Liverpool City Council
Business Paper
Council Agenda
Ordinary Council Meeting
26 August 2015
Francis Greenway Centre
170 George Street
Liverpool
You are hereby notified that an Ordinary Council Meeting of Liverpool City Council will be held at the Francis Greenway Centre, 170 George Street, Liverpool on Wednesday, 26 August 2015 commencing at 6.00pm. Doors to the Francis Greenway Centre will open at 5.45pm.
Liverpool City Council Meetings are taped for the purposes of minute taking and record keeping. If you have any enquiries please contact Council and Executive Services on 9821 9237.
![]() |
Carl Wulff
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Order of Business
PAGE TAB
Prayer
Apologies
Condolences
Confirmation of Minutes
Ordinary Council Meeting held on 29 July 2015...................................................................... 9
Declarations of Interest
Public Forum
Mayoral Report
NIL
Notices of Motion Of Rescission
NIL
Notices of Motion
NOM 01 Small Business Workshops............................................................................ 97......... 1
NOM 02 Domestic Violence in Liverpool LGA.............................................................. 99......... 2
NOM 03 Liverpool Bowling Club Site ......................................................................... 102......... 3
NOM 04 Orthodox Interfaith Lunch 2016.................................................................... 108......... 4
NOM 05 Pensioner Rate Rebates............................................................................... 110......... 5
NOM 06 Mayoral Charity Ball 2016............................................................................ 112......... 6
NOM 07 Bin Cycle....................................................................................................... 114......... 7
NOM 08 Low Kill Animal Policy................................................................................... 116......... 8
NOM 09 Cleaning Tender............................................................................................ 118......... 9
NOM 10 Council and Executive Support.................................................................... 120....... 10
NOM 11 Current Media Policy.................................................................................... 122....... 11
NOM 12 Christian Orthodox Interfaith Lunch of the 2nd of August 2015................... 124....... 12
NOM 13 Media releases of Liverpool Councils negotiations with the Wests Tigers Rugby League Football Club................................................................................................. 127....... 13
Motions of Urgency
NIL
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report
IHAP 01 Proposed use of site for container depot at 77 Governor Macquarie Drive, Chipping Norton (Lot 38 DP 17311)............................................................................. 129....... 14
Development Application Determination Report
NIL
Chief Executive Officer Report
NIL
Business Improvement Report
NIL
Chief Financial Officer
CFO 01 Nomination for Liverpool City Council member on Luddenham Quarry Community Consultative Committee............................................................................... 136....... 15
CFO 02 Local Government NSW Annual Conference.............................................. 139....... 16
CFO 03 Investment Report July 2015........................................................................ 144....... 17
CFO 04 Minor Amendment to Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy......................... 157....... 18
CFO 05 Budget Review - June 2015 (to be provided in Addendum Booklet)
City Presentation Report
NIL
Community and Culture Report
DCC 01 Donations, Grants and Sponsorships........................................................... 177....... 19
DCC 02 Revocation of No Smoking In Public Places Policy.................................... 194....... 20
DCC 03 Safety Audit Report conducted at Parks in Wattle Grove............................ 204....... 21
Economic Development Report
DEE 01 Review of Town Improvement Fund (now known as City Development Fund) 238 22
Infrastructure and Environment Report
DIEN 01 Managing Stormwater Quality...................................................................... 245....... 23
Planning and Growth Report
DPG 01 Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 37) - Heritage Listing of the Defence National Storage and Distribution Centre........................................................................................ 249....... 24
DPG 02 Draft Social Impact Assessment Policy and Draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 19) - Post-public exhibition............................................................................................. 291....... 25
DPG 03 Review of Permit Parking Policy.................................................................. 306....... 26
DPG 04 Recommendation to refuse application for rezoning of 1 and 67 Orange Grove Road, Liverpool........................................................................................................ 325....... 27
DPG 05 Protection of the Environment Operations (POEO (Clean Air)) Amendment (Heaters and Fireplaces) Regulation 2015......................................................................... 330....... 28
DPG 06 Changes to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Charter........ 344....... 29
DPG 07 Business Case to Attend Infor Public Sector User Forum........................... 352....... 30
DPG 08 2015-16 Operational Plan and Budget - Proposed new fees and charges - 3D images for new development in the city centre.............................................................. 362....... 31
Property and Commercial Development Report
NIL
Committee Reports
CTTE 01 Minutes Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on the 5 August 2015 367 32
CTTE 02 Minutes of Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce meeting held 5 August 2015 375 33
CTTE 03 Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee meeting held on 4 August 2015. 380....... 34
CTTE 04 Minutes of Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting held on 3 August 2015. 385....... 35
CTTE 05 Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 22 July 2015...... 405....... 36
CTTE 06 Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 5 August 2015 408....... 37
CTTE 07 Minutes of Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held 5 August 2015 414....... 38
CTTE 08 Minutes of Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 9 July 2015....... 422....... 39
CTTE 09 Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 4 August, 2015 429 40
CTTE 10 Minutes of the Planning and Development Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2015 436....... 41
Questions with Notice
QWN 01 Question with Notice - Clr Hadchiti............................................................... 443....... 42
QWN 02 Question with Notice - Clr Stanley................................................................ 445....... 43
QWN 03 Question with Notice - Clr Harle................................................................... 450....... 44
QWN 04 Question with Notice - Clr Stanley................................................................ 452....... 45
Council in Closed Session
The following items are listed for consideration by Council in Closed Session with the public excluded, in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 1993 as listed below:
CONF 01 Acquisition of part Lot 3149 DP 1190525, 130 Flynn Avenue, Middleton Grange for drainage and open space purposes
Reason: Item CONF 01 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10(A)(2)(c) of the Local Government Act because it contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
CONF 02 Proposed reclassification, rezoning and disposal of Lot 4 DP 1007383, Owl Place, Green Valley
Reason: Item CONF 02 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10(A)(2)(c) of the Local Government Act because it contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
CONF 03 Key Sites Master Planning Steering Committee
Minutes from Meeting held 4 August 2015
Reason: Item CONF 03 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10(A)(2)(c) of the Local Government Act because it contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
CONF 04 The Tender for the Liverpool Engagement Strategy (to be provided in Confidential Addendum Booklet)
Reason: Item CONF 04 is confidential pursuant to the provisions of s10(A)(2)(c) of the Local Government Act because it contains information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
Close
|
THIS PAGE IS BLANK
MINUTES OF THE Ordinary Meeting
HELD ON 29 July 2015
PRESENT:
Mayor Ned Mannoun
Councillor Balloot
Councillor Hadchiti
Councillor Hadid
Councillor Harle
Councillor Karnib
Councillor Ristevski
Councillor Shelton
Councillor Stanley
Councillor Waller
Mr Carl Wulff, Chief Executive Officer
Mr Gary Grantham, Chief Financial Officer
Ms Toni Averay, Director Planning and Growth
Ms Kiersten Fishburn, Director Community and Culture
Mr Gino Belsito, Director City Presentation
Mr Michael Cullen, Director Economy and Engagement
Mr Raj Autar, Director Infrastructure and Environment
Ms Carole Todd, Director Business Improvement
Mr John Morgan, Director Property and Commercial Development
The meeting commenced at 6.07pm.
OPENING 6.07pm.
PRAYER The prayer of the Council was read by Pastor Phil
Hanbury from Southwestern Community Baptist Church.
APOLOGIES Clr Mamone
Motion: Moved: Clr Stanley Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
CONDOLENCES Nil
Confirmation of Minutes
Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Hadid
That the minutes of the
Ordinary Meeting held on 17 June 2015 be confirmed as a true |
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Declarations of Interest
Clr Hadchiti declared a non-pecuniary, less than significant interest in the following item:
Item CONF 03: Acquisition of Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, for open space purposes
Reason: Clr Hadchiti has used the services of the solicitor named in the report 7 - 8 years ago.
Clr Hadchiti did not leave the Chamber for the duration of the item.
Clr Shelton declared a pecuniary interest in the following items:
Item CONF 01: Community Representation - Liverpool Council's Economic Development and Events Committee
Item CONF 02: Appointment of Community and Industry Representatives to the Environment Advisory Committee (EAC)
Reason: Clr Shelton has or has had a minor business relationship with some of the individuals referred to in these items.
Clr Shelton left the Chamber for the duration of these items.
Public Forum
Presentation – Items not on agenda
1. Mr Jeffrey Smith addressed the Council on the construction of the detention basin at Amalfi Memorial Park.
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Shelton
That a two minute extension of time be given to Mr Jeffrey Smith.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Representation – Items on agenda
1. Mr Julious Vergara from Liverpool Boys High School addressed the Council on the following item:
Item DIEN 02: Speaking 4 the Planet (S4P) Event
Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That a two minute extension of time be given to Mr Julious Vergara.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
2. Ms Melinda Cruz addressed the Council on the following item:
Item NOM 11: Miracle Babies
Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun Seconded: Clr Shelton
That a two minute extension of time be given to Ms Melinda Cruz.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
3. Mr Leo Epifania addressed the Council on the following item:
Item DCC 01: Donations, Grants and Sponsorships
Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That a two minute extension of time be given to Mr Leo Epifania.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Item DCC 01: Donations, Grants and Sponsorships
Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun Seconded: Clr Shelton
That a two minute extension of time be given to Mr James Martin.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
5. Mr Milorad Arcaba from Harcourts Real Estate addressed the Council on the following item:
Item CONF 12: Tender WT2448 - Macquarie Mall Revitalisation
6. Mr Daren Camilleri from Casanova Café addressed the Council on the following item:
Item CONF 12: Tender WT2448 - Macquarie Mall Revitalisation
7. Ms Svetlana Kaluderovic addressed the Council on the following item:
Item CONF 12: Tender WT2448 - Macquarie Mall Revitalisation
8. Sabih Aldoumany addressed the Council on the following item:
Item CONF 12: Tender WT2448 - Macquarie Mall Revitalisation
9. Mr Milos Dyakovic addressed the Council on the following item:
Item CONF 12: Tender WT2448 - Macquarie Mall Revitalisation
10. Ms Djana Stefanovska from The Chocolate Room addressed the Council on the following item:
Item CONF 12: Tender WT2448 - Macquarie Mall Revitalisation
BRING ITEM FORWARD
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That CONF 12: Tender WT2448 - Macquarie Mall Revitalisation be brought forward and dealt with now.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
13
ITEM NO: CONF 12
FILE NO: 184468.2015
SUBJECT: Tender WT2448 - Macquarie Mall Revitalisation
RECOMMENDATION That Council: 1. Accepts the tender submitted from Hargraves Urban Pty Ltd for Tender WT2448 - Macquarie Mall Revitalisation, for the GST exclusive price of $8,429,542. 2. Allocates an additional $3,000,000 to enable completion of the full scope of the upgrade works, noting that the 2015/16 Capital Works Budget will not be exceeded. 3. Makes public its decision regarding Tender WT2448 - Macquarie Mall Revitalisation. 4. Notes that the Director Infrastructure and Environment will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of the draft minutes on Council’s website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority. 5. Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Balloot
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Vote for: Mayor Mannoun Clr Balloot Clr Hadchiti Clr Hadid Clr Harle Clr Ristevski
Vote against: Clr Karnib Clr Shelton Clr Stanley Clr Waller
|
Mayoral Minute Subject: Women in the Police Force Event - Liverpool Local Area Command |
In 2015, the NSW Police Force celebrates 100 years of women in policing. The anniversary marks a significant milestone for the Force and celebrates the evolution of the role of women in policing in NSW since the introduction of the first female Special Constable in 1915.
To commemorate such an historic milestone, the NSW Police Force has been running a range of events and activities throughout this year and will continue until the end of September 2015. The events and activities to mark the anniversary include amongst other things a baton relay, which has been travelling across NSW since March. The Baton Relay will also be held in Liverpool and is scheduled for 19 August 2015 at Bigge Park.
To acknowledge the great and important work the NSW Police Force undertakes and in recognition of women in policing, with particular acknowledgement of our female police officers in the Liverpool Local Area Command, the Council should give its full support and assistance for the Baton Relay event on 19 August.
When requests are made to the Council for the use of Bigge Park for special events, a bond of $1,056 is required and should be waived for The Baton Relay event on 19 August 2015. As well as the waiver of the bond, Council should also provide, free of charge, the following provisions for this event:
The cost of the above provisions amounts to approximately $1,180 and should be waived in recognition of the important milestone the NSW Police Force is currently celebrating. The bond normally required is $1,056 and this also should be waived. |
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council:
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun
That the recommendation be adopted. On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
Notices of Motion
ITEM NO: NOM 01
FILE NO: 177408.2015
SUBJECT: Waiving Fees for Storage for not for profit groups
NOTICE OF MOTION
That Council waive fees for storage for all not for profit groups using our community halls.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Stanley Seconded: Clr Karnib
That Council waive fees for storage for all not for profit groups, for the first storage cupboard, using our community halls.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
17
ITEM NO: NOM 02
FILE NO: 177411.2015
SUBJECT: Place Manager Carnes Hill
NOTICE OF MOTION
That Council:
1. Dedicate a resource to become the Carnes Hill Place Manager.
2. Begin planning the uses of the facility and programmes required by residents by engaging the community and planning programmes.
3. Implement programmes before the opening of the facility.
4. Report to Council at an appropriate time the findings of this pilot programme with a view to implementing LGA wide.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Stanley Seconded: Clr Waller
That Council:
1. Dedicate a resource to become the Carnes Hill Place Manager.
2. Begin planning the uses of the facility and programmes required by residents by engaging the community and planning programmes.
3. Implement programmes before the opening of the facility.
4. Report to Council at an appropriate time the findings of this pilot programme with a view to implementing LGA wide.
5. Staff implement the actions from the Chief Executive Officer’s comment (to the Notice of Motion as published below) as part of this motion.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT
International research (OECD, 2015) suggests that infrastructure projects should be developed in co-operation with local stakeholders including local and regional authorities, involve public consultations and be aligned with the strategic needs of specific sectors of the economy. The same principles also apply at micro-level: and in instances such as Carnes Hill, the success of the significant investment by Council is more likely to be assured if necessary preliminary activities relating to raising awareness, identifying local needs through community consultations and aligning aspirations with Council objectives are planned and organised in a systematic manner.
Done well, such processes can lead to local communities being empowered, willing to participate in organisations and projects, connected with Council and working toward shared goals. In effect, infrastructural development acts as the catalyst for building a sense of “place”, linked to a strong sense of local ownership and influence.
Best practice also suggests that, given the multiplicity of relationships involved in planning, delivering and managing major projects, resources need to be invested in the professional management of land relationships by a lead body (i.e. Council) so as to avoid blurring of lines of accountability. In this instance, the fundamental challenge is how Council manages the individual components so as to complement other activities within an multipurpose precinct.
As construction of Carnes Hill Recreation and Community Precinct is well underway and will be operational in 2016, it is timely to begin exploring best practice management models to realise its full potential. The intent of the place management approach is entirely consistent with the guiding principles and content of the Draft Community Facilities Strategy. Research undertaken for the Draft Strategy found that effective programming of libraries and community facilities is particularly pertinent during their start-up phase in activating spaces and encouraging a wider usage by different members of the community. This was supported by evidence from other successful community facilities indicating that programming creates an environment for significantly higher levels of usage and greater awareness of programs and activities offered.
It is recommended that Council officers investigate and report back the outcomes of research on best practice approaches (including international examples) for managing Carnes Hill Recreation and Community Precinct. Carnes Hill offers Council the opportunity to pilot a place management approach which, if successful, could be adopted for future projects across the LGA.
19
ITEM NO: NOM 03
FILE NO: 177419.2015
SUBJECT: Advocating changes to State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009
NOTICE OF MOTION
That Council:
1. Write to the Minister for Planning detailing the issues that can arise with this loop hole in the legislation.
2. Submit a Notice of Motion to the Local Government Conference in October.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Balloot Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That the item be deferred to be discussed at the Councillor Briefing Session on 18 August 2015.
Foreshadowed motion: Moved: Clr Stanley Seconded: Clr Waller
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion (moved by Clr Balloot) was declared CARRIED and the Foreshadowed motion (moved by Clr Stanley) lapsed. |
19
ITEM NO: NOM 04
FILE NO: 177570.2015
SUBJECT: Publication of Mayor and Deputy Mayor Messages in Foreign Language Media
NOTICE OF MOTION
That Council review which foreign language print media both the Mayor and Deputy Mayor messages are printed in every week.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Balloot Seconded: Clr Ristevski
That the recommendation be adopted.
Foreshadowed motion: Moved: Clr Harle Seconded: Clr Ristevski
That:
On being put to the meeting the motion (moved by Clr Balloot) was declared CARRIED and the Foreshadowed motion (moved by Clr Harle) lapsed.
|
21
ITEM NO: NOM 05
FILE NO: 177598.2015
SUBJECT: Youth Unemployment
NOTICE OF MOTION
That:
1. Council set up a committee to investigate the high youth unemployment rate in Liverpool LGA.
2. The Committee report back to Council in early 2016 with details of the many issues confronting our youth and recommendations as to what Council can do to assist our youth to find unemployment and improve their lives.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Balloot Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That Council:
Foreshadowed motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Stanley
That Council receives and notes the Chief Executive Officer’s Comment (to the Notice of Motion) as published below. |
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT
Council has an existing Economic Development & Events Committee which would be an appropriate vehicle to consider the issue of high youth unemployment. It is suggested that a representative of the Commonwealth Department of Employment be invited to brief this Committee on the issue and the various efforts in place to address high youth unemployment nationally and how this is delivered locally. The Committee will then be in a position to consider what additional local efforts are required by business and Council to address these issues.
On being put to the meeting the motion (moved by Clr Balloot) was declared CARRIED and the Foreshadowed motion (moved by Clr Shelton) lapsed.
BRING ITEM FORWARD
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Waller
That NOM 11: Miracle babies be brought forward and dealt with now.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
23
ITEM NO: NOM 11
FILE NO: 179870.2015
SUBJECT: Miracle Babies
NOTICE OF MOTION
That Council:
1. Sponsors this years Miracle Babies Foundation Annual Ball with three tables:
· 1 x Table for Council · 1 x Table for Volunteers of the foundation · 1 x table for the Miracle Baby Survivor's
2. Congratulate the Foundation for the hard work it has done in the past 10 years
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Stanley Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That Council:
1. Sponsors this years Miracle Babies Foundation Annual Ball with three tables:
· 1 x Table for Council · 1 x Table for Volunteers of the foundation · 1 x table for the Miracle Baby Survivor's
2. Congratulate the Foundation for the hard work it has done in the past 10 years
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Mayor Mannoun called for a recess of Council at 8.05pm.
Mayor Mannoun reopened the meeting at 8.25pm.
|
BRING ITEMS FORWARD
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Balloot
That the IHAP items be brought forward and dealt with now.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
23
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report
ITEM NO: IHAP 01
FILE NO: 157157.2015
SUBJECT: DA-1136/2014 - Torrens title subdivision of one lot into eight lots at 10 Nader Place, Horningsea Park
RECOMMENDATION
That Council approves Development Application DA-1136/2014, subject to the amended recommended conditions of consent.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Harle Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
25
ITEM NO: IHAP 02
FILE NO: 161095.2015
SUBJECT: DA-964/2014 - Torrens title subdivision of two lots into 22 residential lots with associated road construction and drainage works.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council approves Development Application DA-964/2014 subject to the amended Recommended Conditions of Consent attached to the report.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Balloot Seconded: Clr Harle
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Vote for: Mayor Mannoun Clr Balloot Clr Hadchiti Clr Hadid Clr Harle Clr Ristevski
Vote against: Clr Karnib Clr Shelton Clr Stanley Clr Waller |
25
ITEM NO: IHAP 03
FILE NO: 162848.2015
SUBJECT: DA-1059/2013 - Torrens title subdivision of two existing lots into four lots, alterations and additions to the existing single storey dwelling on 60 Passefield Street, demolition of existing dwelling and construction of a new dwelling on 62 Passefield Street; and construction of a new dwelling on proposed 60a and 60b Passefield Street, Liverpool
RECOMMENDATION
That Council approves Development Application DA-1059/2013 by way of Deferred Commencement consent, subject to the recommended conditions of consent attached to the Council officer’s IHAP report.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Stanley Seconded: Clr Karnib
That Council:
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Vote for: Mayor Mannoun Clr Balloot Clr Hadchiti Clr Hadid Clr Harle Clr Karnib Clr Ristevski Clr Shelton Clr Stanley
Vote against: Clr Waller
|
27
Business Improvement Report
ITEM NO: DBI 01
FILE NO: 153719.2015
SUBJECT: Community Performance Report 4th Quarter Jun 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receives and notes the June Community Performance Report which outlines the progress of all principal activities contained in the 4-year Delivery Program and Operational Plan 2014-15.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
27
Chief Financial Officer
ITEM NO: CFO 01
FILE NO: 138515.2015
SUBJECT: Borrowing to Refinance Existing Loan
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. That Council note the refinancing requirement of the 2007/2008 Loan program and authorise the Chief Executive Officer to accept the best quote offered and execute the loan agreement.
2. That Council authorises affixation of the Council seal to the loan agreement.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Harle
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
29
ITEM NO: CFO 02
FILE NO: 141105.2015
SUBJECT: Report on Progress of Policy Review (Red Tape Reduction) Project
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receive and note this report.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Balloot
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
29
ITEM NO: CFO 03
FILE NO: 147375.2015
SUBJECT: Review of Ethical Governance: Conflicts of Interest Policy
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Note this report; and
2. Adopt the Ethical Governance: Conflicts of Interest Policy, as attached to this report.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadid Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
31
ITEM NO: CFO 04
FILE NO: 147997.2015
SUBJECT: Review of Code of Conduct and Code of Conduct Procedures
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Note this report; and
2. Adopt the Code of Conduct and Code of Conduct Procedures, as attached to this report.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadid Seconded: Clr Balloot
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
31
ITEM NO: CFO 05
FILE NO: 148401.2015
SUBJECT: Review of Legal Services Policy
RECOMMENDATION
That Council approve and adopt the revised Legal Services Policy, included as Attachment 1 to the report of staff. |
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadid Seconded: Clr Balloot
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
33
ITEM NO: CFO 06
FILE NO: 149130.2015
SUBJECT: Review of the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Note this report;
2. Adopt the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy, as attached to this report; and
3. Provide a copy of the attached policy and the related public notice to the Chief Executive of the Office of Local Government within 28 days of the date of this Council resolution.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Balloot Seconded: Clr Harle
That Council:
1. Note this report;
2. Adopt the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy, as attached to this report, subject to the following changes:
a) The first line of clause 4.5.1d) be changed so that the allowance of $6,000 per Councillor is per “calendar year”, not “per annum” as currently stated.
b) In clause 4.7.1 Telephone expenses, the “Home telephone/fax” and “Mobile Phones” be grouped together and the amounts allocated be combined.
3. Provide a copy of the attached policy and the related public notice to the Chief Executive of the Office of Local Government within 28 days of the date of this Council resolution.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED. |
33
ITEM NO: CFO 07
FILE NO: 164583.2015
SUBJECT: Local Government NSW Annual Conference
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Endorse the key issues to be submitted for consideration at the Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2015.
2. Notes that further information will be provided to Councillors in relation to number of voting delegates that Liverpool will be entitled to when it comes to hand.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Balloot
That Council:
1. Endorse the key issues to be submitted for consideration at the Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2015 and delegate to the CEO to amend the motions to make them more generic and less Liverpool specific.
2. Nominates Mayor Mannoun, Clr Balloot, Clr Hadchiti, Clr Hadid, Clr Harle, Clr Mamone, Clr Karnib and Clr Ristevski as Council’s voting delegates at the Conference.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
35
ITEM NO: CFO 08
FILE NO: 167690.2015
SUBJECT: Investment Report June 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receives and notes this report.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Waller Seconded: Clr Shelton
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
41
ITEM NO: CFO 09
FILE NO: 175013.2015
SUBJECT: Reimbursement of Goods & Services Tax (GST) - Councils Class Court Action
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Direct and delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to engage Council in a Court Action seeking declaration that Councils form part of the State Government for GST purposes;
2. Note that Genesis Accounting Chartered Accountants will act as agents of Liverpool City Council for the duration of the Court Action.
3. Note that there will be no additional cost to Council, except when successful, Genesis Accounting Chartered Accountants will take 25% of the total GST reimbursement as their fees;
4. Direct and delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to enter into an agreement with Genesis Accounting – Chartered Accountants to represent Council in this Court Action.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Stanley
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
Clr Harle left the Chambers at 8.52pm.
Clr Balloot left the Chambers at 8.54pm.
Clr Balloot returned to the Chambers at 8.55pm.
Community and Culture Report
ITEM NO: DCC 01
FILE NO: 089694.2015
SUBJECT: Donations, Grants and Sponsorships
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Endorses the Financial Contribution Panel's recommendations for the provision of $15,000 (GST exclusive) under the Community Donations Program as summarised in the table below:
Community Grants Program
2. Endorses the Financial Contributions Panel’s recommendations for the provision of $22,600 (GST exclusive) under the Corporate Sponsorship Program as summarised in the table below:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Ristevski Seconded: Mayor Mannoun
That Council:
1. Endorses the Financial Contribution Panel's recommendations for the provision of $15,000 (GST exclusive) under the Community Donations Program as summarised in the table below:
Community Grants Program
2. Approves the provision of $50,000 (GST exclusive) under the Corporate Sponsorship Program as summarised in the table below:
Amendment: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That Council:
1. Endorses the Financial Contribution Panel's recommendations for the provision of $15,000 (GST exclusive) under the Community Donations Program as summarised in the table below:
Community Grants Program
2. Approves the provision of $30,000 (GST exclusive) under the Corporate Sponsorship Program as summarised in the table below:
Amendment: Moved: Clr Stanley Seconded: Clr Shelton
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the Amendment (moved by Clr Hadchiti) was declared lost.
On being put to the meeting the Amendment (moved by Clr Stanley) was declared CARRIED.
The Amendment (moved by Clr Stanley) then became the motion on being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Note:
During the meeting (at 9.15pm) a Rescission Motion was lodged (by Clrs Ristevski, Hadchiti and Balloot) in respect of the above item (DCC 01: Donations, Grants and Sponsorships).
In accordance with clause 38.3 of Council’s Code of Meeting Practice as stated below, the Rescission Motion was dealt with later at this meeting (see pages 84 - 85 of these minutes):
“A rescission motion may be given or intimated during the meeting at which the resolution to which it relates is made. Where the notice is given (30 minutes) and duly signed by three Councillors the motion to rescind the resolution may be put to that meeting in order to expedite the business of Council.”
|
Clr Harle returned to the Chambers at 9.00pm.
ITEM NO: DCC 02
FILE NO: 136273.2015
SUBJECT: Draft Grants and Donations Policy
RECOMMENDATION
That Council endorse the draft Grants and Donations Policy to be placed on public exhibition and receives a further report following public exhibition.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Stanley
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
41
ITEM NO: DCC 03
FILE NO: 142459.2015
SUBJECT: South West Sydney Academy of Sport Review of Contribution Request
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Increase its annual contribution to the South West Sydney Academy of Sport for the 2015/2016 financial year by $4,000 to $26,000 ex GST.
2. Increase subsequent annual contributions to the South West Sydney Academy of Sport by the Australian Bureau of Statistics Consumer Price Index.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Stanley Seconded: Clr Shelton
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
43
ITEM NO: DCC 04
FILE NO: 169120.2015
SUBJECT: Liverpool Sports Committee Charter
RECOMMENDATION
That Council that Council adopts the Liverpool Sports Committee Charter as attached to this report.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadid Seconded: Clr Balloot
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
45
Economy and Engagement Report
ITEM NO: DEE 01
FILE NO: 145282.2015
SUBJECT: Report on the Live At The Mall Activation Program
RECOMMENDATION
That Council notes the report on the Live at the Macquarie Mall activation program.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Balloot Seconded: Mayor Mannoun
That Council:
1. Notes the report on the Live at the Macquarie Mall activation program.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
Clr Balloot left the Chambers at 9.09pm.
Infrastructure and Environment Report
ITEM NO: DIEN 01
FILE NO: 151009.2015
SUBJECT: Liverpool Pioneers' Memorial Park Interpretive Signage Strategy
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Adopts the Interpretive Signage Strategy for Liverpool Pioneers’ Memorial Park.
2. Includes the implementation of the signage strategy in the 2016/17 Operational Plan.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Mayor Mannoun
That Council:
2. Includes the implementation of the signage strategy in the 2016/17 Operational Plan.
Foreshadowed motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Stanley
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion (moved by Clr Hadchiti) was declared LOST. The Foreshadowed motion (moved by Clr Shelton) then became the motion and on being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
47
ITEM NO: DIEN 02
FILE NO: 164856.2015
SUBJECT: Speaking 4 the Planet (S4P) Event
RECOMMENDATION
That Council writes to each winner and congratulates them on their success.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Waller Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That Council:
2. Thanks Julious Vergara for delivering his winning speech at this Council meeting.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
Clr Balloot returned to the Chambers at 9.11pm.
Planning and Growth Report
ITEM NO: DPG 01
FILE NO: 115637.2015
SUBJECT: Proposed amendment to the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 - Rezoning of land at 2140 Camden Valley Way, Edmondson Park
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Resolves to prepare and exhibit the Draft amendment to the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008.
2. Resolves to prepare and exhibit the Draft Amendment to the Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008.
3. Forwards a copy of the Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning and Environment seeking a Gateway determination and following that proceed with public authority consultation and public exhibition.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Stanley Seconded: Clr Harle
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
47
ITEM NO: DPG 02
FILE NO: 133470.2015
SUBJECT: Proposal to rezone 77-83 Moore and 193 Macquarie Streets and 165 Macquarie Street from B3 - Commercial Core to B4 - Mixed Use
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Endorses in principle, the proposal to rezone 77-83 Moore and 193 Macquarie Streets and 165 Macquarie Street, Liverpool from B3 Commercial Core to B4 Mixed Use.
2. Delegates to the CEO the authority to approve the final Planning Proposal to administer this rezoning, for submission to the Department of Planning and Environment for Gateway Review.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun Seconded: Clr Balloot
That the recommendation be adopted.
Vote for: Mayor Mannoun Clr Balloot Clr Hadid Clr Harle Clr Karnib Clr Ristevski Clr Waller
Vote against: Clr Hadchiti Clr Shelton Clr Stanley
|
49
ITEM NO: DPG 03
FILE NO: 158046.2015
SUBJECT: Bigge Park Draft Conservation Management Plan
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts the draft Bigge Park Conservation Management Plan for Bigge Park, Liverpool, subject to the amendments proposed in Table 1 of this report.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That the item be deferred to the next Council meeting.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
49
ITEM NO: DPG 04
FILE NO: 161759.2015
SUBJECT: Proposal to amend Part 2.11 of Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 to remove reference to Edmondson Park South (Draft Amendment 18)
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts LDCP 2008 (Amendment 18) in accordance with section 21 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 to come into effect on the publication of the required notice in the local newspaper.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Stanley Seconded: Clr Karnib
That the recommendation be adopted.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
51
ITEM NO: DPG 05
FILE NO: 169350.2015
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Review of Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Endorses the proposed project to prepare a comprehensive new Liverpool Local Environment Plan.
2. Notes the estimated timeframes and budget implications as detailed in the report.
3. Notes that a budget funding request will be referred to the first quarterly review this year.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Stanley Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That Council:
1. Endorses the proposed project to prepare a comprehensive new Liverpool Local Environment Plan.
2. Notes the estimated timeframes and budget implications as detailed in the report.
3. Notes that a budget funding request will be referred to the first quarterly review this year.
4. Notes that a strategy will be developed for significant consultation with the residents of Liverpool during this process.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
Mayor Mannoun called for a recess of Council at 9.25pm.
Mayor Mannoun reopened the meeting at 9.42pm.
Committee Reports
ITEM NO: CTTE 01
FILE NO: 134002.2015
SUBJECT: Minutes Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on the 3 June 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2015
2. The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
53
ITEM NO: CTTE 02
FILE NO: 135552.2015
SUBJECT: Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee meeting held on 2 June 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 2 June 2015.
2. Writes to the EPA to request the EPA to install additional air quality monitoring stations.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Harle
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
53
ITEM NO: CTTE 03
FILE NO: 135593.2015
SUBJECT: Minutes of the Warwick Farm Steering Committee meeting held on 2 June 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Warwick Farm Steering Committee Meeting held on 2 June 2015.
2. Receives a further report outlining the issues associated with acquiring land for the bypass road.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Harle
That Council:
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
55
ITEM NO: CTTE 04
FILE NO: 149875.2015
SUBJECT: Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 3 June 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Building our New City Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2015.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
55
ITEM NO: CTTE 05
FILE NO: 149878.2015
SUBJECT: Minutes of Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held 3 June 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Economic Development and Events Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2015.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
57
ITEM NO: CTTE 06
FILE NO: 149885.2015
SUBJECT: Minutes of Committee for Liverpool Meeting held 25 May 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Committee for Liverpool Meeting held on 25 May 2015.
2. Formally approve additional membership to the Committee for Liverpool: · Phil Cameron, SAP (instead of Tim Sleep) · Jason Little, Goodman · Darren Pearce, Australian Turf Club · Marina Go, West Tigers/Bauer Media Group · Andrew Head, Transurban
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
57
ITEM NO: CTTE 07
FILE NO: 153433.2015
SUBJECT: Minutes of Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting held on 1 June 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council
1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting held on 1 June 2015.
2. Endorses the tasks recommended by the Heritage Advisory Committee at the meeting held on 1 June 2015.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
59
ITEM NO: CTTE 08
FILE NO: 153723.2015
SUBJECT: Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council held on 2 June 2015 and Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council held on 7 July 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on 2 June, 2015.
2. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on 7 July 2015.
3. Endorses the appointment of Mr James Mansaray and Ms Maleeka Gazula as members of Liverpool Youth Council for the remainder of the 2014-2016 Term.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
59
ITEM NO: CTTE 09
FILE NO: 165059.2015
SUBJECT: Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee held on 1 July 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee Meeting held on 1 July 2015.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
61
ITEM NO: CTTE 10
FILE NO: 169637.2015
SUBJECT: Minutes of Planning and Development Committee Meeting held 3 June 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Planning and Development Committee Meeting held on 3 June 2015.
2. Amends the Planning and Development Committee Charter to change the Committee to an Advisory Committee rather than a Committee of the Whole and the quorum to two Councillors, not half the members.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
61
ITEM NO: CTTE 11
FILE NO: 173843.2015
SUBJECT: Minutes of Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 14 May, 2015 and Minutes of Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 11 June, 2015
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Receives and notes the minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 14 May 2015; and
2. Receives and notes the minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 11 June 2015.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
63
Questions with Notice
ITEM NO: QWN 01
FILE NO: 159587.2015
SUBJECT: Question with Notice - Clr Stanley
Please address the following:
Environmental Levy
1. When was the Environmental levy first added to council rates?
Council’s first Environment Levy program named “The Environment Plan” was originally adopted by Council in May 2002 and approved by the Minister for Local Government in June 2002. This levy program was based on an ad velorum charge to all rateable properties and was approximately $12 per household. This levy program was approved for a five year period and concluded in June 2007.
Due to the success of this Environment Levy program, Council applied for a permanent Environment Levy in 2006. Council was granted approval for the new permanent environment levy named The Environment Restoration Plan (ERP). This new Program was approved by the Minister for Local Government on 2 July 2007. The ERP Levy program is also an ad velorum charge which equates to approximately $20 per household per year for a 650m2 (approx.) property. This currently generates approximately $1.5 million per annum.
2. What was the original reason and objectives of the scheme and levy?
The Environment Levy was originally adopted to ensure Council had a separate and a sustainable source of funding to specifically deliver natural area restoration and environmental education programs. Large areas of existing bushland and riparian corridors in Liverpool are substantially degraded, mostly arising from urban pressures over a period of time. The ERP aims to restore the ecological health of the creeks, rivers and bushland areas through an ongoing program of the following on-ground works:
· Noxious and environmental weed management and control; · Litter removal; · Planting of locally native plants; · Provision of access paths and fences to protect vegetation of ecological significance; · Building community networks through the Environment Volunteer Program and Environment Advisory Committee; · Delivering environmental education to the Liverpool community. · Major natural area (bushland) restoration works; · Schools programs and newsletters; and · Community based environmental activities including support for Environment Groups (who undertake environmental restoration works in various Council parks and reserves) and community tree planting activities to support natural area restoration.
A broad program of works for the Environment Levy is outlined in the ERP program (attached).
3. What major projects have been completed using the environmental levy?
Environment Plan Program 2002-2007
Outlined below is a list of achievements delivered by Council’s first five year Environment Plan Program from 2002 to 2007:
The Environment Restoration Plan
Councils permanent Environment Levy program “The Environment Restoration Plan” commenced in 2007. Projects and programs delivered through the ERP are reported quarterly to the Environment Advisory Committee (EAC). Outlined below is an overview of some of the projects and programs delivered annually under the ERP:
· Eight Major Bush Regeneration projects per year; · Support for Environment Volunteer activities including Environment Group works and Community Tree Planting Activities (held monthly); · Support for Schools Environmental Programs including Schools National Tree Day, Environment Citizen of the Year and for the first time this year, Speaking 4 the Planet; · Environmental Education including Quarterly Sustaining Liverpool Newsletter, facilitation of monthly Sustainability Blitz Workshop series (held monthly); · Facilitation of the National Tree Day event; · Facilitation of the Environment Advisory Committee (EAC); · Involvement in broader Council Events eg: Spring Expo, Australia Day; and · Facilitation of Grant projects including Green Army. · Facilitation of an annual Environment Volunteer Recognition Event
ERP Indicators
With the commencement of the permanent Environment Levy program in 2007, Council developed a set of indicators to monitor the success of the program. Each year, Council reports on these indicators to the Environment Advisory Committee. Below is a table showing the indicator results for 2013/14 (2014/15 report is currently being prepared).
School Environmental Grant Program
4. Has council set criteria for the $75,000 funding recently approved?
The criteria has been developed and is included in the Draft Grants and Donations Policy, which is being presented to Council for endorsement and public exhibition.
5. What is the criteria?
6. Have any schools applied for funding as yet?
No
7. Which schools?
N/A
The Environmental Education Centre & Community Nursery
8. How and when did council decide to pursue a nursery and environmental education centre?
Through the delivery of the Environment Plan 2002-2007, Council acknowledged the possibility of an Environmental Education Centre and Community Plant Nursery.
A Business Case for the proposed facility is presently being prepared for consideration by Council.
9. What was the estimated cost of this project?
Estimated costs will be developed to inform the preparation of the business case.
10. Can the reports pertaining to the Nursery/Education Centre be provided to me?
A copy of the most pertinent EAC Reports and associated Council resolutions are attached. A number of reports regarding the Education Centre and Community Nursery were considered in between the two reports provided, however these were all associated with various prospective site reviews.
11. Can I be advised the financial commitments and priorities for the Environmental Levy for the budget periods 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16.
As a requirement of the Environment Levy funding, Council is required to provide a detailed cost report of the spending of the Environment Levy in the Annual Report. The information from the report is summarised in the table below.
*includes salary costs
The annual report information for 2014/15 is currently being prepared.
In addition, $80,000 has been allocated per project for the following bush regeneration project sites for 2015/16:
· Lot 10 Heathcote Road (Area 2), Holsworthy; · Blamfield Oval (Area 2), Ashcroft; · Glen Regent Reserve (Tom Way) (Area 2), Glen Regent; · Tepper Park (Area 3), Liverpool; · Dwyer Oval (Area 2), Warwick Farm; · Mannix Park (Area 3), Heckenberg; · Clinches Pond (Area 1), Moorebank; and · Bill Anderson Park (Area 1), Kemps Creek.
JRPP
1. Can I be advised of the usual process of applications that come to Council that meet the criteria to be assessed by the JRPP or Department of Planning? Development applications with a capital investment value in excess of $20m are required to be determined by the JRPP. Development Applications required to be determined by the JRPP undertake the following process:
a. The JRPP is notified of the lodgement of any application which meets the criteria of being determined by the JRPP.
b. Upon initial assessment of the application by the assessing officer, a meeting is held with the JRPP and Council officers, whereby the Panel is briefed on the application including any preliminary matters which have been identified. This is also an opportunity for the Panel to relay any concerns to Council officers raised with respect to the application upon initial review of the application and supporting documentation. The specific concerns raised by the Panel at this meeting are required to be considered as part of the assessment of the application.
This meeting is not a public meeting, however the chair of the Panel may agree to allow the Applicant to make representations at this meeting.
c. Upon completion of the assessment of the application, the assessment report including the recommendation made by Council officers is submitted to the JRPP who publish on the NSW Planning and Environment website, the officers report and supporting documentation submitted with the application one 7 days before the scheduled determination meeting.
d. At the JRPP determination meeting, the Panel, Council officers, the Applicant and their representatives and objectors/members of the public are invited to speak for or against the application. The Applicant may also be asked to clarify certain matters raised by the Panel in respect to the application.
e. While this is a public meeting, a closed session is held with the Panel and Council staff to discuss or clarify any matters, prior to reconvening the public meeting where the Panel will advise of the determination of the application which can either be an approval or refusal. The Panel may also choose to defer the determination of the application subject to further information being provided. If an application is deferred, a further determination meeting is held pending receipt of further information or clarification as outlined by the Panel.
2. What input is sought from the elected Council before these reports are provided to the JRPP? Prior to the establishment of the Planning and Development Committee, there was no formal process for seeking the input of Councillors prior to the determination of a JRPP application.
3. How are Councillors advised of applications that meet the criteria to go the JRPP?
There is currently no formal process in place whereby Councillors are advised of the applications being referred to the JRPP for determination. The newly established Planning and Development Committee provides a forum for major applications, including those to be determined by the JRPP, to be discussed with Councillors prior to a JRPP determination hearing. Note all development applications are published on Council’s eplanning portal and those subject to determination by the JRPP are identified as such in the application description.
However, to ensure Councillors are kept informed of the progress of JRPP applications, a similar process to that used for IHAP reports will be introduced. Councillors will be advised by Memo of all applications listed for JRPP hearings and determination meetings at least one week prior to the meeting.
4. If this process has recently changed given the Planning and Development Committee, please provide information on the previous process and any changes thereto? See comments for (4) above.
5. What notification is provided to Councillors that applications are to be forwarded to the JRPP? See comments for (4) above.
|
69
ITEM NO: QWN 02
FILE NO: 177335.2015
SUBJECT: Question with Notice - Clr Hadchiti
Please address the following:
In relation to Westfield Liverpool
1. What are the approved trading hours?
2. Do the stalls that pop up and generally located in the walk ways have DA approval?
3. Council was to have discussions with their management to resolve some traffic issues. Did this occur and what was the outcome?
In relation to food premises inspections required to be undertaken by Council:
1. Are we on track to ensure that all food premises will be inspected this calendar year?
2. In relation to fire safety audits/inspections
3. Are we up to date in this area?
In relation to Construction Certificates, Councillors at a workshop were given a presentation on new measures put in place to increase the number of construction certificates we issue.
Can an update be provided on how that is tracking since that presentation?
A response to these questions will be provided in the August 2015 Business Papers.
Note: At the meeting it was requested that the response to these questions be provided to all Councillors as soon as they are ready. |
71
ITEM NO: QWN 03
FILE NO: 180399.2015
SUBJECT: Question with Notice - Clr Stanley
Please address the following:
Sometime ago there was plans and public consultation completed for the Casula Parklands (the piece of land in front of the Casula Power House towards Liverpool, there was also funding secured from the State Government for the project.
1. How much was the funding?
2. Is it still held for this project?
3. Can a copy of those plans and consultation please be provided?
A response to these questions will be provided in the August 2015 Business Papers |
Clr Shelton left the Chambers at 9.53pm.
Council In Closed Session
ITEM NO: CONF 01
FILE NO: 148903.2015
SUBJECT: Community Representation - Liverpool Council's Economic Development and Events Committee
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Approve the recommended candidates, viz: · Justine Guest · Michelle Caruso · Karress Rhodes · Tracey Lentell · Robynne Cooke · Sharvek Naidu · Maryanne Munro · Tony Atkins
2. Amend the Economic Development and Events Committee Charter to allow for up to eight community representatives.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Waller Seconded: Clr Stanley
That the recommendation be adopted.
Amendment Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Mayor Mannoun
That Council:
1. Approve the following candidates, viz: · Justine Guest · Michelle Caruso · Karress Rhodes · Tracey Lentell · Robynne Cooke · Sharvek Naidu · Maryanne Munro · Tony Atkins · Garry O’Neill
2. Amend clause 8.3d) of the Economic Development and Events Committee Charter to allow for up to nine community representatives.
On being put to the meeting the Amendment (moved by Clr Hadchiti) was declared CARRIED. The Amendment then became the motion and on being put to the meeting was declared CARRIED. |
73
ITEM NO: CONF 02
FILE NO: 165977.2015
SUBJECT: Appointment of Community and Industry Representatives to the Environment Advisory Committee (EAC)
RECOMMENDATION
That Council appoints the following representatives to the Environment Advisory Committee in accordance with the terms of their appointment in the EAC Charter.
Community representatives: · Ian Bailey; · Robert Storey; · Jim Dimovski; · Signe Westerberg; and · Stephen Dobell-Brown.
Industry Representative: · Tony Wales –Georges River Riverkeeper.
Environment Group Representatives: · Jeff Webster – Voyager Point Environment Group; and · Paul Silato – Clinches Pond Environment Group.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Waller Seconded: Clr Stanley
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
Clr Shelton returned to the Chambers at 9.58pm.
ITEM NO: CONF 03
FILE NO: 169454.2015
SUBJECT: Acquisition of Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, for open space purposes
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Approves the acquisition of Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, for the price and terms outlined in the confidential attachment;
2. Upon settlement of the acquisition, classifies Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, being acquired as 'Operational' land;
3. Keeps confidential the attachment supplied under separate cover containing the acquisition price pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and
4. Authorises its delegated officer to execute any document, under Power of Attorney necessary to give effect to this decision.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved:Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Shelton
That this item be discussed in closed session at the end of the meeting.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
75
ITEM NO: CONF 04
FILE NO: 169805.2015
SUBJECT: Proposed easement for underground electricity cables over Lot 1 and 2 DP 1069920 and Lot 1 DP 239334, Sydney Road, Warwick Farm, known as 'Military Reserve'
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Grants an easement for underground electricity cables to Endeavour Energy over Lot 1 and 2 DP 1069920 and Lot 1 DP 239334, Sydney Road, Warwick Farm, known as ‘Military Reserve’ as outlined in the confidential report;
2. Keeps confidential the attachment supplied under separate cover containing the compensation amount pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and
3. Authorises the relevant documentation necessary for the formalisation of the easement to be signed under Power of Attorney by Council's delegated officer.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Harle
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
75
ITEM NO: CONF 05
FILE NO: 167345.2015
SUBJECT: Tender WT2443 - Construction of City Centre Trunk Drainage Works Elizabeth Street between George and College Streets, Liverpool
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Accepts the Tender from Civil Construction Pty Ltd for WT2443 – Construction of City Centre Trunk drainage works in Elizabeth Street between George and College streets, Liverpool for lump sum contract price of $2,953,680 GST exclusive.
2. Makes public its decision regarding Tender WT2443 – Construction of City Centre Trunk drainage works in Elizabeth Street between George and College streets, Liverpool.
3. Notes that the Director Infrastructure & Environment will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft minutes on Council’s website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority.
4. Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Harle Seconded: Clr Shelton
That the recommendation be adopted.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
77
ITEM NO: CONF 06
FILE NO: 171339.2015
SUBJECT: Proposed Easement for Underground Cables over Lots 15 & 16 in DP1129945 known as Light Horse Park in Liverpool, Lot 13 in DP247485 known as Mill Park in Liverpool and Lot 11 in DP881265 known as Helles Park in Moorebank.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Grants an easement for underground electricity cables to Endeavour Energy over Lots 15 & 16 in DP1129945 known as Light Horse Park in Liverpool, Lot 13 in DP247485 known as Mill Park in Liverpool and Lot 11 in DP881265 known as Helles Park in Moorebank, as outlined in this confidential Report;
2. Keeps confidential this Report pursuant to the provisions of Sections 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993, as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and
3. Authorises the relevant documentation necessary for the formalisation of the easement to be signed under Power of Attorney by Council’s delegated officer.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Stanley
That this item be deferred pending investigation of an alternative location for the easement so it does not go through the middle of the park.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
77
ITEM NO: CONF 07
FILE NO: 168909.2015
SUBJECT: RCL2452 Trade Services - Steel Fabricataion, Fencing, Glazing
RECOMMENDATION That Council: 1. Accept the Tenders from the below listed tenderers for each trade service for RCL2452 Provision of Trade Services for Steel Fabrication, Fencing and Glazing for an initial two (2) year contract term with the option of extending 3 x 12 months. STEEL FABRICATION SERVICES · Fabrication Services Pty Ltd · A.G & G Engineering Pty Limited · Lamond Contracting Pty Ltd
FENCING SERVICES · Amrod Pty Limited · Top Job Installations Pty Ltd · Lamond Contracting Pty Ltd · Northern Fencing Specialist Pty Ltd
GLAZING SERVICES · Gough Family Holdings · O’Brien Glass 2. Makes public its decision regarding tender RCL2452 Provision of Trade Services for Steel Fabrication, Fencing and Glazing 3. Notes that the Chief Financial Officer will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft Minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority. 4. Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Harle
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
79
ITEM NO: CONF 08
FILE NO: 172570.2015
SUBJECT: Tender WT2463 - Lift Renewal Works at 33 Moore Street, Liverpool
RECOMMENDATION That Council: 1. Accepts the alternative Tender from Kone Elevators Pty Ltd for Tender WT2463 –Lift Renewal Works at 33 Moore Street, Liverpool at the GST exclusive price of $990,000. 2. Makes public its decision regarding Tender WT2463 – Lift Renewal Works at 33 Moore Street, Liverpool. 3. Notes that the Director Infrastructure and Environment will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of the draft minutes on Council’s website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority. 4. Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Balloot Seconded: Clr Waller
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
79
ITEM NO: CONF 09
FILE NO: 172576.2015
SUBJECT: Tender WT2462 - Mechanical Services Replacement Works at 33 Moore Street, Liverpool
RECOMMENDATION That Council: 1. Accepts the Tender from Ram Air Conditioning Pty Ltd for Tender WT2462 – Mechanical Services Replacement Works at 33 Moore Street, Liverpool at the GST exclusive price of $1,534,700. 2. Allocates additional funding of $109,700 to this project. 3. Makes public its decision regarding Tender WT2462 – Mechanical Services Replacement Works at 33 Moore Street, Liverpool. 4. Notes that the Director Infrastructure and Environment will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft minutes on the Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority. 5. Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. |
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Waller Seconded: Clr Karnib
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion. |
81
ITEM NO: CONF 10
FILE NO: 176005.2015
SUBJECT: Tender RCL2327 - Horticultural Materials and Parks Services
RECOMMENDATION That Council: 1. Accept the Tender from the following tenderers as part of a Recognised Contractor Listing for RCL2327 - Horticultural Materials and Parks Services for an initial two year contract term with the option of extending it by 3 x 12 months. · Alco Pump Maintenance Pty Ltd · Astec Mulch Pty Limited · Austec Irrigation & Garden Supplies Pty Ltd · Benedict Sand & Gravel · Evergreen Turf Australia Unit Trust · Garden Growing Solutions Pty Ltd · Grae's Grass N Gardens · Green Options · JSC Maintenance Service · Lamond Contracting Pty Ltd · M Collins & Sons (Contractors) Pty Ltd · Qualturf Pty Ltd · Solid Ground Landscaping Pty Ltd · Manoeuvre Mow PLTA Cobbitty Turf · The Green Horticultural Group Pty Ltd · Veljohn Pty Ltd
2. Pursuant to clause 178(3) of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, enter into negotiations with select companies that have the capability to supply the items listed below for which no offer was received:
2.1.12 Mulch supply & delivery 15mm pine bark nuggets 15m3 2.1.12 Mulch supply & delivery red chip 15m3 2.1.13 Mulch supply & delivery cypress 15m3 3. Makes public its decision regarding tender RCL2327 - Horticultural Materials and Parks Services. 4. Notes that the Director will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft Minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority. 5. Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That the recommendation be adopted with the following amendment:
· Remove Magnolia Grandiflora from the planting list. · Consider appropriate locations for deciduous trees.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
83
ITEM NO: CONF 11
FILE NO: 177429.2015
SUBJECT: Tender ST2442 - Acceptance and Disposal of Waste
RECOMMENDATION That Council: 1. Accept the below listed tenders, in order of preference (ranking) for an initial three (3) year contract term with the option of extending 2 x 12 month periods
2. Pursuant to clause 178(3) of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, enter into negotiations with select companies that have the capability to supply items 2.3 waste from litter bins and animal waste as no offers were received for these items. 3. Makes public its decision regarding tender ST2442 - Acceptance and Disposal of Waste. 4. Notes that the Director City Presentation will finalise all details and sign the Letter of Acceptance following publication of draft Minutes on Council website for the tender, giving it contractual effect, in accordance with delegated authority. 5. Keeps confidential the details supplied in this report containing information on the submissions received, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(d)(i) of the Local Government Act 1993 as it contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Stanley
That the recommendation be adopted with the following amendments:
· Removal of the organisation listed in Category 2.6 as number 2 and categories 2.7 & 2.8 as number 3 (subject to no legal consequences) and any further references to that company.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Councillors voted unanimously for this motion.
|
85
ITEM NO: NOM 06
FILE NO: 177671.2015
SUBJECT: Jobskills Workshops for Baby Boomers
NOTICE OF MOTION
That Council:
1. Investigate the demand and feasibility of providing free workshops for resident baby boomers to upgrade their job skills using modern technology.
2. Report back findings of the study by October 2015.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Balloot Seconded: Clr Ristevski
That the recommendation be adopted.
Foreshadowed motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Waller
That Council receives and notes the Chief Executive Officer’s Comment (to the Notice of Motion) as published below.
On being put to the meeting the motion (moved by Clr Balloot) was declared CARRIED and the Foreshadowed motion (moved by Clr Shelton) lapsed.
|
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT
Council’s Economic Development and Events Committee would be an appropriate vehicle to consider this issue in the first instance. Council through its library services already provides the following technology training to older residents:
David Sharman, Manager Library and Museum Services will arrange for the Committee to be provided with a presentation on the nature of this training and how the service is promoted to and accessed by residents. The Commonwealth Department of Employment also runs a number of incentive programs for employers to engage and train older people. Arrangements will also be made for the Department to present to the Committee on their services.
87
ITEM NO: NOM 07
FILE NO: 179294.2015
SUBJECT: Orthodox Interfaith Lunch - Saint Ilija Day 2 August 2015
NOTICE OF MOTION
That Council:
1. Increase the budget to $20,000. The full amount may not be needed however as it's the first Orthodox Interfaith event, we want to accommodate everyone that wants to attend via RSVP. This is to allow a buffer should we get an overwhelming response in attendance.
2. Acknowledges the great work that Alyson Infanti and other staff have provided in organising the event.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Ristevski Seconded: Mayor Mannoun
That Council add a further $29,150 to Council’s budget to cover the cost of $40,650 for the event for the 500 expected guests, as detailed in the Chief Executive Officer’s Comments (to the Notice of Motion) published below.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT
Council has a budget of $25,000 for Interfaith events. To date, $13,500 was spent on the Ramadan interfaith event on 11 July 2015, leaving $11,500 in the budget. We have received 500 rsvp’s to attend the Orthodox lunch on Sunday 2 August.
The capacity has been capped at 500. The cost of the event for 500 guests (which includes costs for a 3 course meal, soft drinks, alcohol, band and photographer) is $40,650. As such, if Council was to support the event at this level, an additional $29,150 will be required to be added to Council’s budget.
87
ITEM NO: NOM 08
FILE NO: 179425.2015
SUBJECT: Roads & Development
NOTICE OF MOTION
That Council:
1. Where possible ensure that DCP roads are provided in early stages of developments especially where the development borders a DCP road and held by the same owner.
2. Ensure new access or access upgrades are provided to any areas of development which have limited access or access that will struggle with the new development.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Shelton
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
89
ITEM NO: NOM 09
FILE NO: 179496.2015
SUBJECT: Trooper Lu's Garage Community Open Day
NOTICE OF MOTION
That Council:
1. Write to Justin Chisolm congratulating him and his team on a successful event.
2. Discuss the possibilities of Council's involvement in next years event.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Hadid
That the recommendation be adopted.
Foreshadowed motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Stanley
That Council receives and notes Chief Executive Officer’s comments (to the Notice of Motion) as published below.
On being put to the meeting the motion (moved by Clr Hadchiti) was declared CARRIED and the forshadowed motion (moved by Clr Shelton) lapsed.
|
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMMENT
On the 27th of June 2015, local motorcycle dealer Trooper Lu’s held their third community open day on their premises attracting an audience of 3000 people, many of whom travelled from Greater Sydney to attend the event at Heathcote Road, Moorebank. The event was supported by several external organisations and businesses, such as members of the NSW rural fire service who ran a sausage sizzle on the day, and also Yamaha Australia who assisted in obtaining significant draw cards in bike displays from recent film, Mad Max Fury Road.
The event attracted a broad demographic of families, youth and mature patrons, and was positively received by the crowd – gaining a significant social media footprint and strong media exposure on Network Ten’s channel ONE.
Event organisers have requested stronger involvement from Liverpool City Council for next years’ event. They would like this in the form of providing children’s entertainment such as face painting, balloon bending and jumping castles. They have also requested a visible Council presence through holding a Council information tent to promote the Liverpool LGA.
Council continuously aims to support and encourage local businesses to further strengthen the economic and cultural landscape of Liverpool Local Government Area. Such endeavours often involve providing support for externally managed events that aid in reinforcing the image of Liverpool as a safe, vibrant destination. The provision of the services requested above would cost in the region of $2,000 - $4,000 depending on the complexity of the entertainment. Considering the reputational and economic benefits that events like this can deliver, it would be appropriate for this request to be considered through the Corporate Sponsorship process.
91
ITEM NO: NOM 10
FILE NO: 179627.2015
SUBJECT: Sydney P.A.C. Fest 2015
NOTICE OF MOTION
That Council:
1. Write to Jessica Sevealli, Chairperson of The Sydney PACFest committee and Executive Director Annie Rogers congratulating them and the team on a successful festival.
2. Have early discussions with the PACFest committee in an attempt to secure the 2016 festival in Liverpool.
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Waller
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
RESCISSION MOTION
Motion: Moved: Clr Ristevski Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That the resolution (which was adopted earlier at this meeting, see pages 29 – 32 of these minutes) relating to Item DCC 01: Grants, Donations and Sponsorships be rescinded.
On being put to the meeting the rescission motion was declared CARRIED.
As such, Item DCC 01 was re-considered as shown below.
ITEM NO: |
DCC 01 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FILE NO: |
089694.2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SUBJECT: |
Donations, Grants and Sponsorships |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Motion: Moved: Clr Ristevski Seconded: Clr Hadchiti
That Council:
1. Endorses the Financial Contribution Panel's recommendations for the provision of $15,000 (GST exclusive) under the Community Donations Program as summarised in the table below:
Community Grants Program
2. Approves the provision of $30,000 (GST exclusive) under the Corporate Sponsorship Program as summarised in the table below:
3. The Corporate Sponsorship Program grants be increased with the CPI each year.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
|
CLOSED SESSION
Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun Seconded: Clr Balloot
● 10A(2)(c) information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business. |
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Council moved into Closed Session at 10.33pm.
The public and media left the Chambers.
ITEM NO: |
CONF 03 |
FILE NO: |
169454.2015 |
SUBJECT: |
Acquisition of Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, for open space purposes |
RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
1. Approves the acquisition of Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, for the price and terms outlined in the confidential attachment;
2. Upon settlement of the acquisition, classifies Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, being acquired as 'Operational' land;
3. Keeps confidential the attachment supplied under separate cover containing the acquisition price pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and
4. Authorises its delegated officer to execute any document, under Power of Attorney necessary to give effect to this decision.
|
|
COUNCIL DECISION
Motion: Moved: Clr Shelton Seconded: Clr Stanley
That Council:
1. Approves the acquisition of Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, for the price and terms outlined in the confidential attachment;
2. Upon settlement of the acquisition, classifies Lot 1104 DP 2475, 75 Fifth Avenue, Austral, being acquired as 'Community' land;
3. Keeps confidential the attachment supplied under separate cover containing the acquisition price pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 as this information would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and
4. Authorises its delegated officer to execute any document, under Power of Attorney necessary to give effect to this decision.
Amendment: Moved: Clr Hadchiti Seconded: Clr Balloot
That the recommendation be adopted.
On being put to the meeting the Amendment (moved by Clr Hadchiti) was declared CARRIED. |
Motion: Moved: Mayor Mannoun Seconded: Clr Balloot
That Council move out of Closed Session and into Open Council.
On being put to the meeting the motion was declared CARRIED.
Council moved into Open Session at 10.45pm.
The Mayor read out the resolution relating to CONF 03 which was considered in Closed Session.
THE MEETING CLOSED AT 10.47pm.
<Signature>
Name: Ned Mannoun
Title: Mayor
Date: 26 August 2015
I have authorised a stamp bearing my signature to be affixed to the pages of the Minutes of the Council Meeting held on 29 July 2015. I confirm that Council has adopted these Minutes as a true and accurate record of the meeting.
97
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Notices of Motion
NOM 01 |
Small Business Workshops |
Strategic Direction |
Vibrant Prosperous City Assist exiting businesses to grow, innovate and become more competitive |
Key Policy |
Economic Development Strategy |
File Ref |
178235.2015 |
Author |
Gus Balloot - Deputy Mayor |
Background
The purpose of this motion is to instill more confidence and professionalism in small business in Liverpool. This would raise the standards and appearances of shops and reduce the amount of casual leases being taken up in the area
That Council provide free small business workshops for local businesses which can provide up to date and effective training and solutions to common problems facing small business today. |
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT
The NSW Government funds a Business Advisory Service to provide assistance to prospective and existing small businesses. This service is delivered to Liverpool via the South West Business Enterprise Centre who have an outlet in Liverpool. The NSW Government also has a comprehensive Small Business toolkit on the Office of the Small Business Commissioner website that covers a range of small business information needs. The Economic Development Unit of Council will be running Small Business Week during September where these services will be highlighted and a number of relevant workshops run.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities. Facilitate economic development. Further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities (in the City Centre). |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Deliver services that are customer focused. Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services. |
99
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Notices of Motion
NOM 02 |
Domestic Violence in Liverpool LGA |
Strategic Direction |
Liveable Safe City Improve the community’s sense of safety in Liverpool |
Key Policy |
Community Safety and Crime Prevention Strategy |
File Ref |
178258.2015 |
Author |
Gus Balloot - Deputy Mayor |
Background
The purpose of this motion is to investigate what Council is doing, and can do about domestic violence in the Liverpool LGA.
The benefits are a better and healthier family and social life style with less social, medical and economic problems.
That Council investigate how chronic domestic violence is in the community, and liaise with women’s support groups in the Liverpool LGA on what Council can do to assist in counteracting domestic violence. |
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT
Council is committed to improving the health and safety of women as part of building stronger families and communities. One way we achieve this is through the delivery of domestic violence initiatives as identified in Council’s Community Safety and Crime Prevention Plan 2013-2017.
The Plan details Council’s commitment in preventing and reducing domestic violence through the following initiatives:
· 16 Days of Activism: The campaign calls for an end to violence against women. Council provides in-kind support to local initiatives including information sessions, forums, morning breakfast and poster designing workshops for women who were victims of domestic violence.
· White Ribbon Day: The White Ribbon Day campaign is held on 25 November each year as part of the 16 Days of Activism campaign. Council works closely with Liverpool Domestic Violence Liaison Committee to plan, deliver and evaluate local initiatives. Furthermore, Council has provided a financial contribution to White Ribbon Day events through its Corporate Sponsorship Program.
· Domestic Violence Factsheet: Council developed a Domestic Violence Factsheet in 2014 and translated the resource into five community languages. The factsheets were disseminated at local schools and shopping precincts.
· Liverpool Domestic Violence Liaison Committee: Council provides in-kind support to this Committee by way of attending regular meetings, providing advice on the needs of our community and developing and implementing programs based on consultation with local services that provide direct support to women experiencing domestic violence.
Nationally, one in three women will experience violence in an intimate relationship. From March 2014 to March 2015, 997 criminal incidents of assault related to domestic violence were recorded in the Liverpool Local Government Area (BOCSAR 2015). This represents the fourth highest rate of recorded domestic violence incidents in NSW after Blacktown, Penrith and Sydney.
Failure to respond to domestic violence has a range of social, psychological and economic implications. For these reasons, Council continues to provide ongoing support and advocacy to reduce violence against women.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. Support policies and plans that prevent crime. Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community. Promote community harmony and address discrimination. Deliver high quality services for children and their families. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility. Facilitate the development of community leaders. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services. |
101
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Notices of Motion
NOM 03 |
Liverpool Bowling Club Site |
Strategic Direction |
Proud Engaged City Provide first class and iconic facilities and places |
Key Policy |
Heritage Strategy |
File Ref |
198171.2015 |
Author |
Peter Ristevski - Councillor |
Background
The Salvation Army of Liverpool do fantastic work within our LGA. The Salvation Army Liverpool were given access to The Liverpool Bowling Club following an arson attack on their premises in Memorial Ave. They were immediately able to respond to the urgent cry of the homeless by providing 150 meals over 3 days a week because the bowling club facility (which had been vacated some months prior to them moving there) allowed them to make a difference as its highly functional. The Salvation Army will now move back to their Memorial Ave premises this month, as they fought numerous battles, and had many conversations with Council requesting they stay, but all to no avail. Whilst they were in Bigge Park there was a place where many homeless could eat, shower, receive new clothing, blankets and meals. After showing an expression of interest to remain there in order to provide a service to the Homeless, disappointingly Council have decided to demolish the property in order to create a ten million dollar restaurant/community precinct.
The Salvation Army were informed that the shell in Bigge Park which has been turned into an Anzac Memorial would be demolished so people could get a better view of the heritage buildings now occupied by TAFE. The same shell has been boarded and painted up so as to get rid of the homeless which have now moved on to the Warren Service Way Car Park.
That:
1. Council calls for a full report on the Liverpool Bowling Club site and activities on that site to be tabled at the next Council meeting to enable the following questions to be answered:
a. What will replace the Bowling Club?
b. What are the social, economic and environmental impacts of this proposal and in particular parking and overshadowing issues?
c. Why was the Salvation Army informed by Council to move out of the Liverpool Bowling Club as it would be demolished to make way for a $10M development?
d. Why has this same development not been tabled in Council?
2. In relation to the Music Shell in Bigge Park.
a. What is Councils position on the Music Shell in Bigge Park which is part of our cultural heritage and has significance in term of being a significant Memorial to a prominent Liverpool Citizen?
b. Has Council called for a public submission on the future of the Music Shell, if not, then Council calls for public submissions for the future of the Music Shell.
|
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT
See below for responses to the questions raised in the Notice of Motion:
That:
1. Council calls for a full report on the Liverpool Bowling Club site and activities on that site to be tabled at the next Council meeting to enable the following questions to be answered:
a. What will replace the Bowling Club?
Redeveloped Bigge Park
b. What are the social, economic and environmental impacts of this proposal and in particular parking and overshadowing issues?
N/A
c. Why was the Salvation Army informed by Council to move out of the Liverpool Bowling Club as it would be demolished to make way for a $10M development?
No, TSA occupation was only a temporary location during the repair/renovation of their existing facility in Liverpool. Refer attached media release.
d. Why has this same development not been tabled in Council?
Bigge Park Redevelopment
2. In relation to the Music Shell in Bigge Park.
a. What is Councils position on the Music Shell in Bigge Park which is part of our cultural heritage and has significance in term of being a significant Memorial to a prominent Liverpool Citizen?
A heritage assessment report undertaken in 2014 found that the music shell is not of heritage significance. The draft Bigge Park Conservation Management Plan prepared for Council by independent cultural heritage consultants also found that the music shell has little heritage significance. The removal of the music shell will place a spotlight on one of Liverpool’s key heritage sites by providing unobstructed views through the park to the TAFE college (formerly Liverpool Hospital – a significant building, designed by Francis Greenway). The music shell has not been used for a long time.
The new design for Bigge Park is intended to ensure the park functions properly as Liverpool’s central park and is sensitive to the heritage of the precinct.
b. Has Council called for a public submission on the future of the Music Shell, if not, then Council calls for public submissions for the future of the Music Shell.
There was not strong community feedback during the Building our new City consultation for the retention of the sound shell.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Support policies and plans that prevent crime. Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place. Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media. Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Deliver services that are customer focused. Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Media Response Salvation Army at Bowling Club 10 August 2015View
107 |
|
NOM 03 |
Liverpool Bowling Club Site |
Attachment 1 |
Media Response Salvation Army at Bowling Club 10 August 2015 |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Notices of Motion
NOM 04 |
Orthodox Interfaith Lunch 2016 |
Strategic Direction |
Healthy Inclusive City Celebrate and respect Liverpool’s rich cultural and social diversity and embrace the opportunities it provides |
Key Policy |
Multicultural Action Plan |
File Ref |
198234.2015 |
Author |
Peter Ristevski - Councillor |
Background
The first Orthodox Christian Interfaith lunch attracted the maximum capacity of 500 people. There were also over 200 people that unfortunately RSVP after the deadline and could not attend the event as a result.
That Council:
1. Congratulate staff and in particular Alyson Infanti, Maree Stewart and Lauren Myers for their hard work and support of the event.
2. Council write to the folk dancing groups Ilinden, Vardar and Izvor for donating their time in performing. Also write to the MC Zack Gulevski for giving up his time for the event.
3. Congratulate Mayor Ned Mannoun, Councillors Sabrina Mamone, Gus Balloot, Peter Harle and Geoff Shelton for showing their support in attending the event.
4. Write to the Liverpool Catholic Club and thanking them for their professionalism in catering for the event for all members of the community.
5. Council book Sunday 31 July 2016 at 12pm for the next Orthodox interfaith lunch. |
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT
In 2015 Council delivered two Interfaith events. Both have been excellent opportunities to bring the community together, to honour and celebrate our cultural differences while finding commonality over a shared meal. I also commend all staff who worked so hard on both events and thank the performers and members of the community who contributed to their success.
To ensure that we provide the most benefit to the community, and represent the many faiths that are proud to base themselves in Liverpool, I have directed staff to develop a policy to guide our delivery of Interfaith events. This policy will be presented to Councillors at a briefing and at a future Council meeting.
In relation to making a booking for a 2016 Orthodox Interfaith lunch, we have investigated the availability of 31st July 2016 at the Liverpool Catholic Club. At this point, that date is not available as they already have bookings. Staff are currently working with the Club to determine alternative dates for Interfaith events.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place. Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community. Promote community harmony and address discrimination. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility. Facilitate the development of community leaders. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. |
109
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Notices of Motion
NOM 05 |
Pensioner Rate Rebates |
Strategic Direction |
Liveable Safe City Facilitate diverse and more affordable housing options |
Key Policy |
Section 575 of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) |
File Ref |
208057.2015 |
Author |
Peter Harle - Councillor |
Background
The maximum $250 pensioner rate rebate is legislated under Section 575 of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW). When introduced, this rebate represented about 30% of the total rates payable by a pensioner owned property. With the property rates increasing year on year, the percentage of rebate available to pensioners has reduced to 15%. I have received several representations from pensioners in the LGA requesting Council to lobby the State Government on their behalf asking for the rebate to be reviewed.
That the Council write to the Minister for Local Government lobbying for a review of the maximum $250 pensioner rate rebate legislated under Section 575 of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW).
|
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S COMMENT
The NSW State Government is responsible to determine pensioner rate rebate and the cost is shared between the State and Councils on a 55%/ 45% split basis. Based on current 8265 pensioners in the LGA, it is costing Council, in terms of lost revenue, $930k per year (8265 x $250 x .45). Any changes to the rebate will translate into additional cost to Council. As an example, if the State Government increases the pensioner rate rebate to $400, it will cost Council extra $558k (8265 x ($400 – $250) x .45) annually.
Councils can also offer, at its own cost, additional rebate to its pensioner residents. In this regard, Council had a resolution to offer an additional $100 rebate. Effective from 1st July 2005, this rebate was withdrawn and not made available to new pensioners. There are however 3612 old pensioners who are still enjoying $100 additional rebate. This legacy arrangement is costing Council $361k per annum. Should the Council contemplate to offer additional $100 to all its pensioner residents, it will cost an additional $465k per year. In view of increasing demand for services and sustainability issues faced by the Council, any change to current Council position is not recommended.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Any changes to the legislated pensioner rate rebate will cost the council 45% of the incremental monetary value. Extension of Council rebate of $100 to all its pensioner ratepayers will cost additional $465k. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
111
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Notices of Motion
NOM 06 |
Mayoral Charity Ball 2016 |
Strategic Direction |
Proud Engaged City Deliver a range of stimulating and vibrant cultural events, programs and festivals |
Key Policy |
Events Strategy |
File Ref |
208423.2015 |
Author |
Sabrina Mamone - Councillor |
Background
In 2014, an Annual Charity Ball was put to council by Cllr Peter Ristevski and adopted.
The original motion named this ball the "Mayors and Councillors Annual Charity Ball" however during debate the words "and Councillors" was dropped from the motion.
The Annual event has been running successfully for the past two years raising approximately $50k in proceeds.
In 2014 the proceeds were given in equal portions to YADA and Cancer Wellness Centre.
This year the proceeds were given in equal portions to ShareCare and The Liverpool Hospital Trauma Unit.
A lot of time and effort goes into organising Charity Ball with many months of preparation as well as various assistance on the day of the event.
That Council:
1. Congratulate staff for their contribution
2. Change the name of the annual Charity Ball to its original title "Mayor and Councillors Charity Ball"
3. The proceeds of the 2016 Ball go to two Charity Organisation in equal portions being; · Miracle Babies Foundation · Salvation Army
|
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community. Support access and services for people with a disability. Deliver high quality services for children and their families. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media. Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility. Facilitate the development of community leaders. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. |
113
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Notices of Motion
NOM 07 |
Bin Cycle |
Strategic Direction |
Liveable Safe City Create clean and attractive public places for people to engage and connect |
Key Policy |
Strategic Maintenance Plan |
File Ref |
208476.2015 |
Author |
Sabrina Mamone - Councillor |
Background
Since June 2009 Council offered residents with three bins 1 Red Lid Bin, 1 Green Lid Bin and 1 Yellow Lid Bin.
Approximately 140,000 bins were distributed to 60,000 homes
The current bin pick-up cycle is;
Red Lid Bin weekly while Green & Yellow Lidded Bins fortnightly (on alternating roster).
Council is well known for it's meticulous recycling and is graded one of the highest in the state.
The material from the red lid (household waste) bin goes to Sita’s AWT facility at Kemps Creek, where 68% of the resources will be recovered and only 32% of this waste will go to landfill.
The material from the green lid (garden waste) bins are taken to Australian Native Landscape (ANL) facility where 100% of garden waste is converted to mulch and organics to be used as fertiliser.
The material from the yellow (recycling) bin is taken to Visy’s facility in Smithfield where it is mechanically sorted and fully recovered.
However, there have been some residents complaining that a fortnightly pickup for the yellow bin is not regular enough.
Council currently offers residents a second Yellow bin on request.
Council has recently, through the 'Street Naming Committee' determined unnamed streets acknowledging new addresses.
These newly named and numbered streets seem to have missed the bin collection cycle with some properties not even receiving bins from council.
That Council:
1. Investigate the cost of changing the pick-up cycle for the yellow bin from fortnightly to weekly.
2. Determine the impact those costs will have to our 'Fit for the Future' studies.
3. Insure that properties on any newly named streets within the Liverpool LGA, named by the 'Street Naming Committee', have bins and are included in the garbage pick-up cycle including Range Road, Cecil Park
4. Report back to Council at the next council meeting.
|
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Minimise household and commercial waste. Enhance the environmental performance of buildings and homes. Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Act as an environmental leader in the community. Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility. |
115
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Notices of Motion
NOM 08 |
Low Kill Animal Policy |
Strategic Direction |
Healthy Inclusive City Plan, support and deliver high quality and accessible services, program and facilities |
Key Policy |
Animal Management Policy |
File Ref |
208560.2015 |
Author |
Sabrina Mamone - Councillor |
Background
Since 14 June 2005 Council has had an 'Animal Management' policy.
Councils current document doesn't seem to provide a 'Low Kill' policy, meaning many healthy animals are being destroyed for no reason.
Council currently owns various animal shelters which habitats a variety of healthy animals. These animals would make perfect pets and are waiting to be adopted.
Council should endorse that families looking for a pet considers the adoption of an animal form one of the shelters in Liverpool.
That Council:
1. Review the current 'Animal Management' document to introduce and consider a 'Low Kill' Policy
2. Include details, of healthy pets from Animal Shelters in Liverpool that are ready to be adopted, in the Council Monthly newsletter.
3. Report back to council at the next Council Meeting on how a 'Low Kill Policy' affects the running of the animal shelters.
|
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
117
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Notices of Motion
NOM 09 |
Cleaning Tender |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations |
Key Policy |
Workforce Management Plan |
File Ref |
208574.2015 |
Author |
Anne Stanley - Councillor |
That:
1. Council complete a tender for only those Cleaning services currently covered by contractors.
2. Council Review the work which is currently completed by staff cleaners. This review must meaningfully engage with staff and the union with the view to retain the services of the in-house cleaning crew, and identify process and practice to find improvements.
3. Council recognise the integral role Council's in house cleaners provide in supporting the business as they provide a time critical best practice work and safety support for all areas of Council's service provision.
4. A resolution of Council is required before any tender is considered, advertised or put to the market place that would potentially outsource staff positions.
5. A resolution of Council is required before a tender may be advertised or submitted for cleaning services currently undertaken by in house staff. |
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
119
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Notices of Motion
NOM 10 |
Council and Executive Support |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations |
Key Policy |
Workforce Management Plan |
File Ref |
208637.2015 |
Author |
Anne Stanley - Councillor |
Background
At a recent Council meeting there were changes made by the CEO to the organisation structure of Council and Executive Support areas. To better understand the roles in the area a report is requested detailing the roles and opportunities for the Mayor and Councillors to access support and the process require to request assistance.
That Council:
1. Provides a report detailing the roles, responsibilities and contact details of the staff who fill roles in Council and Executives Services team including the Mayoral office.
2. Should the Mayor or Councillors require particular assistance such as secretarial or research support how and to whom should that support be requested?
3. Puts into place now a process which sees all invitations and correspondence is provided to Councillors as soon as it is received.
4. All invitations addressed to the Mayor and Councillors is sent to all Councillors as soon as it is received by the Mayoral office.
|
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
121
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Notices of Motion
NOM 11 |
Current Media Policy |
Strategic Direction |
Proud Engaged City Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement |
Key Policy |
Communications Plan |
File Ref |
208680.2015 |
Author |
Peter Harle - Councillor |
Background
In relation to Councils current 'Media Policy'; As per NOM-01 2009/0709 and subsequent amendments, the policy reads;
1. "The group photo to be used, not the single Mayoral photo".
a. Council recently erected signs at the Carnes Hill Precinct. The signs contained pictures of only the Mayor, including Council's Logo and plans of the precinct. Most of these signs have been removed.
b. Currently Councils monthly Newsletter is distributed with a picture of the Mayor.
2. "Any invitation sent from Council for events be addressed from “The Mayor and Councillors of Liverpool City Council."
a. Currently all invitations sent from Council are addressed as “From the Mayor, Ned Mannoun and Councillors of Liverpool City Council.
That:
1. Council receives a report, by the next Council meeting on the following; · How many of the signs referred to above were initially erected at the Carnes Hill Precinct? · Who authorised the signs? · What was the cost of the signs? · Who paid for the signs? (i.e.; was “rate payers” money used to pay for these signs? · Did the originally erected signs comply with current Council Policy? (As per NOM-01 2009/0709 and subsequent amendments.) · Have there been any complaints regarding the installation of these signs and what were those complaints? · Were these signs removed due to community opposition? · Have all non-complying signs been removed and if not why not?
2. Council modifies its existing media Policy to include; · In future, the traditional Mayoral Portrait is to be replaced by a Group Photo of all elected Councillors in recognition of their contribution during their term of office.
3. All future invitations for events from Council be addressed as per the policy; "The Mayor and Councillors of Liverpool City Council" removing the words 'Ned Mannoun' from all invitations.
4. Personal letters and the Mayoral Column are to be the only exceptions.
5. The CEO investigates any breaches made due to this policy and reports to Council at the next council meeting.
|
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
123
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Notices of Motion
NOM 12 |
Christian Orthodox Interfaith Lunch of the 2nd of August 2015 |
Strategic Direction |
Proud Engaged City Strengthen and celebrate Liverpool’s unique community identity |
Key Policy |
Events Strategy |
File Ref |
208752.2015 |
Author |
Peter Harle - Councillor |
Background
Council has been holding Interfaith events for the past two years;
1. The 2nd Islamic Interfaith Dinner was held on the 11th July 2015 at the Skyview Lounge with approximately 250 guests and traditionally held during Ramadan.
2. On the 2nd August 2015, known as St Elijah Day, Council held its first Christian Orthodox Interfaith Lunch at the Liverpool Catholic Club (LCC) catering for 600 guests.
3. The Liverpool Catholic Club invoiced Council a standard rate which includes access to the clubs security personnel as part of the fee charged to Council.
Both events were successful and delivered a peaceful atmosphere.
However, at the Christian Orthodox Lunch the following occurred:
1. Four external security guards were hired for this event.
2. Several uniformed Police Officers, dressed in riot gear, arrived during the function causing concern to those attending.
3. Previous Interfaith events did not include additional Private Security Guards and Police attendance.
4. There has been some media coverage with complaints from this community regarding the presence of Private Security and the attendance of Police dressed in riot gear.
That Council: 1. Receives and Notes the comments. 2. Reports back to council at the next General Council Meeting with the following; a. Who authorised the hire of external Private Security Guards and called the Police, dressed in Riot gear, to this event? b. When was the decision made to hire Private Security Guards and to call Police, dressed in Riot gear, and on what basis? c. If there were safety concerns surrounding the Christian Orthodox Interfaith Lunch, why were these not mentioned in the CEO's report in the July council meeting four days prior to the lunch? d. Were any threatening advances made to the Mayor, Councillors or distinguished guests during the Christian Orthodox Interfaith Lunch? e. Was the Christian Orthodox community consulted regarding concerns that may have been expressed at the presence of private security guards and Police dressed in riot gear? f. What was the total cost of hiring the Private Security Guards and how where these cost funded? i.e.; was Rate Payers money used to pay for this expense? g. Why were the “costs of hiring the Private Security Guards" not tabled at the 27th July Council Meeting four days prior to the Christian Orthodox Lunch as a “Notice of Motion” or an “Amendment to the Notice of Motion” that was raised by Clr Peter Ristevski? h. Has this set a precedent for future Liverpool City Council events requiring Private Security Guards and Police attendance and how does that impact on Council financially? i. Has council addressed all complaints made from the Christian Orthodox community in relation to the appearance of the Private Security Guards and Police dressed in Riot gear?
3. The Mayor writes to all community leaders that attended apologising for the over-reaction of hiring the Private Security Guards and calling Police to the event prematurely.
|
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media. Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility. Facilitate the development of community leaders. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
126
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Notices of Motion
NOM 13 |
Media releases of Liverpool Councils negotiations with the Wests Tigers Rugby League Football Club |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Lead partnerships and collaboration with community, business and governments |
Key Policy |
Property Strategy |
File Ref |
208761.2015 |
Author |
Peter Harle - Councillor |
Background
1. On approximately 29th of July 2015, the Mayor had media coverage on major TV programs and various newspapers.
2. Based on the media coverage it appears Council had been in confidential discussion with the Wests Tigers Rugby League Football Club.
3. As part of the Local Government Act and Councils Code of Conduct, Councillors are prohibited from discussing confidential items within committee meetings.
That:
1. The matter is investigated under the delegation of the CEO via the Office of Local Government as to whether the Mayor broke any confidential agreements between Wests Tigers Rugby League Football Club and Liverpool City Council including any privacy legislation that Councillors are governed under. A report of findings of the investigation to be brought to Council as soon as possible.
2. All media rights are to be suspended from the Mayor until a full investigation of this matter has taken place and is brought back to Council for determination.
3. The Mayor writes to the Wests Tigers Rugby League Football Club apologising for the premature leak and for any complications the media release may have caused the club and any other agreements or discussions they may have been having with other stakeholders.
4. Council receives a report outlining any damage caused and options available.
|
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
128
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Report
IHAP 01 |
Proposed use of site for container depot at 77 Governor Macquarie Drive, Chipping Norton (Lot 38 DP 17311) |
Strategic Direction |
Liveable Safe City Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development |
Key Policy |
Urban Development Plans |
File Ref |
189413.2015 |
Report By |
Shannon Rickersey - Team Leader Development Assessment |
Approved By |
Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth |
Property |
77 Governor Macquarie Drive, Chipping Norton Lot 38 DP 17311 |
Owner |
Mr G Bernard, Mrs L Landro, Mrs M Bernard, G Bernard, Ms T Bernard, Mr P Bernard |
Applicant |
Michael Brown Planning Strategies |
Executive Summary
Council has received and considered Development Application DA-1895/2012 proposing the use of a site for a container depot at 77 Governor Macquarie Drive, Chipping Norton. This application was lodged on 5 December 2012.
This application was referred to the 27 July 2015 meeting of the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) as the development received more than five unresolved submissions objecting to the proposal. Sixteen (16) objections were received from 15 different persons objecting to the proposal. The unresolved issues include stormwater design, flooding and filling of land.
The IHAP recommendation was to refuse the development application as the application had not provided adequate information in relation to those unresolved issues.
That Council:
1. That Council refuse DA-1895/2012 for the following reasons:
i. The application has not adequately demonstrated compliance with the relevant environmental planning instruments pursuant to s79C(1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
ii. The application has not adequately demonstrated compliance with the relevant development control plan pursuant to s79C(1)(a)(ii) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
iii. The application has not adequately demonstrated the likely impacts of the development pursuant to s79C(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
iv. The application has not adequately demonstrated the suitability of the site for the development pursuant to s79C(1)(c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
v. The application has not adequately demonstrated that the proposed development is in the public interest pursuant to s79C(1)(e) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
2. Refers the matter of the unauthorised use of the site as a container depot to Council’s Community Standards Department for enforcement action. |
Background
Council has received and considered Development Application DA-1895/2012 proposing the use of a site for a container depot at 77 Governor Macquarie Drive, Chipping Norton.
There is a history of customer service enquiries for the subject site. The development application was lodged in response to enquiries from Council’s Building and Compliance staff initiated from a customer enquiry dated 8 October 2012.
Notice of Proposed Order 12 was served on the owners of 77 Governor Macquarie Drive on 26 May 2015 by Council. The order is in relation to drainage matters and requires the owner to construct various items of drainage infrastructure.
Pursuant to the requirements of the endorsed Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure, the proposal was referred to the IHAP for consideration as the proposed development received more than five unresolved submissions objecting to the proposal. Sixteen (16) objections were received from 15 different persons objecting to the proposal. The unresolved issues identified in submissions are as follows:
Issue 1 – Flooding of adjoining property
Concerns have been expressed regarding flooding that is experienced on the adjoining site at 21 – 27 Childs Road, Chipping Norton.
Comment
The application has not adequately addressed issues regarding flooding.
Issue 2 – Stormwater design
Concerns have been expressed regarding existing stormwater infrastructure on the site and the fact that it is not able to properly drain water.
Comment
The application has not provided an adequate stormwater design.
Issue 3 – Filling
Concerns have been expressed that illegal filling has been undertaken on the subject site which has exacerbated flooding problems in the area.
Comment
A Works-as-Executed survey has been requested for the previously approved filling on the site. No survey has been submitted.
Issue 4 – Height of containers
Concerns have been expressed regarding the height of containers to be stored on the site and to previous incidents of containers falling.
Comment
Workcover has provided some feedback to the applicant and advised that the height of shipping containers shall be limited to a height of two containers around the perimeter of the site and be setback 4.5m from the property boundary.
Issue 5 – Noise and vibrations
A concern has been expressed that noise associated with the stacking of shipping containers is causing an impact on neighbouring properties.
Comment
The use is proposed in an existing industrial area that permits heavy industrial activities, as such the proposal would be required to comply with the NSW EPA Industrial Noise Guidelines.
The Site
The site is identified as 77 Governor Macquarie Drive, Chipping Norton, with a legal description of Lot 38 DP 17311. The subject site is regular in shape, has a frontage of approximately 101 metres to Governor Macquarie Drive and a site area of 41,490m2. An internal driveway services the site.
The area of the site identified for the use in this application is at the rear of the site in the eastern corner as shown in the figure below. The site is located adjacent to existing industrial uses to the north, south and east and to residential properties to the west.
An aerial map of the site is provided in Figure 1 below.
Childs Road Area of site for proposed use Governor Macquarie Drive
Figure 1: Aerial image of the subject site.
The subject site is located in an existing industrial area that is bordered by residential areas to the north and west and the Georges River and associated recreation areas to the east.
Figure 2: The site and surrounding locality.
details of the proposal
The proposed development consists of:
· Use of part of the site for the purpose of a container depot for the storage of shipping containers.
· Proposed hours of operation are:
Monday to Friday: 7:00am to 4:00pm
Saturdays and
Sundays: Closed
A plan of the proposed development is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Proposed layout for subject site.
the issues
The key issues identified with respect to the proposal relates to the unresolved issues in relation to stormwater, flooding and filling. The applicant has not provided sufficient information to demonstrate that the proposed use can operate in an orderly manner on the site with respect to stormwater and flooding. Council has made several requests for additional information and held meetings with applicant in order to resolve these issues as outlined in the report considered by the IHAP (see attached), however to date the issues remain unresolved and the application has not demonstrated compliance with the relevant environmental planning instruments and Council policies. Therefore, the application is to be considered on the current information submitted with the application.
If the application is to be refused by Council, then orders would be served by Council on the owner and the operator to cease the use.
Independent Hearing and assessment panel
At their meeting on 27 July 2015, the IHAP made the following recommendation:
The Panel recommends that DA-1895/2012 which seeks approval for the use of Lot 38 DP 17311, 77 Governor Macquarie Drive, Chipping Norton be refused for the reasons listed in the Council officer’s report.
Conclusion
The application has been assessed against the relevant considerations prescribed by Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. It is considered that the application fails to adequately address the matters for consideration under Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The matters the application has failed to address are as follows:
· The application has not adequately demonstrated compliance with the relevant environmental planning instruments.
· The application has not adequately demonstrated compliance with the relevant development control plan.
· The application has not adequately demonstrated the likely impacts of the development.
· The application has not adequately demonstrated the suitability of the site for the development.
· The application has not adequately demonstrated that the application is in the public interest.
Accordingly it is recommended that Development Application DA-1895/2012 be refused.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Manage the environmental health of waterways. Manage air, water, noise and chemical pollution. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Applicant detailsView (Under separate cover)
2. IHAP report DA-1895/2012, 77 Governor Macquarie DriveView (Under separate cover)
3. IHAP meeting minutes 27 July 2015View (Under separate cover)
135
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Chief Financial Officer
CFO 01 |
Nomination for Liverpool City Council member on Luddenham Quarry Community Consultative Committee |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Lead partnerships and collaboration with community, business and governments |
Key Policy |
Property Strategy |
File Ref |
194878.2015 |
Report By |
George Georgakis - Manager Council and Executive Services |
Approved By |
Gary Grantham - Chief Financial Officer |
Executive Summary
The Department of Planning and Environment has requested as a condition of Epic Mining Pty Ltd’s (owner of Luddenham Quarry) modified Development Consent, that a Community Consultative Committee be established and operated by Epic Mining. Membership of that Committee is to include one representative from Council and this report seeks to nominate a Councillor on the Committee.
That Council:
1. Nominate a Councillor to represent Council on the Luddenham Quarry Community Consultative Committee.
2. Advise Epic Mining of Council’s nominee. |
REPORT
Epic Mining Pty Ltd (Epic) is the current owner and operator of the Luddenham Quarry located at 275 Adams Road, Luddenham.
The Department of Planning and Environment has requested as a condition of their modified Development that a Community Consultative Committee be established and operated by Epic in accordance with its guidelines titled: “Guidelines for establishing and operating community consultative Committee for mining projects – Department of Planning 2007”.
In accordance with these guidelines, the membership of the Committee should include one representative from the local Council.
Epic is now seeking nominations from Liverpool City Council to represent it on this Committee.
The frequency of meetings is yet to be determined, but is likely to be between 2-4 times per year.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
ATTACHMENTS
137 |
|
CFO 01 |
Nomination for Liverpool City Council member on Luddenham Quarry Community Consultative Committee |
Attachment 1 |
Liverpool City Council Representative Nomination Form |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Chief Financial Officer
CFO 02 |
Local Government NSW Annual Conference |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation |
Key Policy |
Long-Term Financial Plan |
File Ref |
199871.2015 |
Report By |
George Georgakis - Manager Council and Executive Services |
Approved By |
Gary Grantham - Chief Financial Officer |
Executive Summary
To provide an update to Council on the number of voting delegates which Liverpool Council is entitled to at the 2015 Local Government NSW Conference and submit a further motion to the Conference.
That:
1. Council endorse the further motion as shown below as discussed and recommended at the Planning and Development Committee on 5 August 2015 to be submitted to the Local Government Conference:
“Liverpool City Council calls upon the NSW Government to address the ‘loop hole’ in the legislation to ensure that Councils and Certifiers are required to ensure the retention of off-street car parking for the principal dwelling, when granting consent for a secondary dwelling under SEPP Affordable Rental Housing 2009.”
2. Should it be confirmed that Liverpool Council is entitled to 10 voting delegates, then Council to determine its remaining voting delegates (as only 8 voting delegates were endorsed at the July 2015 Council meeting).
|
REPORT
Council at its meeting on 29 July 2015 considered a report on the Local Government NSW Annual Conference and resolved:
That Council:
1. Endorse the key issues to be submitted for consideration at the Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2015 and delegate to the CEO to amend the motions to make them more generic and less Liverpool specific.
2. Nominates Mayor Mannoun, Clr Balloot, Clr Hadchiti, Clr Hadid, Clr Harle, Clr Mamone, Clr Karnib and Clr Ristevski as Council’s voting delegates at the Conference.
The motions referred to in Point 1 of the 29 July 2015 resolution have been finalised, provided to the Mayor and Councillors and submitted for inclusion in the Conference Business Papers. A copy is attached to this report for information.
At the 29 July 2015 Council meeting, Council also considered a Notice of Motion relating to “Advocating changes to State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009” and resolved:
“That the item be deferred to be discussed at the Councillor Briefing Session on 18 August 2015”.
The matter was discussed at the Planning and Development Committee meeting on 5 August 2015 and the following motion on this matter was recommended and is now submitted to the August Council meeting for Council’s endorsement prior to submitting to the Conference for inclusion in the Business Paper:
Secondary dwellings - Affordable Rental Housing SEPP
Details of issue
The State Environmental Planning Policy for Affordable Rental Housing (2009) specifies that the provision of additional car parking is not required for the purpose of a secondary dwelling and; while attached garages which form part of the principal dwelling (including basement garages), cannot be altered to form a secondary dwelling under the SEPP (Complying Development), the SEPP is silent on the matter of retaining hard stand car parking for the principal dwelling. This ‘loop hole’ enables Council’s and Certifiers to grant development consent for a secondary dwelling (under the provisions of the SEPP) without the requirement to retain hard stand car parking for the principal dwelling. This has resulted in situations where vehicles for the principal dwelling are not able to park within the property boundaries and are creating excessive on street parking which causes adverse traffic and pedestrian safety implications on local streets.
Motion
Call upon the NSW Government to address this ‘loop hole’ in the legislation to ensure that Councils and Certifiers are required to ensure the retention of off-street car parking for the principal dwelling, when granting consent for a secondary dwelling under SEPP Affordable Rental Housing 2009.
Voting
At the time of preparing this report, Local Government NSW had verbally advised that they had prepared a draft of the number of voting delegates and it appears Liverpool will be entitled to 10 voting delegates for motions and 10 voting delegates for voting in the elections for Office Bearers and the Board. Written confirmation is expected to be received prior to the August Council meeting and Councillors will be updated when the information comes to hand.
Should it be confirmed that Liverpool Council is entitled to 10 voting delegates, then Council will need to determine its remaining voting delegates.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Costs will be approximately $2,000 per delegate for registration, travel, accommodation (if required) and meals. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues. |
Social and Cultural |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Act as an environmental leader in the community. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Motions submitted to LGNSW Conference 2015View
141 |
|
CFO 02 |
Local Government NSW Annual Conference |
Attachment 1 |
Motions submitted to LGNSW Conference 2015 |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Chief Financial Officer
CFO 03 |
Investment Report July 2015 |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations |
Key Policy |
Long-Term Financial Plan |
File Ref |
201270.2015 |
Report By |
Christian Hope - Senior Financial Accountant |
Approved By |
Gary Grantham - Chief Financial Officer |
Executive Summary
This report details the Council’s Investment portfolio.
At 31st July 2015, Council held investments with a market value of $159.3 million. The portfolio yield for twelve months ended was 3.85 per cent exceeding the benchmark of 2.55 per cent by 130 basis points for the same period.
Council’s investments and reporting obligations fully comply with the requirements of Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005.
That Council receives and notes this report.
|
REPORT
Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 requires that the Responsible Accounting Officer must provide Council with a written report setting out details of all money that Council has invested under section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993.
Council’s Portfolio
At 31st July 2015, Council held investments with a market value of $159.3 million. Council’s investment register detailing all its investments is provided as an attachment to this report.
In summary, Council’s portfolio consisted of investments in:
As at the end of July 2015, the ratio of market value compared to face value of various debt securities is shown in the table below.
Asset Class |
Jul -15 |
Jun-15 |
Senior Debts (FRN’s & *TCD’s) |
100.60 % |
100.49% |
MBS (Reverse Mortgage Backed Securities) |
66.12 % |
66.01% |
Total |
97.64% |
97.35% |
* A TCD stands for Transferrable Certificate of Deposit; it is a security issued with the same characteristics as a Term Deposit however it can be sold back (transferred) in to the market prior to maturity. A floating TCD pays a coupon linked to a variable benchmark (90 days BBSW).
Council is fully compliant with the requirements of the Ministerial Investment Order including the grand fathering provision in regards to its investment portfolio holdings. The grand fathering provision states that Council continues to hold to maturity, redeem or sell investments that comply with previous Ministerial Investment Orders. Any new investments must comply with the most recent Order. Council continues to closely monitor the investments in its portfolio to ensure continued compliance and minimal exposure to risk.
During the month of July Council purchased $3 million senior floating rate notes (FRN) issued by Macquarie Bank maturing in March 2020.The long term credit rating for this investment by S&P is “A” and it pays a coupon interest rate of 110 basis points above BBSW. This purchase enhances liquidity and diversification to Council’s investment portfolio. Council sold its $1m Transferable Certificate of Deposit (TCD’s) issued by Bank of China before its maturity date and realised a capital gain of $4,170.
Portfolio Maturity Profile
The table below shows the percentage of funds invested at different durations to maturity
Term to maturity |
Total |
% Holdings |
Term to maturity Policy Limit |
Cash & Cash at Call |
19,408,979 |
12.19% |
100.00% |
Term Deposits < 1 Year |
41,000,000 |
25.74% |
100.00% |
Tradeable Securities |
31,889,434 |
20.02% |
100.00% |
Term Deposits 1 to < 3 Years |
33,000,000 |
20.72% |
60.00% |
Term Deposits 3 to < 5 Years |
32,000,000 |
20.09% |
25.00% |
Grandfathered Securities |
1,967,213 |
1.24% |
N/A |
Grand Total |
159,265,626 |
100.00% |
|
Market Value by Issuer and compliance to investment policy
Credit Rating |
Issuer |
Market Value |
% Holding |
Institution Policy Limit |
Credit Rating Category Limit |
Moodys P-1 |
Rabobank Australia Ltd |
9,000,000 |
5.65% |
35% |
100% |
S&P A1 |
AMP Bank Ltd |
5,680,038 |
3.57% |
35% |
100% |
S&P A1+ |
Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd |
13,728,941 |
8.62% |
45% |
100% |
S&P A1+ |
National Australia Bank Ltd |
33,000,000 |
20.72% |
45% |
100% |
S&P AA- |
ANZ Banking Group Ltd |
702,324 |
0.44% |
35% |
100% |
S&P AA- |
National Australia Bank Ltd |
7,000,000 |
4.40% |
35% |
100% |
S&P AA- |
St George Bank Limited |
2,000,000 |
1.26% |
35% |
100% |
S&P AA- |
Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd |
4,000,000 |
2.51% |
35% |
100% |
S&P AAA |
Emerald Reverse Mortgage Trust |
1,165,308 |
0.73% |
45% |
100% |
Fitch A |
Emerald Reverse Mortgage Trust |
275,425 |
0.17% |
25% |
60% |
S&P A |
Emerald Reverse Mortgage Trust |
526,480 |
0.33% |
35% |
60% |
S&P A |
Macquarie Bank |
3,022,020 |
1.90% |
35% |
60% |
S&P A- |
Bank of Queensland Ltd |
2,014,900 |
1.27% |
25% |
60% |
S&P A- |
Bendigo & Adelaide Bank Ltd |
3,031,710 |
1.90% |
25% |
60% |
S&P A+ |
Suncorp-Metway Ltd |
2,015,260 |
1.27% |
25% |
60% |
S&P A2 |
Bank of Queensland Ltd |
27,000,000 |
16.95% |
25% |
60% |
S&P A2 |
Members Equity Bank Ltd |
3,000,000 |
1.88% |
25% |
60% |
S&P A2 |
MyState Bank Ltd |
2,000,000 |
1.26% |
25% |
60% |
S&P A2 |
P&N Bank Ltd |
11,000,000 |
6.91% |
25% |
60% |
S&P A2 |
Police Bank Ltd |
2,000,000 |
1.26% |
25% |
60% |
Fitch BBB+ |
Heritage Bank Ltd |
3,024,000 |
1.90% |
15% |
50% |
S&P BBB+ |
Credit Union Australia Ltd |
4,019,060 |
2.52% |
15% |
50% |
S&P BBB+ |
Members Equity Bank Ltd |
1,009,110 |
0.63% |
15% |
50% |
S&P BBB+ |
Newcastle Permanent Building Society Ltd |
10,034,760 |
6.30% |
15% |
50% |
S&P BBB+ |
Police Bank Ltd |
1,005,730 |
0.63% |
15% |
50% |
S&P BBB+ |
Teachers Mutual Bank Ltd |
2,010,560 |
1.26% |
15% |
50% |
Unrated UR |
Bananacoast Community Credit Union Ltd |
4,000,000 |
2.51% |
5% |
25% |
Unrated UR |
Bank of Sydney Ltd |
1,000,000 |
0.63% |
5% |
25% |
Unrated UR |
SGE Mutual Ltd trading as G&C Mutual Bank |
1,000,000 |
0.63% |
5% |
25% |
Grand Total |
|
159,265,626 |
100.00% |
|
|
Portfolio Performance
Council’s investment portfolio yield for the 12 months ended 31 July 2015 was 3.85 per cent which exceeded benchmark of 2.55 per cent by 130 basis points for the same period. Council continues to achieve a solid outcome despite ongoing margin contraction and significantly lower deposit yields on offer. Council’s ongoing outperformance has been boosted by a handful of longer term investments yielding above 4% and maturing out to 2019. Return on investments is expected to slowly decrease as old investments in Council’s portfolio mature and replaced with investments yielding lower returns. Comparative yields for the previous months are charted below:
Investment Portfolio at a Glance
Portfolio Performance vs. 90 day Bank Bill index over the 12 month period. |
|
The portfolio yield for 12 month ended is 130 basis points above the benchmark for the same period (3.85% against 2.55%). |
Annual Income vs. Budget |
|
Council’s investment interest income was slightly below budget for the month; however it is expected to improve and exceed year to date budget during the course of this financial year. |
Investment Policy Compliance
Legislative Requirements |
|
Fully Compliant. |
Portfolio Credit Rating Limit |
|
Fully Compliant. |
Institutional Exposure Limits |
|
Fully Compliant. |
Term to Maturity Limits |
|
Fully Compliant |
Economic Outlook – Reserve Bank of Australia
At its August 2015 meeting, the Board of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 2.0 per cent. A statement released on 4 August 2015 by Glenn Stevens, Governor of the RBA commenting on the central bank decision is attached to this report. The cash rate is at historically low level and adversely impacting returns on investment. Returns on Term Deposits have significantly dropped since the last twelve months. The average market returns on term deposits are:
· Longer term deposits (> 3years maturity) - 3.1% to 3.4% p.a
· Medium term (2 to 3 years to maturity) - 2.9% to 3.1% p.a.
· Short term deposits rate (less than one year to maturity) – ranges from 2.25% for 30 days to 2.9% per annum.
· Cash & Cash At Call accounts range from1.8% to 2.55%
· 31 Days’ Notice Account 2.7%
Certificate of Responsible Accounting Officer
The Chief Financial Officer, as Responsible Accounting Officer certifies that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Councils Investment Policies at the time of their placement. The previous investments are covered by the “grandfather” clauses of the current investment guidelines issued by the Minister for Local Government.
.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Council’s investment interest income was slightly below budget for the month; however it is expected to improve and exceed year to date budget during the course of this financial year. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Investment Portfolio Details July 2015View
2. Performance graphs Actual to Budget July 2015View
3. RBA Cash Rate media release August 2015View
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Chief Financial Officer
CFO 04 |
Minor Amendment to Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations |
Key Policy |
Long-Term Financial Plan |
File Ref |
202170.2015 |
Report By |
David Maguire - Governance Coordinator |
Approved By |
Gary Grantham - Chief Financial Officer |
Executive Summary
In accordance with section 253 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act), Council adopted its Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy on 29 July 2015. Clause four of the Council resolution adopting the policy determined that:
“Staff investigate ways of simplifying the telephone expense reporting process and as part of that process, investigate whether the claiming timeframe can be extended beyond 3 months.”
Council staff have ascertained that the period for making a claim can be extended beyond three months. They have recommended that the period be increased to a maximum of six months and that clause 4.7.1a) of Council’s policy be amended accordingly. This would constitute only a minor change to the policy which does not require public exhibition.
In regard to simplifying the process for making a claim, Council’s Chief Financial Officer has recently sent a memo to the Mayor and Councillors, setting out a simpler process for Councillors to claim reimbursement of their telephone expenses without the need to further amend Council’s current policy.
That Council:
1. Note this report;
2. Amend the clause 4.7.1a) of the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy by substituting “six months” for “three months”. |
REPORT
In accordance with section 253 of the Act, Council adopted its Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy on 29 July 2015. The new policy is attached to this report.
When adopting the policy, Council decided that its staff should investigate ways of simplifying the telephone expense reporting process, including investigating whether the claiming timeframe can be extended beyond three months.
The mandatory Guidelines for the payment of expenses and the provision of facilities for Mayors and Councillors in NSW, issued by the then Division of Local Government in October 2009, state:
2.3.9 Telecommunications
Councils should establish a monthly monetary limit for the cost of official mobile, landline and facsimile calls made by councillors. A system should also be established to reconcile all telephone call costs claimed with account statements. Councils should also consider limiting expenses for internet use.
The current provisions in Council’s policy relating to telephone expenses comply with clause 2.3.9 of the Guidelines. However, Council staff have ascertained that the period for making a claim can be extended beyond three months, recommending that the period be increased to a maximum of six months and that clause 4.7.1a) of the policy be amended accordingly. This would constitute only a minor change to the policy, not requiring public exhibition.
Council staff have also identified a simpler process for reimbursing telephone expenses of Councillors. To this effect, the Chief Financial Officer has recently sent a memo to the Mayor and Councillors, giving details of this new process for Councillors to claim reimbursement of their telephone expenses without the need to further amend Council’s current policy.
It is recommended that Council note this report and amend the clause 4.7.1a) of the Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy by substituting “six months” for “three months”.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Draft Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy View
157 |
|
CFO 04 |
Minor Amendment to Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy |
Attachment 1 |
Draft Civic Expenses and Facilities Policy |
175
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Community and Culture Report
DCC 01 |
Donations, Grants and Sponsorships |
Strategic Direction |
Healthy Inclusive City Foster social inclusion, strengthen the local community and increase opportunities for people who may experience barriers |
Key Policy |
Donations Policy |
File Ref |
089695.2015 |
Report By |
Sarah Rees - Coordinator Community Development |
Approved By |
Kiersten Fishburn - Director Community & Culture |
Executive Summary
Council provides financial assistance to the community under three categories: Community Donations (including Community Grants, Small Grants, School and Youth Donations), Sporting Donations and Corporate Sponsorship.
The Financial Contributions Panel (FCP) recently considered a number of applications from local residents for the Sporting Donations Program and local community organisations for the Community Grants and Corporate Sponsorship.
This report presents the funding recommendations made by the FCP for Council's consideration.
That Council:
1. Endorses the Financial Contribution Panel's recommendations for the provision of $2,700 (GST exclusive) under the Sporting Donations Program as summarised in the table below:
2. Endorses the Financial Contribution Panel's recommendations for the provision of $5,960 (GST exclusive) under the Community Donations Program as summarised in the table below:
3. Endorses the Financial Contributions Panel’s recommendations for the provision of $11,000 (GST exclusive) under the Corporate Sponsorship Program as summarised in the table below:
|
REPORT
The Donations program has three categories:
· Community Donations (including Community Grants, Small Grants, Men’s Shed One-off Grants School and Youth Donations);
· Sporting Donations; and
· Corporate Sponsorship.
Applications for Sporting Donations, Community Grants and Corporate Sponsorship are accepted on an ongoing basis. Applications are then reviewed by the Financial Contributions Panel (FCP) comprised of the Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Chief Executive Officer and delegated staff.
This report contains the most recent recommendations by the FCP for Sporting Donations, Community Donations and Corporate Sponsorship.
Sporting Donations
Council's Sporting Donations Program is available to individuals and sporting teams who live in Liverpool City. Twenty-six applications for sporting donations were received by Council. Twelve applications met the program criteria and were recommended for funding by the Liverpool Sports Committee. The program criteria can be found as an attachment to this report for the reference of Councillors. A summary of the request received and the FCP recommendations are shown in the table below.
Applicant Details |
Eligibility |
Representation |
FCP Recommendation |
Brenan Chattaway |
Local resident – Moorebank
|
Representing NSW Veteran Men’s Division at the 2015 National Barefoot Waterski Championships held in Yarrawonga/ Mulwala from 7 to 12 April 2015. |
$200 |
John Mamis |
Local resident – Chipping Norton
|
Representing Sydney United U15’s Premier League Team at the 2015 Milk Cup Soccer Tournament held in Ireland from 22 July to 4 August 2015. |
$100 |
Matthew Wu |
Local resident – Wattle Grove
|
Representing Sydney United U15's Premier League Team at the 2015 Milk Cup Soccer Tournament held in Ireland from 22 July to 4 August 2015. |
$100 |
Trystan A Singh |
Local resident - Casula
|
Representing International Soccer Academy U17's Team at Real Madrid, Barcelona and Sporting Lisbon from 19 September to 3 October 2015. |
$0 This is an academy team not a Football Federation Australia or Football NSW selected team. It does not meet the representative requirements. |
Adam Chan |
Local resident - Liverpool |
Representing Australia Fiji Soccer Team at the 2015 Sanatan Convention held in Fiji from 3 to 6 April 2015. |
$0 (Council resolved in May 2015 not to support individual applications to this event but to give $1,000 to the team) |
Amal Chand |
Local resident - Liverpool
|
Representing Australia Fiji Soccer Team at the 2015 Sanatan Convention held in Fiji from 3 to 6 April 2015. |
$0 (Council resolved in May 2015 not to support individual applications to this event but to give $1,000 to the team) |
Arif Khan |
Local resident - Liverpool
|
Representing Australia Fiji Soccer Team at the 2015 Sanatan Convention held in Fiji from 3 to 6 April 2015. |
$0 (Council resolved in May 2015 not to support individual applications to this event but to give $1,000 to the team) |
Arvin Deo |
Local resident - Liverpool
|
Representing Australia Fiji Soccer Team at the 2015 Sanatan Convention held in Fiji from 3 to 6 April 2015. |
$0 (Council resolved in May 2015 not to support individual applications to this event but to give $1,000 to the team) |
Jerad Sharma |
Local resident - Liverpool |
Representing Australia Fiji Soccer Team at the 2015 Sanatan Convention held in Fiji from 3 to 6 April 2015. |
$0 (Council resolved in May 2015 not to support individual applications to this event but to give $1,000 to the team) |
Jason Kumar |
Local resident - Liverpool |
Representing Australia Fiji Soccer Team at the 2015 Sanatan Convention held in Fiji from 3 to 6 April 2015. |
$0 (Council resolved in May 2015 not to support individual applications to this event but to give $1,000 to the team) |
Justin Sharma |
Local resident - Liverpool |
Representing Australia Fiji Soccer Team at the 2015 Sanatan Convention held in Fiji from 3 to 6 April 2015. |
$0 (Council resolved in May 2015 not to support individual applications to this event but to give $1,000 to the team) |
Nirhil Prasad |
Local resident - Liverpool |
Representing Australia Fiji Soccer Team at the 2015 Sanatan Convention held in Fiji from 3 to 6 April 2015. |
$0 (Council resolved in May 2015 not to support individual applications to this event but to give $1,000 to the team) |
Rohit Narain |
Local resident - Liverpool |
Representing Australia Fiji Soccer Team at the 2015 Sanatan Convention held in Fiji from 3 to 6 April 2015. |
$0 (Council resolved in May 2015 not to support individual applications to this event but to give $1,000 to the team) |
Saanil Prasad |
Local resident - Liverpool |
Representing Australia Fiji Soccer Team at the 2015 Sanatan Convention held in Fiji from 3 to 6 April 2015. |
$0 (Council resolved in May 2015 not to support individual applications to this event but to give $1,000 to the team) |
Nitesh Maharaj |
Local resident - Liverpool |
Representing Australia Fiji Soccer Team at the 2015 Sanatan Convention held in Fiji from 3 to 6 April 2015. |
$0 (Council resolved in May 2015 not to support individual applications to this event but to give $1,000 to the team) |
Rhiannon Dotti |
Local resident – Wattle Grove
|
Representing Australia Indigenous Oztag Team at Oztag World Cup Tour 2015 held in Sunshine Coast from 3 to 7 December 2015. |
$300 |
Zac Makelim |
Local resident – Ashcroft |
Representing Australia Indigenous Oztag Team at Oztag World Cup Tour 2015 held in Sunshine Coast from 3 to 7 December 2015. |
$300 |
Mahmoud Derbas |
Local resident - Cartwright |
Representing International Soccer Academy U17's Team at Real Madrid, Barcelona and Sporting Lisbon from 19 September to 3 October 2015. |
$0 This is an academy team not a Football Federation Australia or Football NSW selected team. It does not meet the representative requirements. |
Keisha Waite |
Local resident – Wattle Grove |
Representing Australia U20’s Mixed Oztag Team at 2015 Tag Football World Cup held in Queensland from 3 to 6 December 2015. |
$300 |
Declan Grohala |
Local resident – Hammondville |
Representing NSW PSG Swimming Team at 9th Pacific School Games held in Adelaide from 21 to 29 November 2015. |
$200 |
Mikayla O’Dwyer |
Local resident – Hammondville |
Representing NSW PSSA Girls Hockey Team at PSSA National Championships held in Perth from 2 to 7 August 2015. |
$200 |
Kaushal Kumar |
Local resident - Prestons |
Representing International Soccer Academy U17's Team at Real Madrid, Barcelona and Sporting Lisbon from 19 September to 3 October 2015. |
$0 This is an academy team not a Football Federation Australia or Football NSW selected team. It does not meet the representative requirements. |
Kim Angelica Afable Albarico |
Local resident – Hoxton Park |
Representing Martial Arts Spirit Team at the Australian Open 2015 held in Melbourne from 26 28 June 2015. |
$100 |
Tianna Elaya |
Local resident – Ashcroft |
Representing Australian U18 Ice Hockey Team overseas for a series of 3 games V’s Denmark . |
$500 |
Nemanja Cerne |
Local resident – Horningsea Park |
Representing NSW Karate Team at the Australia Karate Federation National Championships held in Perth from 30 July to 4 August 2015. |
$200 |
Tamara Cerne |
Local resident – Horningsea Park |
Representing NSW Karate Team at the Australia Karate Federation National Championships held in Perth from 30 July to 4 August 2015. |
$200 |
Community Grants
Council's Community Grants Program is available to community groups who provide programs or services to the residents of Liverpool. Two applications for community grants were received by Council. Two applications met the program criteria and are recommended for funding. The program criteria can be found as an attachment to this report for the reference of Councillors. A summary of the requests are outlined in the table below.
Applicant Details |
Event Name and Description |
Amount Requested |
FCP Recommendation |
School of Verdic Sciences (Australia) Incorporated |
Bhagawat Gita Competition
To promote and encourage students to learn and study Sanskrit, one of the most ancient languages which originated in India.
Community Benefits: · Enhanced social and cultural cohesion among the attendees of this Bhagawat Gita Sanskrit text competition; · Enhanced social harmony and cultural diversity in the community; and · Promote cultural awareness and celebrate community pride in mastering language skill achievements. |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
SLOOSH Kids Care Inc |
Walk for William Event – Liverpool, 12 September 2015
To raise community awareness of the disappearance of William Tyrrell which will further highlight the social issue of all missing Australians. Information will be disseminated to participants on child protection, safety and local emergency services.
Community Benefits: · Enhanced community participation to raise awareness of the social issues of missing Australians; and · Increased knowledge of local support and emergency services. |
$4,960 |
$4,960 |
Corporate Sponsorship
Council delivers a Corporate Sponsorship Program for local organisations seeking financial support to deliver events that benefit Liverpool. Four applications for corporate sponsorship were received by Council. Three applications met the program criteria and are recommended for funding. The program criteria can be found as an attachment to this report for the reference of Councillors. A summary of the request received and the FCP recommendation are shown in the table below.
Applicant Details |
Project Name and Description |
Amount Requested |
FCP Recommend-ation |
Ingham Institute |
Ingham Institute Award Dinner –Liverpool Catholic Club - 27 November 2015 The event is to acknowledge the achievements of the researchers that are working at the Ingham Institute and Liverpool Hospital. The event is a prestigious occasion showcasing the depth of talent at the Institute. This is a not-for-profit event. Researchers, businesses and the general community are invited to attend. Estimated attendance is 300 people.
Sponsorship of the early career researcher award at the event.
Benefits: - Mayoral opportunity to present award - Logo inclusion on all promotional materials, social media, website and award plaque etc. - Signage at the event - Table of 10 tickets
Liverpool has identified the Health and Medical sector as a priority sector and the Ingham Institute is a key player within the Health and Medical precinct. The event provides an opportunity to showcase the often internationally ground-breaking work of the Institute which in turn supports Liverpool’s overarching positioning in this area. Strong alignment with program criteria. Recommended for funding in line with previous support. |
$5,000 |
$5,000 |
Arab Bank Australia |
Charity Golf Day – Twin Creeks Golf and Country Club , Luddenham– 25 September 2015
Charity golf day to raise funds for My Westmead, for healthcare and research.
Benefits: Major Sponsor (1 Sponsor Only) – Sponsorship $10,000 - 2 complimentary teams of 4 on the day (valued at $1200) - 2 complimentary hole sponsorships on the day (valued at $1600) - 2 Banners - Banners up in the registration area and the lunch/presentation area - Thanked in official speeches and an appreciation certificate from My Westmead - Company representative allowed to say a few words at the presentation ceremony and to assist in handing out trophies - Company entitled to include 2 pieces in the gift bags for participants with their marketing material in it (one bag will be allocated on each chair in the lunch room)
Co-Sponsors (2 Sponsors only) – Sponsorship $6,500 - 2 complimentary teams of 4 on the day (valued at $1200) - 1 complimentary hole sponsorship on the day (valued at $800) - 1 banner up in the registration area only - Thanked in official speeches on the day and an appreciation certificate from My Westmead - 1 piece of marketing material allowed to be distributed in the gift bag on the day
Exclusive Polo Shirt Sponsorship (1 only) – Sponsorship $5,000 - 1 complimentary team of 4 on the day (valued at $600) - 1 complimentary hole sponsorship on the day (valued at $800) - Company name/logo on the polo shirt’s along with the Arab Bank Australia logo and My Westmead logo - An appreciation certificate from My Westmead - 1 piece of marketing material allowed to be distributed in the gift bag on the day
Poor alignment with program criteria. Whilst this event is raising funds for healthcare and research, this event is not being held in the Liverpool LGA and is not supporting a Liverpool based local charity.
The program focuses on supporting events that occur within the Liverpool region and events which support local charities. Not recommended for funding. |
$5,000 - $10,000 |
Nil |
Eggtober Foundation Ltd |
Eggtober Foundation – Purple Tie Charity Ball Saturday October 31, 2015 at the Liverpool Catholic Club
Not-for profit event raising funds for equipment and research into gynaecological cancers.
Benefits: $20,000 Platinum Partner - Recognition of your Platinum sponsorship status - Proudly sponsored by {company logo} placed on our website - home page with a link to your web page - These inclusions are repeated on our website sponsors page - Proudly sponsored by logo inclusion on our invitation to participate in our major charity events which is distributed by email - Proudly sponsored by logo inclusion on our official event stationery in both hard copy and which can be downloaded from our website www.eggtober.com.au - Proudly sponsored by logo inclusion on dedicated slide on audio-visual presentations given to community groups (Rotary, CWA, - Quota) and Cancer Support Groups in the following 12 months exposing your brand to a captured and targeted market - Proudly sponsored by logo inclusion on dedicated slide on the rolling power point during our Purple Tie Charity Ball
$10,000 Gold Partner - Logo inclusion on our website home page and a link to your web page - These inclusions are repeated on our website sponsors page - Logo inclusion on our invitation to participate in major charity events which is distributed by email - Logo inclusion on our official event stationery in hard copy and which can be downloaded from our website www.eggtober.com.au - Logo inclusion on shared slide on audio-visual presentations given to community groups (Rotary, CWA, Quota) and Cancer Support - Groups in the following 12 months exposing your brand to a captured and targeted market - Placement on our Honour Roll as a Gold Partner - Acknowledgement of Gold Partnership by CEO during handover of equipment ceremonies and at our major charity events - Complimentary table of 10 at our Purple Tie Charity Event
$5,000 Silver Partner - Name inclusion on our website home page and a link to your web page - Logo inclusion on our website’s dedicated sponsors page - Name inclusion on our invitation to participate in our major charity events which are distributed by email Name inclusion on official event stationery both in hardcopy and which can be downloaded from our website www.eggtober.com.au - Name inclusion on shared slide on audio-visual presentations given to community groups (Rotary, CWA, Quota) and Cancer Support - Groups in the following 12 months exposing your brand to a captured and targeted market - Placement on our Honour Roll as a Silver Partner - Acknowledgement of Silver Partnership during major charity events. - Complimentary table of 10 at our Purple Tie Charity Event
$2,500 Bronze Partner - Logo inclusion on our website’s dedicated sponsors page as a - Bronze partner and a link to your web page - Name inclusion on our invitation to participate in our major charity events which is distributed by email - Name inclusion on shared slide on audio-visual presentations given to community groups (Rotary, CWA, Quota) and Cancer Support - Groups in the following 12 months exposing your brand to a captured and targeted market - Placement on our Honour Roll as a Bronze Partner - Acknowledgement of Bronze Partnership at our major charity events - Complimentary Table of 10 at our Purple Tie Charity Event
Aligns with program criteria as it is an event occurring within the local area and is raising funds for an important medical condition. Recommended for funding in line with previous support. |
$2,500 - $20,000 |
$2,500 |
Friends of India Australia |
Ganetshotsava – Whitlam Centre, 26 - 27 September 2015
Community event marking the Annual celebration of Lord Ganesh’s birthday. Well attended event with a long track record. Anticipated attendances of 6,000 people.
Benefits - Speaking opportunity at the event - Logo inclusion on all promotional materials, social media, website etc.
Aligns with program criteria. Recommended for funding at the $3,500 level in line with previous support. |
$10,000 |
$3,500 |
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
A budget allocation of $15,000 for the Sporting Donations Program was adopted by Council in its 2015/2016 Operational Plan. If the recommended amount of $2,700 is endorsed the remaining balance will be $12,300. The recommendations within this report for sporting donations will be funded from the Sporting Donations Program.
A budget allocation of $100,000 for the Community Grants Program was adopted by Council in its 2015/2016 Operational Plan as part of the Community Donations Program. If the recommended amount of $5,960 is endorsed the remaining balance will be $79,040. The recommendations within this report for Community Grants will be funded from the Community Donations Program.
The 2015/16 Corporate Sponsorship Program has a budget of $125,000 and if the recommended amount of $11,000 is endorsed, the remaining balance will be $75,400.
|
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Criteria for Sporting DonationsView
2. Criteria for Community Grants ProgramView
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Community and Culture Report
DCC 02 |
Revocation of No Smoking In Public Places Policy |
Strategic Direction |
Healthy Inclusive City Improve health and wellbeing and encourage a happy, active community |
Key Policy |
Recreation Strategy |
File Ref |
189901.2015 |
Report By |
Mark Egan - Coordinator Community Planning |
Approved By |
Kiersten Fishburn - Director Community & Culture |
Executive Summary
Council adopted an updated No Smoking In Public Places Policy at its meeting on 28 May 2012. The purpose of the policy, then adopted by Council, was to improve the health and wellbeing of Liverpool residents by restricting smoking in public places, particularly in areas with children and young people. The key change to the policy at this time was the introduction of a reduced rate for outdoor café permits in instances where the café agreed to operate smoke free.
Effective from 6 July 2015 onwards, all commercial outdoor dining areas in NSW, including hotels, clubs, restaurants and cafes are now smoke-free, under the Smoke-free Environment Act 2000. The Act also bans smoking in a number of other public places that are also identified in Council’s abovementioned Policy.
Given this change, it is considered that Council’s No Smoking In Public Places Policy is no longer required as it has been superseded. It is therefore recommended that the Policy be revoked by Council.
That Council:
1. Note this report.
2. Revoke the Use of the No Smoking In Public Places Policy.
|
REPORT
At its meeting on 28 May 2012, Council adopted the amended No Smoking In Public Places Policy. The Policy was amended at this time to provide a discounted outdoor café permit rate to those cafes that opted to operate as smoke free venues. The report provided to Council for that meeting stated:
“The primary purpose of this [amended Policy] is to reduce the amount of smoking in Liverpool's city centre. Being subjected to smoking in an outdoor environment can be harmful to those who inhale it. The close proximity of people in the typical outdoor café setting means that patrons would likely be subjected to second hand smoke if people in this area were smoking. Encouraging smoke-free outdoor dining options may attract new business to those cafés who introduce a smoke-free policy in their outdoor dining area.”
As at 6 July 2015, the NSW Government has introduced legislation that makes commercial outdoor dining areas smoke-free. The reason for banning smoking in outdoor dining areas is that:
· they are often visited by children and families and they can be crowded;
· they allow limited opportunity for people to avoid second hand smoke;
· this approach will achieve an important reduction in many people’s exposure to second hand smoke; and
· this approach will create a more supportive environment for those who have quit.
The new legislation supersedes Council’s No Smoking In Public Places Policy, including the discounted outdoor dining café permit rate and other locations identified as smoke free in the following two Acts:
· Public Health (Tobacco) Act 2008
· The Smoke-free Environment Act 2000
The Smoke-free Environment Act 2000, Smoke-free Environment Amendment Regulation 2009, and the Smoke-free Environment Regulation 2007 ban and regulate smoking in enclosed public places and also in the following outdoor public places:.
· Within 10 metres of children’s play equipment in outdoor public places;
· Public swimming pools;
· Spectator areas at sports grounds or other recreational areas used for organised sporting events;
· Public transport stops and platforms , including ferry wharves and taxi ranks; and
· Within 4 metres of a pedestrian access point to a public building.
Some of the above locations are also identified in Council’s existing No Smoking In Public Places Policy.
Given these legislative changes, it is therefore considered that the No Smoking In Public Places Policy is no longer required by Council. Accordingly, it is recommended that this report be noted and that the policy be revoked by Council.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Revocation of this Policy will have no negative social or cultural consequences. The introduction of NSW Government legislation banning smoking in outdoor dining areas is likely to have positive social impacts by reducing exposure to second hand smoke and the associated health risks. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
ATTACHMENTS
195 |
|
DCC 02 |
Revocation of No Smoking In Public Places Policy |
Attachment 1 |
No Smoking In Public Places Policy |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Community and Culture Report
DCC 03 |
Safety Audit Report conducted at Parks in Wattle Grove |
Strategic Direction |
Liveable Safe City Improve the community’s sense of safety in Liverpool |
Key Policy |
Community Safety and Crime Prevention Strategy |
File Ref |
193221.2015 |
Report By |
Kamrun Rahman - Community Development Worker (Community Safety) |
Approved By |
Kiersten Fishburn - Director Community & Culture |
Executive Summary
At its meeting on 25 February 2015, Council resolved that safety audits be conducted at John Edmondson Memorial VC Park, and other relevant parks in Wattle Grove, with particular regard to the lighting and configuration of the park.
Accordingly, this report provides a summary of the outcomes and recommendations of the safety audits conducted at John Edmondson Memorial VC Park, Cameron Park and Orara Park at Wattle Grove.
Copies of the full safety audits reports are attached.
That Council:
1. Receive and notes these reports.
2. Adopts the recommendations detailed within this report. |
REPORT
The safety audit was commissioned via a Council Resolution on 25 February 2015 in response to community concerns regarding safety issues attributed to the lack of lighting at parks in Wattle Grove. In response, safety audits have been conducted and three separate reports prepared for John Edmondson Memorial VC Park, Cameron Park and Orara Park, Wattle Grove. The safety audit team consisted of members of Liverpool City Council and Liverpool Local Area Command. The audits were conducted during the day on Thursday 9 April 2015 and at night on Friday 8 May 2015.
This report reflects the brief summary of the findings and key recommendations of the safety audits conducted at John Edmondson Memorial VC Park, Cameron Park and Orara Park, Wattle Grove and the crime data from Liverpool Police LAC. The detailed safety audit reports are attached.
Liverpool Police crime data
Council sought crime data from Liverpool Police LAC in relation to John Edmondson Memorial VC Park, Cameron Park and Orara Park, Wattle Grove prior to conducting safety audits. According to Liverpool Police LAC:
· One incident reported to police in 2007 occurred in John Edmondson Memorial VC Park, since then there have been no reported incidents;
· Two incidents reported to police for graffiti and assault in 2009 and 2011 respectively at Orara Park; and
· One incident reported to police for robbery in 2007 in Cameron Park.
It should be noted that Liverpool Police LAC does not encourage installation of new lighting in the parks due to low reported crime.
Safety audit
The primary purpose of the safety audits was to identify and evaluate safety and security related issues in order to reduce opportunities for crime, anti-social behaviour and the threat of criminal exposure by:
· Discouraging opportunities for physical violence;
· Reducing the opportunities for crime against property;
· Improving community partnerships between citizens, police and other agencies;
· Providing feedback to Liverpool City Council;
· Reducing urban decay; and
· Rejuvenating community pride and cohesion.
The safety audits were conducted using Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles which aim to create a safer environment by reducing opportunistic crime. The four key strategies assessed were:
· Natural surveillance and lighting;
· Maintenance;
· Access control; and
· Territorial reinforcement.
A brief summary of the three safety audit reports are set out below:
John Edmondson Memorial VC Park
The general impression was that the park was well-maintained open area with very good natural surveillance.
The findings of the audit include:
· The park was well maintained, a practice that is found to reinforce ownership of the site;
· Good natural surveillance during the day from the surrounding roads and houses;
· Limited natural surveillance at night;
· A number of street lights were broken or damaged;
· Overgrown vegetation and trees reducing visibility and impeding on site lines; and
· Informal pathway between Birdwood Avenue and Wattle Grove Drive was being used during the day and night by pedestrians accessing the nearby bus stops.
Recommendation that:
1. Traffic and Transport to conduct regular maintenance of street lighting to improve natural surveillance and visibility around the park;
2. Traffic and Transport to consider the installation of additional lighting on pole number 771 and 773 at Birdwood Avenue and pole number 783 at Hamilton Avenue to improve natural surveillance and visibility around the park;
3. Traffic and Transport to replace the damaged light on pole number 788 at Hamilton Avenue, and on pole 797344 located at Wattle Grove Drive;
4. Tree Management Officer to maintain overgrown trees and vegetation;
5. Improve general tidy up and clearing;
6. City Presentation to conduct regular maintenance of the park to reinforce ownership of the site;
7. Graffiti vandalism be removed from the play equipment;
8. City Presentation to trim overgrown vegetation around the park including the corner of Birdwood Avenue and Wattle Grove Drive, children play equipment and Bridges Avenue to improve sightlines and reduce concealment areas; and
9. Infrastructure and Design to consider the installation of a formal pathway from the southern end of Birdwood Avenue through to Wattle Grove Drive
Cameron Park
The general impression was that the park was well maintained. The pathways provided in the park were well utilised by residents to go to the shops, bus stop, work, schools and residential houses across the park. It was noted that the park contains relatively clear sight lines during the day.
During the night audit, it was noted that adequate lighting only exists on the pedestrian crossing to and from shops. There was one lighting pole situated near the children’s play area in the reserve. The park is quite dark and the street lighting is not sufficient to light up the park. The pathways in the park were used by local people at night while coming back from the station, going to neighbouring houses and going to shops.
The findings of the audit include:
· The park was well used;
· The park was well maintained, a practice that is found to reinforce ownership of the site;
· Good natural surveillance during the day from the surrounding roads;
· Limited natural surveillance at night; and
· Overgrown vegetation and trees reducing visibility and impeding on site lines and.
Recommendation that:
1. Tree Management Officer maintain overgrown tree and vegetation around the park to improve natural surveillance and sightlines;
2. Improve general tidy up and clearing;
3. Traffic and Transport in consultation with Parks and Reserves Section to investigate the installation of lighting along the pathways in the park;
4. Maintain regular maintenance including rubbish collection;
5. City Presentation conduct regular maintenance of the park to reinforce ownership of the site; and
6. City Presentation trim overgrown vegetation around the park to improve sightlines and reduce concealment areas.
Orara Park
It was noted that the park is well used by local residents. The pathways provided in the park were well utilised by residents to go to the bus stop, work, schools and residential houses across the park.
During the night audit, it was noted that the park is quite dark and the street lighting is not sufficient to light up the park.
The findings of the audit include:
· The park was well used;
· The park was well maintained, a practice that is found to reinforce ownership of the site;
· Good natural surveillance during the day from the surrounding roads;
· Limited natural surveillance at night; and
· Overgrown vegetation and trees reducing visibility and impeding on site lines.
Recommendation that:
1. Tree Management Officer maintain overgrown tree and vegetation around the park to improve natural surveillance and sightlines;
2. Improve general tidy up and clearing;
3. Traffic and Transport in consultation with Parks and Reserves Section to investigate the installation of lighting along the pathways in the park;
4. Maintain regular maintenance including rubbish collection;
5. City Presentation conduct regular maintenance of the park to reinforce ownership of the site; and
6. City Presentation trim overgrown vegetation around the park to improve sightlines and reduce concealment areas.
Conclusion
The safety audits were conducted using the Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles which is a crime prevention strategy that outlines how physical environments can be designed in order to reduce the opportunity for crime. There were no major issues identified by the audit team. The recommendation for the lighting upgrade around the pathways in Cameron and Orara Parks was to improve visibility and perception of safety.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. The recommendations identified within this report can be resourced through Council’s operational budget. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Support policies and plans that prevent crime.
|
Civic Leadership and Governance |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Safety Audit Report - Cameron Park, Wattle GroveView
2. Safety Audit Report - Orara Park, Wattle GroveView
3. Safety Audit Report - John Edmonson VC Park, Wattle Grove
207 |
|
DCC 03 |
Safety Audit Report conducted at Parks in Wattle Grove |
Attachment 1 |
Safety Audit Report - Cameron Park, Wattle Grove |
DCC 03 |
Safety Audit Report conducted at Parks in Wattle Grove |
Attachment 2 |
Safety Audit Report - Orara Park, Wattle Grove |
DCC 03 |
Safety Audit Report conducted at Parks in Wattle Grove |
Attachment 3 |
Safety Audit Report - John Edmonson VC Park, Wattle Grove |
236
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Economic Development Report
DEE 01 |
Review of Town Improvement Fund (now known as City Development Fund) |
Strategic Direction |
Vibrant Prosperous City Activate the city centre and develop vibrant places that attract people to Liverpool |
Key Policy |
City Centre Strategy |
File Ref |
205594.2015 |
Report By |
Michael Cullen - Director Economic Development |
Approved By |
Michael Cullen - Director Economic Development |
Executive Summary
On 26 May 2015, Council adopted the attached policy in principle, subject to public exhibition as required under section 253(1) of the Act.
The main changes to the policy are:
1. Changing the name of the Town Improvement Fund to the City Development Fund.
2. Revision to the Charter for the Building Our New City Committee which will have responsibility for management, all boundaries, expenditure recommendations and strategies and other elements of the City Development Fund.
3. That a regular review of the City Development Fund be undertaken every 2 years with respect to its scope, boundaries and rate.
The public exhibition period ran from Wednesday 10 June 2015 until Wednesday 8 July 2015 with a final date for submissions being Wednesday 22 July 2015. No comments were received.
That Council:
1. Note this report;
2. Adopt the City Development Fund Policy, as attached to this report; and
3. Provide a copy of the attached policy and the related public notice to the Chief Executive of the Office of Local Government within 28 days of the date of this Council resolution.
|
REPORT
In accordance with section 253(1) of the Act, the attached policy was publicly exhibited from Wednesday 10 June 2015 until Wednesday 8 July 2015. No public submissions were received.
Once Council adopts the policy, administrative arrangements will be finalised including advice to the Office of Local Government.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
The City Development Fund will play a significant role in facilitating economic development in the city centre through strategic civic improvements The Town Improvement Fund currently raises approximately $1.6 m per annum in revenue for Council. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Improvements to the city centre are also aimed at improving both environmental and economic sustainability within the Liverpool city centre. |
Social and Cultural |
Improvements to the city centre will be sensitive to the cultural and social inclusion needs of Liverpool |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
The Building Our New City program is a key Council leadership initiative in attracting new public and private sector investment to Liverpool and will be supported by revenue raised from the City Development Fund. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. City Development Fund Policy August 2015 (previously Town Improvement Fund)View
243 |
|
DEE 01 |
Review of Town Improvement Fund (now known as City Development Fund) |
Attachment 1 |
City Development Fund Policy August 2015 (previously Town Improvement Fund) |
243
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Infrastructure and Environment Report
DIEN 01 |
Managing Stormwater Quality |
Strategic Direction |
Natural Sustainable City Reduce adverse environment impacts for present and future generations |
Key Policy |
Integrated Environmental Sustainability Action Plan |
File Ref |
198667.2015 |
Report By |
Madhu Pudasaini - Manager Technical Support |
Approved By |
Raj Autar - Director Infrastructure and Environment |
Executive Summary
Council, at its meeting held on 26 May 2015, resolved to receive a report outlining strategies and programs that are currently in place to manage the quality of water reaching our creeks and rivers. While a range of strategies and programs are in place for the ongoing management of stormwater quality, Council initiated a comprehensive review of its stormwater management practices early this year with the view to incorporating current best management practices in the way both the stormwater quality and quantity are managed. This review is anticipated to be completed by November 2015.
This report provides the current framework for the management of water quality across the LGA, however, a further briefing and report will be provided towards the end of this year upon completion of the current best practice review.
That Council:
1. Receives and notes the contents of this report.
2. Receives a detailed briefing and a report later in the year following completion of the review of stormwater management practices that is currently underway. |
REPORT
1. Background
Liverpool is traversed by a large number of creeks and river systems making the management of water a key issue for Council. Increasing urbanisation has resulted in a significant increase in impervious surfaces and has significantly increased the volume of stormwater flowing into urban waterways. This leads to the continued physical degradation of natural watercourses in urban environments as evident by creek erosion, siltation and die back of vegetation. Activities in urban areas also cause urban contaminants to be deposited and subsequently conveyed by stormwater to surrounding natural water environments, leading to stormwater pollution in these environments. The projected further growth forecasted for Liverpool means that these pressures on our waterways will continue to intensify.
2. Current water management practices
As a proactive response, Council has developed and has in place a range of strategies and programs that seek to protect aquatic ecosystems and water resources, and minimise the impacts of urban development on the urban water cycle.
2.1. Managing stormwater quality in new urban release areas
For new developments, it is essential that the right controls are put in place to manage stormwater, prevent flooding and improve water quality. Water quality management in new areas is regulated through controls in the Development Control Plan (DCP), which requires developers to implement an integrated system of water quality improvement devices in accordance with best management practices and water sensitive urban design principles. This involves the implementation of a hierarchy of controls utilising the following treatment-train approach to progressively remove pollutants from stormwater runoff to achieve the targeted quality parameters;
§ Primary controls - use of gross pollutant traps (GPTs) and purpose-built trash racks to capture gross pollutants comprising leaf litter, cans, bottles and coarse sediments before these pollutants enter the creeks and waterways. Grassed swales and sediment ponds are also being used to specifically treat coarse sediments.
§ Secondary controls - a range of secondary controls are now being introduced within the newer areas of Liverpool comprising rain gardens and vegetated filters to remove the finer sediments and nutrients. Examples of this can be seen in new residential release areas such as Voyager Point and Elizabeth Hills as well as in Council’s own projects such as Carnes Hill Community and Recreation Centre and Kurrajong Road.
§ Tertiary controls - comprise bio-retention systems and wetlands that are specifically designed to remove nutrients and dissolved heavy metals. Again, examples of this can be seen in Elizabeth Hills, Georges Fair, Cecil Hills, Wattle Grove and Carnes Hill.
2.2. Managing stormwater quality in existing areas
Large parts of the existing urban areas already have an extensive network of piped drainage systems discharging stormwater directly into creeks and waterways. Over the years, Council has implemented a comprehensive program of stormwater quality improvement works to address the adverse effects of stormwater runoff. These include:
i). Provision of gross pollutant traps and trash racks
Over 115 gross pollutant traps have been provided across the existing urban areas to capture pollutants before it reaches the waterways. Council continues to invest an average of over $300,000 annually towards the provision of new GPTs. However, a more recent assessment shows that this number is well below the total number of these devices required to effectively manage the capture of gross pollutants. Consequently a LGA wide mapping exercise is already under way as part of the best practice review to identify and prioritise sites for the provision of additional GPTs.
It is worth noting, however, that GPTs are designed to capture pollutants mobilised during the more frequent rain events. During the less frequent but larger storms, the capacity of the pipe system and the associated GPTs are very quickly exceeded and the runoff including the mobilised pollutants and debris bypass the entire stormwater system and end up in downstream waterways.
ii). Riparian zone vegetation works
Riparian vegetation is vitally important to the health of rivers and streams. Among others, it provides a buffer between adjoining land and the river, filtering nutrients, sediment and pesticides from catchment runoff. It provides stability to creek banks, minimises erosion and provides shade that can influence water temperature and light penetration, thereby regulating instream primary production.
Council’s assement shows that the underlying reasons for the poor eclogical health of the creeks and river systems arise from degraded riparian vegetation and increased colonisation of invasive aquatic weeds. While council implements a regular program of bush regeneration and weed removal along the river corridors through its Environment Restoration Plan (ERP) program, a more comprehensive ERP strategy is being developed to improve and re-establish the riparian vegetation along the creek corridors with greater focus on improving water quality and overall environmental outcomes.
iii). Erosion protection and bank stabilisation works
Council spends an average of $250,000 annually to restore and stabilise eroded creek banks and stormwater outlets. These works are not only critical for asset protection but prevents ongoing erosion and contamination of the water course though sedimentation and siltation.
iv). Education and awareness
Council’s website currently provides important information on the river and creek catchments, water quality and water sensitive urban design to the community. A number of fact sheets are available to educate the community on how to reduce litter and pollutants generated from day to day activities, such as car washing, gardening and household cleaning, from entering into our waterways. These fact sheets are also distributed to the community at community events such as National Tree Day. The proposed Water Management Policy and Strategy will review the current awareness program and provide more focus on the active education and awareness program for pollution control.
3. Improvement strategies
As stated above, a comprehensive review of Council’s stormwater management practices is underway. It is proposed to develop a consolidated and coherent framework to manage both the quantity and quality aspects of stormwater. This will include policy, strategy, guidelines and will be translated into a program of works with supporting funding strategies. This review is anticipated to be completed by November 2015.
4. Conclusion
Council currently has a range of strategies and programs to improve the quality of water reaching our creeks and waterways. However, it is considered that a more holistic and proactive water management approach is essential to respond to the challenges of future urban growth. A Water Management Policy and Strategy, which is being developed, will provide a coherent framework for the effective management of water within the LGA.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There ongoing financial impact will be further considered as part of formulation of long term works programs. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Manage the environmental health of waterways. Manage air, water, noise and chemical pollution. |
Social and Cultural |
Community education and awareness will form a key element of the updated strategy to manage water quality. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Act as an environmental leader in the community. |
247
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Planning and Growth Report
DPG 01 |
Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 37) - Heritage Listing of the Defence National Storage and Distribution Centre |
Strategic Direction |
Liveable Safe City Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development |
Key Policy |
Urban Development Plans |
File Ref |
162633.2015 |
Report By |
Benny Horn - Strategic Planner |
Approved By |
Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth |
Executive Summary
In accordance with Council’s resolution at its meeting on 25 September 2013, Council prepared and exhibited draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan (LLEP) 2008 (Amendment 37). The planning proposal seeks to add the Defence National Storage and Distribution Centre (DNSDC) site in Moorebank to the Local Heritage Register of LLEP 2008.
The site is listed on the Commonwealth Heritage List. Once the current Commonwealth lease ends, to enable development of the proposed intermodal freight terminal, the site will lose its Commonwealth heritage listing. This planning proposal seeks to ensure ongoing protection of the site’s heritage value.
Pursuant to the Department of Planning and Environment’s Gateway determination, the Heritage Division of the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) was consulted on draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 37) in March 2014 but did not make a submission.
Public exhibition was undertaken between 11 June 2014 and 2 July 2014, with one submission received by Council. The submission was from SIMTA, the owner of the site, and raised a number of issues concerning the proposed local heritage listing of the site.
At its meeting on 25 September 2013, Council also resolved to write to the OEH to request that the DNSDC site be listed on the State Heritage Register. The OEH responded to Council’s request in October 2014, declining to nominate the site.
Council officers have considered the issues raised by SIMTA, as well as comments provided by the OEH in declining the State Heritage listing of the site. This report recommends that Council proceed with the proposed local heritage listing of the DNSDC site.
That Council adopts the Draft Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment 37) and forwards the plan to the NSW Department of Planning and Environment requesting notification (gazettal) of the amendment.
|
REPORT
The DNSDC site (Lot 1 DP 1048263) is located on Moorebank Avenue, Moorebank and is proposed to be developed as an intermodal freight terminal by the Sydney Intermodal Terminal Alliance (SIMTA). The site was previously part of military land and was rezoned to become Moorebank Technology Park in 2004. However the site continues to be leased by the Department of Defence.
Figure 1: Site identification
The DNSDC site contains a variety of heritage buildings and a long heritage association. As the site is classified as Commonwealth land, it is listed on the Commonwealth Heritage List. In particular, the site has 20 timber post and beam buildings dating to World War Two, including the Quartermaster’s Store and the Carpentry Workshop. Other elements of heritage significance include the alignments of rail sidings that once ran through the site and are still visible in the landscape, and part of the School of Military Engineering site (which is already listed as a local heritage item in LLEP 2008).
Heritage assessments undertaken on behalf of the Department of Defence in 2001 and SIMTA in 2012 have both recognised the high heritage significance of the DNSDC site and recommend preservation of the site. However, once the Commonwealth lease ends, to enable development of the proposed intermodal freight terminal, the site will no longer be classified as Commonwealth land and will be removed from the Commonwealth Heritage Register. The heritage value of the site will then no longer be protected.
In response, Council has prepared and exhibited a planning proposal (Attachment 1), in accordance with Council’s resolution at its meeting on 25 September 2013. It sets out draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 37), which seeks to list the DNSDC site on the Local Heritage Register of the LLEP 2008 and thereby ensure ongoing protection of the heritage value of the DNSDC site. At the meeting Council also resolved to write to the OEH and “encourage them to list the site on the State Heritage Register”.
Public authority consultation and public exhibition
The Gateway determination (Attachment 2) of the planning proposal, dated 17 February 2014, stated that the proposed amendment to LLEP 2008 should proceed, subject to conditions requiring the planning proposal to be publicly exhibited and relevant public authorities to be consulted.
Pursuant to the Gateway requirements, the OEH was consulted on draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 37) in March 2014. The OEH did not provide a submission to the proposed amendment.
Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 37) was publicly exhibited for 21 days between Wednesday 11 June 2014 and Wednesday 2 July 2014. Public exhibition was carried out in accordance with clauses 56(2)(c) and 57 of the EP&A Act 1979.
One submission was received by Council. The submission was provided by SIMTA, the owner of the subject site, and did not support the proposed local heritage listing of the DNSDC. The submission also referred to professional advice supporting SIMTA’s objection to the local heritage listing. Council officers requested this document in order to inform the development of Council’s response to the submission. However, by early 2015 it had not been provided to Council, and Council’s response to the issues raised was developed without the additional information. The key issues raised by SIMTA are summarised below, and the SIMTA submission and a table outlining the response of Council officers are at Attachment 3 and Attachment 4 respectively.
Issue raised by SIMTA |
|
Council officers’ response |
Council can be confident that the heritage values of the DNSDC site will continue to be comprehensively considered and appropriately managed in the development of SIMTA’s proposed intermodal terminal facility.
|
|
The DNSDC is a highly significant heritage place that is currently listed on the Commonwealth Heritage List. It is worthy of continued heritage listing for its historic, associational, aesthetic and social significance and rarity and representational values. The future of this heritage place is uncertain and therefore the proposed local heritage listing is being pursued to recognise the significance of the place and ensure the conservation of that significance into the future.
It is noted that no definitive information is available on either the development strategy or mitigating measures that would be employed to respect the heritage significance of the place. Council is not satisfied that the heritage values of the DNSDC site will be appropriately managed by SIMTA.
The listing of the DNSDC site would not prevent any future adaptive re-use of the place but would require mitigating measures to minimize any adverse impact on its heritage values.
|
An intermodal terminal facility of key strategic importance is proposed for the site.
|
|
Noted. However, this does not impact on the recognised heritage significance of the site. |
Any consideration by Council to list the DNSDC site on the local heritage register should be informed by the outcomes of those discussions at the State and Commonwealth level. |
|
Local heritage listing identifies places that are considered to be locally significant. It does not impede listing on the State Heritage Register nor does it require concurrence. The different heritage lists and registers in NSW recognise levels of significance, i.e. local listing for local significance and State Heritage Register listing for state significance.
The protection afforded by local heritage listing provides the legislative basis for ongoing consideration of heritage issues with the adaptive reuse of the DNSDC.
|
The proposal to heritage list the whole of the DNSDC site is too broad. |
|
Liverpool City Council does not dispute that there are elements within the subject site that are of lesser or no significance. Most heritage places have a hierarchy of significance which identifies the relative significance of all elements at the place, enabling effective management of change. The hierarchy of significance would generally support the most alteration to elements and areas of lower significance while elements of high significance are conserved as much as possible.
The heritage listing of a lot boundary curtilage would not imbue all elements with the same level of significance but instead recognise the historical significance of the site as a whole.
|
Assessment of the heritage impacts of the proposed intermodal terminal has already been undertaken by SIMTA as part of the concept plan application. |
|
Noted. Concept approval was obtained on 29 September 2014. The approval requires that “mitigation measures should be considered for heritage impacts, without being limited to, adaptive re-use of buildings or building elements on site”.
This finding of the Planning Assessment Commission would be supported by the local heritage listing of the DNSDC site.
|
The Department of Planning and Environment has imposed conditions requiring SIMTA to consider heritage impacts on the site as part of any future development application. |
|
Noted. As stated above, the concept approval required the implementation of mitigating measures to minimise adverse heritage impacts. The local listing of the DNSDC site would support the findings of the Planning Assessment Commission. |
Nomination for listing on the State Heritage Register
Council wrote to the OEH on 24 December 2013 to formally nominate the DNSDC for the State Heritage Register. The OEH responded on 8 October 2014 (Attachment 5), declining the nomination for the site on the basis that:
· The site’s heritage value is currently protected by its listing on the Commonwealth Heritage List;
· The site’s heritage value will continue to be protected by Council’s proposed local heritage listing;
· The heritage value of the site will be considered as part of the future intermodal terminal development application for the site; and
· A number of the newer buildings in the area proposed to be heritage listed are not compatible with contemporary warehousing technologies and practices, limiting the scope for adaptive reuse in the nominated area.
Conclusion
Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 37) has been prepared and exhibited in accordance with the resolution of Council on 25 September 2013. The intent of the amendment is to list the DNSDC site on the local heritage register of LLEP 2008 and thereby ensure ongoing protection of the heritage value of the site.
In line with the requirements of the Gateway determination, in March 2014 the OEH was consulted but did not provide a submission. The draft LEP amendment was publicly exhibited between 11 June 2014 and 2 July 2014. One submission was received, from SIMTA as the owner of the site, and made several comments about the proposed changes.
SIMTA’s submission also referred to professional advice supporting its views. Council officers requested the additional advice from SIMTA, however by early 2015 this had not been provided, and evaluation of issues raised in the submission thus took place without it.
Council also wrote to the OEH in December 2013 to request that the DNSDC site be listed on the State Heritage Register. The OEH responded in October 2014, declining Council’s nomination of the site.
Council officers have considered the issues raised by SIMTA, as well as comments provided by the OEH in declining the request for State Heritage listing of the site. No changes have subsequently been made to the planning proposal or draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 37).
It is recommended that Council proceed with the proposed local heritage listing of the site. Council has been granted delegation with regard to making this amendment. As such, if endorsed by Council, the required documentation can be submitted to the NSW Department of Planning and Environment for notification (gazettal).
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning ProposalView
2. Gateway determinationView
3. SIMTA submissionView
4. Table of issues raised in public consultationView
5. NSW Office of Environment and Heritage response to Council's nomination of the DNSDC site for State Heritage Listing
253 |
|
DPG 01 |
Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 37) - Heritage Listing of the Defence National Storage and Distribution Centre |
Attachment 1 |
Planning Proposal |
DPG 01 |
Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 37) - Heritage Listing of the Defence National Storage and Distribution Centre |
Attachment 2 |
Gateway determination |
DPG 01 |
Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 37) - Heritage Listing of the Defence National Storage and Distribution Centre |
Attachment 3 |
SIMTA submission |
DPG 01 |
Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 37) - Heritage Listing of the Defence National Storage and Distribution Centre |
Attachment 4 |
Table of issues raised in public consultation |
DPG 01 |
Draft LLEP 2008 (Amendment 37) - Heritage Listing of the Defence National Storage and Distribution Centre |
Attachment 5 |
NSW Office of Environment and Heritage response to Council's nomination of the DNSDC site for State Heritage Listing |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Planning and Growth Report
DPG 02 |
Draft Social Impact Assessment Policy and Draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 19) - Post-public exhibition |
Strategic Direction |
Liveable Safe City Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development |
Key Policy |
Urban Development Plans |
File Ref |
178938.2015 |
Report By |
Benny Horn - Strategic Planner |
Approved By |
Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth |
Executive Summary
At its 17 June 2015 meeting, Council resolved to endorse the draft Social Impact Assessment (SIA) Policy and draft Liverpool Development Control Plan (LDCP) 2008 (Amendment 19) and place the documents “on public exhibition, with a further report to be provided to Council following public exhibition”. This followed an independent review of the documents by an expert on social impact assessment, in accordance with Council’s resolution at its 25 March 2015 meeting.
The draft documents establish steps and guidelines for the assessment of social impacts as part of the formulation of Council plans and policies and applications for certain types of development.
Public exhibition was undertaken between 18 June and 16 July 2015, with five submissions received. One submission expressed support for the changes and, along with three other submissions, voiced concern about the level of community consultation preceding rezoning in Moorebank. The remaining submission did not support the proposed changes, and suggested raising the threshold for the provision of a social impact assessment for residential development.
As a result of public exhibition and internal feedback, one minor change to the draft documents was made, adding educational establishments to the table of types of development for which a social impact assessment is required.
It is recommended that Council adopt the draft SIA Policy and draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 19). The draft documents are attached to this report for adoption by Council.
That Council:
1. Adopts the draft Social Impact Assessment Policy.
2. Adopts the draft Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 (Amendment 19), to come into effect upon publication of the required notice in the local newspaper.
|
REPORT
Background
Social Impact Assessment (SIA) refers to the process in which plans, policies and applications for change to either the physical or cultural landscape of the area are reviewed and assessed in relation to the likely impact of these changes on the community. Social impacts can include changes to way of life, inter-generational equity, health and culture in a community, and the capacity of a community to sustain these things.
At its 26 November 2014 meeting, Council requested a detailed report to include controls relating to social impact assessment. Council staff subsequently presented the draft SIA Policy and draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 19) to Council at its 25 March 2015 meeting. The draft Policy and draft DCP amendment set out requirements for the assessment of social impacts as part of applications for certain types of development, Council plans and policies.
In accordance with Council’s resolution on 25 March 2015, an experienced social scientist was engaged by Council to undertake an independent expert review of the proposed changes. In line with the recommendations of the expert review, Council staff made a number of changes to the draft documents, including the addition of a reference in the SIA Policy to the establishment of a local Social Impacts Advisory Panel (SIAP). The SIAP, comprising a pool of external advisors with expertise in a range of social impact issues, could advise Council when DAs which raise significant social impacts are received.
At its 17 June 2015 meeting, Council resolved to endorse the amended draft SIA Policy and draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 19), and place the draft documents “on public exhibition, with a further report to be provided to Council following public exhibition”.
Public exhibition
Public exhibition was undertaken between 18 June 2015 and 16 July 2015, in accordance with clause 18 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000. Five submissions were received by Council.
One submission expressed support for the proposed changes, linking support for the changes to concerns about the level of community consultation that preceded rezoning for higher density residential development in Moorebank in 2008. Three submissions also voiced concerns regarding previous community consultation processes in Moorebank, but did not directly address the draft changes to requirements for social impact assessment. The remaining submission did not support the proposed changes, suggesting a higher threshold for the number of dwellings in a residential development before social impact assessment is required. Please see Attachment 1 for the issues raised in the submissions, and the response of Council staff.
Following consideration of the submissions received and internal feedback, one minor change to the draft SIA Policy and draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 19) has been made: the addition of educational establishments to the table of types of development for which a Social Impact Comment (a brief assessment providing an initial scoping on social impacts) is required. This provides Council with a mechanism to consider concerns about development and expansion of schools, such as insufficient provision of open space.
The amended draft documents included as Attachments 2 and 3 respectively.
Conclusion
The attached draft SIA Policy and draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 19) have been prepared in accordance with previous resolutions of Council. The intent of the proposed changes is to set out clear requirements for the assessment of social impacts as part of plans, policies and applications for certain types of development.
In line with Council’s resolution at its 17 June 2015 meeting, the draft documents were publicly exhibited between 18 June and 16 July 2015. Five submissions were received, with one expressing support for the proposal. This submission, along with three others, also voiced concerns about the level of community consultation preceding rezoning for higher density development in Moorebank. The fifth submission did not support the proposed changes, and suggested a higher threshold for residential development before social impact assessment is required. Following consideration of the submissions and internal feedback, one minor change was made to the draft documents to add educational establishments to the table of types of development for which a social impact assessment is required.
It is recommended that Council adopt the draft SIA Policy and draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 19). With regard to the LDCP 2008 amendment, if adopted it will come into effect upon publication of the required notice in the local newspaper.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Public interest is taken into consideration when assessing applications for development and liquor/gaming machine licences. Support policies and plans that optimize social outcomes and community wellbeing. Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media. Foster neighbourhood pride and a sense of responsibility. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Table of issues raised in public submissionsView
2. Draft Social Impact Assessment PolicyView (Under separate cover)
3. Draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 19)View
295 |
|
DPG 02 |
Draft Social Impact Assessment Policy and Draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 19) - Post-public exhibition |
Attachment 1 |
Table of issues raised in public submissions |
DPG 02 |
Draft Social Impact Assessment Policy and Draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 19) - Post-public exhibition |
Attachment 3 |
Draft LDCP 2008 (Amendment 19) |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Planning and Growth Report
DPG 03 |
Review of Permit Parking Policy |
Strategic Direction |
Accessible Connected City Provide safe and easy travel with a high quality road and traffic management network |
Key Policy |
Traffic and Transport Plan |
File Ref |
209423.2015 |
Report By |
Alex Helderman - Parking Services Coordinator |
Approved By |
Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth |
Executive Summary
At its meeting on 6 February 2013 Council adopted a Permit Parking Policy associated with the introduction of ticketed parking. The Policy allows Council to issue parking permits with the aim to minimise the impact of ticketed parking on residents and business operators in the Liverpool City Centre.
In accordance with Council’s Policy and Procedure Guide, adopted on 21 October 2014, the existing Policy has been reviewed.
The review has been carried out taking into consideration representations received from Councillors, the State Member for Liverpool and local residents to extend the Permit Parking Scheme to cover the whole (Local Government Area) LGA.
This report recommends the following changes to the Permit Parking Policy:
· Expand the Scheme to cover the whole LGA;
Introduce an assessment criterion to manage customer requests for the introduction of Resident Parking Schemes.
That Council:
1. Receives and notes this report
2. Adopts the draft revised Permit Parking Policy
3. Includes the draft revised Permit Parking Policy in its communication strategy |
REPORT
Council at its meeting held on Monday 23 July 2012 considered a report on the CBD Parking Strategy Review and resolved among others to:
“Prepare a Draft Permit Parking Policy to be presented to Council at its meeting to be held on 20 August 2012.”
Subsequently, following community consultation the Permit Parking Policy was adopted by Council on 6 February 2013.
The Permit Parking Policy adopted by Council on 6 February 2013 addressed issues associated with the introduction of ticketed parking in the Liverpool City Centre and to minimise the impact on residents and business operators. The current Policy only covers the Liverpool City Centre.
Review of current policy
Clause 4.8 of Council’s Policy and Procedure Guide, adopted on 21 October 2014, specifies that all Council resolved policies should be reviewed every two-years.
In line with this Guide the Permit Parking Policy has been reviewed in consultation with the Local Traffic Committee.
The review has taken into consideration the following issues.
· Expansion of the Scheme to cover the whole LGA;
This has been done in response to representations from Councilors, the State Member for Liverpool and local residents for parking permits to be issued to address concerns about regular commuter parking on residential streets in areas including the Warwick Farm precinct, Casula and Holsworthy.
The recommended expansion of the draft revised Policy would authorise Council to issue permits across the whole LGA where required.
· Introduction of an assessment criterion to manage customer requests for the introduction of Resident Parking Schemes
The proposed assessment criterion ensures a consistent approach in dealing with requests for the introduction of permit parking schemes.
Section 7 - Eligibility Criteria
This section now provides permits for residents who reside within the Liverpool City Centre (Section 7.3) and those who reside outside the Liverpool City Centre (Section 7.4).
Residents who reside within the Liverpool City Centre may be eligible for a Resident Parking Permit and Resident’s Visitors Parking Permit; whereas residents who reside outside the Liverpool City Centre may be eligible for a Resident Parking Permit only.
Section 7.5 - Assessment process for the request of Resident Parking Scheme
To ensure the requests for Resident Parking Schemes (RPS) are handled in a consistent manner an assessment process has been developed. This approach is in line with other Sydney Metropolitan Councils.
Following the receipt of either a petition or five individual requests in a 12–month period from owner / occupiers, who reside in the same street, Council will conduct an on-street parking utilisation survey. The street will be surveyed three times per day (morning, noon and afternoon) for three days. If the survey reveals an on-street occupancy of 80% or greater, a resident survey will be conducted to ascertain the residents’ acceptance of parking restrictions on their street.
The on-street parking occupancy of 80% is calculated on the number of available parking spaces in the street compared to the number of vehicles parked in the street. Surveys will not be undertaken during school holidays, public holidays, Easter or Christmas.
If 51% or more of the residents agree to the introduction of a RPS with associated parking restrictions, a report will be prepared and referred to the Local Traffic Committee for consideration and Council for approval.
In the event that the on-street parking utilisation is below 80% or resident support for the scheme is below 51%, the scheme will not be introduced and the residents notified accordingly.
It is taken that residents who do not respond to the survey have no objection to the introduction of the scheme.
Budget Impact
The implementation of the draft revised Permit Parking Policy can be funded from Council’s existing budget for 2015/2016.
Subject to demand for Permit Parking Schemes outside the Liverpool City Centre, additional funding will be sought for future Council budgets for the implementation and enforcement of the Scheme.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Provide efficient parking for the City Centre |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Support the delivery of a range of transport options |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Deliver services that are customer focused |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Draft Permit Parking Policy Review View
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Planning and Growth Report
DPG 04 |
Recommendation to refuse application for rezoning of 1 and 67 Orange Grove Road, Liverpool |
Strategic Direction |
Liveable Safe City Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development |
Key Policy |
Urban Development Plans |
File Ref |
184328.2015 |
Report By |
Graham Matthews - Strategic Planner |
Approved By |
Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth |
Executive Summary
Council received an application to rezone land at 1 and 67 Orange Grove Road (Lots 11&12 DP881728), Liverpool from RE2 – Private Recreation to R2 – Low Density Residential on 25 October 2013. On 3 January 2014, Council wrote to the proponent raising a number of concerns with the proposal and requesting additional supporting information. This information has not been forthcoming. On 17 December 2014 the proponent met with the Mayor and senior staff and indicated an intention to substantially alter the proposal.
On 27 February 2015 Council wrote to the proponent requesting withdrawal of the current application and inviting the proponent to lodge a new application which addresses Council’s concerns and reflects their current plans for the site. The proponent has failed to respond to Council’s request. This report therefore recommends that Council refuse the application, and refunds a portion of the proponent’s application fees. The proponent is entitled to lodge a new application to rezone the site.
That Council:
1. Refuses the application to rezone land at 1 and 67 Orange Grove Road from RE2 – Private Recreation to R2 – Low Density Residential.
2. Writes to the proponent, pursuant to Clause 10A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2000, to inform them that this proposal is not supported.
3. Refunds $6000 of the fees paid at the time of lodgement of the rezoning application to the proponent in accordance with Council’s Statement of Revenue Policy. |
REPORT
Background
On 25 October 2013, Council received an application to rezone land at 1 and 67 Orange Grove Road (Lots 11&12 DP881728), Liverpool from RE2 – Private Recreation to R2 – Low Density Residential (see Attachment 1). On January 3 Council wrote to the proponent outlining a range of serious concerns regarding the application and requesting further information on the following matters (See Attachment 2):
· Flooding: The subject site is flood prone with the land subject to high and medium flood risk. The proponent was requested to redesign their flood study, based on Council’s most recent flood information; to demonstrate that the proposed filling of land would not adversely affect flood behaviour under all design flood events; and to include an assessment of flood impacts which would result from increasing the impervious surface of the site. The proponent was also advised of the Office of Water requirements for the retention of appropriate riparian corridors.
· Flora and Fauna Report: A consultant engaged by Council to review the Flora and Fauna Report submitted by the proponent raised significant concerns regarding the evidence provided in the proponent’s report and requested that a revised report be submitted which addressed all concerns raised.
· Traffic Impact Assessment: Significant concerns were raised regarding the Traffic Impact Assessment submitted by the proponent. The proponent was requested to incorporate additional information relating to intersection performance, development potential, access, location of proposed roads and other related matters.
· Bushfire Protection: The subject site is bushfire prone. The application did not address Section 117 Ministerial Direction 4.4 – Planning for Bushfire Protection. The proponent was requested to revise their planning proposal to address the requirements of the Ministerial Direction.
· Lot Sizes: Forty nine proposed lots were identified on the
proponent’s masterplan as being 250sqm, smaller than the minimum 300sqm
lot size required for detached dwellings. The proponent was requested to
provide justification for the proposed variation.
· Rezoning of the Riparian Corridor to RE1 Public Recreation: Council acknowledged and welcomed the proposal to dedicate land along the Cabramatta Creek to Council as RE1- Public Recreation zoned land. Council also requested that the proponent negotiate a Voluntary Planning Agreement which would respond to the requirements of the Environmentally Sensitive land mapped on the site.
Council’s letter concluded that “Council cannot support your application until such time as the above mentioned issues are addressed to Council’s satisfaction.” Although Council Officers were advised by the proponent on a number of occasions, that a response to Council’s request for more information was in preparation, no information has been received to date.
On 17 December 2014 the proponent met with the Mayor and senior Council Officers and stated their intentions to substantially alter the proposal for the subject site and significantly change the site layout. The proponent intended to develop land zoned R4 – High Density Residential, which was not referenced in the original submission.
On 27 February 2015, Council’s Director of Planning and Growth sent a letter to the proponent (See Attachment 3) which stated;
“A modification to the planning proposal which incorporated high density residential uses would require a reassessment of the planning proposal as a whole. Council would consider this an entirely new proposal.
“Should you wish to formally proceed with rezoning to R4 – High Density residential, in addition to R2 – Low Density Residential, Council would require a new planning proposal to be lodged reflecting the new form of development proposed.”
Council Officers have been in contact with the proponent, who has indicated that the submission of a new application and supporting information is imminent. To date, however, nothing has been received.
Identification of the subject site
The subject site is described as 1 and 67 Orange Grove Road (Lots 11&12 DP881728), Liverpool. Its former use was as the Cumberland Grove Country Club, a use which is now redundant. The area of the site is approximately twelve hectares.
Figure 1: Subject site shown shaded. Cabramatta Creek lies to the north of the site.
Source: NearMap
Figure 2: The subject site (shaded) zoned RE2 – Private Recreation. Note low density housing to the south, and the Orange Grove Stand Alone Centre to the east.
Source: Council GIS
Recommended action
Pursuant to Council’s letter to the proponent dated 27 February 2015, and in consideration of the fact that the proponent has not formally responded to Council’s request for further information dated 3 January 2014, it is recommended that Council refuse this application.
It is further recommended that Council write to the applicant, pursuant to Clause 10A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2000, and notify the proponent that this application to rezone land at 1 and 67 Orange Grove Road, Liverpool from RE2 – Private Recreation to R2 – Low density residential is not supported by Council. It is further noted that Council’s Statement of Revenue Policy dictates that $6000 of the fee paid by the proponent shall be refunded where consideration of a planning proposal does not result in a resolution to proceed with the Section 56 (Gateway Review) notification.
It is noted that Council’s refusal of the subject application does not preclude the proponent from lodging a new planning proposal for the subject site. Council’s letter to the proponent dated 27 February 2015 invites the proponent to submit such a revised proposal.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations beyond the refund of $6000 of the original $26,000 fee paid on application. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Manage the environmental health of waterways. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Proponent's Planning ProposalView (Under separate cover)
2. Letter to the proponent dated 3 January 2014View (Under separate cover)
3. Letter to the proponent dated 27 February 2015View (Under separate cover)
330
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Planning and Growth Report
DPG 05 |
Protection of the Environment Operations (POEO (Clean Air)) Amendment (Heaters and Fireplaces) Regulation 2015 |
Strategic Direction |
Healthy Inclusive City Improve health and wellbeing and encourage a happy, active community |
Key Policy |
Protection of the Environment Operations (Clean Air) Regulations 2010 |
File Ref |
199844.2015 |
Report By |
Nada Mardini - Manager Community Standards |
Approved By |
Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth |
Executive Summary
On 5 March 2015 the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) provided Council with the opportunity to review the draft Protection of the Environment Operations (POEO (Clean Air)) Amendment (Heaters and Fireplaces) Regulation 2015. As part of this process, Council is required to respond to their questionnaire and advise the NSW EPA in writing of their inclusion in the Regulation’s Schedule.
The amendments to the Protection of the Environment Operations Act (Clean Air) Regulation 2010 will incorporate:
- A new schedule of additional controls that Councils will be able to choose to implement.
- Updated Australian/New Zealand standards for wood heaters which set more stringent emission limits and new efficient limits.
NSW EPA are currently seeking comments and submissions from Councils across NSW on the proposed wood smoke control framework.
That Council: 1. Notes the proposed amendments to the Protection of the Environment (Clean Air) Regulation 2010 and adopts the following options:
a. Prohibit the installation of new or replacement solid fuel heaters within residential zones R1, R2, R3 and R4.
b. That from 1 September 2016 new or replacement solid fuel wood heaters in Zone RU1, RU2, RU4 and R5 must have:
i. A minimum efficiency of 60% as tested in accordance with AS/NZS 4012:2014 and ii. Emission factor of 1.5g/kg for non-catalytic and 0.8 g/kg for catalytic heaters as tested in accordance with AS/NZS 4013:2014
2. Responds to the NSW EPA Local Government Wood Smoke Survey accordingly.
3. Notes that Council officers will also progress amendments to Council’s DCP to reflect these provisions.
|
REPORT
Background information
It is widely reported that air pollution accumulates in the Western Sydney Basin due to its landform characteristics. According to WSROC, the shape of the Sydney Basin and prevailing wind directions mean that air quality in Western Sydney is worse on almost all measures when compared to other areas. This is disturbing as planned growth centres in south-western Sydney will locate large populations in areas where pollution is expected to concentrate.
Given that is the case solid fuel heating will greatly impact on local air quality if not adequately regulated. The adverse environmental and health effects associated with wood smoke underline the importance of responsible solid fuel heater installation and operation.
The growth in wood fire heaters and the resulting smoke accounts for more than 60 per cent of Sydney’s winter air pollution, triggering complications among asthmatics, emphysema and chronic bronchitis sufferers. NSW Chief Medical Officer Kerry Chant stated that long-term exposure to particulate pollution, especially finer particles known as PM2.5 can cause heart and lung disease. In addition, brief exposure can aggravate asthma and worsen pre-existing heart and lung conditions.
Air quality impacts arising from the operation of solid fuel heaters can be summarised as follows:
· The NSW EPA found that wood-heaters are a major source of Sydney’s fine particle emissions during winter. Other sources such as road transport, industry and non-road equipment are a much smaller fraction of the total;
· Over a five year period wood smoke PM2.5 emissions increased from 4503 tonnes to 5669 tonnes in 2008;
· Between 2008 and 2011 the number of Sydney households burning wood for heating increased from 70,700 to 83,000;
· The cost to health of wood smoke emissions across urban, regional and rural areas was estimated to be $8.1 billion over the next 20 years; and
· In the Sydney region, domestic solid fuel combustion contributes 47% of PM2.5 particle pollution. In July 2014 PM2.5 was 75 per cent.
(Sydney Morning Herald (dated 29 June 2014)
According to the Australian Air Quality Group, only a small proportion of households in Sydney use wood heaters. However, sampling undertaken in Liverpool revealed that nearly half of PM2.5 particles were attributed to domestic wood heaters. This is concerning as wood heater use in the Liverpool Local Government Area is 6.7% lower than other regions including Baulkham Hills, Blacktown and Penrith.
Table 1 illustrates wood heater use in Sydney. (Source: AECOM 2011)
There has also been a rise in complaints associated with air pollution, in particular the use of solid fuel heaters causing excessive smoke and offensive odour within Liverpool City Local Government Area. It is apparent that there is a need to consider prohibiting the use of solid fuel heating and open fire places within residential zones.
Key Issues
The amendments to the Protection of the Environment Operations (Clean Air) Regulation 2010 propose to include a new Schedule (Schedule 9) with additional controls where Councils can choose to be listed in one or more Parts of the Schedule. As part of the consultation process the NSW Environment Protection Authority has forwarded a survey to all NSW Councils requesting nomination of specific wood smoke control options. A complete copy of the survey that has been forwarded to Council is shown in Appendix A.
The questions contained within the survey are of an operational nature however it is considered that question 8 (below) would require the consideration of Council as the answer will result in the nomination of Liverpool Council in the new schedule of legislation controlling the use of wood heaters. The survey question has been divided into three parts and a response is required for each of the parts. It is recommended that Council responds to the NSW EPA as below:
NSW EPA proposes that the wording of the draft legislation remain as is shown in the above new schedule and no alterations to the wording will be accepted within the state wide legislation. However, Councils can place additional controls in their DCP. It is proposed to incorporate the following wording into Council’s Development Control Plans.
No new solid fuel heating appliances in the Liverpool City Local Government Area within residential zones that include R1, R2, R3, R4 as per the Liverpool LEP 2008. For remaining zones Liverpool City Local Government Area shall be specified in Part 1, 2 and 3 of Schedule 9 of the Regulation;
Implications for answering ‘yes’ within part 1 of the draft Regulation Schedule
The reason for answering ‘yes’ within Part 1 of the new schedule is to ensure that no new wood heaters are accepted within R1, R2, R3, R4 as per the Liverpool LEP 2008. For remaining zones Liverpool City Local Government Area shall be specified in Part 1 of Schedule 9 of the Regulation;
Implications for answering ‘yes’ within Part 2 of the draft Regulation Schedule
The reason for answering ‘yes’ within Part 2 of the new schedule applies to the remaining zones such as RU1, RU2, RU4 and R5 listed under the Liverpool LEP 2008. Wood heating appliances complying with the above standards as listed in Part 2 would continue to be subject to any relevant provisions of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act and/or the Local Government Act.
Wood heating appliances that have efficiency and emission levels greater than those listed above shall not be approved.
Implications for answering ‘yes’ within part 3 of the draft Regulation Schedule
The reason for answering ‘yes’ within Part 3 of the new schedule is to ensure that no new open fire places are accepted within R1, R2, R3, R4 as per the Liverpool LEP 2008. For remaining zones Liverpool City Local Government Area shall be specified in Part 1 of Schedule 9 of the Regulation;
Existing wood heaters and open fireplaces
NSW EPA have advised that due to limitations to the EPA’s powers under environmental legislation the amendment to the regulation does not include an option to phase out existing wood heaters and open fireplaces. This option is likely to be resource-intensive and may result in significant financial impacts on households. It is proposed that Council continues with its Woodsmoke Reduction program to educate households that have existing solid fuel heaters.
Commencement of the changes to the POEO (Clean Air) regulation 2010
Subsequent to submissions from the community, industry and government stakeholders, the NSW Government will proceed with the regulation amendment. The draft regulation will be amended to include Councils that choose the additional controls in the schedule. The new regulation will be published in the NSW Government Gazette and the new framework will commence from 1 September 2016.
It should be noted that inclusion in the schedule would not impact on wood heaters currently installed throughout the Liverpool LGA.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Prohibiting the installation of new wood heaters in R1, R2, R3 and R4 as per the Liverpool LEP 2008 will reduce any unnecessary regulatory burden on Council and financial impacts on the local community. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Woodsmoke is a significant environmental and public health issue relevant to the entire Liverpool City Local Government Area.
Non-compliant and poorly operated wood heaters create localised smoke and odour pollution nuisances and contribute to ambient particle pollution with likely adverse health impacts within the community. Wood smoke also affects local air quality due to topography, weather patterns and population density.
Implementation of the legislation will result in the reduction of wood smoke throughout the Liverpool City Local Government Area. |
Social and Cultural |
To improve the health and well-being of the community within Liverpool LGA.
Improvements in air quality associated with increased controls over wood smoke and other related impacts has the potential to reduce complaints between neighbours. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
The amendment to the regulation and Council’s DCP/LEP provides Council with additional legal powers to control particulate pollution from solid fuel heaters. Reduce the impact of community concern regarding wood smoke issues. |
ATTACHMENTS
343 |
|
DPG 05 |
Protection of the Environment Operations (POEO (Clean Air)) Amendment (Heaters and Fireplaces) Regulation 2015 |
Attachment 1 |
NSW EPA Local Government Woodsmoke Survey |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Planning and Growth Report
DPG 06 |
Changes to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Charter |
Strategic Direction |
Liveable Safe City Deliver an efficient planning system which embraces sustainable urban renewal and development |
Key Policy |
Urban Development Plans |
File Ref |
199959.2015 |
Report By |
Lina Kakish - Manager Development Assessment |
Approved By |
Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth |
Executive Summary
This report outlines proposed minor changes to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel (IHAP) Charter and Procedure to facilitate further improvements to the IHAP processes.
The current Charter was endorsed by Council at its meeting of 20 June 2014.
Minor changes are proposed as follows to further streamline IHAP processes:
· Clarify the interpretation of multiple unresolved objections from the same household or property;
· Correct a grammatical error in the current wording regarding variations to a development standard; and
· Delegate to the CEO authority to refuse development applications where the application is incomplete or insufficient.
The proposed changes will be discussed further within this report and reflected in the attached draft IHAP Charter and Procedure.
That Council:
1. Adopts the revised Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Charter and Procedure as attached to this report.
2. Amends the IHAP delegation of 2 December 2013 to reflect those changes within the revised IHAP Charter and Procedure.
3. Delegates authority to the CEO to approve and amend the IHAP procedure from time to time, in consultation with the members of the IHAP and the community. |
REPORT
On 20 June 2014, Council resolved to endorse the proposed changes to the IHAP charter as follows:
1. Adopts the revised Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Charter and Procedure as attached to this report.
2. Amends the IHAP delegation of 30 October 2013 by including a new Clause (c) as follows to reflect the requirement for all development applications proposing a variation to a development standard of 10% or greater to be decided by Council:
(c) That all development applications where there has been a variation to a development standard of 10% or greater, be determined by the elected Council in accordance with Clause 4.6 of Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008.
3. Notes that a further report will be provided to Council at a future meeting on assessment panel options as part of a broader review of development assessment delegations.
Discussion
The draft revised IHAP Charter (Attachment 1) proposes minor amendments to further streamline development assessment processes.
Following are the proposed revised referral triggers:
1. Those Class 2 to 9 Buildings under the Building Code of Australia (BCA) where there are five or more unresolved objections, except where the application is being refused on the grounds of incomplete or insufficient information to enable a complete and proper assessment of the application in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979;
2. Any matter that involves a variation to the Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 of greater than 10% (the current IHAP Charter stipulates a variation of 10% or greater); and
3. Multiple submissions received from the one household or property to be considered as one unresolved objection.
The development applications referred to above will only be considered by IHAP and Council in circumstances where the Joint Regional Planning Panel is not the determining authority.
The draft revised Charter also proposes that the Chief Executive Officer be delegated authority to refuse an application on the grounds of insufficient or incomplete information which is required for a complete and proper assessment of the application, despite five or more unresolved objections.
Each of these key changes is discussed separately below.
Variations to development standards
The IHAP Charter adopted by Council on 20 June 2014 stated that variations of 10% or greater are required to be referred to IHAP and the full Council for determination. However, the NSW Planning and Infrastructure’s Planning Circular PS 11-018 and supporting Guide to Varying Development Standards require the referral of an application to IHAP and Council only where a variation of greater than 10% is proposed. The revised Charter has been amended accordingly.
Delegation to the CEO
The Charter also proposes the delegation of authority to the CEO to refuse any development application which is incomplete or where insufficient information has been provided to enable a complete and proper assessment in accordance with the Environmental Planning Act 1979, despite five or more unresolved objections having been received.
The Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2000, require any development application to be accompanied by particular documentation to enable a complete and proper assessment of the application against the matters of consideration as outlined within Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. When a development application is not accompanied by the required information, the assessment of the proposed development cannot be properly completed by Council officers and as a result, an informed recommendation relating to the merits of an application cannot be made. In this circumstance, the application is recommended for refusal on the basis of the application being incomplete, rather than a recommendation being made in respect to the merits of an application.
Accordingly, an amendment to the delegation of 2 December 2013 and to the IHAP Charter is proposed.
Submissions
It is proposed to provide further clarity in respect to the submission trigger for referral to IHAP by defining multiple unresolved objections from the same property as one unresolved objection.
Any matters raised by multiple objectors from the same household or property, are taken to be one unresolved objection by Council officers. It would be unreasonable to count multiple objections from the same household separately when the impacts of a proposal would be of the same nature.
All submissions are considered during the assessment process by Council’s planning and other relevant technical officers. Referral to IHAP can add two months delay to the decision making timeframe for the determination of a development application. This represents additional cost and uncertainty for applicants. Even where there are fewer than five submissions, matters raised in submissions will still be addressed by Council officers as part of the assessment process.
Conclusion
The proposed changes outlined above will enable development applications to be determined more efficiently while still maintaining transparent, robust decision making processes in compliance with legislative requirements.
This report presents the revised IHAP Charter for Council approval. These changes aim to simplify IHAP processes to further improve development assessment decision making.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Facilitate improved efficiency in development assessment processes to minimise costs and avoid delays in assessment timeframes. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Maintain robust and transparent development assessment processes and community engagement in IHAP considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Deliver services that are customer focused. Operate a well-developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
ATTACHMENTS
351 |
|
DPG 06 |
Changes to the Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel Charter |
Attachment 1 |
IHAP Charter and Procedure |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Planning and Growth Report
DPG 07 |
Business Case to Attend Infor Public Sector User Forum |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations |
Key Policy |
Workforce Management Plan |
File Ref |
207898.2015 |
Report By |
Toni Dait - Team Leader – Business Support |
Approved By |
Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth |
Executive Summary
This report seeks approval for Aden Gutman and Toni Dait to attend a four day Infor (Pathway) Public Sector User Forum, Wellington New Zealand from 7 September 2015 - 11 September 2015.
That Council approves Council officers to represent Liverpool City Council at the Infor Public Sector Forum. |
REPORT
The Infor Public Sector User Forum is the membership of Local Government, Water Authorities and other organisations in Australia and New Zealand who utilise the Pathway PPR applications.
The forum will provide demonstrations on new and emerging technologies in the public sector, as well as the changing nature of our customer relationships and services. This will provide discussions through keynote speakers, user experience sessions, outside the box workshops and Infor Corporate and Public Sector Product Updates.
The Infor Public Sector User Forum promotes and celebrates the outstanding work being undertaken and delivered by individuals and teams working in the public sector using Infor products and services.
The agenda for the conference has been attached for Council’s consideration. Particular interest to Council would be the following:
• ION (Intelligent Open Network)overview - product integration;
• Management of Pathway Templates;
• Changing to Mobile;
• Proactive Dashboards;
• Application referrals online;
• One view of the Customer via Web Services
• Works Management Reporting & Analytics
• Online
Financial Analysis
Expenses |
|
Conference Registration |
$550.00/pp |
Accommodation |
1 Bdrm Apt $650.00 2 Bdrm Apt $950.00 |
Meal Allowance |
Approx $100/day/pp (Developing our People Policy) |
Airfare (see note about travel reimbursement from Infor below) |
Approx $450.00/pp |
Travel Reimbursement
AIR TRAVEL
In respect to delegates travelling by aircraft, one economy class return airfare for the most direct route available from the member location per delegate per meeting will be reimbursed the Infor Public Sector User Forum. Reimbursement is to a maximum of AU$1000.00 per return airfare from any Australian state to New Zealand and a maximum of AU$500.00 per return airfare within New Zealand.
CONDITIONS OF REIMBURSEMENT
In both the above cases, reimbursements will apply to a maximum of four (4) delegates per member organisation and will only be made upon a claim supported by appropriate documentation being lodged with the Treasurer of the Forum and will only be available to financial members. Payments will only be made for claims lodged by 30 June immediately following the conference. Payment will not be made until all outstanding accounts are paid by the member organization
Benefits
As Liverpool Council is leading the state in ePianning this requires Council to stay current with the new technology and enhancements of our systems. Benefits to Council by our representation at the conference will include:
· Integration of our current platform lnfor (Pathway) with third party software applications i.e Technology1 (FastTrack) to provide a simple but powerful and scalable framework, allowing the elimination of operational silos;
· Creation of workflows and alerts that dramatically improve exception management
· Design, standardise, monitor, or change any business process without IT involvement;
· Connect applications to the actions that take place outside of them;
· Customise mobility applications for Planning & Growth
· Monitor business and make better decisions from reporting and analysis;
· Continued training for Planning & Growth staff on Infor (Pathway) and use of smart client on IT rollout;
· Provide a consistent training message;
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Deliver services that are customer focused. Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
ATTACHMENTS
355 |
|
DPG 07 |
Business Case to Attend Infor Public Sector User Forum |
Attachment 1 |
Infor Public Sector User Forum Agenda |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Planning and Growth Report
DPG 08 |
2015-16 Operational Plan and Budget - Proposed new fees and charges - 3D images for new development in the city centre |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Provide business excellence and financial sustainability to deliver services that meet community expectations |
Key Policy |
Long-Term Financial Plan |
File Ref |
207935.2015 |
Report By |
Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth |
Approved By |
Toni Averay - Director Planning & Growth |
Executive Summary
The Local Government Act requires all proposed fees and charges to be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days before adoption by Council.
This report recommends several changes to the Draft Revenue Pricing Policy (Fees and Charges) 2015-16, comprising of the adding of new 3D CAD Model fees.
A summary of the proposed fees is outlined below:
3D CAD model
fees – for all new development proposals in the city centre
It is proposed to require the submission of a 3D CAD image for new development applications and planning proposals for inclusion in the city 3D planning model initially developed as part of the Building our New City program.
All CAD provided is to be 3D. Where a 3D CAD model is not available, Council will arrange a quote on a per job basis. The proposed fee structure is as follows:
Less than $1m development value
|
$2,200.00*
|
Greater than $1m and less than $3m development value
|
$3,300.00* |
Greater than $3m development value |
$6,600.00*
|
*Note: If a design is amended and a new 3D image is submitted for modeling, Council will arrange a quote.
If the changes are minor, an hourly rate can be charged. If the changes are substantial, a new modeling fee may apply.
If endorsed by Council, the fees will be placed on public exhibition to allow for feedback.
That Council:
1. Approves the following fees to be placed on Public Exhibition: 3D CAD model fees – for all new development
proposals in the city centre
*Note: If a design is amended and a new 3D image is submitted for modeling, Council will arrange a quote. If the changes are minor, an hourly rate can be charged. If the changes are substantial, a new modeling fee may apply.
2. Receives a further report following the exhibition process which outlines any submissions made/public feedback. |
REPORT
3D Images for
New Development in the City Centre
Council advertised an RFQ in 2014 for an interactive and navigable 3D model for Liverpool City Centre in 2014. Ineni Realtime was selected as the successful tenderer.
The initial work involved the preparation of 3D images of the city centre. Further 3D models were prepared to support the Building our New City projects, and in particular, the
redevelopment of the Macquarie Mall and Bigge Park. A flyover was developed from the images to represent the planned work.
It was intended that the modelling would be expanded to include new developments to provide a current visual representation of the changing city skyline. It was also anticipated that the 3D modelling capability would assist with the assessment, consultation and exhibition process by providing accurate images for the purposes of assessing shadowing and built form impacts etc. This would involve applicants providing a file in the appropriate format to be uploaded into the model.
The modelling software has been further enhanced over the last 12 months and will now enable a range of CAD formats to be used, essentially meaning that applicants will not be expected to reformat graphical images. Additionally, Ineni can provide a 3D CAD model where an applicant is unable to provide one.
City Planner 3D
Model
The 3D model will assist the council in assessing the visual impacts of development applications and planning proposals within the city centre and has the following features:
· Free orbiting movement aerially over the city to view it from any angle
· Controllable sun shadowing, accurate to the Sydney region
· Tools to make point to point distance measurements
· Ability to scale where necessary
· Terrain detail covers 3km square area of Liverpool CBD
· 3D model area is bounded by the Hume Highway, Terminus Street and the rail line
Proposed new
Fee
It is proposed to
require the submission of a 3D CAD image for new development applications and
planning proposals.
Each applicant will be required to provide a 3D image, or to engage Ineni to produce one, for inclusion in the city 3D planning model. Ineni will accept all 3D CAD models.
This will require the inclusion of a new fee in Council’s Fees and Charges Schedule to pass on the Ineni charges.
Note that it is proposed to replace the current requirement for a 3D scale model to be provided for major development applications with the requirement for the 3D CAD image.
This will represent a significant saving for applicants.
Following is the proposed fee structure. The proposed fees represent Ineni’s fees plus 10% to cover licensing fees and Council’s administration costs.
3D CAD model fees – for all new development proposals in the city centre
All CAD provided is to be 3D. Where a 3D CAD model is not available, Council will arrange a quote on a per job basis.
Less than $1m development value
|
$2,200.00*
|
Greater than $1m and less than $3m development value
|
$3,300.00* |
Greater than $3m development value |
$6,600.00*
|
*Note: If a design is amended and a new 3D image is submitted for modeling, Council will arrange a quote.
If the changes are minor, an hourly rate can be charged. If the changes are substantial, a new modeling fee may apply.
Budget
Implications
· Annual software licence fee, includes free updates every two months - $14,400.00
· Application updates requested outside of the regular bi-monthly cycle - $1,000.00
· Hardware user licence fees - $22,999 one off fee for up to four users. Additional user licences are available at $4,999 per additional user.
· Only four users are currently proposed.
The proposed new fee structure incorporates 10% loading to cover Council’s licensing and administration costs.
If endorsed by Council, the fees will be placed on public exhibition to allow for feedback, with a subsequent report presented to Council summarising responses received.
Consultation
Council’s Manager Information Technology has been consulted regarding this proposal and the Team Leader GIS has reviewed the technical specifications in terms of compatibility with Council’s IT systems and ongoing support. No major issues were identified.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
The financial implications for each of the fees and charges have been outlined in the body of this report. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. Provide information about Council’s services, roles and decision making processes. Ensure Fees and Charges are equitable. |
367
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Committee Reports
CTTE 01 |
Minutes Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on the 5 August 2015 |
Strategic Direction |
Proud Engaged City Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement |
Key Policy |
Community Engagement Policy |
File Ref |
114947.2015 |
Report By |
Sarah Rees - Coordinator Community Development |
Approved By |
Kiersten Fishburn – Director Community and Culture |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2015.
That Council:
1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2015.
2. The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.
|
REPORT
1. The Minutes of the Aboriginal Consultative Committee held on 5 August 2015are attached for the information of Council.
2. The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place. Support community organisations, groups and volunteers to deliver coordinated services to the community. Promote community harmony and address discrimination. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
There are no civic leadership and governance considerations. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Minutes Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2015View
369 |
|
CTTE 01 |
Minutes Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on the 5 August 2015 |
Attachment 1 |
Minutes Aboriginal Consultative Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2015 |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Committee Reports
CTTE 02 |
Minutes of Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce meeting held 5 August 2015 |
Strategic Direction |
Vibrant Prosperous City Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney |
Key Policy |
Economic Development Strategy |
File Ref |
149881.2015 |
Report By |
Nicole Voorhout - Personal Assistant to Director Economic Development |
Approved By |
Michael Cullen – Director Economic Development |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce Meeting held on 5 August 2015.
That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce Meeting held on 5 August 2015.
|
REPORT
1. The Minutes of the Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce held on 5 August 2015 are attached for the information of Council.
2. There are no actions arising from the report that will have financial implications for Council.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
The activities of the Taskforce will support Council’s efforts to advocate to the Commonwealth and NSW Governments for the necessary infrastructure and planning investments to support the Airport and its ability to generate new economic development opportunities for the Liverpool local government area |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Environmental and sustainability factors will be important aspects that need to be considered in development of the Airport at Badgerys Creek. |
Social and Cultural |
The availability of supporting social and cultural facilities will be important considerations in development of the Airport site at Badgerys Creek. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
The Taskforce will assist Council in its advocacy efforts to influence the Commonwealth and NSW Governments decision concerning development of the Airport and its connecting infrastructure. |
ATTACHMENTS
377 |
|
CTTE 02 |
Minutes of Badgerys Creek Airport Taskforce meeting held 5 August 2015 |
Attachment 1 |
MINUTES Badgerys Creek Taskforce 5 August 2015 FINAL |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Committee Reports
CTTE 03 |
Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee meeting held on 4 August 2015 |
Strategic Direction |
Proud Engaged City Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement |
Key Policy |
Community Engagement Policy |
File Ref |
184449.2015 |
Report By |
Ash Chand - Executive Planner |
Approved By |
Toni Averay – Director Planning & Growth |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 4 August 2015.
That Council receives and adopts the Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee Meeting held on 4 August 2015. |
REPORT
The Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee held on 4 August 2015 are attached for the information of Council.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Raise community awareness and support action in relation to environmental issues The media campaign will raise awareness about the potential impacts of the intermodal proposals. The additional budget allocation is sought in order to continue work relating to the intermodal proposals. |
Social and Cultural |
The media campaign will raise awareness about the potential impacts of the intermodal proposals. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Actively advocate for federal and state government support, funding and services. |
ATTACHMENTS
383 |
|
CTTE 03 |
Minutes of the No Intermodal Committee meeting held on 4 August 2015 |
Attachment 1 |
No Intermodal Committee meeting minutes |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Committee Reports
CTTE 04 |
Minutes of Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting held on 3 August 2015 |
Strategic Direction |
Proud Engaged City Protect and preserve Liverpool’s heritage, including its rural landscape and cultural history |
Key Policy |
Heritage Strategy |
File Ref |
184454.2015 |
Report By |
Anna London - Heritage Officer |
Approved By |
Toni Averay – Director Planning & Growth |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting held on 3 August 2015.
That Council
1. Receives and adopts the Minutes of the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting held on 3 August 2015.
2. Adopts the amended Heritage Advisory Committee Charter as recommended by the Committee. |
REPORT
The Minutes of the Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting held on 3 August 2015 are attached for the information of Council.
The Committee recommended that the Charter be amended to enable meetings to proceed if a Councillor is unable to attend but a Quorum is otherwise achieved. The proposed changes are as follows:
8.1 The quorum to enable business to be transacted at meetings shall be half the membership plus one. It is expected that at least one Councillor will attend each Committee meeting. However, in the unavoidable absence of both Councillors, the Manager Strategic Planning can act as Chair if a quorum has otherwise been established. In the absence of the Manager Strategic Planning, an acting Chair can be appointed by the remaining Committee members, subject to a quorum otherwise being achieved.
Additionally the Charter has been reviewed in accordance with Council’s Red Tape Policy Reduction program and amended accordingly.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Preserve and maintain heritage, both landscape and cultural as urban development takes place. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Undertake communication practices with the community and stakeholders across a range of media. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Heritage Advisory Committe minutesView
387 |
|
CTTE 04 |
Minutes of Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting held on 3 August 2015 |
Attachment 1 |
Heritage Advisory Committe minutes |
CTTE 04 |
Minutes of Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting held on 3 August 2015 |
Attachment 2 |
Draft Revised Heritage Advisory Committee Charter |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Committee Reports
CTTE 05 |
Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 22 July 2015 |
Strategic Direction |
Accessible Connected City Provide safe and easy travel with a high quality road and traffic management network |
Key Policy |
Traffic and Transport Plan |
File Ref |
194125.2015 |
Report By |
Charles Wiafe - Manager Traffic and Transport |
Approved By |
Toni Averay – Director Planning & Growth |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 22 July 2015.
That Council:
1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 22 July 2015.
2. Adopts the Local Traffic Committee recommendations as noted in the report below. |
REPORT
1. The Minutes of the Local Traffic Committee meeting held on 22 July 2015 are attached for Council to adopt the recommendations made.
2. The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake. The financial implication of each of the recommendations is noted at the end of this report
Summary of the Local Traffic Committee recommendations:
Item 1 Campbell Street, Liverpool – Proposed Raised Threshold Pedestrian Crossing
That:
1. Council supports the installation of a raised threshold at the existing pedestrian crossing in Campbell Street between Goulburn and Forbes Streets, Liverpool.
2. A detailed design plan of the proposed raised threshold is to be submitted to RMS and NSW Police for their information, prior to installation.
3. All stake holders be advised accordingly of Council’s resolution.
Item 2 Liverpool CBD – Festival of Ganeshostsava - Approval of Traffic Management and Operation Plan
That:
1. The event be classified as a Class 4 event.
2. Conditional approval is granted for the rolling half road closures of Memorial Avenue, Northumberland Street, Moore Street and Macquarie Street subject to the applicant submitting the following:
o A revised traffic management plan showing the revised route and traffic control plan
o A confirmation letter from the NSW Police Force,
o A copy of public liability insurance indemnifying the RMS, Police and Council.
3. The applicant advises the local bus operators and emergency services.
4. The applicant is advised of Council’s resolution.
Item 3 Stockton Avenue, Moorebank – Proposed Raised Threshold Pedestrian Crossing
That:
1. Council supports the installation of a raised threshold marked pedestrian crossing at the existing pedestrian crossing in Stockton Avenue, Moorebank.
2. A speed survey be carried out before the removal of speed cushions.
3. All stakeholders are advised of Council’s resolution.
Item 4 Village Way, Wattle Grove – Proposed Raised Threshold Pedestrian Crossing
That:
1. Council supports the installation of a raised threshold at the existing pedestrian crossing in Village Way, Wattle Grove.
2. A detailed design of the raised pedestrian crossing be submitted to RMS and NSW Police for their review prior to installation.
3. All stake holders be advised accordingly of Council’s resolution.
Item 5 2015-16 Federal Blackspot Funded Projects
That:
1. Council supports the regulatory signs and line marking of the proposed single lane roundabout at the Flowerdale Road and McLean Street intersection.
2. Council supports the regulatory signs and line marking of the proposed minor intersection treatment at Campbell Street and Castlereagh Street intersection as attached with additional No Stopping signs at the intersection of Secant Street and Castlereagh Street.
Budget Impact of Matters Arising from Minutes
Item |
Description |
Funding Arrangements |
1 |
Campbell Street, Liverpool – Proposed Raised Threshold Pedestrian Crossing |
Council’s minor traffic facilities. |
2 |
Liverpool CBD – Festival of Ganeshostsava - Approval of Traffic Management and Operation Plan |
Funded by the applicant. |
3 |
Stockton Avenue, Moorebank – Proposed Raised Threshold Pedestrian Crossing |
Council’s minor traffic facilities. |
4 |
Village Way, Wattle Grove – Proposed Raised Threshold Pedestrian Crossing |
Council’s minor traffic facilities. |
5 |
2015-16 Federal Black Spot Funded Projects |
Grant funding from the Federal Government. |
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
Deliver a high quality local road system including provision and maintenance of infrastructure and management of traffic issues. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Promote an integrated and user friendly public transport service. Support the delivery of a range of transport options. |
Social and Cultural |
Improved traffic and pedestrian safety. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
The recommendation provides opportunity to advocate for the local community. The recommendations are required in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Minutes of the Liverpool Local Traffic Committee Meeting - 22 July 2015View (Under separate cover)
408
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Committee Reports
CTTE 06 |
Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 5 August 2015 |
Strategic Direction |
Vibrant Prosperous City Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney |
Key Policy |
Economic Development Strategy |
File Ref |
198320.2015 |
Report By |
Nicole Voorhout - Personal Assistant to the Director Economic Development |
Approved By |
Michael Cullen – Director Economic Development |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Building Our New City Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2015.
That Council:
1. Receives and notes the Minutes of the Building our New City Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2015.
2. Approves renewal of Council’s membership of the Future Cities Collaborative and extends the services provided by Professor Ed Blakely for an additional 12 months. |
REPORT
1. The Minutes of the Building Our New City Committee meeting held on 5 August 2015 are attached for the information of Council.
2. The Committee discussed the value of the membership of the Future Cities Collaborative and retaining the services of Professor Ed Blakely and it was recommended Council extend both the membership and Professor Ed Blakely’s services for a further 12 months given the implementation phase of the Building Our New City project had been reached and that Professor Blakely’s services would continue to have value during this phase.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
The activities of the Committee support Council’s efforts to further develop a commercial centre that accommodates a variety of employment opportunities. The approximate cost for membership renewal and services by Ed Blakely will incur costs of up to $80,000 (including minor travel costs and incidental costs related to expert speakers from the US Studies Centre) and will be funded from the City Development Fund (CDF). |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Environmental and sustainability considerations will be factored into urban design for key City Centre precincts. |
Social and Cultural |
Revitalisation of the City Centre will embrace a range of arts and space activation opportunities. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
The Committee provides guidance for Council’s Building Our New City Projects. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. MINUTES Building Our New City Committee 5 August 2015 FINAL
413 |
|
CTTE 06 |
Minutes of Building Our New City Committee meeting held 5 August 2015 |
Attachment 1 |
MINUTES Building Our New City Committee 5 August 2015 FINAL |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Committee Reports
CTTE 07 |
Minutes of Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held 5 August 2015 |
Strategic Direction |
Vibrant Prosperous City Position Liverpool as the destination of choice to attract business and investment in South Western Sydney |
Key Policy |
Economic Development Strategy |
File Ref |
199854.2015 |
Report By |
Tracey Lee - Economic Development Assistant |
Approved By |
Michael Cullen – Director Economic Development |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held on 5 August 2015.
That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Economic Development and Events Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2015. |
REPORT
1. The Minutes of the Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held on 5 August 2015 are attached for the information of Council.
2. There are no actions arising from the report that will have financial implications for Council.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
The activities of the Committee support Council’s efforts to facilitate economic development. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
Environmental and sustainability considerations will be factored into economic development activities. |
Social and Cultural |
Economic development will boost demand for cultural and arts activities. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
The Committee provides guidance for Council’s economic development projects and initiatives. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. MINUTES Economic Development and Events Committee 5 August 2015 FINAL
421 |
|
CTTE 07 |
Minutes of Economic Development and Events Committee meeting held 5 August 2015 |
Attachment 1 |
MINUTES Economic Development and Events Committee 5 August 2015 FINAL |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Committee Reports
CTTE 08 |
Minutes of Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 9 July 2015 |
Strategic Direction |
Proud Engaged City Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement |
Key Policy |
Community Engagement Policy |
File Ref |
200857.2015 |
Report By |
Sarah Rees - Coordinator Community Development |
Approved By |
Kiersten Fishburn – Director Community and Culture |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 9 July 2015.
That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 9 July 2015.
|
REPORT
1. The Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee held on 9 July 2015 are attached for the information of Council.
2. The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
All recommendations are accommodated within existing budgets. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
Raise awareness in the community about the available services and facilities. Support access and services for people with a disability. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Facilitate the development of community leaders. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee meeting held on 9 July 2015View
427 |
|
CTTE 08 |
Minutes of Liverpool Access Committee Meeting held on 9 July 2015 |
Attachment 1 |
Minutes of the Liverpool Access Committee meeting held on 9 July 2015 |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Committee Reports
CTTE 09 |
Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 4 August, 2015 |
Strategic Direction |
Proud Engaged City Engage and consult with the community to enhance opportunities for communication and involvement |
Key Policy |
Community Engagement Policy |
File Ref |
202932.2015 |
Report By |
Derek Tweed - Community Development Worker (Youth) |
Approved By |
Kiersten Fishburn – Director Community & Culture |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 4 August, 2015.
That Council receives and notes the Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 4 August 2015.
|
REPORT
1. The Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council held on Tuesday 4 August 2015 are attached for the information of Council.
2. The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Facilitate the development of community leaders. Encourage the community to engage in Council initiatives and actions. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Minutes Liverpool Youth Council August 2015View
431 |
|
CTTE 09 |
Minutes of the Liverpool Youth Council Meeting held on Tuesday 4 August, 2015 |
Attachment 1 |
Minutes Liverpool Youth Council August 2015 |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Committee Reports
CTTE 10 |
Minutes of the Planning and Development Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2015 |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Position Council as an industry leader, delivering best practice and innovation |
Key Policy |
Long-Term Financial Plan |
File Ref |
204795.2015 |
Report By |
Sheela Naidu - Personal Assistant to Director Planning & Growth |
Approved By |
Toni Averay – Director Planning & Growth |
Executive Summary
This report is tabled in order to present the Minutes of the Planning and Development Meeting held on 5 August 2015.
That Council receives and adopts the Minutes of the Planning and Development Meeting held on 5 August 2015.
|
REPORT
The Minutes of the Planning and Development Committee held on 5 August are attached for the information of Council. The Minutes identify a number of actions that require Council staff to undertake, none of which will have any financial impact on Council.
CONSIDERATIONS
Economic and Financial |
There are no economic and financial considerations. |
Environmental and Sustainability |
There are no environmental and sustainability considerations. |
Social and Cultural |
There are no social and cultural considerations. |
Civic Leadership and Governance |
Operate a well developed governance system that demonstrates accountability, transparency and ethical conduct. |
ATTACHMENTS
1. Draft Minutes of Planning and Development Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2015 - pdf
441 |
|
CTTE 10 |
Minutes of the Planning and Development Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2015 |
Attachment 1 |
Draft Minutes of Planning and Development Committee Meeting held on 5 August 2015 - pdf |
443
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Questions with Notice
QWN 01 |
Question with Notice - Clr Hadchiti |
Strategic Direction |
Vibrant Prosperous City Activate the city centre and develop vibrant places that attract people to Liverpool |
Key Policy |
City Centre Strategy |
File Ref |
197273.2015 |
QUESTION WITH NOTICE
Please address the following:
In relation to Westfield Liverpool
1. What are the approved trading hours?
A search of Council’s records has identified that a significant number of applications were destroyed in Council’s fire of 2010. While some records were found in respect to some change of use applications, there was no record of any development consent granted, which referenced hours of operation for the complex.
2. Do the stalls that pop up and generally located in the walk ways have DA approval?
There is no record of DA approval for any kiosk or stall.
These stalls are typically referred to as kiosks which may not require development consent if the premises is not for the sale of food and drink, involves skin penetration (i.e. beauty salon) and hair dressing, as well as some other uses as prescribed within the State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008. If the kiosk or any shop involves any of these uses, a complying development or development application approval is required.
The fit out of a kiosk may require development consent depending on the nature of the structures used i.e. the placement of furniture such as display tables may not require development consent, whereas barricade structures and counter tops may require development approval.
3. Council was to have discussions with their management to resolve some traffic issues. Did this occur and what was the outcome?
A meeting has been organised for 17 August 2015 to discuss Westfield car park entrances on Bathurst Street.
In relation to food premises inspections required to be undertaken by Council:
1. Are we on track to ensure that all food premises will be inspected this calendar year?
We are track to have all the food premises inspected.
2. In relation to fire safety audits/inspections
Council has employed a full time fire safety officer to work with the consultant to complete the fire safety audit of the 107 properties. There are currently 21 properties that are yet to be inspected and it is expected that the inspections will be completed by the end of the year.
3. Are we up to date in this area?
See response for question 2.
In relation to Construction Certificates, Councillors at a workshop were given a presentation on new measures put in place to increase the number of construction certificates we issue.
Can an update be provided on how that is tracking since that presentation?
Count Applications - CCB Lodged Total |
|
FROM 1st November 2013 to 20th July 2014 |
220 |
FROM 1st November 2014 to 20th July 2015 |
360 |
For the same period last year 140 more construction certificates were submitted to Council.
445
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Questions with Notice
QWN 02 |
Question with Notice - Clr Stanley |
Strategic Direction |
Liveable Safe City Create clean and attractive public places for people to engage and connect |
Key Policy |
Strategic Maintenance Plan |
File Ref |
197277.2015 |
QUESTION WITH NOTICE
Please address the following:
Sometime ago there was plans and public consultation completed for the Casula Parklands (the piece of land in front of the Casula Power House towards Liverpool, there was also funding secured from the State Government for the project.
1. How much was the funding?
The NSW State Government provided $2M in 2008 towards park embellishment works along the Georges River between Casula Powerhouse and Liverpool.
2. Is it still held for this project?
While some funds were expended to develop the master plan, an amount of $1.84M remains in the reserves for these works.
3. Can a copy of those plans and consultation please be provided?
Please see attached. The plan was updated following the consultation process to incorporate feedback received.
ATTACHMENTS
449 |
|
QWN 02 |
Question with Notice - Clr Stanley |
Attachment 1 |
Georges River Casula Parklands Master Plan |
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Questions with Notice
QWN 03 |
Question with Notice - Clr Harle |
Strategic Direction |
Natural Sustainable City Lead the community to develop and implement environmentally sustainable practices |
Key Policy |
Integrated Environmental Sustainability Action Plan |
File Ref |
206911.2015 |
QUESTION WITH NOTICE
Could Councillors be provided with an update on the following issues:
1. Bellfield College:
Council approved a NOM in August 2012, a copy has been attached to this QWN. In relation to the NOM:
a. Have all conditions of the NOM been carried out?
b. Councillors to be provided with all relevant information as per NOM.
2. Continuing fill at 235 Denhamcourt Road, Denhamcourt.
a. What is the current status of this site especially as it is evident that fill including large boulders are continuing to be brought onto the site despite a previous Council investigation?
A response to these questions will be provided in the September 2015 business papers.
ATTACHMENTS
Ordinary Meeting 26 August 2015
Questions with Notice
QWN 04 |
Question with Notice - Clr Stanley |
Strategic Direction |
Leading Proactive Council Lead partnerships and collaboration with community, business and governments |
Key Policy |
Property Strategy |
File Ref |
208656.2015 |
QUESTION WITH NOTICE
Since the closure of the bowling club early last year there is nothing close to the CBD of Liverpool that provides spaces for older Liverpool residents for sport and recreation.
What has been planned to replace recreation opportunities for older Liverpool residents given the explosion of residential units currently under construction?
A response to these questions will be provided in the September 2015 business papers.