AGENDA
Governance Committee Meeting
10 October 2023
Book 1
Level 6, 35 Scott Street, Liverpool NSW 2170

You are hereby notified that a Governance Committee Meeting of Liverpool City Council will be held at Level 6, 35 Scott Street, Liverpool NSW 2170 on Tuesday, 10 October 2023 commencing at 10.00am.
Please note this meeting is closed to the public. The minutes will be submitted to the next Council meeting.
If you have any enquiries, please contact Council and Executive Services on 8711 7441.

![]()
Hon John Ajaka
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Order of Business
PAGE TAB
Apologies
Declarations of Interest
Infrastructure and Planning Committee
ITEM 01 Voluntary Planning Agreement Monthly Status Report................................... 4......... 1
ITEM 02 Proposed heritage listing of 124 Moore Street, Liverpool.............................. 14......... 2
ITEM 03 Development Assessment............................................................................ 113......... 3
ITEM 04 Strategic Planning Work Program................................................................ 115......... 4
ITEM 05 Compliance and Enforcement Policy........................................................... 148......... 5
Budget Committee
ITEM 06 Review of Council's Financial progress, forecasts and assumptions.......... 167......... 6
Strategic Priorities Committee
ITEM 07 Response report - RV Parks......................................................................... 209......... 7
ITEM 08 Cabramatta Loop Project Update................................................................. 219......... 8
ITEM 09 Delivery Management Framework (DMF).................................................... 223......... 9
ITEM 10 Reconciliation Action Plan September 2023 - September 2024.................. 230....... 10
Strategic Performance Committee
ITEM 11 Independent Library Review......................................................................... 244....... 11
Closed Session
The following items are listed for consideration by the Committee in Closed Session in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 1993 as listed below:
ITEM 12 Liverpool Civic Place Project Update
Reason: Item 12 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(c) (d i) of the Local Government Act because it contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
ITEM 13 Position and Staff Budget Report September 2023
Reason: Item 13 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(a) of the Local Government Act because it contains personal matters concerning particular individuals (other than councillors).
Close
5
Governance Committee Meeting
10 October 2023
Infrastructure and Planning Committee Report
|
ITEM 01 |
Voluntary Planning Agreement Monthly Status Report |
|
Strategic Objective |
Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging Improve liveability and quality of life for the community by delivering vibrant parks, places and facilities |
|
File Ref |
312185.2023 |
|
Report By |
Yee Lian - Contributions Planning Officer |
|
Approved By |
Lina Kakish - Director Planning & Compliance |
Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of all activity associated with Planning Agreements (VPAs), which include VPAs that are offers under review, negotiation and executed VPA schedule of works, land and monetary contributions.
That the Governance Committee receive and note this report.
REPORT
This report is prepared to table the status of Voluntary Planning Agreements (VPAs) for October 2023. The list outlines the status of each VPA, as well as their individual items.
Items that are stricken through resemble matters that are considered no longer outstanding.
Items are still outstanding when the works or land have not commenced, incomplete, under defects, maintenance periods, or deferred for further diligence / investigations.
Currently Council has:
• 1 Letter of offers under review
• 3 under review and/or negotiation
• 21 current executed VPAs.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications relating to this recommendation.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
|
Environment |
Manage the environmental health of waterways. Manage air, water, noise and chemical pollution. Protect, enhance and maintain areas of endangered ecological communities and high quality bushland as part of an attractive mix of land uses. There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership |
Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Deliver services that are customer focused. Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
|
Legislative |
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2021 |
|
Risk |
There is no risk associated with this report. |
ATTACHMENTS
|
8 |
|
|
Item 01 |
Voluntary Planning Agreement Monthly Status Report |
|
Attachment 1 |
Monthly VPA Status Report - 10 October 2023 |
Governance Committee Meeting
10 October 2023
Infrastructure and Planning Committee Report
|
ITEM 02 |
Proposed heritage listing of 124 Moore Street, Liverpool |
|
Strategic Objective |
Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging Embrace the city’s heritage and history |
|
File Ref |
315205.2023 |
|
Report By |
Thomas Wheeler - Heritage Officer |
|
Approved By |
Lina Kakish - Director Planning & Compliance |
Executive Summary
At the Council meeting of 26 July 2023, the Council resolved to defer the listing of the property located at 124 Moore Street, Liverpool on Schedule 5 – Environmental Heritage of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008, to enable further consultation with the owner (Scouts NSW) and a presentation to Council’s Governance Committee (this report).
This report has been prepared in response to this resolution and includes the following documents as attachments:
· Attachment A: Heritage Significance Assessment, Edwards Heritage, prepared for Liverpool City Council.
· Attachment B: Heritage Significance Assessment, DFP Planning, prepared for Scouts NSW.
· Attachment C: Follow up response from Scouts NSW.
· Attachment D: Copy of the Council report tabled 26 July 2023.
This report does not re-assess the heritage significance assessments prepared for this site and reference should be made to the 26 July 2023 Council report (Attachment D) for that specific information. This report focuses on the consultation process and post 26 July 2023, actions and responses to the additional submission from Scouts NSW.
That the Governance Committee receives and notes this report.
The Governance Committee recommends:
That Council receives a report to a future Council meeting to decide whether to prepare a planning proposal to amend the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 to list 124 Moore Street, Liverpool under Schedule 5 – Environmental Heritage.
REPORT
Background
A detailed summary of the background of the proposal is contained in the Council report tabled at the 26 July 2023 Council meeting (Attachment D). In summary:
· February 2021 – Council resolved to issue an Interim Heritage Order (IHO) for the property which was then gazetted by the NSW government;
· March 2021 – Edwards Heritage was engaged by Council to prepare an Assessment of Heritage Significance for 124 Moore Street, Liverpool (Attachment A);
· June 2021 – Council resolved to prepare a planning proposal to list 124 Moore Street (and other properties), Liverpool in Schedule 5 - Environmental Heritage of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008;
· February 2022 – Council resolved to endorse the planning proposal (Amendment 95) and forward to the Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) seeking a Gateway determination;
· May and June 2022 – The planning proposal was on public exhibition;
· July 2022 – Council received a request from the landowner to defer the heritage listing and requested six months to engage a heritage consultant to peer review the Heritage Significance Assessment prepared for Council;
· October 2022 – Council resolved to receive a further report and recommendation following further consultation with the owner of 124 Moore St, Liverpool;
· April 2023 – Scouts NSW provided a response (Heritage Significance Assessment, DFP Planning (Attachment B);
· July 2023 – Council considered a report recommending that a planning proposal is progressed to heritage list the 124 Moore St property.
A decision was deferred at the July meeting where it was resolved that Council:
1. Defer this item and refer this matter to a Governance Committee Meeting for further consultation with the landowners.
2. Discuss at the Governance Committee Meeting how we prevent this happening in the future.
After the Council meeting, the landowner was invited to provide any further information that they wished to be considered in Council making a decision. Further written advice was provided by Scouts NSW and DFP Planning (Attachment C). The additional advice summarises the points presented by the DFP Consultant at the July Council meeting, including the provision of justification for the consideration of buildings across the State or Sydney as a part of the comparative analysis.
Matters raised at the 26 July 2023 Council Meeting
This section addresses several issues raised during the Council meeting as a part of the considerations of this proposed heritage listing, as well as the proposed IHO for the property located at 15 Heathcote Road, Moorebank.
Land Zoning
While the property is zoned MU1 Mixed Use, it is currently a small land-locked parcel given that it is surrounded by strata-listed 1970/80s apartments. As a result, there is currently limited development potential of the property located at 124 Moore Street, Liverpool.
Assessing Significance
The assessment of heritage significance is guided by the ICOMOS Australia Burra Charter (globally accepted as an industry-leading framework for heritage significance) and the NSW Guidelines for Assessing Heritage Significance. In reviewing a report on heritage significance, a benchmark to consider is whether the consultant has used these documents to inform the process they followed and the outcomes they assessed. This means that the consultant is following industry best practice. Both heritage reports (Attachment A and B) adhere to this framework.
Previous Heritage Studies
The primary heritage study used as a reference tool within Liverpool is the 1992 study prepared by Neustein and Associates. The study followed the traditional expert lead methodology implemented through a street survey across the Liverpool LGA. This study did not incorporate an assessment of significance or any sort of formal assessment criteria and was based on the visual presentation to the street. In total, approximately 400 potential heritage items were identified but only 115 were listed.
In 2005, a review was undertaken by the Council of the original heritage study as a part of the preparation of the 2008 Local Environmental Plan. The study confirmed 380 potential heritage items, however, the Administrator at the time stated that only potential items supported by the landowner would be listed. As a result of this ruling, no additional items were added to the heritage register.
In 2015, a small, targeted heritage study was undertaken by Council’s Heritage Advisory Committee focusing on potential items of note at that time. This resulted in a small pool of potential items. This study was deferred by Council with no action taken.
The Liverpool Comprehensive Heritage Study which is now underway is designed to provide a coordinated response to identifying potential gaps in the existing heritage register and to minimise an ad hoc approach being taken to identify and protect heritage items across the Liverpool LGA. The majority of the project will be completed utilising internal resources. Consultants will be required to undertake the land use economics and land use planning study components of the project. Budget has already been approved and allocated to fund these activities.
Council Staff Comments on Heritage Significance
In assessing the property located at 124 Moore Street, Liverpool, the assessment considers the significance the building has within the local context. While there may be value in comparing the building to assets across the state in terms of technical significance, its value in considering the item for historic significance and even rarity within the context of Liverpool is minimal.
Furthermore, the fact that 4 out of 23 scout halls are heritage-listed cannot be categorically associated with a lack of significance for the subject property. There are various factors that can impact this outcome, including the following:
- The appetite within the relevant Council to heritage list properties;
- Whether a heritage study been undertaken; and
- Whether support or objections have been raised by state agencies and / or the community.
Therefore, it is acknowledged that there are potential variables which inform the outcome.
In relation to their being no active use for the building by Scouts NSW currently, this is considered only a minor consideration. Many heritage properties are no longer used for their original purpose or no longer have a direct connection to their original owner. This is the case for numerous heritage properties in Liverpool including:
- The Former Liverpool Courthouse;
- Liverpool State Hospital;
- Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre (former power station); and
- The Liverpool School of Arts.
The assessment of significance guidelines is clear that the previous user or owner does not need to be still using the asset, but there should be the ability to read that association within the fabric of the building or in its history, which can again be associated with the building.
For these reasons, it is the opinion of Council officer’s that there are still valid grounds for the heritage listing of the property.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications relating to this recommendation.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place. |
Civic Leadership |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
|
Legislative |
There are no legislative considerations relating to this report. |
|
Risk |
The risk is deemed to be Low. There is a low civic and cultural risk that if the subject property is not heritage listed and subsequently demolished, that there will be community frustration and criticism. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Assessment of Significance - Edwards Heritage
2. Heritage Significance Assessment - DFP Planning
3. Follow up response from Scouts NSW
|
1 |
|
|
Item 02 |
Proposed heritage listing of 124 Moore Street, Liverpool |
|
Attachment 1 |
Assessment of Significance - Edwards Heritage |
|
Item 02 |
Proposed heritage listing of 124 Moore Street, Liverpool |
|
Attachment 2 |
Heritage Significance Assessment - DFP Planning |
|
Item 02 |
Proposed heritage listing of 124 Moore Street, Liverpool |
|
Attachment 3 |
Follow up response from Scouts NSW |
|
Item 02 |
Proposed heritage listing of 124 Moore Street, Liverpool |
|
Attachment 4 |
Council Report 26 July 2023 |
Governance Committee Meeting
10 October 2023
Infrastructure and Planning Committee Report
|
ITEM 03 |
Development Assessment |
|
Strategic Objective |
Liveable, Sustainable, Resilient Deliver effective and efficient planning and high-quality design to provide best outcomes for a growing city |
|
File Ref |
322837.2023 |
|
Report By |
William Attard - Manager Development Assessment |
|
Approved By |
Lina Kakish - Director Planning & Compliance |
Executive Summary
This report is prepared to table a snapshot of key Development Assessment (DA) statistics.
That the Governance Committee receives and notes the Development Assessment report.
REPORT
The following key Development Assessment (DA) statistics are provided:
Development Applications and Class 1 Appeals
|
Outstanding Development Applications (DAs) |
|
|
31 August 2023 (Prior Report) |
524 DAs |
|
30 September 2023 |
474 DAs |
|
Difference in Reporting Periods |
50 DAs |
|
Active Class 1 Appeals |
|
|
31 August 2023 (Prior Report) |
42 Appeals |
|
30 September 2023 |
46 Appeals |
|
Difference in Reporting Periods |
4 Appeals |
|
Development Applications (DAs) Received & Completed (September 2023) |
|
|
DAs Received |
188 DAs |
|
DAs Completed |
207 DAs |
|
Development Application (DA) Approval Statistics (September 2023) |
|
|
DAs Approved |
54 DAs |
|
Total Capital Investment Value ($) |
$82M Capital Investment Value |
|
New Lots Approved |
248 Lots |
|
New Homes Approved |
35 Homes |
|
DA Fees Released from Trust ($) |
$337k Fees |
|
Contribution Fees Raised ($) |
$5M Contributions |
Development Assessment (DA) Team Vacancy (Technical Officers Only)
|
Position |
Positions |
Vacancy |
|
Principal Planner |
1 |
0 |
|
Senior DA Planners |
10 |
5 |
|
Senior Planning Advisory Officers |
2 |
1 (Extended Leave) |
|
DA Planners |
14 |
0 (1x Vacancy filled since August) |
|
Student Planners |
4 |
1 |
|
Duty Officers |
2 |
0 |
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications relating to this recommendation.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership |
Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. |
|
Legislative |
There are no legislative considerations relating to this report. |
|
Risk |
There is no risk associated with this report. |
Nil
1
Governance Committee Meeting
10 October 2023
Infrastructure and Planning Committee Report
|
ITEM 04 |
Strategic Planning Work Program |
|
Strategic Objective |
Liveable, Sustainable, Resilient Deliver effective and efficient planning and high-quality design to provide best outcomes for a growing city |
|
File Ref |
328425.2023 |
|
Report By |
Luke Oste - Coordinator Strategic Planning |
|
Approved By |
Lina Kakish - Director Planning & Compliance |
Executive Summary
This report is prepared to table the Strategic Planning Work Programme for October 2023.
That the Governance Committee recommends that Council receives and notes this report.
REPORT
This report is prepared to table the Strategic Planning Work Program for October 2023 (Attachment 1). The Work Program outlines the status of each planning proposal, as well as broader strategic planning projects.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications relating to this recommendation.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership |
Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. |
|
Legislative |
There are no legislative considerations relating to this report. |
|
Risk |
There is no risk associated with this report. |
ATTACHMENTS
Governance Committee Meeting
10 October 2023
Infrastructure and Planning Committee Report
|
ITEM 05 |
Compliance and Enforcement Policy |
|
Strategic Objective |
Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging Improve liveability and quality of life for the community by delivering vibrant parks, places and facilities |
|
File Ref |
328175.2023 |
|
Report By |
David Day - Acting Manager Community Standards |
|
Approved By |
Lina Kakish - Director Planning & Compliance |
Executive Summary
In late 2015 the NSW Ombudsman issued Enforcement Guidelines and a Model Policy for Councils. The Policy provides structure for consistency and transparency in decision-making regarding compliance and enforcement issues and facilitates a proportional approach to compliance and enforcement based on risk and impact.
The draft Compliance and Enforcement Policy is intended to replace Council’s Current Enforcement Policy (adopted on 23 November 2022).
The key changes to the Policy include:
· The title has been changed to include both compliance and enforcement;
· It has been updated to reflect the principles of the NSW Ombudsman‘s Guidelines and Model Policy for Councils;
· The Policy provides greater clarity on the use of discretion; and
· The Policy proposes a proportionate approach to enforcement and compliance management based on the level of risk in regard the unlawful activity and the resources available.
That the Governance Committee recommends:
That Council:
1. Endorse the draft ‘Compliance & Enforcement Policy’ for public exhibition for a period of not less than 28 days (Attachment 1); and
2. Delegates to the CEO the finalisation of the ‘Compliance & Enforcement Policy’, should no submissions be received; or report back to Council the details of the submissions upon conclusion of the exhibition period.
REPORT
As a regulator, Council is obliged to properly deal with allegations about unlawful activities. These regulatory functions include planning, building and construction, environmental and public health, safety, car parking and transport, companion animal management, and public and natural area regulation.
This may also include activities that are prohibited or unauthorised or contrary to the terms of a consent or approval. A failure to properly deal with allegations and compliance can have adverse outcomes for the community and expose Council to liability and subsequent litigation expenses.
The Policy outlines matters for consideration through the various stages of the process from receipt of unlawful activity complaints through to the types of enforcement actions that can be considered, including the use of discretion.
A key aspect of the Policy is the inclusion of a “risk matrix” which provides guidance on how Council will prioritise, and action complaints received, particularity during times where the number of complaints received exceed the available resources dedicated to investigations.
Currently, with the exception of the most serious public safety matters, requests are dealt with in the order they are received and utilising the same investigative process (site visit etc). Given the available Council resources, the current process has resulted in a backlog of more than 700 unactioned requests with wait times far exceeding 12 months.
The Policy is intended to give priority to the high risk complaints where a full investigation will be conducted. Lower risk complaints may be dealt with via the use of discretion (i.e. no action) or alternatively via “letters of cooperation”. Letters of cooperation will provide information on how the customer may be able to resolve the issue via other means. This may include speaking with their neighbour, seeking the support of the Community Justice Centre (mediation), other requests that may be better dealt with via for example a strata corporation or other agency (such as NSW Police or the NSW Housing).
As staff resources become available, more detailed investigations of complaints other than high risk would be able to occur.
The benefits of this approach include a focus on the more serious matters in our community i.e. where there is a threat to persons, property or the environment and a more timely response to concerns from our community. This approach also provides clear communication and expectations on how Council will respond.
As part of the implementation of a revised Compliance and Enforcement Policy Council will need to make internal administrative changes to its processes to manage the impact of the Policy changes. This includes developing processes and forms / checklists, standard letters used to respond to low risk and impact concerns. It is also planned that a significant review and update of the information available to the community on Council’s Website be carried out.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications as a result of this report.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
|
Environment |
Manage the environmental health of waterways. Manage air, water, noise and chemical pollution. Protect, enhance and maintain areas of endangered ecological communities and high quality bushland as part of an attractive mix of land uses. Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues. |
Social |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership |
Act as an environmental leader in the community. Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Deliver services that are customer focused. Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
|
Legislative |
Local Government Act 1993. |
|
Risk |
The risk is deemed to be Medium. |
ATTACHMENTS
Governance Committee Meeting
10 October 2023
Budget Committee Report
|
ITEM 06 |
Review of Council's Financial progress, forecasts and assumptions |
|
Strategic Objective |
Visionary, Leading, Responsible Ensure Council is accountable and financially sustainable through the strategic management of assets and resources |
|
File Ref |
315158.2023 |
|
Report By |
Vishwa Nadan - Chief Financial Officer |
|
Approved By |
Farooq Portelli - Director Corporate Support |
In June 2023 the Council adopted its 2023-24 operating budget with estimated revenue of $379.3 million and expenditure of $250.8 million. In terms of the net operating result before grants and contributions provided for capital purposes, Council budgeted for an operating deficit of $3.7 million.
Based on Council resolutions, program initiatives, and market trends up to 31 August 2023, Council is projecting to report an operating deficit of $5.6 million at 30 June 2024. Key points include:
· Higher market interest rates and cash holdings due to unspent Liverpool Civic Place loan funds is expected to yield additional $3 million interest earnings.
· Council’s inability to fulfill conditions precedent (TNSW approval for road closure/ reallocation of services etc) for sale of 24 Scott Street has delayed realisation of $1.9 million expected gain on sale.
· On-going review of resource requirements to achieve corporate initiatives has resulted in an investment in additional positions and program costs. The cost associated with engagement of additional staff resources is expected to be absorbed by salary savings from vacancies and deferred recruitment across the Council. Program costs in the order of $800k are estimated.
· Additional $23 million loan for the Liverpool Civic Place is expected to be drawn down in November 2023 and will increase borrowing costs by $0.7 million in FY 2023/24.
· Inclusion of $0.8 million cost for replacement of non-energy efficient streetlights that is expected to reduce electricity costs in forward years. Endeavor Energy will also issue resaleable energy credits that can be sold in forward years.
· Inclusion of $0.2 million additional legal expenses relating to court action taken against Canterbury/ Bankstown Council on Voyager Point Footbridge matter.
The report further highlights key risk and opportunities that will potentially impact on the projected result.
Key points include:
· Favourable interest markets are expected to generate additional $2 million interest income.
· Grants Commission has paid 2023/24 FAG in advance. Any change in their policy will increase budget deficit.
· Depending on depth of road surfaces removed, the write-off cost can be higher than expected.
In relation to the budget for FY 2023-24, attached presentation includes principles of sound financial management and sustainability, historical trends, and cost analysis of Councils functions and services.
That the Governance Committee receives and notes the report.
REPORT
Budget Performance
In June 2023 the Council adopted its 2023-24 operating budget with projected revenue of $379.3 million and expenditure of $250.8 million. In terms of the net operating result before grants and contributions provided for capital purposes, Council budgeted for an operating deficit of $3.7 million.
Based on Council resolutions, program initiatives, and market trends up to 31 August 2023, Council is projected to report an operating deficit of $5.6 million at 30 June 2024.
Key points include:
· Higher market interest rates and cash holdings due to unspent Liverpool Civic Place loan funds is expected to yield additional $3 million interest earnings.
· Council’s inability to fulfill conditions precedent (TNSW approval for road closure/ reallocation of services etc) for sale of 24 Scott Street has delayed realisation of $1.9 million expected gain on sale.
· On-going review of resource requirements to achieve corporate initiatives has resulted in an investment in additional positions and program costs. The cost associated with engagement of additional staff resources is expected to be absorbed by salary savings from vacancies and deferred recruitment across the Council. Program costs in the order of $800k are estimated.
· Additional $23 million loan for the Liverpool Civic Place is expected to be drawn down in November 2023 and will increase borrowing costs by $0.7 million in FY 2023/24.
· Inclusion of $0.8 million cost for replacement of non-energy efficient streetlights that is expected to reduce electricity costs in forward years. Endeavor Energy will also issue resaleable energy credits that can be sold in forward years.
· Inclusion of $0.2 million additional legal expenses relating to court action taken against Canterbury/ Bankstown Council on Voyager Point Footbridge matter.

Operating Revenue
Budget performance of key sources of operating revenue were as follows:

Operating Expenditure
Budget performance of key areas of operating expenses were as follows:

Cash Reserves
At 31 August 2023, Council had $431 million in cash and investments classified as follows:

Risks & Opportunities
The following risks and opportunities have been identified with the potential to change the projected budget result for FY 2023/24 to a deficit of $9.2 million.
i) Interest on Investments [Risk Probability: Highly Likely] – based on current market interest rates and expected cash holdings, Council will further exceed its budget by $2.0 million for interest on investment income.
ii) FAG Operating Grant [Risk Probability: Low/Moderate] – The NSW Grants Commission fully paid 2023/24 financial assistance grant in advance. Any change to their position for FY2024/25 is not known at this stage.
iii) Net Loss from Disposal of Assets [Risk Probability: Highly Likely] – As part of the road renewal process, a portion of the road surface is scrapped off and then replaced. The replacement cost is capitalised, however, there is a written down value attached to the portion removed. The cost of write-off depends on the condition of the road at time of renewal and depth of surface removed.

Budget FY 2024/25
The Governance Committee at its last month’s meeting agreed to follow the timelines below to formulate 2024/25 operating and capital budget.
|
Activity |
Timelines |
|
1. Discuss timetable and approach |
22-Aug-2023 |
|
2. Identify range of Council activities / services |
22-Aug-2023 |
|
3. Classify all services: a. Required by legislation. b. Core services c. Non-core services d. Support functions |
Oct-2023 to Feb 2024 |
|
4. Develop priority guidelines |
|
|
5. Review of Services |
|
|
6. Prioritise capital works program |
|
|
7. Review: a. LTFP assumptions b. Projected performance ratio’s c. Articulate variations for “pessimistic” and “optimistic” scenarios and action plans |
|
|
8. Draft Budget and LTFP endorsed for public exhibition |
Mid Apr-2024 |
|
9. Draft Budget and LTFP Public exhibition period |
May-2024 |
|
10. Council adopts Delivery Plan, Operational Plan and LTFP |
26-Jun-2024 |
The attached presentation includes principles of sound financial management and sustainability, historical trends, and cost analysis of Councils functions and services for deliberation by Councillors.
ATTACHMENTS
1. 2023-24 Budget Variance Analysis - August 2023
2. Governance Committee 2024-25 Budget Presentation - Oct 2023
|
1 |
|
|
Item 06 |
Review of Council's Financial progress, forecasts and assumptions |
|
Attachment 1 |
2023-24 Budget Variance Analysis - August 2023 |
|
Item 06 |
Review of Council's Financial progress, forecasts and assumptions |
|
Attachment 2 |
Governance Committee 2024-25 Budget Presentation - Oct 2023 |
Governance Committee Meeting
10 October 2023
Strategic Priorities Committee Report
|
ITEM 07 |
Response report - RV Parks |
|
Strategic Objective |
Evolving, Prosperous, Innovative Market Liverpool as a business destination and attract investment |
|
File Ref |
290535.2023 |
|
Report By |
Susana Freitas - Visitor Economy Officer |
|
Approved By |
Shayne Mallard - Director City Futures |
Executive Summary
At the 18 July 2023 Governance Committee Meeting, the Committee resolved to receive a report back on the feasibility of a Recreational Vehicle Park (RV Park) within the Liverpool LGA including:
1. Further flood planning investigation
2. Possible sites that meet the criteria from Campervan and Motorclub of Australia and are available for the next 10 years
In July 2023, Council identified seven sites which met the size criteria set by Campervan and Motorclub of Australia (CMCA). Attachment 1 provides details on every potential site within the LGA that meets the size criteria provided by CMCA. In summary, of the seven sites identified only two met all the criteria set by CMCA, and only one of these two sites, Black Muscat Park and Angle Park, is currently suitable for an RV Park due to limited flood risks at the park. The conversion of Black Muscat Park and Angle Park to an RV Park will have significant impacts on current recreational users within the community. Black Muscat Park attracts the highest number of passive park users of any space within the Chipping Norton Lakes. The conversion to an RV Park will likely disadvantage current users. Lehmanns Oval, Liverpool is suitable under the provision of a vehicle access bridge over the high flood risk area at a cost to Council.
That the Governance Committee recommends Council:
1. Receives and notes the report;
2. Notes the significant impact transforming Black Muscat Park and Angle Park will have on community access to open green space; and
3. Make the recommendation if Council is to proceed with consultation with the Chipping Norton Lake Authority to transform Black Muscat and Angle Park or receive official costings to transform Lehmanns Oval to an RV Park for 10 years.
REPORT
At the 18 July 2023 Governance Committee Meeting, the Committee resolved to receive a report back regarding the feasibility of an RV Park within the Liverpool LGA including:
1. Further flood planning investigation
2. Possible sites that meet the criteria from Campervan and Motorclub of Australia and are available for the next 10 years.
In the July 2023 Governance Committee report, Council presented seven potential locations that met the size criteria provided by Campervan and Motorhome Club of Australia (CMCA). Of those seven sites, two were identified as suitable for an RV Park and meeting all criteria requested. Attachment A highlights the suitability of each site and flood risk. Of the sites identified only Black Muscat Park and Angle Park, Chipping Norton, are currently suitable as they meet the criteria specified by CMCA and are a suitable flood risk due to sufficient evacuation opportunities and warning times.
Black Muscat Park and Angle Park are situated within the Chipping Norton Lakes Parklands and are highly utilised for passive recreation purposes and is Council’s most popular parkland destination. The spaces attract large volumes of users predominantly for group and family gatherings and the conversion to an RV Park would be significantly impactful to the community, including removal of access to public open green space and significant impacts on parking availability along the Chipping Norton Lakes and Parklands.
The site is also opposite residential properties that would likely be negatively impacted by the conversion to an RV Park. Consideration should be made to the potential environmental impact given the proximity of the location to the Chipping Norton Lakes and Georges River. The site is owned by the Chipping Norton Lake Authority. Change of current use to accommodate an RV Park for 10 years, as adopted in the July 2023 Governance Committee Meeting, will require consultation and approvals from the Chipping Norton Lake Authority.
Lehmanns Oval, Liverpool is suitable under the provision of a vehicle access bridge over the high flood risk area at a cost to Council. Lehmanns Oval has no current users and was decommissioned by Council due to significant vandalism. CMCA is unable to cover the costs of any remedial works required for any site. Indicative cost estimates indicate that the cost for the bridge installation would exceed $200,000.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no budget provision or funding allocated in the long-term financial plans for these works.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
Facilitate economic development. Facilitate the development of new tourism based on local attractions, culture and creative industries. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place. |
Civic Leadership |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
|
Legislative |
There are no legislative considerations relating to this report. |
|
Risk |
The risk is deemed to be Medium. Installation of an RV Park at Black Muscat Park and Angle Park Chipping Norton will cause the displacement of current users, cause potential negative impacts on adjacent residents and will require a thorough environmental impact assessment. The risk is considered outside Council’s risk appetite. |
ATTACHMENTS
Governance Committee Meeting
10 October 2023
Strategic Priorities Committee Report
|
ITEM 08 |
Cabramatta Loop Project Update |
|
Strategic Objective |
Evolving, Prosperous, Innovative Continue to invest in improving and maintaining Liverpool’s road networks and infrastructure |
|
File Ref |
298241.2023 |
|
Report By |
Jennifer Reynolds - Senior Officer, Business Development |
|
Approved By |
Jason Breton - Director Operations |
Executive Summary
The Cabramatta Loop project is an Australian Government funded project which aims to alleviate road congestion and increase capacity in Sydney’s freight network. A presentation to the Governance Committee will be facilitated by the Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) project team who are responsible for project delivery.
The presentation will be delivered by ARTC Senior Project Manager Richard Tang and Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Manager NSW Alec Brown, and will provide the opportunity for committee members to review the project status and conduct Q&A with the presenters.
The Governance Committee receives and notes the status of the Cabramatta Loop Project update.
REPORT
Background
The Southern Sydney Freight Line (SSFL) is a dedicated 36-kilometre-long single
bi-directional train freight track-line located between Macarthur and Sefton in South-West Sydney.
The Cabramatta Loop Project involves the construction and operation of a passing loop on the SSFL to enable freight trains of up to 1,300 metres long to pass in either direction on the existing rail corridor between the Hume Highway and Cabramatta Road East overbridges in Warwick Farm and Cabramatta respectively.
The Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) is delivering the project on behalf of the Australian Government.
Major construction started in early 2022 and the project is due to be completed in early 2024.
The ARTC Senior Project Manager and Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Manager NSW will present at the October 2023 Governance committee regarding project aims and benefits to the local community. Highlights from the presentation will include:
· Australia’s freight network is set to experience significant growth over the coming decades. The existing freight infrastructure cannot support this projected growth with increasing pressure on already congested roads and rail lines through Sydney. With one train able to move the same number of containers as 54 trucks, the Cabramatta Loop project will encourage a freight transport mode shift from road to rail by increasing the capacity on the freight rail network, helping to reduce truck movements and associated traffic congestion.
· Construction scope includes a new rail track, track re-alignment, construction of two new bridges next to the existing bridges over Sussex Street, Fairfield, and Cabramatta Creek Road, Warwick Farm, works at Jacquie Osman Reserve Warwick Farm, retaining wall and ancillary works including communication, signalling and power upgrades.
· Jacquie Osmond Reserve Warwick Farm update including discussions with NSW Department of Planning and Environment on planning pathways to enable the donation of a number of project infrastructure, including hardstand and site offices to council for community use.
· Current project status involving landscaping works, track works and the installation of new fencing on Jacquie Osmond Reserve.
· Community Engagement program.

Diagram 1 Cabramatta Loop Scope of Works
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications to council.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
Facilitate economic development. |
|
Environment |
Support the delivery of a range of transport options. |
Social |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
|
Legislative |
There are no legislative considerations relating to this report. |
|
Risk |
There is no risk associated with this report. |
Nil
1
Governance Committee Meeting
10 October 2023
Strategic Priorities Committee Report
|
ITEM 09 |
Delivery Management Framework (DMF) |
|
Strategic Objective |
Liveable, Sustainable, Resilient Deliver effective and efficient planning and high-quality design to provide best outcomes for a growing city |
|
File Ref |
315139.2023 |
|
Report By |
Jason Breton - Director Operations |
|
Approved By |
John Ajaka - Chief Executive Officer |
Executive Summary
In 2023 the Operations Directorate conducted a review of how Council delivers Major Projects, in fact all its Projects. This review was triggered by several concurrent investigations:
· An analysis of the effectiveness of traditional project reporting
· An analysis of the commercial success (or otherwise) of project delivery
· An audit of Infrastructure Delivery (2022 Audit)
· The review of the Delivery Plan Operation Plan (DPOP); and
· A financial review of Major Infrastructure Project delivery including Civic Place.
These investigations were undertaken internally at a time when Council also received >$160 million AUD in WestInvest funding.
With this funding arrived significant requirements as to how Council needed to report on Major Projects.
In designing our response, and by using WestInvest as the catalyst, Council has designed and is delivering a new approach – the Delivery Management Framework (DMF).
Initially focused on Major Projects >$5 million dollars, the DMF will be extended to everything we deliver at Council. Essentially the DMF is made up of:
· An online framework of standard forms and templates, managed centrally
· Increased transparency in project financials with direct inputs from Tech One®
· Data Analysis and Project Health Reporting via PowerBI®
Collectively the DMF allows the Director Operations to understand five key project metrics.
1. The budgeted cost of the project
2. The timelines for project delivery
3. The cost of the project to date
4. Committed funds for the ensuing period; and
5. The project’s cost to complete.
This model of transparency and project visibility will allow early identification of ‘red flags’ to the project and prepare the Directorate better in managing its wider portfolio of works. With better management, Council expects to see efficiencies in project delivery that will ultimately save money and time.
That the Governance Committee notes the information.
REPORT
There has been insufficient rigor[1] around project performance at Liverpool City Council in that:
· There were no documented guidelines for project budget planning or review.
· There were no guidelines to assess the complexity of projects to assist delivery.
· The Infrastructure Delivery Team managed projects manually and in relative isolation.
· No contract management nor supplier performance was evident to improve delivery.
· Key project documents were missing rendering lessons learned almost impossible.
In 2023 the Operations Directorate conducted a review of how Council delivers Major Projects, in fact all its Projects. This review was triggered by several concurrent investigations:
· An analysis of the effectiveness of traditional project reporting
· An analysis of the commercial success (or otherwise) of project delivery
· An audit of Infrastructure Delivery (2022 Audit)
· The review of the Delivery Plan Operation Plan (DPOP); and
· A financial review of Major Infrastructure Project delivery including Civic Place.
The Operations Directorate discovered a Project Management Framework (PMF) had been developed by the Council previously but never implemented.
By taking this PMF and developing its artefacts to a more contemporary version of project delivery, Operations have developed the DMF to a standard that will allow consistency in reporting and processing, which includes, but is not limited to the following documents:

In applying a consistent approach, these tools and templates become project imperatives which are not negotiable. It will serve as a catalyst for the creation of further project delivery practices and behaviours whereby there will be increased visibility and accountability for performance.
Uniform application of the DMF will further strength all project planning and delivery across Council, allowing increased visibility as the Project Managers need to comply and it will reduce the historical issues discovered in the June 2022 Audit in that:
· There were no documented guidelines for project budget planning or review.
· There were no guidelines to assess the complexity of projects to assist delivery.
· The Infrastructure Delivery Team managed projects manually and in relative isolation.
Reporting the DMF
Tech One will still provide project budget level reporting however the introduction of Power BI®[2], will enable Operations to produce a series of data driven and project specific reports which will visualise project performance monthly across capital works (major) projects, portfolios and Divisions within the Directorate focusing on project financials with a clear priority on establishing triggers where the Cost to Complete (CtC) exceeds the Planned Budget (PB).

Figure 1 - Indicative Project Data
This metric can then be filtered by specific Project Manager to identify project performance trends and be used to remedy issues as and when they arrive – not post project delivery.

Figure 2 - Indicative Project Performance
Demarcation by Service Delivery Centre will allow the Operations Director to better manage portfolio work including enhanced visibility of the Value of Works (VoW) completed against key performance documents like the DPOP.

Figure 3 - Indicative Planned Expenditure
Project duration will also be monitored allowing the Council to forecast project carryover and address the concerns of the community early – where they see a potential delay or overrun in duration.

Figure 4 - Indicative Durations
A Comprehensive DMF Communications and Engagement Plan has been developed including this briefing (Circled) to ensure we have captured all the project stakeholders needed.
As we develop the DMF for wider use across the Council – Operations will re-engage with this Plan.

The DMF will include, and will be configured for WestInvest reporting to, again, reduce any duplication in reporting and streamline project management. All Major Projects (>$5m AUD) will be reported on using the tools and systems described, in this fashion by November 2023.
This report has been prepared for the advice of Councillors and in response to questions asked during the previous governance committee as they relate to project forecasting, overruns, and delays.
For the information of the Governance Committee.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications relating to this recommendation.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
Enhance operational and thus, economic performance. Facilitate economic development. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership |
Deliver services that are customer focused. Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency, and ethical conduct. |
|
Legislative |
There are no legislative considerations relating to this report. |
|
Risk |
There is no risk associated with this report. |
Nil
1
Governance Committee Meeting
10 October 2023
Strategic Priorities Committee Report
|
ITEM 10 |
Reconciliation Action Plan September 2023 - September 2024 |
|
Strategic Objective |
Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging Promote a harmonious community that celebrates its diversity |
|
File Ref |
295063.2023 |
|
Report By |
Jacqueline Newsome - Coordinator Community Development |
|
Approved By |
Tina Bono - Director Community & Lifestyle |
Executive Summary
The Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP) outlines Council’s ongoing commitment to the advancement of First Nations people in Liverpool by sustainably and strategically taking meaningful action to advance reconciliation.
Based around the core pillars of relationships, respect and opportunities, RAPs provide tangible and substantive benefits for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, increasing economic equity and supporting First Nations self-determination.
Liverpool’s ‘Reflect’ RAP represents the first time Council has officially sought endorsement of a RAP from Reconciliation Australia (RA). Previous plans and strategies focussing on supporting First Nations communities have not undergone this process and have therefore not been considered formal RAPs.
The Governance Committee recommends that Council receive a briefing on the Reconciliation Action Plan September 2023 – September 2024.
REPORT
Background
The Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP) outlines Council’s ongoing commitment to the advancement of First Nations people in Liverpool by sustainably and strategically taking meaningful action to advance reconciliation.
Based around the core pillars of relationships, respect and opportunities, RAPs provide tangible and substantive benefits for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, increasing economic equity and supporting First Nations self-determination.
Liverpool’s ‘Reflect’ RAP represents the first time Council has officially sought endorsement of a RAP from Reconciliation Australia (RA). Previous plans and strategies focussing on supporting First Nations communities have not undergone this process and have therefore not been considered formal RAPs.
Liverpool’s draft RAP has been developed by Ngurra Advisory, a wholly First Nations-owned and operated consultancy group, in collaboration with Council’s Community Development team. This ‘Reflect’ RAP outlines realistic and achievable goals for reconciliation and promotes Council’s broader commitment to supporting the advancement of First Nations people in Liverpool. This Reflect RAP represents Council’s first steps on its formal RAP journey.
The draft RAP was presented to RA for conditional endorsement in May 2023 as part of a public exhibition process. Positive feedback was received from RA in June 2023 and formal endorsement of Council’s Reflect RAP was granted in August 2023.
Governance Committee briefing
At its meeting on 30 August 2023, Council received the draft RAP for endorsement. This matter was subsequently deferred to the September 2023 Council meeting to allow a briefing to occur at the next Governance Committee meeting. This report is presented to facilitate this briefing.
The purpose of this briefing is to inform Councillors of the direction and goals outlined within the RAP, as well as provide further context on the formal RAP process and stages of an organisation’s RAP journey.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications relating to this recommendation.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place. Promote community harmony and address discrimination. |
Civic Leadership |
Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
|
Legislative |
There are no legislative considerations relating to this report. |
|
Risk |
There is no risk associated with this report. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Reconciliation Action Plan September 2023 - September 2024
|
1 |
|
|
Item 10 |
Reconciliation Action Plan September 2023 - September 2024 |
|
Attachment 1 |
Reconciliation Action Plan September 2023 - September 2024 |
1
Governance Committee Meeting
10 October 2023
Strategic Performance Committee Report
|
ITEM 11 |
Independent Library Review |
|
Strategic Objective |
Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging Communicate, listen, engage and respond to the community by encouraging community participation |
|
File Ref |
332497.2023 |
|
Report By |
Elysa Dennis - Information Services Coordinator |
|
Approved By |
Tina Bono - Director Community & Lifestyle |
Executive Summary
An independent review of the Library Service will be examining opportunities to deliver innovative and effective service to Liverpool in the future.
It will include significant consultation with the community and stakeholders to ensure a service that aligns with Liverpool’s strategic direction. The Mayor, Councillors and Executive Leadership Team will be invited to contribute to this consultation as key stakeholders.
Review outcome will include a presentation to the Mayor and the Councillors on the community led vision for library service and recommendations plan for delivery.
That the Governance Committee receives and notes the report.
REPORT
In accordance with the Integrated Planning and Reporting guidelines, Council is required to identify the services it will review during its term of office. Council has selected the Provision of services at Council’s libraries as part of 2022-2023 review and will engage with the local community and other stakeholders to determine service level expectations, sustainability, relevance, and appropriate performance measures.
The council will assess the selected service areas using an evidence-based approach to identify areas of improvement. Actions will be implemented and a report on the progress of the service review will feature in the Council’s Annual Report and highlight any changes made and the benefits to Council’s service delivery.
Jan Richards consulting has been appointed to provide an independent review process. The objective is ensuring alignment of the service to Liverpool’s strategic direction.
The review will include:
· Benchmarking of current service;
Comparison of similar library services using State Library Public Library network data; and
Review against the ALIA Public Library national standards.
· Community Priorities consultation;
Community consultation to establish satisfaction with current service and
barriers to usage;
Consult community to establish vision for library services; and
Identify opportunities for new or improved services based on community vision.
· Service model options;
Identify new technology for alternate service delivery;
Develop a range of options for service delivery models; and
Consult community response to service delivery model options.
· Recommendations and Implementation plan
Consultation with stakeholders will be key to this review. The Mayor, Councillors and Executive Leadership Team will be invited to share their views through attendance at community focus groups or individual interviews.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Costs associated with this recommendation have been included in Council’s budget for the current year and long-term financial plan.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. Provide cultural centres and activities for the enjoyment of the arts. Support access and services for people with a disability. Deliver high quality services for children and their families. |
Civic Leadership |
Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. Provide information about Council’s services, roles, and decision-making processes. Deliver services that are customer focused. |
|
Legislative |
Library Act, NSW Local Government Act, NSW |
|
Risk |
There is no risk associated with this report. |