Liverpool City Council

Business Paper

 

 

 

 

Council Agenda

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ordinary Council Meeting

28 October 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Francis Greenway Centre

170 George Street

Liverpool


Description: LCC_bw_logo 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


You are hereby notified that an Ordinary Council Meeting of Liverpool City Council will be held at the Francis Greenway Centre, 170 George Street, Liverpool on Wednesday, 28 October 2015 commencing at 6.00pm. Doors to the Francis Greenway Centre will open at 5.45pm.

 

Liverpool City Council Meetings are taped for the purposes of minute taking and record keeping.  If you have any enquiries please contact Council and Executive Services on 9821 9237.

 

Text Box:
 

 

 


Carl Wulff

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

 


 

 

 


Order of Business

 

                                                                                                              PAGE     TAB

Opening

Prayer

Apologies 

Condolences

Confirmation of Minutes

Ordinary Council Meeting held on 30 September 2015 and reconvened on 6 October 2015 9

Declarations of Interest

Public Forum

Mayoral Report

NIL

Notices of Motion Of Rescission

NIL

Notices of Motion

NOM 01          Interfaith Functions 2015.............................................................................. 105......... 1

NOM 02          Fiscal Restraint............................................................................................. 107......... 2

NOM 03          Council Policy and Media Announcements.................................................. 109......... 3

NOM 04          Welcoming the Wanderers W-League Team to Liverpool........................... 112......... 4

NOM 05          Law & Order.................................................................................................. 114......... 5

Motions of Urgency

NIL

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

IHAP 01          DA-1162/2014 - Construction of a food and drink premises with 24 hour operation on proposed Lot 1 created in DA-1106/2014 at 501 Cowpasture Road, Len Waters Estate                                                                                                                        116......... 6

IHAP 02          DA-997/2014 - Subdivision of proposed Lot 207 (approved under Development Consent No.508/2013) into two Torrens title lots at 291 Green Valley Road, Green Valley   123 7

IHAP 03          DA-439/2015 - Demolition of existing structures and construction of a seven (7) double storey multi dwelling housing development at 283-285 Newbridge Road, Chipping Norton                                                                                                                       132......... 8

IHAP 04          DA-998/2014 - Subdivision of proposed Lot 9 and Lot 10 (as approved under Development Consent No. DA-507/2013) into four Torrens title lots at 315 Green Valley Road, Green Valley...................................................................................... 137......... 9

 

IHAP 05          DA-1183/2014 - Construction of 24 detached dwellings and community title subdivision on proposed development Lots 7 and 8 within proposed Lot 22 in the Plan of Subdivision of Lots 31 and 32 in DP 1181985 within the former New Brighton Golf Course at Lot 31 Brickmakers Drive, Moorebank................................................................... 146....... 10

IHAP 06          DA-850/2014 - Construction of a Rural Fire Service Station at Corner Lot 1 Twenty Seventh Avenue, West Hoxton.................................................................... 153....... 11

Development Application Determination Report

NIL

Chief Executive Officer Report

CEO 01          Corporate Sponsorships............................................................................... 161....... 12

Business Improvement Report

NIL

Chief Financial Officer

CFO 01           Tabling of the Annual Pecuniary Interest Returns for Councillors and Designated Persons                                                                                                                       164....... 13

CFO 02           Investment Report September 2015............................................................ 166....... 14

CFO 03           Timing of Committee Meetings ................................................................... 175....... 15

CFO 04           Annual Financial Reports 2014/15................................................................ 183....... 16

CFO 05           Councillor Transparency............................................................................... 188....... 17

City Presentation Report

NIL

Community and Culture Report

DCC 01          Domestic Violence in Liverpool LGA............................................................ 231....... 18

DCC 02          Grants and Donations................................................................................... 245....... 19

DCC 03          Planning for Toilets in Council Reserves...................................................... 250....... 20

Economy and Engagement Report

DEE 01           Pump House (Coffee Shop), Bigge Park..................................................... 256....... 21

DEE 02           Small Business Workshops.......................................................................... 260....... 22

DEE 03           Review of Outgoing Corporate Sponsorship Policy..................................... 273....... 23

Infrastructure and Environment Report

NIL

Planning and Growth Report

DPG 01          Outdoor Signage and Outdoor Product Displays......................................... 302....... 24

DPG 02          Update on proposed Northumberland and George Streets conversion to two-way traffic flow................................................................................................................ 305....... 25

DPG 03          Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment 55) - Permit additional uses (service station and take away food and drink premises) at 1-5 Yato Road, Prestons 313                                                                                                                         26

DPG 04          Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment 46) - Macleod Park Master Plan............................................................................................................... 316....... 27

DPG 05          Animal Management Policy.......................................................................... 319....... 28

DPG 06          Outcome of Public Exhibition - Proposed New 3D Imaging Fees............... 321....... 29

DPG 07          Air Quality Monitoring................................................................................... 325....... 30

Property and Commercial Development Report

DPC 01           Classification of Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, Lot 10 DP 1043935, 305 Cowpasture Road, Carnes Hill and Lot 2 and 3 DP 1208552, 350-354 Macquarie Street, Liverpool, as 'Operational' land..................................................................... 330....... 31

Committee Reports

CTTE 01         Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee held on 7 October 2015.... 336....... 32

CTTE 02         Minutes Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting  held on the 2 September 2015 341                                                                                                                         33

CTTE 03         Minutes of the Street Naming Committee meeting held on 27 August 2015 348        34

CTTE 04         Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 1 September, 2015 and Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 6 October, 2015 ............................................................................................................. 368....... 35

CTTE 05         Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 23 September 2015 381    36

CTTE 06         Minutes of Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held 5 October 2015                                                                                                                       386....... 37

CTTE 07         Draft Minutes of Planning and Development Committee Meeting held on 7 October 2015                                                                                                                       431....... 38

CTTE 08         Minutes of Committee for Liverpool Meeting held 29 September 2015...... 437....... 39

Questions with Notice

QWN 01         Question with Notice - Clr Stanley................................................................ 442....... 40

QWN 02         Question with Notice - Clr Stanley................................................................ 449....... 41

QWN 03         Question with Notice - Clr Stanley................................................................ 452....... 42

QWN 04         Question with Notice - Clr Stanley................................................................ 454....... 43  

Questions Taken on Notice

Presentations by Councillors

Council in Closed Session

The following items are listed for consideration by Council in Closed Session with the public excluded, in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 1993 as listed below:

 

 

 

 
CONF 01        Moorebank Voluntary Acquisition Scheme

Reason:     Item CONF 01 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10(A)(2)(g) of the Local Government Act because it contains advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.

 

CONF 02   Tender WT1390 – Design and Supply of Multi and Single Function Poles

Reason:     Item CONF 02 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10(A)(2)(d i) of the Local Government Act because it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

CONF 03   Key Sites Master Planning Steering Committee Minutes from Meeting held 6 October 2015

Reason:     Item CONF 03 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10(A)(2)(c) of the Local Government Act because it contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

 

CONF 04   Tender for the Liverpool Engagement Strategy

Reason:     Item CONF 04 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10(A)(2)(c) of the Local Government Act because it contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

 

CONF 05   Acquisition of Lot 1 DP 153264, 37 Scott Street, Liverpool, for road purposes

Reason:     Item CONF 05 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10(A)(2)(c) of the Local Government Act because it contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.  

Close


 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE IS BLANK

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE IS BLANK

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 


MINUTES OF THE Ordinary Meeting

HELD ON 30 September 2015 AND RECONVENED ON 6 OCTOBER 2015

 

 

PRESENT:

Mayor Ned Mannoun

Councillor Balloot

Councillor Hadchiti

Councillor Hadid

Councillor Harle

Councillor Karnib

Councillor Mamone (arrived at 7.35pm)

Councillor Ristevski (arrived at 7.35pm)

Councillor Shelton

Councillor Stanley

Councillor Waller

Mr Gary Grantham, Acting Chief Executive Officer

Ms Toni Averay, Director Planning and Growth

Ms Kiersten Fishburn, Director Community and Culture

Mr Michael Cullen, Director Economic Development

Ms Carole Todd, Director Business Improvement

Mr John Morgan, Director Property and Commercial Development

 

 

The meeting commenced at 6.13pm.

 

 

OPENING                              6.13pm

PRAYER                               The prayer of the Council was read by Father Remy Lam Son Bui from All Saints Catholic Parish, Liverpool.

APOLOGIES                         Nil


 

CONDOLENCES               

 

Chris Dunn – read by Clr Stanley

 

It is with deep regret that I advise Council of the sad passing of Mr Chris Dunn. Chris was a long term resident of Liverpool making his home at Hinchinbrook. Chris passed away on 30th August 2015, after a long illness. He started work after completing an apprenticeship working for more than 20 years for Sydney Water. Chris’s contribution to the local community was diverse and invaluable; he was a life member of Parents without Partners and also a volunteer bus driver for South West Community transport and drove buses for James Busby High School and several other Liverpool community groups. He was also a member of Liverpool wood-turners guild and made wooden toys for local children, hospitals and communities in need. Mr Chris Hayes described him recently in Federal Parliament “as a very popular, gregarious and larger-than-life character, always there to help when needed.”

 

Chris Dunn was a long term member of the Labor Party and because of his wish to help his community ran for Liverpool Council twice once in 1999 falling just short of the required votes to be elected and again in 2008.

 

A number of staff in Council’s Community Planning and Development worked closely with Chris in his capacity as a local volunteer and were saddened by his passing. They have asked that their appreciation for his work be noted and they wish to pass on their condolences to Chris’s family. The staff have provided the following thoughts about Mr Dunn: “for many years Chris was a volunteer bus driver for the Mayoral Concert, Discovery Tours, Sorry Day and other community programs. There was always praise given for Chris’s gentle and kind nature. Chris was also involved in the Hinchinbrook Management Committee for many years. A valuable volunteer, Chris will be remembered as a lovely gentleman, who assisted Council on many occasions through his volunteer work. Chris was a nice and caring person.”

 

I offer my condolences to his family, especially his wife, Sue, and his mother, Margaret. I ask Council to provide a copy of this motion and Council condolences to his family.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That Council:

 

  1. Express its deepest sympathy to Mr Dunn’s family, especially his wife, Sue and his mother, Margaret.

 

  1. Provide a copy of this motion and a letter of Condolence to his family.

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

Confirmation of Minutes

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the minutes of the Ordinary Meeting held on 26 August 2015 and the Extraordinary Meeting held on 2 September 2015 be confirmed as a true record of that meeting subject to the minutes of the 26 August 2015 meeting being corrected (on page 45) on CFO 01 (Nomination for Liverpool Cit Council member on Luddenham Quarry Community Consultative Committee) to show that Councillor Harle was the Councillor nominated to represent Council on the Committee.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Declarations of Interest

Clr Stanley declared a pecuniary interest in the following Item:

 

Item NOM 09: Phase Three Land Reclassifications and Rezonings

Reason: Clr Stanley owns property in the area of one of the parks in question.

Clr Stanley left the Chambers for the duration of the Item.

 

 

Clr Shelton declared a pecuniary interest in the following Item:

 

Item CONF 12: ST2483 Provision of Expert Legal Services

Reason: Clr Shelton has had business dealings with various tendering parties.

 

Clr Shelton left the Chambers for the duration of the Item.

 

 

Mayor Mannoun declared a non-pecuniary, less than significant interest in the following Item:

 

Item DCC 03: Grants and Donations

Reason: One of the proposed recipients of a donation is a family friend and their father lives in his investment property.

 

Mayor Mannoun left the Chambers for the duration of the item.

 

Public Forum

 

Presentation – Items not on agenda

 

  1. Ms Marella Harris addressed the Council on offensive noise and investigations.

 

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That a two minute extension of time be given to Marella Harris.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

Representation – Items on agenda

 

1.    Ms Lisa Warton addressed the Council on the following Item:

 

NOM 09 - Phase Three Land Reclassifications and Rezonings

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Mayor Mannoun

 

That a two minute extension of time be given to Lisa Warton.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

2.    Mr Peter Maatouk addressed the Council on the following Item:

 

NOM 03 - Investigation into allegations made in NSW Legislative Council about Liverpool Council

 

Clr Stanley asked that her concerns regarding the legality of Mr Maatouk’s comments be noted.

 

3.    Ms Rima Katrib addressed the Council on the following Item:

 

NOM 07 - Pump House (Coffee Shop) Bigge Park Liverpool

 

4.    Mr Joseph Rodi addressed the Council on the following Item:

 

NOM 04 - Housing Crisis

 

5.    Ms Melinda Cruz will address Council on the following Item:

 

NOM 08 - Action Forum for the Women of the Western Sydney Region

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That a two minute extension of time be given to Melinda Cruz.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

6.    Ms Ruby Walker addressed Council on the following Item:

 

NOM 09 - Phase Three Land Reclassifications and Rezonings

 

 

 

Mayoral Minute

SUBJECT: Support and Encouragement for UNSW Landscape Architecture Students

As part of UNSW’s landscape architecture undergraduate degree program, 3rd year students are currently undertaking a course titled “landscape design 6: design with a complex program”.   Their task is to provide a comprehensive vision for the riverfront lands, extending from Liverpool hospital in the north east, to Light Horse Park in the south, and present ideas to reconnect Liverpool City Centre with the east bank of the river.

 

On Monday 17 August, Council hosted a one-day intensive design charrette for 45 students.  These students worked together in small groups of 4-5 persons and develop initial ideas for a master plan which could be refined throughout the semester.   Also in attendance were staff from Council’s City Design, Community Planning, Property Services, and Library Heritage sections, who provided background information and history of the study area, as well as advice and feedback on the numerous great ideas presented by students.

 

Council was thanked by UNSW for the generous support thus far and look forward to continuing engagement.  As a result, UNSW has invited Council to further assist students by involvement in a juror panel to help determine the most outstanding master plan.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That Council:

 

  1. Acknowledges that new ideas by students can contribute to Building Our New City.

 

  1. Acknowledges the role of landscape design in the future development of Our City.

 

  1. Acknowledges the importance of cultivating a supportive relationship with UNSW.

 

  1. Provide continuing in-kind support for students including involvement in juror panel convened by UNSW Architecture and Design Faculty and selection of best group master plan and individual contribution.

 

  1. Provide up to $1000 as a group prize to those students who contribute the best landscape master plan for the City Centre Riverfront.

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

Mayoral Minute

SUBJECT: Miller Public School and sister school in Chile

 

Towards the end of 2014, Miller Public School established a sister school partnership with Liceo Rural de Putu in Chile. The sister school partnership between the two schools was established by the School Counsellor, Grace Canales, at Miller Public School.

 

The idea for the sister school partnership was born when Ms Canales, who originates from Chile, visited her sister in Chile. As part of the partnership a teacher and a student from Liceo Rural de Putu were invited to travel to Australia and visit the Miller Public School and arrived in Australia on Sunday 27 September.

 

The Miller Public School agreed to cover half the costs of the airfares with the Liceo Rural de Putu school and Ms Canales has already covered those expenses out of her own pocket.

 

On the basis that a sister school partnership has formed within our local community, Council should provide assistance and funding towards the airfares on behalf of Ms Canales and the Miller Public School. The Miller Public School Principal, Ms Bronwyn York has informed Council that the cost of half the airfares amounted to $1500, therefore Council should provide financial assistance by way of reimbursement to Ms Canales to the amount of $1500.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That Council:

 

  1. Commends the formation of the sister school relationship between Miller Public School and Liceo Rural de Putu school in Chile.

 

  1. Commends the Principal Bronwyn York and Miller Public School Counsellor Grace Canales for their initiative in establishing the sister school relationship.

 

3.    Reimburse Grace Canales of Miller Public School the sum of $1500 that she paid towards half the airfares from Chile to Australia of the school teacher and student from Chile.

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


 

Mayoral Minute

SUBJECT: Legal Response to Concrete Recycling Facility

 

On September 11, 2015 the Planning Assessment Commission (PAC) approved the construction of the controversial Moorebank Waste and Recycling Facility on the banks of the Georges River.

 

This facility will handle approximately 500,000 tonnes of construction waste per year and sits next to brand new residential housing estate, and a proposed luxury marina on the George’s River.  Our council has worked to develop a positive plan for our community and the prime waterfront land alongside our beautiful George’s River. This facility will spoil those plans.

 

PAC approved the final decision after the NSW Department of Planning progressed the application and recommended its approval.  This decision by the PAC was made despite a vigorous defence mounted by the Liverpool Council, our State MP Melanie Gibbons and Federal MP Craig Kelly, and members of the community.

 

The decision by the PAC in the face of sound planning arguments has outraged all involved in the staunch defence of residents in Georges Fair and the greater Liverpool area.

 

Previously, this council had assured the community that we will engage in a legal challenge in the Land and Environment Court and seek to overturn this decision.

 

Consequently, Council has sought legal advice and will pursue all available legal avenues to argue against this development. We will also continue to stand by the residents in voicing their opposition to the concrete recycling plant.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That Council:

 

  1. Write to the NSW Planning Minister to express our disappointment to the decision by the PAC to approve this facility and inform him that we will oppose the decision in the Land and Environment Court.

 

  1. Delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to commence legal proceedings against any and all relevant parties in relation to Planning Assessment Commission determination D356/15 and Part 3A application 05-0157, concerning the approval of a waste recycling facility in Moorebank.

 

  1. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to explore all avenues including the potential of a land swap and site testing to stop the proposed development proceeding, should legal action be unsuccessful; And

 

 

  1. Write to the affected residents to advise them of Liverpool Council’s planned course of action, and continue to update them periodically on the progress of our legal challenge.

 

  1. Notes the confidential legal advice received by Liverpool Council in regards to a legal challenge.

 

Motion:                                            Moved: Mayor Mannoun

 

That this item be dealt with in closed session at the end of the meeting in accordance with Section 10(A)(2)(g) of the Local Government Act.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 


 

Mayoral Minute

SUBJECT: Korean War Veterans Memorial

 

On November 1st at Bigge Park Liverpool Council with veterans of the Korean War will be unveiling a plinth dedicated to the Australian soldiers still missing in action from the Korean War.

 

Another sad chapter from our history, the Korean War marks the beginning of open hostilities that would be part of the so called Cold War. Australia joined the United States and other allies in the war and fought against the tyranny of North Korea that threatened to consume the country.

 

In the 3 years of hostilities before the ceasefire Australia suffered nearly 2000 casualties; killed, wounded or still missing in action. It is to those 43 men who still remain on the Korean battle field, their bodies’ un-located, that we particularly honour with this memorial. Their names and rank are listed on the plaque.

 

To foster the memory of those who served and were lost in the Korean conflict Council should provide every assistance to the Korean War Veterans Association for the event to honour the memories of our Australian Soldiers.

 

Special acknowledgement is deserved to Mr Sheridan O’Brien, himself a veteran of the war, and member of Korean War Veterans Association. Korea is sometimes miss characterised as “The Forgotten War” but with active veterans like Mr O’Brien we can ensure that the lives of all soldiers who served are not forgotten.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That Council:

 

  1. Acknowledges the Korean War Veterans and the service to their country.

 

  1. Supports the commemorative day by donating $3500 to cover associated requirements with the November 1st unveiling.

 

  1. Congratulate Mr Sheridan O’Brien for his initiative and hard work.

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

Clr Mamone and Clr Ristevski arrived at the Chambers at 7.35pm

 

Clr Karnib, Clr Stanley, Clr Shelton and Clr Waller left the Chambers at 7.38pm

 

Mayoral Minute

 

SUBJECT: Lies told under Parliamentary Privilege

 

On the 10th of September 2015 a series of lies were told by Robert Borsack, a Member of the Shooters and Fishers Party. The lies, told under the protection of Parliamentary Privilege are part of an ongoing campaign against the Mayor, the Liverpool CEO and Council staff.

 

The statement was made in a cowardly fashion during an adjournment debate in the Legislative Council. Had Mr Borsak made these fabricated allegations outside of the protection of Parliamentary Privilege they would have deemed defamatory.

 

The importance of free speech during parliamentary proceedings is paramount and necessary in the development of policy and legislation. However, serious questions must be asked when a Member of Parliament uses free speech under the cloak of parliamentary privilege as a sword to attack the character of people rather than a shield to protect good government.

 

Following the speech Council quickly examined the statement and publicly refuted all the lies.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That Council:

 

1.    Condemns the cowardly and inappropriate behaviour of the MP Robert Borsak in the Upper House on 10th of September when he engaged in a series of lies about individuals at Liverpool Council.

 

2.    Notes that Council did respond swiftly and publicly to examine and refute the lies that were told.

 

3.    Confirms publicly that Council has not been contacted by the Minister for Local Government or Division of Local Government in relation to an investigation into the lies.

 

4.    Notes that the Mayor has written to the Minister for Local Government welcoming him to conduct an investigation into the MP’s dishonest statement. (Letter attached)

 

5.    Recommends that anyone with information about illegal activities contacts the relevant authorities.

6.    Recommends lawyers acting on behalf of Council, the Mayor and the CEO, examine whether a case for defamation exists, where the statements have been reproduced outside of parliamentary privilege.

 

7.    Congratulates our local media for recognising that Mr Borsak’s statement lacked any credibility.

 

8.    Writes to the Parliament of NSW to seek a review of the rules surrounding parliamentary privilege.

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun

 

That Council:

 

1.    Condemns the inappropriate behaviour of the MP Robert Borsak in the Upper House on 10th of September when he engaged in a series of lies about individuals at Liverpool Council.

 

2.    Notes that Council did respond swiftly and publicly to examine and refute the lies that were told.

 

3.    Confirms publicly that Council has not been contacted by the Minister for Local Government or Division of Local Government in relation to an investigation into the lies.

 

4.    Notes that the Mayor has written to the Minister for Local Government welcoming him to conduct an investigation into the MP’s dishonest statement. (Letter attached)

 

5.    Recommends that anyone with information about illegal activities contacts the relevant authorities.

 

6.    Seek advice to examine whether a case for defamation against Council exists.

 

7.    Congratulates our local media for recognising that Mr Borsak’s statement lacked any credibility.

 

8.    Writes to the Parliament of NSW and the LGNSW to seek a review of the rules surrounding parliamentary privilege.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Note: Clr Stanley, Clr Waller, Clr Karnib and Clr Shelton were not in the Chambers when the item was voted on.

 

Mayor Mannoun called for a recess of Council at 7.40pm.

 

Mayor Mannoun reopened the meeting at 8.06pm

 


21

Notices of Motion Of Rescission

ITEM NO:      NOMR 01

FILE NO:        245882.2015

SUBJECT:     Notice of Motion of Rescission - NOM 04 Orthodox Interfaith Lunch 2016 from the Council meeting of 26 August 2015

 

NOTICE OF MOTION OF RESCISSION

 

That Council rescinds the resolution relating to NOM 04 Orthodox Interfaith Lunch 2016 from the Council Meeting 26 August 2015, namely point 6 of the resolution as shown below:

 

That Council:

 

1.   Congratulate staff and in particular Alyson Infanti, Maree Stewart and Lauren Myers for their hard work and support of the event.

 

2.   Council write to the folk dancing groups Ilinden, Vardar and Izvor for donating their time in performing. Also write to the MC Zack Gulevski for giving up his time for the event.

 

3.   Congratulate Mayor Ned Mannoun, Councillors Sabrina Mamone, Gus Balloot, Peter Harle and Geoff Shelton for showing their support in attending the event.

 

4.   Write to the Liverpool Catholic Club and thanking them for their professionalism in catering for the event for all members of the community.

 

5.   Report to Council on the best way to conduct Interfaith functions in the future.

 

6.   Notes with regret the late change to the running order on the day which withdrew the invitation to speak at the event of the Hon. Laurie Ferguson MP Member for Werriwa. Council sincerely apologises to Hon Mr Ferguson for this change. Council notes Hon. Mr Ferguson’s long term support of Liverpool and its residents and all ethnic groups and cultures.

 

7.   The Mayor on behalf of Council writes to Hon Laurie Ferguson to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti                      Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the resolution from the 26 August 2015 Council meeting was Rescinded (to remove points 6 and 7 of the motion).

 

 

 

Division called:

 

Vote for:                       Mayor Mannoun

                                      Clr Hadchiti

                                      Clr Hadid

                                      Clr Harle

                                      Clr Balloot

                                      Clr Mamone

 

Vote against:               Clr Karnib

                                      Clr Ristevski

                                      Clr Shelton

                                      Clr Stanley

                                      Clr Waller

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti                      Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That Council:

 

1.   Congratulate staff and in particular Alyson Infanti, Maree Stewart and Lauren Myers for their hard work and support of the event.

 

2.   Council write to the folk dancing groups Ilinden, Vardar and Izvor for donating their time in performing. Also write to the MC Zack Gulevski for giving up his time for the event.

 

3.   Congratulate Mayor Ned Mannoun, Councillors Sabrina Mamone, Gus Balloot, Peter Harle and Geoff Shelton for showing their support in attending the event.

 

4.   Write to the Liverpool Catholic Club and thanking them for their professionalism in catering for the event for all members of the community.

 

5.   Report to Council on the best way to conduct Interfaith functions in the future.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


23

Notices of Motion

ITEM NO:      NOM 01

FILE NO:        220743.2015

SUBJECT:     Timing of Committee meetings

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That all committee meetings commence from 6pm onwards.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Ristevski           Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That the CEO be authorised with the membership of the new committees to make changes to meeting times to suit the participation and to come back to the next Council meeting with some suggestions.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


23

ITEM NO:      NOM 02

FILE NO:        241530.2015

SUBJECT:     Lurnea High School 50th Anniversary

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

1.   That Council notes Lurnea High School 50 years of providing quality education to students of Liverpool.

 

2.   Writes to the Principal congratulating the school on the anniversary and the events which celebrated the milestone.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


25

ITEM NO:      NOM 03

FILE NO:        244447.2015

SUBJECT:     Investigation into allegations made in NSW Legislative Council about Liverpool Council

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

1.    Have Council officers been made aware of an investigation by the Minister for Local Government or Division of Local Government into these outrageous allegations?

 

2.    If not, Council request such an immediate independent investigation to assist in clearing the names of those who were named in the speech? 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Ristevski

1.    Have Council officers been made aware of an investigation by the Minister for Local Government or Division of Local Government into these outrageous allegations?

 

2.    If not, Council request that the matter be referred to the Office of Local Government to be investigated by Weir Pty Ltd or another qualified company.

 

Foreshadowed motion:       Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That Council request that the matter be referred to the Office of Local Government to be investigated by a qualified company.

 

Mayor Mannoun ruled that the motion (moved by Clr Ristevski) was out of order and as such, the motion was not put to the meeting.

 

The Foreshadowed motion (moved by Clr Stanley) was then put to the meeting and was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 


25

Clr Mamone left the Chambers at 8.39pm.

 

ITEM NO:      NOM 04

FILE NO:        245538.2015

SUBJECT:     Housing Crisis

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That:

 

1.   The CEO write to the Housing Minister congratulating him on this innovative concept and invite him to do the same in Liverpool.

 

2.   Setup a housing crisis Councillor Taskforce to be chaired by Councillor Ristevski and made up of all Councillors to co-ordinate with the relevant stakeholders in finding solutions to this problem in our LGA.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Ristevski           Seconded: Clr Stanley

That:

 

1.   The CEO write to the Housing Minister congratulating him on this innovative concept and invite him to do the same in Liverpool.

 

2.   Amend the Homelessness Taskforce established at the Extraordinary Council meeting of 2 September 2015 to include a housing crisis focus. The taskforce is to be chaired by Councillor Ristevski and made up of all Councillors to co-ordinate with the relevant stakeholders including the Salvation Army in finding solutions to this problem in our LGA.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Clr Mamone returned to the Chambers at  8.42pm.


27

ITEM NO:      NOM 05

FILE NO:        245553.2015

SUBJECT:     Customer Service

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Open Customer Service on Saturdays from 9am-1pm for a three month trial period.

 

2.   Have one planner working during this period to assist ratepayers with their planning queries.

 

3.   Advertise the Saturday opening period of our Customer Service period in both local papers and South West Voice including our ratepayers newsletter and our website/Facebook page to get the message to our ratepayers so that the three month trial period is effective. 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Ristevski           Seconded: Clr Waller

That Council:

 

1.   Consider opening the Customer Service on Saturdays from 9am-1pm for a three month trial period.

 

2.   Have one planner working during this period to assist ratepayers with their planning queries.

 

3.   Conduct a staff and community survey to engage if there is support for Saturday opening hours for the Customer Service Centre with a report to come back to the next Council meeting. If there is a demand, what is the cost?

 

4.   That a report be brought back to the next Council meeting that addresses:

 

·         How many Council staff have left since Council voted to go ahead with the partnership and and what were the reasons behind it?

 

·         How much has the new customer service centre cost in total?

 

·         That an accurate organisational structure showing all positions within the  Customer Service division and note whether these positions are filled now by Council staff, Propel staff or agency staff.

 

·         Outline exactly what new equipment or programs will be purchased or installed to assist staff in the Customer Service division including telephones and customer service software.

 

 

5.  In relation to the smell of raw sewerage which is currently in the Customer Service area:

 

·         Staff be moved to a safe place to work that is not impacted by the smell

·         Work to fix the source of the smell be arranged immediately

·         Any carpets that have been impacted be replaced as a matter of urgency

·         A report be prepared on how this matter was handled and why it has been allowed to drag on for 6 days

 

6.  Ensure there are adequate public toilets for the public in the Customer Service area.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


29

ITEM NO:      NOM 06

FILE NO:        245569.2015

SUBJECT:     Determination Moorebank Recyclers by Planning Assessment Commission

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Discuss options available to it to appeal this decision.

 

2.   To allow discussion it would be appreciate if staff could provide a briefing paper outlining the timeline of this application.

 

3.   Provide any legal advice available to assist Councillors to discuss options for this development approval. (Under confidential cover as necessary.)

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Note: This item was dealt with in conjunction with the Mayoral Minute – Legal Response to Concrete Recycling Facility, on pages 55-56 of these minutes.


29

ITEM NO:      NOM 07

FILE NO:        245625.2015

SUBJECT:     Pump House (Coffee Shop) Bigge Park Liverpool

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receive a report for the October 2015 Council meeting into The Pump House Coffee Shop in Bigge Park.

 

2.   The report should include but not be limited to the following:

a)   Costs and scope of all works at the site since July 2013

b)   Who provided the works-Council day labor, Council contractors, leasee,

c)   Were there also inkind works? If so, what did these works involve?

d)   What was the value of the initial lease.

e)   What is the expected value of new lease, what terms will this take?

f)    Has Council been provided with details of turnover, profit of the Pump House since opening if so can it be provided.

 

*(Under confidential cover as necessary.)

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


31

ITEM NO:      NOM 08

FILE NO:        245662.2015

SUBJECT:     Action Forum for the Women of the Western Sydney Region

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That:

 

  1. Council host a Women's Forum at the Casula Powerhouse in November 2015 with the focus of the following motion:

 

"To form an Organisation for Women to represent the interests of those in the Western Sydney Region with its Board comprising of the following membership:

 

a)   A maximum of two female Councillors from each council and

b)   Two non-Council representatives including one from each Local Government Areas of each member Council:

 

i.   A community representative or not for profit organisation, and

ii.   A prominent business woman

iii.  All nominations be returned to Council and considered in Confidential session."

 

  1. Send an invite, from Clr Sabrina Mamone, to all the female Western Sydney Councillors inviting them to the Women’s Forum attaching a copy of this Notice of Motion.

 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Mamone            Seconded: Clr Hadid

That:

 

  1. Council host a Women's Forum at the Casula Powerhouse in November 2015 with the focus of the following motion:

 

"To form an Organisation for Women to represent the interests of those in the Western Sydney Region with a Board comprising of the following membership:

 

a)   A maximum of two female Councillors from each council and

b)   Two non-Council representatives including one from each Local Government Area of each member Council which includes:

 

i.   A community representative or not for profit organisation, and

ii.   A prominent business woman”

 

c)   All nominations be returned back to Council to be considered in a Confidential           session.

    

    d)  Council write to all Ministers for relevant funding that may be available.

 

  1. Allow Clr Sabrina Mamone to invite all the female Western Sydney Councillors to the Women’s Forum attaching a copy of this Notice of Motion.
  2. Allow Clr Sabrina Mamone to invite any relevant Members of Parliamant to attend the Forum in November.
  3. Allow Clr Sabrina Mamone to liaise with WSROC and MACROC for assistance which may be required.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


33

Clr Stanley left the Chambers at 8.57pm.

ITEM NO:      NOM 09

FILE NO:        245695.2015

SUBJECT:     Phase Three Land Reclassifications and Rezonings

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council forthwith discontinue its attempts to reclassify, rezone and dispose of the following properties: 

·    124A Wonga Road, Lurnea (McCarthy Park)

·    Part of 15 Qantas Boulevard, Middleton Grange (Part of Stante Reserve)

·    8 Ferrington Crescent, Liverpool (Ferrington Park)

·    20A Frazer Avenue, Lurnea (Baker Park)

·    84A St Andrews Boulevard, Casula (St Andrews Park)

·    26 Wendlebury Road, Chipping Norton (Wendlebury Park)

·    22 Box Road, Casula (Mimosa Park)

·    72A Grevillea Crescent, Prestons (Acacia Park)

·    230 Newbridge Road, Moorebank (Part of Regan Park)

·    99-101 Rose Street, Liverpool (Part of Pearce Park)

·    12A Brain Avenue, Lurnea (Hannan Park),

·    and Thawaral and Hazel Bradshaw parks to the extent as much might still be under consideration. 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Harle

 

  1. That Council forthwith discontinue its attempts to reclassify, rezone and dispose of the following properties: 

 

·    124A Wonga Road, Lurnea (McCarthy Park)

·    Part of 15 Qantas Boulevard, Middleton Grange (Part of Stante Reserve)

·    8 Ferrington Crescent, Liverpool (Ferrington Park)

·    20A Frazer Avenue, Lurnea (Baker Park)

·    84A St Andrews Boulevard, Casula (St Andrews Park)

·    26 Wendlebury Road, Chipping Norton (Wendlebury Park)

·    22 Box Road, Casula (Mimosa Park)

·    72A Grevillea Crescent, Prestons (Acacia Park)

·    230 Newbridge Road, Moorebank (Part of Regan Park)

·    99-101 Rose Street, Liverpool (Part of Pearce Park)

·    12A Brain Avenue, Lurnea (Hannan Park),

·    and Thawaral and Hazel Bradshaw parks to the extent as much might still be under consideration. 

 

 

2.    A report be brought to Council on possible park upgrades.

 

Amendment:                         Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

1.    That the item be deferred to the next Council meeting, alongside the Council officers report in relation to community consultation on the pocket parks mentioned above.

 

2.    That the report also report on possible park upgrades on those parks that are not recommended for sale.

 

3.    Officers list the park priority for this financial year.

 

4.    Officers report back on a funding source if needed to immediately undertake works at one or any of those parks.

 

On being put to the meeting the Amendment (moved by Clr Hadchiti) was declared CARRIED.

 

The Amendment then became the motion and on being put the meeting was declared CARRIED.

 

 

Clr Stanley returned to the Chambers at 9.18pm.


35

Mayor Mannoun left the Chambers at 9.18pm and the Deputy Mayor, Clr Balloot took the Chair.

ITEM NO:      NOM 10

FILE NO:        245726.2015

SUBJECT:     Air Quality Monitoring

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council generates a report for the next Council Meeting Council addressing the following questions.

1.   In light of the above concerns, what practical options could Council implement to better monitor and control the amount of dust particles that settle in residential areas within close proximity Building Material Waste Recycling Centres located in the Liverpool LGA?

 

2.   Based on the recent decision by the NSW PAC and its approval for the Moorebank Waste Recycling Centre, what practical options are available to Council to ensure that the plant operates within the conditions of consent and in particular to air quality?

 

3.   What would be the cost of purchasing portable air quality monitoring equipment that could be set up in areas of concerns considered problematic?

 

4.   In the case of the Moorebank Recycling Centre, does Council have the power/authority to ensure that independent 24 hour 7 days a week air quality monitoring takes place and that the information is published on the Council Website on a regular basis?   

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Mayor Mannoun returned to the Chambers at 9.26pm.


35

Clr Balloot left the Chambers at 9.27pm.

Clr Hadchiti left the Chambers at 9.28pm.

Clr Balloot returned to the Chambers at 9.29pm.

Clr Hadchiti returned to the Chambers at 9.30pm.

ITEM NO:      NOM 11

FILE NO:        245744.2015

SUBJECT:     Recovering Plans

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Report at the next Council Meeting on what records were actually lost

 

2.   Come up with an action plans in assisting in recovering house plans for those homes and report back to council at the next meeting.

 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Mamone            Seconded: Clr Waller

 

That Council:

 

  1. Report back to Council on what records staff believe was lost in the fire and what can be done to address the matter, including costs of an audit.

 

Put a policy in place to deal with records that were burnt

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


37

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

ITEM NO:      IHAP 01

FILE NO:        220518.2015

SUBJECT:     DA-66/2015 - Construction of 19 detached and 4 semi-detached dwellings and community title subdivision on proposed development Lots 5 and 10 within proposed Lot 22, in the Plan of Subdivision of Lots 31 and 32 in DP 1181985 within the former New Brighton Golf Course

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Development Application DA-66/2015, subject to the amended conditions of consent (Attachment 4)

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 


37

ITEM NO:      IHAP 02

FILE NO:        221998.2015

SUBJECT:     DA-198/2015 - Three stage Torrens title subdivision and construction of 12 dwellings at Lot 310 DP 1186176 Bryant Avenue, Lot 311 DP 1186176 Flynn Avenue, and Lot 2 DP 1184259 Genairco Park, Hall Circuit, Middleton Grange

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Development Application DA-198/2015, subject to the recommended conditions of consent contained within the Council officer’s report (attached).

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

 


39

ITEM NO:      IHAP 03

FILE NO:        222261.2015

SUBJECT:     DA-1105/2014 - Demolition of existing structures and Torrens title subdivision over 2 stages: Stage 1 seeks approval for the creation of five lots. Stage 2 seeks approval for the creation of 24 lots and demolition at 636 Hoxton Park Road, Hoxton Park

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Development Application DA-1105/2014, subject to the recommended conditions of consent contained within the Council officer’s IHAP report (attached).

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Mamone

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

 


39

ITEM NO:      IHAP 04

FILE NO:        224036.2015

SUBJECT:     DA-180/2015 - Two lot Torrens title subdivision at 64 Pleasure Point Road, Pleasure Point

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approve Development Application DA-180/2015, subject to the recommended conditions attached to the Council officer’s IHAP report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Balloot

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Vote for:                                Mayor Mannoun

                                                Clr Balloot

                                                Clr Hadchiti

                                                Clr Hadid

                                                Clr Harle

                                                Clr Karnib

                                                Clr Mamone

                                                Clr Ristevski

                                                Clr Shelton

                                                Clr Waller

 

Vote against:                         Clr Stanley

 

 


41

ITEM NO:      IHAP 05

FILE NO:        225082.2015

SUBJECT:     DA-630/2014 - Three lot Torrens title subdivision at 20 First Avenue, Hoxton Park

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Development Application DA-630/2014, subject to the recommended Conditions of Consent attached to the Council Officer’s report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Balloot

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Vote for:                                Mayor Mannoun

                                                Clr Balloot

                                                Clr Hadchiti

                                                Clr Hadid 

                                                Clr Karnib

                                                Clr Mamone

                                                Clr Ristevski 

                                                Clr Waller

 

Vote against:                         Clr Harle

                                                Clr Shelton

                                                Clr Stanley

 


43

ITEM NO:      IHAP 06

FILE NO:        225142.2015

SUBJECT:     DA-304/2015 - Three lot Torrens title subdivision at 11 Bullrush Cr, Voyager Point

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approve Development Application DA-304/2015, subject to the recommended conditions attached to the Council officer’s IHAP report (Attachment No 2)

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

Amendment: Moved: Clr Harle              Seconded: Clr Mamone

 

That the application be deferred and the applicant be invited to amend the application to two lots and a report be brought back to Council once a response has been received.

 

On being put to the meeting the Amendment (moved by Clr Harle) was declared LOST.

 

Vote for:                                Clr Harle

Clr Karnib

Clr Mamone

Clr Ristevski

Clr Waller

 

Vote against:                         Mayor Mannoun

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadid

Clr Hadchiti

Clr Shelton

Clr Stanley

 

The motion (moved by Clr Hadchiti) was then put to the meeting and was declared LOST.

 

Vote for:                                Mayor Mannoun

                                                Clr Balloot

                                                Clr Hadchiti

                                                Clr Hadid

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vote against:                         Clr Harle

                                                Clr Karnib

                                                Clr Ristevski

                                                Clr Shelton

                                                Clr Stanley

                                                Clr Mamone

                                                Clr Waller

 

As both the Amendment and Motion were lost when put to the meeting, IHAP 06 was resubmitted for Council to consider and the following motion was moved:

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

Foreshadowed motion:                 Moved:Clr Harle                   Seconded: Clr Mamone

 

That the application be deferred and the applicant be invited to amend the application to two lots and a report be brought back to Council once a response has been received.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion (moved by Clr Hadchiti) was declared LOST.

 

 Vote for:                               Mayor Mannoun

                                                Clr Balloot

                                                Clr Hadchiti

                                                Clr Hadid

 

Vote against:                         Clr Harle

                                                Clr Karnib

                                                Clr Ristevski

                                                Clr Shelton

                                                Clr Stanley

                                                Clr Mamone

                                                Clr Waller

 

The foreshadowed motion (moved by Clr Harle) then became the motion and on being put to the meeting was declared CARRIED.

 

Vote for:                                Mayor Mannoun

                                                Clr Harle

                                                Clr Karnib

                                                Clr Mamone

                                                Clr Ristevski       

                                                Clr Waller

                                               

Vote against:                         Clr Balloot

                                                Clr Hadid

                                                Clr Hadchiti

                                                Clr Shelton

                                                Clr Stanley

 


43

Chief Executive Officer Report

ITEM NO:      CEO 01

FILE NO:        089696.2015

SUBJECT:     Corporate Sponsorships

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

Endorses the Financial Contributions Panel’s recommendations for the provision of $30,750 (GST exclusive) under the Corporate Sponsorship Program as summarised in the table below. If the recommended amount of $30,750 is endorsed, the remaining balance will be $20,750

 

Applicant name

Amount

Igbo  Community Australia (in partnership with Liverpool MRC and Rwandan Community of NSW)

$5,000 ex gst

Wattle Grove Public School

$500 ex gst

Lurnea High School

$250 ex gst

Western Sydney Wanderers

$25,000 ex gst

 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That Council approves the provision of $5,750 (GST exclusive) under the Corporate Sponsorship Program as summarised in the table below. Council note that the remaining balance will be $45,750.

 

Applicant name

Amount

Igbo  Community Australia (in partnership with Liverpool MRC and Rwandan Community of NSW)

$5,000 ex gst

Wattle Grove Public School

$500 ex gst

Lurnea High School

$250 ex gst

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


45

ITEM NO:      CEO 02

FILE NO:        241681.2015

SUBJECT:     Carnes Hill Precinct Signage

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council note the contents of this report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Stanley              Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


45

Chief Financial Officer

ITEM NO:      CFO 01

FILE NO:        214003.2015

SUBJECT:     Review of Delegations by Council to the Chief Executive Officer

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Note this report;

 

2.    Delegates to the Chief Executive Officer the delegations set out in the Delegations to the Chief Executive Officer, as attached to this report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Clr Karnib, Clr Shelton and Clr Stanley asked that they be recorded as voting against the motion.

 


47

MOTION TO BRING ITEM FORWARD

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Mamone

 

That CFO 05 be brought forward and dealt with now.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared LOST.

 

ITEM NO:      CFO 02

FILE NO:        228280.2015

SUBJECT:     Election of Deputy Mayor

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council proceeds with the election of the Deputy Mayor to be conducted by the Returning Officer.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Method of Election

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Balloot  

 

That the method of election for the position of Deputy Mayor of Liverpool City Council for the term 30 September 2015 to 9 September 2016 be determined by open vote.

 

Amendment:                         Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That the method of election for the position of Deputy Mayor of Liverpool City Council for the term 30 September 2015 to 9 September 2016 be determined by preferential ballot.

 

On being put to the meeting the Amendment (moved by Clr Harle) was declared LOST.

 

The motion (moved by Mayor Mannoun) was then voted on and on being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

Nominations:

 

Nominations were called for the position of Deputy Mayor by the Acting Chief Executive Officer as the Returning Officer. 

 

The Acting Chief Executive Officer advised that three nominations had been received being for Clr Waller, Clr Harle and Clr Hadchiti.  The following votes were recorded:

 

         

Clr Waller – 4 votes

          Clr Harle   – 1 vote

          Clr Hadchiti – 6 votes

 

Clr Hadchiti was declared the Deputy Mayor.  

 

 

Motion:                         Moved: Mayor Mannoun              Seconded: Clr Balloot  

 

That:

 

1.    Councillor Hadchiti be declared the Deputy Mayor of Liverpool City Council for the term 30 September 2015 to 9 September 2016.

 

2.    Council’s Register of Delegations be amended accordingly.

 

3.    All balloot papers be collected and destroyed by the Returning Officer.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 


49

ITEM NO:      CFO 03

FILE NO:        233520.2015

SUBJECT:     Investment Report August 2015

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes this report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Waller                Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


53

ITEM NO:      CFO 04

FILE NO:        234251.2015

SUBJECT:     Appointment of Councillors to Committees and Affiliated Bodies

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Appoints Councillors as representatives to the following Committees for the period to September 2016:

 

a.   Aboriginal Consultative Committee

b.   Audit and Risk Committee

c.   Badgerys Creek Taskforce

d.   Budget and Finance Committee

e.   Building our New City

f.    Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre Board

g.   Civic Advisory Committee

h.   Committee for Liverpool

i.    Economic Development and Events

j.    Environment Advisory Committee

k.   Heritage Advisory Committee

l.    Liverpool Access Committee

m.  Liverpool Sports Committee

n.   Master Plan Steering Committee

o.   Multicultural Advisory Committee

p.   No Intermodal Committee

q.   Planning and Development Committee

r.    Street Naming Committee

s.   Warwick Farm Racing Precinct Steering Committee

t.    Youth Council

 

2.   Appoints Councillors as representatives to the following community committees and affiliated bodies and notifies of their representatives for the period to September 2016:

 

a.   Floodplain Management Association

b.   Georges River Combined Councils Committee

c.   Joint Regional Planning Panel

d.   Liverpool Migrant Resource Centre

e.   Liverpool Traffic Committee

f.    Macarthur Bushfire Management Committee

g.   Macarthur Zone Bushfire Liaison Committee

h.   Macarthur/Liverpool Community Relations Commission Regional Advisory Council

i.    NSW Metropolitan Public Libraries Association

j.    The South West Sydney Academy of Sport

k.   Westpool

l.    Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Mannoun           Seconded: Clr Balloot

1.    That Council appoints the following Councillor representatives to the internal Committees as listed below for the period to September 2016:

 

Internal Committees:

 

  1. Aboriginal Consultative Committee

 

Clr Shelton

Clr Waller

 

  1. Audit and Risk Committee

 

Clr Hadid

Clr Mamone

Clr Shelton

 

  1. Badgerys Creek Taskforce

 

Mayor Mannoun

Deputy Mayor Hadchiti

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadid

Clr Harle

Clr Mamone

 

  1. Budget and Finance Committee

 

Mayor Mannoun

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadid

Clr Harle

Clr Ristevski

Clr Shelton

 

  1. Building our New City

 

Mayor Mannoun

Deputy Mayor Hadchiti

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadid

Clr Mamone

Clr Shelton

 

  1. Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre Board

 

Clr Hadid

Clr Waller

 

 

  1. Civic Advisory Committee

 

Mayor and all Councillors

 

  1. Committee for Liverpool

 

Mayor Mannoun and President of WSROC (Clr Hadchiti)

 

  1. Economic Development and Events

 

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadid

Clr Harle

Clr Mamone

Clr Shelton

 

  1. Environment Advisory Committee

 

Clr Harle

Clr Mamone

Clr Shelton

 

  1. Heritage Advisory Committee

 

Clr Hadid

Clr Harle

 

  1. Liverpool Access Committee

 

Clr Waller

 

  1. Liverpool Sports Committee

 

Clr Hadid

Clr Ristevski

 

  1. Master Plan Steering Committee

 

Mayor Mannoun

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadchiti

Clr Hadid

Clr Harle

Clr Shelton

 

  1. Multicultural Advisory Committee

 

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadchiti

Clr Mamone

Clr Ristevski

 

  1. No Intermodal Committee

 

Mayor Mannoun

Clr Hadchiti

Clr Harle

 

  1. Planning and Development Committee

 

Mayor and all Councillors

 

  1. Street Naming Committee

 

Mayor Mannoun

Clr Balloot

Clr Harle

 

  1. Warwick Farm Racing Precinct Steering Committee

 

Deputy Mayor Hadchiti

 

  1. Youth Council

 

Clr Ristevski

Clr Waller

 

2.    Appoints the following Councillors as representatives to the following community Committees and affiliated bodies for the period to September 2016 and notifies the organisations of the representatives:

 

External Committees:

 

  1. Floodplain Management Association

 

Clr Harle

 

  1. Georges River Combined Councils Committee

 

Clr Harle

Clr Shelton

 

  1. Joint Regional Planning Panel

 

Clr Mamone

Clr Ristevski

Clr Hadchiti (alternate)

Clr Harle (alternate)

 

  1. Liverpool Migrant Resource Centre

 

Clr Balloot

Clr Karnib

 

  1. Liverpool Traffic Committee

 

Clr Hadchiti

 

  1. Macarthur Bushfire Management Committee

 

Clr Harle

 

  1. Macarthur Zone Bushfire Liaison Committee

 

Clr Harle

 

  1. Macarthur/Liverpool Community Relations Commission Regional Advisory Council

 

Clr Hadid

 

  1. NSW Metropolitan Public Libraries Association

 

Clr Mamone

 

  1. The South West Sydney Academy of Sport

 

Clr Stanley

 

  1. Westpool

 

Clr Ristevski

 

  1. Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils.

 

Clr Hadchiti

Clr Hadid

 

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

.


55

ITEM NO:      CFO 05

FILE NO:        241266.2015

SUBJECT:     Councillor Transparency

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Receive and note the information.

 

2.    Advertise the attendance at Councillor Briefing Sessions, Council meetings and Committee meetings once a month in the local Liverpool newspapers and maintain the register on Council’s website as outlined in this report.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Ristevski           Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That Council defer this item to the next meeting.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

BRING ITEM FORWARD

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Clr Stanley               Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

 

That Items DCC01, DCC02,  DCC 03, DCC 04 and DPG 02 be moved forward and dealt with now.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


55

Community and Culture Report

ITEM NO:      DCC 01

FILE NO:        225440.2015

SUBJECT:     Grants and Donations Policy Post-exhibition Report

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Adopt the draft Grants and Donations Policy.

 

2.   Approves $200,000 in the 2015/2016 budget as per resolution at 25 February 2015 Council meeting to be allocated towards a Community Matching Grants program with funds to be included in the budget variance report to come to the October Council meeting.

 

3.   Approves $75,000 in the 2015/2016 budget as per resolution at 29 April 2015 Council meeting to be allocated towards a proposed Sustainable Environment Grants program with funds to be allocated from the Environment, Stormwater and Waste Levy programs.

 

4.   Approves $87,000 to employ one full-time equivalent position to assist with administration of all programs including the two additional grants programs proposed by Council resolution. Funds to be included in the budget variance report to come to the October Council meeting.

 

5.   Allocate $20,000 towards a one year subscription to SmartyGrants and an additional $2,500 to be used for promotion of the grants and donations programs including information sessions and workshops with potential applicants. Funds to be included in the budget variance report to come to the October Council meeting.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Mannoun           Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


57

ITEM NO:      DCC 02

FILE NO:        234004.2015

SUBJECT:     Draft Homelessness Policy and Homelessness Strategy and Action Plan 2015-2017

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Places the draft Homelessness Policy and Homelessness Strategy and Action Plan 2015-2017 on public exhibition for a period of 28 days inviting public submissions.

 

2.   Receives a further report on the Homelessness Policy and Homelessness Strategy and Action Plan 2015-2017 following public exhibition.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Mamone            Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


59

Mayor Mannoun left the Chambers at 10.42pm and the Deputy Mayor Clr Hadchiti took the chair.

ITEM NO:      DCC 03

FILE NO:        234026.2015

SUBJECT:     Grants and Donations

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Endorses the Financial Contribution Panel's recommendations for the provision of $1,000 (GST exclusive) under the Community Donations Program as summarised in the table below:

         

          Community Grants Program

Applicant Name

Project Name

Amount

St Vincent de Paul Society-Liverpool Men’s Refuge

Emergency Access to Showers (EATS)

$1,000

 

2.   Endorses the Financial Contribution Panel's recommendations for the provision of $500 (GST exclusive) under the Youth Donations Program as summarised in the table below:

 

 

 

          Youth Donations Program

Applicant Name

Project Name

Amount

Stephan Marie-Louise

2015 East Timor Immersion Program

$500

 

3.   Endorses the Financial Contribution Panel's recommendations for the provision of $400 (GST exclusive) under the School Donations Program as summarised in the table below:

         

          School Donations Program

Applicant Name

Suburb

Amount

Ashcroft High School

Ashcroft

$100

William Carey Christian School

Preston

$100

All Saints Catholic Senior College

Casula  

$100

Holsworthy High School

Holsworthy

$100

         

 

 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Mamone            Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

 

.


61

ITEM NO:      DCC 04

FILE NO:        235920.2015

SUBJECT:     Fijian Prime Minister visit to Liverpool

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council Allocate from the Councillor Reserve $5,000 to fund a dinner in honour of the Fijian Prime Minister’s visit to Liverpool.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Mamone

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

Mayor Mannoun returned to the Chambers at 10.44pm

 

ITEM NO:      DPG 02

FILE NO:        209750.2015

SUBJECT:     Proposed amendment to the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 - Rezoning of land at 311 Hume Highway, Liverpool

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.       Resolves to prepare and exhibit the Draft amendment to the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008.

 

2.       Forwards a copy of the Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning and Environment seeking a Gateway determination and following that proceed with public authority consultation and public exhibition.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

Vote for:          Mayor Mannoun

                        Clr Balloot

                        Clr Hadid

                        Clr Hadchiti

                        Clr Harle

                        Clr Mamone

                        Clr Ristevski

 

Vote against:   Clr Karnib

                        Clr Shelton

                        Clr Stanley

                        Clr Waller

 

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun     Seconded: Clr Waller

 

1.  That Council move into Closed Session to deal with Mayoral Minute (Legal Response to Concrete Recycling Facility) in conjunction with CONF 14, and CONF 10, CONF 8 and CONF 12 :

 

·         Mayoral Minute (Legal Response to Concrete Recycling Facility)

Reason: s10A(g)

 

·         CONF 14 Legal Matter – Moorebank Waste Recycling Project

      Reason: s10A(g)

 

·         CONF 10 Tender RCL2383 – Recognised Contractor Listing for Stormwater Drainage Pipe Rehabilitation Works

Reason: s10A(d i)

 

·         CONF 8  ST2480 Fire Safety Programme Fire Engineered Solutions

Reason: s10A(c)

 

·         CONF 12 ST2483 Provision of Expert Legal Services

Reason: s10A(c)

 

.

 

2.    Pursuant to Section 10A(1)-(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, the media and public to be excluded from the meeting on the basis that the business to be considered is classified confidential under the provisions of:

 

●       10A(2)(c) information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.●     10A(2)(g) advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.●    10A(2)(a) personal matters concerning particular individuals (other than councillors).●       10A(2)(d ii) commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council.●   10A(2)(d i) commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Council moved into Closed Session at 10.52pm.  The public and media left the Chambers.


63

 

Mayoral Minute

SUBJECT: Legal Response to Concrete Recycling Facility

 

On September 11, 2015 the Planning Assessment Commission (PAC) approved the construction of the controversial Moorebank Waste and Recycling Facility on the banks of the Georges River.

 

This facility will handle approximately 500,000 tonnes of construction waste per year and sits next to brand new residential housing estate, and a proposed luxury marina on the George’s River.  Our council has worked to develop a positive plan for our community and the prime waterfront land alongside our beautiful George’s River. This facility will spoil those plans.

 

PAC approved the final decision after the NSW Department of Planning progressed the application and recommended its approval.  This decision by the PAC was made despite a vigorous defence mounted by the Liverpool Council, our State MP Melanie Gibbons and Federal MP Craig Kelly, and members of the community.

 

The decision by the PAC in the face of sound planning arguments has outraged all involved in the staunch defence of residents in Georges Fair and the greater Liverpool area.

 

Previously, this council had assured the community that we will engage in a legal challenge in the Land and Environment Court and seek to overturn this decision.

 

Consequently, Council has sought legal advice and will pursue all available legal avenues to argue against this development. We will also continue to stand by the residents in voicing their opposition to the concrete recycling plant.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That Council:

 

  1. Write to the NSW Planning Minister to express our disappointment to the decision by the PAC to approve this facility and inform him that we will oppose the decision in the Land and Environment Court.

 

  1. Delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to commence legal proceedings against any and all relevant parties in relation to Planning Assessment Commission determination D356/15 and Part 3A application 05-0157, concerning the approval of a waste recycling facility in Moorebank.

 

  1. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to explore all avenues including the potential of a land swap and site testing to stop the proposed development proceeding, should legal action be unsuccessful; And

 

  1. Write to the affected residents to advise them of Liverpool Council’s planned course of action, and continue to update them periodically on the progress of our legal challenge.

 

  1. Notes the confidential legal advice received by Liverpool Council in regards to a legal challenge.

 

Motion:                                            Moved: Mayor Mannoun

 

That Council:

 

  1. Delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to commence legal proceedings against any and all relevant parties in relation to Planning Assessment Commission determination D356/15 and Part 3A application 05-0157, concerning the approval of a waste recycling facility in Moorebank.

 

  1. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to explore all avenues including the potential of a land swap and site testing to stop the proposed development proceeding, should legal action be unsuccessful; And

 

  1. Write to the affected residents to advise them of Liverpool Council’s planned course of action, and continue to update them periodically on the progress of our legal challenge.

 

4.    Notes the confidential legal advice received by Liverpool Council in regards to a legal challenge.

 

5.    Deal with NOM 06 and CONF 14 as part of this motion.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


ITEM NO:      CONF 14

FILE NO:        250215.2015

SUBJECT:     Legal Matter - Moorebank Waste Recycling Project

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council, subject to the final legal advice, delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to undertake legal proceedings against any and all relevant parties in relation to Planning Assessment Commission determination D356/15 and Part 3A application 05-0157, concerning the approval of a waste recycling facility in Moorebank.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved:                                   Seconded:

 

Note: This item was dealt with in conjunction with the Mayoral Minute – Legal Response to Concrete Recycling Facility, on pages 55-56 of these minutes.

 

 

 

 


67

ITEM NO:      CONF 10

FILE NO:        223577.2015

SUBJECT:     Tender RCL2383 - Recognised Contractor Listing for Stormwater Drainage Pipe Rehabilitation Works

 

RECOMMENDATION

That Council: 

1.    Accepts the tenders from the below listed contractors for Tender RCL2383 – Stormwater Drainage Pipe Rehabilitation Works for an initial period of two years, with the option to extend by three one year terms.

 

Category F2.1: CCTV            Category F2.1: CCTV Inspection and Condition Assessment

·    Interflow Pty Limited;

·    Total Drain Cleaning Services Pty Ltd;

·    ITS Trenchless Pty Ltd;

·    Aqua Assets Pty Limited; and

·    Insituform Pacific Pty Ltd

 

          Category F2.2: Enhanced Pipe Maintenance

·    Total Drain Cleaning Services Pty Ltd;

·    ITS Trenchless Pty Ltd;

·    Interflow Pty Limited; and

·    Insituform Pacific Pty Ltd

 

Category F2.3: Pipe Restoration

·    ITS Trenchless Pty Ltd;

·    Interflow Pty Limited;

·    Total Drain Cleaning Services Pty Ltd; and

·    Insituform Pacific Pty Ltd

Category F2.4 & F2.5

                                               Drainage Pipe Renewal and Replacement

·    Interflow Pty Limited;

·    Insituform Pacific Pty Ltd; and

·    ITS Trenchless Pty Ltd

 

2.    Makes public its decision regarding Tender RCL2383 – Stormwater Drainage Pipe Rehabilitation Works.

 

3.    Notes that the Director Infrastructure and Environment will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of the draft minutes on Council’s website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority.

 

4.    Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved:  Mayor Mannoun         Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

 


67

ITEM NO:      CONF 08

FILE NO:        231152.2015

SUBJECT:     ST2480 Fire Safety Programme Fire Engineered Solutions

 

RECOMMENDATION

That Council: 

1.    Accept the Tender from Holmes Fire Limited Partnership for Tender ST2480 – Fire Safety Programme – Fire Engineered Solutions for a one year contract term with the option of extending 1 x 12 months.

2.    Makes public its decision regarding tender Tender ST2480 – Fire Safety Programme – Fire Engineered Solutions.

3.    Notes that the Director will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft Minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority.

4.    Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Mannoun           Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

 


69

Clr Shelton left the Chambers at 10.59pm.

ITEM NO:      CONF 12

FILE NO:        232890.2015

SUBJECT:     ST2483 Provision of Expert Legal Services

 

RECOMMENDATION

That Council: 

1.    Accept the Tender from Clayton Utz for ST2483 – Provision of Expert Legal Services for a three (3) year contract term.

2.    Makes public its decision regarding tender ST2483 – Provision of Expert Legal Services.

3.    Notes that the Director – Business Improvement will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft Minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority.

4.    Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Mannoun           Seconded: Clr Stanley

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 

 

Clr Shelton returned to the Chambers at 11:03pm.

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Mannoun         Seconded: Clr Balloot

That the meeting be extended until the business is completed.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared LOST.

 

Mayor Mannoun adjourned the meeting at 11.04pm and advised that it will reconvene at 5.00pm on Tuesday 6 October 2015, to deal with the remaining items on the agenda.

 

 

 


 

Mayor Mannoun reconvened the meeting at 5.07pm on Tuesday 6 October 2015 with the following people present:

 

Mayor Ned Mannoun

Councillor Balloot

Councillor Hadchiti

Councillor Hadid

Councillor Harle

Councillor Karnib

Councillor Mamone

Councillor Ristevski

Councillor Shelton

Councillor Stanley

Councillor Waller

Ms Kiersten Fishburn, Acting Chief Executive Officer

Mr Gary Grantham, Director Corporate Services/Chief Financial Officer

Ms Toni Averay, Director Planning and Growth

Mr Michael Cullen, Director Economic Development

Ms Carole Todd, Director Business Improvement

Mr John Morgan, Director Property and Commercial Development

Mr Kevin Smith, Acting Director Infrastructure and Environment

 


71

Economy and Engagement Report

ITEM NO:      DEE 01

FILE NO:        232094.2015

SUBJECT:     City Exchange Report 2015

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council notes the report’s key findings and observations with respect to local funding and financing mechanisms, as an outcome of the Future Cities Collaborative overseas mission to the United States.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Mamone

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


 

Planning and Growth Report

ITEM NO:      DPG 01

FILE NO:        182934.2015

SUBJECT:     Miller Town Centre Master Plan 2015

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Endorses the draft Miller Town Centre Master Plan.

 

2.    Notes the primary objectives of the master plan to improve services, safety and amenity for the Miller community and address social disadvantage.

 

3.    Publicly exhibits the draft Miller Town Centre Master Plan for 28 Days, including a public information session.

 

4.    Receives a further report detailing the community’s feedback on the Draft Miller Town Centre Master Plan noting any changes.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Stanley

 

That Council:

 

1.    Publicly exhibits the draft Miller Town Centre Master Plan for 28 Days, including a public information session.

 

2.  Receives a further report detailing the community’s feedback on the Draft Miller Town Centre Master Plan noting any changes

 

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 


73

ITEM NO:      DPG 03

FILE NO:        223229.2015

SUBJECT:     Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment 53) - Rezoning of part Copeland Street, Liverpool

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Endorses the Planning Proposal and forwards it to the NSW Department of Planning and Environment seeking a Gateway determination.

 

2.    Subject to Gateway approval, proceeds with public authority consultations and public exhibition in accordance with the determination.

 

3.    Notes that the outcomes of public authority consultation and public exhibition will be reported to Council in the future.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion           Moved: Clr Hadchiti        Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Vote for:        Mayor Mannoun

                        Clr Balloot

                        Clr Hadchiti

                        Clr Hadid

                        Clr Harle

                        Clr Mamone

                        Clr Ristevski

                        Clr Shelton

                        Clr Stanley

                       

Vote against: Clr Karnib

                        Clr Waller

 

 


73

ITEM NO:      DPG 04

FILE NO:        223821.2015

SUBJECT:     Compliance Levy

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Approves the following fee to be placed on Public Exhibition:

 

A compliance levy of 0.25% of the capital investment value (CIV) of a proposed development be charged on each development application with a minimum levy of $75.00.

 

2.    Receives a further report following the exhibition process which outlines any submissions made/public feedback.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion

 


75

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REPORT

ITEM NO:      DPG 05

FILE NO:        228511.2015

SUBJECT:     Review of Liverpool City Council Section 94 Contributions Framework

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Conducts a cost/benefit analysis and risk and compatibility assessments on transitioning to a Technology One based platform for Council’s property and developer contributions software.

 

2.    Investigates options to provide discounted developer contributions in order to incentivise specific development in the Liverpool City Centre and other areas in accordance with future Council strategic objectives.

 

3.    Seeks Ministerial approval pursuant to Clause 94E(1)(d) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to increase the rate of the development contributions applying to the Liverpool City Centre under the Liverpool Development Contributions Plan 2007 to 3% for all zones.

 

4.    Seeks Ministerial approval pursuant to Clause 94E(1)(d) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to introduce a S94A scheme across the established areas of Liverpool, levying a developer contribution of 2% for works with a capital value in excess of $200,000, with 0.5% applying to development valued at between $100.000 and $200,000, except for identified high growth areas where existing contributions charges would remain.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Hadchiti

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 


75

Property and Commercial Development Report

ITEM NO:      DPC 01

FILE NO:        235540.2015

SUBJECT:     Acquisition of Lot 204 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill, for road purposes

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approves the acquisition of Lot 204 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill, for the price and terms outlined in the confidential attachment;

 

2.   Upon settlement of the acquisition, dedicates Lot 204 DP 1194243, Kurrajong Road, Carnes Hill, as public road;

 

3.   Keeps confidential the attachment supplied under separate cover containing the acquisition price pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and

 

4.   Authorises its delegated officer to execute any document, under Power of Attorney necessary to give effect to this decision.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Clr Harle

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


77

Committee Reports

ITEM NO:      CTTE 01

FILE NO:        208319.2015

SUBJECT:     Environment Advisory Committee Meeting minutes held on 10 August 2015

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Environment Advisory Committee Meeting held on 10 August 2015.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


77

ITEM NO:      CTTE 02

FILE NO:        224408.2015

SUBJECT:     Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee held on 5 August 2015 and 2 September 2015

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee Meetings held on 5 August 2015 and 2 September 2015.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


79

ITEM NO:      CTTE 03

FILE NO:        226557.2015

SUBJECT:     Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 2 September 2015

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the Building our New City Committee Meeting held on 2 September 2015.

 

2.   Approves the updating of the current paving strategy.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


79

ITEM NO:      CTTE 04

FILE NO:        227920.2015

SUBJECT:     Liverpool Sports Committee minutes of meeting 30 July 2015

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Sports Committee Meeting held on 30 July 2015.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


81

ITEM NO:      CTTE 05

FILE NO:        228326.2015

SUBJECT:     Minutes of the Civic Advisory Committee Meeting held 25 August 2015

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Civic Advisory Committee Meeting held on 25 August 2015.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


81

ITEM NO:      CTTE 06

FILE NO:        228788.2015

SUBJECT:     Minutes of Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held 2 September 2015

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Economic Development and Events Committee Meeting held on 2 September 2015.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


83

ITEM NO:      CTTE 07

FILE NO:        237412.2015

SUBJECT:     Minutes of the Planning and Development Committee Meeting held on 2 September 2015

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and adopts the Minutes of the Planning and Development Committee Meeting held on 2 September 2015.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 


85

Questions with Notice

ITEM NO:      QWN 01

FILE NO:        220734.2015

SUBJECT:     Question with Notice - Clr Harle

 

Please address the following:

 

2.      Reports back to council at the next General Council Meeting with the following;

    1. Who authorised the hire of external Private Security Guards and called the Police, dressed in Riot gear, to this event?

The CEO based on a credible threat and on the advice of the Police and in consultation with the Catholic Club. Police attended of their own volition but were not Riot Squad but general duty Police.

 

    1. When was the decision made to hire Private Security Guards and to call Police, dressed in Riot gear, and on what basis?

On the Thursday and Friday prior to the event and following the evidence of a credible threat on social media.

 

    1. If there were safety concerns surrounding the Christian Orthodox Interfaith Lunch, why were these not mentioned in the CEO's report in the July council meeting four days prior to the lunch?

The information was not available at that time regarding the threats that had been made.

 

    1.  Were any threatening advances made to the Mayor, Councillors or distinguished guests during the Christian Orthodox Interfaith Lunch?

No.

 

    1. Was the Christian Orthodox community consulted regarding concerns that may have been expressed at the presence of private security guards and Police dressed in riot gear?

Police were not dressed in riot gear. The CEO nor any staff member present received any comment or concern from attendees on the day of the event.

 

    1. What was the total cost of hiring the Private Security Guards and how where these cost funded? i.e.; was Rate Payers money used to pay for this expense?

The cost of security was included in the cost of staging the event through the Catholic Club which was paid for by Council.

 

    1. Why were the “costs of hiring the Private Security Guards" not tabled at the 27th July Council Meeting four days prior to the Christian Orthodox Lunch as a “Notice of Motion” or an “Amendment to the Notice of Motion” that was raised by Clr Peter Ristevski?

See comments in “C” above.

 

    1. Has this set a precedent for future Liverpool City Council events requiring Private Security Guards and Police attendance and how does that impact on Council financially?

Each instance with be assessed on its merits but where there is a credible threat appropriate action will be taken to ensure the safety of all attendees.

 

    1. Has council addressed all complaints made from the Christian Orthodox community in relation to the appearance of the Private Security Guards and Police dressed in Riot gear?

At this point no formal complaints have been made concerning the use of security personnel and the Police presence.

 

  1. The Mayor writes to all community leaders that attended apologising for the over-reaction of hiring the Private Security Guards and calling Police to the event prematurely.

This was not an overreaction. The actions taken were taken following consultation with Police and were justified to ensure the safety of attendees. Council has a significant Duty of Care which in this case has been appropriately discharged. There is therefore no basis or reason for an apology to be given.

 

 


87

ITEM NO:      QWN 02

FILE NO:        220736.2015

SUBJECT:     Question with Notice - Clr Harle

 

Could Councillors be provided with an update on the following issues:

 

  1. Bellfield College:

Council approved a NOM in August 2012, a copy has been attached to this QWN. In relation to the NOM:

a.    Have all conditions of the NOM been carried out?

b.    Councillors to be provided with all relevant information as per NOM.

 

Council records indicate that meetings were held in 2012 on site with the PCA, the school and the concerned residents and Councillors.  Council officers had conducted investigations into concerns regarding unlawful filling and contaminated soil on the school grounds.

 

The investigations related to the unauthorised conversion of an area within the school grounds into a playing /sporting field through unlawful filling.  A development application was subsequently lodged on 25 August 2014 seeking approval for use of the sporting/playing field.  As the application was not determined within the statutory timeframe, the applicant lodged a deemed refusal appeal in the Land and Environment Court.  The matter was heard through a Section 34 conference on site on 28 November 2014. The deferred commencement issued on 5 December 2014 required the applicant to provide a contamination report by a NSW EPA Accredited Site Auditor (Accredited under the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997) in respect of the fill used on site.   The deferred consent had to be addressed within 6 months.  All the other technical issues including flooding had also been assessed and satisfied.

 

On 19 March 2015, the applicant submitted the required site audit report.  The report was reviewed by Council's Environmental Health team and found to be satisfactory.  The applicant was notified on 21 May 2015 that the deferred consent was satisfied and the development consent became operative. There are no current issues with Belfield College.

 

It is noted that in respect of the unlawful filling matter, this was also the subject of a separate Order issued by Council.  The applicant appealed the Order in addition to the deemed refusal. The deemed refusal was heard through the Section 34 conference held on 5 December 2014. Following the determination of the development application and the satisfying of the deferred consent the applicant discontinued the appeal to the order on 17 May 2015.

 

 

  1. Continuing fill at 235 Denhamcourt Road, Denhamcourt.

a.      What is the current status of this site especially as it is evident that fill including large boulders are continuing to be brought onto the site despite a previous Council investigation?

 

A Section 96 modification approval was issued on 12 June 2014 granting approval for minor changes to Development Consent DA-84/2013 which granted approval for a tennis court.  The modification approval imposed conditions requiring the following:

 

·         all fill introduced to the site to undergo a contaminated site assessment;

·         design of rock wall and footings to be prepared by a qualified structural engineer;

·         sediment and erosion control measures to be implemented and maintained during works; and

·         removal of any unapproved fill.

 

A construction certificate for current works on site was issued by a private certifier. A certificate was provided to Council regarding the contaminated soil assessment.  A recent inspection by Council officers found that work on site was progressing in accordance with the approval and no compliance issues were identified.  There was no excess fill on site and satisfactory sediment and erosion control measures were in place.  However it is noted that works are still underway and Council officers will continue to monitor until completion.

 

General

 

At the Planning and Development Committee meeting of 2nd September, it was agreed that officers will ensure that Councillors are kept informed regarding development applications and other compliance matters where there is strong community interest.

 

 


89

ITEM NO:      QWN 03

FILE NO:        220739.2015

SUBJECT:     Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

 

Since the closure of the bowling club early last year there is nothing close to the CBD of Liverpool that provides spaces for older Liverpool residents for sport and recreation.

 

What has been planned to replace recreation opportunities for older Liverpool residents given the explosion of residential units currently under construction?

 

Opportunities for sport, recreation and leisure are critical for all members of our community. For the seniors in our community, these programs can help reduce isolation, provide health benefits and give opportunities for pleasurable, social experiences.

 

Within the city centre, there are a number of opportunities for seniors to actively participate. These include programs run through:

 

Liverpool Senior Citizens

Location: Hilda M Davis Centre

Description: Card games, social events, movie showings

 

Liverpool U3A School for Seniors Inc.

Location: Dr. Pirie Community Centre

Description: Liverpool U3A are running classes for seniors aged 50 and above. Classes include aqua-aerobics, computing and internet, creative writing, drawing, euchre, French, oil painting, oldtime/new vogue dancing, patchwork and needlework, tai chi, yoga, topical discussion group, china painting, water colour, Australian & local history, art appreciation, Chinese painting, calligraphy, craft and social walking group. Australian Native Plants; Meditation; Numeracy; Photography; Trivia

 

Liverpool District Men's Shed

Location: 31 Shepherd St, Liverpool NSW 2170

Description: Provides a workshop well equipped with electrical tools, hand tools and materials. Woodwork and handicraft projects are the major activities performed. Provides supervision and assistance.

 

Liverpool Migrant Resource Centre

Location: 108 Moore St, Liverpool NSW 2170

Description: : The Liverpool MRC provides information and referral on settlement issues to newly arrived migrants and refugees settling in the Liverpool LGA . We offer a range of programs including English classes, multicultural playgroups and arts projects. We also offer support and capacity building to CALD groups, new and emerging communities, women, youth and other groups through community development services such as groups, playgroups, senior support and youth programs.

 

Our own library service provides:

 

Broadband for Seniors

Description: Provides lessons on Computer Basics, Internet, e-mail, Windows 8, photo-sharing, social media for seniors.

 

Tech Savvy Seniors - Liverpool City Library

Description: A joint initiative of TELSTRA and the State Government providing FREE Internet lessons to seniors. Liverpool Library and MacArthur Community College have joined hands to deliver the program.

 

The library also provides activities including Book Chats, Liverpool Knitters Group, Family History Fridays monthly at the Museum, and a range of museum events and library talks that while not specifically targeted to the seniors community are all very popular with that demographic. The library also holds a large collection of large print fiction and non-fiction on topics that may be of interest to the seniors community including healthy ageing, finance etc.

 

The Whitlam Centre has membership and entrance options for the seniors community and are actively targeting this group for fitness and healthy ageing initiatives.

 

Further out from the CBD, Casula Powerhouse has regular matinee performances and seniors friendly workshops and events.

 

Both the library and Casula Powerhouse have increased their programming for the seniors community in recent years and will continue to do so. We will also continue to support seniors groups through the use of space in community centres and through promoting their activities through our community directory and other relevant opportunities.

.


89

ITEM NO:      QWN 04

FILE NO:        246300.2015

SUBJECT:     Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

 

Files lost in August 2010 Fire

 

Some time ago a report was furnished of Council regarding files etc lost in the Council Building Fire. Recently I have been made aware of another item that is not able to be found subsequent to the fire.

 

  1. Can officers provide a follow up report to Council regarding issues of missing files, and a copy of the original report, please.

 

  1. Is a list/report etc being kept as it emerges that files or DA’s are not able to be found?

 

  1. How is a determination made when items are unable to be located that it is because of the fire? As the fire was 5 years ago could there be other explanations why files are missing?

 

  1. Is it possible and if so what would be the cost for a comprehensive audit to determine what is missing? Was this done at any time since the fire in 2010?

 

  1. Has this issue been discussed at the Audit and Risk Committee to determine whether Council has / should have concerns regarding risk to its business? If so, what was the outcome?

 

  1. How often are audits done on the completeness of details of Council’s files and reports?

 

  1. What actions are in place to ensure that all files are captured on the computer             network?

A response to these questions will be provided in the October business papers.


91

ITEM NO:      QWN 05

FILE NO:        246304.2015

SUBJECT:     Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

 

Please address the following:

 

1.      Have Council Officers had discussions, pre-DA meetings or any other correspondence with the DeAngelis Group or any other parties with the purpose of formulating a new DA for the site 467 HUME HIGHWAY CASULA NSW 2170 also known as Fontainebleau Motel.

 

a)    if so, please provide details the nature, content and purpose of these discussions

b)    are  Council officers aware of when any application maybe expected to be lodged

c)    if an application is lodged for this site can Councillors be advised immediately by email.

 

2.      Are Council officers aware of discussion owners may have had with local schools regarding a VPA for the site. Does this negotiation have any weight and have officers been involved in such negotiations?

 

3.      Are Council officers aware of any organisations in addition to Casula Public School, that have been approached by representatives of the De Angelis Hotel group to consider/sign a VPA with them?

 

4.      Is Council aware of anyone who has refused to enter into such VPA agreements?

 

5.      When or have Council officers engaged in any discussions with Police concerning a possible new DA for the hotel? Are there minutes or similar available from any meetings of this type.

 

6.      What are the implications of VPAs on the Council and IHAP planning assessment and approval process?

 

7.      Could Council officers determine what legal avenues there are  to oppose on negative social impact grounds under the NSW Liquor and Gambling laws, the move of 30 poker machines from the New Commercial Hotel in Liverpool to a proposed hotel in Casula –within the same LGA, should this be part of any proposal put to Council in the future.

 

8.      Are officers aware if and when an application is expected for the site?

A response to these questions will be provided in the October business papers.


91

ITEM NO:      QWN 06

FILE NO:        246307.2015

SUBJECT:     Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

 

Please address the following:

 

  1. Can I be advised the costs in relation to industrial matters including legal fees for the following financial years:

 

·         2012-2013

·         2013-2014

·         2014-2015

 

  1. How does this compare to costs for the previous Council term 2008-2012, by financial year?

 

A response to these questions will be provided in the October business papers.

   


93

ITEM NO:      CONF 01

FILE NO:        246642.2015

SUBJECT:     Compulsory acquisition of part Lot 7001 DP 1027994, 16 Stroud Avenue, Warwick Farm, known as 'Rosedale Park' for road purposes

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Proceeds with the compulsory acquisition of part Lot 7001 DP 1027994, 16 Stroud Avenue, Warwick Farm, for road purposes, once the exact road alignment has been determined;

 

2.   Proceeds with making the necessary application to the Minister for Local Government and the Governor in accordance with Section 187(2) of the Local Government Act 1993 to obtain approval to give an acquisition notice for part Lot 7001 DP 1027994 to Crown Lands and commence compulsory acquisition under the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991;

 

3.   Upon settlement of the acquisition, classifies part Lot 7001 DP 1027994, 16 Stroud Avenue, Warwick Farm as ‘Operational' land;

 

4.   Keeps confidential the attachment supplied under separate cover containing Council’s valuation advice pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and

 

5.    Authorises its delegated officer to execute any document, under Power of Attorney necessary to give effect to this decision.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Mamone            Seconded: Clr Harle

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Clr Stanley asked that she be recorded as voting against the motion.


93

ITEM NO:      CONF 02

FILE NO:        216990.2015

SUBJECT:     Voyager Point Footbridge - Legal Dispute

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Receive and note the report of staff in relation to the Voyager Point footbridge.

 

2.    Delegate authority to the CEO to do all things necessary in his discretion to pursue Council’s rights under the Heads of Agreement against the Commonwealth, including legal action in the Federal Courts and/or the NSW Supreme Court.

 

3.    Engage with Bankstown City Council to consider options for mitigating the loss of the respective Councils resulting from the Commonwealth’s repudiation of the Heads of Agreement.

 

4.    Receive further updates on the progress of this matter through the quarterly legal report to Council.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Harle

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


95

ITEM NO:      CONF 03

FILE NO:        220980.2015

SUBJECT:     RCL2449 - Major Events Core Infrastructure

 

RECOMMENDATION

That Council: 

1.    Accept the Tenders as listed below for RCL – 2449 Major Events Core Infrastructure for an initial two year contract term with the option of extending 3 x 12 month options.

PLANNED EVENTS

EVENT: Night Markets

Rank

Tenderer

Lump Sum Amount

Primary

Festival Hire

$13,168.80

Secondary

Party Hire Group

$18,392

 

EVENT: Starry Sari

Rank

Tenderer

Lump Sum Amount

Primary

Festival Hire

$19,228

Secondary

Party Hire Group

$25,440

 

 

 

 

 

 

EVENT: Spring Expo

Rank

Tenderer

Lump Sum Amount

Primary

Festival Hire

$16,379

Secondary

Party Hire Group

$19,005

 

EVENT: New Years Eve

Rank

Tenderer

Lump Sum Amount

Primary

Festival Hire

$8,690

Secondary

Pillingers Hiring Service

$12,504.70

 

EVENT: Australia Day

Rank

Tenderer

Lump Sum Amount

Primary

Festival Hire

$29,700

Secondary

Pillingers Hiring Service

$28,392.10

 

UNPLANNED EVENTS

Rank

Tenderer

Panel

Festival Hire (NSW) Pty Ltd

Panel

Pillingers Hiring Service

Panel

The Trustee for the unit trust (Party Hire Group)

Panel

Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd

 

2.    Makes public its decision regarding tender RCL2449 – Major Events Core Infrastructure.

3.    Notes that the Director will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft Minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority.

4.    Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadchiti             Seconded: Clr Mamone

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

Vote for:        Mayor Mannoun

                        Clr Balloot

                        Clr Hadchiti

                        Clr Hadid

                        Clr Harle

                        Clr Karnib

                        Clr Mamone

                        Clr Ristevski

                        Clr Shelton

                        Clr Waller

 

Vote against: Clr Stanley

 

.


97

ITEM NO:      CONF 04

FILE NO:        225917.2015

SUBJECT:     Easement for Underground Cables over Lots 15 & 16 in DP1129945 known as Light Horse Park in Liverpool, Lot 13 in DP247485 known as Mill Park in Liverpool and Lot 11 in DP881265 known as Helles Park in Moorebank.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Grants an easement for underground electricity cables to Endeavour Energy over Lots 15 & 16 in DP1129945 known as Light Horse Park in Liverpool, Lot 13 in DP247485 known as Mill Park in Liverpool and Lot 11 in DP881265 known as Helles Park in Moorebank, as outlined in this confidential Report;

 

2.   Keeps confidential this Report pursuant to the provisions of Sections 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993, as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and

 

3.   Authorises the relevant documentation necessary for the formalisation of the easement to be signed under Power of Attorney by Council’s delegated officer.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Waller                Seconded: Clr Harle

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


99

ITEM NO:      CONF 05

FILE NO:        226048.2015

SUBJECT:     RCL2459 - Plant and Equipment Hire

 

RECOMMENDATION

That Council: 

1.    Accept the tenders from the below listed contractors for tender RCL2459 – Plant and Equipment Hire for an initial two year contract term with the option of extending 2 x 12 months;

·    A&A Hire Service

·    A and C Plant Hire Pty Ltd

·    A.M.A Building Development Pty Ltd

·    Acclaimed Excavations Pty Ltd

·    Action Recover Services Pty Ltd

·    Allards Plant Hire Pty Ltd

·    Aqua Assets Pty Limited

·    Astec Mulch Pty Ltd

·    Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd

·    Conplant Pty Ltd

·    E and B Tipper Hire Pty Ltd

·    Kennards Hire Pty Ltd

·    Max Hire Pty Ltd

·    Online Pipe and Cable Locating Pty Ltd

·    Premiair Hire

·    Raygal Pty Ltd

·    Sharpe Bros (Aust) Pty Ltd

·    Sherrin Rentals Pty Ltd

·    Spyder Excavation Pty Ltd

·    Total Drain Cleaning

·    Toxfree

2.    Makes public its decision regarding tender RCL2459 – Plant and Equipment Hire.

3.    Notes that the Director will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft Minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority.

4.    Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature

 

 

 

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion:                                  Moved:      Clr Shelton                  Seconded: Clr Mamone

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.

 


99

ITEM NO:      CONF 06

FILE NO:        228608.2015

SUBJECT:     Order of Liverpool Awards

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Adopts the award recipients as recommended by the Civic Advisory Committee as set out in this report.

 

2.   Announces the recipients of the Order of Liverpool on 7 November (the date Liverpool was founded by Governor Lachlan Macquarie in 1810) and presents the awards on Australia Day.   

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Harle                  Seconded: Clr Shelton

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


101

ITEM NO:      CONF 07

FILE NO:        228741.2015

SUBJECT:     Acquisition of part Lot 1 DP 112012, 35 Rynan Avenue, Edmondson Park, for drainage and open space purposes

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approves the acquisition of part Lot 1 DP 112012, 35 Rynan Avenue, Edmondson Park, containing an area of approximately 9,451 square metres for the price and terms outlined in the confidential attachment;

 

2.   Upon settlement of the acquisition, classifies the portion of Lot 1 DP 112012, 35 Rynan Avenue, Edmondson Park, being acquired as 'Community' land;

 

3.   Keeps confidential the attachment supplied under separate cover containing the acquisition price pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and

 

4.   Authorises its delegated officer to execute any document, under Power of Attorney necessary to give effect to this decision.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Shelton              Seconded: Clr Hadid

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


101

ITEM NO:      CONF 09

FILE NO:        231588.2015

SUBJECT:     Proposed reclassification, rezoning and disposal of part Lot 1001 DP 1006332, Forcett Close, West Hoxton

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approves the reclassification, rezoning and disposal of part Lot 1001 DP 1006332, Forcett Close, West Hoxton, for the price and terms outlined in the confidential attachment;

2.   Keeps confidential the attachment supplied under separate cover containing the purchase price pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business;

3.   Authorises its delegated officer to execute any document, under Power of Attorney necessary to give effect to this decision; and

4.   Transfers the net proceeds from the sale back into the relevant Section 94 Contribution Plan.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.


103

ITEM NO:      CONF 11

FILE NO:        230186.2015

SUBJECT:     ST2441 - Newspaper Advertising

 

RECOMMENDATION

That Council:

1.    Accept the Tender from News Limited for ST2441 -  for an initial 2 year contract term with the option of extending for a further one year  at the GST inclusive price of $110,000.

2.    Accept the Tender from New Creative Advertising Company for Portion B of Tender ST2441 – Newspaper Advertising for an initial two year contract term with the option of extending for a further one year at the GST inclusive price of $72,912.00

3.    Makes public its decision regarding tender ST2441 – Newspaper Advertising.

4.    Notes that the Executive Director will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft Minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority.

5.    Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

Motion:                                  Moved: Mayor Mannoun               Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

 

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

Vote for:        Mayor Mannoun

                        Clr Balloot

                        Clr Hadchiti

                        Clr Hadid

                        Clr Mamone

                        Clr Ristevski

 

Vote against: Clr Harle

                         Clr Karnib

                         Clr Shelton

                         Clr Stanley

                         Clr Waller

 

 

ITEM NO:      CONF 13

FILE NO:        230248.2015

SUBJECT:     Legal Affairs Report

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receive and note the report concerning the Legal Affairs of Council.

 

COUNCIL DECISION

 

Motion                              Moved: Clr Hadid                 Seconded: Clr Balloot

 

That the recommendation be adopted.

On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.

 

 

THE MEETING CLOSED AT 5.25pm

 

 

<Signature>

Name: Ned Mannoun

Title:     Mayor

Date:     28 October 2015

I have authorised a stamp bearing my signature to be affixed to the pages of the Minutes of the Council Meeting held on  30 September 2015 and reconvened on 6 October 2015. I confirm that Council has adopted these Minutes as a true and accurate record of the meeting.

 

 

 

 


105

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Notices of Motion

 

NOM 01

Interfaith Functions 2015

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Deliver a range of stimulating and vibrant cultural events, programs and festivals

Key Policy

Events Strategy

File Ref

246397.2015

Author

Gus Balloot - Deputy Mayor

 

 

Background

 

The recent Interfaith functions held by Liverpool Council have been rather controversial and caused a storm in the media. They have brought a negative light onto our Council and we should investigate why this has occurred.

 

This information is important to understand and learn any mistakes made from the recent events, so as to avoid making the same mistakes in the future. It is after all, rate payers money being spent on these events, and Council conduct should be investigated. 

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council provide details of attendees who attended on each occasion Council held an Interfaith dinner or luncheon.

 

The report should include the following information:

 

·    Number of people who attended each function.

·    The amount spent on each function.

·    How many attendees for each function were from outside our LGA.

·    Who organised and was in charge of invitations for each function.

 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT

 

In July 2015 Liverpool Council held an Iftar Interfaith Dinner at Skyview Reception with 300 attendees.  The cost of function was $13,500.  Names of attendees for this function were generated by the Mayor and some Councillors.   The event was co-ordinated by staff in consultation with the Mayor and those Councillors who attended.

 

In August an Orthodox Interfaith Lunch was held in Liverpool Catholic Club.  There were 591 attendees.  The cost of the function was $45,698.  Names of attendees for this function were predominately generated by Councillor Ristevski and Councillor Mamone.  The event was co-ordinated by staff in consultation with the two Councillors.

 

In both instances, the majority of the contact details for the invitations were sent via email.  As such, a percentage of the attendees who are from the LGA could not be captured for both functions.   

 

In addition to those invitations issued via email, it is believed that the Orthodox Lunch invitations were issued through word of mouth in local Churches,  as was reflected in the number of unexpected attendees.    

 

As per 30 September 2015 NOM, Council staff will be preparing a report to Council on the best way to conduct interfaith functions and civic events generally in the future.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place.

Promote community harmony and address discrimination.

Civic Leadership and Governance

Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media.

Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility.

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


107

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Notices of Motion

 

NOM 02

Fiscal Restraint

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

271953.2015

Author

Peter Ristevski - Councillor

 

 

Background

 

At a time where all levels of Government (Federal, State & Local) are tightening their belts in these lean economic times, as Councillors we need to lead by example. As Councillors we have a fiduciary duty to our ratepayers to ensure that their money is spent in the most efficient way without waste. We have a fiscal responsibility especially when we do not satisfy all four criteria in the NSW Government Fit For The Future Benchmarks. At a time when we owe over $40,000,000 in debt, we should not be spending money on Mayor & Councillors Policy Advisors and Research Staff. Especially since we have been cutting costs in other areas like cleaning and customer service staff.

 

The office of the Mayor has increased the pressure on the budget from $127,997 to an estimated cost to ratepayers for this financial year of $430,542. The office of the CEO has increased the pressure on the budget from $488,193 to an estimated cost to ratepayers for this financial year of $908,232. That is a total annual increase of $722,584 to the ratepayers.

 

An examination of adjoining Councils demonstrates the outrageous level of waste within our Mayor and Councillor office. Example, in Fairfield and Bankstown Council (which are of equivalent size to Liverpool), the Mayor and Councillors do not have any policy advisors or research staff.

 

As Councillors we need to show leadership and cut our costs firstly before asking others within the organization to do the same.

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That:

 

1.   A restructure occur in the Mayoral and Chief Executive Officer’s area that sees all positions except a personal assistant for both the Mayor and CEO removed from the structure.

 

2.   The funding for these positions be diverted to fund the legal challenge against the Moorebank Recyclers. It is no fair that the entire ratepayers fund this as this is the case currently. We Councillors should ensure there is enough money in the budget to fight this properly and not half heartedly.

 

3.   Any future positions created in the executive area be brought to Council for briefing and determination as the relevant industrial instrument sets out.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.

Civic Leadership and Governance

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Deliver services that are customer focused.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


109

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Notices of Motion

 

NOM 03

Council Policy and Media Announcements

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Communications Plan

File Ref

272060.2015

Author

Peter Ristevski - Councillor

 

 

Background

 

Recent media reports have been reporting on major policy shifts in Council that on paper will have a significant effect on our budget. The most concerning thing about these media reports is that they have not gone through the legislative checks and balances by seeking the approval of Councillors. An example of these media reports are as follows:

 

1.   Stadium Policy that is to be funded via developer contributions to the sum of $400,000,000. If we break down these costs to the $10,000 developer contribution for each unit as reported in the media, this equates to an astounding figure of 40,000 units. The following questions need to be asked:

 

i.    How long will it take to build 40,000 units in Liverpool? 20 years?

ii.    What if 40,000 units don’t get built? How will this project be funded? Will it become a white elephant?

iii.   Who will fund the cost overruns? Will we have to sell Council assets to fund this? Have we done a complete cost analysis? Projects of this size, nine times out of ten go over budget. We already have a $40,000,000+ debt.

 

We can never forget the Oasis project which also involved the building of a stadium in Liverpool and left ratepayers with a massive debt and the sacking of the complete Council.

 

2.   World on a Plate Food Truck – Council spent $42,000 on feeding Martin Place executives outside of our LGA for free when we have a homeless issue in our LGA. Question:

 

i.    How did we measure if this was a success or a complete waste? What benchmarks have we applied?

ii.    What benchmarks have we applied?

 

It is bad policy to announce such major issues without firstly running it through Council. We cannot have a situation where the Mayor is the centrepiece of all these news stories without the express approval of the full Council. As Council is not a Presidency, such media reports have the potential to put ratepayers in the red costing thousands of dollars per household if something goes wrong. Decisions such as these must have the full backing of Council.

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

Noting Council's Media representation policy:

 

"Official Council Spokespersons

 

 4.4  The Mayor is Council’s official spokesperson and is responsible for providing media comment and media statements about Council policies and other matters of public interest."

 

That a report be provided for the November 2015 Council meeting addressing the following:

 

1a) When did Council agree that its policy was to build a Stadium worth $600 million?

 

1b) Have Councillors been provided with such plans or proposals for the stadium at this cost? If so, when and how were these plans discussed?

 

1c) When was an agreement made that such a policy would be funded by developer contributions?

 

1d) What consultation has been sought and what reaction has there been to this statement from Developers and ratepayers?

 

1e) What risks are there to continued development in Liverpool if further costs are added to developer's levies for such a venture? Is such a levy possible under current legislation?

 

1f)  Why were Councillors not informed in advance of the Media Coverage of the announcement of a seemingly major outlay of ratepayers' money on this development?

 

2.   And answer the questions posed in the background of this notice of motion namely:

                  

a)   Stadium Policy that is to be funded via developer contributions to the sum of $400,000,000. If we break down these costs to the $10,000 developer contribution for each unit as reported in the media, this equates to an astounding figure of 40,000 units. The following questions need to be asked:

 

i.    How long will it take to build 40,000 units in Liverpool? 20 years?

ii.    What if 40,000 units don’t get built? How will this project be funded? Will it become a white elephant?

iii.   Who will fund the cost overruns? Will we have to sell Council assets to fund this? Have we done a complete cost analysis? Projects of this size, nine times out of ten go over budget. We already have a $40,000,000+ debt.

         

b)   World on a Plate Food Truck – Council spent $42,000 on feeding Martin Place executives outside of our LGA for free when we have a homeless issue in our LGA. Question:

 

i.    How did we measure if this was a success or a complete waste? What benchmarks have we applied?

ii.     What benchmarks have we applied?

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.

Civic Leadership and Governance

Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Deliver services that are customer focused.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


112

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Notices of Motion

 

NOM 04

Welcoming the Wanderers W-League Team to Liverpool

 

Strategic Direction

Healthy Inclusive  City

Improve health and wellbeing and encourage a happy, active community

Key Policy

Recreation Strategy

File Ref

272150.2015

Author

Peter Ristevski - Councillor

 

 

Background

 

Now that Liverpool has secured the rights to host the Wanderers W-League team regular training at Ernie Smith Reserve, it would be fitting to host a ‘Welcome to Liverpool’ event for the players at CPAC to toast this partnership.

 

Having the Wanderers W-League team based right here in Liverpool will not only raise the profile of women’s soccer and the sport more generally, it will help boost local female participation across all ages in soccer.

 

I would also like to extend the invitation to this event to Council Staff and Jim Stefan who have worked tirelessly behind the scenes to make this happen. 

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Host a welcome reception for the Wanderers W- League team.

 

2.   As well as the Wanderers W-League team, invite representatives from Southern Districts Soccer Football Association (SDSFA), female players from local clubs, and selected female students from local schools interested in soccer.

 

3.   Hold the event in the afternoon or early evening so that Councillors, players, local female club players, and local school children can attend.

 

4.   Delegate Councillor Ristevski to invite all attendees

 

5.   Allocates up to $5,000 to host this event.

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.

Promote community harmony and address discrimination.

Deliver high quality services for children and their families.

Civic Leadership and Governance

Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media.

Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility.

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Deliver services that are customer focused.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


114

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Notices of Motion

 

NOM 05

Law & Order

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Improve the community’s sense of safety in Liverpool

Key Policy

Community Safety and Crime Prevention Strategy

File Ref

272162.2015

Author

Peter Ristevski - Councillor

 

 

Background

 

Council has committed to a $10,000,000 plus investment in the Mall. Like any major investment, it must be protected in order to see a return to the ratepayers.

 

One of the basic rights that citizens of our LGA should expect is proper law and order when they are dinning in the Mall. There have been many media reports of dinners being harassed by people with substance abuse whilst they are enjoying their social time in the Mall. Situations such as this do nothing more than encourage dinners not to visit the Mall again and leave a bad impression for those outside of our LGA visiting for the first time.

 

Unless we are proactive, our investment of $10,000,000 in the Mall will become a white elephant. Great to look at but with very little visitation due to law & order issues.

 

The success of organisations like Westfields comes down to the fact that they control the shopping experience with a very big emphasis on law & order. Our mall is open to elements as there is no physical presence to control unsocial behaviour.

 

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Implement a concierge service throughout the Mall to maintain social acceptable behaviour.

 

2.   Establish a taskforce of Councillors to work with the Police in maintaining a permanent beat in the Mall at all times.

 

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.

Social and Cultural

Support policies and plans that prevent crime.

Deliver high quality services for children and their families.

Civic Leadership and Governance

Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility.

Deliver services that are customer focused.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil   


116

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 01

DA-1162/2014 - Construction of a food and drink premises with 24 hour operation on proposed Lot 1 created in DA-1106/2014 at 501 Cowpasture Road, Len Waters Estate

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Assist exiting businesses to grow, innovate and become more competitive

Key Policy

Economic Development Strategy

File Ref

256163.2015

Report By

Shannon Rickersey - Team Leader Development Assessment

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

Property

501 Cowpasture Road, Len Waters Estate NSW

Owner

Amarino Pty Ltd

Applicant

McDonald's Australia Ltd

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council has received and considered a development application DA-1162/2014 proposing the construction of a food and drink premises with 24 hour operation on proposed Lot 1 created in DA-1106/2014 in a subdivision of Lot 29 DP 1044841 at 501 Cowpasture Road, Len Waters Estate.

 

This application was referred to the 28 September 2015 meeting of the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) as the development seeks to vary Clause 7.15 of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008 which requires a 90m building street frontage in the B6 Zone.  The proposed street frontage of 32.9m represents a variation of 63.6% to the standard.  No submissions were received in response to the notification of the proposal.

 

The IHAP recommendation was to approve the development application subject to conditions of consent as contained within the Council Officer’s IHAP report (See Attachment 2).

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Development Application DA-1162/2014 subject to the recommended conditions of consent attached to the Council officer’s IHAP report (See Attachment 2).

 

Background

 

Council has received and considered a development application DA-1162/2014, proposing the construction of a food and drink premises with 24 hour operation on proposed Lot 1 created in DA-1106/2014 in a subdivision of Lot 29 DP 1044841 at 501 Cowpasture Road, Len Waters Estate.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the endorsed Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, the proposal was referred to the IHAP for consideration as the proposed development includes a request to vary a development standard in excess of 10% pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the LLEP 2008.

 

The application is accompanied by a written request to vary Clause 7.15 of the LLEP 2008 which prescribes a 90m building street frontage in the B6 Zone.  A street frontage of 32.9m exists for proposed Lot 1, however the site is part of a larger approved master planned commercial development with a total combined street frontage of 217m.

 

The Site

 

The subject site is identified as proposed Lot 1 created in DA-1106/2014 in a subdivision of Lot 29 DP 1044841 at 501 Cowpasture Road, Len Waters Estate. The subject site is an irregular shaped lot with an area of 2525m².  The subject site is currently vacant and undergoing earthworks approved in development application DA-926/2010.  The site fronts Cowpasture Road to the north and west, Hinchinbrook Creek to the east, and vacant SP2 land to the south.

 

An aerial map of the site is provided in Figure 1 below.

 Lot 29

 

Figure 1: Aerial view of the subject site.

 

Subject Site: Proposed Lot 1

 

Figure 2: Location of Proposed Lot 1 (Approved Plan under DA-1106/2014)

 

The subject site is located in an area containing a mixture of commercial and industrial development as well as land reserved for road corridor and public recreation land.

 

 

 

Subject Site

 

Commercial Development

 

M7 Motorway

 

Hinchinbrook Creek

 

Figure 3: The site and surrounding locality.

 

details of the proposal

 

The proposed development consists of:

 

·    Construction of a free standing food and drink premises (McDonald’s Restaurant) with a proposed floor area of 341m² on proposed Lot 1 including the following details:

 

24 hour operation, seven days a week.

Restaurant seeting capacity of 64 seats.

32 car parking spaces (including 1 accessible space).

Drive-through lane.

Associated landscaping works.

Associated signage including pylon sign, wall signs, flag poles, directional signage.

 

The application is accompanied by a written request, pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the LLEP 2008, to vary Clause 7.15 of the LLEP 2008, which prescribes a minimum building street frontage in the B6 Zone of 90m. 

 

An extract of the proposed development plans is provided in Figure 4 below. 

 

Figure 4: Proposed Lot layout for subject site.

 

the issues

 

The key issue identified with respect to the proposal relates to the variation to the minimum building street frontage in Zone B6 required by Clause 7.15 of the LLEP 2008.

 

Proposed Lot 1 fails to comply with Clause 7.15, which states ‘Development consent must not be granted to the erection of a new building or to an addition to an existing building on land in Zone B6 Enterprise Corridor unless any frontage of the site to a classified road is at least: (a) 90 metres.’

 

The application proposes the construction of a new building on a lot (Proposed Lot 1) with a frontage to Cowpasture Road of 32.9m, representing a variation of 63.6% to the standard.

 

Consequently, the applicant has submitted a written request seeking a variation to the minimum building street frontage control as prescribed by Clause 7.15 of LLEP 2008.

 

The objectives of Clause 4.6 of the LLEP 2008 are as follows:

 

(a)     “to provide an appropriate degree of flexibility in applying certain development         standards to particular development,

 

(b)     to achieve better outcomes for and from development by allowing flexibility in         particular circumstances.”

 

Clause 4.6 (3) prescribes:

 

          Development consent must not be granted for development that contravenes a      development standard unless the consent authority has considered a written request     from the applicant that seeks to justify the contravention of the development standard       by demonstrating:

 

          (a)     that compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary             in the circumstances of the case, and

 

          (b)     that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening                 the development standard.”

The applicant has provided justification for the departure to the development standard as follows:

 

·    The objectives of the clause are met notwithstanding the non-compliance.  Proposed Lot 1 has a frontage of 32.9m, however it is part of a larger master planned commercial development that has a total frontage of 217m to Cowpasture Road.  Access to the commercial development is via a signalised intersection and a slip lane.

·    Strict compliance with the control would not facilitate the proper development of land.

·    It is unnecessary to insist on strict compliance as the objectives of the standard are achieved and access to the site can be limited to the signalised intersection and an uncluttered street presentation remains achievable. 

 

The following comments are offered in response to the variation sought to Clause 7.15:

 

·    Appropriate access arrangements are provided to the site as approved in DA-1106/2014, which provides for a signalised intersection and slip lane to provide access to five approved lots.  Individual access from proposed Lot 1 is not proposed.

·    The development complies with other relevant LLEP 2008 development standards and will result in a visually ordered streetscape and is consistent with the desired future character of the B6 Enterprise Corridor Zone.

·    The development therefore meets the objectives of the standard despite the proposed non-compliance.

 

Having regard to the above, it is considered that strict compliance with Clause 7.15 is unreasonable and unnecessary in this instance, and there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the standard.

 

Independent Hearing and assessment panel

 

At their meeting on 28 September 2015, the IHAP made the following recommendation:

 

‘The Panel recommends that DA-1162/2014 be approved subject to the conditions recommended in the Council officer’s report.’

 

Conclusion

 

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and is worthy of support. On this basis, the application is recommended for approval, subject to conditions.

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities.

Facilitate economic development.

Environmental and Sustainability

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Applicant and Land Owner DetailsView (Under separate cover)

2.         IHAP reportView (Under separate cover)

3.         IHAP RecommendationView (Under separate cover)  


123

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 02

DA-997/2014 - Subdivision of proposed Lot 207 (approved under Development Consent No.508/2013) into two Torrens title lots at 291 Green Valley Road, Green Valley

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

257221.2015

Report By

Rodger Roppolo - Development Assessment Planner

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

Property

Lot 11 DP 838137, 291 Green Valley Road, Green Valley

Owner

Oliveri Transport Services Pty Ltd

Applicant

Grinsell & Johns Pty Ltd

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council has received and considered a development application DA-997/2014, proposing the subdivision of proposed Lot 207 (approved under Development Consent No. DA-508/2013) into two Torrens title lots at Lot 11 DP 838137, 291 Green Valley Road, Green Valley. This application was lodged on the 13 November 2014.

 

This application was referred to the 28 September 2015 meeting of the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) as the development seeks to vary Clause 7.13 of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008 which requires a 5 metre minimum lot width for access handles. The proposed lots have a combined access handle width of 5 metres, however individually the access handle width is 2.5 metres, representing a variation of 50%.

 

The IHAP recommendation was to approve the development application subject to conditions of consent as contained within the Council Officer’s IHAP report (See Attachment 3).

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves development application DA-997/2014 subject to conditions of consent contained within the Council officer’s IHAP report (see Attachment 2).

 

Background

 

Council has received and considered a development application DA-997/2014, proposing the subdivision of proposed Lot 207 (approved under Development Consent No. DA-508/2013) into two Torrens title lots at Lot 11 DP 838137, 291 Green Valley Road, Green Valley.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the endorsed IHAP Charter and Procedure, the proposal was referred to the IHAP for consideration as the proposed development includes a request to vary a development standard in excess of 10%; pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the LLEP 2008.

 

The application is accompanied by a written request to vary Clause 7.13 of the LLEP 2008 which prescribes the minimum lot width for subdivision in Zones R1, R2, R3 and R4.

 

The development application seeks to vary Clause 7.13 of the LLEP 2008 which requires a 5 metre width for access handles. The proposed lots have a combined access handle width of 5 metres, however individually the access handle width is 2.5 metres, representing a variation of 50%

 

The Site

 

The development site is legally identified as Lot 11 in DP 838137, being 291 Green Valley Road, Green Valley. The site is regularly shaped with an area of approximately 7,980m2. The site together with the adjoining site to the west was formerly used as a bus depot.

 

An aerial map of the site is provided in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1: Aerial image of the subject site.

 

The immediate locality is generally comprised of low scale residential development consisting of single storey and two storey detached dwellings. Development to the west of the subject site consists of a service station.

 

Figure 2: The site and surrounding locality.

 

It is noted that Development consent No. DA-508/2013 issued on the 11 March 2014, granted approval for the subdivision of the site into 15 Torrens title lots including the construction of roads, drainage and infrastructure. An extract of the subdivision plan is provided below.

Proposed Lot 207 to be subdivided, under DA-997/2014.

 

Figure 3: Extract of the subdivision plan as approved under Development Consent No. DA-508/2013.

 

details of the proposal

 

The development application seeks consent for the subdivision of proposed Lot 207 into two Torrens title lots. It is noted that proposed Lot 207 was approved under Development Consent No. DA-508/2013.

 

Details of the proposed Lots are as follows:

 

Proposed Lot

Area

Lot Width

Access Handle Width

Type of Lot

401

474m2

12.4m

2.5m

Battle axe lot

402

537m2

12.4m

2.5m

Battle axe lot

 

-     The proposed lots will be accessible via Rocco Place, which is to be extended under Development Consent No. DA-507/2013 and DA-508/2013.

-     Proposed Lot 401 and Lot 402 will share a 5 metre wide access handle.

 

The application is accompanied by a written request, pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the LLEP 2008, to vary Clause 7.13 of the LLEP 2008, which prescribes the minimum lot width for access handles in Zones R1, R2, R3 and R4.

 

An extract of the proposed subdivision plan is provided in Figure 4 below. 

 

Proposed Lot 401 and Lot 402 to share a 5m wide access handle

 

Figure 4: Proposed Lot layout for subject site.

 

the issues

 

The key issue identified with respect to the proposal relates to the variation to the minimum lot width for the access handle required by Clause 7.13 of the LLEP 2008.

 

Clause 7.13(4)(a) of the LLEP 2008, identifies a minimum lot width of 5 metres for the access handle for all battle axe lots. The development proposes the following:

 

-     Lot 401 provides a minimum access handle width of 2.5 metres. The extent of variation is 2.5 metres or 50%.

-     Lot 402 provides a minimum access handle width of 2.5 metres. The extent of variation is 2.5 metres or 50%.

 

Consequently, the applicant has submitted a written request seeking a variation to the minimum lot width control as prescribed by Clause 7.13(4)(a) of the LLEP 2008.

 

The objectives of Clause 4.6 of the LLEP 2008 are as follows:

 

(a)     “to provide an appropriate degree of flexibility in applying certain development         standards to particular development,

 

(b)     to achieve better outcomes for and from development by allowing flexibility in         particular circumstances.”

 

Clause 4.6 (3) prescribes:

 

          Development consent must not be granted for development that contravenes a      development standard unless the consent authority has considered a written request     from the applicant that seeks to justify the contravention of the development standard       by demonstrating:

 

          (a)     that compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary             in the circumstances of the case, and

 

          (b)     that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening                 the development standard.”

The applicant has provided justification for the departure to the development standard summarised as follows:

 

The development standard is unnecessary in this instance as the battle-axe allotments provide an access handle that will allow suitable movement to and from the 2 lots which it seeks to service. The 5m wide shared driveway is considered suitable as it:

-     Provides the ability for a vehicle and pedestrian to pass safely if required;

-     Is only required to be 13.7m long to allow access to proposed Lot 402;

-     Will provide a length in which vehicles entering and existing the site in a forward direction will be able to view other vehicle using the access handle, allowing vehicles to give way accordingly; and

-     Will manage the 18 daily trips and 1.7 week date peak hour trips generated by future dwellings houses as detailed in the RMS ‘Guide to Traffic Generating Development’.

 

The following comments are offered in response to the variation sought to Clause 7.13(4)(a):

 

Although the proposed lot width does not meet the numerical control it still achieves the objective of the Clause which is to ensure that lot dimensions are able to accommodate residential development that is suitable for its purpose and is consistent with relevant development controls. The following factors have been considered in assessing the appropriateness of this variation:

 

-     The proposal would still provide an average lot width of 12.4 metres, and site areas well in excess of the 300m2 requirement which is more than sufficient to accommodate a dwelling.

-     Based on the above, the variation does not prevent the objectives of the lot width standard from being achieved, in terms of enabling suitable residential development to be constructed on the site.

-     The variation would not result in any detrimental environmental impacts and is acceptable.

-     The variation is considered to be consistent with Draft LLEP 2008 Amendment 32 which will facilitate the sharing of access handles for a maximum of two allotments. The gazettal of Amendment 32 is imminent.

 

Having regard to the above, it is considered that strict compliance with Clause 7.13 is unreasonable and unnecessary in this instance and there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard in this instance.

 

Independent Hearing and assessment panel

 

At their meeting on 29 September 2015, the IHAP made the following recommendation:

 

The Panel recommends that DA-997/2014 for the subdivision of proposed Lot 207 (approved under Development Consent No. DA-508/2013) into two Torrens title lots be approved subject to conditions attached to the Council officer’s report.

 

Conclusion

 

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and is worthy of support. On this basis, the application is recommended for approval, subject to conditions.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Environmental and Sustainability

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.


Social and Cultural

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.

Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Applicant and Land Owner DetailsView (Under separate cover)

2.         IHAP ReportView (Under separate cover)

3.         IHAP Recommendation View (Under separate cover)  


131

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 03

DA-439/2015 - Demolition of existing structures and construction of a seven (7) double storey multi dwelling housing development at 283-285 Newbridge Road, Chipping Norton

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

257339.2015

Report By

George Dojas - Senior Development Planner

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

Property

283-285 Newbridge Road, Chipping Norton NSW 2170

Owner

MR M AL ASKAR

Applicant

ABSOLUTE DESIGN GROUP

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council has received and considered a Development Application DA-439/2015, proposing demolition of existing structures and construction of a seven (7) double storey multi dwelling housing development at 283-285 Newbridge Road, Chipping Norton. This application was lodged on 29 May 2015.

 

This application was referred to the 28 September 2015 meeting of the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) as the proposal generated more than five (5) unresolved objections.

 

The IHAP recommendation was to approve the Development Application subject to conditions of consent contained within the Council Officer’s IHAP report (See Attachment 2), and additional conditions recommended by IHAP (See Revised Recommended Conditions of Consent - Attachment 4).

 

 

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Development Application No. DA-439/2015, subject to the revised recommended conditions of consent (See Attachment No. 4).

 

Background

 

Council has received and considered a Development Application DA-439/2015 proposing demolition of existing structures and construction of a seven (7) double storey multi dwelling housing development at 283-285 Newbridge Road, Chipping Norton.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the endorsed Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, the proposal was referred to the IHAP for consideration as the proposed development generated more than five (5) unresolved objections.

 

The proposal was notified in accordance with Council’s notification procedures contained in Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008. The proposal was notified between 16 June 2015 and 2 July 2015. In response 31 submissions were received. The submissions are addressed in the IHAP Assessment Report (See Attachment 2).

 

The Site

 

The site is identified as 283-285 Newbridge Road Chipping Norton, with a legal description of Lots 3 & 4 in DP 234918. The sites are rectangular shaped allotments located on the northern side of Newbridge Road with a total site area of 1505sqm.

 

The subject sites contain single storey dwelling houses with pitched roofs. The site has a slope from south to north of approximately 1m.

 

An aerial map of the site is provided in Figure 1 below.

Subject Sites

 

Figure 1: Aerial image of the subject sites

 

The subject site is located in an established residential area within Chipping Norton. The surrounding locality consists of low density residential development, and small scale commercial development directly to the east of the site.

 

Subject Sites

 

Figure 2: The site and surrounding locality

 

 

details of the proposal

 

The proposed development consists of:

 

·    Demolition of all existing structures, tree removal and excavation;

·    Construction of a two (2) storey multi dwelling housing development containing seven (7) units;

·    Associated landscaping and drainage works.

 

An extract of the proposed development is provided in Figure 3 below. 

 

Figure 3: Streetscape elevation of the proposed development

 

the issues

 

The proposed development is compliant with applicable planning instruments and policies. The key issue identified with the proposal relates to the number of submissions received during the notification period. The development was notified in accordance with Council’s notification procedures contained in Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008. The proposal was notified between 16 June 2015 and 2 July 2015, in response 31 submissions were received. The issues raised within the submissions were generally related to the proposed development type (multi dwelling housing), privacy impacts, noise impacts, overshadowing, and parking onsite. The submissions are discussed in detail within the IHAP Assessment Report (See Attachment 2).

 

Independent Hearing and assessment panel

 

At their meeting on 28 September 2015, IHAP stated the following:

 

The Panel have inspected the site and read the Council officer’s report. The Panel heard representation from one objector and the applicant’s architect.

 

The Panel agrees with the Council officer’s recommendation for approval subject to the following issues being addressed by way of additional conditions:

 

·    An additional one visitor car parking space is required to comply with the LDCP 2008 (the Panel recommends that this space be provided adjacent to the existing visitor’s space).

 

·    A fixed privacy screen is to be provided to each bedroom window on the northern elevation of the first floor in order to screen views into the private open space of adjacent properties to the north.

 

·    A detailed landscape plan is to be submitted identifying proposed trees, shrubs and ground covers, numbers, types and sizes that will provide an appropriate amenity to the subject site. The palm trees to the rear and eastern boundary of the site are to be retained and integrated into the revised landscape plan.

 

Recommendation of the Panel:

 

The Panel recommends that DA-439/2015 be approved subject to the conditions recommended in the Council officer’s report and additional conditions described above.

 

Additional conditions recommended by IHAP have been included (See Revised Recommended Conditions of Consent - Attachment 4).

 

Conclusion

 

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and is worthy of support. On this basis, the application is recommended for approval, subject to conditions.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Environmental and Sustainability

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.


Social and Cultural

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Applicant and Land Owner DetailsView (Under separate cover)

2.         IHAP ReportView (Under separate cover)

3.         IHAP RecommendationView (Under separate cover)

4.         Revised Conditions of ConsentView (Under separate cover)  


136

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 04

DA-998/2014 - Subdivision of proposed Lot 9 and Lot 10 (as approved under Development Consent No. DA-507/2013) into four Torrens title lots at 315 Green Valley Road, Green Valley

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

257537.2015

Report By

Rodger Roppolo - Development Assessment Planner

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

Property

Lot 202 DP 1175213, 315 Green Valley Road, Green Valley

Owner

Mrs K J Oliveri

Applicant

Grinsell & Johns Pty Ltd

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council has received and considered a development application DA-998/2014 proposing the subdivision of proposed Lot 9 and Lot 10 (as approved under Development Consent No. DA-507/2013) into four Torrens title lots at Lot 202 DP 1175213, 315 Green Valley Road, Green Valley.  This application was lodged on 13 November 2014.

 

This application was referred to the 28 September 2015 meeting of the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) as the development seeks to vary Clause 7.13 of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008 which requires a 10 metre minimum lot width and a 5 metre minimum lot width for access handles. Proposed Lot 301 provides an access handle width of 2.51 metres representing a variation of 49%, proposed Lot 302 proposes an access handle width of 2.55 metres, representing a variation of 49% and proposed Lot 304 provides a minimum lot width of 5.92 metres representing a variation of 59%.  

 

The IHAP recommendation was to approve the development application subject to the conditions of consent as contained within the Council Officer’s IHAP report (See Attachment 2) and additional conditions as recommended by the IHAP.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Development Application DA-998/2014 subject to the conditions of consent contained within the Council officer’s IHAP report (see Attachment 2) and the following additional conditions:

 

·    A right of way shall be created over each of the access ways of Lot 301 and Lot 302 to benefit Lot 303.

 

·    Vehicular access to Lot 303 shall be restricted by a covenant on title to the access ways of Lot 301 and Lot 302. Direct access from Rocco Place is prohibited.

 

Background

 

Council has received and considered a development application DA-998/2014 proposing the subdivision of proposed Lot 9 and Lot 10 (as approved under Development Consent No. DA-507/2013) into four Torrens title lots at Lot 202 DP 1175213, 315 Green Valley Road, Green Valley. 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the endorsed IHAP Charter and Procedure, the proposal was referred to the IHAP for consideration as the proposed development includes a request to vary a development standard in excess of 10%; pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the LLEP 2008.

 

The application is accompanied by a written request to vary Clause 7.13 of the LLEP 2008 which prescribes the minimum lot width for subdivision in Zones R1, R2, R3 and R4. Proposed Lot 301 and Lot 302 each require a minimum access handle width of 5 metres. However, individually they are provided with an access handle width of 2.5 metres. Proposed Lot 304 requires a minimum lot width of 10 metres. However, Lot 304 proposes a minimum lot width of 5.88 meters along the front boundary. 

 

The Site

 

The development site is legally identified as Lot 202 in DP 1175213, being 315 Green Valley Road, Green Valley. The site is irregular shaped with an area of approximately 7,773m2. The site together with the adjoining site to the east was formerly used as a bus depot.

 

An aerial map of the site is provided in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1: Aerial image of the subject site.

 

The immediate locality is generally comprised of low scale residential development consisting of single storey and two storey detached dwellings. Immediate development to the west of the subject site consists of a service station.

Figure 2: The site and surrounding locality.

 

It is noted that Development Consent No. DA-507/2013 issued on 11 March 2014, granted approval for the subdivision of the site into 14 Torrens title lots including the construction of roads, drainage and infrastructure. An extract of the subdivision plan is provided below.

 

Proposed Lot 9 and Lot 10, to be subdivided, under DA-998/2014.

 

Figure 3 – Extract of the subdivision plan as approved under Development Consent No. DA-507/2013.

 

details of the proposal

 

The development application seeks consent for the subdivision of proposed Lot 9 and Lot 10 into four Torrens title lots. It is noted that proposed Lot 9 and Lot 10 were approved under Development Consent No. DA-507/2013.

 

Details of the proposed Lots are as follows:

 

Proposed Lot

Area

Lot Width

Type of Lot

301

462m2

Average lot width of 11m, with an access handle width of 2.51m

Battle axe lot

302

412m2

Average lot width of 11m, with an access handle width of 2.55m

Battle axe lot

303

357m2

Average lot width of 10.1m, with an access handle width of 5.8m

Battle axe lot

304

363m2

Lot width ranges from 10.5m at the rear boundary to 5.88m at the front boundary.

Regular lot

 

-     The proposed lots will be accessible via Rocco Place, which is to be extended under Development Consent No. DA 507/2013.

-     Proposed Lot 301 and Lot 302 will share a 5.06m wide access handle, with access from Rocco Place.

-     Lot 303 which is a battle-axe lot will have an access handle width of 5.8m with vehicular access permitted from the right of way located on Lot 301 and 302.

-     Lot 304 will have direct access from Rocco Place.

 

An extract of the proposed subdivision plan is provided in Figure 4 below. 

 

Proposed Lot 304 has a minimum lot width of 5.88m at the front boundary

 

Proposed Lot 301 and Lot 302 to share a 5m wide access handle

 

Figure 4: Proposed Lot layout for subject site.

 

the issues

 

The key issue identified with respect to the proposal relates to the variation to the minimum lot width required by Clause 7.13 of the LLEP 2008.

 

Clause 7.13 of the LLEP 2008, identifies a minimum lot width of 10m for all lots (expect battle axe lots) and a minimum lot width of 5m (for the access handle) for all battle axe lots.

 

 

 

The development proposes the following:

 

-     Lot 301 provides a minimum access handle width of 2.51m. The extent of variation is 2.49m or 49%.

-     Lot 302 provides a minimum access handle width of 2.55m. The extent of variation is 2.45m or 49%.

-     Lot 304 provides a minimum lot width of 5.92. The extent of variation is 4.08m or 59%.

 

Consequently, the applicant has submitted a written request seeking a variation to the minimum lot width control as prescribed by Clause 7.13 LLEP 2008.

 

The objectives of Clause 4.6 of the LLEP 2008 are as follows:

 

(a)     “to provide an appropriate degree of flexibility in applying certain development         standards to particular development,

 

(b)     to achieve better outcomes for and from development by allowing flexibility in         particular circumstances.”

 

Clause 4.6 (3) prescribes:

 

          Development consent must not be granted for development that contravenes a      development standard unless the consent authority has considered a written request     from the applicant that seeks to justify the contravention of the development standard       by demonstrating:

 

          (a)     that compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary             in the circumstances of the case, and

 

          (b)     that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening                 the development standard.”

The applicant has provided justification for the departure to the development standard as follows:

 

Compliance with the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstance of the case, as detailed below:

 

·        Proposed Lot 301 and Lot 302 will share a 5m access handle, with each lot having a 2.5m wide portion of the access handle. This is considered suitable as the combined access handle width achieves the requirement of 5m which will provide the ability for suitable vehicular access.

·        The access handle will serve three lots being Lots 301, 302 & 303.

·        In relation to Lot 304, a 10m lot width will be achieved at the building line of any future dwelling. Additionally, a suitable width is provided at the frontage for vehicular access.

 

The following comments are offered in response to the variation sought to Clause 7.13(3):

 

In consideration of the merits of the proposal and the applicant’s submission with respect to Clause 4.6 it is considered that the objectives of Clause 7.13 are still satisfied with this proposal despite the variation.  The objective of Clause 7.13 is to ensure that lot dimensions are able to accommodate residential development that is suitable for its purpose and is consistent with relevant development controls.

 

The provision of a shared access handle for proposed Lot 301 and Lot 302 will not prevent suitable residential development occurring on the subject lots. The lots meet the minimum lot size requirements and the average lot width requirement. Additionally, the shared access handle will help to minimise separate driveway access points. Furthermore, the variation is considered to be consistent with Draft LLEP 2008 Amendment 32 which will facilitate the sharing of access handles for a maximum of two allotments. The gazettal of Amendment 32 is imminent.

 

In relation to Lot 304, residential development will still be able to be achieved on the subject lot, as a minimum lot width of 10m will be achieved at the building line.

 

Having regard to the above, it is considered that strict compliance with Clause 7.13 of the LLEP 2008 is unreasonable and unnecessary in this instance.

 

Independent Hearing and assessment panel

 

At their meeting on 28 September 2015, IHAP made the following recommendation:

 

The Panel recommends that DA-998/2014 be approved subject to the conditions recommended in the Council officer’s report and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

1.   The vehicular access point to Lot 303 should be restricted by covenant on title to the proposed driveway to Lots 301 and 302 (direct access to Rocco Place is to be prohibited).

2.   A right of way should be created over the driveway to proposed lots 301 and 302 in favour of proposed lot 303.

3.   The western boundary of proposed lot 304 where it intersects with Rocco Place be extended in a direct line to Rocco Place rather than at a diagonal as shown on the proposed plan of subdivision.

 

It is recommended that only Condition No. 1 and Condition No. 2 are adopted by Council, as this would assist in reducing the number of driveways on the corner of Rocco Place. It is considered that condition No.3 would significantly reduce the frontage of Lot 303 and does not provide any overall benefit to the adjoining lots. Further, proposed Lot 304 would be capable of supporting the development of a dwelling in an orderly manner in its current proposed form.

 

Condition No.’s 1 and 2 have been incorporated into the recommendation in addition to the recommended conditions of consent contained within the Council officer’s IHAP report (Attached).

 

Conclusion

 

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and is worthy of support. On this basis, the application is recommended for approval, subject to the revised conditions. 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Environmental and Sustainability

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.


Social and Cultural

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Applicant and Land Owner DetailsView (Under separate cover)

2.         IHAP ReportView (Under separate cover)

3.         IHAP Recommendation View (Under separate cover)  


145

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 05

DA-1183/2014 - Construction of 24 detached dwellings and community title subdivision on proposed development Lots 7 and 8 within proposed Lot 22 in the Plan of Subdivision of Lots 31 and 32 in DP 1181985 within the former New Brighton Golf Course at Lot 31 Brickmakers Drive, Moorebank

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

258625.2015

Report By

David Smith - Acting Coordinator Development Assessment

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

Property

Lot 31, DP 1181985

Brickmakers Drive, Moorebank

Owner

New Brighton Golf Club Ltd

Applicant

Mirvac Homes (NSW) Pty Ltd

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council has received and considered a development application DA-1183/2014, proposing the construction of 24 detached dwellings and community title subdivision on proposed development lots 7 and 8 within proposed Lot 22 in the Plan of Subdivision of Lots 31 and 32 in DP 1181985 (approved DA-426/2014) within the former New Brighton Golf Course.

 

This application was lodged on 23 December 2014.

 

This application was referred to the 28 September 2015 meeting of the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) as the development seeks to vary Clause 4.3 of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008 which requires a maximum building height of 8.5 metres. The proposed building heights range from 6.468m to 11.379 metres, representing a variation of up to 33.87%.

 

The application was not required to be notified or advertised in accordance with the notification policy contained within the Liverpool Development Control Plan (LDCP) 2008.

The IHAP recommendation was to approve the development application subject to conditions of consent as contained within the Council Officer’s IHAP report (See Attachment 2).

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Development Application DA-1183/2014 subject to the recommended conditions of consent attached to the Council officer’s IHAP report (Attachment 2).

 

Background

 

Council has received and considered a development application DA-1183/2014 proposing the construction of 24 detached dwellings and community title subdivision on proposed development lots 7 and 8 within proposed Lot 22 in the Plan of Subdivision of Lots 31 and 32 in DP 1181985 (approved DA-426/2014) within the former New Brighton Golf Course.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the endorsed Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, the proposal was referred to the IHAP for consideration as the proposed development includes a request to vary a development standard in excess of 10%; pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the LLEP 2008.

 

The application is accompanied by a written request to vary Clause 4.3 of the LLEP 2008 which requires a maximum building height of 8.5 metres. The proposed building heights range from 6.468m to 11.379 metres, representing a variation of up to 33.87%.

 

The Site

 

The site is identified as Lot 31 Brickmakers Drive, Moorebank with legal description of Lot 31 DP 1181985. The proposed development will occur on proposed development lots 7 and 8 within proposed lot 22 in the Plan of Subdivision of Lots 31 and 32 in DP 1181985.

 

An aerial map of the site is provided in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1: Aerial image of the subject site.

 

Figure 2 below shows the approved subdivision layout of Development Consent DA-426/2014. The portion of the site which is the subject of this application is proposed development lots 7 and 8 within proposed Lot 22 in the Plan of Subdivision of Lots 31 and 32 in DP 1181985, for which development has been granted (DA 426/2014) – identified by the yellow shading in Figure 2 below. The site is located within an established residential area.

 

Figure 2: The site and surrounding locality.

 

 

details of the proposal

 

The proposed development consists of:

 

·    Construction of 24 detached dwellings;

·    Community title subdivision of the two development lots 7 and 8;

·    Works within proposed community lot 1, including landscaping and footpaths within the road verges and construction of part of a pedestrian pathway between the residential allotments in Lot 7 and the adjoining golf course and landscaping of the drainage reserve in Lot 16 and the pocket park at the end of the cul-de-sac of Road 5

 

The application is accompanied by a written request, pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the LLEP 2008, to vary Clause 4.3 of the LLEP 2008, which prescribes the maximum height of buildings. 

 

An extract of the proposed development plan is provided in Figure 3 and 4 below. 

 

Figure 3: Proposed lot layout for Lot 7.

Figure 4: Proposed lot layout for lot 8

 

 

the issues

 

The key issue identified with respect to the proposal relates to the variation to the maximum height of buildings development standard required by Clause 4.3 of the LLEP.

 

It is noted that building height is measured from existing ground level and notwithstanding that Council has granted consent to some substantial earthworks on the subject site that alter the ground levels significantly; the approved works have not been constructed and therefore the application is required to be assessed on the basis of the existing ground levels, rather than the approved ground levels. It is also noted that if the applicant had carried out the earthworks and benching works for the site prior to the determination of this application, the height would have been measured from the new benching levels which would have resulted in all of the dwellings complying with the height standard.

 

Given the non-compliance with the height standard, the applicant has submitted a written request seeking a variation to the maximum height of buildings standard as prescribed by Clause 4.3 LLEP.

 

The objectives of Clause 4.6 of the LLEP are as follows:

 

(a)     “to provide an appropriate degree of flexibility in applying certain development         standards to particular development,

 

(b)     to achieve better outcomes for and from development by allowing flexibility in         particular circumstances.”

 

Clause 4.6 (3) prescribes:

 

          Development consent must not be granted for development that contravenes a      development standard unless the consent authority has considered a written request     from the applicant that seeks to justify the contravention of the development standard       by demonstrating:

 

          (a)     that compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary             in the circumstances of the case, and

 

          (b)     that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening                 the development standard.”

The applicant has provided justification for the departure to the development standard as follows:

 

·    Once the earthworks are completed all dwellings will comply with the height control from the finished earthworks level and the development will appear as a predominantly two storey development.

·    Compliance with the height control is unnecessary and unreasonable to deliver built form across the site which is of commensurate scale and character.

·    The assessment of all other planning controls is from the finished levels and as such there are no environmental impacts associated with the additional earthworks.

·    The breach of the control does not raise matters of State or regional environmental planning.

·    There is public benefit in maintaining the standard only if the application takes into account the earthworks levels on the site that have already been approved by Council.

 

The following comments are offered in response to the variation sought to Clause 4.3:

 

Council has approved the extent of earthworks proposed on the site, and in doing so determined that the earthworks are appropriate for future development of the site as a residential estate. It is therefore considered that there are no significant detrimental impacts upon the amenity or environment of the area. On this basis, notwithstanding the works have not yet been completed, it was anticipated that a two-storey form of development would be constructed and measured from the approved ground levels. As this is contemplated and as the finished streetscapes are appropriate and the design does not result in excessive visual bulk or impacts from the current additional height by way of unacceptable shadowing or overlooking impacts, the variation to the control is considered to be consistent with the objectives of the height control and the zone; and as such is considered to result in a desirable planning outcome. It is therefore considered unreasonable and unnecessary to require compliance with the height control in this instance.

 

Having regard to the above, it is considered that strict compliance with Clause 4.3 of LLEP is unreasonable and unnecessary in this instance.

 

Independent Hearing and assessment panel

 

At their meeting on 28 September 2015, IHAP made the following recommendation:

 

The Panel recommends that DA-1183/2014 be approved subject to the conditions recommended in the Council officer’s report.

 

Conclusion

 

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and is worthy of support. On this basis, the application is recommended for approval, subject to conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Applicant and Land Owner DetailsView (Under separate cover)

2.         IHAP Report View (Under separate cover)

3.         IHAP RecommendationView (Under separate cover)  


152

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report

 

IHAP 06

DA-850/2014 - Construction of a Rural Fire Service Station at Corner Lot 1 Twenty Seventh Avenue, West Hoxton

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

258860.2015

Report By

David Smith - Acting Coordinator Development Assessment

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

Property

Cnr Lot 1 DP 409303

Corner Lot 1 Twenty Seventh Avenue

West Hoxton

Owner

Western Sydney Parklands Trust

Applicant

Liverpool City Council

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council has received and considered a development application DA-850/2014, proposing the construction of a Rural Fire Service Station at Corner Lot 1, Twenty Seventh Avenue, West Hoxton. This application was lodged on 29 September 2014.

 

This application was referred to the 28 September 2015 meeting of the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) as Council is the applicant and has a pecuniary interest in the development.

 

The IHAP recommendation was to approve the development application subject to conditions of consent as contained within the Council Officer’s IHAP report (See Attachment 2).

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council approves Development Application DA-850/2014 subject to the recommended conditions of consent (Attachment 1).

 

 

Background

 

Council has received and considered a Development Application DA-850/2014, proposing the construction of a Rural Fire Service Station at Corner Lot 1, Twenty Seventh Avenue, West Hoxton.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the endorsed Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, the proposal was referred to the IHAP for consideration as Council is the applicant and has a pecuniary interest in the development.

 

The assessment of the application was undertaken by an independent planning consultant who also prepared the IHAP report (See Attachment 1).

 

The Site

 

The site is identified as Corner Lot 1 Twenty Seventh Avenue, West Hoxton, with legal description of Corner Lot 1 DP 409303.

 

The subject site is located on the south-eastern corner of Twenty Seventh Avenue and Kirkpatrick Avenue, West Hoxton.  The site has a frontage to Twenty Seventh Avenue of 87.63m and to Kirkpatrick Avenue of 169.29m, with an area of 2,030m².

 

The proposed development is to occur on the front portion of the site.

 

An aerial map of the site is provided in Figure 1 below.

Subject Site

 

Figure 1: Aerial image of the subject site.

 

The locality is characterised by residential development to the north-east, with the Sydney Water Supply Channel and thence rural land to the eastern side of Twenty Seventh Avenue and rural land to the south and east, as can be seen in the locality photograph below.

Subject Site

 
http://adm-m-gis1/output/Buffer_ims_adm-m-gis168207644347427.jpg

Figure 2: The site and surrounding locality.

 

details of the proposal

 

The proposed development is for construction of a Rural Fire Service Fire Station with 15 car parking spaces. The application is described in detail as follows:

 

Fire Station

The proposed fire station is a single building with a setback from Twenty Seventh Avenue of 23m. The first element is a large, rectangular built element to be used to park fire engines and other appliances in 6 bays. This element has dimensions of 27.3m x 15.3m and has a wall height of approximately 4.9m, with a height to the low pitched roof ridge of approximately 6.4m. To the rear portion of this element is a catering store, store room and toilets and showers (including an accessible WC), over which is to be a future storage area.

 

The second element, which is located to the south of the fire engine parking area, is a lower built form with a skillion roof, having dimensions of approximately 11.2m x 13.2m and a maximum height of 4.9m. This element is to contain a lunch area, kitchenette, pantry and two offices.

 

Figure 3: Proposed building and car parking

 

The building is to be constructed of colorbond metal wall cladding with custom orb metal roof sheeting. As can be seen in Figures 4 and 5, it is also proposed to provide a building identification sign to the facades facing Twenty Seventh and Kirkpatrick Avenues. The signage is to consist of the RFS logo and the words “Middleton Grange RFS Station” and is to be flush wall signs.

 

Figure 4: Proposed building as viewed from Twenty Seventh Avenue

 

Figure 5: Proposed building as viewed from Kirkpatrick Avenue

 

 

External Works

The site is to be regraded in the vicinity of the proposed development using cut and fill and a 1:4 batter slope is proposed at the rear of the building. In front of the building is a concrete hardstand area for maneuvering of fire appliances and to the south of that area is a proposed 15 space (including 1 accessible space) car parking area. Both the hardstand and parking areas are proposed to be set back approximately 6m from Twenty Seventh Avenue. Two x 20,000L rainwater tanks are proposed at the rear of the building, along with a generator. Landscaping is proposed around the hardstand and car parking areas by way of low to medium shrubs (maximum 3m height) and 5 Spotted Gums are proposed to be planted to replace the two trees required to be removed to construct the building. The regraded areas of the site are to be turfed. A 2.4m high chainwire fence is proposed around the RFS compound for security.

 

Use

The premises is not to be permanently staffed, being utilised only when a fire call is received or in order to carryout regular training for the brigade. It is estimated that 6-8 brigade members will attend in the event of a fire call, with a maximum of 14 in extreme events. The premises will be operable 24 hours a day in relation to response to emergency fire calls. The station will have the following trucks parked permanently onsite:

 

·    1 x 13 tonne vehicle

·    1 x 7-8 tonne vehicle

·    1 x 2-2-5 tonne vehicle

·    1 x Hilux or equivalent

 

the issues

 

The key issue identified with respect to the proposal relates to the servicing of the site and the impact of the development upon the nearby residential area in terms of traffic and noise.

 

In accordance with the Liverpool Development Control Plan the development application was notified between 29 October and 13 November 2014 and two submissions were received raising the following concerns with the proposal.

 

Risk to Pedestrians/Cyclists

 

Concern is raised that any increase in traffic on Twenty Seventh Avenue will result in a high risk to pedestrians and cyclists using the road as the road has no dedicated footpath or cycle way.

 

Officer Comment

 

Twenty Seventh Avenue (in proximity to the site and leading up to its intersection with Fifteenth Avenue) is not a road where it would be difficult for a pedestrian or cyclist to view vehicles or vice versa, being a relatively flat and straight road. In such conditions, and given the relatively low traffic numbers on the road, it is not considered that the use of the road network by vehicles from the facility will result in any unacceptable increase in risk to cyclists or pedestrians.

 

Safety at intersection of Twenty Seventh and Fifteenth Avenues

 

Concern is raised that the poor visibility at the intersection due to existing guard rails will result in pedestrian and cyclist safety concerns with the increase in traffic from the proposal.

 

Officer Comment

 

It is not considered that the intersection has unacceptable visibility such that the location of the facility at the subject site would be inappropriate.

 

Sewer

 

Concern is raised that the facility should be connected to the sewer to avoid impact upon the water supply channel.

 

Officer Comment

 

The application has been amended to include connection to the sewer.

 

Telecommunication Availability

 

Concern is raised as to whether there are adequate telecommunication facilities available to the site as internet services are congested and mobile coverage is patchy.

 

Officer Comment

 

This is a matter for investigation by the applicant.

 

Noise

 

Concern is raised that an acoustic report has not been prepared and submitted to Council with the development application and that given the proximity to residential properties, conditions limiting the time of day sirens can be used should be imposed upon any approval.

 

Officer Comment

 

The proposed facility is not one that inherently results in noise impacts (i.e. due to the day to day operation on the site), other than potentially due to the plant. Noise impact from plant is appropriately addressed at the construction certificate stage as the need for noise amelioration measures can only be determined once the equipment is chosen, which happens at that stage. Accordingly, a condition of consent is recommended requiring an acoustic report to address the noise emission of plant to be submitted with the construction certificate application.

 

The only other potentially intrusive noise is that from sirens on appliances used at the premises. Sirens are only used when the vehicle which is breaking the road rules (due to speed, travelling on the opposite side of the road, going through red lights, etc.) and needs to warn other road users of its presence or when the vehicle needs to take priority over other road users and needs to warn them. As such, no sirens would be used for training, for back burning or for other similar works by the facility. Sirens would only be used in close proximity to the site when there is an excess of traffic on Twenty Seventh Avenue near the exit to the facility or at nearby intersections where priority is required in built up traffic. Given the infrequency of such events coinciding with bush fire events, it is not considered that siren noise will be a significant noise problem for residents. It is further noted that as sirens are used in emergency situations and only to ensure safety, it is unrealistic and unsafe to attempt to limit their use or ameliorate the noise from them in any way.

 

For these reasons an acoustic report was not requested, being considered to be unnecessary in relation to the sirens, and not required until the construction certificate stage in relation to plant noise.

 

Should be Located in Middleton Grange

 

The application has been assessed in terms of its suitability for the subject site and it is considered that the site is suitable for the facility.

 

Officer Comment

 

The decision on the most appropriate location for the facility in terms of the catchment of its services is a matter for NSW RFS.

 

Independent Hearing and assessment panel

 

At their meeting on 28 September 2015, IHAP made the following recommendation:

 

The Panel recommends that DA-850/2014 be approved subject to the conditions recommended in the Council officer’s report.

 

Conclusion

 

The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and is worthy of support. On this basis, the application is recommended for approval, subject to conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         IHAP Report View (Under separate cover)

2.         IHAP Recommendation View (Under separate cover)    


160

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Chief Executive Officer Report

 

CEO 01

Corporate Sponsorships

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney

Key Policy

Marketing and Promotion Strategy

File Ref

269705.2015

Report By

Anthea Hall - Manager Marketing and Communications

Approved By

Kiersten Fishburn - Acting Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council provides financial assistance to the community through the Corporate Sponsorship program.

 

The Financial Contributions Panel (FCP) recently considered applications from local residents and community groups for Corporate Sponsorship.

 

This report presents the funding recommendations made by the FCP for Council's consideration.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

Endorses the Financial Contributions Panel’s recommendations for the provision of $1,200 (GST exclusive) under the Corporate Sponsorship Program as summarised in the table below. If the recommended amount of $1,200 is endorsed, the remaining balance will be $24,550.

 

Applicant name

Amount

Hinchinbrook Public School

$1,200 ex gst

 

REPORT

 

This report contains the most recent recommendations by the FCP for Corporate Sponsorship.

 

Corporate Sponsorship

Council delivers a Corporate Sponsorship Program for local organisations seeking financial support to deliver events that benefit Liverpool. One application for corporate sponsorship was received by Council. The application met the program criteria and is recommended for funding. The program criteria can be found as an attachment to this report for the reference of Councillors. A summary of the request received and the FCP recommendation are shown in the table below.

                  

APPLICANT

PROJECT NAME & DESCRIPTION

AMOUNT REQUESTED

 

AMOUNT RECOMMENDED

Hinchinbrook Public School

Hinchinbrook Public School Mega Fair 13 November 2015

School fundraising event with stalls and rides

 

Benefits:

·    Logo inclusion on all promotional materials

 

Moderate alignment with program criteria. Recommended for funding.

$1,200 ex gst

$1,200 ex gst

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

Economic and Financial

 

The 2015/16 Corporate Sponsorship Program has a budget of $125,000, with a remaining balance of $25,750. If the recommended amount of $1,200 is endorsed, the remaining balance will be $24,550.

 

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil   


163

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Chief Financial Officer

 

CFO 01

Tabling of the Annual Pecuniary Interest Returns for Councillors and Designated Persons

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Workforce Management Plan

File Ref

254788.2015

Report By

David Maguire - Governance Coordinator

Approved By

Gary Grantham - Acting Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Section 450A of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act) requires that the completed annual pecuniary interest returns of Councillors and designated persons holding office and occupying positions, as at 30 June 2015, be tabled before Council.

 

This report recommends that Council notes that the annual pecuniary interest returns of Councillors and designated persons, as at 30 June 2015, are now tabled before Council.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council notes that the annual pecuniary interest returns of all Councillors and all designated persons, holding office or occupying positions within Council, as at 30 June 2015, are tabled before this meeting of Council in accordance with section 450A of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

REPORT

 

Section 449(3) of the Act provides that a Councillor or a designated person, holding that position as at 30 June in any year, must complete and lodge with the CEO within three months after that date, a return in the form prescribed by the regulations.

 

It is noted that, in accordance with section 449(3) of the Act, all Councillors and all designated persons duly completed and lodged their annual pecuniary interest disclosures returns (102 returns in total) with Council by the due date of 30 September 2015.

 

Designated persons are defined under section 441 of the Act as: 

 

·    The CEO

·    Senior staff members of Council

·    Members of Council staff who hold positions which have been identified by the CEO as designated persons because the exercise of the regulatory or contractual functions of their role could give rise to a conflict between the person’s duty as a member of Council staff and the person’s private interest

·    Persons (other than members of the senior staff of Council) who are members of a committee of Council identified by the Council as a committee whose members are designated persons because the functions of the committee involve the exercise of the Council’s functions under the Act or any other Act (including the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979) that, in their exercise, could give rise to a conflict between the member’s duty as a member of the committee and the member’s private interest. (All members of Council's Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel are designated persons.). 

 

Section 450A of the Act requires that all annual pecuniary interest disclosures returns that have to be lodged with the CEO must be tabled at the first meeting of the Council after the date on which they are required to be lodged, that is, at this meeting of Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


165

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Chief Financial Officer

 

CFO 02

Investment Report September 2015

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

265379.2015

Report By

Vishwa Nadan - Manager Financial Management

Approved By

Gary Grantham - Acting Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report details the Council’s Investment portfolio.

 

At 30 September 2015, Council held investments with a market value of $168.4 million. The portfolio yield for twelve months ended was 3.62 per cent exceeding the benchmark of 2.47 per cent by 115 basis points for the same period.

 

Council’s investments and reporting obligations fully comply with the requirements of Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes this report.

 

 

REPORT

 

Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 requires that the Responsible Accounting Officer must provide Council with a written report setting out details of all money that Council has invested under section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

Council’s Portfolio

 

At 30 September 2015, Council held investments with a market value of $168.4 million. Council’s investment register detailing all its investments is provided as an attachment to this report.

 

 

 

 

             

In summary, Council’s portfolio consisted of investments in:

 

 

As at the end of September 2015, the ratio of market value compared to face value of various debt securities is shown in the table below.

 

Asset Class

Sep-15

Jun-15

Senior Debts (FRN’s & *TCD’s)

100.21 %

 100.49%

MBS (Reverse Mortgage Backed Securities)

  65.81 %

  66.01%

* A TCD stands for Transferrable Certificate of Deposit; it is a security issued with the same characteristics as a   Term Deposit however it can be sold back (transferred) in to the market prior to maturity. A floating TCD pays a coupon linked to a variable benchmark (90 days BBSW).

 

Council is fully compliant with the requirements of the Ministerial Investment Order including the grand fathering provision in regards to its investment portfolio holdings. The grand fathering provision states that Council continues to hold to maturity, redeem or sell investments that comply with previous Ministerial Investment Orders. Any new investments must comply with the most recent Order. Council continues to closely monitor the investments in its portfolio to ensure continued compliance and minimal exposure to risk.

 

During the month of September Council purchased $2 million floating rate notes (FRN) detailed as follows:

 

Issuer

Credit Rating

Coupon Interest

Rate

Face Value

Bendigo & Adelaide Bank Limited

S&P A-

BBSW+110 basis points

$2,000,000

 

This purchase further enhances liquidity and diversification to Council’s investment portfolio.

 

 

Portfolio Maturity Profile

 

The table below shows the percentage of funds invested at different durations to maturity.

 

 

Market Value by Issuer and compliance to investment policy

 

Portfolio Performance

 

Council’s investment portfolio yield for the 12 months ended 30 September 2015 was 3.62 per cent which exceeded benchmark of 2.47 per cent by 115 basis points for the same period. Council continues to achieve a solid outcome despite ongoing margin contraction and significantly lower deposit yields on offer. Council’s ongoing outperformance has been boosted by a handful of longer term investments yielding above 4% and maturing out to 2019. Return on investments is expected to slowly decrease as old investments in Council’s portfolio mature and replaced with investments yielding lower returns. Comparative yields for the previous months are charted below:

 

 

Investment Portfolio at a Glance

Portfolio Performance vs. 90 day Bank Bill index over the 12 month period.

MCWB01114_0000[1]

The portfolio yield for 12 month ended is 115 basis points above the benchmark for the same period (3.62% against 2.47%).

Annual Income vs. Budget

MCWB01114_0000[1]

Council’s investment interest income was slightly below budget for the month; however it is expected to improve and exceed year to date budget during the course of this financial year.

 

Investment Policy Compliance

Legislative Requirements

 

MCWB01114_0000[1]

Fully Compliant.

Portfolio Credit Rating Limit

MCWB01114_0000[1]

Fully Compliant.

 

Institutional Exposure Limits

MCWB01114_0000[1]

Fully Compliant.

Term to Maturity Limits

MCWB01114_0000[1]

Fully Compliant

 

 

Economic Outlook – Reserve Bank of Australia

At its October 2015 meeting, the Board of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 2.0 per cent. A statement released on 6th October 2015 by Glenn Stevens, Governor of the RBA commenting on the central bank decision is attached to this report. The cash rate is at historically low level and adversely impacting returns on investment. Returns on Term Deposits have significantly dropped since the last twelve months. The average market returns on term deposits are:

·    Longer term deposits (> 3years maturity) - 3.1% to 3.5% p.a

·    Medium term (2 to 3 years to maturity) – 3.0% to 3.10% p.a.

·    Short term deposits rate (less than one year to maturity) – ranges from 2.65% for 30 days to 2.95% per annum.

·    Cash & Cash At Call accounts range from1.8% to 2.55%

·    31 Days’ Notice Account 2.7%

 

Certificate of Responsible Accounting Officer

 

The Chief Financial Officer, as Responsible Accounting Officer certifies that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Councils Investment Policies at the time of their placement. The previous investments are covered by the “grandfather” clauses of the current investment guidelines issued by the Minister for Local Government.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Investment Portfolio - September 2015View

2.         Investment Performance Charts - September 2015View

3.         RBA Cash Rate Media Release - October 2015View  


171

CFO 02

Investment Report September 2015

Attachment 1

Investment Portfolio - September 2015

 


 


173

CFO 02

Investment Report September 2015

Attachment 2

Investment Performance Charts - September 2015

 


173

CFO 02

Investment Report September 2015

Attachment 3

RBA Cash Rate Media Release - October 2015

 


174

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Chief Financial Officer

 

CFO 03

Timing of Committee Meetings

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

266061.2015

Report By

George Georgakis - Manager Council and Executive Services

Approved By

Gary Grantham - Chief Financial Officer / Director Corporate Services

 

 

Executive Summary

 

To report to Council on a proposal to alter some of the meeting times of Council’s Committees.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

Adopt the changes to the Committee meeting times to the following Committees as outlined in the report:

 

·    Aboriginal Consultative

·    Budget and Finance

·    Civic Advisory

·    Heritage Advisory

·    Multicultural Advisory

·    Street Naming

·    Planning and Development

 

 

REPORT

 

Council at its meeting on 30 September 2015 considered a Notice of Motion from Councillor Ristevski and resolved:

 

“That the CEO be authorised with the membership of the new Committees, to make changes to meeting times to suit the participation and to provide a report to the next Council meeting with some suggestions”. 

 

The background to Councillor Ristevski’s Notice of Motion provided the following:

 

“As the position of a Councillor is effectively a part time position which is normally juggles by most in conjunction with full time employment, it is important to get participation from Councillors in Committee. The current times of Committee meetings during the day is inflexible as it could put at risk the full time employment of Councillors with their employers if they are constantly taking time off during the day to attend Committee meetings”.   

 

Listed below are:

 

·    Each of Council’s Committees

·    The current meeting times

·    The current representatives

·    A comment on whether a meeting time change is proposed

 

Committee Name

Current meeting times

Current representatives

Comment

Proposal

 

Aboriginal Consultative

 

6pm – 8pm

First Wednesday of the month

 

Clr Shelton

Clr Waller

 

 

It’s proposed to move the meeting day from to the first Wednesday of the month at 6pm to the first Thursday of the month at 6.30pm, so that the meeting does not clash with the Planning and Development Committee which is proposed to now be held on the first Wednesday of the month at 6pm.  

 

 

Proposed to move the meeting day from the first Wednesday of the month at 6pm to the first Thursday of the month at 6.30pm.

 

Audit and Risk

 

3pm – 5pm

Quarterly on second Wednesday of the month

 

 

Clr Hadid

Clr Mamone

Clr Shelton

 

 

No change proposed.

 

No change proposed.

 

Badgerys Creek Taskforce

 

 

Meets when required on first Wednesday of the month during the day

 

Mayor Mannoun

Deputy Mayor Hadchiti

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadid

Clr Harle

Clr Mamone

 

 

The Taskforce involves external members from organisations and the community so it’s best it continue during the day. 

 

 

No change proposed.

 

Budget and Finance

 

2pm – 3pm

First Wednesday of the month

 

Mayor Mannoun

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadid

Clr Harle

Clr Ristevski

Clr Shelton

 

This Committee could be moved to later in the day.

 

Proposed to change the meeting time to 5pm-6pm on first Wednesday of the month to then be followed by the Planning and Development Committee which is proposed to commence at 6pm.

 

Building our New City

 

 

9.15am – 10.30am

First Wednesday of the month

 

Mayor Mannoun

Deputy Mayor Hadchiti

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadid

Clr Mamone

Clr Shelton

 

 

This Committee could potentially be moved but Ed Blakely as an external member (and co-chair) may have difficulty attending if held after hours. External speakers are also often asked to present at the meeting (external architects, urban design consultants) so their availability is likely to be more problematic.

 

 

 

No change proposed.

 

Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre Board

 

 

4.30pm – 6pm

Bi-monthly on a Thursday

 

Clr Hadid

Clr Waller

 

 

 

Currently commences late  afternoon.

 

 

 

 

No change proposed.

 

Civic Advisory

 

 

Meets quarterly when required. Meetings currently held during the day.

 

Mayor and all Councillors

 

The Committee consists of many external representatives, including representatives from the three Service Clubs, Liverpool Hospital, Holsworthy Barracks and former Mayors and Councillors.

The timing could potentially be moved, but it could make attendance problematic. A compromise would be to have meetings commence late in the afternoon.

 

 

 

Proposed to change the meeting time to 4.00pm.

 

Committee for Liverpool

 

 

Generally meets during the day when required

 

Mayor Mannoun and

President of WSROC

(Clr Hadchiti)

 

 

The Committee is subject to the Mayor and members availability, with morning to lunchtime meetings established practice to generate good attendance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

No change proposed.

 

Economic Development and Events

 

 

10.30am – 12noon

first Wednesday of the month 

 

 

 

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadid

Clr Harle

Clr Mamone

Clr Shelton

 

 

The Committee involves external members from organisations and the community so it’s best it continue during the day. 

 

 

No change proposed.

 

Environment Advisory

 

 

5.30pm – 7.30pm

Quarterly on second Monday

 

 

Clr Harle

Clr Mamone

Clr Shelton

 

 

The meeting is currently held after business hours.

 

No change proposed.

 

Heritage Advisory 

 

 

2.30pm – 4.30pm

Bi-monthly on a Monday

 

 

Clr Hadid

Clr Harle

 

 

Could be moved to the evening.

 

Proposed to change meeting time to bi-monthly at 5.30pm – 7.30pm on third Monday

 

 

Liverpool Access

 

 

1pm – 3pm

Monthly on second Thurs

 

Clr Waller

 

 

The meeting will need to stay as is as members will have issues with accessing transportation outside of business hours.

 

No change proposed.

 

Liverpool Sports

 

 

7pm – 9pm

Bi-monthly on a Thursday

 

Clr Hadid

Clr Ristevski

 

 

The meeting is currently held after business hours.

 

No change proposed.

 

Master Plan Steering

 

 

3.30pm – 5pm

Monthly on first Tuesday

 

 

Mayor Mannoun

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadchiti

Clr Hadid

Clr Harle

Clr Shelton

 

 

No change proposed.

 

No change proposed.

 

Multicultural Advisory

 

Meets as required (usually once a year)

 

Clr Balloot

Clr Hadchiti

Clr Mamone

Clr Ristevski

 

 

Proposed to hold future meetings in the evening.

 

Proposed to hold future meetings in the evening.

 

No Intermodal

 

 

5pm – 6.30pm

Monthly on first Tuesday

 

 

Mayor Mannoun

Clr Hadchiti

Clr Harle

 

 

No change proposed. 

 

No change to the meeting time is proposed.

 

Planning and Development

 

 

3pm – 5pm

Monthly on first Wednesday

 

 

Mayor and

all Councillors

 

 

To be moved to 6pm-8pm on the first Wednesday of the month.

 

Proposed to change the meeting time to 6.00pm-8pm.

 

Street Naming

 

 

10am – 11.30am

Bi-monthly on first Tuesday

 

 

Mayor Mannoun

Clr Balloot

Clr Harle

 

 

Proposed to hold future meetings in the evenings.

 

Proposed to change the meeting time to bi-monthly 5.30pm – 7.30pm on third Tuesday of the month

 

 

Warwick Farm Racing Precinct  Steering

 

 

2pm – 3.30pm Quarterly on first Tuesday

 

Deputy Mayor Clr Hadchiti

 

 

Current Council representative is  able to attend meetings at current times.

 

 

No change proposed.

 

Youth Council

 

 

6pm – 7.30pm

Monthly on first Tuesday

 

 

Clr Ristevski

Clr Waller

 

 

The meeting is currently held after business hours.

 

 

No change proposed.

 

It should be noted, that any changes to meetings currently held during the day to outside business hours would involve a requirement to pay overtime to support staff and other non-management staff required to attend and time in lieu for management staff.

 

This report recommends changes to meeting times to the following Committees:

 

·    Aboriginal Consultative

·    Budget and Finance

·    Civic Advisory

·    Heritage Advisory

·    Multicultural Advisory

·    Street Naming

·    Planning and Development

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Additional costs would be incurred if more Committees were held after business hours.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media.

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Deliver services that are customer focused.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


181

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Chief Financial Officer

 

CFO 04

Annual Financial Reports 2014/15

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

267802.2015

Report By

Vishwa Nadan - Manager Financial Management

Approved By

Gary Grantham - Acting Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The Council has a regulatory obligation to prepare and present audited financial reports to the Office of Local Government (due on or before 31th October 2015) and the Community.

 

Council’s financial reports for the year ended 30 June 2015 has been prepared and audited. This paper seeks Council’s endorsement and a resolution authorising issue of the financial reports.

 

Council’s auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers, have audited the financial reports and will issue an unqualified audit certificate after receiving a signed “statement by Councillors and Management” following this Council meeting.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and endorses the 2014/15 audited financial reports;

 

2.   Authorises the Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Chief Executive Officer and the Responsible Accounting Officer (CFO) to sign the prescribed statement that will form part of the financial reports;

 

3.   Authorises the CEO to issue a public notice containing a summary of financial results and put the financial reports on exhibition for 7 days to seek public submissions ; and

 

4.   Note that the financial reports and a summary of public submissions received will be presented to Council at its next meeting for consideration and adoption.

 

 

REPORT

 

Legislative Requirements

 

The Local Government Act 1993 states:

·    Council must prepare financial reports for each year, and must refer them for audit as soon as practicable [Section 413(1)]

·    Council must fix a date for a meeting to present its financial reports and to give public notice of the date so fixed and any person may make submission on the financial reports and/or audit reports". The public notice provides a summary of the Income Statement, Balance Sheet and key financial indicators. The public are able to make submissions regarding the financial reports up to one week following the presentation of the reports to Council [Section 418 (1) and Section 420 (1)].

 

Council’s financial reports for the year ended 30 June 2015 has been prepared and audited.

 

This paper seeks Council’s endorsement and a resolution authorising issue of the financial reports. Council’s auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers, have audited the financial reports and will issue an unqualified audit certificate after receiving a signed “statement by Councillors and Management” (provided as Attachment 1) following this Council meeting.

 

A complete set of financial statements is provided in Attachment 2.

 

Key highlights are as follows:

 

·    $247.3 million Income from Continuing Operations

·    $104.9 million capital expenditure (including $45.9 million dedication of road reserves)

·    Rates and Charges comprised $108.4 million (43.8 per cent) of the total Income from Continuing Operations

·    $9.4 million Financial Assistance Grant (FAG) received during the year

·    Operating Surplus (after Capital receipts) $78.9 million

·    Net Operating Result excluding Capital receipts is surplus of $4.6 million

·    Infrastructure Backlog reduced from $63 million to $60 million.

 

To fulfil the legislative requirements, the Chief Executive Officer will issue a public notice (provided as Attachment 3) which will include a summary of financial results and put the audited financial reports on public exhibition for 7 days. A summary of public submissions, if any, will be presented to the Council at its next meeting for consideration and adoption of 2014/15 financial reports.

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The financial implications are contained and presented within the report.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Statement by Councillors and ManagementView

2.         Public Notice - Summary Financial Results 2014/15View

3.         General Purpose Financial Statements - 2014/15View (Under separate cover)  


185

CFO 04

Annual Financial Reports 2014/15

Attachment 1

Statement by Councillors and Management

 


185

CFO 04

Annual Financial Reports 2014/15

Attachment 2

Public Notice - Summary Financial Results 2014/15

 


186

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Chief Financial Officer

 

CFO 05

Councillor Transparency

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Workforce Management Plan

File Ref

270004.2015

Report By

George Georgakis - Manager Council and Executive Services

Vishwa Nadan - Manager Financial Services

Approved By

Gary Grantham - Chief Financial Officer / Director Corporate Services

 

 

Executive Summary

 

To provide a report back to Council on the Councillor Transparency matters raised in the 26 August 2015 Council resolution.

 

This report was submitted to the 30 September 2015 Council meeting and Council resolved to defer the matter to the October 2015 meeting.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Receive and note the information.

 

2.    Advertise the attendance at Councillor Briefing Sessions, Council meetings and Committee meetings once a month in the local Liverpool newspapers and maintain the register on Council’s website as outlined in this report.

 

 

REPORT

 

Council at its meeting on 25 August 2015 resolved:

 

That Council:

 

1.    Make publicly available the attendance of the Mayor and all Councillors at Councillor Briefing sessions, Council Committees and Council Meetings backdated to September 2012 Local Government Elections.

 

2.    Investigate whether Councillors should be paid docked pay for not attending meetings.

 

3.    Investigate making this attendance information available once a month in the local Liverpool newspapers and on its website, and ensures these records are maintained beyond tonight.

 

4.    Provides a report to Councillors detailing the roles responsibilities and contact details of the staff in roles in Council and Executive Services team, including the Mayoral office.

 

5.    Defines who Mayor or Councillors should approach for assistance with secretarial or research support and the extent of the support available.

 

6.    Puts into place now a process which sees all invitations and correspondence is provided to Councillors as soon as it is received.

 

7.    Ensures that all invitations addressed to the Mayor and Councillors is sent to all Councillors as soon as it is received by the Mayoral office.

 

8.    Provides a report detailing budget versus actual allocations to the following areas. The report should indicate why the allocations were made i.e. staff salaries, entertainment and good, gifts, stationary etc:

 

 

9.    Provides the costs incurred in the renovation of the Mayor’s office and provision of Councillors facilities. Was this budgeted for and if not, where was the money originally allocated and have those items now been completed.

 

10.  Adopts the CFO’s simpler process for Councillors to claim telephone expenses –Amending clause 4.7.1a of the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy by substituting “six months” for “three months.”

 

11.  Deal with items NOM 10 and CFO 04 from this Agenda in conjunction with this Mayoral Minute.

 

 

Below are the responses to the points in the above resolution:

 

1.   Make publicly available the attendance of the Mayor and all Councillors at Councillor Briefing sessions, Council Committees and Council Meetings backdated to September 2012 Local Government Elections.

 

See Attachment 1 for Councillor Briefings and Council meetings since the 2012 Local Government Elections.

See Attachment 2 for Council Committee meetings since the 2012 Local Government Elections.

 

Note, there is a gap in the Attachment 1 for Councillor Briefing Sessions from late 2013 until August 2014. During that period, we did not record who attended Councillor Briefing Sessions. We recommenced recording this information from August 2014 during discussions on the type of information to be recorded for inclusion in Council’s Annual Report.

 

It should be noted that delegates to the various Committees are appointed annually.  In addition, during the course of the year, delegates can sometimes change or be added. In addition, although a Councillor/s is not a Committee representative, they sometimes attend that Committee meeting.

 

2.   Investigate whether Councillors should be paid docked pay for not attending meetings.

 

In accordance with section 248 of the Local Government Act 1993, Council must pay an annual fee to each Councillor, as determined by the Remuneration Tribunal.  The only provision for the non-payment of Councillor fees is contained in section 249 of the Act which provides that annual fees are not to be paid to a Councillor during a period of suspension (imposed by the Chief Executive of the Office of Local Government).    

 

An example of a suspension imposed by the Chief Executive of the Office of Local Government would be in the case where a Councillor missed three consecutive ordinary meetings without leave of absence being granted by Council.

 

The civic remuneration has been set by resolution and to amend that for any councillor would require a resolution, possibly a rescission motion if done within 3 months of the annual May/June review.  There is no facility to punish a lack of attendance at committees or briefings in the Act or Regulations – only the requirement to seek leave if not attending Ordinary Meetings of Council (this doesn’t apply to Extraordinary meetings).  Remuneration is a base figure intended to compensate councillors for attending to ordinary business of Council only.  This is further reinforced by the notion that a Councillor, not part of extra committees, still gets paid the same as a Councillor who attends many committees.

 

3.   Investigate making this attendance information available once a month in the local Liverpool newspapers and on its website, and ensures these records are maintained beyond tonight.

 

The information can be made available in the local Liverpool newspapers and on the website. A summary of the information dating back to 2012 can be provided in the local newspapers as an initial communication providing the web link to view the full details (as attached to this report) which can be posted on Council’s website. Moving forward, attendance at monthly meetings will then be published on a monthly basis in the local papers with details also posted on Council’s website.

 

4.   Provides a report to Councillors detailing the roles, responsibilities and contact details of the staff in roles in Council and Executive Services team, including the Mayoral office.

 

Initially there were five members in the Council and Executive Services team, however, two team members (ie the Civic/Citizenship Officer as well and the Civic Support Officer) have been moved to the Community and Culture Directorate from 1 July 2015 as per (Item CONF 12) the Council resolution from 17 June 2015 . That Directorate now encompasses all Civic and Council events.

 

The remaining three in the team, their contact details and the team’s main responsibilities are:

 

-      Manager Council and Executive Services
George Georgakis, phone: 9821 9515, email:
g.georgakis@liverpool.nsw.gov.au

 

-      Council and Executive Services Coordinator
Maree Stewart, phone: 9821 9237, email:
Ma.Stewart@liverpool.nsw.gov.au

 

-      Councillor Support Officer
Aarti Suryaprakash, phone: 9821 9151, email:
A.Suryaprakash@liverpool.nsw.gov.au

 

Team responsibilities:

 

·    Production of Council meeting agendas, including publishing papers in the Diligent system and Council’s website and Council meeting minutes;

·    Assigning, tracking and reporting on Council resolutions;

·    Managing, attending to and reporting on Councillor requests;

·    Managing the Councillors intranet site and Councillors’ diaries

·    Managing Councillor Briefing Sessions and actions arising.

 

There are two members of staff in the Mayor’s office, their contact details and their main responsibilities are:

 

-      Senior Policy Advisor
Jennifer Havilah, phone 9821 9297, email:
j.havilah@liverpool.nsw.gov.au

 

The Senior Policy Advisor role is to provide high level support, analysis and strategic advice on a broad range of matters to the Offices of the Mayor and the CEO.

 

-      Executive Assistant
Lauren Myers, phone 9821 9850, email:  
l.myers@liverpool.nsw.gov.au

 

The Executive Assistant role is to provide professional executive assistance to the Mayor by ensuring high quality, accurate and timely delivery of all facets of work within the Office of the Mayor so that their time is used efficiently and effectively.

 

The above information does not include the two Research Officers who are part of the CEO’s office.

 

5.   That Council defines who the Mayor or Councillors should approach for assistance with secretarial or research support and the extent of the support available.

 

Council’s Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy outlines the support provided to the Mayor and Councillors.  In relation to the Mayor, Clause 4.4.2 d) provides for a “dedicated personal assistant and a senior advisor”.

 

Clause 4.5 of the Policy outlines the support provided to Councillors and includes “secretarial services subject to specific approval of the CEO”.   Councillors should request assistance by contacting the Councillor Support Officer or the Manager Council and Executive Services (the contact details are provided in point 4 above).  They will then either undertake or arrange for the assistance to be provided or liaise with the staff in the CEO’s office for their assistance, or if need be, seek the approval of the CEO.

 

6.  and 7.

 

Puts into place now a process which sees all invitations and correspondence is provided to Councillors as soon as it is received.

 

and

 

Ensures that all invitations addressed to the Mayor and Councillors is sent to all Councillors as soon as it is received by the Mayoral Office.

 

Invitations to the Mayor and Councillors are currently received through the Mayor’s Office, CEO’s Office and the Councillor Support Officer.

 

Invitations that are received by the Mayor and the CEO’s office for Councillors, are forwarded to the Councillor Support Officer who then distributes invitations to all Councillors and also manages responses as well as coordinating diary appointments on behalf of Councillors for events.

 

This practice has been in place for some time and is considered the most efficient way for Councillors to receive invitations that are received within Council.  Recent discussions with the Mayor’s Office and Councillor Support confirm that all invitations are being processed through the Councillor Support Officer to manage.

 

The only exception to the above are invitations for the Mayor which are managed by the Mayor’s Executive Assistant.  The Mayor’s EA will work with the Mayor to identify his availability for invitations directed to the Mayor.  Where the Mayor is unable to attend an event, the Mayor’s EA will liaise directly with the Deputy Mayor or nominated Councillor to represent the Mayor at that event.

 

8.   Provides a report detailing budget versus actual allocations to the following areas.  The report should indicate why the allocations were made ie staff salaries, entertainment and goods, gifts, stationery etc.

 

Office of the Chief Executive Officer

 

Mayor’s Office

The budget amount of $42,695 for salaries for 2012/13 is made up of the Executive Assistant to the Mayor at 0.6 full time equivalent. The actual amount of $101,838 is made up of 1 full time equivalent Executive Assistant to the Mayor and the Senior Policy Officer for 2.5 months of the financial year.

 

9.   Provides the costs incurred in the renovation of the Mayor’s office and provision of Councillors facilities.  Was this budgeted for and if not, where was the money originally allocated and have those items now been completed.

 

A budget of $208k was provided for Mayor’s Office through the budget review processes over two years. As at 30 June 2015, a total expenditure of $79k was incurred on this project and works are still in progress.

 

10. Adopts the CFO’s simpler process for Councillors to claim telephone expenses – Amending clause 4.7.1a of the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy by substituting “six months” for “three months”.

 

Clause 4.7.1a has been amended and published and details of the amendment have been entered into the Policy and Procedure Register.

 

11. Deal with items NOM 10 and CFO 04 from this Agenda in conjunction with this Mayoral Minute.

 

NOM 10 and CFO 04 have been addressed above in conjunction with this Mayoral Minute.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There may be an additional cost in advertising the attendance of the Mayor and Councillors at Councillor Briefing Sessions, Council Committees and Council meetings. Any costs can be minimised by including a summary in the newspaper advertisement, with full details posted on our website.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Councillor Briefings and Council Meetings register View

2.         Council Committees register


193

CFO 05

Councillor Transparency

Attachment 1

Councillor Briefings and Council Meetings register

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


209

CFO 05

Councillor Transparency

Attachment 2

Council Committees register

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

 


229

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Community and Culture Report

 

DCC 01

Domestic Violence in Liverpool LGA

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Improve the community’s sense of safety in Liverpool

Key Policy

Community Safety and Crime Prevention Strategy

File Ref

262806.2015

Report By

Kamrun Rahman - Community Development Worker (Community Safety)

Rebekah  Elliott - A/ Coordinator Community Development

Approved By

Eddie Jackson – Acting Director Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

At its meeting on 26 August 2015, it was resolved that Council would:

 

1.   Investigate how chronic domestic violence is in the community, and liaise with women’s support groups in the Liverpool LGA on what Council can do to assist in counteracting domestic violence.

2.   Create a policy to assist employees of Council when they experience domestic violence.

 

This report provides information on the extent of domestic violence in the community, an outline of current local initiatives Council is involved in and feedback from local support services.

 

This report recommends that council become a White Ribbon Accredited Workplace through participation in the White Ribbon Workplace Accredited Program provided White Ribbon Australia. This program is an internationally recognised workplace based prevention program that targets employees in a structured learning environment to raise awareness of and enhance positive action against domestic violence.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes this report.

 

2.   Approve $7,500 excluding GST from the 2015/16 budget to become a member of the White Ribbon Workplace Accredited Program provided White Ribbon Australia.

 

 

 

REPORT

 

At its meeting on 26 August 2015, it was resolved that Council would:

 

1.   Investigate how chronic domestic violence is in the community, and liaise with women’s support groups in the Liverpool LGA on what Council can do to assist in counteracting domestic violence.

2.   Create a policy to assist employees of Council when they experience domestic violence.

 

While it is acknowledged that Federal and State governments hold the statutory authority and funding allocation to provide services to people who are at risk of or experiencing domestic violence, Liverpool City Council recognises that it has an important role in local leadership and can assist and complement the work of other tiers of government as facilitators of solutions at a local level.

Research has been conducted and a meeting was held with key members of the Liverpool Domestic Violence Liaison Committee (LDVLC) to identify the extent of domestic violence in the community and what Council can do to assist in counteracting domestic violence.

 

Currently Council does not have a specific policy related to domestic and family violence to assist employees. To explore further, Council staff contacted White Ribbon Australia to learn more about the White Ribbon Workplace Accredited Program, to ensure a best practice and holistic approach to the policy.

 

Data and statistics

It should be noted that extent of domestic violence is not accurately reflected in the below data and statistics reflect only those incidents that are actually reported.

 

National

 

·    To date 65 women have been killed in 2015 due to domestic and family violence nationally

·    1 in 5 Australian women had experienced sexual violence, compared to 1 in 22 Australian men

·    1 in 6 Australian women had experienced physical violence from a current or former partner, compared to 1 in 19 Australian men

·    1 in 4 Australian women had experienced emanation abuse from a current or former partner, compared to 1 in 7 Australian men

·    1 in 3 Australian women had experienced physical violence, the vast majority of which is perpetrated by men they know. 1 in 2 Australian men had experienced physical violence, the vast majority of which is perpetrated by another man who they do not know.

·    Violence against women and their children cost the Australian economy $14.7 billion in 2013

·    Without appropriate action, the cost of violence against women and their children to the Australian economy by 2022 is estimated to be $15.6 billion

 

 

 

 

State

 

According to Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research:

·    In 2014, a total of 1023 assault – domestic violence incidents reported to Police for Liverpool LGA, compared to 783 incidents reported for Fairfield LGA and 337.3 incidents reported for NSW, rate per 100,000 population

·    Liverpool LGA ranked 41(higher) in 2014 and ranked 53 in 2012, compared to Fairfield LGA ranked 71 (lower) in 2014 and 69 (lower) in 2012

·    874 assaults – domestic violence incidents occurred in residential dwelling out of 1023 incidents in 2014

·    24 months trend (between July 2013 to June 2015) domestic violence assault incidents is stable, in Liverpool rate per 100,000 population was 906.1, compared to NSW rate per 100,000 population 396.4

Local

 

Currently, Liverpool LGA is ranked in the top ten LGAs in NSW for domestic violence and family violence. Rate per 100,000 population of reported incidents of domestic violence assaults in Liverpool was 505.1 between July 2014 to June 2015.

 

According to local service providers, the extent of domestic violence in Liverpool is much higher than any other LGA. Green Valley Liverpool Domestic Violence Service received approximately 1000 referrals in 2013 and over 700 referrals in 2014.

 

One of the key issues identified by local service providers has been the struggle to find appropriate accommodation for victims of domestic violence. They believe it is due to federal government reforms. Finding accommodation can become harder if the victim has a child over 12 years of age. Currently, Sisters of Charity - Safe Haven is the only refuge that is located in Liverpool that provides accommodation for victims of domestic violence. Bonnies Support Services is located in Fairfield LGA and they are funded to provide services in Liverpool.

 

Feedback from local service providers on what Council can do to assist in counteracting domestic violence includes: 

 

·    Lobby federal government to allocate more funding to Liverpool to deal with the extent of domestic violence, including funding for a school education program, more accommodation services and other assistance to victims of domestic and family violence including newly arrived refugees in the area.

·    A local public awareness campaign, where Council in partnership with local services is taking stand and saying ‘No to Domestic and Family Violence’. This can be done by installing signage around Liverpool, a local media campaign and providing posters to local hotels, clubs and pubs.

·    Council’s Customer Service Centre could take a more proactive role in promoting that they can assist and provide referral numbers for the Domestic Violence Assistance Line and to local services.

·    Update the Council website to include information for the community on domestic violence.

·    Council to provide ongoing financial support annually to LDVLC. Since 2014, Council has been providing $5,000 through corporate sponsorship to support White Ribbon Day. Agreeing to a budget allocation annually would reduce the administrative task required as the local service providers volunteer time to be involved in this initiative and are already stretched dealing with their day to day workloads.

Current initiatives Council is involved in.

As part of building stronger families and communities Council has been addressing the domestic and family violence through Council’s Community Safety and Crime Prevention Plan 2013-2017. Council is one of the key members of the LDVLC and the Community Development Team is currently supporting and delivering the following initiatives: 

 

·    Liverpool Domestic Violence Liaison Committee – Attendance at monthly meetings and participation in relevant working groups. In-kind support such as venue and printing offered when requested.

·    16 Days of Activism - The campaign calls for an end to violence against women. Council provides in-kind support to local initiatives including information sessions, forums, morning breakfast and poster designing workshops for women who were victims of domestic violence.

·    White Ribbon Day - The White Ribbon Day campaign is held on 25 November each year as part of the 16 Days of Activism campaign. Council works closely with LDVLC to plan, deliver and evaluate local initiatives.  Furthermore, Council has provided a financial contribution to White Ribbon Day events through its Corporate Sponsorship Program since 2014.

·    Domestic Violence Factsheet - Council developed a Domestic Violence Factsheet in 2014 and translated the resource into five community languages. The factsheets were disseminated through local schools and shopping precincts. 

 

Failure to respond to domestic violence has a range of social, psychological and economic implications. For these reasons, Council continues to provide ongoing support to local services and advocacy to reduce domestic violence in Liverpool.

 

White Ribbon Workplace Accredited Program

This program has been explored to embed a policy response throughout the organisation to assist employees who experience domestic and family violence. The program is an internationally recognised workplace based prevention program that targets adults in a structured learning environment to raise awareness of and enhance positive action around domestic violence. The Program has reached a quarter of a million Australian employees to date and 90 different organisations. The program:

 

·    Builds on current gender equality and diversity initiatives and provides the strategies and tools for organisations to prevent and respond to incidents of violence whether they occur inside or outside the workplace 

·    Provides a framework for organisations to review, refine and implement policies, procedures, training and communication important to cultural change

·    Positive cultural change is measured through pre and post implementation surveys for all staff 

·    Post accreditation organisations are encouraged to become known as a ‘White Ribbon Workplace’ externally and internally evidencing their commitment to prevention of violence against women and alignment with primary prevention White Ribbon action

 

The cost to undertake the Workplace Accreditation for Liverpool City Council is $7500 ex GST. This one off, upfront payment includes support during the implementation period (12-18 months) and following Accreditation for 3 years.  This charge covers implementation, excluding training. They also provide details of registered training organisations that provide applicable training, and costs vary, some are free. Attached for further information are the White Ribbon Australia Workplace Accreditation Program Frequently Asked Questions and Examples of accredited White Ribbon Workplaces and participating organisations.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

A total of $7,500 excluding GST is required from the 2015/2016 budget to become a White Ribbon Accredited Workplace.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support policies and plans that prevent crime.

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Frequently Asked QuestionsView

2.         Examples of accredited White Ribbon Workplaces and participating organisations


243

DCC 01

Domestic Violence in Liverpool LGA

Attachment 1

Frequently Asked Questions

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


243

DCC 01

Domestic Violence in Liverpool LGA

Attachment 2

Examples of accredited White Ribbon Workplaces and participating organisations

 


243

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Community and Culture Report

 

DCC 02

Grants and Donations

 

Strategic Direction

Healthy Inclusive  City

Foster social inclusion, strengthen the local community and increase opportunities for people who may experience barriers

Key Policy

Donations Policy

File Ref

266179.2015

Report By

Rebekah  Elliott - A/ Coordinator Community Development

Approved By

Eddie Jackson - Acting Director Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council provides financial assistance to the community under three categories: Community Donations (including Community Grants, Small Grants, School and Youth Donations), Sporting Donations and Corporate Sponsorship.

 

The Financial Contributions Panel (FCP) recently considered a number of applications from local community organisations for the Community Grants and School Donations.

 

This report presents the funding recommendations under the previous policy as applications were received by Council prior to the current Grants and Donations Policy being adopted by Council on 30 September 2015.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Endorses the Financial Contribution Panel's recommendations for the provision of $3957.50 (GST exclusive) under the Community Donations Program as summarised in the table below:

         

          Community Grants Program

Applicant Name

Project Name

Amount

Miller Art and Fact Inc

2168 Outdoor Movie Night Under the Stars

$3957.50

 

 

2.   Endorses the Financial Contribution Panel's recommendations for the provision of $100 (GST exclusive) under the School Donations Program as summarised in the table below:

         

 

 

          School Donations Program

Applicant Name

Suburb

Amount

Lurnea High School

Lurnea

$100

         

 

REPORT

 

Under the previous policy, the Donations program had three categories:

 

·    Community Donations (including Community Grants, Small Grants, School and Youth Donations);

·    Sporting Donations; and

·    Corporate Sponsorship.

 

Applications for Community Grants, Youth Donations and School Donations were accepted on an ongoing basis. Community Grants were then reviewed by the Financial Contributions Panel (FCP) comprised of the Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Chief Executive Officer and delegated staff.

 

This report contains the most recent recommendations for Community Grants and School Donations in alignment with the Donations Policy adopted by Council 25 February 2014.

 

Community Grants

Council's Community Grants Program is available to community groups who provide programs or services to the residents of Liverpool. One application for community grants was received by Council. The application met the program criteria and is recommended for funding. The program criteria can be found as an attachment to this report for the reference of Councillors. A summary of the requests are outlined in the table below.

 

Applicant Details

Project Name and Description

Amount Requested

FCP Recommendation

Miller Art and Fact Inc

Hold a free outdoor movie night in early December 2015 at Edwin Wheeler Oval Cartwright.

 

Community Benefits:

·    Promote awareness of local public assets

·    Enhance the wellbeing of 2168 residents through the provision of recreational activities

·    Build and promote social cohesion in 2168 postcode area

$3,957.50

$3,957.50

 

School Donations

Council's School Donations Program provides donations to each high school in the Liverpool Local Government Area to be given as a prize to a student who has excelled in citizenship, academic studies, artistic or sporting proficiency. One application for a school donation was received by Council. The application is considered eligible and is recommended for funding. The program criteria can be found as an attachment to this report for the reference of Councillors. A summary of the requests are outlined in the table below.

 

Name of School

Suburb

Amount Requested

Recommendation

Lurnea High School

Lurnea

$100

$100

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

A budget allocation of $100,000 for the Community Donations Program was adopted by Council in its 2015/2016 Operational Plan as part of the Community Donations Program. If the recommended amount of $4,057.50 is endorsed the remaining balance will be $79,042.50.

 

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Criteria for Community Grants ProgramView

2.         Criteria for School Donations Program


247

DCC 02

Grants and Donations

Attachment 1

Criteria for Community Grants Program

 


247

DCC 02

Grants and Donations

Attachment 2

Criteria for School Donations Program

 


248

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Community and Culture Report

 

DCC 03

Planning for Toilets in Council Reserves

 

Strategic Direction

Healthy Inclusive  City

Plan, support and deliver high quality and accessible services, program and facilities

Key Policy

Recreation Strategy

File Ref

266589.2015

Report By

James Flinn - Community Planning Policy Officer (Recreation) 

Approved By

Eddie Jackson - Acting Director Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

At the 26 May 2015 Council Meeting, Council resolved to consider a further report to Council identifying other district level parks where fully automated toilets could be installed.

 

Provision of public toilets creates an environment whereby park visitors are encouraged to stay longer, helping to activate the park and improve recreation outcomes for all residents visiting the park.  They are best located in regional or district level parks which attract residents and visitors from outside of the immediate catchment area and best purposed where they support other park infrastructure.

 

This approach is consistent with the forthcoming Recreation Strategy which will recommend consideration of amenities, including public toilets, in future planning for all regional and district level parks.

 

Several parks are identified for future consideration with public toilets as an integral element of park infrastructure.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Notes the contents of this report.

 

2.   Acknowledges that public toilets are an important functional consideration of any public space.

 

3.   Commits to consider the installation of public toilets as part of any planning and design works for all future or current regional or district level parks.

 

4.   Considers the comfort of park users and acknowledges the general importance of public toilets in creating public spaces that meet the needs of parents with young children, older residents, persons with a disability, as well as the general public.

 

5.   Acknowledges that careful siting, co-location with other facilities and design treatments (including automation) can reduce anti-social behaviour around these facilities to a minimum.

 

6.   Within the next five years install public toilets in the following Macleod Park, Grand Flaneur Beach, Bigge Park, Phillip Park, Liverpool Bicentenary Park and Gough Park.

 

7.   Investigates the removal of older style and problematic public toilets across Liverpool and reports back to Council early next year regarding the outcomes of this research.

 

REPORT

 

Why public toilets are important

Public toilets or ‘restrooms’ support active participation by all residents in social, recreational, and commercial activities.  In particular, they allow children and parents, older persons and persons with a disability to stay longer in public spaces. This contributes positively to increased social connection, park activation, greater utilisation of existing resources and when combined with a café/restaurant, the potential for increased retail spend. 

 

Over the years Council has steadily removed public toilets from public spaces.  Many of these toilets were problematic in that they were deliberately ‘hidden’ or sited away from view and subsequently attracted anti-social behaviour.  This led to public safety concerns, vandalism and ongoing maintenance issues.  As a result, Liverpool, like many other Councils, removed troublesome public toilets as a default response, which infers that the toilet itself led to these negative issues rather than poor siting and design of the toilet block.

 

In many high profile locations, public toilets take pride of place.  At the recently opened Barangaroo Headland Park, a 1904 sewerage pump house building has been ‘adapted’ to incorporate public toilets, whilst the ‘Cutaway’- the large underground cultural space - also includes public toilets.  It is hard to imagine any of the great parks of the world without public toilets. If they were installed for one reason, it would be to allow people to linger longer in the park.

 

Of course public toilets alone won’t activate a park but neither will any singular piece of park infrastructure (e.g. playground).  A park is a complex whole comprised of many parts, and any individual piece of park infrastructure, whilst having an identifiable purpose, does not operate in isolation.  Rather they are at the most effective when they support and build on other infrastructure.  For example, evidence from best practice examples suggest that the most highly utilised playgrounds in the Sydney area and further afield are those that are supported by access to public toilets, parking, seating, natural shade, shared paths and a café.

 

Relationship of Park to Surrounding Area

In light of the recent controversy regarding the proposed automated toilet at Lakeside Park, Wattle Grove, it is important to consider in more detail how a park relates to its immediate surroundings. 

 

Whilst many of the community’s concerns can be easily appeased by siting and design of toilets, what cannot be dismissed is the poor design of Lakeside Park and the inherent conflict present in the public/private interface and the overall cost to construct and install public toilets. 

 

Unfortunately, residential lots directly adjoin Lakeside Park without barrier or clear demarcation between public and private land.  Feeling attachment or a sense of pride in a park is generally a good thing, but such ‘ownership’ may lead to a sense of entitlement and effective privatisation of public land.  Greater awareness of these issues and improved planning (LEP and DCP controls) has reduced the number of parks where private residences back or face onto public space.  This is to be commended.

 

With regard to the substantially higher cost to construct public toilets, much of the cost relates to servicing (electricity, water, and sewerage) and site preparation (footings, concrete slab etc.), structure (it needs a roof, walls that will withstand the elements), use of harder wearing materials (such as metal bowls, hand rails), structural designs and engineering, and deployment of advanced technologies (sensors, remote locking).  Clearly, this is most cost effective when consideration is given at the early stages of planning as to any proposed installation.

 

A local example may be cited to illustrate the point. Recently an enquiry was received as to whether public toilets could be installed in the newly established Georges Fair Estate in Moorebank for use by visitors.  A single fully automated toilet in Liverpool Bicentenary  Park was suggested as it is central to residents and includes a playground, modified basketball court, picnic shelter, pathways, seating, barbecue with shelter, parking, recessed path lighting, landscaping including turfed areas, shrubs, native grasses and established trees. Unfortunately, as the park had been constructed without consideration given to provision of public toilets, the cost to retrofit a single automated toilet in this park now will be in excess of $200,000 – of which $70,000 could have been avoided if the toilets had been originally planned in that park (with service connections capped underground) and delivered at a later stage.

 

The critical question remains and it relates to the relative importance of toilets - why should Council fund the installation of a $200,000 toilet when that money could be spent elsewhere e.g. to fund road construction, improved lighting or renewal of two small playgrounds?

 

The answer lies not so much in the ‘infrastructure’ itself but the intention of the park.  If Council is committed to creating public spaces of distinction, focal points of activity, places that are unique and where people (of all ages) meet and have fun, then public toilets combined with other park infrastructure can greatly assist these objectives. 

Planning Principles

The following principles are highly pertinent when considering requests for new public toilets.

 

·    Limit public toilets to regional or district level parks and to high profile public spaces (e.g. Macquarie St Mall).

·    Consider public toilets as part of any master plan, concept plan, or design plan for any regional or district level park (new or existing).

·    Ensure toilets are designed to support key infrastructure and are co-located with other park infrastructure e.g. major playground.

·    Incorporate CPTED principles in design and siting of all new toilets.

·    Public toilets should be given prominence by siting in locations that are highly visible.

·    Public toilets shall be connected by accessible pathways.

·    Include at least one accessible toilet.  An accessible toilet can be the sole toilet.

·    Toilets must be lockable at night. Remote operation is preferable to manual operation.

·    Self-cleansing and automated technologies are preferred where up to 3 toilets only are provided.

·    Inclusion of design treatments that ‘show’ off the toilet, including branding or ‘skins’ with public art.

 

Development Options

There are three development options to consider when installing public toilets in public parks:

 

Typology

Preferred Application

Traditional amenities block – separate male and female block model with individual cubicles, troughs and shared areas for basins etc.

 

Larger parks where large crowds at regular intervals are expected e.g. Chipping Norton Lakes.

 

Requires high quality design and prominence.

Pre-fabricated and automated toilets – individual use only, sliding doors, concealed services, remote locking and monitoring, self-cleansing technology.

 

Small to medium sized district parks where lesser amounts of people are expected and 1-3 toilets is sufficient to meet need.  These toilets should all be sited with supporting infrastructure e.g. shared paths, major playgrounds, café etc.

Internalisation of toilets in larger facility eg. café/restaurant, community facility, library etc.

 

Where a building exists or is planned in a park.  Consideration of augmentation to existing building and public access is required before proceeding.

 


 

In Which Parks Should Toilets Be Included?

The following parks have been identified for future consideration of public toilets when new plans for these parks are developed:

 

·    Grand Flaneur Beach, Chipping Norton – the forthcoming Recreation Strategy will provide additional commentary and direction on the future role of the Chipping Norton Lakes Precinct. New toilets here could potentially replace both existing toilet blocks at Angle and Homestead Parks (see overleaf)

·    Macleod Park, Prestons

·    Bigge Park, Liverpool

·    Phillip Park, Lurnea

·    Liverpool Bicentenary, Moorebank

·    Gough Park, Cecil Hills

·    Hammondville Park, Hammondville

 

Removal of Public Toilets in Council Reserves

It is also important to periodically consider the adequacy of the current stock of toilet blocks found across Liverpool and whether it meets an identified need or the original purpose.  Our research indicates that the majority of existing toilet facilities in parks across Liverpool are old, in very poor condition and do not meet current community expectations, nor meet principles for Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED).  Issues of anti-social behavior and higher maintenance cost in these toilets consistently raised by staff, police and the community support this hypothesis. It is these toilets that help create the stigma, become places to be avoided and create ongoing maintenance issues for Council staff and contractors. 

 

Parks with old style public toilets which should be reviewed with the aim of decommissioning or rebuilding according to future approved masterplans are:

 

·    Clinches Pond Reserve (adjacent to Seton Hall)

·    Lighthorse Park, Liverpool

·    Homestead Park, Chipping Norton (to be replaced by new facility at Grand Flaneur Beach)

·    Angle Park, Chipping Norton (to be replaced by new facility at Grand Flaneur Beach)

 

Other Councils

A growing number of Council’s within the Greater Sydney area have or about to install automated public toilets in parks and important public spaces.  This includes Fairfield, Campbelltown, Holroyd, Parramatta, Sutherland Shire, Hurstville, Bankstown, City of Sydney, Marrickville, Manly, and Blacktown.

 

Fairfield Council has recently purchased six new and one second hand automated toilets. Fairfield Council staff confirmed that they purchased a second-hand unit for $7,500 from the company, but that this was only after they had installed six other facilities that they had purchased brand new. New automated toilets range in price from $90,000 - $190,000. It also cost Fairfield Council another $40,000 in additional works to install the second-hand facility. This figure included connection to water and sewage as well as the laying of a concrete slab on which to install the toilet.

 

Campbelltown Council is installing toilets in five locations and in conjunction with Campbelltown Arts Centre is running a competition to design ‘skins’ along with branding that will improve the external appearance of these toilets.

 

According to Exeloo, the main manufacturer of automated toilets in Australia, there are now over 670 automated toilets installed across Australia.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations at present. Future planning and delivery work will need to include toilet facilities in project budgets for the identified regional and district parks.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Support policies and plans that prevent crime.

Promote community harmony and address discrimination.

Support access and services for people with a disability.

Deliver high quality services for children and their families.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Deliver services that are customer focused.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil  


254

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Economic development Report

 

DEE 01

Pump House (Coffee Shop), Bigge Park

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Activate the city centre and develop vibrant places that attract people to Liverpool

Key Policy

City Centre Strategy

File Ref

263838.2015

Report By

Michael Cullen - Director Economic Development

Approved By

Michael Cullen - Director Economic Development

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council at its meeting of 30 September 2015 requested a report in to the Pump House “Coffee Shop” in Bigge Park.  The report was to cover, but not be limited to the cost and scope of works, provision of the works, in kind works, value of the initial lease, new lease arrangements proposed and trading results.

 

The report outlines the rationale for the pop up café service initiative, the expression of interest process used to secure a proponent, the cost and nature of works undertaken and the proposed process and timing for new tender arrangements .

 

Under the terms of the temporary licence for the pop-up café service the proponent is required to provide Council with a report on the operations of the venture within the licenced area.  That report is now due and has been sought from the proponent.  Given its commercial in confidence nature that material will be provided separately under confidential cover to Councillors, once received.

 

A Development Application was separately submitted to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) in relation to formalising operation of a kiosk from the Pump House on a permanent basis.  IHAP considered the application and recommended approval at its 28 September 2015 meeting with appropriate conditions.  The conditions reflect the likelihood of the level of food preparation on-site being beyond that envisaged for the initial pop up concept.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council note the report

 

 

 

 

REPORT

 

At its meeting of 30 September 2015 a Notice of Motion was received and considered by Council in relation to the “Pump House (Coffee Shop)” at Bigge Park, Liverpool. The motion sought that Council:

 

1.   Receive a report for the October 2015 Council meeting into The Pump House Coffee Shop in Bigge Park.

2.   The report should include but not be limited to the following:

a)   Costs and scope of all works at the site since July 2013.

b)   Who provided the works-Council day labor, Council contractors, lease?

c)   Were there also in kind works? If so, what did these works involve?

d)   What was the value of the initial lease?

e)   What is the expected value of new lease, what terms will this take?

f)    Has Council been provided with details of turnover, profit of the Pump House since opening? If so can it be provided?

 

Context

 

An Expression of Interest (EOI) was publically advertised in the Sydney Morning Herald on the 30 September 2014 and Liverpool Leader on 1 October 2014, to operate a pop up café service utilising the Pump House building in Bigge Park with EOI’s closing on 15 October 2014.  That date was subsequently extended to 22 October 2014 and that extension of time advised to all interested parties though Tenderlink.

 

The motivation for the initiative was to activate the Park and in particular to draw people out from the adjacent Liverpool Hospital and surrounding health and education precinct to use the civic space.  This initiative looked to build on successful activation programs in the Park, ranging from the Live, Life, Active lunchtime exercise programs to events such as Harmony Day celebrations and the Spring Expo. Strong positive feedback has been received by Council from senior representatives of Liverpool Hospital about the value of the pop-up café in improving the interaction of Hospital staff with the Park.

 

At its meeting of 3 September 2014, Council’s Building Our New City Committee prioritised a range of works for Bigge Park that included a short term pop up café and longer term re-use of the Pump House building. The Committee’s minutes were approved at Council’s meeting of 24 September 2014.

 

Council received three EOI responses to operate the pop up.  All three responses were brought through to a final selection process with Ristretto & Co the selected operator.  A licence for temporary operation for 12 months was signed between Council and the proponent, with trading commencing on 19 January 2015.

 

 

 

 

 

Costs and scope of works

 

Costs were incurred by Council in relation to connection of the sewer to the site as well as excavation work.  The total cost of this work was $21,595 which also incorporated some works required to restore concrete paths arising from NBN installation.  The works undertaken, while allowing discharge of waste water from the Pump House to service the needs of the pop up café, also provided capacity for longer term use of the site beyond the twelve month trial period that will allow future installation of toilets, a permanent kiosk or food outlet and/or other facilities.  Trunk drainage works are also scheduled in Elizabeth Street to service the longer term needs of Bigge Park.

 

Specialised excavation (taking into account the presence of telecommunications cabling) and sewer connection works were undertaken by contractors engaged by Council totaling $21,595. The work undertaken by Council staff in-house involved non-specialist excavation and restoration work.

 

The modifications to the Pump House building were undertaken by Ristretto & Co at a cost to the proponent of $26,300.  Work undertaken in modifying the Pump House building involved engagement of contractors directly by Ristretto & Co.

 

Initial licence arrangements

 

Ristretto & Co signed a licence for use of the Pump House building for a 12 month period.  In recognition of the trial nature of the exercise and that the commercial risk in relation to the venture was with the proponent, Council charged a peppercorn fee of $1 for the 12 month trial period.  The EOI document for the pop up café indicated that Council would not be charging the successful vendor for the usage of the identified space.

 

It should be also noted that a Food Truck trial was undertaken on the same site during May 2014 and was not successful.

 

Proposed licence arrangements

 

Planned upgrade works to Bigge Park are anticipated to commence in early 2016 and are expected to take approximately 6 months. During this time there will be major disruption to any ongoing pop-up café service.  As such, it is Council’s intention to seek tenders for the use of the Pump House building as a kiosk or food service and beverage outlet once the Bigge Park works are underway with a view to the successful tenderer commencing operations from the premises upon completion of the Bigge Park works.

 

Independent advice has been sought on the appropriate commercial retail licence arrangements for the future operation of a kiosk at the site.  Commercial arrangements will be negotiated with the successful tenderer following completion of works in Bigge Park taking in to account this advice. 

 

The pop up has allowed Council to establish the viability of such a venture as well as meeting the primary place-making activation objectives of the trial.

Approval of operations

The initial licence was issued to cover the temporary nature of the pop-up venture. With the success of the venture, approval for formalisation of the use of the building for a kiosk outlet has been sought through a Development Application which was submitted on 25 August 2015. At its meeting of 28 September 2015 IHAP recommended approval of the Development Application subject to standard conditions related to construction and occupation of the building as a food premises.

 

IHAP noted that Council officers have considered the existence of any unresolved land claims under the Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983, the Plan of Management for Bigge Park and Crown Lands requirements. The Panel recommended that these issues be addressed specifically by Council officers in any report provided to Council.

 

The operation of a food and beverage outlet on a permanent basis will in all likelihood involve a level of food preparation beyond that originally envisaged for the temporary pop up operation.

 

Trading Performance

As part of the licence agreement the proponent is required to provide a report on the operations within the licenced area after 6 months of trading. That report is now due and has been sought from the proponent.  Once received that report will be provided to Councillors on a confidential basis (confidentiality is required in line with the terms of the licence agreement), under separate cover.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Encourage and promote businesses to develop in the hospital, health and medical precinct (of the City Centre).

A peppercorn licence fee of $1 was charged for the use of the Pump House building in line with the intent of the Expression of Interest process.

Environmental and Sustainability

Operation of the pop-up kiosk is subject to waste management and other relevant environmental regulations.


Social and Cultural

The pop-up café has played an important place-making role in Bigge Park.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The pop-up café has been an important place making initiative for the future development of Bigge Park.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Trading Performance Report (to be provided prior to the Council meeting)View - Confidential


258

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Economic development Report

 

DEE 02

Small Business Workshops

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Assist exiting businesses to grow, innovate and become more competitive

Key Policy

Economic Development Strategy

File Ref

264991.2015

Report By

Julie Scott - Manager Economic Development

Approved By

Michael Cullen - Director Economic Development

 

 

Executive Summary

 

97% of Liverpool’s over 13,000 businesses are small in nature i.e. they employ 20 or less employees.  Through its Economic Development Unit, Liverpool City Council provides services to all sizes of prospective and existing businesses in Liverpool.  Strategy 2 in Council’s Economic Development Strategy “Assisting existing businesses in Liverpool to link programs and services delivered by the Commonwealth and NSW Governments that help them grow, innovate and improve their competitiveness” has a number of actions aimed at assisting small business.

 

Council’s current approach to assisting small business is to work closely with local organisations such as the South West Business Enterprise Centre and the Liverpool Chamber of Commerce and Industry to provide access to services for locally based small businesses.  Council, through its Director Economic Development, is a board member on each of these organisations. 

 

Council also works closely with government organisations such as the NSW Office of Small Business, Office of the NSW Small Business Commissioner, Office of State Revenue, NSW Department of Industry and AusIndustry to help local businesses tap into relevant programs and services.

 

This partnership approach represents an efficient means of tapping into government programs and services for the benefit of local small business.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Note the report outlining existing small business programs delivered in Liverpool.

 

2.    Endorse continuation of the partnership-based approach for delivery of services to small business in Liverpool.

 

REPORT

 

At its meeting on 26 August, 2015 it was decided by Council that:

 

1.   Council investigate the cost of designing a small business program.

2.   The Economic Development Unit provide a report to Council as soon as practicable to look at all the things Council is currently doing for small business and provide that information to the wider public and outline how and where businesses can access the information.

3.   Councillors be provided with information relating to existing programs for small businesses in the LGA.

 

Context

 

97% of Liverpool’s over 13,000 businesses are small in nature.  Small businesses are defined as having 20 or less employees.  95% of businesses in Australia are small businesses meaning that Liverpool has an even greater concentration of businesses of this scale, with business ownership also representing the ethnic diversity that is a strong demographic feature of the Liverpool local government area.

 

Council’s current approach to assisting small businesses is to work closely with the South West Business Enterprise Centre (which has an outlet in Liverpool) and the Liverpool Chamber of Commerce and Industry to provide access to services to locally based small businesses.  The Business Enterprise Centre (BEC) is funded by the NSW Government to deliver a Business Advisory Service to start-up and existing businesses in the broader South West Sydney region. 

 

The Liverpool Chamber of Commerce and Industry is a membership-based organisation which has approximately 100 members who are primarily small business in nature, drawn from across the local area.

 

Council through its Director Economic Development, is a board member of these organisations (at these organisation’s invitation to Council).

 

This partnership approach with the Chamber and BEC to delivering services to small business represents an efficient use of resources by Council and avoids duplication of effort.  This approach also helps build a “team Liverpool” alliance to promoting Liverpool as a business location.

 

Council also works closely with Commonwealth and NSW Government agencies to ensure local businesses can tap into their programs and information.  Council is accredited as a Small Business Friendly Council under the NSW Office of the Small Business Commissioner’s program.  Council also looks to tap into local businesses services provided by AusIndustry, Austrade, NSW Department of Industry, Commonwealth Department of Employment, WorkCover NSW, NSW Office of State Revenue, etc.

 


 

Current Services to Small Businesses

 

Item/Activity

Purpose

NSW Government

 

1.  NSW Office of Small Business Commissioner

To help small businesses operate as professionally, efficiently and successfully as they can. Services include:

‒  Serving as a neutral party in mediation and dispute resolution between small businesses or between a small business and a larger one or between a small business and government

‒  Providing high quality business advice and advisors with access to world class tools

‒  Speaking up for small businesses within government

· Small business toolkit - http://toolkit.smallbiz.nsw.gov.au/

· Business Advisory services – 1300 134 359

· Dispute resource unit – 1300 795 534

· Small Business Friendly Council program

T: 1300 795 534

E: we.assist@smallbusiness.nsw.gov.au

W: http://www.smallbusiness.nsw.gov.au/

 

2.  NSW Fair Trading

NSW Government agency which provides advice on laws affecting small businesses including the latest reforms and an interactive website that provides a wide range of information to help run a business, including how to provide quality service, how to deal with complaints, and how to protect against scams that target businesses.

T: 13 32 20

W: http://www.fairtrading.nsw.gov.au/

 

3.  NSW Office of State Revenue

Small business grant

The Small Business Grant is designed to encourage small businesses in New South Wales that do not pay payroll tax to hire new employees and expand their business

T: 1300 241 869

E: business.grants@osr.nsw.gov.au

W: http://www.osr.nsw.gov.au/grants/sbg

Jobs Action Plan

The Jobs Action Plan provides NSW businesses that are required to pay payroll tax with a rebate when they employ new workers in new eligible employment.

W: http://www.osr.nsw.gov.au/taxes/payroll/jap

 

 

4.  WorkCover NSW

WorkCover provides a rebate of up to $500 back to small business owners who buy and install eligible safety equipment to address a safety problem in their workplace. It is open to sole traders or small businesses with up to 50 full time employees or equivalent.

T: 13 10 50

W: http://www.workcover.nsw.gov.au/health-and-safety/how-we-can-help/small-business-rebates

 

Commonwealth Government

 

AusIndustry

AusIndustry is the Federal Government's principal agency for delivering assistance, programs and services which support industry, research and innovation.  Programs include: Entrepreneur’s Program, Business Growth Grant, Research and Development, Tax Incentive, Australian Small Business Advisory Services.

T: 13 28 46

W: http://www.business.gov.au/about-businessgovau/Pages/Single-Business-Service.aspx 

 

Australian Business Register

Businesses carrying out an enterprise in Australia are required to have an Australian Business Number (ABN).  ABR lookup provides access to publicly available information provided by businesses when they register for an ABN.

W: http://abr.business.gov.au/

 

South West Sydney Business Enterprise Centre

Advice and assistance to all small businesses, in particular start-ups via regular seminars and workshops and face-to-face services.

T: 02 4647 6232

W: https://www.swsydneybec.com.au/

 

Liverpool Chamber of Commerce

The Liverpool Chamber of Commerce & Industry is an organisation of business and professional leaders, whose purpose is advancing the economic, industrial, professional and civic welfare of the Liverpool Local Government Area and surrounds.

T: 1300 242 629

E: business.grants@osr.nsw.gov.au

W: http://www.liverpoolchamber.org.au/

 

NSW Business Chamber of Commerce

The Chamber is a passionate advocate for business in the public arena: whether standing up to government and decision makers when business interests are neglected, or working together to create positive change.  The Chamber helps all businesses from small enterprises to large corporations.

T: 13 26 96

W: http://www.nswbusinesschamber.com.au/

 

Liverpool City Council

 

Economic Development facilitation

Liverpool Council recognises the importance of small business in retaining and creating jobs in the local government area and works in partnership with organisations such as the Liverpool Chamber of Commerce and Liverpool Business Enterprise Centre to create an environment where small business can capitalise on growth opportunities.

The thrust of Liverpool Council's efforts to assist economic growth in the area involves:-

‒  Attracting new job-generating investment to Liverpool, consistent with the local government area's competitive strengths

‒  Working with existing business to assist them to grow and improve competitiveness

‒  Working with employers to engage and train local people

Advice and referral services are provided to all sizes of business.

T: 02 9821 9575

E: business@liverpool.nsw.gov.au

W: http://www.liverpool.nsw.gov.au/business

 

Sponsorship of local small business awards

Recognition of local small business champions.

Supply Chain Accelerator Program

Medium sized companies looking to grow their markets.  An insight in to seeing how businesses can review and improve their business through developing globally competitive supply chains and capacity building between companies and business customers.  The 2015 program was funded by the NSW Department of Industry.

 

Small Biz Week

· Workshops tailored for start-ups, growing businesses and networking organisations

· Retail specialist for CBD retailers looking to “renew” their business

· Held each year in September to promote the small business sector in Liverpool

 

Procurement Workshop

Advice to South West Sydney businesses on how to do business with local government.

 

 

Economic Development and Events Committee

Council committee that guides Council’s economic development activities

‒  Monthly meeting

‒  Community representatives including small businesses

W: http://www.liverpool.nsw.gov.au/business/economic-development/economic-development-committee

 

Current Situation

 

Council has also prepared a DL flyer that provides contact details for services and information pertinent to small business.  This flyer is available at customer service and is now provided with all Development Approval application forms (copy of flyer attached).

 

Links to this information are provided through Council’s website (Economic Development section).  Updates to businesses are provided through Council’s e-business newsletter.  Council also uses the Commonwealth Australia Business Register list to invite businesses with registered addresses in the Liverpool area to events and briefings.

 

Council, the South West Sydney Business Enterprise Centre and the Liverpool Chamber of Commerce have co-hosted SmallBiz Week since 2013 to highlight the importance of small businesses in the area.  This year the Office of Small Business Commissioner’s migrant small business advisors (Arabic and Vietnamese) were part of the Small Business Bus visit to Liverpool to provide assistance to key ethnic business concentrations represented in Liverpool.  A copy of the flyer and media release on the 2015 SmallBiz Week is attached.

 

Additional small business workshops

 

Council currently provides services to all sizes of businesses through its Economic Development Unit, with a special concentration on promoting small business needs during Small Business Week each September. 

 

More intensive small business workshop activity over the year would need further resources allocated by Council, to work closely with local organisations to supplement their activities.  A budget of at least $30,000 would be required to support a more intensive program over and above the programs currently delivered by the Business Enterprise Centre and Liverpool Chamber of Commerce.  Expenditure of additional funds, if provided, would be allocated towards speaker, venue, promotion and administrative support costs for an expanded workshop program.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Small business is an important component of the economy in Liverpool, representing 97% of all businesses in the local government area. 

Council currently allocates $7,500 for Small Business Week each year as part of its Economic Development budget.

Environmental and Sustainability

As needed, small business in Liverpool is kept informed of relevant, environmental and sustainability programs run by the Commonwealth and NSW Governments aimed at small business through Council’s e-business newsletter.


Social and Cultural

The rich mixture of ethnically diverse businesses in Liverpool is a feature of the local government area.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Local business membership on the Economic Development and Events Committee is an important focus for small business engagement with Council.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Connect Your Business Locally A5 -FINAL WEBView

2.         SmallBiz week final web flyer 2015View

3.         Media Release for Small Business Week 3 September 2015View  


265

DEE 02

Small Business Workshops

Attachment 1

Connect Your Business Locally A5 -FINAL WEB

 


 


267

DEE 02

Small Business Workshops

Attachment 2

SmallBiz week final web flyer 2015

 


 


269

DEE 02

Small Business Workshops

Attachment 3

Media Release for Small Business Week 3 September 2015

 


 


271

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Economic development Report

 

DEE 03

Review of Outgoing Corporate Sponsorship Policy

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Activate the city centre and develop vibrant places that attract people to Liverpool

Key Policy

City Centre Strategy

File Ref

265311.2015

Report By

Michael Cullen - Director Economic Development

Approved By

Michael Cullen - Director Economic Development

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council’s Corporate Sponsorship (Outgoing) Policy adopted in August 2013 is due for review. Corporate sponsorship is defined in the current policy as “a contribution to a group or organisation for a specific community purpose in return for tangible benefits to Council, the community or the City of Liverpool, such as signage, advertising, promotion, etc. A corporate sponsorship must endorse and promote Liverpool’s role and image as the Regional Centre of South West Sydney. The contribution may be either monetary or in kind.”

 

Council makes an allocation to its corporate sponsorship program through its annual budget process. The demand for funds has escalated significantly over the past two years in line with rapid growth in the number of external parties looking to run events in Liverpool. This growth has presented a number of management challenges in relation to leveraging benefits from projects sponsored and rationing available funds equitably.

 

The process of managing corporate sponsorships needs to be streamlined to better manage customer expectations and to ensure full benefits are derived for Liverpool and Council.

 

Funds for corporate sponsorship were significantly supplemented by Council in 2014/15 through both the quarterly review process and through the Councillor Reserve.  A budget of $125,000 was allocated for corporate sponsorship in 2015/16.

 

A number of changes are proposed to the Corporate Sponsorship (Outgoing) Policy.  One of the primary recommendations is establishing separate arrangements for supporting small scale community events and festivals through the Community Grants Program.  A number of other administrative changes are also proposed to streamline arrangements, including capping of amounts available to events in line with the scale of attendance.

 

Sponsorship has a different objective to community grants but it is important that policies are aligned.  A separate report proposing changes to the Grants and Donations Policy was approved by Council at its September meeting.

 

The Corporate sponsorship policy has been on the Councillor Intranet for comment.  The draft policy was also presented at Councillor briefings on 29 January 2015 and on 24 September 2015.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council endorse the draft Corporate Sponsorship (Outgoing) Policy to be placed on public exhibition and receives a further report following public exhibition.

 

 

REPORT

 

Context

 

Council’s current corporate sponsorship (outgoing) policy has been in place since August 2013. At the time of its adoption the processes and resources to manage the program in place were reasonably aligned to the level of activity. However, over the last 2 years there has been a rapid escalation in the demand for sponsorship funds, partly in response to positive promotion of Liverpool and partly due to the success of community events and festivals conducted in Liverpool.

 

Current Position

 

A comparison of expenditure and commitments for corporate sponsorship from 2012/2013 to 2014/15 (YTD) is outlined below:

 

2012/13 Sponsorship spend

$50,000

2013/14 Sponsorship spend

$59,225

2014/15 Sponsorship spend

$239,813

2015/16 Sponsorship commitments YTD (September 2015)

$88,250

 

It should be noted that in 2013/14 sponsorship of $25,000 for the Wanderers Football Club was sourced from the Tourism & Events Special Reserve while in 2014/15 that sponsorship was allocated from general corporate sponsorship funds.

 

Analysis

 

The increased demand for sponsorship funds has been driven both by a range of new events looking to operate in Liverpool as well as existing events seeking a higher level of funding. A number of operational and strategic issues need to be considered to manage this increased demand and ensure equity in decision making, viz:

 

1.    The purpose of corporate sponsorship

In line with the existing policy the purpose of corporate sponsorship is for Council to provide modest financial or in kind support to events, projects or programs that allow Council to promote the area, Council’s work and facilities and Council’s aspirations for the area. In summary the sponsorship provided by Council should achieve one or more of the following:

 

a.   Provide a vehicle for raising the profile of Liverpool

b.   Cross promote Council services and venues

c.   Help secure events for Liverpool that generate economic activity that would otherwise not be realised, with an emphasis on city centre activation

d.   Directly underpin Community Strategic Plan objectives

 

Sponsorship is not an appropriate mechanism for events to be underwritten or shortfalls in revenue to be offset.

 

Recurrent sponsorship beyond a period of 3 years, with the exception of important civic events (e.g. Remembrance Day or Anzac Day events), should also not be encouraged as the value proposition to Council from sponsorship is ideally reviewed in a regular cycle.

 

The strengthened corporate sponsorship policy and associated operational guidelines proposed will provide greater clarity on these aspects.

 

Council objectives to build strong and resilient communities and to maximise social well-being for all residents is best achieved through the Community Grants program.

 

2.    Timeliness of corporate sponsorship applications

There has been an increased frequency in submission of late applications for corporate sponsorship. While the existing policy states that applicants must submit an application form at least three months in advance of the date of their event, in practice this is not being applied.

 

As part of an improved process it is proposed that all event organisers and community networks are advised that corporate sponsorship applications will need to be received at a specified closing date each quarter. Given that corporate sponsorship is intended to provide benefits to Council a three month period to leverage such benefits is reasonable. An organisation unable to meet this time frame draws into question their capability to conduct the event or program professionally and/or the rationale for their seeking sponsorship.

 

Applications for corporate sponsorship are proposed to be submitted through an on-line portal (SmartyGrants or equivalent system).

 

3.    Consistency in approach and amounts offered

The current corporate sponsorship guidelines do not provide guidance on the amounts to be sought for various types of corporate sponsorship. As a result, in the case of events in particular, there has been an inconsistency in the corporate sponsorship amounts offered for similar sized events. It is proposed that as part of the new policy guidelines the amount made available is capped according to the size of the event. Sponsorship for programs will be assessed in terms of the benefits offered and should be modest.

 

Small scale community and cultural events and festivals are more appropriately funded through the Community Grants Program.

 

 

4.    Competing events

The current Council policy states that corporate sponsorship will not be provided to “more than one event within the Liverpool area within a similar timeframe that celebrates or marks a special occasion or activity”. In practice this has not been routinely applied. It is proposed that corporate sponsorship guidelines provide clearer guidance on this requirement to both specify the appropriate exclusion period (e.g. 2 months) for competing events and to nominate the timeframe over which an event has run to establish its priority (e.g. 3 years). Receipt of applications on a quarterly basis will also assist in establishing Council priorities through assessment of the relative benefits of competing events. An important consideration is that Council does not inadvertently erode the viability of events that have built a profile and attendance through Council providing corporate sponsorship for a new event targeting the same audience at a similar time or venue.

 

Council of course cannot reasonably withhold approval for an event (e.g. through a development approval or S68 application) but can choose to provide or not provide sponsorship.

 

5.    Administrative arrangements

Currently the Corporate Sponsorship Policy requires all applications to be assessed by an internal Financial Contributions Panel (FCP). The FCP adds limited value in that it adds time to the assessment process for applications and in many cases Council at its meetings amends the recommendations of the FCP. The existing policy also allows for assistance by way of a Council resolution without a prior recommendation by the FCP. The proposed policy looks to streamline these arrangements by deleting the requirement for an FCP to consider corporate sponsorship applications.

 

6.    In kind support

There is an expectation from many of the groups supported by corporate sponsorship that “in kind” support is provided as a matter of course. In some cases the expectation that items such as portable toilets, bins, parking and provision of rangers are provided free represent real costs incurred by Council. While the policy identifies that in kind support will be ascribed a value and assessed as a total sponsorship contribution by Council, expectations will still need to be managed. Guidelines will be strengthened to address this need.

 

7.    Measurement of impact of sponsorship

Figures provided to Council for attendance by event organisers are not reliable nor provided through a consistent measurement methodology. As part of acquittal of  sponsorship funds for events Council will require an estimate of attendance numbers based on a simple methodology (yet to be developed) provided to event organisers. The reliability of figures will of course be more accurate for ticketed events than for general admission events. For other forms of sponsorship other relevant performance indicators will be sought and agreed with the proponents prior to the program commencing.

 

8.    Corporate sponsorship versus funding for small scale community events

The biggest proportion of funds from corporate sponsorship has been provided to either help support an event that is commencing in Liverpool for the first time or recurrent support for an event that has established itself and is looking to offset particular costs on an ongoing basis.

 

The Community Grants Program presents the best way of managing requests for funding for small scale community or cultural events.

 

Once events grow in scale and professionalism it is proposed that Council support revert to a corporate sponsorship model where events are assessed against the benefits that accrue to Liverpool, with sponsorship capped in line with a demonstrated track record of participation numbers. It may also be appropriate for sponsorship arrangements to be for up to a three year period to provide reasonable certainty of support. 

 

Event organisers will often “program shop” by applying to the Council program where they anticipate they will gain the largest contribution. Council needs to be more strategic in its intent for each program to minimise this.

 

9.    Private gain

An applicant for corporate sponsorship who acts for private gain is eligible for funding.  The requirement for Council to provide 28 days public notice for a proposal to pass such a resolution is not required if:

 

a.   The financial assistance is part of a specific program, and

b.   The program’s details have been included in the council’s draft operational plan for the year in which the financial assistance is proposed to be given, and

c.   The program’s proposed budget for that year does not exceed 5 per cent of the council’s proposed income from the ordinary rates levied for that year, and

d.   The program applied uniformly to all persons within the council’s area or to a significant group of persons within the area

e.   Public notice is also not required if the financial assistance is part of a program of graffiti removal work

 

The Council’s 4 year operational and delivery plan needs to explicitly mention the corporate sponsorship program to satisfy these requirements.  This is reflected in Council’s current Community Strategic Plan

 

10.  Charity fundraising activities

Sponsorship for fundraising events such as school fetes and charity fundraising dinners is an eligible activity through the corporate sponsorship program.  The level of sponsorship will often need to be aligned to a set category of sponsorship (e.g. platinum, gold, bronze) from the proponent.  Where category sponsorship is not offered a cap in line with that of corporate sponsorship for a small event should be applied.

 

Council’s sponsorship will be assessed against benefits offered and the alignment of objectives between the charity and Council’s Community Strategic Plan.  The highest priority should be given to functions that are physically held in Liverpool as well as demonstrating clear benefits to Liverpool based charities and/or Liverpool residents.

 

Advice on Council’s approach to charity fundraising activities will be specified in Council proposed revised corporate sponsorship guidelines.

 

These issues have been taken into account in drafting the attached revised Corporate Sponsorship (Outgoing) Policy. 

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Corporate sponsorship plays an important role in attracting economic and community development opportunities to Liverpool.

A budget of $125,000 was allocated in 2015/16 for corporate sponsorship.  A total of $88,250 has been committed for the financial year to date (September 2015).

Environmental and Sustainability

Council’s Events Policy encourages events to be conducted in a sustainable fashion.


Social and Cultural

Corporate sponsorship has been important in supporting events that celebrate cultural diversity in Liverpool.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The corporate sponsorship program objectives provide policy leadership to promote Liverpool and events and programs that demonstrate Liverpool’s status as a regional city.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Liverpool City Council Corporate Sponsorship (Outgoing) Policy Final and Adopted by Council 28 August 2013 PDF VersionView

2.         DRAFT Liverpool City Council Corporate Sponsorship (Outgoing) Policy October 2015View

3.         DRAFT GUIDELINES Corporate Sponsorship Outgoing 2015View

4.         DRAFT FORM Corporate Sponsorship Outgoing Application 2015View  


277

DEE 03

Review of Outgoing Corporate Sponsorship Policy

Attachment 1

Liverpool City Council Corporate Sponsorship (Outgoing) Policy Final and Adopted by Council 28 August 2013 PDF Version

 


 


 


 


 


289

DEE 03

Review of Outgoing Corporate Sponsorship Policy

Attachment 2

DRAFT Liverpool City Council Corporate Sponsorship (Outgoing) Policy October 2015

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


289

DEE 03

Review of Outgoing Corporate Sponsorship Policy

Attachment 3

DRAFT GUIDELINES Corporate Sponsorship Outgoing 2015

 


 


 


 


 


301

DEE 03

Review of Outgoing Corporate Sponsorship Policy

Attachment 4

DRAFT FORM Corporate Sponsorship Outgoing Application 2015

 


 


 


 


 


 

 


300

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Planning and Growth Report

 

DPG 01

Outdoor Signage and Outdoor Product Displays

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Create clean and attractive public places for people to engage and connect

Key Policy

Strategic Maintenance Plan

File Ref

166027.2015

Report By

Nada Mardini - Manager Community Standards

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

At its meeting on 29 April 2015 Council resolved to:

 

1.   Prepare a report on the use of outdoor signage and outdoor product displays by small businesses.

 

2.   Develop a policy in conjunction with business owners that permit the use of outdoor signage, including advertising community events.

 

This report discusses the use of outdoor signage and product displays by small business and concludes that this would add to the congestion of the footpath particularly in conjunction with outdoor dining, impacting on the safety of pedestrians and pedestrian traffic flows. 

 

However, should Council wish to permit occupation of footpath it is recommended that A frames only be permitted but not goods or product displays, and that the approval process be incorporated in the draft Outdoor Dining Policy.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council;

 

1.    Notes the advice provided in this report.

 

2.    Determines that outdoor goods and signage not be permitted on public footpaths or Council land.

 

 

 

REPORT

 

The placing of goods and signage on a public footpath while providing business opportunities for traders can impact on a number of issues such as:

 

·  Pedestrian traffic flows and safety

·  Appearance of the street and surroundings

·  Traffic flows and safety

 

In order to deal with the above issues a policy would need to be developed to control location, size and area of occupation on the footpath.  Under Section 68 of the Local Government Act prior approval is required to place goods on the footpath.  As such, an application process would also need to be created.  This would enable the activity to be managed through the provision of permits/licences.  The administration of this process would need to be resourced by Council.

 

In regards to signage, the A frame is generally used by retailers.  As discussed above an application would be required to be approved prior to the placing of such signs.  The applicant would be required to provide public liability insurance to protect Council.  However, there may be an increase in goods on the footpath without approval.   Additional resources will need to be allocated to ongoing enforcement.

 

Council currently has outdoor dining approvals in a number of areas in the CBD and a draft Outdoor Dining Policy which may facilitate the placing of further outdoor dining.  The permitting of goods and signage on footpaths will add to congestion and negatively contribute to the urban character and amenity of the area.

 

With the increase in development of the area and the population there will be an increase in outdoor dining and pedestrian traffic.  Allowing for goods as well as signage to be placed on the footpath will not provide a relaxed environment and will not enhance the streetscape.

 

In addition, the Liverpool City Centre vision focuses on Liverpool as one of Sydney’s regional cities.  The vision looks at ways to improve the city centre and one of the aims is to become a city that is pedestrian friendly.  Permitting goods and signs on the footpath is not compatible with the City Centre Vision.  It should also be noted that a number of Councils in Sydney do not permit goods/signage within the City Centre.  These Councils include City of Sydney, Parramatta City Council and Penrith City Council.

 

Given the above it is recommended that outdoor goods or signage on Council footpaths not be permitted.  However, if Council prefers to still allow the occupation of the footpath then this should be limited to the provision of A frames rather than the placing of goods for sale.  The permitting of goods on footpath is difficult to control particularly in regards to the type of product displayed and consistency in display.  The application process for the placing of A frames should be incorporated in the draft outdoor dining Policy and should be subject to the following requirements:

 

·    Minimum width of footpath is 3.3 metres

·    One A frame per business adequately weighted down

·    Placed adjacent to the building line

·    Allowing an unimpeded 2.3 metres thoroughfare for pedestrians

·    Public liability insurance policy of $20m

 

Following is an alternative recommendation, should Council wish to allow A frame business signage on public footpaths in the city centre:

 

1.   Display goods and products are not permitted on Council footpaths.

 

2.   A frame business signs will be permitted subject to approval and conditions to be incorporated into the Draft Outdoor Dining Policy.

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings.

Facilitate economic development.

Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities and business growth (in the City Centre).

Should Council determine to allow A frames business signs on CBD footpaths, additional enforcement resources will be required. An application fee would be payable by applicants.

Environmental and Sustainability

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings.

Promote an integrated and user friendly footpath areas.


Social and Cultural

Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place.

Support access and services for people with a disability.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Act as an environmental leader in the community.

Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility.

Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


303

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Planning and Growth Report

 

DPG 02

Update on proposed Northumberland and George Streets conversion to two-way traffic flow

 

Strategic Direction

Accessible Connected City

Provide safe and easy travel with a high quality road and traffic management network

Key Policy

Traffic and Transport Plan

File Ref

194236.2015

Report By

Charles Wiafe - Manager Traffic and Transport

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

At its meeting of 26 May 2015, Council considered a report on design investigations of the proposed traffic flow changes along George and Northumberland Streets from one-way to two-way and Dewsbury Serviceway extension to George Street, and resolved for community consultation of the proposed traffic flow changes be carried out in June/July 2015.

 

This report provides a summary of the proposed features, objectives, benefits, traffic impacts, community feedback, Road and Maritime Services (RMS) in-principle support, and Liverpool Local Traffic Committee (LTC) recommendations on the proposal.

 

The community consultation was carried out in July 2015, and attracted three objections out of eight submissions received. The LTC considered the proposal at its meeting on 23 September 2015, and supported the proposal. RMS representatives have reviewed traffic and design investigations and given in-principle support for the modifications to the affected traffic signals.

 

Traffic impact assessment, design investigations and community consultations undertaken to date have not identified significant adverse impacts on the affected streets, associated intersections and adjoining sections of the existing road network. 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Notes the information contained in this report.

2.   Approves implementation of the proposed traffic flow changes along George and Northumberland Streets to two-way.

3.   Defers the Dewsbury Serviceway Extension to George Street for the project to be considered in the 2016/17 Budget.

 

 

REPORT

 

At its meeting of 26 May 2015, Council considered a report on design investigations of the proposed traffic flow changes along George and Northumberland Streets from one-way to two-way, Dewsbury Serviceway extension to George Street and resolved that:

 

1.       Community consultation of the proposed traffic flow changes be undertaken and 

2.       A report on the outcome of the community consultation and design investigations to be presented to Council at a future meeting.

 

In addition, at its meetings on 30 July 2014 and 24 November 2014 Council considered the following related reports:

 

Liverpool City Centre Traffic Study - At the meeting on 30 July 2014, Council considered a report on a Liverpool City Centre Traffic Study carried out by an independent consultant. The study assessed and recommended traffic improvements to accommodate additional planned developments in the City Centre. Amongst others, the study recommended traffic flow change along the existing one-way sections of George and Northumberland Streets to two-way traffic movement.  

 

Council resolved that a further report be presented following design investigations, RMS initial consultation, and community feedback with an implementation plan for the two-way movement.

 

Update on Design Investigation - At its meeting of 24 November 2014, Council noted a status report on design investigations for the proposed traffic flow changes and the required approval process for implementation.

 

GEORGE AND NORTHUMBERLAND STREETS TWO-WAY

 

Objectives and Benefits

§     The proposal will:

 

·        Improve traffic circulation within the city centre 

·        Improve access to commercial and retail precincts within the city centre

·        Improve accessibility to major car parks (Northumberland Street , Liverpool Plaza)

·        Re-distribute traffic flow within the city centre

 

 

 

 

Features of the Proposed Traffic Flow Changes

 

The affected sections of Northumberland and George Streets have a carriageway of approximately 12.7m wide.  This currently accommodates a typical mid-block cross section of kerb side parallel parking and two traffic lanes in the same direction.

 

The traffic flow changes will involve the following:

·        Linemarking and signage to show two-way traffic movement

·        Maintaining kerb side parking on both sides 

·        Modification to seven existing signalised intersections

·        Minor road works including removal of kerb blisters along Northumberland Street at
two intersections

·        Reversing existing traffic movements at the Liverpool Plaza and Northumberland Street car park driveways

·        Removing substandard pedestrian crossings

 

A layout of the proposed traffic flow changes is attached.

 

Traffic Impacts of the Proposed Traffic Flow Changes

 

Road Capacity - Two streets form a one-way pair and provide two north and southbound lanes.  With the proposed changes the total number of north and southbound lanes will remain unchanged.

 

The 2014 Liverpool City Centre Traffic Study and intersection performance analysis at the affected signalised intersections indicate that after the traffic flow changes, the two streets will continue to operate with acceptable levels of service.

 

The RMS has provided comments on the concept designs of the seven signalised intersections and these comments have been incorporated in the detailed designs.

 

Traffic Efficiency – Traffic conditions along road sections, such as the affected sections of Northumberland and George Streets, with closely spaced intersections are impacted by traffic delays at intersections.  Intersection performance analysis carried out in accordance with the RMS guidelines, has identified that all the seven  affected signalised intersections on the two streets will continue to operate within acceptable levels of service.

 

Impact on adjoining developments - George Street provides access to the Warren Serviceway Car Park, the Liverpool Court House, the Police Station and private car parks.  The proposed two way traffic flow will not affect existing traffic movements to these off-street car parks.

 

Northumberland Street provides access to Liverpool Plaza car park, and the Northumberland Street car park.  Traffic flows to both car parks will be reversed.

 

Impact on on-street parking –The traffic flow changes at the seven affected existing traffic signals along two streets will require RMS specified parking restrictions on the approach and departure sides.  This will result in the loss of nine car parking spaces along George Street and no loss of parking spaces along Northumberland Street.

 

To address this impact, six additional parking spaces will be line marked along George Serviceway. kerb blisters and raised thresholds will also be installed along George Street, reducing the length of existing “No Stopping” parking restrictions to provide three parking spaces along George Street. 

 

Community Consultation

 

In July 2015, Council carried out community consultation with local businesses expected to be affected by the proposed changes and the local community in general.  The consultation included:

 

·           Advertisement in Local Newspapers over a three week period

·           Advertisement and invitation for responses on Liverpool Listens website

·           A letter box drop to over 650 property and businesses owners

·           Display in the Liverpool Library foyer and Council’s customer service counter

·           Meetings with major stakeholders including the Liverpool Plaza Centre Management

 

By the end of the consultation period, 68 local residents had viewed the proposal on the Liverpool Listens website and eight written submissions were received with the following comments:

 

·       Five in support and one against the proposal

·       Two other comments – One submission indicated that the current traffic arrangement is satisfactory and could be maintained and other that the project funding should be used to improve road conditions in the LGA.

 

In addition, to the written comments the following comments were raised at three meetings with stakeholders:

 

·       Liverpool Plaza supports the proposal and will work with Council to undertake the required changes at the shopping centre car park driveways, should the project proceed.

·       Request for review of no right turn restrictions at Moore/George Streets and Moore/Northumberland Streets intersections, and left turn restrictions at the George/Scott Streets intersection.  The three intersections have been reassessed and the results of the forecast intersection performance have been discussed with RMS and local bus company representatives.

 

The intersection performance analysis indicates that right turn movements can be permitted at the Moore/George Streets and Moore/Northumberland Streets intersections and these have been incorporated in the revised design.  However, left turn movements at the George/Scott Streets intersection would have a significant impact on the existing bus lane along this section of George Street and have not been included in the revised design.

 

Liverpool Local Traffic Committee recommendations

 

The Liverpool Local Traffic Committee (LTC) considered the proposal at the meeting on 23 September 2015 and recommended that Council:

 

1.       Approves the proposed two-way traffic flow changes along:

·      Northumberland Street, between Memorial Avenue and Elizabeth Street

·      George Street,  between Scott Street and Elizabeth Street

2.       Undertakes detailed design of the affected traffic signals and submit to the RMS for approval.

3.       Prepares a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) addressing traffic impact during construction and submit a copy to the RMS for endorsement.

4.       Advises stakeholders of its resolution.

 

The minutes of LTC Meeting of 23 September 2015 are included in the agenda for this Council meeting.

 

Budget Impact

 

The cost estimates for the proposed traffic flow changes along George and Northumberland Streets are as follows:

 

Civil work including Traffic Management and Control

$   900,000

Changes to affected signalised intersections and street lighting

$   950,000

Reversal of traffic movements at the Northumberland Car Park

$     50,000

Reversal of traffic movements Liverpool Plaza car park

$   140,000

Contingencies

$   204,000

Total

$2,244,000

 

This financial year’s budget includes an allocation of $2.5 million for traffic management works in the City Centre.  Should the proposal be supported it could be funded from this budget allocation.

 

DEWSBURY SERVICEWAY EXTENSION TO GEORGE STREET

 

At its meeting on 26 May 2015, Council considered a report on design investigation for Dewsbury Serviceway extension to George Street, and resolved that the design is to be revised to include a wider footpath along the northern side of the Serviceway.

 

The proposed extension is to provide alternative vehicular access for traffic movements out of the Serviceway to Bigge Street, to address traffic congestion and delays at the Bigge Street and Dewsbury Serviceway intersection, particularly during the week day afternoon peak periods.

 

The proposed extension is 3.5 to 4.0m one way westbound, with a 1.5 to 1.8m concrete footpath. The proposed extension will reduce the existing loading zone fronting 33 Moore Street.

 

Due to the existing road layout, the proposed extension will predominately benefit traffic movements from the car parking west of Warren Serviceway.  A business owner at the corner of George Street and the Dewsbury Serviceway has expressed objection to the proposal due to possible impact on the operation of its existing loading dock and waste storage area.

 

Budget Impact

 

The proposed extension is estimated at $407,000.  There is no budget allocation for the project in this financial year’s budget, if the proposed traffic flow changes along George and Northumberland Streets to two-way are to proceed.  It is recommended that the proposal be deferred, for consideration for funding in next financial year’s budget.

 

Cost Benefit Analysis

Cost benefit analysis has been carried out on the two projects, in accordance with Transport for NSW Principles and Guidelines for Economic Appraisal of Transport Investment and Initiatives.  Both projects have been found to deliver positive cost benefit ratios over a 30 year period.

 

IMPLEMENTATION TIME LINE

 

Subject to Council’s approval, the following indicative program is proposed:

 

·    RMS approval of the seven traffic signal modifications - November to January 2016

·    Procurement for the traffic signals modifications - January – February 2018

·    Start of Construction - April 2016 

 

A detail indicative program will be provided as part of a future report on the procurement, should the project proceed.

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Deliver and maintain a range of transport related infrastructure such as footpaths, bus shelters and bikeways.

Environmental and Sustainability

Promote an integrated and user friendly public transport service.

Support the delivery of a range of transport options.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Foster neighborhood pride and a sense of responsibility.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         George and Northumberland Streets, Liverpool - Linemarking and Signposting Plan for Two-Way Movement


309

DPG 02

Update on proposed Northumberland and George Streets conversion to two-way traffic flow

Attachment 1

George and Northumberland Streets, Liverpool - Linemarking and Signposting Plan for Two-Way Movement

 


310

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Planning and Growth Report

 

DPG 03

Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment 55) - Permit additional uses (service station and take away food and drink premises) at 1-5 Yato Road, Prestons

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

241823.2015

Report By

Benny Horn - Strategic Planner

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

At its meeting on 17 June 2015, Council resolved to support a proposal to amend Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008, to permit additional uses (service station and take away food and drink premises) on Lot 1 DP 1168422, known as 1-5 Yato Road, Prestons.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Department of Planning and Environment’s Gateway determination on 27 July 2015, public authorities were consulted and did not raise any objections to the proposed amendment.  Public exhibition was undertaken between 26 August and 9 September 2015, with no submissions received.

 

This report outlines the outcomes of public authority consultation and public exhibition, and recommends Council proceed with the proposed LLEP 2008 amendment to permit additional uses (service station and take away food and drink premises) at 1-5 Yato Road, Prestons.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council adopts draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment 55) and forwards the plan to the NSW Department of Planning and Environment requesting notification (gazettal) of the amendment.

 

REPORT

 

Background

On 31 March 2015, Council received a planning proposal (Attachment 1) seeking an amendment to LLEP 2008 Schedule 1 Clause 9 to permit additional uses (service station and take away food and drink premises) on Lot 1 DP 1168422, known as 1-5 Yato Road, Prestons (Figure 1).

 

The subject site is 8,541 square metres and located in the western precinct of Prestons industrial area.  The site is zoned IN3 Heavy Industrial and sits at a four-way intersection at the centre of the precinct, with frontages to Yato Road and Bernera Road.  The site is 600 metres south of M7 Motorway on- and off-ramps and 300 metres north of Kurrajong Road.

 

At its meeting on 17 June 2015, Council endorsed the proposal to permit additional uses on the site and resolved that the planning proposal be sent to the Department of Planning and Environment for a Gateway determination.  Council subsequently received the Gateway determination on 27 July 2015.

 

Figure 1: Aerial view of the subject site (marked in red)

 

Public authority consultation and public exhibition

Pursuant to the requirements of the Gateway determination, Council consulted on draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 55) with Roads and Maritime Services (RMS), Endeavour Energy, Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH), Sydney Water and Telstra.

 

No objections to the proposed amendment were raised in the submissions from RMS, OEH and Sydney Water (Attachment 3).  Endeavour Energy and Telstra did not provide submissions to Council.

 

Following consultations with public authorities, Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 55) was publicly exhibited between 26 August and 9 September 2015.  No submissions were received by Council during the public exhibition period.

 

Subsequently, no changes have been made to the planning proposal.

 

Conclusion

Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 55) seeks to permit additional uses (service station and take away food and drink premises) at 1-5 Yato Road, Prestons.

 

The planning proposal was exhibited for a period of 14 days and relevant public authorities were consulted, in accordance with the requirements of the Gateway determination.  No objections to the draft amendment were raised by public authorities, and no submissions were received by Council during public exhibition.

 

No changes have been made to the draft amendment and it is recommended that draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 55) be adopted.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Facilitate economic development.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Planning proposalView (Under separate cover)

2.         Gateway determinationView (Under separate cover)

3.         Submissions from public authoritiesView (Under separate cover)  


313

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Planning and Growth Report

 

DPG 04

Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment 46) - Macleod Park Master Plan

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Strategic Maintenance Plan

File Ref

249754.2015

Report By

Benny Horn - Strategic Planner

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

At its meeting on 26 March 2014, Council resolved to proceed with draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008 (Amendment 46) to rezone and reclassify part of Lot 3 DP 855930, known as Macleod Park, Prestons, to contribute to the funding required to deliver planned improvement works as part of the Macleod Park master plan.

 

Following public exhibition of the proposed amendment in July 2014 and a public hearing on 19 August 2014, Council discussed the proposal at its meetings on 25 February and 26 May 2015, deferring the matter for further consideration on both occasions.

 

This matter was subsequently discussed at the Councillor Briefing Session on 18 August 2015. It was recommended as an outcome of the meeting not to proceed with the proposed amendment, and to instead fund the remaining stages of the Macleod Park master plan through Council’s existing funds.

 

In accordance with the discussion at the Councillor Briefing Session, this report recommends that Council write to the Minister of Planning pursuant to clause 58(4) of the EP&A Act 1979, to request that draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 46) not proceed.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Writes to the Minister of Planning pursuant to clause 58(4) of the EP&A Act 1979, to request that the matter not proceed.

 

2.    Writes to those who provided written submissions or attended the public hearing advising of Council’s decision.

 

 

REPORT

 

Background

At its meeting dated 26 March 2014, Council resolved to proceed with draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 46) to rezone and reclassify part of Lot 3, DP 855930, known as Macleod Park, Prestons.  The purpose of the proposed rezoning and reclassification was to contribute to funding required for the delivery of planned improvement works as part of the Macleod Park master plan.

 

In accordance with the Gateway determination dated 20 June 2014, the planning proposal (Attachment 1) was placed on public exhibition in July 2014, with two written submissions received.

 

As draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 46) pertains to the reclassification of community land, a public hearing was also held on 19 August 2014 in accordance with section 29 of the Local Government Act 1993.  Eight community members attended. Six of whom made verbal submissions relating to Macleod Park.

 

Following community consultations, Council resolved at its meeting on 25 February 2015 to defer the proposal “for further discussion at a Councillor Briefing Session” (Attachment 2).

 

The proposal was subsequently considered further at the Councillor Briefing Session on 22 April 2015.  Council then resolved at its meeting on 26 May 2015 to “defer this matter for further community consultation” and “seek feedback with Councillors through a working session on further park upgrades” (Attachment 3).

 

Councillor Briefing Session

At its Councillor Briefing Session on 18 August 2015, it was recommended not to pursue the rezoning and reclassification of part of Macleod Park, and to instead fund the remaining stages of the Macleod Park master plan through Council’s existing funds.

 

This report recommends that Council writes to the Minister of Planning, pursuant to clause 58(4) of the EP&A Act 1979, to request that draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 46) not proceed.  It is also recommended that Council writes to those who wrote submissions or attended the public hearing to advise them of Council’s decision.

 

Conclusion

In consideration of the above, it is therefore recommended that Council writes to the Minister to request that draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 46) not proceed.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Act as an environmental leader in the community.

Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Planning ProposalView (Under separate cover)

2.         Council report and resolution 25 February 2015View (Under separate cover)

3.         Council report and resolution 26 May 2015View (Under separate cover)  


316

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Planning and Growth Report

 

DPG 05

Animal Management Policy

 

Strategic Direction

Healthy Inclusive  City

Plan, support and deliver high quality and accessible services, program and facilities

Key Policy

Animal Management Policy

File Ref

258902.2015

Report By

Nada Mardini - Manager Community Standards

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

In response to Council’s resolution regarding the ‘Low Kill Animal Policy’, Council Officers are reviewing the Animal Management Policy to incorporate a low euthanasia policy.  The policy will be reported to the next Council meeting. 

 

In addition, arrangements have been made to place details of Renbury Farm Animal Shelter on Council’s communication outlets to promote the adoption of healthy pets.  Council actively encourages responsible pet ownership through a number of means to help prevent and locate lost animals.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council;

 

1.    Notes the advice contained in this report.

 

2.     Notes that the Animal Management Policy is currently being reviewed and a report will be presented to the November meeting.

 

REPORT

 

On 26 August Council resolved following a notice of motion to:

 

1.    Review the current ‘Animal Management’ document to introduce and consider a ‘Low Kill’ Policy.

2.    Include details, of healthy pets from Animal Shelters in Liverpool that are ready to be adopted, in the Council Monthly newsletter, Council website and Council social media sites.

 

3.    Report back to Council at the next Council Meeting on how a ‘Low Kill Policy’ affects the running of the animal shelters.

4.    Liaise with its contractors on how Council can assist with proactively preventing lost animals and report back to Council at the next meeting.

 

Council’s Animal Management Policy is currently being reviewed and will include a low euthanasia policy.  The reviewed policy will be forwarded to Council for endorsement at the next Council meeting.

 

Renbury Farm Animal Shelter’s details have been placed on Council’s website and details will be included on other relevant communication.  A link has also been placed on Council’s website.

 

As previously outlined in response to the Notice of Motion Council currently uses Renbury Farm Animal Shelter which has procedures in place that are in line with a ‘Low Kill’ Policy.   Council is currently preparing a tender for a provision of a pound and will be including in the tender a requirement to operate under a low euthanasia policy.  The impact of such a policy on the pound is that the animals may be held for longer than required under the legislation and can lead to overcrowding.  There will also be financial impact on the pound and Council.

 

In regards to actively encouraging responsible pet ownership, promoting microchipping and educating owners to update contact details will help prevent and locate lost animals, Council actively does this through the school awareness program, free microchipping day and information provided via the website. 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.

 


Civic Leadership and Governance

Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media.

Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility.

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


318

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Planning and Growth Report

 

DPG 06

Outcome of Public Exhibition - Proposed New 3D Imaging Fees

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

265991.2015

Report By

Miles Carter - Project Officer - Strategy and Performance

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

At the August 26 Council meeting, Council resolved to place several proposed new fees and charges, as part of the Statement of Revenue Policy (Fees and Charges) 2015-16, on public exhibition.

 

The exhibition period has now ended with no submissions being received. Consequently it is recommended that the following new fees and charges be adopted:

 

3D CAD model fees – for all new development proposals in the city centre

 

The proposed fee structure is as follows:

 

Less than $1m development value

 

$2,200.00*

 

Greater than $1m and less than $3m development value

 

$3,300.00*

Greater than $3m development value

$6,600.00*

 

 

*Note:   If a design is amended and a new 3D image is submitted for modeling, Council will arrange a quote. 

If the changes are minor, an hourly rate can be charged.  If the changes are substantial, a new modeling fee may apply.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council adopts the following 3D CAD model fees and charges, as part of the Statement of Revenue Policy (Fees and Charges) 2015-2016:

 

·    Less then $1m development value - $ 2,200.00.

·    Greater then $1m and less than 3m development value – $3,300.00.

·    Greater than $3m development value - $6,600.00.

·    New modelling fee if a design is amended and a new 3D image is submitting for modelling. If the changes are minor, an hourly rate can be charged. If the changes are substantial, a new modelling fee may apply.

 

 

REPORT

 

3D Images for New Development in the City Centre

 

Council advertised an RFQ in 2014 for an interactive and navigable 3D model for Liverpool City Centre in 2014. Ineni Realtime was selected as the successful tenderer.

 

The initial work involved the preparation of 3D images of the city centre. Further 3D models were prepared to support the Building our New City projects, and in particular, the redevelopment of the Macquarie Mall and Bigge Park. A flyover was developed from the images to represent the planned work.

 

It was intended that the modelling would be expanded to include new developments to provide a current visual representation of the changing city skyline. It was also anticipated that the 3D modelling capability would assist with the assessment, consultation and exhibition process by providing accurate images for the purposes of assessing shadowing and built form impacts etc. This would involve applicants providing a file in the appropriate format to be uploaded into the model.

 

The modelling software has been further enhanced over the last 12 months and will now enable a range of CAD formats to be used, essentially meaning that applicants will not be expected to reformat graphical images. Additionally, Ineni can provide a 3D CAD model where an applicant is unable to provide one.

 

City Planner 3D Model

 

The 3D model will assist the council in assessing the visual impacts of development applications and planning proposals within the city centre and has the following features:

·    Free orbiting movement aerially over the city to view it from any angle

·    Controllable sun shadowing, accurate to the Sydney region

·    Tools to make point to point distance measurements

·    Ability to scale where necessary

·    Terrain detail covers 3km square area of Liverpool CBD

·    3D model area is bounded by the Hume Highway, Terminus Street and the rail line

 

Proposed new Fee

 

It is proposed to require the submission of a 3D CAD image for new development applications and planning proposals.

 

Each applicant will be required to provide a 3D image, or to engage Ineni to produce one, for inclusion in the city 3D planning model. Ineni will accept all 3D CAD models.

 

This will require the inclusion of a new fee in Council’s Fees and Charges Schedule to pass on the Ineni charges. Note that it is proposed to replace the current requirement for a 3D scale model to be provided for major development applications with the requirement for the 3D CAD image.This will represent a significant saving for applicants.

 

Following is the proposed fee structure. The proposed fees represent Ineni’s fees plus 10% to cover licensing fees and Council’s administration costs. 3D CAD model fees – for all new development proposals in the city centre

 

All CAD provided is to be 3D. Where a 3D CAD model is not available, Council will arrange a quote on a per job basis.

 

The proposed fee structure is as follows:

 

Less than $1m development value

 

$2,200.00*

 

Greater than $1m and less than $3m development value

 

$3,300.00*

Greater than $3m development value

$6,600.00*

 

 

*Note:   If a design is amended and a new 3D image is submitted for modeling, Council will arrange a quote. 

 

If the changes are minor, an hourly rate can be charged.  If the changes are substantial, a new modeling fee may apply.


Budget Implications

 

·    Annual software licence fee, includes free updates every two months - $14,400.00

·    Application updates requested outside of the regular bi-monthly cycle - $1,000.00

·    Hardware user licence fees - $22,999 one off fee for up to four users. Additional user licences are available at $4,999 per additional user.

·    Only four users are currently proposed.

 

The proposed new fee structure incorporates 10% loading to cover Council’s licensing and administration costs.

 

 

 

 

Consultation

 

Council’s Manager Information Technology has been consulted regarding this proposal and the Team Leader GIS has reviewed the technical specifications in terms of compatibility with Council’s IT systems and ongoing support. No major issues were identified.

 

Public Exhibition Process:

Information on the above Fees and Charges was placed on Council’s website under the Public Exhibition section, inviting submissions and comment, from the 1 to 29 September.

 

Council did not receive any submissions on the proposed amendments. It is therefore recommended that Council adopts the proposed fees and charges.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The financial implications for each of the fees and charges have been outlined in the body of this report.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

 

Ensure Fees and Charges are equitable.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


322

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Planning and Growth Report

 

DPG 07

Air Quality Monitoring

 

Strategic Direction

Natural Sustainable City

Reduce adverse environment impacts for present and future generations

Key Policy

Integrated Environmental Sustainability Action Plan

File Ref

268218.2015

Report By

Nada Mardini - Manager Community Standards

Approved By

Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council resolved on 30 September to address the following questions and report back to Council.

 

1.   In light of the above concerns, what practical options could Council implement to better monitor and control the amount of dust particles that settle in residential areas within close proximity Building Material Waste Recycling Centres located in the Liverpool LGA?

 

2.   Based on the recent decision by the NSW PAC and its approval for the Moorebank Waste Recycling Centre, what practical options are available to Council to ensure that the plant operates within the conditions of consent and in particular to air quality?

 

3.   What would be the cost of purchasing portable air quality monitoring equipment that could be set up in areas of concerns considered problematic?

 

4.   In the case of the Moorebank Recycling Centre, does Council have the power/authority to ensure that independent 24 hour 7 days a week air quality monitoring takes place and that the information is published on the Council Website on a regular basis?   

 

The following report addresses the questions in detail.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council notes the information provided in the report.

 

 

 

 

REPORT

 

The following information is provided in response to the Notice of Motion.

 

Options for monitoring and controlling dust

 

The operation of building material waste recycling centres that exceed the threshold listed in Schedule 1 – Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 are licensed and regulated by New South Wales Environmental Protection Authority.

 

Under the schedule activities associated with recycling centres are likely to be defined as Resource Recovery. This clause applies to the following activities:

recovery of general waste, meaning the receiving of waste (other than hazardous waste, restricted solid waste, liquid waste or special waste) from off site and its processing, otherwise than for the recovery of energy.

recovery of hazardous and other waste, meaning the receiving of hazardous waste, restricted solid waste or special waste (other than asbestos waste or waste tyres) from off site and its processing, otherwise than for the recovery of energy.

recovery of waste oil, meaning the receiving of waste oil from off site and its processing, otherwise than for the recovery of energy.

recovery of waste tyres, meaning the receiving of waste tyres from off site and their processing, otherwise than for the recovery of energy.

2.       However, this clause does not apply to the recovery of stormwater or the      processing of any of the following:

a)   contaminated soil,

b)   contaminated groundwater,

c)   sewage within a sewage treatment system (whether or not that system is licensed).

 

3.       Each activity referred to in Column 1 of the Table to this clause is declared to be    a scheduled activity if:

a)   it meets the criteria set out in Column 2 of that Table, and

b)   either:

i.    less than 50% by weight of the waste received in any year requires disposal after processing, or

ii.    an exemption granted under Part 9 of the Protection of the Environment Operations (Waste) Regulation 2014 exempts the person carrying out the activity from the requirements of section 48 (2) as they apply to waste disposal (application to land), waste disposal (thermal treatment), waste processing (non-thermal treatment) and waste storage.

 

 

Table

Column 1

Column 2

Activity

Criteria

recovery of general waste

if the premises are in the regulated area:

(a)  involves having on site at any time more than 1,000 tonnes or 1,000 cubic metres of waste, or

(b)  involves processing more than 6,000 tonnes of waste per year

if the premises are outside the regulated area:

(a)  involves having on site at any time more than 2,500 tonnes or 2,500 cubic metres of waste, or

(b)  involves processing more than 12,000 tonnes of waste per year

recovery of hazardous and other waste

involves having on site at any time more than 200 kilograms of waste

recovery of waste oil

involves processing more than 20 tonnes of waste oil per year or having on site at any time more than 2,000 litres of waste oil

recovery of waste tyres

involves having on site at any time (other than in or on a vehicle used to transport the tyres to or from the premises) more than 5 tonnes of waste tyres or 500 waste tyres, or

involves processing more than 5,000 tonnes of waste tyres per year

 

At this point in time the following recycling centres located in Liverpool LGA are currently active and are regulated by NSW EPA.

Company name

Address

Licence No:

Issued date

Benedict Industries Pty Ltd

146 Newbridge Road, Moorebank NSW 2170

4612

24 November 2000

Benedict Industries Pty Ltd

146 Newbridge Road, Moorebank NSW 2170

10490

06 February 2001

Benedict Industries Pty Ltd

33-37 Riverside Road, Chipping Norton NSW 2170

12794

18 December 2007

Brandown Pty Ltd

Lot 90 Elizabeth Drive, Kemps Creek NSW 2178

5186

21 December 2000

Brandown Pty Ltd

Lot 90 Elizabeth Drive, Kemps Creek NSW 2178

12618

28 February 2007

Onesteel Recycling Pty Ltd

53-57 Riverside Road, Chipping Norton NSW 2170

872

21 June 2000

 

Perusal of licence conditions of the above mentioned licenced premises there is a condition in relation to Dust which outlines the following:

All operations and activities occurring at the premises must be carried out in a manner that will minimise the emission of dust from the premises.

 

Failure to comply with the conditions outlined in the licence agreement results in NSW EPA issuing on the spot Penalty Infringement Notices of up to $15,000.

 

Council’s authorised officers do not have jurisdiction in regulating the above premises. Provided that the activity associated with resource recovery is below the threshold outlined in Schedule 1 of Protection of the Environment and Operations Act 1997 then the jurisdiction falls under Local Government Authority.

 

Options to ensure plant operates within consent conditions especially re air quality

 

It is envisaged that the proposed Moorebank resource recovery centre recycle up to 500,000 tonnes of building waste per year for re-use in the construction industry. This exceeds the criteria outlined in column 2 for resource recovery operation. As a result, Council has no jurisdiction in regulating the plant operations.

 

Considering that Moorebank Waste Recycling Centre was approved by Minister for Planning, compliance should be undertaken by authorised officers of NSW Department of Planning and Environment

 

The Department of Planning and Environment’s compliance team monitors and enforces the conditions of projects granted by the Minister for Planning or their delegate.

 

To make sure companies are adhering to the conditions placed on their projects, the compliance team:

·    Conducts spot checks and unannounced visits to projects, including surveillance

·    Conducts compliance audits

·    Meets with the community and industry

·    Investigates all complaints.

 

If a company is found to have breached its conditions, compliance officers take necessary enforcement action. 

This includes:

·    Prosecution for the most serious offences

·    Issuing a fine

·    Imposing orders

·    Issuing warning letters working with industry and the community to negotiate a good outcome.

 

 

 

Air Quality

 

The cost of air quality monitoring equipment varies. It is advised that quotes can be obtained from the following but is not limited to: Aeroqual, Environment Experts, Kenelec Products, Thermo Scientific, etc.

As mentioned above the operations of the proposed Moorebank Resource Recovery centre are likely to be classified as a scheduled premises or licenced premises under the Protection of the Environment and Operations Act 1997. Council’s authorised officers may assist EPA operation officers in investigating complaints and undertaking monitoring.

 

The Appropriate Regulatory Authority (ARA) may collaborate with Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO). ANSTO has been using Ion Beam Analysis (IBA) techniques to analyse fine particle pollution samples collected from key sites around Australia.

 

ANSTO is a public research organisation responsible for delivering specialised advice, scientific services and products.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

Manage air, water, noise and chemical pollution.

Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes.

Protect, enhance and maintain areas of endangered ecological communities and high quality bushland as part of an attractive mix of land uses.

Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Act as an environmental leader in the community.

Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility.

Deliver services that are customer focused.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil  


327

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Property and Commercial Development Report

 

DPC 01

Classification of Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, Lot 10 DP 1043935, 305 Cowpasture Road, Carnes Hill and Lot 2 and 3 DP 1208552, 350-354 Macquarie Street, Liverpool, as 'Operational' land

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Property Strategy

File Ref

262396.2015

Report By

Andy Kabok - Senior Property Officer

Approved By

John F Morgan - Director Property & Commercial Development

 

 

Executive Summary

 

On 29 July 2015, Council resolved to acquire Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, under the provisions of hardship and upon settlement, to classify this land as ‘Operational’ land.

 

On 17 June 2015, Council resolved to acquire Lot 10 DP 1043935, 305 Cowpasture Road, Carnes Hill, and upon settlement, to classify this land as ‘Operational’ land.

 

On 24 March 2015, Council resolved to acquire Lot 2 and 3 DP 1208552, 350-354 Macquarie Street, Liverpool, and upon settlement, to classify this land as ‘Operational’ land.

 

In accordance with the provisions of Section 31 of the Local Government Act 1993, Council is required to classify public land as either 'Community' or 'Operational' within three months of acquisition. Public notice was given of Council's intention to classify Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, Lot 10 DP 1043935, 305 Cowpasture Road, Carnes Hill and Lot 2 and 3 DP 1208552, 350-354 Macquarie Street, Liverpool as 'Operational' land in the local newspaper. No submissions were received.

 

This report recommends that Council proceeds with the classification as proposed.

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council classifies Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, Lot 10 DP 1043935, 305 Cowpasture Road, Carnes Hill and Lot 2 and 3 DP 1208552, 350-354 Macquarie Street, Liverpool, as 'Operational' land, in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993.

 

 

REPORT

 

On 29 July 2015, Council resolved to acquire Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, under the provisions of hardship and upon settlement, to classify this land as ‘Operational’ land.

 

On 17 June 2015, Council resolved to acquire Lot 10 DP 1043935, 305 Cowpasture Road, Carnes Hill, and upon settlement, to classify this land as ‘Operational’ land.

 

On 24 March 2015, Council resolved to acquire Lot 2 and 3 DP 1208552, 350-354 Macquarie Street, Liverpool, and upon settlement, to classify this land as ‘Operational’ land.

 

Section 31 of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a Council must resolve to classify public land within three months of acquisition. Section 34 of the Local Government Act 1993 also requires that public notice be given of a proposed resolution to classify public land.

 

Accordingly, notices advising that Council proposes to resolve to classify Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, Lot 10 DP 1043935, 305 Cowpasture Road, Carnes Hill and Lot 2 and 3 DP 1208552, 350-354 Macquarie Street, Liverpool, as 'Operational' land were published in the Liverpool Leader on 26 August 2015 and 2 September 2015. A period of not less than 28 days was provided during which submissions could be made to Council.

 

The public exhibition concluded on Friday 25 September 2015. No submissions were received.

 

This report recommends that Council proceeds with classifying Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, Lot 10 DP 1043935, 305 Cowpasture Road, Carnes Hill and Lot 2 and 3 DP 1208552, 350-354 Macquarie Street, Liverpool as 'Operational' land.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no financial implications resulting from this report.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Location Map - 75 Fifth Avenue, AustralView

2.         Location Map - 305 Cowpasture Road, Carnes HillView

3.         Location Map - 350-354 Macquarie Street, Liverpool


333

DPC 01

Classification of Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, Lot 10 DP 1043935, 305 Cowpasture Road, Carnes Hill and Lot 2 and 3 DP 1208552, 350-354 Macquarie Street, Liverpool, as 'Operational' land

Attachment 1

Location Map - 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral

 


333

DPC 01

Classification of Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, Lot 10 DP 1043935, 305 Cowpasture Road, Carnes Hill and Lot 2 and 3 DP 1208552, 350-354 Macquarie Street, Liverpool, as 'Operational' land

Attachment 2

Location Map - 305 Cowpasture Road, Carnes Hill

 


335

DPC 01

Classification of Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, Lot 10 DP 1043935, 305 Cowpasture Road, Carnes Hill and Lot 2 and 3 DP 1208552, 350-354 Macquarie Street, Liverpool, as 'Operational' land

Attachment 3

Location Map - 350-354 Macquarie Street, Liverpool

 

 


336

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 01

Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee held on 7 October 2015

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

224425.2015

Report By

Rita Busuttil - Personal Assistant - Chief Financial Officer

Approved By

Gary Grantham – Chief Financial Officer / Director Corporate Services

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee Meeting held on 7 October 2015.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee Meeting held on 7 October 2015.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee meeting held on 7 October 2015 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee held on 7 October 2015View  


339

CTTE 01

Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee held on 7 October 2015

Attachment 1

Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee held on 7 October 2015

 


 


 


341

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 02

Minutes Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting  held on the 2 September 2015

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

114953.2015

Report By

Rebekah  Elliott - A/ Coordinator Community Development

Approved By

Eddie Jackson – Acting Director Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 2 September 2015.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 2 September 2015.

 

2.   The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee held on 2 September 2015 are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community.

Promote community harmony and address discrimination.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Draft Minutes of Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 2 September 2015View  


343

CTTE 02

Minutes Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting  held on the 2 September 2015

Attachment 1

Draft Minutes of Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 2 September 2015

 


 


 


 


 


348

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 03

Minutes of the Street Naming Committee meeting held on 27 August 2015

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Strengthen and celebrate Liverpool’s unique community identity

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

184469.2015

Report By

Benny Horn - Strategic Planner

Approved By

Toni Averay – Director Planning and Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Street Naming Committee Meeting held on 27 August 2015.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Notes the Minutes and recommendations of the Street Naming Committee Meeting held on 27 August 2015.

 

2.    Notes the proposed changes to the Street Naming Committee process.

 

3.    Notes that the proposed changes to the Street Naming Committee process will be addressed in the draft Naming Convention Policy and will be presented to Council in a future report.

 

 

REPORT

 

The Minutes of the Street Naming Committee held on 27 August 2015 are at Attachment 1 for the information of Council.

 

Delegation of all naming functions of Council to the Street Naming Committee

At its 29 April 2015 meeting, Council resolved to delegate the determination of all street names to the Mayor and the Street Naming Committee (the “Committee”), unless three or more Councillors request that a proposed street name be referred to Council for decision.  The delegation was made to reduce delays in the street naming process occurring because of the requirement for formal approval by Council after consideration by the Committee.

 

In addition to street naming, the Committee is responsible for consideration of other place names including parks, facilities and geographical features.  As with street naming decisions, all other place naming decisions by Council are evaluated by the Geographical Names Board of NSW (GNB) and must comply with stringent GNB guidelines.  However, the process for naming places other than streets naming has not been delegated to the Committee, creating delays whilst waiting for formal Council approval each time.

 

Consistent with Council’s delegation of street naming, the Committee therefore recommends that Council delegates the determination of all naming functions to the Mayor and the Street Naming Committee, unless three or more Councillors request that a proposed place name be referred to Council for decision.

 

Changes to Street Naming Committee processes

The Committee’s naming processes are presently also subject to long delays as a result of the time span between Committee meetings.  Preparations for the Committee meetings also take up Council officers’ time and resources.

 

The Committee has therefore considered changes to enable its naming processes to be carried out more efficiently and effectively.  The Committee recommends that its meetings be discontinued, to be replaced with email consultation of all matters by the Committee members.

 

Under the proposed changes, the Street Naming Committee secretariat will raise all street and place naming matters with Committee members via email every two weeks.  Committee members will then provide comments within 14 days of the matter being raised.  In line with existing protocols, Committee recommendations and decisions will be made only when a quorum (a majority of members including the Chairperson) are in agreement on the matter.  At the discretion of the Chairperson, a vote via email may be called to resolve a matter, and extraordinary meetings may be called to facilitate face-to-face discussion among Committee members and with external stakeholders, where appropriate.

 

The proposed changes to the way in which the Committee functions will maintain the consultative, deliberative approach of the Committee – albeit via email – but the Committee will no longer need to formally meet to reach agreement.

 

Under the proposed changes, Council will continue to be informed of all decisions made by the Committee.  In accordance with the proposed delegation of all naming functions to the Committee, Council will also continue to have scope to decide on any naming matters if three or more Councillors request that a matter be referred to Council for decision.

 

However, a policy review is being undertaken and a report will be presented to the next Council meeting.

 

Renaming of the Street Naming Committee

The Street Naming Committee is responsible not only for the naming of streets, but also the naming of other community assets and places, including parks, facilities, suburbs and geographical features.

 

To reflect its role in naming a range of community assets in addition to streets, the Committee recommends that its name be changed to the ‘Community Naming Committee’.

 

 

 

Updates to the Street Naming Committee Charter

In accordance with Council’s Red Tape Policy Reduction timetable, the Street Naming Committee Charter has been reviewed and updated. 

 

As part of the review, formatting changes and standard wording have been applied to sections of the Charter, to align it with other Council committee charters.

 

Additional modifications to the Charter have been made to reflect the proposed changes outlined in this report.  The updated Charter is at Attachment 2.  It is recommended that the Charter be adopted, with a further review to be undertaken in two years.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Minutes of meetingView

2.         Community Naming Committee Charter - proposed changes


351

CTTE 03

Minutes of the Street Naming Committee meeting held on 27 August 2015

Attachment 1

Minutes of meeting

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


367

CTTE 03

Minutes of the Street Naming Committee meeting held on 27 August 2015

Attachment 2

Community Naming Committee Charter - proposed changes

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


368

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 04

Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 1 September, 2015 and Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 6 October, 2015

 

Strategic Direction

Proud Engaged City

Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement

Key Policy

Community Engagement Policy

File Ref

228883.2015

Report By

Derek Tweed - Community Development Worker (Youth)

Approved By

Eddie Jackson – Acting Director Community & Culture

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on 1 September, 2015 and the Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council held on Tuesday 6 October, 2015.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on 1 September, 2015 and the Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council held on Tuesday 6 October, 2015.

 

REPORT

 

1.   The Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council held on 1 September, 2015 and the Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council held on Tuesday 6 October, 2015 are attached for the information of Council.

 

          2.   The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities.

Promote community harmony and address discrimination.


Civic Leadership and Governance

Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions.

Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes.

Facilitate the development of community leaders.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council  1 September, 2015View

2.         Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council 6 October,2015View  


373

CTTE 04

Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 1 September, 2015 and Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 6 October, 2015

Attachment 1

Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council  1 September, 2015

 


 


 


 


 


375

CTTE 04

Meeting Notes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 1 September, 2015 and Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 6 October, 2015

Attachment 2

Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council 6 October,2015

 


 


 


 


 


 


381

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 05

Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 23 September 2015

 

Strategic Direction

Accessible Connected City

Provide safe and easy travel with a high quality road and traffic management network

Key Policy

Traffic and Transport Plan

File Ref

253684.2015

Report By

Charles Wiafe - Manager Traffic and Transport

Approved By

Toni Averay – Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 23 September 2015.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.    Receives and notes the Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 23 September 2015.

 

2.    Adopts the Local Traffic Committee recommendations as noted in the report below.

 

 

REPORT

 

At its meeting held on 23 September 2015, the Local Traffic Committee considered seven agenda items and four technical discussion items.  Minutes of the meeting are attached for Council to adopt the recommendations made.

 

The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake.  The financial implication of each of the recommendations is noted at the end of this report.

 

Summary of the Local Traffic Committee recommendations:

 

Item 1         Braidwood Drive, Prestons – Proposed Traffic Calming Facilities

 

1.    Approves the installation of rumble bars along the curved section of Braidwood Drive in the vicinity of 22 Braidwood Drive, Prestons.

 

2.    Requests Liverpool Highway Patrol to include Braidwood Drive  in their speed enforcement

 

3.    Advises all stakeholders of its resolution.

 

Item 2         George Street and Northumberland Street, Liverpool - Traffic Flow Changes

 

1.    Approves the proposed two-way traffic flow changes along:

·     Northumberland Street, between Memorial Avenue and Elizabeth Street.

·     George Street, between Scott Street and Elizabeth Street.      

2.    Undertakes detailed design of the affected traffic signals and submits to the RMS for approval.

3.    Prepares a Construction Traffic Management Plan addressing traffic impact during construction and submits a copy to the RMS for endorsement.

4.    Advises stakeholders of its resolution.

 

Item 3         White Ribbon Day Street Parade – 25 November 2015

 

Classifies the 2015 White Ribbon Day Street Parade on 25 November 2015, as a Class 4 event with the following conditions requiring the applicant to:

 

1.       Provide a copy of the Police approval of undertaking rolling road closures;

2.      Install variable message signs advising motorists of the event and traffic delays at least one week before the event;

3.      Advise all stakeholders including Transit Systems, the Miller Shopping Centre Management and State Emergency Services of the event.

 

Item 4         De Meyrick Avenue/ Reserve Road intersection, Casula – Proposed Modifications to Existing Roundabout

 

1.    Approves modifications to the existing roundabout including installation of a guard rail along the north western corner of the roundabout.

 

2.    Advises all stakeholders of its decision

 

 

 

 

 

Item 5         Beech Road/Barcelona Drive intersection, Prestons - Proposed Modifications to Existing Roundabout

 

1.    Approves remedial works, including correction of  adverse crossfall  and installation of guard rails along the north eastern and north western corners of the roundabout;

 

2.    Undertakes the approved remedial works

 

3.    Consider upgrading of the Kurrajong Road and Beech Road intersection after the mssing section of Lyn Parade is opened to traffic.

 

4.    Advises all stakeholders of its decision.

 

Item 6         Proposed On-Street Parking Changes, for South West Community Transport and Taxis, Liverpool City Centre

 

1.    Approves replacement of the P15 outside 181 Bigge Street, Liverpool with ‘No Parking’.

 

2.    Approves replacement of the P15 outside 234-235 and 279 Macquarie Street, Liverpool, with ‘No Parking’ as indicated on the attached plan.

 

3.    All stakeholders be advised of Council’s decision.

 

Item 7         Elizabeth Drive and Elizabeth Street, Liverpool – Proposed Shared User Path

 

1.    Approves the regulatory signs and line marking of the shared user path along sections of Elizabeth Drive and Elizabeth Street, between Hume Highway and Macquarie Street.

 

2.    Undertakes construction of shared user path and installation of associated regulatory signs and line marking.

 

In addition, the Committee considered the following items and outcome of the discussion is summarised below.

 

Item TD1   Nineteenth Avenue, Hoxton Park – Request for Removal of Existing Speed Hump

 

The Committee recommended that an alternative traffic calming devices should be provided to replace the existing speed cushions, at the frontage of 88 Nineteenth Avenue, Hoxton Park.

 

 

 

Item TD2   Manning Street, Warwick Farm - Speed Zone Review

 

The RMS representative advised that the request has been forwarded to the Speed Management Unit for investigation.

 

Item TD3   Airfield Drive, Aviation Road and Blackbird Close, Len Waters Estate - Speed Zone Review

 

The RMS representative advised that the request has been forwarded to the Speed Management Unit for investigation.

 

Item TD4   Dewsbury Serviceway – Proposed Dual Left Turn into Bigge Street, Liverpool        

 

The Committee concluded that this proposal is unlikely to be cost effective or address the traffic congestion effectively.

 

The Committee noted that traffic along this section of Bigge Street is affected by traffic signal phasing at the Bigge Street and Railway Street intersection and suggested Council to work with the RMS to undertake improvement works.

 

Council to undertake enforcement of the existing ‘No Stopping’ restrictions along Bigge Street, between Elizabeth Street and Dewsbury Serviceway, in the peak periods.

 

Budget Impact of Matters Arising from Minutes

Item

Description

Funding Arrangements

1

Braidwood Drive, Prestons – Proposed Traffic Calming Facilities

Council’s Minor Works Program

2

George Street and Northumberland Street, Liverpool - Traffic Flow Changes

Council’s funding arrangements for the City Centre improvement works

3

White Ribbon Day Street Parade – 25 November 2015

No Cost to Council

4

De Meyrick Avenue/Reserve Road intersection, Casula – Proposed Modifications to Existing Roundabout

Council’s Minor Works Program

5

Beech Road/Barcelona Drive intersection, Prestons - Proposed Modifications to Existing Roundabout

Council’s Minor Works Program

6

Proposed On-Street Parking Changes, for South West Community Transport and Taxis, Liverpool City Centre

RMS Block Grant

7

Elizabeth Drive and Elizabeth Street, Liverpool – Proposed Shared User Path

RMS funding for Active Transport

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues.

Environmental and Sustainability

Promote an integrated and user friendly public transport service.

Support the delivery of a range of transport options.


Social and Cultural

Improved traffic and pedestrian safety.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The recommendation provides opportunity to advocate for the local community.

The recommendations are required in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Minutes - Liverpool Traffic Committee Meeting - 23 September 2015View (Under separate cover)  


386

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 06

Minutes of Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held 5 October 2015

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney

Key Policy

Economic Development Strategy

File Ref

263158.2015

Report By

Tracey Lee - Economic Development Assistant

Approved By

Michael Cullen – Director Economic Development

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held on 5 October 2015.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Economic Development and Events Committee Meeting held on 5 October 2015.

 

REPORT

 

1.       The Minutes of the Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held on 5 October are attached for the information of Council.

 

2.       There are no actions arising from the report that will have financial implications for Council.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The activities of the Committee support Council’s efforts to facilitate economic development.

Environmental and Sustainability

Environmental and sustainability considerations will be factored into economic development activities.


Social and Cultural

Economic development will boost demand for cultural and arts activities.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The Committee provides guidance for Council’s economic development projects and initiatives.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         MINUTES Economic Development and Events Committee 7 October 2015 View

2.         PRESENTATION - Growing Your Exports - NSW Trade and Investment  7 October 2015View

3.         PRESENTATION - Jobactive and Generation Success - Department of Employment 7 October 2015View  


393

CTTE 06

Minutes of Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held 5 October 2015

Attachment 1

MINUTES Economic Development and Events Committee 7 October 2015

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


395

CTTE 06

Minutes of Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held 5 October 2015

Attachment 2

PRESENTATION - Growing Your Exports - NSW Trade and Investment  7 October 2015

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


413

CTTE 06

Minutes of Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held 5 October 2015

Attachment 3

PRESENTATION - Jobactive and Generation Success - Department of Employment 7 October 2015

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


431

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 07

Draft Minutes of Planning and Development Committee Meeting held on 7 October 2015

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

266045.2015

Report By

Sheela Naidu - Personal Assistant to Director Planning & Growth

Approved By

Toni Averay – Director Planning & Growth

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Planning and Development Committee Meeting held on 7 October 2015.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council  receives and adopts the Minutes of the Planning and Development Committee Meeting held on 7 October 2015.

 

 

REPORT

 

The Minutes of the Planning and Development Committee meeting held on 7 October 2015 are attached for the information of Council. The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.

 

Further, the Committee resolved to amend the IHAP Charter as follows:

That Council:

1.   Determines that no councillor have a role determining any development applications unless legally obliged.

2.   Delegates to the CEO authority to determine all development applications referred to IHAP in accordance with the IHAP charter, except where there is a variation to a development standard greater than 10%.

3.   Amend IHAP charter to reflect point 2

4.   Notes that development applications will be referred to Council for determination if 3 or more Councillors advise the CEO in writing that they deem it to be in the community interest to do so.

 

Upon adoption of the Planning and Development Committee Meeting Minutes, the IHAP charter will be amended as recommended.

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

There are no economic and financial considerations.

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

There are no social and cultural considerations.


Civic Leadership and Governance

There are no civic leadership and governance considerations.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         Draft Minutes of Planning and Development Committee Meeting held on 7 October 2015View  


433

CTTE 07

Draft Minutes of Planning and Development Committee Meeting held on 7 October 2015

Attachment 1

Draft Minutes of Planning and Development Committee Meeting held on 7 October 2015

 


 


 


 


437

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Committee Reports

 

CTTE 08

Minutes of Committee for Liverpool Meeting held 29 September 2015

 

Strategic Direction

Vibrant Prosperous City

Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney

Key Policy

Economic Development Strategy

File Ref

266617.2015

Report By

Michael Cullen - Director Economic Development

Approved By

Michael Cullen - Director Economic Development

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Committee for Liverpool meeting held on 29 September 2015 and to vary the membership of the Committee with respect to the NSW Government representative.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:

 

1.   Receives and notes the Minutes of the Committee for Liverpool Meeting held on 29 September 2015.

 

2.   Formally approves the addition of Phil Hamdorf, Senior Regional Coordinator, Department of Premier and Cabinet to the membership of the Committee for Liverpool.

 

REPORT

 

The Minutes of the Committee for Liverpool meeting held on 25 May 2015 are attached for the information of Council. 

 

Mr David Tow from the Department of Premier and Cabinet (DP&C) was originally nominated by the NSW Government as their representative on the Committee for Liverpool.  Mr Tow has now been seconded to Urban Growth and Mr Phil Hamdorf has been nominated by the Premier as the replacement DP&C representative.

 

 

 

 

CONSIDERATIONS

 

Economic and Financial

The Committee for Liverpool will provide important external perspectives to Council in pursuing its economic development and marketing activities.

Costs will be incurred in using the services of Taylor Advisory Services to support the Committee as well as minor meeting costs

Environmental and Sustainability

There are no specific environmental and sustainability considerations.


Social and Cultural

The group will if and as required be able to provide external perspectives on relevant social and cultural matters.


Civic Leadership and Governance

The Committee for Liverpool is an important leadership initiative for Liverpool Council.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         MINUTES Committee for Liverpool 29 September 2015 FINAL


439

CTTE 08

Minutes of Committee for Liverpool Meeting held 29 September 2015

Attachment 1

MINUTES Committee for Liverpool 29 September 2015 FINAL

 


 


 

 


442

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Questions with Notice

 

QWN 01

Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation

Key Policy

NA

File Ref

250212.2015

 

 

QUESTION WITH NOTICE

 

Files lost in August 2010 Fire

 

Some time ago a report was furnished of Council regarding files etc lost in the Council Building Fire. Recently I have been made aware of another item that is not able to be found subsequent to the fire.

 

1.   Can officers provide a follow up report to Council regarding issues of missing files, and a copy of the original report, please.

 

The response to the Questions With Notice were reported to Council in August 2013 and are attached.

 

Council’s first Document Management System (DMS) ‘Genesis’ was introduced in 1990. It was quite unsophisticated in today’s terms. Prior to that, Council mainly relied on hard copy files some of which some are on microfilm although the quality in some cases is extremely poor. From 2003 a more robust Document Management System (DMS) – TRIM was introduced, however in the early years, there would have been limited ability to scan large documents and therefore it is highly likely that large plans would have been kept in hard copy only.

 

The information given prior to this report regarding the number and nature of files destroyed in the fire is shown in Table One below. Having undertaken additional analysis, these figures appear to be incorrect. Whilst an audit was undertaken after the fire, seemingly it was performed in an unstructured manner over several months on and off site, it is understood the findings were not recorded in a formal report.

 

The current method of research into missing files is under investigation; and a further report will be provided to Council in the next 2 months regarding the accuracy of the estimate of missing files.

 


 

 

Table One

 

File Type

Number

Planning

591

Building

654

Development Application

1926

Construction Certificates

4425

Subdivisions

19

Engineering

20

Administration

35

Fire

263

Various

972

Total

8905

 

 

2.   Is a list/report etc being kept as it emerges that files or DA’s are not able to be found?

 

Yes, if it is brought to Council’s attention that a file is missing and cannot be traced or electronically recovered or partially recovered, a notation is made in a central repository in the TRIM system, however in some cases the reason why the classification of being destroyed in the fire has been made is somewhat unreliable.  

 

3.   How is a determination made when items are unable to be located that it is because of the fire? As the fire was 5 years ago could there be other explanations why files are missing?

 

The determination should be made on the basis of an investigation using a relevant reference point e.g. address of property, LOT number (assuming it is a property file such as a DA). In most cases the documentation will be saved in the DMS, which identifies its location, either stored electronically, on microfilm or in hard copy at the offsite storage facility. The DMS should be interrogated to its full extent and then Council’s archives should be examined to determine the true location of the file.   

 

In terms of other explanations, obviously human error cannot be discounted, hard copy files do go missing, they can get left in drawers or packed in between other files by mistake. 

 

4.   Is it possible and if so what would be the cost for a comprehensive audit to determine what is missing? Was this done at any time since the fire in 2010?

 

Until recently, estimates of the number of Council’s hard copy files that were lost in the fire in 2010 indicated that 8905 paper files. Similarly, it was understood somewhere in the region of 750 files were completely destroyed.

 

There are currently c19,000 boxes of files in offsite storage, 435 rolls on microfilm containing various records from historic building files to financial records, 15 boxes of microfilm/microfiche and 1,675,957 records in TRIM. It is virtually impossible to audit that level of recorded information or supervise in excess 890 TRIM records edited or saved each day. 

 

The Director Business Improvement is now undertaking a further investigation regarding the loss of files due to the fire. At this point it is highly questionable as to whether over 9500 hard copy files were actually being stored at the Hoxton Park Council Buildings during the period when the fire occurred. At this stage preliminary results indicate that there is some doubt regarding files that have been labelled ‘lost in the fire’.

 

5.   Has this issue been discussed at the Audit and Risk Committee to determine whether Council has / should have concerns regarding risk to its business? If so, what was the outcome?

 

It appears no formal external audit was undertaken after the fire. It is understood that whilst this matter was discussed by senior management at the time, no formal report was submitted.

 

6.   How often are audits done on the completeness of details of Council’s files and reports?

 

In general, audits are not undertaken, Council’s Records Management policy states that It is the responsibility of all council officers to save their records to TRIM. 

 

Broadly estimated council employees save or edit some 890 TRIM records each day. It is virtually impossible to audit that level of recorded information or supervise that amount of activity each day. 

 

Council Records and Archives section has barcode and Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID), which are electronic devices which are commonly used in supermarkets and retail outlets.   Files are barcoded and initially ‘signed out’ by a staff member and allocated electronically to that staff member’s location.

 

The Records and Archives Team undertake audits of files as they move throughout the building. The RFID system has static scanners in several sections and files as are moved past these scanners the location is recorded on the tracking system.

 

Occasionally files still go missing, due to human error or being filed in the wrong place; but using this technology staff can audit each floor using scanners and usually can locate the file.

 

7.   What actions are in place to ensure that all files are captured on the computer network?

 

All staff receive training on how to use the TRIM system. Council staff must acquaint themselves with record keeping requirements that affect the performance of their duties, including the making of records to support the conduct of Council’s business, registering records, and knowing how and where records are kept within Council.

 

Council staff must ensure that records in any format, including electronic documents and electronic messages, are captured into the Councils record keeping systems.

 

A more robust procedure will be developed during the next 2 months to ensure all records are captured and all requests for information are thoroughly investigated.

 

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.         QWNO 02 - 28 August 2013 - Question With Notice Clr Stanley


447

QWN 01

Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

Attachment 1

QWNO 02 - 28 August 2013 - Question With Notice Clr Stanley

 


 


 


449

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Questions with Notice

 

QWN 02

Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development

Key Policy

Urban Development Plans

File Ref

250217.2015

 

 

QUESTION WITH NOTICE

 

Please address the following:

 

1.    Have Council Officers had discussions, pre-DA meetings or any other correspondence with the DeAngelis Group or any other parties with the purpose of formulating a new DA for the site 467 HUME HIGHWAY CASULA NSW 2170 also known as Fontainebleau Motel.

 

a)   if so, please provide details the nature, content and purpose of these discussions

b)   are  Council officers aware of when any application maybe expected to be lodged

c)   if an application is lodged for this site can Councillors be advised immediately by email.

 

The owner requested a meeting with Council officers in June and indicated that he is intending to lodge a new application for the proposed Casula Hotel shortly.  He advised he was intending to request a pre-DA meeting; however, this has not been scheduled. During the meeting, officers advised that Council had adopted the Social Impact Policy on 17 June 2015 and that accordingly any new application would be required to be supported by a social impact assessment.  The application has not yet been lodged and this is a matter for the owner.

 

Councillors receive a weekly email with a list of all development applications lodged in the previous week with a link to the applications in the ePlanning portal.  However, given the interest in this application, Councillors can also be advised by the Manager Development Assessment if a new application is lodged.

 

2.    Are Council officers aware of discussion owners may have had with local schools regarding a VPA for the site. Does this negotiation have any weight and have officers been involved in such negotiations?

 

A Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) under Section 93F of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 is an agreement or arrangement between one or more planning authorities and a developer under which the developer dedicates land free of cost, pays a monetary contribution or provides alternative material public benefit for a public purpose.  A VPA can be negotiated when a developer seeks a change to an environmental planning instrument or proposes to make a development application. 

 

As noted above, the owner has indicated he is intending to lodge a new application for the proposed Casula Hotel shortly.  Council officers have not entered into any negotiations regarding a VPA.

 

3.    Are Council officers aware of any organisations in addition to Casula Public School, that have been approached by representatives of the De Angelis Hotel group to consider/sign a VPA with them?

 

Council officers are not aware of any approaches by the owner except through recent media coverage.  As noted above, a VPA is entered into between a planning authority and a developer.

 

4.    Is Council aware of anyone who has refused to enter into such VPA agreements?

 

Council officers are not aware of any approaches by the owner except through recent media coverage.  As noted above, a VPA is entered into between a planning authority and a developer.

 

5.    When or have Council officers engaged in any discussions with Police concerning a possible new DA for the hotel? Are there minutes or similar available from any meetings of this type.

 

Council officers have not had any discussions with the police regarding a possible new DA.

 

6.    What are the implications of VPAs on the Council and IHAP planning assessment and approval process?

 

As noted above, a VPA is an agreement or arrangement between one or more planning authorities and a developer under which the developer dedicates land free of cost, pays a monetary contribution or provides alternative material public benefit for a public purpose.  A VPA can be negotiated when a developer seeks a change to an environmental planning instrument or proposes to make a development application. 

 

A proposed VPA would be reported to Council for endorsement before public exhibition for a period of not less than 28 days.  A VPA cannot impose an obligation on a planning authority to grant development consent. A proposed VPA is not required to be reported to Council’s IHAP; however, a future development application would be reported to IHAP if triggered in accordance with Council’s IHAP Charter by receiving more than 5 unresolved objections.

 

7.    Could Council officers determine what legal avenues there are  to oppose on negative social impact grounds under the NSW Liquor and Gambling laws, the move of 30 poker machines from the New Commercial Hotel in Liverpool to a proposed hotel in Casula –within the same LGA, should this be part of any proposal put to Council in the future.

 

Council is not the determining authority for gaming licences. The State office of the Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority (ILGA) determines the applications. A local impact assessment (LIA) is required where a hotel or registered club proposes to increase its gaming machine threshold (GMT) in order to operate more gaming machines. All new applications are listed on the LIA public register and with any new applications, the local authority is notified. Council then has the opportunity to provide a submission in response to their Local Impact Assessment.

 

The only Hotels that are currently listed on the register are:

 

·    Liverpool Catholic Club

·    Liverpool Hotel

·    The Corner Hotel

 

http://www.ilga.nsw.gov.au/gaming/hotel-gaming/local-impact-assessment/lia-public-register

 

8.    Are officers aware if and when an application is expected for the site?

 

Council Officers are unaware of when the application will be lodged.

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


452

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Questions with Notice

 

QWN 03

Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

 

Strategic Direction

Leading Proactive Council

Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations

Key Policy

Long-Term Financial Plan

File Ref

250221.2015

 

 

QUESTION WITH NOTICE

 

Please address the following:

 

1.   Can I be advised the costs in relation to industrial matters including legal fees for the following financial years:

 

·    2012-2013

·    2013-2014

·    2014-2015

 

Please note that Council is a member of Local Government NSW, who conduct the bulk of Council’s Industrial Relations legal work.  Council also has an internal legal team who, subject to expertise and capacity, can undertake some of this work.

 

More complex matters, or matters that require special expertise, are briefed out.

 

Council briefed out four industrial matters between 2008/09 and 2014/15.  Two of these matters were briefed out in 2014/15.  One was briefed out in 2013/14, and another in 2011/12.

 

The matters briefed out in 2014/15 were both in relation to the defence of legal proceedings brought by the United Services Union against Council.  One of these matters related to the defence of an application for a special Award condition for certain child care workers, who sought a permanent 4 day working week.  This type of application is very unusual in the Local Government sector and required specific legal expertise to defend.  Council was successful in defending the proceedings, but the defence required significant preparation and several days of court hearing time.  The cost of defending this matter was $102,043.44 and this one matter represents over 80% of the total external legal fees expended by Council on industrial matters since 2008.

 

Legal costs awards in the Industrial Relations Commission are rare.

 

 

 

2.   How does this compare to costs for the previous Council term 2008-2012, by financial year.

 

Please find below a breakdown of the legal costs relating to external management of industrial matters since 2008/09.  Council’s annual reports contain details of all legal matters involving Council, and the costs relating to their management, from year to year.  The archived reports are available on Council’s website.

 

2014/15: $121,058

2013/14: $4,256

2012/13: $1,408

2011/12: Nil

2010/11: Nil

2009/10: Nil

2008/09: Nil

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil


454

Ordinary Meeting 28 October 2015

Questions with Notice

 

QWN 04

Question with Notice - Clr Stanley

 

Strategic Direction

Liveable Safe City

Create clean and attractive public places for people to engage and connect

Key Policy

Strategic Maintenance Plan

File Ref

254993.2015

 

 

QUESTION WITH NOTICE

 

Please address the following:

 

There has been significant work done around the CBD of Liverpool which has occasioned the digging up of pavement and laying cables (I am assuming this is the NBN delivery).

 

The pavement has not been reinstated and for the most part has been filled in with bitumen. This is very unsightly and does not give a good look for Liverpool considering the amount money we are spending to improve things in the Mall. It is also a significant risk for those in the community who find uneven footpaths a concern.

 

1.   Does Council have an audit of all the areas in the CBD (except the Mall) which required reinstatement?

 

Yes Council officers inspect all footpath openings and following the completion of the work, Council will arrange full restoration of the area on charge to the applicant.

 

2.   Will these areas be reinstated properly using concrete and to match the surrounding area or the way they were before the works were done?

 

Yes all restorations will be completed to the same or better standard than the original area.

 

3.   When will this occur?

 

Once the work is completed and Council receives the restoration order, repairs to the area will be completed as soon as possible.

 

4.   What has been done to follow this up to date?

 

All footpath openings are monitored and repairs are carried out as soon as possible.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Nil