COUNCIL AGENDA
Ordinary Council Meeting
23 July 2025
BOOK 1
Liverpool Civic Tower council chamber, level 1, 50 Scott Street, LIVERPOOL

You are hereby notified that an Ordinary Council Meeting of Liverpool City Council will be held at the Liverpool Civic Tower, 50 Scott Street , LIVERPOOL NSW 2170 on Wednesday, 23 July 2025 commencing at 6.00pm. Doors to the Chamber will open at 5.50pm.
Liverpool City Council Meetings are livestreamed onto Council’s website and remain on Council’s website for a period of 12 months. If you have any enquiries, please contact Council and Executive Services on 8711 7863.

Mr Jason Breton
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Statement of Ethical Obligations
Oath or Affirmation of Office
In taking the Oath or Affirmation of Office, each Councillor has made a commitment to undertake the duties of the office of councillor in the best interests of the people of Liverpool and Liverpool City Council and that they will faithfully and impartially carry out the functions, powers, authorities and discretions vested in them under the Local Government Act 1993 or any other Act to the best of their ability and judgment.
Conflicts of Interest
A councillor who has a conflict of interest in any matter with which the council is concerned, and who is present at a meeting of the council when the matter is being considered, must disclose the interest and the nature of the interest to the meeting as soon as practicable. Both the disclosure and the nature of the interest must be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting where the conflict of interest arises. Councillors should ensure that they are familiar with Parts 4 and 5 of the Code of Conduct in relation to their obligations to declare and manage conflicts of interests.
Order of Business
PAGE TAB
Opening
Acknowledgment of Country and Prayer
National Anthem
Apologies
Condolences
Confirmation of Minutes
Ordinary Council Meeting held on 18 June 2025.................................................................... 7
Declarations of Interest
Public Forum
Mayoral Minute
Notices of Motion Of Rescission
NIL
Chief Executive Officer Reports
CEO 01 Funding the Maintenance of Assets in Bradfield............................................ 76......... 1
Planning & Design Report
PD 01 Revocation of the Visiting International Delegations Policy........................... 98......... 2
PD 02 Public Art Policy - Proposed Amendments.................................................. 108......... 3
PD 03 New Liverpool LEP Gateway Determination - Next Steps........................... 165......... 4
PD 04 Revocation of City Activation Strategy......................................................... 174......... 5
Community & Lifestyle Reports
COM 01 Policy Review - Code of Meeting Practice Policy........................................ 177......... 6
COM 02 Council Grants Donations and Sponsorship Report.................................... 230......... 7
COM 03 Community Facilities Hire Policy.................................................................. 243......... 8
COM 04 Civic Acknowledgement for Former Mayor Gary Lucas.............................. 272......... 9
Corporate Support Reports
CORP 01 Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy............................................................ 275....... 10
CORP 02 Confirmation of Creation of Policy and Procedures for the Recruitment, Appointment, Performance Review and Management and Separation of the Chief Executive Officer by Council......................................................................... 279....... 11
CORP 03 Investment Report June 2025...................................................................... 311....... 12
Operations Reports
OPER 01 FOGO - Kitchen Caddy Distribution Success (SUD's and Rural Properties) 323 13
Committee Reports
CTTE 01 Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council meeting held Tuesday 10 June 2025.............................................................................................................. 328....... 14
CTTE 02 Minutes of the Liverpool Sports Committee meeting held 4 June 2025...... 336....... 15
Questions with Notice
QWN 01 Question with Notice - Clr Ristevski - Code of Conducts............................. 345....... 16
QWN 02 Question with Notice - Clr Ristevski - Rate Rise.......................................... 347....... 17
QWN 03 Question with Notice - Clr Ristevski - Public Inquiry Legal Expenses......... 349....... 18
QWN 04 Question with Notice - Clr Ristevski - Roundabout (Diamondabout) at the Intersection of Twenty-Eighth Avenue and Fifteenth Avenue in Austral..... 350....... 19
QWN 05 Question with Notice - Mayor Mannoun - Civic Place.................................. 352....... 20
Presentations by Councillors
Notices of Motion
NOM 01 Vine-covered carparks.................................................................................. 354....... 21
NOM 02 Establishment of an Internal Independent Ombudsman to Handle Code of Conduct and Public Complaints.................................................................................. 355....... 22
Council in Closed Session
The following items are listed for consideration by Council in Closed Session with the public excluded, in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 1993 as listed below:
CONF 01 Tourism and CBD Committee - New Community Representatives
Reason: Item CONF 01 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(a) of the Local Government Act because it contains personal matters concerning particular individuals (other than councillors).
CONF 02 Single Source Software Solution for Council - Update
Reason: Item CONF 02 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act because it contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
CONF 03 Legal Affairs
Reason: Item CONF 03 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(a) (c) (g) of the Local Government Act because it contains personal matters concerning particular individuals (other than councillors); AND information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; AND advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.
CONF 04 Liverpool Powerhouse Board
Reason: Item CONF 04 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(a) of the Local Government Act because it contains personal matters concerning particular individuals (other than councillors).
CONF 05 Commercial Property Report - June 2025
Reason: Item CONF 05 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(d i) of the Local Government Act because it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
CONF 06 Organisational Structure Review - Staged Update
Reason: Item CONF 06 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(a) of the Local Government Act because it contains personal matters concerning particular individuals (other than councillors).
Close
MINUTES OF THE Ordinary Meeting
HELD ON 18 June 2025
PRESENT:
Mayor Ned Mannoun
Deputy Mayor Harle
Councillor Adjei
Councillor Ammoun
Councillor Dr Green (online)
Councillor Harte
Councillor Ibrahim
Councillor Karnib
Councillor Macnaught
Councillor Monaghan
Councillor Ristevski
Mr Jason Breton, Chief Executive Officer
Mr Farooq Portelli, Director Corporate Support
Ms Tina Bono, Director Community & Lifestyle
Ms Lina Kakish, Director Planning & Compliance
Ms Michelle Mcilvenny, Director Customer Experience & Business Performance
Ms Hiba Soueid, Manager City Strategy and Performance
Mr Peter Scicluna, Acting Director Operations
Mr David Galpin, Public Inquiry Lead
Mr Vishwa Nadan, Chief Financial Officer
Mr Mark Hannan, Manager City Planning
Mr Michael Zengovski, Manager Environment
Ms Justine Young, Acting Manager Civic and Executive Services
Ms Susan Ranieri, Coordinator Council and Executive Services
Ms Katrina Harvey, Councillor Executive and Support Officer
The meeting commenced at 6.00pm.
Attending Remotely
|
STATEMENT REGARDING WEBCASTING OF MEETING |
The Mayor read the following: In accordance with clause 5.34 of Council’s Code of Meeting Practice, I inform the persons attending this meeting that:
(a) the meeting is being recorded, livestreamed and made publicly available on the council’s website, and
(b) persons attending the meeting should refrain from making any defamatory statements |
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF COUNTRY, PRAYER OF COUNCIL AND AFFIRMATION |
The Acknowledgement of Country, Affirmation of Council and prayer was read by Father Anthony Morgan from St George and Prince Tadros Coptic Orthodox Church.
|
|
NATIONAL ANTHEM |
Michaela Ann Ellington from Miller Technology High School performed the Australian National Anthem.
|
|
COUNCILLORS ATTENDING REMOTE
Clr Dr Green has requested permission to attend this meeting via MS Teams.
Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun Seconded: Clr Macnaught
That Clr Dr Green be granted permission to attend the meeting via MS Team.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
|
APOLOGIES
NIL
CONDOLENCES
NIL.
Confirmation of Minutes
Motion: Moved: Clr Dr Green Seconded: Deputy Mayor Harle
|
That the minutes of the Ordinary Meeting held on 21 May 2025 be confirmed as a true record of that meeting. On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
Declarations of Interest
NIL
Public Forum
NIL
MAYORAL MINUTES
|
Mayoral Minute
ITEM: MAYOR 01 SUBJECT: Tribute to Professor Les Bokey AM REPORT OF: Mayor Ned Mannoun
|
|
Liverpool aspires to be a centre of innovation, and Liverpool City Council is proud to be a founding member of the Liverpool Innovation Precinct. Among the other visionaries who helped establish the Precinct is Professor Les Bokey AM - a passionate advocate for a world-class health, research, and education hub that would serve not only the communities of Liverpool and South West Sydney but also make an impact globally. Professor Bokey has been instrumental in turning that vision into reality. As the Founding Director of the South Western Institute for Robotics and Automation in Health (SWIRAH), he brought international expertise in rectal cancer surgery and a research focus on early diagnosis of bowel cancer, surgical outcomes, inflammatory bowel disease, and the integration of robotics and automation into healthcare. Before his work with the Ingham Institute and Liverpool Hospital, Professor Bokey held key positions at St. Bartholomew’s Hospital in London, Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg, and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. He later served as Head of Surgery and Associate Dean of Surgical Sciences at the University of Sydney’s Faculty of Medicine before joining Western Sydney University. In recognition of his extraordinary service to medicine—as a colorectal surgeon, educator, researcher, and administrator—Professor Bokey was awarded the Order of Australia Medal. He has also received honorary degrees from several international universities and professional societies. Professor Bokey recently announced his retirement and will step down from the Ingham Institute at the end of June. For over a decade, he has been a staunch advocate for Liverpool, always willing to share his knowledge, mentor the next generation, and help shape the future of healthcare and education in our city. His infectious passion for innovation, his unwavering dedication, and, of course, his trademark bow ties will leave an enduring legacy—not only in Liverpool but in the wider world of medical research and global health advancement.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council:
1 Congratulates Professor Bokey on his years of service to health and research and wish him the absolute best on his retirement; and
2 Writes to Professor Bokey to congratulate him.
COUNCIL DECISION Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
ITEM NO: MAYOR 01 – Tribute to Professor Les Bokey
|
Mayoral Minute
ITEM: MAYOR 02 SUBJECT: Professor Max Lu AO Appointed as Vice-Chancellor of the University of Wollongong REPORT OF: Mayor Ned Mannoun
|
|
I would like to acknowledge the recent appointment of Professor Max Lu AO as the sixth Vice-Chancellor and President of the University of Wollongong (UOW), coinciding with the University’s 50th anniversary.
Professor Lu is an internationally respected academic leader and chemical engineer with over 35 years of experience in higher education and research. His leadership at the University of Surrey in the United Kingdom, and now at UOW, reflects a strong commitment to innovation, inclusion and community engagement.
Liverpool has been proud to host a UOW campus in our city centre, offering world-class education and strengthening the economic and social fabric of our region. We welcome Professor Lu’s appointment as an opportunity to deepen this relationship and work together to ensure Western Sydney students continue to access quality higher education close to home.
On behalf of Liverpool City Council, I extend our congratulations to Professor Lu and look forward to working with him to advance education, research and innovation in our city.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
COUNCIL DECISION: Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun That the recommendation be adopted. On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
|
Mayoral Minute
ITEM: MAYOR 03 SUBJECT: Congratulations to Sonja Vujanic – Finalist in the 2025 7NEWS Young Achiever Awards REPORT OF: Mayor Ned Mannoun
|
|
I wish to formally acknowledge and extend heartfelt congratulations to Ms. Sonja Vujanic of Liverpool, who has been recognised as a finalist in the 2025 7NEWS Young Achiever Awards for New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory, an event that was attended by our Deputy Mayor Clr Harle on behalf of Council.
Ms. Vujanic's dedication to youth advocacy and community empowerment is truly commendable. As an executive member of Teach Learn Grow, she played a pivotal role in expanding the program's reach into New South Wales, significantly increasing volunteer participation and enhancing educational support for students in need.
In addition to her work with Teach Learn Grow, Ms. Vujanic led the NSW Youth Advisory Council’s mental health initiative, providing valuable insights and advice to government leaders on critical youth issues.
Ms. Vujanic embodies the spirit of leadership and service that enriches our community. Her commitment to education, mental health advocacy, and youth empowerment serves as an inspiration to all.
RECOMMENDATION:
I move that Council:
3. That a certificate of recognition be presented to Ms. Vujanic, by the Mayor and Deputy Mayor Clr Harle in appreciation of her service to the Liverpool community.
COUNCIL DECISION: Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
Ms Sonja Vujanic was then presented with a certificate from Mayor Mannoun and Deputy Mayor Harle. |
|
Mayoral Minute
ITEM NO: MAYOR 04 SUBJECT: Celebrating 60 Years of Service by Hoxton Industries REPORT OF: Mayor Ned Mannoun |
|
It is with great pride that I bring to the Council's attention a significant milestone in our community. This year marks the 60th anniversary of Hoxton Industries, a cornerstone of Hoxton Park and the broader Liverpool region. Established in 1969, Hoxton Industries has grown into a leading provider of packaging, warehousing, and recycling solutions. Their services encompass co-packing, shrink wrapping, palletising, and de-palletising, among others. Beyond their commercial success, Hoxton Industries stands out for its unwavering commitment to social responsibility. As a registered charity and Australian Disability Enterprise, they have been instrumental in providing employment opportunities for people with disabilities and others facing barriers to mainstream employment Over the past six decades, Hoxton Industries has not only contributed to our local economy but has also fostered an inclusive community where every individual is valued and empowered. Their dedication to ethical practices and community engagement sets a benchmark for businesses across the region. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that Council:
COUNCIL DECISION:
Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
|
Mayoral Minute
ITEM NO: MAYOR 05 REPORT OF: Mayor Ned Mannoun |
|
I take this opportunity to acknowledge and congratulate three outstanding Australians who have been recognised in the 2025 King’s Birthday Honours for their exceptional contributions to our nation. Professor Jennifer Westacott AO has been appointed a Companion of the Order of Australia (AC) – the highest level of the Order - for distinguished service to public administration, business, and policy reform. Professor Westacott’s decades of leadership in both the public and private sectors have shaped national conversations on economic development, social inclusion, and infrastructure. Professor Westacott’s contributions have been particularly significant for Liverpool. As a key figure in the establishment of Bradfield – the new high-tech city being developed near the Western Sydney International Airport – she has played a vital role in shaping one of the most transformative infrastructure and innovation projects in our nation’s history. Her leadership as Chancellor of Western Sydney University continues to drive positive outcomes for education, research and economic participation across our region. Ms Kathleen Margaret Smith OAM has been awarded the Medal of the Order of Australia (OAM) for her dedicated service to the Liverpool community. Ms Smith’s long-standing involvement in local community organisations, particularly in the fields of education and aged care, exemplifies the spirit of service and compassion. Her tireless advocacy has improved the lives of countless residents and embodies the values we hold dear in Liverpool. These honours serve as a powerful reminder of the impact individuals can have when they dedicate themselves to serving others. On behalf of Liverpool City Council, I extend our heartfelt congratulations and appreciation to both Professor Westacott and Ms Smith. Their achievements are a source of great pride for our community and our country. Mr Robert Fleeton OAM has been awarded the Medal of the Order of Australia (OAM) in recognition of his exceptional service to sports administration and the Moorebank community. Bob, as he was more affectionately known, was a foundational figure in Liverpool’s sporting landscape. He co-founded the Moorebank Rams Junior Rugby League Club in the early 1990s and served as its president from 1975 to 1994. His leadership extended to the Moorebank Sports Club, where he was the driving force behind its construction in 1994 and served as president from 1995 to 2019, and again from 2020 to 2021. Under Bob’s stewardship, the club became a cornerstone of the community, supporting thousands of young athletes across various sports. His dedication was not limited to sports; he also championed numerous community programs and initiatives, leaving an indelible mark on Moorebank and its residents. In honour of his enduring legacy, the Moorebank Sports Club established the Bob Fleeton Scholarship, providing financial assistance to local students pursuing higher education. Bob’s passing in August 2024 was a profound loss to our community. This national recognition serves as a testament to his unwavering commitment and the lasting impact of his contributions. RECOMMENDATION: I move that Council writes to both recipients to formally acknowledge and congratulate them on their well-deserved recognition and hold a small civic reception to be funded from the Civic programs Budget.
COUNCIL DECISION:
Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
|
ITEM NO: MAYOR 06 SUBJECT: Commemoration of the 30th Anniversary of the Srebrenica Genocide REPORT OF: Mayor Ned Mannoun
|
|
Background:
Council has received a formal request from the Consulate of Bosnia and Herzegovina seeking support to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the Srebrenica genocide.
This anniversary remains a deeply significant and painful milestone for the Bosnian community both globally and here in Liverpool. Many families in our local area continue to carry the trauma of these events, and it is fitting that Council supports their efforts to remember, reflect, and educate.
Proposal:
Council proposes to provide in-kind support for a commemorative event to be held at Liverpool Powerhouse (formerly Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre) on 5 July 2025 (or other date in July). The event will include a visual display, light entertainment, and a film screening, and will be open to the broader community in the spirit of remembrance, reflection, and solidarity.
The estimated value of Council’s in-kind contribution, which includes waiving venue hire fees and providing staff resources, is approximately $5,000.
Recommendation:
That Council:
1 Endorses its support for the commemoration of the 30th anniversary of the Srebrenica genocide to be held at Liverpool Powerhouse on 5 July 2025 or other date in July.
2 Provides in-kind assistance to the value of approximately $5,000, covering venue hire and staffing resources.
3 Acknowledges the ongoing trauma experienced by members of the Bosnian community and reaffirms its commitment to supporting multicultural communities through events that promote education, remembrance, and unity.
COUNCIL DECISION:
Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
BRING ITEMS FORWARD
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Clr Adjei
That item CFD 01 - Adoption of the Draft Community Strategic Plan 2025-2035, Draft Delivery Program 2025-2029 and Operational Plan 2025-2026 and Resourcing Strategy including the Draft Long-Term Financial Plan 2026-2035, Revenue Pricing Policy (Fees and Charges), Asset Management Strategy 2025-2035 and Endorsement of the Workforce Management Strategy 2025-2029Fees be brought forward and dealt with now.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
CITY FUTURES REPORT
ITEM NO: CFD 01 – addendum book 5
FILE NO: 172432.2025
SUBJECT: Adoption of the Draft Community Strategic Plan 2025-2035, Draft Delivery Program 2025-2029 and Operational Plan 2025-2026 and Resourcing Strategy including the Draft Long-Term Financial Plan 2026-2035, Revenue Pricing Policy (Fees and Charges), Asset Management Strategy 2025-2035 and Endorsement of the Workforce Management Strategy 2025-2029
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun Seconded: Clr Macnaught
That Council:
On being put to the meeting the motion (moved by Mayor Mannoun) was declared CARRIED and the Foreshadowed motion (moved by Clr Karnib) therefore lapsed and was not voted on.
Division called: Vote for: Mayor Mannoun, Clr Adjei, Clr Ammoun, Clr Dr Green, Deputy Mayor Harle, Clr Harte, Clr Ibrahim, Clr Karnib, Clr Macnaught and Clr Monaghan. Vote against: Clr Ristevski.
Foreshadowed motion: Moved: Clr Karnib Seconded: Clr Ristevski
That this item be deferred until the budgetary items in this agenda are dealt with.
|
BRING ITEM FORWARD
Motion: Moved: Clr Karnib Seconded: Clr Monaghan
That item CORP 01 - Local Government Remuneration Tribunal - Mayor & Councillor Fees be brought forward and dealt with now.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
CORPORATE SUPPORT REPORT
ITEM NO: CORP 01
FILE NO: 097424.2025
SUBJECT: Local Government Remuneration Tribunal - Mayor & Councillor Fees
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Monaghan Seconded: Clr Karnib
That Council:
On being put to the meeting the motion (moved by Clr Monaghan) was declared CARRIED and the Foreshadowed motion (moved by Clr Macnaught) therefore lapsed and was not voted on.
Division called (for the Motion moved by Clr Monaghan): Vote for: Clr Dr Green, Deputy Mayor Harle, Clr Ibrahim, Clr Karnib, Clr Monaghan and Clr Ristevski. Vote against: Mayor Mannoun, Clr Adjei, Clr Ammoun, Clr Harte and Clr Macnaught. Foreshadowed motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded Clr Harte
That Council:
2. Agrees to set the fees payable to the Mayor and Councillors for the period 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2026 to an amount equal to the maximum allowable under the Annual Determination as set out in the body of the report. |
Planning & Compliance Reports
ITEM NO: PLAN 01
FILE NO: 144831.2025
SUBJECT: Policy and Standard - Street Lighting Policy and Procedure
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Deputy Mayor Harle
That this item be deferred.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
ITEM NO: PLAN 02
FILE NO: 143626.2024
SUBJECT: Liverpool Community Participation Plan - Proposed Amendments
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Ristevski Seconded: Clr Monaghan
That Council:
3. Publicly exhibits the draft Community Participation Plan 2025 for a minimum period of 28 days;
4. Receives a Post-Exhibition Report detailing the outcomes of the public exhibition period; and
5. Delegates to the CEO (or delegate) authority to amend the Community Participation Plan 2025 for any typographical and minor amendments as required.
Amendment: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Clr Ammoun
That Council:
Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun Seconded: Clr Macnaught
That Council vote on the Amendment (moved by Clr Macnaught).
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
The Amendment (moved by Clr Macnaught) then became the motion and on being put to the meeting was declared CARRIED.
The motion (moved by Clr Ristevski) therefore lapsed and was not voted on. |
ITEM NO: PLAN 03
FILE NO: 188110.2025
SUBJECT: Post Exhibition Report - Planning Proposal - Heritage Listing for Lot 17 Leacocks Lane, Casula ("Mt Omei")
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Deputy Mayor Harle
That Council:
1. Receives and notes this Report;
2. Proceeds with the amendment to include Lot 17 Leacocks Lane, Casula (“Mt Omei”) under Schedule 5 of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008;
3. Delegates authority to the Chief Executive Officer (or their delegate) to forward the Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning Housing and Infrastructure as the Plan-making Authority for this Planning Proposal; and
4. Notifies those representatives who made a submission on the Planning Proposal during the public exhibition of Council’s decision; and
5. Writes to the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service to inform the Agency of Council’s decision.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for the motion.
|
ITEM NO: PLAN 04
FILE NO: 150142.2025
SUBJECT: Amendment to the State Environmental Planning Policy (Precinct - Western Parkland City) - 205 Adams Road, Luddenham
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Deputy Mayor Harle Seconded: Clr Ammoun
That Council:
1. Receives and notes this Report;
2. Receives and notes the advice of the Liverpool Local Planning Panel;
3. Endorses “in principle” the Proponent-initiated Planning Proposal subject to the following amendments: a. Amending the proposed local provision to only apply to the eastern portion of the site zoned Agribusiness; and b. Introducing a cap on the maximum Gross Floor Area of 23,000m2 for the proposed additional permitted use of a hotel and motel accommodation.
4. Forwards the amended Proponent-initiated Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure pursuant to Section 3.34 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 seeking a Gateway Determination;
5. Subject to Gateway Determination, undertakes public exhibition and community consultation on the amended Planning Proposal in accordance with the conditions of the Gateway Determination and Council’s Community Participation Plan; and
6. Receives a Post-Exhibition Report on the outcomes of public exhibition and community consultation.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for the motion.
|
COMMUNITY & LIFESTYLE REPORTS
ITEM NO: COM 01
FILE NO: 179617.2025
SUBJECT: Report back to Council: Dissolution of the Liverpool Access Committee - member consultation
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Harte Seconded: Clr Adjei
That Council:
1. Dissolve the Liverpool Access Committee and its Charter in its current form; and
2. Establishes a Disability Consultation Register.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
ITEM NO: COM 02
FILE NO: 182421.2025
SUBJECT: Council Grants Donations and Sponsorship Report
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Monaghan Seconded: Clr Ammoun
That Council: 1. Endorses the funding recommendation of $10,000 (GST exclusive) under the Sustainable Environment Grant Program for the following projects:
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
ITEM NO: COM 03
FILE NO: 183478.2025
SUBJECT: Review of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Structure and Charter
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Dr Green Seconded: Clr Monaghan
That Council endorse the revised Aboriginal Consultative Committee Charter.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
ITEM NO: COM 04
FILE NO: 191717.2025
SUBJECT: Policy Review - Councillor and Staff Interaction Policy
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Deputy Mayor Harle
That this item be deferred.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
CORPORATE SUPPORT REPORTS
ITEM NO: CORP 02
FILE NO: 282749.2024
SUBJECT: Delegations of the Chief Executive Officer
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Deputy Mayor Harle
That Council:
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
ITEM NO: CORP 03
FILE NO: 182300.2025
SUBJECT: Code of Conduct Complaints
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Monaghan Seconded: Clr Karnib
That Council receive and consider the report.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
RECESS Mayor Mannoun called a recess of meeting at 7.34pm.
RESUMPTION OF MEETING Mayor Mannoun resumed the meeting at 7.50pm in Open Council with all Councillors present except Clr Macnaught.
|
Clr Macnaught returned to the Chamber at 7.51pm.
ITEM NO: CORP 04
FILE NO: 166172.2025
SUBJECT: Investment Report May 2025
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Deputy Mayor Harle Seconded: Clr Harte
That the Council receives and notes this report.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Note: Council previously resolved to receive a property portfolio report that is accompanied with the investment report. It is requested that the property portfolio report is received next month.
|
ITEM NO: CORP 05 - Confidential
FILE NO: 187824.2025
SUBJECT: Purchase of Lot 675 DP2475, 220 Thirteenth Avenue, Austral for RE1 Public Recreation and SP2 Local Drainage
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Deputy Mayor Harle
That Council:
1. Purchase Lot 675 DP 2475, 220 Thirteenth Avenue, Austral for the price and terms as outlined in this report.
2. Upon settlement classifies Lot 675 DP 2475 as “Operational Land” to allow for future road and drainage works.
3. Keeps confidential this report pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and
4. Authorises the CEO or delegate to execute all documents necessary to give effect to these resolutions. On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
ITEM NO: CORP 06
FILE NO: 167812.2025
SUBJECT: Confirmation of Creation of Policy and Procedures for the Recruitment, Appointment, Performance Review and Management and Separation of the Chief Executive Officer by Council
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Clr Adjei
That this item is deferred to a Governance Committee meeting.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
ITEM NO: CORP 07 – Confidential
FILE NO: 190217.2025
SUBJECT: Proposed Granting of an easement for Gas Main over Council land identified as Lot 201 in DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Deputy Mayor Harle Seconded: Clr Harte
That Council note that negotiations are ongoing with Jemena in respect to the terms of the draft Deed of Agreement and 88B instrument for registration of the gas easement.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
Operations Reports
ITEM NO: OPER 01
FILE NO: 189254.2025
SUBJECT: Mosquitoes
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Deputy Mayor Harle Seconded: Clr Monaghan
That Council receives and notes this report.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
ITEM NO: OPER 02
FILE NO: 192851.2025
SUBJECT: Fines issued by Illegal Waste Rangers
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Deputy Mayor Harle
That Council receive and note this report.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
|
COMMITTEE REPORTS
MOTION TO MOVE AS A WHOLE
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Deputy Mayor Harle
That items CTTE 01 Minutes of the Environment Advisory Committee Meeting held on 10 February & 14 April 2025, CTTE 03 Minutes of the Liverpool Local Traffic Committee Held 21 May 2025 and CTTE 04 Minutes of the Civic Advisory Committee held on 20 May 2025 be moved a whole.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
ITEM NO: CTTE 01 FILE NO: 189795.2025 SUBJECT: Minutes of the Environment Advisory Committee Meeting held on 10 February & 14 April 2025
|
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Deputy Mayor Harle
That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Environment Advisory Committee Meeting held on 10 February & 14 April 2025.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
ITEM NO: CTTE 03
FILE NO: 176325.2025
SUBJECT: Minutes of the Liverpool Local Traffic Committee Held 21 May 2025
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Deputy Mayor Harle
That Council:
1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 21 May 2025.
2. Endorse the recommendations in the Minutes.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
ITEM NO: CTTE 04
FILE NO: 187550.2025
SUBJECT: Minutes of the Civic Advisory Committee held on 20 May 2025
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Deputy Mayor Harle
That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Civic Advisory Committee Meeting held on 20 May 2025.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
|
|
ITEM NO: CTTE 02
FILE NO: 164961.2025
SUBJECT: Minutes of the Tourism and CBD Committee Meeting held on 6 May 2025
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Clr Ammoun
That Council:
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
Questions with Notice
ITEM NO: QWN 01
FILE NO: 177063.2025
SUBJECT: Question with Notice - Clr Ristevski - Legal Fees
|
Please address the following:
1. Which Councillors have their legal expenses covered by the ratepayers for the Public Inquiry?
2. How much are the legal fees for each Councillors for the Public Inquiry?
3. Will Council's insurance premiums increase because of this?
4. Is there an excess on the legal fees' insurance claim for Councillors for the Public Inquiry and of so who is paying for this?
Responses (provided by Corporate Support)
1. It is not expected that any councillors will have their legal expenses covered by ratepayers for the public inquiry. Councillors and employees of Liverpool City Council are covered under the applicable insurance policy as Insured Persons. Therefore, should any councillor, or employee, attend or participate in the Public Inquiry, the associated legal costs will be met by the insurer, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy.
2. While each Councillor is covered under the relevant insurance policy, with respect to the Public Inquiry, the extent of their individual involvement will ultimately determine the amount of legal fees incurred.
3. Council insures through a mutual arrangement involving 27 councils (Civic Risk Mutual). The cost of management liability insurance will be negotiated in October, so any increase is not known at this time. The following matters can be stated: (a) claims will contribute to the claims history of Civic Risk Mutual and may impact the cost of Management Liability insurance, (b) insurance costs are shared between the 27 members of Civic Risk Mutual, (c) contributions for management liability insurance are based on council size, (d) there is no factor included for the claim experience of individual councils, so Liverpool will not have any loading added for these claims.
4. Council is awaiting confirmation from the insurers about this. In some circumstances there may be an applicable excess in respect of claims for cover by councillors for the Public Inquiry. To the extent this is applied, this is met by Council. |
ITEM NO: QWN 02
FILE NO: 184593.2025
SUBJECT: Question with Notice - Clr Harte - Payouts
|
Please address the following:
1. Since 2018, how many staff (excluding the executive level) have received a redundancy, or separation payment, or ex-gratia arrangement, or any other confidential settlement that exceeded one year's gross salary? 2. For each occasion, without identifying each former employee: (a) Can the gross amount of payment be provided? (b) Who authorised the payment? (c) Was legal advice obtained? (d) Were such arrangements reported to Council?
Responses (provided by Corporate Support)
1. Since 2018, how many staff (excluding the executive level) have received a redundancy, or separation payment, or ex-gratia arrangement, or any other confidential settlement that exceeded one year's gross salary? Two (2) 2. For each occasion, without identifying each former employee: (a) Can the gross amount of payment be provided? (b) Who authorised the payment? (c) Was legal advice obtained? (d) Were such arrangements reported to Council?
Person A (a) Can the gross amount of payment be provided? No, confidential under a deed (b) Who authorised the payment? CEO, Dr Eddie Jackson (c) Was legal advice obtained? Yes, legal advice was obtained. (d) Were such arrangements reported to Council? No, operational issue.
Person B (a) Can the gross amount of payment be provided? No, confidential under a deed (b) Who authorised the payment? CEO, John Ajaka (c) Was legal advice obtained? Yes, legal advice was obtained. (d) Were such arrangements reported to Council? No, operational issue.
|
PLANNING AND COMPLIANCE REPORT
ITEM NO: PLAN 05 – addendum book 5
FILE NO: 185837.2025
SUBJECT: Energy Savings Certificate (ESC) Sale
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Clr Dr Green
That Council: 1. Approves sale of 44,580 ESCs, through Ironbark Sustainability Pty Ltd, that is estimated to be valued at $843,454 2. Authorises the CEO to execute the sale of the remaining 5,600 ESCs on completion of the project. 3. Authorises the CEO or his delegate to execute any documentation that may be required to complete these sales. 4. Authorises the CEO to decide the appropriate timing of the sale based on market pricing. On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
Community & Lifestyle Reports
ITEM NO: COM 05 – addendum book 5
FILE NO: 198639.2025
SUBJECT: Revised Schedule for Governance Committee Meetings and Councillor Briefing Sessions 2025
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Ristevski Seconded:
That Council:
This item lapsed as there was no seconder and was not voted on.
|
Mayor Mannoun then tabled a previous Mayoral Minute, item no: MAYOR 01 - The Office of Local Government's Review of the Councillor Conduct Framework from the 20 November 2024 Council meeting which was LOST at that meeting.
The Mayoral Minute was dealt with as shown below:
Clr Macnaught left the Chamber at 8:40pm.
Clr Macnaught returned to the Chamber at 8:41pm.
|
Mayoral Minute
ITEM: MAYOR 07 SUBJECT: The Office of Local Government’s Review of the Councillor Conduct Framework REPORT OF: Mayor Ned Mannoun
|
|
The Office of Local Government (OLG) is completing a comprehensive review of the Councillor Conduct Framework, proposing updates to promote accountability, transparency, and integrity across New South Wales councils. These recommendations cover critical areas, including clearer behavioural standards, a refined dispute resolution and penalty framework, and measures to restore professionalism in council meetings. Liverpool City Council’s endorsement of these changes reflects our commitment to governance, excellence and public trust. Key Recommendations being considered: 1. Changes to the Code of Conduct and Oath of Office: o Enhanced Code of Conduct Requirements: The OLG proposes aligning councillor conduct with parliamentary standards, establishing clearer behavioural expectations. Updates to the Oath of Office will further reinforce councillors’ commitment to ethical public service.
o Clearer Behavioural Definitions: Revised definitions are proposed to better address significant conduct issues and reduce minor complaints, focusing the complaints process on substantive matters. o Stricter Regulations for Property Developers and Real Estate Agents: The OLG recommends stricter standards for councillors with ties to property development or real estate to address potential conflicts of interest, ensuring impartial decision-making. o Addressing Inappropriate Lobbying: The OLG proposes guidelines to address inappropriate lobbying, ensuring councillors engage with stakeholders transparently and avoid undue influence that could impact council decisions.
o State-Wide Peer Panel for Behavioural Issues: A state-wide panel of experienced councillors would handle behaviour-related complaints, providing a fair and peer-reviewed oversight mechanism. o Centralized Conflict of Interest Management: The OLG recommends managing significant conflicts of interest at a state level, applying a structured penalty system to ensure consistency across councils. o Referral of Significant Sanctions: For serious breaches, the OLG proposes that significant sanctions be referred to an appropriate independent tribunal or body, ensuring that higher-level penalties are reviewed and administered by an impartial authority.
o Increased Transparency and Order in Meetings: The OLG recommends empowering mayors to address disruptions by imposing sanctions to ensure respect and order within council proceedings.
These recommendations represent essential reforms aimed at upholding integrity, transparency, and accountability in local councils across New South Wales. By supporting these changes, Liverpool City Council demonstrates its commitment to the highest standards of governance and professional conduct in serving our community. [1]Recommendation: That Council: 1. Formally endorses each recommendation in the OLG’s review of the Councillor Conduct Framework, recognising these changes as essential for maintaining and enhancing public trust in local government. 2. Makes a submission to the OLG outlining its formal endorsement in support of the proposed framework. 3. In its submission, advocates for the NSW Government to consider adopting a similar conduct framework at the state level, ensuring consistency and reinforcing public confidence in governance across all tiers. 4. Directs the Acting CEO to submit Liverpool City Council’s endorsement by the OLG’s specified deadline. 5. Immediately implement open door Briefing Sessions.
[2]COUNCIL DECISION:
Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun That Council: 1. Adopts the revised Meeting schedule effective July 2025;
2. Notes the July – December meeting dates; 3. Supports in principle each recommendation in the OLG’s review of the Councillor Conduct Framework, recognising these changes as essential for maintaining and enhancing public trust in local government; 4. Write to the OLG outlining Council’s in principle support of the proposed framework; 5. Support in principle, subject to the report, open door Briefing Sessions and all Governance and Committee meetings; and
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
Clr Harte left the Chambers at 8:49pm.
Clr Harte returned to the Chambers at 8:51pm.
ITEM NO: COM 06 – addendum book 5
FILE NO: 200969.2025
SUBJECT: Suspension of AFZ Bigge Park for EuroFest Event
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Clr Harte
That Council:
2. Note that the AFZ will be suspended within a demarcated area, allowing Police to continue to enforce the AFZ outside this area.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
OPERATIONS Reports
ITEM NO: OPER 03 – addendum book 5
FILE NO: 164067.2025
SUBJECT: Floodplain and Stormwater Management Policy
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Harte Seconded: Clr Ammoun
That this item be deferred to a Governance Committee meeting.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
ITEM NO: OPER 04 – addendum book 5
FILE NO: 192908.2025
SUBJECT: Liverpool Waste Committee Charter
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Harte Seconded: Clr Macnaught
That this item be deferred to a Governance Committee meeting for further discussion.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
Committee Reports
ITEM NO: CTTE 05 – addendum book 5
FILE NO: 183422.2025
SUBJECT: Minutes of the Governance Committee Meeting held on 10 June 2025
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Clr Adjei
That this item be deferred in order to ensure procedural correctness.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
RECESS Mayor Mannoun called a recess of meeting at 8.58pm.
RESUMPTION OF MEETING Clr Harle, as the Deputy Mayor, became the Chairperson as Mayor Mannoun left the meeting during the recess. Deputy Mayor Harle resumed the meeting in Open Council at 9.11pm.
Clr Ammoun was not present when the meeting resumed. Clr Dr Green retired from the meeting during the recess. Mayor Mannoun left the meeting during the recess due to family reasons.
|
Clr Ammoun returned to the Chamber at 9.12pm.
Presentations by Councillors
NIL.
Notices of Motion
ITEM NO: NOM 01
FILE NO: 163409.2025
SUBJECT: Michael Wenden Aquatic Leisure Centre
|
NOTICE OF MOTION (submitted by Clr Ristevski)
That:
1. Council receive a report showing expenditure on Michael Wenden Aquatic Leisure Centre including: a) Maintenance b) Management of contract c Capital works
2. The CEO advises when the contract to manage the Michael Wenden Aquatic Leisure Centre is due for renewal.
3. The CEO prepare a report of all metropolitan councils identifying aquatic and leisure centres and identifying if they are operated by council or under a contract.
4. A report be prepared that reviews the viability of bringing the operation of the Michael Wenden Aquatic Leisure Centre in-house including: a) Potential staff costs b) Maintenance of the centre c) Capital works
|
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Ristevski Seconded: Clr Monaghan That the Notice of Motion be adopted. On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
ITEM NO: NOM 02
FILE NO: 167062.2025
SUBJECT: Support for Local Businesses through Tender Loadings in Liverpool LGA
|
Background
This motion aims to support our local economy, create jobs, and ensure that Liverpool’s community benefits directly from the Council’s procurement activities.
NOTICE OF MOTION (submitted by Clr Ristevski)
That Council:
1. Recognises the significant economic challenges facing our community, with Liverpool having one of the highest unemployment rates in the country, and the importance of supporting local businesses to foster economic growth and community resilience.
2. Notes the benefits of prioritising local businesses in Council tenders, including: i. Stimulating local job creation and employment opportunities. ii. Boosting the local economy through increased spending and investment. iii. Strengthening the sustainability and resilience of Liverpool’s business community.
3. Resolves to implement a local business loading or weighting system in the tendering process, which provides additional points or considerations for businesses that are based within the Liverpool LGA when bidding for Council contracts.
4. Further resolves to: i. Develop clear criteria and guidelines to ensure transparency and fairness in the tender process. ii. Engage with local businesses and stakeholders to promote awareness and participation. iii. Monitor and report annually on the outcomes of this initiative, including the proportion of council contracts awarded to local businesses and related economic impacts.
5. Calls on the relevant department within Council to commence work immediately to incorporate these considerations into future tenders and to report back to Council within three months on the implementation plan.
|
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Ristevski Seconded: Clr Monaghan
That Council:
1. Recognises the significant economic challenges facing our community, with Liverpool having one of the highest unemployment rates in the country, and the importance of supporting local businesses to foster economic growth and community resilience.
2. Notes the benefits of prioritising local businesses in Council tenders, including: i. Stimulating local job creation and employment opportunities. ii. Boosting the local economy through increased spending and investment. iii. Strengthening the sustainability and resilience of Liverpool’s business community.
3. Further resolves to: i. Engage with local businesses and stakeholders to promote awareness and participation. ii. Monitor and report annually on the outcomes of this initiative, including the proportion of council contracts awarded to local businesses and related economic impacts.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
ITEM NO: NOM 03
FILE NO: 167102.2025
SUBJECT: Inclusion of Councillors’ Political Affiliations on the Council’s Website
|
Background
Transparency in local government is fundamental to fostering community trust and ensuring that residents have access to pertinent information regarding their elected representatives. Publishing councillors’ political affiliations aligns with best practices in governance transparency and supports an open, accountable local democracy.
NOTICE OF MOTION (submitted by Clr Ristevski)
That:
1. The Council’s official website, under the "Councillors" tab, include a clear indication of each Councillor’s political affiliation.
2. Council further resolves that the Council’s Communications Department be tasked with implementing this update promptly and that ongoing reviews be conducted to ensure the accuracy and currency of this information.
3. Council notes that this initiative promotes transparency and accountability by providing residents with accessible information about their representatives’ political alignments.
4. Council recognises that such transparency can: i. Enhance community trust in local governance. ii. Enable residents to make more informed decisions when engaging with their representatives. iii. Foster a greater understanding of the political landscape within the Council. iv. Support informed debate and civic participation.
|
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Ristevski Seconded: Clr Karnib
That:
2. Council further resolves that the Chief Executive Officer be tasked with implementing this update promptly and that ongoing reviews be conducted to ensure the accuracy and currency of this information.
3. Council notes that this initiative promotes transparency and accountability by providing residents with accessible information about their representatives’ political alignments.
4. Council recognises that such transparency can: i. Enhance community trust in local governance. ii. Enable residents to make more informed decisions when engaging with their representatives. iii. Foster a greater understanding of the political landscape within the Council. iv. Support informed debate and civic participation.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Division called: Vote for: Deputy Mayor Harle, Clr Ibrahim, Clr Karnib, Clr Monaghan and Clr Ristevski. Vote against: Clr Adjei, Clr Ammoun, Clr Harte and Clr Macnaught.
|
ITEM NO: NOM 04
FILE NO: 176764.2025
SUBJECT: Provision of Food and Snacks for Public Attendees at Liverpool Council Meetings
|
Background Community engagement is a cornerstone of effective local governance. By providing food and snacks at council meetings, we can remove barriers to attendance, such as time constraints or lack of refreshments, and demonstrate our commitment to fostering an inclusive and welcoming environment for all residents.
NOTICE OF MOTION (submitted by Clr Ristevski)
That Council resolves to:
1. Implement the provision of light refreshments, including food and snacks, for members of the public attending council meetings to promote greater community engagement and ensure accessibility for all residents;
2. Allocate the necessary funds for this initiative from the existing budget designated for dinner provisions for councillors attending evening meetings. This reallocation will ensure the initiative is cost-effective and sustainable without requiring additional expenditure;
3. Recognise that offering food and refreshments during meetings encourages increased attendance, participation, and a sense of welcome among community members, thereby strengthening democratic processes within our city; and
4. Establish a process to ensure that the provision of food and snacks is managed efficiently, hygienically, and in accordance with health and safety standards.
|
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Ristevski Seconded: Clr Karnib
That Council resolves to:
1. Implement the provision of light refreshments, including food and snacks, for members of the public attending council ordinary meetings to promote greater community engagement and ensure accessibility for all residents;
2. Allocate the necessary funds for this initiative from the existing budget designated for light refreshments for councillors attending evening meetings. This reallocation will ensure the initiative is cost-effective and sustainable without requiring additional expenditure;
3. Recognise that offering food and refreshments during meetings encourages increased attendance, participation, and a sense of welcome among community members, thereby strengthening democratic processes within our city; and
4. Establish a process to ensure that the provision of food and snacks is managed efficiently, hygienically, and in accordance with health and safety standards.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
ITEM NO: NOM 05
FILE NO: 178173.2025
SUBJECT: Reimbursement and Accountability for Council-Related Event Attendance
|
Background Non-attendance at official events, despite acceptance of tickets, can reflect poorly on the Council’s reputation and undermine public trust. To uphold transparency, accountability, and professionalism, it is essential to establish clear expectations and consequences regarding attendance at such events.
I propose the following motion as such actions are necessary to maintain the integrity and reputation of Council and to prevent bring the Council into disrepute.
NOTICE OF MOTION (submitted by Clr Ristevski)
That Council:
1. Implement a policy whereby any councillor who RSVP’s to attend an event and Council subsequently purchases a ticket on their behalf to attend the event but does not attend the event without valid reason, they shall be responsible for reimbursing the full cost of the ticket to Council;
2. Direct the Chief Executive Officer to develop and implement guidelines and procedures to ensure compliance with this Policy;
3. Request the CEO to communicate this Policy to all Councillors; and
4. Require that the councillor formally apologises to the hosting organisation for their non-attendance and gets reported at the next scheduled Council meeting.
|
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Ristevski Seconded: Clr Monaghan
That the Notice of Motion be adopted and that it is incorporated in the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
Clr Ibrahim left the Chambers at 9:39pm.
Confidential Items
ITEM NO: CONF 01
FILE NO: 125983.2025
SUBJECT: ST3360 Request for Tender - Vet Services and Animal Boarding
This item was dealt with later in the meeting in Closed Session pursuant to the provisions of pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(d i) of the Local Government Act 1993 because it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it
ITEM NO: CONF 02
FILE NO: 185643.2025
SUBJECT: Liverpool Youth Council Member Nominations 2025 - 2027
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Clr Karnib
1. That Council endorse the proposed members of the Liverpool Youth Council 2025 – 2027:
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
Clr Ibrahim returned to the Chambers at 9:43pm.
ITEM NO: CONF 03
FILE NO: 182457.2025
SUBJECT: RCL3259 Provision of Security Guard Services for Liverpool City Council's Buildings and Facilities
This item was dealt with later in the meeting in Closed Session pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 because it contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
ITEM NO: CONF 04
FILE NO: 185899.2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of an Application for the acquisition of land on the grounds of hardship - 26 Derwent Avenue, Bradfield identified as Part of Lot 82 DP 864799
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Clr Harte
It is resolved that Council:
1. Notes that: i. Part of Lot 82 DP 8864799 (Land) is zoned SP2 Infrastructure (Local Drainage) and RE1 - Public Recreation under the State Environmental Planning Policy (Precincts - Western Parkland City – Western Sydney Aerotropolis) 2021 and is reserved for future acquisition by Council; ii. The owners of the Land have made a hardship application pursuant to Division 3, Part 2 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW) (Acquisition Act); iii. Advice has been provided that the Owners have satisfied the requirements to establish hardship for the acquisition of the SP2 Infrastructure (Local Drainage) and RE1 Public Recreation zoned land under the Acquisition Act; iv. Subject to Council adopting a resolution to proceed to compulsory acquisition on hardship provisions, a Plan of Acquisition will be prepared and a valuation will be obtained and a “without prejudice” offer made to the owners. v. If the owners accept Council’s offer a further report will be submitted to Council seeking approval to purchase prior to compulsory acquisition; vi. If an agreement is not reached on the amount of compensation payable through the voluntary negotiations, then compensation will be determined by the Valuer General under s41 of the Acquisition Act.
2. Notes that the purchase of the portions of the subject property zoned SP2 Infrastructure (Local Drainage) and RE1 Public Recreation have a total area of approximately 8,144m2 (subject to survey).
3. Proceeds with the compulsory acquisition of the Land under S186 of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) and in accordance with the Acquisition Act.
4 Delegates authority to, and directs the Chief Executive Officer and his delegates, to proceed with making the necessary application to the Minister for Local Government and the Governor in accordance with the Local Government Act, 1993 to obtain approval to acquire the property in accordance with the Acquisition Act;
5. Takes all necessary actions to proceed with and complete the compulsory acquisition of the land in accordance with the applicable legislation, including making any application or giving notice to the relevant Minister and the Governor and serving or publishing any other documentation or notice.
6. Delegates authority to and directs the Chief Executive Officer and his delegates to enter into negotiations with the property owner and/or their representative to acquire the property by agreement and enter into any agreement reached with the Owner pursuant to S30 of the Acquisition Act without having to submit a further report to Council for approval.
7. Authorises payment of compensation as determined by the Valuer General, if accepted by the Owner, plus statutory interest in accordance with S49 of the Acquisition Act;
8. If the Owner commences proceedings in the Land and Environment Court (Court), authorises: i. Payment to the Owner of 90% of the compensation as determined by the Valuer-General pursuant to s68(2)(a) of the Acquisition Act, or if that payment is not accepted by the Owner, pay that amount into trust pursuant to s68(2)(b) of the Acquisition Act. ii. Engage solicitors, experts and counsel, as needed, to defend Council’s position in Court; and iii. Payment of compensation in accordance with the Order issued by the Court.
9. Authorises its delegated officer to execute any document, under Power of Attorney, necessary to give effect to this decision; and
10. Keeps this report confidential pursuant to the provisions of Section 10(A)(2)(c) of the Local Government Act, 1993 as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion. |
ITEM NO: CONF 05
FILE NO: 190175.2025
SUBJECT: Proposed dedication of Lot 1417 DP 882409 as Public Road to provide access to Lot 101 DP 1213451 (1895 Camden Valley Way, Horningsea Park) DA-707/2022.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Harte Seconded: Clr Macnaught
That Council:
1. Approves proceeding with the dedication of Lot 1417 DP 882409 as public road based on court approved DA-707/2022 consent conditions.
2. Approves to proceed with the gazettal of Lot 1417 DP 882409 to be lodged at land registry Services for registration and formal dedication as public road based on the court approved DA-707/2022 consent conditions.
3. Notes that all costs of registration and construction of the missing link section of road at this location are to be at the developers cost
4. Keeps confidential this report pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and
5. Authorises the CEO or delegate to execute all documents necessary to give effect to these resolutions.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion. |
ITEM NO: CONF 06
FILE NO: 189567.2025
SUBJECT: Installation of flags on Council buildings
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Ristevski Seconded: Clr Monaghan
That Council:
1. Receives and notes this report;
2. Explores options for financing and installation of flagpoles including ongoing costs.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
CLOSED SESSION
Motion: Moved: Clr Harte Seconded Clr Macnaught
That Council move into Closed Session to deal with the following items:
Item No: CONF 01 - ST3360 Request for Tender - Vet Services and Animal Boarding is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(d i) of the Local Government Act 1993 because it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
Item No: CONF 03 - RCL3259 Provision of Security Guard Services for Liverpool City Council's Buildings and Facilities and Item No: CONF 07 - Opportunity with UNSW on Microrecycling Research and Future Microfactory Development are confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 because they contain information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
The public left the Chamber. The meeting moved into Closed Session at 9.56pm.
ITEM NO: CONF 01
FILE NO: 125983.2025
SUBJECT: ST3360 Request for Tender - Vet Services and Animal Boarding
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Clr Adjei
That Council:
1. Declines to accept the tender submission, in accordance with section 178(1)(b) of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021.
2. Declines to accept fresh tender submissions or applications for the following reasons: a. the poor response to the request for tenders, and b. the known shortage of animal shelter providers as highlighted in the Report of the NSW Legislative Inquiry into Pounds in NSW published on 18 October 2024.
3. Authorises the CEO or delegate to negotiate with the one and only tenderer as identified in the body of this report for the following reasons. a. The Tenderer has submitted an offer to perform the services but cannot be accepted by Council in its current form. b. The submitted Schedule of Rates is considered generally competitive and reflects a reasonable cost for the scope of services required. c. The Tenderer is Council’s current service provider and has demonstrated satisfactory performance in the delivery of animal shelter and veterinary services to date. d. The Tenderer is the only known provider currently able to meet Council’s full- service requirements, including the necessary infrastructure, capacity, and proximity to deliver animal shelter and veterinary care within the required parameters. 4. Authorises the CEO to enter into a contract with the tenderer or to report back to Council should a satisfactory agreement not be reached.
5. Makes public its decision regarding tender ST3360 – Animal Shelter and Veterinary Services.
6. Authorises the CEO or delegate to execute all documents necessary to give effect to this resolution, and
7. Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submission received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion. |
ITEM NO: CONF 03
FILE NO: 182457.2025
SUBJECT: RCL3259 Provision of Security Guard Services for Liverpool City Council's Buildings and Facilities
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Clr Harte
That Council:
§ Allied Integrated Management Group Pty Ltd § Business Security & Management Solutions Pty Ltd § ECS International Security § National Integrated Services Pty Ltd § Vibrant Services Pty Ltd
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. Councillors voted unanimously for this motion. |
ITEM NO: CONF 07 – Addendum book 6
FILE NO: 199298.2025
SUBJECT: Opportunity with UNSW on Microrecycling Research and Future Microfactory Development
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded: Clr Harte
That Council:
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion. |
OPEN SESSION
Motion: Moved: Clr Macnaught Seconded Clr Adjei
That Council move into Open Session.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Deputy Mayor Harle then read the resolutions for the following items that were passed in Closed Session:
· CONF 01 - ST3360 Request for Tender - Vet Services and Animal Boarding;
· CONF 03 - RCL3259 Provision of Security Guard Services for Liverpool City Council's Buildings and Facilities; and
THE MEETING CLOSED AT 10.31pm by Deputy Mayor Harle.
<Signature>
Name: Ned Mannoun
Title: Mayor
Date: 23 July 2025
I have authorised a stamp bearing my signature to be affixed to the pages of the Minutes of the Council Meeting held on 18 June 2025. I confirm that Council has adopted these Minutes as a true and accurate record of the meeting.
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Chief Executive Officer Report
|
CEO 01 |
Funding the Maintenance of Assets in Bradfield |
|
Strategic Objective |
Evolving, Prosperous, Innovative Continue to invest in improving and maintaining Liverpool’s road networks and infrastructure |
|
File Ref |
200136.2025 |
|
Report By |
Jason Breton - CEO |
|
Approved By |
Jason Breton - CEO |
Executive Summary
Bradfield City Centre is Australia’s newest city, the first in 100 years. The development in Bradfield and the broader Aerotropolis is transformative for the people of Greater Sydney and the community of Liverpool City Council (LCC).
An important consideration for Council will be the ongoing maintenance and delivery of any infrastructure assets developed and funded by BDA that will be the responsibility of Council post-delivery.
Although the extent of infrastructure that is likely to be developed and handed over to LCC is unknown, it is widely acknowledged within LCC that this will entail significant costs which will need to be resourced adequately to ensure the standard of delivery and service remains consistent over the life of these assets. In response, Council has undertaken a review of funding opportunities Council could consider, ensuring there is sufficient funding to maintain these assets.
Astrolabe Group were engaged by LCC to undertake a review of funding options for the ongoing management of the infrastructure assets within Bradfield and identify various funding mechanisms beyond Council’s standard financial practices, including:
· Section 7.12 levies (current state)
· Adjusted rate pegs
· Special Rate Variations (SRV)
· Adjusting the ad valorem taxes
· Community Title schemes
That Council:
1. Receive and note this Report;
2. Authorise the CEO to undertake financial modelling to better understand the options and expenses, and how they could be deployed based on specific variables applicable to LCC and Bradfield to better understand the best possible financial option for LCC to pursue; and
3. Authorise the CEO to progress the wider funding options for the maintenance of Assets in Bradfield to determine and arrive at an optimum funding model.
REPORT
Bradfield City Centre is Australia’s newest city, the first in 100 years. The development in Bradfield and the broader Aerotropolis is transformative for the people of Greater Sydney and the community of Liverpool City Council (LCC).
The delivery of the Bradfield City and Aerotropolis precincts in the west of the LCC Local Government Area (LGA) will play a significant part in defining the future of LCC and its communities. This development provides both significant opportunities and constraints and threats to Council and the wider community.
The area surrounding the airport, known as the Aerotropolis is located within the Liverpool Council and Penrith Council LGA. Within the Aerotropolis lies the Bradfield City Centre of which LCC will manage and maintain after its development and handover from the Bradfield Development Authority (BDA).
The BDA are responsible for the development of the Bradfield City Centre located in the heart of the Aerotropolis. The BDA also has a focus on attracting investment to drive economic benefits to the Aerotropolis and surrounding areas.
In September 2024, the Bradfield City Centre Masterplan was approved by the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces which will guide the delivery of homes, jobs, mixed-use areas, open and green spaces and essential connectivity and transport links.
To ensure that the delivery of the Aerotropolis and Bradfield is aligned to the Council’s requirements and needs and provides a value proposition for both Council and the BDA, Council is proactively seeking to define and implement a Strategic Governance framework with the BDA.
An important consideration for Council will be the ongoing maintenance and delivery of any infrastructure assets developed and funded by BDA that will be the responsibility of Council post-delivery.
Although the extent of infrastructure that is likely to be developed and handed over to LCC is unknown, it is widely acknowledged within LCC that this will entail significant costs which will need to be resourced adequately to ensure the standard of delivery and service remains consistent over the life of these assets. In response, Council has undertaken a review of funding opportunities Council could consider, ensuring there is sufficient funding to maintain these assets.
Astrolabe Group were engaged by LCC to undertake a review of funding options for the ongoing management of the infrastructure assets within Bradfield and identify various funding mechanisms beyond Council’s standard financial practices, including:
· Section 7.12 levies (current state)
· Adjusted rate pegs
· Special Rate Variations (SRV)
· Adjusting the ad valorem taxes
· Community Title schemes
Each option was analysed using a SWOT framework, offering insights into their advantages and potential limitations. Additionally, case studies from other councils, such as Penrith City Council and Camden Council, were used to highlight successful applications of these mechanisms.
This review identified approaches LCC could consider implementing to raise funds for the management and maintenance of potential assets within Bradfield, including:
· Undertake financial modelling to better understand the options and expenses, and how they could be deployed based on specific variables applicable to LCC and Bradfield to better understand the best possible financial option for LCC to pursue
· LCC to develop an advocacy program to advocate to IPART for an adjusted rate peg to consider growth in employment lands and the subsequent impact on council’s long-term maintenance. This is an issue faced by any council in NSW experiencing growth in employment generating lands, without existing recourse for funding the maintenance of the required infrastructure.
· Consider an aerotropolis specific special rate variation to expand the rateable income of LCC, localising rate impacts to Bradfield and creating a means for Council to generate funds to contribute to the maintenance of new infrastructure.
The CEO is undertaking a series of meetings after signing a Memorandum of Understanding with BDA, to progress this and other issues, the latest being on Friday 11th July 2025.
The Report with recommendations therein, is attached at Attachment 1.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
It is expected the costs associated with Recommendation 2 will not exceed $7000 and will be allocated from General Funds.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
Facilitate economic development. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
|
Legislative |
There are no legislative considerations relating to this report. |
|
Risk |
There is no current risk associated with this report. |
ATTACHMENTS
|
CEO 01 |
Funding the Maintenance of Assets in Bradfield |
|
Attachment 1 |
Assets in Bradfield - Astrolabe Group Document |

Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Planning & Design Report
|
PD 01 |
Revocation of the Visiting International Delegations Policy |
|
Strategic Objective |
Visionary, Leading, Responsible Position Council as an industry leader that plans and delivers services for a growing city |
|
File Ref |
194148.2025 |
|
Report By |
Julie Scott - Manager City Economy |
|
Approved By |
Lina Kakish - Director Planning & Design |
Executive Summary
The Visiting International Delegations Policy was adopted by Council on 14 March 2016 with the aim of establishing a coordinated and transparent approach to the way in which Council manages requests from representatives or agents for international delegations.
The position of International Engagement and Trade Advisor had responsibility for organising arrangements regarding international delegations. However, this position has since been discontinued, and the policy is therefore obsolete.
That Council:
1. Revokes the Visiting International Delegations Policy, acknowledging the discontinuation of the International Engagement and Trade Advisor role and the resulting lack of capacity to implement the policy as originally intended; and
2. Notes that ad hoc strategic delegation requests may continue to be assessed on a case-by-case basis, where aligned to Council’s Economic Development or Civic priorities.
REPORT
The Visiting International Delegations Policy was adopted by Council on 14 March 2016 to establish a coordinated and transparent framework for managing requests from international governments, consulates, business groups, or community organisations seeking to be hosted by Council for civic, cultural, educational, or investment-related purposes.
The policy set out:
· The circumstances under which delegation requests would be considered;
· The procedures for assessing, accepting, and managing such requests;
· The operational responsibilities for pre-visit and post-visit arrangements
At the time of the adoption, the implementation of this policy was supported by the role of International Engagement and Trade Advisor, who had dedicated responsibility for coordinating delegation logistics, intergovernmental liaison, and strategic follow up.
This position has since been discontinued and there is no staffing capacity to support the requests for hosting international delegations. In the absence of dedicated resources and with no immediate plan to reinstate this function, the policy is no longer operationally viable and has become obsolete.
Accordingly, it is appropriate that Council revokes the Visiting International Delegations Policy
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications relating to this recommendation.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
Facilitate economic development. Facilitate the development of new tourism based on local attractions, culture and creative industries. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
Promote community harmony and address discrimination. |
Civic Leadership |
Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision-making processes. |
|
Legislative |
There are no legislative considerations relating to this report. |
|
Risk |
There is no risk associated with this report. |
ATTACHMENTS
|
PD 01 |
Revocation of the Visiting International Delegations Policy |
|
Attachment 1 |
Visiting International Delegations Policy |

Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Planning & Design Report
|
PD 02 |
Public Art Policy - Proposed Amendments |
|
Strategic Objective |
Visionary, Leading, Responsible Place customer satisfaction, innovation and best practice at the centre of all operations |
|
File Ref |
172677.2025 |
|
Report By |
Clare Cochrane - Public Arts Officer |
|
Approved By |
Lina Kakish - Director Planning & Design |
Executive Summary
The Public Arts Policy (“the Policy”), adopted by Council in July 2020, provides the framework for how Liverpool City Council (“Council”) supports, encourages, promotes, guides and assists with the planning, development and implementation of public art across the Liverpool Local Government Area (LGA). A copy of Council’s current Policy is provided in Attachment 1.
Council is required to periodically review and update our endorsed Policies to ensure they remain fit-for-purpose, reflect industry best practice and evolve to align with changes in legislation, policies, strategies and Ministerial Directions.
Although the current Policy has successfully promoted the greater provision of public art across the Liverpool LGA, the lack of clarity on which developments should include public art and if so to what extent, is a significant gap in the Policy and an ongoing operational challenge for both Council and the development industry.
To address this challenge and identify opportunities for further improvement, City Planning has undertaken a review of Council’s current Public Arts Policy. The review included a benchmarking of public art-related policies, strategies and guidelines from other NSW Councils and an analysis of recent public art projects delivered across the Liverpool LGA by the private sector (see Attachment 2).
Furthermore, the review also considered the public art requirements already in force for new development across the Aerotropolis Precinct via the Western Sydney Aerotropolis Development Control Plan 2022 (“Aerotropolis DCP”).
From the review, the following amendments are proposed for the Public Arts Policy:
1. Inclusion of thresholds to provide clarity on which types of development require the provision of public art and to what scale – this would effectively align the Policy with the public art requirements already in force across the Aerotropolis Precinct via the Aerotropolis DCP;
2. Utilise public art to address the proliferation of bulk facades across the LGA; and
3. Ensure local artists and creative industries are engaged to participate in public art projects proposed within the Liverpool LGA.
A clean version of the amended Public Arts Policy is provided in Attachment 3, with a marked-up version provided in Attachment 4. Further detail on the proposed amendments, and associated justification for the changes, is provided in Attachment 5.
The proposed amendments will ensure Council provides consistent guidance in relation to public art thresholds and triggers across the LGA, provides clarity for the development sector and community, and standardises the expectations for public art provision between the Aerotropolis Precinct and the broader LGA.
This Report seeks Council endorsement to publicly exhibit the updated Public Arts Policy for a minimum period of 28 days to seek feedback on the proposed amendments.
Following the public exhibition, Council staff will review all submissions received on the updated Policy and prepare a Post-Exhition Report for Council consideration at a future Ordinary Meeting of Council.
That Council:
1. Receives and notes this Report;
2. Endorses the draft Public Arts Policy (Attachment 3) for public exhibition;
3. Publicly exhibits the draft Public Arts Policy for a minimum period of 28 days;
4. Receives a Post-Exhibition Report detailing the outcomes of the public exhibition period; and
5. Delegates to the CEO (or delegate) authority to amend the Public Arts Policy for any typographical and minor amendments as required.
REPORT
Background
The Public Arts Policy, adopted by Council in July 2020, provides the framework for how Council supports, encourages, promotes, guides and assists with the planning, development and implementation of public art across the Liverpool Local Government Area (LGA). A copy of Council’s current Public Arts Policy is provided in Attachment 1.
Since the adoption of the Public Arts Policy in 2020, the LGA has seen a significant increase in the provision of art in the public domain through private sector development projects. A snapshot of successful privately-initiated projects is provided in Attachment 2.
Although Council’s current Public Arts Policy has successfully promoted the greater provision of public art across the Liverpool LGA, the lack of clarity on which developments should include public art and if so to what extent, is a significant gap in the Policy and an ongoing operational challenge for both Council and the development industry.
Western Sydney Aerotropolis Development Control Plan
In November 2022, the Western Sydney Aerotropolis Development Control Plan (“Aerotropolis DCP”) was introduced. The Aerotropolis DCP provides the planning, design and environmental objectives and controls which will inform the preparation and assessment of Development Applications and Masterplans across the Aerotropolis Precinct (see Figure 1).
Section 2.19 of the Aerotropolis DCP provides guidance on the provision of public art across the Precinct and is applicable to development proposals greater than 20 hectares or with a Capital Investment Value (CIV) exceeding $20 Million (M).
Section 2.19 – which supplements Council’s current Public Arts Policy – requires all development proposals exceeding these thresholds must include:
a minimum of 1 work of public art is provided within the publicly available and accessible spaces of the development such as:
a. Any frontage to the public domain;
b. Building entrances; or
c. Arcades and through site links
The introduction of the Aerotropolis DCP and its specific threshold requirements for public art for private development across the Aerotropolis Precinct has created inconsistency in the art outcome for development proposed within and outside the Aerotropolis. Although Council’s current Public Arts Policy encourages the provision of art in the public domain, the lack of specific thresholds for new development – unlike the Aerotropolis DCP – means the outcomes are often inconsistent and open to interpretation.
Figure 1 – Land to which the Aerotropolis DCP applies

Policy Benchmarking
As part of the Policy update, a review was also undertaken of public art-related policies, strategies and guidelines currently in use by other NSW Councils to benchmark opportunities for improvement, particularly in the thresholds requiring the provision of public art for private development.
A summary of the benchmarking exercise is presented in Table 1.
Table 1 – Summary of public art thresholds for other NSW Councils
|
Agency |
Document |
Threshold |
% of CIV* |
|
Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure |
Western Sydney Aerotropolis Development Control Plan 2022 |
> $20M or 20ha |
N/A |
|
Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure |
Draft Leppington Town Centre DCP |
> $5M or excess of 5,000m2 |
1.5% |
|
Randwick City Council |
Public Art Strategy |
|
1% |
|
Georges River Council |
Public Art Guidelines for Developers |
> $5M |
1% |
|
Burwood Council |
Public Art Guidelines for Developers |
> $10M |
1% |
|
Lismore City Council |
Public Art Policy |
> $2M |
1% |
|
City of Sydney |
Guidelines for Public Art in Private Developments |
> $10M |
1% |
|
City of Ryde |
Public Art Planning Guide for Developers Development Control Plans |
|
1% |
|
Waverley Council |
Public Art Policy |
> $10M |
1% |
|
Central Coast Council |
Development Control Plan 2022 |
> $2M |
0.75% |
|
Byron Shire Council |
Public Art Strategy Development Control Plan 2014 |
> $2M Every additional million |
2.5% 1% |
* Capital Investment Value (CIV)
Of the 11 benchmarked examples, the development threshold necessitating the provision of public art for private development ranged from $2M (Byron Shire, Central Coast, Lismore) up to $20M (Aerotropolis Precinct).
Of the 10 benchmarked examples specifying a financial contribution towards public art as a percentage of the Capital Investment Value (CIV) of the private development, the majority of examples applied a rate of 1% of CIV while the percentages ranged from 0.75% (Central Coast) up to 2.5% (Byron Shire).
Proposed Policy Amendments
Council is required to periodically review and update our endorsed Policies to ensure they remain fit-for-purpose, reflect industry best practice and evolve to align with changes in legislation, policies, strategies and Ministerial Directions.
Although the current Policy has successfully promoted the greater provision of public art across the Liverpool LGA, the lack of clarity on which developments should include public art and if so to what extent, is a significant gap in the Policy and an ongoing operational challenge for both Council and the development industry.
Following the benchmarking exercise and review of relevant legislation including the Aerotropolis DCP, the following amendments are proposed for the Public Arts Policy:
1. Inclusion of thresholds to provide clarity on which types of development require the provision of public art and to what scale – this would effectively align the Policy with the public art requirements already in force across the Aerotropolis Precinct via the Aerotropolis DCP;
2. Utilise public art to address the proliferation of bulk facades across the LGA; and
3. Ensure local artists and creative industries are engaged to participate in public art projects proposed within the Liverpool LGA.
A summary of the key proposed amendments is unpacked further below, while the full list of proposed amendments and associated rationale is provided in Attachment 5. A clean version of the amended Public Arts Policy is provided in Attachment 3, with a marked-up version provided in Attachment 4.
Amendment 1 – Inclusion of Thresholds for Public Art Provision
As noted previously, the introduction of the Western Sydney Aerotropolis Development Control Plan (“Aerotropolis DCP”) in November 2022 necessitated the provision of public art across the Aerotropolis Precinct (see Figure 1) for all development proposals greater than 20 hectares or with a CIV exceeding $20M. This scenario has created differing approaches to the provision of public art within the Aerotropolis and the remainder of the LGA.
Similarly, the benchmarking exercise (see Table 1) has identified viable approaches adopted by other NSW Councils to ensure the provision of public art for private development is both clear and robust for Council, the development sector and the community.
To address this ambiguity, it is proposed to update the Policy to expand the threshold stipulated in the Aerotropolis DCP to the entire LGA (i.e. public art is to be provided for all development proposals greater than 20 hectares or with a CIV exceeding $20M).
In addition, it is also proposed to adopt a conservative sliding scale approach to the CIV percentage that will provide clarity to the development industry on the total cost ($) of public art to be provided for a specific development proposal.
These amendments would not only deliver consistency on which private developments require the provision of public art across the LGA, it would also provide clarity on the quantum of public art required per development. A summary of the proposed thresholds is provided in Table 2.
It should be noted that the contribution towards public art provision calculated from Table 2 would be the minimum contribution for each development i.e. a Proponent could deliver public art greater than the proposed minimum.
Table 2 – Proposed Thresholds for Public Art Provision
|
Minimum % of CIV* |
|
|
> 20ha and CIV between $10M and $20M |
0.5% |
|
CIV > $20M and up to $50M |
0.75 % |
|
CIV > $50M and up to $200M |
1.0 % |
|
CIV > $200M |
1.5% |
* Capital Investment Value (CIV)
Table 3 below provides worked examples of how the proposed thresholds would apply to private development across the Liverpool LGA.
Table 3 – Worked Examples of Threshold Application
|
Development Threshold |
% of CIV |
CIV ($M) |
Minimum Financial Contribution for Public Art |
|
> 20ha and CIV between $10M and $20M |
0.5% |
$11M |
$55,000 |
|
$19M |
$95,000 |
||
|
CIV > $20M and up to $50M |
0.75% |
$21M |
$157,500 |
|
$49M |
$367,500 |
||
|
CIV > $50M and up to $200M |
1% |
$51M |
$510,000 |
|
$190M |
$1,900,000 |
||
|
CIV > $200M |
1.5% |
$201M |
$3,015,000 |
|
$350M |
$5,250,000 |
Amendment 2 – Addressing Bulk Facades
The proliferation of high-bay warehousing and other major developments within the LGA has significantly increased the bulk and scale of blank facades visible from the public domain. Public art ameliorates the negative visual impacts of such developments for static and transient audiences within the public domain.
The updated Policy will provide alternative opportunities to address large areas of blank or poorly articulated walls which negatively impact the public domain. These opportunities will provide extensive economic, social and cultural benefits for the community, businesses and visitors.
Amendment 3 – Supporting Local Creative Industries
The Australian Government identifies that creative industries contributed $63.7 billion to the Australian economy in 2022-23[3]. Creative industries generate economic goods and activities that are associated with creativity, culture and innovation. The updated Policy identifies and advocates for local artists and creative industries to leverage and participate in economic opportunities associated with public art.
Council has ensured that public art has supported and advocated for local creative industries through engagement and collaboration with local artists. The proposed amendments to the Policy will ensure Council drives creative economic and social growth cohesively across the LGA and ensures Liverpool creatives will be promoted when new public art opportunities arise.
Amendment 4 – General Housekeeping
The updated Policy will deliver standardised objectives, controls and guidance relating to public art and secure Council’s capacity to advocate for consistent outcomes in State-led planning documents that will impact areas of the LGA.
Securing consistent public art guidance across all local planning documents and panels will benefit all internal and external stakeholders.
Conclusion
Council has continued to make significant and innovative advancements in public art since the endorsement of the original Public Arts Policy. Public art has continued to be guided by the Community Strategic Plan and align with feedback from community consultation.
The updated Public Arts Policy has been developed in direct response to feedback and expectations identified through consultation with the development and creative industries, community and business. Furthermore, the updated Policy is based on extensive research, benchmarking studies and internal consultation and will ensure that the Liverpool LGA remains at the forefront of leveraging public art as an economic opportunity and legacy.
In conclusion, the proposed amendments would not only deliver consistency on which private developments require the provision of public art across the LGA, it would also provide clarity on the quantum of public art required per development. In addition, the updated Policy would also actively promote local artists and creative industries generating economic growth and employment opportunities for more Liverpool creative businesses.
Next Steps
Subject to Council endorsement, draft Public Arts Policy (Attachment 3) will be placed on public exhibition for a minimum of 28 days.
Following public exhibition, a Post-Exhibition Report detailing the outcomes of the public exhibition period, and the finalised Public Arts Policy 2025, will be prepared and referred to Council for consideration and endorsement.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications relating to this recommendation.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
Facilitate economic development. Facilitate the development of new tourism based on local attractions, culture and creative industries. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
Promote community harmony and address discrimination. |
Civic Leadership |
Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility. Facilitate the development of community leaders. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services. |
|
Legislative |
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 |
|
Risk |
The risk associated with endorsing the proposed amendments to the current Public Arts Policy is deemed to be low. Should Council not endorse the proposed amendments to the current Policy, the ongoing ambiguity for internal and external stakeholders, especially relating to thresholds and triggers for the provision of public art for private development, will continue. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. 2020 Endorsed Public Arts Policy
2. Developer Commissioned Public Art
3. 2025 Public Art Policy Clean
4. 2025 Public Art Policy Track Changes
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Planning & Design Report
|
PD 03 |
New Liverpool LEP Gateway Determination - Next Steps |
|
Strategic Objective |
Liveable, Sustainable, Resilient Deliver effective and efficient planning and high-quality design to provide best outcomes for a growing city |
|
File Ref |
222098.2025 |
|
Report By |
Brianna Van Zyl - Executive Planner |
|
Approved By |
Lina Kakish - Director Planning & Design |
Executive Summary
On 29 May 2024, Council endorsed a Principal Planning Proposal (“Planning Proposal”) which seeks to establish a new Local Environmental Plan (LEP) for Liverpool. The Planning Proposal was subsequently forwarded to the NSW Government for Gateway Assessment in August 2024.
On 22 April 2025, Council received a Gateway Determination (Attachment 1) from the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI). The Gateway Determination included a number of conditions that must be addressed for the Planning Proposal to continue progressing.
The Gateway Determination did not support several key aspects of the Planning Proposal, including the following changes:
· The proposed downzoning of residential land from R4 High Density Residential to R3 Medium / R2 Low Density Residential where interface issues have been identified, or where land is far from a centre;
· The proposed downzoning of residential land from R3 Medium Density Residential to R2 Low Density Residential where areas have recently been developed and reflect a low-density character; and
· The reduced height and floor space ratios proposed for commercial-zoned land.
These changes were put forward having regard to local character, as well as the available services and public transport provision in these areas. The proposed changes have also been underpinned by over two years of strategically informed land use planning and community engagement.
Despite having these considerations, the new LEP as proposed by Council is still effective in seeing latent housing capacity increase from 31,825 new residential dwellings to approximately 41,250 new residential dwellings – an increase of nearly 9,500 new homes.
In light of the Gateway Determination received, a breakdown of the available pathways to progress the Planning Proposal include:
· Option 1: Proceed with Gateway Determination
· Option 2: Lodge a Gateway Review
· Option 3: Spilt the Planning Proposal to progress the changes unimpacted by the Gateway conditions in Stage 1, and residential and commercial changes in Stage 2.
The three options are detailed in the body of this report. Option 1 provides the most straightforward and time efficient approach, however, will undermine some of the extensive work undertaken to inform the Planning Proposal. It will also mean growth is delivered in areas that are missing the essential services and infrastructure needed to support this density.
This scenario is not beneficial for our community, particularly after the NSW Government’s Low and Mid-Rise Housing Reforms have come into force to permit Dual Occupancies in the R2 Low Density Residential zone in 2024. This reform further increased housing capacity within the Liverpool LGA, and well beyond the additional capacity estimated for the new LEP.
Whilst there is an opportunity to seek a review of the Gateway Determination (being Option 2), given the current push for housing at all costs by the NSW Government, this is likely to be an unrewarding pursuit of Council resources.
Rather, progressing Option 3 and splitting the Planning Proposal into two separate stages will allow beneficial LEP changes to progress, whilst still protecting the current urban fabric of our suburbs in the interim.
This approach will enable long overdue amendments to our planning controls to proceed without further delays. For instance, changes that seek to encourage industrial development amidst a shortage of urban services, as well as strengthening the environmental considerations in our LEP through new clauses for urban heat and water sensitive urban design.
The residential land changes and commercial can subsequently be dealt with in a second stage when additional justification can be prepared. This will also provide Council the opportunity to reconsider these amendments in light of the NSW Government’s assessment, but also the additional housing capacity created under the Low and Mid-Rise Housing Reforms.
Therefore, Council staff are recommending the progression of the Principal Planning Proposal for the new Liverpool Local Environmental Plan through two separate stages (Option 3).
That Council:
1. Notes the Gateway Determination issued by the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) found at Attachment 1; and
2. Endorses the progression of the Principal Planning Proposal for the new Liverpool Local Environmental Plan through two separate stages, comprising of:
a) Stage 1 which will broadly progress changes to industrial, infrastructure, environmental and recreational zoned land, as well as other relevant miscellaneous changes / identified errors. Stage 1 will also include Build-to-Rent and additional bonus provisions in the Liverpool City Centre, Gateway Sites and Schedule 1 Clause 9 changes; and
b) Stage 2 which will progress other residential and commercial land changes.
REPORT
Background
At the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 2 February 2022, Council endorsed the ‘100-Day Plan’ which included the following commitments:
· “Start the process to create a new Liverpool LEP as a matter of urgency”; and
· “Prepare a Planning Proposal to lower the height of buildings development standards in the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 down to 12 metres in Carnes Hill, Casula, Cecil Hills, Chipping Norton, Green Valley, Hammondville, Prestons and Wattle Grove”.
To address these two points, Strategic Planning commenced a review of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008, with the intent of preparing a Planning Proposal to create a brand new Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LEP).
The preparation of the Planning Proposal was informed by numerous councillor workshops and extensive preliminary consultation with the community, NSW State Agencies, and the development industry. Additional investigations including design and feasibility testing were also undertaken to support the new LEP.
At the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 29 May 2024, Council resolved to endorse the draft Principal Planning Proposal for the new LEP – with some minor changes – and to submit it to the NSW Government for a Gateway Determination (Attachment 1). A copy of Report and Council Resolution is provided in Attachment 2.
In August 2024, the Planning Proposal was subsequently forwarded to the NSW Government for a Gateway Determination.
The Planning Proposal
The overarching objectives of this Planning Proposal are to:
1. Establish a new Liverpool Local Environmental Plan, to align with the strategic vision of the Western City District Plan and the Liverpool Local Strategic Planning Statement (LSPS);
2. Implement the endorsed Liverpool Land Use Strategy actions (e.g. Liverpool Housing Strategy); and
3. Repeal the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008.
In summary, the Planning Proposal applies revised land use zones, development standards (e.g. maximum height of buildings) and local clause provisions relating to residential, commercial, industrial, recreational and environmental land across the LEP application area. The LEP application area primarily covers the established suburbs and far western rural areas of the Liverpool Local Government Area (LGA).
Residential Land
In relation to residential land, the changes included in the Planning Proposal for the new LEP have been guided by the following Council-endorsed Planning Principles:
· Encourage high density residential development around the City Centre, Town Centres and transport corridors;
· Facilitate appropriate transition from R4 High Density to R3 Medium Density Residential;
· Promote high quality medium density residential development near centres;
· Incentivise Medium Density housing to create housing diversity; and
· Protect suburban character of low density area.
In light of the above Principles, the Planning Proposal implements a strong focus on addressing the current housing crisis, however, in a balanced manner that facilitates density in locations that are adequately serviced by infrastructure.
Resultingly, the new LEP as proposed by Council would see latent housing capacity increase in Liverpool from 31,825 new residential dwellings to approximately 41,250 new residential dwellings, which is an increase of nearly 9,500 new homes.
Gateway Determination
On 22 April 2025, Council received a Gateway Determination (Attachment 2) from the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI). The Gateway Determination included a number of conditions that must be addressed for the Planning Proposal to continue progressing.
Significantly, the Gateway Determination did not support several key aspects of the Planning Proposal, including the proposed downzoning of certain residential and commercial areas.
More specifically, this includes:
· The downzoning of residential land from R4 High Density Residential to R3 Medium Density Residential where interface issues have been identified (i.e. parts of Liverpool, Casula, Green Valley, Cartwright and Lurnea);
· The downzoning of residential land from R4 High Density Residential to R2 Low / R3 Medium Density Residential where land is far from a centre and associated supporting infrastructure (i.e. parts of Chipping Norton, Ashcroft and Hinchinbrook);
· The reduced Height of Building (12m) and Floor Space Ratio (0.9:1) proposed for parts of Moorebank, Casula, Green Valley, Ashcroft and Cartwright zoned R4 High Density Residential. This was proposed to help address local character and ensure appropriate transitions down to existing development;
· The downzoning of residential land from R3 Medium Density Residential to R2 Low Density Residential where areas have recently been developed and reflect a low-density character (i.e. parts of Moorebank, Carnes Hill, Wattle Grove, Prestons and Cecil Hills);
· The reduced Height of Building and Floor Space Ration controls proposed for commercial-zoned land has not been supported;
Options for Next Steps
A breakdown of the available pathways to progress the Planning Proposal are detailed in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Options to Progress Planning Proposal
|
Option 1: Proceed with Gateway Determination |
Option 2: Lodge a Gateway Review |
Option 3: Split the Planning Proposal |
|
Progress with the Planning Proposal and comply with all the conditions of the Gateway Determination. |
Lodge a Gateway Review formally with the DPHI, seeking to remove the conditions considered to be inappropriate. |
Split the Planning Proposal & progress the changes unimpacted by the Gateway conditions in Stage 1, and residential changes in Stage 2. |
|
· Most time efficient option · Does not reflect a balanced approach as the new LEP will only seek to maximise density without consideration of infrastructure provision and character · Together with recent significant changes to our planning controls (under the Low & Mid Rise Housing Reforms) will have poor implications on urban fabric. |
· Will require additional resourcing & reporting to the DPHI · Likely to result in further delays for the entire project · No appetite currently from NSW Government for any reductions in residential density |
· Stage 1 which will broadly progress changes to industrial, infrastructure, environmental and recreational zoned land, as well as other relevant miscellaneous changes / identified errors. This approach will enable public exhibition to occur for long overdue amendments to our planning controls to proceed without further delays. · However, will require additional resourcing and potentially costs if additional reports are needed for Stage 2. · Provides opportunity for Stage 2 changes to be further worked on and justified and put forward at a time when the DPHI may be more palatable to them. |
Option 1 provides the most straightforward and time efficient approach, however, will undermine some of the extensive work undertaken to inform the Planning Proposal, including the guiding Principles endorsed by Council.
Amending the Planning Proposal to comply with the Gateway Determination as it currently stands will also mean growth is delivered in areas that are missing the essential services and infrastructure needed to support this density.
This scenario is not beneficial for our community, particularly after the NSW Government’s Low and Mid-Rise Housing Reforms have come into force to permit Dual Occupancies in the R2 Low Density Residential zone in 2024. This reform further increased housing capacity within the Liverpool LGA, and well beyond the additional capacity estimated for the new LEP.
Whilst there is an opportunity to seek a review of the Gateway Determination (being Option 2), given the current push for housing at all costs by the NSW Government, this is likely to be an unrewarding pursuit of Council resources.
Rather, progressing Option 3 and splitting the Planning Proposal into two separate stages will allow beneficial LEP changes to progress, whilst still protecting the current urban fabric of our suburbs in the interim.
This approach will enable long overdue amendments to our planning controls to proceed without further delays. For instance, changes that seek to encourage industrial development amidst a shortage of urban services, as well as strengthening the environmental considerations in our LEP through new clauses that address matters like urban heat and water sensitive urban design.
The residential land changes and commercial can subsequently be dealt with in a second stage when additional justification can be prepared to support the amendments. This will also provide Council the opportunity to reconsider these amendments in light of the NSW Government’s assessment, but also the additional housing capacity created under the Low and Mid-Rise Housing Reforms. Option 3 may require additional resourcing to complete stage 2, however a project plan would be prepared and subject to a further Council Report.
Therefore, Council staff are recommending the progression of the Principal Planning Proposal for the new Liverpool Local Environmental Plan through two separate stages.
Stage 1 which will broadly progress changes to industrial, infrastructure, environmental and recreational zoned land, as well as other relevant miscellaneous changes / identified errors. Stage 1 will also include Build-to-Rent and additional bonus provisions in the Liverpool City Centre, Gateway Sites and Schedule 1 Clause 9 changes; and
Stage 2 which will progress other residential and commercial land changes.
Conclusion
It is recommended that Council select Option 3 which is to split the Planning Proposal into two stages.
Ultimately, this will mean changes that are unimpacted by the condition Gateway Determination can progress in accordance with the timeframes issued by the DPHI, whilst additional work is undertaken to support the changes not supported by the DPHI.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications relating to this recommendation at this stage.
Once a Project Plan is developed for Stage 2 however, additional costs may be needed for additional reports, if deemed necessary. Should this be the case however, a further report will be tabled at a future Council meeting for funding.
Council has an allocated budget for the LEP & DCP Review which has been included in Council’s budget for the current year and long-term financial plan.
|
201594 – LEP & DCP Review |
2025/2026 Remaining |
|
Total |
$150,547 |
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
Further develop a commercial Centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities. Facilitate economic development. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people. |
Civic Leadership |
Act as an environmental leader in the community. |
|
Legislative |
Division 3.2 and 3.4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. |
|
Risk |
The risk is deemed to be Medium. The new Liverpool Local Environmental Plan will lead to implications for landowners in the LGA (where land use zone, development standards and/or mapping varies from the LLEP 2008). However, extensive community engagement has already occurred, and further engagement will continue to occur as part of the Planning Proposal process. If Council progress the Planning Proposal in accordance with the Gateway Determination, it would undermine the strategic work completed to date and result in growth in areas that are devoid of essential infrastructure. Further a Gateway Review may result in additional information and resourcing to be provided to DPHI. This will likely result in further delays for the entire project. Given the current push for housing, it is unlikely to be supported by the independent panel. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Attachment 1 - Gateway Determination (Under separate cover)
2. Attachment 2 - Council Report and Resolution - 29 May 2024 (Under separate cover)
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Planning & Design Report
|
PD 04 |
Revocation of City Activation Strategy |
|
Strategic Objective |
Visionary, Leading, Responsible Position Council as an industry leader that plans and delivers services for a growing city |
|
File Ref |
194136.2025 |
|
Report By |
Julie Scott - Manager City Economy |
|
Approved By |
Lina Kakish - Director Planning & Design |
Executive Summary
The City Activation Strategy 2019–2024 provided a framework for revitalising Liverpool’s City Centre. Through targeted placemaking, cultural programming, infrastructure upgrades, and coordinated partnerships, the strategy aimed to create a lively and inclusive urban environment that supports economic growth, enhances civic pride, and responds to the evolving needs of the community.
Recommendations and actions from the City Activation Strategy will be rolled into the Visitor Economy Strategy.
That Council revokes the City Activation Strategy, noting that relevant recommendations and actions will be included in the draft Visitor Economy Strategy.
REPORT
The City Activation Strategy 2019–2024 was developed by Liverpool City Council, in collaboration with Stafford Strategy, to guide the transformation of Liverpool’s City Centre into a vibrant, economically dynamic and well-integrated precinct. The Strategy aimed to attract private investment and encourage greater engagement with the City Centre by residents, businesses, students, workers, and visitors.
The strategy outlined a series of short, medium, and long-term initiatives to activate public spaces, enhance the night-time economy, and build a strong foundation for social and economic growth. Key recommendations of the strategy included:
· Fostering an 18-hour walkable city to boost investment and community engagement
· Developing and expanding Liverpool’s night-time economy
· Activating underutilised public spaces, particularly for youth and student engagement
· Balancing activation across the City Centre, especially in the southern precinct
· Delivering major infrastructure projects such as a convention centre and river promenade
· Establishing strong partnerships and stakeholder collaboration frameworks
· Implementing a coordinated calendar of public events and activations
· Leveraging Liverpool’s cultural and heritage assets for activation
· Aligning planning policies and public space design with activation goals
Recommendations and actions from the strategy will be incorporated into the Visitor Economy Strategy (VES).
The Visitor Economy Strategy (formerly the Destination Management Plan) will be a five-year strategy that details Council’s priorities for the development of the visitor economy in Liverpool. The draft vision is to position Liverpool as a vibrant and inclusive global city. The strategy aims to establish Liverpool as a sustainable and globally recognised destination through increased visitation, stronger identity, improved infrastructure, and industry collaboration. Key pillars of the VES focus on:
· Marketing what makes Liverpool unique
· Vibrant and activated precincts that are safe and engaging
· An 18-hour economy
· Celebrating Liverpool’s rich history and diversity through events and cultural assets
· Enabling tourism growth through investment and development, and;
· Fostering industry cohesion and collaboration
The draft VES will go to the next Tourism and CBD Committee for review. Following Committee review, the VES will go on Public Exhibition and to the September Council meeting.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications relating to this recommendation.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
|
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
|
Legislative |
There are no legislative considerations relating to this report. |
|
Risk |
There is no risk associated with this report. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. City Activation Strategy 2019-2024 (Under separate cover)
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Community & Lifestyle Report
|
COM 01 |
Policy Review - Code of Meeting Practice Policy |
|
Strategic Objective |
Visionary, Leading, Responsible Demonstrate a high standard of transparency and accountability through a comprehensive governance framework |
|
File Ref |
196296.2025 |
|
Report By |
M'Leigh Brunetta - Manager Civic & Executive Services |
|
Approved By |
Tina Bono - Director Community & Lifestyle |
Executive Summary
Under the Local Government Act 1993 (LGA), Councils are required to adopt a Code of Meeting Practice within 12 months of a local government election. Prior to adoption, a draft of the proposed Code must be publicly exhibited for a minimum period of 28 days.
At the 16 October 2024 Council Meeting, Council initiated a review of the Code of Meeting Practice Policy and report back to Council as a priority. An internal and external review of the Code of Meeting Practice was subsequently conducted.
Recommended amendments to the draft Code of Meeting Practice were tabled at the Governance Meeting 13 November 2024.
In addition, the report Policy Review - Code of Meeting Practice was tabled at the 26 November 2024 Council meeting COM07 (deferred), 10 December 2024 Council meeting COM04 (deferred) and Governance Meeting 26 January 2025. Consultation continued with Council throughout this period.
At its meeting held on 21 May 2025, Council resolved (COM 02) to place the draft Code of Meeting Practice on public exhibition for 28 days, incorporating amendments from a previous resolution made at the 26 February 2025 Council meeting (COM 05), specifically Item 9 (3.1), which proposed set meeting dates and times:
“Council meetings to commence at 6:00pm on the last Wednesday of February through to November. Council is also to meet on the first Wednesday of every February at 6.00pm. The Council meeting in December is to occur on the second Wednesday at 6.00pm. The Council meetings are to occur at Liverpool Council Chamber at 50 Scott Street, Liverpool.”
Councillors were advised that, if adopted as drafted, the proposed clause would remove any flexibility to vary meeting dates outside those listed in the Code (excluding extraordinary meetings).
Extensive consultation has been undertaken throughout the development of the draft Policy, including engagement with Councillors, relevant stakeholders, and external legal advisors. All feedback and supporting documentation have been transparently provided to ensure compliance, clarity, and accuracy in the final policy presented for adoption.
That Council endorse the Code of Meeting Practice Policy.
REPORT
The Model Code of Meeting Practice (Model Code), developed by the Office of Local Government (OLG), establishes a standardised set of meeting rules for councils across New South Wales to ensure that meetings are accessible, orderly, effective, and efficient. The Model Code applies to all meetings of the Council, including committees comprised solely of Councillors.
Under the Local Government Act, Councils are required to adopt a Code of Meeting Practice within 12 months of a local government election. Prior to adoption, a draft of the proposed Code must be publicly exhibited for a minimum period of 28 days.
At the 16 October 2024 Council Meeting, Council initiated to complete a review of the Code of Meeting Practice Policy and report back to Council as a priority. An internal and external review of the Code of Meeting Practice was subsequently conducted.
Recommended amendments to the draft Code of Meeting Practice were tabled at the Governance Meeting 13 November 2024.
In addition, the report Policy Review - Code of Meeting Practice was tabled at the 26 November 2024 Council meeting COM07 (deferred), 10 December 2024 Council meeting COM04 (deferred) and Governance Meeting 26 January 2025. Consultation continued with Council throughout this period.
At its meeting held on 21 May 2025, Council resolved (COM 02) to place the draft Code of Meeting Practice on public exhibition for 28 days, incorporating amendments from a previous resolution made at the 26 February 2025 Council meeting (COM 05), specifically Item 9 (3.1), which proposed set meeting dates and times:
“Council meetings to commence at 6:00pm on the last Wednesday of February through to November. Council is also to meet on the first Wednesday of every February at 6.00pm. The Council meeting in December is to occur on the second Wednesday at 6.00pm. The Council meetings are to occur at Liverpool Council Chamber at 50 Scott Street, Liverpool.”
Councillors were advised that, if adopted as drafted, the proposed clause would remove any flexibility to vary meeting dates outside those listed in the Code (excluding extraordinary meetings).
Extensive consultation has been undertaken throughout the development of the draft Policy, including engagement with Councillors, relevant stakeholders, and external legal advisors. All feedback and supporting documentation have been transparently provided to ensure compliance, clarity, and accuracy in the final policy presented for adoption.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications relating to this recommendation.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
Raise awareness in the community of the available services and facilities. Promote community harmony and address discrimination. |
Civic Leadership |
Facilitate the development of community leaders. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision-making processes. Deliver services that are customer focused. Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
|
Legislative |
Local Government Act 1993 (LGA), sections 360 - 364 Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 (LGGR), clause 182 and 232 Model Code of Meeting Practice for Local Councils in NSW, published in the Gazette on 29 October 2021 The NSW Government has prescribed a model code of meeting practice pursuant to section 360 of the LGA and section 232 of the LGGR. Council is required to adopt a code of meeting practice that incorporates the mandatory provisions of the model code (LGA, section 360(3)). Council must adopt the code of meeting practice within 12 months after an ordinary election of councillors. The code of meeting practice may incorporate non-mandatory provisions and other provisions. The code of meeting practice must not be inconsistent with the mandatory provisions of the model code (LGA, section 360(4)). Council must conduct its meetings in accordance with the code of meeting practice, as must committees of which all the members are councillors (LGA, section 360(5)). Before adopting a code of meeting practice, Council must prepare a draft code and place it on public exhibition (LGA, section 361). Council must consider submissions received and may amend the non-mandatory provisions of the draft code or adopt the code (LGA, section 362). Council may amend its code by adopting a code, in which case the requirements of public exhibition apply (LGA, section 363). |
|
Risk |
The risk is deemed to be low. |
ATTACHMENTS
|
COM 01 |
Policy Review - Code of Meeting Practice Policy |
|
Attachment 1 |
Draft Code Meeting Practice - V2 |

Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Community & Lifestyle Report
|
COM 02 |
Council Grants Donations and Sponsorship Report |
|
Strategic Objective |
Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging Promote a harmonious community that celebrates its diversity |
|
File Ref |
203887.2025 |
|
Report By |
Javeria Hoda - Community Development Worker Funding & Support |
|
Approved By |
Tina Bono - Director Community & Lifestyle |
Council is committed to building strong and resilient communities in the Liverpool Local Government Area (LGA) and maximising social wellbeing. Council helps achieve these goals by providing financial support through grants and sponsorships to develop leadership skills, increase participation in community activities and address identified social issues.
This report provides a recommendation for endorsement of funding totalling $65,000 from the Community Grants, Community Sponsorship and Matching Grants program.
That Council:
1. Endorses the funding recommendation of $15,000 (GST exclusive) under the Matching Grant Program for the following project:
|
Applicant |
Project |
Recommended |
|
UNSW Founders |
Digital Makers |
$15,000 |
2. Endorses the funding recommendation of $20,000 (GST exclusive) under the Community Grant Program for the following projects:
|
Applicant |
Project |
Recommended |
|
The Business Concierge LTD |
Survivor Life Skills |
$10,000 |
|
Miracle Babies Foundation |
NICU Survival Packs for families of premature and sick babies |
$10,000 |
3. Endorses the funding recommendation of $30,000 (GST exclusive) under the Community Sponsorship Program for the following project
|
Applicant |
Project |
Recommended |
|
Vedic Festival Incorporated |
Festival of Chariots 2025 |
$10,000 |
|
Friends Of India Australia Incorporated |
Ganeshotsava 2025 |
$10,000 |
|
Thomas Hassall Anglican College |
South West Festival 2025 |
$10,000 |
REPORT
Matching Grants Program
The Matching Grants Program received one application which met the eligibility criteria and is recommended for funding as follows:
|
Applicant |
UNSW Founders |
||
|
Project |
Digital Makers |
||
|
Amount Requested |
$15,000 |
Total Project Cost |
$36,257 |
|
Location |
Civic Place Council Chambers 50 Scott St, Liverpool NSW 2170 |
Date |
June – August 2025 |
|
About the Applicant
|
UNSW Founders is a leading entrepreneurial program that expanded to Liverpool in 2024, engaging over 550 local residents in digital literacy, career development, and entrepreneurship. Their community-driven, family-friendly approach—highlighted through the successful Digital Makers program and diverse participation—continues to empower Liverpool’s youth, families, and professionals. |
||
|
Description |
Objective: Outcomes: · Improved digital literacy and inclusion, especially youth, women, and culturally diverse group. Participants will gain essential digital and entrepreneurial skills, closing gaps in access to technology and innovation; · Enhanced workforce readiness and career pathways, as the program will equip individuals with practical experience in digital tools, AI, website/app development, and e-commerce, boosting their job readiness and supporting career transitions; and · Stronger local innovation and business ecosystem for Liverpool, by guiding participants from idea to prototype, the program will cultivate an entrepreneurial culture in Liverpool, empowering startups and small businesses to adopt tech-based solutions and grow sustainably. |
||
|
Funding Allocation |
Grant funding of $15,000 in matching funds will be allocated as follows: · $3,920 towards program facilitators · $5,880 towards project design for Liverpool · $1,190 towards marketing and program promotion · $5,230 towards catering for 9 workshop sessions |
||
|
Beneficiaries |
· 400 residents, including youth and teenagers, multicultural groups, women, and broader job-seeking and entrepreneurial network in Liverpool. |
||
|
Assessment |
Recommended Funding - $15,000 The project aligns with the Community Strategic Plan Objective 1 - Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging, Objective 3 - Evolving, Prosperous, Innovative, Objective 4 - Visionary, Leading, Responsible, and meets the Sustainable Environment funding priority Waste Minimisation, Sustainable Water Use, Environmental Improvement, Sustainable Living. Expected Matching Grants program outcomes 7.6.2 a), b), c), and d). |
||
Community Grants Program
The Community Grants
Program received two applications which met the eligibility criteria and are
recommended for funding as follows:
|
Applicant |
The Business Concierge LTD |
||
|
Project |
Survivor Life Skills |
||
|
Amount Requested |
$10,000 |
Total Project Cost |
$10,000 |
|
Location |
Liverpool LGA Schools |
Date |
Aug 2025 – June 2026 |
|
About the Applicant
|
The Business Concierge Ltd. is a not-for-profit organisation that provides courses and training programs to high school students around financial literacy, stress and mental health, employment, and other life skills. The organisation offers up to 60 subjects designed to meet the needs of students. |
||
|
Description |
Objectives: The Survivor Life Skills project aims to deliver a self-development course that equips students with lifelong skills. Students will gain knowledge in making informed and educated decisions in areas of finance, employment and other key skills which are not available within the school curriculum. The program is beneficial to all individuals, inclusive of age, gender, race, or socio-economic status. · Improved financial literacy in students, as they learn how the Australian banking system works, including responsible use of credit and avoiding debt traps—especially relevant for newly arrived migrants and their families; · Increased employment readiness for youth, by equipping them with skills to create resumes, find part-time jobs, and succeed in job interviews, addressing youth unemployment challenges in Western Sydney; · Enhanced goal setting and personal development, as students learn to set realistic goals and create action plans, promoting long-term planning and self-confidence; and · Support for culturally diverse communities across the LGA as the program creates inclusive school environments where migrant and Australian-born youth learn and grow together, fostering integration and cultural understanding. |
||
|
Funding Allocation |
Grant funding of $10,000 will be allocated as follows: · $2104 towards program materials and student workbooks · $7,896 towards 15 days of workshop facilitation |
||
|
Beneficiaries |
· 3000 primary school and high school students across the Liverpool LGA (Ashcroft High School, Holsworthy High School, William Carey, Miller Tech High, Liverpool Boys, Liverpool Girls, All Saints Catholic College, and Miller Public School) |
||
|
Assessment |
Recommended Funding - $10,000 The project aligns with the Community Strategic Plan Objective 1 - Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging, Objective 3 - Evolving, Prosperous, Innovative, Objective 4 - Visionary, Leading, Responsible, and meets the Sustainable Environment funding priority Waste Minimisation, Sustainable Water Use, Environmental Improvement, Sustainable Living. Expected Community Grants program outcomes 7.4.1 b), c), d), e) and f). |
||
|
Applicant |
Miracle Babies Foundation |
||
|
Project |
NICU Survival Packs for families of premature and sick babies |
||
|
Amount Requested |
$10,000 |
Total Project Cost |
$11,290 |
|
Location |
Liverpool Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit |
Date |
June to September 2025 |
|
About the Applicant
|
Miracle Babies Foundation (MBF) was established in 2005 in the Liverpool community. Since then, the organisation has developed and provided services and resources to support local families with babies born prematurely or sick, both while they are in Liverpool Hospital’s NICU and once they are at home with their baby. Miracle Babies have worked in collaboration with Liverpool Hospital since its inception to achieve their vision of better, healthier outcomes for newborns and their families challenged by prematurity or sickness. |
||
|
Description |
Objective: The program aims to provide emotional support, practical tools, and essential information to families with premature or sick newborns in the NICU at Liverpool Hospital, helping them navigate their hospital journey and connect with ongoing community-based support services.
Outcome: · Improved emotional wellbeing and support for parents, focusing on mental health during a highly stressful and traumatic period, and reducing the risk of postnatal depression and emotional distress. · Increased access to information and support by providing families with essential guidance about neonatal care and connects them to ongoing community-based support services. · Enhanced parent-infant bonding and empowerment by offering tools like journals and milestone items that help parents feel more connected to their baby’s journey, fostering hope, control, and emotional resilience. |
||
|
Funding Allocation |
Grant funding of $10,000 will be allocated towards the preparation of 200 NICU Survival Packs. |
||
|
Beneficiaries |
· 200 newborn babies and families in NICU/SCN at Liverpool Hospital. · NICU families and support communities. |
||
|
Assessment |
Recommended Funding - $10,000 The project aligns with the Community Strategic Plan Objective 1 - Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging, Objective 3 - Evolving, Prosperous, Innovative, Objective 4 - Visionary, Leading, Responsible, and meets the Sustainable Environment funding priority Waste Minimisation, Sustainable Water Use, Environmental Improvement, Sustainable Living. Expected Community Grants program outcomes 7.4.1 c) and d). |
||
Community Sponsorship Program
The Community Sponsorship Grants Program received three applications which met the eligibility criteria and are recommended for funding as follows:
|
Applicant |
Vedic Festival Incorporated |
||
|
Project |
Festival of Chariots 2025 |
||
|
Amount Requested |
$10,000 |
Total Project Cost |
$40,000 |
|
Location |
Bigge Park and Liverpool CBD |
Date |
28 June 2025 |
|
About the Applicant
|
Vedic Festival Incorporated (VFI) is a not-for-profit organisation engaging the community through Indian cultural experiences. The group works closely with Liverpool’s large Indian and Fijian community and aims to promote Indian culture and art through accessible community events such as street parades and festivals. VFI also invests in programs that integrate migrants and international students to Australia and creates opportunities for groups to establish beneficial networks within the community. |
||
|
Description |
Objectives: The Festival of Chariots is a large street parade and fair that attracts many visitors to the Liverpool LGA. This multicultural event aims to celebrate traditions and culture through various activities and musical performances, encourages a vibrant cultural exchange. The event envisions to unite community members from all backgrounds to share knowledge and culture. Funding will be used to deliver the street parade through Liverpool CBD, followed by a cultural fair at Bigge Park.
· Foster an inclusive and connected community by celebrating the rich cultural diversity of Liverpool’s residents; · Enhance social wellbeing by encouraging active community participation in vibrant cultural experiences; · Support the local economy and small businesses by attracting visitors from across the region and beyond; · Increase visibility and pride in Liverpool through widespread promotion of community-led events and initiatives; and · Strengthen Liverpool’s identity as a welcoming, dynamic, and thriving place to live, work, and contribute. |
||
|
Funding Allocation |
Grant funding of $10,000 will be allocated as follows: · $9,256 towards event traffic management · $746 towards chariot decoration and preparation |
||
|
Beneficiaries |
· 4000+ CALD Community from Liverpool LGA · 2000+ visitors from the broader community and neighbouring LGA’s. |
||
|
Assessment |
Recommended Funding - $10,000 The project aligns with the Community Strategic Plan Objective 1 - Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging, Objective 3 - Evolving, Prosperous, Innovative, Objective 4 - Visionary, Leading, Responsible, and meets the Sustainable Environment funding priority Waste Minimisation, Sustainable Water Use, Environmental Improvement, Sustainable Living. Expected Community Sponsorship program outcomes 7.7.1 a), b), c), d) and e). |
||
|
Applicant |
Friends Of India Australia Incorporated |
||
|
Project |
Ganeshotsava 2025 |
||
|
Amount Requested |
$10,000 |
Total Project Cost |
$55,161 |
|
Location |
Whitlam Leisure Centre Liverpool 2170 |
Date |
30 to 31 August 2025 |
|
About the Applicant
|
Established in 1996, Friends of India Australia (FOIA) is a volunteer-run, non-profit organisation committed to supporting the Liverpool community through cultural, environmental, and social initiatives. FOIA has a long history of community service, including food relief, blood donation drives, Clean Up Australia events, and support during bushfires, floods, and the COVID-19 pandemic. The flagship event, Ganeshotsava, has been held in Liverpool for over 20 years and is one of the region’s largest cultural festivals, attracting thousands of local, interstate, and international visitors. It fosters cultural exchange, social cohesion, and economic benefit for the area. FOIA marks their 30th anniversary in 2025, with plans to deliver an outstanding event this year.
|
||
|
Description |
Objectives: The objective of Ganeshotsava 2025 is to celebrate the 30th anniversary of this long-standing cultural event by delivering an inclusive, educational, and vibrant community festival that strengthens cultural awareness, fosters social cohesion, and boosts Liverpool’s local economy. Through traditional ceremonies, youth engagement activities, artistic expression, and a special community procession through Liverpool CBD, the event aims to unite diverse communities, promote intercultural exchange, and showcase Liverpool as a thriving multicultural hub. The event also provides skill-building opportunities for local youth and generates economic benefits by sourcing goods and services from local businesses and attracting visitors to the region. Outcomes: · Foster social inclusion and cultural understanding, as the event brings together a diverse cross-section of the Liverpool community; · Empower youth and build community capacity particularly in young people that are actively engaged through event planning and practical life skills within a supportive volunteer environment; and
· Strengthen local economic and community connections by sourcing supplies, food, and accommodation locally. The event supports small businesses in Liverpool while encouraging ongoing collaboration with local service providers, volunteers, and community organisations. |
||
|
Funding Allocation |
Grant funding of $10,000 will be allocated as follows: · $5,702 towards event production (audio & lighting system) · $4,298 towards event catering (free for all attendees) |
||
|
Beneficiaries |
· 3000+ visitors Liverpool LGA and beyond. |
||
|
Assessment |
Recommended Funding - $10,000 The project aligns with the Community Strategic Plan Objective 1 - Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging, Objective 3 - Evolving, Prosperous, Innovative, Objective 4 - Visionary, Leading, Responsible, and meets the Sustainable Environment funding priority Waste Minimisation, Sustainable Water Use, Environmental Improvement, Sustainable Living. Expected Community Sponsorship program outcomes 7.7.1 a), b), c), d) and e). |
||
|
Applicant |
Thomas Hassall Anglican College |
||
|
Project |
South West Festival 2025 |
||
|
Amount Requested |
$10,000 |
Total Project Cost |
$62,646 |
|
Location |
Thomas Hassall Anglican College |
Date |
30 August 2025 |
|
About the Applicant
|
Thomas Hassall Anglican College is a co-educational Kindergarten to Year 12 school located in Middleton Grange, serving the Liverpool LGA and South West Sydney. With 1,800 students and over 200 staff, the College is committed to partnering with families to nurture each child’s academic, personal, and spiritual development. The school delivers an annual South West Festival that celebrates the region’s multicultural diversity. |
||
|
Description |
Objectives:
· Strengthened community connection and social cohesion, as the festival provides a welcoming space for people of all ages, backgrounds, and cultures to come together, build relationships, and celebrate as one community; · Support the local economy and small business growth by showcasing local makers, food vendors, and small businesses; and · Increase visitation to Liverpool LGA, highlighting the region as a social and multicultural community. |
||
|
Funding Allocation |
Grant funding of $10,000 will be allocated towards event equipment and furniture hire (tables and chairs) |
||
|
Beneficiaries |
· 18,000+ visitors from the school community, Liverpool, and neighbouring LGA’s. · Local vendors, small businesses and entrepreneurs. |
||
|
Assessment |
Recommended Funding - $10,000 The project aligns with the Community Strategic Plan Objective 1 - Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging, Objective 3 - Evolving, Prosperous, Innovative, Objective 4 - Visionary, Leading, Responsible, and meets the Sustainable Environment funding priority Waste Minimisation, Sustainable Water Use, Environmental Improvement, Sustainable Living. Expected Community Sponsorship program outcomes 7.7.1 a), b), c), d) and e). |
||
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
At the June 2025 Council Meeting, Council endorsed the 2025/26 Financial Year Budget, which included an increase of $200,000 to the Grants, Donations and Sponsorship Program. As a result, the total budget allocation for this program in 2025/26 is $677,000.
The additional funding has been allocated across the Community Sponsorship, Community Grants, and Matching Grants streams to enhance community support and engagement opportunities.
All costs associated with this recommendation have been incorporated into Council’s 2025/26 Operational Budget and Long-Term Financial Plan. A detailed breakdown of the operating budget is provided below.
|
Budget |
Balance |
Recommendation for funding in this report |
Remaining |
|
$225,000 |
$225,000 |
$30,000 |
$195,000 |
|
COMMUNITY GRANTS |
|||
|
Budget |
Balance |
Recommendation funding in this report |
Remaining |
|
$227,000 |
$227,000 |
$20,000 |
207,000 |
|
MATCHING GRANTS |
|||
|
Budget |
Balance |
Recommendation for funding in this report |
Remaining |
|
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
$15,000 |
$135,000 |
|
COMBINED FUNDING BALANCE
|
|||
|
Combined Budget |
Combined Balance
|
Total recommendation for funding for Community Sponsorship, Community Grants and Matching Grants |
Remaining |
|
$602,000 |
$602,000 |
$65,000
|
$537,000 |
|
SUSTAINABLE
ENVIRONMENT GRANTS |
|||
|
Budget |
Balance |
Recommendation for funding in this report |
Remaining |
|
$75,000 |
$75,000 |
Nil |
$75,000
|
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
The financial impacts are outlined in the report above. |
|
Environment |
Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues. |
Social |
Support community organisations, groups, and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community. |
Civic Leadership |
Foster neighborhood pride and a sense of responsibility. Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency, and ethical conduct. |
|
Legislative |
Local Government Act 1993, including sections 24 and 356. The council may by resolution contribute money or otherwise grant financial assistance to people for the purpose of exercising its functions. Council’s grant programs are targeted to ensure a lawful and consistent approach to its contributions and financial assistance. Key functions that are supported are Council’s functions of providing goods, services, and facilities, and conducting activities, appropriate to the current and future needs within the Liverpool local community and of the wider public, subject to the Local Government Act, the regulations, and any other law. |
|
Risk |
There is no risk associated with this report. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Grants, Donations and Sponsorship Report Confidential Addendum 23 July 2025 (Under separate cover) - Confidential
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Community & Lifestyle Report
|
COM 03 |
Community Facilities Hire Policy |
|
Strategic Objective |
Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging Improve liveability and quality of life for the community by delivering vibrant parks, places and facilities |
|
File Ref |
226954.2025 |
|
Report By |
Craig Lambeth - Manager Community Recreation |
|
Approved By |
Tina Bono - Director Community & Lifestyle |
Executive Summary
At the Council meeting held 21 May 2025, Council considered recommendations to adopt a Community Facilities Hire Policy and changes to its Fee reduction Policy. At this meeting Council resolved to:
1. Note the consultation that has been conducted with key stakeholders;
2. Adopt the recommended Community Facilities Hire Policy and the Fee Reduction Policy attached to this Report to replace current Policies including:
- Commercial Businesses Short-term Hire Procedures (Terms and Conditions)
- Community Facilities Management Casual Hire (Terms and Conditions)
- Community Venues Permanent Hire Procedures (Terms and Conditions)
- Community Facilities 3-year Licence Agreement
- Change/Cancellation of Permanent Facility Hiring
3. Delegate to the CEO, the development of Conditions of Hire for Community Facilities;
4. Proceed to 28 days public exhibition; and
5. Direct the CEO that a report come back to Council following the 28 days of public exhibition.
These proposed Policy changes were placed on Public Exhibition on 4 June 2025 for 28 period of 28 days ending 2 June 2025. The proposed changes were also circulated via email on two separate occasions to all current permanent and licence holders during the public exhibition period. In addition, Council Officers conducted outbound phone calls to permanent and licensed hirers to ensure they received and understood the proposed changes.
Council received two (2) responses to its request for feedback via public exhibition that are contained within the body of this report.
That Council:
1. Receives and notes this report; and
2. Endorse the recommended Community Facilities Hire Policy and the Fee Reduction Policy attached to this report, which will supersede the following;
- Commercial Businesses Short-term Hire Procedures (Terms and Conditions)
- Community Facilities Management Casual Hire (Terms and Conditions)
- Community Venues Permanent Hire Procedures (Terms and Conditions)
- Community Facilities 3-year Licence Agreement
- Change/Cancellation of Permanent Facility Hiring.
REPORT
Council avails its Community Facilities to local organisations, clubs, schools, residents and other entities on a hire basis. These facilities accommodate important activities that support marginalised and targeted community groups, support small, locally based commercial entities and attract significant locally significant external events. These facilities are generally accessed on a fee-for-use basis, with the applicable fees and charges reviewed and endorsed by Council as part of the annual budget process.
At the Council meeting held 21 May 2025, Council considered recommendations to adopt an overarching Community Facilities Hire Policy. Subsequent to that Report Council resolved to:
1. Note the consultation that has been conducted with key stakeholders;
2. Adopt the recommended Community Facilities Hire Policy and the Fee Reduction Policy attached to this Report to replace current Policies including:
- Commercial Businesses Short-term Hire Procedures (Terms and Conditions)
- Community Facilities Management Casual Hire (Terms and Conditions)
- Community Venues Permanent Hire Procedures (Terms and Conditions)
- Community Facilities 3 year Licence Agreement
- Change/Cancellation of Permanent Facility Hiring
3. Delegate to the CEO, the development of Conditions of Hire for Community Facilities;
4. Proceed to 28 days public exhibition; and
5. Direct the CEO that a report come back to Council following the 28 days of public exhibition.
The proposed Community Facilities Hire Policy seeks to simplify a number of hire documents that acts to define the terms and conditions of hire into a single hire Policy. The primary changes contained within the endorsed Policy include:
• Establishment of up to 5-year hire agreements for community groups delivering community facing programs and services, and allowing their capacity to future plan their services, either by Lease (exclusive) or Licence (non-exclusive);
• Establishment of a Priority of Use framework that supports local and not-for-profit entities where conflicting applications are received; and
• Recategorising Religious Organisations from a Category C to Category A within the fee framework.
Additionally, proposed changes to Councils Fee redefines eligibility criteria to exclude:
• Organisations of any Category whose financial turnover, or turnover of parent organisation exceeds $5m per annum or organisations whose operating surplus in the previous financial year is greater the $250,000; and
• Organisations who are not based within the Liverpool LGA or organisations who are not delivering the majority of their services within the Liverpool LGA.
These proposed Policy changes were placed on Public Exhibition on 4 June 2025 for 28 period of 28 days ending 2 June 2025. The proposed changes were also circulated via email on two separate occasions to all current permanent and licence holders during the public exhibition period. In addition, Council Officers conducted outbound phone calls to permanent and licensed hirers to ensure they received and understood the proposed changes.
Council received two (2) items of feedback as outlines below:
|
Basis of feedback |
Council Response |
|
Change in fee category for religious organisations from Category C to Category A will result in financial strain placed on religious entities who operate on shoestring budgets. |
Religious organisations are currently classified as Category C under Council’s Fees and Charges framework. This category offers a discounted rate intended for not-for-profit, community-based organisations and funded agencies that deliver services directly benefiting Liverpool residents. The proposed change in category reflects a growing trend in the use of Council’s community facilities by religious organisations for commercially oriented services, which may fall outside the original intent of Category C. This reclassification ensures that the fee structure remains equitable, transparent, and aligned with the nature of use.
|
|
Application of means testing for hirers seeking fee reduction will impact on hirer (Fairfield City Council)
|
The proposed changes to Council’s Fee Reduction Policy are designed to better target support to organisations that genuinely require financial assistance. Specifically, the intent is to ensure that subsidies are limited to locally based, community-facing not-for-profit organisations with limited financial capacity. Under the revised policy, eligibility for fee reductions will be restricted to not-for-profit community entities with an annual turnover of less than $5 million and operating surpluses below $250,000. This change ensures that Council’s financial support is directed to those organisations most in need, while promoting fairness, accountability, and sustainability in the use of public resources.
|
Given the low volume of feedback received during the public consultation and exhibition period, Council Officers have assessed the anticipated impact on facility utilisation as minimal.
Importantly, the proposed changes are projected to deliver a positive financial benefit estimated between $180,000 and $300,000 per annum, equating to a cumulative five-year financial impact of approximately $900,000 to $1.5 million. This represents a significant and sustainable improvement to Council’s long-term financial position, while ensuring resources are more equitably allocated.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The recommended policy changes are expected to positively impact Council’s hire revenue streams, with projected increases ranging from $180,000 to $300,000 annually, assuming booking activity remains consistent. This adjustment will enhance the financial sustainability of Council’s community facilities by aligning fees more closely with actual usage and organisational capacity.
It should be noted that any projected increases associated with implementing these changes have not yet been factored into Council’s current budget or Long-Term Financial Plan, and would need to be considered as part of future financial planning processes.
|
|
2025/26 |
2026/27 |
2027/28 |
2028/29 |
2029/30 |
5 Year |
|
Operating budget / LTFP impact |
$180,000 |
$180,000 |
$180,000 |
$180,000 |
$180,000 |
$900,000 |
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community. Support access and services for people with a disability. Deliver high quality services for children and their families. |
Civic Leadership |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
|
Legislative |
Local Government Act 1993 (Division 2 – Part 2 – Section 35 and 47A) and (Division 12 – Part 1 – Section 356) Local Government (General) Regulations 2021 (Division 5 – Part 2 – Section 49) Generic Plan of Management: Community Facilities, 2005 Crown Land Management Act 2006 |
|
Risk |
There is no risk associated with this report. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Draft Community Facilities Hire Policy
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Community & Lifestyle Report
|
COM 04 |
Civic Acknowledgement for Former Mayor Gary Lucas |
|
Strategic Objective |
Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging Embrace the city’s heritage and history |
|
File Ref |
229961.2025 |
|
Report By |
Justine Young - Acting Manager Civic and Executive Services |
|
Approved By |
Tina Bono - Director Community & Lifestyle |
Executive Summary
At the May 2025 Council meeting a Condolence Motion for Gary Lucas was presented.
At this meeting Council endorsed to:
1. Accepts this condolence motion;
2. At the appropriate time, acknowledge Former Mayor Gary Lucas’s contributions with a suitable memorial.
This report presents three options for Council’s consideration in selecting a suitable memorial to honour Mr Gary Lucas.
Options include:
1. A bronze Plaque in the forecourt of Civic Place;
2. A commemorative wall featuring a bronze plaque in a prominent community location; or
3. A pictorial booklet of his achievements, to present to the Lucas Family.
1. That Council receive and note this report; and
2. That Council nominate a preferred option, as outlined in this report, for appropriately honouring the contributions of Mr Gary Lucas.
REPORT
Background
Gary Lucas will be fondly remembered for his unwavering commitment to public service and historical preservation. His distinguished service to the Liverpool community spanned multiple decades, beginning with his term as Councillor from 1978 to 1991, during which he served as Deputy Mayor from 1983 to 1984, and subsequently as Mayor from 1988 to 1991. Following a period away from local government, Mr Lucas returned for a further term as Councillor from 2008 to 2012.
Achievements
Mr Lucas was an active and engaged member of the wider Liverpool community. He was a founding member of both the Chipping Norton Sports Club and the Liverpool Action Group, and he held leadership positions with the Liverpool Sub-Branch of the Returned and Services League (RSL) and the Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre Board.
He was a passionate advocate for local sport, ensuring sporting fields and facilities were maintained to a high standard, and was actively involved with local cricket and soccer clubs. Mr Lucas also played a key role in the establishment of graffiti removal teams, exemplifying his hands-on approach to improving community amenity.
A notable aspect of Mr Lucas’s legacy was his dedication to preserving and commemorating Liverpool’s military history. In 2002, he identified 49 servicemen from Liverpool who died during the Gallipoli campaign, and 97 who perished in World War II. He continued researching local service personnel who served in the Korean, Vietnam, and more recent conflicts, ensuring their contributions were recognised.
Post-council, Mr Lucas deepened his involvement in military history, notably identifying local servicemen who participated in the Boer War (1899–1902). His efforts culminated in the publication of Carve Their Names in Stone, a booklet dedicated to previously unrecognised soldiers. In 2015, his research led to the recognition and installation of headstones for World War I soldiers buried in the Liverpool New Cemetery, including that of Private Eric George Batson—99 years after his death.
Recommended Options to Honour Mr Gary Lucas
That consideration be given to the following options:
· Option 1: Installing a bronze plaque in the forecourt area at Civic Place to honour Mr Lucas’s service to the City of Liverpool;
· Option 2: The establishment of a commemorative wall featuring a bronze plaque representing Mr Lucas’s service and achievement including his tenures on Council and broader community service in a prominent community location; or
· Option 3: A pictorial book using archival material photographs and other visual materials to commemorate Mr Lucas’s lifelong commitment to the Liverpool community.
All proposed options will include a small Civic ceremony to unveil the commemorative plaque, providing an opportunity to formally recognise the occasion with community members, stakeholders, and elected representatives. The estimated cost for the Civic ceremony is $5000 and has been factored into each option from the Civic Programs budget.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Costs associated with this recommendation have been included in Council’s Civic programs budget, the estimated cost for the Civic ceremony is $5000 and has been factored into each option.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership |
Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility. To honour the memory of Councillor Gary Lucas, we recognise their unwavering dedication to civic leadership and lasting contributions to the well-being of our community. |
|
Legislative |
There are no legislative considerations relating to this report. |
|
Risk |
There is no risk associated with this report. |
Nil
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Corporate Support Report
|
CORP 01 |
Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy |
|
Strategic Objective |
Visionary, Leading, Responsible Demonstrate a high standard of transparency and accountability through a comprehensive governance framework |
|
File Ref |
196577.2025 |
|
Report By |
Suzanne Kendall - Deputy General Counsel |
|
Approved By |
Farooq Portelli - Director Corporate Support |
Executive Summary
The report presents the outcome of a review of Council’s Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy. It is proposed to place the policy on public exhibition for a period of not less than 28 days.
That Council:
1. Consider the outcome of the review and proposed changes to the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy;
2. Agree to place the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy on public exhibition for a period of not less than 28 days.
3. Authorise the CEO or delegate to adopt the revised Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy if no representations are received during the public exhibition period.
4. Note that a further report will be provided in relation to any representations received during the public exhibition period.
REPORT
Council must adopt a policy in the first 12 months of its term concerning the payment of expenses incurred or to be incurred by, and the provision of facilities to, the Mayor, the Deputy Mayor (if there is one) and the other Councillors in relation to discharging the functions of civic office (Local Government Act 1993, section 252(1)).
The policy must comply with the Local Government Act 1993 (Act), the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 (Regulations), and guidelines issued pursuant to section 23A of the Act. Guidelines were issued in 2009 dealing with the payment of expenses and the provision of facilities for Mayors and Councillors in NSW (Guidelines). OLG has also published a suggested template policy for councils to adopt.
Council last updated the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy in July 2024. The current review considered the following:
· the requirements of the Act and the regulations,
· consistency with the Guidelines and the template policy,
· recent experience in applying the policy, and
· the Council resolution of 18 June 2025 concerning non-attendance at events.
Attachment 1 sets out the detailed review findings.
Attachment 2 is a track-changed version of the Policy which incorporates the review findings.
Attachment 3 is a clean version of the Policy, which is easier to read given the number of changes to the Policy.
In summary, the proposed changes to the Policy seek to:
· bring Council’s Policy into closer alignment with the Guidelines and the OLG template,
· better define roles, particularly the role of the CEO,
· provide further clarification regarding the expenses Council will pay and the facilities Council will provide,
· identify when Councillors may access community facilities,
· reinforce that expenses and facilities are provided in support of civic duties,
· emphasise a requirement of reasonableness in relation to expenses,
· introduce some limits on expenses associated with conferences, seminars and courses,
· require repayment of expenses in some instances of non-attendance,
· strengthen and clarify existing controls around travel,
· specify that insurance cover is subject to the wording of Council’s policy of insurance,
· clarify the circumstances in which legal expenses can be recovered,
· update language in the Policy and make the Policy easier to read.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications relating to this recommendation. The proposed changes will assist to ensure accountability, transparency and equity in the use of existing budgets.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership |
Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
|
Legislative |
252 Payment of expenses and provision of facilities (1) Within the first 12 months of each term of a council, the council must adopt a policy concerning the payment of expenses incurred or to be incurred by, and the provision of facilities to, the mayor, the deputy mayor (if there is one) and the other councillors in relation to discharging the functions of civic office. (2) The policy may provide for fees payable under this Division to be reduced by an amount representing the private benefit to the mayor or a councillor of a facility provided by the council to the mayor or councillor. (3) A council must not pay any expenses incurred or to be incurred by, or provide any facilities to, the mayor, the deputy mayor (if there is one) or a councillor otherwise than in accordance with a policy under this section. (4) A council may from time to time amend a policy under this section. (5) A policy under this section must comply with the provisions of this Act, the regulations and any relevant guidelines issued under section 23A. 253 Requirements before policy concerning expenses and facilities can be adopted or amended (1) A council must give public notice of its intention to adopt or amend a policy for the payment of expenses or provision of facilities allowing at least 28 days for the making of public submissions. (2) Before adopting or amending the policy, the council must consider any submissions made within the time allowed for submissions and make any appropriate changes to the draft policy or amendment. (3) Despite subsections (1) and (2), a council need not give public notice of a proposed amendment to its policy for the payment of expenses or provision of facilities if the council is of the opinion that the proposed amendment is not substantial. (4) (Repealed) (5) A council must comply with this section when proposing to adopt a policy in accordance with section 252(1) even if the council proposes to adopt a policy that is the same as its existing policy. 254 Decision to be made in open meeting The council or a council committee all the members of which are councillors must not close to the public that part of its meeting at which a policy for the payment of expenses or provision of facilities is adopted or amended, or at which any proposal concerning those matters is discussed or considered. |
|
Risk |
The risk is deemed to be Low. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Review Table of Changes for Civic Expenses & facilities Policy (Under separate cover)
2. Civic Expenses New Proposed policy (Under separate cover)
3. Tracked Changes version 5 of the policy (Under separate cover)
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Corporate Support Report
|
CORP 02 |
Confirmation of Creation of Policy and Procedures for the Recruitment, Appointment, Performance Review and Management and Separation of the Chief Executive Officer by Council |
|
Strategic Objective |
Visionary, Leading, Responsible Demonstrate a high standard of transparency and accountability through a comprehensive governance framework |
|
File Ref |
223384.2025 |
|
Report By |
Philippa Venn-Brown - Workforce Policy and Project Officer |
|
Approved By |
Farooq Portelli - Director Corporate Support |
Executive Summary
To assist Council in their recruitment, interaction and management expectations of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), the following policy and procedure documents have been prepared and considered by the Governance Committee and now presented for adoption by Council:
· Policy for the Recruitment, Appointment, Performance Review and Separation of the CEO by Council;
· Procedure for the Recruitment and Appointment of the CEO: and
· Procedure for the Performance Review and Management of the CEO.
The policy and procedures have been prepared to reflect the Office of Local Government Guidelines for the Appointment and Oversight of General Managers and commit Council to compliance with them.
That Council:
1. Note the benefits of having a clearly defined Policy and relevant procedures in regard to the recruitment, appointment, management, performance review and separation of the CEO; and
2. Adopt and implement the attached policy and procedures for the ongoing supervision and management of the Chief Executive Officer by the Mayor and Council.
REPORT
The recruitment, appointment, performance, management oversight and separation of the CEO is regulated by a number of documents including legislation, OLG guidelines, standard contracts of employment and other standards. It would seem both logical and prudent to encompass those requirements into Council’s own policy and procedures.
A review of the legislation, best practices and the recommendations contained in the Office of Local Government’s publication Guidelines for the Appointment and Oversight of General Managers, 2022, informed the creation of the proposed policy and procedures.
The resulting policy covers the lifecycle of tenure of the position of CEO of Liverpool City Council from recruitment to separation. The supporting procedures detail the processes for the recruitment and appointment of the CEO of Liverpool City Council and for the required performance review, management and oversight process.
The recent recruitment and appointment of the new CEO of Liverpool City Council followed the process recommended by the Office of Local Government and is consistent with the new policy and procedures currently under consideration for adoption by Council.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications relating to this recommendation.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
|
Legislative |
Relevant legislative considerations are identified in the proposed Policy |
|
Risk |
There is no risk associated with this report |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Policy for the Recruitment, Performance Review and Management, and Separation of the CEO by Council.
2. Procedure for the Performance Review and Management of the CEO.
3. Procedure for the Recruitment and Appointment of the CEO.
|
CORP 02 |
Confirmation of Creation of Policy and Procedures for the Recruitment, Appointment, Performance Review and Management and Separation of the Chief Executive Officer by Council |
|
Attachment 1 |
Policy for the Recruitment, Performance Review and Management, and Separation of the CEO by Council. |

|
CORP 02 |
Confirmation of Creation of Policy and Procedures for the Recruitment, Appointment, Performance Review and Management and Separation of the Chief Executive Officer by Council |
|
Attachment 2 |
Procedure for the Performance Review and Management of the CEO. |

|
CORP 02 |
Confirmation of Creation of Policy and Procedures for the Recruitment, Appointment, Performance Review and Management and Separation of the Chief Executive Officer by Council |
|
Attachment 3 |
Procedure for the Recruitment and Appointment of the CEO. |

Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Corporate Support Report
|
CORP 03 |
Investment Report June 2025 |
|
Strategic Objective |
Visionary, Leading, Responsible Ensure Council is accountable and financially sustainable through the strategic management of assets and resources |
|
File Ref |
224237.2025 |
|
Report By |
Vishwa Nadan - Chief Financial Officer |
|
Approved By |
Farooq Portelli - Director Corporate Support |
Executive Summary
This report presents Council’s investment portfolio and its performance at 30 June 2025. Key highlights include:
· Council held investments with a market value of $416 million (see Attachment 1 for details).
· The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA)’s official cash rate remained at 3.85 per cent.
· The portfolio yield (for the year to June 2025) was 6 basis points above the benchmark (AusBond Bank Bill Index)
|
|
AusBond Bank Bill Index (ABBI) |
|
|
|
|
Benchmark |
4.39% |
|
Portfolio yield |
4.45% |
|
Performance above benchmark |
0.06% |
· Council’s investment portfolio is performing slightly better than ABBI benchmark. Council still has $19.35 million in low-yielding (returning less than 2%) investments and not maturing till 2026. These investments will continue to impact on Council’s overall portfolio performance.
· Year-to-date, Council’s investment income was $5.14 million higher than the original budget. This is due to a combination of increase in market interest rates and unrealised gain in fair value of Floating Rate Notes (FRNs).
· Year-to-date, Council’s investment in mortgage-backed securities (MBSs) is valued at $357 thousand below face value. Council’s investment advisor continues to review Council’s investment in MBSs and recommends Council continue to hold its investments in the Class A and Class C securities. There is significant uncertainty associated with these investments, however presently Council’s investment advisor
believes there is, on balance, more upside opportunity than downside risk. This is subject to ongoing regular review. MBSs are no longer rated.
· Council’s investments and reporting obligations fully complied with the requirements of section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993 and section 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021.
· Council’s portfolio also fully complied with limits set out in its current Investment Policy, noting the exception applicable to MBSs (as investment in them pre-dates the current Investment Policy).
· Council is committed to NSW TCorp’s balanced investment framework and held 18.78 per cent of its portfolio in ADIs rated BBB and below.
· At the time of writing this report, financial year-end adjustments were not complete. The schedule of cash reserves will be provided to Councillors at the meeting.
That the Council receives and notes this report.
Section 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 requires that the Responsible Accounting Officer must provide Council with a written report setting out details of all money that Council has invested under section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993.
Council’s portfolio
At 30 June 2025, Council held investments with a market value of $416 million. Council’s investment register detailing all its investments is provided as an attachment to this report. In summary, Council’s portfolio consisted of investments in:

The ratio of market value compared to face value of various debt securities is shown in the table below.

*Definition of terms
· FRN - Floating Rate Note - returns an aggregate of a fixed margin and a variable benchmark (usually the Bank Bill Swap Rate).
· FRB - Fixed Rate Bond – returns a fixed coupon (interest) rate and is tradeable before maturity.
· TCD - Transferrable Certificate of Deposit - security issued with the same characteristics as a term deposit, however it can be sold back (transferred) into the market prior to maturity. A floating TCD pays a coupon linked to a variable benchmark (90-day Bank Bill Swap Rate).
Council continues to closely monitor the investments in its portfolio to ensure continued compliance and minimal exposure to risk.
Council is committed to NSW TCorp’s balanced investment framework and held 18.78 per cent of its portfolio in ADIs rated BBB and below.
Mortgaged-backed securities
Council’s investment advisor regularly reviews investments in grandfathered mortgage-backed securities (MBSs) and continues to recommend “hold” position on investments in Class A and both Class C securities.
There is significant uncertainty associated with these investments, however presently the investment advisors believe there is, on balance, more upside opportunity than downside risk. Notwithstanding this recommendation, Council’s investment advisor has assessed that both Class C securities are likely to eventually default. However, Council will continue to receive interest up until default which is likely to be many years in the future. Fitch Rating Agency has decided to withdraw its rating on MBSs and as a result, Council’s investments in these securities are now classed as non-rated. Year-to-date, Council’s investment in MBSs is valued at $357 thousand below face value.
Portfolio maturity profile
The table below shows the percentage of funds invested at different durations to maturity.

Counterparty policy limit compliance
Credit rating policy limit compliance

Compliance with Investment policy – In summary
|
Legislative requirements |
ü |
Fully compliant, noting exception applicable to grandfathered mortgaged-backed investments. |
|
Portfolio credit rating limit |
ü |
Fully compliant |
|
Institutional exposure limits |
ü |
Fully compliant |
|
Overall portfolio credit limits |
ü |
Fully compliant |
|
Term to maturity limits |
ü |
Fully compliant |
Portfolio performance against relevant market benchmark
Council’s Investment Policy prescribes the AusBond Bank Bill Index (ABBI) as a benchmark to measure return on cash and fixed interest securities. The ABBI represents the average daily yield of a parcel of bank bills. Historically there has been a positive correlation between changes in the cash rate and the resulting impact on the ABBI benchmark.
Council’s investment portfolio is performing slightly better than ABBI benchmark. Council still has $19.35 million in low-yielding (returning less than 2%) investments and not maturing till 2026. These investments will continue to impact on Council’s overall portfolio performance.
The portfolio yield for the year to June 2025 was above the ABBI index by 6 basis points (portfolio yield: 4.45%; ABBI: 4.39%).
Comparative yields for the previous months are charted below:
Performance of portfolio returns against budget
Year-to-date, Council’s investment income was $5.14 million higher than the original budget. This is due to a combination of increase in market interest rate and unrealised gain in fair value of Floating Rate Notes (FRNs).
|
|
YTD Budget |
YTD Actuals |
Budget Variance |
|
Interest yield on cash holdings |
$14.26m |
$17.82m |
$3.56m |
|
Fair value market movement |
$0.00m |
$1.58m |
$1.58m |
|
Total |
$14.26m |
$19.40m |
$5.14m |

Economic outlook – Reserve Bank of Australia
The Reserve Bank of Australia kept the official cash rate at 3.85 per cent in its meeting on 8 July 2025.
Certificate of Responsible Accounting Officer
The Chief Financial Officer, as Responsible Accounting Officer, certifies that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, section 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 and Council’s Investment Policy at the time of their placement. The previous investments are covered by the grandfathering clauses of the current investment guidelines issued by the Minister for Local Government.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
Council’s investment income was $5.14 million higher than the original budget at 30 June 2025. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
|
Legislative |
Local Government Act 1993, section 625 Local Government (General) Regulation 2021, section 212 Council is empowered by section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993 to invest money that is not, for the time being, required by Council for any other purpose. Council may invest money in a form of investment notified by order of the Minister. The Minister has published the Local Government Act 1993 – Investment Order which specifies the forms of investment that a council may make. It makes clear that Council must have an investment policy and invest in accordance with that policy. Council is required to invest prudently and must consider: · the risk of capital or income loss or depreciation, · the likely income return and the timing of income return, · the length of the term of the proposed investment, · the liquidity and marketability of the proposed investment, · the likelihood of inflation affecting the value of the proposed investment, and · the costs of making the proposed investment. The responsible accounting officer must provide Council with a written report setting out details of money invested at its ordinary meetings (but only at one meeting in a month): section 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021. The report must include a certificate as to whether the investment has been made in accordance with the Act, the regulations and Council’s investment policies. |
|
Risk |
The capital value and return-on-investment is subject to market risks. Investment limits prescribed in Council’s policy framework is aimed to mitigate these risks. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Investment Portfolio June 2025
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Operations Report
|
OPER 01 |
FOGO - Kitchen Caddy Distribution Success (SUD's and Rural Properties) |
|
Strategic Objective |
Liveable, Sustainable, Resilient Manage waste effectively and maximise recycling opportunities |
|
File Ref |
220523.2025 |
|
Report By |
Tim Pasley - Manager Circular Economy |
|
Approved By |
Peter Scicluna - Acting Director Operations |
Executive Summary
The 2025 rollout of the Food Organics and Garden Organics (FOGO) kitchen caddy distribution has been a landmark project for Liverpool City Council, delivering over 65,000 caddies and educational packs to residents across the Local Government Area (LGA). The rollout, initiated in May 2025 and completed in June 2025, aimed to prepare the community for the official start of FOGO collection services on 7 July 2025. With a 99% distribution success rate and overwhelmingly positive community feedback, the initiative represents a major achievement in Council's commitment to sustainability, circular economy principles, and community engagement.
This report outlines the rollout's success, its alignment with Council's waste management strategy (Waste Management and Resource Recovery Strategy 2021), and its contribution to the NSW Government's organics diversion targets. It also highlights engagement efforts, challenges addressed, and the smooth transition from rollout to service commencement.
That Council:
1. Notes the successful completion of the FOGO kitchen caddy distribution program (SUD’s and Rural Properties), with over 65,000 households reached and a 99% delivery success rate; and
2. Continues to support the next phase of implementation as the weekly FOGO service begins on 7 July 2025.
REPORT
Background
In line with Council's Waste Management and Resource Recovery Strategy 2021 and the NSW Waste and Sustainable Materials Strategy 2041, Liverpool City Council committed to a comprehensive rollout of the FOGO waste management system. This included the distribution of kitchen caddies, compostable liners, instructional materials, and a multilingual FOGO services guide upon request.
The rollout officially began in early May 2025, following a preparation week for team training. It spanned seven weeks, including all urban and rural zones. Importantly, this rollout focused solely on Single Unit Dwellings (SUDs) with a full set of bins and Rural Properties (that required delivery of a green lidded bin). Properties without a complete three bin setup were not included.
A significant milestone in this project was bringing rural properties into alignment with the rest of the LGA by providing them with green lidded organics bins, enabling full participation in the FOGO service for the first time.
Project Overview
· Total Targeted Properties: 65,555
· Successful Deliveries: 65,079 (99%)
· Total Visits Conducted: 66,331 (Rectification Works included)
· Success Rate: 98.7%
· New Properties Identified During Rollout: 1,252
Engagement and Communication
Community response to the rollout has been very positive. Residents expressed excitement and readiness for the FOGO service, with many rural households contacting Council proactively to confirm eligibility. The Customer Experience team noted an increase in positive calls and feedback, particularly in the lead up to the service launch.
Council's Communications team supported the rollout with a strategic campaign, including:
· Social media posts and multilingual videos
· Printed material distribution
· Community pop up events support.
The videos, available in English, Arabic, Vietnamese, Hindi, and Simplified Chinese, helped broaden accessibility and understanding across culturally and linguistically diverse communities.
The campaign adopted the consistent slogan "FOGO IS A GOGO!" across all materials to reinforce key messages.
Challenges and Learnings
As with any large-scale rollout, a few challenges were encountered, though all were anticipated and managed effectively:
· Multi-Unit Dwellings (MUDs): A small number of MUDs received caddies in error due to data discrepancies. These properties are not yet eligible for the 7 July service but will be included in a dedicated MUDs FOGO rollout at a later stage. Council will issue courtesy letters advising affected households to retain their caddies for future use. This proactive and cost-effective approach has been supported by the FOGO grant.
· Inaccessible or Unoccupied Properties: Some properties, particularly in newer developments or construction zones, were inaccessible or vacant at the time of delivery. These have been captured and included in rectification plans, with 90% already resolved by late June.
· Secondary Dwellings (Granny Flats): During the rollout, Council received a number of enquiries from residents occupying granny flats or secondary dwellings regarding their eligibility for FOGO. Council’s Customer Experience team managed these cases by referring residents to the waste support team for assessment and inclusion in FOGO. This was an expected scenario due to property configuration complexities.
· Rural Adjustments: Bringing rural properties into alignment required additional coordination, including the delivery of green bins to those previously without them. This was well received and considered a major success.
Despite these minor issues, overall execution was smooth and reflective of robust planning, agile field operations, and responsive customer service.
July 7th 2025 Launch
Please note this report has been prepared prior to the official commencement of FOGO services on 7 July 2025 and will be presented to Council on the 23rd of July. As residents transition to the new weekly green lidded bin collection, a temporary increase in missed bin reports is anticipated, which is a normal part of service changeovers. Additionally, Council expects several enquiries from residents in townhouses who may not currently have a full set of bins whilst their neighbors do. Where these properties are not classified as Multi-Unit Dwellings (MUDs) and are deemed eligible, they will be triaged through Customer Service and issued appropriate bins via Council’s contractor. This applies only to a select list of properties that received caddies due to earlier data discrepancies, as outlined in the Challenges and Learnings section.
Timeline and Suburb Delivery Schedule
The rollout was conducted over seven weeks from 9 May to 27 June 2025. Each week focused on specific suburbs, allowing for measured, targeted delivery and engagement.
· Prep/Training Week (9 May): Cecil Hills, Elizabeth Hills
· Week 1 (12–16 May): Cecil Hills, Elizabeth Hills, Green Valley, Hinchinbrook
· Week 2 (19–23 May): Hinchinbrook, Busby, Heckenberg, Mount Pritchard, Sadlier, Ashcroft, Cartwright, Miller, Middleton Grange
· Week 3 (26–30 May): Middleton Grange, West Hoxton, Carnes Hill, Hoxton Park, Horningsea Park, Prestons, Rural Properties (Start)
· Week 4 (2–6 June): Prestons, Edmonson Park, Leppington, Denham Court, Rossmore, Casula, Rural Properties (Continued)
· Week 5 (9–13 June): Casula, Lurnea, Warrick Farm, Chipping Norton, Moorebank, Rural Properties (Continued)
· Week 6 (16–20 June): Moorebank, Wattle Grove, Hammondville, Voyager Point, Pleasure Point, Bringelly, Wallacia, Luddenham, Kemps Creek, Rural Properties (Continued)
· Week 7 (23–27 June): Austral, Liverpool, Rectification Works
Infrastructure and Implementation
The FOGO implementation included:
· Caddy distribution packs with liners, stickers, and education materials (Waste and Resource Recovery Services Guide)
· Green bin distribution to rural properties
· Preparation for weekly green bin collection commencing 7 July 2025.
Additional education activities included:
· Council hosted community workshops
· School sessions and forums
· Internal staff training (Specialist for relevant teams) and Councillor briefings
· Library educational support
· Targeted support for Customer Experience staff with FAQs and factsheets.
Conclusion
The FOGO kitchen caddy rollout has been an outstanding success. It marks the largest change to Council’s waste system since the introduction of the yellow recycling bin and sets the stage for a more sustainable future. The positive community sentiment, efficient distribution, and high engagement levels position Liverpool as a leader in organics recovery five years ahead of the 2030 state mandate. With the FOGO service launching on 7 July 2025, Council is well placed to realise both environmental and financial benefits through increased diversion from landfill.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
There are no financial implications relating to this recommendation.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
|
Environment |
Minimise household and commercial waste. |
Social |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
|
Legislative |
There are no legislative considerations relating to this report. |
|
Risk |
There is no risk associated with this report. |
Nil
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Committee Reports
|
CTTE 01 |
Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council meeting held Tuesday 10 June 2025. |
|
Strategic Objective |
Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging Communicate, listen, engage and respond to the community by encouraging community participation |
|
File Ref |
225561.2025 |
|
Report By |
Derek Tweed - Community Development Worker (Youth) |
|
Approved By |
Tina Bono - Director Community & Lifestyle |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on 10 June 2025.
That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on 10 June 2025.
REPORT
The Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council held on 10 June 2025 are attached for the information of Council.
The minutes contain the following actions or Committee recommendations:
· ACTION:
The Youth Council members voted unanimously to continue their successful Free HSC Tutoring program annually into the future where financially feasible to continue.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The above action will be funded through existing budget allocation to the Liverpool Youth Council.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community. Deliver high quality services for children and their families. |
Civic Leadership |
Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media. Facilitate the development of community leaders. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. |
|
Legislative |
There are no legislative considerations relating to this report. |
|
Risk |
There is no risk associated with this report. |
ATTACHMENTS
|
CTTE 01 |
Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council meeting held Tuesday 10 June 2025. |
|
Attachment 1 |
Meeting Notes Liverpool Youth Council 10 June 2025 |

Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Committee Reports
|
CTTE 02 |
Minutes of the Liverpool Sports Committee meeting held 4 June 2025 |
|
Strategic Objective |
Healthy, Inclusive, Engaging Communicate, listen, engage and respond to the community by encouraging community participation |
|
File Ref |
227043.2025 |
|
Report By |
Chris Corby - Coordinator Recreation and Community |
|
Approved By |
Tina Bono - Director Community & Lifestyle |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled to present the Minutes of the Liverpool Sports Committee meeting held on 4 June 2025.
That Council:
1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Sports Committee meeting held on 4 June 2025;
2. Recognises and thanks Sports Committee members for volunteering to participate in the Liverpool Sports Committee; and
3. Instruct the Chief Executive Officer to disburse the Sporting Grants and Donations in accordance with the recommendations of the Liverpool Sports Committee.
REPORT
The Minutes of the Liverpool Sports Committee meeting held on 4 June are attached for the information of Council.
Actions include:
· Processing eight (8) approved Sporting Donations to support local athletes.
|
Applicant |
Sport |
Amount |
|
Mariam Arifaki |
Baseball |
$400.00 |
|
Taran Sinari |
Volleyball |
$400.00 |
|
Mackenzie Jackson |
Baseball |
$400.00 |
|
Maddison Heath |
Baseball |
$400.00 |
|
James Sadler |
Race walking |
$400.00 |
|
Jacob Copp |
4 x 100m Relay |
$400.00 |
|
Summer Judd |
3kg Hammer Throw |
$400.00 |
|
Jayden Schipp |
Swimming |
$400.00 |
|
TOTAL |
|
$3,200.00 |
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
An allocation of $30,000 within Sporting Donations is within the Council operating budget.
CONSIDERATIONS
|
Economic |
There are no economic or financial considerations. |
|
Environment |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
|
Social |
Support community organisations, groups, and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community. |
|
Civic Leadership |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
|
Legislative |
Sections 356(3), 377(1), and 378 of the Local Government Act 1993. |
|
Risk |
There are no risk considerations. |
ATTACHMENTS
|
CTTE 02 |
Minutes of the Liverpool Sports Committee meeting held 4 June 2025 |
|
Attachment 1 |
Minutes Sports Committee Meeting 4 June 2025 |

Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Questions with Notice
|
QWN 01 |
Question with Notice - Clr Ristevski - Code of Conducts |
|
Strategic Objective |
Visionary, Leading, Responsible Place customer satisfaction, innovation and best practice at the centre of all operations |
|
File Ref |
215471.2025 |
QUESTION WITH NOTICE
Please address the following:
1. How many code of conducts have been submitted during this new Council term. What is the cost to the ratepayers for these code of conducts in terms of external costs and staff time?
2. Why aren't Councillors given internal counselling to coach them and to educate them on a code of conduct that has been lodged against them rather than blindly submitting it to an external consultant for assessment?
3. What is Council's position on the article in the Daily Telegraph on 14. June 2025 where the State Government is cracking down on trivial complaints and the weaponisation of code of conducts by Councillors which have the undesigned effect of costing ratepayers millions of dollars?
Responses (provided by Corporate Support)
1. The number of councillor code of conduct complaints and the associated costs were reported to the Council meeting of 18 June 2025. A further update report can be provided in due course.
2. Training has been provided to all councillors on the Code of Conduct. Council is required to deal with Code of Conduct complaints in accordance with the Code of Conduct Procedures. The table below identifies procedural steps provided in the Code of Conduct Procedures for the assessment and investigation of code of conduct complaints. As outlined in the report to the Council meeting of 18 June 2025, some complaints have not proceeded past the initial assessment stage. Where matters have been referred to a conduct reviewer, they have predominantly then proceeded to investigation.
|
Procedural step |
Potential outcomes |
|
Initial consideration of complaint by CEO |
· Refer to external agency · Decline complaint · Resolve by alternative strategies · Refer to conduct reviewer |
|
Preliminary assessment by conduct reviewer |
· Take no action · Resolve by alternative strategies · Refer back to CEO for resolution · Refer to external agency · Investigate |
|
Investigation |
· Resolve by alternative strategies · Refer back to CEO for resolution · Refer to external agency · Final investigation report |
3. Council is not named in the Daily Telegraph article and has not expressed a position on it. OLG is reviewing the councillor conduct framework, but there has not yet been any legislative change. In the meantime, Council continues to apply the councillor conduct framework which applies under the Local Government Act 1993, the Code of Conduct and the Code of Conduct Procedures.
Nil
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Questions with Notice
|
QWN 02 |
Question with Notice - Clr Ristevski - Rate Rise |
|
Strategic Objective |
Visionary, Leading, Responsible Demonstrate a high standard of transparency and accountability through a comprehensive governance framework |
|
File Ref |
218839.2025 |
QUESTION WITH NOTICE
At the last council meeting the Mayor came out and stated that there were 249,000 residents that were happy with the 6% rate rise.
Please address the following:
1. Can I please get some clarification in terms of evidence of how this number was determined?
2. If there is no evidence to support this fact can a councillor request that this mayor apologise for making a false statement in Council chambers?
Response (provided by CEO)
In reference to question 1 above, the number quoted by the Mayor when he commented that “…there are 249,000 people in our community who are happy to progress (the budget) and did not see fit to go out there and do that …” (‘that’ referring to the partaking in Councillor Ristevski’s State of Origin competition).
Note parenthesis added.
The estimated resident population of the Liverpool local government area in 2024 is 254,905 (figure extracted from Council website at Home | Liverpool City Council | Community profile.
Given only about 200 people made submissions as a result of the competition incentive, the actual number that did not is actually in excess of 254,000.
As there is clear evidence for the statement made by the mayor as per response to question 1, question 2 becomes irrelevant.
Nil
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Questions with Notice
|
QWN 03 |
Question with Notice - Clr Ristevski - Public Inquiry Legal Expenses |
|
Strategic Objective |
Visionary, Leading, Responsible Ensure Council is accountable and financially sustainable through the strategic management of assets and resources |
|
File Ref |
218868.2025 |
QUESTION WITH NOTICE
Please address the following:
1. Which Councillors have presented their legal expenses to be covered by the Council’s insurer for the Public Inquiry and the dollar amounts for each Councillors.
(Response provided by Corporate Support)
Under Council’s policy of insurance (Policy), the Council is the Insured Entity and councillors are Insured Persons. Applications for cover under the Policy are presented to the insurer for decision. The applications and decisions in relation to cover would constitute personal information within the meaning of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW) and the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). It is unclear how the details of any Insured Person’s cover under the policy is required either for councillors to discharge their roles under section 232 of the Local Government Act 1993 or for the governing body to discharge its role under section 223 of the Act.
Council has been provided with the cost to Council of its legal representation for the public inquiry, which is the amount of the deductible under the Policy. If there is any change in the cost to Council, then an update can be provided.
Nil
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Questions with Notice
|
QWN 04 |
Question with Notice - Clr Ristevski - Roundabout (Diamondabout) at the Intersection of Twenty-Eighth Avenue and Fifteenth Avenue in Austral |
|
Strategic Objective |
Evolving, Prosperous, Innovative Continue to invest in improving and maintaining Liverpool’s road networks and infrastructure |
|
File Ref |
219758.2025 |
QUESTION WITH NOTICE
Please address the following:
1. Who approved the installation of the roundabout at the above location?
2. How much did it cost as the Mayor made a recent announcement that the cost was $600,000?
3. How much did it cost to have it removed and replaced and where did the funds come from? Will any funds be removed from frontline services?
4. How much will it cost to replace the roundabout for the second time?
5. Why was it left up to the CEO to rectify the issue on social media when 99% of the time it's the Mayor speaking on behalf of the council? Is this a matter of the Mayor is only there to give good news and leaves the bad news to the CEO?
6. Why did the Mayor blame the State Member for Leppington for the roundabout in the Sydney Morning Herald article on 27 June 2025 when he had nothing to do with it? Has he put Council in disrepute and as a result subject to a code of conduct?
7. Who designed the roundabouts?
8. Who constructed the roundabouts?
9. Were the roundabouts built as per the approved designs?
10. Was the same contractor used for all 5 roundabouts?
11. Has the Contractor been paid for the work yet?
12. Have all the roundabouts been assessed after construction?
13. Are ALL the roundabouts compliant with construction design and construction codes?
14. Can trucks and buses navigate around every roundabout?
Responses to these questions will be provided in an in-depth report to be tabled to the 27 August 2025 Council meeting.
Nil
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Questions with Notice
|
QWN 05 |
Question with Notice - Mayor Mannoun - Civic Place |
|
Strategic Objective |
Visionary, Leading, Responsible Ensure Council is accountable and financially sustainable through the strategic management of assets and resources |
|
File Ref |
230765.2025 |
QUESTION WITH NOTICE
Now that Civic Place has been completed, could you please provide answers to the following questions:
1. What is the total cost of Civic Place?
2. What was the projected cost vs the actual cost?
3. What have been the interest costs (during construction and after practical completion?
4. When was income projected to be received?
5. How much has been used from general reserves to fund civic place?
6. Any other financial implications or learnings from the project?
Responses provided by Corporate Support and Office of the CEO)
1. What is the total cost of Civic Place?
Construction costs = $218,563,053
Capitalised interest on loan = $7,854,206
Total costs (as per asset register) = $226,417,259
2. What was the projected cost vs the actual cost?
Projected costs (total approved budget) = ($195,500,000 + $23,000,000)
$218,500,000
Actual costs = $218,563,053
3. What have been the interest costs (during construction and after practical completion?
Interest on loan during construction = $7,854,206
Interest costs after practical completion = $63,603,674 (Total interest payable $71,457,880 less capitalised interest $7,854,206)
4. When was income projected to be received?
Rental income was projected to commence in January 2025.
Civic Tower was expected to be fully tenanted by July 2024 with 6 months rent free incentive.
5. How much has been used from general reserves to fund civic place?
In total $7,799,553 was used from general reserves towards the construction costs which includes $1,000,000 still owed by Built developer.
Principal and interest loan repayment is paid from general reserves.
6. Any other financial implications or learnings from the project?
Council was able to lock in its borrowing costs at very favourable interest rates.
Nil
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Notices of Motion
|
NOM 01 |
Vine-covered carparks |
|
Strategic Objective |
Liveable, Sustainable, Resilient Deliver and advocate for a sustainable, cool and green city |
|
File Ref |
215548.2025 |
|
Author |
Matthew Harte - Councillor |
Background
A recent trial of covering parking spots with vine-covered trellises by Cumberland Council found that surface temperatures dropped by over 35C.
That Council:
1. Direct the CEO to prepare a report investigating the feasibility of trialling vine-covered trellises in Council carparks; and
2. The report to include costs, implementation and potential options for the trial.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT
Should Council resolve to support the Motion and nominate a funding source, a response report will be provided to a future Council meeting including costs, implementation and potential options for the trial.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Costs associated with this recommendation are outside of Council’s current budget and long-term financial plan.
Nil
Ordinary Meeting
23 July 2025
Notices of Motion
|
NOM 02 |
Establishment of an Internal Independent Ombudsman to Handle Code of Conduct and Public Complaints |
|
Strategic Objective |
Visionary, Leading, Responsible Demonstrate a high standard of transparency and accountability through a comprehensive governance framework |
|
File Ref |
180082.2025 |
|
Author |
Peter Ristevski - Councillor |
Background
Recent concerns about the misuse of code of conduct complaints to suppress criticism underscore the need for an impartial mechanism within the council’s internal structure. An appointed internal independent ombudsman would serve to strengthen trust in the council’s governance processes and safeguard democratic accountability.
Furthermore, the escalation of code of conduct complaints could cost ratepayers nearly $1 million.
That Council:
1. Recognises the importance of maintaining integrity, transparency, and fairness in the handling of code of conduct complaints and public grievances.
2. Notes that the current process, whereby complaints and allegations concerning councillors and council staff are managed solely by the council’s governance team, presents a potential conflict of interest and risks being weaponised to silence legitimate criticism.
3. Appoint an internal independent ombudsman, to be appointed by Council, who will be responsible for overseeing and investigating code of conduct issues and complaints submitted by members of the public.
4. Further resolves that the internal independent ombudsman shall:
(i). Operate independently of the governance team to ensure impartiality.
(ii). Receive, investigate, and make recommendations on complaints related to conduct and public grievances.
(iii). Be accessible to members of the public, providing an impartial avenue for complaint resolution.
5. Develop and implement a framework for the appointment, powers, and responsibilities of the internal independent ombudsman.
6. Amend existing governance procedures to incorporate this role, ensuring greater transparency, accountability, and public confidence.
7. Reaffirms its commitment to uphold high standards of conduct and to ensure that all complaints are handled fairly, transparently, and without bias.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT
Section 332 of the Local Government Act 1993 provides for the determination of Council’s organisation structure. Pursuant to section 332 –
· Council determines the resources to be allocated towards the employment of staff after consulting the CEO,
· The CEO determines the positions within the organisation structure after consulting the Council, and
· The positions in the organisation structure are to give effect to the priorities in Council’s strategic plans and delivery program.
The creation of an Internal Ombudsman position is a matter to be determined by the CEO.
No evidence has been presented in the notice of motion to support the premises on which it is proposed that the role of Internal Ombudsman is created.
1. The allegation that code of conduct complaints are being misused to suppress criticism has not been established.
Council has received many code of conduct complaints against Councillors in the current reporting period. A report was provided to Council on 18 June 2025, which detailed the number of complaints and illustrates that this is high compared to previous years and other councils. The fact that there is a high number of complaints does not, in itself, enable a conclusion to be reached regarding the purpose behind the making of a complaint or the conduct complained of. At the time of the last report, 15 of 115 complaints (13%) had been concluded and the remainder were being assessed or investigated. It is premature to conclude that complaints have been misused to suppress criticism.
If it were found in the complaints process that a complaint constituted misuse of the Complaints Procedure, that would be identified by the CEO, conduct reviewer or investigator, and may constitute a breach of the Code of Conduct. The CEO can respond to a potential breach of the Code of Conduct as if a complaint had been made.
2. The implication that Governance team is failing to deal impartially with complaints is unsupported.
The Code of Conduct Procedures determines how code of conduct complaints must be dealt with. The following table summarises the staged assessment process that applies to the code of conduct complaints against councillors.
|
Stage |
Potential outcomes |
|
Consideration by CEO |
· Refer to external agency · Decline · Resolve by alternative means · Refer to conduct reviewer |
|
Assessment by external conduct reviewer |
· Take no action · Resolve by alternative means · Refer to CEO for resolution · Refer to external agency · Investigate |
|
Investigation by external investigator |
· Resolve by alternative means · Refer to CEO for resolution · Refer to external agency · Final report with findings and recommendations |
|
Consideration by Council |
· Decline investigator’s recommendations (subsequent referral to OLG) · Censure · Censure and referral to OLG |
The report provided to Council on 18 June 2025 demonstrated that:
· complaints are being progressed through each of the stages established by the Code of Conduct Procedures,
· most complaints are proceeding past initial assessment by the CEO to preliminary assessment by independent, external conduct reviewers, and
· in most cases, the preliminary assessment has resulted in a recommendation for investigation, with investigations being conducted by independent, external investigators.
Complaints are being dealt with in accordance with the Code of Conduct Procedures. There is no evidence of any partiality on the part of Council’s Governance team.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Costs associated with this recommendation are outside of Council’s current budget and long-term financial plan.