will ensure that land which is flood prone will continue to trigger assessment of flood impacts thereby protecting existing and future developments. This report and ancillary planning proposal is endorsed by Council’s flood engineers.

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are significant benefit in having up to date flood data shown on the property report including S149 planning certificates with respect to property value and insurance premium.

Environmental and Sustainability

Manage the environmental health of waterways.

Manage air, water, noise and chemical pollution.

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Act as an environmental leader in the community.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Deliver services that are customer focused.

Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

DCP Controls - Flood Planning

2.View

Current LEP Clause 7.8 Flood Planning

3.View

Flood Mapping Planning Proposal (Amendment No. 49) (Under separate cover)

  


303

GMPG 01

LLEP Draft Amendment No 49 - Removal of Flood Prone Area Mapping from LLEP

Attachment 1

DCP Controls - Flood Planning

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


303

GMPG 01

LLEP Draft Amendment No 49 - Removal of Flood Prone Area Mapping from LLEP

Attachment 2

Current LEP Clause 7.8 Flood Planning

 


 


305

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Planning and Growth Report

 

GMPG 02

Draft Liverpool LEP 2008 Amendment 35 Post Exhibition Report

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

117224.2014

Report By

Simon Porter - Executive Planner

Approved By

Tanya O'Brien - Manager Strategic Planning

 

 

Executive Summary

 

At the 28 August 2013 Council Meeting, Council considered a planning proposal for the rezoning of a portion of the Tree Valley Golf Course, 2162 Camden Valley Way, Edmondson Park. It was resolved to send the proposal to the Department of Planning & Environment (then Department of Planning and Infrastructure) for Gateway review.

 

Following receipt of the Gateway Determination additional information from the applicant was sought to meet the gateway conditions before proceeding to State Agency consultation and public exhibition, which was held 19 February to 19 March 2014.

 

A number of submissions were received during this public exhibition period, and the issues raised are summarised and addressed in this report.

 

It is recommended that draft Liverpool LEP 2008 amendment 35 be adopted and, as Council has delegation for the making of this plan, the amended maps be sent to Parliamentary Counsel for approval.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council resolves to proceed with the making of Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan Amendment 35.

 

REPORT

 

Background

 

Council received an application to rezone a portion of Tree Valley Golf Course site at 2162 Camden Valley Way Edmondson Park from R3 Medium Density Residential to B6 Enterprise Corridor. The proposal also seeks to amend the Minimum Dwelling Density maps to maintain the same yield across the site as well as amend to the Height of Building and FSR maps to make these development standards for the site appropriate to the proposed zonings.

 

The subject site is legally described as Lot 101 in DP 117017 and is currently zoned a mix of R3 Medium Density Residential, R1 General Residential, and RE2 Private Recreation. It is identified in the Edmondson Park Indicative Layout Plan (ILP) as a 'Village Centre', specifically one of three 'Gateway Villages' intended to attract passing traffic from the main entries to Edmondson Park.

 

The proposed amendment would facilitate a range of uses and a built form outcome consistent with the Edmondson Park Indicative Layout Plan (ILP) which envisages a 'Gateway Village' on the site. It would allow retail uses suitable for a main road frontage which would complement the nearby planned Edmondson Park Town Centre.

 

Council considered this proposal at the 28 August 2013 Council Meeting where it was endorsed to be sent to the NSW Planning and Environment (then Department of Planning and Infrastructure) for Gateway review.

 

The Gateway determination was made on the 10 October 2013. It requested that the Economic Impact Assessment be updated and expanded to more thoroughly address the potential impact on nearby existing and planned centres. This was completed by the applicant. The Gateway determination also requested that the Planning Proposal be amended to demonstrate consistency with the Edmondson Park Conservation Agreement and the Growth Centres Biodiversity Certification and Strategic Assessment. This was completed by Council officers.

 

State Agency Consultation

 

As per the requirements of the gateway determination State Agency Consultation was undertaken with copies of the planning proposal being forwarded to the following agencies for consideration:

 

·    Roads and Maritime Services (RMS)

·    NSW Trade and Investment

·    Transport for NSW

 

As no response was received within the 21 day timeframe given it is considered that no issues were present with the proposal.

 

A phone conversation was held with a representative from RMS in response to the State Agency Consultation where they sought clarification as to the extent of the rezoning with regard to land owned by the RMS which is currently used as part of the golf course operations. It was clarified that this land is outside the area subject to this planning proposal.

 

Public Exhibition

 

As per the gateway determination, a public exhibition was held for 28 days from 19 February to 19 March 2014. Surrounding landowners were notified and advertisements were placed in the Liverpool Leader. The planning proposal and additional material as required by A Guide to Preparing LEPs (Department of Planning & Infrastructure 2013) was available for viewing on Council’s website as well as at the customer service counter.

 

 

Six submissions were received during the public exhibition. The issues raised are summarised and addressed in the table in Attachment 1. The concerns related primarily to the potential economic impact of the proposal on existing and planned centres, and the potential amenity and streetscape impacts of intensification of development on Ardennes Avenue. Following is a summary and response to these key issues.

 

Economic Impact

 

A number of submissions raised the issue of economic impact on the proposal on the planned Edmondson Park Town Centre and nearby established centres. These impacts were considered and addressed by the applicant’s Economic Impact Assessment. In summary, the subject site is located at the edge of Edmondson Park catchment on a busy road and would serve and attract passing traffic and those within the surrounding walking catchment, rather than competing directly with the broader catchment which the Edmondson Park Town Centre would serve.

 

It is important to note that this proposal is different to a number of other recent rezonings on Camden Valley Way which seek to rezone land from B6 Enterprise Corridor to B2 Local Centre. In the case of these other rezonings, the amount of retail floor space which would be facilitated would be much more significant and is intended to provide for full line supermarkets. These are much more likely to have a significant impact on both Casual Mall and the planned Edmondson Park town centre. Because of the maximum of 1,600m2 of floor space for retail premises in the B6 zone, LEP 2008 Clause 7.23, the extent of retail uses on the site is restricted.

 

If the economic impact on existing and planned centres is to be minimised it would be more appropriate to curtail rezoning proposals for additional B2 Local Centre areas because these seek to create a much larger amount of out of centre retail including full line supermarkets which would have a much greater impact on the trade of exiting centres.

 

The subject proposal is considered appropriate for the location on a busy road near the intersection of the Motorway and at the edge of the Edmondson Park Area, and would only facilitate a relatively small amount of retail floor space. Given this, and that a small village on the site was envisaged in the planning for Edmondson Park, the proposal is supported

 

Impacts on residents

 

Most of the submissions received related to the impact on the character of the Ardennes Avenue streetscape and the potential amenity impact on nearby residents, particularly the impact of increased traffic

 

Ardennes Avenue with the upgraded intersection with Camden Valley Way was always intended to carry significant traffic into and out of the Edmondson Park area. The development to be facilitated by this proposal would mainly serve vehicles travelling already travelling along this route and residents walking from the surrounding streets. This means that traffic to and from site would not be likely to be significantly increased by development facilitated by this rezoning. Specific concerns were also raised regarding opening hours and loading times. These detailed issues would be addressed during the assessment of any development application lodged for the site.

 

There was also concern raised over the change from low density residential (detached houses) to medium density residential (town houses or row housing). Although the built form of the residential proposed on the site would change from what is permitted now, there would be no increase in density. There is also no increase in building height proposed which means that the changes in built form would be minimal. Rather than large houses with individual garages and small gaps between them, the proposed R3 Medium Density Residential zone would facilitate smaller dwellings with consolidate garages or parking internally on the site. This would improve the streetscape, notwithstanding that the small gaps between dwellings would no longer be provided. This type of multi dwelling housing also provides the opportunity for more significant communal open space areas which facilitates more mature tree planting than may be possible in small individual backyards.

 

It should be noted that a number of the submissions raised that the most recent subdivision on Ardennes Avenue was marketed as a golf course estate and was sold on the understanding that the golf course would remain in operation on the site and as such an outlook onto open space would be enjoyed by residents. However, residential development was planned and permissible for the subject site, and this proposal was reviewed with consideration of the current planning controls for the site rather than just the existing operation of the site or the character of the area. This is because, as a release area, it is undergoing significant change.

 

Conclusion

 

The submissions received have been reviewed, and the potential impacts of this rezoning are not considered to be significantly greater than those from the development already permissible on the site. Additionally, it is considered that the updated Economic Impact Assessment provided by the applicant addressed the concerns raised regarding the potential economic impacts on the existing and planned centres.

 

It is recommended that Council resolves to proceed with the making of Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan Amendment 35.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Facilitate economic development.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Response to submissions - Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (Amendment 35)

  


309

GMPG 02

Draft Liverpool LEP 2008 Amendment 35 Post Exhibition Report

Attachment 1

Response to submissions - Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (Amendment 35)

 


 


 


312

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Planning and Growth Report

 

GMPG 03

Draft LLEP 2008 Amendment No 32 (Anomalies) Post Exhibition Report

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

132481.2014

Report By

Taylar Vernon - Strategic Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

At its meeting dated 25 September 2013, Council resolved to prepare and exhibit Draft Amendment No 32 to the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008. The draft plan relates to various minor amendments to the written instrument, associated maps, and the reclassification of publicly owned land from community land to operational land.

 

The draft plan was exhibited in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Local Government Act 1993 and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. Submissions received related to various aspects of the planning proposal and are summarised in the attached submissions table, along with Council response to those issues. No changes to the Planning Proposal are recommended as a result of the public exhibition.

 

It is recommended that Council adopt Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment No 32) and forward a copy of the planning proposal to the Department of Planning and Environment for finalisation and provide respond to submissions received during the public exhibition period.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Adopt Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No 32) and forward a copy of the attached planning proposal and supporting documentation to the Department of Planning and Environment for finalisation.

 

2.       Provide responses to those submissions received during public consultation advising of Council’s decision.

 

 

 

REPORT

 

Background

 

At its meeting dated 25 September 2013, Council resolved to prepare and exhibit Draft Amendment No 32 to the Liverpool local Environmental Plan (LEP) 2008. The draft amendment relates to a number of minor amendments to the both the written instrument and the associated maps. In addition, five publicly owned land parcels are proposed to be reclassified from community land to operational land as part of the draft amendment, in accordance with Section 30 of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

Gateway determination to proceed with exhibition of the planning proposal was initially received on 5 December 2013, stipulating that the planning proposal should proceed to public exhibition subject to conditions including;

 

·    Additional information regarding hydraulic analysis for flood prone land at Tepper Park and the adjoining road reserve be prepared and exhibited with the planning proposal

·    The planning proposal and supporting documentation be publicly exhibited for a minimum of 28 days

·    The following public authorities be consulted for a minimum of 21 days;

 

Transport for NSW

Penrith City Council

Wollondilly Shire Council]

Campbelltown City Council

Office of Environment and Heritage

Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority

NSW Rural Fire Service

 

A revised Gateway determination was received on 23 December 2013 which acknowledged that changes to the permissibility of ‘restricted premises’, which were initially incorporated with this proposed amendment, would instead be considered through a separate planning proposal. It also corrected a former error regarding the location of Tepper Park, Liverpool.

 

Consultation with the abovementioned public authorities was undertaken between 19 March and 9 April 2014 and the planning proposal and supporting documentation were publicly exhibited from 30 April to 4 June 2014. A public hearing was held on 10 June 2014 in accordance with Section 29 of the Local Government Act 1993 No 30 and LEP Practice Note PN 09-003. The outcomes of the consultation process will be addressed later in the relevant section of this report.

 

Explanation of Provisions

 

Draft Amendment No 32 to the LLEP 2008 relates to various minor changes to both the written instrument and the associated maps; and the reclassification of five parcels of publicly owned land from community land to operational land. A brief outline of the proposed changes is provided in the table below;

 

 

 

 

Amendment applies to:

Explanation of provision

Part of Lots 1-2 DP 1162379, 50-60 Glenfield Road and 19-21 Streeton Place, Casula

Rezone from RE1 Public Recreation to R2 Low Density Residential. Amend the corresponding development standard and ESL maps to align with the proposed zone boundaries.

Part of Lot 213 DP 280030, Robey Avenue, and Part of Lots 217-218 and 228-229 DP 280030, McIntyre Circuit, Middleton Grange

Realign zone boundary between R1 General Residential and SP2 (Drainage) zones to reflect the correct location of existing drainage basin.

 

As the drainage basin has been acquired by Council, the item is to be removed from the Land Reservation Acquisition Map.

Part of Lot 1 DP 1188619, Denham Court Road and part of Lots 3-4 DP 1188619 and Lot 44 DP 1186853, Huntingdale Drive, Denham Court.

Realign the R5 Large Lot Residential and RU2 Rural Landscape zone boundary to align with property boundaries. The minimum lot size map will also be amended to align with the proposed zone boundary.

Part of Lot 1 DP 1046088, 20 Nimbin Avenue, Hoxton Park

Rezone from E2 Environmental Conservation to R2 Low Density Residential and amend corresponding development standard maps to align with the proposed zone boundary.

Part of Lot 13 DP 1172599, Lot 13 Elvira Place, and part of Lots 8-10 DP 1172599, Elvira Place, West Hoxton

Realign R2 Low Density Residential and RE1 Public Recreation zone boundary to correspond to property boundaries. Corresponding LEP maps will also be amended.

Lot 100 DP 1160322, Sarah Hollands Drive, Lots 200-201 and 203 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Lot 3124 DP 1160426, Lot 3124 Pioneer Drive, Carnes Hill

Realign SP2 (Local Road) zone boundary to reflect location of planned Kurrajong Road extension between Prestons and Carnes Hill.

Part of Lot 7000 DP 1169480, Elizabeth Hills

Rezone from SP2 (Local Road) to RE1 Public Recreation and rezone the existing road reserve of Airfield Drive, Elizabeth Hills from RE1 to SP2 (Local Road).

 

The road has been dedicated to Council and the Land Reservation Acquisition Map will be updated to reflect this.

Lot 101 DP 630178, 85 Lee & Clarke Road, Kemps Creek

Rezone from RU4 Primary Production Small Lots to SP2 (Depot) and remove the existing minimum lot size control to facilitate expansion to Council’s Western Depot.

Lot 7 DP 238364, McLean Street, Liverpool

 

Rezone from B6 Enterprise Corridor to R3 Medium Density Residential and amend corresponding LEP maps.

Part of Lots 20-22 DP 29317, Jardine Drive, Edmondson Park

Rezone from SP2 (Educational Establishment) to R1 General Residential. Amend corresponding LEP maps consistent with surrounding R1 zoned land.

Lot 101 DP 30136, Grimson Crescent, Liverpool

Rezone from B1 Neighbourhood Centre to R3 Medium Density Residential and amend corresponding LEP maps, consistent with adjoining R3 zoned land.

Part 7 – Local Provisions

Amend Clause 7.13(4) to remove reference to average lot width of battle-axe lots and insert a subclause making the sharing of a single access handle by two adjoining battle-axe lots permissible.

Part 7 – Local Provisions

Amend Clause 7.7 having regard to Acid Sulfate Soils, in accordance with advice from NSW Planning and Infrastructure.

Part 7 – Local Provisions

Create controls on the development of dual occupancies on R5 Large Lot Residential zoned land.

Part 7 – Local Provisions

rural worker’s dwelling means a building or place that is additional to a dwelling house on the same lot and that is used predominantly as a place of residence by persons employed, whether on a long-term or short-term basis, for the purpose of agriculture or a rural industry on that land.

 

Rural workers dwelling will be added as a permissible use in the RU1 and RU4 zones, with controls restricting their size and quantity. There shall be a maximum of one (1) rural workers dwelling permitted per lot, with the dwelling having a maximum gross floor area of 100sqm.

Schedule 4 -

Classification and Reclassification of Public Land

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassification of the following lots from community land to operational land:

 

·    Lots 2-3 DP 1184259 – Genairco Park, Middleton Grange (Schedule 4 Part 1)

·    Lot 241 DP 1191341 – Lot 241 Warialda Way, Hinchinbrook (Schedule 4 Part 1)

·    Lot 1 DP 805582 – 16A Coonong Street, Busby (Schedule 4 Part 2)

·    Lot 10 DP 776165 – Lot 10 Sappho Road, Warwick Farm (Schedule 4 Part 2)

·    Part of Lot 17 DP 31863, Tepper Park, Liverpool (Schedule 4 Part 2)

 

Those properties above which are to be listed under Schedule 4 Part 1 will facilitate the construction of public roads. Those properties which are proposed to be listed under Schedule 4 Part 2 will be disposed of by Council, with the funds raised to be credited to Council’s property development reserve.

Part of Lot 17 DP 31863, Tepper Park, Liverpool

Rezone part of Tepper Park and part of the adjoining road reserve from RE1 Public Recreation to R2 Low Density Residential. Update floor space ratio, minimum lot size and maximum building height maps.

Schedule 5 -

Environmental Heritage

Amend the description of Item 55, being the former Pitt Street Road Bridge at Cabramatta Creek, Miller, to accurately reflect its location within Lot 16 DP 1036695, Hoxton Park Road, Cartwright.

 

A more detailed explanation of each of these amendments is provided in Part 3 of the attached planning proposal.

 

Public Authority Consultation and Public Exhibition

 

In accordance with the Gateway determination, consultation with the following public authorities was undertaken for a period of 21 days between 19 March and 9 April 2014;

 

Ø Transport for NSW

Ø Penrith City Council

Ø Wollondilly Shire Council

Ø Campbelltown City Council

Ø Office of Environment and Heritage

Ø Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority

Ø NSW Rural Fire Service

Those responses which were received during the public authority consultation period raised no comments regarding the proposed amendment.

 

The planning proposal and supporting documentation were publicly exhibited from 30 April to 4 June 2014. A total of five submissions were received during the public exhibition period. The Roads and Maritime Services advised that they had no comment on the proposed amendment. The other four were submissions were received from residents and members of the business community. The following matters were considered to be of concern in these submissions;

 

Ø Proposed controls on ‘Rural Workers Dwellings’

Ø Rezoning of Council owned land at 85 Lee & Clarke Road, Kemps Creek, to facilitate the proposed expansion of Council’s Western depot.

Ø Reclassification of part of Tepper Park and the adjacent McLean Street Road Reserve

Ø Changes to height of building and floor space ratio controls associated with rezoning of part of Lots 20-22 DP 29317, Jardine Drive, Edmondson Park

A summary of the issues raised and Council’s response to these matters is provided in the attached submissions table. A formal response addressing the issues raised in each of the submissions will be provided to those parties, following Council’s decision on the draft amendment.

 

A public hearing was held on 10 June 2014 to discuss the proposed reclassification of publicly owned land from community land to operational land. The hearing was organized in accordance with Section 29 of the Local Government Act 1993 No 30 and LEP Practice Note PN 09-003. There were no attendees to the hearing. StraightTalk were engaged to facilitate the public hearing and have prepared a community feedback report which is provided as an attachment to this report.

 

Conclusions

 

Draft Amendment No 32 to the LLEP2008 relates to various minor amendments to both the written instrument and relevant maps. It also proposes the reclassification of publicly owned land from community land to operational land in five (5) locations. In two of these locations (Hinchinbrook and Middleton Grange), the reclassification has been sought to facilitate the construction of public road. The remaining properties, being Lot 10, DP 776165, Lot 1, DP 805582, and Lot 17, DP 31863, will be disposed of, with the proceeds of their sale to be credited to Council’s property development reserve.

 

The draft amendment has been exhibited in accordance with the Gateway determination and the relevant provisions of both the Local Government Act 1993 No 30 and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The relevant matters which were raised during the consultation process have been addressed in the attached submissions table. No changes to the planning proposal are recommended following the public authority consultation or the public exhibition.

 

It is recommended that Council adopt Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No 32) and forward a copy of the planning proposal and supporting documentation to the Department of Planning and Environment for legal drafting and finalisation.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Proceeds from the sale of publicly owned land will be credited towards Council’s property development reserve.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Act as an environmental leader in the community.

Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Public Exhibition Submissions Table (Under separate cover)

2.View

Public Hearing Report (Under separate cover)

3.View

Draft Planning Proposal LLEP 2008 Amendment No.32  (Under separate cover)

4.View

Liverpool LEP 2008 (Amendment No 32) Revised Gateway Determination (Under separate cover)

  


318

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Planning and Growth Report

 

GMPG 04

Public Exhibition Outcomes - Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Amendment 15)

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

140055.2014

Report By

Graham Matthews - Strategic Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Regular reviews of the Liverpool Development Control Plan (LDCP) 2008 are required to ensure the document controls are relevant and respond to development trends in the area. The proposed amendment seeks to correct errors/omissions in Parts 2.2, 2.3, 2.5, 2.14 and 2.19 and to make more substantive amendments to Parts 3.1 and 7. It is considered that the amendments outlined in the report are necessary to improve the clarity of LDCP 2008 and provide certainty and consistency for Council staff and customers.

 

Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 15) was publicly exhibited from 21 May 2014 to 19 June 2014. No submissions were received.

 

This report recommends progressing with the amendment to LDCP 2008.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council adopts Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Amendment 15) in accordance with section 21 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 to come into effect upon the publication of a public notice in the local newspaper.

 

REPORT

 

Background

The LDCP 2008 is a detailed instrument that provides controls that apply to certain types of development throughout the local government area. Regular reviews of the LDCP 2008 are required to keep the document updated and clear. During an internal review process a number of matters have emerged which require the need for some amendments. The majority of these amendments are minor in nature and do not significantly affect the application of the LDCP 2008. These amendments are outlined below.

 

Proposed Amendments

 

Part 2.2 – Hoxton Park, Carnes Hill and Prestons (subdivision of land)

It is proposed to correct a typographical error by amending Section 1 (Preliminary) such that point 3 will read “Part 1 and Chapter 4 of this Part (2.2) applies to the land shown in Figure 14.” The current wording references Figure 13, which shows the wrong area, creating potential confusion and leading to possible misinterpretation.

 

Parts 2.3, 2.5, 2.9, 2.14

It is proposed to correct an omission by adding the subheading “Privacy” to the “Amenity and Environmental Impact” section of each Part. The addition of the subheading clarifies the requirement to provide privacy to neighbouring dwellings, improving planning outcomes and safeguarding residential amenity. This does not affect the content of the controls but clarifies the structure of the LDCP.

 

Part 3.1 – Dwelling Houses in the R5 zone

The R5 – Large Lot Residential zoning is generally reserved for rural residential precincts. R5 zoned land in Liverpool is generally characterised by a minimum lot size of 10,000sqm, and lots with wide frontages and deep lengths. Development controls outlined in Part 3.1 of LDCP 2008, including minimum front and rear setbacks of 12m, side setbacks of 5m and the requirement that a minimum of 75% of the lot be landscaped, help protect the unique character and amenity of these rural residential developments.

 

However, in addition to rural residential land, 12 smaller lots in Pleasure Point have also been zoned R5 – Large Lot Residential, even though the lots are far smaller (ranging in area from around 600-1600sqm), with street frontages of less than 20m, and lot depths between 30 and 80m.  The subject lots have been zoned R5 to prevent over-development of an area that has limited access to infrastructure and is bushfire prone. Because of the smaller size of the lots, strict application of the development controls regarding setbacks and minimum landscaped area is impractical and would stifle development of the lots. This has led to the granting of routine variations to the development controls applying to these lots, which is undesirable.

 

This amendment proposes to insert an extra statement in Section 1 of Part 3.1 of LDCP 2008, stating, “Requirements for Setbacks and Landscaped Area and Private Open Space must be assessed on their merits in relation to the following lots in Pleasure Point, which are also illustrated in Figure 1 below.” The individual Lot and DP numbers are detailed in the attachment to this report. Figure 1 below shows the specific lots to be effected. The amendment addresses an anomaly in the Part, which will facilitate easier development of the subject lots, without impacting on R5 zoned land elsewhere in the local government area.

 

Figure 1: Lots in Pleasure Point subject to merit assessment of Setbacks, Landscaping and Private Open Space (subject lots highlighted).

 

Part 7 – Development in Industrial Zones

A routine review of Part 7 of LDCP 2008 has highlighted a number of small typographical errors which when corrected will make the DCP easier to navigate. In addition, it is proposed to make an amendment to the treatment of E2 – Environmental Conservation zoned land along Cabramatta Creek in Prestons, and to update the Lot and DP numbers of properties requiring the addition of speed humps along the required access road, that must provide a right of way and easements for drainage infrastructure along Bernera Road.

 

Land in Environmental Conservation zone at Prestons

Land abutting Cabramatta Creek which runs through the Prestons industrial area is zoned E2 – Environmental Conservation by Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008 in order to limit development and to safeguard the environmental integrity of the creek. This amendment proposes to correct an error in Part 7 of the LDCP 2008, where the land was incorrectly described as E3 – Environmental Management zoned land.

 

The amendment also proposes to clarify and simplify development controls for the land, including requiring that all development (that is, not just buildings but any development) be setback 10m from the E2 zoned land, while clarifying that any development in or within 10m of the E2 zoned land that “is likely to adversely impact on bushland on the E2 zoned land, a Vegetation Management Plan (VMP) for the conservation of the bushland shall be submitted. The VMP shall be undertaken in accordance with the pertinent NSW Office of Water Guidelines”. The amendment will clarify the responsibility of landowners of the E2 – Environmental Conservation zoned land and help protect the riparian corridor along Cabramatta Creek in Prestons.

 

Traffic and Site Access adjacent to Kurrajong Road, Prestons

Control 1 of Section 8 of Part 7 states that there is to be no truck access to industrial zoned sites adjacent to Kurrajong Road from Kurrajong Road. All truck access to these properties is to be via rear driveways or roads. Control 5 further states that speed humps are to be provided within the required service road at 100m intervals. The control goes on to describe the specific properties which must locate the speed humps.

 

Subdivision of land since the adoption of Part 7 of LDCP 2008 has changed the Lot and DP designation for two of the lots that require speed humps. This amendment proposes to update the Lot and DP number of these lots, but also to add a map of the subject lots to further clarify the effected lots for the ease of developers and Council staff (see Figure 2 below).

 

Figure 2: Speed humps are to be provided within the service road to be located on the highlighted lots at 100m intervals.

 

 

Right of Way

The DCP limits truck access for certain allotments facing Kurrajong Road and Bernera Road.  There is also one lot to which road access is severed by the M7 motorway. The DCP requires that “certain allotments must retain a right-of-way across the land giving truck access to certain other lots as shown in the corresponding row of the table below. These allotments are listed in column 2 of table 3,” (see table below).

 

 

Subdivision of land since the adoption of Part 7 of LDCP 2008 has changed the Lot and DP designation for one of the lots that are required to provide a right of way. A further lot was incorrectly described. This amendment proposes to update the Lot and DP number of these lots and to provide a map of the lots required to provide and benefit from a right of way (see Figure 3 below).

Figure 3: Land which fronts Kurrajong Rd or without road access and Land which must give right of way to the adjoining land.

 

Lots fronting Bernera Road, Prestons

Control 4 requires that, “Any DA for development of the following allotments must identify and dedicate a 14m wide easement along the Bernera Road frontage to accommodate drainage infrastructure”. The control goes on to list 10 lots which front Bernera Road, which are to provide the required easement.

 

Subdivision of land since the adoption of Part 7 of LDCP 2008 has changed the Lot and DP designation for one of the lots that require the 14m setback. This amendment proposes to update the Lot and DP number of this lot, but also to add a map of the subject lots to further clarify the effected lots for the ease of applicants and Council staff (see Figure 3 below).

 

Figure 4: Allotments which must identify and dedicate a 14m wide easement along the Bernera Road frontage to accommodate drainage infrastructure.

 

These amendments are shown in Attachment 1 – tracked changes

 

Community Consultation

Council publicly exhibited Draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 15) for 29 days from 21 May 2014 to 19 June 2014. Advertisements advising of the public exhibition were published in the Liverpool Leader on the following dates:

 

§ 21 May 2014

§ 28 May 2014

§ 4 June 2014

§ 11 June 2014

§ 18 June 2014

 

The public exhibition material was made available for viewing at Council’s Administration Building. Additionally, the exhibition documents were available for download from Council’s website during the duration of the public exhibition period. Council staff were available to answer questions over the phone or in person.

 

No submissions were received during the public exhibition period.

 

Conclusion

The addition of the maps and the other amendments described above will ensure that the development controls are able to be easily applied through the development phase of the subject areas. Regular reviews and amendments to LDCP 2008 are required to keep the document up to date and concise. As stated previously, the majority of these amendments are of a minor and administrative nature only. The proposed amendments will rectify inconsistencies and help deliver a clearer and more user friendly document. Further the proposed amendments do not change the intent of the plan and are consistent with LLEP 2008. It is recommended that Council adopt Draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 15) as endorsed by Council on 30 April 2014 to be effective from the date of publication of a notice in the local newspaper.

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Facilitate economic development.

 

Environmental and Sustainability

Protect, enhance and maintain areas of endangered ecological communities and high quality bushland as part of an attractive mix of land uses.

 


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Draft Liverpool Development Contributions Plan 2008 (Amendment 15) - Tracked Changes (Under separate cover)

   


325

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 01

Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee
Meeting held on 4 June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

047878.2014

Report By

Norma Burrows - Community Development Worker (ATSI)

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Group Manager Economy & Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

 

1.    The Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.    The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place.

Promote community harmony and address discrimination.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee meeting held on 4 June 2014

  


327

CTTE 01

Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee

Meeting held on 4 June 2014

Attachment 1

Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee meeting held on 4 June 2014

 


 


 


330

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 02

Liverpool Youth Council Meeting Notes June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

140010.2014

Report By

Derek Tweed - Community Development Worker (Youth)

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Group Manager Economy & Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 3 June 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 3 June 2014.

 

2.       Notes that this meeting was the final meeting of the Liverpool Youth Council 2012- 2014 term and that a quorum was not present.       

 

 

REPORT

 

The Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 3 June 2014 are attached for the information of Council. The Meeting Notes identify a number of actions for Council Staff and Youth Councillors to undertake, none of which have financial or policy implications for Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

MEETING NOTES June 2014 Liverpool Youth Council     

  


337

CTTE 02

Liverpool Youth Council Meeting Notes June 2014

Attachment 1

MEETING NOTES June 2014 Liverpool Youth Council

 


 


 


335

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 03

Heritage Advisory Committee Minutes 3 June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Protect and preserve Liverpool’s heritage, including its rural landscape and cultural history

Key Policy

Heritage Strategy

File Ref

149367.2014

Report By

Anna London - Heritage Officer

Approved By

Carole Todd – Group Manager Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Heritage Advisory Committee held on 3 June 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Draft minutes of Heritage Advisory Committee meeting 3 June 2014

  


337

CTTE 03

Heritage Advisory Committee Minutes 3 June 2014

Attachment 1

Draft minutes of Heritage Advisory Committee meeting 3 June 2014

 


 


 


 


 


342

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 04

Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee 12 June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

150511.2014

Report By

Kathryn Sloan - Community Development Worker (Aged and Disability)

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Group Manager Economy & Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 12 April 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 12 April 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee held on 12 June 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support access and services for people with a disability.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Minutes Liverpool access committee 12 June 2014

  


349

CTTE 04

Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee 12 June 2014

Attachment 1

Minutes Liverpool access committee 12 June 2014

 


 


 


347

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 05

No Intermodal Committee Meeting Minutes of 1 July 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

154214.2014

Report By

Megan Munari - Senior Strategic Planner

Approved By

Carole Todd - Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report presents the Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 1 July 2014

 

The report also provides an update on the media campaign developed in accordance with Council’s resolution of 28 May 2014 to allocate $25,000 to further undertake an awareness campaign. 

 

An additional budget allocation of $95,000 is also sought in order to continue the work relating to the intermodal proposals.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 1 July 2014.

 

2.   Notes the advice in this report regarding the media awareness campaign.

 

3.   Allocates $95,000 from the Intermodal Reserve to the Intermodal Fighting Fund to continue work relating to the intermodal proposals.

 

REPORT

 

The Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee meetings held on 1 July 2014 are attached for the information of Council.  During the meeting, officers briefed the Committee members on the media strategy developed to raise awareness about the intermodal proposals. 

 

The media campaign involves awareness weekday advertising on major AM and FM Sydney radio stations during morning and afternoon drive sessions to target both younger and older demographic groups.  The campaign commenced 22 July and runs to 14 August.  Listeners are advised about the potential traffic impacts of the intermodal proposals and encouraged to speak up and have their say on Liverpool Listens.

 

A key early priority has been to raise community awareness about the Planning and Assessment Commission public meeting to consider the SIMTA intermodal proposal to be held on 31 July at 4pm at the Wattle Grove Community Centre.  Maximum community attendance is important to highlight the level of community concern about the proposed intermodals.

 

Budget Allocation

 

At its meeting of 30 April 2012, Council resolved to allocate $70,000 to fund the engagement of a consultant to prepare a peer review of the SIMTA Concept Plan and Environmental Assessment. Council also resolved to allocate funding as a priority from any identified surplus resulting from the March Quarterly Budget Review for the following actions:

 

1.   to engage a consultancy firm to undertake a detailed review of the imminent Federal Government intermodal Concept Plan and Environmental Assessment;

2.   to engage a consultant to chair the No Intermodal Working Party meetings; and

3.   to develop and undertake a comprehensive communications strategy.

 

Subsequently, at a meeting held on 28 May 2012 as part of the March 2012 quarterly review process, Council allocated $200,000 towards the opposing the intermodal.

 

At its meeting on Monday 5 November 2012 Council resolved to allocate $58,000 to the No Intermodal Fighting Fund.

 

Expenditure relating to the intermodal proposals since 2012 has consisted of:

 

·    Peer review of SIMTA EIS by Cardno;

·    Peer review of re-exhibited SIMTA EIS by Cardno;

·    Community awareness and engagement;

·    No Intermodal Rally including advertising and promotion;

·    Creation of the Fair Go for South West Sydney campaign;

·    Online petition to oppose the intermodals; and

·    Cameras for filming of the freight line.

 

Council has been committed in its opposition to the intermodal by committing resources and funding for the items described above. Council has also engaged Cardno to provide a peer review of the Moorebank Intermodal Company Limited environmental impact assessment when it goes on exhibition, expected in September 2014. Council has also committed $25,000 to the current media awareness campaign.

 

The funding for the No Intermodal campaign and peer reviews was allocated in 2012 and is close to being exhausted.  Additional funds are now sought to continue the work opposing the intermodals and ensuring that the Liverpool community gets a fair go. An amount of $95,000 remains uncommitted in the Intermodal Reserve and it is proposed to transfer this  to the fighting fund to enable the work of the Committee to continue.

 

It is recommended that Council allocates a further $95,000 to the No Intermodal Fighting Fund to allow the work relating to the intermodals to continue.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

An additional allocation of $95,000 is sought from Council’s Intermodal Reserve to continue the work opposing the intermodal proposals.

Environmental and Sustainability

 

Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues. The media campaign will raise awareness about the potential impacts of the intermodal proposals.  The additional budget allocation is sought in order to continue work relating to the intermodal proposals.

 


Social and Cultural

 

The media campaign will raise awareness about the potential impacts of the intermodal proposals.   The additional budget allocation of $95,000 is sought to continue work relating to the intermodal proposals.

 


Civic Leadership and Governance

Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Draft No Internodal Committee Meeting Minutes 1 July 2014

2.View

No Intermodal Committee Presentation by Moorebank Intermodal Company Limited

  


355

CTTE 05

No Intermodal Committee Meeting Minutes of 1 July 2014

Attachment 1

Draft No Internodal Committee Meeting Minutes 1 July 2014

 


 


 


353

CTTE 05

No Intermodal Committee Meeting Minutes of 1 July 2014

Attachment 2

No Intermodal Committee Presentation by Moorebank Intermodal Company Limited

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


372

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 06

Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

154785.2014

Report By

Grace Farrugia - Business Support Officer

Approved By

Julie Hately – Executive Director

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee Meeting held on 2 July 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee Meeting held on 2 July 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee meeting held on 2 July 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Budget and Finance Committee Minutes 2 July 2014

  


377

CTTE 06

Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee

Attachment 1

Budget and Finance Committee Minutes 2 July 2014

 


 


376

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 07

Key Sites Master Planning Steering Committee Minutes from meeting held 1 July 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Activate the city centre and develop vibrant places that attract people to Liverpool

Key Policy

City Centre Strategy

File Ref

154820.2014

Report By

Tersia Wilson - Business Support Officer

Approved By

Nadia Napolitano – Group Manager Governance

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Key Site Master Planning Steering Committee Meeting held on 1 July 2014.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the Minutes of the Key Site Master Planning Steering Committee Meeting held on 1 July 2014;

 

2.       Adopts the recommendation put forward in the confidential report provided under separate cover; and

 

3.       Keeps confidential the minutes supplied under separate cover containing information pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains information that would if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Key Site Master Planning Steering Committee held on 1 July 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that are required to be undertaken by Council staff.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities.

Provide efficient parking for the City Centre.

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues.

Facilitate economic development.

Facilitate the development of new tourism based on local attractions, culture and creative industries.

Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities (in the City Centre).

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Master Planning Steering Committee Minutes from meeting held 1 July 2014 - Open Minutes

  


383

CTTE 07

Key Sites Master Planning Steering Committee Minutes from meeting held 1 July 2014

Attachment 1

Master Planning Steering Committee Minutes from meeting held 1 July 2014 - Open Minutes

 


 


 


 


382

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 08

Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney

Key Policy

Economic Development Strategy

File Ref

155097.2014

Report By

Julie Scott - Manager Economic Development

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Group Manager Economy & Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Building Our New City Committee Meeting held on 2 July 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the Building our New City Committee Meeting held on 2 July 2014.

 

2.   Approves the following amendments to the Building Our New City Committee Charter as follows:

 

·        Amend the wording of 8.1.1 from ‘The Mayor’ to ‘The Mayor or delegate’.

 

·        Amend the wording of 8.1.2 from ‘The Deputy Mayor and one Councillor, as elected by Council’ to “The Deputy Mayor or delegate, and one Councillor or delegate, as elected by Council”.

 

3.   Approves the removal of section 5. (vi) from the Economic Development Committee charter, which reads “Manage all Town Improvement Fund (TIF), all boundaries, expenditure recommendations and strategies and other elements as per and instead of the TIF Management steering group.”

 

4.   Approves the addition of the following function to section 5 as item 5.3 to the Building Our New City Committee Charter: “Manage all Town Improvement Fund (TIF), all boundaries, expenditure recommendations and strategies and other elements as per and instead of the TIF Management steering group.”

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Building Our New City Committee meeting held on 2 July 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions for Council staff, none of which has financial implications for Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

                                                     

Economic and Financial

The activities of the Committee support Council’s efforts to further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities.

Environmental and Sustainability

Environmental and sustainability considerations will be factored into urban design for key City Centre precincts.


Social and Cultural

Revitalisation of the City Centre will embrace a range of arts and space activation opportunities.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The Committee provides guidance for Council’s Building Our New City Projects.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

MINUTES Building Our New City Committee 2 July 2014 FINAL

2.View

DRAFT Building Our New City Committee Charter - revision 17 July 2014

3.View

Building Our New City Committee Charter - revised 26 March 2014 FINAL

  


389

CTTE 08

Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 1

MINUTES Building Our New City Committee 2 July 2014 FINAL

 


 


 


 


399

CTTE 08

Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 2

DRAFT Building Our New City Committee Charter - revision 17 July 2014

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


409

CTTE 08

Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 3

Building Our New City Committee Charter - revised 26 March 2014 FINAL

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


407

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 09

Minutes of Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Deliver a range of stimulating and vibrant cultural events, programs and festivals

Key Policy

Events Strategy

File Ref

155308.2014

Report By

Julie Scott - Manager Economic Development

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Group Manager Economy & Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Tourism and Events Committee Meeting held on 2 July 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the Tourism and Events Committee Meeting held on 2 July 2014.

 

2.   Approves the new Charter for the merged Economic Development and Events Committee with the amendment that the clause relating to the Town Improvement Fund be removed and be added to the Building Our New City Charter.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Tourism and Events Committee held on 2 July 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions for Council staff to undertake, none of which has financial implications for Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The activities of the Committee support Council’s efforts to facilitate the development of new tourism based on local attractions, culture and creative industries as well as economic development.

Environmental and Sustainability

Environmental and sustainability considerations are factored into the planning approval process for relevant events.


Social and Cultural

The work of the Committee supports events and activities which promote Council’s diversity.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The Committee provides guidance for Council’s tourism and events efforts.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

MINUTES Tourism and Events Committee meeting 2 July 2014

2.View

CHARTER Economic Development and Events Committee DRAFT

3.View

CHARTER Tourism and Events Committee - updated 30 October 2013

  


409

CTTE 09

Minutes of Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 1

MINUTES Tourism and Events Committee meeting 2 July 2014

 


 


 


 


 


 


415

CTTE 09

Minutes of Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 2

CHARTER Economic Development and Events Committee DRAFT

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


425

CTTE 09

Minutes of Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 3

CHARTER Tourism and Events Committee - updated 30 October 2013

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


433

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 10

Minutes of Economic Development Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney

Key Policy

Economic Development Strategy

File Ref

155312.2014

Report By

Julie Scott - Manager Economic Development

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Group Manager Economy & Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Economic Development Committee meeting held on 2 July 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the Economic Development Committee Meeting held on 2 July 2014.

 

2.   Approves the new Charter for the combined Economic Development and Events Committee with the amendment that the clause relating to the Town Improvement Fund be removed and be added to the Building Our New City Committee Charter.

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Economic Development Committee meeting held on 2 July 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have financial implications for Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The activities of the Committee support Council’s efforts to facilitate economic development.

Environmental and Sustainability

Environmental and sustainability considerations will be factored into economic development activities.


Social and Cultural

Economic development will boost demand for cultural and arts activities.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The Committee provides guidance for Council’s economic development projects and initiatives.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

MINUTES Economic Development Committee meeting 2 July 2014 FINAL

2.View

CHARTER Economic Development and Events Committee DRAFT

3.View

Economic Development Committee Charter - amended 1 November FINAL

  


435

CTTE 10

Minutes of Economic Development Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 1

MINUTES Economic Development Committee meeting 2 July 2014 FINAL

 


 


 


 


 


 


441

CTTE 10

Minutes of Economic Development Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 2

CHARTER Economic Development and Events Committee DRAFT

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


451

CTTE 10

Minutes of Economic Development Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 3

Economic Development Committee Charter - amended 1 November FINAL

 


 


 


 


 


 


 

 


458

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Correspondence Reports

 

CORR 01

Incoming and Outgoing Correspondence Report

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

NA

File Ref

076535.2014

Report By

George Georgakis - Service Manager Council and Executive Services

Approved By

George Georgakis - Service Manager Council and Executive Services

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The purpose of this report is to table all incoming and outgoing correspondence generated as a result of a council resolution, and petitions received by Council.

 

At the Extraordinary meeting of Council on 28 April, 2010 Council resolved to:

 

Establish a new standing agenda item in all council meeting agendas called “Correspondence”. All incoming and outgoing correspondence, in whatever form, including emails, fax messages, letters, submission, resulting from a council resolution must be tabled in chambers and be put on the agenda at the next scheduled Council meeting.

 

At the Extraordinary meeting of 25 February, 2014 Council resolved that:

 

“Petitions received by Council be attached to the Correspondence item on the Council Business Papers and provided under separate cover.”

 

Accordingly correspondence and the list of petitions received between 13 June 2014 and 17 July 2014 are included in this report.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the report.

 

 

 

REPORT

 

incoming correspondence

No

Date

From

To

Details

NIL

 


OUtgoing correspondence

No

Date

From

To

Details

NIL

 


Petitions

No

Issue

Number of Signatories

1

I oppose the Federal Government’s compulsory acquisition of land parcels on the Georges River corridor for the Moorebank Terminal. I call on the Federal Government to ensure a fair go for South West Sydney.

11

2

Opposition to development at 153 Hoxton Park Road, Cartwright – DA-257/2014

100

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social or cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Provides information to Councillors to assist in decision making processes.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil  


460

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Questions with Notice

 

QWN 01

Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

156738.2014

 

 

QUESTION WITH NOTICE

 

Please address the following:

 

1.   Have staff had an opportunity to look at the ramifications of changes and funding cuts in the Federal Budget?

 

Yes, please see details below in point 2.

 

2.   Can I be advised what the budget will mean for:

 

a)   The Pensioner rate subsidies?

 

At this stage, details regarding percentage decrease in pensioner rate subsidies are not known. Assuming a reduction of 15% (effectively putting subsidy at 40%), the financial impact on Council is estimated at $282k.

 

b)   Road upgrades and works for the next budget.

 

The decision by the Australian government to continue the Roads to Recovery Program means that Council can continue to deliver its road pavement renewal, replacement and resurfacing program, which has over the years seen a significant improvement to council’s road network.

 

However, the flatlining of the Federal Assistance Grants announced in the Federal Budget means that annual funding is being significantly eroded in real terms and is discussed in detail below.

 

c)   Any other known changes that may affect ratepayers or Liverpool plans or projects.

 

The 2014/15 budget assumed a 3% indexation to actual $9m Financial Assistance Grants received in 2013/14. The Grants Commission NSW has not released any information re 2014/15 FAG to-date, however, indications are that there will be negative adjustments. In a worst case scenario, the general purpose component of FAG may reduce by 5%, whilst the local roads component may increase by 1.5% - resulting in net $353,986 decrease in grant to Council, calculated as follows:

 

 

Likely

Impact

Financial

Impact

General purpose

$7,673,126

-5%

($383,656)

Local roads component

$1,978,004

+1.5%

    $29,670

Totals

$9,651,130

 

($353,986)

          

On this basis, the 2014/15 budget impact will be $643,520.

 

Both Federal and State Governments are facing budget pressures and are reviewing all their programs. Program cuts may have flow-on effect on grant funding to the Council. At this stage, no information is available.

 


462

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Questions with Notice

 

QWN 02

Question with Notice - Clr Harle

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

164654.2014

 

 

QUESTION WITH NOTICE

 

As part of DA-1454/2013 Hume Hwy Hotel Casula, the proponents have indicated their intention if the DA is approved by this Council, to remove the Commercial hotel’s liquor license and poker machine allocation to their new development in Casula.

 

1.   Would the Council’s CEO urgently obtain from the owners of the Commercial hotel their intentions of its future use in regard to preserving the building of heritage importance that has been identified by Council in the following report;

 

http://www.liverpool.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/3155/The-Heritage-Strategy-for-the-City-of-Liverpool-2011-2014.pdf (see p12)

 

2.   Would the CEO advise Councillors of the steps required to urgently seek the listing of Commercial hotel as being of State heritage significance given it is apparently  one of the last virtually intact examples of a 19th century hotels in the larger area. See http://www.weekendnotes.com/the-lost-pubs-of-liverpool-new-south-wales/ .

 

3.   Would the CEO also ask the owners (and possibly future owners - if known) of the Commercial hotel, what effective fire protection measures they have in place to ensure the substantial heritage significance of this building to the people of NSW and Western Sydney LGA can be retained and assured.

 

4.   Since the Carbon Tax has been abolished/repealed, can Council detail the effects on Councils’ 2014-15 budget and the overall savings.

 

 

A response to these questions will be provided in the August Business Papers.

 

 

 


463

Ordinary Meeting 30 July 2014

Questions with Notice

 

QWN 03

Question with Notice - Clr Shelton

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

164748.2014

 

 

QUESTION WITH NOTICE

 

With respect to 'Liverpool Listens' please provide the following:

 

1.   Current number of enrolments and if available:

 

a)   breakdown between North and South Wards;

b)   breakdown between females and males;

c)   breakdown according to age bracket.

 

2.   Breakdown according to areas of interest as nominated by respondents.

 

 

A response to these questions will be provided in the August Business Papers.