COUNCIL AGENDA
Ordinary Council Meeting
28 June 2017
FRANCIS GREENWAY CENTRE
170 GEORGE STREET LIVERPOOL
You are hereby notified that an Ordinary Council Meeting of Liverpool City Council will be held at the Francis Greenway Centre, 170 George Street, Liverpool on Wednesday, 28 June 2017 commencing at 6.00pm. Doors to the Francis Greenway Centre will open at 5.50pm.
Liverpool City Council Meetings are taped for the purposes of minute taking and record keeping. If you have any enquiries please contact Council and Executive Services on 9821 9237.
Kiersten Fishburn
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Order of Business
PAGE TAB
Acknowledgement of Country and Prayer
Apologies
Condolences
Confirmation of Minutes
Ordinary Council Meeting held on 31 May 2017..................................................................... 7
Declarations of Interest
Public Forum
Mayoral Report
NIL
Notices of Motion Of Rescission
NIL
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report
IHAP 01 DA-1038/2016 - Construction of a 10 unit boarding house and demolition of existing dwelling at 24 Madang Street, Holsworthy..................................................... 48......... 1
Development Application Determination Report
NIL
Planning and Growth Report
DPG 01 Liverpool Potential Items Heritage Study....................................................... 57......... 2
DPG 02 Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment 65) - Shepherd Street Planning Proposal .......................................................................................... 63......... 3
DPG 03 Street and Park Naming Proposals................................................................ 80......... 4
Chief Executive Officer Report
CEO 01 Draft Delivery Program 2017-2021 and Operational Plan 2017-2018 and Budget (including Statement of Revenue).................................................................. 86......... 5
CEO 02 Strategic Panel Minutes 6 June 2017 ............................................................ 94......... 6
CEO 03 Amendments to Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee Charter............ 179......... 7
CEO 04 Review of the Enterprise Risk Management Policy .................................... 192......... 8
City Community and Culture Report
DCC 01 Draft Disability Inclusion Action Plan 2017 - 2021 Post Exhibition Report... 194......... 9
DCC 02 Grants, Donations, and Corporate Sponsorship........................................... 229....... 10
DCC 03 Draft Cultural Policy...................................................................................... 238....... 11
City Corporate Report
CFO 01 Investment Report May 2017....................................................................... 249....... 12
CFO 02 Minutes of Budget Review Panel 25 May 2017........................................... 258....... 13
City Presentation Report
DCP 01 Big Bag Project Trial..................................................................................... 264....... 14
Economic Development Report
DEE 01 Smart Hub Feasibility Report........................................................................ 275....... 15
City Infrastructure and Environment Report
NIL
Committee Reports
CTTE 01 Liverpool Youth Council Minutes of meeting held 10 May 2017 and Meeting Notes of meetings held on 12 April 2017 and 8 March 2017.................................. 282....... 16
CTTE 02 Minutes of the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee 19 May 2017...... 297....... 17
CTTE 03 Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 17 May 2017...... 305....... 18
CTTE 04 Minutes of the Environment Advisory Committee Meeting held on 23 May 2017 310 19
CTTE 05 Minutes of the Civic Advisory Committee Meeting held 13 June 2017....... 314....... 20
Questions with Notice
QWN 01 Question with Notice - Clr Harle .................................................................. 326....... 21
Presentations by Councillors
Notices of Motion
NOM 01 Small Business in Liverpool ......................................................................... 328....... 22
Council in Closed Session
The following item is listed for consideration by Council in Closed Session with the public excluded, in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 1993 as listed below:
CONF 01 Legal Affairs Report
Reason: Item CONF 01 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10A(2)(g) of the Local Government Act because it contains advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.
Close
MINUTES OF THE Ordinary Meeting
HELD ON 31 May 2017
PRESENT:
Mayor Wendy Waller
Councillor Ayyad
Councillor Balloot
Councillor Hadchiti
Councillor Hadid
Councillor Hagarty
Councillor Harle
Councillor Kaliyanda
Councillor Karnib
Councillor Rhodes
Councillor Shelton
Ms Kiersten Fishburn, Chief Executive Officer
Mr Chris White, Director City Corporate Services
Ms Lina Kakish, Acting Director Planning and Growth
Dr Eddie Jackson, Director City Community and Culture
Mr Wayne Carter, Director City Presentation
Ms Julie Scott, Acting Director Economic Development
Mr Raj Autar, Director Infrastructure and Environment
Mr John Morgan, Director Property and Commercial Development
The meeting commenced at 6.00pm
OPENING 6.00pm
ACKNOWLEDEGEMENT OF COUNTRY, The Prayer of the Council was read
PRAYER OF COUNCIL AND by Pastor Claudio Alosi from Living
AFFIRMATION TO BE READ BY Grace Christian Church.
APOLOGIES Nil
CONDOLENCES
Andy Watts (read by Mayor Waller)
Andy Watts, aged 79, passed away on the 20 May 2017.
As a local resident to Liverpool, Andy was renowned for his strong advocacy for disability access and inclusion across our city. With a background as an electrician, Andy focussed on redressing poor planning decisions on existing infrastructure and leading community consultation on new developments to ensure disability access was considered a priority.
To his family, friends, and the community Andy was known as a humble man with a big heart and a positive attitude. He was courteous and professional, and as a foundation member of the Liverpool Access Committee he was a good influence on members throughout the years.
He encouraged a progressive mindset and we believe this city is a better place to live as a result of his many years of hard work.
May he rest in peace.
RECOMMENDATION
Motion: Moved: Mayor Waller Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That Council writes to the family of Andy Watts expressing our condolences for their loss.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Kevin Walter Perry (read by Mayor Waller)
Kevin Walter Perry JP, late of Busby and aged 79, passed away on the 20 May 2017.
As a past President of the City of Liverpool Lions Club, member of Green Valley Lions, a Liverpool Leo Advisor and District Liverpool Leo Chair, Kevin contributed to fundraising for many charitable events over the years.
After years of servicing the Liverpool community as a Justice of the Peace, Kevin started the JP Desk at the Liverpool Courthouse and was a longstanding member of the Liverpool Justices Association and held the position of Desk Coordinator.
Kevin worked at all of the JP Desks in the local community and mentored all new Justices of the Peace.
Liverpool Council acknowledged his charitable and volunteer work in the community and in 2013 Kevin was awarded an Order of Liverpool Award.
Kevin was described as a quiet achiever, who always worked hard for Liverpool and to support the local community.
Kevin is survived by his wife Lorraine, his children Leone, Darren, Rachel and their families.
May he rest in peace.
RECOMMENDATION
Motion: Moved: Mayor Waller Seconded: Clr Harle
That Council writes to the family of Kevin Walter Perry expressing our condolences for their loss.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED
Rex John Harris BEM (read by Mayor Waller)
Rex John Harris BEM, “Captain Harris”, was born on 14 December 1936 and passed away on the 17 May 2017.
Rex was a man
who helped the youth of South
West Sydney from the late 60's through to the 90's.
Rex was involved in the Church Army, many Anglican youth groups across
Sydney and the Green Valley Choir.
As a choir master, church youth group leader and scripture teacher, Rex was
known to many kids in the Valley, and was a positive influence on hundreds of
lives in the greater Green Valley area.
A man who was a true Christian in every sense of the word.
As an appropriate recognition of Rex’s service to the community,
he was awarded a BEM (British Empire Medal) in 1982 for “For service to
youth, the aged and the community.”
Rex was also instrumental in establishing the Anglican Church’s camping
programmes at Port Hacking and has authored a book about those years and that
endeavour.
Rex was on staff at Macarthur Anglican College for 17 years. He taught Biblical
Studies and was involved in a wide array of Christian Ministry initiatives
within the School.
Rex is survived by his wife Norma and his two daughters, Glenda and
Kerrie.
May he rest in peace.
RECOMMENDATION
Motion: Moved: Mayor Waller Seconded: Clr Karnib
That Council writes to the family of Rex John Harris BEM expressing our condolences for their loss.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
One minutes silence was then
observed for Andy Watts, Kevin Walter
Perry JP and Rex John Harris BEM.
Confirmation of Minutes
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
|
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
NOTE: The transcript from DPG 01 from the 26 April 2017 Council meeting (referred to in point 2 above) appears below;
Mayor Waller: The next item on the agenda is the Planning and Growth Report.
The recommendation is on page 54.
Clr Hadchiti: Move that way Mayor.
Clr Shelton: Second that, thank you Madam Mayor.
Mayor Waller: Thank you, any discussion?
I’ll put it, those in favour, those against, declare it carried.
Declarations of Interest
Clr Hadchiti declared a non-pecuniary, less than significant interest in the following item:
Item DCC 05 Liverpool City Council Sporting Grants Program 2016/2017
Reason His son plays for a team that is recommended to receive a grant.
Clr Hadchiti will leave the Chambers for the duration of the item.
Public Forum
Presentation – items not on agenda
1. Mr Ian Bailey addressed Council on the following item:
Disposal of hard waste in Liverpool.
2. Ms Kate Woods addressed Council on the following item:
Affordable Housing Policy.
Representation – items on agenda
1. Ms Fiona Macnaught addressed Council on the following item:
CONF 02 Report on Legal Proceedings – Moorebank Recyclers Appeal.
2. Mr Frank Mosca from Mosca Pserras Architects addressed Council on the following item:
IHAP 01 DA-582/2016 - Alterations and additions to a mixed use development at 420-446 Macquarie Street, Liverpool.
Mayoral Report
ITEM NO: MAYOR 01
FILE NO: 132315.2017
SUBJECT: Photographic History of Mayors and Councillors
background
Liverpool City Council has a history which spans 145 years this year.
Currently, Liverpool has had 69 Mayors with 50 persons occupying this role. With the exception of myself all Mayors have been male. I am the 69th and 67th Mayor.
Since gaining city status we have featured the Mayoral photographic portraits in our foyer or as we do now outside the chamber. This pictorial history is important for our city’s history.
It is important to also display a photographic history of our councillors, where photographs are available. Subsequently, we need to display a group photo of elected councillors since we gained city status in a prominent place for public consumption. This should be also accommodated.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Display photos of all Mayors from the time Liverpool became a city in a suitable place in the new Civic Place, and until the Civic Place is made available display such photos outside the current council chambers.
2. Display available group photos of the elected councillors from when Liverpool became a city within their term in an appropriate place now and into the future.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Mayor Waller
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
Urgency Motion:
Clr Ayyad requested that a motion dealing with allocating funds for CCTV cameras be dealt with now as a matter of urgency.
The Mayor ruled that the motion can be dealt with at this meeting during item CFO 04 – Budget Review March 2017.
BRING ITEM FORWARD
Moved: Clr Hagarty Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That CONF 02 be brought forward and dealt with now.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Mayor Waller advised the gallery that Council would move into Closed Session to discuss CONF 02 as the item contains confidential information pursuant to the provisions of S10A(2)(g) of the Local Government Act because it contains advice concerning litigation or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the grounds of legal professional privilege.
Mayor Waller called a 5 minute recess at 6.20pm to allow members of the public to leave the gallery.
Council moved into Closed Session at 6.25pm
CONFIDENTIAL ITEM
ITEM NO: CONF 02
FILE NO: 127429.2017
SUBJECT: Report on Legal Proceedings - Moorebank Recyclers Appeal
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note the report of staff concerning the outcomes of the Moorebank Recyclers litigation. |
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That Council lodge an appeal in the Appeals Court based on the legal advice received from Mr Chris Shaw.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Karnib
That Council move back into Open Session.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Council moved back into Open Session at 6.58pm.
Mayor Waller then read out the Motion which was passed in Closed Session relating to CONF 02. |
15
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report
ITEM NO: IHAP 01
FILE NO: 107961.2017
SUBJECT: DA-582/2016 - Alterations and additions to a mixed use development at 420-446 Macquarie Street, Liverpool
RECOMMENDATION
That Council approves Development Application DA-582/2016 subject to the amended recommended conditions of consent contained in Attachment 4.
|
COUNCIL DECISION Motion: Moved: Clr Harle Seconded: Clr Rhodes |
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Vote for: Clr Ayyad
Clr Balloot
Clr Hadchiti
Clr Hadid
Clr Harle
Clr Rhodes
Vote against: Mayor Waller
Clr Hagarty
Clr Kaliyanda
Clr Karnib
Clr Shelton
17
Planning and Growth Report
ITEM NO: DPG 01
FILE NO: 055619.2017
SUBJECT: Cooling the Streets
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Notes Council’s ongoing participation in WSROC’s ‘Turn Down the Heat’ project.
2. Requests the CEO to undertake a comprehensive study of the potential strategies to address the impacts of extreme heat in the Liverpool LGA, including the Urban Heat Island Effect and to submit a policy to Council after the completion of the ‘Turn Down the Heat’ framework.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Kaliyanda Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That Council:
1. Notes Council’s ongoing participation in WSROC’s ‘Turn Down the Heat’ project.
2. Requests the CEO to undertake a comprehensive study of the potential strategies to address the impacts of extreme heat in the Liverpool LGA, including the Urban Heat Island Effect and to submit a policy to Council after the completion of the ‘Turn Down the Heat’ framework.
3. Consider the Tree Pricing Policy that went through Council and consider how to integrate these strategies when masterplanning or considering upgrades of areas of the LGA.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion. |
17
ITEM NO: DPG 02
FILE NO: 110455.2017
SUBJECT: Notification of Development Applications
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receives and notes this report.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
19
Community and Culture Report
ITEM NO: DCC 01
FILE NO: 206409.2016
SUBJECT: The Mandaean Community of Liverpool - Baptismal Area on the Georges River
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Defer a decision until risks to the public, identified in this report, are addressed; the real time monitoring of water for indicator organisms is in place; and until such time sufficient evidence is available to confirm the adequacy of water quality in the Georges River for primary contact recreational activities; 2. Install signage along the river to highlight potential dangers of primary contact recreational activities; 3. Report back the findings of this report to the Mandaean community and the outcome of Council’s decision; 4. Ensures the Mandaean community is made fully aware of the potential dangers of primary contact recreation in the Georges River; and 5. Advocate to Federal and State Governments for a collaborative approach to improving water quality in the Georges River at Liverpool in order to allow primary contact recreational activities in the long-term.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Rhodes Seconded: Clr Harle
1. Site 3 Haigh Park be the most suitable site and that a further report be brought to Council within six months addressing the risks to the public, identified in this report; the real time monitoring of water for indicator organisms is in place; and until such time sufficient evidence is available to confirm the adequacy of water quality in the Georges River for primary contact recreational activities; 2. Install signage along the river to highlight potential dangers of primary contact recreational activities; 3. Report back the findings of this report to the Mandaean community and the outcome of Council’s decision; 4. Ensures the Mandaean community is made fully aware of the potential dangers of primary contact recreation in the Georges River; and 5. Advocate to Federal and State Governments for a collaborative approach to improving water quality in the Georges River at Liverpool in order to allow primary contact recreational activities in the long-term.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
21
ITEM NO: DCC 02
FILE NO: 025812.2017
SUBJECT: Draft Community Facilities Strategy
RECOMMENDATION
That Council: 1. Places the draft Community Facilities Strategy on public exhibition for at least 28 days seeking general community feedback;
2. Utilises the District Forums (June quarter) as a mechanism to provide feedback on the Draft Strategy; and
3. Brings forth a report in August noting feedback received and any changes made to the document in line with community feedback.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That Council: 1. Places the draft Community Facilities Strategy on public exhibition for at least 28 days seeking general community feedback;
2. Utilises the District Forums (June quarter) as a mechanism to provide feedback on the Draft Strategy;
3. Brings forth a report in August noting feedback received and any changes made to the document in line with community feedback;and
4. Commend staff for their work in developing the Draft Strategy.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
21
ITEM NO: DCC 03
FILE NO: 098214.2017
SUBJECT: Amendments to Corporate Sponsorship (Outgoing) Policy
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts the amendments to the Corporate Sponsorship (Outgoing) Policy.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Kaliyanda Seconded: Clr Hagarty
That Council adopts the amendments to the Corporate Sponsorship (Outgoing) Policy subject to changing the cap on the amount that applicants are able to request and receive to $10,000.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
23
ITEM NO: DCC 04
FILE NO: 111210.2017
SUBJECT: Grants, Donations, and Corporate Sponsorship
RECOMMENDATION
That Council endorses the provision of $27,820 (GST exclusive) under Sustainable Environment Grants:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Kaliyanda Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
25
Clr Hadchiti left the Chambers at 7.25pm.
ITEM NO: DCC 05
FILE NO: 123017.2017
SUBJECT: Liverpool City Council Sporting Grants Program 2016/2017
RECOMMENDATION
That Council approves the following recommendations for the allocation of the $30,000 sporting grants funding, as determined by the Liverpool Sports Committee grants assessment panel:
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadid Seconded: Clr Karnib
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
25
Clr Hadchiti returned to the Chambers at 7.26pm
ITEM NO: DCC 06
FILE NO: 127545.2017
SUBJECT: Family and Domestic Violence Workplace Support Policy
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Endorses the Family and Domestic Violence Workplace Support Policy; and
2. Approves a budget allocation of $5,000 for the 2017/18 budget and an annual budget thereafter of $5,000 plus CPI increases for Family and Domestic Violence leave.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadid Seconded: Clr Harle
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion. |
27
Chief Financial Officer
ITEM NO: CFO 01
FILE NO: 117219.2017
SUBJECT: Local Government NSW Annual Conference
RECOMMENDATION
That:
1. Any Councillors who wish to attend the 2017 Local Government NSW Annual Conference notify the Councillor Support Officer.
2. A further report be submitted to a future meeting of Council dealing with:
a) any motions Council may wish to submit to the Conference; b) a confirmation of Council’s voting delegates, and c) a review of the Conference Program.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
27
ITEM NO: CFO 02
FILE NO: 120163.2017
SUBJECT: Investment Report April 2017
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receives and notes this report.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Harle
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
29
ITEM NO: CFO 03
FILE NO: 127280.2017
SUBJECT: Mayoral Directions pursuant to Section 226(d) of the Local Government Act 1993
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note and endorse the Mayoral Directions dated 12 May 2017 attached to the report.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Rhodes
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
31
ITEM NO: CFO 04
FILE NO: 133801.2017
SUBJECT: Budget Review - March 2017
RECOMMENDATION
That Council approves the identified budget variations in accordance with this report.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
NOTE: Motions were voted on separately on this item as shown below.
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Ayyad
The identified budget variations not be adopted and that the $3.5million (Contract Administration Expense identified on page 153 of the Council Agenda) be reported to the Office of the Local Government.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared LOST.
Division called:
Vote for: Clr Ayyad Clr Balloot Clr Hadchiti Clr Hadid
Vote against: Mayor Waller Clr Hagarty Clr Harle Clr Kaliyanda Clr Karnib Clr Shelton Clr Rhodes
Motion: Moved: Clr Ayyad Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Division called:
Vote for: Mayor Waller Clr Ayyad Clr Balloot Clr Hadchiti Clr Hadid Clr Harle Clr Rhodes
Vote against: Clr Hagarty Clr Kaliyanda Clr Karnib Clr Shelton
Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Hagarty
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Division called:
Vote for: Mayor Waller Clr Hagarty Clr Harle Clr Kaliyanda Clr Karnib Clr Rhodes Clr Shelton
Vote against: Clr Ayyad Clr Balloot Clr Hadchiti Clr Hadid
|
31
Property and Commercial Development Report
ITEM NO: DPC 01
FILE NO: 125896.2017
SUBJECT: Closing of a Temporary Public Road between Mullumbimby Avenue and Pacific Palms Circuit at Hoxton Park and Transfer to the Original Subdivider.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Close the temporary public road identified as Lots 40 & 50 in Deposited Plan 1074539, located between Mullumbimby Avenue and Pacific Palms Circuit in Hoxton Park.
2. Transfer Lots 40 & 50 in Deposited Plan 1074539 to the Original Subdivider, being AV Jennings Properties Limited.
3. Authorises its Delegated Officer to execute any documentation, under Power of Attorney, necessary to give effect to this decision.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Balloot
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
33
Committee Reports
ITEM NO: CTTE 01
FILE NO: 101895.2017
SUBJECT: Minutes of Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 9 March 2017
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receives and notes the minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on Thursday 9 March 2017.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Kaliyanda Seconded: Clr Rhodes
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
35
PRESENTATIONS BY COUNCILLORS
Clr Hadchiti reported back to Council on his attendance on behalf of the Mayor, to open the NSW Radio Controlled Racing Car Championships held on 5 May 2017 at Helles Park Moorebank.
Notices of Motion
ITEM NO: NOM 01
FILE NO: 112563.2017
SUBJECT: Electronic Voting and Recording Systems
Background
At General Council Meetings, it is often difficult for the Chairperson to accurately determine the order and timing of Councillor voting by means of a show of hands or a verbal response.
Councils Code of Meeting Practice and Code of Conduct states that Councillors should have mutual respect, however the current system does not promote that principle as well as it could by ensuring accurate procedures and results are recorded.
The current system of Movers and Seconders of Motions and subsequent recording of votes is subjective and does not necessarily reflect the actual and timely responses by Councillors at Council Meetings.
For the above stated reasons, an Electronic Voting Systems was implemented in the 2008-12 term of Council. At the previous Council Administration Centre at 1 Hoxton Park Road. The Electronic voting and recording system addressed the main problems that may contribute to doubt and transparency on some aspects of Council Meetings.
NOTICE OF MOTION (submitted by Clr Harle)
Therefore, I move that Council; 1. Prepares a report on the implementation of an electronic voting and recording system based on one that operated at the Hoxton Park Administration Centre in the 2008-12 term of Council and
2. Council further investigates similar systems used in other Councils and State and Federal Parliament.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Ayyad
That Council note the comments of the CEO (as shown at the end of this item).
Foreshadowed Motion Moved: Clr Harle Seconded: Clr Rhodes
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the Motion (moved by Clr Hadchiti) was declared CARRIED and the Foreshadowed motion (moved by Clr Harle) lapsed.
|
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT
As part of an external review of the microphone system installed in the Council Chamber, staff have already commissioned a review of possible electronic voting options for Council. This review is currently underway, and it is expected that recommendations will be available from the consultant by the end of June, 2017.
Staff are happy to report the outcomes of that process to a future meeting of Council for debate.
It is noted that at present, there is no specific budget set aside for either new microphones or electronic voting systems. Any progress on these initiatives would need to be funded through a future quarterly budget review process.
37
ITEM NO: NOM 02
FILE NO: 136393.2017
SUBJECT: Energy Efficiency and Renewables
Background
Upon election, all Councillors undertook a commitment to fulfil our duties in the best interests of the Liverpool community. This includes listening and acting upon the voice of our youth. In addition, Council has a responsibility to leave a clean, liveable and safe Liverpool for future generations. One way it can do this is through renewable energy.
Recently, I was approached by the Youth Council to enquire into Council's commitment to solar and other renewable technologies.
Members of the Youth Council and I agree that renewable energy and solar in particular, is an effective means of reducing both carbon emissions and Council's energy costs. A reduction in carbon emissions combats the effects of climate change, while a reduction in energy costs means Council has more funds available to improve community services.
In 2012 Council showed its commitment to energy efficiency and renewables by publishing an Energy Management Plan (EMP). The EMP outlined a series of actions to reduce energy use across major Council assets, including through the use of solar technology where appropriate. It is important this term of Council renew that commitment to energy efficiency by protecting and promoting the use of solar and other renewable technologies in Liverpool.
NOTICE OF MOTION (submitted by Clr Hagarty)
That Council show its commitment to energy efficiency, solar and other renewable technologies by: 1. Seeking all available avenues of funding, including State and Federal governments, to reduce energy use across existing and future Council's assets through the use solar and other renewable energy sources;
2. Ensuring all future development consider the impact on existing renewable energy production by ensuring any shadowing assessments take into account the impact on neighbouring building's solar panels; and
3. Providing regular updates to Councillors on the 2012 Energy Management Plan (EMP) by incorporating progress into existing reporting, for example within the Quarterly Capital Works Summary.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hagarty Seconded: Clr Kaliyanda
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED
|
39
ITEM NO: NOM 03
FILE NO: 137262.2017
SUBJECT: Contaminated Site Remediation Policy
Background
Where land within the Liverpool LGA is considered to be in need of remediation from contaminants various state and local government instruments are enlivened including Council’s policy headed:
Asbestos Policy (with general advice and information) for residents and the public within the Local Government Area, 2017
and state government:
State Environment Planning Policy 55
the former of which indicates, in a footnote, that SEPP 55 is itself subject to an ‘ongoing major review’.
Under these instruments, and related provisions, regulatory and enforcement responsibilities for contaminated lands are divided primarily between Councils and the state government’s Environmental Protection Agency.
With these matters in mind, guidance may on occasion be required as to the most suitable and acceptable method of remediation to be adopted, where as is often the case, there is more than one possible approach to the question of remediation, and that guidance, on some views, is not to be found as clearly as it might be in the aforementioned instruments.
Differing approaches to remediation might vary on account of longevity, cost, effectiveness, risk, time to implement and so on.
NOTICE OF MOTION (submitted by Clr Shelton) That Council:
1. Provides a briefing session to Councillors as to whether there is utility in Council producing a contaminated site remediation policy or document to similar effect either as a stand-alone policy or as an adjunct to the Asbestos Policy (noting asbestos in its various forms is not necessarily the only contaminant which may be an issue) which briefing may, if thought useful, include consideration of a draft of such a policy;
2. Also at the same time updates Councillors on the present relation in this area between Council and SEPP 55 and the EPA given particularly the latter instrument is said to be evolving; and
3. Updates Councillors on any other matter thought to be related to the foregoing.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadid Seconded: Clr Shelton
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
41
ITEM NO: DEE 01
FILE NO: 142997.2017
SUBJECT: Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
2. Note that matters pertaining to the construction and operation of the new airport will be reported back to Council from the CEO via the District Forums and Council’s Strategic Panel.
3. Write to the members of the Taskforce thanking them for their contribution and advising them of the new communication process via the District Forums and Council’s Strategic Panel for regular updates on the Western Sydney Airport.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hagarty
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
41
Clr Harle left the Chambers at 7.57pm.
ITEM NO: CTTE 02
FILE NO: 141758.2017
SUBJECT: Minutes of the Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 15 May 2017
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Notes the Minutes of the Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 15 May 2017.
2. Delegates authority to the Chief Executive Officer to consider the content of the Minutes, and report back to Council on any relevant issues arising.
|
COUNCIL DECISION Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That Council:
2. Correct the Mover and Seconder in the minutes to show that Jennifer French was the Mover for all the motions and John Anderson was the Seconder for all the motions.
3. Actions motion 2, motion 3 (desktop review), motion 4 and motion 6 of the recommendations in the Committee Minutes.
4. Report back to Council of the costs of motion 1 and motion 5.
Foreshadowed Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Hagarty
That Council:
1. Notes the Minutes of the Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 15 May 2017.
On being put to the meeting the Motion (moved by Clr Hadchiti) was declared CARRIED.
The Foreshadowed Motion (moved by Clr Shelton) therefore lapsed. Note: Clr Harle was not in the Chambers when this item was being voted on. |
43
Clr Harle returned to the Chambers at 8.00pm
CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS
ITEM NO: CONF 01
FILE NO: 106797.2017
SUBJECT: Ticket Parking Machine Upgrade
RECOMMENDATION
That Council: 1. Exempts the ticket parking machines
upgrade from open tender under the Local Government Act 1993, Sect. 55 (3)
(i), 2. Delegates authority to the CEO to finalise a contract with Reino International to carry out the required upgrade to the ticket parking machines.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadid Seconded: Clr Harle
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
43
ITEM NO: CONF 03
FILE NO: 126473.2017
SUBJECT: Tender ST2601 Receipt and Processing of Household Cleanup Material
RECOMMENDATION That Council: 1. Accept the Tender from Benedict Recycling Pty Ltd for tender ST2601 – Receipt and Processing of Household Cleanup Materials for an initial three (3) year contract term with the option of extending 2 x 12 months at the GST inclusive schedule of rates of $302.50 for 25% of waste received and sent to landfill and $209.00 for 75% of waste received and recovered. 2. Makes public its decision regarding tender ST2601 – Receipt and Processing of Household Cleanup Materials. 3. Notes that the Chief Executive Officer will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft Minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority. 4. Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
5. Extend the existing engagement of Suez Recycling and Recovery Pty Ltd (Suez) to provide receipt and processing of household cleanup material until 30 June 2017 pursuant to 55(3)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993, for the following reasons:
b. The extension is required to ensure the ongoing provision of household cleanup services to the residents of the Liverpool LGA; c. The service has now been market tested, and a new contract for the service will commence effective 1 July 2017. |
COUNCIL DECISION Motion: Moved: Clr Harle Seconded: Clr Rhodes
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion. |
45
ITEM NO: CONF 04
FILE NO: 141509.2017
SUBJECT: Tender Exemption Report - Infor Pathway
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1) Extend the engagement of Infor Global Solutions (ANZ) Pty Ltd to provide the annual software license renewal for the Infor Pathway for a period of three (3) years pursuant to 55(3)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993, for the following reasons:
a) Pathway is an integral software package that allows Council to meet customer service objectives across all service delivery areas.
b) Council has successfully used Pathway since late 2001.
c) Infor Global Solutions (ANZ) Pty Ltd is the sole supplier of the Pathway software and license renewal.
d) To migrate to another system at this timeframe would be both cost prohibitive and difficult to achieve for various technical challenges (refer to background for further information).
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadid Seconded: Clr Balloot
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
46
ITEM NO: CONF 05
FILE NO: 142146.2017
SUBJECT: ST2627 - Veterinary Services for Liverpool Animal Shelter
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Resolves to decline all tenders for ST2627– Veterinary Services for Liverpool Animal Shelter pursuant to Section 178 (3) (a) of the Local Government Act and cancel the proposal for the contract.
2. Makes public its decision regarding tender ST2627– Veterinary Services for Liverpool Animal Shelter.
3. Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A (2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Hagarty
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion. |
THE MEETING CLOSED AT 8.11pm
<Signature>
Name: Wendy Waller
Title: Mayor
Date: 28 June 2017
I have authorised a stamp bearing my signature to be affixed to the pages of the Minutes of the Council Meeting held on 31 May 2017. I confirm that Council has adopted these Minutes as a true and accurate record of the meeting.
55
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report
IHAP 01 |
DA-1038/2016 - Construction of a 10 unit boarding house and demolition of existing dwelling at 24 Madang Street, Holsworthy |
Strategic Direction |
Liveable Safe City Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development |
Key Policy |
Urban Development Plans |
File Ref |
153741.2017 |
Report By |
Boris Santana - Development Assessment Planner |
Approved By |
Lina Kakish - Acting Director Planning and Growth |
Property |
24 Madang Street, Holsworthy |
Owner |
Mr R J Steel |
Applicant |
Mr R J Steel |
Executive Summary
Council has received and considered a development application DA-1038/2016, proposing the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a ten unit boarding house at 24 Madang Street, Holsworthy. This application was lodged on 4 November 2016.
Due to the application receiving more than five unresolved objections and pursuant to the requirements of the endorsed Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, the proposal was referred to the 29 May 2017 meeting of the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP).
The IHAP recommended Council refuse the development application for the reasons contained within the Council Officer’s IHAP report (See Attachment 1).
That Council refuse Development Application DA-1038/2016 for the following reasons: 1. The proposed development is considered to be inconsistent with the objectives of the R3 Medium Density zone in so far as it is not a high quality residential development, and the proposed built form is unlikely to preserve and maintain the residential amenity of adjoining residences, pursuant to the provisions of Section 79C(1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
2. The proposed development is inconsistent with the provisions of Clause 30A of Division 3 of Part 2 of State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 in that the design of the proposed development is not compatible with the character of the local area and will have an adverse impact on the physical amenity of the neighbourhood, pursuant to the provisions of Section 79C(1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
3. The proposed development does not achieve satisfactory compliance with the relevant controls as stipulated in Liverpool Development Control Plan (DCP) 2008 Chapter 3.6 –regarding sections, 3 Site Planning, Section 9 Landscaping and Fencing and Section 10 Amenity and Environmental Impact, pursuant to the provisions of Section 79C(1)(a)(iii) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
4. The proposed development is inconsistent with the relevant provisions of Clause 46 of the Public Health Regulation 2012 in that a majority of bedrooms for boarding rooms that occupy two lodgers do not provide a floor area of at least 11 square metres, pursuant to the provisions of Section 79C(1)(a)(iv) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
5. The design of the proposed development will not provide an acceptable level of amenity to the future occupants of the boarding house and is likely to result in an adverse impact on the acoustic and visual privacy of the residents of the dwellings to the east and south of the land, pursuant to the provisions of Section 79C(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. |
Background
Council has received and considered a development application DA-1038/2016 proposing the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a ten unit boarding house at 24 Madang Street, Holsworthy.
The proposal was advertised between 7 December 2016 and 27 January 2017. A total of 53 written objections, a written petition signed by 243 individuals as well as an online petition with 549 objections to the proposed development were received by Council. The key issues raised in the submissions relate to inappropriateness of a boarding house in the locality, traffic and on-street parking congestion, management of the boarding house, loss in property value of surrounding residences, amenity impacts to surrounding residences, social impacts and inconsistency with the existing residential character of the street.
The Site
The site is identified as 24 Madang Street Holsworthy with a legal description of Lot 410 DP 234857.
The site is located in a residential block bounded by Madang Street, Markham Street, Lae Road and Satelberg Street, Holsworthy. The block contains a mixture of one and two storey detached dwelling houses of fibro, weatherboard and brick veneer or brick construction with open space located at the front and rear of each property.
The immediate adjoining property to the east is a residential property containing a single storey brick dwelling house facing Madang Street. To the south, the site is adjoined by a single storey brick dwelling facing Markham Street. To the north, on the opposite side of Madang Street, are single storey detached dwelling houses. To the west, on the opposite side of Markham Street, is a double storey dwelling house.
Although the local area within the visual catchment of the site is predominately characterised by single storey and double storey detached houses, the locality is within a medium density residential zoned area. The site is located approximately 1 km west from Holsworthy Train Station, 700m south-east from Wattle Grove Plaza, and 4.4 km south-east of the Liverpool CBD.
An aerial map of the site is provided in Figure 1 and Figure 2 below.
Figure 1: Site Map (Source: GeoCortex)
Figure 2: Locality Map (Source: GeoCortex)
details of the proposal
The proposed development consists of:
· Demolition of the existing single storey dwelling and associated outbuildings and construction of a two storey boarding house development.
· The proposed new structure is a single storey rectilinear building. It is approximately 21m in length, ranges between 11 to 13m in width and is setback 2.2m – 6.5m from the side boundary and 4.5m – 6.4m from the rear boundary.
· The proposed boarding house provides for 10 self-contained boarding rooms with private kitchen and bathroom facilities. One self-contained room is located on the ground floor, two self-contained rooms are located on the first floor, and seven self-contained rooms will have private access at ground level facing the side boundaries and private stairway to individual sleeping quarters on the first floor.
· Each boarding room, with the exception of a boarding room on the first floor, is designed to cater for 2 lodgers per room. The boarding house is designed to accommodate a maximum of 19 lodgers at the site. As the boarding house accommodates less than 20 lodgers a boarding room will not be provided for a boarding house manager.
· Two car parking spaces are proposed within the double garage with vehicular access from Markham Street via a 4m driveway. A driveway is also located at the rear of the site and provides one car parking space and two motorbike spaces. Parking for bicycles is also located along the southern property boundary near Markham Street.
· A communal open space area (55m2) is provided in the rear yard of the site. A common lounge room is proposed on the ground floor adjacent to the main front entry door and facing the Madang Street frontage.
· The building has been designed to have an appearance of a large two storey dwelling with a double garage, and an entry point facing Markham Street. The entry point of the building provides access to two boarding rooms on the first floor and the communal lounge room. Access to all other boarding rooms is achieved via an external pathway with individual entrances to each unit.
· A waste bin storage area is proposed adjacent to the drying area at the rear of the site. The bin bay is located away from rooms and 8m from the nearest opening in the adjoining property to the east of the subject site. The bin bay is enclosed by a 1.8m high screen.
· A Plan of Management has been submitted with the development application providing details of the house rules, management and maintenance of the boarding house, waste management and collection, emergency contact and procedures as well as conflict resolution.
· The building is to be constructed of brick with hipped pitched roofs of colorbond metal construction.
An extract of the proposed site plan, elevations and perspective are provided in Figures 3, 4, and 5 below.
Figure 3: Site Plan
Figure 4: North and South Elevations
Figure 5: Perspective drawing
the issues
State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 (SEPP ARH) requires the consent authority to take into consideration whether the proposal is compatible with the character of the local area.
At present, the immediate adjoining residential properties enjoy an open space buffer from the subject site in that nearly all the allotments are comprised of single detached housing located towards the front of the site with sizable private open space at the rear. There is a consistent pattern with respect to the positions of dwellings and their private open spaces. As a result, it is considered that adjoining residents are provided with a reasonable level of residential amenity, particularly in terms of visual and acoustic privacy, given that the dwelling at the subject site is not directly facing the adjoining properties.
The proposed development will replace the existing dwelling with a building comprising ten boarding rooms, of which a majority of rooms have private access at ground level via entry doors that face the side boundaries. Consequently, the proposed configuration is likely to negatively impact on the amenity of the adjoining residents, by way of loss of visual and acoustic privacy. Council officers and IHAP considers that the proposed development does not satisfy the character test in the Affordable Housing SEPP and has an unacceptable impact on the adjoining properties under Section 79C of the EP&A Act.
Moreover, it is noted that the locality is zoned R3 – Medium Density Residential, and in considering the proposed development, a high level of residential amenity is to be achieved. In this regard, to ensure that the development results in a building form that achieves a high level of residential amenity for future occupants as well as surrounding residences, the application has been assessed against the relevant controls of the Liverpool Development Control Plan (LDCP) 2008. The development is found to be unsatisfactory with a number of objectives and development controls in the LDCP 2008, particularly Sections 3 Site Planning, Section 9 Landscaping and Fencing and Section 10 Amenity and Environmental Impact.
In its present form, the internal organisation of the building is considered to be unsatisfactory. The communal living room is too isolated from a majority of boarding rooms to be a meaningful and functional space that would add to the residential amenity of the boarding house. Additionally, a well-conceived boarding house should provide a common area that is well connected to a usable, functional outdoor open space area. Again, the proposed communal living room is isolated from the rear open space. It is considered that the boarding house has been designed to maximise the number of rooms as opposed to providing a high quality environment for the occupants of the building.
The provisions of the Public Health Act 2010 and Public Health Regulation 2012, as prescribed in Section 6 of the Boarding Houses Act 2012, apply to the development of the site for the purpose of a boarding premises. The proposed development is therefore required to be designed in accordance with all relevant provisions of both the Act and Regulations. In this case, assessment of the application has revealed that the boarding house does not comply with Clause 46 Sleeping accommodation of the Regulations. Based on the sizing shown on the submitted plans, a majority of double bedrooms appear to be approximately 10m2 which does not meet the minimum standards in the Regulation.
IHAP noted that the number of onsite car parking spaces complies with the Affordable Housing SEPP, and that in those circumstances the number of car parking spaces cannot be used as a reason for refusal. However, the panel is concerned that the SEPP is not particularly well designed to a boarding house in this location and of this design. The site is located in an area that is not particularly well serviced by public transport and, unlike other boarding houses designed for very low income earners, future tenants are likely to own their own vehicles. Moreover, the panel is also concerned about the ability of an external manager to properly manage the premises particularly given that the common room and common areas are accessible directly from the street, without the supervision of tenants that would normally occur in a more conventional boarding house.
Independent Hearing and assessment panel
At their meeting on 29 May 2017, IHAP made the following recommendation:
IHAP recommendation |
Agreed/Not Agreed |
Council Officer’s comment |
The panel recommends DA-1038/2016 be refused for the reasons described in the Council officers report. |
Agreed |
The panel recommendation is noted. |
Consultation
The proposal was advertised between 7 December 2016 and 27 January 2017 in accordance with LDCP 2008. A total of 53 written objections, a written petition signed by 243 individuals as well as an online petition with 549 objections to the proposed development have been submitted to Council.
A summary and assessment of the issues raised in the submissions, is detailed in the Council Officer’s IHAP Report (Attachment 1). The issues raised in the submissions are considered to contain varying degrees of relevance and have been considered in the assessment of the application. Given that the submissions received are unable to be resolved, the application was referred to the Independent Hearing Assessment Panel (IHAP) for consideration. The panel received representations from nine (9) local residents, the owner/applicant and the owner’s planning consultant.
Conclusion
The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The proposed development is permissible within the R3 Medium Density Residential Zone under LLEP 2008. Notwithstanding this, there are a number of design concerns with the proposal. The proposed development is for a building form that does not achieve a high level of residential amenity for future occupants of the boarding house. Additionally when applying the required character test under the SEPP, the development is likely to compromise the amenity of surrounding residential properties, by way of loss of visual and acoustic privacy.
Accordingly, and taking into consideration the submissions received from local residents, it is recommended that the application be refused.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Council Officer's IHAP ReportView (Under separate cover)
2. IHAP Recommendation View (Under separate cover)
57
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Planning and Growth Report
DPG 01 |
Liverpool Potential Items Heritage Study |
Strategic Direction |
Proud Engaged City Protect and preserve Liverpool’s heritage, including its rural landscape and cultural history |
Key Policy |
Heritage Strategy |
File Ref |
098188.2017 |
Report By |
Thomas Wheeler - Heritage Officer |
Approved By |
Lina Kakish - Acting Director Planning and Growth |
Executive Summary
At the Ordinary Meeting of 27 July 2016, Council resolved to adopt the Draft Heritage Study: Potential Heritage Items, and its recommendations. A recommendation of the study was to undertake a comprehensive assessment of fifteen identified potential heritage items to determine whether they are suitable to be listed under Schedule 5 of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008.
Council further resolved to undertake an assessment of significance of the Skipton Lane Cistern, Prestons and the farm buildings at 1432 The Northern Road, Bringelly, (both included in the above fifteen items) with the intention of seeking Interim Heritage Orders (IHO).
This report and attached heritage study has been prepared in response to the resolutions of Council and it is recommended that Council proceed with the listing of thirteen (13) of the originally identified potential heritage items.
That Council: 1. Endorses the recommendations of the Liverpool Potential Items Heritage Study (attached); 2. Resolves to prepare a Planning Proposal to amend Schedule 5 of Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008; and 3. Resolves to undertake a review of existing items in Schedule 5 of Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008. |
REPORT
Background
In 2015, a study was undertaken of potential heritage items, which considered thirty-five (35) places and seven (7) movable objects. Based on the findings of the study, fifteen of the places and seven (7) moveable objects were recommended to Council for formal assessment of heritage significance, with the view of possibly listing the places as local heritage items under Schedule 5 of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008.
The report was original tabled at the Ordinary Meeting of 27 April 2016 where it was resolved to defer the matter, for it to be considered by Council’s Heritage Advisory Committee on 6 June 2016.
The Liverpool Heritage Advisory Committee considered the draft study on 6 June 2016 and moved the following motion:
That Council adopts the Draft Heritage Study: Potential Heritage Items, and its recommendations as outlined in the Council Report (Item No DPG 01, 25 May 2016), subject to the amendment that the movable items be deferred to an Extraordinary Heritage Advisory Meeting to allow descriptions and draft statements of significance.
Council adopted this resolution at its Ordinary Meeting of 27 July 2016.
This report has been prepared in accordance with the resolutions of Council and proposes to list thirteen (13) of the fifteen (15) identified heritage items and not to proceed with the issuing of the Interim Heritage Orders (IHO).
Scope and Purpose
The scope of this study was limited to the fifteen (15) identified places as recommended by the Heritage Study dated April 2016 and the resolution of Council. The movable items have been removed from the study for separate consideration and consultation with the Liverpool Heritage Advisory Committee.
The purpose of this study was to review the places nominated as potential heritage items and to make recommendations as to whether Council should proceed with listing the items under Schedule 5 of Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008.
Potential Heritage Items
The list of potential heritage items includes the following fifteen (15) places:
· 113 Atkinson Street, Liverpool;
· 12 Bringelly Road, Horningsea;
· 955 Fifteenth Avenue, Kemps Creek;
· John Edmondson Memorial Clock, 166-170 George Street, Liverpool;
· 136 Hill Road, Lurnea;
· 10 Hoxton Park, Liverpool;
· Three Lights, Hume Highway, Liverpool;
· 26 Kennedy Street, Liverpool;
· 16 Longstaff Avenue, Chipping Norton;
· 12 Moorebank Avenue, Moorebank;
· 1432 The Northern Road, Bringelly;
· Rosedale Park, 16 Stroud Avenue, Warwick Farm;
· 59-61 Scott Street, Liverpool;
· Cistern, 30 Skipton Lane, Prestons; and
· 44 South Pacific Avenue, Mount Pritchard.
Methodology
Historical research has been undertaken on each potential heritage item. This has included, where possible, searches in the Liverpool City Heritage Library Collection and online sources such as Trove, the State Library of NSW, University of Sydney, NSW Lands and Property Information and the Australian Dictionary of Biography.
Each site was reviewed based on current photographs and aerial images, as well as any available maps for the area.
Heritage Inventories were prepared based on the NSW State Heritage Inventory Template and assessments of significance were undertaken in accordance with the NSW Heritage Division guidelines Assessing Significance.
Findings
Items proposed to be included:
Of the fifteen (15) potential heritage items, the following thirteen (13) are recommended for listing:
· 113 Atkinson Street, Liverpool;
· 955 Fifteenth Avenue, Kemps Creek;
· John Edmondson Memorial Clock, 166-170 George Street, Liverpool;
· 136 Hill Road, Lurnea;
· 10 Hoxton Park, Liverpool;
· 26 Kennedy Street, Liverpool;
· 16 Longstaff Avenue, Chipping Norton;
· 12 Moorebank Avenue, Moorebank;
· 1432 The Northern Road, Bringelly;
· Rosedale Park, 16 Stroud Avenue, Warwick Farm;
· 59-61 Scott Street, Liverpool;
· Cistern, 30 Skipton Lane, Prestons; and
· 44 South Pacific Avenue, Mount Pritchard.
Items not proposed to be included:
· Three Lights, Hume Highway, Liverpool
This item is not recommended for listing and is proposed to be removed from the potential heritage items list as the research into the item has not identified any substantial historical information which can identify the origins and age of the light posts. It is acknowledged that they are cast iron, featuring sculpted roses on the base of the lights, however without any accurate or credible historical information it is difficult to adequately assess the heritage significance of the item and to make a recommendation for its inclusion on the heritage register.
· 12 Bringelly Road, Horningsea
This item is located in the Western Sydney Parklands and not subject to Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008. Accordingly it cannot be included in Schedule 5 of the LEP. Nevertheless, Council officers will write to NSW Department of Planning and Environment requesting that Western Sydney Parklands Trust undertake an assessment of the item for inclusion on the heritage list under State Environmental Planning Policy (Western Sydney Parklands) 2009.
Interim Heritage Orders (IHO)
Under the Heritage Act 1977 (the Act), councils have the authority to issue Interim Heritage Orders to protect items of potential local heritage significance if they are considered to be at threat of demolition or unsympathetic alteration. The IHO protects the identified place for up to 12 months with the intention of enabling Council to undertake a further assessment of the place to determine its heritage significance and to proceed to list the item on the local heritage register.
The Potential Heritage Items Study, attached to this report, has identified that the cistern at 30 Skipton Lane and the cottage at 1432 The Northern Road are of high local significance. Both items are significant for their aesthetic characteristics and their association to the growth and development of Liverpool. Both are included in the list of thirteen (13) items recommended to be listed under Schedule 5 of Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008.
There is currently no evidence available to Council, either through the submission of a development application or through visits to the sites, to indicate that the items are under an immediate threat of demolition or unsympathetic alteration. Further, as the assessment of significance has already been completed and it is the recommendation of this report for Council to resolve to amend Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 to include the subject items, the issuing of an IHO under the Act is not appropriate.
The unnecessary or inappropriate use of the Interim Heritage Order provisions of the Act, runs the risk of Council’s delegated authority under the Act being revoked by the Minister for Heritage. This would mean that Council would be unable to issue future IHOs on risk sites.
Implications of Heritage Listing
Items listed under Schedule 5 of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 are subject to the provisions of the LLEP 2008 and the legislative requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. Works to heritage items, which would normally be exempt under another plan, would not be exempt and require development consent. Furthermore, any development proposal for the subject site and properties in the vicinity need to consider the impacts of the proposal on the heritage significance of the item.
A review of Council’s records indicate that there are no current development applications that would be impacted by the proposed heritage listing, but future development applications would be considered under provision 5.10 of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008.
Heritage listing does not prevent the use and in some cases the development of a subject site, but requires the developer or property owner to carefully consider the item and the potential impacts of a proposal on the item. Development may still be possible, if it is undertaken in a way that is sensitive and responsive to the item and its setting.
Council also has the ability under LLEP2008 to provide exemptions for minor works and maintenance, where it is satisfied that the works are going to have a minimal impact. An online portal is currently being developed to enable the submission of applications for minor works exemptions through Council’s ePlanning system. This will improve home owner access to this mechanism and enable minor works to be undertaken.
Review of Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008
The study of 15 potential heritage items has identified the need to undertake a review of the existing Schedule 5 of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008. The review is not to remove items from the list, but to correct the item names, and provide greater detail in the Statements of Significance and underlying data within Council’s Heritage Inventory.
A number of the item names within Schedule 5 are vague and lack sufficient detail. The naming of an item as “cottage”, while being a clear descriptor, challenges whether the internal fabric and the surrounding landscape of the item is also included. Current standard practice under the Standard LEP template is to ensure that the descriptor is sufficiently detailed to clearly outline what is listed. A descriptor of “cottage” would therefore change to “Victorian cottage, front fence and landscaping”, this provides a clear understanding of what is significant and what is included in the listing.
To amend the descriptors within Schedule 5 of the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008, a planning proposal would be required to be prepared. This can be undertaken in conjunction with the proposed planning proposal to include the additional 13 items, reducing duplication and the time in implementing the changes.
In relation to the Heritage Inventory, the data within the Inventory is critical to understanding the significance of the item but also the key elements within an item. A number of the existing inventories are incomplete, or lack sufficient detail to enable a clear understanding as to what is significant.
An initial review of the inventory has identified “MM Cables and Pirelli Power Cables (item 76” as an example, whereby there are a number of buildings within the complex which might be of significance, however the inventory lacks the detail to clearly identify the significance across the site and focuses primarily on the Administration Building which is only one component.
A review and update of the inventories, using available historical data, will ensure a comprehensive set of information which will assist property owners and developers, as well as Council Officers in the assessment of development proposals.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Heritage Study - Potential Heritage Items Recommended for ListingView (Under separate cover)
63
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Planning and Growth Report
DPG 02 |
Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment 65) - Shepherd Street Planning Proposal |
Strategic Direction |
Liveable Safe City Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development |
Key Policy |
Urban Development Plans |
File Ref |
113847.2017 |
Report By |
Ash Chand - Executive Planner |
Approved By |
Lina Kakish - Acting Director Planning and Growth |
Property |
20-33 Shepherd Street, Liverpool |
Owner |
Shepherd Street Developments Pty Limited Coronation Pty Limited Shepherd Property Nominee Pty Limited |
Applicant |
Mecone |
Executive Summary
At its Ordinary Meeting on 29 June 2016, Council resolved to support an application to amend the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008 for land located at 20, 26, 28, 31, 32 and 33 Shepherd Street, Liverpool, and to submit the proposal to the Department of Planning and Environment for Gateway Determination.
Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 65) seeks to increase the principal development standards of building height (HOB) and floor the space ratio (FSR) across the subject site, from the current 24m HOB and 1.5:1 FSR, to a maximum of 77m HOB and a maximum of 3.7:1 FSR. The R4 High Density Residential zoning for the site remains unchanged. The main objective of the planning proposal is to intensify the existing land use by increasing HOB and FSR to facilitate the development of approximately 1,200 residential units across the subject properties. It is noted the current LEP development standards enable the delivery of approximately 600-800 residential units.
This report details the conditions of the Gateway Determination and the results of the public exhibition and community consultation for draft Amendment 65. This report also updates Council on the details of a draft planning agreement (VPA) submitted by the proponent as an offer of public benefits in conjunction with the draft amendment. The VPA proposes improvements to local infrastructure and mitigation measures to offset the potential impacts as a result of the proposed development and increased density.
Whilst the increased density on the subject site from the amendment to the LEP is likely to have impacts within the local area and its surroundings, the specific components of the public benefits package offered by the proponent as they relate to upgrading public infrastructure, including works proposed to revitalise and activate sections of the Georges River adjacent to the subject site which are in Council ownership, will contribute to the overall improvement of those portions of the Georges River, Council officers believe this will yield a net benefit to the local community.
The approach is also in line with Council objectives to revitalise and activate the sections of Georges River which are in proximity to the Liverpool CBD, to provide greater amenity to the local community.
This report, therefore, recommends Council support the making of draft Amendment 65 (Attachment 1) and forward the updated planning proposal and supporting documentation to the Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) for finalisation, subject to Council resolving to endorse and place on public exhibition the draft VPA (Attachment 2).
This report also recommends that the CEO, or her delegate, be granted delegation to finalise and execute the VPA following its public exhibition, subject to no submissions with respect to the Planning Agreement being received, prior to the gazettal of Amendment 65.
That Council: 1. Note the Gateway Determination for draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment 65) and the results of the public exhibition and community consultation. 2. Subject to Item 3 and Item 4, forwards the updated Planning Proposal and supporting documentation to the Department of Planning and Environment for finalisation. 3. Endorse and places on public exhibition the draft Planning Agreement offered by the proponent in conjunction with the Planning Proposal. 4. Delegate authority to the CEO, or to her delegate, to execute the Planning Agreement following its public exhibition, if no submissions are received with respect to the Planning Agreement. |
Report
Site Context and Background
Draft Amendment 65, otherwise known as the Shepherd Street Planning Proposal, encompasses 20, 26, 28, 31, 32 and 33 Shepherd Street, Liverpool. The subject site (depicted in Figure 1) is approximately 3.1 hectares in total area. It is located on the eastern edge of Shepherd Street, south of the intersection with Atkinson Street and is bounded by the western bank of the Georges River. To its immediate south is Mill Park and the road which leads to the Casula Powerhouse.
The subject site is of an irregular configuration, located on the narrowing peninsula as it moves south along the river. In walking distance, it is approximately 1.2km south of the Liverpool Train Station and the Liverpool City Centre and 1.8km north of the Casula Powerhouse.
Figure 1: Planning Proposal Site 20, 26, 28, 31, 32 and 33 Shepherd Street, Liverpool
Currently, under LLEP 2008, the subject site is zoned R4 High Density Residential. Draft Amendment 65 retains the R4 zoning and instead seeks to permit greater HOB and FSR across the site to facilitate increased density. The changes proposed to LLEP 2008 in relation the subject properties are outlined in the following table.
Property |
Existing HOB |
Proposed HOB |
Existing FSR |
Proposed FSR |
20 Shepherd Street |
24m |
29m, 76m |
1.5:1 |
3.3:1 |
26 Shepherd Street |
24m |
45m |
1.5:1 |
3.7:1 |
28 Shepherd Street |
24m |
20m, 58m, 68m |
1.5:1 |
3.6:1 |
32 Shepherd Street |
24m |
56m |
1.5:1 |
3.6:1 |
33 Shepherd Street |
24m |
65m |
1.5:1 |
3.5:1 |
31 Shepherd Street |
24m |
77m |
1.5:1 |
3.5:1 |
The concept design of the proposed development, in terms of height and massing of the proposed development that may result from draft Amendment 65 across the subject properties, and within the Shepherd Street preicint as a whole, is illustrated in Figure 2 below.
Figure 2: Concept Massing of Development Proposal
The proposed changes to LLEP 2008 Map with regard to the principal development standard of HOB is shown below in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Existing and Proposed Height of Building Maps
The proposed changes to LLEP 2008 Map with regard to the principal development standard of FSR is shown below in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Existing and Proposed Floor Space Ratio Maps
As noted above, the subject site includes 20 Shepherd Street, which is also a local heritage item, listed under Schedule 5 of LLEP 2008. This property, also known as the “Paper Mill,” was a granted development consent in October 2015 (DA-1010/2014) for two residential flat buildings, 9 and 15 storeys, with a total 247 units. The subject site also includes 28 Shepherd Street, which was granted a development consent in January 2017 (DA-612/2015) for two residential flat buildings, 6 and 7 storeys, with a total of 140 units.
With the making of LLEP 2008, the Shepherd Street precinct, south of Atkinson Street, which encompasses the subject site, was zoned from IN1 General Industrial to R4 High Density Residential. The dominant character of the site, as well as the properties on the western side of Shepherd Street, remain largely industrial, notwithstanding the development consent for residential has been granted for 20 Shepherd Street and 28 Shepherd Street. Both these properties are under the same ownership interest, made up of Shepherd Street Developments and Coronation Property respectively.
Planning Proposal
In September 2015, the proponent (Coronation Property) lodged the Planning Proposal with Council. The initial application was for selected properties which included 20, 28, 31 and 33 Shepherd Street, Liverpool. These properties were either already held by the proponent or were in their commercial interest, as in the case of 31 Shepherd Street which is currently owned by Council.
In response to concerns raised by Council officers in the proponent’s disjointed treatment of isolated properties, significant offsetting on adjacent and adjoining properties and the lack of consent from adjoining landowners, the proponent modified their proposal in March 2016 to also include 26 and 32 Shepherd Street (owned by Shepherd Street Nominee).
At that time, Council officers also emphasised the absence of a comprehensive approach in addressing the constraints presented by the Shepherd Street precinct, in terms of the potential impacts of the proposed development on immediate, and surrounding areas and on the larger catchment, in terms of its capacity to support the increased residential densities and the resultant demand for additional infrastructure that may be required to support the proposed densities.
Council officers assessing the application held some concerns about the scale and scope of the proposed development, as reflected by proponent’s urban design report. The key issues identified at that time were with regard to the potential visual impacts and juxtaposition of the mass of development proposed to its surrounding and its disproportionate character in relation the immediate area and proximity to the Liverpool CBD.
The assessment found the subject site did not possess a strong correlation between density and connectivity. Generally, higher densities are best supported in locations that either function as, contribute towards, or form a part of an activity node or hub. The development potential of a site is based on its capacity to either deliver mixed and higher uses within the site itself, or alternatively its proximity to existing mixed and higher uses, including access to public transport, employment, services, recreational and community facilities, schools, amenities, etc. The redevelopment of a site for higher density should also yield multiple and diverse housing options. This is a straightforward, evidence-based approach to land-use planning and place-making.
As the Shepherd Street precinct is approximately 1.2km from Liverpool CBD and found to be lacking permeability and connectivity to the broader catchment, increasing densities as proposed on the subject site would likely lead to the increased traffic generation within the catchment as well as social impacts due to the inadequate public infrastructure and community facilities in proximity to support the proposed development.
The Planning Proposal was subsequently modified by the proponent to reflect some of the concerns raised by Council officers and, through revised studies to assess urban design, transport and mobility, and social impacts it was also proposed by the proponent that an offer of a public benefits would be provided with the intent to mitigate the potential impacts and to provide improvements to existing community assets and to create new assets, subject to Council agreement.
The offer of public benefits through a VPA to support the Shepherd Street Planning Proposal provides opportunities for Council to activate and revitalise a portion of the Georges River, to create new and improved local assets for the community. Furthermore, the offer provides contributions towards the improvement of local and regional road infrastructure and opportunities to provide public and active transport infrastructure which will contribute towards improving the connectivity and permeability of the site to its surroundings, and address concerns raised in the assessment.
On this basis, and on the condition that the proponent revise the planning proposal to provide additional information in support of the proposed development specifically with regard to assessments of urban design, transport and mobility, and social impacts, Council resolved to support the application by Coronation Property and submit the planning proposal to DPE seeking Gateway Determination.
At its Ordinary Meeting on 29 June 2016, it was resolved (Attachment 3):
That Council:
1. Endorses in principle the modified planning proposal for 20-33 Shepherd Street, Liverpool for increased density on the existing R4 site;
2. Delegates to the A/CEO the authority to finalise the planning proposal and submit to DPE for Gateway Approval, subject to submission of the following:
a. An urban design analysis;
b. A transport and mobility study; and
c. A comprehensive social impact assessment.
3. Notes that the A/CEO will finalise negotiations regarding the proposed voluntary planning agreement and public benefit offer and any other relevant conditions as required to support the proposal, with a report to be presented to a future Council meeting.
In relation to Item 2 of the resolution, those analyses were completed and the planning proposal for Shepherd Street was updated to reflect the studies, which in turn was forwarded to DPE seeking Gateway Determination.
It is noted here that Council commissioned independent peer reviews of both the transport and mobility study, which was undertaken by GTA Consultants on behalf of Council, and the social impact study, which was undertaken by Judith Stubbs and Associates on behalf of Council. Both the peer reviews were completed during the post-Gateway period and informed the key considerations for the VPA and the public benefits package.
As these reports are of substantial volume, the executive summaries of the analyses are attached for the reference of Council and public (Attachment 4). The full reports are publically available on council’s website (e-planning portal), and may also be provided to councillors directly via the Councillor Request system.
Gateway Determination
A Gateway Determination for the Planning Proposal was issued by DPE on 9 September 2016 (Attachment 5). The Determination required that draft Amendment 65 address a number of conditions. The following sections highlight Gateway conditions, the issues raised and provides a discussion of the actions undertaken by Council to meet those conditions.
Acid Sulfate Soils Study and Contaminated Land Assessment
Condition 1 of the Gateway determination required an acid sulfate soils assessment and contaminated land assessment be prepared prior to the public exhibition of the planning proposal. This was to satisfy the requirements of Section 117 Directions 4.1 Acid Sulfate Soils and State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land.
Environmental Investigations Australia, on behalf of the proponent, prepared a statement of environmental effects for acid sulfate soils and potential contamination for the subject site. This was received by Council on 29 September 2016 and forwarded to DPE for review. The assessment of acid sulfate soils noted that the risk posed was considered to be low. The results of the laboratory analysis indicated that the tested soils to depths of up to 5m below fill were unlikely to be affected by actual acid soil sulfate or potential acid sulfate soils.
In terms of contamination, the assessment concluded that the properties were suitable for redevelopment process, providing optimal opportunity for the removal of both primary and secondary sources of contamination, mainly through the excavation process and remediation works.
On 12 October 2016, Council received correspondence that the assessment satisfactorily addressed Condition 1 of the Determination Notice (Attachment 6).
Inconsistency with Section 117 Directions
The Secretary’s delegate noted in the Determination notice that the proposal was inconsistent with the following Section 117 Directions, however found these to be of minor significance:
· 2.1 Environment Protection Zones
· 3.5 Development Near Licensed Aerodromes
· 4.3 Flood Prone Land
Community Consultation
The Gateway Determination required Council to undertake community consultation in accordance with section 56(2)(c) and 57 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment (Act) 1979.
Draft Amendment 65 was placed on public exhibition from 26 October 2016 to the close of business 25 November 2016, with placement of notifications in the local paper, the Liverpool Leader, notification on Council’s website, and placement of exhibition materials in Council’s Administration Centre at 33 Moore Street.
As a result of the public exhibition, Council received one submission from the community. The main points of the submission (Attachment 7), and the Officer’s response is summarised below.
Public Submission Themes |
Officer Response |
Car Parking Impacts: Consideration to be given to car parking for tenants, visitors or industrial estate tenants |
Car parking provisions under the Liverpool DCP 2008 ensures that any future development will provide sufficient car parking for residents and visitors. |
Access to Education: Where will the children go to school? |
The Department of Education and Communities did not raise any objection to the planning proposal. |
Flooding: The area has continually been inundated by flooding |
Council has developed the Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan (FRMP) for the Georges River in accordance with the Guideline of the NSW Floodplain Development Manual (FDM) 2005. Flood modelling was undertaken for full range of the floods up to the probable maximum flood (PMF) and flood risk maps were prepared as part of development of FRMP. The site is located on the low risk flood zone and the corresponding flood planning level (FPL) for residential development is 1%AEP flood + 0.5m freeboard, which is 10.4m AHD. It should be noted that the adopted FPL for the site is consistent with the State Government’s Flood Policy and Planning Circular dated 31 January 2007 on Section 117 direction & EPA Regulation on Flood Prone Land. |
Consequently, the one submission received from the member of the public is not considered significant enough to preclude any change to the draft amendment.
Public Authority Consultation
Public authority consultation was undertaken in accordance with section 56(2)(d) of the Act 1979, and as required under Condition 4 and 5 of the Determination Notice.
Council provided the public authorities with a copy of the draft amendment, and the authorities were given a minimum of 28 days to comments with extensions where required, and late comments were accepted. The draft amendment was forwarded to the relevant public authorities on 26 October 2016 with comments due by close of business on 9 December 2016.
The main points of each of the submissions (refer to Attachment 8), and the Officer’s response is summarised below.
Public Authority |
Public Authority Comments |
Council Officer Comments |
DPI Fisheries |
DPI recommended the public pathway along Georges River be constructed above and outside the top of the river bank. Concerns were raised regarding stability of the bank in relation to floodwaters and the erosion and slumping of banks if the riparian corridor is cleared for the boardwalk. It was pointed out that Appendix 6 of planning proposal is inaccurate in its consideration of the bank stability issues and land degradation issues as required under the Greater Metropolitan Regional Environment Plan No.2 – Georges River. |
As part of the VPA negotiations, the public pathway along the Georges River will be assessed at the application stage by Council under Part 5 of the Act. Appropriate assessment of the subject site and the larger Georges River precinct will be undertaken to determine the bank stability having regard to both flood events and storm water discharge, and with consideration to the rehabilitated vegetated riparian zone (VRZ). |
DPI Water |
DPI Water raised concerns regarding Vegetated Riparian Zones and the proposed encroachment by the development into the inner 50% of the riparian zone and the requirements for providing offsets. DPI Water requested a scaled plan demonstrating an agreed approach to the precinct development in terms of offsets of development within the Vegetated Riparian Zones. The proposed development of the precinct should be able to demonstrate consistency with the DPI Water Guidelines for Controlled Activities on Waterfront Land (2012). |
The proponent has submitted a scaled precinct plan which highlights the proposed development footprint, highest bank, the 40m VRZ plus inner and outer VRZs, and areas of offsets and encroachments for the entire precinct. DPI Water agreed at the meeting held at the Minister’s office on 3 November 2016 that currently built upon land in the Inner Vegetated Riparian Zone (VRZ) can be used as part of offsetting for development incursions into the Outer 50% VRZ. The proponents scaled precinct plan is considered consistent. |
Office Environment & Heritage |
Do not object to the draft amendment. However, the authority noted the following items locally listed with Schedule 5 - Environmental Heritage of the draft Liverpool LEP 2008.
|
The matter was addressed in the DA for 20 Shepherd Street. However, in view of increasing the development standards, Council will give further consideration to future DAs with regard to potential adverse impacts due to the development of property within the subject site. |
Endeavour Energy |
Endeavour Energy has no objections to the planning proposal. |
No action required. Future DAs on the subject site will be referred to Endeavour Energy. |
Telstra |
Noted. Mobile sites will not be adversely affected by the planning proposal. |
Noted. No action required. |
Sydney Water |
No comment on the proposal as it is not located near any of their assets or infrastructure. |
Noted. No action required. |
Bankstown Airport |
Bankstown Airport Limited noted the building height is expected to extend close to the OLS surface pertaining to Bankstown Airport and as such an aviation assessment may be required when the final drawings are available. |
Noted. No action required. Future DAs on the subject site will be referred to Bankstown Airport Limited for an aviation assessment. |
Consultation for Regional Infrastructure Contributions
Condition 5 of the Determination Notice required Council to consult the public authorities specifically with regard to regional infrastructure contributions as a result of increasing the development standards to facilitate 1,200 dwellings. It is noted the current LEP development standards enable the delivery of approximately 600-800 residential units.
A summary of each submission is detailed in the table below, as well as considerations for Council arising from the respective submissions by the public authorities.
State Agency |
Public Authority Comments |
Council Officer Response |
Transport NSW |
TfNSW and RMS provided a joint submission requesting the deferral of the planning proposal until such time that the cumulative transport study associated with the Liverpool City Centre LEP (Amendment 52) was gazetted, along with the developer contribution being commensurate with an identified contribution scheme/levy that may be generated for the City Centre planning proposal. It was also advised that the traffic generation rate should be based on the rate for high density residential development in Metropolitan Sub-Regional Centres referenced in Section 3.3.3 of the Guide to Traffic Generating Development. The Guide specifies a rate of 0.29 trips per hour in the AM and PM peaks for high density residential developments not well serviced by public transport and this rate should be applied to Shepherd Street precinct. |
At a meeting in February 2017, it was agreed that in the absence of a funding mechanism being established for the City Centre Planning Proposal (Amendment 52) (i.e. residential population uplift) the public authorities would consider a monetary contribution in a form of a VPA towards regional road and transport infrastructure. On 1 May 2017, it was agreed by RMS and TfNSW that a monetary contribution in the order of $10,000 per dwelling (per agreed uplift as a consequence of the LEP amendment) go towards regional road and transport infrastructure, removing the previous objection to this amendment, proceeding to gazettal ahead of Draft LEP Amendment No.52. An updated traffic report prepared by GTA Consultants was submitted to Council in April 2017. The outcomes of this report will contribute to a revised strategy to manage traffic in the area and, together with conditioned works, the funding proposed through the VPA will be applied to this purpose. |
Roads & Maritime Services |
||
Department Education & Communities |
Do not consider regional infrastructure contributions or a VPA is appropriate in the circumstances with regard to school facilities. |
Noted. No action required. |
Ministry of Health |
Commented on the proposed overshadowing of the Georges River, setback of the buildings from the river.
|
Noted. No action required. Council at the pre-Gateway Council Meeting resolved to support the application as proposed (including the bulk and heights as depicted in the concept plan).
|
Commented that Council should take into consideration the Liverpool Hospital Helicopter Landing Site and Flight Path. |
Noted. No action required. Council is in the process of implementing provision to protect the Helicopter Flight Path within the Liverpool CBD (draft Amendment 67). |
|
Office of Environment & Heritage |
Provided comments relating to further flood studies which consider the risks to people and property from the Georges River and any potential overland flooding. The public authority did not specify requirements for regional infrastructure contributions. |
The site is not affected by floodway of the Georges River and the proposed development does not involve filling of flood storage area. Therefore there would be no adverse impact on flood behaviour or flow redistribution. Council has developed the Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan (FRMP) for the Georges River in accordance with the Guideline of the NSW Floodplain Development Manual (FDM) 2005. Flood modelling was undertaken for full range of the floods up to the probable maximum flood (PMF) and flood risk maps were prepared as part of development of FRMP. The site is located on the low risk flood zone and the corresponding flood planning level (FPL) for residential development is 1%AEP flood + 0.5m freeboard, which is 10.4m AHD. It should be noted that adopted FPL for the site is consistent with the State Government’s Flood Policy and Planning Circular dated 31 January 2007 on Section 117 direction & EPA Regulation on Flood Prone Land. |
State Emergency Services |
Do not object to the draft amendment. Comments related to the flood prone nature of the precinct. |
Noted. No action required. |
Fire & Rescue NSW |
Acknowledged request. No comments on the draft amendment. |
Noted. No action required. |
NSW Police |
Do not object to the draft amendment. However commented with regards to the future design of the residential development, consideration of the location of mailboxes and access to underground car parking. |
Noted. These design matters will be considered at the development application stage. |
Sydney Water |
Provided comments relating to the need for upgrades to the reticulation network and wastewater system. |
Noted. These matters will be considered at the development application stage. |
Summary of Key Issues
From the submission received as a result of the public exhibition and community consultation, and with reference to the aforementioned sections of this report, Council officers conclude that the comments received from the community and the public authorities do not require any further modifications to the Planning Proposal. These above matters are technical in nature and do not represent in-principle objections to draft Amendment 65.
Consequently, it is recommended that Council support the finalisation of Amendment 65, subject to endorsement of the draft VPA, offered by the proponent in conjunction with the LEP amendment. The following section of this report will summarise the contents of the VPA in terms of public benefits for Council’s consideration.
Draft Planning Agreement
The Planning Proposal was accompanied by a ‘letter of offer’ to enter into a VPA upon lodgement in September 2015, which was amended prior to being reported to Council on 29 June 2016.
Council at that meeting resolved inter alia, that it:
Notes that the A/CEO will finalise negotiations regarding the proposed voluntary planning agreement and public benefit offer and any other relevant conditions as required to support the proposal, with a report to be presented to a future Council meeting.
There have been subsequent negotiations between Council and the applicant for the Planning Proposal regarding various aspects of the VPA, which are now largely finalised for consideration by Council, though some further negotiation and amendment of the structure and form of the final VPA may still be required (subject to legal advice). The VPA has been drafted in accordance with Council’s Planning Agreements Policy.
Planning agreements generally involve an agreement between a developer and the planning authority, in this case, Council, whereby the developer, when undertaking a development, agrees to provide a public purpose such as:
· Land dedicated for a community benefit;
· Works associated with the delivery of infrastructure or a community benefit;
· Monetary contributions to Council for the provision of land and works (usually not on the site of the development); and
· Payment towards temporary recurrent costs of public facilities.
It should be noted that the letter of offer covers only some of the properties identified in the draft VPA. The draft VPA cannot be finalised until all of the owners of land identified in the VPA have signed it.
The VPA will operate in the following manner:
· It will be a legal document whereby the owners of land identified in it will agree to provide works or pay a monetary contribution in conjunction with the development of their properties;
· The signatories to it will be the owners of land identified in the PA and Council;
· It will be tied to specific land parcels in Shepherd Street and, under the EP&A Act 1979, will apply to the existing and future land owners;
· It will have a list of works to be provided and a list of monetary contributions to be paid (listed below);
· As it is expected there will be a number of developments, there will be a number of stages in the provision of works and the payment of monetary contributions;
· It will specify thresholds which will require a land owner to have undertaken works or provide monetary contributions before an occupation certificate is issued for a development;
· It will contain securities in the form of payment of bonds to ensure that works are adequately funded if the land owners are unable to deliver works for whatever reason;
· It will contain various clauses to cover dispute matters etc.
Whilst the substance of the proposed VPA works and contributions are agreed between the parties in principle, please note that at the time of drafting this report, technical elements of the Draft VPA and schedules (Attachment 2) were still undergoing legal review. Furthermore, quantity-surveyed values for some works and contributions remained under review and were expected to change. As such, staff expect to be in a position to provide Council and the public with a revised draft VPA for review as an addendum, prior to the Council meeting on 28 June 2017.
Overview of Contributions
Infrastructure funding from the development of sites subject to the PA will be received in the following ways:
· S94A contribution in accordance with the Liverpool Contributions Plan 2007 (Liverpool City Centre);
· Infrastructure costs directly related to a development such as footpaths, street tree planting, local road works (S80A of the EP&A Act);
· Works or monetary contributions in the VPA to minimise the impact of development; and
· Works or monetary contributions in the VPA to provide a public benefit.
The following is the scope of works in the draft VPA.
Item |
Reason for item |
Provision of a free shuttle bus service linking the Shepherd Street development to the Liverpool City Centre for a period of 5 years, providing an adequate level of service at suitable intervals in both the AM and the PM peak periods |
Assist with minimising traffic generation from the additional developments |
Provision of bike share pods at Shepherd Street, Liverpool Railway Station and Casula Railway Station |
Assist with minimising traffic generation from the additional developments |
Line marking of car parking spaces in Shepherd Street for 3 to 4 cars used in car sharing arrangements, located near new retail area within the Paper Mill |
Assist with minimising traffic generation from the additional developments |
Re-opening of the Woodbrook Road Railway underpass for pedestrians and cyclists |
Partial public benefit (est. 50% of contribution value)to provide access to the Georges River Parklands from areas in Casula |
Monetary contribution towards local traffic infrastructure |
Assist with provision of local road works to accommodate traffic generated by the additional development |
Monetary contribution towards regional traffic infrastructure |
Assist with provision of regional transport works to accommodate traffic generated by the additional development, to satisfy the requirements of RMS / TfNSW. |
Provision of a pedestrian and cycle river walk along the riparian zone between the developments and the Georges River, including stabilisation of the existing river bank which is currently unstable |
Partial public benefit (est. 50% of contribution value) to provide access to the Georges River foreshore for residents of the developments and for the public |
Construction of an upgrade to the existing path way along the riparian zone north of the Development through Lighthorse Park to Newbridge Road |
Partial public benefit (est. 50% of contribution value) to improve access to Lighthorse Park access for residents of the developments and for the public |
Rehabilitation of the riparian zone along the river adjacent to the Development and north to Lighthorse Park, including replanting where relevant |
Partial public benefit (est. 50% of contribution value) to improve the Georges River foreshore to Lighthorse Park for residents of the developments and for the public |
Monetary contribution for public open space within the City Centre and public domain works to be determined by Council |
Partial public benefit (est. 50% of contribution value) to improve for residents of the developments and for the public |
The value of the works to be provided through in the VPA is estimated at $38,058,330. It should be noted that the cost of works includes a substantial contingency for the cost of the stabilisation of the riverbank (referred to above) due to the uncertainties in relation to its eventual cost.
Exhibition
If Council supports the recommendations of this report, the draft VPA will be publicly exhibited for a minimum of 28 days with delegation to the CEO, or her delegate, to execute the VPA if no submissions are received in relation to it.
If any submissions are received as a result of the public exhibition, these will then be reported back to Council for its consideration.
At this point it is proposed that the draft Amendment 65 can then be submitted to the NSW Department of Planning and Environment for finalisation and gazettal. The Planning Agreement could be conditioned to enable it to come into force when the LEP is gazetted.
Conclusion
It is the recommendation of this report that Council resolve to support the making of draft Amendment 65 (Shepherd Street Planning Proposal) and submit the proposal to the DPE for finalisation, subject to endorsement and public exhibition of the VPA offered by Coronation Property in support of the draft amendment.
It is also the recommendation of this report to delegate authority to the CEO, or to her delegate, to execute the VPA.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Protect, enhance and maintain areas of endangered ecological communities and high quality bushland as part of an attractive mix of land uses. |
Social and Cultural |
Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place. Regulate for a mix of housing types that responds to different population groups such as young families and older people. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Attachment 1 - Planning Proposal without AppendicesView (Under separate cover)
2. Attachment 2 - Draft VPA (at 19 June 2017)View (Under separate cover)
3. Attachment 3 - June 2016 Council Resolution and Report View (Under separate cover)
4. Attachment 4 - Executive SummariesView (Under separate cover)
5. Attachment 5 - Gateway Determination - Amendment 65View (Under separate cover)
6. Attachment 6 - Letter from DP&E View (Under separate cover)
7. Attachment 7 - Community ConsultationView (Under separate cover)
8. Attachment 8 - Public Agency SubmissionsView (Under separate cover)
79
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Planning and Growth Report
DPG 03 |
Street and Park Naming Proposals |
Strategic Direction |
Proud Engaged City Strengthen and celebrate Liverpool’s unique community identity |
Key Policy |
Community Engagement Policy |
File Ref |
155137.2017 |
Report By |
Peter Pham - Strategic Planning |
Approved By |
Lina Kakish - Acting Director Planning and Growth |
Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to update Council on the current naming requests. All street and park names have been assessed using the Naming Convention Policy and in consultation with the Geographical Names Board (GNB) of NSW. Accordingly, the proposals are recommended for Council approval and gazettal.
That Council: 1. Adopts the recommendation to support the street and park names noted in this report; and
2. Delegates to the Chief Executive Officer to begin the process of gazettal being: a) Public notification for 28 days in the local newspaper; and b) State referral agencies to be notified using the GNB’s Online Road Naming System to seek endorsement. |
REPORT
Street and park naming proposals were received for the month of May. All street and park names have been assessed using the naming guidelines and in consultation with the Geographical Names Board (GNB) of NSW. The names have been checked for duplication using the GNB’s Online Road Naming System.
The following items in collaboration with the GNB, are recommended for Council approval and gazettal:
Item 1: 35-37 Gurners Avenue, Austral (DA-1164/2015)
Council received an application located at 35-37 Gurners Avenue, Austral known as Kingfisher Estate. Given the name of the estate, the proponent has proposed street names after birds in Western Sydney (Attachment 1). These names are:
· Crown Street
· Swamphen Street
· Scrubwren Street
· Thornbill Street
· Gerygone Street
· Lapwing Street
Item 2: 290 Kurrajong Road, Prestons (DA- 987/2015)
Some parts of Prestons are named after small towns (e.g. San Marino Drive, Venezia Street, Calabria Street etc.) in Italy. The proponent has proposed Melito Court, which is a small town north of Naples (Attachment 2). Therefore, the proposal is consistent with the theme of the area.
Next Steps
All street names will be:
· Placed on public notification for 28 days in the local newspaper; and
· The GNB and other relevant state agencies (Australia Post, NSW Ambulance, Fire and Rescue NSW, NSW Rural Fire Service, NSW State Emergency Service, NSW Volunteer Rescue Association, Roads and Maritime Services and NSW Police Force) will be notified using the GNB’s Online Road Naming System to seek endorsement.
Please note that if there are any objections from the relevant state agencies, a report to Council will be prepared for the next available meeting outlining the reason for objection.
Park Naming
Item 3: Judy Pack Park – 110 Edinburgh Circuit, Cecil Hills (Lot 1000 DP830610)
Judy Pack was a dedicated historian for Liverpool and helped to preserve and display much of our history to the public. Her assistance in the Liverpool and District Historical Society provided invaluable assistance to the preservation of the history she cared so deeply about. As the Vice President of the Liverpool U3A (School For Seniors, A University of the Third Age), Judy assisted in bringing history to the senior citizens of Liverpool and ensuring that a continued tradition of our past is available to people of all ages.
Council officers liaised with Judy’s grandson on finding an appropriate location for a park to be named after her.
Figure 1: Proposed Judy Pack Park – 110 Edinburgh Circuit, Cecil Hills.
Item 4: John Edmondson Memorial Park – Lot 942 Wakeling and Jardine Drives, Edmondson Park.
Council has received an application for land, located at Wakeling and Jardine Drives, which is soon to be dedicated as a park to be called John Edmondson Memorial Park.
The suburb of Edmondson Park is the rural district where John Edmondson was raised. John Edmondson was known for his heroic actions at the Battle of Tobruk in North Africa in 1941. He was posthumously awarded the Victoria Cross which was presented to his mother by the Governor General.
Figure 2: Proposed John Edmondson Memorial Park – Lot 942 Wakeling Drive, Edmondson Park.
The park names process will be undertaken by the GNB on behalf of Council.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media. Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Item 1 - Kingfisher EstateView
85
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Chief Executive Officer Report
CEO 01 |
Draft Delivery Program 2017-2021 and Operational Plan 2017-2018 and Budget (including Statement of Revenue) |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation |
Key Policy |
Local Government Act 1993 |
File Ref |
137110.2017 |
Report By |
Emily Tinson - Acting Manager Corporate Strategy and Performance |
Approved By |
Kiersten Fishburn - Chief Executive Officer |
Executive Summary
At the Council meeting on 26 April 2017, Council resolved that the draft Delivery Program 2017-2021 and draft Operational Plan 2017-2018, and Statement of Revenue Policy (fees and charges) be placed on public exhibition, with a further report to be provided to Council following public exhibition.
Under the Local Government Act 1993 each local government area must endorse a four-year Delivery Program by June 30 in the year following a Council election. The one-year Operational Plan is the annual sub-plan for the Delivery Program and must be adopted before the beginning of the financial year. Each plan must be placed on exhibition for 28 days. The 2017-2021 Delivery Program and 2017-2018 Operational Plan are incorporated into one document. This report also includes the Statement of Revenue Policy (fees and charges).
Public exhibition was undertaken between Monday 1 May, 2017 and Monday 29 May 2017 with one submission received within the period and one submission received on 4 June, 2017.
The draft Delivery Program 2017-2021 and draft Operational Plan 2017-2018 is recommended for adoption with the changes outlined in this report.
The Statement of Revenue Policy (fees and charges) is recommended for adoption, with additional amendments approved, subject to exhibition for 28 days.
That Council:
1. Adopt the Delivery Program 2017-2021 and Operational Plan 2017-2018
2. Adopt the Statement of Revenue Policy (fees and charges), and approve additional amendments to fees and charges subject to exhibition for 28 days.
3. In the event there are no submissions received concerning the proposed additional amendments to the fees and charges following the 28 day exhibition period, incorporate those changes into Council’s Statement of Revenue Policy (fees and charges);
4. In the event submissions are received concerning the proposed additional amendments to the fees and charges, bring a report to the August meeting of Council detailing the submissions and including recommendations on how to proceed. |
REPORT
At its meeting on 26 April 2017, Council resolved to place the draft Delivery Program 2017-2021 and draft Operational Plan 2017-2018, and Statement of Revenue Policy (fees and charges) on public exhibition for a period of 28 days. The draft plans were publicly exhibited from May 1 to May 29, 2017.
Under the Local Government Act 1993 each local government area must endorse a 10-year Community Strategic Plan and four-year Delivery Program by June 30 in the year following a Council election. The one-year Operational Plan is the annual sub-plan for the Delivery Program and must be adopted before the beginning of the financial year. Each plan must be placed on exhibition for 28 days.
The Community Strategic Plan (CSP) – Our Home Liverpool 2027 – is the highest level plan for the community. It identifies the main priorities and aspirations for the future of the local government area. Created in consultation with the Liverpool community, the CSP sets four key directions that address the quadruple bottom line (social, economic, environment and civic leadership). Council’s CSP was adopted on 26 April, 2017.
The Delivery Program 2017-2021 translates the directions of the CSP into strategies that will guide Council for the next four years, and is a statement of commitment to the community for each newly elected term of office.
The Operational Plan is reviewed annually and details the actions that Council will undertake within the financial year.
The Delivery Program 2017-2021 and Operational Plan 2017-2018 are incorporated into one document, along with the Budget. The document also includes Council’s proposed capital works program.
The Statement of Revenue Policy outlines all of Council’s proposed fees and charges for the 2017-2018 year.
Public exhibition and consultation on the draft Delivery Program 2017-2021 and draft Operational Plan 2017-2018, and Statement of Revenue Policy (fees and charges)
The drafts were placed on public exhibition throughout May 2017. The following activities were undertaken to seek community feedback on the drafts:
· Printed copies at all of Council’s libraries and Customer Service Centre
· Public notices in the Liverpool Leader
· Advertising in the Liverpool Leader
· A project on Liverpool Listens including the documents available for download and feedback
· Information on Council’s Facebook page
· A public information session held on Thursday May 18 at Carnes Hill Community Centre. Five residents attended.
Results of the consultation – Delivery Program and Operational Plan
Public submissions
Two submissions were received. One was received one week past deadline, but has also been considered. The responses to the submissions are summarised in the Attachment. The following change has been proposed as a result of this feedback.
Source |
Document |
Change |
Submission |
DPOP |
Pge 85. Table redeveloped to reflect request in submission to clarify expenditure funding sources and decrease duplication. |
Staff submissions
Staff also reviewed the documents during the exhibition process and have proposed amendments which are detailed in the next three tables.
· The first table outlines changes to the Delivery Program and Operational Plan.
· The second table outlines changes to the Operating Budget.
· The
third table outlines changes to the Capital Budget.
Delivery Program and Operational Plan
Page/code |
Reason |
Change |
p34/S.1.1
|
Changes as result of council resolution DCP 1, March 29, 2017 |
Additions to the Delivery Program Measures · Meetings held with neighbouring councils on joint tender project for future disposal of waste · Project Timeline and Team developed for future disposal of waste · Procurement Process commenced (future disposal of waste)
|
p.31/C.5.2
|
Changes as a result of consultation |
Add Revitalisation of Ferrington Reserve Pocket Park – June Add Lighthorse Park Feasibility Study - June Add Create Recreation Sports and Open Space Strategy – October Add Adopt Community Facilities Strategy - October
|
P64/L.3.1
|
Changes as a result of consultation |
Replace Review Council’s community engagement process with Develop Community Engagement Policy – December Add Update Social Impact Policy - June
|
Operating Budget
Directorate |
Description |
Change |
CEO |
Annual fees for the Chairperson and two other independent members of the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee per Council Resolution 26 April 2017 |
+$21,000 |
CEO |
External review of Internal Audit function per Resolution – Council Resolution 26 April 2017 |
+$20,000 |
City Corporate |
Increase in Mayoral fees – NSW LG Remuneration Tribunal determination on allowances applicable to Metropolitan Large councils. |
+$18,781 |
City Corporate |
Increase in Councillors fees - NSW LG Remuneration Tribunal determination on allowances applicable to Metropolitan Large councils. |
+$49,434 |
City Corporate |
Maintenance costs to include additional cameras to CCTV surveillance network – Council Resolution 31 May 2017 |
+$40,000 |
City Corporate |
Additional legal costs relating to Moorebank Recyclers Court Case Appeal – Council Resolution 31 May 2017 |
+$80,000 |
|
TOTAL |
$229,215 |
Capital Budget
Directorate |
Description |
Change |
City Economy & Growth |
Ticket Parking Machine upgrade at Warren Service Way as per Council resolution CONF 01 Council meeting 31 May 2017 |
+$300,000 |
City Corporate |
Cost of licences, recording space and configuration of additional cameras to CCTV surveillance network – Council Resolution 31 May 2017 |
+$25,200 |
|
TOTAL |
$325,200 |
Results of consultation – Statement of Revenue Policy (fees and charges)
Staff have proposed the following amendments to the Statement of Revenue (Fees & Charges).
Fee Details |
Exhibited Fees |
Proposed Fees |
Comments |
S603 Certificates |
$75 |
$80 |
OLG Circular 18th May 2017 |
Interest on overdue rates |
8% |
7.5% |
OLG Circular 18th May 2017 |
Children’s Services: Returned cheque, Direct Debit or unpaid Credit Card Fees – All Other payments |
Varies |
Not Applicable |
Fee deleted as Council will cease to charge this fee in FY 2017/2018. |
Fees for Casula Pre-school (per day) Pre-school fee for 8:30 am – 4:30 pm
Standard non-equity rate 4 and 5 year old rate Equity rate |
$45 |
Nil
$47 $32.90 $15
|
Replaced by a new pricing structure below
Proposed new pricing structure in line with the NSW government’s new Preschool Funding model aimed at ensuring affordability for families with young children. Eligibility criteria applies for each proposed fee. |
Global Section 68 Temporary Structures and Mechanical Devices
Mobile Food Vehicle – Permit Approval Fee
|
Nil
$340 |
$231.60
$720 |
New fees under Events
The proposed increase is consistent with current external demands to assess and monitor mobile businesses in Liverpool based on a cost recovery basis. |
Naming fee for geographical features including streets, parks, suburbs, Council owned buildings, reserves and waterways within the Liverpool LGA.
Application Fee – Base Fee (up to 10 names) Additional fee per name (in excess of 10 names) Newspaper and Gazettal Fee Re-advertising |
Nil
Nil
Nil Nil |
$140
$10
$430 $150 |
Proposed fees are intended to cover the costs of Council resources, consultation with Geographical Names Board of NSW, public exhibition and gazettal charges. When benchmarked with other comparable Councils, these fees are significantly less than what is currently charged by other Councils. |
Warren Serviceway Car Park Fees
0 – 1 hour 1 – 2 hours 2 – 3 hours 3 – 4 hours 4 – 5 hours 5 hours and over Maximum daily |
$2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $14 $14 |
$3 $5 $7 $10 $12 $15 $15 |
Car parking fees at Warren Serviceway have not been increased for the last four years. Proposed fees have been benchmarked with other Councils and they are comparable if not lower than current fees. |
Road Occupancy
Temporary Half Road Closure per week – outside the Liverpool City centre
Temporary Full Road Closure per week – outside the Liverpool City centre |
$178.50
Nil |
$125
$250 |
The fees are structured to ensure that contractors do not close roads over an extensive period of time. The fees are approximately half the fees charged for road occupancy in the city centre.
|
Resident Parking Permits
Resident Parking Permit – First Permit
Resident Parking Permit – Second Permit if applicable
Permit for Pensioner of Student, Concession Cardholders per year
Replacement of Permit |
$20
$40 |
Free
$20
$10
$25 |
Council has approved and will be implementing resident parking schemes along local streets outside the CBD following representations from residents. The fees have been structured to recoup the costs of the scheme and are comparable to the fees charged by Parramatta Council. |
Rental, installation and removal of banners from Council poles (minimum 4 weeks)
Community Not-for-Profit Organisations
Other Institutions |
Nil
Nil |
$50
$120 |
Flags and Banners Policy approved by CEO |
In addition, several minor editorial changes have been made.
Thank you to the Liverpool community and Liverpool City Council staff for their participation and feedback in the creation of the Delivery Program and Operational Plan.
As a result of the overall community endorsement of the Delivery Program and Operational Plan it is recommended that Council adopts Delivery Program and Operational Plan.
It is recommended that the Statement of Revenue Policy is adopted, and amendments to fees and charges are approved, subject to exhibition for 28 days.
CONSIDERATIONS
The new Community Strategic Plan (adopted in April 2017) and Delivery Program and Operational Plan take a holistic approach to the goals and aspirations of the community. They directly address quadruple bottom line: social, economic, environment and leadership. The directions of the Community Strategic Plan filter into the actions of the Delivery Program and Operational Plan.
Economic and Financial |
The new Community Strategic Plan’s Direction 3 - Generating Opportunity – underlines the need for Council to support economic growth, including employment and investment options. It includes the measurement of Council’s financial sustainability through reporting on its Fit for the Future financial obligations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
The new Community Strategic Plan’s Direction 2 – Strengthening and Protecting Our Environment – is about planning high-quality, sustainable urban environments to create a great place to live, work and play. |
Social and Cultural |
The new Community Strategic Plan’s Direction 1 – Creating Connection – emphasises the importance of connections within Liverpool to create a harmonious community. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
The new Community Strategic Plan’s Direction 4 – Leading through Collaboration – highlights the importance of a Council proactively leading the community, while continually engaging the community to ensure an aligned vision. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Response to Delivery Program and Operational Plan Submissions View (Under separate cover)
2. Delivery Program 2017-2021 & Operational Plan 2017-2018View (Under separate cover)
3. FY 1718 Fees and Charges Version 2View (Under separate cover)
93
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Chief Executive Officer Report
CEO 02 |
Strategic Panel Minutes 6 June 2017 |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Lead partnerships and collaboration with community, business and governments |
Key Policy |
Long-Term Financial Plan |
File Ref |
138519.2017 |
Report By |
Claudia Novek - Corporate Planner |
Approved By |
Kiersten Fishburn - Chief Executive Officer |
Executive Summary
This report tables the minutes of the Strategic Panel held on 6 June 2017.
That Council receives the minutes of the Strategic Panel held on 6 June 2017. |
REPORT
The Strategic Panel met on 6 June 2017 and considered four agenda items. The minutes are attached for the information of Council.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Enhancing Liverpool’s economic profile to encourage investment and tourism. Revitalising the City Centre through initiatives, projects and events. Deliberating on major developments that will impact the Liverpool local government area. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Improving Liverpool’s social profile to achieve a community renewal of the City Centre. Reviewing community recommendations to create a collaborative approach to Council’s strategic direction. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Achieving an integrated and coordinated approach to deliver strategic initiatives. Making informed decisions as a Council. Working in partnership with organisations to achieve the best result for the community. Advocating for federal and state government support, funding and services. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Strategic Panel Meeting Minutes - June View
2. June Strategic Panel PowerPoint View
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Chief Executive Officer Report
CEO 03 |
Amendments to Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee Charter |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation |
Key Policy |
Good Governance |
File Ref |
154869.2017 |
Report By |
David Maguire - Acting Head of Audit and Risk |
Approved By |
Kiersten Fishburn - Chief Executive Officer |
Executive Summary
This report recommends minor changes to the clauses 7.1 (Councillor representation) and 9.1 (quorum) for the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee Charter.
That Council adopt the Draft Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee Charter attached to this report. |
REPORT
At its meeting held on 19 May 2017, the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC) approved changes to the quorum provisions of the ARIC Charter to enable a Councillor attending an ARIC meeting as an observer to stand in for a Councillor member unable to attend the ARIC meeting. It is considered, however, that this proposal could pose a problem if a Councillor member of the ARIC was absent and two or more Councillor observers were then present at the meeting: how would the replacement Councillor then be chosen?
It is considered that a preferable and easier option would be to reduce the ARIC quorum to one Councillor member and one independent member as per the proposed amendment to clause 9.1 of the attached Draft Charter.
It is also recommended that a minor amendment be made to clause 7.1 of the Charter to clarify (but not alter) Councillor representation.
For the information of Council, an expression of interest process is currently underway to obtain two new independent ARIC members. It is anticipated that a report with recommendations for new ARIC members will be submitted to the July Council meeting.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Draft Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee Charter June 2017 PDF Version
191 |
|
CEO 03 |
Amendments to Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee Charter |
Attachment 1 |
Draft Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee Charter June 2017 PDF Version |
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Chief Executive Officer Report
CEO 04 |
Review of the Enterprise Risk Management Policy |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation |
Key Policy |
Long-Term Financial Plan |
File Ref |
156005.2017 |
Report By |
David Maguire - Acting Head of Audit and Risk |
Approved By |
Kiersten Fishburn - Chief Executive Officer |
Executive Summary
Council’s current Enterprise Risk Management Policy (ERM Policy) and its Enterprise Risk Management Strategy (ERM Strategy) were both due for review recently. A review of both the ERM Policy and the ERM Strategy has recently been completed. During the course of these two reviews, it was concluded that the provisions of the ERM Strategy, to some extent, duplicated those of the ERM Policy. As a result, it was recommended to include most of the differing provisions of the ERM Strategy into the one document, a new Draft ERM Policy, which was endorsed with a minor amendment by the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee (ARIC) at its meeting on 19 May 2017. The Draft ERM Policy is now, therefore, submitted to Council for adoption.
That Council:
1. Adopt the Draft Enterprise Risk Management Policy attached to this report; and
2. Revoke the Enterprise Risk Management Strategy attached to this report. |
REPORT
Council’s ERM Policy and ERM Policy are overdue for review. As a result of reviews undertaken by the Acting Head of Audit and Risk, it was concluded that the provisions of the ERM Strategy, to some extent, duplicated those of the ERM Policy and that the ERM Policy and the ERM Strategy could be included within one document, a new Draft ERM Policy, which was submitted for endorsement to the ARIC meeting on 19 May 2017.
One major change to the current ERM Policy is that responsibility for administration of the ERM Policy has been moved from Council’s Risk Coordinator to the Head of Audit and Risk, and to Internal Audit unit generally, reflecting the fact that Internal Audit is responsible for maintaining, reviewing and updating Council’s Risk Register, after consultation with the CEO and risk owners (Council directors and managers).
During the consideration of the Draft ERM Policy at the ARIC meeting on 19 May 2017, a representative of the Audit Office of NSW suggested that Council should have a separate risk appetite statement. The Acting Head of Audit and Risk has recently obtained a copy of the Audit Office of NSW Risk Appetite Statement (attached to this report), the provisions of which are quite similar to the provisions of clauses 4.3 and 4.4 of the Draft ERM Policy. Given this fact, at this time it is not considered expedient or necessary to issue a separate Council risk appetite statement, given the provisions of clauses 4.3 and 4.4 of the Draft ERM Policy and the fact that the ARIC, at its last meeting, resolved that “any future changes to Council’s risk appetite to the ARIC for consideration prior to implementing any changes”.
Further, it is probably not useful to make further changes to the risk appetite provisions within the Draft ERM Policy, at least until after the external assessment of Council’s Internal Audit unit is completed, possibly by August 2017.
It is, therefore, recommended that, in the meantime, Council adopt the Draft ERM Policy attached to this report and revoke the current ERM Strategy which would be superfluous when the Draft ERM Policy is adopted by Council.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Economic and financial considerations are accounted for in Council’s Risk Register and Council’s budgetary process. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Draft Enterprise Risk Management ViewPolicy (Under separate cover)
2. Audit Office of NSW Risk Appetite ViewStatement (Under separate cover)
3. Enterprise Risk Management Strategy View (Under separate cover)
193
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
City Community and Culture Report
DCC 01 |
Draft Disability Inclusion Action Plan 2017 - 2021 Post Exhibition Report |
Strategic Direction |
Healthy Inclusive City Plan, support and deliver high quality and accessible services, program and facilities |
Key Policy |
Disability Strategy |
File Ref |
108067.2017 |
Report By |
Galavizh Ahmadi Nia - Acting Manager Community Development and Planning |
Approved By |
Eddie Jackson - Director City Community & Culture |
Executive Summary
At the Council meeting on 26 April 2017, Council resolved that the draft Disability Inclusion Action Plan (DIAP) 2017-2021 be placed on public exhibition, with a further report to be provided to Council following public exhibition.
The draft DIAP outlines Council’s ongoing commitment to supporting equity and inclusion for people with disability in Liverpool. The DIAP sets out a four year plan of action that Council will deliver to achieve accessible and equitable programs for people with disability. The implementation of Council’s DIAP will require a whole of Council approach to ensure that the requirements of the NSW Disability Inclusion Act 2014 are achieved.
Public exhibition was undertaken between Thursday 27 April 2017 and Wednesday 24 May 2017 with no submissions received.
The Draft Disability Inclusion Action Plan 2017-2021 is presented to Council with this report for adoption.
That Council: 1. Adopt the draft Disability Inclusion Action Plan 2017-2021; and 2. Approve minor changes to the draft Disability Inclusion Action Plan 2017-2017 in accordance with further review of the documentation by Council staff. |
REPORT
All Councils in New South Wales are required by the NSW Disability Inclusion Act 2014 to prepare a Disability Inclusion Action Plan (DIAP) by 1 July 2017.
The draft DIAP outlines Council’s ongoing commitment to supporting equity and inclusion for people with disability in Liverpool. The DIAP sets out a four year plan of action that Council will deliver to achieve accessible and equitable programs for people with disability. The implementation of Council’s DIAP will require a whole of Council approach to ensure that the requirements of the NSW Disability Inclusion Act 2014 are achieved.
At the Council meeting on 26 April 2017, Council resolved that the draft Disability Inclusion Action Plan (DIAP) 2017-2021 be placed on public exhibition, with a further report to be provided to Council following public exhibition.
Public exhibition was undertaken between Thursday 27 April 2017 and Wednesday 24 May 2017 with no submissions received. Exhibition took place using various methods including placement of copies of the draft DIAP in Council libraries and customer service centre, advertising in the local papers, providing information regarding the exhibition through Council’s community networks and on Council’s website. The Liverpool Access Committee were also provided the opportunity to comment.
Additional changes
Minor changes to the draft DIAP 2017-2021 as identified by Council staff following a further review are as follows:
· Update of the integrated planning and reporting framework chart to ensure consistency with other Council documents.
· The inclusion of the Mayor and Chief Executive Officer messages.
· Formatting of the document.
The draft Disability Inclusion Action Plan 2017-2021 is attached for the reference of Councillors.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Actions can be delivered within existing budgets. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. Promote community harmony and address discrimination. Support access and services for people with a disability. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility. Deliver services that are customer focused.
|
ATTACHMENTS
1. Disability Inclusion Action Plan 2017-2021View
227 |
|
DCC 01 |
Draft Disability Inclusion Action Plan 2017 - 2021 Post Exhibition Report |
Attachment 1 |
Disability Inclusion Action Plan 2017-2021 |
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
City Community and Culture Report
DCC 02 |
Grants, Donations, and Corporate Sponsorship |
Strategic Direction |
Healthy Inclusive City Foster social inclusion, strengthen the local community and increase opportunities for people who may experience barriers |
Key Policy |
Donations Policy |
File Ref |
147372.2017 |
Report By |
Galavizh Ahmadi Nia - Acting Manager Community Development and Planning |
Approved By |
Eddie Jackson - Director City Community & Culture |
Executive Summary
Council is committed to building strong and resilient communities in Liverpool and to maximising social wellbeing for all residents. One way of achieving these goals is to provide financial assistance in the form of grants and sponsorships to individuals and groups to develop leadership skills, increase participation in community life and address identified social issues.
This report presents the funding recommendations for the Community Grants Program and a sponsorship request submitted during the review of the Corporate Sponsorship Program for Council’s consideration.
That Council: 1. Endorses the recommended provision of $15,000 (GST exclusive) under Community Grants Program:
|
REPORT
Community Grants Program
Applications are accepted bi-annually and are reviewed by an internal working group, comprised of Council staff members. This report presents the funding recommendation for an application received under the first round of the Matching Grants Program 2016/17 which required a complying development application prior to Council’s final consideration. The Matching Grants Program is fully expended for the 2016/2017 financial year. However, the budget allocation of $100,000 adopted by Council in its 2016/2017 Operational Plan for the purpose of Council’s Community Grants Program has funds available. There is currently $22,000 remaining in the budget. If the recommended amount of $15,000 is endorsed it will be expended from this budget, leaving a remaining balance of $7,000 at the end of this financial year.
Given the extenuating circumstances surrounding the application and Council’s ongoing commitment to reducing violence against women in the local government area, the following application is recommended for funding as shown in the table below. The program criteria for the Matching Grants Program and Community Grants Program can be found as an attachment to this report.
Applicant Name and Organisation Status |
Project Name/ Description |
Beneficiaries |
Amount Requested |
Amount Recommended |
Liverpool Women’s Health Centre
Organisation Status: Not-For-Profit |
Liverpool Women's Health Centre Safety Hub
Objective: Construction of a childcare crèche room on the ground floor level of the centre and an upgrade to the kitchen and dining area for women and children accessing the safety hub
Outcomes: · Optimise the space at the Health Centre to establish the Safety Hub as a pathway to services with a primary focus on keeping women and children safe and helping them recover from violence · The Safety Hub will serve as a single, area-based and highly visible intake point making it easier for victims of family violence to find help quickly |
Women and their children across the Liverpool LGA who are in need of support to escape violent situations. The crèche will allow women to access the health centre and receive direct support while their children are being minded.
|
$15,000 |
$15,000 |
Funding request under Corporate Sponsorship Program
In 2016/2017 there was no program funding available in the budget for the Corporate Sponsorship Program. In February 2017, it was decided to close the program and cease accepting applications whilst undertaking a comprehensive review of the Corporate Sponsorship (Outgoing) Policy and program. The revised Corporate Sponsorship Policy was endorsed by Council on 31 May 2017. The Community Development and Planning Team will work with organisations and groups to ensure a smooth transition to the new program including information sessions and promotion of new procedures.
During the review and closure period a request by Vedic Festival Inc. was received seeking financial support for the Festival of Chariots event on 1 July 2017. The Festival is an annual event which has previously been supported through the Corporate Sponsorship Program. The Festival aligns with Council’s Community Strategic Plan (Direction 1: Creating Connection) and the outcomes Council aims to achieve in partnership with the local community, including creating links between communities, more community activities and events, and promoting a sense of belonging.
The revised Corporate Sponsorship Policy will bring a more robust approach to the timing and assessment of all grants in the coming financial year. However it is accepted that the process has to be bedded down, promoted and that officers should be prepared to work with groups to ensure that important community events are considered. Therefore, whilst the sponsorship was requested during the review and closure of the program, it is recommended that Council provide financial assistance toward the delivery of this event, given the project’s alignment to the established Community Grants Program and the availability of funding under that program.
A summary of the request received is shown in the table below.
Applicant Name |
Project Name/ Description |
Amount Requested |
Amount Recommended |
Vedic Festival Inc
|
Festival of Chariots A community festival to promote the celebration and respect of Indian art, Indian cultural heritage, and diversity. The festival consists of a street parade and Fair in the Park. There will be singing and playing of Indian musical instruments. |
$4,000 |
$4,000 |
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Community Grants Program A budget allocation of $100,000 was adopted by Council in its 2016/2017 Operational Plan for the purpose of Council’s Grants Program. There is currently $22,000 remaining in the budget. If the recommended amount of $15,000 is endorsed the remaining balance will be $7,000. Corporate Sponsorship Program There is currently no budget allocation for Corporate Sponsorship in the 2016/2017 Operation Plan. However, should approval be granted for the Vedic Festival Inc, funding of $4,000 would be allocated from the Community Grants Program, leaving a balance of $3,000. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Matching Grants CriteriaView
DCC 02 |
Grants, Donations, and Corporate Sponsorship |
Attachment 2 |
Community Grants Program Criteria |
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
City Community and Culture Report
DCC 03 |
Draft Cultural Policy |
Strategic Direction |
Healthy Inclusive City Celebrate and respect Liverpool’s rich cultural and social diversity and embrace the opportunities it provides |
Key Policy |
Cultural Policy |
File Ref |
155923.2017 |
Report By |
Vi Girgis - Acting Policy and Projects Officer |
Approved By |
Eddie Jackson - Director City Community & Culture |
Executive Summary
The attached Draft Cultural Policy outlines Liverpool’s ambitions towards a creative, innovative and inclusive city over the next four years. The Policy acknowledges the role of culture in promoting social cohesion, civic pride, economic growth, environmental sustainability and individual wellbeing. It outlines Council’s role in actively building the cultural life of the city by presenting greater opportunities for creative and cultural participation, and supporting artists and creatives to make and present work in Liverpool. As well, this Policy aims to build on the reputation of Western Sydney arts and culture as a whole, positioning Liverpool at the forefront of this movement.
This Policy will be supplemented by a four-year Cultural Strategy and Action Plan, which will outline a coordinated, cross-Council approach to creative and cultural development throughout the Liverpool LGA.
The Draft Cultural Policy is presented to Council with this report for adoption.
That Council:
1. Adopts the Draft Cultural Policy; and 2. Brings forth a report in September 2017 detailing a Draft Cultural Strategy and Action Plan for public exhibition.
|
REPORT
Council is committed to recognising and celebrating the rich cultural fabric of Liverpool’s communities, allocating significant resources to cultural infrastructure and to maintaining policies which facilitate aspects of cultural development. Although Council’s ongoing contribution to the LGA’s creative cultural development are apparent, it has lacked the policy framework to articulate and realise its vision for the cultural life of the city.
The Draft Cultural Policy outlines Liverpool’s ambitions towards a creative, innovative and inclusive city. The Policy acknowledges the role of culture in promoting social cohesion, civic pride, economic growth, environmental sustainability and individual wellbeing. It outlines Council’s role in actively building the cultural life of the city by presenting greater opportunities for creative and cultural participation, and supporting artists and creatives to make and present work in Liverpool. As well, this Policy aims to build on the reputation of Western Sydney arts and culture as a whole, positioning Liverpool at the forefront of this movement.
The Policy principles are derived from the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity unanimously adopted on 2 November 2001, and are as such:
(a) Inclusion
(b) Diversity
(c) Cultural products are unique commodities
(d) Creativity and experimentation
The Policy objectives are as follows:
(a) Develop Liverpool’s reputation as the cultural destination in South West Sydney.
(b) Create the conditions for engaging, diverse and accessible cultural experiences for residents and visitors of Liverpool.
(c) Support artists and creatives to produce and present work in Liverpool.
The Policy outlines Council’s roles and responsibilities in areas of strategy, planning, provision of services, provision of funding, seeking funding, developing partnerships, promotions, consultation and feedback, evaluation and reporting.
It is envisioned that the four-year Policy will be
supplemented by a four-year Cultural Strategy and Action Plan. The Strategy and
Action Plan are currently in development, with consultations being undertaken
across Council divisions. The Strategy and Action Plan will outline a
coordinated, cross-Council approach to creative and cultural development
throughout the Liverpool LGA, towards the ambition of sustaining a creative,
innovative and inclusive city that is the cultural capital of South West
Sydney. The Draft Cultural Strategy and Action Plan will be presented to
Council in September 2017 for endorsement. Following endorsement by Council,
the Draft Cultural Strategy and Action Plan will go on public exhibition for
feedback from cultural and community organisations and the wider community.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Facilitate economic development. Facilitate the development of new tourism based on local attractions, culture and creative industries. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. Provide cultural centres and activities for the enjoyment of the arts. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. Deliver services that are customer focused. |
ATTACHMENTS
255
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
City Corporate Report
CFO 01 |
Investment Report May 2017 |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations |
Key Policy |
Long-Term Financial Plan |
File Ref |
153632.2017 |
Report By |
Christian Hope - Senior Financial Accountant |
Approved By |
Vishwa Nadan - Manager Financial Services |
Executive Summary
This report details Council’s Investment portfolio.
At 31 May 2017, Council held investments with a market value of $182 million.
The portfolio yield to the end of May 2017 is 108 basis points above the AusBond Bank Bill index and 113 basis points above the BBSW benchmark for the same period.
|
AusBond Bank Bill Index |
BBSW |
Benchmark |
1.85% |
1.80% |
Portfolio yield |
2.93% |
2.93% |
Performance above benchmarks |
1.08% |
1.13% |
Return on investment year to date was $1.14 million higher than budget.
Council’s investments and reporting obligations fully comply with the requirements of Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation
That Council receives and notes this report. |
REPORT
Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 requires that the Responsible Accounting Officer must provide Council with a written report setting out details of all money that Council has invested under section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993.
Council’s Portfolio
At 31 May 2017, Council held investments with a market value of $182 million. Council’s investment register detailing all its investments is provided as an attachment to this report. In summary, Council’s portfolio consisted of investments in:
At 31 May 2017, the ratio of market value compared to face value of various debt securities is shown in the table below.
Asset Class |
May-17 |
Jun-16 |
Senior Debts(FRN's & TCD's |
100.72% |
100.00% |
MBS( Reverse Mortgage Backed Securities) |
60.92% |
65.00% |
T- Corp Unit Trust – Strategic Cash Fund |
100.86% |
98.57% |
|
|
|
* A TCD stands for Transferrable Certificate of Deposit; it is a security issued with the same characteristics as a Term Deposit however it can be sold back (transferred) in to the market prior to maturity. A floating TCD pays a coupon linked to a variable benchmark (90 days BBSW).
Council is fully compliant with the requirements of the Ministerial Investment Order including the grand fathering provision in regards to its investment portfolio holdings. The grand fathering provision states that Council continues to hold to maturity, redeem or sell investments that comply with previous Ministerial Investment Orders. Any new investments must comply with the most recent Order. Council continues to closely monitor the investments in its portfolio to ensure continued compliance and minimal exposure to risk.
Portfolio Maturity Profile
The table below shows the percentage of funds invested at different durations to maturity.
Market Value by Issuer and Institution Policy limit as per Investment Policy
Overall Portfolio Credit Framework compliance to Investment Policy
Portfolio Performance against relevant market benchmarks
The AusBond Bank Bill Index (ABBI) and Bank Bill Swap Rates (BBSW) are two key benchmarks used in Australia to measure return on investment on cash and fixed interest securities. The ABBI represents average daily yield of a parcel of bank bills and the BBSW represents daily lending rates between the banks. There is also a notable correlation between changes in the cash rate and impact on both these benchmarks. For reporting and benchmarking purposes, Council is using annualised average ABBI and a 90-day average BBSW.
The portfolio yield to 31 May 2017 exceeded the AusBond Bank Bill index by 108 basis points (2.93% against 1.85%).
The portfolio yield to 31 May 2017 exceeded the Bank Bill Swap Rate by 113 basis points (2.93% against 1.80%).
Council continues to achieve a solid outcome despite ongoing margin contraction and significantly lower market deposit yields. Return on investments is expected to slowly decrease as old investments in Council’s portfolio mature and are replaced with investments yielding lower returns. Comparative yields for the previous months are charted below:
Performance of Portfolio Returns against Budget
Council’s investment income year to date to May 2017 exceeded budget by $1.14 million mainly due to higher actual monthly average portfolio holdings compared to budgeted monthly average portfolio holdings for the year.
Investment Portfolio at a Glance
Portfolio Performance |
|
The portfolio yield to 31 May 2017 exceeded the AusBond Bank Bill index by 108 basis points (2.93% against 1.85%)
The portfolio yield to 31 May 2017 exceeded the Bank Bill Swap Rate by 113 basis points (2.93% against 1.80%) |
Annual Income vs. Budget |
Council’s investment interest income exceeded budget by $1.14 million as at 31 May 2017 mainly due to higher actual monthly average portfolio holdings compared to budgeted monthly average portfolio holdings for the year |
Investment Policy Compliance
Legislative Requirements |
|
Fully Compliant. |
Portfolio Credit Rating Limit |
Fully Compliant. |
|
Institutional Exposure Limits |
X |
S&P Rating Agency downgraded long term credit-rating of Bank of Queensland and Bendigo & Adelaide Bank from “A-“ to “BBB+” mainly due to an anticipated price correction in housing property market. Policy will be appropriately amended for flexibility in event of unpredicted low-risk movements in status by the credit-rating agencies. |
Term to Maturity Limits |
Fully Compliant |
Economic Outlook – Reserve Bank of Australia
The Reserve Bank has left the official cash rate on hold at 1.5 per cent in its 9 June 2017 meeting. The current 1.5 per cent cash rate is at a historically low level and impacts returns on investment. Returns on Term Deposits and Floating Rate Notes have significantly dropped since the last twelve months. The average market returns on term deposits are:
· Longer term deposits (> 3years maturity) – 3% to 3.5% p.a.
· Medium term (2 to 3 years to maturity) – 2.5% to 3% p.a.
· Short term deposits rate (less than one year to maturity) – ranges from 2.3% to 2.5% per annum.
· Cash & Cash At Call accounts range from 1.4% to 2.15%
· 31 Days’ Notice Account 2.25%
Certificate of Responsible Accounting Officer
The Manager Financial Services, as Responsible Accounting Officer certifies that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Councils Investment Policies at the time of their placement. The previous investments are covered by the “grandfather” clauses of the current investment guidelines issued by the Minister for Local Government.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Council’s investment interest income exceeded budget by $1.14 million as at 31 May 2017 mainly due to higher actual monthly average portfolio holdings compared to budgeted monthly average |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Investment Portfolio - May 2017View
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
City Corporate Report
CFO 02 |
Minutes of Budget Review Panel 25 May 2017 |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations |
Key Policy |
Long-Term Financial Plan |
File Ref |
160439.2017 |
Report By |
Earl Paradeza - Senior Management Accountant |
Approved By |
Vishwa Nadan - Manager Financial Services |
Executive Summary
The report tables the Minutes of the Budget Review Panel meeting held on 25 May 2017.
That Council adopts the minutes of the Budget Review Panel meeting held on 25 May 2017. |
REPORT
The Minutes of the Budget Review Panel held on 25 May 2017 are attached for the information of Council.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities. Deliver and maintain a range of transport related infrastructure such as footpaths, bus shelters and bikeways. Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues. Facilitate economic development. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues. |
Social and Cultural |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Deliver services that are customer focused. Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Minutes of Budget Review Panel Meeting - 25 May 2017View
263 |
|
CFO 02 |
Minutes of Budget Review Panel 25 May 2017 |
Attachment 1 |
Minutes of Budget Review Panel Meeting - 25 May 2017 |
267
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
City Presentation Report
DCP 01 |
Big Bag Project Trial |
Strategic Direction |
Natural Sustainable City Lead the community to develop and implement environmentally sustainable practices |
Key Policy |
Domestic Waste Management Policy |
File Ref |
162661.2017 |
Report By |
Rebecca Scarpin - Waste Management Coordinator |
Approved By |
Wayne Carter - Director City Presentation |
Executive Summary
At the Council Meeting of 29 October, 2014 Council resolved in part that Council:
2. Proceed with trialing the bulka bag initiative for cost savings and increased resource recovery of household clean up material.
The Big Bag Project Trial was supported by the NSW Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and funded via the Better Waste and Recycling Program.
The Big Bag Project Trial was split into two phases – Phase 1 being a trial of the collection process and Phase 2 incorporating the electronic dispatch and the Big Bag materials sorting, re-use and recycling processes. The Phase 1 Trial commenced in April 2017 and was completed by end of May 2017.
The Phase 1 Trial has established that the Big Bag Collection Process;
· is more expensive than the traditional waste compactor collection process,
· is more time consuming to collect the waste from the kerb and unload at the waste disposal site than the traditional waste compactor collection process,
· does not provide the same level of service expected by councils’ residents,
· is unlikely to achieve better rates of diversion from landfill than those achieved by conventional Resource Recovery Facilities.
As a result of these findings there does not appear to be a financial or environmental basis on which to progress to Phase 2 of the Big Bag Project Trial.
That Council: 1. Acknowledges that the cost savings and increased resource recovery outcomes envisaged for the Big Bag Household Waste Collection Service have not been realised by the Big Bag Project Trial - Phase 1;
2. Does not proceed with the Big Bag Project Trial – Phase 2; and
3. Advises the NSW Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) of the outcomes of the Big Bag Project Trial – Phase 1.
|
REPORT
The Big Bag initiative was introduced to Council at its Councillor Strategic Workshop in December 2013 as the Bulka Bag Project, now known as the Big Bag Project. The initiative proposed an innovative change to the methodology for the booked household clean up collection service. The traditional collection process involves household waste (bulky goods including furniture, white goods, toys, and other non-putrescible waste) being placed in a pile at the kerb by the resident on a pre-booked basis. Council crews collect the material by manual handling, moving the material from the kerb into a compactor waste truck which involves some WHS risks to the loading crew. The compacted material has traditionally been disposed at an appropriate licenced landfill site.
The Big Bag initiative identified the opportunity of reducing the WHS risk along with a perceived significant reuse opportunity for the waste material being placed by the resident for removal. It was proposed that a bag be provided to the resident to place their waste in for collection by Council. Rather than compacting the waste in the conventional collection system, the bag would be collected by a truck incorporating a lifting mechanism (mounted crane) and placed on the truck tray. The bag would be collected and transported to a sorting facility where recyclable materials and re-useable products could be separated from the waste stream and sold on.
At the Council Meeting of 29 October 2014 Council resolved to progress with the trial of the Big Bag initiative. The Big Bag Initiative was supported by the NSW Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the proposed trial funded by the EPA through the Better Waste and Recycling Program.
The project trial scope was designed to include;
· the purchase and fit out of suitable truck to collect the Big Bags from the kerb,
· procurement of appropriate Big Bags,
· development of a dispatch system for delivery of the Big Bag to the resident,
· access to a licenced facility to place the Big Bags for hand sort and recovery,
In February 2016 a Councillor briefing and demonstration of the proposed Big Bag collection process with the truck and bag was held at the Rose Street Operations Centre.
Big Bag Project Trial- Phase 1
Phase 1 of the Big Bag Project Trial (“the Trial”) focussed on the viability of the collection process and an assessment of the potential for re-use and recycling of collected material.
The Trial commenced with the distribution of the Big Bags to local residents in April 2017 and the collection of the bags from the kerb commencing 1 May 2017 through to 25 May 2017, using the one Big Bag truck available. Council’s usual four compactor trucks continued delivering the standard service elsewhere throughout the Trial, collecting 560 services per week. The Big Bags were packaged up in a clear plastic bag with an instruction sheet for its use and delivered by a Council Officer to the resident. The resident had been contacted by Council’s Customer Service team following their request for a Household Waste Collection, and advised they had been selected to participate in the Trial, and if at home when the bag was delivered would be advised how the bag was to be used.
The disposal site chosen for the Trial was the Benedict Resource Recovery Facility located at Riverside Road, Chipping Norton. A Big Bag Site Assessment Sheet was completed by the operator to document operational concerns and was also used to log re-useable/ recyclable materials identified within the Big Bag.
The significant findings from the Trial are detailed below.
Resident Participation
A reasonable proportion of the residents who participated in the trial placed their waste materials in the Big Bag in accordance with the instructions provided to them.
Of the 187 bags delivered to residents;
· 49 properties (26%) did not use the bags
Of the 138 properties who did use the bag;
· 19 placed additional waste outside the bag
· 30 properties required collection by compactor truck for various reasons
· 41 bags (30%) contained furniture
Therefore, successful participation in the use of Big Bags and the collection truck in the Trial was 108 properties or 58%.
Operation Issues
Several operational issues arose from the trial at a number of collection sites including restricted access due to overhead wires and road widths. The lifting of the bags onto the truck was quite slow and not a simple exercise and then once the bags were on the truck, load shifting during transport became an issue restricting capacity for additional collections and closing the sliding door. Unloading bags at the disposal site was also difficult and time consuming. It was also identified that the operation of the truck required a 2 man crew rather than a single person as first anticipated.
Recyclable or re-useable products
Based on the recorded assessment of materials in the Big Bag at the time of collection, the following possible recyclable and re-useable waste streams were identified:
· Metals / whitegoods 66 Bags – 48%
· Recyclable plastics 58 Bags – 42%
· Re-useable furniture 41 Bags – 30%
· Cardboard /paper 55 Bags – 40%
· Re-useable toys 19 Bags – 14%
A further detailed list of findings from the Trial is included in the technical report as Attachment 1.
The aim of the Trial was to confirm anticipated cost savings and increased resource recovery of household clean-up material.
Councils’ current service comprises 4 waste compactor trucks and 1 metals collection truck and 10 staff who collect 720 services per week. Transition of the entire service to the Big Bag Collection method would result in an increase in fleet requirements from the existing 5 vehicles to an anticipated 13 vehicles and an increase in labour requirements of 16 extra staff. This clearly represents a significant increase in operating costs to service current demand.
The Trial shows that residents do dispose of significant amounts of recyclable and/or re-useable products through the household collection service. However, any re-useable material was frequently found to be crushed in the Big Bag transport. In addition the current disposal of all household waste to landfill will cease on 30 June 2017. Council has recently accepted a tender for a contract commencing 1 July to dispose of all household collection waste at the Benedict Resource Recovery Facility in Chipping Norton. This facility achieves a 75% diversion from landfill of all materials received at the facility. Council already provides a separate collection service for metals and whitegoods which are recycled.
It is therefore concluded that implementation of this service will significantly and unacceptably increase operational costs. It is also considered very unlikely that the processing of Big Bag products by hand at a specialised facility would significantly increase waste diversion rates from those able to be achieved at conventional Resource Recovery Facilities.
It is considered that sufficient data has been generated through the operation of the Big Bag Project Trial Phase 1 to determine that the Big Bag initiative will not realise the anticipated cost savings nor will it significantly improve resource recovery originally anticipated.
Big Bag Project Trial – Phase 2
Phase 2 of the Big Bag Project Trial incorporates the commissioning of the on-line booking of the Big Bag Collection Service and the dispatch system for delivery of the bags, along with the establishment of a sorting facility.
The establishment of a sorting facility was investigated in some depth prior to the decision to split the Big Bag Project Trial into Phase 1 and 2. There are no known commercial licenced facilities available to access for a short period to conduct the trial. It has also been confirmed that should a local site be identified as suitable to conduct the trial a formal Development Application would need to be submitted and approved.
Given the initial findings on the viability of the Big Bag collection and the likely proportion of materials that would be re-used as whole products it is clear that there is little basis for further expenditure on Phase 2 of the Trial.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
The Trial exposed significant financial risks to Council that have been included in the report. These could have a negative impact on the domestic waste reserve if the service is implemented. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Minimise household waste going to landfill. Improve recycling and recovery rates. |
Social and Cultural |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Act as an environmental leader in the community. Deliver services that are customer focused. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Technical Report for Big Bag Trial-Phase 1View
273
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Economic Development Report
DEE 01 |
Smart Hub Feasibility Report |
Strategic Direction |
Vibrant Prosperous City Assist exiting businesses to grow, innovate and become more competitive |
Key Policy |
Economic Development Strategy |
File Ref |
153974.2017 |
Report By |
Nicole Voorhout - Personal Assistant to the Director Economic Development |
Approved By |
Julie Scott - Acting Director Economic Development |
Executive Summary
At the 25 November 2015 Council meeting, Council approved $25,000, on the recommendation of the Economic Development and Events Committee, to seek independent expertise to examine the feasibility of establishing a Smart Work Hub facility in Liverpool.
The feasibility study sought advice on:
· Potential locations in the Liverpool city centre
· Market demand, pricing and the appropriate operating model
· A sample layout
· Target clients
· Management model, likely costs and budget breakdown
A request for quote process concluded with the feasibility study awarded to Coactiv8[1], a leading consultancy in work hubs that has experience with corporate, government and property client groups.
The report completed in March 2016 is attached.
At the October 2016 Council meeting Councillor Kaliyanda submitted a NOM regarding “Opportunities to support local businesses and social enterprise.”
This report addresses both requests for information relating to the potential of a Smart Work Hub facility.
The March 2016 report highlighted significant financial implications for Council and alternate solutions were sought to offer a wide range of options in establishing a smart hub.
That Council:
1. Endorses further investigation on the establishment of a Smart Work Hub or alternative facility in Liverpool; and
2. That a further report on these investigations be bought back to Council in the 2017/18 third quarter |
REPORT
Coactiv8 Liverpool Work Hub Feasibility Report
Coactiv8’s report was built on research by the University of Technology Sydney’s Institute for Sustainable Futures (Smart Work Centres: An Analysis of Demand in Western Sydney[2]). The report found that there is a current market gap in South West Sydney for co-working spaces. Liverpool’s market size includes 1400 eligibile individuals and 516 eligible businesses. For greatest success, a work hub would need to be located in a commercial activity area close to public transport and retail services.
(Source: Coactiv8)
Neighbouring Work Hubs
Oran Park Smart Work Hub |
Part Time |
$200/month |
Full Time |
$400/month |
|
Dedicated Desk |
$500/month |
|
Dedicated Office |
$1220/month |
|
Wotso Work Space - North Strathfield |
Desk |
From $220/month |
Wotso Work Space - Penrith |
Desk |
From $330/month |
The Creative Fringe – Penrith |
Casual Desk |
$44/day |
Full Time Desk |
$363/month |
|
Dedicated Desk |
$440/month |
|
Western Sydney University Werrington Park Corporate Centre |
Casual Desk |
$25/day |
Part Time (10 days/month) |
$180/month |
|
Full Time (incl. weekends) |
$290/month |
|
Office |
$330 - $800/month |
Proposal
Seven sites were inspected in the Liverpool CBD and two were considered suitable.
· OPTION A – Level 2, 296 Macquarie Street
o A 500sqm space with minimal building works required.
o Estimated investment cost of $475,000 with no profit for the first three years but would require corporate sponsorship.
· OPTION B – Soldiers Memorial School of Arts, 306 Macquarie Street
o A lower-risk 380sqm space.
o Estimated investment cost of $403,100 but with no requirement for corporate sponsorship.
Estimates for both sites include fitout ($600/sqm) launch activities ($62,000) and start-up consultancy ($127,500).
The financial implications for Council being involved in the establishment and start up phase of the Smart Hub was considered impractical in Council’s overall budget.
Other Opportunities
In addition to the original site locations, alternative opportunities were also sought for comparison purposes.
Regus – Level 2, 215-219 George Street LIVERPOOL
Regus is the world’s largest provider of flexible workplaces. They currently manage a property in the Liverpool CBD and list their product as:
· Window Office ($17.80 – $62.70)
· Internal Office ($13.60 – $50.10)
· Virtual Office ($3.44 – $10.04)
· Co-working Space – Coming Soon[3]
They currently manage co-working spaces in Blacktown and Parramatta.
WSU Launch Pad[4]
The Western Sydney University Launchpad has been marketed as a ‘technology business incubator’. It is meant to support business by providing a modern collaborative work and meeting space, specialist business advice, mentoring, events, networking, training and education. They currently have an active co-working space at the Penrith Smart Business Centre and launched their Parramatta space in May 2017. A space was opened up in the Liverpool CBD in November 2015 however with smaller scale facilities. Unfortunately the space has suffered from lack of presence and activation. Discussions are in place to partner the South West Business Enterprise Centre with the service to provide business advisory services. It is envisioned that Launchpad will co-locate with the University’s new campus in 2018
Two Space[5]
Two Space is a start-up based in Sydney that is working towards transforming empty restaurants into co-working spaces by day. They are not restricted to hospitality venues and are open to using any underutilised space. Two Space will help set up Wi-Fi (sponsored by Optus) and will recruit a ‘host’ to welcome users. They currently have spaces in Darlinghurst, Wynyard and Potts Point. Future locations include Manly, Surry Hills, Bondi and Parramatta.
Maker Space
A makerspace is a physical location where people gather to share resources and knowledge, work on projects, network, and build. Makerspaces were inspired by ‘hacker culture’ and many are still primarily places for technological experimentation, hardware development and idea prototyping and are the birthplace of many product start-ups. The makerspace emerged initially as a powerful learning force in the non-academic community however many universities have recognised their value in learning and now have maker spaces of their own.[6]
Local University Maker Spaces:
· UOW MakerSpace and MediaSpace[7] - Wollongong
· WSU MakerSpace[8] - Penrith
· UNSW Michael Crouch Innovation Centre[9] - Kensington
Private/Not-For Profit Makerspaces
· Maker Space &Co[10] - Marrickville
· Makers Place Inc.[11] - Redfern
· Robots and Dinosaurs[12] - Meadowbank
· Mobile Makerspace[13] (pop up space)
Social Infrastructure
Another option to be considered is discussed in an article from landscape australia and is attached to this report. The article titled “Is it possible to use social infrastructure to catalyse economic growth”, discusses the funding of co-working spaces (with a community focus) through Council’s Voluntary Planning Agreements (VPA).
Recommendations
Co-working spaces are becoming increasingly popular and vital in the start-up and innovation economy. With future developments in the LGA including expanding university campuses for both University of Wollongong and Western Sydney University, Civic Place and the Aerotropolis at Badgerys Creek, and neighbouring developments such as Sydney Science Park at Luddenham it would be beneficial for Liverpool to keep abreast with trends in the teleworking and start-up sector. Discussions with business stakeholders, tertiary institutions and the market in general suggest better infrastructure and service offerings are required in the city centre (e.g. retail and hospitality) for a smart hub or incubator to work successfully. It is recommended that further investigation occurs to work towards establishing a Smart Work Hub in parallel to work being conducted with city centre revitalisation and new business and amenity installation.
Council officers will also seek meetings with the following organisations to ascertain possible sites and opportunities for partnership.
· Regus
· Western Sydney University Launch Pad
· Two Space
· University of Wollongong
It is recommended that further investigation occurs to work towards establishing a Smart Work Hub or alternative in the third quarter of the 2017/18 financial year.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities. Encourage and promote businesses to develop in the hospital, health and medical precinct (of the City Centre). Facilitate economic development. Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities (in the City Centre). Funding options to be considered as part of future reporting. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. Provide cultural centres and activities for the enjoyment of the arts. Support access and services for people with a disability. Deliver high quality services for children and their families. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media. Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility. Facilitate the development of community leaders. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. Deliver services that are customer focused. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. FINAL - Liverpool Work Hub Feasibility ReportView (Under separate cover)
2. ARTICLE Is it possible to use social infrastructure to catalyse economic growth - Landscape AustraliaView (Under separate cover)
279
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Committee Reports
CTTE 01 |
Liverpool Youth Council Minutes of meeting held 10 May 2017 and Meeting Notes of meetings held on 12 April 2017 and 8 March 2017. |
Strategic Direction |
Proud Engaged City Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement |
Key Policy |
Community Engagement Policy |
File Ref |
152881.2017 |
Report By |
Galavizh Ahmadi Nia - Acting Manager Community Development and Planning |
Approved By |
Eddie Jackson - Director City Community & Culture |
Executive Summary
This report presents the minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on 10 May 2017 and the meeting notes of the Liverpool Youth Council meetings held on 12 April 2017 and 8 March 2017.
That Council receive and note the minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on 10 May 2017 and the meeting notes of the Liverpool Youth Council meetings held on 12 April 2017 and 8 March 2017.
|
REPORT
1. The minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council held on 10 May 2017 are attached for the information of Council. Meetings held on 12 April 2017 and 8 March 2017 had no quorum, however the meeting notes are attached for the information of Council.
2. The minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Facilitate the development of community leaders. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Minutes Liverpool Youth Council 10 May 2017View
2. Meeting Notes Liverpool Youth Council 12 April 2017View
3. Meeting Notes Liverpool Youth Council 8 March 2017View
281 |
|
CTTE 01 |
Liverpool Youth Council Minutes of meeting held 10 May 2017 and Meeting Notes of meetings held on 12 April 2017 and 8 March 2017. |
Attachment 1 |
Minutes Liverpool Youth Council 10 May 2017 |
CTTE 01 |
Liverpool Youth Council Minutes of meeting held 10 May 2017 and Meeting Notes of meetings held on 12 April 2017 and 8 March 2017. |
Attachment 2 |
Meeting Notes Liverpool Youth Council 12 April 2017 |
CTTE 01 |
Liverpool Youth Council Minutes of meeting held 10 May 2017 and Meeting Notes of meetings held on 12 April 2017 and 8 March 2017. |
Attachment 3 |
Meeting Notes Liverpool Youth Council 8 March 2017 |
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Committee Reports
CTTE 02 |
Minutes of the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee 19 May 2017 |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation |
Key Policy |
Local Government Act 1993 |
File Ref |
155727.2017 |
Report By |
David Maguire - Acting Head of Audit and Risk |
Approved By |
Kiersten Fishburn - Chief Executive Officer |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee Meeting held on 19 May 2017.
That Council receive and note the Minutes of the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee Meeting held on 19 May 2017. |
REPORT
1. The Minutes of the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee held on 19 May 2017 are attached for the information of Council.
2. The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council. (Please note that Committee recommendations relating to the Draft Enterprise Risk Management Policy and amendments to the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee Charter are dealt with in separate reports to this Council meeting.)
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Minutes of the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee 19 May 2017View
303 |
|
CTTE 02 |
Minutes of the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee 19 May 2017 |
Attachment 1 |
Minutes of the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee 19 May 2017 |
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Committee Reports
CTTE 03 |
Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 17 May 2017 |
Strategic Direction |
Accessible Connected City Provide safe and easy travel with a high quality road and traffic management network |
Key Policy |
Traffic and Transport Plan |
File Ref |
157532.2017 |
Report By |
Charles Wiafe - Service Manager Traffic and Transport |
Approved By |
Lina Kakish - Acting Director Planning and Growth |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 17 May 2017.
That Council adopts the following recommendations in the Minutes as follows: i) Item 1 - Governor Macquarie Drive, Warwick Farm, road widening - proposed signs and linemarking. · Council notes the signs and linemarking scheme required for the proposed traffic signals, as shown in Attachments 1.1 to1.6. · The approval of signs and linemarking scheme as presented, be deferred until the signs and linemarking scheme associated with the Traffic Control Signals has been approved by the Roads and Maritime Services. · The signs and linemarking scheme be presented to the Roads and Maritime Services and Police for approval under delegated authority. · Council advises the Australian Turf Club of its decision. ii) Item 2 - Flowerdale Road and Memorial Avenue intersection, Liverpool proposed signs and linemarking.
· Council notes the signs and
linemarking scheme required for the proposed traffic signals, as shown in
Attachment 2.1.
· The approval of signs and linemarking
scheme as presented, be deferred until the signs and linemarking scheme
associated with the Traffic Control Signals has been approved by the Roads
and Maritime Services. · Council undertakes
appropriate community consultation prior to installation of the traffic
signals, and associated signs and linemarking scheme. · The signs and linemarking scheme is to be presented to the Roads and Maritime Services and Police for approval under delegated authority. iii) Item 3 - Proposed change to bus route 827 and associated bus stops, Cecil Hills · Council approves the installation of bus zones at: a. Frederick Road near Alice Place on the northern and southern side of the road b. Frederick Road in front of Cecil Hills High School on the northern and southern side of the road c. Airfield Drive near Aviation Drive d. Airfield Drive before and after Big W driveway · All stakeholders be informed including notification to local residents. · The existing bus stops/zone along Gabriella Street and Spencer Street be decommissioned and the existing bus shelters be relocated. · Council advises Transport for NSW of the new bus stop locations and decommissioning of bus shelters. iv) Item 4 - Newbridge Road and Kelso Crescent intersection, Moorebank - proposed no right turn into Newbridge Road. · Council approves the installation of a ‘No Right Turn’ restriction from Kelso Crescent into Newbridge Road, subject to the approval of a Traffic Management Plan by the Roads and Maritime Services. · Council advises all stakeholders of its resolution. v) Item 5 - Liverpool City Centre - proposed special community event ‘Festival of Chariots’ · Council classifies the event as a Class 2 Special Event with all associated conditions including: a. Submission of a Traffic Management Plan b. Police approval and management of the street parade and rolling road closures c. Advertisement of event in the local papers d. Submission of public liability insurance e. Payment of Council fees and charges for occupation of the car park · Council notes the closure of the ground floor of Northumberland Street Car Park for the special event between 5.00am and 4:00pm. · Council arranges a meeting with the event organisers, Police and Transit Systems to ensure that the impacts of the event are minimised. · All stakeholders be notified accordingly. vi) Item 6 - Sappho Road, Warwick Farm - proposed marked parking spaces · Council approves the signs and linemarking of the unrestricted parallel kerbside parking spaces along Sappho Road, Warwick Farm. · Council advises Masterton Homes Display Village of its decision and confirms the arrangement for installation and maintenance of the sign and linemarking at no cost to Council. vii) Item 7 - Terminus Street and Charles Street, Liverpool - proposed ‘No Right Turn’ restriction. · Council approves the installation of ‘No Right Turn’ restriction from Terminus Street into Charles Street, subject to the approval of a Traffic Management Plan by the Roads and Maritime Services. · Council advises all stakeholders of its resolution. viii) Item 8 - National Aborigines and Islanders Day Observance Committee (NAIDOC) Street Parade – Liverpool CBD – special community event · Council classifies the NAIDOC street parade as a Class 4 Special Event with all associated conditions including: a) Submission of a Traffic Management Plan b) Police approval and management of the street parade and rolling road closures c) Advertisement of event in the local papers d) Submission of public liability insurance e) Payment of Council fees and charges for
occupation of the car park · All stakeholders be notified accordingly. |
REPORT
The Local Traffic Committee at its
meeting on 17 May 2017 considered the above mentioned eight (8) Agenda Items
and discussed one (1) Technical Item and nine (9) General Business Items:
Technical Discussion Item
Item TD1 Falcon Circuit, Green valley- request for a pedestrian crossing facility
The Committee supported the proposed pedestrian refuge in-principle on Falcon Circuit in the vicinity of Ospray Avenue as per the attached sketch 5.1 and agreed that a design be presented to a future Local Traffic Committee Meeting for further consideration.
General Business Items
GB1 Hanover Street, Cecil Hills - proposed parking restrictions
GB2 290 Kurrajong Road, Prestons - signs and linemarking
GB3 Car Show at Mega Centre -Traffic Management Plan
GB4 Annual Street Parade - Traditions of India Incorporated
GB5 Designated Police parking request out the front of TAFE
GB6 Governor Macquarie Drive and Short Street intersection
GB7 Braidwood Drive, Prestons - speeding
GB8 Council requests from Interline
GB9 Hoxton Park Road - Illegal Traffic movements
The Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting are
attached for the information of Council.
The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake. The non- financial implications to Council of each recommendation is noted below:
Budget impact of matters arising from the minutes
Item |
Description |
Funding |
1 |
Governor Macquarie Drive, Warwick Farm, road widening - proposed signs and linemarking |
Roads and Maritime Services / Traffic Facilities Grant |
2 |
Flowerdale Road and Memorial Avenue intersection, Liverpool - proposed signs and linemarking |
Roads and Maritime Services / Federal Black Spot Program |
3 |
Proposed change to bus route 827 and associated bus stops, Cecil Hills |
Council’s Minor Facilities Program |
4 |
Newbridge Road and Kelso Crescent intersection, Moorebank - proposed no right turn into Newbridge Road |
Roads and Maritime Services / Traffic Facilities Grant |
Item |
Description |
Funding |
5 |
Liverpool City Centre - proposed special community event ‘Festival of Chariots’ |
Vedic Festival Incorporated |
6 |
Sappho Road, Warwick Farm - proposed marked parking spaces |
Masterton Homes Display Village |
7 |
Terminus Street and Charles Street, Liverpool - proposed ‘No Right Turn’ restriction. |
Roads and Maritime Services/ Traffic Facilities Grant |
8 |
NAIDOC Street Parade - Liverpool CBD - special community event |
NAIDOC |
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Promote an integrated and user friendly public transport service. Support the delivery of a range of transport options. |
Social and Cultural |
Improve traffic and pedestrian safety. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
The recommendation provides the opportunity to advocate for the local community. The recommendations are required in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting 17 May 2017View (Under separate cover)
307
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Committee Reports
CTTE 04 |
Minutes of the Environment Advisory Committee Meeting held on 23 May 2017 |
Strategic Direction |
Natural Sustainable City Lead the community to develop and implement environmentally sustainable practices |
Key Policy |
Environment Restoration Plan |
File Ref |
160847.2017 |
Report By |
Madhu Pudasaini - Manager Technical Support |
Approved By |
Raj Autar - Director Infrastructure and Environment |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Environment Advisory Committee (Committee) Meeting held on 23 May 2017.
One of the matters considered by the Committee relates to Council’s plans for the provision of a community nursery and an environmental education centre within Liverpool. The purpose of this facility would be to provide appropriate supply of plant and nursery products and services to support Council’s on-ground environment restoration activities as well as to be the focal point for environment education and community engagement projects. As a first step in progressing this proposal, Council commissioned an options analysis exercise to:
§ Research and identify the exact nature of service delivery needs and requirements;
§ Explore available options to meet the service delivery requirements; and
§ Undertake financial and feasibility analysis of the available options.
The options analysis exercise found that:
§ Council’s requirements for native plants can be more effectively serviced by the existing plant nursery industry. It also found that contractual certainties arising from a longer term supply arrangement would enable the market to better respond to council’s requirements for local provenance native plant and hence recommended establishment of a long-term supply contract for plant and nursery products.
§ With regards to establishing an environment education centre, the analysis found that the education centre could be better accommodated by integrating it into a future community facility in keeping with council’s strategy to create multi-purpose hubs in lieu of single use facilities.
This report recommends that the
Committee’s recommendations be accepted.
That Council:
1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Environment Advisory Committee Meeting held on 23 May 2017.
2. Endorses the draft Community Nursery and Environmental Education Centre Options Analysis Report.
3. Establishes a long-term supply contract for the provision of plant and nursery products and services to meet Council’s ongoing requirements.
4. Incorporates an Environmental Education Centre into the planning for a future Community Facility.
|
REPORT
Background
Council adopted an Environment Restoration Plan in 2007 (ERP), which provides a framework for managing and improving Liverpool’s highly significant natural environment for the long-term benefit of Liverpool and its community. The ERP identifies a wide range of projects and programs to be delivered over the medium to long-term including the establishment of a community nursery and environmental education centre.
The purpose of this facility would be to provide appropriate supply of plant and nursery products and services to support Council’s on-ground environment restoration activities as well as to be the focal point for environment education and community engagement projects.
To progress the required planning for this facility, Council engaged Montemare Consulting to research and identify the exact nature of service delivery requirements and to explore available options to meet the identified requirements. This included a detailed financial and feasibility analysis of the available options.
Options analysis and recommendation
The details of the various service delivery options and its corresponding feasibility analysis are attached in the attachments to this report. The report identified the following five service delivery options that had the potential to meet the requirements and objectives of Council’s proposal.
1. Option 1 - Do Nothing. This option involves maintaining the current arrangement of sourcing plants and delivering educational programmes.
2. Option 2 - Liverpool Sustainability Hub. This option involves the establishment of a purpose built community nursery and environmental education centre at a suitable location that is yet to be identified.
4. Option 4 - In-house Native Plant Nursery involves establishment of Council’s own native plant nursery with the educational centre integrated within a future community hub.
5. Option 5 - Council to Council Partnership involves establishing a partnership with a neighbouring council that already has a nursery with the educational centre integrated within a future community hub.
A rigorous analysis of each option found that Option 3 provided the best overall outcome and has been recommended for detailed planning and implementation. This option, which involves the establishment of a long-term supply contract for the supply of native plants and the integration of the education component into a future community facility is supported for the following reasons:
§ Council is well advanced in its skills and capacity to manage large contracts. Some minor delivery issues identified in the report can be effectively managed through well-developed contractual provisions.
§ Certainty of long-term contract and continuous interaction with the supplier will encourage the contractor to become involved in the research and development and hence will contribute to the Cumberland Plan Woodland Conservation objectives.
§ Costs associated with establishing and operating a plant nursery would be significant and there are financial risks associated with operating a nursery.
§ Analysis also suggests that council may potentially save up to 25% of current plant supply costs under this arrangement, further reducing ongoing costs.
§ The draft Community Facility Strategy (currently on exhibition) has identified environmental education as key function of the future community facility.
§ Annual plant supply cost savings of between $30,000 and $40,000 would contribute towards additional environmental education and engagement programs.
§ Provision of an Environmental Education Centre in a future community facility will provide a home venue for environmental and sustainability learning.
§ Due to the integrated nature of the facility with library and other community activities, an environmental education centre will be better promoted and utilised by the wider Liverpool community.
§ This is a lower cost solution, compared to other options, with little or no capital outlay associated with infrastructure.
The Committee considered the options analysis report and recommended that Council:
1. Endorses the draft Community Nursery and Environmental Education Centre Options Analysis Report.
2. Establishes a long-term supply contract for the provision of plant and nursery products and services to meet Council’s ongoing requirements.
3. Incorporates an Environmental Education Centre into the planning for a future Community Facility.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
The recommended option provides the best long-term environmental and education outcomes while at the same time reducing Council’s long term and ongoing financial liabilities. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
The establishment of a long term supply contract will enable council to better meet its requirements for local provenance native plant. Further, integrating the environmental education centre within a future community facility will enhance sustainability education outcomes. |
Social and Cultural |
Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Act as an environmental leader in the community. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Minutes of EAC Meeting held on 23 May 2017View (Under separate cover)
2. Community Nursery and Environmental Education Centre Analysis ReportView (Under separate cover)
315
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Committee Reports
CTTE 05 |
Minutes of the Civic Advisory Committee Meeting held 13 June 2017 |
Strategic Direction |
Proud Engaged City Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement |
Key Policy |
Events Strategy |
File Ref |
163435.2017 |
Report By |
George Georgakis - Manager Council and Executive Services |
Approved By |
Chris White - Director City Corporate |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Civic Advisory Committee Meeting held on 13 June 2017.
That Council:
1. Receive and note the Minutes of the Civic Advisory Committee Meeting held on 13 June 2017.
2. Endorse the recommendations in the Minutes, with the exception of the following recommendation, and note that a separate report will be submitted to the July 2017 Council meeting on the following recommendation;
“That the Civic Advisory Committee recommends to Council to proceed with the design of a statue in honour of Thomas Moore and report back to the Committee. Various sites to be examined, with the Committee’s preferred site for the statue being Thomas Moore Park or the Hospital Precinct”. |
REPORT
1. The Minutes of the Civic Advisory Committee held on 13 June 2017 are attached for the information of Council.
2. The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, including the following which will have a financial impact on Council;
- Berryman Park, relocation of the Cenotaph (page 3 of minutes)
The Committee was advised that the cost of relocating the Cenotaph (previously located in Macquarie Mall) to Berryman Park, Warwick Farm was in the order of $300,000 and that a report would be submitted to the July 2017 Council meeting requesting additional funding if this is to be carried out. Although no motion was passed by the Committee at their meeting on 13 June 2017, the matter is brought to Council’s attention and to advise that a separate report on the matter will be submitted to the July Council meeting.
- Investigation into cost of a statue in honour of Thomas Moore (as per Council resolution from 29/3/17 meeting) (page 8 of minutes)
When adopting the previous minutes of the Civic Advisory Committee meeting (in March 2017), Council also resolved that;
“Investigate and report back to Council by the June 2017 meeting on the cost of a substantial statue equivalent to that of Macquarie to be erected in honour of Thomas Moore and report back to the Civic Advisory Committee in June 2017”.
The Committee was advised that five sites had been examined and costs were in the order of $265,000.
The Committee recommended that;
Council proceed with the design of a statue in honour of Thomas Moore and report back to the Committee. Various sites to be examined, with the Committee’s preferred site for the statue being Thomas Moore Park or the Hospital Precinct.
Council is advised that Council staff will be submitting a report to the July 2017 Council meeting in relation to this matter.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Costs in relation to the relocation of the Cenotaph and the design of a statue in honour of Thomas Moore will be the subject of reports to Council in July 2017. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues. |
Social and Cultural |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place. Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Civic Advisory Committee Minutes from 13 June 2017View
315 |
|
CTTE 05 |
Minutes of the Civic Advisory Committee Meeting held 13 June 2017 |
Attachment 1 |
Civic Advisory Committee Minutes from 13 June 2017 |
327
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Questions with Notice
QWN 01 |
Question with Notice - Clr Harle |
Strategic Direction |
Liveable Safe City Create clean and attractive public places for people to engage and connect |
Key Policy |
Urban Development Plans |
File Ref |
165895.2017 |
QUESTION WITH NOTICE
These questions relate to the current state of the Liverpool CBD.
Visitors to the Liverpool CBD area have expressed concern at the rapidly increasing amounts of black chewing gum ingrained on the pavement including the recently refurbished Mall.
The current state of the pavements detracts from the efforts of Council Staff to maintain areas free from litter. It is also disappointing to see that people are not using rubbish bins within a few metres of where they leave their litter behind.
Please address the following:
· Is Council aware of the increasing amounts of Chewing Gum in the CBD in general and particularly in the Mall?
· Has Council abandoned the use of the Special Purpose Chewing Gum Removal Machine purchased at substantial cost of around $80,000?
· Has Council considered the use of weekend Corrective Services Detention offenders to remove the chewing gum from pavement surfaces in the CBD as proposed some time ago?
· Does Council have a plan on addressing this issue and littering in the CBD and Mall areas in general?
· Is it possible to display appropriate warning signs that include the scheduled fines in appropriate areas within the CBD?
· Has Council considered fining offenders as per the current applicable scheduled fines?
General littering
Littering is subject to a tiered range of fines under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997:
· $80 for littering small items, such as bottle tops and cigarette butts
· $250 for general littering,
· $250 for an individual littering from a vehicle ($500 for corporations)
· $450 for littering in dangerous circumstances, such as depositing a syringe or a lit cigarette ($900 for corporations).
More information here: http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/regulations/2014-564.pdf
A response to these questions will be provided in the July 2017 Business Papers.
329
Ordinary Meeting 28 June 2017
Notices of Motion
NOM 01 |
Small Business in Liverpool |
Strategic Direction |
Vibrant Prosperous City Assist existing businesses to grow, innovate and become more competitive |
Key Policy |
Economic Development Strategy |
File Ref |
165817.2017 |
Author |
Gus Balloot - Councillor |
Background
This council needs to support small business in Macquarie Mall and Liverpool in general by removing unnecessary red tape which makes the business environment more difficult and costly than it already is.
Small businesses are vital to support families, give individuals independence, to employer local residents and allows competition in the marketplace which keep prices down and more affordable.
Council plays a vital part in supporting small businesses. With our support, they can succeed. Without the support of small businesses, they will inevitably cease to exist as the larger corporations put pressure on them. The small business owners and employees will in turn be unemployed and more reliant on welfare.
That Council:
1. Freeze any additional charges for the outdoor seating; 2. Conduct an urgent study regarding providing additional chairs and umbrellas for shops that may require to provide more seating for their customers; 3. Hold a grand opening for Macquarie mall to assist in informing the public in our LGA that the mall is open for business in order to support struggling small business; and 4. Officers report back to Council on how best Liverpool Council may be able to further assist small business.
|
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities. Facilitate economic development. Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities (in the City Centre). |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Deliver services that are customer focused. |