Liverpool City Council

Business Paper

 

 

 

 

Council Agenda

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ordinary Council Meeting

27 August 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Francis Greenway Centre

170 George Street

Liverpool


Description: LCC_bw_logo 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


You are hereby notified that an Ordinary Council Meeting of Liverpool City Council will be held at the Francis Greenway Centre, 170 George Street, Liverpool on Wednesday, 27 August 2014 commencing at 6.00pm. Doors to the Francis Greenway Centre will open at 5.45pm.

 

Liverpool City Council Meetings are taped for the purposes of minute taking and record keeping.  If you have any enquiries please contact Council and Executive Services on 9821 9237.

 

Text Box:
 

 

 


Carl Wulff

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

 


 

 

 


Order of Business

 

                                                                                                              PAGE     TAB

Opening

Prayer

Apologies 

Condolences

Confirmation of Minutes

Ordinary Council Meeting held on 30 July 2014...................................................................... 5

Declarations of Interest

Public Forum

Mayoral Report

NIL

Notices of Motion Of Rescission

NIL

Notices of Motion

NIL

Motions of Urgency

NIL

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

IHAP 01          DA-589/2013 Construction of a six storey residential flat building comprising 17 residential units, and two levels of basement car park; demolition of existing structures and tree removal at 83 Campbell Street, Liverpool...................................................... 68......... 1

IHAP 02          DA-851/2013 - Construction of a boarding house at 16 Collinsville Place, Miller       74 2

IHAP 03          DA-65/2014 Construction of eight attached 2-storey dwellings; and re-subdivision of land to create eight Torrens title lots at Hugh Terrace and Windsock Avenue, Middleton Grange............................................................................................................ 81......... 3

Development Application Determination Report

DAD 01           DA-1198/2013 - Partial demolition and alterations and additions to the existing dwelling; use of the dwelling as a child care centre; and installation of signage at 4 Bungarra Crescent Chipping Norton.............................................................................. 88......... 4

Chief Executive Officer Report

NIL

Chief Financial Officer

CFO 01           Planning Proposal Fees and Public Exhibition of Fees and Charges Amendments   96 5

CFO 02           Performance Report June ........................................................................... 101......... 6

CFO 03           Budget Review - June 2014......................................................................... 103......... 7

CFO 04           Investment Report July 2014........................................................................ 130......... 8

CFO 05           Classification of Lot 1 DP 1196393, Lot 1 Bigge Street, Liverpool as 'Operational' land 141                                                                                                                           9

CFO 06           Tender WT2307 - Construction of eight townhouses at 39 Heckenberg Avenue, Sadlier                                                                                                                       144....... 10

CFO 07           Proposed Acquisition of Part Lot 201 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill for Open Space and Drainage..................................................................................... 148....... 11

CFO 08           General Power of Attorney........................................................................... 153....... 12

CFO 09           Councillor Briefing Session Terms of Reference......................................... 158....... 13

City Presentation Report

DCP 01           Regional Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy................... 172....... 14

Community and Culture  Report

DCC 01          Request for fee waiver - Liverpool Action Group ........................................ 175....... 15

DCC 02          Donations, Grants and Sponsorship............................................................. 178....... 16

Economy and Engagement Report

NIL

Infrastructure and Environment Report

NIL

Planning and Growth Report

DPG 01          Proposed Am 38 Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 Phase 3 Land Reclassifications and Rezonings.................................................................. 192....... 17

DPG 02          Liverpool LEP Amendment No. 50- 900 Cowpasture Rd, Cecil Hills (Sydney Water Site)                                                                                                                       245....... 18

DPG 03          LLEP Draft Amendment No 49 - Removal of Flood Prone Area Mapping from LLEP 261                                                                                                                         19

DPG 04          Draft LLEP 2008 Amendment No 32 (Housekeeping) Post Exhibition Report 287    20

DPG 05          Public Exhibition Outcomes - Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Amendment 15) .......................................................................................... 293....... 21

Committee Reports

CTTE 01         Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee
Meeting held on 4 June 2014 ....................................................................... 301....... 22

CTTE 02         Liverpool Youth Council Meeting Notes June 2014..................................... 306....... 23

CTTE 03         Heritage Advisory Committee Minutes 3 June 2014.................................... 311....... 24

CTTE 04         Minutes of Economic Development Committee and Events Committee meeting held 6 August 2014.................................................................................................. 318....... 25

CTTE 05         Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee 12 June 2014......................... 326....... 26

CTTE 06         No Intermodal Committee Meeting Minutes of 1 July 2014......................... 331....... 27

CTTE 07         Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee 2 July 2014....................... 356....... 28

CTTE 08         Key Sites Master Planning Steering Committee Minutes from meeting held 1 July 2014                                                                                                                       360....... 29

CTTE 09         Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 2 July 2014.... 366....... 30

CTTE 10         Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee 10 July 2014.......................... 391....... 31

CTTE 11         Minutes of Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 2 July 2014....... 396....... 32

CTTE 12         Minutes of Economic Development Committee meeting held 2 July 2014. 422....... 33

CTTE 13         Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre Board Minutes from Meeting 17 July 2014 447      34

CTTE 14         Local Traffic Committee Minutes of Meeting held on 16 July 2014............ 452....... 35

CTTE 15         Street Naming Committee Meeting 5 August 2014...................................... 458....... 36

CTTE 16         Liverpool Sports Committee Minutes of Meeting 29 May 2014 .................. 463....... 37

CTTE 17         Minutes of Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce meeting held 6 August 2014 471        38

CTTE 18         No Intermodal Committee Meeting Minutes 5 August 2014........................ 477....... 39

CTTE 19         Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee 6 August 2014................... 499....... 40

Correspondence Reports

CORR 01       Incoming and Outgoing Correspondence Report......................................... 503....... 41

CORR 02       Incoming and Outgoing Correspondence Report......................................... 508....... 42

Questions with Notice

QWN 01         Question with Notice - Clr Harle................................................................... 510....... 43

QWN 02         Question with Notice - Clr Shelton................................................................ 513....... 44

QWN 03         Question with Notice - Clr Stanley................................................................ 515....... 45

QWN 04         Question with Notice - Clr Hadchiti............................................................... 517....... 46

QWN 05         Question with Notice - Clr Shelton................................................................ 518....... 47  

Questions Taken on Notice

Presentations by Councillors

Close

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

MINUTES OF THE Ordinary Meeting

HELD ON 30 July 2014

 

 

PRESENT:

Mayor Ned Mannoun

Councillor Balloot

Councillor Hadchiti

Councillor Hadid

Councillor Harle

Councillor Karnib

Councillor Ristevski (arrived at 6.19pm)

Councillor Shelton

Councillor Stanley

Councillor Waller

Mr Carl Wulff Chief Executive Officer

Ms Toni Averay, Acting Executive Director

Mr Mathew Walker, Group Manager Business Excellence

Ms Kiersten Fishburn, Group Manager Community and Culture

Mr Gino Belsito, Group Manager City Presentation

Ms Nadia Napoletano, Group Manager Governance

Mr Michael Cullen, Group Manager Economy and Engagement

Mr Raj Autar, Group Manager Infrastructure and Environment

Ms Carole Todd, Acting Group Manager Planning and Growth

 

The meeting commenced at 6.01pm

 

 

OPENING                              6.01pm

PRAYER                               The prayer of the Council was read by Reverend Anne Hibbard from Liverpool Uniting Church.

APOLOGIES                         Nil


 

CONDOLENCES               

 

Mr Tom Murphy – Clr Waller

 

Clr Waller read the condolences at the Council meeting for the passing of Mr Tom Murphy.

 

Tom Murphy was a very determined resident who volunteered a huge amount of his time on various committees, spending endless hours and giving up his personal time for the benefit of the community.  He always fully supported the committees he was involved in, attending their meetings, going from one committee to another, always being direct and speaking his mind, yet gaining the respect and support from residents, committee members, Council and State Government staff and achieving so much for so many.

 

An indication of the committees that Tom was involved in are listed below:

 

 

Tom also attended Council’s Community Focus Group for over 15 years as well as Liverpool Transport Task Force, Local Traffic Committee for over 12 years and Council’s Neighbourhood and Community Forums for a number of years, raising local issues with Council for actioning and then reporting these outcomes back to the residents and local committees who relayed their concerns to him and always relied upon him.  He was well known within the community and always a very viable and very active member of all committees he was involved in and determined to achieve a lot for the community to the best of his ability, putting the needs of the community first. 

 

Council would like to acknowledge his contribution to the community and to Liverpool.

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Waller                Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That Council express its deepest condolences for the recent passing of Tom Murphy and a letter of condolence be sent to his family.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr Tom Murphy – Clr Stanley

 

Clr Stanley made the following comments about Mr Tom Murphy:

 

On Friday 18th July I along with my colleagues, Councillors Waller, Karnib, and Harle and the Member for Liverpool Hon Paul Lynch attended the funeral for Mr Tom Murphy. Mr Murphy was truly a member of his community serving on many Council and Community committees which have been detailed previously. Tom was passionate about what he believed in and was truly passionate about what he saw to be unfair or wrong.

 

Tom was born in Scotland on 24th June 1924 and died aged 89 on 13th July 2014. Tom left school at 14 and served an apprenticeship as a boiler maker until he joined the navy during World War Two. Tom was a Morse code operator and was able to translate Morse code in three languages, Japanese, German and English. During his service in the British Navy he made several trip to Australia and decided that if he got married and had children it was here that he would raise his family. He met his wife, Eileen in 1954 and made good his promise to move to Australia in 1961; moving to Busby in 1964 where he has lived ever since.

 

He joined the Labor party when he was 16 and it is through this organisation that I first met Tom almost 20 years ago. He has been active member of the party and of Council committee bringing issues that are raised with him by residents so that improvements could be made for the community in which he lived. He also served on the Liverpool Traffic committee until recently when ill health made this too difficult to continue. Tom is well known for his vigorous debates and forceful opinions on many topics.

 

I offer my sincere condolences to his wife Eileen, and Tom’s children, grandchildren and great grandchildren at this time.

 

 

 

 

Marc Arcuri

 

Mayor Mannoun read the condolences at the Council meeting for the passing of Marc Arcuri.

 

Marc Arcuri passed away on 19 July 2014 after suffering a suspected heart attack whilst playing for Austral soccer club at WV Scott Memorial Park in Austral.

 

Marc was a gentle, kind loving and caring young man who always saw the good in others. The happiness and kindness he brought will always be cherished.

 

Marc’s love for football was one of his favourite pass times and he will be sadly missed. His loss has not only affected his family but the lives of many people, his team, mates, friends and the entire community.

 

Gone too soon, Marc will always be remembered. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family.

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That Council express its deepest condolences to the Arcuri family after the tragic passing of their son.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Confirmation of Minutes

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Clr Harle

 

That the minutes of the Extraordinary Meeting held on 20 June 2014 be confirmed as a true record of that meeting.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Declarations of Interest

 

Clr Hadchiti declared a non-pecuniary, less than significant interest in the following Item:

 

Item NOM 05:     Quota 50th Birthday July 2014 Presentation by Councillors

Reason:              One of the new board members is related to him by marriage.

 

Clr Hadchiti will not leave the Chambers for the duration of this Item.

 

 

Clr Hadchiti declared a non-pecuniary, less than significant interest in the following Item:

 

Item DAD 03:               Modification to DA-492/2008 - Education Establishment at 83-87 Gurner Avenue, Austral

Reason:              One of the applicants has attended a Liberal Party fundraising event.

 

As Clr Hadchiti was not a personal beneficiary of any donation, he will not leave the Chambers for the duration of this Item.

 

 

Clr Balloot declared a non-pecuniary, less than significant interest in the following Item:

 

Item DAD 02:               Modification to Development Consent No. DA-611/2009 at  No.1 Mill Road Liverpool (Lot 1 100 DP1180561)

Reason:                        The applicant is a member of the Australian Arab Business Network of which the Councillor is a member. The applicant has attended a Liberal Party fundraising event.

 

As Clr Balloot was not a personal beneficiary of any donation, he will not leave the Chambers for the duration of this Item.

 

 

Clr Balloot declared a non-pecuniary, less than significant interest in the following Item:

 

Item DAD 03:               Modification to DA-492/2008 - Education Establishment at 83-87 Gurner Avenue, Austral

Reason:              One of the applicants has attended a Liberal Party fundraising event.

 

As Clr Balloot was not a personal beneficiary of any donation, he will not leave the Chambers for the duration of this Item.

 

 

Clr Harle declared a non-pecuniary, less than significant interest in the following Item:

 

Item GMEE 02:            Community and Business Representation - Liverpool Council's Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce

Reason:                        Pauline Rowe is the secretary of his registered political party.

 

Clr Harle will not leave the Chambers for the duration of this Item.

 

 

Clr Hadid declared a non-pecuniary, less than significant interest in the following Item:

 

Item DAD 03:               Modification to DA-492/2008 - Education Establishment at 83-87 Gurner Avenue, Austral

Reason:              One of the applicants has attended a Liberal Party fundraising event.

 

As Clr Hadid was not a personal beneficiary of any donation, he will not leave the Chambers for the duration of this Item.

 

 

Mayor Mannoun declared a non-pecuniary, less than significant interest in the following Item:

 

Item DAD 03:               Modification to DA-492/2008 - Education Establishment at 83-87 Gurner Avenue, Austral

Reason:              One of the applicants has attended a Liberal Party fundraising event.

 

As Mayor Mannoun was not a personal beneficiary of any donation, he will not leave the Chambers for the duration of this Item.


 

Public Forum

(Presentation – items not on agenda)

                                                                                   

  1. Roueida Maskaleh and Delise Kerehona from The Street University – Ted Noffs Foundation addressed Council in relation to a sponsorship request to support the Pioneers Mega Crew.

 

Clr Ristevski arrived at the meeting at 6.19pm.

 

(Representation – items on agenda)

Three speakers (as listed below) addressed the Council in relation to the following item:

 

NOM 03 – Liquor related Development Applications

 

  1. Dr John Crozier

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti                      Seconded: Mayor Mannoun

 

That a two minute extension of time be given to Dr John Crozier.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

  1. Ms Allison Keogh

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti                      Seconded: Mayor Mannoun

 

That a two minute extension of time be given to Ms Allison Keogh.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

  1. Mr Tony Brown (on behalf of the Casula Community Group for Responsible Planning Inc)

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti                      Seconded: Mayor Mannoun

 

That a two minute extension of time be given to Mr Tony Brown.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

Three speakers (as listed below) addressed Council in relation to the following item:

IHAP 01 – DA790/2013 – Stage 2 development of a court approved masterplan in DA-394/2011 for a non-denominational cemetery at 41 Greendale Road, Bringelly (Lot 5 DP 252040).

  1. Ms Dianne Newell

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That a two minute extension of time be given to Ms Dianne Newell.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

  1. Ms Cheryl Keane

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That a two minute extension of time be given to Ms Cheryl Keane.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

  1. Mr Phil Coxall (on behalf of the applicant)

 

 

Two speakers (as listed below) addressed Council in relation to the following item:

GMPG 03 - Draft LLEP 2008 Amendment No 32 (Anomalies) Post Exhibition Report

 

  1. Ms Kathryn Ussia

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That a two minute extension of time be given to Ms Kathryn Ussia.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

  1. Ms Briona Jocic

 


 

Clr Balloot left the Chambers at 6.55pm

 

 

Mayoral Minute

Subject: Malaysian Airlines flight MH17

 

On 17 July, a routine international flight Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 was shot down over Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine, with the loss of all 298 passengers and crew on board including 36 passengers who called Australia home. 193 Dutch, 43 Malaysian, 12 Indonesian and 10 British nationals were also lost in the tragedy along with passengers from Belgium, Germany, Canada, New Zealand and the Philippines. Eighty of the passengers were children.

 

Our thoughts and prayers are with the families and friends of those lost on flight MH17. Our thoughts and prayers are also with the investigators and the officers sent to protect and negotiate the return of victims’ bodies.

 

It is apparent that the Australian government is doing the utmost to ensure that human dignity is preserved and that the investigation is carried out thoroughly, with the rigour expected by the Australian people and the international community, and for that they are to be commended.

 

At a time of conflict around the globe and not just in the Ukraine, the indiscriminate violent shooting down of a routine civilian flight and the loss of innocent lives reminds us all of the fragility and precious nature of life.

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun

 

That Council observes a one minute silence in honour of victims of MH17.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


 

Clr Balloot returned to the Chambers at 6.57pm

 

Mayoral Minute

Subject: Sponsorship request to support the Pioneers Mega Crew

 

Council has been approached by the Street University – Ted Noffs Foundation seeking   sponsorship for the Pioneers Dance Crew who will represent Australia in the Mega Crew Division at the 2014 World Hip-Hop Championships in Las Vegas, USA. The Championships run from August 5-10, 2014. A shortfall of $10,000 to fund the tour currently exists and Council’s support has been sought to meet part of this funding gap.

 

The Pioneers Mega Crew is a socially and culturally inclusive dance group and consists of 20 youth aged between 10 and 22. The members of the crew have suffered from disadvantage and marginalisation. The Crew is based out of the Street University’s premises at 1 Speed Street, Liverpool.

 

The Pioneers were the feature act at the July Liverpool Night Markets and have also indicated their willingness to perform at other events, for example the upcoming Mayoral Ball.

 

As the Crew will be performing in the USA in early August, I have brought forward this request for sponsorship as an urgent item for consideration by Council.

 

I propose that sponsorship of $5000 be provided by Council to meet part of the Street University’s funding shortfall for the participation of the Pioneers Mega Crew in the World Hip Hop Championships. 

 

The request is consistent with Council’s Corporate Sponsorship guidelines through its community and social development and cultural development objectives. Particular benefits from sponsoring this activity include:

 

  • International exposure for Liverpool as a place of excellence for hip-hop and street dance
  • Local media exposure for Liverpool and Council’s partnership  with the Street University
  • Social benefits in instilling confidence in young people based in Liverpool and providing  them with life skills and linkages to employment and educational pathways

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun

 

That Council provides sponsorship of $5000 from the Councillor Reserve to the Street University toward the costs of the Pioneers Mega Crew’s participation in the World Hip Hop Championships in Las Vegas from 5 August – 10 August, 2014.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


Notices of Motion

ITEM NO:      NOM 01

FILE NO:        164272.2014

SUBJECT:     Bus Shelter in Liverpool LGA

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Investigates options to provide more Bus Shelters in Liverpool to reduce current back log by:

 

a)   increasing the number of sponsored or advertising shelters

b)   more cost effective design solutions

c)   exploring grant sources 

d)   commit budget to reduce the back log of bus shelters by no less than 10 each year over the next 5 years commencing with the 2015-16 budget year

e)   increase the number of bus shelters provided 2014-15 if changes to design can reduce the cost of shelters

 

2.   Provide a report to Council for its September 2014 meeting discussing the findings of this motion.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That Council:

 

  1. Investigates options to provide more Bus Shelters in Liverpool to reduce current back log by:

 

a)   increasing the number of sponsored or advertising shelters having full regard to sensitive areas and the advertising that is allowed near schools and churches.

b)   more cost effective design solutions.

c)   exploring grant sources. 

d)   commit budget to reduce the back log of bus shelters by no less than 10 each year over the next 5 years commencing with the 2015-16 budget year.

e)   increase the number of bus shelters provided 2014-15 if changes to design can reduce the cost of shelters.

 

  1. Be consulted on the final design of bus shelters.

 

 

  1. Provide a report to Council for its September 2014 meeting discussing the findings of this motion.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:      NOM 02

FILE NO:        164377.2014

SUBJECT:     Youth Homeless Services in Liverpool

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Views with serious concern the decision by the NSW government to defund the Liverpool Youth Refuge.

 

2.   Views with concern the defunding of other specialist homeless services through both Liverpool and New South Wales and issues and hardship that will cause.

 

3.   Writes to other services in Liverpool to ascertain how they have been effected by the changes in the funding model by the State Government and advocates similarly for all services.

 

4.   Provides a report to the next Council meeting detailing other effected services.

 

5.   Resolves to write to the Minister for Family and Community Services and the Premier of NSW expressing Council's strong opposition to the defunding of this service and calling on the government to reconsider its decision to defund the Liverpool Youth Refugee and all other effected services in Liverpool LGA; noting this motion.

 

6.   To show Council's commitment to this service provide a one off grant of $50, 000 from the Councillor reserve to assist the Liverpool Youth Refuge provide services for the youth of Liverpool if the NSW Government reconsiders its decision and decides to fund the service.

 

7.    Write to all local members of Parliament in the Liverpool area seeking their support to lobby Minister and Premier to reconsider this decision.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved:Clr Hadchiti              Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That Council:

 

1.    Notes the motion and the information provided by the CEO including a reported 2% increase in funding for homelessness services in south west Sydney. 

 

2.    Notes that the Mayor has written to the Minister requesting a review of the tender decision.

 

Foreshadowed Motion:       Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That Council:

 

1.   Views with serious concern the decision by the NSW government to defund the Liverpool Youth Refuge.

 

2.   Views with concern the defunding of other specialist homeless services through both Liverpool and New South Wales and issues and hardship that will cause.

 

3.   Writes to other services in Liverpool to ascertain how they have been effected by the changes in the funding model by the State Government and advocates similarly for all services.

 

4.   Provides a report to the next Council meeting detailing other effected services.

 

5.   Resolves to write to the Minister for Family and Community Services and the Premier of NSW expressing Council's strong opposition to the defunding of this service and calling on the government to reconsider its decision to defund the Liverpool Youth Refugee and all other effected services in Liverpool LGA; noting this motion.

 

6.   To show Council's commitment to this service provide a one off grant of $50, 000 from the Councillor reserve to assist the Liverpool Youth Refuge provide services for the youth of Liverpool if the NSW Government reconsiders its decision and decides to fund the service.

 

7.    Write to all local members of Parliament in the Liverpool area seeking their support to lobby Minister and Premier to reconsider this decision.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion (by Clr Hadchiti) was declared CARRIED and the foreshadowed motion lapsed.

 

Division Called:

 

Vote for:                       Mayor Mannoun

                                      Clr Balloot

                                      Clr Hadchiti

                                      Clr Hadid

                                      Clr Ristevski

 

Vote against:               Clr Karnib

                                      Clr Harle 

                                      Clr Shelton

                                      Clr Stanley

                                      Clr Waller

 

The motion was passed on the Mayor’s Casting Vote.

 


ITEM NO:      NOM 03

FILE NO:        164468.2014

SUBJECT:     Liquor Related Development Applications

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

1.   In order for Councillors to meet their due diligence and statutory obligations, Council and IHAP suspend consideration of DA (1454/2013) – Hume Hwy Hotel Casula until it obtains and provides Councillors with:

 

a)   Independent advice from the CEO of ILGA as to the capacity/obligations Councils have to consider the social impacts of liquor related developments. Is the consideration of the general social impact of liquor related DAs and s96 amendments the sole prerogative of OLGR or ILGA?

 

b)   Information from Police on the legal compliance record for all De Angelis group hotels, the number of alcohol reported incidents within each hotel and the number and type of alcohol related incidents that are linked to the hotels’ patrons after they leave those licensed premises (contained in COPS linking data).

 

c)   Advice from FACS as to their intentions for the ongoing provision of emergency/crisis public accommodation provided on site at the Fontainebleau Motel (or elsewhere) – location of the proposed Hume Hwy hotel.

 

d)   Advice from the owner and Council of the intended use of the heritage important Commercial Hotel – Liverpool if their liquor and poker machine licensees were to be removed to the proposed Hume Hwy hotel.

 

2.   Council notes that the substantial disproportionate negative social impact the introduction and operation of poker and other gambling machines can have on especially socially disadvantaged communities including migrants and person with English as a Second Language (ESL). In particular, that Liverpool LGA pub poker machines have the highest rate of return (losses to community) before tax in NSW (OLGR) and neighbouring Fairfield LGA has the worst rate of gambling losses in NSW.

 

To address this problem Council:

 

a)   Requests the NSW Premier to repeal s209 of the NSW Gaming Machines Act 2001 that precludes Councils from considering the social impact of poker machines imposed upon local communities when determining DA’s and related matters

 

 

 

 

 

 

b)   Requests the NSW Premier to provide local government (that is closest to local communities) the planning powers to consider and determine all aspects of the provision of poker machines and other gambling devices in their LGAs, and notes that this request is consistent with Goal “32” of the NSW State Plan 2021 “Increase the opportunity for people to participate in the way government makes decisions….. devolve decision making as close to the people and places affected by decisions”…

 

c)   Requests Local Government NSW (formerly the Local Government and Shires Associations of NSW (LGSA) to circulate this motion with a supportive discussion paper to all other Councils to gauge their level of support and response.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That this Item be considered later at this meeting after the recess period.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:      NOM 04

FILE NO:        164537.2014

SUBJECT:     Council Committees

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That the charters of all committees of Council be amended such that all Councillors are members of each committee.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That Council notes the motion and defers consideration of the issues raised to the September Council meeting where committee positions are elected.

 

Foreshadowed Motion:       Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded:  Clr Stanley

 

That the charters of all committees of Council be amended such that all Councillors are members of each committee.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion (by Clr Hadchiti) was declared CARRIED and the foreshadowed motion lapsed.

 

 


ITEM NO:      NOM 05

FILE NO:        164592.2014

SUBJECT:     Quota 50th Birthday July 2014 Presentation by Councillors

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Notes the 50th Anniversary of the Quota Club of Liverpool on 18th July 2014.

 

2.   Acknowledges the club and its members over the last 50 years for their support of the people of Liverpool.

 

3.    Writes to the President to acknowledge this milestone, providing a copy of this report and motion.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That Council:

 

  1. Notes the 50th Anniversary of the Quota Club of Liverpool on 18th July 2014.

 

  1. Acknowledges the club and its members over the last 50 years for their support of the people of Liverpool.

 

  1. Writes to the President to acknowledge this milestone, providing a copy of this report and motion.

 

  1. Note the correction in the background information provided in the Notice of Motion to reflect that the club was honoured with the Order of Liverpool Award in 2002, not 2012.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

ITEM NO:      IHAP 01

FILE NO:        124503.2014

SUBJECT:     DA-790/2013 - Stage 2 development of a court approved masterplan in DA-394/2011 for a non-denominational cemetrary at 41 Greendale Road, Bringelly (Lot 5 DP 252040)

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approves Development Application DA-790/2013 at 41 Greendale Road, Bringelly (Lot 5 DP 252040) for the Stage 2 development of the court approved master plan in DA-394/2011 for a non-denominational cemetery, subject to the recommended conditions of consent.

 

2.   Notifies in writing, the persons who made a submission with regard to the proposed development.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That Council defers the item for negotiation regarding the issues raised by both speakers at this Council meeting, Mrs Dianne Newell and Ms Cheryl Keane.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.


ITEM NO:      IHAP 02

FILE NO:        151287.2014

SUBJECT:     DA-105/2014 - Torrens title subdivision creating five lots at 54 Nineteenth Avenue, Hoxton Park

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Development Application DA-105/2014 at 54 Nineteenth Avenue, Hoxton Park (Lot 536 in DP 865435), subject to the recommended conditions contained within Attachment 2 (under separate cover).

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

Vote for:                       Mayor Mannoun

                                      Clr Balloot

                                      Clr Hadchiti

                                      Clr Hadid

                                      Clr Harle

                                      Clr Karnib

                                      Clr Ristevski

                                      Clr Shelton

                                      Clr Stanley

 

Vote against:               Clr Waller

 

 


ITEM NO:      IHAP 03

FILE NO:        151949.2014

SUBJECT:     DA-1198/2013 - Partial demolition and alterations and additions to the existing dwelling; use of the dwelling as a child care centre; and installation of signage at 4 Bungarra Crescent, Chipping Norton

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Approve the application DA-1198/2013, subject to the recommended conditions attached to the IHAP Report and the following amendments to the Draft Determination Notice considered by IHAP:

 

Amend Draft Condition 1 to read as follows:

 

1.      Development the subject of this determination notice must be carried out strictly in accordance with Development Application No. DA-1198/2013 lodged on 24 October 2013 and accompanying plans and reports listed below and stamped DA-1198/2013, except where modified by the undermentioned conditions and amendments contained within this condition:

 

Description

Issue

Job No

Sheet

Date

Prepared By

DA01 - Cover Page, Site Analysis & Site/Roof Plan

B

13011

1 of 5

28 March 2014

De Angelis Taylor + Associates

DA02 - Ground Floor Plan & Sections

B

13011

2 of 5

28 March 2014

De Angelis Taylor + Associates

DA03 -Elevations & Street Elevation

B

13011

3 of 5

28 March 2014

De Angelis Taylor + Associates

DA04 - Demolition Plan & Earthworks Plan

B

13011

4 of 5

28 March 2014

De Angelis Taylor + Associates

L-01 - Landscape Plan

B

3442b

 

24 March 2014

Ray Fuggle Associates

Exterior Finishes Schedule

C

13011

-

n.d.

De Angelis Taylor + Associates

Childcare Centre Noise Assessment

-

20130747.1

-

26 August 2013

Acoustic Logic

 

         

 

 

          The following design amendments are required:

·    A minimum of 50% of the rear yard marked on the approved landscape plan as “turf, artificial turf or wetpour rubber”, is to be comprised of permeable landscaping. This shall be situated in such a manner as to ensure the viability of the trees to be retained.

·    The two Pyrus Calleryana provided within the front setback shall be planted with a pot size of 200L.

·    Horizontal sunhoods shall be located above the front windows to the rooms marked as Foyer, Admin and Staff Room. There are to be two continuous sunhoods: one over the windows between the Foyer and the Admin room, and one over all three windows to the Staff Room. The sunhoods are to project one metre from the front wall.

·    The proposed front wall sign shall be located below the first sunhood described above.

 

Amend Draft Condition 129 to read as follows:

 

129.    The applicant is to prepare and implement an Operational Traffic Management Plan (OTMP). The OTMP shall incorporate the following:

 

·    Strategies for information advising parents and care givers of preferred route to the child care centre and the time for pick-up and drop-off, having regard to the Assessment of Traffic and Parking Implications prepared by Traffic Impact Services Pty Ltd and dated October 2013, and having regard for the peak periods of vehicle movement for nearby schools.

·    Strategies for minimising potential queuing when parents drop off and pick up children.

 

The OTMP shall be implemented on an ongoing basis.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared LOST.

 

Vote for:                       Mayor Mannoun

                                      Clr Balloot

                                      Clr Hadid

                                      Clr Shelton

 

Vote against:               Clr Hadchiti

                                      Clr Harle

                                      Clr Karnib

                                      Clr Ristevski

                                      Clr Stanley

                                      Clr Waller

 

 

During the meeting a rescission motion was lodged and signed by Mayor Mannoun, Clr Hadchiti and Clr Ristevski in relation to this Item.

 

In accordance with Clause 38.3 of Council’s Code of Meeting Practice the Mayor gave notice of the rescission motion and the motion was dealt with later at this meeting. It is however shown below for easy reference.

 

The vote on the rescission motion and subsequent resolution is shown below:

 

Recission Motion:                Mayor Mannoun, Clr Hadchiti and Clr Ristevski              

 

That Council rescind the resolution passed earlier at this meeting relating to Item IHAP 03.

 

Vote for:                       Mayor Mannoun

                                      Clr Balloot

                                      Clr Hadchiti

                                      Clr Hadid

                                      Clr Harle

                                      Clr Karnib

                                      Clr Ristevski

 

Vote against:               Clr Shelton

                                      Clr Stanley

                                      Clr Waller

 

After the rescission motion was carried, the following motion was put and voted on in relation to IHAP 03;

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That Council defers IHAP 03 - DA-1198/2013 to the next Council meeting after Councillors have had the opportunity to review the objections received.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Vote for:                       Mayor Mannoun

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadchiti

Clr Hadid

Clr Harle

Clr Karnib

Clr Ristevski

 

Vote against:               Clr Shelton

                                      Clr Stanley

                                      Clr Waller

 

 
Development Application Determination Report

ITEM NO:      DAD 01

FILE NO:        140655.2014

SUBJECT:     Modification to Development Consent No.693/2009 at 320-400 Badgerys Creek Road, Badgerys Creek (Lot 1 DP 1188956)

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approve the application to modify DA-693/2009 at 320-400 Badgerys Creek Road, Badgerys Creek (Lot 1 DP 1188956), pursuant to Section 96(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the following way:

 

A.        New Condition 1A is added to Development Consent No. DA-693/2009 to read as follows:

 

1A.      Consent is granted for the receipt and stockpiling of screened soil to be used in accordance with the requirements of the Sydney Trains Screened Soil Exemption dated February 2014, or a more recent version, as updated by the EPA. The use of the material is subject to the following:

 

i.      Screened soil must only be used to construct acoustic berms, in accordance with Condition 124 and Condition 125, and to construct visual berms adjacent to the eastern boundary of the site.

ii.     Notwithstanding (i) berms must be finished as indicated within the approved documentation outlined within Condition 1, including the Landscape Plan.

iii.    Measures for controlling the growth of noxious weeds must be implemented in the stockpile locations.

iv.   The quantity of screened soil accepted on site must not exceed 85,000 tonnes.

v.    The material must be stockpiled within the location of proposed Pit 5, and at no time shall exceed 10m in height, or 85m in length.

vi.   The screened soil must be stored in separate stockpiles of a maximum height of 3 meters.

vii.  The storage of screened soil must be carried out in a manner which minimises or prevents the emission of dust from the premises.

viii. The construction of acoustic and visual berms must be carried out in a manner which minimises or prevents the emission of dust from the premises.

ix.   Any unused material must be either transported off site to an industrial site authorised to receive the waste as per the resource recovery exemption, or subsequently applied to land as waste, with any required appropriate levy paid.

 

B.        Condition 9 is deleted from Development Consent No. DA-693/2009.

 

C.        Condition 119 is added to Development Consent No. DA-693/2009.

 

 

119A.   Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, an Environmental Protection License must be obtained from the NSW Environmental Protection Authority. A copy of the Environmental Protection License must be provided to Council.

 

119A.   Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, an Environmental Protection License must be obtained from the NSW Environmental Protection Authority. A copy of the Environmental Protection License must be provided to Council.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That Council defer this Item until the completion of an investigation into compliance matters associated with current activities on the site.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 


ITEM NO:      DAD 02

FILE NO:        151941.2014

SUBJECT:     Modification to Development Consent No. DA-611/2009 at  No.1 Mill Road Liverpool (Lot 1 100 DP1180561)

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Approve the application to modify DA-611/2009, Pursuant to Section 96(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the following way:

 

A.      Condition 1 of Development Consent No. DA-611/2009 is modified to read as follows:

 

1.       Development must be carried out generally in accordance with Development Application received 4 July 2008 and the following plans and documentation:

 

(a)     Architectural plans prepared by Tony Owen Prtnrs as follows:

 

·        Site Plan / Site Analysis Plan – Drawing No. A 001 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Basement 2 Plan – Drawing No. A 101 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Basement 1 Plan – Drawing No. A 102 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Ground Floor Plan – Drawing No. A 103 Revision B and dated 6 May 2014;

·        Level 1-3 Floor Plan – Drawing No. A 104 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Level 4 Floor Plan – Drawing No. A 105 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Level 5-6 Floor Plan – Drawing No. A 106 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Level 7 Floor Plan – Drawing No. A 107 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014

·        Roof Plan – Drawing No. A 108 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        East Elevation – Drawing No. A 200 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        North Elevation – Drawing No. A 201 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        West Elevation – Drawing No. A 202 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        South Elevation – Drawing No. A 203 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Section A-A – Drawing No. A 300 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

 

·        Section B – Drawing No. A 301 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Adaptable Unit – Drawing No. A 110 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Carpark Ramp Section – Drawing No. A 410 Revision A and dated 6 May 2014;

 

(b)     Engineering and Hydraulic Plans prepared by Australian Consulting Engineers as follows:

 

·   Upper Basement Drainage Plan and Details, Drawing No.D02 Revision D, Job No.08AH225 and dated 18 June 2006;

·   Ground/Site Stormwater Drainage Plan and Details, Drawing No. D03 Revision E and dated 18 June 2006;

·   Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Drainage Plan and Details, Drawing No.D04 Revision A and dated 31 October 2008; and

·   Proposed Easement and existing layout, Drawing No.D05 Revision C, Job No.08AH225 and dated 19 June 2006.

 

(c)     Landscape Works Site Plan prepared by Formed Gardens, Job No. FG 13 235 Drawing No. L_001, Issue D, and dated 6 May 2014;

 

(d)     Soil Salinity Study prepared by Environmental Solutions and dated 24 November 2008;

 

(e)     Access Report prepared by Accessibility Solutions Pty Ltd and dated 19 June 2009;

 

(f)      Assessment of Traffic and Parking Implications prepared by Traffic Impact Services Pty Ltd and dated November 2008;

 

(g)     Safety Management Plan prepared by Tony Owen NDM;

 

(h)     Waste Management Plan dated 5 December 2008;

 

(i)      Schedule of Finishes approved in accordance with Part 1 and generally in accordance with materials schedule board submitted by CMT Architects and dated 19 December 2008, except as updated by plan titled Material Finishes, Drawing No. A 408, Revision A, prepared by Tony Owen Ptnrs, and dated 12 February 2014;

 

(j)      BASIX Certificate 527234M and dated 17 February 2014;

 

except where modified by the following conditions.

 

B.      Condition 23 of Development Consent No. DA-611/2009 is modified to read as follows:

 

 

 

2.       As a consequence of this development, Council has identified an increased demand for public amenities and public services.  The following payment represents 2% of the cost of the development and is imposed in accordance with Liverpool Contributions Plan 2007 Liverpool City Centre. 

 

The total contribution is $205,485.

 

A breakdown of the contributions payable is provided in the attached payment form.

 

Contributions will be adjusted at the time of payment in line with the Consumer Price Index (all groups index number for Sydney) using the following formula:

 

Contribution at the time of payment = C x CPI2

                                                           CP11           

Where:      

C =    Original contributions as shown on the consent

CPI2 =        Latest "Consumer Price Index: All Groups Index Number" for Sydney available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics at the time that the contribution is to be paid

         CPI2 =         Latest "Consumer Price Index: All Groups Index Number" for Sydney available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics as at the time of granting the development consent

 

Payments made prior to the settlement of this amount shall be deducted from the remaining balance, and shall be adjusted to the Consumer Price Index as required.

 

The Contributions Plan may be inspected at Council’s Administration Centre, 1 Hoxton Park Road, Liverpool or at www.liverpool.nsw.gov.au.

 

Please note.  Payment must be accompanied by the attached form.    

 

C.      Condition 30 shall be deleted.

 

D.      Condition 31 shall be deleted.

 

E.      Attachment 2: Section 94A Payment Form is attached to the Development Consent to read as follows:

         

ATTACHMENT 2. SECTION 94A PAYMENT FORM

 

CONTRIBUTIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 94A OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL

PLANNING & ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

 

 

Liverpool Contribution Plan 2007

 

Note to the applicant:           When remitting payment as specified in the Conditions of Consent to the approval, this Form must be submitted with your payment.

                                    These figures have been calculated to the CPI September 2013 Quarter and will be adjusted at the time of payment in accordance with the conditions of consent.

 

APPLICATION NO.:             DA-611/2009

 

PROPERTY:                         1 Mill Road, Liverpool

 

PROPOSAL:                          Erection of an eight storey residential flat building comprising of 1 x studio apartment, 30 x 2 bedroom apartments, 16 x 3 bedroom apartments, two levels of basement car parking and associated landscaping

 

Facilities

Amount ($)

Job No.

Liverpool Contributions Plan 2007

Central Library Extensions

$3,948

GL.10000001870.10112

Whitlam Centre Extensions

$2,916

GL.10000001869.10110

District Community Facility upgrade (Central area)

$3,764

GL.10000001870.10099

Woodward and Collimore Parks

$17,714

GL.10000001869.10093

Georges River Foreshore

$124,001

GL.10000001869.10105

Bigge Park

$26,572

GL.10000001869.10105

Pioneer Park

$26,572

GL.10000001869.10105

Access – car parks, bridge link, bus priority

$0

GL.10000001868.10108

Central Library Extensions

$3,948

GL.10000001870.10112

Whitlam Centre Extensions

$2,916

GL.10000001869.10110

District Community Facility upgrade (Central area)

$3,764

GL.10000001870.10099

Woodward and Collimore Parks

$17,714

GL.10000001869.10093

Total

$205,487

 

 

---------------------------------------------- OFFICE USE ONLY -------------------------------------------

 

RECORD OF PAYMENT

 

Total Amount paid: ______________________________

 

Date:________________________

 

Receipt No.:_____________________________Cashier:_____________________

 

2.       Write to the applicant to advise of the remaining balance of the Section 94A Contributions.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That this matter be deferred to the Council meeting in August with a report outlining the stage of this development as at 30 July 2014.

 

 

Foreshadowed Motion:       Moved: Mayor Mannoun   Seconded: Clr Ristevski

 

That the item be deferred and be delegated to the CEO after a report outlining the stage of this development as at 30 July 2014 has been provided to Councillors.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion (moved by Clr Shelton) was declared CARRIED and the forshadowed motion lapsed.

 

Vote for:                       Clr Hadchiti

Clr Harle

          Clr Karnib

          Clr Shelton

Clr Stanley

Clr Waller

 

Vote against:               Mayor Mannoun

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadid

Clr Ristevski

 

During the meeting a rescission motion was lodged and signed by Mayor Mannoun, Clr Hadchiti and Clr Ristevski in relation to this Item.

 

In accordance with Clause 38.3 of Council’s Code of Meeting Practice the Mayor gave notice of the rescission motion and the motion was dealt with later at this meeting. It is however shown below for easy reference.

 

The vote on the rescission motion and subsequent resolution is shown below:

 

Rescission Motion:              Mayor Mannoun, Clr Hadchiti and Clr Ristevski               

 

That Council rescind the resolution passed earlier at this meeting relating to Item DAD 02.

 

Vote for:                       Mayor Mannoun

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadchiti

Clr Hadid

Clr Karnib

Clr Ristevski

 

 

Vote against:               Clr Harle

Clr Shelton

Clr Stanley

Clr Waller

 

After the rescission motion was carried, the following motion was put and voted on in relation to DAD 02;

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Ristevski

 

1. That Council approves the application, subject to a satisfactory inspection report compiled

   by a senior Council Building Surveyor, to be submitted to the CEO.

 

2. The report shall assess whether the construction on the site is in accordance with the

    certification issued by the Private Certifier and subject to all the relevant requirements of          

    the Building Code of Australia.

 

3. The following to also be included in any approval:

 

A.      Condition 1 of Development Consent No. DA-611/2009 is modified to read as follows:

 

1.       Development must be carried out generally in accordance with Development Application received 4 July 2008 and the following plans and documentation:

 

(a)     Architectural plans prepared by Tony Owen Prtnrs as follows:

 

·        Site Plan / Site Analysis Plan – Drawing No. A 001 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Basement 2 Plan – Drawing No. A 101 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Basement 1 Plan – Drawing No. A 102 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Ground Floor Plan – Drawing No. A 103 Revision B and dated 6 May 2014;

·        Level 1-3 Floor Plan – Drawing No. A 104 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Level 4 Floor Plan – Drawing No. A 105 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Level 5-6 Floor Plan – Drawing No. A 106 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Level 7 Floor Plan – Drawing No. A 107 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014

·        Roof Plan – Drawing No. A 108 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        East Elevation – Drawing No. A 200 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        North Elevation – Drawing No. A 201 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

 

 

·        West Elevation – Drawing No. A 202 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        South Elevation – Drawing No. A 203 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Section A-A – Drawing No. A 300 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Section B – Drawing No. A 301 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Adaptable Unit – Drawing No. A 110 Revision A and dated 12 February 2014;

·        Carpark Ramp Section – Drawing No. A 410 Revision A and dated 6 May 2014;

 

(b)     Engineering and Hydraulic Plans prepared by Australian Consulting Engineers as follows:

 

·   Upper Basement Drainage Plan and Details, Drawing No.D02 Revision D, Job No.08AH225 and dated 18 June 2006;

·   Ground/Site Stormwater Drainage Plan and Details, Drawing No. D03 Revision E and dated 18 June 2006;

·   Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Drainage Plan and Details, Drawing No.D04 Revision A and dated 31 October 2008; and

·   Proposed Easement and existing layout, Drawing No.D05 Revision C, Job No.08AH225 and dated 19 June 2006.

 

(c)     Landscape Works Site Plan prepared by Formed Gardens, Job No. FG 13 235 Drawing No. L_001, Issue D, and dated 6 May 2014;

 

(d)     Soil Salinity Study prepared by Environmental Solutions and dated 24 November 2008;

 

(e)     Access Report prepared by Accessibility Solutions Pty Ltd and dated 19 June 2009;

 

(f)      Assessment of Traffic and Parking Implications prepared by Traffic Impact Services Pty Ltd and dated November 2008;

 

(g)     Safety Management Plan prepared by Tony Owen NDM;

 

(h)     Waste Management Plan dated 5 December 2008;

 

(i)      Schedule of Finishes approved in accordance with Part 1 and generally in accordance with materials schedule board submitted by CMT Architects and dated 19 December 2008, except as updated by plan titled Material Finishes, Drawing No. A 408, Revision A, prepared by Tony Owen Ptnrs, and dated 12 February 2014;

 

(j)      BASIX Certificate 527234M and dated 17 February 2014;

 

except where modified by the following conditions.

 

B.      Condition 23 of Development Consent No. DA-611/2009 is modified to read as follows:

 

2.       As a consequence of this development, Council has identified an increased demand for public amenities and public services.  The following payment represents 2% of the cost of the development and is imposed in accordance with Liverpool Contributions Plan 2007 Liverpool City Centre. 

 

The total contribution is $205,485.

 

A breakdown of the contributions payable is provided in the attached payment form.

 

Contributions will be adjusted at the time of payment in line with the Consumer Price Index (all groups index number for Sydney) using the following formula:

 

Contribution at the time of payment = C x CPI2

                                                           CP11           

Where:      

C =    Original contributions as shown on the consent

CPI2 =        Latest "Consumer Price Index: All Groups Index Number" for Sydney available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics at the time that the contribution is to be paid

         CPI2 =         Latest "Consumer Price Index: All Groups Index Number" for Sydney available from the Australian Bureau of Statistics as at the time of granting the development consent

 

Payments made prior to the settlement of this amount shall be deducted from the remaining balance, and shall be adjusted to the Consumer Price Index as required.

 

The Contributions Plan may be inspected at Council’s Administration Centre, 1 Hoxton Park Road, Liverpool or at www.liverpool.nsw.gov.au.

 

Please note.  Payment must be accompanied by the attached form.    

 

C.      Condition 30 shall be deleted.

 

D.      Condition 31 shall be deleted.

 

E.      Attachment 2: Section 94A Payment Form is attached to the Development Consent to read as follows:

         

ATTACHMENT 2. SECTION 94A PAYMENT FORM

 

CONTRIBUTIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 94A OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL

PLANNING & ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

 

Liverpool Contribution Plan 2007

 

Note to the applicant:           When remitting payment as specified in the Conditions of Consent to the approval, this Form must be submitted with your payment.

                                    These figures have been calculated to the CPI September 2013 Quarter and will be adjusted at the time of payment in accordance with the conditions of consent.

 

APPLICATION NO.:             DA-611/2009

 

PROPERTY:                         1 Mill Road, Liverpool

 

PROPOSAL:                          Erection of an eight storey residential flat building comprising of 1 x studio apartment, 30 x 2 bedroom apartments, 16 x 3 bedroom apartments, two levels of basement car parking and associated landscaping

 

Facilities

Amount ($)

Job No.

Liverpool Contributions Plan 2007

Central Library Extensions

$3,948

GL.10000001870.10112

Whitlam Centre Extensions

$2,916

GL.10000001869.10110

District Community Facility upgrade (Central area)

$3,764

GL.10000001870.10099

Woodward and Collimore Parks

$17,714

GL.10000001869.10093

Georges River Foreshore

$124,001

GL.10000001869.10105

Bigge Park

$26,572

GL.10000001869.10105

Pioneer Park

$26,572

GL.10000001869.10105

Access – car parks, bridge link, bus priority

$0

GL.10000001868.10108

Central Library Extensions

$3,948

GL.10000001870.10112

Whitlam Centre Extensions

$2,916

GL.10000001869.10110

District Community Facility upgrade (Central area)

$3,764

GL.10000001870.10099

Woodward and Collimore Parks

$17,714

GL.10000001869.10093

Total

$205,487

 

 

---------------------------------------------- OFFICE USE ONLY -------------------------------------------

RECORD OF PAYMENT

 

Total Amount paid: ______________________________

 

Date:________________________

 

Receipt No.:_____________________________Cashier:_____________________

2.       Write to the applicant to advise of the remaining balance of the Section 94A Contributions.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Vote for:                       Mayor Mannoun

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadchiti

Clr Hadid

Clr Karnib

Clr Ristevski

 

Vote against:               Clr Harle

Clr Shelton

Clr Stanley

Clr Waller

 

 

Motion of Dissent against Mayor’s ruling

 

During discussion on this Item, Clr Shelton raised a point of order that the motion proposed by the Mayor was unworkable. The Mayor disagreed and advised that his motion, the wording of which was reviewed by Council officers, was workable.

 

Clr Shelton then moved a motion of dissent against the Mayor’s ruling.

 

Motion:                         Mover: Clr Shelton               Seconder: Clr Stanley

 

That a motion of dissent be moved against the Mayor’s ruling.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared LOST.

 

The vote for and against Clr Shelton’s motion of dissent against the Mayor’s ruling is shown below:

 

Vote for:                      Clr Harle

Clr Shelton

Clr Stanley

Clr Waller

 

Vote against:               Mayor Mannoun

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadchiti

Clr Hadid

Clr Karnib

Clr Ristevski

 


ITEM NO:      DAD 03

FILE NO:        143905.2014

SUBJECT:     Modification to DA-492/2008 - Education Establishment at 83-87 Gurner Avenue, Austral.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Approves modification application DA-492/2008/A which seeks to modify DA-492/2008 at 83-87 Gurner Avenue, Austral subject to amendments to Conditions No. 1 and No. 157 of the development consent and additional conditions of consent, as follows:

 

·    Condition No.1 of DA-492/2008 is amended to read as follows:

 

Development must be carried out generally in accordance with Development Application received 30 November 2007 and Modification Application DA-492/2008/B received on 24 December 2014, except where amended by DA-492/2008/A as follows:

 

Architectural Drawings

 

Drawing

No.

lssue

Title

Author

Date

2836-A01

 

5

Site plan and

construction

stages

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

 

16 October 2009

2836-A02

4

Ground Floor Plan

1of 2

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

8 October 2009

2836-A03

4

Ground Floor Plan

2of 2

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

8 October 2009

2836-A04

4

First Floor Plan 1 of 2

 

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

8 October 2009

2836-A05

4

First Floor Plan 2 of 2

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

8 October 2009

2836-A06

2

Sections and Elevations 1

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

14 September 2008

2836-A07

2

Sections and Elevations 2

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

14 September 2008

2836-A08

4

Sections and Elevations 3

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

8 October 2009

LC01/1-

R13802

 

-

Concept Landscape Plan

 

Michael Siu

Landscape

Architects

5 November 2008

2

CC

Admin Building Ground & First Floor

Acrom Holdings

Pty Ltd

11 September 2013

S96-02

-

Detail Plan

Millennium Design Consultants Pty Ltd

April 2013

 

Note: Drawing No. 2, issue CC, prepared by Acrom Holdings Pty Ltd, supersedes Drawings 2836-A02, 2836-A03, 2836-04 and 2836-05 as it relates to the floors of the Administration Building. 

 

          Documents

 

Title

Author

Date

Traffic and Car Parking

Assessment Report

Reference No.07197

Transport and Traffic

Associates

 

September 2007

Supplementary Report

Transport and Traffic

Associates

11 June 2008

Noise Acoustic Assessment

Reference No.

R020708nk1589.wpd

Koikas Acoustics Pty Ltd

 

4 July 2008

Bush Fire Hazard Assessment

Report

Building Code and

Bushfire Hazard

Solutions

September 2008

Wastewater Management

Report

Report No. 16908-8

Enviro Tech

Environmental and

Engineering

Consultants

29 October 2008

Contamination Assessment

Phase 1 and 2

Report No.11908-4

Enviro Tech

Environmental and

Engineering

Consultants

4 August 2008

Salinity Report

Report No.REP-16408-4

Enviro Tech

Environmental and

Engineering

Consultants

14 September 2008

Concept Management Plan for

the Educational Establishment

 

 

Document entitled "To demolish

all existing buildings on site and

construct a school (Qaadiri

College), catering for 1000

students with ancillary facilities

and a child care centre catering

for 29 children"

D-Plan Urban

Planning Consultants

Pty Ltd

March 2008

Acoustic assessment report

SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd (reference No: 610.13781 S96 L01 20140304)

5 March 2014

                                              

·   
Condition No. 157 is amended to read as follows:

 

          Acoustic

 

          157.   An acoustic fence is to be constructed along the entire western side boundary       and part of the eastern side boundary of the site, as indicated on the approved plans. A qualified acoustic consultant is to certify that the       acoustic fence has been        constructed in      accordance with the     approved acoustic           assessment reports.     Note: the acoustic fencing is permitted to be constructed on (meaning a zero setback      from the property boundary) the eastern and western boundary.

 

·    The following conditions of consent are inserted into DA-492/2008:

 

          Prior to the release of a Construction Certificate

 

         Amended Fencing Detail Plan

 

1A. Elevation plans detailing the construction type, materials and colours of the       proposed fencing along the entire northern, eastern and western boundary of the subject site, are required to be submitted and approved by Council prior to the release of any Construction Certificate. The plans shall be accompanied by a statement prepared by a qualified and practicing acoustic person, detailing that the fencing will be consistent with the approved noise acoustic assessment and acoustic assessment report listed within Condition No. 1 of this development consent.

 

               Recommendations of Acoustic Report

 

          71A.The recommendations provided in the approved acoustic assessment report prepared by SLR           Consulting Australia Pty Ltd (reference No: 610.13781 S96 L01   20140304), dated 5       March 2014 shall be      implemented and incorporated into the design and     construction         of the development and shall be shown on   plans accompanying the CC application. 

 

        During Construction Works

 

Pollution Control

 

          98A.Building operations such as brick cutting, mixing mortar and the washing of tools,    paint brushes, form-work, concrete trucks and the like shall not be performed on the   public footway or any other locations which may lead to the discharge of materials into       Council’s stormwater drainage system.

 

 

E. Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate

 

         Recommendations of Acoustic Report

 

107A.A Compliance Certificate or other documentation deemed suitable to the PCA is     to be submitted to the PCA, detailing compliance with the following:

 

          (a)     The recommendations contained within the acoustic assessment report by SLR              Consulting Australia Pty Ltd (reference No: 610.13781 S96 L01 20140304),           dated 5 March 2014

          Use of the site

 

238A.   Any public address system or sound amplifying equipment shall be installed so

                as to   not emit an offensive noise as defined by the Protection of the      

                Environment Act 1997.

 

238B. Noise associated with the use of the premises including but not limited to children     playing, alarm systems and the bell shall not give rise to offensive noise as is                 defined within the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun               Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Vote for:                       Mayor Mannoun

                                      Clr Balloot

                                      Clr Hadchiti

                                      Clr Hadid

                                      Clr Harle

                                      Clr Ristevski

 

Vote against:               Clr Karnib

                                      Clr Shelton

                                      Clr Stanley

                                      Clr Waller

 

 

Mayor Mannoun called for recess of Council at 7.59pm

 

Mayor Mannoun resumed the meeting at 8.27pm.

 

 


 

BRING FORWARD AN AGENDA ITEM

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadchiti                  Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That Item GMPG 02 be brought forward and dealt with now.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

ITEM NO:

GMPG 02

FILE NO:

117224.2014

SUBJECT:

Draft Liverpool LEP 2008 Amendment 35 Post Exhibition Report

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council resolves to proceed with the making of Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan Amendment 35.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved:Clr Hadchiti              Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Vote for:                       Mayor Mannoun

                                      Clr Balloot

                                      Clr Hadchiti

                                      Clr Hadid

                                      Clr Harle

                                      Clr Karnib

                                      Clr Ristevski

                                      Clr Shelton

                                      Clr Waller

 

Vote against:                Clr Stanley

 

 

BRING FORWARD AN AGENDA ITEM

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That NOM 03 be brought forward and dealt with now.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:

NOM 03

FILE NO:

164468.2014

SUBJECT:

Liquor Related Development Applications

NOTICE OF MOTION

1.   In order for Councillors to meet their due diligence and statutory obligations, Council and IHAP suspend consideration of DA (1454/2013) – Hume Hwy Hotel Casula until it obtains and provides Councillors with:

 

a)   Independent advice from the CEO of ILGA as to the capacity/obligations Councils have to consider the social impacts of liquor related developments. Is the consideration of the general social impact of liquor related DAs and s96 amendments the sole prerogative of OLGR or ILGA?

 

b)   Information from Police on the legal compliance record for all De Angelis group hotels, the number of alcohol reported incidents within each hotel and the number and type of alcohol related incidents that are linked to the hotels’ patrons after they leave those licensed premises (contained in COPS linking data).

 

c)   Advice from FACS as to their intentions for the ongoing provision of emergency/crisis public accommodation provided on site at the Fontainebleau Motel (or elsewhere) – location of the proposed Hume Hwy hotel.

 

d)   Advice from the owner and Council of the intended use of the heritage important Commercial Hotel – Liverpool if their liquor and poker machine licensees were to be removed to the proposed Hume Hwy hotel.

 

2.   Council notes that the substantial disproportionate negative social impact the introduction and operation of poker and other gambling machines can have on especially socially disadvantaged communities including migrants and person with English as a Second Language (ESL). In particular, that Liverpool LGA pub poker machines have the highest rate of return (losses to community) before tax in NSW (OLGR) and neighbouring Fairfield LGA has the worst rate of gambling losses in NSW.

 

To address this problem Council:

 

a)   Requests the NSW Premier to repeal s209 of the NSW Gaming Machines Act 2001 that precludes Councils from considering the social impact of poker machines imposed upon local communities when determining DA’s and related matters

 

b)   Requests the NSW Premier to provide local government (that is closest to local communities) the planning powers to consider and determine all aspects of the provision of poker machines and other gambling devices in their LGAs, and notes that this request is consistent with Goal “32” of the NSW State Plan 2021 “Increase the opportunity for people to participate in the way government makes decisions….. devolve decision making as close to the people and places affected by decisions”…

c)      Requests Local Government NSW (formerly the Local Government and Shires           Associations of NSW (LGSA) to circulate this motion with a supportive discussion           paper to all other Councils to gauge their level of support and response.

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

1.   In order for Councillors to meet their due diligence and statutory obligations, Council and IHAP consider the following issues when considering liquor related DA’s.

 

a)   Independent advice from the CEO of ILGA as to the capacity/obligations Councils have to consider the social impacts of liquor related developments. Is the consideration of the general social impact of liquor related DAs and s96 amendments the sole prerogative of OLGR or ILGA?

 

b)   Information from Police on the legal compliance record for all the applicants, the number of alcohol reported incidents within each hotel and the number and type of alcohol related incidents that are linked to the hotels’ patrons after they leave those licensed premises (contained in COPS linking data).

 

2.   Council notes that the substantial disproportionate negative social impact the introduction and operation of poker and other gambling machines can have on especially socially disadvantaged communities including migrants and person with English as a Second Language (ESL). In particular, that Liverpool LGA pub poker machines have the highest rate of return (losses to community) before tax in NSW (OLGR) and neighbouring Fairfield LGA has the worst rate of gambling losses in NSW.

 

To address this problem Council:

 

a)   Requests the NSW Premier to repeal s209 of the NSW Gaming Machines Act 2001 that precludes Councils from considering the social impact of poker machines imposed upon local communities when determining DA’s and related matters.

 

b)   Requests the NSW Premier to provide local government (that is closest to local communities) the planning powers to consider and determine all aspects of the provision of poker machines and other gambling devices in their LGAs, and notes that this request is consistent with Goal “32” of the NSW State Plan 2021 “Increase the opportunity for people to participate in the way government makes decisions….. devolve decision making as close to the people and places affected by decisions”…

 

c)   Requests Local Government NSW (formerly the Local Government and Shires Associations of NSW (LGSA) to circulate this motion with a supportive discussion paper to all other Councils to gauge their level of support and response.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


ITEM NO:      DAD 04

FILE NO:        161067.2014

SUBJECT:     Modification to DA-1552/2006 - Road Bridge at Newbridge Road, Moorebank (Lot 6 & 7 DP 1065574 & Pt Lot 105 DP 1070029)

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approves the application to modify DA-1552/2006 at Lots 6 & 7 DP 1065574 & Pt Lot 105 DP 1070029 pursuant to Section 96(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the following way:

 

A.        Condition 1 is amended to read as follows:

 

Development must be carried out strictly in accordance with DA-1552/2006 and accompanying plans, except where modified by the undermentioned conditions.

 

Modification application DA-1552/2006/B and plans:

 

Worley Parsons

 

101015-00561-CI-FIG 3, Worley Parsons, Issue B, dated 21.08.13

 

Cardno

 

SK1001, Cardno, Revision L, dated 15.08.13

SK1003, Cardno, Revision E, dated 01.08.13

SK1004(E) – Cross Sections

SK2001, Cardno, Revision D, dated 15.08.13

SK2003, Cardno, Revision D, dated 05.08.13

SK2004 (C) – Cross Sections Layout

 

Report “Assessment of the Impact of the Proposed Bridge on Flooding in the Vicinity of the Georges Cove Marina, Moorebank. Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Ref: NA49913037:BCP/bcp dated 23 May 2014, except where modified by the undermentioned conditions.

 

B.        Condition 14 is amended to read as follows:

 

The bridge is to be designed and constructed such that it is able to comply with the Orders of the NSW Court of Appeal (Tanlane’s easement over Moorebank Recyclers land) and the Orders of the NSW Land and Environment Court (Moorebank recyclers Pty Ltd easement over Council Land).

 

C.        New Condition 17A is added to Development Consent DA-1552/2006  to read as follows:

 

17A      There shall be no net loss of floodplain storage volume below the 1% Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) flood. The compensatory flood storage volume shall be no less than 4,780cum. The flood compensatory storage shall be provided as shown in Drawing No DA-001, Job No. 0914, Issue C by Micheal Fountain Architects Pty Ltd (Amendment June 2014).

 

D.        New Condition 31A is added to Development Consent DA-1552/2006  to read as follows:

 

31A      Prior to the issue of the construction certificate, the plans identified in Condition 1 are to be amended to exclude the central bridge pier and to ensure the minimum bridge clear span is 32m.

 

E.        New Condition 34A is added to Development Consent DA-1552/2006  to read as follows:

 

34A      The approved intersection treatment of Brickmakers Drive and the bridge with the associated road link is to be constructed to Councils satisfaction prior to opening the bridge to traffic. 

 

F.         New Condition 34B is added to Development Consent DA-1552/2006  to read as follows:

 

34B      The developer is required to provide detailed analysis (Sidra Modelling) and design of the required urban channelised interim intersection treatment off Brickmakers Drive. 

 

G.        Condition 39 is amended to read as follows:

 

39        The height clearance of the bridge is affected with the flood level and the use of the underpass. Appropriate information about the flood levels should be used along with the future use of the underpass to determine the height clearance. This assessment should be carried out and included in the design to the satisfaction of Council, prior to construction certificate.  

 

H.        Condition 45 is amended to read as follows:

 

45.       The bridge design shall be undertaken in accordance with Bridge Design Code AS5100. The design shall include impact of blockage and loading from debris.

  

I.          New Condition 45A is added to Development Consent DA-1552/2006 to read as follows:

 

45A.     Timber formworks shall not constitute a structural component of the bridge. To facilitate inspection and maintenance, all formworks shall be removed from the built structure prior to handover to Council

 

 

 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That Council refuse the application to modify DA-1552/2006 at Lots 6 & 7 DP 1065574 & Pt Lot 105 DP 1070029 based upon the previous position of Council on this matter.

 

Foreshadowed Motion:        Moved: Clr Hadchiti            Seconded: Clr Ristevski

 

  1. That the recommendation be adopted (as shown on pages 42-43 of the minutes) in addition to points 2 and 3 below.

 

  1. That Council reaffirms the opposition to the concrete recyclers application currently before the PAC.

 

3.    That Council notes that the bridge has been approved by a court order.

 

Vote for:                       Clr Stanley

 

Vote against:                Mayor Mannoun

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadchiti

Clr Hadid

Clr Harle

Clr Karnib

Clr Ristevski

Clr Shelton

Clr Waller

 

On being put to the meeting the motion (by Clr Stanley) was declared LOST and the forshadowed motion (by Clr Hadchiti) then became the motion and on being put to the meeting was declared CARRIED.

 

Vote for:                       Mayor Mannoun

                                      Clr Balloot

                                      Clr Hadchiti

                                      Clr Hadid

                                      Clr Harle

                                      Clr Karnib

                                      Clr Ristevski

                                      Clr Shelton

                                      Clr Waller

 

Vote against:               Clr Stanley

 

9.30pm       EXTENSION OF TIME TO CONTINUE MEETING

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That an extension of time of 30 minutes be granted to continue the meeting.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


Chief Executive Officer Report

ITEM NO:      CEO 01

FILE NO:        155618.2014

SUBJECT:     Local Government NSW Annual Conference

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council endorse the key issues to be submitted for consideration at the Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2014.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                   Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Waller

 

1.    That Council endorse the key issues to be submitted for consideration at the Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2014 as listed in the report.

 

2.    In addition to the motions submitted in this report, Council also submit the motions as outlined in the resolution relating to NOM 03 on page 41 of these minutes.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:      CEO 02

FILE NO:        164528.2014

SUBJECT:     Proposed Organisational Structure

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Adopts the organisation structure as provided in Attachment 1 of this report in accordance with Section 333 of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

2.   Notes the effective date for implementation of the revised executive structure for senior staff positions as 1 August 2014.

 

3.   Determines the positions of Directors ‘Senior Staff’ positions subject to performance based contracts in accordance with Section 332 of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

4.   Notes the draft Executive Structure as provided in Attachment 1.

 

5.   Notes the termination of the senior staff positions of Executive Directors and 2 Group Managers.


 

6.   Notes that the proposed structure will finance the new positions of Property and Commercial Development, Business Improvement and Chief Financial Officer.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Waller                Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

Foreshadowed Motion:       Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That Council move into closed session to discuss this item as the matter is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10(A)(2)(a) of the Local Government Act because it contains personnel matters concerning particular individuals (other than Councillors).

 

 

On being put to the meeting the motion (by Clr Waller) was declared LOST.

 

 

The foreshadowed motion (by Clr Hadchiti) then became the motion and on being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


Council moved into Closed Session at 9.45pm. The public and the media left the Chambers.

 

Clr Hadchiti and Clr Balloot left the Chambers at 9.45pm.

 

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Mannoun

 

That Council move out of Closed Session and into Open Council.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Open session resumed at 9:47pm.

 

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Ristevski

 

That the recommendation as listed below be adopted;

 

That Council:

 

  1. Adopts the organisation structure as provided in Attachment 1 of this report in accordance with Section 333 of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

  1. Notes the effective date for implementation of the revised executive structure for senior staff positions as 1 August 2014.

 

  1. Determines the positions of Directors ‘Senior Staff’ positions subject to performance based contracts in accordance with Section 332 of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

  1. Notes the draft Executive Structure as provided in Attachment 1.

 

  1. Notes the termination of the senior staff positions of Executive Directors and 2 Group Managers.

 

6.    Notes that the proposed structure will finance the new positions of Property and Commercial Development, Business Improvement and Chief Financial Officer.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

Clr Hadchiti and Clr Balloot returned to the Chambers at 9.47pm.

 

Clr Hadchiti retired from the meeting at 9.49pm.


 

 

 

 


 

ITEM NO:      CEO 03

FILE NO:        162656.2014

SUBJECT:     Adoption of the exhibited amendments to the Revenue Policy (Fees and Charges) 2014-15

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:


Considers any submissions received and adopts the following amendments to the Statement of Revenue Policy (Fees and Charges) 2014-2015:

 

1.   Changes to the fee structure for onsite sewerage fees.

2.   New fee structure for construction certificates for Class 2-9 Commercial / Industrial, Class 10A Outbuildings over $5,000 Residential and Class 2-9 and 10A Commercial over $5,000 if the application is lodged as a combined Development Application and Construction Certificate including registration.

3.   Change in cost of after-hours venue hire for the Michael Wenden Aquatic Leisure Centre from not applicable in 2013-14 to subject to negotiation in 2014-15.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Waller                Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

BRING FORWARD AN AGENDA ITEM

 

Motion                                   Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Harle

 

That Item GMGO 01 be brought forward and dealt with now.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 


 

ITEM NO:

GMGO 01

FILE NO:

134681.2014

SUBJECT:

Proposed Deed of Agreement to facilitate the acquisition of a part of Lot 1 DP 1175057, Progress Circuit, Prestons and the construction of the Lyn Parade, Prestons extension

RECOMMENDATION

That Council:

 

1.   Agrees to enter into a Deed of Agreement with the landowner on terms outlined in the confidential attachment including:

 

1.1  Approve the acquisition of a part of Lot 1 DP 1175057, Progress Circuit, Prestons, containing an area of approximately 13,684 square metres for drainage purposes (drainage land);

 

1.2 Upon acquisition of the drainage land, classifies a part of Lot 1 DP 1175057, Progress Circuit, Prestons as ‘Community’ land;

 

1.3 Approve the acquisition of a two metre wide middle strip of land within the  proposed Lyn Parade road extension,  comprising an area of approximately 616 square metres (road extension portion);

 

1.4 Dedicates the road extension when completed as a public road in accordance with the Roads Act 1993;

 

1.5 Reimburse the landowner the cost of construction of the two metre wide middle strip of road extension as outlined point 1.3;

 

2.   Notes the linear and/or square metre areas stated are approximate and subject to final survey. Council approves acquisition and construction costs on a dollar per square/linear metre basis as outlined in the confidential attachment; 

 

3.   Keeps confidential the attachment supplied under separate cover containing the purchase price and details of the deed of agreement pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and

 

4.       Authorises its delegated officer to execute any documents, under Power of Attorney           necessary to give effect to this decision.

 

 

 

 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


Executive Director Report

ITEM NO:      ED 01

FILE NO:        156374.2014

SUBJECT:     Hoarding Fees

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Notes the information contained in this report.

 

2.   Endorses the following proposed new hoarding fees:

       A class – Application fee of $250 and $25 per metre

       B class – Application fee of $500 and $50 per metre.

 

3.   Directs the Group Manager Planning and Growth to progress an amendment to the adopted 2014/15 Revenue Policy (Fees and Charges) incorporating the revised hoarding fees, including public exhibition.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:      ED 02

FILE NO:        156893.2014

SUBJECT:     IHAP Members

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approves the extension of the current IHAP appointments for a period of 12 months.

 

2.   Authorises the Chief Executive Officer to finalise all appointment details and letters of acceptance for panel members.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

Foreshadowed Motion:       Moved: Clr Ristevski           Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That Council conduct an expression of interest process to establish a new panel of IHAP members

 

On being put to the meeting the motion (by Clr Shelton) was declared LOST.

 

The forshadowed motion (by Clr Ristevski) then became the motion and was declared CARRIED.

 

 
Business Excellence Report

ITEM NO:      GMBE 01

FILE NO:        147029.2014

SUBJECT:     Affixation of the Common Seal of Council

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council authorises the Common Seal of Council to be affixed to the loan refinancing agreement with National Australia Bank for $4.78m which was drawn on 30 June 2014.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Mayor Mannoun

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:      GMBE 02

FILE NO:        149826.2014

SUBJECT:     Statutory Investment Report June 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes this report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved:Clr Stanley               Seconded:  Clr Shelton

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 
Community and Culture  Report

ITEM NO:      GMCC 01

FILE NO:        130642.2014

SUBJECT:     Quarterly Report on Compliments and Complaints

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes this report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 
Economy and Engagement Report

ITEM NO:      GMEE 01

FILE NO:        155177.2014

SUBJECT:     Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Endorses the Financial Contributions Panel's recommendations for the provision of $10,000 from the 2014/15 Corporate Sponsorship Program as summarised in the table below:

 

Applicant name

Amount

Igbo Community Australia

$5,000 + GST

Future Achievement Australia Foundation

$4,000 + GST

Thomas Hassall Anglican College Parents and Friends Association

$1,000

 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That Council endorses the Financial Contributions Panel's recommendations for the provision of $10,000 from the 2014/15 Corporate Sponsorship Program as summarised in the table below:

 

Applicant name

Amount

Igbo Community Australia

$5,000 + GST

Future Achievement Australia Foundation

$4,000 + GST

Thomas Hassall Anglican College Parents and Friends Association

$2,500

 

 

 

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:      GMEE 02

FILE NO:        155980.2014

SUBJECT:     Community and Business Representation - Liverpool Council's Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council appoints the two representatives recommended in the confidential report to positions on the Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Waller                Seconded: Mayor Mannoun 

 

That Council defers the appointments to this committee, broadening the membership to ensure that we have the important stakeholders and to ensure true community representation and to include a solicitation of Kathryn Ussia and Briona Jocic as prospective candidates as community representatives if they prove appropriate in the nomination process.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 
Governance Report

 

ITEM NO:      GMGO 02

FILE NO:        148552.2014

SUBJECT:     Acquisition of Lot 358 DP 1184144, 80 Inverell Avenue, Hinchinbrook for drainage purposes

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approves the acquisition of Lot 358 DP 1184144, 80 Inverell Avenue, Hinchinbrook, containing an area of 5,077 square metres for the price and terms outlined in the confidential attachment;

 

2.   Upon settlement of the acquisition, classifies Lot 358 DP 1184144, 80 Inverell Avenue, Hinchinbrook as 'Community' land;

 

3.   Keeps confidential the attachment supplied under separate cover containing the acquisition price pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and

 

4.   Authorises its delegated officer to execute any document, under Power of Attorney necessary to give effect to this decision.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Waller                Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.


On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:      GMGO 03

FILE NO:        151176.2014

SUBJECT:     Acquisition of Lot 200 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill for the purposes of extending Kurrajong Road

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Agrees to the acquisition of Lot 200 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill for the increased purchase price outlined in the confidential attachment;

 

2.       Keeps confidential the report supplied under separate cover containing the acquisition price pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and

 

3.       Authorises its delegated officer to execute any document, under Power of Attorney necessary to give effect of this decision.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Waller                Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:      GMGO 04

FILE NO:        157890.2014

SUBJECT:     Authorisation of Remediation Works, Lot 2 DP 719245, 33 Moore Street, Liverpool

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Delegate to the CEO authority to utilise funds from the Administration Building Reserve to remediation works;

 

2.   Authorises the Chief Executive Officer or his delegate to enter into contracts for remediation works within Lot 2 DP 719245, 33 Moore Street, Liverpool;

 

3.   Notes that in the event that funds are allocated for remediation works a report outlining the works undertaken and costs of works will be submitted to the next available Council meeting.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Waller                Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 
Infrastructure and Environment Report

ITEM NO:      GMIE 01

FILE NO:        108749.2014

SUBJECT:     Tender WT2324 - Replacement of Car Park Equipment, Management System and Maintenance at the Warren Serviceway Car Park

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

 That Council:

 

1.   Adopts the recommendation outlined in the confidential report provided under separate cover.

 

2.   Keeps confidential the details supplied under separate cover containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Waller                Seconded: Clr Karnib

 

That Council:

1.         Accepts the Tender from RTS Constructions Aust. t/as Automated Parking Systems for Tender - WT2324 for the replacement of car park equipment, management system and maintenance for a five-year contract term for the price of $516,512 plus GST.

2.         Makes public its decision regarding Tender WT2324 - Replacement of car park equipment, management system and maintenance

3.         Notes that the Acting Executive Director will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority.

4.         Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 


ITEM NO:      GMIE 02

FILE NO:        151206.2014

SUBJECT:     Liverpool City Centre Traffic Study - Findings and next steps

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Notes the study findings and recommendations contained in the attached report;

2.       Undertakes detailed consultation with the Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) and Transport for NSW to secure their support for implementation of the study recommendations; 

3.       Makes representation to the Minister for Roads and Ports to seek State Government funding to enable the provision of a grade-separated intersection at Hume Highway and Hoxton Park Road intersection;

4.       Undertakes community consultation on the study findings and recommendations; and

5.       Be presented with a further report on an implementation plan following the initial consultation with the community and RMS.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Mayor Mannoun

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 
CONSIDERATION OF REMAINING ITEMS ON COUNCIL AGENDA

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Waller                Seconded: Mayor Mannoun

 

That all remaining items (as listed below) be deferred to the August Council meeting:

 

GMPG 01, GMPG 03, GMPG 04, CTTE 01, CTTE 02, CTTE 03, CTTE 04, CTTE 05, CTTE 06, CTTE 07, CTTE 08, CTTE 09, CTTE 10, CORR 01, QWN 01, QWN 02, QWN 03 and the presentation by Clr Balloot on his recent trip to China.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

The Mayor declared the meeting closed at 10.00pm.

 

 

 

<Signature>

Name: Ned Mannoun

Title:     Mayor

Date:     27 August 2014

I have authorised a stamp bearing my signature to be affixed to the pages of the Minutes of the Council Meeting held on  30 July 2014. I confirm that Council has adopted these Minutes as a true and accurate record of the meeting.

 

     


68

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 01

DA-589/2013 Construction of a six storey residential flat building comprising 17 residential units, and two levels of basement car park; demolition of existing structures and tree removal at 83 Campbell Street, Liverpool

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Activate the city centre and develop vibrant places that attract people to Liverpool

Key Policy

City Centre Strategy

File Ref

151635.2014

Report By

Venetin Aghostin - Team Leader Statutory Planning

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

Property

83 Campbell Street, Liverpool (Cnr Lot 6 DP 30366)

Owner

Windsor Apartments Pty Ltd

Applicant

Windsor Apartments Pty Ltd

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council is in receipt of a development application proposing the construction of a six storey residential flat building at 83 Campbell Street, Liverpool.

 

Pursuant to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, this application was referred to the IHAP who recommended that the application …be deferred until the applicant has made the appropriate changes in accordance with the IHAP’s recommendations and the Design Review Panel’s recommendations.

 

Council officers acknowledge the issues raised by the IHAP and provide a detailed response to those issues within the body of this report. Since the IHAP meeting, the applicant has lodged amended documentation to address the issues of concern. Council officers have reviewed the documentation and consider that the development application is now acceptable to be approved in its amended form.

 

The application is recommended for approval.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approve Development Application No. DA-589/2013 subject to the revised recommended conditions attached.

 

 

REPORT

 

Background

Council is in receipt of a development application proposing the construction of a six storey residential flat building at 83 Campbell Street Liverpool.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the endorsed Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, the proposal was referred to the IHAP for consideration, and is now referred to Council for consideration and determination, as the proposed development a multi-storey building in the Liverpool City Centre; and also because it involves a variation to the building separation development standard of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP), 2008 of more than 10%.

 

At their meeting on 30 June 2014, IHAP recommended that the application be deferred until the applicant has made the appropriate changes in accordance with the IHAP’s recommendations and the Design Review Panel’s recommendations.

 

The reason for the recommendation was explained as follows:

 

The Panel have inspected the site, the plans and have read the Council officer’s report. The Panel is of the view that there are aspects of the proposal to recommend, that is the amount of sunlight penetration and the cross ventilation within each unit and zero setback to the western boundary is recommended, however the site is a prominent corner in the city centre and requires an appropriate design response. The Panel is of a view that this design response has not been made in the drawings before it.

 

The external façade composition, material choice and the specification of materials and colours are inadequate. The inadequacies relate to the design response to a prominent corner site and the failure to give sufficient information regarding materials and colours. The same comments apply to the landscape plan where more details are required, such as, the extent of on-slab planting etc.

 

The Panel suggests that a further opinion is obtained from the applicant’s transport planner with respect to the interaction with the adjacent traffic signals. This has not been considered in the current traffic report.

 

The Panel recommends that the amended drawings be referred to the Design Review Panel for comment.

 

The issues raised by IHAP have been addressed within this report, and are generally considered to now be resolved, via the submission of amended documentation from the applicant which now addresses the issues of concern.


The proposal

The development application seeks consent for the construction of a six storey residential flat building comprising a total of 17 residential units; two basement levels providing for a total of 23 car parking spaces; and ancillary works. The height of the building is 21.8m and the Floor Space Ratio (FSR) is 1.99:1 (based on a Gross Floor Area (GFA) of 1,353m2 and site area of 676.6m2.    

 

The site

The site is identified as Lot  6 DP 30366, and is known as 83 Campbell Street, Liverpool. The site has a total land area of 676.6m2. The site is a corner allotment with a secondary frontage to Bathurst Street.

 

Figure 1: Aerial Photograph

 

The issues raised in the planning report

The main issue identified by the planning report with respect to the proposal relates to the proposed variation to the minimum building separation requirement prescribed by Clause 7.4 of the LLEP 2008.

 

Clause 7.4 requires a 9m separation between this proposal and an approved residential flat building on the west-adjoining land which has approval for a nil setback to the common boundary between the sites. This development also proposes a nil setback along the western boundary which would result in a nil building separation between the two buildings.

 

Compliance with the LLEP’s building separation standard of 9m is unrealistic and unnecessary in this instance, given the adjoining land has a similar approval for a building on the boundary. The variation is considered to be acceptable in the circumstances of this case, as outlined in the planning report to IHAP, attached under separate cover.

 

The issues raised by IHAP

The issues identified by the IHAP after their review of the planning report primarily related to the impact of the development on nearby traffic signals; a redesign of the development; and a further review by the independent Design Review Panel (DRP).

 


Impact on traffic signals

The first issue relating to the impact on traffic signals has already been addressed by Council’s planning officers. IHAP …suggests that a further opinion is obtained from the applicant’s transport planner with respect to the interaction with the adjacent traffic signals… on the basis that this issue …has not been considered in the current traffic report…:

 

However, a further opinion from the applicant’s consultants is unnecessary as this issue has been considered to be acceptable. Council’s internal Traffic and Transport Section specifically provided the following advice in relation to this issue:

 

The proposed development is approximately 20m from traffic signals at the Bathurst Street and Campbell Street intersection. It is considered that right turning manoeuvres at the proposed development are likely to have impact on traffic in Campbell Street especially during peak periods. It is recommended that movement from the proposed development is restricted to left-in and left-out either by providing minimum 900 wide central median in Campbell Street or configuring the driveway for left-in and left-out manoeuvres only.

 

Accordingly, the following Draft Condition No. 17 was recommended in the planning report referred to IHAP:

 

Left-Turn Only’ Traffic Movements Plan

 

17. A design plan shall be submitted to Council’s Traffic Section for approval, illustrating that vehicular access to the development will be limited to left-turn-in into the site, and left-turn-out out of the site, only.

 

In this regard, a further opinion from the applicant’s consultants is unnecessary.

 

Redesign and Amended Plans

The second issue pertaining to the redesign of the development has been addressed via the applicants’ submission of amended plans which fully address the IHAP and DRP issues of concern.

 

IHAP stated that …the site is a prominent corner in the city centre and requires an appropriate design response. The Panel is of a view that this design response has not been made in the drawings before it…The external façade composition, material choice and the specification of materials and colours are inadequate. The inadequacies relate to the design response to a prominent corner site and the failure to give sufficient information regarding materials and colours. The same comments apply to the landscape plan where more details are required, such as, the extent of on-slab planting etc…The Panel recommends that the amended drawings be referred to the Design Review Panel for comment.

 

The amended plans addressed the IHAP concerns as follows:

 

·    The corner element of the building is accentuated with a corner curtain wall which reflects the curved corner of the site.

·    Submission of a detailed Materials Schedule clearly identifying the materials and finishes to be utilised on all components of the development. 

·    Landscaping amendments including:

Front fence amended to reflect the ‘urban’ character; fence extended around the ground corner unit; and low height fence added around the common open space.

Deep soil area identified; a simplified plantation scheme added; and planting details and quantities provided.

Driveway reduced to 6.1m to reduce extent of hard-paved areas.

 

Overall, the development in its amended form is considered to be an appropriate response to this corner site; maintains an appropriate façade composition; incorporates an acceptable choice of material; and provides the necessary level of detail of planting.

 

The draft recommended conditions of consent previously reported as part of the IHAP report have been updated and amended to reflect the amended plans, and form an attachment to this report.

 

Review by DRP

The third IHAP issue relating to a further DRP review is considered unnecessary as Council’s planning officers have assessed and considered the DRP’s comments relating to design aspects of the proposal and consider the amended proposal to be acceptable.

 

It is noted that the independent advice of the DRP was obtained by Council officers when the application was originally lodged. The DRP’s advice to Council officers was that, provided the application was amended to incorporate the recommendations of the DRP, satisfactory design excellence could be achieved in accordance with provisions of the LLEP 2008.

 

The application has since been amended several times by the applicant to address Council’s concerns with the proposal. The recent amendments responding to the IHAP concerns have been evaluated by Council officers taking into account advice of the DRP. It is concluded that the amendments appropriately address the DRP recommendations and that a further review by the DRP would be unnecessary, hence, the application is being reported to Council for determination, without a further referral to the DRP.

 

It should be noted that planning officers have satisfied Council’s obligations under State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP) No. 65 – Design Quality of Residential Flat Development with respect to obtaining and considering the advice of the DRP. It is considered that a further review by the DRP is unnecessary. Any further delay would be unreasonable as it is unlikely that a further review would lead to a development outcome that would be significantly different in comparison to the current amended proposal.

 

Exhibition of the proposal

The application was advertised and publicly notified to surrounding properties for a period of 14 days between 3 July 2013 to 18 July 2013 in accordance with the Liverpool Development Control Plan (LDCP) 2008. No submissions were received.

 

Conclusion

Pursuant to the assessment of the application in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment (EP&A) Act 1979 and the LLEP 2008, it is considered that the proposed development is acceptable. Accordingly, the application is recommended for approval.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Environmental and Sustainability

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Applicant and Land Owner Details (Under separate cover)

2.View

Revised draft conditions of consent (Under separate cover)

3.View

IHAP Report (Under separate cover)

4.View

IHAP recommendation (Under separate cover)

  


74

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 02

DA-851/2013 - Construction of a boarding house at 16 Collinsville Place, Miller

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

175913.2014

Report By

Melissah Osland - Senior Development

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

Property

Lot 22 DP 221267

16 Collinsville Place, Miller

Owner

Avoser Pty Ltd

Applicant

DeAngelis Taylor and Associates

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council is in receipt of a development application proposing the construction of a boarding house containing eleven boarding rooms within a part single storey and part three storey building. Also proposed is the creation of a stormwater easement through a property to the rear known as No. 19 Cabramatta Avenue, Miller or Lot 3 DP 22167.

 

The site is zoned R4 High Density Residential pursuant to the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008. The proposal is defined as a ‘boarding house’ and is permissible in the R4 zone, subject to Council consent.

 

The Application was referred to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) who recommended that the application be approved as per the Officer recommendation, subject to the imposition of additional conditions of consent relating to privacy.

 

The recommended conditions are considered to be appropriate and it is therefore recommended that the conditions be incorporated into the recommended conditions of consent.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Approves the application DA-851/2013, subject to the recommended conditions attached to the IHAP report and the following amendments to the Draft Determination Notice considered by IHAP:

 

Amend Draft Condition 5 to read as follows:

 

Rear Windows

 

5.  The windows on the rear elevation shall be reconfigured to increase the area of the window and reduce the sill height to 900mm. Amended plans shall be submitted to the satisfaction of Council’s Service Manager, Development Assessment.

 

To insert two additional conditions as follows:

 

Privacy

 

The windows on the western elevation adjacent to the stairwell must be obscure glazed on the bottom four rows. Details are to be submitted to the PCA with the Construction Certificate application.

 

The outdoor covered seating area shall be screened by a 1.5 metre high screen to the full width of the southern elevation. Details are to be submitted to the PCA with the Construction Certificate application.   

 

REPORT

 

Background

 

The development application seeks consent for the construction of a boarding house containing eleven boarding rooms within a part single storey and part three 3 storey building; including creation of a stormwater easement through the rear property known as Lot 3 DP 22167, 19 Cabramatta Avenue, Miller.

 

The site is zoned R4 High Density Residential pursuant to the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008. The proposal is defined as a ‘boarding house’ and is permissible in the R4 zone, subject to Council consent.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the endorsed Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, the proposal is referred to IHAP for consideration as the proposal seeks a Clause 4.6 variation to the minimum building street frontage under Clause 7.14 of Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (LLEP 2008).

 

At their meeting on 28 July 2014, IHAP made the following recommendations:

 

The Panel is concerned about potential overlooking through the extensive glazing on the western elevation, adjacent to the stairwell. The Panel recommends that the glazing be translucent to restrict direct viewing across the side boundary for all the glazing except for the top row of panels. The objective is to restrict viewing across the side boundary but to allow views to the sky through the top two panels.

 

The Panel is concerned about potential overlooking of the backyards of the properties to the south from the proposed outdoor covered seating area. To address this impact, the Panel recommends that a 1.5 metre high privacy screen be installed across the full width of the southern elevation of the outdoor seating area.

 

The Panel notes that the proposed drainage line through the property at 19 Cabramatta Avenue appears to be surface flow only. The Panel suggest that Council’s drainage engineer is satisfied that this type of drainage arrangement is appropriate.

 

The Panel supports condition 5 to reduce the sill height of the south facing bedroom windows. The Panel recommends that the condition be altered to require the windows to be reconfigured with a 900mm high sill.

 

The Panel recommends that Council grant development consent to DA-851/2013 subject to the deferred commencement conditions and other conditions recommended by Council officers as supplemented by the Panel’s recommended conditions as outlined in these minutes.

 

The Proposal

 

The development application seeks consent for the construction of a boarding house comprising 11 boarding rooms. Further details of the application are provided below:

 

Building Design

 

·    Construction of a boarding house comprising of 11 boarding rooms for single lodgers only, each with kitchen and bathroom facilities;

·    The development is single storey at the front and three storeys at the rear;

·    The highest point of the building, measured from natural ground to the ridge is 9.14m;

·    Total Gross Floor Area (GFA) of the development is 390m2 with Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 0.67:1 (based on GFA 390m2 and site area of 575m2); and

·    Building materials primarily include metal deck roof; rendered and painted  brick walls in various shades of black and grey; fibre cement cladding,  aluminium framed windows; and a face brick feature wall.

 

Vehicular and Pedestrian Access

 

·    Vehicular access is provided from Collinsville Place via a 5 metre wide driveway providing direct at grade access to the garage.

·    Pedestrian access is provided from Collinsville Place via a common footpath entrance.

 

 

 

 

 

Parking Provisions

 

·    Car parking for 2 spaces is provided. 

·    Bicycle parking to accommodate 3 bicycles, located adjacent to the garage.

·    Motorcycle parking is not provided. A condition of consent is recommended in this regard.

 

Floor Layouts

 

·    Upper Level Floor: The upper floor level contains a double garage and the entry/foyer area. A large void area is also provided which facilitates in allowing natural light to penetrate down into the common room below. Access to mid-level floor and lower level floor are provided by a lift or stairs.

·    Mid-Level Floor: Contains six boarding rooms including one accessible boarding room. A common room with an area of 45m2 is also provided.

·    Lower Level Floor: Contains five boarding rooms including one accessible boarding room. A common room with an area of 44m2 is provided, as well as a laundry room and store room.

 

Landscaping and Private Open Space

 

·    The development provides a total of 223m2 of landscaped area which equates to 38.8% of the site area.

·    The front setback comprises a combination of soft landscaping and deep soil planting for medium to large plantings while the rear setback is predominately turfed with some medium plantings along the side boundaries for additional privacy. 

·    The development provides 184m2 of private open space, which includes an outdoor covered seating area.  Direct access to the private open space, is from the lower level communal area.

 

Stormwater Drainage

 

·    Stormwater runoff will be conveyed to the existing stormwater system in Cabramatta Avenue via a proposed drainage easement. The drainage easement is proposed to be created over the downstream property (Lot 3, DP 221267, 19 Cabramatta Avenue Miller) and will consist of a 1m wide unlined drain along the southern side boundary. Owners consent has been provided by the owners of No. 19 Cabramatta Avenue, Miller for lodgement of the application.

·    An on-site detention (OSD) tank will be provided within the rear yard that will connect to the proposed drainage easement.

 

The Site

 

The site is an irregular shaped lot known as 16 Collinsville Place, Miller being Lot 22 DP 221267. The site has an area of 574.4m2 with a frontage of 16.1m to Collinsville Place and is currently vacant. The site has a fall of approximately 7.7m over a distance of 30m from its northern to southern boundary.  The site is not affected by any easements or restrictions.

 

Figure 1 Aerial image of the subject site

 

Consideration of IHAP Recommendation

 

An assessment of each of the matters raised in the IHAP recommendation has been undertaken and is provided below.

 

Privacy

 

Panel Comment:

The Panel is concerned about potential overlooking through the extensive glazing on the western elevation, adjacent to the stairwell. The Panel recommends that the glazing be translucent to restrict direct viewing across the side boundary for all the glazing except for the top row of panels. The objective is to restrict viewing across the side boundary but to allow views to the sky through the top two panels.

 

The Panel is concerned about potential overlooking of the backyards of the properties to the south from the proposed outdoor covered seating area. To address this impact, the Panel recommends that a 1.5 metre high privacy screen be installed across the full width of the southern elevation of the outdoor seating area.

 

Response:

 

The panel recommendations will ensure the amenity of adjoining properties. Conditions are proposed to address these recommendations as outlined above.

 

Drainage Easement

 

Panel Comment:

The Panel notes that the proposed drainage line through the property at 19 Cabramatta Avenue appears to be surface flow only. The Panel suggest that Council’s drainage engineer is satisfied that this type of drainage arrangement is appropriate.

 

Response:

 

Council’s Drainage Engineer has reviewed the proposal and has found overland flow satisfactory as per the following comments:

 

A detail design of the OSD will be required at the Construction Certificate stage and it should include all the calculations (as per Council On-Site Stormwater Detention Technical Specification and Policy) and DRAINS model shall be submitted within Construction Certificate for further assessment.

 

An overland flow path through the downstream property is shown on the revised plan to account for emergency spillwavs or overflows. The existing structure, metal shed and chicken coop, located within the proposed easement on Lot 3 DP221267 will be relocated to allow for free overland flow path over the easement.

 

Conditions are recommended to reflect the above.

 

Amenity of Boarding Rooms

 

Panel Comment:

The Panel supports condition 5 to reduce the sill height of the south facing bedroom windows. The Panel recommends that the condition be altered to require the windows to be reconfigured with a 900mm high sill.

 

Response:

 

Condition 5 has been amended to reflect this. A high level of amenity for the boarding rooms facing the rear will be provided by 900mm sill heights.

 

Conclusion

 

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and is worthy of support. On this basis, the application is recommended for approval, subject to the additional conditions discussed within this report.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

 


Social and Cultural

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Applicant and Land Owner Details (Under separate cover)

2.View

IHAP report (Under separate cover)

3.View

IHAP Recommendation (Under separate cover)

  


81

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 03

DA-65/2014 Construction of eight attached 2-storey dwellings; and re-subdivision of land to create eight Torrens title lots at Hugh Terrace and Windsock Avenue, Middleton Grange

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

178250.2014

Report By

Ruth Bennett - Development Planner

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

Property

Lots 201-205 and Part Residue Lot 215 DP 1169240 Hugh Terrace, Middleton Grange

Owner

Danallam Developments Pty Ltd

Applicant

Danallam Developments Pty Ltd

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council is in receipt of a Development Application proposing the construction of attached housing including Torrens title subdivision, having the following key components:

 

·    The creation of eight lots from proposed Lot 205.  The proposed small lots will range in size from 254.6m2 to 356.3m2.  Six of the lots do not comply with the minimum lot size requirement of 300m2 prescribed by Clause 4.1 of LLEP 2008.  (Note: a separate development application being DA-1285/2013 was granted approval on 4 April 2014 for the consolidation of Lots 201-205 and Part Residue Lot 215 into one large lot.  Proposed Lot 205 is subsequently being re-subdivided under this DA, but is not currently registered.)

·    The construction of five attached dwellings over five of the proposed lots

·    The construction of three attached dwellings over three of the proposed lots

·     Floor Space Ratio (FSR) ranges from 0.54:1 to 0.78:1.  One dwelling exceeds the allowable FSR.

This application was referred to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP).  IHAP recommended that the application be approved as per the Officer’s recommendation, subject to the imposition of additional conditions of consent requiring the planting of twelve (12) street trees. 

 

The application has been considered in the context of the applicable planning instruments and merit.  It is considered that the application should be approved, subject to the imposition of additional conditions of consent being added to the recommended conditions of consent. 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Approve the application DA-65/2014, subject to the recommended conditions attached to the IHAP Report, and the following amendments to the Draft Determination Notice as recommended by IHAP:

 

Add Draft Conditions 20a and 47a to read as follows:

 

B.   PRIOR TO ISSUE OF A CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE

 

Amended Landscape Concept Plan – Street Trees

 

20a.     An amended landscape concept plan is to be submitted to the satisfaction of Council which includes incorporation of twelve (1) street trees, to be planted at appropriate intervals.  The species is to be selected in consultation with Council’s landscape architect.  Details are to be shown on the construction certificate plans.

 

D.   DURING CONSTRUCTION

 

47a.     Twelve (12) street trees are to be planted at appropriate intervals, in accordance with the amended landscape concept plan.

 

 

REPORT

 

Background

Council has received and considered a development application proposing the construction of attached housing including Torrens title subdivision.  The key components are as follows:

 

·    The creation of eight lots from proposed Lot 205

·    The construction of five attached dwellings over five of the proposed lots

·    The construction of three attached dwellings over three of the proposed lots.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the endorsed Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, the proposal was referred to the IHAP for consideration, and is now referred to Council for consideration and determination, as the proposed development includes a request to vary two development standards in excess of 10%, pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008.

 

At their meeting on 30 July 2014, the IHAP made the following recommendation:

 

The panel agrees with the recommendation contained within the assessment report subject to the inclusion of additional conditions of consent to address the following point:

 

The Panel notes that there are no details of street tree planting on the landscape concept plan.  The Panel recommends that a condition be imposed requiring the planting of 12 street trees at appropriate intervals with species selected in consultation with Council’s landscape architect.  Details to be shown on the construction certificate plans.

 

The proposal

The application seeks consent for the construction of attached housing including Torrens title subdivision, having the following key components:

 

·    The creation of eight lots from proposed Lot 205.  (Note: proposed Lot 205 was approved under DA-1285/2013, but not currently registered.)  These lots will range in size from 254.6m2 to 356.3m2.  Six of the lots do not comply with the minimum lot size requirement of 300m2 prescribed by Clause 4.1 of LLEP 2008.  (Note: a separate development application being DA-1285/2013 was granted approval on 4 April 2014 for the consolidation of Lots 201-205 and Part Residue Lot 215 into one large lot.  Proposed Lot 205 is subsequently being re-subdivided under this DA.) 

·    The construction of five attached dwellings over five of the proposed lots

·    The construction of three attached dwellings over three of the proposed lots

·     Floor Space Ratio (FSR) ranges from 0.54:1 to 0.78:1.  One dwelling exceeds the allowable FSR.

The proposed subdivision plan is shown below.

 

 

 Figure 1 – Submitted Proposed Subdivision Plan

Accordingly, the application is accompanied by written requests, pursuant to Clause 4.6 of LLEP 2008, to vary:

 

·    Clause 4.1 of the LLEP 2008, which prescribes the minimum lot size requirement

·    Clause 4.4 of the LLEP 2008, which prescribes the maximum floor space ratio requirement.

 

The applicant has provided architectural plans to enable consideration of the proposal with respect to Council’s relevant development controls and standards.

 

The site

The subject application proposes works affecting several existing registered lots, which are legally described as follows:

 

·    Lots 201, 202, 203, 204 DP 1169240 Hugh Terrace, Middleton Grange

·    Lot 205 DP 1169240, No. 2 Windsock Avenue, Middleton Grange

·    Part Residue Lot 215 DP 1169240, Southern Cross Avenue, Middleton Grange.

The site is zoned R1 - General Residential.  The subject site is irregular in shape, having an area measuring 2,340m2 and is currently vacant.  The site has been cleared, and earthworks, drainage, and utilities associated with the subdivision undertaken under DA-505/2011 have been completed. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT SITE

 

 

Figure 2 - DA-1285/2013 – Approved Plan of Subdivision

SUBJECT SITE

 
 

IHAP Recommendation

The IHAP recommendation seeks to minimise the potential impacts of the proposed development through the imposition of adequate landscaping, to improve the amenity of the neighbourhood. 

The recommendations of the Panel are summarised and discussed below:

The Panel notes that there are no details of street tree planting on the landscape concept plan.  The Panel recommends that a condition be imposed requiring the planting of 12 street trees at appropriate intervals, with species selected in consultation with Council’s landscape architects.

It is evident that the IHAP recommendation would improve the design outcome of the proposed subdivision and multi-dwelling proposal, particularly in terms of the additional landscaping recommended with the planting of twelve street trees on Hugh Terrace, Windsock Avenue, and proposed Holden Terrace.  The street tree planting will improve the level of amenity in the public space along the street frontage on the north-western boundary of the site, and will reduce potential impacts that may arise from the proposed development.

The Panel agrees with the Council officer’s assessment of the proposed variation to the minimum lot size in Clause 4.1 and the maximum floor space ratio for proposed Lot 2054 in Clause 4.4 of LLEP 2008.

On this basis, in accordance with the IHAP recommendations and the assessment conducted above, it is recommended that the following conditions be included in the consent as follows:

 

B.   PRIOR TO ISSUE OF A CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE

 

Amended Landscape Concept Plan – Street Trees

 

20a.     An amended landscape concept plan is to be submitted to the satisfaction of Council which includes incorporation of twelve (1) street trees, to be planted at appropriate intervals.  The species is to be selected in consultation with Council’s landscape architect.  Details are to be shown on the construction certificate plans.

 

D.   DURING CONSTRUCTION

 

47a.     Twelve (12) street trees are to be planted at appropriate intervals, in accordance with the amended landscape concept plan.

 

Conclusion

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and is worthy of support.  On this basis, the application is recommended for approval, subject to the draft conditions contained within the Council officer’s IHAP report, and the additional conditions contained herein.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

 

Environmental and Sustainability

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

 


Social and Cultural

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

IHAP Report (Under separate cover)

2.View

IHAP Recommendation (Under separate cover)

   


87

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Development Application Determination Report

 

DAD 01

DA-1198/2013 - Partial demolition and alterations and additions to the existing dwelling; use of the dwelling as a child care centre; and installation of signage at 4 Bungarra Crescent Chipping Norton

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

184877.2014

Report By

Brendon Clendenning - Senior Development Planner

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

Property

4 Bungarra Crescent Chipping Norton

Owner

Mr Ozden Mustafa

Applicant

Mr Ozden Mustafa

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council is in receipt of a Development Application proposing partial demolition of existing dwelling; alterations and additions to the existing dwelling; use of the dwelling as a child care centre; and installation of business identification signage at 4 Bungarra Crescent, Chipping Norton.

 

This application was referred to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) who recommended that the application be approved as per the Officer recommendation, and subject to the imposition of additional conditions of consent relating to design, traffic management and landscaping. The conditions recommended by IHAP were considered to be appropriate and it was recommended that they be incorporated into the recommended conditions of consent.

 

At its meeting on 30 July 2014, Council resolved to defer the application to the next Council meeting after the Councillors have had the opportunity to review the objections received. The information contained within the objections has been summarised within this report.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Approve the application DA-1198/2013, subject to the recommended conditions attached to the IHAP Report and the following amendments to the Draft Determination Notice considered by IHAP:

 

Amend Draft Condition 1 to read as follows:

 

1.      Development the subject of this determination notice must be carried out strictly in accordance with Development Application No. DA-1198/2013 lodged on 24 October 2013 and accompanying plans and reports listed below and stamped DA-1198/2013, except where modified by the undermentioned conditions and amendments contained within this condition:

 

Description

Issue

Job No

Sheet

Date

Prepared By

DA01 - Cover Page, Site Analysis & Site/Roof Plan

B

13011

1 of 5

28 March 2014

De Angelis Taylor + Associates

DA02 - Ground Floor Plan & Sections

B

13011

2 of 5

28 March 2014

De Angelis Taylor + Associates

DA03 -Elevations & Street Elevation

B

13011

3 of 5

28 March 2014

De Angelis Taylor + Associates

DA04 - Demolition Plan & Earthworks Plan

B

13011

4 of 5

28 March 2014

De Angelis Taylor + Associates

L-01 - Landscape Plan

B

3442b

 

24 March 2014

Ray Fuggle Associates

Exterior Finishes Schedule

C

13011

-

n.d.

De Angelis Taylor + Associates

Childcare Centre Noise Assessment

-

20130747.1

-

26 August 2013

Acoustic Logic

 

          The following design amendments are required:

·    A minimum of 50% of the rear yard marked on the approved landscape plan as “turf, artificial turf or wetpour rubber”, is to be comprised of permeable landscaping. This shall be situated in such a manner as to ensure the viability of the trees to be retained.

·    The two Pyrus Calleryana provided within the front setback shall be planted with a pot size of 200L.

 

 

 

 

·    Horizontal sunhoods shall be located above the front windows to the rooms marked as Foyer, Admin and Staff Room. There are to be two continuous sunhoods: one over the windows between the Foyer and the Admin room, and one over all three windows to the Staff Room. The sunhoods are to project one metre from the front wall.

·    The proposed front wall sign shall be located below the first sunhood described above.

 

Amend Draft Condition 129 to read as follows:

 

129.    The applicant is to prepare and implement an Operational Traffic Management Plan (OTMP). The OTMP shall incorporate the following:

 

·    Strategies for information advising parents and care givers of preferred route to the child care centre and the time for pick-up and drop-off, having regard to the Assessment of Traffic and Parking Implications prepared by Traffic Impact Services Pty Ltd and dated October 2013, and having regard for the peak periods of vehicle movement for nearby schools.

·    Strategies for minimising potential queuing when parents drop off and pick up children.

 

The OTMP shall be implemented on an ongoing basis.

 

REPORT

 

Background

 

Council has received and considered a development application proposing partial demolition of the existing dwelling; alterations and additions to the existing dwelling; use of the dwelling as a child care centre; and installation of business identification signage at 4 Bungarra Crescent, Chipping Norton.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the endorsed Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, the proposal was referred to the IHAP for consideration, and was referred to Council for consideration and determination, as the proposal has received 12 objections.

 

At their meeting on 30 June 2014, IHAP recommended that the application be approved subject to conditions requiring design amendments. Council Officers considered the recommendation of IHAP in a report made to Council. At their meeting on 30 July 2014, Council resolved as follows:

 

“That Council defers IHAP 03 - DA-1198/2013 to the next Council meeting after Councillors have had the opportunity to review the objections received”.

 

 

 

 

The Proposal

 

The Development Application proposes the following:

 

·    Demolition of the majority of the existing dwelling, include the outbuilding located on the east of the site.

·    Construction of a single storey child care centre to cater for 28 children and three staff, with hours from 7:00am-6:00pm, Monday to Friday.

·    Provision of a total of six parking spaces including:

4 at the east of the site, including a stacked parking space

2 at the front of the site including an accessible parking space.

·    Construction of a second vehicular crossing to enable vehicles to enter and exit in a forward direction.

·    Provision of a Perspex return over the rear fence to address acoustic impacts of the proposal.

 

The Site

 

The subject site is known as Lot 52 DP 566849, Chipping Norton and has an area of 815.5m2.The site is accessible from Bungarra Crescent and currently contains a detached single storey dweling.

 

Subject Site

 

Figure 1 Aerial image of the subject site

 

Council Resolution

 

The application register had included the names of thirteen parties who had made a submission to this application. A review of the document management system has identified that there are twelve individual responses recorded on the file. The reason for the discrepancy is that two objectors were registered individually, despite submitting a combined letter, and providing an identical postal address.

 

 

It is noted that the applicant had raised concerns about a potential inconsistency in Council’s recording of the number of submissions that had been received. The cause of the inconsistencies may be partly explained by the following:

 

·    Of the twelve located submissions, one of those was a letter from a neighbour of a nearby child care centre, which was forwarded to Council by the applicant. This letter stated that the signatory did not have any complaints about the operation of the centre near their residence. This letter was registered as a letter of support for the application.

·    Several of the letters did not specifically state an objection to the development. However, these letters were registered as objections, as they had raised concerns with the application and the information submitted with the application, and they did not explicitly state any support for the application.

·    The applicant had requested a copy of the objections, which was sent to the applicant with the personal details of the objectors removed. However, one of the submissions was not recorded electronically at that time and was not sent to the applicant. This submission raised parking, traffic and pedestrian safety issues, which were similar to issues raised by other objectors.

 

Aside from the letter of support, all of these submissions were received prior to the closing date of 7 February 2014. A range of issues were identified within the submissions received by Council. Many of the issues were raised by more than one objector. The issues within the submissions were categorised broadly and outlined within the report that was prepared for the IHAP meeting. This information is reproduced below:

 

ISSUE 1:         There are already childcare centres within the immediate vicinity, and there are more appropriate areas for the location of a child care centre.

 

Comment:      The proposal satisfies the requirements of the LDCP 2008, which require child care centres to be provided on sites that are not located:

·     Adjacent to industrial activities.

·     Closer than 300m to another childcare centre.

·     On a classified road.

·     On a Road carriageway with a width of less than 6.5m.

·     On a cul-de-sac.

 

The proposal is permissible within the zone, and may be provided on the subject site.

 

ISSUE 2:         Traffic congestion, particularly during the morning and afternoon, and on Bungarra Crescent, Bangalow Avenue and Nuwarra Road.

 

Concerns were also raised that the initial Traffic Report was not undertaken during AM and PM peak school hours, when nearby schools are busiest.

 

Comment:      A traffic report has been submitted with the proposal which indicates that the proposal would not create undue traffic impacts on surrounding streets.

 

An additional assessment of peak morning and afternoon periods was submitted to Council on 28 March 2014, which also concluded that the proposal was satisfactory with respect to traffic generation.

 

ISSUE 3:         Insufficient parking

 

Comment:      Amended plans were submitted which provided an additional parking space on the site, in order to achieve compliance with the LDCP. There is no basis under Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 for requiring additional parking beyond this requirement.

 

ISSUE 4:         Acoustic impacts to neighbouring residential properties, and uncertainty as to the accuracy of the Acoustic Report.

 

Comment:      The application was accompanied by an acoustic report, which demonstrated that the proposal would be able to comply with relevant noise legislation, subject to the provision of an acoustic fence at the rear.

 

                        The report was prepared by an accredited acoustic consultant, and reviewed by Council, and there is no evidence to suggest that the findings are not accurate.

 

ISSUE 5:         Acoustic testing was based on data gathered for a facility with only 8 children

 

Comment:      The applicant responded to this matter by providing a letter from the appointed acoustic consultant, who advised that the collected data was adjusted using a percentage of sound calculation for noise levels for the proposed fifteen children in external areas. This methodology is considered to be sound.

 

ISSUE 6:         Safety Issues for school children and nearby immobile residents, due to increased traffic, insufficient parking and new vehicle crossings.

 

Comment:      There is no evidence to indicate that the proposal will create adverse impacts on safety of pedestrians (including children and immobile persons) within the vicinity of the site. The proposal will not create any substantial changes to the existing conditions for pedestrians and vehicles within the vicinity of the site. The new vehicle crossing must be designed to the satisfaction of Council.

 

ISSUE 7:         Potential Errors within Statement of Environmental Effects (SOEE), as follows:

·   Neighbourhood shops are located on Longstaff Avenue provide parking for staff and patients.

 

·   Bungarra Crescent does not connect directly to Alfred Road. Bungarra Crescent is the only western exit from the local estate and connects to Nuwarra Road. Cars must turn right from Bungana Crescent into Nuwarra Road and then into Alfred Road.

 

Comment:      The SOEE does not imply that parking is available at the nearby shops. While the error with relation to Alfred Road is noted, it does not influence the assessment of the proposal, and relates only to descriptive components of the SOEE.

 

ISSUE 8:         Potential for asbestos removal has not been addressed within application.

 

Comment:      A condition is recommended that requires any asbestos removal to be carried out in accordance with the requirements of WorkCover NSW and the Environment Protection Authority.

 

ISSUE 9:         Inconsistency with existing fencing height provided within submission documents.

 

Comment:      The acoustic report details that a fence is proposed to minimise the acoustic impacts to neighbouring properties. It is acknowledged that the existing fences on the site vary in height. However, the height of the existing fencing does not influence the assessment of the application, and the height of the proposed fencing has been considered in this assessment.

 

ISSUE 10:      Potential Hours of operation unclear, given conflicting information within Statement of Environmental Effects and Traffic Report.

 

Comment:      This was addressed by the applicant, who outlined the hours to be 7:00am to 6:00pm.

 

ISSUE 11:       Visual quality of the surrounds will not be improved.

 

Comment:      The proposal is of a satisfactory visual appearance.

 

ISSUE 12:       Loss of privacy to 10 Nuwarra Road Chipping Norton (inspection requested)

 

Comment:      The proposal is single storey only and would not present any adverse impacts to the visual privacy of neighbouring dwellings. Acoustic privacy has been addressed elsewhere.

 

ISSUE 13:       Subject site is adjacent to a site with a swimming pool, which may be inappropriate for a childcare centre.

 

Comment:      Child care centres do not need to be located away from swimming pools, and to require such, would be an unreasonable constraint on the establishment of childcare centres.

 

The Swimming Pools Act 1992 requires the landowner of the site containing the swimming pool to undertake specific measures to minimise the risk to safety associated with the swimming pool.

 

ISSUE 14:       The position of the property does not fall into most of DOCSs guidelines as stated in Southern Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils (SSROC) discussion paper on Planning Requirements for Childcare Centres (Sept 2005).

 

Comment:      There is no requirement to comply with these guidelines.

 

Conclusion

 

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the information contained within the submissions has been summarised herein. The application is considered worthy of support, and on this basis, the application is recommended for approval, subject to the additional conditions described herein.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Social and Cultural

There are no civic social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

IHAP report for DA 1198 2013 (Council report attachment) (Under separate cover)

2.View

Council resolution - Alterations and additions to the existing dwelling; use of the dwelling as a child care centre; and installation of signage at 4 Bungarra Cres(2) (Under separate cover)

   


95

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Chief Financial Officer

 

CFO 01

Planning Proposal Fees and Public Exhibition of Fees and Charges Amendments

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

182314.2014

Report By

Miles Carter - Project Officer - Strategy and Performance

Approved By

Hiba Soueid - Service Manager Corporate Strategy and Performance

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The purpose of this report is to recommend changes to the Revenue Pricing Policy (Fees and Charges) 2014-15.

 

It is proposed to increase the current fee for Major Planning Proposals to $30,000 plus cost recovery. This will allow Council to pass many of the costs associated with larger proposals to the applicant and is comparable to other larger Sydney council’s.

 

In addition, at the 7 May 2014 Council meeting, Council resolved to place the draft 2013-2017 Delivery Program and 2014-2015 Operational Plan (including Statement of Revenue Policy, Fees and Charges) on public exhibition. Following the public exhibition period of the amended fees and charges, it was discovered that several fees were not aligned to the correct description. This error impacts on two pages of the ‘Development Application’ fees.

 

It is proposed to re-exhibit both the amendments to the development application fees with the correct alignment and the increased Major Planning Proposals Fee which includes cost recovery.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Notes the Information contained in this report.

 

2.       Endorses the proposal to increase the fee for Major Planning Proposals from $30,000 to $30,000 plus cost recovery.

 

 

 

3.       Approves the new Major Planning Proposal Fee and amendments to the Development Application fees to be placed on public exhibition for 28 days and that a further report to Council be provided with any submissions made.

 

 

 

REPORT

 

Major Planning Proposals Fee

 

It is proposed to amend the fee for Major Planning Proposals that seek rezoning and/or additional use of one or more properties, and/or require amendment of multiple clauses of development standards and supporting maps.  Currently the fee is set at $30,000. 

 

Benchmarking has been conducted with other relevant councils for major proposals and results are noted as follows:

 

Council

2013/14 Fee

2014/15 Fee

Fairfield Council

$35,000

$35,000

Blacktown Council

Up to $100,000 at discretion of Director

$103,000

Campbelltown Council

$41,250

$42,485

Penrith Council

$92,791

$95, 296

Parramatta Council

$36,000 - $83,000 at discretion of CEO

$86,528

Sutherland Council

$20,000 plus cost recovery

$20,000 plus cost recovery

 

It is proposed to increase the current fee for Major Planning Proposals to add a cost recovery component.  Currently, the application fee is applied to Council’s costs in conducting the detailed assessment required for the consideration of complex and significant proposals.  However, there is often a requirement to engage external professional experts and consultants to undertake supporting studies and provide reports on environmental, economic, traffic, flooding and broader planning implications and to undertake associated modelling.  The cost of these studies should be met by the applicant. 

 

Accordingly it is proposed to amend the fee structure to provide for these charges to be passed on to the applicant on a cost recovery basis.

 

The new recommended fee is $30,000 plus cost recovery.

 

Development Application Fees

 

Council has made several amendments to The Statement of Revenue Policy (Fees and Charges) since the initial adoption by Council at its meeting on 20 June 2014. These have been placed on public exhibition and reported back to Council where applicable.

 

Following public exhibition, a misalignment error on two pages of the Fees and Charges was discovered. This error occurred in the Statutory Planning – Category 1 Development Applications Subdivisions fees and subsequent pages (amended pages attached). In total, eleven fees have been misrepresented in the document and as a result it is recommended that these fees be re-exhibited.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The financial implications for each of the fees and charges have been outlined in the attached documents and report.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Ensure Fees and Charges are equitable.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Amended DA Fees Pages

  


99

CFO 01

Planning Proposal Fees and Public Exhibition of Fees and Charges Amendments

Attachment 1

Amended DA Fees Pages

 


 


100

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Chief Financial Officer

 

CFO 02

Performance Report June

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Local Government Act 2003

File Ref

182955.2014

Report By

Sneha Sabu - Senior Project Officer

Approved By

Hiba Soueid - Service Manager Corporate Strategy and Performance

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The quarterly performance report provides an overview of Council’s performance against the 4-year Delivery Program and Operational Plan for the April to June period. It demonstrates key operational achievements and provides information and statistics for key areas of Council’s operations during the period.

 

By the end of the June quarter, 93% of actions in the Delivery Program and Operational Plan were on track for completion or completed. Of the 7% of actions experiencing delays, 6% percent were delayed or rolled over to 2014-15 and 1% of actions were not completed.  Explanations for all delayed or not completed actions have been provided in the report.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the June 2014 Performance Report which outlines the progress of all principal activities contained in the 4-year Delivery Program and Operational Plan.

 

REPORT

 

On 26 June 2013, Council adopted the Growing Liverpool 2023, Community Strategic Plan. Growing Liverpool 2023 outlines the community’s vision and priorities for the Liverpool area and contains 7 directions and corresponding strategies for Liverpool. It was developed following an extensive community consultation and engagement process. The Plan sets the direction for Council's operations and services for the next ten years.

 

Section 404(5) of the Local Government Act (1993) requires the Chief Executive Officer to ensure that regular progress reports are provided to the Council at least every six months with respect to the principal activities detailed in its four year Delivery Program. This is an important mechanism that enables Council and the public to monitor progress. To comply with the requirement to provide regular progress reports at least every six months, Council receives quarterly performance reports.

 

The 4-year Delivery Program and Operational Plan 2013-14 is Council’s commitment to the community .It details the principal activities that Council will deliver towards achieving the community vision and directions outlined in Growing Liverpool 2023. Each principal activity has several actions for the 2013-14 year, these actions make up Council’s annual Operational Plan.

 

This report provides details of a comprehensive review of the April to June quarter, which was undertaken to determine Council's progress against the principal activities outlined in the Delivery Program.

 

June 2014 Performance Report

 

Council determined to deliver 28 principal activities as part of its 2013-17 Delivery Program, with 216 specific actions for the 2013-14 year.

 

The June 2014 Performance Report contains details on the progress of all the principal activities and is attached under separate cover. It showcases highlights during this period, provides a progress update for all of Council’s significant projects and includes statistics on several areas of Council’s operations.

 

By the end of the June quarter, 93% of actions in the Delivery Program and Operational Plan were on track for completion or completed. Of the 7% of actions experiencing delays, 6% were delayed or rolled over to 2014-15 and 1% of actions were not completed.  Explanations for all delayed or not completed actions have been provided in the report.

 

It is recommended that Council receives and notes the June 2014 Performance Report.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Ensures Council operates effectively and demonstrates accountability and transparency in its business operations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Performance Report June 2014 (Under separate cover – to be provided separately)

  


102

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Chief Financial Officer

 

CFO 03

Budget Review - June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

183781.2014

Report By

Vishwa Nadan - Service Manager Financial Management

Approved By

Matthew Walker - Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

On 26 June 2013 Council approved a balanced budget for the 2013-14 financial year and adopted further changes following budget reviews at end of each quarter and Council Resolutions during the year.

 

The budget result for the year ended 30 June 2014 after accounting for $2.538 million general funds for works carried forward to 2014-15, is a surplus of $4.870 million.

 

This is preliminary unaudited result for the year and subject to change. The post audit result will be reported to Council with further recommendations, if any, following receipt of the final audit report from PricewaterhouseCoopers.

 

This report outlines the budget result for the financial year ended 30 June 2014, highlighting key budget variations and requests for works to be carried over to 2014-15 for Council to complete its 2013-14 Operating Plan Objectives.

 

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the report;

 

2.       Votes to carry forward $17.476 million for incomplete works into 2014/15, comprising:

·    Reserves (External/ Internally Restricted)       $4,922,441

·    Grant funds                                                      $2,549,444

·    S94 Developer Contributions                           $7,466,329

·    General Funds                                                  $2,537,964

 

3.       Approves allocation of funds to recommended initiatives to commit the balance of $4.870 million surplus.

 

REPORT

 

Legislative Requirements

 

Clause 203(1) of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 requires the Responsible Accounting Officer to provide a quarterly budget review not later than two months after each quarter's end. This report provides budget review for the financial year ended 30 June 2014.

 

Budget Commentary

In June 2013 Council adopted a balanced budget for 2013-14 financial year after allowing for depreciation (a non-cash item) of $32.199 million. The budget was subject to review at end of each quarter and during the year Council resolved to include additional items. The Councils revised budget forecast to June 2014 was a funding deficit of $3,512.

 

Overall actual funding result at 30 June 2014 of $7.408 million surplus was $7.411 million better than the budget. A consolidated budget report is provided as Attachment 1.

 

The surplus to budget result was mainly due to lower employee costs from extended vacancies across the Council, lower than anticipated consultancy costs from delays in strategic projects, lower than expected costs in civil maintenance from delays in works program, and higher income from s94 developer contributions and DA application fees. These favorable budget variations were slightly offset by lower parking fines income.

 

Details of budget variations by service group are included in Attachment 2.

 

Carryover Funds

The carryovers represent the balance of funds provided in the budget for works, goods and services that have not been finalised prior to 30 June 2014. Program managers have reviewed actual financial results against budget for their programs and identified funds that were committed and should be carried forward to 2014-15. Attachment 3 provides a listing of these commitments valued at $17.476 million, comprising:

 

Source funding

Amount ($)

Reserves (Internal/ External)

4,922,441

Grants

2,549,444

S94 Developer Contributions

7,466,329

General Funds

2,537,964

Total

17,476,178

 

 

 

 

Working Funds

Working funds are uncommitted funds on which Council can build its next budget or call on if required. Council commenced the financial year with a working fund balance of $3.133 million. The table below outlines movements during the year. The cumulative balance in Working Funds after adjusting for recommended carry overs and proposed funding commitments at 30 June 2014 is $3m.

 


 

 

Description

 

 

Movement

$'000

Cumulative Working Funds Balance

$'000

Working Funds Balance (per audited financial reports)

 

3,133

Less: Reduction in shop inspection fees

(138)

2,995

Add: Funding of reduction in revenue from Salary Savings

138

3,133

Less:  Funding of building works at the Old  Miller Library (31 July 2013, GMEE07)

(50)

3,083

Less: Funding of membership of Western Sydney First Program (28 August 2013, GMEE04)

(12)

3,071

September Review Surplus

1,167

4,238

Less: Funding for upgrade works to the boom gate and pay stations at Warren Service Way car park $390k; Transfer $848k to the Council Reserve

 

(1,238)

3,000

Less: Funding of Access Audit (30 October 2013 , GMEE05)

 

(20)

2,980

Less: Funding ten temporary Town Planners (30 October 2013, DIRS02)

(235)

2,745

Less: Funding Middleton Grange event and signage (18 December 2013, COMM06)

(5.5)

2,739.5

Less: Funding  Liverpool Mobility Map update (18 December 2013, COMM02)

(15)

2,724.5

Less: Funding  membership Future City (18 December 2013, COMM04)

(15)

2,709.5

Add: December  2013 Review Surplus

35.3

2,744.8

Less: Membership to Committee of Sydney

(15)

2,729.8

Less: Mayoral minute on the organization of two interfaith dinners

(10)

2,719.8

Less: Additional funding for Access Audits

(2.6)

2,717.2

Add: March Quarter Review Surplus

823.3

3,540.5

Less: Funding to engage a Fire Inspection Consultant $250k; Transfer $125k to the Plant Reserve; Transfer $166.5k to the Council Reserve

 

(540.5)

3,000

Less: Allocation of funds for waving hire fee of Sv. Arhangel Gavril for the full use of CPAC theatre

(1)

2,999

Less: Allocation of funds for street naming project

(2.5)

2,996.5

Add: June Review Surplus

7,411.4

10,407.9

Less: Proposed General Fund Carryovers

(2,537.9)

7,870

Less: Proposed transfers:

·    $485k - Savings in insurance activities to be transferred to the Insurance Reserve

·    $450k - Funding for the organisation reform and review program from salary savings

·    $775k - Funding of organisation structure reform from salary savings

·    $300k - Additional funding for the Plant Reserve to fund additional plant replacement activities

·    $440k - Surplus on property services additional revenue and savings in expenditure to be transferred the Administration Building Reserve

·    $300k - Transfer additional funds to Employee Leave Entitlement (ELE) Reserve

·    $497.7k - Savings from Civil Maintenance activities to be transferred to the Asset Maintenance Reserve

·    $50k - Acquisition and implementation of Rates Modelling Software

·    $200k - Funding of leadership training program from salary savings

·    $60k -  Additional funding for recruitment of executive positions

·    $100k  - Additional funding for Online DA project

·    $452.3k - Transfer surplus funds to Council Reserve

·    $300k - Forward funding of Carnes Hill Library Collection

·    $110k  - Additional funding for events program as per Economic Development & Events Committee Meeting on 6th August 2014

·    $100k - Additional funds for Night Markets

·    $250k - Additional funds required to fund the implementation of the Liverpool Branding project

 

 

(4,870)

 

3,000

 

 

Grant Funding

The Council received $16.918m in grant funding during 2013-14 mainly from Federal and State governments. Details are included in Attachment 5.

 

The financial results contained in this report are unaudited and may change as a result of material audit findings. Any changes impacting on the results in this report will be reported to the Council together with the audited financial statements.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

Economic and Financial

This report shows an unaudited funding surplus of $7.408 million for the financial year 2013-14.

The Council is requested to consider:

1.   Carrying over funds for incomplete works totaling $17.476 million to 2014/15 which includes $2.538 million general funds

2.   Committing balance of $4.870 million general fund surplus as follows:

·    $485k - Savings in insurance activities to be transferred to the Insurance Reserve

·    $450k - Funding for the organisation reform and review program from salary savings

·    $775k - Funding of organisation structure reform from salary savings

·    $300k - Additional funding for the Plant Reserve to fund additional plant replacement activities

·    $440k - Surplus on property services additional revenue and savings in expenditure to be transferred the Administration Building Reserve

·    $300k - Transfer additional funds to Employee Leave Entitlement (ELE) Reserve

·    $497.7k - Savings from Civil Maintenance activities to be transferred to the Asset Maintenance Reserve

·    $50k - Acquisition and implementation of Rates Modelling Software

·    $200k - Funding of leadership training program from salary savings

·    $60k -  Additional funding for recruitment of executive positions

·    $100k  - Additional funding for Online DA project

·    $452.3k - Transfer surplus funds to Council Reserve

·    $300k - Forward funding of Carnes Hill Library Collection

·    $110k  - Additional funding for events program as per Economic Development & Events Committee Meeting on 6th August 2014

·    $100k - Additional funds for Night Markets

·    $250k - Additional funds required to fund the implementation of the Liverpool Branding project

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Deliver services that are customer focused.

Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Consolidated Budget Summary - June 2014

2.View

Group Summary - Explanatory Notes to Budget Variances

3.View

Schedule of Carryover Funding to 2014-15

4.View

Explanatory Notes to Carryovers

5.View

Schedule of Grant Funding 2013-14

  


109

CFO 03

Budget Review - June 2014

Attachment 1

Consolidated Budget Summary - June 2014

 


 


 


115

CFO 03

Budget Review - June 2014

Attachment 2

Group Summary - Explanatory Notes to Budget Variances

 


 


 


115

CFO 03

Budget Review - June 2014

Attachment 3

Schedule of Carryover Funding to 2014-15

 


 


 


 


 


121

CFO 03

Budget Review - June 2014

Attachment 4

Explanatory Notes to Carryovers

 


 


129

CFO 03

Budget Review - June 2014

Attachment 5

Schedule of Grant Funding 2013-14

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


129

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Chief Financial Officer

 

CFO 04

Investment Report July 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

181713.2014

Report By

Christian  Hope - Senior Financial Accountant

Approved By

Matthew Walker - Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report details the balance of investments held at 31 July 2014 in a form compliant with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council's Investment Policy at the time of entering into each transaction.

 

Council held investments with a market value of $139.9 million as at 31 July 2014. The portfolio yielded a return of 4.11 per cent being 146 basis points above the benchmark of 2.65 per cent for the month of July 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council That Council receives and notes this report.

 

REPORT

 

Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 requires that the Responsible Accounting Officer must provide Council with a written report setting out details of all money that Council has invested under section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993.

Council's portfolio of $139.9 million consisted of $15.2 million invested in various debt securities (bonds) with maturity dates ranging from one year to thirteen years; $111.5 million in short to medium term deposits; and $ 13.2 million in Cash at Call bank accounts. Council yielded a return of 4.11 per cent being 146 basis points above the benchmark of 2.65 per cent for the month of July.


As at the end of July 2014 the ratio of market value compared to face value of various debt securities is shown in the table below.

 

Asset Class

July-14

Jun-14

Senior Debts (FRN's)

101.80%

 101.48%

Senior Bonds (NCD & Corporate Bonds)

104.84%

 104.56%

MBS (Reverse Mortgage Backed Securities)

  60.29%

  60.14%

Total

  94.32%

  94.05%

 

Council is fully compliant with the requirements of the Ministerial Investment Order including the grand fathering provision in regards to its investment portfolio holdings. The grand fathering provision states that Council continue to hold to maturity, redeem or sell investments that comply with previous Ministerial Investment Orders. Any new investments must comply with the most recent Order.

 

§     At its July 2014 meeting, the Board of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 2.5 per cent. A statement released on 5 August 2014 by Glenn Stevens, Governor of the RBA commenting on the RBA decision is attached to this report.

 

The return on term deposits over medium term (2 to 3 years to maturity) is currently at 3.7 per cent to 3.9 per cent per annum. Short term deposits rate (less than one year to maturity) is ranging from 3 per cent for 30 days to 3.65 per cent for one year.

 

Council continues to closely monitor the investments in its portfolio to ensure continued compliance and minimal exposure to risk.

 

Portfolios break down (at "Market Value")

 

The chart below shows the proportion of Council's investment portfolio by category of investment type at market value.

 

 

 

 

Movement in Investment Holding

 

Council held investments with a market value of $139.9 million as at 31 July 2014 compared to $150.6 million as at 30 June 2014.  A summary of major types of receipts and payments for the period is attached to this report.

 

Portfolio Maturity Profile

 

The chart below shows the market value of funds invested at different durations to maturity.

 

 

 

Investment Portfolio at a Glance

 

Portfolio Performance vs. 90 day annualised Bank Bill Index for the month

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

The portfolio yield for July is above the annualised benchmark for the month (4.11% against 2.65%).

Portfolio Performance vs. 90 day Bank Bill index over the 12 month period.

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

The portfolio yield for the past 12 month period is above the benchmark for the same period (4.19% against 2.63%).

Annual Income vs. Budget

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

Council’s investment income on

General Fund was $9k below budget.

 

 

Investment Policy Compliance

 

Legislative Requirements

 

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

Fully Compliant.

Portfolio Credit Rating Limit

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

Fully Compliant.

Institutional Exposure Limits

        MCWB01114_0000[1]

Fully Compliant.

Term to Maturity Limits

       X

Exceeded term to maturity limit on

existing Mortgage Back Securities

purchased in 2006 and in 2007

The maturity dates have been

extended by the issuer of the

securities to reflect the revised

actuarial expected weighted average life (WAL) of when they are most likely to be fully paid.

 

Certificate of Responsible Accounting Officer

 

The Group Manager Business Excellence, as Responsible Accounting Officer certifies that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Councils Investment Policies at the time of their placement. The previous investments are covered by the “grandfather” clauses of the current investment guidelines issued by the Minister for Local Government.

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

For the month of July 2014, Council investment income on General Fund was $9k below budget. This variance is attributed to lower investment balance for the first period of the new financial year.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Statement by Glen Stevens Governor RBA August 2014

2.View

Movement in Investment Holding July 2014

3.View

Portfolio Investment Details July 2014

4.View

Performance Graphs Actual to Budget July 2014

  


133

CFO 04

INVESTMENT REPORT JULY2014

Attachment 1

Statement by Glen Stevens Governor RBA August 2014

 


135

CFO 04

INVESTMENT REPORT JULY2014

Attachment 2

Movement in Investment Holding July 2014

 


 


139

CFO 04

INVESTMENT REPORT JULY2014

Attachment 3

Portfolio Investment Details July 2014

 


 


 


139

CFO 04

INVESTMENT REPORT JULY2014

Attachment 4

Performance Graphs Actual to Budget July 2014

 


140

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Chief Financial Officer

 

CFO 05

Classification of Lot 1 DP 1196393, Lot 1 Bigge Street, Liverpool as 'Operational' land

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Property Strategy

File Ref

161922.2014

Report By

Andy Kabok - Senior Property Officer

Approved By

Matthew Walker - Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

On 29 May 2013, Council resolved to “Agree to swap Council owned Lot 1 DP 703565, Speed Street, Liverpool with the privately owned part of Bigge Street to the south of Newbridge Road, part of Bigge Street to the north of Newbridge Road and the road reserve known as Lot 4 DP 226933” and that Council “Upon completion of the landswap, classifies a part of Bigge Street to the south of Newbridge Road as ‘Operational’ land”.

 

A part of Bigge Street to the south of Newbridge Road that is proposed to be classified as ‘Operational’ land is now known as Lot 1 DP 1196393, Lot 1 Bigge Street, Liverpool.

 

This report recommends that Council agrees to classify Lot 1 DP 1196393, Lot 1 Bigge Street, Liverpool, as ‘Operational’ land.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council classifies Lot 1 DP 1196393, Lot 1 Bigge Street, Liverpool as 'Operational' land in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993.

 

REPORT

 

On 29 May 2013, Council resolved to “Agree to swap Council owned Lot 1 DP 703565, Speed Street, Liverpool with the privately owned part of Bigge Street to the south of Newbridge Road, part of Bigge Street to the north of Newbridge Road and the road reserve known as Lot 4 DP 226933” and that Council “Upon completion of the landswap, classifies a part of Bigge Street to the south of Newbridge Road as ‘Operational’ land”.

 

A part of Bigge Street to the south of Newbridge Road that is proposed to be classified as ‘Operational’ land is now known as Lot 1 DP 1196393, Lot 1 Bigge Street, Liverpool.

 

Section 31 of the Local Government Act 1993 states that before a Council acquires land, or within three months after it acquires land, a Council may resolve to classify land as either ‘Community’ or ‘Operational’ land. Section 34 of the Local Government Act 1993 also requires that public notice be given of a proposed resolution to classify public land.

 

Council is not yet in ownership of Lot 1 DP 1196393. It is envisaged that once in ownership Council could potentially provide rear vehicular access through Lot 1 DP 1196393 to adjoining owners on Speed Street via negotiated easements for access. Easements for access to adjoining owners can only be granted if the land is classified as ‘Operational’ land.

 

Notices advising that Council proposes to resolve to classify Lot 1 DP 1196393, Lot 1 Bigge Street, Liverpool, as 'Operational' land were published in the local newspaper on 25 June 2014 and on 2, 9 and 16 July 2014. A period of not less than 28 days was provided during which submissions could be made to Council. No submissions were received.

 

This report recommends that Council agrees to classify Lot 1 DP 1196393, Lot 1 Bigge Street, Liverpool, as ‘Operational’ land.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Location Map

  


143

CFO 05

Classification of Lot 1 DP 1196393, Lot 1 Bigge Street, Liverpool as 'Operational' land

Attachment 1

Location Map

 


143

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Chief Financial Officer

 

CFO 06

Tender WT2307 - Construction of eight townhouses at 39 Heckenberg Avenue, Sadlier

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Property Strategy

File Ref

174875.2014

Endorsed By

Andy Kabok - Senior Property Officer

Approved By

Michael  Williams - Manager Property Services

 

 

Executive Summary

 

On 29 May 2013, Council resolved to:

 

·    “Approve DA-1301/2012 for the construction of a multi dwelling housing development containing 6 x 3 bedroom dwellings and 2 x 2 bedroom dwellings with associated on-site parking for 17 vehicles” and;

·    “Conduct a tender for the fixed price contract to construct the project”.

This report details the tender submissions received for Tender WT2307 – Construction of eight townhouses at 39 Heckenberg Avenue, Sadlier.

 

Following a detailed assessment of the tenders and in accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, this report recommends that Council declines to accept any of the tenders for WT2307 – Construction of eight townhouses at 39 Heckenberg Avenue, Sadlier, and cancels the proposal for the contract.

 

This report recommends that Council agrees to sell Lot 493, 494 and 552 DP 217650, 39 Heckenberg Avenue, Sadlier, as an approved development site by placing the property on the open market for sale by way of public auction through a local real estate agent. 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That Council: 

1.   Declines to accept any of the tenders for Tender WT2307 – Construction of eight townhouses at 39 Heckenberg Avenue, Sadlier and cancels the proposal for the contract;

2.   Makes public its decision regarding Tender WT2307 – Construction of eight townhouses at 39 Heckenberg Avenue, Sadlier;

3.   Agrees to sell Lot 493, 494 and 552 DP 217650, 39 Heckenberg Avenue, Sadlier, as an approved development site by placing the property on the open market for sale by way of public auction through a local real estate agent;

4.   Agrees to set the reserve price for the public auction as outlined in the confidential attachment;

5.   Authorizes the Chief Executive Officer or his nominee to negotiate the sale of Lot 493, 494 and 552 DP 217650, 39 Heckenberg Avenue, Sadlier, if not sold under the hammer, for a sale price of not less than five percent below the reserve price, on the day of auction, and execute the contract for sale to facilitate the exchange of contracts on the day of the auction;

6.   Agrees that if the property is not sold at auction it is immediately placed on the open market for sale by private treaty;

 

7.   Transfers the net proceeds from the sale to the Property Development Reserve; and

8.   Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received and proposed sale, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) and 10A(2)(c)  of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it and/or confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

REPORT

 

On 29 May 2013, Council resolved to:

 

·    “Approve DA-1301/2012 for the construction of a multi dwelling housing development containing 6 x 3 bedroom dwellings and 2 x 2 bedroom dwellings with associated on-site parking for 17 vehicles” and;

·    “Conduct a tender for the fixed price contract to construct the project”.

Tenders for the construction of eight townhouses at 39 Heckenberg Avenue, Sadlier, were invited publicly in the Sydney Morning Herald on Tuesday, 10 June 2014, the Liverpool Leader and South West Advertiser on Wednesday, 11 June 2014 and was made available on the Council eTendering portal https://www.tenderlink.com/liverpoolcity from 3 June 2014.

 

Tenders closed at 3:00 pm on 10 July 2014 with the following submissions received (in alphabetical order):-

 

Tenderer

ABT Construction & Fitout

Camporeale Holdings Pty Ltd

Jan General Constructions Pty Ltd

M & M Pripic Pty Ltd

Mosaiquestone Pty Ltd

 

A preliminary assessment of the submissions was carried out to check for general compliance with the requirements of the selection criteria and the tender documents. It was found that four out of the five tenders were conforming and were considered for further assessment.

 

Full details of the tenders received and evaluations are provided in a confidential report under separate cover in accordance with Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

Following a detailed assessment of the tenders and in accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, this report recommends that Council declines to accept any of the tenders for WT2307 – Construction of eight townhouses at 39 Heckenberg Avenue, Sadlier, and cancels the proposal for the contract.

 

This report recommends that Council agrees to sell Lot 493, 494 and 552 DP 217650, 39 Heckenberg Avenue, Sadlier, as an approved development site by placing the property on the open market for sale by way of public auction through a local real estate agent. 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

Economic and Financial

The sale was not included in this year’s budget. It is recommended that the net proceeds of the sale be credited into the Property Development Reserve.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.

Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Location Map

  


147

CFO 06

Tender WT2307 - Construction of eight townhouses at 39 Heckenberg Avenue, Sadlier

Attachment 1

Location Map

 


147

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Chief Financial Officer

 

CFO 07

Proposed Acquisition of Part Lot 201 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill for Open Space and Drainage

 

Strategic Direction

Natural Sustainable City

Enhance and protect natural corridors, waterways and bushland

Key Policy

Floodplain Risk Management Plans

File Ref

184662.2014

Report By

Michael  Williams - Manager Property Services

Approved By

Matthew Walker - Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

On 26 March 2012 Council resolved to “acquire part of Lot 3126 in Deposited Plan 1160426, Off Pioneer Drive Carnes Hill”, now known as Lot 200 DP 1194243 for the purposes of extending Kurrajong Road.

 

The owner of Lot 200 is required to dedicate Lots 201 and 203 DP 1194243 at no cost to Council except for approximately 3,790 square metres of Lot 201 designated for Open Space and Drainage under the Liverpool Local Environment Plan 2008.

 

This report recommends Council accepts the dedication of Lots 201 and 203 DP 1194243 at no cost and approves the acquisition of approximately 3,790 square metres of Lot 201 Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill for the amount outlined in the confidential attachment in accordance with Section 10A (2) (c) of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Accepts the dedication of Lots 201 and 203 DP 1194243 at no cost;

 

2.       Approves the acquisition of part of Lot 201 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill designated Open Space and Drainage in the Liverpool Local Environment Plan 2008 for the purchase price outlined in the confidential attachment;

 

3.       Upon dedication of Lots 201 and 203 DP 1194243 and the acquisition of part Lot 201 classifies the land as ‘Community Land’;

 

 

 

4.       Notes the square metre area for acquisition is approximate and subject to final survey. Approves the acquisition on a dollar rate per square metre as outlined in the confidential attachment;

 

5.       Keeps confidential the report supplied under separate cover containing the acquisition price pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A (2) (c) of the local Government Act 1993 as this information would if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and

 

6.       Authorises its delegated officer to execute any document, under Power of Attorney necessary to give effect to this decision.

 

 

REPORT

 

On 26 March 2012 Council resolved to “acquire part of Lot 3126 in Deposited Plan 1160426, Off Pioneer Drive Carnes Hill”, now known as Lot 200 DP 1194243 for the purposes of extending Kurrajong Road.

 

The owner of Lot 200 is required to dedicate Lots 201 and 203 DP 1194243 at no cost to Council except for approximately 3,790 square metres of Lot 201 designated for Open Space and Drainage under the Liverpool Local Environment Plan 2008.

 

Lot 201 DP 1194243 is approximately 26,210 square metres and is covered by a High Voltage Transmission Line easement. Council will construct drainage infrastructure within this lot to service the surrounding new residential development. Part of Lot 201 is designated for acquisition under the Liverpool Local Environment Plan 2008 for drainage and open space.

 

Lot 203 DP 1194243 is approximately 36,730 square metres and is also covered by the High Voltage Transmission Line Easement. See the attached aerial map.

 

Council appointed a Valuer to determine the value of the part of Lot 201 designated for acquisition in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991. Negotiations with the owner have been completed and a purchase price has been agreed subject to Council approval. Details of the valuation and negotiations are considered to be confidential for commercial reasons and are contained in the confidential attachment.

 

This report recommends Council accepts the dedication of Lots 201 and 203 DP 1194243 at no cost and approves the acquisition of approximately 3,790 square metres of Lot 201 Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill, in accordance with the terms outlined in the confidential attachment.

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Funding for the acquisition is provided for in Council’s Section 94 Contribution Plan

Environmental and Sustainability

Manage the environmental health of waterways.

 


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Aerial Map Lots 201 and 203

2.View

Acquisition Map Part Lot 201

  


151

CFO 07

Proposed Acquisition of Part Lot 201 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill for Open Space and Drainage

Attachment 1

Aerial Map Lots 201 and 203

 


151

CFO 07

Proposed Acquisition of Part Lot 201 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill for Open Space and Drainage

Attachment 2

Acquisition Map Part Lot 201

 


152

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Chief Financial Officer

 

CFO 08

General Power of Attorney

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Workforce Management Plan

File Ref

184885.2014

Report By

David Maguire - Governance Officer

Approved By

Matthew Walker - Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

Executive Summary

 

At its meeting on 30 October 2013, Council resolved to appoint its Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Executive Directors, Group Manager Governance and Public Officer to be its attorneys.

 

Under a power of attorney, an attorney can execute documents on behalf of Council without the need for the Council seal to be attached.

 

At its meeting on 30 July 2014, Council adopted a report which deleted the positions of Executive Director and Group Manager Governance from its organisational structure. As a result, the only positions within Council that can currently exercise Council’s power of attorney are the CEO and the Public Officer.

 

Given the considerable number of documents executed under the power of attorney and the occasional unavailability of the CEO and Public Officer to execute documents, it is considered necessary to appoint an additional member of Council staff to exercise the Council's power of attorney.

 

It is recommended that Council appoints the persons for the time being holding the position of CEO, Chief Financial Officer and Public Officer, to be its attorneys, subject to the limitations set out in the attached recommendation to Council, and that Council revokes its current power of attorney.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.  Appoints the persons for the time being holding the position of Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Public Officer, to be its attorneys, severally to exercise, subject to any conditions and limitations specified below, the authority conferred on them by section 43 of the Powers of Attorney Act 2003, to do on the Council’s behalf, anything it may lawfully authorise its attorney to do. The power of attorney is limited to the execution of documents, dealings and instruments relating to the following matters:

 

·    The creation (whether by acquisition or other means), disposal or extinguishment of an interest in land;

·    The creation, disposal or extinguishment of a right, obligation or interest other than in land; and

·    Contracts for works services and supply of goods.

 

2.  Revokes the previous power of attorney granted by Council, being Registered Book 4660 Number 962.

 

3.  Authorises the seal of Council to be affixed to the power of attorney and to the revocation of the previous power of attorney.

 

 

REPORT

 

At its meeting on 30 October 2013, Council resolved to appoint its CEO, Executive Directors, Group Manager Governance and Public Officer to be its attorneys.

 

An attorney can execute documents on behalf of Council without the need for the Council seal to be affixed. This is customary practice in local government.

 

In regard to the purchase or sale of land, the granting of a power of attorney does not entitle the attorney to decide whether or not to buy or sell land. The sale or purchase of land cannot be delegated by Council since it requires a Council resolution. However, once such a resolution has been passed, the attorney can execute the necessary document(s) without the need for the Council seal to be affixed. Copies of documents executed under the power of attorney are retained in a register maintained by Council’s Public Officer (the Governance Officer).

 

At its meeting on 30 July 2014, Council adopted a report which deleted the positions of Executive Director and Group Manager Governance from its organisational structure. As a result, the only positions within Council that can currently exercise Council’s power of attorney are the CEO and the Public Officer.

 

Given the considerable number of documents executed under the power of attorney and the occasional unavailability of the CEO and Public Officer to execute documents, it is considered necessary to appoint an additional member of Council staff to exercise the Council's power of attorney, namely, the Chief Financial Officer.

 

It is recommended that Council appoints the persons for the time being holding the positions of CEO, Chief Financial Officer and Public Officer, to be its attorneys, subject to the limitations set out in the attached recommendation to Council, and that Council revokes its current power of attorney.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Draft General Power of Attorney (August 2014)

2.View

Draft Revocation of Power of Attorney (August 2014)

  


155

CFO 08

General Power of Attorney

Attachment 1

Draft General Power of Attorney (August 2014)

 


157

CFO 08

General Power of Attorney

Attachment 2

Draft Revocation of Power of Attorney (August 2014)

 


157

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Chief Financial Officer

 

CFO 09

Councillor Briefing Session Terms of Reference

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Councillor Briefing Session Terms of Reference

File Ref

188200.2014

Report By

George Georgakis - Service Manager Council and Executive Services

Approved By

Matthew Walker - Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

At the Ordinary Council meeting 27 March 2013, Council decided on the Terms of Reference for holding Councillor Briefing Sessions.

 

As a result of discussions held with Councillors at the workshop on 9-10 August 2014, it is proposed that the Councillor Briefing Session Terms of Reference be amended as per the recommendation below.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That:

 

1.   Council hold Councillor Briefing Sessions regardless of the number of Councillors attending.

 

2.   The only senior staff required at the sessions will be those that are presenting on a topic.

 

3.   The Councillor Briefing Session Terms of Reference be reformatted and retitled as per the attached Councillor Briefing Guidelines to ensure consistency with other policy documents of Council.

 

 

REPORT

 

On 27 March 2013, Council adopted the Councillor Briefing Session Terms of Reference and resolved in part that:

 

“Briefings will be held when a minimum of five Councillors are in attendance in person.  Should less than five Councillors be available to attend, the Briefing will be cancelled.”

 

In the past, due to the above requirement, Councillor Briefings have been cancelled when less than five Councillors were able to attend. To maintain the flow of information presented at these Briefings for those that can attend, the requirement for a minimum number of Councillors for the Briefings has been removed. This is in line with discussions held at the recent workshop on 9-10 August 2014.

 

The Councillor Briefing Guidelines have therefore been altered so that Councillor Briefing Sessions will be held in future regardless of the number of Councillors attending. Further, the only senior staff required at the sessions will be those staff that are presenting on a topic. This has been reflected in the attached Draft Councillor Briefing Guidelines.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The additional expense of running all Councillor Briefing Sessions, regardless of numbers, will be offset by the cost savings of not cancelling Councillor Briefing Sessions at the last minute, when a refund of the catering costs cannot be arranged.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Requiring only staff presenting on a topic to attend the sessions will reduce the workload on staff caused by attending Councillor Briefing Sessions and result in an improved work/life balance.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Increase Mayor and Councillor awareness of community issues by not cancelling briefing sessions because of a lack of quorum.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Councillor Briefing Guidelines (with recommended amendments)

  


159

CFO 09

Councillor Briefing Session Terms of Reference

Attachment 1

Councillor Briefing Guidelines (with recommended amendments)

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

 


171

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

City Presentation Report

 

DCP 01

Regional Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy

 

Strategic Direction

Lead the community to develop and implement environmentally sustainable practices in waste management

Key Policy

Domestic Waste Management Policy

File Ref

175067.2014

Report By

Rebecca Scarpin - Waste Management Coordinator

Approved By

Gino Belsito - Director City Presentation

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The Regional Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy (Strategy) applies to the nominated Western Sydney Councils. The aim of the Strategy is to ensure that the future direction of the region is one which maximises waste avoidance and resource recovery, whilst considering population growth and the visions of the region.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receive the information contained in the report on the Regional Waste Strategy.

 

2.   Endorse the Regional Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy.

 

REPORT

 

Waste management has been identified as a priority under NSW 2012: A plan to make NSW Number 1. The Strategy demonstrates the region’s commitment to a strategic and unified approach to waste management and resource recovery, and takes into account the population growth that the region will see over the next few years. The Strategy has been developed in accordance with Environment Protection Authority 2014 guidelines and the State Government’s NSW Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy 2013- 2021.

 

The Strategy also fits within the wider policy context set by the State and Federal governments and seeks to maximise funding opportunities under the “Waste Less Recycle More Initiative.”

 

The Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils (WSROC) members: Auburn, Blacktown, Blue Mountains, Fairfield, Hawkesbury, Holroyd, Liverpool, Parramatta and Penrith Councils are committed to the Strategy. Although not formally part of WSROC, The Hills Shire Council is participating in the Strategy while Bankstown is not, having elected to participate in the Southern Sydney Regional Waste Strategy.

 

The Strategy outlines the Western Region vision over the next few years and how we will achieve the visions and targets. The Strategy takes into consideration population growth in the area and varying targets of the group’s member councils. Implementation of this Strategy can assist councils to:

 

•      Improve recycling and resource recovery rates;

•      Reduce contamination of recyclables;

•      Reduce waste going to landfill;

•      Achieve cost savings;

•      Deliver educational campaigns to improve waste management behaviour;

•      Increase productive economy of the region;

•      Achieve higher environmental standards; and

•      Improve community reputation and standing

 

The Draft Strategy has now been submitted to the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) and subject to endorsement by the member councils will be published alongside other NSW regional strategies.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Facilitate economic development.

Increase productive economy of the region.

Environmental and Sustainability

Minimise household and commercial waste going to landfill.

Improve recycling and resource recovery rates.

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Improve community reputation and standing.

Support policies and plans that prevent illegal dumping.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Act as an environmental leader in the community.

Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility.

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Deliver services that are customer focused.

Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Draft Western Sydney Regional Draft Western Sydney Regional Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy (Under separate cover)

   


174

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Community and Culture  Report

 

DCC 01

Request for fee waiver - Liverpool Action Group

 

Strategic Direction

Healthy Inclusive  City

Foster social inclusion, strengthen the local community and increase opportunities for people who may experience barriers

Key Policy

Library Services Strategy

File Ref

179790.2014

Report By

Kiersten Fishburn - Director Community & Culture

Approved By

Kiersten Fishburn - Director Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Liverpool Action Group Inc. has used the Gold Room at the City library for over six years to hold monthly meetings. They have not been charged a fee for the room use in that time, nor has there been any formal arrangement in place regarding fees.

 

Liverpool Action Group Inc. meets to discuss issues of concern regarding the natural and built environment in the Liverpool local government area. They also have an environment group with a focus on bushland regeneration.

 

This report recommends that Liverpool Action Group Inc. are put on a three-year license for use of the Gold Room to continue their meetings. It also recommends that as they are an unfunded group and they meet the criteria for full fee waiver, that the normal fees for this room hire are waived.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Approve a three-year license from 1 September 2014 for Liverpool Action Group Inc. to use the City Library Gold Room for monthly meetings.

 

2.       Approve the waiver of normal rental fees for the period of this license.

 

 

 


 

REPORT

 

Liverpool Action Group Inc. meets monthly to discuss issues of concern regarding the natural and built environment in the Liverpool local government area. This includes clean-up campaigns, rubbish removal, posters on poles, graffiti, chewing gum and cigarette butts and litter. They also have an environment group with a focus on long-term bushland regeneration.

 

Liverpool Action Group Inc. has used the Gold Room at the City library for over six years to hold monthly meetings. However, there has never been a formal agreement in place for this arrangement, nor any discussion of room rental fee. To ensure transparency and probity, it is recommended that Liverpool Action Group Inc. be placed on a three-year license agreement for the use of the Gold Room in the City Library. This would allow them to continue the planning of their service delivery with the surety of Council support. Based on current fees and charges at a Category C Community Rate, the three-year rental fee would be $6,936. It is recommended that as they are an unfunded group and they meet the criteria for full fee waiver, that the normal fees for this room hire are waived.

 

Their request for support has been evaluated in accordance with the Policy for Reduction or Waiver of Council Fees and Charges under section 9.3. This Policy must be read and implemented in conjunction with Council’s Social Justice Policy, Growing Liverpool 2023 and the Donations Policy.

 

According to the Donations Policy the applicant meets the eligibility criteria as they are a not for profit organisation, their projects are benefiting residents of Liverpool and the project is meeting an identified social need in accordance with the Growing Liverpool 2023 Community Strategic Plan (specifically directions 2 and 5). According to the policy the organisation as an environmental group meets the requirement of a special interest group.

 

The project and organisation align with the principles outlined in the Social Justice Policy including access, equity, participation, safe and healthy communities and community strengthening.

 

As no fees have ever been charged before for the room use, this will not impact on projected income for the library.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Revenue forgone of $6,936 over three years

Environmental and Sustainability

Minimise household and commercial waste.

Manage the environmental health of waterways.

Manage air, water, noise and chemical pollution.

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Protect, enhance and maintain areas of endangered ecological communities and high quality bushland as part of an attractive mix of land uses.

Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues.


Social and Cultural

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Act as an environmental leader in the community.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


177

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Community and Culture  Report

 

DCC 02

Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

 

Strategic Direction

Healthy Inclusive  City

Foster social inclusion, strengthen the local community and increase opportunities for people who may experience barriers

Key Policy

Donations Policy

File Ref

188290.2014

Report By

Mark Egan - Coordinator Community  Planning

Approved By

Kiersten Fishburn - Director Community and Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council provides financial assistance to the community under three categories; Community Donations (including Community Grants, Small Grants, Men’s Shed One-off Grants, School and Youth Donations), Sporting Donations and Corporate Sponsorship.

 

The Financial Contributions Panel (FCP) met recently to consider applications from local residents for the Sporting Donations Program and local community organisations for the Community Grants and Corporate Sponsorship.

 

This report presents the funding recommendations made by the FCP for Council's consideration.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Endorses the Financial Contribution Panel's recommendations for the provision of $2,100 under the Sporting Donations Program as summarised in the table below

 

Applicant Name

Amount

Luke Mills

$200

Rory Southwell

$500

South West Metro Waratahs

$500

Pending additional information confirming 75% of the team are local residents

Thomas Carroll

$200

Antonio Labbozzetta

$200

Select Dance School

$500

 

 

2.   Endorses the Financial Contribution Panel's recommendations for the provision of $4,950 under the Community Donations Program (including one Community Grants application) as summarised in the table below

 

Applicant Name

Project Name

Amount

Dictionary of Sydney

Accessing Liverpool Oral Histories for Georges River Project

$4,950

 

 

3.   Endorses the Financial Contributions Panel's recommendations for the provision of up to $32,200 in 2014/15 under the Corporate Sponsorship Program as summarised in the table below:

 

Applicant name

Amount

Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research

$5,000

Sanatan Satsang Sabha of NSW Inc

up to $7,200

International Centre for Indian Cinema

$10,000

Liverpool Domestic Violence Liaison Committee

$3,000

Wattle Grove Public School

$500

Friends of India Australia Inc (FOIA)

$3,500

Desi Media Group

$3,000

 

 

 

REPORT

 

The Donations program has three categories:

 

·    Community Donations (including Community Grants, Small Grants, Men’s Shed One-off Grants School and Youth Donations);

 

·    Sporting Donations; and

 

·    Corporate Sponsorship.

Applications for Sporting Donations, Community Grants and Corporate Sponsorship are accepted on an ongoing basis. Applications are then reviewed by the Financial Contributions Panel (FCP) comprising the Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Chief Executive Officer and delegated staff.

 

This report contains the most recent recommendations by the FCP for Sporting Donations, Community Donations and Corporate Sponsorship.

 

 

Sporting Donations

 

Council's Sporting Donations Program is available to individuals and sporting teams who live in Liverpool City. Six applications for sporting donations were received by Council. Six applications met the program criteria and were recommended for funding by the Liverpool Sports Committee. The program criteria can be found as an attachment to this report for the reference of Councillors. A summary of the request received and the FCP recommendations are shown in the table below.

 

Applicant Details

Eligibility

Representation

FCP Recommendation

Luke Mills

Local resident – Wattle Grove

 

Representing Macarthur Little League Baseball Team at the 2014 Australian Little League Championships in Gold Coast 4 to 9 June 2014

$200

Rory Southwell

Local resident – Prestons

 

Representing BMX Australia at the 2014 UCI BXM World Championships Rotterdam 22 to 27 July 2014.

$500

South West Metro Waratahs

Local team - Liverpool

 

Representing South West Metro Waratahs RLFC at the Indigenous Rugby League Knockout Competition held at Raymond Terrace 3 to 6 October 2014.

$500

Pending additional information confirming 75% of the team are local residents

Thomas Carroll

Local resident – Green Valley

 

Representing NSW U/18 Mixed Netball Team at the 2014 Indoor Netball Super national Championships QLD 6 to 12 July 2014.

$200

Antonio Labbozzetta

Local Resident – Kemps Creek

 

Representing WAKO National Kickboxing Team at the 2014 WAKO World Championship in Italy 6 to 14 September 2014.

$200

Select Dance School

Local Resident – Moorebank

 

Representing Australian Dance Team during the 2014 tour in US 20 September to 10 October 2014.

$500

 

 

 

Community Grants

Council's Community Grants Program is available to community groups who provide programs or services to the residents of Liverpool. Two applications for community grants (one was a Youth Donations Application) were received by Council. One application met the program criteria and is recommended for funding. The program criteria can be found as an attachment to this report for the reference of Councillors. A summary of the requests are outlined in the table below.

 

Applicant Details

Event Name and Description

Amount Requested

FCP Recommendation

Dictionary of Sydney

Accessing Liverpool Oral Histories for Georges River Project

 

Community Benefits:

·    Facilitate discussion on Liverpool heritage.

·    Encourage tourism to area by linking the past to current Liverpool.

·    Make Liverpool heritage available to a broader audience.

$4,950

$4,950

Diane Kaye Alde

Applicant has been awarded a talent based scholarship to attend the New York Film Academy, for a one year Musical Theatre Program.

 

 

$500

$0

Not recommended – personal development opportunity rather than an opportunity to develop leadership skills or encourage community participation.

 

Corporate Sponsorship

 

Council delivers a Corporate Sponsorship Program for local organisations seeking financial support to deliver events that benefit Liverpool. Six applications for corporate sponsorship were received by Council. Six applications met the program criteria and are recommended for funding. The program criteria can be found as an attachment to this report for the reference of Councillors. A summary of the request received and the FCP recommendation are shown in the table below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Applicant Details

Project Name and Description

Amount Requested

FCP

Recommend-ation

Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research

 

Event name

Ingham Institute Awards Dinner, 20/11/14,  Liverpool Catholic Club

The event is to acknowledge the achievements of the researchers that are working at the Ingham Institute and Liverpool Hospital. The event is to be a prestigious occasion showcasing the depth of talent at the Institute.  The new MRI Linac will also be showcased at the event – one of only three in the world being built here in Liverpool.  International physicians will be in attendance.  Tickets are $95 however it is not intended to be a fundraiser and this ticket price will essentially only cover the costs of the function.  Researchers, businesses and the general community are invited to attend.  Estimated Attendance is 300 people.

 

Benefits include:

·   Mayoral opportunity to present award

·   Logo inclusion on all promotional materials, social media, website etc.

·   Signage at the event

·   Table of 10 tickets

 

Strong alignment with Liverpool Council’s economic development priority of the Health and Medical sector being a key business investment and jobs driver

 

$5,000 ex GST

$5,000 ex GST

Sanatan Satsang Sabha of NSW Inc

Deepawali together with Fiji Day – 11, 12 Oct – George St 2014

The Festival of Lights celebration as well as Fiji Independence day which falls on Oct 10.

This festival was funded in the March round however an additional request has been received to support the road closure of George Street. 

 

There have been discussions with both groups running Deepawali celebrations and Council is keen for both events to be able to be run in such a way as to not directly compete with each other for audiences.  The suggestion was made to run the smaller Deepawali event in George Street rather than the same venue as the larger Deepawali event (the Northumberland St car park), whilst also allowing a non- Council event with a street closure to be trialled. This additional funding would be a one off arrangement for this year only.

 

$7,200 ex GST

$7,200 ex GST

International Centre for Indian Cinema

The Australasian Awards and Festival of Indian Cinema – date to be confirmed for 2014/15, Liverpool

 

The festival will be a first in Australia and showcase the finest contemporary Indian feature films to be held over a week in Liverpool. 

 

The event organizer is looking to conduct the event in Liverpool and utilise CPAC as part of its screening program.  A detailed proposal has been provided separately.  October was the original timeframe proposed but the timing is flexible at this stage.  The festival organisers are looking for a three year commitment.

Benefits include:

1. National Naming Rights Partner

$125,000 for one year of $350,000

for three years payable in

Installments.

2. Platinum Sponsor

Limited to one - $75,000

3. Gold Sponsor

Limited to 3 - $20,000

4. Silver Sponsor

Limited to 5 - $5,000

5. Services Provider

6. Individual Session Sponsorship

$2,000 to $7,500

7. Industry Support

Open to film and other related industry

organisations only. Prices vary from

$2,500 to $10,000.

8. Open Sponsorship Package

A special package can be designed for

interested sponsors with budget

Strong alignment with program objectives.  This high profile event would provide Liverpool with an opportunity to showcase the city positively outside of the region and potentially internationally as a film-friendly location capable of delivering high profile events.  

 

$packages ranging up to $350,000

Up to $10,000 pa for 3 yrs

Liverpool Domestic Violence Liaison Committee

White Ribbon Day March – Macquarie St, to Bigge Park 24/11/14

A march planned to highlight White Ribbon day which aims to raise awareness and to break the silence about domestic violence within the community.  Members of the committee include the local men’s White Ribbon Day Committee.

 

The day will include a march from Macquarie St down Elizabeth street through to Bigge Park where there will be entertainment and a sausage sizzle.  Anticipated audience 200+ people

 

Benefits include:  logo inclusion on all promotional activity, opportunity to present a speech at the event.

 

Recommended for funding.  The activity aligns with program objectives.  It is a new event being held in the city centre which aims to raise awareness about an important issue in the community.

 

$8,000 ex GST

$3,000 ex GST

Wattle Grove Public School

Wattle Grove Public School Spring Fair, 19/10/14

School’s annual spring fair.  Free event. 

Benefits include: logo inclusion in all promotional activities, vocal acknowledgement at the event, 4 unlimited ride passes for the day. 

 

Moderate alignment with program criteria.  Activity is not in the city centre and does not align with economic development objectives.  Moderate alignment with community and social benefits. 

 

Recommended for funding at a level in line with support provided to similar school related events.

$500 ex GST

$500 ex GST

Friends of India Australia

Ganetshotsava – Whitlam Centre, 13/9/14

Community event marking the 19th Annual celebration of Lord Ganesh’s birthday.  Well attended event with long track record.  Anticipated attendance of 6,000 people.

 

Recommended for funding at the $3,500 level.

$8,000 ex GST

$3,500 ex GSt

Desi Media Group

Fiji Fest – 12/10/2013, Bulldog Park, Liverpool

Celebrating Fiji Independence Day and promoting Fijian culture. Event will include live bands, rides, fashion show and dance competition.  Free Entry.  The event is a for-profit-activityEstimated Attendance is 4-5000 people.

 

Sponsorship Benefits

·   Mayoral and Deputy Mayoral speaking opportunities  on the day

·   Logo inclusion on all promotional materials

·   Opportunity for Council stall at the event

 

Comments:

Liverpool has a strong Fijian Indian community which are very active within both the general and business community.  The event ran for the first time last year and achieved good attendance.  The event does align with program criteria but is not focused on activating the CBD.

 

The event is recommended for funding for $3,000 in line with previous support – subject to DA approval.

$15,000 ex GST

$3,000 ex GST

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

A budget allocation of $15,000 for the Sporting Donations Program was adopted by Council in its 2013/2014 Operational Plan. If the recommended amount of $2,100 is endorsed the remaining balance will be $12,900. The recommendations within this report for sporting donations will be funded from the Sporting Donations Program.

 

A budget allocation of $100,000 for the Community Grants Program was adopted by Council in its 2013/2014 Operational Plan as part of the Community Donations Program. If the recommended amount of

$4,950 is endorsed the remaining balance will be $85,224.50 ($9,825.50 of previous commitments from 2013/14). The recommendations within this report for Community Grants will be funded from the Community Donations Program.

 

The current balance of the Corporate Sponsorship Program is $53,500. If the recommended amount of $32,200 is endorsed the remaining balance will be $21,300.

 

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Criteria for Corporate Sponsorship

2.View

Criteria for Sporting Donations

3.View

Criteria for Community Donations

  


189

DCC 02

Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

Attachment 1

Criteria for Corporate Sponsorship

 


 


191

DCC 02

Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

Attachment 2

Criteria for Sporting Donations

 


189

DCC 02

Donations, Grants and Sponsorship

Attachment 3

Criteria for Community Donations

 

Criteria for Community Grants Program

 

Program eligibility and exclusions:

To be eligible for funding through the Community Grants Program, applicants must:

·     Be incorporated or auspiced, non-profit community service organisations or groups providing programs or services to the residents of Liverpool.

·     Have Public Liability Insurance of up to $20 million.

·     Supply a copy of their most recent annual report and/or financial statements.

·     Have acquitted previous Liverpool City Council donations and grants and have no outstanding debts to Liverpool City Council

 

Applications will not be accepted from the following organisations or for the purposes outlined below:

·     Government departments

·     Commercial or profit making enterprises

·     Political parties

·     Individuals unless auspiced by an incorporated organisation

·     General fundraising activities

·     General shortfalls in funding by government departments

·     Completed projects

·     Retrospective projects

·     Profit making projects

·     Duplication of existing services

 

Assessment Criteria

To be considered for a grant, applicants should clearly describe the proposed project and how it will meet the following criteria:

 

Criteria

Weighting

Evidence that the organisation has capacity to deliver the project.

15%

Evidence provided to support the need for the project, including the degree to which the project addresses at least one of the strategic directions in Growing Liverpool 2023, Community Strategic Plan

20%

The anticipated number of individuals that will participate in and benefit from the proposed project.

15%

Timeframe and budget are realistic and align with project objectives.

20%

Evidence of collaboration and partnership to maximise the use of existing community resources and to avoid duplication.

20%

Evidence project strategies are innovative or practical to meeting the project need.

10%

 

   


190

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Planning and Growth Report

 

DPG 01

Proposed Am 38 Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 Phase 3 Land Reclassifications and Rezonings

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Property Strategy

File Ref

087242.2014

Report By

Tanya O'Brien - Manager Strategic Planning

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

It is proposed to make an amendment to the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (LLEP 2008) to reclassify and rezone underutilised land within the Liverpool local government area. A report from the Council meeting of 25 September 2013 outlined 14 parcels of land proposed to be reclassified and/or rezoned for future sale. Council resolved to reclassify and/or rezone all 14 lots.

 

This report recommends the reconsideration of five of these parcels of land from phase 3 land reclassifications before proceeding with the reclassification and rezoning process. Due to the nature of reclassifying land and removing local parks it is important that all matters are considered before Council requests a Gateway Determination from NSW Planning and Infrastructure.

 

This report outlines the location of each park, the proposed change to the park as part of proposed draft amendment 38 to LLEP 2008 and the distance to surrounding parks in the area. Any parks resolved to be reclassified and/or rezoned will be included in draft amendment 38 to LLEP 2008 which will be sent to the Department of Planning and Environment seeking Gateway Determination to proceed with state agency and community consultation.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Proceed with the reclassification and rezoning of the following parcels of land:

·           124A Wonga Road, Lurnea (McCarthy Park)

·    Part of 15 Qantas Boulevard, Middleton Grange (Part of Lascondor Park)

·    8 Ferrington Crescent, Liverpool (Ferrington Park)

·    20A Frazer Avenue, Lurnea (Baker Park)

·    84A St Andrews Boulevard, Casula (St Andrews Park)

·    26 Wendlebury Road, Chipping Norton (Wendlebury Park)

·    2A Deerwood Avenue, Liverpool (Hazel Bradshaw Park)

·    22 Box Road, Casula (Mimosa Park)

·    72A Grevillea Crescent, Prestons (Acacia Park)

 

2.       Not proceed with the reclassification and rezoning of the following parcels of land:

·    9 Gunsynd Avenue, Casula (Part of Thawaral Park)

·    10 Anjudy Close, Casula (Part of Thawaral Park)

·    230 Newbridge Road, Moorebank (Part of Regan Park)

·    99-101 Rose Street, Liverpool (Part of Pearce Park)

·    12A Brain Avenue, Lurnea (Hannan Park)

 

3.       Send a copy of the Planning Proposal to NSW Planning and Infrastructure to seek a Gateway Determination to proceed with Draft Amendment 38 to Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 which includes the reclassification and rezoning of the parcels of land identified in Recommendation 2.

 

 

REPORT

 

The proposed amendment no. 38 to the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (LLEP 2008) to reclassify and rezone underutilized land within the Liverpool local government area was initiated in a Council report on 25 September 2013 (attachment 2). In September 2013 the Council considered 14 parcels of land to be reclassified and/or rezoned for future sale. Due to the nature of reclassifying land and removing local parks it is important that all matters are considered before Council requests a Gateway Determination from the Department of Planning and Environment.

 

It is recognised that the proposed reclassifications contributes to the financial sustainability of Council and allows the funding of asset renewal projects, embellishment of existing parks and further property investments. A review of the proposed properties has been undertaken in consultation with Council’s community planners, open space planner and property team.

 

It is important that community access to a park is not made difficult due to the reclassification and sale of a park. The suitable distance that a resident should be able to walk to a park is 500 metres which is approximately a 5 minute walk at an average pace. Attachment 1 to this report shows the location of all fourteen parcels of land and the location of surrounding parks in the local community.

 

This report proposes that five of the fourteen lots are resolved to no longer be reclassified and/or rezoned as the parks are no longer seen as appropriate to reclassify due to emerging information.

 

The five parcels of land that are proposed to be removed from phase 3 land reclassifications and rezonings include:

 

·    9 Gunsynd Avenue, Casula (Part of Thawaral Park)

·    10 Anjudy Close, Casula (Part of Thawaral Park)

·    230 Newbridge Road, Moorebank (Part of Regan Park)

·    99-101 Rose Street, Liverpool (Part of Pearce Park)

·    12A Brain Avenue, Lurnea (Hannan Park)

 

The following properties are recommended to be reclassified/rezoned:

·  124A Wonga Road, Lurnea (McCarthy Park)

·  Part of 15 Qantas Boulevard, Middleton Grange (Part of Lascondor Park)

·  8 Ferrington Crescent, Liverpool (Ferrington Park)

·  20A Frazer Avenue, Lurnea (Baker Park)

·  84A St Andrews Boulevard, Casula (St Andrews Park)

·  26 Wendlebury Road, Chipping Norton (Wendlebury Park)

·  2A Deerwood Avenue, Liverpool (Hazel Bradshaw Park)

·  22 Box Road, Casula (Mimosa Park)

·  72A Grevillea Crescent, Prestons (Acacia Park)

 

Parcels proposed to be removed from Phase 3 land reclassifications and rezonings

 

Part of ‘Thawaral Park’ 9 Gunsynd Avenue (Lot 151 DP 717423) and 10 Anjudy Avenue, Casula (Part Lot 1227 DP 788408)

 

Parts of Thawaral Park in Casula were selected to be reclassified and rezoned. The assessment found that the remaining park would have limited access, only from three cul-de-sacs (Leilani Place, Baguette Close and laneway access from Toparoa Close). This would create an unsafe park that would not meet crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) principles for safety. This park is considered a local park rather than a pocket park and contains seating therefore potential for regular use is greater. Daruk Park is 290 metres and Jardine Park is 380 metres from Thawaral Park which provides an appropriate level of park access.

 

It is not considered appropriate to reclassify and rezone parts of Tharrawal Park as it will be creating a park with poor crime prevention design due to lack of visual surveillance and reduced entry/exits which is an outcome to be avoided where possible.

 

It is recommended that the part sale of Thawaral Park is removed from phase 3 land reclassifications. Any future consideration of the removal of any portion of this park should not take place without a Strategic Review of Open Space or a Social Impact Assessment.

 

Description: http://adm-m-gis1/output/Buffer_ims_adm-m-gis18524220304687.jpg

Figure 1 Thawaral Park Casula (red areas = portions previously proposed to be sold)

 


Part of ‘Regan Park’ 230 Newbridge Road, Moorebank (Lot 56 DP 567062)

 

Regan Park is located on Newbridge Road in Moorebank and is also accessed from Lucas Avenue. It has been proposed to reclassify the area of park outlined red from community land to operational land and rezone it from R3 Medium Density Residential to B6 Enterprise Corridor. The previous resolution was to sell the north eastern portion and maintain a 6 metre wide length of park would be maintained for access from Lucas Avenue through to Newbridge Road, with the southern area of the park being completely maintained. There are concerns with the park already being a small size and the surrounding area experiencing a lack of parks within a close vicinity that are not located on the opposite side of major roads. Major roads create a barrier for pedestrian usage in particular for children.

 

There are two parks located on the opposite side of Nuwarra Road which are within a walking distance however Nuwarra Road itself can create a barrier for the usage of these parks. There are also several small pocket parks to the north on the opposite side of Newbridge Road which is a major road that creates a barrier for pedestrians. Another park within walking vicinity that is not cut off by major roads has been reclassified to operational land and sold as part of phase 2 reclassifications in Amendment 27 to LLEP 2008.

 

It is noted that this parcel of land is part of phase 3 reclassifications as a result of a request to revisit the reclassification and rezoning of part of Regan Park for the use of extra parking for Food Lovers which adjoins the park and is located at 228 Newbridge Road.

 

The proposal to reclassify and rezone part of Regan Park and provide embellishment works to the remaining park was part of Amendment 16 LLEP 2008 and did not proceed due to community objection when this same proposal was put forth in 2010-11.

 

This park is an important area of open space for the surrounding medium density residential area. It is recommended that Regan Park is removed from phase 3 land reclassifications as surrounding parks within a safe walkable distance have now been reclassified from community to operational with intention for sale or non-park uses. Any future consideration of the removal of any portion of this park should not take place without a Strategic Review of Open Space or a Social Impact Assessment.

 

Description: http://adm-m-gis1/output/Buffer_ims_adm-m-gis18524220305535.jpg

Figure 2 Regan Park Moorebank (red area = portion previously proposed to be sold)

 


Part of ‘Pearce Park’ 99-101 Rose Street, Liverpool (fronting Hoxton Park Road – Part Lot 6 DP 10500036)

 

A small portion of Pearce Park fronting Hoxton Park Road (outlined in red) is proposed to be rezoned from RE1 Public Recreation to B2 Local Centre. The portion of land is small and adjoins existing B2 Local Centre zoned land. As the land is already classified as operational land only a rezoning is proposed for this site.

 

The rezoning is not seen as appropriate as the area proposed to be rezoned has undergone environmental restoration works. The environmental restoration works were part of the Paciullo Park Riparian Restoration Project which took place from October 2011 to March 2013 costing council $74,480. It is recommended that this portion of Pearce Park is removed from phase 3 land reclassifications.

 

Figure 3 Pearce Park Liverpool (red area = portion previously proposed to be sold)

 


‘Hannan Park’ 12A Brain Avenue, Lurnea (Lot 145-146 DP 213510)

 

Hannan Park is located on Brain Avenue in Casula with alternate access off of Ida Avenue. It is proposed to reclassify the park from community land to operational land and rezone it from RE1 Public Recreation to R2 Low Density Residential. Hannan Park is located near Trewatha Park which is 260 metres from Hannan Park in a south west direction and McCarthy Park is 275 metres from Hannan Park in a north west direction. The closest park in an easterly direction is Amalfi Memorial Park which is a large park located 400 metres from Hannan Park. Hannan Park has had embellishment works completed in the form of landscaping and tree planting since it was selected as underutilised surplus land. Hannan Park was elected to be reclassified prior to embellishment works that have taken place.

 

McCarthy Park to the north west of Hannan Park is also proposed to be reclassified and rezoned as part of Phase 3 land reclassifications. Upon discussions since the 25 September 2013 resolution it is believed that one of these parks should be retained. It is proposed that Hannan Park is retained as it is not located in a close proximity to other parks as McCarthy Park is, the park is a good size and shape and has had embellishment works completed.

 

Figure 4 Hannan Park Lurnea

 

Parcels proposed to remain within Phase 3 land reclassifications and rezonings

 

The review of the Phase 3 properties found that there was sufficient alternate open space in the remaining areas and concluded that the remaining nine properties are surplus to community needs. This report recommends to proceed to rezone and reclassify these properties.

 

‘McCarthy Park’ 124A Wonga Road Lurnea (Lot 106 DP 515081)

 

McCarthy Park is located on Wonga Road in Lurnea and has additional access from Jan Avenue. A bus stop is located in front of the park on Wonga Road therefore the park is seen as a link for pedestrians who may wish to travel from Wonga Road to Jan or Quist Avenues. The distance it would take to walk to Jan Avenue without cutting through McCarthy Park has been considered and is approximately a 400 – 500 metre walk dependent on which direction you take. This distance is considered an acceptable distance to walk to public transportation. Ultimately McCarthy Park lacks any embellishment works and is seen as underutilized. The park is also in close proximity to other parks such as Kotlash Park which is only 80 metres from McCarthy Park and Phillip Park which is 200 metres from McCarthy Park.

 

Hannan Park to the south east of McCarthy Park is also proposed to be reclassified and rezoned as part of Phase 3 land reclassifications. Upon discussions since the 25 September 2013 resolution it viewed that at least one of these parks should be retained. As Hannan Park has had embellishment works made to the park to make it more useable and is more secluded in comparison to McCarthy Park it is recommended that McCarthy Park is disposed of and Hannan Park is retained and removed from the phase 3 land reclassifications.

 

Description: http://adm-m-gis1/output/Buffer_ims_adm-m-gis18524220304702.jpg

Figure 5 McCarthy Park Lurnea

 

Part of ‘Lascondor Park’ 15 Qantas Boulevard, Middleton Grange (Part Lot 2 DP 1141036)

 

It is proposed to rezone land on Qantas Boulevard in Middleton Grange. This land is already classified as operational therefore a reclassification is not required. The detention basin has been constructed and the land outlined in red is excess to Council’s drainage needs and is therefore proposed to be rezoned from SP2 Drainage to R1 General Residential. Stante Reserve is a large reserve therefore the rezoning is not creating a shortfall of open space in the area.

 

Figure 6 Lascondor Park Middleton Grange (red areas = portions proposed to be sold)

 


‘Ferrington Park’ 8 Ferrington Crescent, Liverpool (Lot 3 DP 227788)

 

Ferrington Park is located on Ferrington Crescent in Liverpool. The land is proposed to be reclassified from Community land to Operational land and sold as a residential lot. The parcel of land is a small pocket park that is located at the end of a cul-de-sac. Due to its location and small size 556.4m2 it is not an ideal park.

 

The local community has appropriate access to open space including a large park and sport fields located at Ireland Park to the north west which is 300 metres from Ferrington Crescent. There are also small parks in the area with Beswick Park 215 metres away, Hanna Family Park 150 metres away and Alamein Park 450 metres away to the north east.

 

Figure 7 Ferrington Park Liverpool

 


‘Baker Park’ 20A Frazer Avenue, Lurnea (Lot Lot 45 DP 220478)

 

Baker Park is located on Frazer Avenue in Lurnea and has additional access from McAndrew Close and laneway access from Hanna Avenue. The existing park is an awkward shape and presents problems from a CPTED standard.

 

Munro Park is 110 metres to the west of Baker Park, Amalfi Memorial Park is a large park located 160 metres north of Baker Park and Meere Park is located 550 metres south west of Baker Park. Both Munro Park and Meere Park are accessible to residents to the south of Baker Park providing adequate accessibility to open space.

 

Due to the undesirable layout of the park and the close proximity to other parks Baker Park is a suitable surplus park to propose for reclassification. Proposed future subdivision and sale as residential lots will fit in with the surrounding residential uses of the area.

 

Figure 8 Baker Park Lurnea

 


‘St Andrews Park’ 84A St Andrews Boulevard, Casula (Lot 515 DP 242589)

 

St Andrews Park is located on St Andrews Boulevard with the Glenfield rail line located to the rear of the lot. The surrounding area has access to nearby parks which contain play equipment. McGrath Park is located to the north and is 200 metres from St Andrews Park and Jamieson Park is 290 metres away and is a local sized park. Due to the park only having one access point, being a smaller size and surrounded by embellished parks within close vicinity it is seen as an appropriate proposal to reclassify St Andrews Park from community land to operational land.

 

Description: http://adm-m-gis1/output/Buffer_ims_adm-m-gis1432067805433.jpg

Figure 9 St Andrews Park Casula (red area = portion proposed to be sold)

 


‘Wendlebury Park’ 26 Wendlebury Road, Chipping Norton (Lot 18 DP 18 DP 261574)

 

Wendlebury Park is a small pocket park that adjoins an industrial business park on the corner of Wendlebury Road and Alfred Road in Chipping Norton. Although the park is located adjacent to residential development, the park has little benefit to the community as there are larger parks such as Molly Mooore Park within 110 metres and Langhoff Park 280 metres away. No embellishment works exist at Wendlebury Park therefore it would be suitable to reclassify the land from community to operational so it can be used for IN2 Light Industrial uses.

 

Adequate park facilities are available in the area therefore it is recommended that this park is reclassified from Community land to Operational land.

 

Figure 10 Wendlebury Park Chipping Norton

 


‘Hazel Bradshaw Park’ 2A Deerwood Avenue, Liverpool (Lot 183 DP 241158)

 

Hazel Bradshaw Park is located on the corner of Deerwood Avenue and Congressional Drive. The park is proposed to be reclassified from community land to operational land and rezoned from RE1 Public Recreation to R2 Low Density Residential for future subdivision and sale as residential lots. The park is located 245 metres from Discovery Park which is a larger park in the area that is well serviced.

 

As the area will be able to be serviced by Discovery Park into the future, it is seen as appropriate to reclassify and rezone Hazel Bradshaw Park.

 

Description: http://adm-m-gis1/output/Buffer_ims_adm-m-gis185246624305338.jpg

Figure 11 Hazel Bradshaw Park Liverpool

 


‘Mimosa Park’ 22 Box Road, Casula (Lot 1103 DP 1051233)

 

Mimosa Park is located on Box Road in Casula. The Park is a small 565 square metre pocket park that in appearance looks like a vacant block of land that has not been developed. Access to the park is not satisfactory as Box Road is disconnected in front of the park and is only accessible by pedestrians. It is proposed to reclassify this lot and sell it as a residential block with driveway access from the formed section of Box Road. Other park facilities are available in the area with Peter Miller Park within 180 metres of Mimosa Park. Peter Miller Park is embellished with sports grounds and play equipment.

 

This reclassification is suitable as a residential dwelling is appropriate development for this residentially zoned neighbourhood. The current park is underutilized and is misleading that it is a public park.

 

Residents to the rear of the lot have not been supportive of the proposal in the past as they were worried about loss of privacy due to the levels of the land. As the adjoining lot to the north of Mimosa Park is now developed a concern of privacy loss should not be a satisfactory reason to not develop this land for a dwelling house. Setback and privacy controls are set out in the Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 and will ensure that any future development is designed to minimize privacy loss.

 

Figure 12 Mimosa Park Casula

 

‘Acacia Park’ 72A Grevillea Crescent, Prestons (Lot 25 DP 244956 and Lot 118 DP 244942)

 

Acacia Park is located on Grevillea Crescent in Prestons with alternate access from Acacia Avenue. It is proposed to reclassify the land from community to operational land and rezone it from RE1 Public Recreation to R2 Low Density Residential. There are three alternate parks within the area surrounding Acacia Park. Henry Kitchen Park is 410 metres away to the west and to the east there is Jarrah Avenue Reserve which is 500 metres from Acacia Park. Alternatively there is access to Peter Miller Park which is a large reserve with play equipment and sporting fields located on the opposite side of the M5 Motorway. The park is a 600metre walk with access via a footbridge over the M5.

 

Due to the parks irregular shape it is thought that CPTED issues may be prevalent at Acacia Park. Therefore this park is proposed for reclassification and rezoning for possible residential use.

 

Figure 13 Acacia Park Prestons

 


Conclusion

 

This report outlines all 14 parcels of land that were resolved to be reclassified and / or rezoned on 25 September 2013. The location of each park, the proposed changes to the park and the distance to surrounding parks in the area is outlined in the report to ensure sufficient information is provided. The results of an open space review have recommended that five parcels of land be retained as open space parkland. It is recommended that Council continue with reclassifying and rezoning the remaining nine parcels. Any parks resolved to be reclassified and/or rezoned will be included in Draft Amendment 38 to LLEP 2008 which will be sent to the Department of Planning and Environment seeking Gateway Determination to proceed with state agency and community consultation.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Facilitate economic development.

 

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Park Maps Draft Amendment 38 LLEP 2008

2.View

Resolution and Council Report 25 September 2014 Phase 3 Land Reclassifications

  


221

DPG 01

Proposed Am 38 Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 Phase 3 Land Reclassifications and Rezonings

Attachment 1

Park Maps Draft Amendment 38 LLEP 2008

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


221

DPG 01

Proposed Am 38 Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 Phase 3 Land Reclassifications and Rezonings

Attachment 2

Resolution and Council Report 25 September 2014 Phase 3 Land Reclassifications

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


243

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Planning and Growth Report

 

DPG 02

Liverpool LEP Amendment No. 50- 900 Cowpasture Rd, Cecil Hills (Sydney Water Site)

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

156587.2014

Report By

Katie Miles - Strategic Planner

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

At its meeting on the 20 June 2014, considered a Planning Proposal for the Sydney Water Site at 900 Cowpasture Road, Cecil Hills, and resolved to defer the matter until further analysis had been completed on the proposed minimum lot size control of 300sqm.

 

The proposal seeks to rezone approximately 300,000sqm of land from SP2 Infrastructure and RE1 Public Recreation zonings to R2 Low Density Residential, as the land is surplus to the needs of Sydney Water’s operational requirements. Further investigation into the proposed minimum lot size has been undertaken and it detailed in this report.

 

As it is understood that Council wishes to ensure that the lot size of the future subdivision on this site better reflects the existing lot sizes which adjoin this property. A balanced approach is being proposed through this report which draws upon the minimum lot sizes imposed across other low density residential zones within Liverpool and other local government areas, and allows the interface between the new lots and the old lots to be treated to ensure greater consistency in terms of lot size.

 

The minimum lot size of 300sqm aligns with the planning provisions placed on the immediate surrounding area, as well as other R2 Low Density Residential areas across many Sydney Councils. This minimum lot size control provides greater market flexibility, housing affordability, housing diversification, increases the catchment area for shopping centres, and increases housing provision.

 

Supporting smaller lot sizes is also consistent with Liverpool’s Community Strategic Plan Growing Liverpool 2023, the State’s draft Metropolitan Strategy, the draft South West Sub-regional Plan, and local strategic policies. This report recommends that Council endorses the rezoning application with ancillary planning provisions and submit the planning proposal to the NSW Planning & Environment for Gateway Determination.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Endorses the Planning Proposal (Amendment No. 50) to forward to NSW Planning and Environment seeking Gateway Determination.

 

2.       Subject to Gateway approval, proceeds with public authority consultation and public exhibition in accordance with the determination.

 

3.       Notes that the outcomes of public authority consultation and public exhibition will be reported to Council in the future.

 

 

REPORT

 

Background

 

In March 2014, Council received a rezoning application seeking to rezone part of Lot 5 DP 1044168 from SP2 Infrastructure (Water Supply System) as well as part of Lot 2 DP 1134646 RE1 Public Recreation, to R2 Low Density Residential. The land is located at 900 Cowpasture Road, Cecil Hills.

 

          Figure 1: Current LLEP 2008 SP2 Zone                       Figure 2: Proposed R2 Low Density Residential

 

At the Council’s Meeting held on 20 June 2014 Council resolved to defer the item as concerns were raised over the proposed Minimum Lot Size of 300sqm. This report provides more information regarding the surrounding minimum area lot size controls and recommends and alternate approach which achieves a compatible lot size interface between the existing development to the north and the proposed development, while allowing the remaining portion of the lot be developed using the normal minimum lot size of 300m2.

 

Context of the Surrounding Area

Under the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008, Cecil Hills is identified a residential area where low density residential uses are to be encouraged due to its established infrastructure network, relative close proximity to open space networks, employment hubs, community facilities, and public transport networks. For these reasons the surrounding area has been zoned R2 Low Density Residential under the Liverpool LEP 2008.

 

Providing opportunities for low scale housing diversity within this area is supported as the area has good access to employment, education facilities and community services, whilst retaining the existing neighbourhood characteristic and amenity.

 

It is noted that the lots directly adjacent to the subject site have an average lot size from 550-700sqm, however this area also has the minimum lot size provision of 300sqm as seen below.

 

Figure 3: Liverpool LEP 2008 Minimum Lot Size Provision of 300sqm applying to the surrounding area of Cecil Hills.

 

An alternative approach

Concerns have been raised regarding the amenity impacts of introducing new smaller lots directly onto the rear of established larger lot sizes. This circumstance is similar to the introduction of new dwellings in the Georges Fair Moorebank release area adjacent to the larger established lots of Moorebank.

 

In that circumstance Council imposed a buffer of one lot depth with a higher minimum lot size directly adjacent to the established lots, and then allowed the smaller lot sizes throughout the remainder of the development. This has resulted in the lots created along the outer fringe of the Georges Fair development being of a similar size to the established lots and providing a buffer between the two lot sizes.

 

An example of this is provided below with the area of the Georges Fair development as it interfaces with established development in Moorebank shown dotted in red:

 

 

 

New development along new roads– average lot sizes 300m2 – 400m2

 

Interface area along new road Horizon Circuit new development controlled by larger minimum lot size in this case 450m2 – average lot sizes 480m2 to 500m2

 

Existing development along Eloura Crescent – average lot sizes 650m2 to 900m2

 
http://adm-m-gis1/output/Buffer_ims_adm-m-gis1432020846369.jpg

 

Changing Development Standards regarding Minimum Lot Size 

To address Sydney’s housing affordability crisis the NSW Department of Planning and Environment have endorsed the minimum lot size standard of 300sqm across R2 Low Density Residential Zones across western Sydney with the gazettal of Standard Instrument LEPs. The proposed approach will allow smaller lots to be developed in the area of the site which does not directly interface with the existing housing, while maintaining a similar form of housing across the back fences.

 

Housing Market Demand

The existing lots within Cecil Hills are predominantly larger because that was the predominant subdivision size when the area was developed. Subdivision size generally responds to the housing market, so if bigger lots are preferable that’s what is provided through subdivision applications. The current market is calling for smaller and more affordable housing. However, it should be noted that the lot size controls are minimums and do not prevent the creation of larger lots. 

 

Conclusion

The proposed minimum lot size of 300sqm is most appropriate for the subject site given the existing planning precedent apparent in the current LLEP 2008 planning provisions across all R2 Low Density Residential zones. Taking into account the desire to have the development directly adjoining the existing subdivision be of an equivalent size, a minimum lot size of 450m2 can be imposed along the northern boundary of this area. The remaining area would have a minimum lot size of 300m2.

 

This approach provides a dual benefit in that it responds to amenity concerns and allows for developmental flexibility, housing affordability, housing diversification, provides housing in a well serviced and established neighbourhood, and achieves the objectives of the Community Strategic Plan Growing Liverpool 2023 in creating sustainable, livable communities and encouraging growth in appropriate locations.  It is recommended that Council proceed with Amendment 50 and lodge a planning proposal with NSW Planning and Environment seeking gateway determination.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues.

Facilitate economic development.

Environmental and Sustainability

Retain viable opportunities for local food production while managing land use to meet urban growth.

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Promote an integrated and user friendly public transport service.

Support the delivery of a range of transport options.


Social and Cultural

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Act as an environmental leader in the community.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Previous Council Meeting Report - Sydney Water Site (Amdt 50) 900 Cowpasture Rd, Cecil Hills.

  


259

DPG 02

Liverpool LEP Amendment No. 50- 900 Cowpasture Rd, Cecil Hills (Sydney Water Site)

Attachment 1

Previous Council Meeting Report - Sydney Water Site (Amdt 50) 900 Cowpasture Rd, Cecil Hills.

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


259

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Planning and Growth Report

 

DPG 03

LLEP Draft Amendment No 49 - Removal of Flood Prone Area Mapping from LLEP

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

089159.2014

Report By

Katie Miles - Strategic Planner

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The Liverpool Local Government Area (LGA) is traversed by a large number of rivers and creeks making flood management a key area of responsibility for Liverpool Council. Large areas of the LGA are subject to flooding from both overland flows and mainstream flooding. Further, with larger urban release areas, landform in the LGA is continually changing to convert flood prone areas to viable developable land through landfilling activities.

 

However, updating of records to reflect flood free nature of the new properties created can take up to 12 months. Whilst Council’s Flood Maps can be updated quickly to reflect on the ground changes, the Flood Prone Land Maps in the LEP must go through the 9-12 month LEP amendment process. This results in inconsistencies in the identification of flood prone land and affects development assessment, 149 Certificate information, and insurance premiums, as well as creating angst and uncertainty for land owners and developers.

 

Council’s Planning and Engineering staff have therefore undertaken a joint review to improve the internal processes in the way flood data is updated and communicated to the community. The review of current flood planning controls has been undertaken considering relevant policies, regional strategies, and best practice guidelines, in particular investigating the best mechanism to map or identify flood liable land.

 

A planning proposal has been prepared which proposes to remove the Flood Prone Land Maps from Liverpool LEP 2008 and amend clause 7.8 Flood Planning to rely on Council’s Flood Maps rather than maps contained in the LEP. This is in line with the approach taken by many other metropolitan Councils, particularly those experiencing significant growth and change which would result in flood mapping information having to be regularly updated.

 

This proposed amendment would allow Council’s flood planning data to be more quickly updated in response to flood mitigation works, ensuring that 149 Certificates are up to date and that there are no out dated restrictions on land which would affect new development.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Forwards a planning proposal to NSW Planning and Environment seeking a Gateway Determination to amend Clause 7.8 and remove the LEP Flood Prone Land Area Mapping.

 

2.       Proceeds with public authority consultation and public exhibition in accordance with the determination, subject to Gateway approval.

 

3.       Notes that the outcomes of public authority consultation and public exhibition will be reported to Council in the future.

 

4.       Proceeds with the minor amendment to the DCP which will identify flooding risk provisions applying to land at or below the flood planning area (as opposed to being identified as per the Flood Prone Land Maps within the LLEP 2008). 

 

REPORT

 

Land that is affected by the flood planning area is identified via two mechanisms being:

 

1.   Council’s Flood Plain Risk Management Studies:

·    Anzac Creek Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    South Creek Floodplain;

·    Cabramatta Creek Flood Plain Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    Georges River Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    Austral Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    Upper Nepean River Flood Management Study and Plan.  

 

2.   The Flood Prone Land Area Maps of the Liverpool LEP 2008.

 

If land is identified by either of these mechanisms as flood liable than any development proposal must comply with the relevant Flood Planning provisions within both the LLEP & LDCP 2008. Inconsistencies occur as Council’s Flood Studies are able to be amended when cut and fill works are carried out and approved by Council’s Infrastructure and Environment Department, in effect they are able to be updated straight away after works have been completed.  However, the LLEP Maps must undergo the amendment process to be updated. This can take up to 12+ months to complete and during this time properties which are no longer flood affected are still subject to flood planning provisions, and the relevant 149 Certificate will still denote the property as flood affected which has impacts on insurance premiums and land values. 

 

These local flood policies are updated frequently within Liverpool’s high-growth areas and new urban release areas which comprise much of the LGA. As development alters the land topography, associated with infrastructure and engineering works, Council’s technical support team update Liverpool’s flood mapping database and management policies to reflect these changes. However, in turn the Flood Mapping within the LLEP is unable to be quickly amended and misrepresents the flood planning areas. This is undesirable for land owners, developers, prospective buyers, Liverpool City Council and NSW Planning & Environment.

 

If the Flood Prone Land Area Maps remain within the Liverpool LEP 2008 council will need to progress ongoing planning proposals requesting flood area adjustments into the future. Property owners who have had the flood threat removed will experience significant delays until these proposals are gazetted on the LEP flood map. Their respective 149 planning certificate will continue to state the property is flood affected until gazettal. This means flood related development control and planning provisions are imposed on sites where the flood risk has been removed.

 

This review considers the mechanism of identifying flood prone land within the LLEP mapping is a doubled-up mechanism of flooding provisions which are out-of-date and problematic for all stakeholders and Council.

 

Council’s flood engineers recommend that “the Flood Prone Land Area maps be excluded from the Liverpool LEP 2008, and that flood affectation is mapped through a flood prone land area map”. It is noted that this impacts on land assessment on flood prone land. The attached planning proposal seeks the removal of these maps from the LLEP and amendment of Clause 7.8 Flood Planning to NSW Planning & Environment’s model clause for flood planning. 

 

The proposed removal of the Flood Prone Land Area Maps from the LLEP 2008 is the only way to prevent the incorrect statements of flood risk on 149 planning certificates and will thus avoid future conflicts between land owners, developers, Council and insurance companies that are being currently experienced. The proposed removal of LEP flood mapping would mean that 149(2)&(5) planning certificate flood information will be based on Council’s flood mapping system and not out-dated LLEP flood prone mapping.

 

The exclusion of flood mapping from the LLEP 2008 will reduce red tape in development assessment and ensure appropriate planning occurs in flood prone areas. The planning proposal will aid meeting housing targets of the draft South West Subregional Strategy, encourage the uptake of new subdivision/release areas, as well as reducing the costs and concerns of land owners in regards to flood insurance premiums.

 

Liverpool will experience extensive population growth over the next 20 years with many residents settling in to new suburbs in a city built on the flood plains of the Georges and Nepean river systems. Effective planning policy must be continually under evaluation in high growth localities. Suburbs which are expected to undergo high rates of development, or have experienced continual development over the last decade, are evolving. Thus there is an impetus placed on monitoring the synergetic relationship between an evolving precinct and its planning provisions. This is especially apparent in regards to prevention planning for natural disasters, such as bushfires and flooding.

 

The bushfire prone land maps are not issued under the LEP Standard Instrument as the consent authority is the NSW Rural Fire Service, but these maps trigger equivalent planning provisions and development controls on affected properties as would an LEP Map relating to building heights, floor space ratios or environmentally sensitive areas for example.

 

 

As the bushfire prone land maps exist outside of the LEP it is a relevant example of how the Flood Mapping of the Flood Risk Management Policies would operate effectively if removed from the LLEP and too, how natural hazard prevention planning needs to be adaptable to specific circumstances.

 

The Planning Proposal

 

This planning proposal seeks to:

 

1.   Remove the Flood Prone Land Area Maps (FLD001-FLD015) from the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008; and

 

2.   To amend Clause 7.8 of the written instrument to the NSW Planning & Environment’s Flood Planning model clause, as identified below:

7.8 Flood Planning

 

(1) The objectives of this clause are as follows:

          a) to minimise the flood risk to life and property associated with the use of     land,

          b) to allow development on land that is compatible with the land’s flood having        taking into account projected changes as a result of climate change,

          c) to avoid significant adverse impacts on flood behaviour and the environment.

 

(2) This clause applies to land at or below the flood planning area. 

 

(3) Development consent must not be granted to development on land to which this clause applies unless the consent authority is satisfied that the development:

          a) is compatible with the flood hazard of the land; and

          b) will not significantly adversely affect flood behaviour resulting in detrimental        increases in the potential flood affectation of other development or properties,       and

          c) incorporates appropriate measures to manage risk to life from flood, and

          d) will not significantly adversely affect the environment or cause avoidable   erosion, siltation, destruction of riparian vegetation or a reduction in the stability      of river banks or watercourses, and

          e) is not likely to result in unsustainable social and economic costs to the      community           as a consequence of flooding.

 

(4) A word or expression used in this clause has the same meaning as it has in the NSW Government’s Floodplain Development Manual published in 2005, unless it is otherwise defined in this clause.

 

(5) In this clause, flood planning area means the level of a 1:100 ARI (average recurrent interval) flood event plus 0.5 metre freeboard.

 

The amendment of Clause 7.8 is necessary so to refer to the flood planning area of Council’s flood policies, and to remove the overly verbose nature of the existing clause.   This current clause was the model clause recommended by the NSW Government in 2006, however, the model clause has now been updated. This amendment seeks to utilize the updated model clause.

 

 

The NSW Government’s Standard Technical Requirements for LEP Maps (Version 2.0) does not define flood mapping as mandatory for inclusion within the new LEPs. Flood mapping is a locally specific map which illustrates unique local conditions or affectations. Many local government authorities have opted not to incorporate a flooding map into their LEPs as Figure 1 below identify which outer Sydney Councils have incorporated flood mapping into their LEPs like Liverpool, and which Councils have not. As can be seen most growth Councils have opted to not include flood mapping into their LEPs.

Figure 1: A depiction of Councils which have/have not included flood mapping in their LEPs.

 

Liverpool’s Flood Management Policies

 

The Liverpool area is located on a number of floodplains, which means that significant portions of land are subject to flooding. As flooding can cause significant damage Council has adopted a number of Flooding Risk Management Plans which include:

 

·    Anzac Creek Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    South Creek Floodplain;

·    Cabramatta Creek Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    Georges River Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    Austral Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan;

·    Upper Nepean River Flood Management Study and Plan.

 

As development occurs in these areas which alter flood affectation of plans need to be updated. Council’s Infrastructure and Environment Department update the relevant flood maps, thus any proposed development on flood affected land then triggers compliance with the LLEP Clause 7.8 and LDCP flooding development controls, irrespective of the LLEP Flood Mapping. This ensures that all DAs for development on flood prone land will continue to be assessed appropriately.

 

 

The implementation of the attached planning proposal will provide important community benefits including ensuring individual land owners are not subject to unnecessary flood insurance premiums, it will provide security to developers that flood engineering and mitigation works will be reflected in development assessment, it will provide Council with an accurate real-time flood assessment areas, it will remove confusion between the LLEP 2008 flood maps versus the real-time flood mapping available on Council’s in-house systems as well as within the flood plan and risk management studies on Councils website.

 

 

It is important to note that only parts of the current LLEP flood prone mapping which are inaccurate area in locations where substantial development occurs, however the majority of Liverpool’s floodplain mapping is correct. As a result of the development ground topography is altered primarily by raising land levels above the 100 year flood planning level, thus flood mapping is altered to remove the flood affectation from completed development sites. There are no changes to the flood planning level nor are there any changes to any adopted flood policies.

 

The Draft DCP Amendment

 

Part 1 of the Liverpool DCP describes general controls relating to all development within the Liverpool and within this document is Section 9 Flooding Risk. The denotation of this Section of when it applies currently states:

 

          Applies to:

                   This section applies to land identified as Flood Prone Land within the Liverpool                 LEP 2008.

 

With the proposed removal of these maps from the LEP, the wording of this clause will need to be amended. It is recommended that the following is incorporated:

 

          Applies to:

                   This section applies to land identified as at or below the flood planning area.

 

Conclusion

 

Due to the lengthy legislative process to facilitate LEP amendments, the LLEP 2008 flood prone land maps are unable to keep up to date with amendments to the flood plain particularly in Council’s rapidly developing release areas. An analysis of flood planning options has been undertaken including research into the new model clause and comparisons to similar growth area council’s which recommends that flood prone land mapping not be included in the LLEP, but are managed as a standalone set of maps which are referenced through the LEP Clause 7.8.

 

The proposal to amend the LEP to make this change will provide advantages to the community, developers, Council and the NSW Department of Planning and Environment with clearer information provided through flood prone land maps, accuracy in Section 149 certificates and eradication of the need to prepare ongoing amendments to the LEP to address flood prone land. The suggested approach will ensure that land which is flood prone will continue to trigger assessment of flood impacts thereby protecting existing and future developments. This report and ancillary planning proposal is endorsed by Council’s flood engineers.

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are significant benefit in having up to date flood data shown on the property report including S149 planning certificates with respect to property value and insurance premium.

Environmental and Sustainability

Manage the environmental health of waterways.

Manage air, water, noise and chemical pollution.

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Act as an environmental leader in the community.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Deliver services that are customer focused.

Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

DCP Controls - Flood Planning

2.View

Current LEP Clause 7.8 Flood Planning

3.View

Flood Mapping Planning Proposal (Amendment No. 49) (Under separate cover)

  


283

DPG 03

LLEP Draft Amendment No 49 - Removal of Flood Prone Area Mapping from LLEP

Attachment 1

DCP Controls - Flood Planning

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


283

DPG 03

LLEP Draft Amendment No 49 - Removal of Flood Prone Area Mapping from LLEP

Attachment 2

Current LEP Clause 7.8 Flood Planning

 


 


285

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Planning and Growth Report

 

DPG 04

Draft LLEP 2008 Amendment No 32 (Housekeeping) Post Exhibition Report

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

132481.2014

Report By

Taylar Vernon - Strategic Planner

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

At its meeting dated 25 September 2013, Council resolved to prepare and exhibit Draft Amendment No 32 to the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008. The draft plan relates to various minor amendments to the written instrument, associated maps, and the reclassification of publicly owned land from community land to operational land.

 

The draft plan was exhibited in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Local Government Act 1993 and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. Submissions received related to various aspects of the planning proposal and are summarised in the attached submissions table, along with Council response to those issues. No changes to the Planning Proposal are recommended as a result of the public exhibition.

 

It is noted that this proposal was in the agenda for the 30 July Council meeting and that verbal submissions were received relating to the use and operation of the western depot. This report does recommend rezoning of adjoining parcel but does not provide detail about the future use of the site, as this will be subject of a future and separate development application.

 

It is recommended that Council adopt Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment No 32) and forward a copy of the planning proposal to the Department of Planning and Environment for finalisation and provide respond to submissions received during the public exhibition period.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Adopt Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No 32) and forward a copy of the attached planning proposal and supporting documentation to the Department of Planning and Environment for finalisation.

 

2.       Writes to the people who lodged submissions advising of Council’s decision.

 

 

REPORT

 

Background

 

At its meeting dated 25 September 2013, Council resolved to prepare and exhibit Draft Amendment No 32 to the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP 2008). The draft amendment relates to a number of minor amendments to the both the written instrument and the associated maps. In addition, five publicly owned land parcels are proposed to be reclassified from community land to operational land as part of the draft amendment, in accordance with Section 30 of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

Gateway determination to proceed with exhibition of the planning proposal was initially received on 5 December 2013, stipulating that the planning proposal should proceed to public exhibition subject to conditions including;

 

·    Additional information regarding hydraulic analysis for flood prone land at Tepper Park and the adjoining road reserve be prepared and exhibited with the planning proposal

·    The planning proposal and supporting documentation be publicly exhibited for a minimum of 28 days

·    The following public authorities be consulted for a minimum of 21 days;

 

Transport for NSW

Penrith City Council

Wollondilly Shire Council]

Campbelltown City Council

Office of Environment and Heritage

Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority

NSW Rural Fire Service

 

A revised Gateway determination was received on 23 December 2013 which acknowledged that changes to the permissibility of ‘restricted premises’, which were initially incorporated with this proposed amendment, would instead be considered through a separate planning proposal. It also corrected a former error regarding the location of Tepper Park, Liverpool.

 

Consultation with the abovementioned public authorities was undertaken between 19 March and 9 April 2014 and the planning proposal and supporting documentation were publicly exhibited from 30 April to 4 June 2014. A public hearing was held on 10 June 2014 in accordance with Section 29 of the Local Government Act 1993 No 30 and LEP Practice Note PN 09-003. The outcomes of the consultation process will be addressed later in the relevant section of this report.

 

Explanation of Provisions

 

Draft Amendment No 32 to the LLEP 2008 relates to various minor changes to both the written instrument and the associated maps; and the reclassification of five parcels of publicly owned land from community land to operational land. A brief outline of the proposed changes is provided in the table below;

 

Amendment applies to:

Explanation of provision

Part of Lots 1-2 DP 1162379, 50-60 Glenfield Road and 19-21 Streeton Place, Casula

Rezone from RE1 Public Recreation to R2 Low Density Residential. Amend the corresponding development standards and ESL maps to align with the proposed zone boundaries.

Part of Lot 213 DP 280030, Robey Avenue, and Part of Lots 217-218 and 228-229 DP 280030, McIntyre Circuit, Middleton Grange

Realign zone boundary between R1 General Residential and SP2 (Drainage) zones to reflect the correct location of existing drainage basin.

 

As the drainage basin has been acquired by Council, the item is to be removed from the Land Reservation Acquisition Map.

Part of Lot 1 DP 1188619, Denham Court Road and part of Lots 3-4 DP 1188619 and Lot 44 DP 1186853, Huntingdale Drive, Denham Court.

Realign the R5 Large Lot Residential and RU2 Rural Landscape zone boundary to align with property boundaries. The minimum lot size map will also be amended to align with the proposed zone boundary.

Part of Lot 1 DP 1046088, 20 Nimbin Avenue, Hoxton Park

Rezone from E2 Environmental Conservation to R2 Low Density Residential and amend corresponding development standard maps to align with the proposed zone boundary.

Part of Lot 13 DP 1172599, Lot 13 Elvira Place, and part of Lots 8-10 DP 1172599, Elvira Place, West Hoxton

Realign R2 Low Density Residential and RE1 Public Recreation zone boundary to correspond to property boundaries. Corresponding LEP maps will also be amended.

Lot 100 DP 1160322, Sarah Hollands Drive, Lots 200-201 and 203 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Lot 3124 DP 1160426, Lot 3124 Pioneer Drive, Carnes Hill

Realign SP2 (Local Road) zone boundary to reflect location of planned Kurrajong Road extension between Prestons and Carnes Hill.

Part of Lot 7000 DP 1169480, Elizabeth Hills

Rezone from SP2 (Local Road) to RE1 Public Recreation and rezone the existing road reserve of Airfield Drive, Elizabeth Hills from RE1 to SP2 (Local Road).

 

The road has been dedicated to Council and the Land Reservation Acquisition Map will be updated to reflect this.

Lot 101 DP 630178, 85 Lee & Clarke Road, Kemps Creek

Rezone from RU4 Primary Production Small Lots to SP2 (Depot) and remove the existing minimum lot size control to facilitate expansion to Council’s Western Depot.

Lot 7 DP 238364, McLean Street, Liverpool

 

Rezone from B6 Enterprise Corridor to R3 Medium Density Residential and amend corresponding development standard maps.

Part of Lots 20-22 DP 29317, Jardine Drive, Edmondson Park

Rezone from SP2 (Educational Establishment) to R1 General Residential. Amend corresponding LEP maps consistent with surrounding R1 zoned land.

Lot 101 DP 30136, Grimson Crescent, Liverpool

Rezone from B1 Neighbourhood Centre to R3 Medium Density Residential and amend corresponding LEP maps, consistent with adjoining R3 zoned land.

Part 7 – Local Provisions

Amend Clause 7.13(4) to remove reference to average lot width of battle-axe lots and insert a subclause making the sharing of a single access handle by two adjoining battle-axe lots permissible.

Part 7 – Local Provisions

Amend Clause 7.7 having regard to Acid Sulfate Soils, in accordance with advice from NSW Planning and Infrastructure.

Part 7 – Local Provisions

Create controls on the development of dual occupancies on R5 Large Lot Residential zoned land.

Part 7 – Local Provisions

rural worker’s dwelling means a building or place that is additional to a dwelling house on the same lot and that is used predominantly as a place of residence by persons employed, whether on a long-term or short-term basis, for the purpose of agriculture or a rural industry on that land.

 

Rural workers dwelling will be added as a permissible use in the RU1 and RU4 zones, with controls restricting their size and quantity. There shall be a maximum of one (1) rural workers dwelling permitted per lot, with the dwelling having a maximum gross floor area of 100sqm.

Schedule 4 -

Classification and Reclassification of Public Land

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassification of the following lots from community land to operational land:

 

·    Lots 2-3 DP 1184259 – Genairco Park, Middleton Grange (Schedule 4 Part 1)

·    Lot 241 DP 1191341 – Lot 241 Warialda Way, Hinchinbrook (Schedule 4 Part 1)

·    Lot 1 DP 805582 – 16A Coonong Street, Busby (Schedule 4 Part 2)

·    Lot 10 DP 776165 – Lot 10 Sappho Road, Warwick Farm (Schedule 4 Part 2)

·    Part of Lot 17 DP 31863, Tepper Park, Liverpool (Schedule 4 Part 2)

 

Those properties above which are to be listed under Schedule 4 Part 1 will facilitate the construction of public roads. Those properties which are proposed to be listed under Schedule 4 Part 2 will be disposed of by Council, with the funds raised to be credited to Council’s property development reserve.

Part of Lot 17 DP 31863, Tepper Park, Liverpool

Rezone part of Tepper Park and part of the adjoining road reserve from RE1 Public Recreation to R2 Low Density Residential. Update floor space ratio, minimum lot size and maximum building height maps.

Schedule 5 -

Environmental Heritage

Amend the description of Item 55, being the former Pitt Street Road Bridge at Cabramatta Creek, Miller, to accurately reflect its location within Lot 16 DP 1036695, Hoxton Park Road, Cartwright.

 

A more detailed explanation and maps of each of these amendments is provided in Part 3 of the attached planning proposal.

 

Public Authority Consultation and Public Exhibition

 

In accordance with the Gateway determination, consultation with the following public authorities was undertaken for a period of 21 days between 19 March and 9 April 2014;

 

Ø Transport for NSW

Ø Penrith City Council

Ø Wollondilly Shire Council

Ø Campbelltown City Council

Ø Office of Environment and Heritage

Ø Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority

Ø NSW Rural Fire Service

 

Those responses which were received during the public authority consultation period acknowledged the consultation but raised no comments regarding the proposed amendment.

 

The planning proposal and supporting documentation were publicly exhibited from 30 April to 4 June 2014. A total of five submissions were received during the public exhibition period. The Roads and Maritime Services advised that they had no comment on the proposed amendment. The other four were submissions were received from residents and members of the business community. The following matters were considered to be of concern in these submissions;

 

Ø Proposed controls on ‘Rural Workers Dwellings’

Ø Rezoning of Council owned land at 85 Lee & Clarke Road, Kemps Creek, to facilitate the proposed expansion of Council’s Western depot.

Ø Reclassification of part of Tepper Park and the adjacent McLean Street Road Reserve

Ø Changes to height of building and floor space ratio controls associated with rezoning of part of Lots 20-22 DP 29317, Jardine Drive, Edmondson Park

 

A summary of the issues raised and Council’s response to these matters is provided in the attached submissions table.

 

This report was originally to be considered at Council’s meeting dated 30 July 2014. Two nearby residents, Kathryn Ussia and Briona Jocic, spoke regarding the proposed rezoning of Lot 101 DP 630178, known as 85 Lee and Clarke Road, Kemps Creek, to facilitate the expansion of Council’s Western Depot. Their concerns principally related to the existing operations of the depot, which is located on adjoining Lot 100 DP 630178, 245 Devonshire Road, Kemps Creek. It has been explained that any future expansion of the depot onto the subject site will be subject to a development application which is to address matters such as noise and air pollution.

 

A public hearing was held on 10 June 2014 to discuss the proposed reclassification of publicly owned land from community land to operational land. The hearing was organized in accordance with Section 29 of the Local Government Act 1993 No 30 and LEP Practice Note PN 09-003. There were no attendees to the hearing. StraightTalk were engaged to facilitate the public hearing and have prepared a community feedback report which is provided as an attachment to this report.

Conclusions

Draft Amendment No 32 to the LLEP 2008 relates to various minor amendments to both the written instrument and relevant maps. It also proposes the reclassification of publicly owned land from community land to operational land in five (5) locations. In two of these locations (Hinchinbrook and Middleton Grange), the reclassification has been sought to facilitate the construction of public road. The remaining properties, being Lot 10, DP 776165, Lot 1, DP 805582, and Lot 17, DP 31863, will be disposed of, with the proceeds of their sale to be credited to Council’s property development reserve.

 

The draft amendment has been exhibited in accordance with the Gateway determination and the relevant provisions of both the Local Government Act 1993 No 30 and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The relevant matters which were raised during the consultation process have been addressed in the attached submissions table. No changes to the planning proposal are recommended following the public authority consultation or the public exhibition.

 

It is recommended that Council adopt Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment No 32) and forward a copy of the planning proposal and supporting documentation to the Department of Planning and Environment for legal drafting and finalisation.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Proceeds from the sale of publicly owned land will be credited towards Council’s property development reserve.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Act as an environmental leader in the community.

Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Public Hearing Report (Under separate cover)

2.View

Liverpool LEP 2008 (Amendment No 32) Revised Gateway Determination (Under separate cover)

3.View

Public Exhibition Submissions Table (Under separate cover)

4.View

Draft Planning Proposal LLEP 2008 Amendment No.32 - Post Exhibition (Under separate cover)


291

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Planning and Growth Report

 

DPG 05

Public Exhibition Outcomes - Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Amendment 15)

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

140055.2014

Report By

Graham Matthews - Strategic Planner

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Regular reviews of the Liverpool Development Control Plan (LDCP) 2008 are required to ensure the document controls are relevant and respond to development trends in the area. The proposed amendment seeks to correct errors/omissions in Parts 2.2, 2.3, 2.5, 2.14 and 2.19 and to make more substantive amendments to Parts 3.1 and 7. It is considered that the amendments outlined in the report are necessary to improve the clarity of LDCP 2008 and provide certainty and consistency for Council staff and customers.

 

Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 15) was publicly exhibited from 21 May 2014 to 19 June 2014. No submissions were received.

 

This report recommends progressing with the amendment to LDCP 2008.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council adopts Draft Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Amendment 15) in accordance with section 21 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 to come into effect upon the publication of a public notice in the local newspaper.

 

REPORT

 

Background

The LDCP 2008 is a detailed instrument that provides controls that apply to certain types of development throughout the local government area. Regular reviews of the LDCP 2008 are required to keep the document updated and clear. During an internal review process a number of matters have emerged which require the need for some amendments. The majority of these amendments are minor in nature and do not significantly affect the application of the LDCP 2008. These amendments are outlined below.

 

Proposed Amendments

 

Part 2.2 – Hoxton Park, Carnes Hill and Prestons (subdivision of land)

It is proposed to correct a typographical error by amending Section 1 (Preliminary) such that point 3 will read “Part 1 and Chapter 4 of this Part (2.2) applies to the land shown in Figure 14.” The current wording references Figure 13, which shows the wrong area, creating potential confusion and leading to possible misinterpretation.

 

Parts 2.3, 2.5, 2.9, 2.14

It is proposed to correct an omission by adding the subheading “Privacy” to the “Amenity and Environmental Impact” section of each Part. The addition of the subheading clarifies the requirement to provide privacy to neighbouring dwellings, improving planning outcomes and safeguarding residential amenity. This does not affect the content of the controls but clarifies the structure of the LDCP.

 

Part 3.1 – Dwelling Houses in the R5 zone

The R5 – Large Lot Residential zoning is generally reserved for rural residential precincts. R5 zoned land in Liverpool is generally characterised by a minimum lot size of 10,000sqm, and lots with wide frontages and deep lengths. Development controls outlined in Part 3.1 of LDCP 2008, including minimum front and rear setbacks of 12m, side setbacks of 5m and the requirement that a minimum of 75% of the lot be landscaped, help protect the unique character and amenity of these rural residential developments.

 

However, in addition to rural residential land, 12 smaller lots in Pleasure Point have also been zoned R5 – Large Lot Residential, even though the lots are far smaller (ranging in area from around 600-1600sqm), with street frontages of less than 20m, and lot depths between 30 and 80m.  The subject lots have been zoned R5 to prevent over-development of an area that has limited access to infrastructure and is bushfire prone. Because of the smaller size of the lots, strict application of the development controls regarding setbacks and minimum landscaped area is impractical and would stifle development of the lots. This has led to the granting of routine variations to the development controls applying to these lots, which is undesirable.

 

This amendment proposes to insert an extra statement in Section 1 of Part 3.1 of LDCP 2008, stating, “Requirements for Setbacks and Landscaped Area and Private Open Space must be assessed on their merits in relation to the following lots in Pleasure Point, which are also illustrated in Figure 1 below.” The individual Lot and DP numbers are detailed in the attachment to this report. Figure 1 below shows the specific lots to be effected. The amendment addresses an anomaly in the Part, which will facilitate easier development of the subject lots, without impacting on R5 zoned land elsewhere in the local government area.

 

Figure 1: Lots in Pleasure Point subject to merit assessment of Setbacks, Landscaping and Private Open Space (subject lots highlighted).

 

Part 7 – Development in Industrial Zones

A routine review of Part 7 of LDCP 2008 has highlighted a number of small typographical errors which when corrected will make the DCP easier to navigate. In addition, it is proposed to make an amendment to the treatment of E2 – Environmental Conservation zoned land along Cabramatta Creek in Prestons, and to update the Lot and DP numbers of properties requiring the addition of speed humps along the required access road, that must provide a right of way and easements for drainage infrastructure along Bernera Road.

 

Land in Environmental Conservation zone at Prestons

Land abutting Cabramatta Creek which runs through the Prestons industrial area is zoned E2 – Environmental Conservation by Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008 in order to limit development and to safeguard the environmental integrity of the creek. This amendment proposes to correct an error in Part 7 of the LDCP 2008, where the land was incorrectly described as E3 – Environmental Management zoned land.

 

The amendment also proposes to clarify and simplify development controls for the land, including requiring that all development (that is, not just buildings but any development) be setback 10m from the E2 zoned land, while clarifying that any development in or within 10m of the E2 zoned land that “is likely to adversely impact on bushland on the E2 zoned land, a Vegetation Management Plan (VMP) for the conservation of the bushland shall be submitted. The VMP shall be undertaken in accordance with the pertinent NSW Office of Water Guidelines”. The amendment will clarify the responsibility of landowners of the E2 – Environmental Conservation zoned land and help protect the riparian corridor along Cabramatta Creek in Prestons.

 

Traffic and Site Access adjacent to Kurrajong Road, Prestons

Control 1 of Section 8 of Part 7 states that there is to be no truck access to industrial zoned sites adjacent to Kurrajong Road from Kurrajong Road. All truck access to these properties is to be via rear driveways or roads. Control 5 further states that speed humps are to be provided within the required service road at 100m intervals. The control goes on to describe the specific properties which must locate the speed humps.

 

Subdivision of land since the adoption of Part 7 of LDCP 2008 has changed the Lot and DP designation for two of the lots that require speed humps. This amendment proposes to update the Lot and DP number of these lots, but also to add a map of the subject lots to further clarify the effected lots for the ease of developers and Council staff (see Figure 2 below).

 

Figure 2: Speed humps are to be provided within the service road to be located on the highlighted lots at 100m intervals.

 

 

Right of Way

The DCP limits truck access for certain allotments facing Kurrajong Road and Bernera Road.  There is also one lot to which road access is severed by the M7 motorway. The DCP requires that “certain allotments must retain a right-of-way across the land giving truck access to certain other lots as shown in the corresponding row of the table below. These allotments are listed in column 2 of table 3,” (see table below).

 

 

Subdivision of land since the adoption of Part 7 of LDCP 2008 has changed the Lot and DP designation for one of the lots that are required to provide a right of way. A further lot was incorrectly described. This amendment proposes to update the Lot and DP number of these lots and to provide a map of the lots required to provide and benefit from a right of way (see Figure 3 below).

Figure 3: Land which fronts Kurrajong Rd or without road access and Land which must give right of way to the adjoining land.

 

Lots fronting Bernera Road, Prestons

Control 4 requires that, “Any DA for development of the following allotments must identify and dedicate a 14m wide easement along the Bernera Road frontage to accommodate drainage infrastructure”. The control goes on to list 10 lots which front Bernera Road, which are to provide the required easement.

 

Subdivision of land since the adoption of Part 7 of LDCP 2008 has changed the Lot and DP designation for one of the lots that require the 14m setback. This amendment proposes to update the Lot and DP number of this lot, but also to add a map of the subject lots to further clarify the affected lots for the ease of applicants and Council staff (see Figure 3 below).

 

Figure 4: Allotments which must identify and dedicate a 14m wide easement along the Bernera Road frontage to accommodate drainage infrastructure.

 

These amendments are shown in Attachment 1 – tracked changes

 

Community Consultation

Council publicly exhibited Draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 15) for 29 days from 21 May 2014 to 19 June 2014. Advertisements advising of the public exhibition were published in the Liverpool Leader on the following dates:

 

§ 21 May 2014

§ 28 May 2014

§ 4 June 2014

§ 11 June 2014

§ 18 June 2014

The public exhibition material was made available for viewing at Council’s Administration Building. Additionally, the exhibition documents were available for download from Council’s website during the duration of the public exhibition period. Council staff were available to answer questions over the phone or in person.

 

No submissions were received during the public exhibition period.

 

Conclusion

The addition of the maps and the other amendments described above will ensure that the development controls are able to be easily applied through the development phase of the subject areas. Regular reviews and amendments to LDCP 2008 are required to keep the document up to date and concise. As stated previously, the majority of these amendments are of a minor and administrative nature only. The proposed amendments will rectify inconsistencies and help deliver a clearer and more user friendly document. Further the proposed amendments do not change the intent of the plan and are consistent with LLEP 2008. It is recommended that Council adopt Draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 15) as endorsed by Council on 30 April 2014 to be effective from the date of publication of a notice in the local newspaper.

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Facilitate economic development.

 

Environmental and Sustainability

Protect, enhance and maintain areas of endangered ecological communities and high quality bushland as part of an attractive mix of land uses.

 


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Draft Liverpool Development Contributions Plan 2008 (Amendment 15) - Tracked Changes (Under separate cover)

   


298

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 01

Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee
Meeting held on 4 June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

047878.2014

Report By

Norma Burrows - Community Development Worker (ATSI)

Approved By

Kiersten Fishburn – Director Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

 

1.       The Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 4 June 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place.

Promote community harmony and address discrimination.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee meeting held on 4 June 2014

  


305

CTTE 01

Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee

Meeting held on 4 June 2014

Attachment 1

Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee meeting held on 4 June 2014

 


 


 


303

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 02

Liverpool Youth Council Meeting Notes June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

140010.2014

Report By

Derek Tweed - Community Development Worker (Youth)

Approved By

Kiersten Fishburn – Director Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 3 June 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 3 June 2014.

 

2.       Notes that this meeting was the final meeting of the Liverpool Youth Council 2012- 2014 term and that a quorum was not present.       

 

 

REPORT

 

The Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 3 June 2014 are attached for the information of Council. The Meeting Notes identify a number of actions for Council Staff and Youth Councillors to undertake, none of which have financial or policy implications for Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

MEETING NOTES June 2014 Liverpool Youth Council     

  


305

CTTE 02

Liverpool Youth Council Meeting Notes June 2014

Attachment 1

MEETING NOTES June 2014 Liverpool Youth Council

 


 


 


308

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 03

Heritage Advisory Committee Minutes 3 June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Protect and preserve Liverpool’s heritage, including its rural landscape and cultural history

Key Policy

Heritage Strategy

File Ref

149367.2014

Report By

Anna London - Heritage Officer

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Heritage Advisory Committee held on 3 June 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Draft minutes of Heritage Advisory Committee meeting 3 June 2014

  


317

CTTE 03

Heritage Advisory Committee Minutes 3 June 2014

Attachment 1

Draft minutes of Heritage Advisory Committee meeting 3 June 2014

 


 


 


 


 


315

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 04

Minutes of Economic Development Committee and Events Committee meeting held 6 August 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney

Key Policy

Economic Development Strategy

File Ref

155095.2014

Report By

Julie Scott - Manager Economic Development

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Director Economy and Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held on 6 August 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the Economic Development and Events Committee Meeting held on 6 August 2014.

 

2.    Support allocation of an additional $110,000 at Council’s budget quarterly review to effectively deliver Council’s 2014/15 events schedule.

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held on 6 August 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes seek additional resources through the quarterly budget review process towards the operation of Council’s 2014/14 program of events.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The activities of the Committee support Council’s efforts to facilitate economic development.

Additional funding of $110,000 has been sought through the quarterly budget review process toward the costs of logistics and operational improvements to Council’s 2014/2015 schedule of events

Environmental and Sustainability

Environmental and sustainability considerations will be factored into economic development activities.


Social and Cultural

Economic development will boost demand for cultural and arts activities.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The Committee provides guidance for Council’s economic development projects and initiatives.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

MINUTES Economic Development Committee meeting 6 August 2014 FINAL

  


317

CTTE 04

Minutes of Economic Development Committee and Events Committee meeting held 6 August 2014

Attachment 1

MINUTES Economic Development Committee meeting 6 August 2014 FINAL

 


 


 


 


 


 


323

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 05

Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee 12 June 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

150511.2014

Report By

Kathryn Sloan - Community Development Worker (Aged and Disability)

Approved By

Kiersten Fishburn – Director Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 12 April 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 12 April 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee held on 12 June 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support access and services for people with a disability.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Minutes Liverpool access committee 12 June 2014

  


325

CTTE 05

Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee 12 June 2014

Attachment 1

Minutes Liverpool access committee 12 June 2014

 


 


 


328

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 06

No Intermodal Committee Meeting Minutes of 1 July 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

154214.2014

Report By

Megan Munari - Senior Strategic Planner

Approved By

Toni Averay – Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report presents the Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 1 July 2014

 

The report also provides an update on the media campaign developed in accordance with Council’s resolution of 28 May 2014 to allocate $25,000 to further undertake an awareness campaign. 

 

An additional budget allocation of $95,000 is also sought in order to continue the work relating to the intermodal proposals.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 1 July 2014.

 

2.   Notes the advice in this report regarding the media awareness campaign.

 

3.   Allocates $95,000 from the Intermodal Reserve to the Intermodal Fighting Fund to continue work relating to the intermodal proposals.

 

REPORT

 

The Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee meetings held on 1 July 2014 are attached for the information of Council.  During the meeting, officers briefed the Committee members on the media strategy developed to raise awareness about the intermodal proposals. 

 

The media campaign involves awareness weekday advertising on major AM and FM Sydney radio stations during morning and afternoon drive sessions to target both younger and older demographic groups.  The campaign commenced 22 July and runs to 14 August.  Listeners are advised about the potential traffic impacts of the intermodal proposals and encouraged to speak up and have their say on Liverpool Listens.

 

A key early priority has been to raise community awareness about the Planning and Assessment Commission public meeting to consider the SIMTA intermodal proposal to be held on 31 July at 4pm at the Wattle Grove Community Centre.  Maximum community attendance is important to highlight the level of community concern about the proposed intermodals.

 

Budget Allocation

 

At its meeting of 30 April 2012, Council resolved to allocate $70,000 to fund the engagement of a consultant to prepare a peer review of the SIMTA Concept Plan and Environmental Assessment. Council also resolved to allocate funding as a priority from any identified surplus resulting from the March Quarterly Budget Review for the following actions:

 

1.   to engage a consultancy firm to undertake a detailed review of the imminent Federal Government intermodal Concept Plan and Environmental Assessment;

2.   to engage a consultant to chair the No Intermodal Working Party meetings; and

3.   to develop and undertake a comprehensive communications strategy.

 

Subsequently, at a meeting held on 28 May 2012 as part of the March 2012 quarterly review process, Council allocated $200,000 towards the opposing the intermodal.

 

At its meeting on Monday 5 November 2012 Council resolved to allocate $58,000 to the No Intermodal Fighting Fund.

 

Expenditure relating to the intermodal proposals since 2012 has consisted of:

 

·    Peer review of SIMTA EIS by Cardno;

·    Peer review of re-exhibited SIMTA EIS by Cardno;

·    Community awareness and engagement;

·    No Intermodal Rally including advertising and promotion;

·    Creation of the Fair Go for South West Sydney campaign;

·    Online petition to oppose the intermodals; and

·    Cameras for filming of the freight line.

 

Council has been committed in its opposition to the intermodal by committing resources and funding for the items described above. Council has also engaged Cardno to provide a peer review of the Moorebank Intermodal Company Limited environmental impact assessment when it goes on exhibition, expected in September 2014. Council has also committed $25,000 to the current media awareness campaign.

 

The funding for the No Intermodal campaign and peer reviews was allocated in 2012 and is close to being exhausted.  Additional funds are now sought to continue the work opposing the intermodals and ensuring that the Liverpool community gets a fair go. An amount of $95,000 remains uncommitted in the Intermodal Reserve and it is proposed to transfer this  to the fighting fund to enable the work of the Committee to continue.

 

It is recommended that Council allocates a further $95,000 to the No Intermodal Fighting Fund to allow the work relating to the intermodals to continue.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

An additional allocation of $95,000 is sought from Council’s Intermodal Reserve to continue the work opposing the intermodal proposals.

Environmental and Sustainability

 

Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues. The media campaign will raise awareness about the potential impacts of the intermodal proposals.  The additional budget allocation is sought in order to continue work relating to the intermodal proposals.

 


Social and Cultural

 

The media campaign will raise awareness about the potential impacts of the intermodal proposals.   The additional budget allocation of $95,000 is sought to continue work relating to the intermodal proposals.

 


Civic Leadership and Governance

Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Draft No Internodal Committee Meeting Minutes 1 July 2014

2.View

No Intermodal Committee Presentation by Moorebank Intermodal Company Limited

  


331

CTTE 06

No Intermodal Committee Meeting Minutes of 1 July 2014

Attachment 1

Draft No Internodal Committee Meeting Minutes 1 July 2014

 


 


 


355

CTTE 06

No Intermodal Committee Meeting Minutes of 1 July 2014

Attachment 2

No Intermodal Committee Presentation by Moorebank Intermodal Company Limited

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


353

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 07

Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee 2 July 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

154785.2014

Report By

Grace Farrugia - Business Support Officer

Approved By

Matthew Walker – Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee Meeting held on 2 July 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee Meeting held on 2 July 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee meeting held on 2 July 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Budget and Finance Committee Minutes 2 July 2014

  


355

CTTE 07

Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee

Attachment 1

Budget and Finance Committee Minutes 2 July 2014

 


 


357

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 08

Key Sites Master Planning Steering Committee Minutes from meeting held 1 July 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Activate the city centre and develop vibrant places that attract people to Liverpool

Key Policy

City Centre Strategy

File Ref

154820.2014

Report By

Tersia Wilson - Business Support Officer

Approved By

Matthew Walker – Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Key Site Master Planning Steering Committee Meeting held on 1 July 2014.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the Minutes of the Key Site Master Planning Steering Committee Meeting held on 1 July 2014;

 

2.       Adopts the recommendation put forward in the confidential report provided under separate cover; and

 

3.       Keeps confidential the minutes supplied under separate cover containing information pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains information that would if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Key Site Master Planning Steering Committee held on 1 July 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that are required to be undertaken by Council staff.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities.

Provide efficient parking for the City Centre.

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues.

Facilitate economic development.

Facilitate the development of new tourism based on local attractions, culture and creative industries.

Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities (in the City Centre).

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Master Planning Steering Committee Minutes from meeting held 1 July 2014 - Open Minutes

  


359

CTTE 08

Key Sites Master Planning Steering Committee Minutes from meeting held 1 July 2014

Attachment 1

Master Planning Steering Committee Minutes from meeting held 1 July 2014 - Open Minutes

 


 


 


 


363

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 09

Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney

Key Policy

Economic Development Strategy

File Ref

155097.2014

Report By

Julie Scott - Manager Economic Development

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Director Economy & Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Building Our New City Committee Meeting held on 2 July 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the Building our New City Committee Meeting held on 2 July 2014.

 

2.   Approves the following amendments to the Building Our New City Committee Charter as follows:

 

·        Amend the wording of 8.1.1 from ‘The Mayor’ to ‘The Mayor or delegate’.

 

·        Amend the wording of 8.1.2 from ‘The Deputy Mayor and one Councillor, as elected by Council’ to “The Deputy Mayor or delegate, and one Councillor or delegate, as elected by Council”.

 

3.   Approves the removal of section 5. (vi) from the Economic Development Committee charter, which reads “Manage all Town Improvement Fund (TIF), all boundaries, expenditure recommendations and strategies and other elements as per and instead of the TIF Management steering group.”

 

4.   Approves the addition of the following function to section 5 as item 5.3 to the Building Our New City Committee Charter: “Manage all Town Improvement Fund (TIF), all boundaries, expenditure recommendations and strategies and other elements as per and instead of the TIF Management steering group.”

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Building Our New City Committee meeting held on 2 July 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions for Council staff, none of which has financial implications for Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

                                                     

Economic and Financial

The activities of the Committee support Council’s efforts to further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities.

Environmental and Sustainability

Environmental and sustainability considerations will be factored into urban design for key City Centre precincts.


Social and Cultural

Revitalisation of the City Centre will embrace a range of arts and space activation opportunities.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The Committee provides guidance for Council’s Building Our New City Projects.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

MINUTES Building Our New City Committee 2 July 2014 FINAL

2.View

DRAFT Building Our New City Committee Charter - revision 17 July 2014

3.View

Building Our New City Committee Charter - revised 26 March 2014 FINAL

  


365

CTTE 09

Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 1

MINUTES Building Our New City Committee 2 July 2014 FINAL

 


 


 


 


369

CTTE 09

Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 2

DRAFT Building Our New City Committee Charter - revision 17 July 2014

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


379

CTTE 09

Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 3

Building Our New City Committee Charter - revised 26 March 2014 FINAL

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


388

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 10

Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee 10 July 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

167594.2014

Report By

Kathryn Sloan - Community Development Worker (Aged and Disability)

Approved By

Kiersten Fishburn – Director Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 10 July 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 10 July 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee held on 10 July 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support access and services for people with a disability.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Minutes Liverpool Access Committee 10 July 2014

  


395

CTTE 10

Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee 10 July 2014

Attachment 1

Minutes Liverpool Access Committee 10 July 2014

 


 


 


393

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 11

Minutes of Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Deliver a range of stimulating and vibrant cultural events, programs and festivals

Key Policy

Events Strategy

File Ref

155308.2014

Report By

Julie Scott - Manager Economic Development

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Director Economy & Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Tourism and Events Committee Meeting held on 2 July 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the Tourism and Events Committee Meeting held on 2 July 2014.

 

2.   Approves the new Charter for the merged Economic Development and Events Committee with the amendment that the clause relating to the Town Improvement Fund be removed and be added to the Building Our New City Charter.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Tourism and Events Committee held on 2 July 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions for Council staff to undertake, none of which has financial implications for Council.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The activities of the Committee support Council’s efforts to facilitate the development of new tourism based on local attractions, culture and creative industries as well as economic development.

Environmental and Sustainability

Environmental and sustainability considerations are factored into the planning approval process for relevant events.


Social and Cultural

The work of the Committee supports events and activities which promote Council’s diversity.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The Committee provides guidance for Council’s tourism and events efforts.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

MINUTES Tourism and Events Committee meeting 2 July 2014

2.View

CHARTER Economic Development and Events Committee DRAFT

3.View

CHARTER Tourism and Events Committee - updated 30 October 2013

  


395

CTTE 11

Minutes of Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 1

MINUTES Tourism and Events Committee meeting 2 July 2014

 


 


 


 


 


 


401

CTTE 11

Minutes of Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 2

CHARTER Economic Development and Events Committee DRAFT

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


411

CTTE 11

Minutes of Tourism and Events Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 3

CHARTER Tourism and Events Committee - updated 30 October 2013

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


419

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 12

Minutes of Economic Development Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney

Key Policy

Economic Development Strategy

File Ref

155312.2014

Report By

Julie Scott - Manager Economic Development

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Director Economy & Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Economic Development Committee meeting held on 2 July 2014

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the Economic Development Committee Meeting held on 2 July 2014.

 

2.   Approves the new Charter for the combined Economic Development and Events Committee with the amendment that the clause relating to the Town Improvement Fund be removed and be added to the Building Our New City Committee Charter.

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Economic Development Committee meeting held on 2 July 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have financial implications for Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The activities of the Committee support Council’s efforts to facilitate economic development.

Environmental and Sustainability

Environmental and sustainability considerations will be factored into economic development activities.


Social and Cultural

Economic development will boost demand for cultural and arts activities.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The Committee provides guidance for Council’s economic development projects and initiatives.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

MINUTES Economic Development Committee meeting 2 July 2014 FINAL

2.View

CHARTER Economic Development and Events Committee DRAFT

3.View

Economic Development Committee Charter - amended 1 November FINAL

  


421

CTTE 12

Minutes of Economic Development Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 1

MINUTES Economic Development Committee meeting 2 July 2014 FINAL

 


 


 


 


 


 


427

CTTE 12

Minutes of Economic Development Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 2

CHARTER Economic Development and Events Committee DRAFT

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


437

CTTE 12

Minutes of Economic Development Committee meeting held 2 July 2014

Attachment 3

Economic Development Committee Charter - amended 1 November FINAL

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


444

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 13

Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre Board Minutes from Meeting 17 July 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Activate the city centre and develop vibrant places that attract people to Liverpool

Key Policy

Economic Development Strategy

File Ref

169800.2014

Report By

Lisa Bowen - Administrative Assistant

Approved By

Kiersten Fishburn – Director Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The Charter for the Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre Board, adopted by Council on 28 November 2012, states that the Board shall, after every meeting, forward the minutes of the meeting to the next meeting of Council.

                                                                                                           

This report recommends the minutes of the meeting held on 17 July 2014 be noted.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre Board meeting held on 17 July 2014.

 

REPORT

 

Council, at its meeting held on 28 November 2012, adopted the current Charter for the Board.

                                         

This Board has been established primarily to assist in the production and promotion of cultural programs including literature, music, performing arts, visual arts, craft, design, film, video, community arts, Aboriginal arts and collections of moveable cultural heritage programs. These programs are delivered through and at Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre through the exhibition, performance, community development, event and public programs facilities.

 

The minutes of the meeting held on 17 July 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre Board Minutes from Meeting 17 July 2014

  


451

CTTE 13

Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre Board Minutes from Meeting 17 July 2014

Attachment 1

Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre Board Minutes from Meeting 17 July 2014

 


 


 


449

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 14

Local Traffic Committee Minutes of Meeting held on 16 July 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Accessible Connected City

Provide safe and easy travel with a high quality road and traffic management network

Key Policy

Traffic and Transport Plan

File Ref

172874.2014

Report By

Charles Wiafe - Service Manager Traffic and Transport

Approved By

Toni Averay – Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 16 July 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 16 July 2014.

 

2.       Adopts the following recommendations of the Local Traffic Committee meeting:

 

          Item 1    Munday Street, Manning Street and Warwick Street, Warwick Farm - Proposed Regulatory Sign Posting

 

i.    Supports the amended sign posting scheme but the proposed pedestrian refuge is to be deleted. 

ii.    The applicant be advised of the outcome accordingly.

 

          Item 2    Kendall Drive, Casula – Traffic Management

 

i.    Supports the appended traffic scheme.

ii.    The traffic scheme be included in Council’s Minor Traffic Facilities Works Programme for implementation.

iii.   All stakeholders be advised of the outcome.

                                  

          Item 3    Westlink M7 Motorway Cities Marathon

 

i.    The event be supported and endorsed as an ongoing annual event subject to:

·    The event be classified as a Class 3 event.

·    A Road Occupancy application is to be submitted to Transport for NSW Traffic Management Centre (TMC) by the event organiser.

·    A Special Event Template is to be submitted with a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) including a Traffic Control Plan (TCP) to Council, Police and the TMC for consideration.

·    The applicant is to meet conditions specified by Council, Police, RMS and the TMC.

·    The event organiser is to submit a Schedule 1 Form (application to hold a Public Assembly) to Liverpool Police.

 

          Item 4    Main Street, Carnes Hill (Holy Spirit School) – Proposed Marked Pedestrian Crossing

 

i.    Supports the proposed permanent marked pedestrian crossing (incorporating an existing children’s crossing) in Main Street, Carnes Hill.

ii.    Supports installation of the required line marking.

iii.   The Principal of Holy Spirit School is advised accordingly.

 

          Item 5    Elizabeth Hills – Proposed Bus Route and Bus Stops

 

i.    Supports the following proposed bus routes in Elizabeth Hills: 

a.    Turn left from Feodore Drive into Newgate Boulevard

b.    Left  from Newgate Boulevard into Rosebank Avenue

c.    Turn left from Rosebank Avenue into Gowanlea Avenue

d.    Turn left from Gowanlea Avenue into Regentville Drive

e.    Turn left from Regentville Drive into Aviation Drive towards Valley Plaza.  

ii.    Request the bus company to undertake further investigation and liaise with the affected residents of the proposed bus stop along Newgate Boulevard and Council for an appropriate bus stop location to be identified.

iii.   The bus stops to include appropriate facilities in accordance with DDA requirements.

iv.  All stakeholders be advised of the outcome.        

 

 

REPORT

 

At its meeting held on 16 July 2014, the LTC considered the following five agenda items.  The minutes of the meeting are attached for Council’s consideration and adoption.

 

Item 1    Munday Street, Manning Street and Warwick Street, Warwick Farm - Proposed Regulatory Sign Posting 

 

As part of the development consent for a Masters Bulky Goods warehouse development at the south western corner of the Governor Macquarie Drive and Munday Street, the developer is required to provide a design for intersection modifications, pavement markings and sign posting scheme for approval by the Local Traffic Committee.

 

Munday Street, Manning Street and Warwick Street are local streets providing access to the Warwick Farm residential, equestrian and industrial precincts.  These roads are under the care and control of Council.

 

The proposed lines and sign posting scheme consists of ‘No Stopping’ signs, a ‘Do Not Queue Across Intersection’ sign and ‘Keep Clear’ and ‘Chevron’ pavement markings. The proposed scheme (with the exception of the proposed pedestrian refuge) has been designed in accordance with Austroads Guidelines and RMS Supplements.

 

The proposed intersection treatments include a median island at the intersection of Warwick Street and Manning Street and kerb widening at the intersection of Manning Street and Munday Street.

 

The Committee discussed and supported the proposed line marking and sign posting scheme.  The RMS representative highlighted that the proposed pedestrian refuge does not meet the Agency’s traffic management supplementary guidelines and should not be installed.

 

Item 2    Kendall Drive, Casula – Traffic Management

 

Council previously received representations to investigate road safety concerns in Kendall Drive due to excessive speeds.   The traffic survey showed that 15% of the traffic exceeded the 50 km/h speed limit by approximately 20%. Subsequently, this location was referred to the Police for appropriate enforcement and surveillance actions.

 

The RMS accident database shows that there have been four (4) recorded accidents in Kendall Drive in the five (5) year period ending 2012.  Two (2) of these occurred near Hilton Crescent and two (2) took place near McCubbin Place. These sections of Kendall Drive have undulating contours and reverse curved bends, and all the accidents involved single vehicle crashes.

 

Another accident occurred on 20 June 2012 which resulted in 4 people being injured and 5 damaged vehicles on bends near House No. 40. Police and the ambulance attended the scene. 

 

To address the above road safety concerns Council has prepared a traffic management scheme and consulted local residents. The scheme involved construction of number of kerb blisters along the route with associated parking restrictions.  During community consultation most of the residents were concerned that the proposed traffic devices will result in loss of street parking.  Considering their concerns a revised traffic calming scheme minimising loss of street parking is proposed. 

 

The modified scheme includes a pedestrian refuge, rumble bars, speed cushions, and kerb blister islands.  Residents directly affected by the modified scheme have been consulted and no objections have been received.

 

The Committee discussed and supported the proposed traffic management scheme.

 

Item 3    Westlink M7 Motorway Cities Marathon

 

The Westlink Cities Marathon from Liverpool to Blacktown was held on Sunday 27 July 2014.

 

This annual marathon is conducted by Blacktown Council in conjunction with Liverpool and Fairfield City Councils. It has been successfully held for the past few years with no adverse traffic implications.

 

The marathon is a 42.195 km foot race from Ash Road Sports Field, Prestons to Blacktown Olympic Park Athletics Precinct, Eastern Road, Rooty Hill.

 

In Liverpool, the event consists of 320 metres of Ash Road and the off-road Westlink M7 shared path from Ash Road to Elizabeth Drive, Cecil Hills. This section of Ash Road will be closed at around 7.30 am for up to 10 minutes to start the race.  Copies of the Race Map, Start Map and Traffic Control Plan (TCP) are appended to this report.

 

Transport for NSW Traffic Management Centre (TMC) has advised that this event needs to be classified by the Local Traffic Committee (LTC).

 

Blacktown City Council has adopted its LTC’s recommendation that the event be classified as a Class 3 event. This classification is in accordance with the RMS’s Special Event Traffic Management Plan and it is recommended that the Committee classifies the section of the event within the Liverpool LGA as Class 3 event.

 

The Committee discussed, supported and endorsed the marathon as an ongoing annual event.

 

Item 4    Main Street, Carnes Hill (Holy Spirit School) – Proposed Marked Pedestrian Crossing

 

Council has received requests from the Principal of Holy Spirit School and the School’s P&C President to install a marked pedestrian crossing in Main Street (directly outside school), to assist students in crossing the road safely.

 

The school is located directly across the road from the local shops and high numbers of children cross Main Street in the mornings and afternoons (before and after school), as well as sometimes during the day. The school and school community are concerned that vehicles have not been stopping for them to cross.

 

The Committee discussed and supported the recommendation.

 

Item 5    Elizabeth Hills – Proposed Bus Route and Bus Stops

 

Council has received representation from the Manager of Transit Systems requesting approval of proposed bus routes and bus stops within Elizabeth Hills residential subdivision.

 

Transit  Systems provides public  transport  services on behalf of the  NSW Government in the western suburbs of Sydney.  As part of the service improvement initiative by Transport for NSW, new and revised services are proposed to operate to and from Elizabeth Hills as part of an extension of the existing network.

 

The Committee discussed and supported the proposed bus route and associated bus stops with the exception of the proposed bus stops along Newgate Boulevard.  The bus company was requested to review and carry out further consultation to identify suitable location for a bus stop along Newgate Boulevard.

 

Technical Discussion and General Business Items

 

In addition to the Agenda items the Committee also discussed the following two Technical Discussion and six General Business items:

 

Item TD1    Wilson Road, Green Valley – Review of Traffic Management fronting 256-276 Wilson Road (for proposed expansion of the existing school)

 

                   Traffic management along the section of Wilson Road fronting the development site was discussed and has been referred to the Green Valley Police for comments as part of Council’s traffic impact assessment of the proposed expansion of the existing school.

 

Item TD2    Nuwarra Road, Moorebank – Traffic Conditions

 

                   A local resident, Mr Jimmy Watson addressed the Committee and requested that if possible Council in consultation with the RMS to consider a reduced speed limit from the current sign posted limit of 60km/hr to 50km/hr and for the number and noise generated by heavy vehicles to be reduced.

 

                   Mr Watson has been advised that speed management is an RMS responsibility and the Agency has been requested to review the current 60km/hr speed limit.  In addition, advisory signs advising heavy vehicle drivers to limit the use of compression brakes have been installed at appropriate locations along the road.

 

G1              Centenary Drive, Moorebank – Transit Systems Depot

G2              Moore Street, Liverpool – Improvements to the street lighting at the eastern bus stop

G3              Existing guard rail on the eastern side of the M5 off ramp to Camden Valley Way, Prestons – safety concern

G4              Anzac Road, Moorebank       - Pot Holes

G5              Cartwright Avenue, Miller – Taxi Zone

G6              George Street, Liverpool – Outside Westfield – Reduce Bus Zone to increase Taxi Zone

 

Details of the discussions and the Committee’s comments are provided in the minutes.

 

Budget Impact

 

Item

Description

Funding Arrangement

1

Munday Street, Manning Street and Warwick Street, Warwick Farm - Proposed Regulatory Sign Posting 

To be funded by the developer of the Masters Bulky Goods development.

2

Kendall Drive, Casula – Traffic Management

To be funded by Council under the RMS grant for the installation of new traffic facilities.

3

Westlink M7 Motorway Cities Marathon

Funded by Blacktown Council.

4

Main Street, Carnes Hill (Holy Spirit School) – Proposed Marked Pedestrian Crossing

To be funded by Council under the RMS grant for the installation of new traffic facilities.

5

Elizabeth Hills – Proposed Bus Route and Bus Stops

 

 

Installation of bus stops to be carried out and funded by the bus company.

Installation of required facility to comply with Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) requirements is to be funded by Council under minor traffic facilities program.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues.

Environmental and Sustainability

Promote an integrated and user friendly public transport service.

Support the delivery of a range of transport options.


Social and Cultural

Improved traffic and pedestrian safety.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The recommendation provides opportunity to advocate for the local community.

The recommendation is required in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

LTC Minutes - 16 July 2014 (Under separate cover)

  


455

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 15

Street Naming Committee Meeting 5 August 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Strengthen and celebrate Liverpool’s unique community identity

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

177999.2014

Report By

Tanya O'Brien - Manager Strategic Planning

Approved By

Toni Averay – Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Street Naming Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Receives and notes the Minutes of the Street Naming Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2014.

2.       Advertises and if no objections are received Gazettes the names Eyre Avenue, Oxley Road and Wentworth Avenue for use in Edmondson Park.

3.       Advertise and if no objections are received Gazettes the name Range Road in Cecil Park.

4.       Writes to residents in Moorebank east of Nuwarra Road to consult with them about a possible suburb name change.

 

 

REPORT

 

The minutes of the Street Naming Committee meeting of 5 August 2014 are attached for

Council's consideration and information. The minutes require council staff to undertake

various actions.

 

Road names in Edmondson Park Town Centre

The road names Eyre Avenue, Oxley Road and Wentworth Road are currently located in the area south of the Edmondson Park Station in the former military housing precinct. It is proposed that the names are relocated and re-used within the Edmondson Park Town Centre as they comply with the Military naming theme. It is recommended that the names are advertised and if no objections are received, are Gazetted and allocated to new roads within the Town Centre area.

 

Road name for Crown Road in Cecil Park

Council has permission from Crown Lands to name an unnamed Crown road in Cecil Park. The road comes off Elizabeth Drive and leads to the Sydney 2000 Olympic Shooting Range. The road name Range Road is proposed as the name represents the shooting range the road is associated with. It is recommended that the name Range Road is advertised and if no objections are received, is Gazetted in the NSW Government Gazette.

 

Possible renaming of part of Moorebank

A suggestion has been made to rename part of Moorebank east of Nuwarra Road, south of Newbridge Road and north of the M5 motorway. It is recommended that Council write to residents to consult with them regarding the proposed name change and a preferred new suburb name from Nuwarra, Nuwarra Waters or an Aboriginal name that refers to the Georges River which has yet to be decided.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Street Naming Committee Minutes 5 August 2014

  


457

CTTE 15

Street Naming Committee Meeting 5 August 2014

Attachment 1

Street Naming Committee Minutes 5 August 2014

 


 


 


460

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 16

Liverpool Sports Committee Minutes of Meeting 29 May 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Healthy Inclusive  City

Plan, support and deliver high quality and accessible services, program and facilities

Key Policy

Recreation Strategy

File Ref

180560.2014

Report By

Mark Westley - Sports Development Officer

Approved By

Kiersten Fishburn – Director Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

On Thursday 29 May 2014, the scheduled meeting of the Liverpool City Sports Committee was held.

 

This report seeks Council to receive and note the minutes of this meeting.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool City Sports Committee meeting held on 29 May 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Liverpool City Sports Committee is a committee of Council established in August 2006.  This committee is made up of endorsed sporting code representatives from sports that are conducted within the Liverpool Local Government Area and representatives from the NSW Police and the NSW Department of Education.

 

2.       The minutes of the meeting held 29 May 2014 are attached for Council to receive and note.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Liverpool Sports Committee minutes 29 May 2014

  


469

CTTE 16

Liverpool Sports Committee Minutes of Meeting 29 May 2014

Attachment 1

Liverpool Sports Committee minutes 29 May 2014

 


 


 


 


 


 


468

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 17

Minutes of Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce meeting held 6 August 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney

Key Policy

Economic Development Strategy

File Ref

181744.2014

Report By

Natasha Lay - Economic Development Assistant

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Director Economy and Engagement

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce Meeting held on 6 August 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce Meeting held on 6 August 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce held on 6 August 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have  financial impact on Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The activities of the Taskforce will support Council’s efforts to advocate to the Commonwealth and NSW Governments for the necessary infrastructure and planning investments to support the Airport and its ability to generate new economic development opportunities for the Liverpool local government area

Environmental and Sustainability

Environmental and sustainability factors will be important aspects that need to be considered in development of the Airport at Badgerys Creek.


Social and Cultural

The availability of supporting social and cultural facilities will be important considerations in development of the Airport site at Badgerys Creek.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The Taskforce will assist Council in its advocacy efforts to influence the Commonwealth and NSW Governments decision concerning development of the Airport and its connecting infrastructure.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

MINUTES Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce 6 August 2014 FINAL

  


475

CTTE 17

Minutes of Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce meeting held 6 August 2014

Attachment 1

MINUTES Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce 6 August 2014 FINAL

 


 


 


 


474

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 18

No Intermodal Committee Meeting Minutes 5 August 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

182405.2014

Report By

Megan Munari - Senior Strategic Planner

Approved By

Toni Averay – Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

The Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of

which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

 


 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

An additional allocation of $95,000 is sought from Council’s Intermodal Reserve to continue the work opposing the intermodal proposals.

Environmental and Sustainability

 

Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues. The media campaign will raise awareness about the potential impacts of the intermodal proposals.  The additional budget allocation is sought in order to continue work relating to the intermodal proposals.

 


Social and Cultural

 

The media campaign will raise awareness about the potential impacts of the intermodal proposals.   The additional budget allocation of $95,000 is sought to continue work relating to the intermodal proposals.

 


Civic Leadership and Governance

Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Draft No Intermodal Committee Meeting Minutes 5 August 2014

2.View

Attachment Liverpool Listens Presentation

  


479

CTTE 18

No Intermodal Committee Meeting Minutes 5 August 2014

Attachment 1

Draft No Intermodal Committee Meeting Minutes 5 August 2014

 


 


 


479

CTTE 18

No Intermodal Committee Meeting Minutes 5 August 2014

Attachment 2

Attachment Liverpool Listens Presentation

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


496

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 19

Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee 6 August 2014

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

186307.2014

Report By

Grace Farrugia - Business Support Officer

Approved By

Matthew Walker – Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee Meeting held on 6 August 2014.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee Meeting held on 6 August 2014.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee Meeting held on 6 August 2014 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Budget and Finance Committee Minutes - 6 August 2014

  


501

CTTE 19

Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee

Attachment 1

Budget and Finance Committee Minutes - 6 August 2014

 


 

 


500

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Correspondence Reports

 

CORR 01

Incoming and Outgoing Correspondence Report

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

NA

File Ref

076538.2014

Report By

George Georgakis - Service Manager Council and Executive Services

Approved By

Matthew Walker - Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The purpose of this report is to table all incoming and outgoing correspondence generated as a result of a council resolution, and petitions received by Council.

 

At the Extraordinary meeting of Council on 28 April, 2010 Council resolved to:

 

Establish a new standing agenda item in all council meeting agendas called “Correspondence”. All incoming and outgoing correspondence, in whatever form, including emails, fax messages, letters, submission, resulting from a council resolution must be tabled in chambers and be put on the agenda at the next scheduled Council meeting.

 

At the Extraordinary meeting of 25 February, 2014 Council resolved that:

 

“Petitions received by Council be attached to the Correspondence item on the Council Business Papers and provided under separate cover.”

 

Accordingly correspondence and the list of petitions received between 18 July 2014 and 14 August 2014 are included in this report.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the report.

 

 

 

 

 

 

REPORT

 

incoming correspondence

No

Date

From

To

Details

Nil

 

 


OUtgoing correspondence

No

Date

From

To

Details

1

7 Aug 2014

Mayor Ned Mannoun

Mrs Eileen Murphy

Condolence letter for the passing of Mr Tom Murphy.

2

7 Aug 2014

Mayor Ned Mannoun

Ms Kerrie Oxlade, President Quota Club

Letter of congratulations for 50 years of continuous service to Liverpool.

 

 


Petitions

No

Issue

Number of Signatories

1

I oppose the Federal Government’s compulsory acquisition of land parcels on the Georges River corridor for the Moorebank Terminal. I call on the Federal Government to ensure a fair go for South West Sydney.

181

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social or cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Provides information to Councillors to assist in decision making processes.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.View

Condolence letter for the passing of Mr Tom Murphy

2.View

Letter of congratulations to Quota

  


503

CORR 01

Incoming and Outgoing Correspondence Report

Attachment 1

Condolence letter for the passing of Mr Tom Murphy

 


507

CORR 01

Incoming and Outgoing Correspondence Report

Attachment 2

Letter of congratulations to Quota

 


505

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Correspondence Reports

 

CORR 02

Incoming and Outgoing Correspondence Report

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

NA

File Ref

076535.2014

Report By

George Georgakis - Service Manager Council and Executive Services

Approved By

Matthew Walker - Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The purpose of this report is to table all incoming and outgoing correspondence generated as a result of a council resolution, and petitions received by Council.

 

At the Extraordinary meeting of Council on 28 April, 2010 Council resolved to:

 

Establish a new standing agenda item in all council meeting agendas called “Correspondence”. All incoming and outgoing correspondence, in whatever form, including emails, fax messages, letters, submission, resulting from a council resolution must be tabled in chambers and be put on the agenda at the next scheduled Council meeting.

 

At the Extraordinary meeting of 25 February, 2014 Council resolved that:

 

“Petitions received by Council be attached to the Correspondence item on the Council Business Papers and provided under separate cover.”

 

Accordingly correspondence and the list of petitions received between 13 June 2014 and 17 July 2014 are included in this report.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the report.

 

 

 

 

REPORT

 

incoming correspondence

No

Date

From

To

Details

NIL

 


OUtgoing correspondence

No

Date

From

To

Details

NIL

 


Petitions

No

Issue

Number of Signatories

1

I oppose the Federal Government’s compulsory acquisition of land parcels on the Georges River corridor for the Moorebank Terminal. I call on the Federal Government to ensure a fair go for South West Sydney.

11

2

Opposition to development at 153 Hoxton Park Road, Cartwright – DA-257/2014

100

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social or cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Provides information to Councillors to assist in decision making processes.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil  


507

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Questions with Notice

 

QWN 01

Question with Notice - Clr Harle

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

173510.2014

 

 

QUESTION WITH NOTICE

 

As part of DA-1454/2013 Hume Hwy Hotel Casula, the proponents have indicated their intention if the DA is approved by this Council, to remove the Commercial hotel’s liquor license and poker machine allocation to their new development in Casula.

 

1.   Would the Council’s CEO urgently obtain from the owners of the Commercial hotel their intentions of its future use in regard to preserving the building of heritage importance that has been identified by Council in the following report;

 

http://www.liverpool.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/3155/The-Heritage-Strategy-for-the-City-of-Liverpool-2011-2014.pdf (see p12)

 

A meeting was attended by Council officers and the owners of the Commercial Hotel on 19 June 2013.  This meeting discussed adaptively reusing the Commercial Hotel as part of a development in the vicinity. There was no specific discussion on the adaptive reuse of the Commercial Hotel However, because heritage listing of the building would have to be retained. 

 

Any proposed development on a heritage listed site requires a stringent assessment to ensure the fabric of the historic item(s) is maintained, to allow the item to benefit the wider community. Any development must address the heritage aspects of the property, and should not detract from the historic fabric of the item.

 

Any DA will need to include a Heritage Impact Statement. A Heritage Impact Statement should contain a Statement of Cultural Significance, a physical inspection of the site and graphical evidence, noting any planned changes, and a review of applicable legislation. Any work should also be submitted with a Statement of Heritage Impact (SOHI).

 

2.   Would the CEO advise Councillors of the steps required to urgently seek the listing of Commercial hotel as being of State heritage significance given it is apparently  one of the last virtually intact examples of a 19th century hotels in the larger area. See http://www.weekendnotes.com/the-lost-pubs-of-liverpool-new-south-wales/ .

 

The listing on the State Heritage Register is an onerous process, and only places considered to be of significance to the state are included on this register.  Whilst the State Heritage Inventory (local listing information) for the Commercial Hotel notes the place to be of ‘state’ significance there is currently no historical information to suggest that the Commercial Hotel would attain the level of significance required to be included on the State Heritage Register.  The listing process usually takes about 6 months, depending on the workload of the Heritage Division, although it can take considerably longer.   

 

The process for listing on the State Heritage Register is as follows:

 

1.   Complete the State Heritage Register Nomination Form.  This will include:

a.   detailed research into the history of the hotel;

b.   physical analysis to understand the integrity of the hotel;

c.   comparative analysis to understand the rarity of the hotel state-wide;

d.   Assessment of significance and preparation of a concise Statement of Significance;

e.   Definition of the curtilage of the hotel; and

f.    Determining the thematic context of the hotel.

 

2.   Submit the completed nomination form to the Heritage Division (1 signed hard copy and 1 electronic copy of all documentation including form, photographs, maps, plans, etc). The nomination should be sent to:

 

The Director

Heritage Division

NSW Office of Environment and Heritage

Locked Bag 5020              

Parramatta NSW 2124

 

Soft copies can be emailed to: heritage@heritage.nsw.gov.au

 

Copies of the guidelines and nomination form for the preparation of State Heritage Register nominations can be provided if required.

 

3.   Would the CEO also ask the owners (and possibly future owners - if known) of the Commercial hotel, what effective fire protection measures they have in place to ensure the substantial heritage significance of this building to the people of NSW and Western Sydney LGA can be retained and assured.

 

In regards to Fire Safety measures, there is no specific legislation for the protection of Heritage Significant buildings. The protection measures must be based on the current and future use of the building in question.

 

The measures currently in place for this property include;

 

·    Emergency lighting

·    Exit signs

·    Lightweight construction fire rating of walls

·    Portable Fire Extinguishers

·    Fire doors

·    Fire Hose Reels System

·    Smoke Detectors and Heat Detectors

 

This is deemed appropriate in terms of the Building Code of Australia.

 

4.   Since the Carbon Tax has been abolished/repealed, can Council detail the effects on Councils’ 2014-15 budget and the overall savings.

The repealing of legislation that gave effect to Carbon Price Mechanism (CPM) became effective from 1st July 2014.

 

On implementation, the CPM impacted both directly and indirectly on the following four major groups of Councils income and expenditure.

 

i.    Rates Income: The Independent Pricing & Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) included in the 2012/13 rate peg a component for a carbon price advance of 0.4%. The rate pegs for 2013/14 and 2014/15 included negative adjustments of 0.1% and 0.3% respectively. The Council envisages that there will be no forward year budget impacts from abolition of CPM. However, is dependent on the position IPART takes when setting rate peg for 2015/16.

ii.    Electricity Costs – The Council has budgeted $4.586 million in 2014/15 for electricity charges. This is inclusive of estimated $1.7 million for electricity infrastructure (poles & wires) costs which does not have any carbon tax component. The Council estimates about $335k reduction in electricity charges resulting from abolition of carbon tax. However, increase in electricity usage due to installation of additional street lights in the LGA and security lighting in CBD area is expected to surpass this potential budget savings.

iii.    Materials & Contracts – The Council anticipates suppliers to adjust their prices for carbon tax, however, has no control over their pricing structure and strategy. As the carbon tax component pass through charge was not visible on supplier invoices, it’s difficult at this stage to quantify Council’s budget savings from any reduction in prices for construction materials. In 2011, IPART estimated the impact of carbon tax for road, footpath, kerbing, drainage and building materials at 0.45%.The Council in 2014/15 budgeted $50.646 million for general materials cost. Using the IPART percentage and subject to suppliers passing their cost savings, the Council estimates a budget savings of $503k.

iv.   Waste Management – Statistics on domestic waste collection show that 46,747 tonnes of waste was collected in 2013/14 and sent to landfill. The Councils contractor, on average, passed through a carbon tax charge of $9.50 per tonne. Based on this, the Council estimates $444k of cost savings in 2014/15. ACCC expects Councils to pass this cost savings to the ratepayers. Council will review its DWM Reserve and funding needs for its future domestic waste management plans and make appropriate adjustments when setting 2015/16 DWM fees.

 

These areas will be closely monitored and any savings realized will be recognised in quarterly reviews.

 

 

 

 


510

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Questions with Notice

 

QWN 02

Question with Notice - Clr Shelton

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

173514.2014

 

 

QUESTION WITH NOTICE

 

With respect to 'Liverpool Listens' please provide the following:

 

1.   Current number of enrolments and if available:

 

3764 people have visited the Liverpool Listens site since its launch in May this year. Of these, 3682 have then looked at a specific project.

Further analytics can be provided about how people have interacted with the site. However the detail on location, age or gender difference can only be provided for the people who have registered.

 

There are currently 127 people registered on Liverpool Listens as at 4/8/14.

 

a)   breakdown between North and South Wards

 

North Ward

57

South Ward

58

Out of LGA

5

(Please note that not everyone responded to this question)

 

b)   breakdown between females and males;

 

Females

73

Males

54

 

c)   breakdown according to age bracket.

 

16-24 years

6

25-35 years

27

36-45 years

39

46-55 years

26

56-65 years

18

65+ years

10

 

126

2.   Breakdown according to areas of interest as nominated by respondents.

 

Area of Interest

Count

% of responses

New infrastructure (parks, playgrounds, community facilities, major roads and drainage projects)

104

17%

Council plans or policies (e.g. Growing Liverpool 2023, Delivery Program and Operational Plan and Budget, Liverpool Local Environment Plan, Community Engagement Policy)

89

14%

Proposed community projects or initiatives

99

16%

Council activities and events (e.g. Night Markets, Australia Day, New Year's Eve events)

90

15%

Community groups (e.g. Families, children, young people and diverse communities)

74

12%

General community issues (e.g. affordable housing, parking and waste management services)

78

13%

Council services (e.g. libraries, museum, children's services, Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre and maintenance)

82

13%

 

616

100%

 

(Please note that multiple responses were allowed for this question)

 


512

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Questions with Notice

 

QWN 03

Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

156738.2014

 

 

QUESTION WITH NOTICE

 

Please address the following:

 

1.   Have staff had an opportunity to look at the ramifications of changes and funding cuts in the Federal Budget?

 

Yes, please see details below in point 2.

 

2.   Can I be advised what the budget will mean for:

 

a)   The Pensioner rate subsidies?

 

At this stage, details regarding percentage decrease in pensioner rate subsidies are not known. Assuming a reduction of 15% (effectively putting subsidy at 40%), the financial impact on Council is estimated at $282k.

 

b)   Road upgrades and works for the next budget.

 

The decision by the Australian government to continue the Roads to Recovery Program means that Council can continue to deliver its road pavement renewal, replacement and resurfacing program, which has over the years seen a significant improvement to council’s road network.

 

However, the flatlining of the Federal Assistance Grants announced in the Federal Budget means that annual funding is being significantly eroded in real terms and is discussed in detail below.

 

c)   Any other known changes that may affect ratepayers or Liverpool plans or projects.

 

The 2014/15 budget assumed a 3% indexation to actual $9m Financial Assistance Grants received in 2013/14. The Grants Commission NSW has not released any information re 2014/15 FAG to-date, however, indications are that there will be negative adjustments. In a worst case scenario, the general purpose component of FAG may reduce by 5%, whilst the local roads component may increase by 1.5% - resulting in net $353,986 decrease in grant to Council, calculated as follows:

 

 

Likely

Impact

Financial

Impact

General purpose

$7,673,126

-5%

($383,656)

Local roads component

$1,978,004

+1.5%

    $29,670

Totals

$9,651,130

 

($353,986)

          

On this basis, the 2014/15 budget impact will be $643,520.

 

Both Federal and State Governments are facing budget pressures and are reviewing all their programs. Program cuts may have flow-on effect on grant funding to the Council. At this stage, no information is available.

 


514

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Questions with Notice

 

QWN 04

Question with Notice - Clr Hadchiti

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

190290.2014

 

 

QUESTION WITH NOTICE

 

Council currently has a Design Review Panel in place which assesses designs on particular applications and makes a recommendation to the assessing officers.

 

1.   Has long have the current members been on this panel?

 

2.   How many applications have been though the panel over the last 6 months?

 

3.   Generally how much time is added to the assessment of a DA because of this process?

 

4.   Are detailed notes kept and circulated to all parties involved in this process?

 

5.   Do Council Officers generally make submissions to the DRP if they don’t agree with the DRP recommendations?

 

Council’s Commercial Properties

 

Can a list please be provided of any vacant council owned commercial properties and the strategy used to find a suitable tenant?

 

 

A response to these questions will be provided in the September Business papers.

 

 


515

Ordinary Meeting 27 August 2014

Questions with Notice

 

QWN 05

Question with Notice - Clr Shelton

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Councillor Access to Information and Interaction with Staff Policy

File Ref

190382.2014

 

 

QUESTION WITH NOTICE

 

The following, on the topic of customer service, is quoted word for word from the final comments of the former Acting CEO, Mr Rob NOBLE, made during the June 2014 Council Meeting, being the last council meeting in which he was in attendance prior to his departure:

 

“Mr Mayor, the reason that I've made those suggestions to adjust those number of days for response is when I was here after only a very short time, I had a look at the statistics of the performance of the organisation in responding to Councillor action requests and it was roughly 50%. 50% achievement of responding to Mayoral requests within 2 days and Councillor requests within 5...I'm just suggesting to you and I've had conversations with several of the Councillors about the existing customer service arrangements and I believe that by putting a higher standard of response time to Councillor and Mayoral requests, then what that's going to do is ultimately and probably already has create and created a two tier customer service system - which is all great for a client who approaches the Mayor or Councillor and gets snappy action maybe at the moment 50% of the time and so that will encourage that person or anyone they speak to do exactly the same thing and so instead of going through what I believe is the most efficient overall system for the bulk of our community of going through the customer services system and having an action request which goes immediately to the relevant officer, we still will end up with a gradually increasingly number of Mayoral and Councillor requests that get dealt with pretty quickly but what's happening then is that every time you have one of those, you are basically s...wing the other 95% of your customers by putting them further down the line...further down the pecking order...”

 

1.   Please outline the actions, executive or otherwise, taken or proposed to be taken to address the concerns of the former Acting CEO, Mr Rob NOBLE. 

 

2.   To what extent do any existing motions of Council impede reform and improvement of customer service functions

 

A response to these questions will be provided in the September Business Papers.